FORM 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2008
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the Transition Period From to
Commission File Number 1-12001
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
25-1792394 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1000 Six PPG Place |
|
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
|
|
15222-5479 |
|
|
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(412) 394-2800
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a
large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Smaller reporting company
o |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
At
October 28, 2008, the registrant had outstanding
96,293,252 shares of its Common Stock.
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
SEC FORM 10-Q
QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page No. |
|
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Income |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About
Market Risk |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Controls and Procedures |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal Proceedings |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. Risk Factors |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and
Use of Proceeds |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6. Exhibits |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURES |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT INDEX |
|
|
37 |
|
2
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In millions, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
(Audited) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
272.6 |
|
|
$ |
623.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
744.5 |
|
|
|
652.2 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
1,083.9 |
|
|
|
916.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Assets |
|
|
2,141.2 |
|
|
|
2,248.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,523.4 |
|
|
|
1,239.5 |
|
Prepaid pension asset |
|
|
266.4 |
|
|
|
230.3 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
204.2 |
|
|
|
209.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
141.6 |
|
|
|
125.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets |
|
$ |
4,312.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,095.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
414.4 |
|
|
$ |
388.4 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
290.8 |
|
|
|
277.3 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Current Liabilities |
|
|
797.8 |
|
|
|
704.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
495.0 |
|
|
|
507.3 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
470.1 |
|
|
|
469.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
184.4 |
|
|
|
191.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities |
|
|
1,947.3 |
|
|
|
1,872.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, par value $0.10: authorized-
50,000,000 shares; issued-none |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value $0.10: authorized-500,000,000
shares; issued-102,404,256 shares at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007; outstanding-97,297,760 shares at
September 30, 2008 and 101,586,334 shares at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
650.1 |
|
|
|
693.7 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,230.4 |
|
|
|
1,830.7 |
|
Treasury stock: 5,106,496 shares at September 30, 2008 and
817,922 shares at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(280.1 |
) |
|
|
(75.4 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
(245.9 |
) |
|
|
(235.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Stockholders Equity |
|
|
2,364.7 |
|
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity |
|
$ |
4,312.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,095.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
3
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In millions except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Sales |
|
$ |
1,392.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,335.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,197.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,178.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
1,085.8 |
|
|
|
968.1 |
|
|
|
3,267.5 |
|
|
|
3,024.0 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
74.3 |
|
|
|
73.5 |
|
|
|
223.7 |
|
|
|
224.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, other income (expense),
and income taxes |
|
|
232.3 |
|
|
|
293.4 |
|
|
|
705.8 |
|
|
|
930.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
228.0 |
|
|
|
294.0 |
|
|
|
698.0 |
|
|
|
924.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
83.9 |
|
|
|
100.1 |
|
|
|
243.0 |
|
|
|
326.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
144.1 |
|
|
$ |
193.9 |
|
|
$ |
455.0 |
|
|
$ |
598.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.46 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
|
$ |
5.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
$ |
4.51 |
|
|
$ |
5.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
4
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In millions)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007* |
|
Operating Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
455.0 |
|
|
$ |
598.2 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
|
75.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
Change in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
(167.8 |
) |
|
|
(172.1 |
) |
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(92.3 |
) |
|
|
(37.2 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
(17.4 |
) |
Retirement benefits |
|
|
(16.7 |
) |
|
|
4.2 |
|
Accrued income taxes, net of tax benefits on share-based compensation |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
69.4 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
(22.5 |
) |
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
344.6 |
|
|
|
530.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(365.1 |
) |
|
|
(281.0 |
) |
Asset disposals and other |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
(3.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(363.8 |
) |
|
|
(284.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing Activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
(14.8 |
) |
|
|
(15.1 |
) |
Net borrowings (repayments) under credit facilities |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in debt |
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
|
|
(24.8 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(241.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid |
|
|
(54.1 |
) |
|
|
(39.8 |
) |
Shares repurchased for income tax withholding on share-based compensation |
|
|
(15.5 |
) |
|
|
(50.1 |
) |
Tax benefit on share-based compensation |
|
|
(9.0 |
) |
|
|
24.6 |
|
Exercises of stock options |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(331.5 |
) |
|
|
(84.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(350.7 |
) |
|
|
161.3 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year |
|
|
623.3 |
|
|
|
502.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
272.6 |
|
|
$ |
663.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Certain amounts have been adjusted. See Note 3. |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
5
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Unaudited
Note 1. Accounting Policies
Basis of Presentation
The interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Allegheny Technologies
Incorporated and its subsidiaries. Unless the context requires otherwise, Allegheny
Technologies, ATI and the Company refer to Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and its
subsidiaries.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the
instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all
of the information and note disclosures required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
for complete financial statements. In managements opinion, all adjustments (which include only
normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.
These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys 2007 Annual Report on
Form 10-K. The results of operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of
the operating results for any future period. The December 31, 2007 financial information has been
derived from our audited financial statements.
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In the first quarter 2008, as required, ATI began the adoption process for the change in
measurement date provisions of FASB Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (FAS 158), which amended the standards for defined
benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans accounting. These provisions require plan
assets and benefits to be measured at the date of the employers statement of financial position,
which is December 31 for ATI, rather than the Companys measurement date of November 30, as was
previously permitted. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material effect on ATIs
financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This
Standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new fair
value measurements. The Standard covers financial assets and liabilities, as well as for any other
assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in financial statements.
FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 for financial assets and
liabilities, and for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for other nonfinancial assets
and liabilities. The adoption of FAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a
material impact on ATIs financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (FAS
159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities. FAS 159 permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. If the fair
value option is elected, unrealized gains and losses will be recognized in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. FAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on ATIs financial statements.
Pending New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS
161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. FAS 161 amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. It requires qualitative disclosures
about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value
amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related
contingent features in derivative agreements. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company will include the required
disclosures beginning with its 2009 financial statements.
6
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (FAS
160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. FAS 160 changes the
classification of noncontrolling (minority) interests on the balance sheet and the accounting for
and reporting of transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling
interests. Under the new standard, noncontrolling interests are considered equity and are to be
reported as an element of stockholders equity rather than within the mezzanine or liability
sections of the balance sheet. In addition, the current practice of reporting minority interest
expense or benefit also will change. Under the new standard, net income will encompass the total
income before minority
interest expense. The income statement will include separate disclosure of the attribution of
income between the controlling and noncontrolling interests. Increases and decreases in the
noncontrolling ownership interest amount are to be accounted for as equity transactions. FAS 160 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and earlier application is
prohibited. Upon adoption, the balance sheet and the income statement will be recast
retrospectively for the presentation of noncontrolling interests. The other accounting provisions
of the statement are required to be adopted prospectively. As of September 30, 2008, other
long-term liabilities included $67 million for minority interest in the STAL joint venture, which
will be reported as an element of stockholders equity upon adoption of FAS 160.
Note 2. Inventories
Inventories at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Raw materials and supplies |
|
$ |
222.7 |
|
|
$ |
179.6 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
|
1,042.6 |
|
|
|
962.1 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
159.2 |
|
|
|
153.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories at current cost |
|
|
1,424.5 |
|
|
|
1,294.8 |
|
Less allowances to reduce current cost values to LIFO basis |
|
|
(338.3 |
) |
|
|
(374.6 |
) |
Progress payments |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total inventories, net |
|
$ |
1,083.9 |
|
|
$ |
916.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out
(FIFO), and average cost methods) or market, less progress payments. Most of the Companys
inventory is valued utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of the Companys non-U.S.
operations is valued using average cost or FIFO methods. The effect of using the LIFO methodology
to value inventory, rather than FIFO, decreased cost of sales by $41.0 million for the 2008 third
quarter and $36.3 million for the first nine months of 2008, compared to decreases of $61.2 million
for the 2007 third quarter and $18.6 million for the first nine months of 2007.
Note 3. Supplemental Financial Statement Information
Property, plant and equipment at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 were as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Land |
|
$ |
23.6 |
|
|
$ |
25.5 |
|
Buildings |
|
|
280.4 |
|
|
|
261.6 |
|
Equipment and leasehold improvements |
|
|
2,430.3 |
|
|
|
2,102.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,734.3 |
|
|
|
2,389.4 |
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(1,210.9 |
) |
|
|
(1,149.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
1,523.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,239.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 includes
a presentation adjustment of $50.1 million pertaining to taxes on share-based compensation. As a
result of this presentation adjustment, cash flow from operating activities for the nine months
ended September 30, 2007 increased from $480.7 million to $530.8 million, and cash used in
financing activities increased from $(34.6) million to $(84.7) million.
7
This adjusted presentation is consistent with the Companys presentation utilized in the 2007
Annual Report on Form 10-K, which presents cash usage related to the repurchase of Company shares
to satisfy employee-owed taxes on stock-based compensation for the nine months ended September 30,
2007 as a financing activity rather than an operating activity.
Fair values of financial instruments included $8.6 million of assets and $29.7 million of
liabilities associated with derivative financial instruments accounted for as cash flow hedges for
nickel, natural gas and foreign currencies. All fair values for these derivatives were measured
using Level 2 information as defined by FAS 157.
Note 4. Debt
Debt at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Allegheny Technologies $300 million 8.375% Notes
due 2011, net (a) |
|
$ |
304.5 |
|
|
$ |
305.4 |
|
Allegheny Ludlum 6.95% debentures, due 2025 |
|
|
150.0 |
|
|
|
150.0 |
|
Domestic Bank Group $400 million unsecured credit
agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Promissory note for J&L asset acquisition |
|
|
30.7 |
|
|
|
41.0 |
|
Foreign credit agreements |
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
Industrial revenue bonds, due through 2020 |
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
Capitalized leases and other |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total short-term and long-term debt |
|
|
515.9 |
|
|
|
528.2 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
(20.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
$ |
495.0 |
|
|
$ |
507.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fair value adjustments for settled interest rate swap contracts of $7.2
million at September 30, 2008 and $8.7 million at December 31, 2007. |
The Company has a $400 million senior unsecured domestic revolving credit facility (the
facility), which includes a $200 million sublimit for the issuance of letters of credit. As of
September 30, 2008, there had been no borrowings made under the facility, although a portion of the
facility was used to support approximately $14 million in letters of credit. In the 2008 third
quarter, the Company established a separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit.
As of September 30, 2008, $28.6 million were outstanding under this credit facility.
In addition, STAL, the Companys Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, has approximately $12 million in letters of credit outstanding as of September 30, 2008
related to the expansion of its operations in Shanghai, China. These letters of credit are
supported solely by STALs financial capability without any guarantees from the joint venture
partners.
8
Note 5. Per Share Information
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common
share (in millions, except per share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Numerator for basic and diluted net income
per common share net income |
|
$ |
144.1 |
|
|
$ |
193.9 |
|
|
$ |
455.0 |
|
|
$ |
598.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for basic net income per common
share-weighted average shares |
|
|
99.0 |
|
|
|
101.8 |
|
|
|
100.2 |
|
|
|
101.7 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option equivalents |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Contingently issuable shares |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator for diluted net income per
common share adjusted weighted
average shares and assumed
conversions |
|
|
99.7 |
|
|
|
103.1 |
|
|
|
100.9 |
|
|
|
103.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.46 |
|
|
$ |
1.90 |
|
|
$ |
4.54 |
|
|
$ |
5.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per common share |
|
$ |
1.45 |
|
|
$ |
1.88 |
|
|
$ |
4.51 |
|
|
$ |
5.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6. Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income, net of tax, were as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
144.1 |
|
|
$ |
193.9 |
|
|
$ |
455.0 |
|
|
$ |
598.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation gains (losses) |
|
|
(25.4 |
) |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
|
|
14.2 |
|
Unrealized losses on energy, raw material and
currency hedges, net of tax |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
Retirement benefits |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
23.8 |
|
Unrealized losses on securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41.1 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
103.0 |
|
|
$ |
197.5 |
|
|
$ |
443.6 |
|
|
$ |
622.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. Income Taxes
Results for the third quarter 2008 included a provision for income taxes of $83.9 million, or
36.8% of income before tax, compared to an income tax provision of $100.1 million, or 34.0% of
income before tax, for the comparable 2007 quarter. The income tax provision for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was $243.0 million, or 34.8% of income before tax, compared to an income
tax provision of $326.3 million, or 35.3% of income before tax, for the comparable prior year
period. The year to date 2008 results include a second quarter 2008 discrete benefit of $11.2
million primarily related to tax refunds and credits associated with prior years. The nine months
ended September 30, 2007 included a benefit of $12.1 million due to reductions in state deferred
tax asset valuation allowances due to increased state taxable income and the probability of
realizing the corresponding state deferred tax assets.
As required, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, on January 1, 2007. For the quarter ended September 30, 2008, the Companys
liability for unrecognized tax
9
benefits decreased by $1.2 million, primarily related to the
favorable resolution of uncertain tax positions taken in prior periods. The long-term liability for
uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 2008 was $33.1 million.
Note 8. Pension Plans and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company has defined benefit pension plans and defined contribution plans covering
substantially all employees. Benefits under the defined benefit pension plans are generally based
on years of service and/or final average pay. The Company funds the U.S. pension plans in
accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, and the Internal
Revenue Code.
The Company also sponsors several postretirement plans covering certain salaried and hourly
employees. The plans provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees. In
most plans, Company contributions towards premiums are capped based on the cost as of a certain
date, thereby creating a defined contribution. For the non-collectively bargained plans, the
Company maintains the right to amend or terminate the plans at its discretion.
For the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the components
of pension (income) expense for the Companys defined benefit plans and components of other
postretirement benefit expense included the following (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Pension Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
7.1 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
$ |
21.1 |
|
|
$ |
20.7 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
32.6 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
97.9 |
|
|
|
95.6 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(50.3 |
) |
|
|
(46.7 |
) |
|
|
(150.7 |
) |
|
|
(140.1 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
23.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension (income) expense |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
|
$ |
(9.3 |
) |
|
$ |
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Postretirement Benefits: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
Interest cost on benefits earned in prior years |
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
23.3 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(1.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
|
(5.5 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
(17.2 |
) |
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other postretirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.7 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retirement benefit expense |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
7.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
22.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
Note 9. Business Segments
Following is certain financial information with respect to the Companys business segments for
the periods indicated (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Total sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
554.1 |
|
|
$ |
561.9 |
|
|
$ |
1,639.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,693.2 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
779.1 |
|
|
|
717.9 |
|
|
|
2,390.6 |
|
|
|
2,350.9 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
130.1 |
|
|
|
112.3 |
|
|
|
394.3 |
|
|
|
345.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,463.3 |
|
|
|
1,392.1 |
|
|
|
4,424.4 |
|
|
|
4,389.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
41.4 |
|
|
|
143.8 |
|
|
|
137.6 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
45.0 |
|
|
|
53.4 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
|
|
227.4 |
|
|
|
210.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
|
510.2 |
|
|
|
520.5 |
|
|
|
1,495.7 |
|
|
|
1,555.6 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
764.6 |
|
|
|
709.2 |
|
|
|
2,345.6 |
|
|
|
2,297.5 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
117.6 |
|
|
|
105.3 |
|
|
|
355.7 |
|
|
|
325.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,392.4 |
|
|
$ |
1,335.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,197.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,178.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profit: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Performance Metals |
|
$ |
139.6 |
|
|
$ |
194.2 |
|
|
$ |
421.8 |
|
|
$ |
541.9 |
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
102.7 |
|
|
|
123.0 |
|
|
|
315.2 |
|
|
|
449.5 |
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
|
30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating profit |
|
|
248.4 |
|
|
|
324.5 |
|
|
|
759.8 |
|
|
|
1,022.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate expenses |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(18.5 |
) |
|
|
(46.5 |
) |
|
|
(56.9 |
) |
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.7 |
) |
|
|
(10.9 |
) |
Retirement benefit expense |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
|
(22.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
228.0 |
|
|
$ |
294.0 |
|
|
$ |
698.0 |
|
|
$ |
924.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefit expense represents pension income or expense and other postretirement
benefit expense. Operating profit with respect to the Companys business segments excludes any
retirement benefit expense. In April 2008, the Company entered into a new five-year labor agreement
with United Steelworkers represented employees at the ATI Wah Chang operation and agreed to
establish a Voluntary Employee Benefit Association (VEBA) trust for certain post-retirement
benefits. For the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recognized $2.3
million and $5.4 million, respectively, of expense for this VEBA, which is included in retirement
benefit expense as reported above in business segments. As a result, total retirement benefit
expense is expected to be $8 million for the full year 2008 including the Companys defined benefit
pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans described in Note 8. Pension Plans and Other
Postretirement Benefits.
In March 2007, the Company reached early resolution on new labor agreements for ATI Allegheny
Ludlum and ATIs Allvac Albany, OR employees. Operating profit for the nine months ended September
30, 2007 for the High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products segments was negatively impacted
by $0.7 million and $4.8 million, respectively, of pre-tax, one-time costs related to the new labor
agreements.
Corporate expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were $13.4 million, compared
to $18.5 million for the comparable period of 2007. This decrease is due primarily to lower
expenses associated with annual and long-term performance-based incentive compensation programs.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, corporate expenses decreased to $46.5 million
compared to $56.9 million primarily due to lower expenses related to annual and long-term
performance-based incentive compensation programs.
11
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, includes charges incurred in connection with
closed operations, pretax gains and losses on the sale of surplus real estate and other assets, and
other non-operating income or expense. These items are presented primarily in selling and
administrative expenses and in other expense in the statement of income. The decreases for the
three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 were primarily related to lower charges for
environmental costs at closed operations.
Note 10. Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
The payment obligations under the $150 million 6.95% debentures due 2025 issued by Allegheny
Ludlum Corporation (the Subsidiary) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Allegheny
Technologies Incorporated (the Guarantor Parent). In accordance with positions established by the
Securities and Exchange Commission, the following financial information sets forth separately
financial information with respect to the Subsidiary, the non-guarantor subsidiaries and the
Guarantor Parent. The principal elimination entries eliminate investments in subsidiaries and
certain intercompany balances and transactions. Investments in subsidiaries, which are eliminated
in consolidation, are included in other assets on the balance sheets.
Allegheny Technologies is the plan sponsor for the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan
(the Plan) which covers certain current and former employees of the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries. As a result, the balance sheets presented for the Subsidiary and the
non-guarantor subsidiaries do not include any Plan assets or liabilities, or the related deferred
taxes. The Plan assets, liabilities and related deferred taxes and pension income or expense are
recognized by the Guarantor Parent. Management and royalty fees charged to the Subsidiary and to
the non-guarantor subsidiaries by the Guarantor Parent have been excluded solely for purposes of
this presentation.
Cash flows related to intercompany activity between the Guarantor Parent, the Subsidiary, and
the non-guarantor subsidiaries are presented as financing activities on the condensed statements of
cash flows. Previously, cash flows related to this intercompany activity were presented as cash
flows from operating activities. The condensed statements of cash flows for prior periods have
been revised to conform to this current method of presentation. The effect of this presentation
change on the Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was
to:
|
- |
|
Increase cash flow from operating activities for the Subsidiary by $174.6 million with
an offsetting decrease to cash flow from financing activities. |
|
|
- |
|
Reduce cash flow from operating activities for the non-guarantor subsidiaries by $70.3
million with an offsetting increase to cash flow from financing activities. |
|
|
- |
|
Reduce cash flow from operating activities for the Guarantor Parent by $104.3 million
with an offsetting increase to cash flow from financing activities. |
This change in presentation did not have any impact on consolidated cash flows as the intercompany
activity eliminates in consolidation.
12
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
88.2 |
|
|
$ |
179.0 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
272.6 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
325.2 |
|
|
|
418.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
744.5 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
322.4 |
|
|
|
761.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,083.9 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
741.4 |
|
|
|
1,393.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,141.2 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
381.2 |
|
|
|
1,140.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,523.4 |
|
Prepaid pension asset |
|
|
266.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266.4 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204.2 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35.2 |
|
Investments in subsidiaries and other
assets |
|
|
4,644.4 |
|
|
|
1,729.3 |
|
|
|
1,625.7 |
|
|
|
(7,857.8 |
) |
|
|
141.6 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,953.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,964.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,252.0 |
|
|
$ |
(7,857.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,312.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
200.7 |
|
|
$ |
210.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
414.4 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,141.7 |
|
|
|
337.6 |
|
|
|
745.0 |
|
|
|
(2,933.5 |
) |
|
|
290.8 |
|
Accrued income taxes |
|
|
29.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.0 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
2,216.6 |
|
|
|
548.8 |
|
|
|
965.9 |
|
|
|
(2,933.5 |
) |
|
|
797.8 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
304.5 |
|
|
|
371.8 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
495.0 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
274.1 |
|
|
|
185.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
470.1 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
57.9 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
109.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184.4 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,589.1 |
|
|
|
1,211.4 |
|
|
|
1,280.3 |
|
|
|
(3,133.5 |
) |
|
|
1,947.3 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,364.7 |
|
|
|
1,752.6 |
|
|
|
2,971.7 |
|
|
|
(4,724.3 |
) |
|
|
2,364.7 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders
equity |
|
$ |
4,953.8 |
|
|
$ |
2,964.0 |
|
|
$ |
4,252.0 |
|
|
$ |
(7,857.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,312.0 |
|
|
|
|
13
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,163.9 |
|
|
$ |
2,033.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,197.0 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
1,832.0 |
|
|
|
1,443.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,267.5 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
69.0 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
125.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223.7 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
) |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
Other income (expense) including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
760.6 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
|
|
(779.9 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
698.0 |
|
|
|
316.3 |
|
|
|
463.6 |
|
|
|
(779.9 |
) |
|
|
698.0 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
243.0 |
|
|
|
116.9 |
|
|
|
157.8 |
|
|
|
(274.7 |
) |
|
|
243.0 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
455.0 |
|
|
$ |
199.4 |
|
|
$ |
305.8 |
|
|
$ |
(505.2 |
) |
|
$ |
455.0 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows
provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
(65.7 |
) |
|
$ |
117.9 |
|
|
$ |
292.4 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
344.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(39.2 |
) |
|
|
(324.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(363.8 |
) |
Cash flows
provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
71.2 |
|
|
|
(178.6 |
) |
|
|
(224.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(331.5 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
5.4 |
|
|
$ |
(99.9 |
) |
|
$ |
(256.2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(350.7 |
) |
|
|
|
14
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Balance Sheets
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
188.1 |
|
|
$ |
435.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
623.3 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
258.3 |
|
|
|
393.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
652.2 |
|
Inventories, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
210.4 |
|
|
|
705.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
916.1 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
Prepaid expenses, and other current
assets |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38.3 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
662.8 |
|
|
|
1,566.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,248.7 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
371.2 |
|
|
|
867.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,239.5 |
|
Prepaid pension asset |
|
|
230.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230.3 |
|
Cost in excess of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
97.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
209.8 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
42.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42.1 |
|
Investment in subsidiaries and other
assets |
|
|
4,143.4 |
|
|
|
1,266.0 |
|
|
|
1,411.6 |
|
|
|
(6,695.8 |
) |
|
|
125.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,436.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,412.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,942.9 |
|
|
$ |
(6,695.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,095.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
165.4 |
|
|
$ |
219.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
388.4 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
1,854.0 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
|
|
|
841.5 |
|
|
|
(2,477.5 |
) |
|
|
294.7 |
|
Short-term debt and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,857.4 |
|
|
|
252.6 |
|
|
|
1,071.5 |
|
|
|
(2,477.5 |
) |
|
|
704.0 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
305.4 |
|
|
|
382.1 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
(200.0 |
) |
|
|
507.3 |
|
Retirement benefits |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
274.6 |
|
|
|
184.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
469.6 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
134.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
191.2 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,212.9 |
|
|
|
926.8 |
|
|
|
1,409.9 |
|
|
|
(2,677.5 |
) |
|
|
1,872.1 |
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
1,485.3 |
|
|
|
2,533.0 |
|
|
|
(4,018.3 |
) |
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,436.4 |
|
|
$ |
2,412.1 |
|
|
$ |
3,942.9 |
|
|
$ |
(6,695.8 |
) |
|
$ |
4,095.6 |
|
|
|
|
15
Note 10. CONTINUED
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated
Financial Information for Subsidiary and Guarantor Parent
Statements of Income
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Sales |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,125.2 |
|
|
$ |
2,053.7 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,178.9 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
1,666.0 |
|
|
|
1,350.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,024.0 |
|
Selling and administrative expenses |
|
|
76.6 |
|
|
|
31.0 |
|
|
|
116.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
224.3 |
|
Interest income (expense), net |
|
|
(13.4 |
) |
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
Other income (expense) including
equity in income of unconsolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
1,022.2 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
(1,041.5 |
) |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax provision |
|
|
924.5 |
|
|
|
451.7 |
|
|
|
589.8 |
|
|
|
(1,041.5 |
) |
|
|
924.5 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
|
326.3 |
|
|
|
170.1 |
|
|
|
197.4 |
|
|
|
(367.5 |
) |
|
|
326.3 |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
598.2 |
|
|
$ |
281.6 |
|
|
$ |
392.4 |
|
|
$ |
(674.0 |
) |
|
$ |
598.2 |
|
|
|
|
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-guarantor |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Parent |
|
|
Subsidiary |
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in)
operating activities |
|
$ |
(44.6 |
) |
|
$ |
338.6 |
|
|
$ |
236.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
530.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows used in investing activities |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(50.5 |
) |
|
|
(234.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284.8 |
) |
Cash flows provided by (used in)
financing activities |
|
|
44.4 |
|
|
|
(185.1 |
) |
|
|
56.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84.7 |
) |
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(0.5 |
) |
|
$ |
103.0 |
|
|
$ |
58.8 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
161.3 |
|
|
|
|
Note 11. Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is subject to various domestic and international environmental laws and
regulations that govern the discharge of pollutants and disposal of wastes, and which may require
that it investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at sites
associated with past and present operations. The Company could incur substantial cleanup costs,
fines, and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims as a
result of violations or liabilities under these laws or noncompliance with environmental permits
required at its facilities. The Company is currently involved in the investigation and remediation
of a number of its current and former sites, as well as third party sites.
Environmental liabilities are recorded when the Companys liability is probable and the costs
are reasonably estimable. In many cases, however, the Company is not able to determine whether it
is liable or, if liability is probable, to reasonably estimate the loss or range of loss. Estimates
of the Companys liability remain subject to additional uncertainties, including the nature and
extent of site contamination, available remediation alternatives, the extent of corrective actions
that may be required, and the number, participation, and financial condition of other potentially
responsible parties. The Company expects that it will adjust its accruals to reflect new
information as appropriate. Future adjustments could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations in a given period, but the Company cannot reliably predict the
amounts of such future adjustments.
Based on currently available information, the Company does not believe that there is a
reasonable possibility that a loss exceeding the amount already accrued for any of the sites with
which the Company is currently associated
16
(either individually or in the aggregate) will be an amount that would be material to a decision to
buy or sell the Companys securities. Future developments, administrative actions or liabilities
relating to environmental matters, however, could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
financial condition or results of operations.
At September 30, 2008, the Companys reserves for environmental remediation obligations
totaled approximately $18 million, of which approximately $7 million were included in other current
liabilities. The reserve includes estimated probable future costs of $5 million for federal
Superfund and comparable state-managed sites; $8 million for formerly owned or operated sites for
which the Company has remediation or indemnification obligations; $4 million for owned or
controlled sites at which Company operations have been discontinued; and $1 million for sites
utilized by the Company in its ongoing operations. The Company continues to evaluate whether it may
be able to recover a portion of future costs for environmental liabilities from third parties.
The timing of expenditures depends on a number of factors that vary by site. The Company
expects that it will expend present accruals over many years and that remediation of all sites with
which it has been identified will be completed within thirty years.
See Note 13. Commitments and Contingencies to the Companys consolidated financial statements
in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 for a
discussion of legal proceedings affecting the Company.
A number of other lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the
Company relating to the conduct of its currently and formerly owned businesses, including those
pertaining to product liability, patent infringement, commercial, government contracting,
employment, employee benefits, taxes, environmental and health and safety, and stockholder matters.
While the outcome of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits,
claims or proceedings may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not believe that
the disposition of any such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the
Companys financial condition or liquidity, although the resolution in any reporting period of one
or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of
operations for that period.
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Allegheny Technologies Incorporated (ATI) is a Delaware corporation with its principal
executive offices located at 1000 Six PPG Place, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15222-5479, telephone
number (412) 394-2800. References to Allegheny Technologies, ATI, the Company, the
Registrant, we, our and us and similar terms mean Allegheny Technologies Incorporated and
its subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise requires.
Allegheny Technologies is one of the largest and most diversified specialty metals producers
in the world. We use innovative technologies to offer growing global markets a wide range of
specialty metals solutions. Our products include titanium and titanium alloys, nickel-based alloys
and superalloys, grain-oriented electrical steel, zirconium, hafnium and niobium, stainless and
specialty alloys, tungsten-based materials, and forgings and castings. Our specialty metals are
produced in a wide range of alloys and product forms and are selected for use in environments that
demand metals having exceptional hardness, toughness, strength, resistance to heat, corrosion or
abrasion, or a combination of these characteristics.
Results of Operations
We operate in three business segments: High Performance Metals, Flat-Rolled Products, and
Engineered Products. These segments represented the following percentages of our total revenues and
segment operating profit for the first nine months of 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
|
Revenue |
|
Profit |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
|
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
|
Engineered Products |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
Sales for the third quarter 2008 were $1.39 billion, 4.3% higher than the third quarter 2007.
Compared to the third quarter 2007, sales increased 8% in the Flat-Rolled Products segment, and 12%
for the Engineered Products segment but declined 2% in the High Performance Metals segment. Direct
international sales increased to a quarterly record of $402.1 million, and represented 29% of our
total sales. We believe that more than 50% of our sales are driven by demand from global markets
when we consider exports of our customers.
The aerospace and defense markets, and the global infrastructure markets, namely chemical
process industry, oil and gas, electrical energy, and the medical markets, have been driving our
performance. These markets accounted for nearly 70% of sales in the nine months ended September
30, 2008. The aerospace and defense market comprised 28% of sales for the nine months 2008, down
slightly from the same period of last year due primarily to declines in average selling prices.
There has been a labor strike at The Boeing Company, a significant customer, which commenced in
September 2008. On October 27, 2008, it was announced that tentative terms for a labor contract
had been reached between Boeing and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace
Workers. These conditions created a period of short-term uncertainty regarding the length of
the labor disruption and associated negative impact on demand in the aerospace supply chain for
both airframe and aero engine related programs. Long-term demand is expected to be strong in the
aerospace market due to the high levels of backlogs at our airframe and jet engine customers.
Demand continued to be strong from the global infrastructure markets: chemical process industry,
oil and gas, and electrical energy. Demand was weak from the U.S. automotive and housing markets.
ATI titanium product shipments, including ATI-produced products for our Uniti titanium joint
venture, were over 36 million pounds in the nine months 2008, a 19% increase over the same period
of last year, as we leverage our manufacturing capabilities across both our High Performance Metals
and Flat-Rolled Products segments and demonstrate our ability to supply diversified global markets
with both long and flat-rolled products.
Segment operating profit for the third quarter 2008 decreased 23%, compared to the third
quarter 2007, to $248.4 million, or 17.8% of sales. Segment operating profit for the nine months
2008 decreased 26% compared to the 2007 period, to $759.8 million, or 18.1% of sales. The
decreases in operating profit were primarily due to rapidly declining raw material costs, which
resulted in higher cost material purchased earlier in the year flowing through cost of sales and
not matching raw material indices or surcharge pricing mechanisms, as well as more
18
competitive pricing for certain products, and product mix. Segment operating profit as a
percentage of sales for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
High Performance Metals |
|
|
27.4 |
% |
|
|
37.3 |
% |
|
|
28.2 |
% |
|
|
34.8 |
% |
Flat-Rolled Products |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
13.4 |
% |
|
|
19.6 |
% |
Engineered Products |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
9.4 |
% |
Our measure of segment operating profit, which we use to analyze the performance and results
of our business segments, excludes income taxes, corporate expenses, net interest expense,
retirement benefit expense, and other costs net of gains on asset sales. We believe segment
operating profit, as defined, provides an appropriate measure of controllable operating results at
the business segment level.
Results for the third quarter 2008 included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of
$41.0 million due to declining raw material costs, primarily nickel and nickel-bearing scrap, and
titanium scrap. For the same 2007 period, the LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit was $61.2
million. For the first nine months of 2008, LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit was $36.3
million, compared to a benefit of $18.6 million for the comparable 2007 period.
Third quarter and first nine months 2008 gross cost reductions, before the effects of
inflation, totaled $35 million and $104 million, respectively, as we remained focused on reducing
costs through improving operating efficiencies.
In the first quarter 2007, we entered into four-year labor agreements with United Steelworkers
represented employees at ATI Allegheny Ludlum and at ATIs Albany, OR titanium operations. As a
result of the new agreements, we recognized a non-recurring charge of $5.8 million, or $3.7 million
after-tax, in 2007, which is primarily reflected in the year to date 2007 operating results of the
High Performance Metals and Flat-Rolled Products business segments.
Income before tax for the third quarter 2008 was $228.0 million, a decrease of $66 million
compared to the third quarter 2007. Net income for the third quarter 2008 was $144.1 million, or
$1.45 per share, compared to the third quarter 2007 of $193.9 million, or $1.88 per share. Third
quarter 2008 results include an income tax provision of $83.9 million, or 36.8% of income before
tax, compared to an income tax provision of $100.1 million, or 34.0% of income before tax, for the
comparable 2007 quarter. The 2007 third quarter included a favorable one-time net tax benefit of
$8.1 million, primarily related to the reduction of a deferred tax valuation allowance for certain
state tax credits expected to be realized in future periods.
Income before tax for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $698.0 million, a 25%
decrease compared to the first nine months of 2007. Net income for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 was $455.0 million, or $4.51 per share, compared to $598.2 million, or $5.81 per share for
the first nine months of 2007. Results for the first nine months of 2008 include an income tax
provision of $243.0 million, or 34.8% of income before tax, which included the favorable one-time
net tax benefit of $11.2 million in the second quarter. Results for the first nine months of 2007
include an income tax provision of $326.3 million, or 35.3% of income before tax, and benefited
from a $12.1 million reduction in valuation allowances associated with state deferred tax assets.
In the first nine months of 2008, our strong cash flow supported investments of $185 million
in managed working capital, $365 million of capital expenditures, nearly $242 million in share
repurchases, and dividend payments of over $54 million. We ended the quarter with nearly $273
million of cash on hand.
We are focused on delivering solid financial results during this period of uncertainty. We
now expect our fourth quarter 2008 results to be in the range of $1.00 to $1.10 per share,
resulting in full year 2008 earnings of $5.51 to $5.61 per share. We expect 2008 fourth quarter
volumes to be down and pricing to be very competitive for most of our products with the exceptions
of grain-oriented electrical steel and our exotic alloys. The strike at The Boeing Company and the
delay in their 787 aircraft production program has created uncertainty in the supply chain for both
airframe and aero engine products. Demand is weak for our standard stainless sheet and plate
products
domestically and globally. With the exception of oil and gas, most markets for our standard
stainless products are
19
soft with housing, appliance, and automotive being particularly weak.
According to industry reports, service center inventories of standard stainless products were low
in the third quarter. These inventory levels could trend lower in the 2008 fourth quarter as some
customers take actions to avoid raw material cost risk. However, even in this weak market, we
expect to ship approximately 300,000 tons of standard stainless products in 2008, which is the low
end of our targeted range. We are proactively adjusting the production levels of some of our
products and increasing our 2009 cost reductions to meet this changing economic environment. We
expect strong cash flow in the fourth quarter 2008, including a significant reduction in managed
working capital.
We believe the long-term growth opportunities of our major global end markets remain strong.
We intend to continue to enhance our leadership position in specialty metals with a focus on
near-term and long-term opportunities in the aerospace and defense, chemical processing industry,
oil and gas, electrical energy generation and distribution, and medical markets.
High Performance Metals Segment
Third quarter 2008 sales were $510.2 million, 2% lower than third quarter 2007 primarily due
to lower shipments and selling prices for nickel-based and specialty alloys, and lower selling
prices for titanium mill products, which was partially offset by increased shipments and higher
prices for our exotic alloys, and higher titanium mill products shipments. Demand for our premium
titanium alloys was good for jet engine applications. Demand for our titanium alloys was steady
from airframe customers and improved from the biomedical market. Demand for our nickel-based
alloys and specialty alloys was softer from the jet engine market and improved from the oil and gas
and electrical energy markets. Demand for our exotic alloys was strong from the chemical process
industry and was good from the aerospace and defense and nuclear energy markets.
Segment operating profit in the quarter was $139.6 million, or 27.4% of sales, a $54.6 million
decrease compared to the third quarter 2007. The third quarter 2008 operating profit was
compressed by rapidly declining raw material costs, primarily titanium and titanium scrap, and
nickel and nickel-bearing scrap. This resulted in higher cost material purchased earlier in the
year flowing through cost of sales and not matching raw material indices included in the selling
prices due to the long manufacturing cycle times of some of our products. This compression was
partially offset by a $16.7 million reduction in the LIFO inventory valuation reserve, increased
shipments and selling prices for zirconium products, higher titanium mill products shipments, and
the benefits of gross cost reductions. The third quarter 2007 had a LIFO inventory valuation
reserve benefit of $43.1 million. Results for the 2008 third quarter benefited from $18.2 million
of gross cost reductions, bringing year to date 2008 gross cost reductions in this segment to $49.6
million.
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
8,707 |
|
|
|
7,815 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
10,365 |
|
|
|
10,999 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
1,113 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
25.95 |
|
|
$ |
29.43 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
18.82 |
|
|
$ |
20.49 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
49.91 |
|
|
$ |
45.16 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
The decline in the average selling price for titanium and titanium-based alloys, and
nickel-based and specialty alloys was primarily due to lower raw material indices due to lower raw
material costs and a more competitive pricing environment.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, segment sales decreased 4% to $1.50 billion.
Operating profit was $421.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, or 28.2% of
sales, compared to $541.9 million,
or 34.8% of sales, for the comparable prior year to date period. Shipments of titanium mill
products increased primarily due to higher aerospace airframe volume. Shipments of nickel-based
and specialty alloys declined
20
primarily due to product mix and inventory management actions at
distribution customers. The nine months 2008 operating profit was impacted by a more competitive
pricing environment for certain titanium mill products and nickel-based alloys and superalloys. In
addition, year to date 2008 margins were compressed by rapidly declining raw material costs,
primarily titanium and titanium scrap, and nickel and nickel-bearing scrap. This resulted in
higher cost material purchased earlier in the year flowing through cost of sales and not matching
raw material indices included in the selling prices due to the long manufacturing cycle times of
some of our products. These impacts were partially offset by increased shipments of titanium mill
products, a $30.1 million reduction in the LIFO inventory valuation reserve, increased shipments
and selling prices for exotic alloys, and the benefits of gross cost reductions. Results for the
nine months 2007 included a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $34.9 million.
Certain comparative information on the segments major products for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
Change |
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
|
25,184 |
|
|
|
22,692 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
|
31,395 |
|
|
|
33,188 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
|
4,194 |
|
|
|
3,524 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per pound): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Titanium mill products |
|
$ |
25.93 |
|
|
$ |
31.31 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Nickel-based and specialty alloys |
|
$ |
18.55 |
|
|
$ |
19.42 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
Exotic alloys |
|
$ |
47.74 |
|
|
$ |
42.07 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
In April 2008, we entered into a new labor agreement with the United Steelworkers represented
employees at ATIs Wah Chang operations. The new agreement expires on March 31, 2013. The new
agreement provides for profit sharing above specified minimum pre-tax profit for ATIs Wah Chang
operations and is capped to provide for no more than $9 million of profit sharing payments under
this provision over the five-year life of the contract.
Flat-Rolled Products Segment
Third quarter 2008 sales were $764.6 million, 8% higher than the third quarter 2007, due
primarily to increased shipments, including higher foreign sales, partially offset by lower raw
material surcharges. Direct international sales increased $41.0 million to 26.9% of total 2008
segment sales. Demand was strong for our industrial titanium sheet, grain-oriented electrical
steel, and nickel-based and specialty alloy products from the chemical process industry, oil and
gas, and electrical energy markets. Shipments of standard stainless products increased 16% while
total high-value products shipments increased 10%. Within high-value products, shipments of
substantially all products, namely industrial titanium sheet, grain-oriented electrical steel,
nickel-based alloys, and Precision Rolled Strip® products, exceeded year-ago levels. Average
transaction prices for all products were 4% lower, primarily due to lower raw material surcharges,
product mix, and more competitive prices for standard stainless products.
Segment operating profit was $102.7 million or 13.4% of sales, a decrease of $20.3 million
compared to the third quarter 2007, primarily as a result of lower average base selling prices for
standard stainless products and the timing difference between raw material surcharges and costs.
Third quarter 2008 operating profit was negatively impacted by lower base prices for standard
stainless sheet and plate products. In addition, third quarter 2008 operating profit was
compressed by a rapid decline in raw material costs, primarily nickel and nickel bearing scrap.
This resulted in higher cost material purchased earlier in the year flowing through cost of sales
and not matching raw material surcharges included in the selling prices due to the long
manufacturing cycle times of some of our products. This compression was partially offset by
increased shipments and higher selling prices for our grain-oriented electrical steel, increased
shipments of our flat-rolled titanium products, increased shipments of standard grade sheet
products, and the benefits of gross cost reductions. Declining raw material costs, primarily for
nickel and nickel scrap, resulted in a LIFO inventory valuation reserve benefit of $25.1 million in
the third quarter 2008. The third quarter 2007 included a LIFO inventory valuation benefit of $18.2
million.
21
Results benefited from $14.3 million in gross cost reductions, bringing 2008 first nine months
gross cost reductions in this segment to $47.5 million.
Comparative information on the segments products for the three months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
133,322 |
|
|
|
121,674 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Standard |
|
|
130,888 |
|
|
|
113,083 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
264,210 |
|
|
|
234,757 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
3.44 |
|
|
$ |
3.37 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
Standard |
|
$ |
2.27 |
|
|
$ |
2.57 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
2.86 |
|
|
$ |
2.99 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, Flat-Rolled Products sales increased 2%, to
$2.35 billion, compared to the nine months 2007, however, segment operating profit declined 30%, or
$134.3 million, to $315.2 million, or 13.4% of sales, compared to $449.5 million, or 19.6% of
sales, for the prior year-to-date period. Average prices for the first nine months 2008, which
include surcharges, were 7% lower than the same period of last year. Demand was strong from the
segments largest markets: chemical process industry, oil and gas, and electrical energy, which
accounted for 54% of year-to-date segment sales. 2008 operating profit was negatively impacted by
significantly lower base selling prices for standard stainless sheet and plate and by margin
compression due to a rapid decline in raw material costs, primarily nickel and nickel bearing
scrap. This resulted in higher cost material purchased earlier in the year flowing through cost of
sales and not matching raw material surcharges included in the selling prices due to the long
manufacturing cycle times of some of our products. These negative impacts were partially offset by
increased shipment volumes for most products, higher selling prices for grain oriented electrical
steel products and the benefits of gross cost reductions. Segment results for the 2008
year-to-date period included a LIFO inventory reserve benefit of $8.7 million, compared to a prior
year LIFO inventory reserve charge of $16.0 million in 2007, due primarily to raw material cost
deflation for nickel and nickel-bearing scrap.
Comparative information on the segments products for the nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007 is provided in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
| |
% |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Volume (000s pounds): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
|
386,113 |
|
|
|
370,351 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Standard |
|
|
481,372 |
|
|
|
424,200 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
867,485 |
|
|
|
794,551 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average prices (per lb.): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High value |
|
$ |
3.29 |
|
|
$ |
3.31 |
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Standard |
|
$ |
2.18 |
|
|
$ |
2.49 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)% |
Combined Average |
|
$ |
2.68 |
|
|
$ |
2.87 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Engineered Products Segment
Sales for the third quarter 2008 of $117.6 million were 12% higher than the third quarter
2007. Demand was solid for our forged products from the construction and mining, and oil and gas
markets. Demand for our cast products was good from the electrical energy market, particularly for
wind and gas turbine components. Demand for our tungsten and tungsten carbide products was down
due to the work stoppage in the aerospace supply chain and shipments were down to the oil and gas
and construction and mining markets due to disruptions after Hurricane Ike. Demand from the
aerospace market remained good for our titanium precision metal processing conversion services.
22
Segment operating profit in the third quarter 2008 was $6.1 million, or 5.2% of sales,
compared to $7.3 million, or 6.9% of sales, for the comparable 2007 period. An increase in
operating profit due to increased sales was offset by $1.5 million start-up expenses with our
Alpena, MI casting operation, and the negative impact of higher raw material costs which resulted
in a LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $0.8 million. The third quarter 2007 included a
LIFO inventory valuation reserve charge of $0.1 million. Prior year results were also impacted by
start-up costs of our operation to internally produce ammonium paratungstate (APT), a key raw
material of the tungsten and tungsten carbide products. Results benefited from $2.7 million of
gross cost reductions, bringing year-to-date gross cost reductions in this segment to $6.7 million.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, sales increased 9% to $355.7 million, and
operating profit was $22.8 million, or 6.4% of sales, compared to $30.6 million, or 9.4% of sales
in 2007. Operating results for the first nine months of 2008 include LIFO inventory valuation
reserve charges of $2.5 million, whereas the first nine months of 2007 include LIFO inventory
valuation reserve charges of $0.3 million. Operating results for the first nine months of 2008
were affected by higher raw material costs, operational execution issues, and start-up expenses
associated with our Alpena, MI casting operation. Nine months 2007 results were negatively impacted
by higher purchased raw material costs and APT plant start-up costs.
We expect to begin to see some improvement in operating results in the Engineered Products
segment. The product mix in our tungsten products business is improving and sales are growing in
the aerospace and defense, electrical energy, oil and gas, and mining markets. Also, our new
casting shop in Alpena, MI is expected to complete qualifications in the fourth quarter for certain
wind energy products, and ramp up production in 2009. Demand for our castings is robust in wind
energy applications.
Corporate Items
Corporate expenses decreased to $13.4 million for the third quarter of 2008, compared to $18.5
million in the year-ago period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, corporate expenses
were $46.5 million compared to $56.9 million in the prior year-to-date period. Changes in
corporate expenses for the quarter and nine month periods are primarily due to lower expenses
associated with annual and long-term performance-based cash incentive compensation programs.
Net interest expense in the third quarter 2008 increased to $1.7 million from $0.1 million for
the same period last year. The increase in net interest expense was primarily due to less interest
income. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net interest expense was $2.8 million
compared to $7.0 million in the prior year-to-date period. The declines in net interest expense in
the nine months 2008 were primarily due to interest capitalization on capital projects offsetting
lower interest income. As a result of capitalization of interest costs, interest expense was
reduced by $17.7 million in the first nine months of 2008, and by $6.0 million in the first nine
months of 2007.
Other expense, net of gains on asset sales, includes charges incurred in connection with
closed operations, pretax gains and losses on the sale of surplus real estate and other assets, and
other non-operating income or expense. These items are presented primarily in selling and
administration expenses, and in other income (expense) in the statement of income and resulted in
other expense of $2.8 million for the third quarter of 2008 and $4.3 million for the third quarter
of 2007. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, other expense, net of gains on asset sales
was $6.7 million, compared to $10.9 million for the comparable 2007 period. The decreases for
the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2008 were primarily related to lower charges
for environmental costs at closed operations.
Retirement benefit expense decreased to $2.5 million in the third quarter 2008, compared to
$7.6 million in the third quarter 2007, primarily as a result of higher than expected returns on
plan assets in 2007 and the positive benefits of voluntary pension contributions made over the last
several years. In April 2008, we entered into a new five-year labor agreement with USW represented
employees at our ATI Wah Chang operation. As a result, retirement benefit expense will be
approximately $8 million for the full year 2008 due to the establishment of a VEBA for certain
post-retirement benefits. This expense is being recognized over the last three quarters of 2008,
with $2.3 million included in the third quarter 2008 and $5.4 million recorded year to date. For
the third quarter 2008, the amount of retirement benefit expense included in cost of sales was $1.6
million, and the amount included in selling and administrative expenses was $0.9 million. For the
third quarter 2007, the amount of retirement benefit
expense included in cost of sales was $4.8 million, and the amount included in selling and
administrative expenses was $2.8 million.
23
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, retirement expense was $5.8 million, compared to
$22.7 million in the same period of 2007. Retirement benefit expense increased cost of sales for
the nine months ended September 2008 by $3.4 million, and increased selling and administrative
expenses by $2.4 million. For the nine months ended September 2007, retirement benefit expenses
increased cost of sales by $14.9 million and increased selling and administrative expenses by $7.8
million.
As of September 30, 2008, our U.S. defined benefit pension plan was approximately 92% funded
which represents a decline in the funding level for this plan from the beginning of the year and
results primarily from a significant decline in the value of global equity and fixed income
investments held by the pension fund. If the value of the pension
plan investments remains at this
level at year-end, we would recognize a significant increase in pension expense in 2009 compared to
2008. We are not required to make cash contributions to our U.S. defined benefit pension plan for
2008. However, we expect to make a voluntary cash contribution of approximately $30 million in the
fourth quarter 2008 to improve the plans funded position.
Income Taxes
Results for the third quarter 2008 included a provision for income taxes of $83.9 million, or
36.8% of income before tax, for U.S. Federal, foreign and state income taxes. The third quarter
2007 included a provision of $100.1 million, or 34.0% of income before tax. For the first nine
months of 2008, the provision for income taxes was $243.0 million, or 34.8% of sales, compared to
$326.3 million, or 35.3% of sales, for the same period of 2007. The year to date 2008 tax
provision included a favorable one-time net tax benefit of $11.2 million, primarily associated with
tax refunds and credits related to prior years. The year to date 2007 tax provision included a
benefit of $12.1 million due to reductions in state deferred tax asset valuation allowances due to
increased state taxable income and the probability of realizing the corresponding state deferred
tax assets.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
We believe that internally generated funds, current cash on hand, and available borrowings
under existing credit lines will be adequate to meet foreseeable liquidity needs, including a
substantial expansion of our production capabilities over the next few years. We did not borrow
funds under our $400 million domestic senior unsecured credit facility during the first nine months
of 2008. However, a portion of this facility is utilized to support letters of credit.
Our ability to access the credit markets in the future to obtain additional financing, if
needed, may be influenced by our credit rating. As of September 30, 2008, Moodys Investor
Services senior unsecured debt rating for our Company was Baa3 with a stable outlook. As of
September 30, 2008, Standard & Poors Ratings Services corporate credit and senior unsecured debt
rating for our Company was BBB- with a stable outlook. Changes in our credit rating do not impact
our access to, or the cost of, our existing credit facilities.
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4) of SEC Regulation S-K.
Cash Flow and Working Capital
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, cash provided by operating activities was
$344.6 million, as operating earnings were partially offset by a $185.2 million increase in managed
working capital. Investing activities included capital expenditures of $365.1 million. Cash used
in financing activities was $331.5 million in the first nine months of 2008, and included purchases
of $241.8 million of the Companys common stock, dividend payments of $54.1 million, cash usage
related to the repurchase of shares to satisfy employee-owed taxes on share-based compensation of
$15.5 million, reductions in estimated federal and state income tax benefits from share-based
compensation of $9.0 million, and a reduction in borrowings of $12.2 million. At September 30,
2008, cash and cash equivalents totaled $272.6 million, a decrease of $350.7 million from year end
2007.
As part of managing the liquidity of our business, we focus on controlling managed working
capital, which is defined as gross accounts receivable and gross inventories, less accounts
payable. In measuring performance in controlling this managed working capital, we exclude the
effects of LIFO inventory valuation reserves, excess and obsolete inventory reserves, and reserves
for uncollectible accounts receivable which, due to their nature, are
managed separately. At September 30, 2008, managed working capital was 31.8% of annualized
sales, compared to 32.2% of annualized sales at December 31, 2007. During the first nine months of
2008, managed working capital increased by $185.2 million, to $1,811.7 million. The increase in
managed working capital since December 31, 2007 was due to increased accounts receivable of $92.5
million, which reflects the timing of sales in the third
24
quarter 2008 compared to the fourth
quarter 2007, and increased inventory of $119.7 million, mostly as a result of increased business
activity, which was partially offset by increased accounts payable of $27.0 million. While
accounts receivable and inventory balances have increased during third quarter 2008, days sales
outstanding, which measures actual collection timing for accounts receivable, have stayed
relatively constant. Gross inventory turns, which excludes the effect of LIFO inventory valuation
reserves, declined compared to year-end 2007, due primarily to a shift in mix to more value-added
products and the increase in Flat-Rolled Products segment inventory balances.
The components of managed working capital were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
$ |
744.5 |
|
|
$ |
652.2 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
1,083.9 |
|
|
|
916.1 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(414.4 |
) |
|
|
(388.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,414.0 |
|
|
|
1,179.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
LIFO reserves |
|
|
338.4 |
|
|
|
374.6 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital |
|
$ |
1,811.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,626.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized prior two months sales |
|
$ |
5,703.7 |
|
|
$ |
5,058.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed working capital as a
% of annualized sales |
|
|
31.8 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
Change in managed working capital from
December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
185.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Expenditures
In the 2008 first nine months, we spent $365 million on capital expenditures. We currently
expect ATI direct capital expenditures for 2008 to be approximately $470 million, with additional
capital expenditures related to STAL, our Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60%
interest, to be approximately $70 million. The STAL expansion is expected to be funded through
existing cash on-hand and internal cash flow of the joint venture plus bank credit lines of the
joint venture. The financial results of STAL are consolidated into our financial statements with
the 40% interest of our minority partner recognized as other income or expense in the consolidated
statements of income and as a liability in the consolidated statements of financial position.
We are significantly expanding our manufacturing capabilities to meet expected near-term and
long-term demand growth from the aerospace (engine and airframe) and defense, chemical process
industry, oil and gas, electrical energy, and medical markets, especially for titanium and
titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, specialty alloys, and exotic alloys.
These self-funded capital investments continue to progress and include:
|
|
The expansion of ATIs aerospace quality titanium sponge production capabilities, including
our titanium sponge facility in Albany, OR, and our greenfield premium-grade titanium sponge
facility in Rowley, UT. The last reduction furnace at our Albany facility went into operation
at the end of the first quarter 2008, which was ahead of schedule. With this approximately
$100 million capital investment, the Albany facility has the capacity to produce aerospace
quality titanium sponge at an annualized rate of 22 million pounds. Primarily due to the
announced push-outs in Boeings 787 ramp-up schedule, we now intend to begin initial
production at the Rowley, UT premium-grade sponge facility in the second quarter 2009. At
full production, this facility is expected to produce 24 million pounds of premium-grade
titanium sponge annually and will represent a total
capital investment of approximately $460 million. Upon completion of these titanium sponge
expansion projects, our annual sponge production capacity is projected to be 46 million pounds.
In addition, the Utah facility will have the infrastructure in place to further expand annual
capacity by approximately 18 million pounds, bringing the total annual capacity at that facility
to 42 million pounds, if needed. We expect to supplement our requirements with titanium sponge
and titanium scrap purchases from external sources. |
25
|
|
The expansion of ATIs melting capabilities for titanium and titanium-based alloys,
nickel-based alloys and superalloys, and specialty alloys. For titanium melting, four new
vacuum-arc remelt (VAR) furnaces are on line, and we expect one more titanium VAR furnace to
be customer qualified by the end of the fourth quarter 2008. VAR melting is a consumable
electrode re-melting process that improves the cleanliness and chemical homogeneity of the
alloys. Our third Plasma Arc Melt (PAM) premium titanium melt furnace is in production and has
completed conditional customer qualifications. We expect to have this PAM furnace qualified
for all products, including premium grade jet engine rotating quality products, during the
fourth quarter 2008. Plasma arc melting is a superior cold-hearth melting process for making
alloyed titanium products for jet engine rotating parts, medical applications, and other
critical applications. One new VAR furnace for nickel-based alloys and superalloys was
qualified and began commercial production in the first quarter of 2008. |
|
|
|
The expansion of ATIs mill products processing and finishing capabilities for titanium and
titanium-based alloys, nickel-based alloys and superalloys, and specialty alloys. Announced
projects include a $260 million expansion of our titanium and superalloy forging capacity at
our Bakers, NC facility through the addition of an integrated 10,000 ton press forge, 700mm
rotary forge, and conditioning, finishing and inspection facilities to produce large diameter
products needed for certain demanding applications. The conditioning, finishing and
inspection facilities began operations in the third quarter 2008, and the forging operations
are expected to be operational by the third quarter 2009. Forging is a hot-forming process
that produces wrought forging billet and forged machining bar from an ingot. In June 2008, we
commissioned the $60 million expansion of our titanium and specialty plate facility located in
Washington, PA. In addition to titanium and titanium alloys, ATIs specialty plate products
include duplex alloys, superaustenitic alloys, nickel-based alloys, zirconium alloys, armor
plate, and specialty and standard stainless grades. The Washington, PA expansion included
increasing reheat furnace, annealing, and flattening capacity at the existing plate mill,
expanding plate size capabilities, and implementing productivity improvements. |
|
|
|
A new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility. Our Board of Directors
approved, subject to satisfactory resolution of certain open issues, a strategic
investment in ATIs Flat-Rolled Products segment. The project is estimated to cost
approximately $1.16 billion and take four years to complete. This investment, which is
expected to be completed in 2012, is designed to produce exceptional quality, thinner, and
wider hot-rolled coils at reduced cost with shorter lead times, and require lower working
capital requirements. The return on investment should be more than 20% by 2014, including
estimated annual cost reductions of $120 million. ATI has tentatively chosen to locate the
advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility at its Brackenridge, PA site
pending resolution of certain open issues, including state and local approvals. When
completed, we believe ATIs new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility
will provide unsurpassed manufacturing capability and versatility in the production of a wide
range of flat-rolled specialty metals. We expect improved productivity, lower costs, and
higher quality for our diversified product mix of flat-rolled specialty metals, including
nickel-based and specialty alloys, titanium and titanium alloys, zirconium alloys, Precision
Rolled Strip® products, and stainless sheet and coiled plate products. Our new advanced
hot-rolling and processing facility is designed to be the most powerful mill in the world for
production of specialty metals. It is designed to roll and process exceptional quality hot
bands of up to 78.62 inches, or 2 meters, wide. |
|
|
|
In connection with the new advanced specialty metals hot rolling and processing facility,
we announced the consolidation of our Natrona, PA grain-oriented electrical steel melt shop
into ATIs Brackenridge, PA melt shop. This consolidation is expected to improve the overall
productivity of ATIs flat-rolled grain-oriented electrical steel and other stainless and
specialty alloys, and reduce the cost of producing slabs and ingots. The investment should
also result in significant reduction of particulate emissions. This consolidation is expected
to be completed in 2010. |
|
|
|
We are increasing our capacity to produce zirconium products through capital expansions of
zirconium sponge production and VAR melting. This new zirconium sponge and melting capacity
better positions ATI for the current and expected strong growth in demand from the nuclear
electrical energy and chemical process industry markets. |
As a result of these strategic investments, which are intended to be self-funded, ATIs annual
capital expenditures are currently expected to remain in the range of $500 to $600 million for 2009
through 2012.
Finally, our STAL joint venture commenced an expansion of its operations in Shanghai, China in
late 2006. This expansion, which is expected to more than triple STALs rolling and slitting
capacity to produce Precision Rolled
26
Strip® products, is estimated to cost approximately $110
million and is expected to be operational in the first quarter 2009.
Debt
At September 30, 2008, we had $515.9 million in total outstanding debt, compared to $528.2
million at December 31, 2007, a decrease of $12.3 million. The decrease in debt was primarily due
to scheduled debt maturity payments.
In managing our overall capital structure, some of the measures on which we focus are net debt
to total capitalization, which is the percentage of our debt, net of cash that may be available to
reduce borrowings, to our total invested and borrowed capital, and total debt to total
capitalization, which excludes cash balances. Net debt as a percentage of capitalization was 9.3%
at September 30, 2008, compared to a negative 4.5% at December 31, 2007, as cash on hand exceeded
total debt at the end of last year. The net debt to capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
515.9 |
|
|
$ |
528.2 |
|
Less: cash |
|
|
(272.6 |
) |
|
|
(623.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash) |
|
$ |
243.3 |
|
|
$ |
(95.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash) |
|
$ |
243.3 |
|
|
$ |
(95.1 |
) |
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,364.7 |
|
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
2,608.0 |
|
|
$ |
2,128.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net debt (cash) to capital ratio |
|
|
9.3 |
% |
|
|
(4.5 |
)% |
Total debt to total capitalization improved to 17.9% at September 30, 2008 from 19.2% at December
31, 2007. Total debt to total capitalization was determined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Total debt |
|
$ |
515.9 |
|
|
$ |
528.2 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
2,364.7 |
|
|
|
2,223.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital |
|
$ |
2,880.6 |
|
|
$ |
2,751.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt to total capital ratio |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
19.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We
did not borrow funds under our $400 million senior unsecured domestic credit facility
during the first nine months of 2008, although a portion of the facility has been utilized to
support the issuance of letters of credit. Outstanding letters of credit issued under the facility
at September 30, 2008 were approximately $14 million. In the 2008 third quarter, the Company
established a separate credit facility for the issuance of letters of credit. As of September 30,
2008, $28.6 million were outstanding under this credit facility.
STAL, our Chinese joint venture company in which ATI has a 60% interest, has a 741 million
renminbi (approximately $108 million at September 30, 2008 exchange rates) revolving credit
facility with a group of banks. This credit facility is supported solely by STALs financial
capability without any guarantees from the joint venture partners, and is intended to be utilized
in the future for the expansion of STALs operations, which are located in Shanghai, China. As of
September 30, 2008, there were no borrowings under this credit facility although STAL had
approximately $12 million in letters of credit outstanding related to the expansion of its
operations.
The ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the three months and nine months ended September
30, 2008 was 20.0 and 20.9, respectively.
Dividends
We paid a regular quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share of common stock on September 9, 2008
to stockholders of record at the close of business on August 22, 2008. The payment of dividends
and the amount of such dividends
27
depends upon matters deemed relevant by our Board of Directors,
such as our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, future prospects, any
limitations imposed by law, credit agreements or senior securities, and other factors deemed
relevant and appropriate.
Share Repurchase Program
On November 1, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program of $500
million. Repurchases of Company common stock have been, and are expected to be made on the open
market or in unsolicited or privately negotiated transactions. Share repurchases have been, and are
expected to be funded from internal cash flow and cash on hand. The number of shares to be
purchased, and the timing of the purchases, will be based on several factors, including other
investment opportunities, the level of cash balances, and general business conditions. During the
third quarter 2008, 3,400,000 shares of common stock were purchased at a cost of $153.4 million
under this program. For the first nine months of 2008, 4,712,200 shares of common stock were
purchased at a cost of $241.8 million. As of September 30, 2008, 5.4 million shares of common
stock had been purchased under this program at a cost of $303.1 million.
Critical Accounting Policies
Inventory
At September 30, 2008, we had net inventory of $1,083.9 million. Inventories are stated at the
lower of cost (last-in, first-out (LIFO), first-in, first-out (FIFO) and average cost methods) or
market, less progress payments. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable
manufacturing and engineering overhead, and other direct costs. Most of our inventory is valued
utilizing the LIFO costing methodology. Inventory of our non-U.S. operations is valued using
average cost or FIFO methods. Under the LIFO inventory valuation method, changes in the cost of raw
materials and production activities are recognized in cost of sales in the current period even
though these material and other costs may have been incurred at significantly different values due
to the length of time of our production cycle. The prices for many of the raw materials we use have
been volatile. Since we value most of our inventory utilizing the LIFO inventory costing
methodology, a rise in raw material costs has a negative effect on our operating results, while
conversely, a fall in material costs results in a benefit to operating results. For example, in
2007, the effect of falling raw material costs on our LIFO inventory valuation method resulted in
cost of sales which was $92.1 million lower than would have been recognized if we utilized the FIFO
methodology to value our inventory. In a period of rising prices, cost of sales expense recognized
under LIFO is generally higher than the cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold.
Conversely, in a period of declining raw material prices, cost of sales recognized under LIFO is
generally lower than cash costs incurred to acquire the inventory sold.
Since the LIFO inventory valuation methodology is designed for annual determination, interim
estimates of the annual LIFO valuation are required. We recognize the effects of the LIFO
inventory valuation method on an interim basis by projecting the expected annual LIFO cost and
allocating that projection to the interim quarters equally. These projections of annual LIFO
inventory valuation reserve changes are updated quarterly and are evaluated based upon material,
labor and overhead costs and projections for such costs at the end of the year plus projections
regarding year-end inventory levels.
The LIFO inventory valuation methodology is not utilized by many of the companies with which
we compete, including foreign competitors. As such, our results of operations may not be
comparable to those of our competitors during periods of volatile material costs due, in part, to
the differences between the LIFO inventory valuation method and other acceptable inventory
valuation methods.
We evaluate product lines on a quarterly basis to identify inventory values that exceed
estimated net realizable value. The calculation of a resulting reserve, if any, is recognized as
an expense in the period that the need for the reserve is identified. At September 30, 2008, no
such reserves were required. It is our general policy to write-down
to scrap value any inventory that is identified as obsolete and any inventory that has aged or has
not moved in more than twelve months. In some instances this criterion is up to twenty-four months
due to the longer manufacturing and distribution process for such products.
Retirement Benefits
We have defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans covering substantially all of
our employees. We account for our defined benefit pension plans in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 87, Employers Accounting for Pensions (FAS 87), as amended
by FAS 158 regarding the balance sheet
28
presentation of pension assets and liabilities. These
accounting standards require that amounts recognized in financial statements be determined on an
actuarial basis, rather than as contributions are made to the plan. A significant element in
determining our pension (expense) income in accordance with these standards is the expected
investment return on plan assets. In establishing the expected return on plan investments, which is
reviewed annually in the fourth quarter, we take into consideration input from our third party
pension plan asset managers and actuaries regarding the types of securities the plan assets are
invested in, how those investments have performed historically, and expectations for how those
investments will perform in the future. We apply this assumed rate to the market value of plan
assets at the end of the previous year. This produces the expected return on plan assets that is
included in annual pension (expense) income for the current year. The cumulative difference between
this expected return and the actual return on plan assets is deferred and amortized into pension
income or expense over future periods. The amount of expected return on plan assets can vary
significantly from year-to-year since the calculation is dependent on the market value of plan
assets as of the end of the preceding year. U.S. generally accepted accounting principles allow
companies to calculate the expected return on pension assets using either an average of fair market
values of pension assets over a period not to exceed five years, which reduces the volatility in
reported pension income or expense, or their fair market value at the end of the previous year.
However, the Securities and Exchange Commission currently does not permit companies to change from
the fair market value at the end of the previous year methodology, which is the methodology that we
use, to an averaging of fair market values of plan assets methodology. As a result, our results of
operations and those of other companies, including companies with which we compete, may not be
comparable due to these different methodologies in calculating the expected return on pension
investments.
Our expected return on pension plan investments for 2008 and each of the past four years has
been 8.75%. While the actual return on pension plan assets was 10.9% for 2007, 18.2% for 2006, 9.7%
for 2005, 11.7% for 2004, the return on pension plan assets through the first nine months of 2008
has been significantly negative due to the performance of the global equity and fixed income
markets. If the value of pension plan investments remains at these depressed levels at year-end,
we would recognize a significant increase in pension expense in 2009 compared to 2008.
In accordance with changes in the accounting standards, we will determine the discount rate to
be used to value pension plan liabilities as of the end of 2008. Previously, we had used November
30th as our measurement date. The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the
pension liabilities could be effectively settled. In estimating this rate, we receive input from
our actuaries regarding the rates of return on high quality, fixed-income investments with
maturities matched to the expected future retirement benefit payments. Based on this assessment at
the end of November 2007, we established a discount rate of 6.25% for valuing the pension
liabilities as of the end of 2007, and for determining the pension expense for 2008. We had
previously assumed a discount rate of 5.8% for 2006, which determined the 2007 expense, 5.9% for
2005, which determined the 2006 expense, and 6.1% for 2004, which determined the 2005 expense. The
estimated effect of changing the discount rate by 0.50%, would decrease pension liabilities in the
case of an increase in the discount rate, or increase pension liabilities in the case of a decrease
in the discount rate by approximately $100 million. Such a change in the discount rate would
decrease pension expense in the case of an increase in the discount rate, or increase pension
expense in the case of a decrease in the discount rate by approximately $8 million. The effect on
pension liabilities for changes to the discount rate, as well as the net effect of other changes in
actuarial assumptions and experience, are deferred and amortized over future periods in accordance
with the accounting standards.
We also sponsor several postretirement plans covering certain hourly and salaried employees
and retirees. These plans provide health care and life insurance benefits for eligible employees.
Under most of the plans, our contributions towards premiums are capped based upon the cost as of
certain dates, thereby creating a defined contribution. For the non-collectively bargained plans,
we maintain the right to amend or terminate the plans in the future. We account for these benefits
in accordance with FAS No. 106, Employers Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other Than
Pensions (FAS 106), as amended by FAS 158, which requires that amounts recognized in
financial statements be determined on an actuarial basis, rather than as benefits are paid. We
use actuarial assumptions, including the discount rate and the expected trend in health care costs,
to estimate the costs and benefit obligations for the plans. The discount rate, which is determined
annually at the end of each year, is developed based upon rates of return on high quality,
fixed-income investments. At the end of 2007, we determined this rate to be 6.25%, compared to a
5.8% discount rate in 2007, 5.9% discount rate in 2005, and 6.1% discount rate in 2004. The
estimated effect of changing the discount rate by 0.50%, would decrease postretirement obligations
in the case of an increase in the discount rate, or increase postretirement obligations in the case
of a decrease in the discount rate by approximately $18 million. Such a change in the discount rate
would decrease postretirement benefit expense in the
29
case of an increase in the discount rate, or
increase postretirement benefit expense in the case of a decrease in the discount rate by
approximately $0.5 million.
Certain of these postretirement benefits are funded using plan investments held in a
Company-administered VEBA trust. The expected return on plan investments is a significant element
in determining postretirement benefits expenses in accordance with accounting standards. In
establishing the expected return on plan investments, which is reviewed annually in the fourth
quarter, we take into consideration the types of securities the plan assets are invested in, how
those investments have performed historically, and expectations for how those investments will
perform in the future. For 2008, our expected return on investments held in the VEBA trust was 9%
which is higher than the return expected on pension plan investments due to a higher percentage of
private equity investments held by the VEBA trust. This assumed long-term rate of return on
investments is applied to the market value of plan assets at the end of the previous year. This
produces the expected return on plan investments that is included in annual postretirement benefits
expenses for the current year. While the actual return on investments held in the VEBA trust was
16.9% in 2007, 50.0% in 2006, 11.6% in both 2005 and 2004, the returns on investments through the
first nine months of 2008 have been significantly negative. If the value of VEBA trust investments
remains at the September 30, 2008 level, we would recognize increased retirement benefit expense in
2009 compared to 2008.
The accounting standards require that the net funded position of the plans, as measured by the
projected benefit obligation (PBO) in the case of pension plans, and by the accumulated
postretirement benefit obligation (APBO) in the case of other postretirement benefit plans, be
recognized as an asset or liability in the employers balance sheet. The funding status of the
plans, as recognized on the balance sheet, is adjusted each year at the end of the year for
changes. The funded status of the plans is highly dependent upon the market value of plan
investments at the end of year and the discount rate assumptions used to value benefit plan
obligations. As of September 30, 2008, the Companys balance sheet included a $266.4 million
prepaid pension asset which represented the overfunded position of pension plan as of the end of
2007, and a $470.1 million liability for long-term retirement benefits, primarily postretirement
benefit plans. As of September 30, 2008, our U.S. defined benefit pension plan was approximately
92% funded which represents a significant decline in value of equity investments held by the
pension fund. If the value of pension plan investments remains at this level, or declines further
at 2008 year-end, we would be required to adjust the funded position of plan recognized on the
balance sheet to eliminate the prepaid pension asset and establish a liability for the funded
position of the pension plan utilizing the values of plan assets and liabilities as of at the end
of the 2008. Any such adjustment in funded status, net of deferred taxes, would be recognized as a
reduction in stockholders equity.
Other Critical Accounting Policies
A summary of other significant accounting policies is discussed in Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 to the consolidated
financial statements contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
The preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles requires us to make judgments, estimates and assumptions regarding
uncertainties that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities. Significant areas of
uncertainty that require judgments, estimates and assumptions include the accounting for
derivatives, retirement plans, income taxes, environmental and other contingencies as well as asset
impairment, inventory valuation and collectability of accounts receivable. We use historical and
other information that we consider to be relevant to make these judgments and estimates. However,
actual results may differ from those estimates and assumptions that are used to prepare our
financial statements.
30
New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted
In the first quarter 2008, as required, we began the adoption process for the change in
measurement date provisions of FASB Statement No. 158, Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans (FAS 158), which amended the standards for defined
benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans accounting. These provisions require assets
and benefits to be measured at the date of the employers statement of financial position, which is
December 31 in our case, rather than our measurement date of November 30, as was previously
permitted. The adoption of these provisions did not have a material effect on our financial
statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). This
Standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting
pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, but does not require any new fair
value measurements. The Standard covers financial assets and liabilities, as well as for any other
assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in financial statements.
FAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 for financial assets and
liabilities, and for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008 for other nonfinancial assets
and liabilities. The adoption of FAS 157 for financial assets and liabilities did not have a
material impact on our financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (FAS
159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities. FAS 159 permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. If the fair
value option is elected, unrealized gains and losses will be recognized in earnings at each
subsequent reporting date. FAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.
The adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on our financial statements.
Pending New Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (FAS
161), Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. FAS 161 amends and
expands the disclosure requirements of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. It requires qualitative disclosures
about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value
amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related
contingent features in derivative agreements. This statement is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal periods beginning after November 15, 2008. We will include the required
disclosures beginning with our 2009 financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (FAS 160),
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. FAS 160 changes the classification
of noncontrolling (minority) interests on the balance sheet and the accounting for and reporting of
transactions between the reporting entity and holders of such noncontrolling interests. Under the
new standard, noncontrolling interests are considered equity and are to be reported as an element
of stockholders equity rather than within the mezzanine or liability sections of the balance
sheet. In addition, the current practice of reporting minority interest expense or benefit also
will change. Under the new standard, net income will encompass the total income before minority
interest expense. The income statement will include separate disclosure of the attribution of
income between the controlling and noncontrolling interests. Increases and decreases in the
noncontrolling ownership interest amount are to be accounted for as equity transactions. FAS 160 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and earlier application is
prohibited. Upon adoption, the balance sheet and the income statement will be recast
retrospectively for the presentation of noncontrolling interests. The other accounting provisions
of the statement are required to be adopted prospectively. We are currently evaluating the impact
of adopting FAS 160, including the reporting of the minority interest in our STAL joint venture, on
our financial statements. As of September 30, 2008, other long-term liabilities included $67
million for minority interest in our STAL joint venture, which will be reported as an element of
stockholders equity upon adoption of FAS 160.
Forward-Looking and Other Statements
From time to time, we have made and may continue to make forward-looking statements within
the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain statements in this
report relate to future events and expectations and, as such, constitute forward-looking
statements. Forward-looking statements include those containing such words as anticipates,
believes, estimates, expects, would, should, will, will likely result, forecast,
outlook, projects, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on
31
managements current expectations and include known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors, many of which we are unable to predict or control, that may cause our actual results,
performance or achievements to materially differ from those expressed or implied in the
forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements include: (a) material adverse changes in economic or
industry conditions generally, including credit market conditions and related issues, and global
supply and demand conditions and prices for our specialty metals; (b) material adverse changes in
the markets we serve, including the aerospace and defense, construction and mining, automotive,
electrical energy, chemical process industry, oil and gas, medical and other markets; (c) our
inability to achieve the level of cost savings, productivity improvements, synergies, growth or
other benefits anticipated by management, including those anticipated from strategic investments
and the integration of acquired businesses, whether due to significant increases in energy, raw
materials or employee benefits costs, the possibility of project cost overruns or unanticipated
costs and expenses, or other factors; (d) volatility of prices and availability of supply of the
raw materials that are critical to the manufacture of our products; (e) declines in the value of
our defined benefit pension plan assets or unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that govern
pension plan funding; (f) significant legal proceedings or investigations adverse to us; and
(g) the other risk factors summarized in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007, and other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We assume
no duty to update our forward-looking statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As part of our risk management strategy, we utilize derivative financial instruments, from
time to time, to hedge our exposure to changes in raw material prices, foreign currencies, and
interest rates. We monitor the third-party financial institutions which are our counterparty to
these financial instruments on a daily basis and diversify our transactions among counterparties to
minimize exposure to any one of these entities.
Interest Rate Risk. We attempt to maintain a reasonable balance between fixed- and floating-rate
debt to keep financing costs as low as possible. At September 30, 2008, we had approximately $52
million of floating rate debt outstanding with a weighted average interest rate of approximately
4.2%. Approximately $31 million of this floating rate debt is capped at a 6% maximum interest rate.
Since the interest rate on floating rate debt changes with the short-term market rate of interest,
we are exposed to the risk that these interest rates may increase, raising our interest expense in
situations where the interest rate is not capped. For example, a
hypothetical 1% increase in the rate of
interest on the $21 million of our outstanding floating rate debt not subjected to a cap would
result in increased annual financing costs of approximately $0.2 million.
Volatility of Energy Prices. Energy resources markets are subject to conditions that create
uncertainty in the prices and availability of energy resources. The prices for and availability of
electricity, natural gas, oil and other energy resources are subject to volatile market conditions.
These market conditions often are affected by political and economic factors beyond our control.
Increases in energy costs, or changes in costs relative to energy costs paid by competitors, have
and may continue to adversely affect our profitability. To the extent that these uncertainties
cause suppliers and customers to be more cost sensitive, increased energy prices may have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We use approximately 10 to 12
million MMBtus of natural gas annually, depending upon business conditions, in the manufacture of
our products. These purchases of natural gas expose us to risk of higher gas prices. For example, a
hypothetical $1.00 per MMBtu increase in the price of natural gas would result in increased annual
energy costs of approximately $10 to $12 million. We use several approaches to minimize any
material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations from volatile energy
prices. These approaches include incorporating an energy surcharge on many of our products and
using financial derivatives to reduce exposure to energy price volatility.
At September 30, 2008, the outstanding financial derivatives used to hedge our exposure to
natural gas cost volatility represented approximately 30% of our forecasted requirements for the
next three years. The net mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding hedges at September 30,
2008 was an unrealized pre-tax loss of $7.9 million, of which $6.6 million was presented in accrued
liabilities on the balance sheet with the remainder included in other long-term liabilities. The
effects of the hedging activity will be recognized in income over the designated hedge periods.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the effects of natural gas hedging activity reduced
cost of sales by $6.6 million.
32
Volatility of Raw Material Prices. We use raw materials surcharge and index mechanisms to offset
the impact of increased raw material costs; however, competitive factors in the marketplace can
limit our ability to institute such mechanisms, and there can be a delay between the increase in
the price of raw materials and the realization of the benefit of such mechanisms. For example, in
2007 we used approximately 80 million pounds of nickel; therefore a hypothetical change of $1.00
per pound in nickel prices would result in increased costs of approximately $80 million. In
addition, in 2007 we also used approximately 500 million pounds of ferrous scrap in the production
of our flat-rolled products and a hypothetical change of $0.01 per pound would result in increased
costs of approximately $5 million. While we enter into raw materials futures contracts from
time-to-time to hedge exposure to price fluctuations, such as for nickel, we cannot be certain that
our hedge position adequately reduces exposure. We believe that we have adequate controls to
monitor these contracts, but we may not be able to accurately assess exposure to price volatility
in the markets for critical raw materials.
The majority of our products are sold utilizing raw material surcharges and index mechanisms.
However as of September 30, 2008, we had entered into financial hedging arrangements at the request
of our customers related to firm orders for approximately 9% of our total annual nickel
requirements. Any gain or loss associated with these hedging arrangements is included in the
selling price to the customer requesting the hedge over the designated hedge period. At September
30, 2008, the net mark-to-market valuation of these outstanding hedges was an unrealized pre-tax
loss of $21.8 million, of which $20.2 million is included in accrued liabilities on the balance
sheet with the remainder included in other long-term liabilities.
Foreign Currency Risk. Foreign currency exchange contracts are used, from time-to-time, to limit
transactional exposure to changes in currency exchange rates. We sometimes purchase foreign
currency forward contracts that permit us to sell specified amounts of foreign currencies expected
to be received from our export sales for pre-established U.S. dollar amounts at specified dates.
The forward contracts are denominated in the same foreign currencies in which export sales are
denominated. These contracts are designated as hedges of the variability in cash flows of a portion
of the forecasted future export sales transactions which otherwise would expose the Company to
foreign currency risk. In addition, we may also designate cash balances held in foreign currencies
as hedges of forecasted foreign currency transactions. At September 30, 2008, the net
mark-to-market valuation of the outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was an unrealized
pre-tax gain of $8.6 million, of which $2.1 million is included in other current assets on the
balance sheet with the remainder included in other long-term assets.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures as of September 30, 2008, and they concluded that these controls and
procedures are effective.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection
with the evaluation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30,
2008, conducted by our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, that occurred during
the quarter ended September 30, 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
A number of lawsuits, claims and proceedings have been or may be asserted against the Company
relating to the conduct of its business, including those pertaining to product liability, patent
infringement, commercial, government contracting, employment, employee benefits, environmental and
health and safety, and stockholder matters. Certain of such lawsuits, claims and proceedings are
described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and addressed in
Note 11 to the unaudited interim financial statements included herein. While the outcome of
litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, and some of these lawsuits, claims or proceedings
may be determined adversely to the Company, management does not believe that the disposition of any
such pending matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition or liquidity, although the
33
resolution in any reporting period of one or more of these matters could have a material
adverse effect on the Companys results of operations for that period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the risk factors and other information set forth in this report, you should
carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which could materially affect our business,
financial condition or future results. The risks described below or in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are
not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to
us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition and/or operating results.
Cyclical Demand for Products. The cyclical nature of the industries in which our customers operate
causes demand for our products to be cyclical, creating potential uncertainty regarding future
profitability. Various changes in general economic conditions may affect the industries in which
our customers operate. These changes could include decreases in the rate of consumption or use of
our customers products due to economic downturns. Other factors that may cause fluctuation in our
customers positions are changes in market demand, lower overall pricing due to domestic and
international overcapacity, currency fluctuations, lower priced imports and increases in use or
decreases in prices of substitute materials. As a result of these factors, our profitability has
been and may in the future be subject to significant fluctuations.
Worldwide economic conditions have recently deteriorated significantly and may remain
depressed, or could worsen, in the foreseeable future. These conditions may have a material
adverse effect on demand for our customers products and, in turn, on demand for our products. If
these conditions persist or worsen, our results of operations and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected.
Risks
Associated with the Commercial Aerospace Industry. A significant portion of the sales of our High
Performance Metals segment represents products sold to customers in the commercial aerospace
industry. The commercial aerospace industry has historically been cyclical due to factors both
external and internal to the airline industry. These factors include general economic conditions,
airline profitability, consumer demand for air travel, varying fuel and labor costs, price
competition, and international and domestic political conditions such as military conflict and the
threat of terrorism. The length and degree of cyclical fluctuation are influenced by these factors
and therefore are difficult to predict with certainty. Demand for our products in this segment is
subject to these cyclical trends. A downturn in the commercial aerospace industry would adversely
affect the prices at which we are able to sell these and other products, and our results of
operations, business and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
The Boeing Company, with which we have a long-term titanium supply agreement, has
experienced a labor strike that has prevented it from building new aircraft, and has experienced
delays in the introduction of its new 787 aircraft. These conditions have created uncertainty in
the aerospace supply chain generally and, if they persist for a significant length of time, could
have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. On October 27, 2008, it was announced
that tentative terms for a labor contract had been reached between Boeing and the International
Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers.
Risks Associated with Retirement Benefits. Our U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan
was fully funded in accordance with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act
of 1974 (ERISA), and the Internal Revenue Code, as of December 31, 2007. Based upon current
analyses and forecasts, we do not expect to be required to make contributions to the defined
benefit pension plan for at least the next several years. However, a significant decline in the
value of plan investments in the future or unfavorable changes in laws or regulations that govern
pension plan funding could materially change the timing and amount of required pension funding.
Depending on the timing and amount, a requirement that we fund our defined benefit pension plan
could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
As of September 30, 2008, our U.S. defined benefit pension plan was approximately 92% funded,
which represents a decline in the funding level for this plan from the beginning of the year and
results primarily from a significant decline in the value of equity investments held by the pension
plan. If the value of pension plan investments remains at this depressed level at year-end, or
further deteriorates, we would recognize a significant increase in pension expense in 2009 compared
to 2008.
34
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Set forth below is information regarding the Companys stock repurchases during the period covered
by this report, including repurchases under the $500 million share repurchase program approved by
the Companys Board of Directors on November 1, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number (or |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares (or Units) |
|
Value) of Shares (or |
|
|
of Shares (or |
|
Average Price |
|
Purchased as Part of |
|
Units) that May Yet Be |
|
|
Units) |
|
Paid per Share |
|
Publicly Announced |
|
Purchased Under the |
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
(or Unit) |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
Plans or Programs |
|
July 1-31, 2008 |
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
$ |
46.37 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
$ |
331,813,014 |
|
August 1-31, 2008 |
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
47.38 |
|
|
|
1,800,000 |
|
|
|
246,522,584 |
|
September 1-30, 2008 |
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
41.32 |
|
|
|
1,200,000 |
|
|
|
196,942,094 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
45.12 |
|
|
|
3,400,000 |
|
|
$ |
196,942,094 |
|
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Exhibits
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Administrative Rules for the Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock
Program, effective as of May 2, 2007 and as amended through August 1, 2008 (filed
herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K for the
event dated August 1, 2008 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a) (filed herewith). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 (filed herewith). |
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
ALLEGHENY TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
|
Date: October 31, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Richard J. Harshman
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Harshman |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: October 31, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Dale G. Reid
|
|
|
|
Dale G. Reid |
|
|
|
Vice President, Controller and
Chief Accounting
Officer and Treasurer
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
|
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
10.1 |
|
Administrative Rules for the Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock
Program, effective as of May 2, 2007 and as amended through August 1, 2008 (filed
herewith). |
|
10.2 |
|
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Program (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K for the
event dated August 1, 2008 (File No. 1-12001)). |
|
12.1 |
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Securities and
Exchange Commission Rule 13a 14(a) or 15d 14(a). |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. |
37