e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2007
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-14773
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
DELAWARE
|
|
75-2230700 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(IRS Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
2300 WEST PLANO PARKWAY
PLANO, TEXAS
75075
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(972) 577-0000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or
a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
þ Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of registrants common stock outstanding as of October 26, 2007: 123,429,318 shares of Class A Common Stock and no shares of Class B Common Stock.
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2007
INDEX
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 AND DECEMBER 31, 2006
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
ASSETS |
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
133 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
783 |
|
Property, equipment and purchased software, net |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
220 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
463 |
|
Deferred contract costs, net |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Accrued and other current liabilities |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
301 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
Non-current deferred revenue |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
627 |
|
|
|
476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
577 |
|
|
|
533 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
654 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
Treasury stock |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,240 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,867 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
1
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 AND 2006
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions, except per share data) |
Revenue |
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
1,880 |
|
|
$ |
1,697 |
|
Direct cost of services |
|
|
542 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
1,556 |
|
|
|
1,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
277 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Provision (benefit) for income taxes |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per
share of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, Class A |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Basic, Class B |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Diluted, Class B |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding (in thousands): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic, Class A |
|
|
122,391 |
|
|
|
118,729 |
|
|
|
121,577 |
|
|
|
118,378 |
|
Basic and diluted, Class B |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
125,315 |
|
|
|
121,817 |
|
|
|
124,967 |
|
|
|
121,821 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
2
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2007 AND 2006
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Impairment of assets |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Change in deferred taxes |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other non-cash items |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities (net of effects from acquisitions of businesses): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Deferred contract costs, net |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
16 |
|
Accrued compensation |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other current and non-current assets |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Other current and non-current liabilities |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, equipment and purchased software |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Acquisitions of businesses, net |
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
Net proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
733 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation arrangements |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Purchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
175 |
|
|
$ |
197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1. GENERAL
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The
interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the consolidated accounts of Perot
Systems Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries and all significant intercompany transactions
have been eliminated. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring
adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial position, results of operations and
cash flows for the interim periods presented have been made. Certain information and footnote
disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and
regulations. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2006, in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the
SEC on February 28, 2007. Operating results for the three and nine month periods ended September
30, 2007, are not necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2007.
Financial instruments
The carrying amounts reflected in our condensed consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash
equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and short-term and
long-term debt approximate their respective fair values. Fair values are based primarily on
current prices for those or similar instruments.
Derivative Financial Instruments
As part of our risk management strategy, we enter into derivative contracts to mitigate certain
financial risks related to foreign currencies and interest rates. We have a risk management policy
outlining the conditions under which we can enter into financial derivative transactions. To date,
our use of derivative financial instruments has been limited to interest rate swaps, which hedges
our exposure to floating rates on certain portions of our debt, and forward contracts and zero cost
collars that hedge our foreign currency exposure, primarily in the Indian Rupee.
In the third quarter of 2007, we began designating certain derivative instruments as cash flow
hedges in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. FAS 133 provides for
matching the gains and losses associated with the change in fair value of the hedged assets or
liabilities with the period in which the derivative instruments matures.
Our policy requires us to document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items,
as well as our risk management objective and strategy for entering into economic hedges. We also
assess, at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are
used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of
hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future
periods. Our inability to demonstrate effectiveness would cause the hedge to be ineffective.
Changes in fair value of a derivative that is highly effective, documented, designated, and
qualified as a cash flow hedge, to the extent the hedge is highly effective, are recorded in other
comprehensive income until earnings are impacted by the variability of the hedged transaction. Any
hedge ineffectiveness, which represents the amount by which the changes in the fair value of the
derivative do not offset the change in the cash flow of the forecasted transaction, is recorded in
earnings.
We will discontinue hedge accounting prospectively when (1) we determine that the derivative is no
longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the underlying exposure
being hedged; (2) the derivative matures, or is sold, terminated or exercised; or (3) we determine
that designating the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate. When hedge accounting is
discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, we carry the derivative at its estimated fair
value on the balance sheet and recognize changes in the fair value in current period earnings. If
a cash flow hedge becomes ineffective, any deferred gains or losses on the cash flow hedge would be
reversed out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and recognized immediately in other
income, net on the condensed consolidated income statements.
For financial derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting or for which we have not elected
to apply hedge accounting, the changes in fair values are recognized in other income, net.
4
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Significant accounting standards to be adopted
FASB Statement No. 157
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting
Standard (FAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which provides guidance for using fair value to
measure assets and liabilities. FAS 157 will apply whenever another standard requires or permits
assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair
value to any new circumstances. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. Our adoption of FAS 157 is not expected to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
FASB Statement No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which expands the use of
fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards which require assets and liabilities
to be carried at fair value. Under FAS 159, a company may elect to use fair value to measure
accounts and loans receivable, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities, equity method
investments, accounts payable, guarantees, issued debt and other eligible financial instruments.
FAS 159 is effective for years beginning after November 15, 2007. Our potential adoption of FAS 159
is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 2. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
As of
September 30, 2007, we have outstanding forward contracts with third parties. We have elected
hedge accounting under FAS 133 for certain foreign currency
derivatives and designated them as cash flow
hedges. The remaining foreign currency derivatives are being marked to market, with changes in fair
value being reported in other income, net in the condensed consolidated income statements. As of
September 30, 2007, the notional amount of foreign currency
derivatives outstanding totaled 7.4 billion
Indian rupees (approximately $186 million), of which
5.6 billion Indian rupees (approximately $142 million) relate to derivatives for which we elected
hedge accounting. These derivatives expire at various dates over
the next eighteen months. At September 30, 2007, the estimated net amount of existing gains that
is expected to be reclassified into earnings within the next 12 months is $1 million. Upon
termination of these contracts, we will purchase Indian rupees at the exchange rates specified in
the forward agreements to pay our operating costs in India. As of September 30, 2007, the
unrealized gain on our foreign currency hedges, reflected in accumulated other comprehensive
income, was approximately $3 million ($2 million, net of tax).
On August 31, 2007, we entered into two interest rate swaps, for which we elected hedge accounting
under FAS 133 and designated them as cash flow hedges. The first interest rate swap converted $75
million of our borrowings under our credit facility from a variable-rate instrument into a
fixed-rate instrument with an interest rate of 5.28%. The second interest rate swap converted an
additional $55 million of our borrowings under our credit facility from a variable-rate instrument
into a fixed-rate instrument with an interest rate of 5.33%. As of September 30, 2007, the
unrealized loss on our interest rate swaps currency hedges, reflected in accumulated other
comprehensive income, was approximately $500,000 ($300,000, net of tax).
NOTE 3. ACQUISITIONS
On February 28, 2006, we acquired substantially all of the assets of eServ, LLC, a provider of
project engineering outsourcing services. During the second quarter of 2007, we determined that
eServ LLC, met their financial targets for 2006 and we paid $4 million of additional consideration
in cash, which was recorded as goodwill on the consolidated balance sheet. The goodwill was
assigned to the Industry Solutions segment and is deductible for tax purposes.
On January 30, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of QSS Group, Inc. (QSS), an
information technology services company providing services to the U.S. federal government. As a
result of the acquisition, we have gained several significant government-wide contracts and
expanded both the scope of services and the areas we serve within the Department of Homeland
Security and the Department of Defense. The initial purchase price for QSS was $248 million (net of
$1 million of cash acquired), $30 million of which is being held in an escrow account for up to
approximately 18 months for potential purchase price adjustments. The
purchase price was partially funded by $75 million borrowed under our existing credit facility. The
results of operations of QSS and the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are
included in our condensed consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date. The
allocation of the QSS purchase consideration to the assets and liabilities acquired, including
goodwill, has not been concluded due to a potential contractual purchase price adjustment relating
to working capital targets. The fair value of the
5
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
acquired intangible assets totaled $50 million,
resulting in the estimated excess purchase price over net assets acquired of $172 million. This
amount was recorded as goodwill on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, was assigned to the
Government Services segment and is deductible for tax purposes.
The following table summarizes the adjusted fair values of the QSS assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition, which was January 30, 2007 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
61 |
|
Property, equipment and purchased software, net |
|
|
1 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
172 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid as of September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
249 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects pro forma combined results of operations as if the acquisition had
taken place at the beginning of the calendar year for each of the periods presented and includes
amortization expense for identifiable intangible assets that were acquired (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
659 |
|
|
$ |
1,905 |
|
|
$ |
1,915 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share, Class A |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share, Class B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share, Class B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.58 |
|
|
|
0.42 |
|
In our opinion, the unaudited pro forma combined results of operations are not indicative of the
actual results that would have occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of
2007 or 2006, nor are they indicative of future operations of the combined companies under our
ownership and management.
On August 31, 2007, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of JJ Wild Holdings, Inc., and its
subsidiary, JJ Wild, Inc. (collectively, JJ Wild), an information technology services company
providing services to the hospital market and also the preferred provider of integrated healthcare
delivery solutions for organizations using the MEDITECH Healthcare Information System.
The acquisition of JJ Wild adds to the capabilities of Perot Systems MEDITECH Solution Center and
enables the company to expand and enhance its MEDITECH service offerings. The initial purchase
price for JJ Wild was $86 million (net of $5 million of cash acquired), $9 million of which is
being held in an escrow account for up to 18 months for potential purchase price adjustments. The
purchase price was partially funded by $55 million borrowed under our existing credit facility. The
results of operations of JJ Wild and the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are
included in our condensed consolidated financial statements beginning on the acquisition date. The
allocation of the JJ Wild purchase consideration to the assets and liabilities acquired, including
goodwill, has not been concluded due to the pending completion of tangible and intangible asset
appraisals. As of September 30, 2007, the estimated fair value of the acquired intangible assets
totaled $11 million, resulting in the estimated excess purchase price over net
assets acquired of $80 million. This amount was recorded as goodwill on the condensed consolidated
balance sheets, was assigned to the Industry Solutions segment and is not deductible for tax
purposes.
6
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following table summarizes the adjusted fair values of the JJ Wild assets acquired and the
liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition, which was August 31, 2007 (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
22 |
|
Property, equipment and purchased software, net |
|
|
1 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
80 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total consideration paid as of September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
The following table reflects pro forma combined results of operations as if the acquisition had
taken place at the beginning of the calendar year for each of the periods presented and includes an
estimate of amortization expense for identifiable intangible assets that were acquired (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Revenue |
|
$ |
670 |
|
|
$ |
601 |
|
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
|
$ |
1,755 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
Net income |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share, Class A |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share, Class B |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share, Class B |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.55 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
In our opinion, the unaudited pro forma combined results of operations are not indicative of the
actual results that would have occurred had the acquisition been consummated at the beginning of
2007 or 2006, nor are they indicative of future operations of the combined companies under our
ownership and management.
NOTE 4. GOODWILL
The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, by
reporting segment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
Industry |
|
Government |
|
Applications |
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
Services |
|
Solutions |
|
Total |
|
|
(in millions) |
Balance as of December 31, 2006
|
|
|
$255 |
|
|
|
$128 |
|
|
|
$80 |
|
|
|
$463 |
|
Goodwill resulting from QSS acquisition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
Goodwill resulting from JJ Wild acquisition
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
Other
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of September 30, 2007
|
|
|
$339 |
|
|
|
$300 |
|
|
|
$75 |
|
|
|
$714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 5. DEFERRED CONTRACT COSTS, NET, AND IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Deferred contract costs, net
During September 2006, we modified an existing contract that included both construction services
and non-construction services. The construction services related to a software development and
implementation project, which was modified to eliminate the fixed-price development and
implementation deliverables in the original contract. Under the original contract, we determined
that we could not
7
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
recognize revenue on the software development and implementation project
separately from the non-construction services based on the guidance of AICPA Statement of Position
No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. As a result, we were deferring both the revenue on the
software development and implementation project, consisting of the amounts we were billing for
those services, and the related costs, up to the relative fair value of the software development
and implementation project. At September 30, 2006 we had deferred $48 million of costs related to
the software development and implementation project. Following the contract modification in
September 2006, we impaired $44 million of the deferred costs and recorded this charge to direct
cost of services in the condensed consolidated income statements.
Identifiable Intangible Assets
Identifiable intangible assets are recorded in other non-current assets in the condensed
consolidated balance sheets and are composed of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Book |
|
|
|
Value |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Service mark |
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
3 |
|
Customer-based assets |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense for identifiable intangible assets was $4 million and $12 million for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, and $2 million and $6 million for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Amortization expense is estimated
at $16 million, $18 million, $16 million, $14 million, $11 million and $2 million for the years
ended December 31, 2007 through 2012, respectively. Identifiable intangible assets are amortized on
a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 1 to 7 years. The weighted
average estimated useful life is approximately five years.
NOTE 6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Total comprehensive income, net of tax, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
ended September 30, |
|
|
ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Net unrealized gain on foreign exchange
forward contracts and interest rate
swaps |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The related net change associated with hedging transactions for our derivative financial
instruments designated as hedges under FAS 133 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
Accumulated gain at December 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
|
|
Net unrealized gain on hedging transactions |
|
|
2 |
|
Reclassifications
into earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated gain at September 30, 2007 |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
8
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 7. LONG-TERM DEBT
Credit Facility
In January 2007, we borrowed $75 million against our credit facility in connection with our
acquisition of QSS. Interest on this borrowing is at a variable rate based on 3 month LIBOR and was
5.86% at September 30, 2007. On February 15, 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap agreement
to effectively convert this borrowing into a fixed-rate instrument with an interest rate of 5.64%,
which was terminated on August 31, 2007. On the same day, we entered into a new interest rate swap
agreement to effectively convert this borrowing into a fixed-rate instrument with an interest rate
of 5.28%. In August 2007, we borrowed an additional $55 million against our credit facility in
connection with our acquisition of JJ Wild. Interest on this borrowing is at a variable rate based
on 3 month LIBOR and was 6.05% at September 30, 2007. On August 31, 2007, we entered into an
interest rate swap agreement to effectively convert this borrowing into a fixed-rate instrument
with an interest rate of 5.33%. The interest rate at September 30, 2007 for our borrowing of $77
million made in March 2005 was 6.05%.
NOTE 8. STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
At September 30, 2007, there were 123,308,000 shares of our Class A Stock outstanding and no shares
of our Class B Common Stock outstanding. At December 31, 2006, there were 120,229,000 shares of
our Class A Stock outstanding and 817,000 shares of our Class B Common Stock outstanding.
NOTE 9. STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation
On January 1, 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, Share-Based
Payment, which requires employee stock options and rights to purchase shares under stock
participation plans to be accounted for under the fair value method. Prior to the adoption of
FAS 123R and as permitted by FAS 123 and FAS 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation
Transition and Disclosure, we elected to follow APB 25 and related interpretations in accounting
for our employee stock options and implemented the disclosure-only provisions of FAS 123 and
FAS 148. Under APB 25, stock compensation expense was recorded when the exercise price of employee
stock options was less than the fair value of the underlying stock on the date of grant. We
continue to account for options issued prior to our initial public offering under APB 25 as
required by FAS 123R.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, stock option compensation expense and costs
associated with our employee stock purchase plan (ESPP) recorded in direct cost of services and
selling, general and administrative expenses, as well as the decrease in diluted earnings per
common share, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
Direct cost of services |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stock compensation expense from stock options and ESPP |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Stock compensation expense from stock options and ESPP, net of tax |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share, Class A |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Basic earnings per common share, Class B |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share, Class A |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
Diluted earnings per common share, Class B |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
9
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Stock compensation expense related to restricted stock units was $1,201,000 ($756,000 net of tax),
and $2,905,000 ($1,830,000 net of tax) for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, and
$573,000 ($361,000 net of tax), and $1,671,000 ($1,053,000 net of tax) for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2006.
At September 30, 2007, there was $44 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of
expected forfeitures, related to non-vested options and restricted stock units, which is expected
to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.2 years.
We utilize the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate our actual and pro forma stock-based
employee compensation expense, and the assumptions used for each period are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 (1) |
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average risk free interest rates |
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.88 |
% |
|
|
4.76 |
% |
Weighted average life (in years) |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
Volatility |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
35 |
% |
Expected dividend yield |
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
|
|
0 |
% |
Weighted average grant-date fair value
per share of options granted |
|
$ |
4.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4.67 |
|
|
$ |
5.94 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
No stock options were granted during the three months ended September 30, 2006. |
Activity in our stock-based compensation plans
Activity in stock options for Class A Common Stock was as follows (options in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
Price |
|
Outstanding at January 1 |
|
|
18,169 |
|
|
$ |
14.42 |
|
|
|
25,342 |
|
|
$ |
14.81 |
|
Granted |
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
15.41 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
15.00 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(1,705 |
) |
|
|
8.22 |
|
|
|
(2,527 |
) |
|
|
8.57 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(1,438 |
) |
|
|
17.28 |
|
|
|
(4,872 |
) |
|
|
20.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30 |
|
|
16,628 |
|
|
|
14.90 |
|
|
|
18,026 |
|
|
|
14.12 |
|
Exercisable at September 30 |
|
|
8,945 |
|
|
|
15.51 |
|
|
|
10,113 |
|
|
|
14.77 |
|
For outstanding and exercisable shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the weighted
average remaining contractual term (in years) is 4.26 and 3.63, respectively. For outstanding and
exercisable shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the aggregate intrinsic value is
$54 million and $32 million, respectively.
The number of outstanding nonvested restricted stock units was 1,298,000 for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, with a weighted-average grant-date fair value per share of $14.92. The number
of nonvested restricted stock units that vested or forfeited for the nine months ended September
30, 2007 was insignificant.
10
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES
Our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 36.0% as compared to 33.8%
for the first nine months ended 2006. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to
additional taxes from the expiration of one of our tax holidays in India and higher state income
taxes as a result of the Texas margin tax and the acquisition of QSS, which operates in several
high-tax states, and is partially offset by a $2 million tax benefit from the reduction of a
valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets in Europe. Income tax expense for the first
nine months of 2006 included a greater impact from foreign operations and tax-exempt investments.
While we are subject to examination by the tax authorities in each of the jurisdictions where we
operate, our principal tax jurisdictions are the United States, India, and the United Kingdom. We
are currently under examination by the IRS for tax years 2003 and 2004. We received a closing
agreement from the IRS in March 2007, which effectively closed all tax years prior to 2003 from
further examination. We are also under examination in India for the fiscal years ended March 31,
2002 through March 31, 2006 and are under examination in the United Kingdom for calendar year 2005.
Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the
accounting for and disclosure of uncertainty in tax positions. Additionally, FIN 48 provides
guidance on the recognition, measurement, derecognition, classification and disclosure of tax
positions and on the accounting for related interest and penalties. As a result of the
implementation of FIN 48, we recognized an $18 million decrease in the reserves for uncertain tax
positions, which was recognized as an $8 million increase to retained earnings, a $5 million
decrease to goodwill to adjust unrecognized benefits recorded in the cost of acquired companies and
a $5 million increase to additional paid in capital to adjust uncertain positions recorded as a
component of shareholders equity. Following our adoption of FIN 48, the gross balance of reserves
for uncertain tax positions was $15 million at January 1, 2007, which does not include $3 million
of offsetting tax benefits, primarily from international tax treaties, which provide for relief
from double taxation. The net unrecognized tax benefit of $12 million includes $10 million that, if
recognized, would benefit our effective income tax rate and $2 million that, if recognized, would
reduce goodwill. We do not anticipate a
significant change to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of
income tax expense. Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits were
approximately $2 million as of both January 1, 2007 and September 30, 2007.
NOTE 11. SEGMENT DATA
We offer our services under three primary lines of business: Industry Solutions, Government
Services, and Consulting and Applications Solutions. Industry Solutions, our largest line of
business, provides services to our customers primarily under long-term contracts in strategic
relationships. These services include technology and business process services, as well as industry
domain-based, short-term project and consulting services. The Government Services segment provides
infrastructure support, application design and development, consulting, engineering, and
technology-based business process solutions for the Department of Defense, the Department of
Homeland Security, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Department of Health and
Human Services, the Department of Education, various federal intelligence agencies, and other
governmental agencies. Consulting and Applications Solutions provides software-related services,
including the implementation of prepackaged software applications, application development and
maintenance, and application systems migration and testing primarily under short-term contracts
related to specific projects. Other includes our remaining operating areas and corporate
activities, income and expenses that are not related to the operations of the other reportable
segments, and the elimination of intersegment revenue and direct costs of services of approximately
$26 and $14 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $66
and $37 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively, related to the
provision of services by the Consulting and Applications Solutions segment to the Industry
Solutions segment and Government Services Segments.
The reportable segments follow the same accounting policies that we use for our consolidated
financial statements. Segment performance is evaluated based on income before taxes, exclusive of
income and expenses that are included in the Other category.
Substantially all corporate and centrally incurred costs are allocated to the segments based
principally on expenses, employees, square footage, or usage.
11
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
The following is a summary of certain financial information by reportable segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consulting and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry |
|
Government |
|
Applications |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Solutions |
|
Services |
|
Solutions |
|
Other |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
655 |
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
583 |
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
226 |
|
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
1,880 |
|
Income (loss) before taxes |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
111 |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
$ |
221 |
|
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
(37 |
) |
|
$ |
1,697 |
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74 |
|
NOTE 12. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and the denominators of the basic and diluted
earnings per common share computations under the two-class method:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
Basic Earnings per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to Class A common shares (1) |
|
$ |
25,088 |
|
|
$ |
311 |
|
|
$ |
70,914 |
|
|
$ |
48,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, Class A |
|
|
122,391 |
|
|
|
118,729 |
|
|
|
121,577 |
|
|
|
118,378 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to Class B common shares (1) |
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
441 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, Class B |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.58 |
|
|
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted Earnings per Common Share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (2) |
|
$ |
25,221 |
|
|
$ |
313 |
|
|
$ |
71,355 |
|
|
$ |
49,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
123,039 |
|
|
|
119,546 |
|
|
|
122,334 |
|
|
|
119,195 |
|
Incremental shares assuming dilution |
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
2,271 |
|
|
|
2,633 |
|
|
|
2,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted common shares outstanding (3) |
|
|
125,315 |
|
|
|
121,817 |
|
|
|
124,967 |
|
|
|
121,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income allocated to Class B common shares (4) |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
430 |
|
|
$ |
327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding, Class B |
|
|
648 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
757 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per common share, Class B |
|
$ |
0.20 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net income is allocated to Class A and Class B common shares based on weighted average
common shares attributable to each class of stock. |
|
(2) |
|
For purposes of the diluted net income per share computation for common stock, shares of
Class B are assumed to be converted; therefore, 100% of net income is allocated to common
stock. |
12
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
(3) |
|
Class B shares are assumed to be converted in the weighted average diluted common shares
outstanding. |
|
(4) |
|
Net income is allocated to class B common shares based on the weighted average diluted
common shares attributable to each class of stock. |
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, outstanding options to purchase 3,495,000
and 3,330,000 shares, respectively, of our common stock were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per common share because including them would be anti-dilutive. For the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2006, outstanding options to purchase 7,678,000 and 6,172,000
shares, respectively, of our common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings
per common share because including them would be anti-dilutive. We determined whether an option
was dilutive or anti-dilutive by comparing the average market price of our common shares for that
period to the aggregate assumed proceeds from each stock option, measured as the sum of the assumed
cash proceeds from and excess tax benefits that would be recorded upon the exercise of each stock
option and the average unearned compensation cost for each stock option.
NOTE 13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
We are, from time to time, involved in various litigation matters. We do not believe that the
outcome of the litigation matters in which we are currently a party, either individually or taken
as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows. However, we cannot predict with certainty any eventual loss or range of
possible loss related to such matters.
We currently purchase and intend to continue to purchase the types and amounts of insurance
coverage customary for the industry and geographies in which we operate. We have evaluated our
risk and consider the coverage we carry to be adequate both in type and amount for the business we
conduct.
IPO Allocation Securities Litigation
In July and August 2001, we, as well as some of our current and former officers and directors and
the investment banks that underwrote our initial public offering, were named as defendants in two
purported class action lawsuits seeking unspecified damages for alleged violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933. These cases focus on alleged
improper practices of investment banks. Our case has been consolidated for pretrial purposes with
approximately 300 similar cases in the IPO Allocation Securities Litigation. We had accepted a
settlement proposal presented to all issuer defendants under which plaintiffs would dismiss and
release all claims against all issuer defendants, in exchange for an assurance by the insurance
companies collectively responsible for insuring the issuers in all of the IPO cases that the
plaintiffs will achieve a minimum recovery of $1 billion (including amounts recovered from the
underwriters).
In December 2006, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the class certifications in the IPO
class action test cases, finding the predominance of common questions over individual questions
that is required for class certification cannot be met by those plaintiffs. The Second Circuit has
denied plaintiffs petition for rehearing. The plaintiffs are seeking certification of a narrower
class at the trial court level. At the request of the issuer defendants, the trial court has
terminated the settlement approval process.
Other
In addition to the matters described above, we have been, and from time to time are, named as a
defendant in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business, including arbitrations,
class actions and other litigation involving commercial and
employment disputes. Certain of these proceedings include claims for substantial compensatory or
punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. We are contesting liability
and/or the amount of damages, in each pending matter.
13
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 14. SUBSEQUENT EVENT
In the fourth quarter of 2007, we received notification from Community Health Systems (CHS) that as
a result of its merger with Triad Hospitals, Inc. (Triad) and expected integration plans, it
intends to end the current services agreement that we signed with Triad in 2006. Although the
termination will be effective December 31, 2007, we will provide CHS with termination and
transition assistance services. These transition assistance services may extend into 2008. Under
the termination for change of control provisions of the agreements,
CHS paid to us, in October 2007, a
termination fee of $26 million and will reimburse us for certain shutdown costs. Prior to this
termination, Triad was one of our ten largest clients.
14
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events
or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by
terminology such as may, will, should, could, forecasts, expects, plans,
anticipates, believes, estimates, predicts, potential, see, target, projects,
position, or continue or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These
statements reflect our current expectations, estimates, and projections. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions that are
difficult to predict. Actual events or results may differ materially from what is expressed or
forecasted in these forward-looking statements. In evaluating these statements, you should
specifically consider various factors, including the risks described in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006. These risk factors describe reasons why our actual
results may differ materially from any forward-looking statement. We disclaim any intention or
obligation to update any forward-looking statement.
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our interim condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q and with our consolidated financial statements and the information under the heading
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which are
included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Lines of Business
We offer our services under three primary lines of business: Industry Solutions, Government
Services, and Consulting and Applications Solutions. Industry Solutions, our largest line of
business, provides services to our customers primarily under long-term contracts in strategic
relationships. These services include technology and business process services, as well as industry
domain-based, short-term project and consulting services. The Government Services segment provides
infrastructure support, application design and development, consulting, engineering, and
technology-based business process solutions for the Department of Defense, the Department of
Homeland Security, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the Department of Health and
Human Services, the Department of Education, various federal intelligence agencies, and other
governmental agencies. Consulting and Applications Solutions provides software-related services,
including the implementation of prepackaged software applications, application development and
maintenance, and application systems migration and testing primarily under short-term contracts
related to specific projects.
Overview of Our Financial Results for the Third Quarter of 2007
Our financial results are affected by a number of factors, including broad economic conditions, the
amount and type of technology spending by our customers, and the business strategies and financial
condition of our customers and the industries we serve, which could result in increases or
decreases in the amount of services that we provide to our customers and the pricing of such
services. Our ability to identify and effectively respond to these factors is important to our
future financial growth.
We evaluate our consolidated performance on the basis of several performance indicators. The four
key performance indicators we use are revenue growth, earnings growth, free cash flow, and the
value of contracts signed. We compare these key performance indicators to both annual target
amounts established by management and to our performance for prior periods. We establish the
targets for these key performance indicators primarily on an annual basis, but we may revise them
during the year. We assess our performance using these key indicators on a quarterly and annual
basis.
Modification of a Customer Contract
During September 2006, we modified an existing contract that included both construction services
and non-construction services. The construction services related to a software development and
implementation project, which was modified to eliminate the fixed-price development and
implementation deliverables in the original contract. Under the original contract, we determined
that we could not recognize revenue on the software development and implementation project
separately from the non-construction services based on
15
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
the guidance of AICPA Statement of Position No. 97-2, Software Revenue Recognition. As a result,
we were deferring both the revenue on the software development and implementation project,
consisting of the amounts we were billing for those services, and the related costs, up to the
relative fair value of the software development and implementation project. At September 30, 2006,
we had deferred $48 million of costs related to the software development and implementation
project. Following the contract modification in September 2006, we impaired $44 million of the
deferred costs and recorded this charge to direct cost of services in the condensed consolidated
income statements.
Revenue Growth
Revenue growth is a measure of the growth we generate through sales of services to new customers,
retention of existing contracts, acquisitions, and discretionary services from existing customers.
Revenue for the third quarter of 2007 grew by 12.3% as compared to the third quarter of 2006. As
discussed in more detail below, this revenue growth came primarily from the following:
|
|
Revenue from a company acquired during the first quarter of 2007. |
|
|
An increase in revenue from the expansion of base services and discretionary technology
investments by our existing long-term customers. |
|
|
Revenue from new contracts signed during the twelve-month period following the third quarter
of 2006. |
Partially offsetting these increases in revenue was the loss of revenue from our infrastructure
outsourcing contract with UBS that ended on January 1, 2007.
Earnings Growth
We measure earnings growth using diluted earnings per share, which is a measure of our
effectiveness in delivering profitable growth. Diluted earnings per share for the third quarter of
2007 increased to $0.20 per share from $0.00 per share for the third quarter of 2006. Improvements
to our earnings consist primarily of the following:
|
|
As discussed above in Modifications of a Customer Contract, during the third quarter of
2006, we modified a customer contract and recorded $44 million of expense in direct cost of
services, or approximately $0.22 per diluted share, associated with the impairment of deferred
software, development and impairment costs. |
|
|
A reduction in incentive compensation of $10 million, or approximately $0.05 per diluted
share. This reduction is attributable to a lower expected amount of
associate incentive
compensation for 2007 and differences in the quarterly recognition of bonus expense between
2006 and 2007. The reduction in associate incentive compensation for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007 in comparison to the nine months ended September 30, 2006, was
approximately $18 million. |
|
|
During the third quarter of 2006, we recorded expense of $6 million, or approximately $0.03
per diluted share, related to actions to strengthen future profitability. The expense is
attributable to the consolidation and elimination of facilities and products, the combination
of units, and severance expense. |
These improvements to our earnings were partially offset by:
|
|
Gross profits from our infrastructure outsourcing contract with UBS decreased by $14 million
in the third quarter of 2007 as compared to the third quarter of 2006 as a result of the end
of the UBS contract. The loss from this infrastructure outsourcing contract resulted in a
decrease in earnings of approximately $0.07 per diluted share. |
|
|
Reduced profits within the Government Services line of business primarily as a result of
contract scope reductions on existing contracts related to federal government budget pressure
and lower margins related to QSS, which was acquired in the first quarter of 2007, because of
the cost plus nature of their work. |
|
|
Reduced profits from existing contracts within Industry Solutions as a result of contracts
that ended during the last twelve months, renegotiated contracts, and new contracts that will
not reach full levels of profitability until after 2007. |
16
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Free Cash Flow
We calculate free cash flow on a trailing twelve month basis as net cash provided by operating
activities less purchases of property, equipment and purchased software, as stated in our condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows. We use free cash flow as a measure of our ability to
generate cash for both our short-term and long-term operating and business expansion needs. We use
a twelve-month period to measure our success in this area because of the significant variations
that typically occur on a quarterly basis due to the timing of certain cash payments. Free cash
flow for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007, was $33 million as compared to $106 million
for the twelve months ended September 30, 2006. Free cash flow, which is a non-GAAP measure, can be
reconciled to Net cash provided by operating activities as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
Purchases of property, equipment and software |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Free cash flow |
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TCV of Contracts Signed
The amount of Total Contract Value (commonly referred to as TCV) that we sell during a
twelve-month period is a measure of our success in capturing new business in the various
outsourcing and consulting markets in which we provide services and includes contracts with new
customers and contracts for new services with existing customers. We measure TCV as our estimate of
the total expected revenue from contracts that are expected to generate revenue in excess of a
defined amount during a contract term that exceeds a defined length of time.
Various factors may impact the timing of the signing of contracts with customers, including the
complexity of the contract, competitive pressures, and customer demands. As a result, we generally
measure our success in this area over a twelve-month period because of the significant variations
that typically occur in the amount of TCV signed during each quarterly period. During the
twelve-month period ended September 30, 2007, the amount of TCV signed was $1.7 billion compared to
$2.3 billion for the twelve-month period ended September 30, 2006. The $2.3 billion of
TCV signed for the twelve-month period ending September 30,
2006, includes $1.2 billion relating to the
signing of the contract with Triad Hospitals, Inc. that was terminated in October 2007, as
discussed in more detail under Subsequent Event below.
Additional Measurements
Each of our three primary lines of business has distinct economic factors, business trends, and
risks that could affect our results of operations. As a result, in addition to the four metrics
discussed above that we use to measure our consolidated financial performance, we use similar
metrics for each of these lines of business and for certain industry groups and operating units
within these lines of business.
Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
Revenue
Revenue for the third quarter of 2007 increased from revenue for the third quarter of 2006 due to
increases in revenue from the Government Services and Consulting and Applications Solutions
segments, partially offset by a decrease in the Industry Solutions segment. Below is a summary of
our revenue for the third quarter of 2007 as compared to the third quarter of 2006 (amounts in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Industry Solutions |
|
$ |
454 |
|
|
$ |
458 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
)% |
Government Services |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
101.4 |
% |
Consulting and Applications Solutions |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
% |
Elimination of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
85.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
655 |
|
|
$ |
583 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Industry Solutions
The net decrease in revenue from the Industry Solutions segment for third quarter of 2007 as
compared to the third quarter of 2006 was primarily due to the $64 million decrease in revenue from
the expiration of our infrastructure outsourcing contract with UBS on January 1, 2007. Partially
offsetting this decrease were increases in revenue primarily attributable to:
|
|
$36 million net increase from existing accounts and short-term project work. This net
increase resulted from expanding our base services to existing long-term customers and from
providing additional discretionary services to these customers. The discretionary services
that we provide, which include short-term project work, can vary from period-to-period
depending on many factors, including specific customer and industry needs and economic
conditions. This increase was primarily related to contracts in the healthcare industry. |
|
|
$17 million increase from new contracts signed during the twelve-month period following the
third quarter of 2006 and from new contracts signed in the third quarter of 2006 for which we
did not recognize a full quarter of revenue in the third quarter of 2006. This increase was
composed of $7 million and $10 million from new contracts signed in the Healthcare and
Commercial Solutions groups, respectively. The services that we are providing to these new
customers are primarily the same services that we provide to the majority of our other
long-term outsourcing customers. |
|
|
$7 million increase from revenue related to an acquisition within our Healthcare group during
the third quarter of 2007. |
Net increases in revenue from contracts in the healthcare industry are largely related to system
investment by our new and existing customers. Because of the complexities associated with system
changes, combined with our customers desire to focus on core functions, the healthcare outsourcing
market has experienced strong growth in recent years. Although we are
still experiencing growth from the healthcare outsourcing market and
we expect market demand to be strong over the long-term because of
the level of technology-driven change in the industry, the rate of growth
has diminished in recent quarters due to longer sales cycles,
primarily on large outsourcing contracts, and increased budgetary
pressures affecting customers, which typically result in lower
discretionary investments.
Government Services
The $74 million, or 101.4%, net increase in revenue from the Government Services segment for the
third quarter of 2007 as compared to the third quarter of 2006 was attributable to the $75 million
in revenue from the acquisition of QSS Group, Inc. (QSS), an information technology services
company providing services to the U.S. federal government. Our business with the federal government
will fluctuate due to annual federal funding limits and the specific needs of the federal agencies
we serve.
Consulting and Applications Solutions
The $14 million, or 21.2% increase in revenue from the Consulting and Applications Solutions
segment was due to a $12 million increase in intersegment revenues, primarily attributable to
consulting, systems integration, and applications maintenance, and a $2 million increase in
direct-to-market revenues, primarily attributable to an increase in the demand for application
development and maintenance services from existing customers in the financial services industry.
Intersegment revenue relates to the provision of services by the Consulting and Applications
Solutions segment to the other segments.
18
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Gross Margin
Gross margin, which is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue, for the third quarter of 2007
was 17.3% of revenue, which is higher than the gross margin for the third quarter of 2006 of 11.8%.
Improvements to our gross margin consist primarily of the following:
|
|
As discussed in Modification of a Customer Contract, in the third quarter of 2006, we
modified a customer contract and recorded $44 million of expense in direct cost of services
associated with the impairment of deferred software development and implementation costs. |
A reduction to employee-related expenses, consisting primarily of incentive compensation.
These improvements to our gross margin were partially offset by:
|
|
A $14 million decrease in gross profit from the expiration of our infrastructure outsourcing
contract with UBS that is reported within the Industry Solutions line of business. |
|
|
A reduced gross profit margin for Government Services primarily attributable to the
acquisition of QSS. The gross margins associated with the acquisition are typically lower than
those we realize within our consolidated margins because of the cost plus nature of their
work. Additionally, lower margins were realized within our Government Services group as a
result of contract scope reductions on existing contracts related to federal government budget
pressure. |
|
|
Reduced profits from existing contracts within Industry Solutions as a result of contracts
that ended during the last twelve months, renegotiated contracts, and new contracts that will
not reach full levels of profitability until after 2007. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the third quarter of 2007 decreased 4.1% to $71
million from $74 million for the third quarter of 2006. Third quarter of 2006 included $5 million
of expenses related to profit improvement actions and an asset impairment. The remaining increase
results primarily from the acquisition of QSS in the first quarter of 2007 and JJ Wild Holdings,
Inc. and JJ Wild, Inc. (collectively, JJ Wild) in the third quarter of 2007, partially offset by
a decrease in associate incentive compensation. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A for the third
quarter of 2007 was 10.8% of revenue, which is lower than SG&A for the third quarter of 2006 of
12.7% of revenue. The decrease in the SG&A as a percentage of revenue was primarily due to the
profit improvement actions and asset impairment in 2006 and the decrease in associate incentive
compensation in 2007 mentioned above.
Other Income Statement Items
Our effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2007 was 39.0% as compared to a tax benefit of
100.0% for the third quarter of 2006. Income tax expense for the third quarter of 2007 included a
greater impact from state income taxes, primarily as a result of the Texas margin tax and the
acquisition of QSS, which operates in several high-tax states, and a reduced benefit from
tax-exempt interest income. Our income tax benefit for the third quarter of 2006 included a benefit
of $1 million, net, relating to the resolution of issues raised in audits by tax authorities. An
additional factor impacting the third quarter of 2006 effective tax rate was the significant
reduction in pretax income resulting from asset impairments.
19
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006
Revenue
Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, increased from revenue for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006, due to increases in revenue from the Government Services and Consulting
and Applications Solutions segments, partially offset by a decrease in revenue from the Industry
Solutions segment. Below is a summary of our revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
Industry Solutions |
|
$ |
1,314 |
|
|
$ |
1,325 |
|
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
|
(0.8 |
)% |
Government Services |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
83.7 |
% |
Consulting and Applications Solutions |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
Elimination of intersegment revenue |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
78.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,880 |
|
|
$ |
1,697 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Industry Solutions
The net decrease in revenue from the Industry Solutions segment for the first nine months of 2007
as compared to the first nine months of 2006 was primarily attributable to the $196 million
decrease in revenue from the expiration of our infrastructure outsourcing contract with UBS on
January 1, 2007. Partially offsetting this loss were increases in revenue primarily attributable
to:
|
|
$129 million net increase from existing accounts and short-term project work. This net
increase resulted from expanding our base services to existing long-term customers and from
providing additional discretionary services to these customers. The discretionary services
that we provide, which include short-term project work, can vary from period-to-period
depending on many factors, including specific customer and industry needs and economic
conditions. This increase was primarily related to contracts in the healthcare industry. |
|
|
$36 million increase from new contracts signed during the twelve-month period following the
third quarter of 2006 and from new contracts signed in the third quarter of 2006 for which we
did not recognize a full nine months of revenue during the nine months ended September 30,
2006. This increase was composed of $16 million, $18 million, and $2 million from new
contracts signed in the Healthcare, Commercial Solutions and Insurance and Business Process
Solutions groups, respectively. The services that we are providing to these new customers are
primarily the same services that we provide to the majority of our other long-term outsourcing
customers. |
|
|
$13 million increase from revenue related to an acquisition within our Commercial Solutions
group during the first quarter of 2006 for which we did not recognize a full nine months of
revenue during the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The acquired company is a provider
of product engineering outsourcing services. |
|
|
$7 million increase from revenue related to an acquisition within our Healthcare group during
the third quarter of 2007. |
Government Services
The $185 million, or 83.7%, net increase in revenue from the Government Services segment for the
nine months of 2007 as compared to the nine months of 2006 was attributable to the $186 million in
revenue from the acquisition of QSS. Our business with the federal government will fluctuate due to
annual federal funding limits and the specific needs of the federal agencies we serve.
Consulting and Applications Solutions
The $38 million, or 20.2%, increase in revenue from the Consulting and Applications Solutions
segment was due to a $29 million increase in intersegment revenues, primarily attributable to
consulting, system integration, and application maintenance, and a $9 million increase in
direct-to-market revenues, primarily attributable to an increase in the demand for application
development and maintenance services from existing customers in the financial services industry.
Intersegment revenue relates to the provision of services by the Consulting and Applications
Solutions segment to the other segments.
20
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Gross Margin
Gross margin, which is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue, for the nine months ended
September 30, 2007, was 17.2%, which is higher than the gross margin for the nine months ended
September 30, 2006, of 16.3%. Improvements to our gross margin consist primarily of the following:
|
|
As discussed in Modification of a Customer Contract, in the third quarter of 2006, we
modified a customer contract and recorded $44 million of expense in direct cost of services
associated with the impairment of deferred software development and implementation costs. |
|
|
A reduction to employee-related expenses, consisting primarily of incentive compensation. |
These improvements to our gross margin were partially offset by:
|
|
A $42 million decrease in gross profit from the expiration of our infrastructure outsourcing
contract with UBS that was reported within the Industry Solutions line of business. |
|
|
The acquisition of QSS within our Government Services group in the first quarter of 2007.
The gross margins associated with the acquisition are typically lower than those we realize
within our consolidated margins because of the cost plus nature of their work. Additionally,
lower margins were realized within our Government Services group as a result of contract scope
reductions on existing contracts related to federal government budget pressure. |
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2007,
increased 1.9% to $212 million from $208 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2006. The
increase in SG&A expenses is primarily due to the acquisition of QSS in the first quarter of 2007
and JJ Wild in the third quarter of 2007, partially offset by a decrease in associate incentive
compensation. The third quarter of 2006 included $5 million of expenses related to profit
improvement actions and an asset impairment which partially offset the net increases during 2007
mentioned above. SG&A for the nine months of 2007 was 11.3% of revenue, which is lower than SG&A
for the nine months of 2006 of 12.3% of revenue. The decrease in the SG&A as a percentage of
revenue was primarily due to the profit improvement actions and asset impairment in 2006 and the
decrease in associate incentive compensation in 2007 mentioned above.
Other Income Statement Items
Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 increased by $5 million as compared
to the nine months ended September 30, 2006 due primarily to increased long-term debt connected
with an acquisition of QSS.
Our effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 was 36.0% as compared to 33.8%
for the first nine months ended 2006. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily due to
additional taxes from the expiration of one of our tax holidays in India and higher state income
taxes as a result of the Texas margin tax and the acquisition of QSS, which operates in several
high-tax states, and is partially offset by a $2 million tax benefit from the reduction of a
valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets in Europe. Income tax expense for the first
nine months of 2006 included a greater impact from foreign operations and tax-exempt investments.
Subsequent Event
In the fourth quarter of 2007, we received notification from Community Health Systems (CHS) that as
a result of its merger with Triad Hospitals, Inc. (Triad) and expected integration plans, it
intends to end the current services agreements that we signed with Triad in 2006. Although the
termination will be effective December 31, 2007, we will provide CHS with termination and
transition assistance services. These transition assistance services may extend into 2008. In
addition, we will provide project-based services to CHS.
Under the termination for change of control provisions of the agreements, CHS paid to us, in
October, a termination fee of $26 million and will reimburse us for certain shutdown costs. We
will recognize termination-related revenue, including previously paid amounts, of approximately $45
million, with non-personnel-related contract shutdown costs of up to $5 million. While we expect
to recognize
21
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
all of
this revenue and profit in the fourth quarter, if the transition
extends into 2008, we may
defer part of this revenue and profit into 2008. Prior to this termination, Triad was one of our
ten largest clients.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2007, we have cash and cash equivalents of $175 million. We believe our existing
cash and cash equivalents, expected cash flows from operating activities, and the $68 million that
is available under our restated and amended credit facility, will provide us sufficient funds to
meet our operating needs for the foreseeable future. During the nine months ended September 30,
2007, cash and cash equivalents decreased 30.0% to $175 million from $250 million and short-term
investments of $133 million were liquidated, primarily due to our acquisitions in 2007.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $35 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007, as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $111 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. The primary reasons for the changes in cash provided by operating
activities are as follows:
|
|
Cash used by changes in accounts payable and accrued liabilities was $12 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to cash provided of $16 million for the same
period of the prior year. This decrease is primarily due to the timing of vendor payments. |
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we increased our spending on deferred
contract costs by $19 million as compared to the same period in 2006 due to recent contract
signings that had significant transitional activity for which costs are deferred until
services are operational. |
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, there was a decrease of $11 million in net
deferred revenue received from clients as compared to the same period in 2006. |
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we made net cash payments for income taxes
of $44 million as compared to $39 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2006. |
|
|
Bonuses paid to associates under our bonus plans during the first nine months of 2007 and
2006 (including payments of annual bonus amounts relating to the previous years bonus plan)
were approximately $54 million and $64 million, respectively. Included in these bonus amounts
paid in 2007 and 2006 were approximately $7 million and $23 million, respectively, of bonus
payments that are reimbursable by our customers. The amount of bonuses that we pay each year
is based on several factors, including our financial performance and managements discretion. |
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $271 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007, as compared to net cash used in investing activities of $188 million for the same period in
2006. This change was primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we paid $338 million for acquisitions of
businesses, including $248 million, net of cash acquired, for the acquisition of QSS, $86
million, net of cash acquired, for the acquisition of JJ Wild, and $4 million of additional
consideration for the acquisition of eServ LLC, a provider of high-end product engineering
outsourcing services. |
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we purchased $66 million of property,
equipment and purchased software as compared to $55 million during the nine months ended
September 30, 2006. This increase was primarily related to our business expansion needs for
data center and office facilities. |
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, we liquidated short-term investments of $133
million, net, primarily due to our acquisition of QSS. |
22
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2006, we paid $29 million for acquisitions of
businesses, including $21 million for the acquisition of eServ and $8 million of additional
consideration for the acquisition of Technical Management, Inc., a provider of policy
administration and business process services to the life insurance and annuity industry. |
Financing Activities
Net cash provided by financing activities was $154 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2007, as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $13 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2006. This increase is primarily due to the additional $130 million borrowed
against our restated and amended credit facility in connection with our acquisitions of QSS and JJ
Wild in 2007 and the $18 million paid to repurchase shares of our Class A Common Stock in 2006.
Partially offsetting these increases in net cash provided by financing activities was a decrease of
$7 million in cash received upon exercise of employee stock options.
We routinely maintain cash balances in certain European and Asian currencies to fund operations in
those regions. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, foreign exchange rate fluctuations
had a net positive impact on our non-domestic cash balances by $7 million, as the U.S. dollar
weakened against the Indian Rupee, Euro, British Pound, and other currencies. We manage foreign
exchange exposures that are likely to significantly impact net income or working capital. At
September 30, 2007, we had numerous derivatives to purchase and sell various currencies in the
amount of $186 million, which expire at various times before the end of 2010.
Profit Improvement Actions
We are
implementing changes in the fourth quarter of 2007 that will increase profit margins and
profitability entering 2008 and improve overall business operations through a greater focusing of
resources, a reconfiguration of functions, and a strengthening of our overall workforce.
These actions will include the termination of employment of approximately 650 associates. The cost
to implement these actions of approximately $20 million will be incurred in the fourth quarter of
2007. Approximately 425 reductions will be beneficial to future earnings, producing an annual
earnings benefit of approximately $45 million. Approximately one-half of these savings will
increase earnings and the remainder will be reinvested in our operations.
Contractual Obligations
We have contractual obligations for operating leases, long-term debt, and interest on long-term
debt that were summarized in a table of Contractual Obligations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006. Since December 31, 2006, there have been no material changes
to the contractual obligations of the company, outside of the ordinary course of business, except
for our liability for unrecognized tax benefits. As discussed in Note 10, Income Taxes of the
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, we adopted the provisions of FASB
Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 as of January 1, 2007. At September 30, 2007, we had gross reserves for
uncertain tax positions totaling $16 million, all of which is expected to be paid after one year.
We are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate as to when a cash settlement with a taxing
authority will occur.
Critical Accounting Policies
Derivative Financial Instruments
As part of our risk management strategy, we enter into derivative contracts to mitigate certain
financial risks related to foreign currencies and interest rates. We have a risk management policy
outlining the conditions under which we can enter into financial derivative transactions. To date,
our use of derivative financial instruments has been limited to interest rate swaps, which hedges
our exposure to floating rates on certain portions of our debt, and forward contracts and zero cost
collars that hedge our foreign currency exposure, primarily in the Indian Rupee.
In the third quarter of 2007, we began designating certain derivative instruments as cash flow
hedges in accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, which establishes accounting and
reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. FAS 133 provides for
matching
23
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
the gains and losses associated with the change in fair value of the hedged assets or liabilities
with the period in which the derivative instruments matures.
Our policy requires us to document all relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items,
as well as our risk management objective and strategy for entering into economic hedges. We also
assess, at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether the derivatives that are
used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of
hedged items and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future
periods. Our inability to demonstrate effectiveness would cause the hedge to be ineffective.
Changes in fair value of a derivative that is highly effective, documented, designated, and
qualified as a cash flow hedge, to the extent the hedge is highly effective, are recorded in other
comprehensive income until earnings are impacted by the variability of the hedged transaction. Any
hedge ineffectiveness, which represents the amount by which the changes in the fair value of the
derivative do not offset the change in the cash flow of the forecasted transaction, is recorded in
earnings.
We will discontinue hedge accounting prospectively when (1) we determine that the derivative is no
longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of the underlying exposure
being hedged; (2) the derivative matures, or is sold, terminated or exercised; or (3) we determine
that designating the derivative as a hedge is no longer appropriate. When hedge accounting is
discontinued and the derivative remains outstanding, we carry the derivative at its estimated fair
value on the balance sheet and recognize changes in the fair value in current period earnings. If
a cash flow hedge becomes ineffective, any deferred gains or losses on the cash flow hedge would be
reversed out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and recognized immediately in other
income, net on the condensed consolidated income statements.
For financial derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting or for which we have not elected
to apply hedge accounting, the changes in fair values are recognized in other income, net.
Significant Accounting Standards to be Adopted
FASB Statement No. 157
In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Financial Accounting
Standard (FAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which provides guidance for using fair value to
measure assets and liabilities. FAS 157 will apply whenever another standard requires or permits
assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair
value to any new circumstances. FAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2007. Our adoption of FAS 157 is not expected to have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
FASB Statement No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial LiabilitiesIncluding an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which expands the use of
fair value accounting but does not affect existing standards which require assets and liabilities
to be carried at fair value. Under FAS 159, a company may elect to use fair value to measure
accounts and loans receivable, available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities, equity method
investments, accounts payable, guarantees, issued debt and other eligible financial instruments.
FAS 159 is effective for years beginning after November 15, 2007. Our potential adoption of FAS 159
is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
24
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2007
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
For a discussion of our market risk associated with foreign currencies as of December 31, 2006, see
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk in Part II, Item 7A, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year then ended.
Using sensitivity analysis, a hypothetical increase of 10% in the interest rate related to our
borrowing of $77 million under our credit facility would increase our net expense by approximately
$400,000 for the year ended December 31, 2007.
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by our
management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over
financial reporting.
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are, from time to time, involved in various litigation matters. We do not believe that the
outcome of the litigation matters in which we are currently a party, either individually or taken
as a whole, will have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows. However, we cannot predict with certainty any eventual loss or range of
possible loss related to such matters.
We currently purchase and intend to continue to purchase the types and amounts of insurance
coverage customary for the industry and geographies in which we operate. We have evaluated our
risk and consider the coverage we carry to be adequate both in type and amount for the business we
conduct.
IPO Allocation Securities Litigation
In July and August 2001, we, as well as some of our current and former officers and directors and
the investment banks that underwrote our initial public offering, were named as defendants in two
purported class action lawsuits seeking unspecified damages for alleged violations of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933. These cases focus on alleged
improper practices of investment banks. Our case has been consolidated for pretrial purposes with
approximately 300 similar cases in the IPO Allocation Securities Litigation. We had accepted a
settlement proposal presented to all issuer defendants under which plaintiffs would dismiss and
release all claims against all issuer defendants, in exchange for an assurance by the insurance
companies collectively responsible for insuring the issuers in all of the IPO cases that the
plaintiffs will achieve a minimum recovery of $1 billion (including amounts recovered from the
underwriters).
In December 2006, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the class certifications in the IPO
class action test cases, finding the predominance of common questions over individual questions
that is required for class certification cannot be met by those plaintiffs. The Second Circuit has
denied plaintiffs petition for rehearing. The plaintiffs are seeking certification of a narrower
class at the trial court level. At the request of the issuer defendants, the trial court has
terminated the settlement approval process.
Other
In addition to the matters described above, we have been, and from time to time are, named as a
defendant in various legal proceedings in the normal course of business, including arbitrations,
class actions and other litigation involving commercial and employment disputes. Certain of these
proceedings include claims for substantial compensatory or punitive damages or claims for
indeterminate amounts of damages. We are contesting liability and/or the amount of damages, in
each pending matter.
25
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2007
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In evaluating all forward-looking statements, you should specifically consider various factors that
may cause actual results to vary from those contained in the forward-looking statements. Please
refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and available at www.sec.gov, for additional information
regarding risk factors.
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K
|
|
|
EXHIBIT |
|
|
NUMBER |
|
DESCRIPTION OF EXHIBIT |
3.1
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Perot Systems Corporation (the Company)
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2002.) |
|
|
|
3.2
|
|
Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Companys Current Report
on Form 8-K filed September, 24, 2004). |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Specimen of Class A Common Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 333-60755.) |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Rights Agreement dated January 28, 1999 between the Company and The Chase Manhattan Bank (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 333-60755.) |
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Form of Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock
(included as Exhibit A-1 to the Rights Agreement) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 333-60755.) |
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Form of Certificate of Designation, Preferences, and Rights of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock
(included as Exhibit A-2 to the Rights Agreement) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of the Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration No. 333-60755.) |
|
|
|
10.43*
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated August 10, 2007, by and among the Company, Eagle Delaware Corp., a Delaware
corporation, J.J. Wild Holdings, Inc., a Massachusetts corporation, J.J. Wild, Inc., a Massachusetts
corporation, and Certain Stockholders of J.J. Wild Holdings, Inc. |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Rule 13a-14 Certification
dated October 31, 2007, by Peter A. Altabef, President and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Rule 13a-14 Certification
dated October 31, 2007, by John E. Harper, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
32.1**
|
|
Section 1350 Certification
dated October 31, 2007, by Peter A. Altabef, President and Chief Executive Officer. |
|
|
|
32.2**
|
|
Section 1350 Certification
dated October 31, 2007, by John E. Harper, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. |
|
|
|
* |
|
Filed herewith. |
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith. |
26
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q
For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2007
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
PEROT SYSTEMS CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: October 31, 2007 |
By /s/ ROBERT J. KELLY
|
|
|
Robert J. Kelly |
|
|
Corporate Controller and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
27