form_10k.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
[ü]
|
ANNUAL
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
|
OR
|
|
[ ]
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For
the transition period from __________ to
__________.
|
Commission File Number 001-16191
TENNANT
COMPANY
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Minnesota
|
|
41-0572550
|
State
or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
incorporation
or organization
|
|
Identification
No.)
|
701
North Lilac Drive, P.O. Box 1452
Minneapolis,
Minnesota 55440
|
(Address
of principal executive offices) (Zip
Code)
|
Registrant’s telephone number, including
area code 763-540-1200
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
Name
of exchange on which registered
|
Common
Stock, par value $0.375 per share
|
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred
Share Purchase Rights
|
|
New
York Stock Exchange
|
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
|
|
Yes
|
ü
|
No
|
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant
to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
|
|
Yes
|
ü
|
No
|
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months
|
(or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days.
|
ü
|
Yes
|
|
No
|
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the
best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form
10-K. [
]
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” "accelerated filer"
and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one):
|
Large
accelerated filer
|
|
|
Accelerated
filer
|
ü
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
|
|
(Do not check if a
smaller reporting company) |
Smaller
reporting company
|
|
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule
12b-2 of the Act).
|
|
Yes
|
ü
|
No
|
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by
non-affiliates as of June 30, 2008, was approximately
$579,852,279.
|
As of March
12, 2009, shares of Common Stock outstanding were
18,317,734.
|
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the registrant’s Proxy Statement for its 2009 annual meeting of shareholders
(the “2009 Proxy Statement”) are incorporated by reference in Part
III.
Tennant
Company
Form
10–K
PART I
|
|
Page
|
|
Item
1
|
|
3
|
|
Item
1A
|
|
4
|
|
Item
1B
|
|
6
|
|
Item
2
|
|
6
|
|
Item
3
|
|
6
|
|
Item
4
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
PART
II
|
|
|
|
Item
5
|
|
6
|
|
Item
6
|
|
8
|
|
Item
7
|
|
9
|
|
Item
7A
|
|
18
|
|
Item
8
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Item
9
|
|
41
|
|
Item
9A
|
|
41
|
|
Item
9B
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
PART
III
|
|
|
|
Item
10
|
|
42
|
|
Item
11
|
|
43
|
|
Item
12
|
|
43
|
|
Item
13
|
|
43
|
|
Item
14
|
|
43
|
PART
IV
|
|
|
|
Item
15
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
TENNANT
COMPANY
2008
ANNUAL
REPORT
Form
10–K
(Pursuant
to Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
PART
I
General
Development of Business
Tennant
Company, a Minnesota corporation incorporated in 1909, is a world leader in
designing, manufacturing and marketing solutions that help create a cleaner,
safer world. The Company’s floor maintenance and outdoor cleaning equipment,
specialty surface coatings and related products are used to clean and coat
floors in factories, office buildings, parking lots and streets, airports,
hospitals, schools, warehouses, shopping centers and more. Customers include
building service contract cleaners to whom organizations outsource facilities
maintenance, as well as end-user businesses, healthcare facilities, schools and
local, state and federal governments who handle facilities maintenance
themselves. We reach these customers through the industry’s largest direct sales
and service organization and through a strong and well-supported network of
authorized distributors worldwide.
Industry
Segments, Foreign and Domestic Operations and Export Sales
The
Company has one reportable business segment. The Company sells its products
domestically and internationally. Financial information on the Company’s
geographic areas is provided on page 39 of this Annual Report on Form 10–K.
Nearly all of the Company’s foreign investments in assets reside within The
Netherlands, Australia, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Canada, Austria,
Japan, Spain, Brazil and China.
Principal
Products, Markets and Distribution
The
Company offers products and solutions mainly consisting of motorized cleaning
equipment targeted at commercial and industrial markets; parts, consumables and
service maintenance and repair; business solutions such as pay-for-use
offerings, rental and leasing programs; and technologies such as chemical-free
cleaning technologies that enhance the performance of Tennant cleaning
equipment. Adjacent products include specialty surface coatings and floor
preservation products. In 2008, the Company expanded its product portfolio by
launching six new products which included the S30 mid-sized sweeper, M30 large
integrated scrubber-sweeper, T1 and T2 scrubbers, R3 carpet cleaner and E5
extractor. The Company also added its proprietary electrically converted water
technology (“ec-water”), which cleans without chemicals, to six of its
walk-behind scrubber machines. The Company’s products are sold through direct
and distribution channels in various regions around the world. In North America,
products are sold through a direct sales organization and independent
distributors; in Australia, Japan and 15 countries principally in Western
Europe, products are sold primarily through direct sales organizations; and in
more than 80 other countries, Tennant relies on a broad network of independent
distributors.
Raw
Materials and Purchased Components
The
Company has not experienced any significant or unusual problems in the
availability of raw materials or other product components. The Company has
sole-source vendors for certain components. A disruption in supply from
such vendors may disrupt the Company’s operations. However, the Company believes
that it can find alternate sources in the event there is a disruption in supply
from such vendors.
Patents
and Trademarks
The
Company applies for and is granted United States and foreign patents and
trademarks in the ordinary course of business, no one of which is of material
importance in relation to the business as a whole.
Seasonality
Although
the Company’s business is not seasonal in the traditional sense, historically
revenues and earnings have been more concentrated in the fourth quarter of each
year reflecting the tendency of customers to increase capital spending during
such quarter and the Company’s efforts to close orders and reduce order
backlogs. In addition, we offer annual distributor rebates and sales commissions
which tend to drive sales in the fourth quarter. Typical seasonality did not
occur in the 2008 fourth quarter due to the deterioration of the worldwide
economy and global credit crisis.
Working
Capital
The
Company funds operations through a combination of cash and cash equivalents and
cash flows from operations. Wherever possible, cash management is centralized
and intercompany financing is used to provide working capital to subsidiaries as
needed. In addition, credit facilities are available for additional working
capital needs or investment opportunities.
Major
Customers
The
Company sells its products to a wide variety of customers, no one of which is of
material importance in relation to the business as a whole. The customer base
includes several governmental entities; however, these customers generally have
terms similar to other customers.
Backlog
The
Company processes orders within two weeks on average. Therefore, no significant
backlogs existed at December 31, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Competition
While
there is no industry association or industry data, the Company believes, through
its own market research, that it is a world-leading manufacturer of floor
maintenance equipment. Significant competitors exist in all key geographic
regions. However, the key competitors vary by region. The Company competes
primarily on the basis of offering a broad line of high-quality, innovative
products supported by an extensive sales and service network in major
markets.
Product
Research and Development
The
Company strives to be an industry leader in innovation and is committed to
investing in research and development. The Company’s new Global Innovation
Center is dedicated to various activities including development of new products
and technologies, improvements of existing product design or
manufacturing
processes and new product applications. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the Company
spent $24.3 million, $23.9 million and $21.9 million on research and
development, respectively.
Environmental
Protection
Compliance
with federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of materials
into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the
environment, has not had, and the Company does not expect it to have, a material
effect upon the Company’s capital expenditures, earnings or competitive
position.
Employment
The
Company employed 3,002 people in worldwide operations as of December 31,
2008.
Access
to Information on the Company’s Website
The
Company makes available free of charge, through the Company’s website at
www.tennantco.com, its Annual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form
10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act
simultaneously when such reports are filed electronically with, or furnished to,
the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).
The
following are significant factors known to us that could materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition, or operating results. The risks
described below are not the only risks facing us. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be
immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
We
may encounter additional financial difficulties if the United States or other
global economies experience a significant long-term economic downturn,
decreasing the demand for our products.
To the
extent that the U.S. and other global economies in which we do business
experience a significant long-term economic downturn, our revenues could decline
to the point that we may have to take additional cost saving measures to reduce
our fixed costs to a level that is in-line with a lower level of sales and to
stay in business long-term in a depressed economic environment.
Because our product sales are sensitive to declines in capital spending by
our customers, we experienced a significant decline in the demand for our
products during the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of the substantial
deterioration in economic conditions. Many of our customers chose
to conserve their cash on hand in the fourth quarter of 2008 to ensure it
was available for their essential business operations, thus delaying
their purchases of our products. Although we believe that over time,
customer spending on our products is not discretionary, we are unable
to predict when an improvement in
economic conditions will return to a level where our customers will
increase their capital spending on products such as ours. Decreased
demand for our products could result in decreased revenues, profitability and
cash flows and may impair our ability to maintain our operations and fund our
obligations to others.
If
the availability of credit in the market remains constrained, our ability
to conduct business as usual with our customers and suppliers may be
adversely impacted.
During
the 2008 fourth quarter there was a substantial decrease in the availability of
credit in the market. Our customers’ ability to obtain credit for
financing the purchase of our products may be adversely impacted by the current
market conditions, resulting in a decrease in sales of our
products. Inability to access credit may also impact our
customers’ ability to pay amounts due to us, resulting in increased
bad debt expense. In addition, if our suppliers are not able to access
credit necessary to maintain their operations, our ability to fulfill customer
orders could be negatively impacted, resulting in a loss of sales of our
products. If we are unable to access credit in the normal course of business, we
may not be able to maintain our operations. We successfully amended our primary
credit facility during the first quarter of 2009 to help ensure our compliance
with debt covenants throughout 2009. However, in order to amend this facility,
we have agreed to new covenant compliance requirements, restrictions on certain
payments, increased interest rate spreads, increased facility fees and we have
provided security interests on certain of our assets. In
addition, our new debt covenants limit our acquisitions to a maximum of $2.0
million for the 2009 fiscal year and the amount of permitted acquisitions in
fiscal years after 2009 will be limited according to our then current leverage
ratio. Although we do not currently believe we will need additional
funding sources, if we do need additional funding sources in the future, this
could result in a significant adverse impact to our operating results and
financial condition.
We
may be required to write down our goodwill or long-lived asset amounts if their
carrying values exceed their fair values.
If the
price of our stock remains depressed or does not increase to the point that our
market capitalization exceeds our carrying value, we may be required to perform
interim impairment tests on our goodwill or long-lived assets. There may be
other triggering events that also indicate that the carrying amount may not be
recoverable from future cash flows. If we determine that any goodwill or
long-lived asset amounts need to be written down to their fair values, this
could result in a charge that may be material to our operating results and
financial condition.
We may consider
acquisition of suitable candidates to accomplish our growth objectives. We may
not be able to successfully integrate the businesses we
acquire.
We may
consider, as part of our growth strategy, supplementing our organic growth
through acquisitions of complementary businesses or products. We have engaged in
acquisitions in the past and believe future acquisitions may provide meaningful
opportunities to grow our business and improve profitability. Acquisitions allow
us to enhance the breadth of our product offerings and expand the market and
geographic participation of our products and services. However, our success in
growing by acquisition is dependent upon identifying businesses to acquire,
integrating the newly acquired businesses with our existing businesses and
complying with the terms of our credit facilities. We may incur difficulties in
the realignment and integration of business activities when assimilating the
operations and products of an acquired business or in realizing projected
efficiencies, cost savings, revenue synergies, and profit margins. Acquired
businesses may not achieve the levels of revenue, profit, productivity or
otherwise perform as expected. We are also subject to incurring unanticipated
liabilities and contingencies associated with an acquired entity that are not
identified or fully understood in the due diligence process. Current or future
acquisitions may not be successful or accretive to earnings if the acquired
businesses do not achieve expected financial results. In addition, we may record
significant goodwill or other intangible assets in connection with an
acquisition. We are required to perform impairment tests at least annually and
whenever events indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable from
future cash flows. If we determine that any intangible asset values need to be
written down to their fair values, this could result in a charge that may be
material to our operating results and financial condition.
We may encounter
difficulties obtaining raw materials or component parts needed to manufacture
our products and the prices of these materials are subject to
fluctuation.
Raw materials and commodity-based
components. As a manufacturer, our sales and profitability are dependent
upon availability and cost of raw materials, which are subject to price
fluctuations, and the ability to control or pass on an increase in costs of raw
materials to our customers. We purchase raw materials, such as steel, rubber,
lead and petroleum-based resins and components containing these commodities for
use in our manufacturing operations. The availability of these raw materials is
subject to market forces beyond our control. Under normal circumstances, these
materials are generally
available
on the open market from a variety of sources. From time to time, however, the
prices and availability of these raw materials and components fluctuate due to
global market demands, which could impair our ability to procure necessary
materials, or increase the cost of such materials. Inflationary and other
increases in the costs of these raw materials and components have occurred in
the past and may recur from time to time, and our financial performance depends
in part on our ability to incorporate changes in costs into the selling prices
for our products.
Freight
costs associated with shipping and receiving product and sales and service
vehicle fuel costs are impacted by fluctuations in the cost of oil and gas. We
do not use derivative commodity instruments to manage our exposure to changes in
commodity prices such as steel, oil, gas and lead. Any fluctuations in the
supply or prices for any of these commodities could have a material adverse
affect on our profit margins and financial condition.
Single-source supply. We
depend on many suppliers for the necessary parts to manufacture our products.
However, there are some components that are purchased from a single supplier due
to price, quality, technology or other business constraints. These components
cannot be quickly or inexpensively re-sourced to another supplier. If we are
unable to purchase on acceptable terms or experience significant delays or
quality issues in the delivery of these necessary parts or components from a
particular vendor and we need to locate a new supplier for these parts and
components, shipments for products impacted could be delayed, which could have a
material adverse affect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We are subject to
risks associated with developing innovative products and technologies, which
could delay the timing and success of new product releases.
Our
products are sold in competitive markets throughout the world. Competition is
based on product features and design, brand recognition, reliability,
durability, technology, breadth of product offerings, price, customer
relationships, and after-sale service. Although we believe that the performance
and price characteristics of our products will provide competitive solutions for
our customers’ needs, there can be no assurance that our customers will continue
to choose our products over products offered by our competitors.
The
market for our products is characterized by changing technological and industry
standards. Our product lines may be threatened by these new technologies or
market demands for competitors’ products may reduce the value of our current
product lines. Our success is based in part on our ability to develop innovative
new products and services and bring them to market more quickly than our
competitors. Our ability to compete successfully will depend on our ability to
enhance and improve our existing products, to continue to bring innovative
products to market in a timely fashion, to adapt our products to the needs and
standards of our customers and potential customers, and to continue to improve
operating efficiencies and lower manufacturing costs. Product development
requires substantial investment by us. If our products, markets and services are
not competitive, we may experience a decline in sales, pricing, and market
share, which adversely impacts revenues, margin, and the success of our
operations.
We are subject to
product liability claims and product quality issues that could adversely affect
our operating results or financial condition.
Our
business exposes us to potential product liability risks that are inherent in
the design, manufacturing and distribution of our products. If products are used
incorrectly by our customers, injury may result leading to product liability
claims against us. Some of our products or product improvements may have defects
or risks that we have not yet identified that may give rise to product quality
issues, liability and warranty claims. If product liability claims are brought
against us for damages that are in excess of our insurance coverage or for
uninsured liabilities and it is determined we are liable, our business could be
adversely impacted. Any losses we suffer from any liability claims, and the
effect that any product liability litigation may have upon the reputation and
marketability of our products, may have a negative impact on our business and
operating results. We could experience a material design or manufacturing
failure in our products, a quality system failure, other safety issues, or
heightened regulatory scrutiny that could warrant a recall of some of our
products. Any unforeseen product quality problems could result in loss of market
share, reduced sales, and higher warranty expense.
We are subject to
risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange
rates.
We are
exposed to market risks from changes in foreign currency exchange rates. As a
result of our increasing international presence, we have experienced an increase
in transactions and balances denominated in currencies other than the U.S.
dollar. There is a direct financial impact of foreign currency exchange when
translating profits from local currencies to U.S. dollars. Our primary exposure
is to transactions denominated in the Euro, British pound, Australian and
Canadian dollar, Japanese yen, Chinese yuan and Brazilian real. Any significant
change in the value of the currencies of the countries in which we do business
against the U.S. dollar could affect our ability to sell products competitively
and control our cost structure. Because a substantial portion of our products
are manufactured in the United States, a stronger U.S. dollar generally has a
negative impact on results from operations outside the United States while a
weaker dollar generally has a positive effect. Unfavorable changes in exchange
rates between the U.S. dollar and these currencies impact the cost of our
products sold internationally and could significantly reduce our reported sales
and earnings. We periodically enter into contracts, principally forward exchange
contracts, to protect the value of certain of our foreign currency-denominated
assets and liabilities. The gains and losses on these contracts generally
approximate changes in the value of the related assets and liabilities. However,
all foreign currency exposures cannot be fully hedged, and there can be no
assurances that our future results of operations will not be adversely affected
by currency fluctuation.
We
may not be able to effectively manage organizational changes which could
negatively impact our operating results or financial condition.
During
the fourth quarter of 2008, we implemented a workforce reduction program to
resize our workforce based on the current global economic conditions. Our
operating results may be negatively impacted if we are unable to
assimilate the work of the positions that were, and may additionally be,
eliminated as part of this action. In addition, if we do not effectively
manage the transition of the workforce reduction program, we may not fully
realize the anticipated savings of this action or it may negatively impact our
ability to serve our customers or meet other strategic objectives.
We may not be
able to adequately acquire, retain and protect our proprietary intellectual
property rights which could put us at a competitive
disadvantage.
We rely
on trade secret, copyright, trademark and patent laws and contractual
protections to protect our proprietary technology and other proprietary rights.
Our competitors may attempt to copy our products or gain access to our trade
secrets. Our efforts to secure patent protection on our inventions may be
unsuccessful. Notwithstanding the precautions we take to protect our
intellectual property rights, it is possible that third parties may illegally
copy or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary technology without our consent.
Any litigation concerning infringement could result in substantial cost to us
and diversions of our resources, either of which could adversely affect our
business. In some cases, there may be no effective legal recourse against
duplication of products or services by competitors. Intellectual property rights
in foreign jurisdictions may be limited or unavailable. Patents of third parties
also have an important bearing on our ability to offer some of our products and
services. Our competitors may obtain patents related to the types of products
and services we offer or plan to offer. Any infringement by us on intellectual
property rights of others could result in litigation and adversely affect our
ability to continue to provide, or could increase the cost of providing, our
products and services.
None.
The
Company’s corporate offices are owned by the Company and are located in the
Minneapolis, Minnesota, metropolitan area. Manufacturing facilities are located
in the states of Minnesota, Michigan, Kentucky and in Uden, The Netherlands, the
United Kingdom, Sao Paulo, Brazil and Shanghai, China. Sales offices, warehouse
and storage facilities are leased in various locations in North America, Europe,
Japan, China, Asia, Australia and Latin America. The Company’s facilities are in
good operating condition, suitable for their respective uses and adequate for
current needs. Further information regarding the Company’s property and lease
commitments is included on pages 15 and 36 of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
There are
no material pending legal proceedings other than ordinary routine litigation
incidental to the Company’s business.
No
matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter
of 2008.
PART
II
STOCK
MARKET INFORMATION – Tennant common stock is traded on the New York Stock
Exchange, under the ticker symbol TNC. As of January 30, 2009, there were
approximately 500 shareholders of record and 4,800 beneficial shareholders. The
common stock price was $13.54 per share on January 30, 2009.
STOCK
SPLIT – On April 26, 2006, the Board of Directors declared a two-for-one common
stock split effective July 26, 2006. As a result of the stock split,
shareholders of record received one additional common share for every share held
at the close of business on July 12, 2006. All share and per share data has been
retroactively adjusted to reflect the stock split, except for the Consolidated
Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss) in Item 8 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
QUARTERLY
PRICE RANGE – The accompanying chart shows the quarterly price range of the
Company’s shares over the past two years:
|
First
|
|
Second
|
|
Third
|
|
Fourth
|
2008
|
$
31.88-45.41
|
|
$
30.07-41.00
|
|
$
24.90-40.48
|
|
$
15.33-33.26
|
2007
|
$
27.84-32.82
|
|
$
31.16-37.31
|
|
$
35.40-49.32
|
|
$
41.26-48.40
|
DIVIDEND
INFORMATION – Cash dividends on Tennant’s common stock have been paid for 64
consecutive years. Tennant’s cash dividend payout increased for the 37th
consecutive year to $0.52 per share in 2008, an increase of $0.04 per share over
2007. Dividends generally are declared each quarter. The Company announced a
cash dividend of $0.13 per share payable March 16, 2009, to shareholders of
record on February 27, 2009. Following are the anticipated remaining record
dates for 2009: May 29, 2009, August 31, 2009 and November 30,
2009.
DIVIDEND
REINVESTMENT OR DIRECT DEPOSIT OPTIONS – Shareholders have the option of
reinvesting quarterly dividends in additional shares of Company stock or having
dividends deposited directly to a bank account. The Transfer Agent should be
contacted for additional information.
TRANSFER
AGENT AND REGISTRAR – Shareholders with a change of address or questions about
their account may contact:
Wells
Fargo Bank, N.A.
Shareowner
Services
P.O. Box
64854
South St.
Paul, MN 55164-0854
(800)
468-9716
SHARE
REPURCHASES – On May 3, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase
of 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. Share repurchases are made from time to
time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, primarily
to offset the dilutive effect of shares issued through our stock-based
compensation programs.
For
the Quarter Ended 12/31/2008
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
(1)
|
|
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
|
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs
|
|
|
Maximum
Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or
Programs
|
|
October
1–31, 2008
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
$ |
29.18 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,874 |
|
November
1–30, 2008
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
23.48 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,874 |
|
December
1–31, 2008
|
|
|
18,156 |
|
|
|
23.04 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,874 |
|
Total
|
|
|
18,320 |
|
|
$ |
23.08 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
288,874 |
|
(1)
Includes 18,320 shares delivered or attested to in satisfaction of the exercise
price and/or tax withholding obligations by employees who exercised stock
options or restricted stock under employee stock compensation
plans.
COMPARATIVE
STOCK PERFORMANCE – The following graph compares the cumulative total
shareholder return on the common stock of the Company for the last five fiscal
years with the cumulative total return over the same period on the Overall Stock
Market Performance Index (Hemscott Composite Index) and the Industry Index
(Hemscott Group Index 62 – Industrial Goods, Manufacturing).
This
assumes an investment of $100 in the Company’s common stock, the Hemscott
Composite Index and the Hemscott Group Index on December 31, 2003, with
reinvestment of all dividends.
COMPARISON
OF 5-YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG
TENNANT COMPANY
HEMSCOTT
COMPOSITE INDEX AND HEMSCOTT GROUP INDEX
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Tennant
Company
|
|
$ |
100.00 |
|
|
$ |
93.57 |
|
|
$ |
125.44 |
|
|
$ |
142.44 |
|
|
$ |
220.39 |
|
|
$ |
78.27 |
|
Hemscott
Group Index
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
123.06 |
|
|
|
135.52 |
|
|
|
163.13 |
|
|
|
214.51 |
|
|
|
115.86 |
|
Hemscott
Composite Index
|
|
|
100.00 |
|
|
|
112.17 |
|
|
|
120.11 |
|
|
|
139.03 |
|
|
|
147.95 |
|
|
|
91.72 |
|
(In
thousands, except shares and per share data)
Years
Ended December 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
Year
End Financial Results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Sales
|
|
$ |
701,405 |
|
|
|
664,218 |
|
|
|
598,981 |
|
|
|
552,908 |
|
|
|
507,785 |
|
|
Cost
of Sales
|
|
$ |
415,155 |
|
|
|
385,234 |
|
|
|
347,402 |
|
|
|
318,044 |
|
|
|
305,277 |
|
|
Gross
Margin – %
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
Research
and Development Expense
|
|
$ |
24,296 |
|
|
|
23,869 |
|
|
|
21,939 |
|
|
|
19,351 |
|
|
|
17,198 |
|
|
%
of Net Sales
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
Selling
and Administrative Expense
|
|
$ |
243,385 |
(1) |
|
|
200,270 |
(2) |
|
|
189,676 |
|
|
|
180,676 |
|
|
|
164,003 |
(3) |
|
%
of Net Sales
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
30.2 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
Profit
from Operations
|
|
$ |
18,569 |
(1) |
|
|
54,845 |
(2) |
|
|
39,964 |
|
|
|
34,837 |
|
|
|
21,307 |
(3) |
|
%
of Net Sales
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
Other
Income (Expense)
|
|
$ |
(994 |
|
|
|
2,867 |
(2) |
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
Income
Tax Expense
|
|
$ |
6,951 |
(1) |
|
|
17,845 |
(2) |
|
|
13,493 |
|
|
|
12,058 |
|
|
|
7,999 |
(3) |
|
%
of Earnings Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
Net
Earnings
|
|
$ |
10,624 |
(1) |
|
|
39,867 |
(2) |
|
|
29,809 |
|
|
|
22,936 |
|
|
|
13,380 |
(3) |
|
%
of Net Sales
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Return
on beginning Shareholders’ Equity – %
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
Per
Share Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
Net Earnings
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
(1) |
|
|
2.14 |
(2) |
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.27 |
|
|
|
0.74 |
(3) |
|
Diluted
Net Earnings
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
(1) |
|
|
2.08 |
(2) |
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
1.26 |
|
|
|
0.73 |
(3) |
|
Cash
Dividends
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
Shareholders’
Equity (ending)
|
|
$ |
11.48 |
|
|
|
13.65 |
|
|
|
12.25 |
|
|
|
10.50 |
|
|
|
9.67 |
|
|
Year-End
Financial Position
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
29,285 |
|
|
|
33,092 |
|
|
|
31,021 |
|
|
|
41,287 |
|
|
|
16,837 |
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
$ |
250,419 |
|
|
|
240,724 |
|
|
|
235,404 |
|
|
|
211,601 |
|
|
|
188,631 |
|
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
$ |
103,730 |
|
|
|
96,551 |
|
|
|
82,835 |
|
|
|
72,588 |
|
|
|
69,063 |
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
456,604 |
|
|
|
382,070 |
|
|
|
354,250 |
|
|
|
311,472 |
|
|
|
285,792 |
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
$ |
107,159 |
|
|
|
96,673 |
|
|
|
94,804 |
|
|
|
88,965 |
|
|
|
81,853 |
|
|
Total
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
$ |
139,541 |
|
|
|
32,966 |
|
|
|
29,782 |
|
|
|
29,405 |
|
|
|
29,905 |
|
|
Shareholders’
Equity
|
|
$ |
209,904 |
|
|
|
252,431 |
|
|
|
229,664 |
|
|
|
193,102 |
|
|
|
174,034 |
|
|
Current
Ratio
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$ |
3,946 |
|
|
|
2,127 |
|
|
|
1,812 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
7,674 |
|
|
Long-Term
|
|
$ |
91,393 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
|
|
1,608 |
|
|
|
1,029 |
|
|
Debt-to-capital
ratio
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
Cash
Flow Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities
|
|
$ |
37,546 |
|
|
|
39,640 |
|
|
|
40,319 |
|
|
|
44,237 |
|
|
|
36,697 |
|
|
Net
Cash Provided by (Used for) Investing Activities
|
|
$ |
(101,979 |
|
|
|
(10,357 |
|
|
|
(45,959 |
) |
|
|
(11,781 |
) |
|
|
(32,062 |
) |
|
Net
Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities
|
|
$ |
62,075 |
|
|
|
(26,679 |
|
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
|
|
(8,111 |
) |
|
|
(12,130 |
) |
|
Other
Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
$ |
1,042 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
1,691 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
$ |
3,944 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
1,147 |
|
|
Depreciation
and Amortization
|
|
$ |
22,959 |
|
|
|
18,054 |
|
|
|
14,321 |
|
|
|
13,039 |
|
|
|
12,972 |
|
|
Purchases
of Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
$ |
20,790 |
|
|
|
28,720 |
|
|
|
23,872 |
|
|
|
20,880 |
|
|
|
21,089 |
|
|
Proceeds
from Disposals of Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
$ |
656 |
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
3,049 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
Number
of employees at year-end
|
|
|
3,002 |
|
|
|
2,774 |
|
|
|
2,653 |
|
|
|
2,496 |
|
|
|
2,474 |
|
|
Diluted
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
18,581,840 |
|
|
|
19,146,025 |
|
|
|
18,989,248 |
|
|
|
18,209,888 |
|
|
|
18,300,414 |
|
|
Closing
share price at year-end
|
|
$ |
15.40 |
|
|
|
44.29 |
|
|
|
29.00 |
|
|
|
26.00 |
|
|
|
19.83 |
|
|
Common
stock price range during year
|
|
$ |
15.33-45.41 |
|
|
|
27.84-49.32 |
|
|
|
21.71–29.88 |
|
|
|
17.39-26.23 |
|
|
|
18.25-22.17 |
|
|
Closing
price/earnings ratio
|
|
|
27.0 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
The
results of operations from our 2008 acquisitions have been included in the
Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the Selected Financial Data
presented above, since each of their respective dates of acquisition.
Refer to additional information regarding our 2008 acquisitions in Note 4,
Acquisitions and Divestitures.
(1) 2008
includes workforce reduction charge and associated expenses of $14,551 pretax
($12,003 aftertax or $0.65 per diluted share), increase in Allowance for
Doubtful Accounts of $3,361 pretax ($3,038 aftertax or $0.16 per diluted share),
write-off of technology investments of $1,842 pretax ($1,246 aftertax or $0.07
per diluted share), gain on sale of Centurion assets of $229 pretax ($143
aftertax or $0.01 per diluted share). (2) 2007 includes restructuring charge and
associated expenses of $2,507 pretax ($1,656 aftertax or $0.09 per diluted
share), a one-time tax benefit relating to a reduction in valuation reserves,
net of the impact of tax rate changes in foreign jurisdictions on deferred taxes
of $3,644 aftertax or $0.19 per diluted share and gain on sale of the Maple
Grove, Minnesota facility of $5,972 pretax ($3,720 aftertax or $0.19 per diluted
share). (3) 2004 includes workforce reduction expenses of $2,301 pretax ($1,458
aftertax or $0.08 per diluted share).
ITEM 7 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Tennant
Company is a world leader in designing, manufacturing and marketing solutions
that help create a cleaner, safer world. We provide equipment, parts and
consumables and specialty surface coatings to contract cleaners, end-user
businesses, healthcare facilities, schools and local, state and federal
governments. We sell our products through our direct sales and service
organization and a network of authorized distributors worldwide. Geographically,
our customers are primarily located in North America, Europe, the Middle East,
Africa, Asia-Pacific and Latin America. We strive to be an innovator in our
industry through our commitment to understanding our customers’ needs and using
our expertise to create innovative products and solutions.
Net
Earnings for 2008 were down 73.4% to $10.6 million, or $0.57 per diluted share,
compared to 2007. Net Sales totaled $701.4 million, up 5.6% over 2007
driven primarily by sales from strategic acquisitions during the year, a net
favorable impact from foreign currency exchange and benefits from pricing
actions taken earlier in the year, partially offset by unit volume declines
within our equipment business year over year. Gross Margins declined 120 basis
points to 40.8% principally due to our inability to leverage our fixed
manufacturing costs as a result of the significant unit volume decline
experienced in the fourth quarter of 2008. Selling and Administrative Expense
(“S&A Expense”) increased 360 basis points as a percentage of Net Sales to
34.7% compared to 2007 due to the inclusion of a workforce reduction and other
charges recognized in the fourth quarter of 2008 as well as S&A Expense
incurred earlier in the year to expand international market coverage and support
new product launches.
During
the fourth quarter of 2008, Tennant announced a workforce reduction program to
resize its worldwide employee base by approximately 8%, or about 240 people. A
pretax workforce reduction charge totaling $14.6 million ($0.65 per diluted
share) was recognized in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of this program.
The workforce reduction was accomplished primarily through the elimination of
salaried positions across the organization. When completed, this measure is
estimated to achieve annualized savings of at least $15 million in 2009 and
approximately $20 million in 2010. Additionally, early retirements, elimination
of contracted positions and attrition will account for some of the eliminated
positions and contribute to these annualized savings. The pretax charge
consisted primarily of severance and outplacement service expenses and was
included within S&A Expense in the Consolidated Statements of
Earnings.
S&A
Expense was also impacted by a significant increase in bad debt expense of $3.4
million ($0.16 per diluted share) resulting from increased Accounts Receivable
reserves due to the global credit crisis and a write-off of $1.8 million ($0.07
per diluted share) related to technology investments that will be replaced by
new solutions.
Net
Earnings were impacted by a $0.15 per diluted share loss from our 2008
acquisitions. This amount includes the effect of purchase accounting items such
as amortization expense on acquired intangible assets, the flow-through of the
fair market value inventory step-up, the unfavorable movement in the foreign
currency exchange rates related to a deal contingent non-speculative forward
contract that we entered into which fixed the cash outlay in U.S. dollars for
our Sociedade Alfa Ltda (“Alfa”) acquisition, as well as the increase in
interest expense related to borrowing against our revolving credit facility
during the year to fund our first quarter acquisitions.
In
addition, Net Earnings were also impacted by the following items:
§
|
The
inclusion of a $2.7 million ($0.09 per diluted share) net foreign currency
gain in the third quarter of 2008 from settlement of forward contracts
related to a British pound denominated
loan.
|
§
|
A
net benefit from discrete tax items, primarily related to U.S. federal tax
settlements, added $0.07 per diluted
share.
|
§
|
Legal
settlement expenses of $0.06 per diluted share primarily related to the
settlement of a claim filed in the second quarter by a terminated
distributor in Brazil.
|
§
|
Expenses
of $0.02 per diluted share related to curtailed acquisition
initiatives.
|
§
|
A
net gain of $0.2 million ($0.01 per diluted share) associated with the
divestiture of assets related to the Centurion street sweeper
product.
|
The total
net effect of these items in 2008 was a reduction in earnings of $0.79 per
diluted share.
Back in
2006, we launched initiatives aimed at consolidating our global footprint,
expanding our presence in China and establishing global sourcing capabilities.
Through these initiatives, we continue to broaden our global sourcing
capabilities, reduce product costs and improve operating efficiencies. Our
global sourcing initiative contributed approximately $6 million in savings
during 2008, allowing us to essentially offset the impact of inflation in 2008
despite experiencing rising material costs throughout the majority of the year.
We also successfully increased the percentage of materials and components
sourced from low-cost regions from approximately 14% in 2007 to approximately
20% in 2008. Our footprint consolidation and lean initiatives contributed
approximately $4 million in savings in 2008, in part from benefits of closing
our Maple Grove, MN facility toward the end of 2007.
Tennant
continues to invest in innovative product development, with 3.5% of Net Sales
spent on Research and Development in 2008. We launched six new products in 2008
in addition to the global introduction of our electrically converted water
technology (“ec-water”) on six of our walk-behind scrubbers. Sales of
new products introduced in the past three years generated approximately 44% of
our equipment sales during 2008, exceeding our target of 30%. Our new product
launches in 2009 will focus on expanding the roll-out of ec-water. This
game-changing technology will be introduced on five rider scrubbers in 2009 in
addition to the six walk-behind scrubbers introduced during 2008.
We ended
2008 with a debt-to-capital ratio of 31.2%, $29.3 million in Cash and Cash
Equivalents and Shareholders’ Equity of $209.9 million. During 2008 we generated
operating cash flows of $37.5 million. During 2008, we repurchased $14.3 million
in Tennant stock under our share repurchase program.
The
relative strength or weakness of the global economies in 2009 is expected to
impact demand for our products and services in the markets we serve. As both
global and regional economies are currently difficult to predict, we continue to
monitor macro-economic indicators closely and conservatively manage the
business.
Our
results are also impacted by changes in value of the U.S. dollar primarily
against the Euro, British pound, Australian and Canadian dollars, Japanese yen,
Chinese yuan and Brazilian real. To the extent the applicable exchange rates
weaken relative to the U.S. dollar, the related direct foreign currency exchange
effect would generally have an unfavorable impact on our 2009 results. If the
applicable exchange rates strengthen relative to the U.S. dollar, our results
would generally be favorably impacted.
Historical
Results
The
following table compares the historical results of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 in dollars and as a percentage
of Net Sales (in thousands, except per share amounts):
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
Net
Sales
|
|
$ |
701,405 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
664,218 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
$ |
598,981 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
Cost
of Sales
|
|
|
415,155 |
|
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
385,234 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
|
|
347,402 |
|
|
|
58.0 |
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
286,250 |
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
|
|
278,984 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
251,579 |
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
Operating
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and Development Expense
|
|
|
24,296 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
23,869 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
21,939 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Selling
and
Administrative
Expense
|
|
|
243,614 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
206,242 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
189,676 |
|
|
|
31.7 |
|
Gain
on Sale of Facility
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,972 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Gain
on Divestiture of Assets
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
267,681 |
|
|
|
38.2 |
|
|
|
224,139 |
|
|
|
33.7 |
|
|
|
211,615 |
|
|
|
35.3 |
|
Profit
from Operations
|
|
|
18,569 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
54,845 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
39,964 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Other
Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(3,944 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(737 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Net
Foreign Currency Transaction
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
ESOP
Income
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Other
Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
(1,679 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
Total
Other Income
(Expense),
Net
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Profit
Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
17,575 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
57,712 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
43,302 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
Income
Tax Expense
|
|
|
6,951 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
17,845 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
13,493 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Net
Earnings
|
|
$ |
10,624 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
39,867 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
$ |
29,809 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Earnings
per Diluted Share
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Financial Results
In 2008,
Net Earnings declined 73.4% to $10.6 million or $0.57 per diluted share as
compared to 2007. Net Earnings were impacted by:
§
|
Growth
in Net Sales of 5.6% to $701.4 million, driven by 2008 acquisitions and
increases in Other International.
|
§
|
A
120 basis point decline in Gross Margins to 40.8% as fixed manufacturing
costs within our plants were not fully leveraged due to a significant
equipment unit volume decline of $22.9 million experienced in the fourth
quarter of 2008.
|
§
|
An
increase in S&A Expense as a percentage of Net Sales of 360 basis
points due to the inclusion of $19.8 million of expenses associated with
the fourth quarter workforce reduction charge and other charges as well as
expenses incurred earlier in the year to expand international market
coverage and support new product
launches.
|
§
|
The
inclusion of a $2.7 million net foreign currency gain from settlement of
forward contracts related to a British pound denominated
loan.
|
§
|
A
net benefit from discrete tax items, primarily related to U.S. federal tax
settlements added $0.07 per diluted
share.
|
§
|
A
dilutive impact to Net Earnings related to our 2008 acquistions of $2.8
million.
|
In 2007,
Net Earnings increased 33.7% to $39.9 million or $2.08 per diluted share as
compared to 2006. Net Earnings were impacted by:
§
|
Growth
in Net Sales of 10.9% to $664.2 million, driven by increases in all
geographic regions (North America; Europe, Middle East, Africa (‘EMEA”)
and Other International) and all product categories (equipment; service,
parts and consumables; and specialty surface
coatings).
|
§
|
Holding
margins flat with 2006 at 42.0%, despite higher material costs and
investments in our footprint consolidation and China expansion
initiatives.
|
§
|
A
decrease in S&A Expense as a percentage of Net Sales of 0.6 percentage
points as growth in Net Sales outpaced increases in S&A Expense,
despite the inclusion of a $2.5 million restructuring charge and higher
costs in support of strategic initiatives and other cost
increases.
|
§
|
A
gain of $6.0 million associated with the sale of our Maple Grove,
Minnesota facility.
|
§
|
A
decrease in Interest Income, Net of $1.0 million primarily reflecting a
lower average interest rate and a lower level of Cash and Cash Equivalents
and Short-term Investments. In addition, Tennant contributed $0.5 million
to the Tennant Foundation increasing Other Expense, Net. Partially
offsetting these decreases is an increase of $1.4 million in ESOP Income
due to a higher average stock
price.
|
For 2008,
we used Economic Profit as a key indicator of financial performance and the
primary metric for performance-based incentives. Economic Profit is based on our
Net Operating Profit After Taxes less a charge for the net assets used in the
business. The key drivers of Net Operating Profit we focus on include Net Sales,
Gross Margin and Operating Expense. The key drivers we focus on to measure how
effectively we utilize net assets in the business include “Accounts Receivable
Days Sales Outstanding” (DSO), “Days Inventory on Hand” (DIOH) and capital
expenditures. These key drivers are discussed in greater depth throughout
Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
Net
Sales
In 2008,
consolidated Net Sales were $701.4 million, increasing 5.6% over 2007.
Consolidated Net Sales were $664.2 million in 2007, an increase of 10.9% from
2006.
The
components of the consolidated Net Sales change for 2008 as compared to 2007 and
2007 compared to 2006 were as follows:
|
|
%
Change
|
|
%
Change
|
|
|
from
2007
|
|
from
2006
|
Organic
Growth (Decline):
|
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
(5%)
|
|
3%
|
|
Price
|
4%
|
|
3%
|
|
|
(1%)
|
|
6%
|
Foreign
Currency
|
2%
|
|
3%
|
Acquisitions
|
5%
|
|
2%
|
|
Total
|
6%
|
|
11%
|
The 5.6%
increase in consolidated Net Sales for 2008 from 2007 was primarily driven
by:
§
|
An
organic decline of 1%, which includes a decline in base business volume,
primarily within North America, partially offset by the net benefit from
pricing actions taken during the
year.
|
§
|
A
favorable direct foreign currency exchange impact of
2%.
|
§
|
An
increase of 5% in sales volume due to our March 28, 2008 acquisition of
Alfa , our February 29, 2008 acquisition of Applied Sweepers, Ltd.
(“Applied Sweepers”) and our February 1, 2007 acquisition of
Floorep Limited (“Floorep”).
|
The 10.9%
increase in consolidated Net Sales for 2007 from 2006 was primarily driven
by:
§
|
Organic
growth in all geographic regions and all product
categories.
|
§
|
A
favorable direct foreign currency exchange impact of
3%.
|
§
|
An
increase of 2% in sales volume due to our February 1, 2007 acquisition of
Floorep.
|
The
following table sets forth annual Net Sales by geography and the related percent
change from the prior year (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
2008
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
%
|
|
North
America
|
|
$ |
402,174 |
|
|
|
(3.7 |
) |
|
$ |
417,757 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
391,309 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Europe,
Middle East and Africa
|
|
|
217,594 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
183,188 |
|
|
|
17.6 |
|
|
|
155,710 |
|
|
|
16.9 |
|
|
|
|
81,637 |
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
63,273 |
|
|
|
21.8 |
|
|
|
51,962 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
701,405 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
$ |
664,218 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
$ |
598,981 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
North America – In 2008, North
American Net Sales declined 3.7% to $402.2 million compared with $417.8 million
in 2007. The primary driver of the decrease in Net Sales is attributable to a
decline in equipment unit volume, with the most significant declines occurring
in the fourth quarter as a result of the credit crisis and its impact on an
already sluggish U.S. economy. Partially offsetting these declines
were benefits from pricing actions taken during the year and a net favorable
impact from foreign currency translation. Our acquisition of Applied Sweepers
contributed approximately 1% to North America’s 2008 Net Sales.
In 2007,
North American Net Sales increased 6.8% to $417.8 million compared with $391.3
million in 2006. The primary drivers of the increase in Net Sales were price
increases in all product categories and an increase in equipment volume within
all sales channels. Shipment of several large non-recurring orders, primarily to
national account customers, and continued success with new products were
significant contributors to the growth in equipment volume in North America in
2007. Organic volume growth in service, parts and consumables sales also
contributed to the increase.
Europe, Middle East and Africa
– EMEA Net Sales in 2008 increased 18.8% to $217.6 million compared to
2007 Net Sales of $183.2 million. Positive direct foreign currency exchange
effects increased EMEA Net Sales by approximately 6% in 2008. Our Applied
Sweepers acquisition contributed approximately 14% to EMEA’s 2008 Net Sales.
EMEA’s organic base was essentially flat in 2008 when compared to 2007. Pricing
increases and volume growth in emerging markets were offset by lower sales of
equipment in the mature markets within Europe. The majority of the equipment
unit volume decline occurred in the fourth quarter following the global credit
crisis and a significant slowdown in these economies.
EMEA Net
Sales in 2007 increased 17.6% to $183.2 million compared to 2006 Net Sales of
$155.7 million. Positive direct foreign currency exchange effects increased EMEA
Net Sales by approximately 9% in 2007. Our Hofmans and Floorep acquisitions
contributed approximately 5% to EMEA’s 2007 Net Sales. EMEA’s organic base grew
slightly in 2007 when compared to 2006. Volume growth from our
Hofmans line of outdoor products during the second half of 2007, volume growth
within our emerging markets of this region, such as the Middle East, along with
benefits from price increases were partially offset by lower sales of equipment
in the United Kingdom, one of our largest markets within the
region.
Other International – Other
International Net Sales in 2008 increased 29.0% to $81.6 million over 2007 Net
Sales of $63.3 million. Growth in Net Sales was driven in part by organic
growth, resulting from expanded market coverage in Brazil and China as well as a
net benefit from pricing actions taken during the year. Our acquisitions
contributed approximately 12% to Other International’s 2008 Net Sales. Price
increases also contributed to the 2008 growth in Net Sales. Positive direct
foreign currency exchange effects increased Net Sales in Other International
markets by approximately 3% in 2008.
Other
International Net Sales in 2007 increased 21.8% to $63.3 million over 2006 Net
Sales of $52.0 million. Growth in Net Sales was primarily driven by organic
growth, resulting in part from expanded market coverage in Brazil and China as
well as volume growth in Australia and Mexico. Price increases also contributed
to the 2007 growth in Net Sales. Positive direct foreign currency exchange
effects increased Net Sales in Other International markets by approximately 5%
in 2007.
Gross
Profit
Gross
Margin was 40.8% in 2008, down 120 basis points as compared to 2007. Although
benefits from pricing actions and cost reduction initiatives were able to
essentially offset higher raw material and purchased component costs during
2008, the inability to leverage the fixed manufacturing costs in our plants, due
to the significant decline in unit volume experience in the fourth quarter,
drove a decline in margins year over year. Gross Margin was also impacted by an
unfavorable sales mix and by the inclusion of $1.2 million in expense from the
flow-through of fair market value inventory step-up from our acquisitions of
Applied Sweepers and Alfa.
Gross
Margin was 42.0% in 2007, the same as in 2006. Price increases and cost
reduction actions in 2007 nearly offset higher costs for raw materials and
purchased components such as the high battery costs experienced during the year
driven by increases in the cost of lead.
We
implemented a selling price surcharge during the fourth quarter of 2007 on
certain products including batteries and battery-operated equipment in North
America. Price increases on similar products in Europe were implemented during
the third quarter of 2007. The benefits from our global sourcing initiative
along with these pricing actions allowed us to nearly fully mitigate the impact
of rising material costs during 2007.
Gross
Margin in 2007 was also impacted by positive direct foreign currency exchange
effects and a favorable mix of products sold, which offset costs associated with
our manufacturing footprint consolidation, China expansion and the integration
of the Hofmans acquisition.
Future
gross margins could continue to be impacted by fluctuations in the cost of raw
materials and other product components, decreased unit volume, competitive
market conditions, the mix of products both within and among product lines and
geographies, and foreign currency exchange effects.
Operating
Expenses
Research and Development Expense
–
Research and Development Expense (“R&D Expense”) increased $0.4
million, or 1.8%, in 2008 compared to 2007 and decreased 10 basis points to 3.5%
as a percentage of Net Sales, which is in line with our target of investing 3%
to 4% of Net Sales annually on research and development. R&D Expense
increased $1.9 million, or 8.8%, in 2007 compared to 2006, and decreased 10
basis points to 3.6% of Net Sales.
We strive
to be the industry leader in innovation and are committed to investing in
research and development. We expect to maintain our spending on research and
development at 3% to 4% of Net Sales annually in support of this
commitment.
Selling and Administrative Expense
–
S&A Expense increased by $37.4 million, or 18.1%, in 2008 compared to
2007. The inclusion of expense from our 2008 acquisitions of Applied Sweepers,
Alfa and Shanghai ShenTan added $10.7 million to S&A Expense during 2008.
S&A Expense included a $14.6 million workforce reduction charge as discussed
in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. S&A Expense was also
impacted by a significant increase in bad debt expense of $3.4 million resulting
from increased Accounts Receivable reserves due to the global credit crisis and
a write-off of $1.8 million related to technology investments that will be
replaced by new solutions. Unfavorable foreign currency exchange was
approximately $4.5 million in 2008.
The
remaining approximate 1% increase in S&A Expense was due to infrastructure
investments implemented in the first quarter to expand market coverage within
our international geographies, higher marketing expenses for new product
launches, and higher base compensation and benefit costs as a result of wage
rate and cost increases. Partially offsetting these increases was a decrease in
performance-based compensation expenses as compared to 2007.
As a
percentage of Net Sales, 2008 S&A Expense increased 360 basis points to
34.7%, in part due to the inclusion of the fourth quarter workforce reduction
and other charges totaling $19.8 million, or 280 basis points. The remaining
increase in S&A Expense as a percentage of sales is attributable to expenses
incurred earlier in the year to expand international market coverage and support
new product launches.
S&A
Expense increased by $16.6 million, or 8.7%, in 2007 compared to 2006. S&A
Expense included a $2.5 million charge for a restructuring action approved by
management during the third quarter as discussed in Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements. The charge consisted primarily of severance and
outplacement benefits. The impact of unfavorable foreign currency translation on
S&A Expense was approximately $6.0 million in 2007. The remaining
approximate 4% increase in S&A Expense was due in part to investments
associated with expanding our international market coverage, the inclusion of
expenses of acquired operations and recruiting expenses associated with filling
restructured positions and other openings. Increased bad debt expense, benefit
costs and depreciation expense also contributed to the increase in S&A
Expense in comparison to 2006. Partially offsetting these increases was a
decrease in performance-based compensation expenses and a reduction in warranty
costs.
Gain on Divestiture of Assets
– We sold assets
related to our Centurion line of sweepers during the second quarter of 2008 for
a pretax gain of $0.2 million.
Gain on Sale of Facility
– We
completed the sale of our Maple Grove, Minnesota facility during the fourth
quarter of 2007 for a net pretax gain of $6.0 million.
Total
Other Income (Expense), Net
Interest Income – Interest
Income was $1.0 million in 2008, a decrease of $0.8 million from 2007. The
decrease between 2008 and 2007 reflects the impact of a decline in interest
rates between periods on lower average cash levels.
Interest
Income was $1.9 million in 2007, a decrease of $0.8 million from 2006. The
decrease was a result of lower interest rates and lower average levels of Cash
and Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments during 2007 compared to
2006.
Interest Expense – Interest
Expense was $3.9 million in 2008 as we became a net debtor during the first
quarter of 2008 borrowing against our revolving credit facility, primarily to
fund the two acquisitions that closed during the first quarter of
2008.
Interest
Expense was $0.9 million in 2007, an increase of $0.2 million as compared to
2006. Interest Expense for both years was 0.1% of Net
Sales.
Net Foreign Currency Transaction
Gains (Losses) – Net Foreign Currency Transaction Gains increased $1.3
million between 2008 and 2007. A
$2.7 million net foreign currency gain from the settlement of forward contracts
related to a British pound denominated loan was the most significant contributor
to the change between years. This gain was partially offset by the $0.9 million
unfavorable movement in the foreign currency exchange rates related to a deal
contingent non-speculative forward contract that we entered into that fixed the
cash outlay in U.S. dollars for the Alfa acquisition in the first quarter of
2008. The remaining change was due to a net favorable impact from
other foreign currency fluctuations between years.
Net
Foreign Currency Transaction Gains decreased $0.5 million between 2007 and 2006
due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
ESOP Income – ESOP Income decreased
$0.3 million between 2008 and 2007 due to a lower average stock price. We
benefit from ESOP Income when the shares held by Tennant’s ESOP Plan are
utilized and the basis of those shares is lower than the current average stock
price. This benefit is offset in periods when the number of shares
needed exceeds the number of shares available from the ESOP as the shortfall
must be issued at the current market rate, which is generally higher than the
basis of the ESOP shares. During the year ended 2008 compared to 2007, we
experienced a lower average stock price and issued additional shares during the
fourth quarter of 2008.
ESOP
Income increased $1.4 million between 2007 and 2006 due to a higher average
stock price. We benefit from ESOP Income when the shares held by the Company’s
ESOP plan are utilized as the basis of those shares is lower than the current
average stock price.
Other Income (Expense), Net –
Other Expense, Net increased $1.0 million between 2008 and 2007. The increase in
Other Expense, Net was primarily due to an increase in discretionary
contributions to Tennant’s charitable foundation.
The
change in Other Expense, Net of $0.4 million between 2007 and 2006 was primarily
due to an increase in discretionary contributions to Tennant’s charitable
foundation.
Income
Taxes
Our
effective income tax rate was 39.6%, 30.9% and 31.2% for the years 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. The increase in the 2008 effective tax rate was
substantially related to changes in our operating profit in total and by taxing
jurisdiction. The effective rate was also negatively impacted due to a
correction of an immaterial error related to reserves for uncertain tax
positions covering tax years 2004 to 2006. See Note 14 for further discussion.
The change in the rate as compared to 2007 was also negatively impacted due to
the 2007 favorable one-time discrete item related to the reversal of a German
valuation allowance as noted below.
During
2007, a favorable one-time discrete item of $3.6 million related to the reversal
of a German valuation allowance, net of the impact of tax rate changes in
foreign jurisdictions on deferred taxes, was recognized in the third quarter. It
was determined that it was now more likely than not that a tax loss carryforward
in Germany will be utilized in the future and accordingly the valuation
allowance on the related deferred tax asset was reduced to zero.
During
2006, we had a favorable impact from the Extraterritorial Income Exclusion Act
(ETI Act), a U.S. tax law, of approximately 2% on our effective tax rate. On
October 22, 2004, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 was signed into law,
which phased out the ETI Act tax benefit during 2005 and 2006. In addition, the
new law established a manufacturing deduction for profits on U.S. manufactured
product to be phased in through 2010. For 2007 and 2008, these changes resulted
in an increase in our effective tax rate of slightly more than 1%.
We expect
our effective tax rate in 2009 to be between 36% and 38%. This rate may vary
based on changes in mix of taxable earnings by country and our ability to
utilize the available foreign net operating loss carryforwards.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity – Cash and Cash
Equivalents totaled $29.3 million at December 31, 2008, as compared to
$33.1 million of Cash and Cash Equivalents as of December 31, 2007. We did not
have any Short-Term Investments as of December 31, 2008 or 2007. Cash and Cash
Equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries totaled $14.6 million as of
December 31, 2008 as compared to $3.8 million of Cash and Cash Equivalents held
by our foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2007. Wherever possible, cash
management is centralized and intercompany financing is used to provide working
capital to subsidiaries as needed. Our current ratio was 2.3 and 2.5 as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, based on working capital of $143.3
million and $144.1 million, respectively.
During
the first quarter of 2008, we borrowed $87.5 million on our Credit Agreement
(defined below) in connection with our acquisitions of Applied Sweepers and
Alfa. Our debt-to-capital ratio was 31.2% as of December 31, 2008,
compared with 1.8% as of December 31, 2007. Our capital structure was
comprised of $91.4 million of Long-Term Debt and $209.9 million of Shareholders’
Equity as of December 31, 2008.
On June
19, 2007, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, Bank of
America, N.A., as syndication agent, BMO Capital Markets Financing, Inc. and
U.S. Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents and the Lenders from
time to time party thereto. The Credit Agreement provides us and certain of our
foreign subsidiaries access to a $125.0 million revolving credit facility until
June 19, 2012. Borrowings may be denominated in U.S. dollars or certain other
currencies. The facility is available for general corporate purposes, working
capital needs, share repurchases and acquisitions. The Credit
Agreement has been amended twice, most recently in March of 2009. For
a detailed description of the amendments, refer to page 14.
If the
global economy deteriorates further, it could have an unfavorable impact on the
demand for our products and, as a result, our operating cash flow. We rely
primarily on operating cash flow to provide for the working capital needs of our
operations. However, we also have short-term and long-term debt facilities
available to us to assist in meeting our cash flow requirements if needed. We
believe that the combination of internally generated funds and present capital
resources are more than sufficient to meet our cash requirements for
2009.
Cash Flow Summary – Cash
provided by (used in) our operating, investing and financing activities is
summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Operating
Activities
|
|
$ |
37,546 |
|
|
$ |
39,640 |
|
|
$ |
40,319 |
|
Investing
Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of Property, Plant and
Equipment, Net of Disposals |
|
|
(20,134 |
) |
|
|
(21,466 |
) |
|
|
(23,240 |
) |
Acquisitions
of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
|
(81,845 |
) |
|
|
(3,141 |
) |
|
|
(8,469 |
) |
Change
in Short-Term Investments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
14,250 |
|
|
|
(14,250 |
) |
Financing
Activities
|
|
|
62,075 |
|
|
|
(26,679 |
) |
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
Effect
of Exchange Rate Changes on
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
250 |
|
Net
Increase (Decrease) in Cash
and Cash Equivalents |
|
$ |
(3,807 |
) |
|
$ |
2,071 |
|
|
$ |
(10,266 |
) |
Operating Activities – Cash
provided by operating activities was $37.5 million in 2008, $39.6 million in
2007 and $40.3 million in 2006. In 2008, cash provided by operating activities
was driven by Net Earnings, as well as increases in Employee Compensation and
Benefits and Other Accrued Expenses and Accounts Receivable, partially offset by
a decrease in Income Taxes Payable/Prepaid.
Cash flow
provided by operating activities decreased $2.1 million in 2008 compared to
2007. This decrease was primarily driven by lower Net Earnings in 2008 compared
to 2007.
In 2007,
cash provided by operating activities was driven primarily by strong Net
Earnings as well as an increase in net Income Taxes Payable/Prepaid, partially
offset by a decrease in Employee Compensation and Benefits and Other
Accrued Expenses. The decrease in Employee Compensation and Benefits and
Other Accrued Expenses was primarily a result of decreases in
performance-based compensation.
As
discussed previously, two metrics used by management to evaluate how effectively
we utilize our net assets are “Accounts Receivable Days Sales Outstanding” (DSO)
and “Days Inventory on Hand” (DIOH), on a FIFO basis. The metrics are calculated
on a rolling three month basis in order to more readily reflect changing trends
in the business. These metrics for the quarters ended December 31, were as
follows (in days):
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
DSO
|
|
77
|
|
61
|
|
61
|
DIOH
|
|
101
|
|
83
|
|
82
|
DSO
increased 16 days in 2008 compared to 2007 due to a decline in sales volume in
late 2008 as well as a higher mix of international receivables which carry
longer payment terms and a recent slowing of payments due to the credit crisis
in the fourth quarter of 2008.
DIOH
increased 18 days in 2008 compared to 2007 due primarily to the decline in sales
volume late in 2008 as well as higher inventory levels due to higher demo and
used Inventories related to the introduction of new products and higher
Inventories in the distribution center and China due to longer lead times for
product sourced from low cost regions.
Investing Activities – Net
cash used in investing activities was $102.0 million in 2008, $10.4 million in
2007 and $46.0 million in 2006. The primary use of cash in investing activities
during 2008 was capital expenditures and our acquisitions, most notably Applied
Sweepers and Alfa.
Net
capital expenditures were $20.1 million during 2008 compared to $21.5 million in
2007. Net capital expenditures were $23.2 million in 2006. Capital expenditures
in 2008 included upgrades to our information technology systems and related
infrastructures and investments in tooling in support of new products, as well
as investment in our corporate facilities to create a Global Innovation Center
for research and development. Net capital expenditures in 2007 included
continued investments in our footprint consolidation initiative, new product
tooling and capital spending related to our global expansion initiatives. Net
capital expenditures in 2006 included continued expansion of our information
systems capabilities and investments in new product tooling as well as capital
spending in support of our China expansion initiative.
In 2009,
net capital expenditures are expected to approximate $15 million or less.
Significant capital projects planned for 2009 include new product development
tooling and assembly line set-up. In addition, we plan to continue to make
investments to maintain and enhance our IT infrastructure and systems. Capital
expenditures in 2009 are expected to be financed primarily with funds from
operations.
On
December 1, 2008, we entered into an asset purchase agreement with Hewlett
Equipment (“Hewlett”) for a purchase price of $0.6 million in cash. The assets
purchased consist of industrial equipment. Hewlett has been a distributor and
service agent for Tennant Industrial and Commercial Equipment in Queensland,
Australia since 1980. The purchase of Hewlett’s existing rental fleet of
industrial equipment will accelerate Tennant’s strategy to grow its direct sales
and service business in Brisbane, Australia. Hewlett will continue as a
distributor and service agent of Tennant’s commercial equipment.
On August
15, 2008, we acquired Shanghai ShenTan Mechanical and Electrical Equipment Co.
Ltd. (“Shanghai ShenTan”) for a purchase price of $0.6 million in
cash. The acquisition of Shanghai ShenTan, a 12 year exclusive
distributor of Tennant products in Shanghai, China, will accelerate Tennant’s
strategy to grow its direct sales and service business in the key economic area
of Shanghai. The purchase agreement also provides for additional contingent
consideration to be paid in each of the three one-year periods following the
acquisition date if certain future revenue targets are met and if other future
events occur. We anticipate that any amount paid under this earn-out
would be considered additional purchase price. The earn-out is denominated in
foreign currency which approximates $0.6 million in the aggregate and is to be
calculated based on 1) growth in revenues and 2) visits to specified customer
locations
during each of the three one-year periods following the acquisition
date.
On March
28, 2008, we acquired Alfa for a purchase price of $11.8 million in cash and
$1.4 million in debt assumed, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. Alfa
manufactures the Alfa brand of commercial cleaning machines, is based in Sao
Paulo, Brazil, and is recognized as the market leader in the Brazilian cleaning
equipment industry. The purchase agreement with Alfa also provides for
additional contingent consideration to be paid if certain future revenue targets
are met. We anticipate that any amount paid under this earn-out would
be considered additional purchase price. The earn-out is denominated
in foreign currency which approximates $5.2 million and is to be calculated
based on growth in revenues during the 2009 calendar year, with an interim
calculation based on growth in 2008 revenues. There is no maximum
earn-out that can be earned during the interim period; however, the maximum
earn-out that can be paid for the interim period approximates $1.2 million. Any
amount earned as of the interim date in excess of the maximum payment will be
held in escrow and will not be paid until the final earn-out calculation is
completed.
On
February 29, 2008, we acquired Applied Sweepers, a privately-held company based
in Falkirk, Scotland, for a purchase price of $75.2 million in cash. Applied
Sweepers is the manufacturer of Green Machines™ and is recognized as the leading
manufacturer of sub-compact outdoor sweeping machines in the United Kingdom.
Applied Sweepers also has locations in the United States, France and Germany and
sells through a broad distribution network around the world.
In
February 2007, we acquired Floorep, a distributor of cleaning equipment based in
Scotland, for a purchase price of $3.6 million in cash. The results of Floorep’s
operations have been included in the Consolidated Financial Statements since
February 2, 2007, the date of acquisition.
In July
2006, we acquired Hofmans Machinefabriek (“Hofmans”) for a purchase price of
$8.6 million. The cost of the acquisition was paid for in cash with funds
provided by operations.
Financing Activities – Net
cash provided by financing activities was $62.1 million in 2008. Net cash used
in financing activities was $26.7 million in 2007 and $4.9 million in 2006. In
2008, issuance of long-term debt for our 2008 acquisitions provided $87.5
million and significant uses of cash included $14.3 million in
repurchases of Common Stock related to our share repurchase program and $9.6
million of dividends paid. Our cash dividend payout increased for the 37th
consecutive year to $0.52 per share in 2008, an increase of $0.04 per share over
2007. In 2007, significant uses of cash included $29.0 million in repurchases of
Common Stock related to our share repurchase program and $9.0 million of
dividends paid.
Proceeds
from the issuance of Common Stock generated $1.9 million in 2008 and $8.7
million in 2007. Proceeds in both years were driven by an increase in employees’
stock option exercises due to a higher average stock price during the first thee
quarters of 2008 and during all of 2007.
In August
2006, the Board of Directors approved the adjustment of the number of shares
then available for repurchase to reflect the impact of the two-for-one stock
split, which increased the number of shares available for repurchase from
approximately 281,000 immediately before the stock split to approximately
562,000. On May 3, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of
1,000,000 additional shares of our Common Stock. At December 31, 2008, there
remained approximately 289,000 shares authorized for repurchase.
Approximately
476,900 and 735,900 shares were repurchased during the years ended 2008 and
2007, respectively, at average repurchase prices of $31.62 and $39.34. Beginning
in September 2008, repurchases were temporarily suspended in order to conserve
cash. Repurchases made in 2006 prior to the stock split on July 26, 2006 totaled
approximately 61,000 shares at an average repurchase price of $46.36 or 122,000
shares at $23.18, post-split. Following the stock split, approximately 87,000
shares were repurchased in 2006 at an average price of $27.96.
Indebtedness – As of
December 31, 2008, we had available lines of credit totaling $136.3
million and stand alone letters of credit of approximately $2.1 million. There
were $87.5 million in outstanding borrowings under these facilities and we were
in compliance with all debt covenants as of December 31, 2008.
JPMorgan
Chase Bank
On June
19, 2007, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, as administrative agent, Bank of
America, N.A., as syndication agent, BMO Capital Markets Financing, Inc. and
U.S. Bank National Association, as Co-Documentation Agents and the Lenders from
time to time party thereto. The Credit Agreement provides us and certain of our
foreign subsidiaries access to a $125.0 million revolving credit facility until
June 19, 2012. Borrowings may be denominated in U.S. dollars or certain other
currencies. The facility is available for general corporate purposes, working
capital needs, share repurchases and acquisitions. The Credit Agreement
contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including but not
limited to covenants restricting our ability to incur indebtedness and liens and
to merge or consolidate with another entity. Further, the Credit Agreement
initially contained a covenant requiring us to maintain indebtedness to EBITDA
ratio as of the end of each quarter of not greater than 3.5 to 1, and to
maintain an EBITDA to interest expense ratio of no less than 3.5 to 1. We were
in compliance with all such covenants as of December 31, 2008.
On
February 21, 2008, we amended the Credit Agreement to increase the sublimit on
foreign currency borrowings from $75.0 million to $125.0 million and to increase
the sublimit on borrowings by the foreign subsidiaries from $50.0 million to
$100.0 million.
To allow
for flexibility during this volatile economic environment, on March 4, 2009, we
entered into a second amendment to the Credit Agreement. This amendment
principally provides: (i) an exclusion from our EBITDA calculation for: all
non-cash losses and charges up to $15.0 million cash restructuring charges
during the 2008 fiscal year and up to $3.0 million cash restructuring charges
during the 2009 fiscal year, (ii) an amendment of the indebtedness to EBITDA
financial ratio required for the second and third quarters of 2009 to not
greater than 4.0 to 1 and 5.5 to 1, respectively, (iii) an amendment to the
EBITDA to interest expense financial ratio for the third quarter of 2009 to not
less than 3.25 to 1, and (iv) gives us the ability to incur up to an additional
$80.0 million of indebtedness pari passu with the lenders under the Credit
Agreement. The revolving credit facility available under the Credit
Facility remains at $125.0 million, but the amendment reduced the expansion
feature under the Credit Agreement from $100.0 million to $50.0 million. The
amendment put a cap on permitted acquisitions of $2.0 million for the 2009
fiscal year and the amount of permitted acquisitions in fiscal years after 2009
will be limited according to our then current leverage ratio. The amendment
prohibits us from conducting share repurchases during the 2009 fiscal year and
limits the payment of dividends or repurchases of stock in fiscal years after
2009 to an amount ranging from $12.0 million to $40.0 million based on our
leverage ratio after giving effect to such payments. Finally, if we obtain
additional indebtedness as permitted under the amendment, to the extent that any
revolving loans under the credit agreement are then outstanding we are required
to prepay the revolving loans in an amount equal to 100% of the proceeds from
the additional indebtedness. Additionally, proceeds over $25.0 million and under
$35.0 million will reduce the revolver commitment on a 50% dollar for dollar
basis and proceeds over $35.0 million will reduce the revolver commitment on a
100% dollar for dollar basis.
In
conjunction with the amendment to the Credit Agreement, we gave the lenders a
security interest on most of our personal property and pledged 65% of the stock
of all domestic and first tier foreign subsidiaries. The obligations under
the Credit Agreement are also guaranteed by our domestic subsidiaries and those
subsidiaries also provide a security interest in their similar personal
property.
Included
in the amendment were increased interest spreads and increased facility
fees. The fee for committed funds under the Credit Agreement now ranges
from an annual rate of 0.30% to 0.50%, depending on our leverage ratio.
Borrowings under the Credit Agreement bear interest at an annual rate of, at our option, either
(i) between LIBOR plus 2.2% to LIBOR plus 3.0%, depending on our leverage ratio;
or (ii) the highest of (A) the prime rate, (B) the federal funds rate plus
0.50%, and (C) the adjusted LIBOR rate for a one month period plus 1.0%; plus,
in any such case under this clause (ii), an additional spread of 1.2% to 2.0%,
depending on our leverage ratio.
There was
$87.5 million in outstanding borrowings under this facility at December 31,
2008, with a weighted average interest rate of 0.88%.
ABN AMRO
Bank
We have a
revolving credit facility with ABN AMRO Bank N.V. (“ABN AMRO”) of 5.0 million
Euros, or approximately $7.0 million, for general working capital
purposes. Borrowings under this facility incur interest generally at
a rate of 1.25% over the ABN AMRO base rate as calculated daily on the cleared
account balance. This facility may also be used for short-term loans up to 3.0
million Euros, or approximately $4.2 million. The terms and
conditions of these loans would be incorporated in a separate short-term loan
agreement at the time of the transaction. There was no balance outstanding on
this facility at December 31, 2008.
Bank of
America
On August
23, 2007, we entered into an unsecured revolving credit facility with Bank of
America, National Association, Shanghai Branch. During 2008 we
extended the term of this facility for an additional year and the agreement will
expire on August 28, 2009. This credit facility is denominated in
renminbi (“RMB”) in the amount of 20.1 million RMB, or approximately $2.9
million, and is available for general corporate purposes, including working
capital needs of our China location. As part of the March 4, 2009
amendment to the Credit Agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank, this Credit Facility
with Bank of America was reduced to an RMB amount equivalent to $2.0
million. The interest rate on borrowed funds is equal to the People’s
Bank of China’s base rate. This facility also allows for the issuance
of standby letters of credit, performance bonds and other similar instruments
over the term of the facility for a fee of 0.95% of the amount issued. There was
no balance outstanding on this facility at December 31, 2008.
Bank of
Scotland
On April
30, 2008, we entered into a committed credit facility with Bank of Scotland
(“BoS”). The credit facility provides us with 0.5 million British pounds, or
approximately $0.7 million, and is available for general working capital
purposes. Borrowings under the credit facility generally bear
interest at a rate of 1.75% over the BoS base rate as calculated daily on the
cleared account balance. This facility contains a covenant requiring us to
maintain a total assets (excluding certain amounts) to borrowings ratio of 2.5
to 1 as of the end of each month and an EBIT to total interest ratio of 2 to 1
as of the end of each quarter. We were in compliance with all such covenants at
December 31, 2008. There was no balance outstanding on this facility at December
31, 2008.
Unibanco
During
2008, we entered in a revolving credit facility with Unibanco Bank (“Unibanco”)
in Brazil for 1.0 million real, or approximately $0.4 million. Borrowings under
this credit facility generally bear interest at a rate of 0.32% over Future
Contracts on Interbank Deposit Certificates (“CDI”). This facility is
collateralized by a letter of credit of $0.6 million.There was no balance
outstanding on this facility at December 31, 2008.
Contractual Obligations – Our
contractual cash obligations and commitments as of December 31, 2008,
are summarized by period due in the following table (in thousands):
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less
Than 1 Year
|
|
|
1
- 3 Years
|
|
|
3
- 5 Years
|
|
|
More
than 5 Years
|
|
Long-term
debt
obligations(1)
|
|
$ |
87,563 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
87,512 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Collateralized
borrowings(2)
|
|
|
1,758 |
|
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
1,088 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Capital
leases
|
|
|
6,018 |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
2,508 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest
payments on
capital leases
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Residual
value guarantees(3)
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Retirement
benefit
plans(4)
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Deferred
compensation arrangements(5)
|
|
|
7,043 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
4,188 |
|
Other
long-term employee benefits(6)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Unrecognized tax
benefits(7)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Operating
leases(8)
|
|
|
19,694 |
|
|
|
7,919 |
|
|
|
8,898 |
|
|
|
2,515 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
|
32,053 |
|
|
|
32,053 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
contractual obligations
|
|
$ |
156,599 |
|
|
$ |
46,807 |
|
|
$ |
14,490 |
|
|
$ |
90,752 |
|
|
$ |
4,550 |
|
(1) Our Credit Agreement does not have specified repayment terms; therefore,
repayment is due upon expiration of the agreement on June 19, 2012.
(2)
Collateralized borrowings represent deferred sales proceeds on certain leasing
transactions with third-party leasing companies. These transactions are
accounted for as borrowings under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” (“SFAS No. 13”). We would be expected
to fund these obligations only as a result of a default in lease payments by the
purchaser.
(3)
Certain operating leases for vehicles contain residual value guarantee
provisions, which would become due at the expiration of the operating lease
agreement if the fair value of the leased vehicles is less than the guaranteed
residual value. Of those leases that contain residual value guarantees, the
aggregate residual value at lease expiration is $11.4 million, of which we have
guaranteed $9.1 million. As of December 31, 2008, we have recorded a liability
for the fair value of this residual value guarantee of $0.9
million.
(4) Our
retirement benefit plans, as described in Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, require us to make contributions to the plans from time to time. Our
plan obligations totaled $21.8 million as of December 31, 2008. Contributions to
the various plans are dependent upon a number of factors including the market
performance of plan assets, if any, and future changes in interest rates, which
impact the actuarial measurement of plan obligations. As a result, we have only
included our $1.1 million of 2009 expected contributions in the contractual cash
obligations and commitments table.
(5) The
unfunded deferred compensation arrangements covering certain current and retired
management employees totaled $7.0 million as of December 31, 2008. Our estimated
distributions in the contractual cash obligations and commitments table are
based upon a number of assumptions including termination dates and participant
distribution elections.
(6) Other
long-term employee benefit arrangements are comprised of long-term incentive
compensation arrangements with certain key management, foreign defined
contribution plans and other long-term arrangements totaling $1.3 million. We
cannot predict the timing or amount of our future payments associated with these
arrangements; as a result, these obligations are not included in the contractual
cash obligations and commitments table.
(7)
Approximately $7.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits have been recorded as
liabilities in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”),
and we are uncertain as to if or when such amounts may be settled; as a result,
these obligations are not included in the table above.
(8)
Operating lease commitments consist primarily of office and warehouse
facilities, vehicles and office equipment as discussed in Note 13 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements. We have applied the provisions of Emerging
Issues Task Force (‘EITF”) Issue No. 01-8, “Determining Whether an Arrangement
Contains a Lease,” and have determined that our agreement with our third-party
logistics provider contains an operating lease under SFAS No. 13. As a result,
we have included the future minimum lease payments related to the underlying
building lease in our operating lease commitments in the contractual cash
obligations and commitments table. In the event we elect to cancel the agreement
with our third-party logistics provider prior to the contract expiration date we
would be required to assume the underlying building lease for the remainder of
its term.
(9)
Unconditional purchase obligations include purchase orders entered into in the
ordinary course of business and contractual purchase commitments. During 2008,
we amended our 2003 non-cancellable purchase commitment with a third-party
manufacturer to extend the terms of the agreement to 2009. The remaining
commitment under this agreement totaled $0.6 million as of December 31, 2008.
This purchase commitment has been included in the contractual cash obligations
and commitments table along with purchase orders entered into in the ordinary
course of business.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS
No. 157”). SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosure about fair value measurements. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position (“FSP”) FAS 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to
FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements that Address Fair
Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement under
Statement 13” (“FSP FAS 157-1”) which states that SFAS No. 157 does
not address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or
measurement. FSP FAS 157-1 does not apply to assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured
at fair value under SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No.
141”) or SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007) (“SFAS No. 141(R)”), regardless
of whether those assets and liabilities are related to leases. In February 2008,
the FASB also issued FSP FAS 157-2, “Effective date of FASB Statement No. 157”
(“FSP FAS 157-2”). FSP FAS 157-2 defers the implementation of SFAS No. 157 for
certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities. We adopted the required provisions
of SFAS No. 157 as of January 1, 2008 and will adopt the provisions of FSP FAS
157-2 on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS No. 157 did not have an impact on
our financial position or results of operations and we do not expect that the
adoption of FSP FAS 157-2 will have an impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R). SFAS No. 141(R)
requires most identifiable assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and
goodwill acquired to be recorded at full fair value. This statement also
establishes disclosure requirements that will enable users to evaluate the
nature and financial effects of the business combination. The requirements are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of
SFAS No. 141(R) will apply prospectively to business combinations completed on
or after January 1, 2009.
In
April 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the
Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS 142-3”), which amends the factors
that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142,
“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” FSP FAS 142-3 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and should be applied
prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective
date.
In
December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about
Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets (“FSP FAS 132(R)-1”). FSP FAS 132(R)-1
provides guidance on an employer’s disclosures about plan assets of a defined
benefit pension or other postretirement plan. The requirements are effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009. This staff position pertains
only to the disclosures and does not affect the accounting for defined benefit
pensions or other postretirement plans; therefore, we do not anticipate that the
adoption of FSP FAS 132(R)-1 will have an impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
Our
Consolidated Financial Statements are based on the selection and application of
accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America, which
require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the
amounts reported in our Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying
notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute
certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of
judgment. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and any such
differences may be material to the Consolidated Financial Statements. We believe
that the following policies may involve a higher degree of judgment and
complexity in their application and represent the critical accounting policies
used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements. If different
assumptions or conditions were to prevail, the results could be materially
different from our reported results.
Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts – We record a reserve for accounts receivable that are
potentially uncollectible. A considerable amount of judgment is required in
assessing the realization of these receivables including the current
creditworthiness of each customer and related aging of the past-due balances. In
order to assess the collectibility of these receivables, we perform ongoing
credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition. Through these
evaluations, we may become aware of a situation where a customer may not be able
to meet its financial obligations due to deterioration of its financial
viability, credit ratings or bankruptcy. The reserve requirements are based on
the best facts available to us and are reevaluated and adjusted as additional
information becomes available. Our reserves are also based on amounts determined
by using percentages applied to trade receivables. These percentages are
determined by a variety of factors including, but not limited to, current
economic trends, historical payment and bad debt write-off experience. We are
not able to predict changes in the financial condition of our customers and if
circumstances related to these customers deteriorate, our estimates of the
recoverability of accounts receivable could be materially affected and we may be
required to record additional allowances. Alternatively, if more allowances are
provided than are ultimately required, we may reverse a portion of such
provisions in future periods based on the actual collection experience. Bad debt
write-offs as a percentage of Net Sales were less than 0.1% in 2008, 0.1% in
2007 and 0.2% in 2006. As of December 31, 2008, we had $6.5 million
reserved against our Accounts Receivable for doubtful accounts.
Inventory Reserves – We value
our inventory at the lower of the cost of inventory or fair market value through
the establishment of a reserve for excess,
slow
moving and obsolete inventory. In assessing the ultimate realization of
inventories, we are required to make judgments as to future demand requirements
compared with inventory levels. Reserve requirements are developed by comparing
our inventory levels to our projected demand requirements based on historical
demand, market conditions and technological and product life cycle changes. It
is possible that an increase in our reserve may be required in the future if
there are significant declines in demand for certain products. This reserve
creates a new cost basis for these products and is considered
permanent.
We also
record a reserve for inventory shrinkage. Our inventory shrinkage reserve
represents anticipated physical inventory losses that are recorded and adjusted
as a part of our cycle counting and physical inventory procedures. The reserve
amount is based on historical loss trends, historical physical and cycle-count
adjustments as well as inventory levels. Changes in the reserve result from the
completed cycle counts and physical Inventories. As of
December 31, 2008, we had $5.1 million reserved against
Inventories.
Goodwill – Goodwill represents
the excess of cost over the fair value of net assets of businesses acquired and
is allocated to our reporting units at the time of the
acquisition. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”), we test goodwill on an annual basis and
when an event occurs or circumstances change that may reduce the fair value of
one of our reporting units below its carrying amount. A goodwill impairment loss
occurs if the carrying amount of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its fair
value.
Goodwill
impairment testing is a two-step process. The first step is used as an indicator
to identify if there is a potential goodwill impairment loss. If the
first step indicates there may be a loss, the second step is performed which
measures the amount of goodwill impairment loss, if any. We perform our goodwill
impairment test as of year end and use our judgment to develop assumptions for
the discounted cash flow model that we use. Management assumptions include
forecasting revenues and margins, estimating capital expenditures, depreciation,
amortization and discount rates.
If our
goodwill impairment testing resulted in one or more of our reporting units’
carrying amount exceeding its fair value, we would write down our reporting
units’ carrying amount to its fair value and would record an impairment loss in
our results of operations in the period such determination is
made. Subsequent reversal of goodwill impairment losses is not
permitted. Each of our reporting units were tested for impairment as of December
31, 2008 and based upon our analysis, the estimated fair values of our reporting
units exceeded their carrying amounts and therefore we have not recorded an
impairment loss as of December 31, 2008. We had Goodwill of $62.1 million as of
December 31, 2008.
Warranty Reserves – We record
a liability for warranty claims at the time of sale. The amount of the liability
is based on the trend in the historical ratio of claims to net sales, the
historical length of time between the sale and resulting warranty claim, new
product introductions and other factors. Future claims experience could be
materially different from prior results because of the introduction of new, more
complex products, a change in our warranty policy in response to industry
trends, competition or other external forces, or manufacturing changes that
could impact product quality. In the event we determine that our current or
future product repair and replacement costs exceed our estimates, an adjustment
to these reserves would be charged to earnings in the period such determination
is made. Warranty expense as a percentage of Net Sales was 1.2% in 2008, 1.2% in
2007 and 1.4% in 2006. As of December 31, 2008, we had $6.0 million
reserved for future estimated warranty costs.
Income Taxes – When preparing
our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to estimate our income
taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. This process involves
estimating our actual current tax obligations based on expected income,
statutory tax rates and tax planning opportunities in the various jurisdictions.
We also establish reserves for uncertain tax matters that are complex in nature
and uncertain as to the ultimate outcome. Although we believe that our tax
return positions are fully supportable, we consider our ability to ultimately
prevail in defending these matters when establishing these reserves. We adjust
our reserves in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the closing
of a tax audit. We believe that our current reserves are adequate. However, the
ultimate outcome may differ from our estimates and assumptions and could impact
the income tax expense reflected in our Consolidated Statements of
Earnings.
Tax law
requires certain items to be included in our tax return at different times than
the items are reflected in our results of operations. Some of these differences
are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in our tax returns, and
some differences will reverse over time, such as depreciation expense on
property, plant and equipment. These temporary differences result in deferred
tax assets and liabilities, which are included within our Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Deferred tax assets generally represent items that can be used as a tax
deduction or credit in our tax returns in future years but have already been
recorded as an expense in our Consolidated Statements of Earnings. We assess the
likelihood that our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable
income, and, based on management’s judgment, to the extent we believe that
recovery is less likely than not, we establish a valuation reserve against those
deferred tax assets. The deferred tax asset valuation allowance could be
materially different from actual results because of changes in the mix of future
taxable income, the relationship between book and taxable income and our tax
planning strategies. As of December 31, 2008, a valuation allowance of $9.3
million was recorded against foreign tax loss carryforwards.
Cautionary
Factors Relevant to Forward-Looking Information
Certain
statements contained in this document as well as other written and oral
statements made by us from time to time are considered “forward-looking
statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act.
These statements do not relate to strictly historical or current facts and
provide current expectations or forecasts of future events. Any such
expectations or forecasts of future events are subject to a variety of factors.
These include factors that affect all businesses operating in a global market as
well as matters specific to us and the markets we serve. Particular risks and
uncertainties presently facing us include:
·
|
Geopolitical,
economic and credit market uncertainty throughout the
world.
|
·
|
Availability
of credit in the open markets.
|
·
|
Effects
of potential impairment write down of our intangible assets
values. |
·
|
Successful
integration of acquisitions, including ability to carry acquired goodwill
at current values.
|
·
|
Ability
to achieve growth plans.
|
·
|
Ability
to achieve projections of future financial and operating
results.
|
·
|
Ability
to achieve operational efficiencies, including synergistic and other
benefits of acquisitions.
|
·
|
Fluctuations
in the cost or availability of raw materials and purchased
components.
|
·
|
Ability
to achieve anticipated global sourcing cost
reductions.
|
·
|
Success
and timing of new technologies and
products.
|
·
|
Unforeseen
product quality problems.
|
·
|
Effects
of litigation, including threatened or pending
litigation.
|
·
|
Relative
strength of the U.S. dollar, which affects the cost of our materials and
products purchased and sold
internationally.
|
·
|
Ability
to effectively manage organizational changes, including workforce
reductions.
|
· |
Ability
to achieve anticipated savings from our workforce reductions. |
·
|
Ability
to attract and retain key
personnel.
|
·
|
Ability
to acquire, retain and protect proprietary intellectual property
rights.
|
·
|
Potential
for increased competition in our
business.
|
·
|
Changes
in laws, including changes in accounting standards and taxation
changes.
|
We
caution that forward-looking statements must be considered carefully and that
actual results may differ in material ways due to risks and uncertainties
both
known and unknown. Shareholders, potential investors and other readers are urged
to consider these factors in evaluating forward-looking statements and are
cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. For
additional information about factors that could materially affect Tennant’s
results, please see our other Securities and Exchange Commission filings,
including disclosures under “Risk Factors” in this document.
We
do not undertake to update any forward-looking statement, and investors are
advised to consult any further disclosures by us on this matter in our filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in other written statements we
make from time to time. It is not possible to anticipate or foresee all risk
factors, and investors should not consider any list of such factors to be an
exhaustive or complete list of all risks or uncertainties.
ITEM 7A – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk
Commodity Risk – We are
subject to exposures resulting from potential cost increases related to our
purchase of raw materials or other product components. We do not use derivative
commodity instruments to manage our exposures to changes in commodity prices
such as steel, oil, gas, lead and other commodities.
Various
factors beyond our control affect the price of oil and gas, including but not
limited to worldwide and domestic supplies of oil and gas, political instability
or armed conflict in oil-producing regions, the price and level of foreign
imports, the level of consumer demand, the price and availability of alternative
fuels, domestic and foreign governmental regulation, weather-related factors and
the overall economic environment. We purchase petroleum-related component parts
for use in our manufacturing operations. In addition, our freight costs
associated with shipping and receiving product and sales and service vehicle
fuel costs are impacted by fluctuations in the cost of oil and gas.
Increases
in worldwide demand and other factors affect the price for lead, steel and
related products. We do not maintain an inventory of raw or fabricated steel or
batteries in excess of near-term production requirements. As a result, increases
in the price of lead or steel can significantly increase the cost of our lead
and steel-based raw materials and component parts.
During
2008, our raw materials and other purchased component costs were unfavorably
impacted by commodity prices although we were able to mitigate these higher
costs with pricing actions and cost reduction actions. We will continue to focus
on mitigating the risk of continued future raw material or other product
component cost increases through product pricing, negotiations with our vendors
and cost reduction actions. The success of these efforts will depend upon our
ability to increase our selling prices in a competitive market and our ability
to achieve cost savings. If the commodity prices increase, our results may be
unfavorably impacted in 2009.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk –
Due to the global nature of our operations, we are subject to exposures
resulting from foreign currency exchange fluctuations in the normal course of
business. Our primary exchange rate exposures are with the Euro, British pound,
Australian and Canadian dollars, Japanese yen, Chinese yuan and Brazilian real
against the U.S. dollar. The direct financial impact of foreign currency
exchange includes the effect of translating profits from local currencies to
U.S. dollars, the impact of currency fluctuations on the transfer of goods
between Tennant operations in the United States and abroad and transaction gains
and losses. In addition to the direct financial impact, foreign currency
exchange has an indirect financial impact on our results, including the effect
on sales volume within local economies and the impact of pricing actions taken
as a result of foreign exchange rate fluctuations.
Because a
substantial portion of our products are manufactured or sourced primarily from
the United States, a stronger U.S. dollar generally has a negative impact on
results from operations outside the United States while a weaker dollar
generally has a positive effect. Our objective in managing the exposure to
foreign currency fluctuations is to minimize the earnings effects associated
with foreign exchange rate changes on certain of our foreign
currency-denominated assets and liabilities. We periodically enter into various
contracts, principally forward exchange contracts, to protect the value of
certain of our foreign currency-denominated assets and liabilities. The gains
and losses on these contracts generally approximate changes in the value of the
related assets and liabilities. We had forward exchange contracts outstanding in
the notional amounts of approximately $63 million and $62 million at the end of
2008 and 2007, respectively. The potential for material loss in fair value of
foreign currency contracts outstanding and the related underlying exposures as
of December 31, 2008, from a 10% adverse change is unlikely due to the
short-term nature of our forward contracts. Our policy prohibits us from
entering into transactions for speculative purposes.
Other Matters – Management
regularly reviews our business operations with the objective of improving
financial performance and maximizing our return on investment. As a result of
this ongoing process to improve financial performance, we may incur additional
restructuring charges in the future which, if taken, could be material to our
financial results.
ITEM 8 – Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data
The Board
of Directors and Shareholders
Tennant
Company:
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tennant Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated
statements of earnings, stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income (loss),
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31,
2008. We also have audited Tennant Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Tennant Company’s management is responsible
for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal
control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the
consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether
effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. Our audits of the consolidated financial statements included
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial
reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and
evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide
a reasonable basis for our opinions.
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to
the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2)
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of
the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not
prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of
effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the financial position of Tennant Company and
subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Also in our opinion, Tennant Company maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO).
The scope
of management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2008 includes all of the Company’s
consolidated subsidiaries except for Applied Sweepers, Ltd. (Applied Sweepers),
a business acquired by Tennant Company during the first quarter of 2008.
Applied Sweepers represented approximately 4% of consolidated net sales and 16%
of consolidated net assets of Tennant Company. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting of the Company also excluded an evaluation of
the internal control over the financial reporting of Applied
Sweepers.
As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company
adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, as of January 1, 2007 and Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements, on January 1, 2008.
/s/ KPMG
LLP
Minneapolis,
MN
March 13,
2009
TENNANT
COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
Years
ended December 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
Net
Sales
|
|
$ |
701,405 |
|
|
$ |
664,218 |
|
|
$ |
598,981 |
|
Cost
of Sales
|
|
|
415,155 |
|
|
|
385,234 |
|
|
|
347,402 |
|
Gross
Profit
|
|
|
286,250 |
|
|
|
278,984 |
|
|
|
251,579 |
|
Operating
Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and Development Expense
|
|
|
24,296 |
|
|
|
23,869 |
|
|
|
21,939 |
|
Selling
and Administrative Expense
|
|
|
243,614 |
|
|
|
206,242 |
|
|
|
189,676 |
|
Gain
on Sale of Facility
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,972 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Gain
on Divestiture of Assets
|
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
267,681 |
|
|
|
224,139 |
|
|
|
211,615 |
|
Profit
from Operations
|
|
|
18,569 |
|
|
|
54,845 |
|
|
|
39,964 |
|
Other
Income (Expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
1,854 |
|
|
|
2,698 |
|
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
(3,944 |
) |
|
|
(898 |
) |
|
|
(737 |
) |
Net
Foreign Currency Transaction Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
1,368 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
516 |
|
ESOP
Income
|
|
|
2,219 |
|
|
|
2,568 |
|
|
|
1,205 |
|
Other
Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
(1,679 |
) |
|
|
(696 |
) |
|
|
(344 |
) |
Total
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
Profit
Before Income Taxes
|
|
|
17,575 |
|
|
|
57,712 |
|
|
|
43,302 |
|
Income
Tax Expense
|
|
|
6,951 |
|
|
|
17,845 |
|
|
|
13,493 |
|
Net
Earnings
|
|
$ |
10,624 |
|
|
$ |
39,867 |
|
|
$ |
29,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
2.14 |
|
|
$ |
1.61 |
|
Diluted
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
2.08 |
|
|
$ |
1.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Shares Outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
18,303,137 |
|
|
|
18,640,882 |
|
|
|
18,561,533 |
|
Diluted
|
|
|
18,581,840 |
|
|
|
19,146,025 |
|
|
|
18,989,248 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Dividends Declared per Common Share
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.48 |
|
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TENNANT
COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In
thousands, except shares and per share data)
December
31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
|
|
$ |
29,285 |
|
|
$ |
33,092 |
|
Receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade,
less Allowances for Doubtful Accounts and Returns ($7,319 in 2008 and
$3,264 in 2007)
|
|
|
120,331 |
|
|
|
126,520 |
|
Other
|
|
|
3,481 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
Net
Receivables
|
|
|
123,812 |
|
|
|
127,491 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
66,828 |
|
|
|
64,027 |
|
Prepaid
Expenses
|
|
|
18,131 |
|
|
|
7,549 |
|
Deferred
Income Taxes, Current Portion
|
|
|
12,048 |
|
|
|
8,076 |
|
Other
Current Assets
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
250,419 |
|
|
|
240,724 |
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
278,812 |
|
|
|
263,643 |
|
Accumulated
Depreciation
|
|
|
(175,082 |
) |
|
|
(167,092 |
) |
Property,
Plant and Equipment, Net
|
|
|
103,730 |
|
|
|
96,551 |
|
Deferred
Income Taxes, Long-Term Portion
|
|
|
6,388 |
|
|
|
2,670 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
62,095 |
|
|
|
29,053 |
|
Intangible
Assets, Net
|
|
|
28,741 |
|
|
|
5,500 |
|
Other
Assets
|
|
|
5,231 |
|
|
|
7,572 |
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
456,604 |
|
|
$ |
382,070 |
|
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Debt
|
|
$ |
3,946 |
|
|
$ |
2,127 |
|
Accounts
Payable
|
|
|
26,536 |
|
|
|
31,146 |
|
Employee
Compensation and Benefits
|
|
|
23,334 |
|
|
|
29,699 |
|
Income
Taxes Payable
|
|
|
3,154 |
|
|
|
2,391 |
|
Other
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
50,189 |
|
|
|
31,310 |
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
107,159 |
|
|
|
96,673 |
|
LONG-TERM
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Debt
|
|
|
91,393 |
|
|
|
2,470 |
|
Employee-Related
Benefits
|
|
|
29,059 |
|
|
|
23,615 |
|
Deferred
Income Taxes, Long-Term Portion
|
|
|
11,671 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
Other
Liabilities
|
|
|
7,418 |
|
|
|
6,129 |
|
Total
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
139,541 |
|
|
|
32,966 |
|
Total
Liabilities
|
|
|
246,700 |
|
|
|
129,639 |
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS’
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock of $0.02 par value per share, 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares
issued or outstanding
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
Stock, $0.375 par value per share, 60,000,000 shares authorized;
18,284,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
18,499,458 issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
6,857 |
|
|
|
6,937 |
|
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
6,649 |
|
|
|
8,265 |
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
223,692 |
|
|
|
233,527 |
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(26,391 |
) |
|
|
5,507 |
|
Receivable
from ESOP
|
|
|
(903 |
) |
|
|
(1,805 |
) |
Total
Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
209,904 |
|
|
|
252,431 |
|
Total
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
$ |
456,604 |
|
|
$ |
382,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
TENNANT COMPANY AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Years
ended December 31
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Earnings
|
|
$ |
10,624 |
|
|
$ |
39,867 |
|
|
$ |
29,809 |
|
Adjustments
to Net Earnings to arrive at operating cash flow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
20,360 |
|
|
|
16,901 |
|
|
|
13,711 |
|
Amortization
|
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
Deferred
Tax (Benefit) Expense
|
|
|
(3,525 |
) |
|
|
(1,510 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
) |
Stock-Based
Compensation Expense (Benefit)
|
|
|
(1,227 |
) |
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
ESOP
Expense
|
|
|
(498 |
) |
|
|
(659 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
Tax
Benefit on ESOP
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Allowance
for Doubtful Accounts and Returns
|
|
|
4,007 |
|
|
|
1,690 |
|
|
|
532 |
|
Gain
on Sale of Facility
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,972 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Other,
Net
|
|
|
7,623 |
|
|
|
3,059 |
|
|
|
2,730 |
|
Changes
in Operating Assets and Liabilities, Excluding the Impact
of Acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
Receivable
|
|
|
5,574 |
|
|
|
(11,258 |
) |
|
|
(9,790 |
) |
Inventories
|
|
|
(3,311 |
) |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
(3,104 |
) |
Accounts
Payable
|
|
|
(8,620 |
) |
|
|
(2,337 |
) |
|
|
3,308 |
|
Employee
Compensation and Benefits and Other Accrued Expenses
|
|
|
11,228 |
|
|
|
(4,323 |
) |
|
|
2,650 |
|
Income
Taxes Payable/Prepaid
|
|
|
(11,247 |
) |
|
|
2,056 |
|
|
|
(2,608 |
) |
Other
Current/Noncurrent Assets and Liabilities
|
|
|
3,930 |
|
|
|
(2,131 |
) |
|
|
(1,197 |
) |
Net
Cash Provided by (Used for) Operating Activities
|
|
|
37,546 |
|
|
|
39,640 |
|
|
|
40,319 |
|
INVESTING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
(20,790 |
) |
|
|
(28,720 |
) |
|
|
(23,872 |
) |
Proceeds
from Disposals of Property, Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
7,254 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
Acquisition
of Businesses, Net of Cash Acquired
|
|
|
(81,845 |
) |
|
|
(3,141 |
) |
|
|
(8,469 |
) |
Purchases
of Short-Term Investments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(7,925 |
) |
|
|
(14,250 |
) |
Sales
of Short-Term Investments
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
22,175 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Net
Cash Provided by (Used for) Investing Activities
|
|
|
(101,979 |
) |
|
|
(10,357 |
) |
|
|
(45,959 |
) |
FINANCING
ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments
on Capital Leases
|
|
|
(4,495 |
) |
|
|
(2,505 |
) |
|
|
(2,257 |
) |
Change
in Short-Term Debt, Net
|
|
|
(1,039 |
) |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Payment
of Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
(474 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Issuance
of Long-Term Debt
|
|
|
87,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchases
of Common Stock
|
|
|
(14,349 |
) |
|
|
(28,951 |
) |
|
|
(5,275 |
) |
Proceeds
from Issuances of Common Stock
|
|
|
1,872 |
|
|
|
8,734 |
|
|
|
8,477 |
|
Tax
Benefit on Stock Plans
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
3,255 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
Dividends
Paid
|
|
|
(9,551 |
) |
|
|
(8,979 |
) |
|
|
(8,574 |
) |
Principal
Payment from ESOP
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
1,562 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
Net
Cash Provided by (Used for) Financing Activities
|
|
|
62,075 |
|
|
|
(26,679 |
) |
|
|
(4,876 |
) |
Effect
of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
(1,449 |
) |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
250 |
|
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(3,807 |
) |
|
|
2,071 |
|
|
|
(10,266 |
) |
Cash
and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year
|
|
|
33,092 |
|
|
|
31,021 |
|
|
|
41,287 |
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
|
|
$ |
29,285 |
|
|
$ |
33,092 |
|
|
$ |
31,021 |
|
SUPPLEMENTAL
CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Paid During the Year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Taxes
|
|
$ |
15,329 |
|
|
$ |
14,543 |
|
|
$ |
15,207 |
|
Interest
|
|
$ |
3,615 |
|
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
Supplemental
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Expenditures Funded Through Capital Leases
|
|
$ |
4,823 |
|
|
$ |
2,441 |
|
|
$ |
2,872 |
|
Collateralized
Borrowings Incurred for Operating Lease Equipment
|
|
$ |
1,758 |
|
|
$ |
696 |
|
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
TENNANT
COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES