sv4za
Table of Contents

As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 15, 2011
Registration No. 333-175842
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
Amendment No 1
to
Form S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
 
 
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
         
Maryland
  6798   84-1259577
(State of other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (Primary standard industrial
classification code number)
  (IRS Employer
Identification Number)
AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
         
Delaware
  6513   84-1275621
(State of other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
  (Primary standard industrial
classification code number)
  (IRS Employer
Identification Number)
4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100
Denver, Colorado 80237
(303) 757-8101
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)
John Bezzant
Executive Vice President
Apartment Investment and Management Company
4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100
Denver, Colorado 80237
(303) 757-8101
(Name, address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code of agent for service)
Copy to:
 
Robert Mintz, Esq.
Hogan Lovells US LLP
One Tabor Center
1200 Seventeenth St., Suite 1500
Denver, Colorado 80202
(303) 899-7300
 
 
 
 
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public:  As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement is declared effective and all other conditions to the merger as described in the enclosed information statement/prospectus are satisfied or waived.
 
If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box:  o
 
If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:  o
 
If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering:  o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
 
             
Large accelerated filer þ
  Accelerated filer o   Non-accelerated filer o   Smaller reporting company o
        (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    
 
If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:
 
Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer) o
 
Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer) o
 
 
 
 
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
 
                                         
            Proposed Maximum
    Proposed Maximum
     
Title of each Class of
    Amount to be
    Offering
    Aggregate
    Amount of
Securities to be Registered     Registered(1)     Price per Share(1)     Offering Price     Registration Fee
Partnership Common Units of AIMCO Properties, L.P. 
                        $ 5,246,078.88       $ 608.61(3 )
Common Stock of Apartment Investment and Management Company(2)
                                   
                                         
 
(1) Omitted in reliance on Rule 457(o) under the Securities Act of 1933.
 
(2) Represents shares of Common Stock issuable upon redemption of Partnership Common Units issued hereunder.
 
(3) A registration fee of $573.53 was paid prior to October 1, 2011, based on a proposed maximum offering price of $4,939,972.80 at the then-applicable fee rate. The aggregate amount of the registration fee represents this previously paid fee plus an additional fee of $35.08, based on the increase in the proposed maximum offering price of $306,106.08 at the current fee rate.
 
 
 
 
The Registrants hereby amend this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrants will file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement will thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement will become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.
 


Table of Contents

The information in this information statement/prospectus is not complete and may be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This information statement/prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.
 
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION, DATED NOVEMBER 15, 2011
 
INFORMATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
 
ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. 6
 
Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. 6, or AIP, has entered into an amended and restated agreement and plan of merger, or merger agreement, with AIMCO Properties, L.P., or Aimco OP, and two wholly-owned subsidiaries of Aimco OP. Under the merger agreement:
 
(i) First, AIP will be merged with and into Angeles Income Properties 6, LP, a Delaware limited partnership, or New AIP, with New AIP as the surviving entity. New AIP was formed for the purpose of effecting this merger and does not have any assets or operations. In the first merger, each unit of limited partnership interest in AIP, or AIP Unit, will be converted into an identical unit of limited partnership interest in New AIP, also referred to herein as an AIP Unit, and the general partnership interest in AIP now held by AIP’s general partner will be converted into a general partnership interest in New AIP. All interests in New AIP outstanding immediately prior to the merger will be cancelled in the first merger; and
 
(ii) Second, Aimco OP’s subsidiary, AIMCO AIP 6 Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, or the Aimco Subsidiary, will be merged with and into New AIP, with New AIP as the surviving entity. Aimco Subsidiary was formed for the purpose of effecting this merger and does not have any assets or operations. In the second merger, each AIP Unit will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such unit, either:
 
  •  $268.04 in cash, or
 
  •  $268.04 in partnership common units of Aimco OP, or OP Units.
 
The merger consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit was based on an independent third party appraisal of AIP’s property by KTR Real Estate Advisors LLC, or KTR, an independent valuation firm.
 
The number of OP Units offered for each AIP Unit in the second merger will be calculated by dividing $268.04 by the average closing price of common stock of Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange, or the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the second merger. For example, as of November 10, 2011, the average closing price of Aimco common stock over the preceding ten consecutive trading days was $23.79, which would have resulted in 11.27 OP Units offered for each AIP Unit. However, if Aimco OP determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction (or that registration or qualification in that state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such limited partner will not be entitled to elect OP Units, and will receive cash.
 
The OP Units are not listed on any securities exchange nor do they trade in an active secondary market. However, after a one-year holding period, OP Units are redeemable for shares of Aimco common stock (on a one-for-one basis) or cash equal to the value of such shares, as Aimco elects. As a result, the trading price of Aimco common stock is considered a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit. Aimco’s common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.”
 
In the second merger, Aimco OP’s interest in the Aimco Subsidiary will be converted into limited partnership interests in New AIP. As a result, after the second merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of New AIP.
 
Within ten days after the effective time of the second merger, Aimco OP will prepare and mail to former holders of AIP Units an election form pursuant to which former holders of AIP Units can elect to receive cash or OP Units. Former holders of AIP Units may elect the form of consideration they wish to receive by completing and returning the election form in accordance with its instructions. If the information agent does not receive a properly completed election form from a former holder of AIP Units before 5:00 p.m., New York time, on the 30th day after the mailing of the election form, such former holder will be deemed to have elected to receive cash. Former holders of AIP Units may also use the election form to elect to receive, in lieu of the merger consideration, the appraised value of their AIP Units, determined through an arbitration proceeding.
 
AIP’s general partner, Angeles Realty Corporation II, or the General Partner, has determined that the merger transactions are advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of AIP and its limited partners and has approved the merger transactions. As of November 10, 2011, there were 47,311 issued and outstanding AIP Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 27,739 of those units, or approximately 58.63% of the number of units outstanding. The General Partner’s affiliates have indicated that they will vote all of their AIP Units in favor of the merger transactions, enabling them to approve the merger transactions without the consent or approval of any unaffiliated limited partners.
 
Aimco OP and its affiliates have indicated that they intend to take action by written consent, as permitted under the partnership agreement, to approve the merger transactions on or about          , 2011. As a result, approval of the merger transactions is assured, and your consent to the merger transactions is not required.
 
WE ARE NOT ASKING YOU FOR A PROXY AND
YOU ARE REQUESTED NOT TO SEND US A PROXY
 
This information statement/prospectus contains information about the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and the securities offered hereby, and the reasons that the General Partner has decided that the merger transactions are in the best interests of AIP and its limited partners. The General Partner has conflicts of interest with respect to the transactions that are described in greater detail herein. Please read this information statement/prospectus carefully, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” beginning on page 19. It provides you with detailed information about the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and the securities offered hereby. The merger agreement is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex A.
 
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of the securities to be issued in connection with the transactions described herein, determined if this information statement/prospectus is truthful or complete, approved or disapproved of the transactions, passed upon the merits or fairness of the transactions or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of the disclosure in this information statement/prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
 
This information statement/prospectus is dated,          , 2011, and is first being mailed to limited partners on or about          , 2011.


Table of Contents

 
WE ARE CURRENTLY SEEKING QUALIFICATION TO ALLOW ALL HOLDERS OF AIP UNITS THE ABILITY TO ELECT TO RECEIVE OP UNITS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER TRANSACTIONS DESCRIBED HEREIN. HOWEVER, AT THE PRESENT TIME, IF YOU ARE A RESIDENT OF ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATES, YOU ARE NOT PERMITTED TO ELECT TO RECEIVE OP UNITS IN CONNECTION WITH THE MERGER TRANSACTIONS DESCRIBED HEREIN:
 
CALIFORNIA
MASSACHUSETTS
NEW YORK
 
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK HAS NOT PASSED ON OR ENDORSED THE MERITS OF THIS OFFERING. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS UNLAWFUL.
 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 
This information statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Aimco from documents that it has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, but that have not been included in or delivered with this information statement/prospectus. For a listing of documents incorporated by reference into this information statement/prospectus, please see “Where You Can Find Additional Information” beginning on page 94 of this information statement/prospectus.
 
Aimco will provide you with copies of such documents relating to Aimco (excluding all exhibits unless Aimco has specifically incorporated by reference an exhibit in this information statement/prospectus), without charge, upon written or oral request to:
 
ISTC Corporation
P.O. Box 2347
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(864) 239-1029
 
If you wish to obtain any of these documents from Aimco, you should make your request no later than          , 2011 to ensure timely delivery. You will not be charged for any of the documents you request.
 
If you have any questions or require any assistance, please contact our information agent, Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016; by fax at (908) 497-2349; or by telephone at (800) 217-9608.
 
ABOUT THIS INFORMATION STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
 
This information statement/prospectus, which forms a part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the SEC by Aimco and Aimco OP, constitutes a prospectus of Aimco OP under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, with respect to the OP Units that may be issued to holders of AIP Units in connection with the transactions described herein, and a prospectus of Aimco under Section 5 of the Securities Act with respect to shares of Aimco common stock that may be issued in exchange for such OP Units tendered for redemption. This document also constitutes an information statement under Section 14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, with respect to the action to be taken by written consent to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.


Table of Contents

 
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
    Page
 
    1  
       
    5  
    5  
    6  
    7  
    7  
    9  
    13  
    17  
       
    19  
    19  
    20  
    20  
    22  
       
    24  
       
    26  
       
    28  
       
    29  
       
    30  
       
    32  
    34  
    35  
    36  
    36  
    37  
       
    38  
    38  
    39  
    41  
    41  
    41  
    41  
    41  
    41  
    42  
    42  
    42  


Table of Contents

         
    Page
 
    43  
    43  
    43  
    43  
    44  
    44  
    44  
    44  
       
    45  
    45  
    45  
    45  
    47  
    48  
    48  
    49  
    49  
    49  
    50  
    50  
    51  
    51  
    52  
    52  
    52  
    52  
       
    54  
    54  
    54  
       
    60  
       
    62  
    65  
       
    67  
    68  
    70  
    76  
    89  
       
    91  
       
    92  
       
    93  


ii


Table of Contents

         
    Page
 
    94  
       
    A-1  
    B-1  
    C-1  
    D-1  
    E-1  
    F-1  
    G-1  
    H-1  
    I-1  
    J-1  
 EX-5.1
 EX-8.2
 EX-23.1
 EX-23.2
 EX-23.3
 EX-23.6
 EX-23.7
 EX-23.8
 EX-23.10
 EX-99.1


iii


Table of Contents

 
SUMMARY TERM SHEET
 
This summary term sheet highlights the material information with respect to the merger agreement, the mergers and the other matters described herein. It may not contain all of the information that is important to you. You are urged to carefully read the entire information statement/prospectus and the other documents referred to in this information statement/prospectus, including the merger agreement. Aimco, Aimco OP, the General Partner and Aimco’s subsidiaries that may be deemed to directly or indirectly beneficially own AIP Units are referred to herein, collectively, as the “Aimco Entities.”
 
  •  The Merger Transactions:  AIP entered into a merger agreement with Aimco OP, New AIP and Aimco Subsidiary. The merger agreement contemplates two merger transactions. First, AIP will be merged with and into New AIP with New AIP as the surviving entity. In this merger, each AIP Unit will be converted into an identical unit of limited partnership in New AIP and the general partnership interest in AIP now held by the general partner will be converted into a general partnership interest in New AIP. All interests in New AIP outstanding immediately prior to the merger will be cancelled in the first merger. AIP’s partnership agreement in effect immediately prior to the first merger will be adopted as the partnership agreement of New AIP, with the following changes: (i) references therein to the California Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended, or the California Act, will be amended to refer to the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended, or the Delaware Act; (ii) a description of the merger will be added; and (iii) the name of the partnership will be “Angeles Income Properties 6, LP.” Second, the Aimco Subsidiary will be merged with and into New AIP, with New AIP as the surviving entity. The Aimco Subsidiary was formed for the purpose of effecting this merger and does not have any assets or operations. In this second merger, each AIP Unit will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration described below. A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this information statement/prospectus. You are encouraged to read the merger agreement carefully in its entirety because it is the legal agreement that governs the mergers.
 
  •  Merger Consideration:  In the second merger, each AIP Unit will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such AIP Unit, either $268.04 in cash or equivalent value in OP Units, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units (or registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly). The number of OP Units issuable with respect to each AIP Unit will be calculated by dividing the $268.04 per unit cash merger consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the second merger. For a full description of the determination of the merger consideration, see “The Transactions — Determination of Merger Consideration” beginning on page 39.
 
  •  Fairness of Merger Consideration:  Although the Aimco Entities have interests that may conflict with those of AIP’s unaffiliated limited partners, each of the Aimco Entities believes that the mergers are fair to the unaffiliated limited partners of AIP. See “Special Factors — Fairness of the Merger Transactions” beginning on page 7. The merger consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit was based on an independent third party appraisal of AIP’s underlying property by KTR, an independent appraisal firm.
 
  •  Opinion of Financial Advisor:  In connection with the transactions, Duff & Phelps, LLC, or Duff & Phelps has delivered its written opinion to the boards of directors of Aimco and the general partners of Aimco OP and AIP to the effect that, as of November 15, 2011, the cash consideration offered in the second merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of AIP. The full text of Duff & Phelps written opinion, which sets forth the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with its opinion, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex B. You are encouraged to read Duff & Phelps’ opinion, and the section entitled “Special Factors — Opinion of Financial Advisor” beginning on page 13, carefully and in their entirety. Duff & Phelps’ opinion was directed to the boards of directors of Aimco and the general partners of Aimco OP and AIP, and addresses only the fairness to the unaffiliated limited partners of AIP, from a financial point of view, of the cash consideration offered to them in the second merger as of the date of the opinion. Duff & Phelps’ opinion did not address any other aspect of the transactions and was not


1


Table of Contents

  intended to and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any party should vote or act with respect to the transactions or any matter relating thereto.
 
  •  Effects of the Transactions:  After the merger transactions, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner in New AIP, and will own all of the outstanding limited partnership interests of New AIP. As a result, after the merger transactions, you will cease to have any rights in New AIP as a limited partner. See “Special Factors — Effects of the Transactions,” beginning on page 6.
 
  •  Appraisal Rights:  Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to a stockholder of a constituent corporation in a merger under Delaware law, and which will enable a limited partner to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited partner’s AIP Units in connection with the transactions. See “The Transactions — Appraisal Rights,” beginning on page 41. A description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex C.
 
  •  List of Investors:  Under AIP’s partnership agreement and applicable law, upon written request and at the cost of the limited partner, a limited partner who holds AIP Units has the right to receive by mail a list of the names and addresses of the partners of AIP and the number of units of partnership interest held by each of them. This list may be obtained by making written request to the Angeles Realty Corporation II, c/o Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016, or by fax at (908) 497-2349.
 
  •  Parties Involved:
 
  •  Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. 6, or AIP, is a California limited partnership organized on June 29, 1984 for the purpose of acquiring, managing, and ultimately selling income-producing real property. AIP presently owns and operates, through a limited partnership of which it owns 99% of the limited partnership interests, one investment property, Lazy Hollow Apartments, a 178 unit apartment project located in Columbia, Maryland. See “Information About Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. 6”, beginning on page 32. AIP’s principal address is 55 Beattie Place, P.O. Box 1089, Greenville, South Carolina 29602, and its telephone number is (864) 239-1000.
 
  •  Apartment Investment and Management Company, or Aimco, is a Maryland corporation that is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. Aimco’s principal financial objective is to provide predictable and attractive returns to its stockholders. Aimco’s common stock is listed and traded on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.” See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 32. Aimco’s principal address is 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237, and its telephone number is (303) 757-8101.
 
  •  AIMCO Properties, L.P., or Aimco OP, is a Delaware limited partnership which, through its operating divisions and subsidiaries, holds substantially all of Aimco’s assets and manages the daily operations of Aimco’s business and assets. See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 30. Aimco OP’s principal address is 4582 South Ulster Street, Suite 1100, Denver, Colorado 80237, and its telephone number is (303) 757-8101.
 
  •  Angeles Income Properties 6, LP, or New AIP, is a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 26, 2011, for the purpose of consummating the first merger with AIP. New AIP’s general partner is Angeles Realty Corporation II, and its sole limited partner is Aimco OP. See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 30.
 
  •  AIMCO AIP 6 Merger Sub LLC, or the Aimco Subsidiary, is a Delaware limited liability company formed on July 26, 2011, for the purpose of consummating the second merger with New AIP. The Aimco Subsidiary is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Aimco OP. See “Information about the Aimco Entities,” beginning on page 30.
 
  •  Reasons for the Transactions:  Aimco and Aimco OP are in the business of acquiring, owning and managing apartment properties such as the one owned by AIP, and have decided to proceed with the transactions as a means of acquiring the property currently owned by AIP in a manner that they believe


2


Table of Contents

  (i) provides fair value to limited partners, (ii) offers limited partners an opportunity to receive immediate liquidity, or defer recognition of taxable gain (except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly), and (iii) relieves AIP of the expenses associated with a sale of the property, including marketing and other transaction costs. The Aimco Entities decided to proceed with the transactions at this time for the following reasons:
 
  •  In the absence of a transaction, AIP limited partners have only limited options to liquidate their investment in AIP. The AIP Units are not traded on an exchange or other reporting system, and transactions in the securities are limited and sporadic.
 
  •  The value of the single property owned by AIP is not sufficient to justify its continued operation as a public company. As a public company with a significant number of unaffiliated limited partners, AIP incurs costs associated with preparing audited annual financial statements, unaudited quarterly financial statements, tax returns and partner Schedule K-1s, periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities estimate these costs to be approximately $89,000 per year.
 
See “Special Factors — Purposes, Alternatives and Reasons for the Transactions,” beginning on page 5.
 
  •  Conflicts of Interest:  The General Partner is indirectly wholly-owned by Aimco. Therefore, the General Partner has a conflict of interest with respect to the transactions. The General Partner has fiduciary duties to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., the General Partner’s sole stockholder and an affiliate of Aimco, on the one hand, and to AIP and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of the General Partner to AIP and its limited partners conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., which could result in the General Partner approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. See “The Transactions — Conflicts of Interest,” beginning on page 40.
 
  •  Risk Factors:  In evaluating the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, AIP limited partners should carefully read this information statement/prospectus and especially consider the factors discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors,” beginning on page 19. Some of the risk factors associated with the transactions are summarized below:
 
  •  Aimco owns the General Partner. As a result, the General Partner has a conflict of interest in the merger transactions. A transaction with a third party in the absence of this conflict could result in better terms or greater consideration to AIP limited partners.
 
  •  AIP limited partners who receive cash may recognize taxable gain in the merger transactions and that gain could exceed the merger consideration.
 
  •  There are a number of significant differences between AIP Units and OP Units relating to, among other things, the nature of the investment, voting rights, distributions and liquidity and transferability/redemption. For more information regarding those differences, see “Comparison of AIP Units and Aimco OP Units,” beginning on page 62.
 
  •  AIP limited partners may elect to receive OP Units as merger consideration in the second merger, and there are risks related to an investment in OP Units, including the fact that there are restrictions on transferability of OP Units; there is no public market for OP Units; and there is no assurance as to the value that might be realized upon a future redemption of OP Units. See “Comparison of AIP Units and Aimco OP Units,” beginning on page 62.
 
  •  Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Transactions:  The merger between AIP and New AIP will generally be treated as a partnership merger for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. In general, AIP will not recognize gain as a result of contribution of its assets to New AIP, and the merger between AIP and New AIP will not result in any tax consequences to the limited partners of AIP. The merger between AIP and the Aimco Subsidiary will generally be treated as a partnership merger for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. In general, any payment of cash for AIP Units will be treated as a sale of such AIP Units by the holder thereof. Any exchange of AIP Units for OP Units under the terms of the merger agreement will be treated as a tax-free transaction, except to the extent described in “Material United States


3


Table of Contents

  Federal Income Tax Considerations — United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Transactions,” beginning on page 68.
 
The foregoing is a general discussion of the material U.S. Federal income tax consequences of the transactions. This summary does not discuss all aspects of U.S. Federal income taxation that may be relevant to you in light of your specific circumstances or if you are subject to special treatment under the U.S. Federal income tax laws. The particular tax consequences of the transactions to you will depend on a number of factors related to your tax situation. You should review “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations,” herein and consult your tax advisors for a full understanding of the tax consequences to you of the transactions.


4


Table of Contents

 
SPECIAL FACTORS
 
Purposes, Alternatives and Reasons for the Transactions
 
Aimco and Aimco OP are in the business of acquiring, owning and managing apartment properties such as the one owned by AIP, and have decided to proceed with the transactions as a means of acquiring the property currently owned by AIP in a manner they believe (i) provides fair value to limited partners, (ii) offers limited partners an opportunity to receive immediate liquidity, or defer recognition of taxable gain (except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly), and (iii) relieves AIP of the expenses associated with a sale of the property, including marketing and other transaction costs.
 
The Aimco Entities determined to proceed with the transactions at this time for the following reasons:
 
  •  In the absence of a transaction, AIP limited partners have only limited options to liquidate their investment in AIP. The AIP Units are not traded on an exchange or other reporting system, and transactions in the securities are limited and sporadic.
 
  •  The value of the single property owned by AIP is not sufficient to justify its continued operation as a public company. As a public company with a significant number of unaffiliated limited partners, AIP incurs costs associated with preparing audited annual financial statements, unaudited quarterly financial statements, tax returns and partner Schedule K-1s, periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities estimate these costs to be approximately $89,000 per year.
 
Before deciding to proceed with the transactions, the General Partner and the other Aimco Entities considered the alternatives described below:
 
Continuation of AIP as a Public Company Operating the Property.  The General Partner and the other Aimco Entities did not consider the continuation of AIP as a public company operating the property to be a viable alternative primarily because of the costs associated with preparing financial statements, tax returns, periodic SEC reports and other expenses. If AIP is unable to generate sufficient funds to cover operating expenses, advances from Aimco OP may not be available in the future as Aimco OP is not obligated to provide such advances.
 
Liquidation of AIP.  The General Partner and the other Aimco Entities considered a liquidation of AIP in which AIP’s property would be marketed and sold to a third party for cash, with any net proceeds remaining, after payment of all liabilities, distributed to AIP’s limited partners. The primary advantage of such a transaction would be that the sale price would reflect arm’s-length negotiations and might therefore be higher than the appraised value which has been used to determine the merger consideration. The General Partner and the other Aimco Entities rejected this alternative because of: (i) the risk that a third party purchaser might not be found that would offer a satisfactory price; (ii) the costs that AIP would incur in connection with marketing and selling the property; (iii) the fact that limited partners would recognize taxable gain on the sale without the option of deferring that gain; and (iv) the prepayment penalties that AIP would incur in repaying its mortgage debt upon a sale of the property.
 
Contribution of the Property to Aimco OP.  The Aimco Entities considered a transaction in which AIP’s property would be contributed to Aimco OP in exchange for OP Units. The primary advantage of such a transaction would be that AIP limited partners would not recognize taxable gain. The Aimco Entities rejected this alternative because it would not offer an opportunity for immediate liquidity to the limited partners that desire such an alternative.


5


Table of Contents

 
Effects of the Transactions
 
The Aimco Entities believe that the transactions will have the following benefits and detriments to unaffiliated limited partners, AIP and the Aimco Entities:
 
Benefits to Unaffiliated Limited Partners.  The transactions are expected to have the following principal benefits to unaffiliated limited partners:
 
Liquidity.  Limited partners are given a choice of merger consideration and may elect to receive either cash or OP Units in the second merger, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units (or registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly). Limited partners who receive cash consideration will receive immediate liquidity with respect to their investment.
 
Option to Defer Taxable Gain.  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger may defer recognition of taxable gain (except where the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction, or where registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly).
 
Diversification.  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the second merger will have the opportunity to participate in Aimco OP, which has a more diversified property portfolio than AIP.
 
Benefits to AIP.  The transactions are expected to have the following principal benefits to AIP:
 
Elimination of Costs Associated with SEC Reporting Requirements and Multiple Limited Partners.  After the transactions, the Aimco Entities will own all of the interests in AIP, and AIP will terminate its registration and cease filing periodic reports with the SEC. As a result, AIP will no longer incur costs associated with preparing audited annual financial statements, unaudited quarterly financial statements, tax returns and partner Schedule K-1s, periodic SEC reports and other expenses. The Aimco Entities estimate these expenses to be approximately $89,000 per year.
 
Benefits to the Aimco Entities.  The transactions are expected to have the following principal benefits to the Aimco Entities:
 
Increased Interest in AIP.  Upon completion of the merger transactions, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of New AIP. As a result, the Aimco Entities will receive all of the benefit from any future appreciation in value of the property after the merger transactions and any future income from such property.
 
Detriments to Unaffiliated Limited Partners.  The transactions are expected to have the following principal detriments to unaffiliated limited partners:
 
Taxable Gain.  Limited partners who receive cash consideration may recognize taxable gain in the second merger and that gain could exceed the merger consideration. In addition, limited partners who receive OP Units in the second merger could recognize taxable gain if Aimco subsequently sells AIP’s property.
 
Risks Related to OP Units.  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the second merger will be subject to the risks related to an investment in OP Units, as described in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors — Risks Related to an Investment in OP Units.”
 
Conflicts of Interest; No Separate Representation of Unaffiliated Limited Partners.  The General Partner is indirectly wholly-owned by Aimco. Therefore, the General Partner has a conflict of interest with respect to the merger transactions. The General Partner has fiduciary duties to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., the General Partner’s sole stockholder and an affiliate of Aimco, on the one hand, and to AIP and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of the General Partner to AIP and its limited partners conflict with the duties of the General Partner to AIMCO/IPT, Inc., which could result in the General Partner approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. The General Partner’s desire to seek the best possible terms for AIP’s limited partners conflicts with Aimco’s interest in obtaining the best possible terms for Aimco OP. In negotiating the merger agreement, no one separately represented the interests of the unaffiliated limited partners. If an independent advisor had been engaged, it is possible that such advisor could have negotiated better terms for AIP’s unaffiliated limited partners.


6


Table of Contents

Detriments to AIP.  The transactions are not expected to have any detriments to AIP.
 
Detriments to the Aimco Entities.  The transactions are expected to have the following principal detriments to the Aimco Entities:
 
Increased Interest in AIP.  Upon completion of the merger transactions, the Aimco Entities’ interest in the net book value of AIP will increase from 59.44% to 100%, or from a deficit of $5,871,000 to a deficit of $9,877,000 as of December 31, 2010. Upon completion of the merger transactions, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of New AIP. As a result, Aimco OP will bear the burden of all future operating or other losses of AIP, as well as any decline in the value of AIP’s property.
 
Burden of Capital Expenditures.  Upon completion of the transactions, the Aimco Entities will have sole responsibility for providing any funds necessary to pay for capital expenditures at the property.
 
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Transactions
 
For a discussion of the material U.S. Federal income tax consequences of the transactions, see “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations — United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Transactions,” beginning on page 68.
 
Fairness of the Merger Transactions
 
Factors in Favor of Fairness Determination.  The Aimco Entities (including the General Partner) believe that the transactions are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of AIP and its unaffiliated limited partners. In support of such determination, the Aimco Entities considered the following factors:
 
  •  The merger consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit was based on an independent third party appraisal of AIP’s property by KTR, an independent valuation firm.
 
  •  Duff & Phelps has delivered its written opinion to the boards of directors of Aimco and the general partners of Aimco OP and AIP to the effect that, as of November 15, 2011, and based on and subject to the various assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with its opinion, the cash consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit offered in the second merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of AIP.
 
  •  The merger consideration is greater than the Aimco Entities’ estimate of liquidation value because there was no deduction for certain amounts that would be payable upon an immediate sale of the property, such as prepayment penalties on the mortgage debt, currently estimated to be approximately $4,210,400.
 
  •  The merger consideration is equal to the Aimco Entities’ estimate of going concern value, calculated as the appraised value of AIP’s property, plus the amount of its other assets, less the amount of AIP’s liabilities, including the market value of mortgage debt (but without deducting any prepayment penalties thereon).
 
  •  The mark-to market adjustment to the mortgage debt encumbering AIP’s property is less than the prepayment penalties that would be payable upon an immediate sale of the property.
 
  •  The merger consideration exceeds the net book value per unit (a deficit of $197.40 per AIP Unit at September 30, 2011).
 
  •  Limited partners may defer recognition of taxable gain by electing to receive OP Units in the second merger, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units (or registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly).
 
  •  The number of OP Units issuable to limited partners in the second merger will be determined based on the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the second merger.
 
  •  Limited partners who receive cash consideration will achieve immediate liquidity with respect to their investment.


7


Table of Contents

 
  •  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the merger will have the opportunity to participate in Aimco OP, which has a more diversified property portfolio than AIP.
 
  •  Although limited partners are not entitled to dissenters’ appraisal rights under applicable law, the merger agreement provides them with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights that are available to stockholders in a corporate merger under Delaware law.
 
  •  Although the merger agreement may be terminated by either side at any time, Aimco OP and the Aimco Subsidiary are very likely to complete the merger transactions on a timely basis.
 
  •  Unlike a typical property sale agreement, the merger agreement contains no indemnification provisions, so there is no risk of subsequent reduction of the proceeds.
 
  •  In contrast to a sale of the property to a third party, which would involve marketing and other transaction costs, Aimco OP has agreed to pay all expenses associated with the merger transactions.
 
  •  The merger consideration is greater than the prices at which AIP Units have recently sold in the secondary market ($10.00 to $160.00 per AIP Unit for transactions reported between January 1, 2010 and November 4, 2011).
 
  •  The merger consideration is greater than the prices at which AIP Units have historically sold in the secondary market ($150.00 to $225.00 per AIP Unit for transactions reported between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2009).
 
Factors Not in Favor of Fairness Determination.  In addition to the foregoing factors, the Aimco Entities also considered the following countervailing factors:
 
  •  The General Partner has substantial conflicts of interest with respect to the transactions as a result of (i) the fiduciary duties it owes to unaffiliated limited partners, who have an interest in receiving the highest possible consideration, and (ii) the fiduciary duties it owes to its sole stockholder, a subsidiary of Aimco, which has an interest in obtaining the AIP property for the lowest possible consideration.
 
  •  The terms of the merger agreement were not approved by any independent directors.
 
  •  An unaffiliated representative was not retained to act solely on behalf of the unaffiliated limited partners for purposes of negotiating the merger agreement on an independent, arm’s-length basis, which might have resulted in better terms for the unaffiliated limited partners.
 
  •  The transactions do not require the approval of any unaffiliated limited partners.
 
  •  In calculating the merger consideration, the market value of the mortgage debt encumbering AIP’s property was deducted, which resulted in less merger consideration than would have been the case if the aggregate amount outstanding was deducted.
 
  •  Limited partners who receive cash consideration in the second merger may recognize taxable gain and that gain could exceed the merger consideration.
 
  •  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the second merger could recognize taxable gain if Aimco subsequently sells AIP’s property.
 
  •  Limited partners who receive OP Units in the second merger will be subject to the risks related to an investment in OP Units, as described in greater detail under the heading “Risk Factors — Risks Related to an Investment in OP Units.”
 
  •  KTR, the valuation firm that appraised the AIP property, has performed work for Aimco OP and its affiliates in the past and this pre-existing relationship could negatively impact KTR’s independence.
 
The Aimco Entities did not assign relative weights to the above factors in reaching their decision that the transactions are fair to AIP and its unaffiliated limited partners. However, in determining that the benefits of the proposed transactions outweigh the costs and risks, they relied primarily on the following factors: (i) the merger consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit is based on an independent third party appraisal of AIP’s property, (ii) the


8


Table of Contents

Duff & Phelps opinion that, as of November 15, 2011, based on and subject to the various assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with its opinion, the cash consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit offered in the second merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of AIP, (iii) limited partners may defer recognition of taxable gain by electing to receive OP Units in the second merger (except in certain jurisdictions) and (iv) limited partners are entitled to contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights. The Aimco Entities were aware of, but did not place much emphasis on, information regarding prices at which AIP Units may have sold in the secondary market because they do not view that information as a reliable measure of value. The AIP Units are not traded on an exchange or other reporting system, and transactions in the secondary market are very limited and sporadic. In addition, some of the historical prices are not comparable to current value because of intervening events, including a property sale, increased borrowings through a second mortgage on AIP’s property and the distribution of proceeds from such events.
 
Procedural Fairness.  The Aimco Entities determined that the transactions are fair from a procedural standpoint despite the absence of any customary procedural safeguards, such as the engagement of an unaffiliated representative, the approval of independent directors or approval by a majority of unaffiliated limited partners. In making this determination, the Aimco Entities relied primarily on the dissenters’ appraisal rights provided to unaffiliated limited partners under the merger agreement that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to stockholders in a corporate merger under Delaware law.
 
The Appraisal
 
Selection and Qualifications of Independent Appraiser.  The General Partner retained the services of KTR to appraise the market value of AIP’s sole property, the Lazy Hollow Apartments. KTR is an experienced independent valuation consulting firm that has performed appraisal services for Aimco OP and its affiliates in the past. Aimco OP believes that its relationship with KTR had no negative impact on its independence in conducting the appraisal related to the merger.
 
Factors Considered.  KTR performed a complete appraisal of the Lazy Hollow Apartments. KTR has represented that its report was prepared in conformity with the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice, as promulgated by the Appraisal Standards Board of the Appraisal Foundation and the Code of Professional Ethics and Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice of the Appraisal Institute. AIP furnished KTR with all of the necessary information requested by KTR in connection with the appraisal. The appraisal was not prepared in conjunction with a request for a specific value or a value within a given range. In preparing its valuation of the property, KTR, among other things:
 
  •  Inspected the property and its environs;
 
  •  Reviewed demographic and other socioeconomic trends pertaining to the city and region where the property is located;
 
  •  Examined regional apartment market conditions, with special emphasis on the property’s apartment submarket;
 
  •  Investigated lease and sale transactions involving comparable properties in the influencing market;
 
  •  Reviewed the existing rent roll and discussed the leasing status with the building manager and leasing agent. In addition, KTR reviewed the property’s recent operating history and those of competing properties;
 
  •  Utilized appropriate appraisal methodology to derive estimates of value; and
 
  •  Reconciled the estimates of value into a single value conclusion.
 
Summary of Approaches and Methodologies Employed.  The following summary describes the approaches and analyses employed by KTR in preparing the appraisal. KTR principally relied on two approaches to valuation: (i) the income capitalization approach and (ii) the sales comparison approach.
 
The income capitalization approach is based on the premise that value is derived by converting anticipated benefits into property value. Anticipated benefits include the present value of the net income and the present value of the net proceeds resulting from the re-sale of the property. This can be accomplished through either a direct capitalization of a single year’s income by an overall capitalization rate or using a discounted cash flow in which the


9


Table of Contents

annual cash flows and reversionary value are discounted to a present value for the remainder of the property’s productive life or over a reasonable ownership period. KTR reported that the property has an adequate operations history to determine its income-producing capabilities over the near future. In addition, performance levels of competitive properties served as an adequate check as to the reasonableness of the property’s actual performance. As such, the income capitalization approach was utilized in the appraisal of the property.
 
As part of the income capitalization approach, KTR used the direct capitalization method to estimate a value for the Lazy Hollow Apartments. According to KTR’s report, the basic steps in the direct capitalization analysis to valuing the property are as follows: (i) calculate potential gross income from all sources that a competent owner could legally generate; (ii) estimate and deduct an appropriate vacancy, collection, administrative use, concession and below-market rental rate loss factor to arrive at effective gross income; (iii) estimate and deduct operating expenses that would be expected during a stabilized year to arrive at a probable net operating income; (iv) develop an appropriate overall capitalization rate to apply to the net operating income; and (v) estimate value by dividing the net operating income by the overall capitalization rate. In addition, any adjustments to account for differences between the current conditions and stabilized conditions are also considered. The assumptions utilized by KTR with respect to the property are set forth below. The property-specific assumptions were determined by KTR to be reasonable based on its review of historical operating and financial data for the property and comparison of said data to the operating statistics of similar properties in the influencing market areas. The capitalization rate for the property was determined to be reasonable by KTR based on its review of applicable data ascertained within the market in which the property is located.
 
The sales comparison approach is an estimate of value based upon a process of comparing recent sales of similar properties in the surrounding or competing areas to the subject property. Inherent in and central to this approach is the principle of substitution. This comparative process involves judgment as to the similarity of the subject property and the comparable sales with respect to many value factors such as location, contract rent levels, quality of construction, reputation and prestige, age and condition, and the interest transferred, among others. The value estimated through this approach represents the probable price at which the subject property would be sold by a willing seller to a willing and knowledgeable buyer as of the date of value. The reliability of this technique is dependent upon the availability of comparable sales data, the verification of the sales data, the degree of comparability and extent of adjustment necessary for differences, and the absence of atypical conditions affecting the individual sales prices. KTR reported that, although the volume of sales activity is down as a result of market conditions, its research revealed adequate sales activity to form a reasonable estimation of the subject property’s market value pursuant to the sales comparison approach.
 
For the appraisal, KTR conducted research in the market in an attempt to locate sales of properties similar to the appraised property. In the appraisal, numerous sales were uncovered and the specific sales included in the appraisal report were deemed representative of the most comparable data available at the time the appraisal was prepared. Important criteria utilized in selecting the most comparable data included: conditions under which the sale occurred (i.e., seller and buyer were typically motivated); date of sale — every attempt was made to utilize recent sales transactions; sales were selected based on their physical similarity to the appraised property; transactions were selected based on the similarity of location between the comparable and appraised property; and, similarity of economic characteristics between the comparable and appraised property. Sales data that may have been uncovered during the course of research that was not included in the appraisal did not meet the described criteria and/or could not be adequately confirmed.
 
According to KTR’s report, the basic steps in processing the sales comparison approach are outlined as follows: (i) research the market for recent sales transactions, listings, and offers to purchase or sell of properties similar to the subject property; (ii) select a relevant unit of comparison and develop a comparative analysis; (iii) compare comparable sale properties with the subject property using the elements of comparison and adjust the price of each comparable to the subject property; and (iv) reconcile the various value indications produced by the analysis of the comparables.
 
The final step in the appraisal process is the reconciliation of the value indicators into a single value estimate. KTR reviewed each approach in order to determine its appropriateness relative to the property. The accuracy of the data available and the quantity of evidence were weighted in each approach. For the appraisal of the Lazy Hollow


10


Table of Contents

Apartments, KTR relied equally on the income capitalization and sales comparison approaches to valuation. Within the income capitalization approach, KTR relied on the direct capitalization method. KTR reported that the value conclusion derived pursuant to the sales comparison approach was directly supportive of the conclusion derived pursuant to the income capitalization approach.
 
Summary of Independent Appraisal of the Lazy Hollow Apartments.  KTR performed a complete appraisal of the Lazy Hollow Apartments. The appraisal report of Lazy Hollow Apartments is dated October 20, 2011. The appraisal report provides an estimate of the property’s market value as of October 1, 2011. The summary set forth below describes the material conclusions reached by KTR based on the value determined under the valuation approaches and subject to the assumptions and limitations described below. According to KTR’s appraisal report, the estimated market value of the Lazy Hollow Apartments was $27,000,000 as of October 1, 2011. Two previous appraisal reports by KTR of the Lazy Hollow Apartments, dated March 11, 2011 and June 3, 2011, respectively, indicated that the estimated market value of the Lazy Hollow Apartments was $26,000,000 as of March 4, 2011 and June 1, 2011, respectively. An increase of $1,000,000 was noted by KTR in the estimated market value of the Lazy Hollow Apartments as of October 1, 2011. The following is a summary of the appraisal report dated October 20, 2011. There is no present intention to further update the appraisal report dated October 20, 2011. The Aimco Entities are not aware of any events that have occurred or conditions that have changed since the October 1, 2011 appraisal that may have caused a material change in the value of the Lazy Hollow Apartments since such date.
 
Extraordinary Assumption.  In connection with the preparation of its March 11, 2011 appraisal report of the Lazy Hollow Apartments, KTR inspected the property on March 4, 2011. KTR noted that the scope of work of the June 3, 2011 and October 20, 2011 appraisal reports of the Lazy Hollow Apartments did not include a physical inspection of the Lazy Hollow Apartments, and that the values derived in the report are based on the extraordinary assumption that the physical condition of the Lazy Hollow Apartments has not materially changed since March 4, 2011.
 
Valuation Under Income Capitalization Approach.  Using the income capitalization approach, KTR performed a direct capitalization analysis to derive a value for the Lazy Hollow Apartments. The direct capitalization analysis resulted in a valuation conclusion for the Lazy Hollow Apartments of approximately $27,200,000.
 
The assumptions employed by KTR to determine the value of the Lazy Hollow Apartments under the income capitalization approach using the direct capitalization method included:
 
  •  potential gross income from apartment unit rentals of $239,915 per month or $2,878,980 for the appraised year;
 
  •  a loss to lease allowance of 3.0% of the gross rent potential;
 
  •  rent concessions of 1.1% of the gross rent potential;
 
  •  a combined vacancy and credit loss allowance of 5.0%;
 
  •  an administrative unit deduction of $16,200 for the appraised year;
 
  •  estimated other income of $1,350 per unit for the appraised year;
 
  •  projected total expenses (including reserves) of $1,206,880 for the appraised year; and
 
  •  capitalization rate of 6.0%.
 
Using the direct capitalization method, KTR calculated the value of the Lazy Hollow Apartments by dividing the stabilized net operating income (including an allowance for reserves) of $1,634,213 by the concluded capitalization rate of 6.0%. KTR calculated the value conclusion of the Lazy Hollow Apartments under the income capitalization approach of approximately $27,200,000 as of October 1, 2011.
 
Valuation Under Sales Comparison Approach.  KTR estimated the property value of the Lazy Hollow Apartments under the sales comparison approach by analyzing sales from the influencing market that were most similar to the Lazy Hollow Apartments in terms of age, size, tenant profile and location. KTR reported that adequate sales existed to formulate a defensible value for the Lazy Hollow Apartments under the sales comparison approach.
 
The sales comparison approach resulted in a valuation conclusion for the Lazy Hollow Apartments of approximately $26,900,000 as of October 1, 2011.


11


Table of Contents

 
In reaching a valuation conclusion for the Lazy Hollow Apartments, KTR examined and analyzed comparable sales of three properties in the influencing market. The sales reflected unadjusted sales prices ranging from $120,047 to $151,479 per unit. After adjustment, the comparable sales illustrated a value range of $146,250 to $154,071 per unit. KTR reported that one of the comparable sales required the least adjustment and was accorded most significance in the analysis, and that the adjusted indicators exhibited by this sale was $151,101 per unit. Further, KTR reported that this comparable sale was the only property also located in Columbia and was accorded the greatest weight in the analysis. KTR estimated a value of $151,000 per unit for the Lazy Hollow Apartments. Applied to the Lazy Hollow Apartments’ 178 units, this resulted in KTR’s total value estimate for the Lazy Hollow Apartments of approximately $26,900,000.
 
Reconciliation of Values and Conclusion of Appraisal.  For the appraisal of the Lazy Hollow Apartments, KTR relied equally on the income capitalization and the sales comparison approaches to valuation. Within the income capitalization approach, KTR relied on the direct capitalization method. KTR reported that the value conclusion derived pursuant to the sales comparison approach is directly supportive of the conclusion derived pursuant to the income capitalization approach. The income capitalization approach using a direct capitalization method resulted in a value of $27,200,000, and the sales comparison approach resulted in a value of $26,900,000. KTR concluded that the market value of the Lazy Hollow Apartments as of October 1, 2011 was $27,000,000.
 
Assumptions, Limitations and Qualifications of KTR’s Valuations.  In preparing the appraisal, KTR relied, without independent verification, on the information furnished by others. KTR’s appraisal report was subject to the following assumptions and limiting conditions: no responsibility was assumed for the legal description or for matters including legal or title considerations, and title to the property was assumed to be good and marketable unless otherwise stated; the property was appraised free and clear of any or all liens or encumbrances unless otherwise stated; responsible ownership and competent property management were assumed; the information furnished by others was believed to be reliable, and no warranty was given by KTR for the accuracy of such information; all engineering was assumed to be correct, and any plot plans or illustrative material in the appraisal report are provided only to assist the reader in visualizing the property; there were no hidden or unapparent conditions of the property, subsoil, or structures that render it more or less valuable, and no responsibility was assumed for such conditions or for arranging for engineering studies that may be required to discover them; there was full compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local environmental regulations and laws unless noncompliance was stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report; all applicable zoning and use regulations and restrictions have been complied with, unless nonconformity had been stated, defined, and considered in the appraisal report; all required licenses, certificates of occupancy, consents, or other legislative or administrative authority from any local, state, or national government or private entity or organization have been or can be obtained or renewed for any use on which the value estimate contained in the appraisal report was based; the utilization of the land and improvements is within the boundaries or property lines of the property described and there is no encroachment or trespass unless noted in the appraisal report; the distribution, if any, of the total valuation in the appraisal report between land and improvements applies only under the stated program of utilization; unless otherwise stated in the appraisal report, the existence of hazardous substances, including without limitation, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls, petroleum leakage, or agricultural chemicals, which may or may not be present on the property, or other environmental conditions, were not called to the attention of nor did the appraiser become aware of such during the appraiser’s inspection, and the appraiser had no knowledge of the existence of such materials on or in the property unless otherwise stated; the appraiser has not made a specific compliance survey and analysis of the property to determine whether or not it is in conformity with the various detailed requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act; and former personal property items such as kitchen and bathroom appliances were, at the time of the appraisal report, either permanently affixed to the real estate or were implicitly part of the real estate in that tenants expected the use of such items in exchange for rent and never gained any of the rights of ownership, and the intention of the owners was not to remove the articles which are required under the implied or express warranty of habitability.
 
Compensation of Appraiser.  KTR’s fee for the appraisal was approximately $15,900. Aimco OP paid for the costs of the appraisal. KTR’s fee for the appraisal was not contingent on the approval or completion of the merger transactions. Aimco OP also has agreed to indemnify KTR for certain liabilities that may arise out of the rendering of the appraisals. In addition to the appraisal performed in connection with the transactions, during the prior two


12


Table of Contents

years, KTR has been paid approximately $288,700 for appraisal services by Aimco OP and its affiliates which includes, but is not limited to, approximately $160,200 in fees paid to KTR for appraisal services rendered in connection with certain other merger transactions that are being effected concurrently with this transaction. Except as set forth above, during the prior two years, no material relationship has existed between KTR and AIP or Aimco OP or any of their affiliates. Aimco OP believes that its relationship with KTR had no negative impact on its independence in conducting the appraisal.
 
Availability of the Appraisal Report.  You may obtain a full copy of KTR’s appraisal upon request, without charge, by contacting Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, by mail at 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016; by fax at (908) 497-2349; or by telephone at (800) 217-9608. In addition, the appraisal report has been filed with the SEC. For more information about how to obtain a copy of the appraisal report see “Where You Can Find Additional Information.”
 
For additional information about the appraisal, see the table, “Summary of Appraisal” attached as Annex J.
 
Opinion of Financial Advisor
 
Aimco OP retained Duff & Phelps to act as financial advisor to the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP, and the general partner of AIP in connection with their evaluation of the proposed terms of the second merger.
 
On November 15, 2011, Duff & Phelps rendered its written opinion to the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP, and the general partner of AIP, to the effect that, as of November 15, 2011, based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken, the cash consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit offered in the second merger is fair from a financial point of view to the unaffiliated limited partners of AIP.
 
The full text of the written opinion of Duff & Phelps, dated November 15, 2011, which sets forth the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with the opinion, is attached as Annex B to this information statement/prospectus. You are encouraged to read the opinion carefully and in its entirety. The summary of Duff & Phelps’ opinion in this information statement/prospectus is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion.
 
Duff & Phelps’ opinion was directed to the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP, and the general partner of AIP, and addressed only the fairness from a financial point of view of the cash consideration offered in the second merger, as of the date of the opinion. Duff & Phelps provided its opinion for the information and assistance of the boards of directors of Aimco, the general partner of Aimco OP, and the general partner of AIP in connection with their evaluation of the second merger. Neither Duff & Phelps’ opinion nor the summary of the opinion and the related analyses set forth in this information statement/prospectus are intended to be, and do not constitute, advice or a recommendation as to how any person should act with respect to any matters relating to the second merger, or whether to proceed with the second merger or any related transaction.
 
In connection with its opinion, Duff & Phelps made such reviews, analyses and inquiries as it deemed necessary and appropriate under the circumstances. Duff & Phelps also took into account its assessment of general economic, market and financial conditions, as well as its experience in securities and business valuation, in general, and with respect to similar transactions, in particular. Duff & Phelps’ procedures, investigations, and financial analysis with respect to the preparation of its opinion included, but were not limited to, the items summarized below:
 
1. Reviewed the following documents:
 
a. Reviewed AIP’s property level internal unaudited financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and AIP’s property level unaudited annual financial statements for each of the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2010;


13


Table of Contents

b. Reviewed other internal documents relating to the history, current operations, and probable future outlook of AIP, including financial projections, provided to Duff & Phelps by the management of Aimco OP; and
 
c. Reviewed documents related to the merger transactions, including certain portions of a draft of this information statement/prospectus, including a draft of the amended and restated agreement and plan of merger agreement dated as of November 15, 2011, and certain other documents related to the merger transactions;
 
2. Reviewed the following information and/or documents related to the real estate holdings of AIP:
 
a. Reviewed previously completed appraisal reports associated with the property owned by AIP prepared by KTR as of October 1, 2011 and provided to Duff & Phelps by management of Aimco OP (and as described under the heading “Special Factors — The Appraisal” and Annex J — Summary of Appraisal Table);
 
b. Reviewed facts and circumstances related to AIP’s property to understand factors relevant to the appraisal; and
 
c. Reviewed market data for the subject market and assessed current supply and demand trends;
 
3. Reviewed the following information and/or documents related to AIP’s property:
 
a. Reviewed operating statements and balance sheets for the twelve month periods ending December 31, 2008, 2009, and 2010;
 
b. Reviewed the year-to-date operating statement and balance sheet for the nine month period ending September 30, 2011;
 
c. Reviewed budgeted financial statements for the twelve month period ending December 31, 2011;
 
d. Reviewed rent rolls prepared as of September 2011; and
 
e. Discussed the information referred to above and the background and other elements of the merger transactions with the management of Aimco OP; and
 
4. Conducted such other analyses and considered such other factors as Duff & Phelps deemed appropriate.
 
In performing its analyses and rendering its opinion with respect to the second merger, Duff & Phelps made certain assumptions, qualifications and limiting conditions, which included, but were not limited to, the items summarized below:
 
a. Relied upon the accuracy, completeness, reliability, and fair presentation of all information, data, advice, opinions and representations obtained from public sources or provided to it from private sources regarding or otherwise relating to the property owned by AIP, AIP, the merger transactions and/or otherwise received by it in connection with the opinion, including information obtained from Aimco OP management, and did not independently verify such information;
 
b. Assumed that any estimates, evaluations, forecasts or projections furnished to Duff & Phelps by management of Aimco OP were reasonably prepared and based upon the best currently available information and good faith judgment of the person furnishing the same;
 
c. Assumed that the final versions of all documents reviewed by Duff & Phelps in draft form conform in all material respects to the drafts reviewed;
 
d. Assumed that there has been no material change in the assets, financial condition, business, or prospects of AIP or its owned property since the date of the appraisal report, the most recent financial statements and the other information made available to Duff & Phelps;
 
e. Assumed that title to the property owned by AIP is good and marketable, that all material licenses and related regulatory approvals that are required or advisable to be obtained with respect to the property owned by AIP have been obtained and are current, and that, except as expressly disclosed in the appraisal report, the property owned by AIP is in compliance with applicable material zoning, use, occupancy, environmental, and similar laws and regulations;


14


Table of Contents

f. Assumed responsible ownership and competent property management of the property owned by AIP, that, except as expressly disclosed in the appraisal report, there are no unapparent conditions with respect to the property owned by AIP that could affect the value of such property, and that, except as expressly disclosed in the appraisal report, there are no hazardous substances on or near the property owned by AIP that could affect the value of such property;
 
g. Assumed that all of the conditions required to implement the merger transactions will be satisfied and that the merger transactions will be completed in accordance with the merger agreement without any amendments thereto or any waivers of any terms or conditions thereof; and
 
h. Assumed that each of the unaffiliated limited partners elects to receive the cash consideration offered, and therefore, Duff & Phelps made no determination as to the fair value of, or fairness with respect to the OP Unit consideration.
 
Duff & Phelps did not evaluate AIP’s solvency or conduct an independent appraisal or physical inspection of any specific liabilities (contingent or otherwise). Duff & Phelps did not evaluate the tax consequences the merger transactions may have on any person, including any unaffiliated limited partner, and did not take any such consequences into account in rendering the opinion. Duff & Phelps was not requested to, and did not, (i) initiate any discussions with, or solicit any indications of interest from, third parties with respect to the merger transactions, the assets, businesses or operations of AIP, or any alternatives to the merger transactions, (ii) negotiate the terms of the merger transactions, or (iii) advise Aimco OP or any other party with respect to alternatives to the merger transactions.
 
Duff & Phelps did not express any opinion as to the market price or value of AIP’s or Aimco OP’s equity (or anything else) after the announcement or the consummation of the merger transactions. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, Duff & Phelps did not express any opinion as to the liquidity of, rights and/or risks associated with owning, or any other feature or characteristic of, the OP Units. The opinion should not be construed as a valuation opinion, credit rating, solvency opinion, an analysis of AIP’s or Aimco OP’s credit worthiness, as tax advice, or as accounting advice. Duff & Phelps did not make, and assumed no responsibility to make, any representation, or render any opinion, as to any legal matter (including with respect to title to or any encumbrances relating to the property owned by AIP).
 
Duff & Phelps did not investigate any of the physical conditions of the property owned by AIP and has not made, and assumed no responsibility to make, any representation, or render any opinion, as to the physical condition of the property owned by AIP. No independent survey of the property owned by AIP was conducted by Duff & Phelps. Duff & Phelps did not arrange for any engineering studies that may be required to discover any unapparent condition in the property. Duff & Phelps did not arrange for or conduct any soil analysis or geological studies or any investigation of any water, oil, gas, coal, or other subsurface mineral and use rights or conditions or arrange for or conduct any other environmental analysis, including with respect to any hazardous materials, which may or may not be present on, in or near the property owned by AIP.
 
In rendering its opinion, Duff & Phelps did not express any opinion with respect to the amount or nature of any compensation to any of Aimco OP’s and/or Aimco’s respective officers, directors, or employees, or any class of such persons, relative to the consideration offered to the unaffiliated limited partners in the second merger, or with respect to the fairness of any such compensation.
 
The opinion (i) does not address the merits of the underlying business decision to enter into the merger transactions versus any alternative strategy or transaction, (ii) does not address any transaction related to the merger transactions, (iii) is not a recommendation as to how any party should vote or act with respect to any matters relating to the second merger or any related transaction, or whether to proceed with the second merger or any related transaction, and (iv) does not indicate that the consideration offered is the best possibly attainable under any circumstances; instead, the opinion merely states whether the cash consideration offered in the second merger is within a range suggested by certain financial analyses. The decision as to whether to proceed with the second merger or any related transaction may depend on an assessment of factors unrelated to the financial analysis on which the opinion was based.


15


Table of Contents

 
Duff & Phelps prepared its opinion effective as of November 15, 2011. The opinion was necessarily based upon market, economic, financial and other conditions as they existed and could be evaluated as of such date, and Duff & Phelps disclaims any undertaking or obligation to advise any person of any change in any fact or matter affecting the opinion which may come or be brought to the attention of Duff & Phelps after such date.
 
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses performed by Duff & Phelps in connection with providing its opinion. The summary of Duff & Phelps’ valuation analyses is not a complete description of the analyses underlying Duff & Phelps’ opinion. The preparation of an opinion regarding fairness is a complex process involving various quantitative and qualitative judgments and determinations with respect to the financial, comparative and other analytic methods employed and the adaptation and application of these methods to the unique facts and circumstances presented. As a consequence, neither an opinion regarding fairness nor its underlying analyses is readily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Duff & Phelps arrived at its opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole and did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any individual analysis, analytic method or factor. Accordingly, Duff & Phelps believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses, analytic methods and factors, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying its analyses and opinion.
 
Valuation Analysis
 
Duff & Phelps estimated the value attributable to the interests of the unaffiliated limited partners as follows:
 
  •  Duff & Phelps reviewed the valuation conclusions for the property owned by AIP reached in the third party appraisal that was provided by the management of Aimco OP and as described in greater detail under the heading “Special Factors — The Appraisal” and Annex J — Summary of Appraisal Table;
 
  •  Duff & Phelps’ review of the third party appraisal included a review of the key assumptions used in and the conclusions reached by the appraisal and a comparison of such assumptions and conclusions to appropriate sources of real estate market data including, but not limited to: market surveys, selected comparable real estate transaction data, and discussions with opinions of professionals in the market place. Duff & Phelps also reviewed the valuation methodology employed by the third party appraiser and determined it to be appropriate;
 
  •  Duff & Phelps estimated the range of value attributable to the interests of the unaffiliated limited partners by adding to the range of the appraised value of the property owned by AIP the amount of AIP’s other non-real estate assets that were not included in the appraisal, and subtracting the amount of AIP’s liabilities, including the market value of mortgage debt (but without deducting any prepayment penalties thereon) and the amount of liabilities estimated by management of Aimco OP for expenses attributable to the property that would be incurred prior to the transactions but payable after the transactions; and
 
  •  Duff & Phelps reviewed Aimco OP management’s estimate of the fair value of the mortgage debt associated with the property owned by AIP, as described in greater detail under the heading “The Transactions — Determination of Merger Consideration,” by reviewing the valuation methodology and the determination of the appropriate current market yield on mortgage debt of similar type, leverage and duration.
 
Estimated Value of Limited Partnership Units
 
The table below provides a summary of (i) the estimated range of value for the property owned by AIP by applying a capitalization rate range that was 25 basis points above and below the capitalization rate used by the third party appraiser to the appropriate measure of income from the property owned by AIP used by the third party appraiser, (ii) a summary of the estimated fair market value of mortgage debt associated with the property owned by


16


Table of Contents

AIP, and (iii) the proposed merger consideration (which was determined by the Aimco Entities) and Duff & Phelps’ range of value for the AIP Units.
 
                                 
    Low Value     Proposed Value     High Value     % of Total  
 
Property Value
                               
Lazy Hollow Apartments
  $ 26,100,000     $ 27,000,000     $ 28,400,000          
Total
                               
Debt Summary
                               
Book Value of Debt(1)
  $ 13,833,072     $ 13,833,072     $ 13,833,072          
Fair Value of Debt(1)
  $ 15,104,298     $ 15,104,298     $ 15,104,298          
Fair Value as a % of Book
    109 %     109 %     109 %        
LP Interest Summary
                               
Proceeds Distributable to LPs
  $ 11,791,247     $ 12,681,356     $ 14,065,970          
Affiliated LP Units
    27,739       27,739       27,739       59 %
Unaffiliated LP Units
    19,572       19,572       19,572       41 %
                                 
Total LP Units
    47,311       47,311       47,311          
Value Per LP Unit
  $ 249.23     $ 268.04     $ 297.31          
 
 
(1) Includes accrued interest.
 
Based on an range of value for the property owned by AIP of $26.1 million to $28.4 million, Duff & Phelps estimated the range of value per AIP Unit to be approximately $249.23 to $297.31, compared to the merger consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit.
 
Other Matters
 
By letter agreement dated June 10, 2011 between Duff & Phelps and Aimco OP, Duff & Phelps was engaged to opine, as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of each of certain limited partnerships (including AIP) of the cash consideration offered in the proposed merger relating to that limited partnership. Duff & Phelps was engaged based on its experience as a leading global independent provider of financial advisory and investment banking services. Duff & Phelps delivers advice principally in the areas of valuation, transactions, financial restructuring, dispute and taxation. Since 2005, Duff & Phelps has completed hundreds of valuations in the real estate investment trust and real estate operating company industry and rendered over 308 fairness opinions in transactions aggregating over $103 billion. Duff & Phelps has also rendered over 222 solvency opinions in transactions aggregating over $1.02 trillion.
 
Duff & Phelps has received a fee in the aggregate amount of $450,000 for its services with respect to all of the partnerships pursuant to this engagement (which includes a retainer in the amount of $200,000 allocated among eleven partnerships, including AIP and a partnership that ultimately did not pursue a merger transaction, and $50,000 for a bring-down of the initial fairness opinions dated July 28, 2011) as well as reimbursement for its expenses in the amount of approximately $50,000. No portion of Duff & Phelps’ fee is contingent upon either the conclusion expressed in this (or any other) opinion or whether or not this (or any other) merger is successfully consummated. Aimco OP also has agreed to indemnify Duff & Phelps for certain liabilities that may arise out of the rendering of this opinion and any related to Duff & Phelps’ engagement. Other than this engagement, during the two years preceding the date of this opinion, Duff & Phelps has been paid approximately $199,400 for property tax consulting services by Aimco OP and its affiliates for which Duff & Phelps received customary fees and indemnification. Except as set forth above, during the two years preceding the date of this opinion, Duff & Phelps had not had any material relationship with any party to the merger for which compensation has been received or is intended to be received, nor is any such material relationship or related compensation mutually understood to be contemplated.
 
Estimated Operating Budget for the Property
 
At the end of each calendar year, Aimco OP’s management prepares an estimated operating budget for the next calendar year for the property owned by AIP. Aimco OP’s management provided the 2011 estimated operating


17


Table of Contents

budget for the property to Duff & Phelps for use in connection with the preparation of its fairness opinion, and to KTR in connection with the preparation of the appraisal.
 
In preparing the 2011 estimated operating budget, Aimco OP’s management made a number of assumptions and estimates, including the following:
 
  •  income was projected to grow in accordance with estimated rent growth projections provided by Reis, Inc. for the market;
 
  •  expense reductions were assumed to be 6.0% for budget year 2011;
 
  •  occupancy rates were budgeted to remain at or above 96%; and
 
  •  turnover was budgeted in accordance with historic experience.
 
Aimco OP’s management believed these assumptions and estimates were reasonable at the time the budgets were prepared, but these assumptions and estimates may not be realized and are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, including, among others, the risks and uncertainties described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in AlP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which is included as Annex F to this information statement/prospectus. All of these uncertainties and contingencies are difficult to predict and many are beyond the control of Aimco, Aimco OP and AIP.
 
The 2011 estimated operating budget has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, Aimco OP’s management. The 2011 estimated operating budget was prepared solely for internal use and not with a view toward public disclosure and, accordingly, does not comply with generally accepted accounting principles, the published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections, or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective financial information. Neither Aimco’s independent registered public accounting firm, nor any other independent accountants, have compiled, examined or performed any procedures with respect to the 2011 estimated operating budget, nor have they expressed any opinion or any other form of assurance on such information or its achievability, and they assume no responsibility for, and disclaim any association with, the 2011 estimated operating budget. Furthermore, the 2011 estimated operating budget does not take into account any circumstances or events occurring after the date they were prepared.
 
The inclusion of the 2011 estimated operating budget in this information statement/prospectus should not be regarded as an indication that any of Aimco, Aimco OP or their respective affiliates advisors or representatives consider the 2011 estimated operating budget to be predictive of actual future results, and it should not be relied upon as such. There can be no assurance that the underlying assumptions will prove to be accurate or that the estimated results will be realized, and actual results likely will differ, and may differ materially, from those reflected in the 2011 estimated operating budget. None of Aimco, Aimco OP or their respective affiliates, advisors, officers, directors or representatives undertakes any obligation to update or otherwise revise the 2011 estimated operating budget to reflect circumstances existing after the date they were prepared, or to reflect the occurrence of future events, even if any or all of the assumptions underlying the 2011 estimated operating budget are no longer appropriate, except as required by law.
 
In light of the foregoing factors and the uncertainties inherent in the 2011 estimated operating budget, holders of AIP Units are cautioned not to place undue, if any, reliance on them.
 
The following table summarizes the 2011 estimated operating budget for the property owned by AIP:
 
         
    Lazy Hollow
 
    Apartments  
 
Effective Gross Income
  $ 2,780,245  
Total Operating Expenses
    1,194,970  
         
Net Operating Income
  $ 1,585,275  
 
AIP’s limited partners are urged to review AlP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which is included as Annex F to this information statement/prospectus, for information regarding AlP’s results of operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2011, including “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial .Condition and Results of operations.”


18


Table of Contents

 
RISK FACTORS
 
Risks Related to the Transactions
 
Conflicts of Interest.  The General Partner is indirectly wholly-owned by Aimco. Therefore, the General Partner has a conflict of interest with respect to the transactions. The General Partner has fiduciary duties to its sole stockholder, which is wholly-owned by Aimco, on the one hand, and to AIP and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of the General Partner to AIP and its limited partners conflict with its duties to its sole stockholder, which could result in the General Partner approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. The General Partner, in its capacity as general partner of AIP, seeks the best possible terms for AIP’s limited partners. This conflicts with Aimco’s interest in obtaining the best possible terms for Aimco OP.
 
No independent representative was engaged to represent the unaffiliated limited partners in negotiating the terms of the transactions.  If an independent advisor had been engaged, it is possible that such advisor could have negotiated better terms for AIP’s unaffiliated limited partners.
 
The terms of the transactions have not been determined in arm’s-length negotiations.  The terms of the transactions, including the merger consideration, were determined through discussions between officers and directors of the General Partner, on the one hand, and officers of Aimco, on the other. All of the officers and directors of the General Partner are also officers of Aimco. There are no independent directors of the General Partner. If the terms of the transactions had been determined through arm’s-length negotiations, the terms might be more favorable to AIP and its limited partners.
 
The merger agreement does not require approval by a majority of the unaffiliated limited partners.  Under the provisions of the AIP partnership agreement and applicable law, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby must be approved by a majority in interest of the AIP Units. As of November 10, 2011, there were 47,311 issued and outstanding AIP Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 27,739 of those units, or approximately 58.63% of the number of units outstanding. The General Partner’s affiliates have indicated that they will vote all of their AIP Units in favor of the merger transactions, enabling them to approve the merger transactions without the consent or approval of any unaffiliated limited partners.
 
In connection with previous partnership merger transactions, lawsuits have been filed alleging that Aimco and certain of its affiliates breached their fiduciary duties to the unaffiliated limited partners.  In February 2011, Aimco and Aimco OP completed six partnership mergers. In each merger, the limited partners who were not affiliated with Aimco received cash or OP Units with a value calculated based on the estimated proceeds that would be available for distribution to limited partners if the partnership’s properties were sold at prices equal to their appraised values. In March 2011, counsel representing a putative class consisting of former limited partners in each of those partnerships contacted Aimco alleging that the merger transactions were unfair to the unaffiliated limited partners because the appraisals used were not of a recent date and no fairness opinions were obtained, among other reasons. Aimco denied the purported class allegations, but agreed to mediate plaintiffs’ claims in June 2011, and agreed to settle this dispute by paying the unaffiliated limited partners additional consideration of $7.5 million. The merger contemplated hereby may also be subject to claims that the merger consideration is unfair and a result of self-dealing.
 
The merger consideration was determined based on the appraised value of the property as of the date of the appraisal, and there can be no assurance that the value of the property will not increase as of the date of the consummation of the merger transactions.  KTR appraised AIP’s property as of October 1, 2011, and the General Partner calculated the amount of the merger consideration based on the appraised value of the property as of such date. The General Partner has not made any other attempt to assess or account for any changes in the value of the property since the date of KTR’s appraisal in its determination of the merger consideration.
 
Alternative valuations of AIP’s property might exceed the appraised value relied on to determine the merger consideration.  Aimco determined the merger consideration in reliance on the appraised value of AIP’s property. See, “Special Factors — The Appraisal,” beginning on page 9, for more information about the appraisal. Although an independent appraiser was engaged to perform a complete appraisal of the property, valuation is not an exact


19


Table of Contents

science. There are a number of other methods available to value real estate, each of which may result in different valuations of the property. Also, others using the same valuation methodology could make different assumptions and judgments, and obtain different results. For example, in connection with the refinancing of the mortgages encumbering the property during 2010, the lender appraised the value of the property at $21,500,000, an amount that is less than the property’s current appraised value.
 
The actual sales price of AIP’s property could exceed the appraised value that Aimco relied on to determine the merger consideration.  Except as described below, no recent attempt has been made to market the Lazy Hollow Apartments to unaffiliated third parties. There can be no assurance that the Lazy Hollow Apartments could not be sold for a value higher than the appraised value used to determine the merger consideration if it was marketed to third-party buyers interested in a property of this type. In September 2009, the limited partnership in which AIP owns a 99% limited partnership interest, together with certain other affiliates of Aimco, entered into a purchase and sale contract with a third party to sell the Lazy Hollow Apartments and certain other apartment complexes. This purchase and sale contract was terminated by the parties in the fourth quarter of 2009. The amount of the overall purchase price to be allocated to the Lazy Hollow Apartments under the terminated purchase and sale contract was $17,510,000, which is less than the property’s current appraised value.
 
The merger consideration may not represent the price limited partners could obtain for their AIP Units in an open market.  There is no established or regular trading market for AIP Units, nor is there another reliable standard for determining the fair market value of the AIP Units. The merger consideration does not necessarily reflect the price that AIP limited partners would receive in an open market for their AIP Units. Such prices could be higher than the aggregate value of the merger consideration.
 
Limited partners may recognize taxable gain in the transactions, and that gain could exceed the merger consideration.  Limited partners who elect to receive cash in the merger transactions will recognize gain or loss equal to the difference between their “amount realized” and their adjusted tax basis in the AIP Units sold. The resulting tax liability could exceed the value of the cash received in the merger transactions.
 
Limited partners in certain jurisdictions will not be able to elect OP Units.  In those states or jurisdictions where the offering of the OP Units hereby is not permitted (or the registration or qualification of OP Units in that state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), residents of those states will receive only the cash consideration in the merger transactions.
 
Risks Related to an Investment in Aimco or Aimco OP
 
For a description of risks related to an investment in Aimco and Aimco OP, please see the information set forth under “Part I — Item 1A. Risk Factors” in the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 of each of Aimco and Aimco OP. Aimco’s Annual Report is incorporated herein by reference and is available electronically through the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, or by request to Aimco. Aimco OP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (excluding the report of the independent registered public accounting firm, the financial statements and notes thereto) is included as Annex G to this information statement/prospectus.
 
Risks Related to an Investment in OP Units
 
There are restrictions on the ability to transfer OP Units, and there is no public market for OP Units.  The Aimco OP partnership agreement restricts the transferability of OP Units. Until the expiration of a one-year holding period, subject to certain exceptions, investors may not transfer OP Units without the consent of Aimco OP’s general partner. Thereafter, investors may transfer such OP Units subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the general partner’s right of first refusal. There is no public market for the OP Units. Aimco OP has no plans to list any OP Units on a securities exchange. It is unlikely that any person will make a market in the OP Units, or that an active market for the OP Units will develop. If a market for the OP Units develops and the OP Units are considered “readily tradable” on a “secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof),” Aimco OP would be classified as a publicly traded partnership for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, which could have a material adverse effect on Aimco OP.
 
Cash distributions by Aimco OP are not guaranteed and may fluctuate with partnership performance.  Aimco OP makes quarterly distributions to holders of OP Units (on a per unit basis) that generally are equal to dividends paid


20


Table of Contents

on the Aimco common stock (on a per share basis). However, such distributions will not necessarily continue to be equal to such dividends. Although Aimco OP makes quarterly distributions on its OP Units, there can be no assurance regarding the amounts of available cash that Aimco OP will generate or the portion that its general partner will choose to distribute. The actual amounts of available cash will depend upon numerous factors, including profitability of operations, required principal and interest payments on our debt, the cost of acquisitions (including related debt service payments), its issuance of debt and equity securities, fluctuations in working capital, capital expenditures, adjustments in reserves, prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, some of which may be beyond Aimco OP’s control. Cash distributions depend primarily on cash flow, including from reserves, and not on profitability, which is affected by non-cash items. Therefore, cash distributions may be made during periods when Aimco OP records losses and may not be made during periods when it records profits. The Aimco OP partnership agreement gives the general partner discretion in establishing reserves for the proper conduct of the partnership’s business that will affect the amount of available cash. Aimco is required to make reserves for the future payment of principal and interest under its credit facilities and other indebtedness. In addition, Aimco OP’s credit facility limits its ability to distribute cash to holders of OP Units. As a result of these and other factors, there can be no assurance regarding actual levels of cash distributions on OP Units, and Aimco OP’s ability to distribute cash may be limited during the existence of any events of default under any of its debt instruments.
 
Holders of OP Units are limited in their ability to effect a change of control.  The limited partners of Aimco OP are unable to remove the general partner of Aimco OP or to vote in the election of Aimco’s directors unless they own shares of Aimco. In order to comply with specific REIT tax requirements, Aimco’s charter has restrictions on the ownership of its equity securities. As a result, Aimco OP limited partners and Aimco stockholders are limited in their ability to effect a change of control of Aimco OP and Aimco, respectively.
 
Holders of OP Units have limited voting rights.  Aimco OP is managed and operated by its general partner. Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, holders of OP Units have only limited voting rights on matters affecting Aimco OP’s business. Such matters relate to certain amendments of the partnership agreement and certain transactions such as the institution of bankruptcy proceedings, an assignment for the benefit of creditors and certain transfers by the general partner of its interest in Aimco OP or the admission of a successor general partner. Holders of OP Units have no right to elect the general partner on an annual or other continuing basis, or to remove the general partner. As a result, holders of OP Units have limited influence on matters affecting the operation of Aimco OP, and third parties may find it difficult to attempt to gain control over, or influence the activities of, Aimco OP.
 
Holders of OP Units are subject to dilution.  Aimco OP may issue an unlimited number of additional OP Units or other securities for such consideration and on such terms as it may establish, without the approval of the holders of OP Units. Such securities could have priority over the OP Units as to cash flow, distributions and liquidation proceeds. The effect of any such issuance may be to dilute the interests of holders of OP Units.
 
Holders of OP Units may not have limited liability in specific circumstances.  The limitations on the liability of limited partners for the obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly established in some states. If it were determined that Aimco OP had been conducting business in any state without compliance with the applicable limited partnership statute, or that the right or the exercise of the right by the OP Unitholders as a group to make specific amendments to the agreement of limited partnership or to take other action under the agreement of limited partnership constituted participation in the “control” of Aimco OP’s business, then a holder of OP Units could be held liable under specific circumstances for Aimco OP’s obligations to the same extent as the general partner.
 
Aimco may have conflicts of interest with holders of OP Units.  Conflicts of interest have arisen and could arise in the future as a result of the relationships between the general partner of Aimco OP and its affiliates (including Aimco), on the one hand, and Aimco OP or any partner thereof, on the other. The directors and officers of the general partner have fiduciary duties to manage the general partner in a manner beneficial to Aimco, as the sole stockholder of the general partner. At the same time, as the general partner of Aimco OP, it has fiduciary duties to manage Aimco OP in a manner beneficial to Aimco OP and its limited partners. The duties of the general partner of Aimco OP to Aimco


21


Table of Contents

OP and its partners may therefore come into conflict with the duties of the directors and officers of the general partner to its sole stockholder, Aimco. Such conflicts of interest might arise in the following situations, among others:
 
  •  Decisions of the general partner with respect to the amount and timing of cash expenditures, borrowings, issuances of additional interests and reserves in any quarter will affect whether or the extent to which there is available cash to make distributions in a given quarter.
 
  •  Under the terms of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, Aimco OP will reimburse the general partner and its affiliates for costs incurred in managing and operating Aimco OP, including compensation of officers and employees.
 
  •  Whenever possible, the general partner seeks to limit Aimco OP’s liability under contractual arrangements to all or particular assets of Aimco OP, with the other party thereto having no recourse against the general partner or its assets.
 
  •  Any agreements between Aimco OP and the general partner and its affiliates will not grant to the OP Unitholders, separate and apart from Aimco OP, the right to enforce the obligations of the general partner and such affiliates in favor of Aimco OP. Therefore, the general partner, in its capacity as the general partner of Aimco OP, will be primarily responsible for enforcing such obligations.
 
  •  Under the terms of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner is not restricted from causing Aimco OP to pay the general partner or its affiliates for any services rendered on terms that are fair and reasonable to Aimco OP or entering into additional contractual arrangements with any of such entities on behalf of Aimco OP. Neither the Aimco OP partnership agreement nor any of the other agreements, contracts and arrangements between Aimco OP, on the one hand, and the general partner of Aimco OP and its affiliates, on the other, are or will be the result of arm’s-length negotiations.
 
Provisions in the Aimco OP partnership agreement may limit the ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge actions taken by the general partner.  Delaware law provides that, except as provided in a partnership agreement, a general partner owes the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the partnership and its limited partners. The Aimco OP partnership agreement expressly authorizes the general partner to enter into, on behalf of Aimco OP, a right of first opportunity arrangement and other conflict avoidance agreements with various affiliates of Aimco OP and the general partner, on such terms as the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion, believes are advisable. The latitude given in the Aimco OP partnership agreement to the general partner in resolving conflicts of interest may significantly limit the ability of a holder of OP Units to challenge what might otherwise be a breach of fiduciary duty. The general partner believes, however, that such latitude is necessary and appropriate to enable it to serve as the general partner of Aimco OP without undue risk of liability.
 
The Aimco OP partnership agreement limits the liability of the general partner for actions taken in good faith. Aimco OP’s partnership agreement expressly limits the liability of the general partner by providing that the general partner, and its officers and directors, will not be liable or accountable in damages to Aimco OP, the limited partners or assignees for errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission if the general partner or such director or officer acted in good faith. In addition, Aimco OP is required to indemnify the general partner, its affiliates and their respective officers, directors, employees and agents to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, against any and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities, joint or several, expenses, judgments, fines and other actions incurred by the general partner or such other persons, provided that Aimco OP will not indemnify for (i) willful misconduct or a knowing violation of the law or (ii) for any transaction for which such person received an improper personal benefit in violation or breach of any provision of the partnership agreement. The provisions of Delaware law that allow the common law fiduciary duties of a general partner to be modified by a partnership agreement have not been resolved in a court of law, and the general partner has not obtained an opinion of counsel covering the provisions set forth in the Aimco OP partnership agreement that purport to waive or restrict the fiduciary duties of the general partner that would be in effect under common law were it not for the partnership agreement.
 
Certain United States Tax Risks Associated with an Investment in the OP Units
 
The following are among the U.S. Federal income tax considerations to be taken into account in connection with an investment in OP Units. For a general discussion of material U.S. Federal income tax consequences


22


Table of Contents

resulting from acquiring, holding, exchanging, and otherwise disposing of OP Units, see “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations — Taxation of Aimco OP and OP Unitholders.”
 
Aimco OP may be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxable as a corporation.  If Aimco OP were treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxed as a corporation for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, material adverse consequences to the partners would result. Moreover in such case, a holder of AIP Units receiving OP Units in the merger would be required to recognize gain or loss on the transaction. In addition, Aimco would not qualify as a REIT for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, which would have a material adverse impact on Aimco and its shareholders. Aimco believes and intends to take the position that Aimco OP should not be treated as a “publicly traded partnership” taxable as a corporation. No assurances can be given that the Internal Revenue Service, or the IRS, would not assert, or that a court would not sustain a contrary position. Accordingly, each prospective investor is urged to consult his tax advisor regarding the classification and treatment of Aimco OP as a “partnership” for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.
 
The limited partners may recognize gain on the transaction.  If an AIP limited partner receives or is deemed to receive cash or consideration other than OP Units in connection with the merger transactions, the receipt of such cash or other consideration may be taxable to the limited partner. Subject to certain exceptions, including exceptions applicable to periodic distributions of operating cash flow, any transfer or deemed transfer of cash by Aimco OP to the limited partner (or its owners) (including AIP’s distribution of funds from the June 30, 2010 second mortgage AIP obtained on the Lazy Hollow Apartments) within two years before or after the merger, including cash paid at closing, will generally be treated as part of a “disguised sale.” The application of the “disguised sale” rules is complex and depends, in part, upon the facts and circumstances applicable to the limited partner, which Aimco has not undertaken to review. Accordingly, limited partners are particularly urged to consult with their tax advisors concerning the extent to which the “disguised sale” rules would apply.
 
A contribution of appreciated or depreciated property may result in special allocations to the contributing partner.  If property is contributed to Aimco OP, and the adjusted tax basis of the property differs from its fair market value, then Aimco OP tax items must be specially allocated for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, in a manner chosen by Aimco OP, such that the contributing partner is charged with and recognizes the unrealized gain, or benefits from the unrealized loss, associated with the property at the time of the contribution. As a result of such special allocations, the amount of net taxable income allocated to a contributing partner may exceed the amount of cash distributions, if any, to which such contributing partner is entitled.
 
The Aimco OP general partner could take actions that would impose tax liability on a contributing partner.  There are a variety of transactions that Aimco OP may in its sole discretion undertake following a property contribution that could cause the transferor (or its partners) to incur a tax liability without a corresponding receipt of cash. Such transactions include, but are not limited to, the sale or distribution of a particular property and a reduction in nonrecourse debt, or the making of certain tax elections by Aimco OP. In addition, future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause Aimco OP to dispose of the contributed property or to reduce its debt. As permitted by the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner intends to make decisions in its capacity as general partner of Aimco OP so as to maximize the profitability of Aimco OP as a whole, independent of the tax effects on individual holders of OP Units.
 
An investor’s tax liability from OP Units could exceed the cash distributions received on such OP Units.  A holder of OP Units will be required to pay U.S. Federal income tax on such holder’s allocable share of Aimco OP’s income, even if such holder receives no cash distributions from Aimco OP. No assurance can be given that a holder of OP Units will receive cash distributions equal to such holder’s allocable share of taxable income from Aimco OP or equal to the tax liability to such holder resulting from that income. Further, upon the sale, exchange or redemption of any OP Units, a reduction in nonrecourse debt, or upon the special allocation at the liquidation of Aimco OP, an investor may incur a tax liability in excess of the amount of cash received.
 
OP Unitholders may be subject to state, local or foreign taxation.  OP Unitholders may be subject to state, local or foreign taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in which Aimco OP transacts business and owns property. It should be noted that Aimco OP owns properties located in a number of states and local jurisdictions, and an OP Unitholder may be required to file income tax returns in some or all of those jurisdictions. The state, local or foreign tax treatment of OP Unitholders may not conform to the U.S. federal income tax consequences of an investment in OP Units, as described in “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations” beginning on page 67.


23


Table of Contents

 
SELECTED SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF
APARTMENT INVESTMENT AND MANAGEMENT COMPANY
 
The following table sets forth Aimco’s selected summary historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Aimco’s historical consolidated statements of operations data set forth below for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and the historical consolidated balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal year-ends in the period ended December 31, 2010, are derived from information included in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011. Aimco’s unaudited historical consolidated statements of operations data set forth below for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the unaudited historical consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2011, are derived from information included in Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on October 28, 2011.
 
You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, and Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on October 28, 2011, which are incorporated by reference in this information statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information” in this information statement/prospectus.
 
                                                         
    For the Nine Months
   
    Ended September 30,   For the Years Ended December 31,
    2011   2010   2010(1)   2009(1)   2008(1)   2007(1)   2006(1)
    (unaudited)                    
    (dollar amounts in thousands, except per share data)
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations:
                                                       
Total revenues
  $ 834,521     $ 812,265     $ 1,092,606     $ 1,082,231     $ 1,128,099     $ 1,063,962     $ 978,692  
Total operating expenses(2)
    (702,240 )     (720,017 )     (967,144 )     (995,469 )     (1,096,498 )     (901,629 )     (825,485 )
Operating income(2)
    132,281       92,248       125,462       86,762       31,601       162,333       153,207  
Loss from continuing operations(2)
    (100,550 )     (121,293 )     (161,725 )     (199,680 )     (117,743 )     (47,827 )     (44,129 )
Income from discontinued operations, net(3)
    50,959       65,881       72,101       154,880       744,745       173,333       331,151  
Net (loss) income
    (49,591 )     (55,412 )     (89,624 )     (44,800 )     627,002       125,506       287,022  
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
    5,438       5,147       17,896       (19,474 )     (214,995 )     (95,595 )     (110,234 )
Net (income) attributable to Aimco’s preferred stockholders
    (35,429 )     (36,626 )     (53,590 )     (50,566 )     (53,708 )     (66,016 )     (81,132 )
Net (loss) income attributable to Aimco’s common stockholders
    (79,751 )     (86,891 )     (125,318 )     (114,840 )     351,314       (40,586 )     93,710  
Earnings (loss) per common share — basic and diluted:
                                                       
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Aimco’s common stockholders
  $ (0.92 )   $ (1.10 )   $ (1.45 )   $ (1.77 )   $ (2.09 )   $ (1.39 )   $ (1.49 )
Net (loss) income attributable to Aimco’s common stockholders
  $ (0.67 )   $ (0.75 )   $ (1.08 )   $ (1.00 )   $ 3.96     $ (0.43 )   $ 0.98  
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
                                                       
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
  $ 6,179,415           $ 6,297,557     $ 6,474,700     $ 6,633,790     $ 6,405,002     $ 5,946,219  
Total assets
    7,042,702             7,378,566       7,906,468       9,441,870       10,617,681       10,292,587  
Total indebtedness
    5,259,725             5,338,630       5,316,303       5,679,544       5,303,531       4,647,864  
Total equity
    1,201,114             1,306,772       1,534,703       1,646,749       2,048,546       2,650,182  
Other Information:
                                                       
Dividends declared per common share(4)
  $ 0.36     $ 0.20     $ 0.30     $ 0.40     $ 7.48     $ 4.31     $ 2.40  
Total consolidated properties (end of period)
    359       419       399       426       514       657       703  
Total consolidated apartment units (end of period)
    83,304       93,008       89,875       95,202       117,719       153,758       162,432  
Total unconsolidated properties (end of period)
    47       59       48       77       85       94       102  
Total unconsolidated apartment units (end of period)
    5,517       6,933       5,637       8,478       9,613       10,878       11,791  


24


Table of Contents

 
(1) Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the September 30, 2011 financial statement presentation, including retroactive adjustments to reflect additional properties sold or classified as held for sale as of September 30, 2011 as discontinued operations (see Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in “Item 1 — Financial Statements” in Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, which are incorporated by reference in this information statement/prospectus).
 
(2) Total operating expenses, operating income and loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, include a $91.1 million pre-tax provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets, which is discussed further in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on February 25, 2011, which is incorporated by reference in this information statement/prospectus.
 
(3) Income from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 includes $94.9 million, $221.8 million, $800.3 million, $116.1 million and $336.2 million in gains on disposition of real estate, respectively. Income from discontinued operations for 2010, 2009 and 2008 is discussed further in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, which is incorporated by reference in this information statement/prospectus.
 
(4) Dividends declared per common share during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, included $5.08 and $1.91, respectively, of per share dividends that were paid through the issuance of shares of Aimco Class A Common Stock (see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, which is incorporated by reference in this information statement/prospectus).


25


Table of Contents

 
SELECTED SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF AIMCO PROPERTIES, L.P.
 
The following table sets forth Aimco OP’s selected summary historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Aimco OP’s historical consolidated statements of operations data set forth below for each of the five fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and the historical consolidated balance sheet data for each of the five fiscal year-ends in the period ended December 31, 2010, are derived from information included in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, and included as Annex I to this information statement/prospectus. Aimco OP’s unaudited historical consolidated statements of operations data set forth below for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the unaudited historical consolidated balance sheet data as of September 30, 2011, are derived from information included in Aimco OP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011 included as Annex H to this information statement/prospectus.
 
You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, and Aimco OP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on October 28, 2011, which are included as Annex I and Annex H, respectively, to this information statement/prospectus.
 
                                                         
    For the Nine Months
       
    Ended September 30,     For The Years Ended December 31,  
    2011     2010     2010(1)     2009(1)     2008(1)     2007(1)     2006(1)  
    (unaudited)                                
    (dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data)  
 
Consolidated Statements of Operations:
                                                       
Total revenues
  $ 834,521     $ 812,265     $ 1,092,606     $ 1,082,231     $ 1,128,099     $ 1,063,962     $ 978,692  
Total operating expenses(2)
    (702,240 )     (720,017 )     (967,144 )     (995,469 )     (1,096,498 )     (901,629 )     (825,485 )
Operating income(2)
    132,281       92,248       125,462       86,762       31,601       162,333       153,207  
Loss from continuing operations(2)
    (99,290 )     (120,651 )     (160,866 )     (198,860 )     (116,957 )     (47,078 )     (41,169 )
Income from discontinued operations, net(3)
    50,959       65,881       72,101       154,880       744,745       173,333       331,151  
Net (loss) income
    (48,331 )     (54,770 )     (88,765 )     (43,980 )     627,788       126,255       289,982  
Net loss (income) attributable to noncontrolling interests
    4,612       1,795       13,301       (22,442 )     (155,749 )     (92,138 )     (92,917 )
Net (income) attributable to Aimco OP’s preferred unitholders
    (40,441 )     (39,918 )     (58,554 )     (56,854 )     (61,354 )     (73,144 )     (90,527 )
Net (loss) income attributable to Aimco OP’s common unitholders
    (84,329 )     (92,893 )     (134,018 )     (123,276 )     403,700       (43,508 )     104,592  
Earnings (loss) per common unit — basic and diluted:
                                                       
Loss from continuing operations attributable to Aimco OP’s common unitholders
  $ (0.91 )   $ (1.10 )   $ (1.44 )   $ (1.76 )   $ (1.94 )   $ (1.38 )   $ (1.47 )
Net (loss) income attributable to Aimco OP’s common unitholders
  $ (0.66 )   $ (0.75 )   $ (1.07 )   $ (1.00 )   $ 4.11     $ (0.42 )   $ 0.99  
Consolidated Balance Sheets:
                                                       
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
  $ 6,179,920           $ 6,298,062     $ 6,475,205     $ 6,634,295     $ 6,405,507     $ 5,946,724  
Total assets
    7,060,492             7,395,096       7,922,139       9,456,721       10,631,746       10,305,903  
Total indebtedness
    5,259,725             5,338,630       5,316,303       5,679,544       5,303,531       4,647,864  
Total partners’ capital
    1,218,904             1,323,302       1,550,374       1,661,600       2,152,326       2,753,617  
Other Information:
                                                       
Distributions declared per common unit(4)
  $ 0.36     $ 0.20     $ 0.30     $ 0.40     $ 7.48     $ 4.31     $ 2.40  
Total consolidated properties (end of period)
    359       419       399       426       514       657       703  
Total consolidated apartment units (end of period)
    83,304       93,008       89,875       95,202       117,719       153,758       162,432  
Total unconsolidated properties (end of period)
    47       59       48       77       85       94       102  
Total unconsolidated apartment units (end of period)
    5,517       6,933       5,637       8,478       9,613       10,878       11,791  
 
 
(1) Certain reclassifications have been made to conform to the September 30, 2011 financial statement presentation, including retroactive adjustments to reflect additional properties sold or classified as held for sale as of


26


Table of Contents

September 30, 2011 as discontinued operations (see Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in “Item 1 — Financial Statements” in Aimco OP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, included as Annex H to this information statement/prospectus and Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, and included as Annex I to this information statement/prospectus).
 
(2) Total operating expenses, operating income and loss from continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2008, include a $91.1 million pre-tax provision for impairment losses on real estate development assets, which is discussed further in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Aimco OP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, and included as Annex G to this information statement/prospectus.
 
(3) Income from discontinued operations for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, 2008, 2007 and 2006 includes $94.9 million, $221.8 million, $800.3 million, $116.1 million and $336.2 million in gains on disposition of real estate, respectively. Income from discontinued operations for 2010, 2009 and 2008 is discussed further in “Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, and included as Annex I to this information statement/prospectus.
 
(4) Distributions declared per common unit during the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, included $5.08 and $1.91, respectively, of per unit distributions that were paid to Aimco through the issuance of OP Units (see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements in “Item 8 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 15, 2011, and included as Annex I to this information statement/prospectus).


27


Table of Contents

 
SELECTED SUMMARY HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF
ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. 6
 
The following table sets forth AIP’s selected summary historical financial data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. AIP’s historical statements of operations and cash flow data set forth below for each of the two fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2010 and the historical balance sheet data as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, are derived from AIP’s financial statements included in AIP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010. AIP’s unaudited historical statements of operations data set forth below for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, and the unaudited historical balance sheet data as of September 30, 2011, are derived from information included in AIP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011.
 
You should read this information together with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and with the financial statements and notes to the financial statements included in AIP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, filed with the SEC on March 25, 2011, and AIP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, filed with the SEC on November 9, 2011, which are included as Annex E and Annex F, respectively, to this information statement/prospectus.
 
                                 
    For the Nine Months
   
    Ended September 30,   For The Years Ended December 31,
    2011   2010   2010   2009
    (unaudited)        
    (dollar amounts in thousands, except per unit data)
 
OPERATING DATA:
                               
Total revenues
  $ 2,091     $ 2,062     $ 2,760     $ 2,726  
Income from continuing operations
    275       249       405       605  
Net income
    350       3,081       3,272       717  
Net income from continuing operations per limited partnership unit
    5.75       5.20       8.46       12.66  
Net income per limited partnership unit
    7.27       62.04       66.94       15.01  
Distributions per limited partnership unit
          178.36       181.90       14.01  
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges
    143 %     154 %     155 %     222 %
BALANCE SHEET DATA:
                               
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 219     $ 109     $ 289     $ 219  
Real estate, net of accumulated depreciation
    3,605       3,639       3,615       3,787  
Assets held for sale
                      2,968  
Total assets
    4,458       4,393       4,568       7,484  
Mortgage notes payable
    13,757       13,939       13,896       7,867  
Due to affiliates
    8                   270  
Liabilities related to assets held for sale
                      3,446  
General partners’ deficit
    (188 )     (305 )     (194 )     (303 )
Limited partners’ deficit
    (9,339 )     (9,651 )     (9,683 )     (4,148 )
Total partners’ deficit
    (9,527 )     (9,956 )     (9,877 )     (4,451 )
Total distributions
          8,586       8,698       679  
Book value per limited partnership unit
    (197.40 )     (203.99 )     (204.67 )     (87.68 )
CASH FLOW DATA:
                               
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
  $ (70 )   $ (110 )   $ 70     $ (34 )
Net cash provided by operating activities
    449       94       338       1,443  


28


Table of Contents

 
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA
 
Aimco common stock trades on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.” The OP Units are not listed on any securities exchange and do not trade in an active secondary market. However, as described below, the trading price of Aimco common stock is considered a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit. After a one-year holding period, OP Units are redeemable for shares of Aimco common stock (on a one-for-one basis) or cash equal to the value of such shares, as Aimco elects. As a result, the trading price of Aimco common stock is considered a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit. The number of OP Units offered in the merger with respect to each AIP Unit was calculated by dividing the per unit cash merger consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the second merger. The closing price of Aimco common stock as reported on the NYSE on November 10, 2011, was $22.82.
 
The AIP Units are not listed on any securities exchange nor do they trade in an active secondary market. The per unit cash merger consideration payable to each holder of AIP Units is greater than the General Partner’s estimate of the proceeds that would be available for distribution to limited partners (following the repayment of debt and other liabilities of AIP) if its property was sold at a price equal to its appraised value, given that the General Partner did not deduct certain amounts that would be payable upon an immediate sale of the partnership’s property, such as prepayment penalties on the mortgage debt of such property.
 
The following tables summarize the historical per share/unit information for Aimco, Aimco OP and AIP for the periods indicated:
 
                                 
    Nine Months Ended
   
    September 30,   Fiscal Year Ended December 31,
    2011   2010   2009   2008
 
Cash dividends declared per share/unit
                               
Aimco Common Stock
  $ 0.36     $ 0.30     $ 0.40     $ 2.40  
Aimco OP Units
    0.36       0.30       0.40       2.40  
AIP Units
          181.90       14.01       6.59  
(Loss) income per common share/unit from continuing operations
                               
Aimco Common Stock
  $ (0.92 )   $ (1.45 )   $ (1.77 )   $ (2.09 )
Aimco OP Units
    (0.91 )     (1.44 )     (1.76 )     (1.94 )
AIP Units
    5.75       8.46       12.66       13.57  
 
                 
    September 30, 2011   December 31, 2010
 
Book value per share/unit
               
Aimco Common Stock(1)
  $ 7.87     $ 8.89  
Aimco OP Units(2)
    7.26       8.18  
AIP Units(3)
    (197.40 )     (204.67 )
 
 
(1) Based on 120.9 million and 117.6 million shares of Aimco common stock outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
 
(2) Based on 129.2 million and 126.1 million Aimco OP Units and equivalents outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
 
(3) Based on 47,311 limited partner units outstanding at September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.


29


Table of Contents

 
INFORMATION ABOUT THE AIMCO ENTITIES
 
Aimco is a Maryland corporation incorporated on January 10, 1994. Aimco is a self-administered and self-managed real estate investment trust, or REIT. Aimco’s principal financial objective is to provide predictable and attractive returns to its stockholders. Aimco’s business plan to achieve this objective is to:
 
  •  own and operate a broadly diversified portfolio of primarily class “B/B+” assets (defined below) with properties concentrated in the 20 largest markets in the United States (as measured by total apartment value, which is the estimated total market value of apartment properties in a particular market);
 
  •  improve its portfolio by selling assets with lower projected returns and reinvesting those proceeds through the purchase of new assets or additional investment in existing assets in its portfolio, including increased ownership or redevelopment; and
 
  •  provide financial leverage primarily by the use of non-recourse, long-dated, fixed-rate property debt and perpetual preferred equity.
 
As of September 30, 2011, Aimco:
 
  •  owned an equity interest in 205 conventional real estate properties with 64,781 units;
 
  •  owned an equity interest in 201 affordable real estate properties with 24,040 units; and
 
  •  provided services for or managed 11,233 units in 159 properties, primarily pursuant to long-term asset management agreements. In certain cases, Aimco may indirectly own generally less than one percent of the operations of such properties through a syndication or other fund.
 
Of these properties, Aimco consolidated 199 conventional properties with 63,335 units and 160 affordable properties with 19,969 units.
 
For conventional assets, Aimco focuses on the ownership of primarily B/B+ assets. Aimco measures conventional property asset quality based on average rents of its units compared to local market average rents as reported by a third-party provider of commercial real estate performance and analysis, with A-quality assets earning rents greater than 125% of local market average, B-quality assets earning rents 90% to 125% of local market average and C-quality assets earning rents less than 90% of local market average. Aimco classifies as B/B+ those assets earning rents ranging from 100% to 125% of local market average. Although some companies and analysts within the multifamily real estate industry use asset class ratings of A, B and C, some of which are tied to local market rent averages, the metrics used to classify asset quality as well as the timing for which local markets rents are calculated may vary from company to company. Accordingly, Aimco’s rating system for measuring asset quality is neither broadly nor consistently used in the multifamily real estate industry.
 
Through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, AIMCO-GP, Inc., the general partner of Aimco OP, and AIMCO-LP Trust, Aimco owns a majority of the ownership interests in Aimco OP. As of September 30, 2011, Aimco held approximately 94% of the OP Units and equivalents. Aimco conducts substantially all of its business and owns substantially all of its assets through Aimco OP. Interests in Aimco OP that are held by limited partners other than Aimco include OP Units, high performance partnership units, or HPUs, and partnership preferred units. The holders of the OP Units receive distributions, prorated from the date of issuance, in an amount equivalent to the dividends paid to holders of Aimco common stock. Holders of OP Units may redeem such units for cash or, at Aimco OP’s option, Aimco common stock. Partnership preferred units entitle the holders thereof to a preference with respect to distributions or upon liquidation. At September 30, 2011, after elimination of shares held by consolidated subsidiaries, 120,916,144 shares of Aimco common stock were outstanding and Aimco OP had 8,289,841 OP Units and equivalents outstanding for a combined total of 129,205,985 shares of Aimco common stock, OP Units and equivalents outstanding.
 
Through its wholly-owned subsidiary, AIMCO/IPT, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Aimco owns all of the outstanding common stock of the General Partner.


30


Table of Contents

AIMCO/IPT, Inc. holds a 70% interest in AIMCO IPLP, L.P. as its general partner. AIMCO/IPT, Inc. and AIMCO IPLP, L.P. share voting and dispositive power over 5,462 AIP Units, or approximately 11.54% of the outstanding AIP Units. Aimco OP holds a 30% interest in AIMCO IPLP, L.P. as its limited partner.
 
Angeles Income Properties 6, LP, or New AIP, is a Delaware limited partnership formed on July 26, 2011, for the purpose of consummating the merger with AIP. New AIP has not carried on any activities to date, except for activities incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. New AIP’s general partner is Angeles Realty Corporation II, and its sole limited partner is Aimco OP.
 
AIMCO AIP 6 Merger Sub LLC, or the Aimco Subsidiary, is a Delaware limited liability company formed on July 26, 2011, for the purpose of consummating the merger with AIP. The Aimco Subsidiary is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Aimco OP. The Aimco Subsidiary has not carried on any activities to date, except for activities incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
 
The names, positions and business addresses of the directors and executive officers of Aimco, Aimco OP, AIMCO-GP, Inc., AIMCO/IPT, Inc., AIMCO IPLP, L.P., Cooper River Properties, LLC, the General Partner and the Aimco Subsidiary, as well as a biographical summary of the experience of such persons for the past five years or more, are set forth in Annex D attached hereto and are incorporated in this information statement/prospectus by reference. During the last five years, none of Aimco, AIMCO-GP, AIMCO/IPT, Inc., AIMCO IPLP, L.P., Aimco OP, Cooper River Properties, LLC, AIP or the General Partner nor, to the best of their knowledge, any of the persons listed in Annex D of this information statement/prospectus (i) has been convicted in a criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors) or (ii) was a party to a civil proceeding of a judicial or administrative body of competent jurisdiction and as a result of such proceeding was or is subject to a judgment, decree or final order enjoining further violations of or prohibiting activities subject to federal or state securities laws or finding any violation with respect to such laws. Additional information about Aimco is included in documents incorporated by reference into this information statement/prospectus. Additional information about Aimco OP is included in Annex G, Annex H, and Annex I to this information statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find Additional Information.”
 
The following chart represents the organizational structure of the Aimco Entities:
 
(FLOW CHART)


31


Table of Contents

 
INFORMATION ABOUT ANGELES INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. 6
 
Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. 6 is a California limited partnership organized in June 1984. During its initial offering period through September 30, 1988, AIP sold a total of 47,384 units of the limited partnership for $1,000 each, for an aggregate capital contribution of $47,384,000. In addition, the general partner contributed a total of $1,000 to AIP for a 1% interest. Since its initial offering, AIP has not received, nor are limited partners required to make, additional capital contributions. AIP’s partnership agreement provides that the partnership is to terminate on December 31, 2037 unless terminated prior to such date. The General Partner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Aimco.
 
AIP was organized for the purpose of acquiring fee and other forms of equity interests in various types of real estate property. On May 20, 2010, AIP sold Homestead Apartments, a 168 unit apartment complex in East Lansing, Michigan, to a third party for a gross sales price of $7,000,000. The net proceeds realized by AIP were approximately $6,802,000 after payment of closing costs of approximately $198,000. AIP used approximately $3,295,000 to repay the mortgage encumbering the property. AIP realized a gain on sale of discontinued operations of approximately $3,820,000 as a result of the sale. In addition, AIP recorded a loss on extinguishment of debt of approximately $968,000 due to the write-off of unamortized loan costs and the payment of a prepayment penalty associated with the payment of the mortgage of approximately $870,000. While AIP is not subject to federal income tax, it is subject to tax related to its Michigan activities. During the year ended December 31, 2010, as a result of the sale of Homestead Apartments, AIP recognized current tax expense of approximately $118,000, with a corresponding liability at December 31, 2010.
 
At September 30, 2011, AIP, through a limited partnership in which AIP owns a 99% interest, owned and operated one property, the Lazy Hollow Apartments, a 178 unit apartment project located in Columbia, Maryland.
 
The average annual rental rates for each of the five years ended December 31, 2010 for the property are as follows:
 
                     
    Average Annual Rental Rates
Property
  2010   2009   2008   2007   2006
 
Lazy Hollow Apartments
  $14,691/unit   $14,598/unit   $14,465/unit   $13,999/unit   $13,614/unit
 
The average occupancy for each of the five years ended December 31, 2010 and for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 for the property is as follows:
 
                                                         
    Average Occupancy
    For the Nine
   
    Months Ended
   
    September 30,   For The Years Ended December 31,
Property
  2011   2010   2010   2009   2008   2007   2006
 
Lazy Hollow Apartments
    97 %     97 %     97 %     96 %     95 %     97 %     95 %
 
The real estate industry is highly competitive. AIP’s property is subject to competition from other residential apartment complexes in the area. The General Partner believes that the property is adequately insured. The property is an apartment complex which leases units for terms of one year or less. No tenant leases 10% or more of the available rental space.
 
In June 2008, Lazy Hollow Apartments suffered damage to several of its apartment units as a result of high winds and falling trees. AIP incurred approximately $67,000 to repair the damaged units during 2008, including approximately $17,000 for clean-up costs. During the year ended December 31, 2009, AIP received approximately $64,000 in insurance proceeds, including approximately $14,000 for emergency expenses. AIP recognized a casualty gain of approximately $36,000 during the year ended December 31, 2009 as a result of the write-off of undepreciated damaged assets of approximately $14,000.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2010, AIP completed approximately $119,000 of capital improvements at Lazy Hollow Apartments consisting primarily of water heater, appliance and floor covering replacements. These improvements were funded from operating cash flow. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, AIP completed approximately $211,000 of capital improvements at Lazy Hollow Apartments, consisting primarily of water heater and floor covering replacements, exterior painting and parking lot improvements. These improvements


32


Table of Contents

were funded from operating cash flow. AIP regularly evaluates the capital improvement needs of the property. AIP has received notice that lender on the first and second mortgage on AIP’s property will require AIP to complete certain parking lot and common area repairs during 2011, which repairs cost approximately $109,800. As discussed above, all of these capital improvements were completed during the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Except for these repairs, AIP has no material commitments for property improvements and replacements, however, certain routine capital expenditures are anticipated during the remainder of 2011. Such capital expenditures will depend on the physical condition of the property as well as anticipated cash flow generated by the property.
 
Additional capital expenditures will be incurred only if cash is available from operations or from AIP reserves. To the extent that such capital improvements are completed, AIP’s distributable cash flow, if any, may be adversely affected at least in the short term.
 
The following table sets forth certain information relating to the mortgages encumbering the Lazy Hollow Apartments at September 30, 2011:
 
                                         
    Principal,
                      Principal
 
    Balance at
                      Balance
 
    September 30,
    Interest
    Period
    Maturity
    Due at
 
    2011     Rate(1)     Amortized     Date     Maturity(2)  
    (In thousands)                       (In thousands)  
 
1st mortgage
  $ 7,520       6.04 %     360 months       07/2020     $ 6,412  
2nd mortgage
    6,237       5.88 %     360 months       07/2020       5,292  
                                         
    $ 13,757                             $ 11,704  
                                         
 
 
(1) Fixed rate mortgages.
 
(2) See “Note C — Mortgage Notes Payable” to the financial statements included in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in AIP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 attached hereto as Annex E for information with respect to AIP’s ability to prepay these mortgages and other specific details about the mortgages.
 
The mortgage notes payable are fixed rate mortgages that are non-recourse and are secured by pledges of AIP’s rental property and by pledges of revenues from the rental property. The mortgage notes payable include prepayment penalties if repaid prior to maturity. Further, the property may not be sold subject to existing indebtedness.
 
On June 30, 2010, AIP obtained a second mortgage loan in the principal amount of $6,330,000 on the Lazy Hollow Apartments. The second mortgage bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.88% per annum and requires monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $37,000, from August 1, 2010 through the July 1, 2020 maturity date. The second mortgage has a balloon payment of approximately $5,292,000 due at maturity. AIP may prepay the second mortgage at any time with 30 days written notice to the lender subject to a prepayment penalty. As a condition of the loan, the lender required Aimco OP to guarantee certain non-recourse carve-out obligations of AIP with respect to the new mortgage financing. In connection with the new loan, AIP incurred loan costs of approximately $189,000, which were capitalized during the year ended December 31, 2010. Included in the capitalized loan costs is a refinance fee of approximately $56,000 which was paid to an affiliate of the General Partner during the year ended December 31, 2010.
 
In connection with the second mortgage loan, AIP also agreed to certain modifications on the existing mortgage loan encumbering the Lazy Hollow Apartments. The modification includes a fixed interest rate of 6.04% per annum and monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $46,000, from August 1, 2010 through the maturity date of July 1, 2020, at which time a balloon payment of approximately $6,412,000 is due. The previous terms provided for a fixed interest rate of 5.94% per annum and monthly payments of principal and interest of approximately $71,000 through the April 30, 2023 maturity date, at which date the mortgage was scheduled to be fully amortized. AIP may prepay the first mortgage loan at any time subject to a prepayment penalty. Total costs associated with the modification of the existing mortgage were approximately $15,000. As a condition of the loan, the lender required Aimco OP to guarantee certain non-recourse carve-out obligations of AIP with respect to the modified loan.


33


Table of Contents

 
Distributions to Limited Partners
 
The AIP Units are entitled to allocations of profit and loss, and distributions, relating to AIP’s interest in the Lazy Hollow Apartments. As of November 10, 2011, there were 47,311 AIP Units outstanding, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 27,739 of those units, or approximately 58.63% of those units.
 
AIP distributed the following amounts during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands except per unit data):
 
                                 
    Year Ended December 31, 2010     Year Ended December 31, 2009  
          Per Limited
          Per Limited
 
          Partnership
          Partnership
 
    Aggregate     Unit     Aggregate     Unit  
 
Sale(1)
  $ 2,276     $ 47.64     $     $  
Financing(2)
    6,205       129.86              
Operations(3)
    211       4.40       670       14.01  
                                 
Total
  $ 8,692     $ 181.90     $ 670     $ 14.01  
                                 
 
 
(1) Proceeds from the May 2010 sale of Homestead Apartments.
 
(2) Proceeds from the June 2010 second mortgage obtained on the Lazy Hollow Apartments.
 
(3) Includes an operating distribution of approximately $111,000 (approximately $110,000 to the limited partners or $2.32 per limited partnership unit) which was declared by AIP on December 31, 2010. This amount is included in distribution payable for the year ended December 31, 2010 and was paid to the partners in March 2011.
 
AIP distributed the following amounts during the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands, except per unit data):
 
                                 
    Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011     Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010  
          Per Limited
          Per Limited
 
          Partnership
          Partnership
 
    Aggregate     Unit     Aggregate     Unit  
 
Sale(1)
  $     $     $ 2,276     $ 47.64  
Financing(2)
                6,147       128.63  
Operations
                100       2.09  
                                 
Total
  $     $     $ 8,523     $ 178.36  
                                 
 
 
(1) Proceeds from the May 2010 sale of Homestead Apartments.
 
(2) Proceeds from the June 2010 second mortgage obtained on Lazy Hollow Apartments.
 
At December 31, 2010, approximately $41,000 of the distribution payable represents the estimated Michigan withholding taxes to be paid by AIP on behalf of certain limited partners in connection with the sale of Homestead Apartments.
 
In conjunction with the transfer of funds from a majority owned sub-tier limited partnership to AIP, approximately $6,000 and $9,000 was distributed to the general partner of the majority owned sub-tier limited partnership during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In the fourth quarter, the general partner of the majority owned sub-tier limited partnership returned $57,000 of distributions previously received. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, AIP paid an operating distribution of approximately $111,000 (approximately $110,000 to the limited partners or $2.32 per limited partnership unit) and approximately $41,000 to the applicable limited partners associated with the sale of Homestead Apartments, which was previously withheld for Michigan withholding taxes, both of which were included in distribution payable at December 31, 2010. No other distributions were made or declared during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
 
Future cash distributions will depend on the level of cash generated from operations, the timing of debt maturity, refinancings, and/or property sale. AIP’s cash available for distribution is reviewed on a monthly basis.


34


Table of Contents

There can be no assurance, however, that AIP will generate sufficient funds from operations after required capital expenditures to permit any distributions to its partners during the remainder of 2011 or subsequent periods.
 
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
 
AIP has no employees and depends on the General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all partnership activities. The AIP partnership agreement provides that the General Partner and its affiliates receive certain payments for services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred on behalf of AIP.
 
The AIP partnership agreement also provides that the General Partner and its affiliates receive 5% of gross receipts from AIP’s properties as compensation for providing property management services. AIP paid to such affiliates approximately $166,000 and $207,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and approximately $103,000 and $133,000 for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
 
Affiliates of the General Partner charged AIP for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $54,000 and $81,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. A portion of these reimbursements for these periods are for construction management services provided by an affiliate of the General Partner of approximately $3,000 and $25,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
 
Affiliates of the General Partner charged AIP for reimbursement of accountable administrative expenses amounting to approximately $43,000 and $45,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. A portion of these reimbursements for these periods are for construction management services provided by an affiliate of the General Partner of approximately $17,000 and $1,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
 
In connection with the second mortgage obtained on Lazy Hollow Apartments during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an affiliate of the General Partner was paid a financing fee of approximately $56,000 in accordance with the Partnership Agreement. The fee was capitalized by AIP.
 
Pursuant to AIP’s partnership agreement, the General Partner is entitled to receive a distribution equal to 3% of the aggregate disposition price of sold properties. Pursuant to this provision, AIP paid total distributions to the General Partner of approximately $731,000 in prior years related to property sales as follows: 1997 sale of LaSalle Warehouse, 1998 sale of Whispering Pines, 1999 sale of Mesa Dunes Mobile Home Park, 2000 sale of Wakonda Shopping Center and Town and Country Shopping Center and the 2001 sale of Casa Granada Apartments. These distributions are subordinate to the limited partners receiving a preferred return, as specified in AIP’s partnership agreement. If the limited partners have not received their preferred return when AIP terminates, the General Partner will be required to return this amount to AIP. AIP did not pay a distribution to the General Partner under this provision during the year December 31, 2010 related to the sale of Homestead Apartments as the limited partners have not received their preferred return as of September 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010.
 
Pursuant to AIP’s partnership agreement for managing the affairs of AIP, the General Partner is entitled to receive a Partnership Management Fee equal to 10% of AIP’s net cash from operations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the amount accrued for the allowable fee was approximately $8,000 and $0, respectively. The total amount due at September 30, 2011 was approximately $8,000. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, the amount accrued for the allowable fee was zero and approximately $55,000, respectively. The total amount due at December 31, 2009 was approximately $270,000. Payment of the Partnership Management Fee is restricted to distributable net proceeds as defined in AIP’s partnership agreement. The cumulative unpaid Partnership Management Fees earned for the years 2003 through 2009 of approximately $270,000 were paid during the year ended December 31, 2010 with distributable net proceeds from the sale of Homestead Apartments.
 
In accordance with AIP’s partnership agreement, during the year ended December 31, 2009, Aimco OP advanced to AIP approximately $70,000 to fund property taxes at the Lazy Hollow Apartments. Interest on the advances was charged at a variable rate based on the prime rate plus a market rate adjustment for similar type loans. Interest expense was approximately $1,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009. There were no such advances or interest expense during the year ended December 31, 2010 or the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010. Total advances and interest of approximately $71,000 were repaid during the year ended December 31, 2009. There were no advances or accrued interest owed to affiliates at December 31, 2010 or September 30, 2011. AIP may receive additional advances of funds from Aimco OP although Aimco OP is not obligated to provide such advances.
 
AIP insures its property up to certain limits through coverage provided by Aimco, which is generally self-insured for a portion of losses and liabilities related to workers’ compensation, property casualty, general liability and vehicle liability. AIP insures its property above the Aimco limits through insurance policies obtained by Aimco from insurers


35


Table of Contents

unaffiliated with the General Partner. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, AIP was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $44,000 and $47,000, respectively, for insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, AIP was charged by Aimco and its affiliates approximately $13,000 for hazard insurance coverage and fees associated with policy claims administration. Additional charges will be incurred by AIP during 2011 as other insurance policies renew later in the year.
 
In addition to its indirect ownership of the general partner interests in AIP, Aimco and its affiliates owned 27,739 AIP Units representing approximately 58.63% of the number of AIP Units outstanding, at November 10, 2011. Pursuant to the AIP partnership agreement, limited partners holding a majority of the units are entitled to take action with respect to a variety of matters that include voting on certain amendments to the AIP partnership agreement and voting to remove the General Partner. As a result of its ownership of 58.63% of the outstanding AIP Units, Aimco and its affiliates are in a position to control all such voting decisions with respect to AIP. Although the General Partner owes fiduciary duties to AIP’s limited partners, it also owes fiduciary duties to its sole stockholder, which is wholly-owned by Aimco. As a result, the duties of the General Partner to AIP and its limited partners may come into conflict with the duties of the General Partner its sole stockholder.
 
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
 
AIP has no directors or executive officers of its own. The names and ages of, as well as the positions and offices held by, the present directors and officers of the General Partner as of September 30, 2011 are set forth in Annex D to this information statement/prospectus. One or more of those persons are also directors and/or officers of a general partner (or general partner of a general partner) of limited partnerships which either have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Further, one or more of those persons are also officers of Aimco and the general partner of Aimco OP, entities that have a class of securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act, or are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. There are no family relationships between or among any officers or directors. No remuneration was paid to AIP nor its directors or officers during the year ended December 31, 2010 or the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
 
The board of directors of the General Partner does not have a separate audit committee. As such, the board of directors of the General Partner fulfills the functions of an audit committee. The board of directors has determined that Steven D. Cordes meets the requirement of an “audit committee financial expert.”
 
The directors and officers of the General Partner with authority over AIP are all employees of subsidiaries of Aimco. Aimco has adopted a code of ethics that applies to such directors and officers that is posted on Aimco’s website (www.aimco.com). Aimco’s website is not incorporated by reference to this filing.
 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
 
The General Partner owns all of the outstanding general partner interests in AIP, which constitute 1% of the total interests in the partnership. AIP has no directors or executive officers of its own. The General Partner is a California corporation, which is indirectly wholly-owned by Aimco. None of the General Partner or any of its directors or executive officers owns any of the AIP Units. The following table sets forth certain information as of


36


Table of Contents

November 10, 2011 with respect to the ownership by any person (including any “group,” as that term is used in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act) known to us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the AIP Units.
 
                 
    Approximate
  Approximate
    Number of
  Percent of
Entity Name and Address
  Units   Class
 
Apartment Investment and Management Company(1)
    27,739 (2)     58.63 %
4582 South Ulster Street,
Suite 1100
Denver, CO 80237
               
AIMCO-GP, Inc.(1)
    27,739 (2)     58.63 %
4582 South Ulster Street,
Suite 1100
Denver, CO 80237
               
AIMCO Properties, L.P.(1)
    27,739 (2)     58.63 %
4582 South Ulster Street,
Suite 1100
Denver, CO 80237
               
AIMCO IPLP, L.P.(3)
    5,462 (4)     11.54 %
4582 South Ulster Street,
Suite 1100
Denver, CO 80237
               
AIMCO/IPT, Inc.(3)
    5,462 (4)     11.54 %
4582 South Ulster Street,
Suite 1100
Denver, CO 80237
               
Cooper River Properties, LLC(5)
    3,506       7.41 %
4582 South Ulster Street,
Suite 1100
Denver, CO 80237
               
 
 
(1) AIMCO-GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation, is the sole general partner of AIMCO Properties, L.P., and owns approximately a 1% general partner interest in AIMCO Properties, L.P. AIMCO-GP, Inc. is wholly-owned by Apartment Investment and Management Company. As of November 10, 2011, AIMCO-LP Trust, a Delaware trust wholly-owned by Apartment Investment and Management Company, owns approximately a 93% interest in the OP Units and equivalents of AIMCO Properties, L.P.
 
(2) AIMCO Properties, L.P., AIMCO-GP, Inc. and Apartment Investment and Management Company share voting and dispositive power over 27,739 AIP Units, representing approximately 58.63% of such units. AIMCO-GP, Inc. holds its AIP Units, directly or indirectly, as nominee for AIMCO Properties, L.P. and so AIMCO Properties, L.P. may be deemed the beneficial owner of the AIP Units held by AIMCO-GP, Inc. Apartment Investment and Management Company may be deemed the beneficial owner of the AIP Units held by AIMCO Properties, L.P. and AIMCO-GP, Inc. by virtue of its indirect ownership or control of these entities.
 
(3) AIMCO/IPT, Inc., is wholly-owned by Aimco and holds a 70.0% interest in AIMCO IPLP, L.P. as its general partner. AIMCO Properties, L.P. holds a 30% interest in AIMCO IPLP, L.P. as the limited partner.
 
(4) AIMCO IPLP, L.P. and AIMCO/IPT, Inc. share voting and dispositive power over 5,462 AIP Units, representing approximately 11.54% of the class, including the 3,506 AIP Units held by Cooper River Properties, LLC.
 
(5) Cooper River Properties, LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AIMCO IPLP, L.P.
 
Additional Information
 
For additional information about AIP and its property and operating data related to this property, see AIP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, attached hereto as Annex E, and AIP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, attached hereto as Annex F.


37


Table of Contents

 
THE TRANSACTIONS
 
Background of the Transactions
 
The General Partner regularly evaluates AIP’s properties by considering various factors, such as AIP’s financial position and real estate and capital markets conditions. The General Partner monitors the properties’ specific locale and sub-market conditions (including stability of the surrounding neighborhood), evaluating current trends, competition, new construction and economic changes. It oversees the operating performance of the properties and continuously evaluates the physical improvement requirements. In addition, the financing structure for the properties (including any prepayment penalties), tax implications to limited partners, availability of attractive mortgage financing to a purchaser, and the investment climate are all considered. Any of these factors, and possibly others, could potentially contribute to any decision by the General Partner to sell, refinance, upgrade with capital improvements or hold AIP’s properties.
 
After taking into account the foregoing considerations, during 2009, the General Partner began to consider strategic alternatives for AIP and its two properties, the Homestead Apartments and the Lazy Hollow Apartments. In September 2009, the General Partner, together with certain other affiliates of Aimco, entered into a purchase and sale contract with a third party to sell the Lazy Hollow Apartments and certain other apartment complexes owned by Aimco’s affiliates. This purchase and sale contract was terminated by the parties in the fourth quarter of 2009. The amount of the overall purchase price to be allocated to the Lazy Hollow Apartments under the terminated purchase and sale contract was $17,510,000. On May 20, 2010, the General Partner sold the Homestead Apartments to a third party for a gross sales price of $7,000,000.
 
During January 2011, officers of the General Partner, who are also officers of Aimco, met several times to discuss strategic alternatives for AIP and its sole remaining property, the Lazy Hollow Apartments. During these meetings, they considered the costs of maintaining AIP’s current ownership structure, including audit, tax and SEC reporting costs, given Aimco OP’s ownership of 58.63% of the AIP Units.
 
After considering all of these factors, the General Partner agreed to explore the possibility of Aimco OP acquiring the Lazy Hollow Apartments through a transaction that would provide the unaffiliated limited partners with the opportunity to defer taxable gain through an exchange of AIP Units for OP Units.
 
During January and February of 2011, the General Partner’s management sought advice from outside counsel to determine whether a transaction would be feasible that would result in Aimco OP’s ownership of the Lazy Hollow Apartments while also providing potential tax deferral to limited partners who are unaffiliated with Aimco OP. At the same time, they spoke with appraisers regarding the possibility of appraising the property for purposes of evaluating a potential transaction with Aimco OP. The General Partner engaged KTR on February 11, 2011 to appraise the Lazy Hollow Apartments. KTR delivered the appraisal for the Lazy Hollow Apartments on March 11, 2011. Pursuant to this appraisal, KTR valued the property at $26,000,000 as of March 4, 2011.
 
Over the following weeks, the General Partner’s management reviewed the appraisal report and discussed both KTR’s assumptions and its valuation of the property and determined that KTR’s assumptions were reasonable and the valuation appropriate. As part of their review, they considered the fiduciary duties owed by the General Partner to unaffiliated limited partners, as well as the property’s appraised value, and the amount of indebtedness secured by the property, which at March 31, 2011 was approximately $13.9 million.
 
In April and May 2011, the General Partner’s management further discussed with outside counsel the possibility of pursuing a transaction that would result in Aimco’s ownership of the Lazy Hollow Apartments. In connection with these discussions, Aimco OP and the General Partner agreed that, if they were to pursue such a transaction, they should consider retaining an independent financial advisor to opine as to the fairness of such transaction to the unaffiliated limited partners of AIP.
 
In May 2011, the General Partner’s management, together with outside counsel, conducted interviews with representatives of Duff & Phelps and two other financial advisory firms. On June 10, 2011, Aimco OP engaged Duff & Phelps to provide a fairness opinion, and, if requested, an updated fairness opinion with respect to the merger transactions and the other possible merger transactions. In the following weeks, Duff & Phelps had due


38


Table of Contents

diligence calls with the General Partner’s management and received due diligence materials in response to its diligence requests.
 
On June 3, 2011, at the request of Aimco OP and the General Partner, KTR delivered an updated appraisal for the Lazy Hollow Apartments, pursuant to which it valued the property at $26,000,000, as of June 1, 2011. The General Partner’s management reviewed and discussed the updated appraisal report and calculated the merger consideration based on this updated appraisal.
 
On July 28, 2011, Duff & Phelps delivered its written opinion to the boards of directors of Aimco and the general partners of Aimco OP and AIP to the effect that, as of July 28, 2011, and based on and subject to the various assumptions made, procedure followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with its opinion, the cash consideration in the second merger is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of AIP.
 
On July 28, 2011, the General Partner considered the merger transactions and decided to approve the merger agreement. Before doing so, the General Partner and the Aimco Entities considered a number of possible alternatives to the proposed transactions, as described in greater detail in this information statement/prospectus. However, the General Partner and the Aimco Entities ultimately determined that the proposed mergers are in the best interests of AIP and its unaffiliated limited partners that hold AIP Units. On July 28, 2011, AIP, New AIP, Aimco OP and the Aimco Subsidiary entered into the agreement and plan of merger.
 
Also on July 28, 2011, Aimco and Aimco OP filed with the SEC a registration statement relating to the merger. In addition, the Aimco Entities made certain other filings required in connection with the merger. From August through November 15, 2011, Aimco and Aimco OP responded to SEC comments and revised the registration statement.
 
On September 20, 2011, the General Partner’s management met to discuss the merger transactions and the valuation of AIP’s property. On October 4, 2011, the General Partner’s management met again to discuss the timing of the merger transactions and considered updating the valuations of AIP’s property. On October 5, 2011, the General Partner engaged KTR to update the appraisal and Duff & Phelps to provide an updated fairness opinion with respect to the equity value resulting from such updated appraisal.
 
On October 20, 2011, KTR delivered an updated appraisal for the Lazy Hollow Apartments, pursuant to which it valued the property at $27,000,000 as of October 1, 2011. Aimco OP and the General Partner reviewed and discussed the updated appraisal report and calculated the equity value of the AIP Units based on the updated appraisal, AIP’s updated financial position and the updated mark-to-market adjustment of the mortgage debt encumbering AIP’s property. This calculation, together with the updated financial information of AIP, resulted in an increase of the equity value of the AIP Units from $252.40 per AIP Unit to $268.04 per AIP Unit.
 
On November 15, 2011, Duff & Phelps delivered its updated written opinion to the boards of directors of Aimco, and the general partners of Aimco OP and AIP, to the effect that, as of November 15, 2011, based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, factors considered, and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Duff & Phelps in connection with its opinion, the cash consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit is fair, from a financial point of view, to the unaffiliated limited partners of AIP.
 
On November 15, 2011, the General Partner and the general partner of Aimco OP approved an amendment and restatement of the merger agreement that provides for consideration of $268.04 per AIP Unit, payable in cash or OP Units. On November 15, 2011, AIP, New AIP, Aimco OP and the Aimco Subsidiary entered into the amended and restated agreement and plan of merger.
 
Determination of Merger Consideration
 
In the second merger, each AIP Unit outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the second merger will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such AIP Unit, either $268.04 in cash or equivalent value in OP Units, except in those jurisdictions where the law prohibits the offer of OP Units in this transaction (or registration or qualification would be prohibitively costly). Because Aimco indirectly owns the General Partner, the merger consideration has not been determined in an arm’s-length negotiation. In order to arrive


39


Table of Contents

at a fair consideration, KTR, an independent real estate appraisal firm, was engaged to perform a complete appraisal of AIP’s sole property, the Lazy Hollow Apartments. For more detailed information about the independent appraiser’s determination of the estimated value of the property, see “Special Factors — The Appraisal.” The per unit cash merger consideration payable to each holder of AIP Units is greater than the General Partner’s estimate of the proceeds that would be available for distribution to limited partners (following the repayment of debt and other liabilities of AIP) if the property was sold at a price equal to its appraised value. The General Partner did not deduct certain amounts that would be payable upon an immediate sale of the partnership’s property, such as prepayment penalties on the mortgage debt of the property. The estimated prepayment penalty would have been approximately $4,210,400 as of September 30, 2011. The General Partner calculated the equity of the partnership by (i) adding to the appraised value the value of any other non-real estate assets of AIP that would not be included in the appraisal; and (ii) deducting all liabilities, including the market value of mortgage debt, debt owed to the General Partner or its affiliates, accounts payable and accrued expenses and certain other costs. The amount of liabilities deducted includes an estimate of $71,200 for expenses attributable to the property that would be incurred prior to the transactions but payable after the transactions. This calculation, which is summarized below, resulted in per unit cash merger consideration of $268.04.
 
         
Appraised value of the Lazy Hollow Apartments
  $ 27,000,000  
Plus: Cash and cash equivalents
    257,981  
Plus: Other assets
    300,841  
Plus: Return of special allocation to General Partner from prior property sales
    731,000  
Less: Mortgage debt, including accrued interest
    (13,833,072 )
Less: Mark-to-market adjustment(1)
    (1,271,226 )
Less: Accounts payable and accrued expenses owed to third parties
    (213,370 )
Less: Other liabilities
    (79,460 )
Less: Allocation to general partner of lower tier partnership
    (12,044 )
Less: Estimated trailing payables
    (71,200 )
         
Net partnership equity
  $ 12,809,450  
Percentage of net partnership equity allocable to limited partners
    99.00 %
         
Net partnership equity allocable to limited partners
  $ 12,681,356  
Total number of Units
    47,311  
         
Cash consideration per unit
  $ 268.04  
         
 
 
(1) The mark-to-market adjustment reflects the difference between the outstanding amount of the mortgage debt and its market value as of September 30, 2011. The market value was calculated as the present value of the remaining required payments under the loan through maturity, discounted at 4.61%, which we believe is an appropriate market rate based on our analysis of interest rates for selected loans of a similar type, leverage and duration.
 
The number of OP Units offered per AIP Unit was calculated by dividing the per unit cash merger consideration by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the second merger. Although there is no public market for OP Units, after a one-year holding period, each OP Unit is generally redeemable for cash in an amount equal to the value of one share of Aimco common stock at the time, subject to Aimco’s right to acquire each OP Unit in exchange for one share of Aimco common stock (subject to antidilution adjustments). Therefore, the General Partner considers the trading price of Aimco common stock to be a reasonable estimate of the fair market value of an OP Unit. As of November 10, 2011, the average closing price of Aimco common stock over the preceding ten consecutive trading days was $23.79, which would have resulted in OP Unit consideration of 11.27 OP Units per AIP Unit.


40


Table of Contents

 
Conflicts of Interest
 
The General Partner is indirectly wholly-owned by Aimco. Therefore, it has a conflict of interest with respect to the transactions. The General Partner has fiduciary duties to its sole stockholder, which is wholly-owned by Aimco, on the one hand, and to AIP and its limited partners, on the other hand. The duties of the General Partner to AIP and its limited partners conflict with its duties to its sole stockholder, which could result in the General Partner approving a transaction that is more favorable to Aimco than might be the case absent such conflict of interest. The General Partner’s desire to seek the best possible terms for AIP’s limited partners conflicts with Aimco’s interest in obtaining the best possible terms for Aimco OP.
 
Future Plans for the Property
 
After the transactions, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner in New AIP, and will own all of the outstanding limited partnership interests of New AIP. The General Partner will continue to be the General Partner of New AIP after the transactions, and AIP’s partnership agreement in effect immediately prior to the merger transactions will be adopted as the partnership agreement of New AIP, with the following changes: (i) references therein to the California Act will be amended to refer to the Delaware Act; (ii) a description of the merger will be added; and (iii) the name of the partnership will be “Angeles Income Properties 6, LP”. Aimco OP intends to retain the limited partnership interests of New AIP after the transactions. After the merger transactions, Aimco will evaluate the capital improvement needs of the Lazy Hollow Apartments, and anticipates making certain routine capital expenditures with respect to the property during 2011, including certain parking lot and common area repairs, which cost approximately $109,800, that are required by AIP’s lender. As discussed above, all of these capital improvements were completed during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.
 
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Transactions
 
For a discussion of the material U.S. Federal income tax consequences of the transactions, see “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations — United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Transactions.”
 
Regulatory Matters
 
No material federal or state regulatory requirements must be satisfied or approvals obtained in connection with the transactions, except (1) filing a registration statement that includes this information statement/prospectus with the SEC and obtaining the SEC’s declaration that the registration statement is effective under the Securities Act, (2) registration or qualification of the issuance of OP Units under state securities laws, and (3) filing certificates of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware and the Secretary of State of the State of California.
 
Accounting Treatment of the Transactions
 
Aimco and Aimco OP will treat the transactions as a purchase of noncontrolling interests for financial accounting purposes. This means that Aimco and Aimco OP will recognize any difference between the purchase price for these noncontrolling interests and the carrying amount of such noncontrolling interests in Aimco and Aimco OP’s consolidated financial statements as an adjustment to the amounts of consolidated equity and partners’ capital attributed to Aimco and Aimco OP, respectively.
 
Appraisal Rights
 
Limited partners are not entitled to dissenters’ appraisal rights under applicable law or AIP’s partnership agreement in connection with the mergers. However, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to a stockholder of a constituent corporation in a merger under Delaware law. These contractual appraisal rights will enable a limited partner to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited partner’s AIP Units in connection with the mergers. Prosecution of these contractual appraisal rights will involve an arbitration proceeding, and the consideration paid to a limited partner after the prosecution of such contractual appraisal rights, which will take a period of time that cannot be predicted with accuracy, will be a cash payment, resulting in a


41


Table of Contents

taxable event to such limited partner. A description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex C.
 
List of Investors
 
Under AIP’s partnership agreement and applicable Law, upon written request and at the cost of the limited partner, a limited partner who holds AIP Units has the right to receive by mail a list of the names and addresses of the partners of AIP and the number of units of partnership interest held by each of them. This list may be obtained by making written request to the Angeles Realty Corporation II, c/o Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, 12 Commerce Drive, Cranford, New Jersey 07016, or by fax at (908) 497-2349.
 
Expenses and Fees and Source of Funds
 
The costs of planning and implementing the transactions, including the cash merger consideration and the preparation of this information statement/prospectus, will be borne by Aimco OP without regard to whether the transactions are effectuated. The estimated amount of these costs is approximately $5,684,400 (assuming all limited partners elect to receive the cash merger consideration). Aimco OP is paying for the costs of the transactions with funds on hand or from drawings under its revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility is pursuant to Aimco OP’s Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement, as amended, with a syndicate of financial institutions, with Bank of America, N.A. as administrative agent, swing line lender and L/C issuer. Borrowings under the revolving credit facility bear interest based on a pricing grid determined by leverage (either at LIBOR plus 4.25% with a LIBOR floor of 1.50% or, at Aimco OP’s option, a base rate equal to the Prime rate plus a spread of 3.00%). The revolving credit facility matures May 1, 2013, and may be extended for one additional year, subject to certain conditions Aimco OP’s obligations under the Amended and Restated Senior Secured Credit Agreement are secured by its equity interests in its subsidiaries.
 
Approvals Required
 
Under applicable law, the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement must be approved by the General Partner and a majority of the limited partnership units. The General Partner has determined that the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable and in the best interests of AIP and its limited partners and has approved the merger transactions. Each AIP Unit is entitled to one vote. As of November 10, 2011, there were issued and outstanding 47,311 AIP Units, and Aimco OP and its affiliates owned 27,739 of those units, or approximately 58.63% of the outstanding AIP Units. The General Partner’s affiliates have indicated that they will vote all of their AIP Units in favor of the merger transactions, enabling them to approve the merger transactions without the consent or approval of any unaffiliated limited partners. Aimco OP and its affiliates have indicated that they intend to take action by written consent, as permitted under the partnership agreement, to approve the merger transactions on or about          , 2011. As a result, approval of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby is assured and your consent is not required.


42


Table of Contents

 
THE MERGER AGREEMENT
 
The following is a summary of the material terms of the merger agreement and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement, which is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex A. You should read the merger agreement carefully in its entirety as it is the legal document that governs these merger transactions.
 
The Mergers
 
AIP has entered into an agreement and plan of merger with New AIP, the Aimco Subsidiary and Aimco OP. The merger agreement amends and restates a prior merger agreement to reflect an increase in the merger consideration from $252.40 per AIP Unit to $268.04 per AIP Unit. The merger agreement contemplates the following transactions:
 
Merger of AIP with and into New AIP.  First, AIP will be merged with and into New AIP with New AIP as the surviving entity. In this merger, each AIP Unit will be converted into an identical unit of limited partnership in New AIP and the general partnership interest in AIP now held by the General Partner will be converted into a general partnership interest in New AIP. All interests in New AIP outstanding immediately prior to the first merger will be cancelled in the first merger. AIP’s partnership agreement in effect immediately prior to the first merger will be adopted as the partnership agreement of New AIP, with the following changes: (i) references therein to the California Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended, or the California Act, will be amended to refer to the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended, or the Delaware Act; (ii) a description of the merger will be added; and (iii) the name of the partnership will be “Angeles Income Properties 6, LP”.
 
Merger of the Aimco Subsidiary with and into New AIP.  Second, the Aimco Subsidiary will be merged with and into New AIP, with New AIP as the surviving entity. In the second merger, each AIP Unit outstanding immediately prior to consummation of the second merger will be converted into the right to receive, at the election of the holder of such AIP Unit, either $268.04 in cash or equivalent value in OP Units (calculated by dividing $268.04 by the average closing price of Aimco common stock, as reported on the NYSE, over the ten consecutive trading days ending on the second trading day immediately prior to the consummation of the second merger); provided, however, that if Aimco OP determines that the law of the state or other jurisdiction in which a limited partner resides would prohibit the issuance of OP Units in that state or other jurisdiction (or that registration or qualification in that state or jurisdiction would be prohibitively costly), then such limited partner will only be entitled to receive $268.04 in cash for each AIP Unit. Each holder of AIP Units must make the same election (cash or OP Units) for all of his or her AIP Units.
 
In this second merger, Aimco OP’s interest in the Aimco Subsidiary will be converted into limited partnership interest of New AIP. After the merger, Aimco OP will be the sole limited partner of New AIP, and will own all of the limited partnership interests of New AIP. The General Partner will continue to serve as the general partner of the surviving entity. The agreement of limited partnership of New AIP, as in effect immediately prior to the consummation of the merger, will be the agreement of limited partnership of the surviving entity after the merger, until thereafter amended in accordance with the provisions thereof and applicable law.
 
Conditions to Obligations to Complete the Mergers
 
None of the parties to the merger agreement will be required to consummate the mergers if any third party consent, authorization or approval that any of the parties deems necessary or desirable in connection with the merger agreement, and the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, has not been obtained or received.
 
Termination of the Merger Agreement
 
The merger agreement may be terminated, and the mergers may be abandoned, at any time prior to consummation of the mergers, without liability to any party to the merger agreement, by AIP, Aimco OP or the Aimco Subsidiary, in each case, acting in its sole discretion and for any reason or for no reason, notwithstanding the approval of the merger agreement by any of the partners of AIP or the member of the Aimco Subsidiary.


43


Table of Contents

 
Amendment
 
Subject to applicable law, the merger agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented by written agreement of the parties at any time prior to the consummation of the mergers with respect to any of the terms contained therein.
 
Governing Law
 
The merger agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to the conflict of law provisions thereof.
 
Appraisal Rights
 
Limited partners are not entitled to dissenters’ appraisal rights under applicable law or AIP’s partnership agreement in connection with the mergers. However, pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Aimco OP will provide each limited partner with contractual dissenters’ appraisal rights that are similar to the dissenters’ appraisal rights available to a stockholder of a constituent corporation in a merger under Delaware law. These contractual appraisal rights will enable a limited partner to obtain an appraisal of the value of the limited partner’s AIP Units in connection with the mergers. Prosecution of these contractual appraisal rights will involve an arbitration proceeding, and the consideration paid to a limited partner after the prosecution of such contractual appraisal rights, which will take a period of time that cannot be predicted with accuracy, will be a cash payment, resulting in a taxable event to such limited partner. A description of the appraisal rights being provided, and the procedures that a limited partner must follow to seek such rights, is attached to this information statement/prospectus as Annex C.
 
Election Forms
 
Within ten days after the effective time of the merger transactions, Aimco OP will prepare and mail to the former holders of AIP Units an election form pursuant to which they can elect to receive cash or OP Units. Each holder of AIP Units must make the same election (cash or OP Units) for all of his on her AIP Units. Former holders of AIP Units may elect their form of consideration by completing and returning the election form in accordance with its instructions. If the information agent does not receive a properly completed election form from a holder before 5:00 p.m., New York time, on the 30th day after the mailing of the election form, the holder will be deemed to have elected to receive the cash consideration. Former holders of AIP Units may also use the election form to elect to receive, in lieu of the merger consideration, the appraised value of their AIP Units, determined through an arbitration proceeding.


44


Table of Contents

 
DESCRIPTION OF AIMCO OP UNITS; SUMMARY OF AIMCO OP PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
 
The following description sets forth some general terms and provisions of the Aimco OP partnership agreement. The following description of the Aimco OP partnership agreement is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the agreement.
 
General
 
Aimco OP is a limited partnership organized under the provisions of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, as amended from time to time, or any successor to such statute, or the Delaware Act, and upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in its agreement of limited partnership. AIMCO-GP, Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Aimco, is the sole general partner of Aimco OP. Another wholly-owned subsidiary of Aimco, AIMCO-LP Trust, a Delaware trust, or the special limited partner, is a limited partner in Aimco OP. The term of Aimco OP commenced on May 16, 1994, and will continue in perpetuity, unless Aimco OP is dissolved sooner under the provisions of the partnership agreement or as otherwise provided by law.
 
Purpose and Business
 
The purpose and nature of Aimco OP is to conduct any business, enterprise or activity permitted by or under the Delaware Act, including, but not limited to, (i) conducting the business of ownership, construction, development and operation of multifamily rental apartment communities, (ii) entering into any partnership, joint venture, business trust arrangement, limited liability company or other similar arrangement to engage in any business permitted by or under the Delaware Act, or to own interests in any entity engaged in any business permitted by or under the Delaware Act, (iii) conducting the business of providing property and asset management and brokerage services, whether directly or through one or more partnerships, joint ventures, subsidiaries, business trusts, limited liability companies or other similar arrangements, and (iv) doing anything necessary or incidental to the foregoing; provided, however, such business and arrangements and interests may be limited to and conducted in such a manner as to permit Aimco, in the sole and absolute discretion of the general partner, at all times to be classified as a REIT.
 
Management by the General Partner
 
Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, all management powers over the business and affairs of Aimco OP are exclusively vested in the general partner. No limited partner of Aimco OP or any other person to whom one or more OP Units have been transferred (each, an “assignee”) may take part in the operations, management or control (within the meaning of the Delaware Act) of Aimco OP’s business, transact any business in Aimco OP’s name or have the power to sign documents for or otherwise bind Aimco OP. The general partner may not be removed by the limited partners with or without cause, except with the consent of the general partner. In addition to the powers granted to a general partner of a limited partnership under applicable law or that are granted to the general partner under any other provision of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner, subject to the other provisions of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, has full power and authority to do all things deemed necessary or desirable by it to conduct the business of Aimco OP, to exercise all powers of Aimco OP and to effectuate the purposes of Aimco OP. Aimco OP may incur debt or enter into other similar credit, guarantee, financing or refinancing arrangements for any purpose (including, without limitation, in connection with any acquisition of properties) upon such terms as the general partner determines to be appropriate. The general partner is authorized to execute, deliver and perform specific agreements and transactions on behalf of Aimco OP without any further act, approval or vote of the limited partners.
 
Restrictions on General Partner’s Authority.  The general partner may not take any action in contravention of the Aimco OP partnership agreement. The general partner may not, without the prior consent of the limited partners, undertake, on behalf of Aimco OP, any of the following actions or enter into any transaction that would have the effect of such transactions: (i) except as provided in the partnership agreement, amend, modify or terminate the partnership agreement other than to reflect the admission, substitution, termination or withdrawal of partners; (ii) make a general assignment for the benefit of creditors or appoint or acquiesce in the appointment of a custodian, receiver or trustee for all or any part of the assets of Aimco OP; (iii) institute any proceeding for bankruptcy on


45


Table of Contents

behalf of Aimco OP; or (iv) subject to specific exceptions, approve or acquiesce to the transfer of the Aimco OP general partner interest, or admit into Aimco OP any additional or successor general partners.
 
Additional Limited Partners.  The general partner is authorized to admit additional limited partners to Aimco OP from time to time, on terms and conditions and for such capital contributions as may be established by the general partner in its reasonable discretion. The net capital contribution need not be equal for all partners. No action or consent by the limited partners is required in connection with the admission of any additional limited partner. The general partner is expressly authorized to cause Aimco OP to issue additional interests (i) upon the conversion, redemption or exchange of any debt, OP Units or other securities issued by Aimco OP, (ii) for less than fair market value, so long as the general partner concludes in good faith that such issuance is in the best interests of the general partner and Aimco OP, and (iii) in connection with any merger of any other entity into Aimco OP if the applicable merger agreement provides that persons are to receive interests in Aimco OP in exchange for their interests in the entity merging into Aimco OP. Subject to Delaware law, any additional partnership interests may be issued in one or more classes, or one or more series of any of such classes, with such designations, preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, powers and duties as shall be determined by the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion without the approval of any limited partner, and set forth in a written document thereafter attached to and made an exhibit to the partnership agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the general partner has authority to specify (a) the allocations of items of partnership income, gain, loss, deduction and credit to each such class or series of partnership interests; (b) the right of each such class or series of partnership interests to share in distributions; (c) the rights of each such class or series of partnership interests upon dissolution and liquidation of Aimco OP; (d) the voting rights, if any, of each such class or series of partnership interests; and (e) the conversion, redemption or exchange rights applicable to each such class or series of partnership interests. No person may be admitted as an additional limited partner without the consent of the general partner, which consent may be given or withheld in the general partner’s sole and absolute discretion.
 
Indemnification.  As a part of conducting the merger transactions described herein, the general partner has agreed not to seek indemnification from, or to be held harmless by, Aimco OP, or its affiliates, for any liability or loss suffered by the general partner related to the merger transactions, unless (i) the general partner has determined, in good faith, that the course of conduct which caused the loss or liability was in the best interests of Aimco OP, (ii) the general partner was acting on behalf of or performing services for Aimco OP, (iii) such liability or loss was not the result of negligence or misconduct by the general partner and (iv) such indemnification or agreement to hold harmless is recoverable only out of the assets of Aimco OP and not from the limited partners of Aimco OP. In addition, the general partner, and any of its affiliates that are performing services on behalf of Aimco OP, have agreed that they will not seek indemnification for any losses, liabilities or expenses arising from or out of an alleged violation of federal or state securities laws unless (i) there has been a successful adjudication on the merits of each count involving alleged securities law violations as to the particular indemnitee, (ii) such claims have been dismissed with prejudice on the merits by a court of competent jurisdiction as to the particular indemnitee, or (iii) a court of competent jurisdiction approves a settlement of the claims against a particular indemnitee and finds that indemnification of the settlement and related costs should be made, and, as relates to (iii), the court of law considering the request for indemnification has been advised of the position of the SEC and the position of any state securities regulatory authority in which securities of Aimco OP were offered or sold as to indemnification for violations of securities laws. Aimco OP shall not incur the cost of that portion of liability insurance, if any, which insures the general partner for any liability as to which the general partner is prohibited from being indemnified as described in this paragraph. Finally, the general partner has agreed that the provision of advancement from Aimco OP funds to the general partner or any of its affiliates for legal expenses and other costs incurred as a result of any legal action is permissible if (i) the legal action relates to acts or omissions with respect to the performance of duties or services on behalf of Aimco OP; (ii) the legal action is initiated by a third party who is not a limited partner of Aimco OP, or the legal action is initiated by a limited partner and a court of competent jurisdiction specifically approves such advancement; and (iii) the general partner or its affiliates undertake to repay the advanced funds to Aimco OP in cases in which such person is not entitled to indemnification under this paragraph.


46


Table of Contents

 
Outstanding Classes of Units
 
As of October 31, 2011, Aimco OP had issued and outstanding the following partnership interests:
 
                         
        Quarterly
  Liquidation
    Units
  Distribution
  Preference
Class
  Outstanding   per Unit   per Unit
 
Partnership Common Units (OP Units)
    120,916,144     $       N/A  
Class T Partnership Preferred Units
    6,000,000     $ 0.50     $ 25.00  
Class U Partnership Preferred Units
    12,000,000     $ 0.485     $ 25.00  
Class V Partnership Preferred Units
    2,587,500     $ 0.50     $ 25.00  
Class Y Partnership Preferred Units
    3,450,000     $ 0.4925     $ 25.00  
Class Z Partnership Preferred Units
    823,817     $ 0.4375     $ 25.00  
Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Partnership Preferred Units(1)
    94     $ 1,875.00     $ 500,000.00  
Class One Partnership Preferred Units(2)
    90,000     $ 2.00     $ 91.43  
Class Two Partnership Preferred Units(2)
    19,289     $ 0.12     $ 25.00  
Class Three Partnership Preferred Units(2)
    1,365,284     $ 0.4925     $ 25.00  
Class Four Partnership Preferred Units(2)
    755,999     $ 0.50     $ 25.00  
Class Six Partnership Preferred Units(2)
    796,668     $ 0.5325     $ 25.00  
Class Seven Partnership Preferred Units(2)
    27,960     $ 0.595     $ 25.00  
Class Eight Partnership Preferred Units(3)
    6,250     $       N/A  
Class I High Performance Partnership Units (HPUs)(3)
    2,339,950     $       N/A  
 
 
(1) The Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Partnership Preferred Units, or the CRA Preferred Units, have substantially the same terms as Aimco’s Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Preferred Stock, or the CRA Preferred Stock. Holders of the CRA Preferred Units are entitled to cumulative cash dividends payable quarterly in arrears on March 31, June 30, September 30, and December 31 of each year, when and as declared, beginning on September 30, 2006. For the period from the date of original issuance through March 31, 2015, the distribution rate is a variable rate per annum equal to the Three-Month LIBOR Rate (as defined in the articles supplementary designating the CRA Preferred Stock) plus 1.25%, calculated as of the beginning of each quarterly dividend period. The rate at September 30, 2011 was 1.50%. Upon liquidation, holders of the CRA Preferred Stock are entitled to a preference of $500,000 per share, plus an amount equal to accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends, whether or not earned or declared. The CRA Preferred Units rank prior to Common OP Units and on the same level as Aimco OP’s other Preferred OP Units, with respect to the payment of distributions and the distribution of amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The CRA Preferred Units were not redeemable prior to June 30, 2011, except in limited circumstances related to Aimco’s REIT qualification. On and after June 30, 2011, the CRA Preferred Units are redeemable for cash, in whole or from time to time in part, upon the redemption, at Aimco’s option, of its CRA Preferred Stock at a price per share equal to the liquidation preference, plus accumulated, accrued and unpaid distributions, if any, to the redemption date.
 
(2) The Class One, Class Two, Class Three, Class Four, Class Six and Class Seven preferred OP Units are redeemable, at the holders’ option. Aimco OP, at its sole discretion, may settle such redemption requests in cash or shares of Aimco common stock in a value equal to the redemption preference. In the event Aimco OP requires Aimco to issue shares to settle a redemption request, it would issue to Aimco a corresponding number of OP Units. Aimco OP has a redemption policy that requires cash settlement of redemption requests for the redeemable preferred OP Units, subject to limited exceptions.
 
(3) The holders of Class Eight preferred OP Units and HPUs receive the same amount of distributions that are paid to holders of an equivalent number of Aimco OP’s outstanding OP Units.


47


Table of Contents

 
Distributions
 
Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding partnership preferred units, the Aimco OP partnership agreement requires the general partner to cause Aimco OP to distribute quarterly all, or such portion as the general partner may in its sole and absolute discretion determine, of Available Cash (as defined in the partnership agreement) generated by Aimco OP during such quarter to the general partner, the special limited partner, the other holders of OP Units and holders of HPUs on the record date established by the general partner with respect to such quarter, in accordance with their respective interests in Aimco OP on such record date. Holders of any partnership preferred units issued in the future may have priority over the general partner, the special limited partner, holders of OP Units and holders of HPUs with respect to distributions of Available Cash, distributions upon liquidation or other distributions.
 
Distributions payable with respect to any interest in Aimco OP that was not outstanding during the entire quarterly period in respect of which any distribution is made will be prorated based on the portion of the period that such interest was outstanding. The general partner in its sole and absolute discretion may distribute to the limited partners Available Cash on a more frequent basis and provide for an appropriate record date. The partnership agreement requires the general partner to take such reasonable efforts, as determined by it in its sole and absolute discretion and consistent with the requirements for qualification as a REIT, to cause Aimco OP to distribute sufficient amounts to enable the general partner to transfer funds to Aimco and enable Aimco to pay stockholder dividends that will (i) satisfy the requirements, or the REIT Requirements, for qualifying as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and the applicable regulations promulgated by the U.S. Treasury Department, or the Treasury Regulations, and (ii) avoid any U.S. Federal income or excise tax liability of Aimco.
 
While some of the debt instruments to which Aimco OP is a party, including its credit facilities, contain restrictions on the payment of distributions to OP Unitholders, the debt instruments allow Aimco OP to distribute sufficient amounts to enable the general partner and special limited partner to transfer funds to Aimco which are then used to pay stockholder dividends, thereby allowing Aimco to meet the requirements for qualifications as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code.
 
Distributions in Kind.  No OP Unitholder has any right to demand or receive property other than cash as provided in the partnership agreement. The general partner may determine, in its sole and absolute discretion, to make a distribution in kind of partnership assets to the OP Unitholders, and such assets will be distributed in such a fashion as to ensure that the fair market value is distributed and allocated in accordance with the Aimco OP partnership agreement.
 
Distributions Upon Liquidation.  Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding partnership preferred units, net proceeds from the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of its assets in a transaction that will lead to a liquidation of Aimco OP or a related series of transactions that, taken together, result in the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of Aimco OP, or a Terminating Capital Transaction, and any other cash received or reductions in reserves made after commencement of the liquidation of Aimco OP, will be distributed to the OP Unitholders in accordance with the Aimco OP partnership agreement.
 
Restricted Distributions.  The Aimco OP partnership agreement prohibits Aimco OP and the general partner, on behalf of Aimco OP, from making a distribution to any OP Unitholder on account of its interest in OP Units if such distribution would violate Section 17-607 of the Delaware Act or other applicable law.
 
Allocations of Net Income and Net Loss
 
OP Units and HPUs.  Net Income (as defined in the Aimco OP partnership agreement) and Net Loss (as defined in the Aimco OP partnership agreement) of Aimco OP will be determined and allocated with respect to each fiscal year of Aimco OP as of the end of each such year. Except as otherwise provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, an allocation to an OP Unitholder of a share of Net Income or Net Loss will be treated as an allocation of the same share of each item of income, gain, loss or deduction that is taken into account in computing Net Income or Net Loss. Except as otherwise provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement and subject to the terms of any outstanding partnership preferred units, Net Income and Net Loss will be allocated to the holders of OP Units and holders of HPUs in accordance with their respective interests at the end of each fiscal year. The Aimco OP


48


Table of Contents

partnership agreement contains provisions for special allocations intended to comply with certain regulatory requirements, including the requirements of Treasury Regulations Sections 1.704-1(b) and 1.704-2. Except as otherwise provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement and subject to the terms of any outstanding partnership preferred units, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes under the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations, each partnership item of income, gain, loss and deduction will be allocated among the OP Unitholders in the same manner as its correlative item of “book” income, gain, loss or deduction is allocated under the Aimco OP partnership agreement.
 
Partnership Preferred Units.  Net income will be allocated to the holders of partnership preferred units for any fiscal year (and, if necessary, subsequent fiscal years) to the extent that the holders of partnership preferred units receive a distribution on any partnership preferred units (other than an amount included in any redemption of partnership preferred units). If any partnership preferred units are redeemed, for the fiscal year that includes such redemption (and, if necessary, for subsequent fiscal years) (i) gross income and gain (in such relative proportions as the general partner in its discretion will determine) will be allocated to the holders of partnership preferred units to the extent that the redemption amounts paid or payable with respect to the partnership preferred units so redeemed exceeds the aggregate capital contributions (net of liabilities assumed or taken subject to by Aimco OP) per partnership preferred units allocable to the partnership preferred units so redeemed and (ii) deductions and losses (in such relative proportions as the general partner in its discretion will determine) will be allocated to the holders of partnership preferred units to the extent that the aggregate capital contributions (net of liabilities assumed or taken subject to by Aimco OP) per partnership preferred units allocable to the partnership preferred units so redeemed exceeds the redemption amount paid or payable with respect to the partnership preferred units so redeemed.
 
Withholding
 
Aimco OP is authorized to withhold from or pay on behalf of or with respect to each limited partner any amount of Federal, state, local or foreign taxes that the general partner determines that Aimco OP is required to withhold or pay with respect to any amount distributable or allocable to such limited partner under the Aimco OP partnership agreement. The Aimco OP partnership agreement also provides that any withholding tax amount paid on behalf of or with respect to a limited partner constitutes a loan by Aimco OP to such limited partner. This loan is required to be repaid within 15 days after notice to the limited partner from the general partner, and each limited partner grants a security interest in its partnership interest to secure its obligation to pay any partnership withholding tax amounts paid on its behalf or with respect to such limited partner. In addition, under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the partnership may redeem the partnership interest of any limited partner who fails to pay partnership withholding tax amounts paid on behalf of or with respect to such limited partner. Also, the general partner has authority to withhold, from any amounts otherwise distributable, allocable or payable to a limited partner, the general partner’s estimate of further taxes required to be paid by such limited partner.
 
Return of Capital
 
No partner is entitled to interest on its capital contribution or on such partner’s capital account. Except (i) under the rights of redemption set forth in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, (ii) as provided by law, or (iii) under the terms of any outstanding partnership preferred units, no partner has any right to demand or receive the withdrawal or return of its capital contribution from Aimco OP, except to the extent of distributions made under the Aimco OP partnership agreement or upon termination of Aimco OP. Except to the extent otherwise expressly provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement and subject to the terms of any outstanding partnership preferred units, no limited partner or assignee will have priority over any other limited partner or assignee either as to the return of capital contributions or as to profits, losses or distributions.
 
Redemption Rights of Qualifying Parties
 
After the first anniversary of becoming a holder of OP Units, each OP Unitholder and some assignees have the right, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, to require Aimco OP to redeem all or a portion of the OP Units held by such party in exchange for shares of Aimco common stock or a cash amount equal to the value of such shares, as Aimco OP may determine. On or before the close of business on the fifth business day after a holder of OP Units gives the general partner a notice of redemption, Aimco OP may, in its


49


Table of Contents

sole and absolute discretion but subject to the restrictions on the ownership of Aimco stock imposed under Aimco’s charter and the transfer restrictions and other limitations thereof, elect to cause Aimco to acquire some or all of the tendered OP Units from the tendering party in exchange for Aimco common stock, based on an exchange ratio of one share of Aimco common stock for each OP Unit, subject to adjustment as provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement. The Aimco OP partnership agreement does not obligate Aimco or the general partner to register, qualify or list any Aimco common stock issued in exchange for OP Units with the SEC, with any state securities commissioner, department or agency, or with any stock exchange. Aimco common stock issued in exchange for OP Units under the Aimco OP partnership agreement will contain legends regarding restrictions under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws as Aimco in good faith determines to be necessary or advisable in order to ensure compliance with securities laws. In the event of a change of control of Aimco, holders of HPUs will have redemption rights similar to those of holders of OP Units.
 
Partnership Right to Call Limited Partner Interests
 
Notwithstanding any other provision of the Aimco OP partnership agreement, on and after the date on which the aggregate percentage interests of the limited partners, other than the special limited partner, are less than one percent (1%), Aimco OP will have the right, but not the obligation, from time to time and at any time to redeem any and all outstanding limited partner interests (other than the special limited partner’s interest) by treating any limited partner as if such limited partner had tendered for redemption under the Aimco OP partnership agreement the amount of OP Units specified by the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion, by notice to the limited partner.
 
Transfers and Withdrawals
 
Restrictions on Transfer.  The Aimco OP partnership agreement restricts the transferability of OP Units. Any transfer or purported transfer of an OP Unit not made in accordance with the Aimco OP partnership agreement will be null and void ab initio. Until the expiration of one year from the date on which an OP Unitholder acquired OP Units, subject to some exceptions, such OP Unitholder may not transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any transferee without the consent of the general partner, which consent may be withheld in its sole and absolute discretion. After the expiration of one year from the date on which an OP Unitholder acquired OP Units, such OP Unitholder has the right to transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any person, subject to the satisfaction of specific conditions specified in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, including the general partner’s right of first refusal.
 
It is a condition to any transfer (whether or not such transfer is effected before or after the one year holding period) that the transferee assumes by operation of law or express agreement all of the obligations of the transferor limited partner under the Aimco OP partnership agreement with respect to such OP Units, and no such transfer (other than under a statutory merger or consolidation wherein all obligations and liabilities of the transferor partner are assumed by a successor corporation by operation of law) will relieve the transferor partner of its obligations under the Aimco OP partnership agreement without the approval of the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion.
 
In connection with any transfer of OP Units, the general partner will have the right to receive an opinion of counsel reasonably satisfactory to it to the effect that the proposed transfer may be effected without registration under the Securities Act, and will not otherwise violate any federal or state securities laws or regulations applicable to Aimco OP or the OP Units transferred.
 
No transfer by a limited partner of its OP Units (including any redemption or any acquisition of OP Units by the general partner or by Aimco OP) may be made to any person if (i) in the opinion of legal counsel for Aimco OP, it would result in Aimco OP being treated as an association taxable as a corporation, or (ii) such transfer is effectuated through an “established securities market” or a “secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof)” within the meaning of section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
HPUs.  HPUs are subject to different restrictions on transfer. Individuals may not transfer HPUs except to a family member (or a family-owned entity) or in the event of their death.


50


Table of Contents

Substituted Limited Partners.  No limited partner will have the right to substitute a transferee as a limited partner in its place. A transferee of the interest of a limited partner may be admitted as a substituted limited partner only with the consent of the general partner, which consent may be given or withheld by the general partner in its sole and absolute discretion. If the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion, does not consent to the admission of any permitted transferee as a substituted limited partner, such transferee will be considered an assignee for purposes of the Aimco OP partnership agreement. An assignee will be entitled to all the rights of an assignee of a limited partnership interest under the Delaware Act, including the right to receive distributions from Aimco OP and the share of Net Income, Net Losses and other items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of Aimco OP attributable to the OP Units assigned to such transferee and the rights to transfer the OP Units provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement, but will not be deemed to be a holder of OP Units for any other purpose under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, and will not be entitled to effect a consent or vote with respect to such OP Units on any matter presented to the limited partners for approval (such right to consent or vote, to the extent provided in the Aimco OP partnership agreement or under the Delaware Act, fully remaining with the transferor limited partner).
 
Withdrawals.  No limited partner may withdraw from Aimco OP other than as a result of a permitted transfer of all of such limited partner’s OP Units in accordance with the Aimco OP partnership agreement, with respect to which the transferee becomes a substituted limited partner, or under a redemption (or acquisition by Aimco) of all of such limited partner’s OP Units.
 
Restrictions on the general partner.  The general partner may not transfer any of its general partner interest or withdraw from Aimco OP unless (i) the limited partners consent or (ii) immediately after a merger of the general partner into another entity, substantially all of the assets of the surviving entity, other than the general partnership interest in Aimco OP held by the general partner, are contributed to Aimco OP as a capital contribution in exchange for OP Units.
 
Amendment of the Partnership Agreement
 
By the General Partner Without the Consent of the Limited Partners.  The general partner has the power, without the consent of the limited partners, to amend the Aimco OP partnership agreement as may be required to facilitate or implement any of the following purposes: (1) to add to the obligations of the general partner or surrender any right or power granted to the general partner or any affiliate of the general partner for the benefit of the limited partners; (2) to reflect the admission, substitution or withdrawal of partners or the termination of Aimco OP in accordance with the partnership agreement; (3) to reflect a change that is of an inconsequential nature and does not adversely affect the limited partners in any material respect, or to cure any ambiguity, correct or supplement any provision in the partnership agreement not inconsistent with law or with other provisions, or make other changes with respect to matters arising under the partnership agreement that will not be inconsistent with law or with the provisions of the partnership agreement; (4) to satisfy any requirements, conditions or guidelines contained in any order, directive, opinion, ruling or regulation of a federal or state agency or contained in federal or state law; (5) to reflect such changes as are reasonably necessary for Aimco to maintain its status as a REIT; and (6) to modify the manner in which capital accounts are computed (but only to the extent set forth in the definition of “Capital Account” in the Aimco OP partnership agreement or contemplated by the Internal Revenue Code or the Treasury Regulations).
 
With the Consent of the Limited Partners.  Amendments to the Aimco OP partnership agreement may be proposed by the general partner or by holders of a majority of the outstanding OP Units and other classes of units that have the same voting rights as holders of OP Units, excluding the special limited partner. Following such proposal, the general partner will submit any proposed amendment to the limited partners. The general partner will seek the written consent of a majority in interest of the limited partners on the proposed amendment or will call a meeting to vote thereon and to transact any other business that the general partner may deem appropriate.
 
Procedures for Actions and Consents of Partners
 
Meetings of the partners may be called by the general partner and will be called upon the receipt by the general partner of a written request by a majority in interest of the limited partners. Notice of any such meeting will be given to all partners not less than seven (7) days nor more than thirty (30) days prior to the date of such meeting. Partners


51


Table of Contents

may vote in person or by proxy at such meeting. Each meeting of partners will be conducted by the general partner or such other person as the general partner may appoint under such rules for the conduct of the meeting as the general partner or such other person deems appropriate in its sole and absolute discretion. Whenever the vote or consent of partners is permitted or required under the partnership agreement, such vote or consent may be given at a meeting of partners or may be given by written consent. Any action required or permitted to be taken at a meeting of the partners may be taken without a meeting if a written consent setting forth the action so taken is signed by partners holding a majority of outstanding OP Units (or such other percentage as is expressly required by the Aimco OP partnership agreement for the action in question).
 
Records and Accounting; Fiscal Year
 
The Aimco OP partnership agreement requires the general partner to keep or cause to be kept at the principal office of Aimco OP those records and documents required to be maintained by the Delaware Act and other books and records deemed by the general partner to be appropriate with respect to Aimco OP’s business. The books of Aimco OP will be maintained, for financial and tax reporting purposes, on an accrual basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or on such other basis as the general partner determines to be necessary or appropriate. To the extent permitted by sound accounting practices and principles, Aimco OP, the general partner and Aimco may operate with integrated or consolidated accounting records, operations and principles. The fiscal year of Aimco OP is the calendar year.
 
Reports
 
As soon as practicable, but in no event later than one hundred and five (105) days after the close of each calendar quarter and each fiscal year, the general partner will make available to limited partners (which may be done by filing a report with the SEC) a report containing financial statements of Aimco OP, or of Aimco if such statements are prepared solely on a consolidated basis with Aimco, for such calendar quarter or fiscal year, as the case may be, presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and such other information as may be required by applicable law or regulation or as the general partner determines to be appropriate. Statements included in quarterly reports are not audited. Statements included in annual reports are audited by a nationally recognized firm of independent public accountants selected by the general partner.
 
Tax Matters Partner
 
The general partner is the “tax matters partner” of Aimco OP for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. The tax matters partner is authorized, but not required, to take certain actions on behalf of Aimco OP with respect to tax matters. In addition, the general partner will arrange for the preparation and timely filing of all returns with respect to partnership income, gains, deductions, losses and other items required of Aimco OP for U.S. Federal and state income tax purposes and will use all reasonable effort to furnish, within ninety (90) days of the close of each taxable year, the tax information reasonably required by limited partners for U.S. Federal and state income tax reporting purposes. The limited partners will promptly provide the general partner with such information as may be reasonably requested by the general partner from time to time.
 
Dissolution and Winding Up
 
Dissolution.  Aimco OP will dissolve, and its affairs will be wound up, upon the first to occur of any of the following (each a “liquidating event”): (i) an event of withdrawal, as defined in the Delaware Act (including, without limitation, bankruptcy), of the sole general partner unless, within ninety (90) days after the withdrawal, a “majority in interest” (as such phrase is used in Section 17-801(3) of the Delaware Act) of the remaining partners agree in writing, in their sole and absolute discretion, to continue the business of Aimco OP and to the appointment, effective as of the date of withdrawal, of a successor general partner; (ii) an election to dissolve Aimco OP made by the general partner in its sole and absolute discretion, with or without the consent of the limited partners; (iii) entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of Aimco OP under the provisions of the Delaware Act; (iv) the occurrence of a Terminating Capital Transaction; or (v) the redemption (or acquisition by Aimco, the general partner and/or the special limited partner) of all OP Units other than OP Units held by the general partner or the special limited partner.


52


Table of Contents

Winding Up.  Upon the occurrence of a liquidating event, Aimco OP will continue solely for the purposes of winding up its affairs in an orderly manner, liquidating its assets and satisfying the claims of its creditors and partners. The general partner (or, in the event that there is no remaining general partner or the general partner has dissolved, become bankrupt within the meaning of the Delaware Act or ceased to operate, any person elected by a majority in interest of the limited partners) will be responsible for overseeing the winding up and dissolution of Aimco OP and will take full account of Aimco OP’s liabilities and property, and Aimco OP property will be liquidated as promptly as is consistent with obtaining the fair value thereof, and the proceeds therefrom (which may, to the extent determined by the general partner, include Aimco stock) will be applied and distributed in the following order: (i) first, to the satisfaction of all of Aimco OP’s debts and liabilities to creditors other than the partners and their assignees (whether by payment or the making of reasonable provision for payment thereof); (ii) second, to the satisfaction of all Aimco OP’s debts and liabilities to the general partner (whether by payment or the making of reasonable provision for payment thereof), including, but not limited to, amounts due as reimbursements under the partnership agreement; (iii) third, to the satisfaction of all of Aimco OP’s debts and liabilities to the other partners and any assignees (whether by payment or the making of reasonable provision for payment thereof); (iv) fourth, to the satisfaction of all liquidation preferences of outstanding Partnership Preferred Units, if any; and (v) the balance, if any, to the general partner, the limited partners and any assignees in accordance with and in proportion to their positive capital account balances, after giving effect to all contributions, distributions and allocations for all periods. In the event of a liquidation, holders of HPUs will be specially allocated items of income and gain in an amount sufficient to cause the capital account of such holder to be equal to that of a holder of an equal number of OP Units.


53


Table of Contents

 
DESCRIPTION OF AIMCO COMMON STOCK
 
General
 
Aimco’s charter authorizes the issuance of up to 510,587,500 shares of capital stock consisting of 480,887,260 shares currently classified as common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share and 29,700,240 shares of preferred stock with a par value of $0.01 per share. As of October 31, 2011, 120,916,144 shares were issued and outstanding. Aimco common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol “AIV.” Computershare Limited serves as transfer agent and registrar of Aimco common stock. On November 10, 2011, the closing price of the Aimco common stock on the NYSE was $22.82. The following table shows the high and low reported sales prices and dividends paid per share of Aimco’s common stock in the periods indicated.
 
                         
Quarter Ended
  High   Low   Dividends
 
December 31, 2011 (through November 10, 2011)
  $ 27.26     $ 20.08     $  
September 30, 2011
    28.12       21.92       0.12  
June 30, 2011
    27.67       24.50       0.12  
March 31, 2011
    26.33       23.38       0.12  
December 31, 2010
  $ 26.24     $ 21.22     $ 0.10  
September 30, 2010
    22.82       18.12       0.10  
June 30, 2010
    24.21       18.14       0.10  
March 31, 2010
    19.17       15.01       0.00  
December 31, 2009
  $ 17.09     $ 11.80     $ 0.20  
September 30, 2009
    15.91       7.36       0.10  
June 30, 2009
    11.10       5.18       0.10  
March 31, 2009
    12.89       4.57       0.00  
 
Aimco has a Stock Award and Incentive Plan to attract and retain officers, key employees and independent directors. Aimco’s plan reserves for issuance a maximum of 4.1 million shares, which may be in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options and restricted stock, or other types of awards as authorized under Aimco’s plan.
 
Holders of Aimco common stock are entitled to receive dividends, when and as declared by the Board of Directors of Aimco, out of funds legally available therefor. The holders of shares of common stock, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco, are entitled to receive ratably any assets remaining after payment in full of all liabilities of Aimco and the liquidation preferences of preferred stock. The shares of common stock possess ordinary voting rights for the election of directors and in respect of other corporate matters, each share entitling the holder thereof to one vote. Holders of shares of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors, which means that holders of more than 50% of the shares of common stock voting for the election of directors can elect all of the directors if they choose to do so and the holders of the remaining shares cannot elect any directors. Holders of shares of common stock do not have preemptive rights, which means they have no right to acquire any additional shares of common stock that may be issued by Aimco at a subsequent date.
 
Outstanding Classes of Preferred Stock
 
Aimco is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one or more classes or subclasses, with such designations, preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restriction, limitations as to dividends, qualifications and terms and conditions of redemption, in each case, if any as are permitted by Maryland law and as


54


Table of Contents

the Aimco Board of Directors may determine by resolution. As of October 31, 2011, Aimco had issued and outstanding the following classes of preferred stock:
 
                                         
            Quarterly
  Liquidation
   
    Shares
  Shares
  Dividend
  Preference
  Conversion
Class
  Authorized   Outstanding   per Share   per Share   Price
 
Class T Cumulative Preferred Stock
    6,000,000       6,000,000     $ 0.50     $ 25.00       N/A  
Class U Cumulative Preferred Stock
    12,000,000       12,000,000     $ 0.485     $ 25.00       N/A  
Class V Cumulative Preferred Stock
    3,450,000       2,587,500     $ 0.50     $ 25.00       N/A  
Class Y Cumulative Preferred Stock
    3,450,000       3,450,000     $ 0.4925     $ 25.00       N/A  
Class Z Cumulative Preferred Stock
    4,800,000       823,817     $ 0.4375     $ 25.00       N/A  
Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Preferred Stock(1)
    240       94     $ 1,875.00     $ 500,000.00       N/A  
 
 
(1) For the period from the date of original issuance through March 31, 2015, the dividend rate is a variable rate per annum equal to the Three-Month LIBOR Rate (as defined in the articles supplementary designating the CRA Preferred Stock) plus 1.25%, calculated as of the beginning of each quarterly dividend period. The rate at September 30, 2011 was 1.5%. Upon liquidation, holders of the CRA Preferred Stock are entitled to a preference of $500,000 per share, plus an amount equal to accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends, whether or not earned or declared. The CRA Preferred Stock ranks prior to the Aimco common stock and on the same level as Aimco’s outstanding shares of preferred stock with respect to the payment of dividends and the distribution of amounts upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. The CRA Preferred Stock was not redeemable prior to June 30, 2011, except in limited circumstances related to REIT qualification. On and after June 30, 2011, the CRA Preferred Stock is redeemable for cash, in whole or from time to time in part, at Aimco’s option, at a price per share equal to the liquidation preference, plus accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the redemption date.
 
Ranking.  Each authorized class of preferred stock ranks, with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco, (a) prior or senior to the common stock and any other class or series of capital stock of Aimco if the holders of that class of preferred stock are entitled to the receipt of dividends or amounts distributable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up in preference or priority to the holders of shares of such class or series (“Junior Stock”); (b) on a parity with the other authorized classes of preferred stock and any other class or series of capital stock of Aimco if the holders of such class or series of stock and that class of preferred stock are entitled to receive dividends and amounts distributable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up in proportion to their respective amounts of accrued and unpaid dividends per share or liquidation preferences, without preference or priority of one over the other (“Parity Stock”); and (c) junior to any class or series of capital stock of Aimco if the holders of such class or series are entitled to receive dividends and amounts distributable upon liquidation, dissolution or winding-up in preference or priority to the holders of that class of preferred stock (“Senior Stock”).
 
Dividends.  Holders of each authorized class of preferred stock are entitled to receive, when and as declared by the Aimco Board of Directors, out of funds legally available for payment, quarterly cash dividends in the amount per share set forth in the table above under the heading, “Quarterly Dividend Per Share.” The dividends are cumulative from the date of original issue, whether or not in any dividend period or periods Aimco declares any dividends or has funds legally available for the payment of such dividend. Holders of preferred stock are not entitled to receive any dividends in excess of cumulative dividends on the preferred stock. No interest, or sum of money in lieu of interest, shall be payable in respect of any dividend payment or payments on the preferred stock that may be in arrears.
 
When dividends are not paid in full upon any class of preferred stock, or a sum sufficient for such payment is not set apart, all dividends declared upon that class of preferred stock and any shares of Parity Stock will be declared ratably in proportion to the respective amounts of dividends accumulated, accrued and unpaid on that class of preferred stock and accumulated, accrued and unpaid on such Parity Stock. Except as set forth in the preceding


55


Table of Contents

sentence, unless dividends on each class of preferred stock equal to the full amount of accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends have been or contemporaneously are declared and paid or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof has been or contemporaneously is set apart for such payment, for all past dividend periods, no dividends may be declared or paid or set apart for payment by Aimco and no other distribution of cash or other property may be declared or made, directly or indirectly, by Aimco with respect to any shares of Parity Stock. Unless dividends equal to the full amount of all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends on each class of preferred stock have been declared and paid, or declared and a sum sufficient for the payment thereof has been set apart for such payment, for all past dividend periods, no dividends (other than dividends or distributions paid in shares of Junior Stock or options, warrants or rights to subscribe for or purchase shares of Junior Stock) may be declared or paid or set apart for payment by Aimco and no other distribution of cash or other property may be declared or made, directly or indirectly, by Aimco with respect to any shares of Junior Stock, nor may any shares of Junior Stock be redeemed, purchased or otherwise acquired (other than a redemption, purchase or other acquisition of common stock made for purposes of an employee incentive or benefit plan of Aimco or any subsidiary) for any consideration (or any monies be paid to or made available for a sinking fund for the redemption of any shares of any such stock), directly or indirectly, by Aimco (except by conversion into or exchange for shares of Junior Stock, or options, warrants or rights to subscribe for or purchase shares of Junior Stock), nor shall any other cash or other property be paid or distributed to or for the benefit of holders of shares of Junior Stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this paragraph, Aimco is not prohibited from (1) declaring or paying or setting apart for payment any dividend or distribution on any shares of Parity Stock or (2) redeeming, purchasing or otherwise acquiring any Parity Stock, in each case, if such declaration, payment, redemption, purchase or other acquisition is necessary to maintain Aimco’s qualification as a REIT.
 
Liquidation Preference.  Upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco, before it makes or sets apart any payment or distribution for the holders of any shares of Junior Stock, the holders of each class of preferred stock are entitled to receive a liquidation preference per share in the amount set forth in the table above under the heading, “Liquidation Preference Per Share,” plus an amount equal to all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not formed or declared) to the date of final distribution to such holders. Holders of each class of preferred stock are not entitled to any further payment. Until the holders of each class of preferred stock have been paid their respective liquidation preferences in full, plus an amount equal to all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends (whether or not earned or declared) to the date of final distribution to such holders, no payment may be made to any holder of Junior Stock upon the liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco. If, upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco, its assets, or proceeds thereof, distributable among the holders of preferred stock are insufficient to pay in full the preference described above for any class of preferred stock and any liquidating payments on any other shares of any class or series of Parity Stock, then such proceeds shall be distributed among the holders of such class of preferred stock and holders of all other shares of any class or series of Parity Stock ratably in the same proportion as the respective amounts that would be payable on such class of preferred stock and any such Parity Stock if all amounts payable thereon were paid in full. A voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco does not include its consolidation or merger with one or more corporations, a sale or transfer of all or substantially all of its assets, or a statutory share exchange. Upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding up of Aimco, after payment shall have been made in full to the holders of preferred stock, any other series or class or classes of Junior Stock shall be entitled to receive any and all assets remaining to be paid or distributed, and the holders of each class of preferred stock and any Parity Stock shall not be entitled to share therein.
 
Redemption.  Except as described below and in certain limited circumstances, including circumstances relating to maintaining Aimco’s ability to qualify as a REIT, Aimco may not redeem the shares of preferred stock. On or after the dates set forth in the table below, Aimco may, at its option, redeem shares of the classes of preferred stock set forth below, in whole or from time to time in part, at a cash redemption price equal to the percentage of the liquidation preference for that class of preferred stock indicated under the heading, “Price,” plus all accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends, if any, to the date fixed for redemption. The redemption price for each class of non-convertible preferred stock (other than any portion thereof consisting of accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends) is payable solely with the proceeds from the sale of equity securities by Aimco or Aimco OP (whether or not such sale occurs concurrently with such redemption). For purposes of the preceding sentence, “capital shares” means any common stock, preferred stock, depositary shares, partnership or other interests, participations or other ownership interests (however designated) and any rights (other than debt securities convertible into or exchangeable


56


Table of Contents

at the option of the holder for equity securities (unless and to the extent such debt securities are subsequently converted into capital stock)) or options to purchase any of the foregoing securities issued by Aimco or Aimco OP.
 
             
Class
 
Date
  Price  
 
Class T Cumulative Preferred Stock
  July 31, 2008     100 %
Class U Cumulative Preferred Stock
  March 24, 2009     100 %
Class V Cumulative Preferred Stock
  September 29, 2009     100 %
Class Y Cumulative Preferred Stock
  December 21, 2009     100 %
Class Z Cumulative Preferred Stock
  July 29, 2016     100 %
Series A Community Reinvestment Act Perpetual Preferred Stock
  June 30, 2011     100 %
 
Except as otherwise described in this information statement/prospectus, none of the authorized classes of preferred stock have any stated maturity or are subject to any sinking fund or mandatory redemption provisions.
 
Conversion.  The shares of convertible preferred stock are convertible at any time, at the option of the holder, into a number of shares of Aimco common stock obtained by dividing its liquidation preference (excluding any accumulated, accrued and unpaid dividends) by the conversion price set forth in the table above. In the case of shares called for redemption, conversion rights will terminate at the close of business on the date fixed for such redemption, unless Aimco defaults in making such redemption payment. Each conversion will be deemed to have been effected immediately prior to the close of business on the date on which the holder surrenders certificates representing shares of preferred stock and Aimco receives notice and any applicable instruments of transfer and any required taxes. The conversion will be at the conversion price in effect at such time and on such date unless the stock transfer books of Aimco are closed on that date, in which event such person or persons will be deemed to have become such holder or holders of record at the close of business on the next succeeding day on which such stock transfer books are open, but such conversion will be at the conversion price in effect on the date on which such shares were surrendered and such notice received by Aimco. No fractional shares of Aimco common stock or scrip representing fractions of a share of Aimco common stock will be issued upon conversion of shares of preferred stock. Instead of any fractional interest in a share of Aimco common stock that would otherwise be deliverable upon the conversion of any share of preferred stock, Aimco will pay to the holder of such shares an amount in cash based upon the closing price of the Aimco common stock on the trading day immediately preceding the date of conversion. If more than one share of preferred stock is surrendered for conversion at one time by the same holder, the number of full shares of Aimco common stock issuable upon conversion thereof will be computed on the basis of the aggregate number of shares of preferred stock so converted. Except as otherwise required, Aimco will make no payment or allowance for unpaid dividends, whether or not in arrears, on converted shares or for dividends (other than dividends on the Aimco common stock the record date for which is after the conversion date and which Aimco shall pay in the ordinary course to the record holder as of the record date) on the Aimco common stock issued upon such conversion. Holders of preferred stock at the close of business on a record date for the payment of dividends on the preferred stock will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the dividend payable on such shares on the corresponding dividend payment date notwithstanding the conversion of such shares following such record date.
 
Each conversion price is subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including: (i) if Aimco (A) pays a dividend or makes a distribution on its capital stock in shares of Aimco common stock, (B) subdivides its outstanding common stock into a greater number of shares, (C) combines its outstanding common stock into a smaller number of shares or (D) issues any shares of capital stock by reclassification of its outstanding common stock; (ii) if Aimco issues rights, options or warrants to holders of common stock entitling them to subscribe for or purchase common stock at a price per share less than the fair market value thereof; and (iii) if Aimco makes a distribution on its common stock other than in cash or shares of common stock.
 
Conversion of preferred stock will be permitted only to the extent that such conversion would not result in a violation of the ownership restrictions set forth in Aimco’s charter.
 
Voting Rights.  Holders of shares of the authorized classes of preferred stock do not have any voting rights, except as set forth below and except as otherwise required by applicable law.
 
If and whenever dividends on any shares of any class of preferred stock or any series or class of Parity Stock are in arrears for six or more quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive, the number of directors then constituting the


57


Table of Contents

Aimco Board of Directors will be increased by two, if not already increased by reason of similar types of provisions with respect to shares of Parity Stock of any other class or series which is entitled to similar voting rights (the “Voting Preferred Stock”), and the holders of shares of that class of preferred stock, together with the holders of shares of all other Voting Preferred Stock then entitled to exercise similar voting rights, voting as a single class regardless of series, will be entitled to vote for the election of the two additional directors of Aimco at any annual meeting of stockholders or at a special meeting of the holders of that class of preferred stock and of the Voting Preferred Stock called for that purpose. Whenever dividends in arrears on outstanding shares of Voting Preferred Stock shall have been paid and dividends thereon for the current quarterly dividend period have been paid or declared and set apart for payment, then the right of the holders of the Voting Preferred Stock to elect the additional two directors shall cease and the terms of office of the directors shall terminate and the number of directors constituting the Aimco Board of Directors shall be reduced accordingly.
 
The affirmative vote or consent of at least 662/3% of the votes entitled to be cast by the holders of the outstanding shares of each class of preferred stock and the holders of all other classes or series of Parity Stock entitled to vote on such matters, voting as a single class, will be required to (1) authorize, create, increase the authorized amount of, or issue any shares of any class of Senior Stock or any security convertible into shares of any class of Senior Stock, or (2) amend, alter or repeal any provision of, or add any provision to, Aimco’s charter or by-laws, if such action would materially adversely affect the voting powers, rights or preferences of the holders of that class of preferred stock; provided, however, that no such vote of the holders of that class of preferred stock shall be required if, at or prior to the time such amendment, alteration or repeal is to take effect or the issuance of any such Senior Stock or convertible security is to be made, as the case may be, provisions are made for the redemption of all outstanding shares of that class of preferred stock. The amendment of or supplement to Aimco’s charter to authorize, create, increase or decrease the authorized amount of or to issue Junior Stock, or any shares of any class of Parity Stock shall not be deemed to materially adversely affect the voting powers, rights or preferences of any class of preferred stock.
 
Transfer.  For Aimco to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, not more than 50% in value of its outstanding capital stock may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities) during the last half of a taxable year and the shares of Aimco common stock must be beneficially owned by 100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year. Because the Aimco Board of Directors believes that it is essential for Aimco to meet the REIT Requirements, the Aimco Board of Directors has adopted, and the stockholders have approved, provisions of Aimco’s charter restricting the acquisition of shares of Aimco common stock.
 
Subject to specific exceptions specified in Aimco’s charter, no holder may own, or be deemed to own by virtue of various attribution and constructive ownership provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, more than 8.7% (or 15% in the case of specific pension trusts described in the Internal Revenue Code, investment companies registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and Mr. Considine) of the outstanding shares of Aimco common stock (the “Ownership Limit”). The Aimco Board of Directors may waive the Ownership Limit if evidence satisfactory to the Aimco Board of Directors and Aimco’s tax counsel is presented that such ownership will not then or in the future jeopardize Aimco’s status as a REIT. However, in no event may such holder’s direct or indirect ownership of Aimco common stock exceed 12.0% of the total outstanding shares of Aimco common stock. As a condition of such waiver, the Aimco Board of Directors may require opinions of counsel satisfactory to it and/or an undertaking from the applicant with respect to preserving the REIT status of Aimco. The foregoing restrictions on transferability and ownership will not apply if the Aimco Board of Directors determines that it is no longer in the best interests of Aimco to attempt to qualify, or to continue to quality as a REIT and a resolution terminating Aimco’s status as a REIT and amending Aimco’s charter to remove the foregoing restrictions is duly adopted by the Aimco Board of Directors and a majority of Aimco’s stockholders. If shares of Aimco common stock in excess of the Ownership Limit, or shares of Aimco common stock which would cause the REIT to be beneficially owned by fewer than 100 persons, or which would result in Aimco being “closely held,” within the meaning of section 856(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, or which would otherwise result in Aimco failing to qualify as a REIT, are issued or transferred to any person, such issuance or transfer shall be null and void to the intended transferee, and the intended transferee would acquire no rights to the stock. Shares of Aimco common


58


Table of Contents

stock transferred in excess of the Ownership Limit or other applicable limitations will automatically be transferred to a trust for the exclusive benefit of one or more qualifying charitable organizations to be designated by Aimco. Shares transferred to such trust will remain outstanding, and the trustee of the trust will have all voting and dividend rights pertaining to such shares. The trustee of such trust may transfer such shares to a person whose ownership of such shares does not violate the Ownership Limit or other applicable limitation. Upon a sale of such shares by the trustee, the interest of the charitable beneficiary will terminate, and the sales proceeds would be paid, first, to the original intended transferee, to the extent of the lesser of (a) such transferee’s original purchase price (or the original market value of such shares if purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and (b) the price received by the trustee, and, second, any remainder to the charitable beneficiary. In addition, shares of stock held in such trust are purchasable by Aimco for a 90 day period at a price equal to the lesser of the price paid for the stock by the original intended transferee (or the original market value of such shares if purportedly acquired by gift or devise) and the market price for the stock on the date that Aimco determines to purchase the stock. The 90 day period commences on the date of the violative transfer or the date that the Aimco Board of Directors determines in good faith that a violative transfer has occurred, whichever is later. All certificates representing shares of Aimco common stock bear a legend referring to the restrictions described above.
 
All persons who own, directly or by virtue of the attribution provisions of the Internal Revenue Code and Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, more than a specified percentage of the outstanding shares of Aimco common stock must file an affidavit with Aimco containing the information specified in Aimco’s charter within 30 days after January 1 of each year. In addition, each stockholder shall upon demand be required to disclose to Aimco in writing such information with respect to the direct, indirect and constructive ownership of shares as the board of directors deems necessary to comply with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code applicable to a REIT or to comply with the requirements of any taxing authority or governmental agency.
 
The ownership limitations may have the effect of precluding acquisition of control of Aimco by specific parties unless the Aimco Board of Directors determines that maintenance of REIT status is no longer in the best interests of Aimco.


59


Table of Contents

 
COMPARISON OF AIMCO OP UNITS AND AIMCO COMMON STOCK
 
Set forth below is a comparison of the OP Units to the Aimco common stock.
 
     
OP Units
 
Common Stock
 
Nature of Investment
The OP Units constitute equity interests entitling each holder to his or her pro rata share of cash distributions made from Available Cash (as such term is defined in the Aimco OP partnership agreement) to the partners of Aimco OP, a Delaware limited partnership.   The Aimco common stock constitutes equity interests in Aimco, a Maryland corporation.
 
Voting Rights
Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, limited partners have voting rights only with respect to certain limited matters such as certain amendments of the partnership agreement and certain transactions such as the institution of bankruptcy proceedings, an assignment for the benefit of creditors and certain transfers by the general partner of its interest in Aimco OP or the admission of a successor general partner.   Each outstanding share of Aimco common stock entitles the holder thereof to one vote on all matters submitted to stockholders for a vote, including the election of directors. Holders of Aimco common stock have the right to vote on, among other things, a merger of Aimco, amendments to the Aimco charter and the dissolution of Aimco. Certain amendments to the Aimco charter require the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of votes entitled to be cast on the matter. The Aimco charter permits the Aimco Board of Directors to classify and issue capital stock in one or more series having voting power which may differ from that of the common stock.
    Under Maryland law, a consolidation, merger, share exchange or transfer of all or substantially all of the assets of Aimco requires the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of all of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter. With respect to each of these transactions, only the holders of common stock are entitled to vote on the matters. No approval of the stockholders is required for the sale of less than all or substantially all of Aimco’s assets.
    Maryland law provides that the Aimco Board of Directors must obtain the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter in order to dissolve Aimco. Only the holders of common stock are entitled to vote on Aimco’s dissolution.
 
Distributions/Dividends
Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding partnership preferred units, the Aimco OP partnership agreement requires the general partner to cause Aimco OP to distribute quarterly all, or such portion as the general partner may in its sole and absolute discretion determine, of Available Cash (as such term is defined in the partnership agreement) generated by Aimco OP during such quarter to the general partner, the Special Limited Partner and the holders of OP Units and HPUs on the record date established by the general partner with respect to such quarter, in accordance with their respective interests in Aimco OP on such record date. Holders of any Partnership Preferred Units currently issued and which may be issued in the future may have priority over the general partner, the special limited partner and holders of OP Units and HPUs with respect to distributions of Available Cash,   Holders of Aimco common stock are entitled to receive dividends when and as declared by the Aimco Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefor. Under the REIT rules, Aimco is required to distribute dividends (other than capital gain dividends) to its stockholders in an amount at least equal to (A) the sum of (i) 90% of Aimco’s “REIT taxable income” (computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction and Aimco’s net capital gain) and (ii) 90% of the net income (after tax), if any, from foreclosure property, minus (B) the sum of certain items of noncash income. See “Material United States Federal Income Tax Considerations.”


60


Table of Contents

     
OP Units
 
Common Stock
 
distributions upon liquidation or other distributions. See “Description of Aimco OP Units; Summary of Aimco OP Partnership Agreement — Distributions.” The general partner in its sole and absolute discretion may distribute to the holders of OP Units and HPUs Available Cash on a more frequent basis and provide for an appropriate record date. The partnership agreement requires the general partner to take such reasonable efforts, as determined by it in its sole and absolute discretion and consistent with the REIT Requirements, to cause Aimco OP to distribute sufficient amounts to enable the general partner to transfer funds to Aimco and enable Aimco to pay stockholder dividends that will (i) satisfy the requirements for qualifying as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, and the Treasury Regulations and (ii) avoid any U.S. Federal income or excise tax liability of Aimco. See “Description of Aimco OP Units; Summary of Aimco OP Partnership Agreement — Distributions.”
   
 
Liquidity and Transferability/Redemption
There is no public market for the OP Units and the OP Units are not listed on any securities exchange.   The Aimco common stock is transferable subject to the Ownership Limit set forth in the Aimco charter. The Aimco common stock is listed on the NYSE.
Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, until the expiration of one year from the date on which a holder acquired OP Units, subject to certain exceptions, such OP Unitholder may not transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any transferee without the consent of the general partner, which consent may be withheld in its sole and absolute discretion. After the expiration of one year, such OP Unitholder has the right to transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any person, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the partnership agreement, including the general partner’s right of first refusal. See “Description of Aimco OP Units; Summary of Aimco OP Partnership Agreement — Transfers and Withdrawals.” After the first anniversary of becoming a holder of OP Units, a holder has the right, subject to the terms and conditions of the partnership agreement, to require Aimco OP to redeem all or a portion of such holder’s OP Units in exchange for shares of common stock or a cash amount equal to the value of such shares, as Aimco OP may elect. See “Description of Aimco OP Units; Summary of Aimco OP Partnership Agreement — Redemption Rights of Qualifying Parties.” Upon receipt of a notice of redemption, Aimco OP may, in its sole and absolute discretion but subject to the restrictions on the ownership of common stock imposed under the Aimco charter and the transfer restrictions and other limitations thereof, elect to cause Aimco to acquire some or all of the tendered OP Units in exchange for common stock, based on an exchange ratio of one share of common stock for each OP Unit, subject to adjustment as provided in the partnership agreement.    

61


Table of Contents

 
COMPARISON OF AIP UNITS AND AIMCO OP UNITS
 
The rights of AIP limited partners are currently governed by the California Act and the AIP partnership agreement. The rights of the limited partners of Aimco OP are currently governed by the Delaware Act and the Aimco OP partnership agreement.
 
The information below highlights a number of the significant differences between AIP Units and OP Units. These comparisons are intended to assist AIP limited partners in understanding how their investment will be changed after completion of the transactions, if they elect to receive OP Units in lieu of cash with respect to the merger.
 
     
AIP Units
 
OP Units
 
 
Nature of Investment
The AIP Units constitute equity interests entitling each partner to his or her pro rata share of distributions to be made to the partners of AIP.   The OP Units constitute equity interests entitling each holder to his or her pro rata share of cash distributions made from Available Cash (as such term is defined in the partnership agreement) to the partners of Aimco OP.
 
Voting Rights
With limited exceptions, under the AIP partnership agreement, upon the vote of a majority in units of all limited partners, the limited partners may make amendments to AIP’s partnership agreement, which vote may be taken by written consent. The limited partners holding a majority of units may remove the general partner and elect a successor general partner. If the general partner withdraws or is otherwise removed, the general partner elected in place thereof may elect to carry on the business of AIP. An affiliate of the general partner of AIP currently owns a majority of AIP’s limited partnership units.   Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, limited partners have voting rights only with respect to certain limited matters such as certain amendments of the partnership agreement and certain transactions such as the institution of bankruptcy proceedings, an assignment for the benefit of creditors and certain transfers by the general partner of its interest in Aimco OP or the admission of a successor general partner.
 
Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, the general partner has the power to effect the acquisition, sale, transfer, exchange or other disposition of any assets of Aimco OP (including, but not limited to, the exercise or grant of any conversion, option, privilege or subscription right or any other right available in connection with any assets at any time held by Aimco OP) or the merger, consolidation, reorganization or other combination of Aimco OP with or into another entity, all without the consent of the OP Unitholders.
   
 
The general partner may cause the dissolution of Aimco OP by an “event of withdrawal,” as defined in the Delaware Act (including, without limitation, bankruptcy), unless, within 90 days after the withdrawal, holders of a “majority in interest,” as defined in the Delaware Act, agree in writing, in their sole and absolute discretion, to continue the business of Aimco OP and to the appointment of a successor general partner. The general partner may elect to dissolve Aimco OP in its sole and absolute discretion, with or without the consent of the OP Unitholders. OP Unitholders cannot remove the general partner of Aimco OP with or without cause.
 
Distributions
Upon disposition, sale, financing, or refinancing, the Net Proceeds (as defined in the AIP partnership agreement) of the disposition will be distributed to each partner unless the general partner determines (i) the proceeds are needed to support the partnership, (ii) after   Subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding partnership preferred units, the Aimco OP partnership agreement requires the general partner to cause Aimco OP to distribute quarterly all, or such portion as the general partner may in its sole and absolute discretion


62


Table of Contents

     
AIP Units
 
OP Units
 
accounting for partners’ tax obligations, the proceeds should be reinvested, or (iii) the proceeds are in a form that cannot reasonably be distributed. In addition to distributions on dispositions, quarterly distributions of Net Cash from Operations (as defined in the AIP partnership agreement) may be made at the discretion of the general partner. Any additional distributions may also be made at the discretion of the general partner. The distributions payable to the partners are not fixed in amount and depend upon the operating results and net sales or refinancing proceeds available from the disposition of AIP’s assets.
  determine, of Available Cash (as such term is defined in the partnership agreement) generated by Aimco OP during such quarter to the general partner, the special limited partner and the holders of OP Units and HPUs on the record date established by the general partner with respect to such quarter, in accordance with their respective interests in Aimco OP on such record date. Holders of any partnership preferred units currently issued and which may be issued in the future may have priority over the general partner, the special limited partner and holders of OP Units and HPUs with respect to distributions of Available Cash, distributions upon liquidation or other distributions. See “Description of Aimco OP Units; Summary of Aimco OP Partnership Agreement — Distributions.” The general partner in its sole and absolute discretion may distribute to the holders of OP Units and HPUs Available Cash on a more frequent basis and provide for an appropriate record date. The partnership agreement requires the general partner to take such reasonable efforts, as determined by it in its sole and absolute discretion and consistent with the REIT requirements, to cause Aimco OP to distribute sufficient amounts to enable the general partner to transfer funds to Aimco and enable Aimco to pay stockholder dividends that will (i) satisfy the requirements for qualifying as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, and the Treasury Regulations and (ii) avoid any U.S. Federal income or excise tax liability of Aimco. See “Description of Aimco OP Units; Summary of Aimco OP Partnership Agreement — Distributions.”
 
Liquidity and Transferability/Redemption
There is a limited market for the AIP Units and the AIP Units are not listed on any securities exchange.   There is no public market for the OP Units and the OP Units are not listed on any securities exchange.
Under the AIP partnership agreement, holders of AIP Units have the right, subject to certain exceptions, to assign three or more AIP Units by means of a written instrument, the terms of which are not in contravention of any of the provisions of the AIP partnership agreement and which instrument has been duly executed by the assignor and assignee of such AIP Units and delivered to the general partner in form and substance satisfying the general partner. Any assignment of AIP Units must be made in compliance with the then applicable rules of any applicable governmental authority. Notwithstanding the above, no partner may make an assignment of any AIP Units if the AIP Units sought to be assigned, when added to the total of all other AIP Units assigned within the period of 12 consecutive months prior to the proposed date of assignment, would result in the termination of the partnership under the Internal Revenue Code, violate any “Blue Sky” law, or result in the partnership being treated as a corporation for tax purposes. No assignee of a limited partner’s interest may become a substituted   Under the Aimco OP partnership agreement, until the expiration of one year from the date on which a holder acquired OP Units, subject to certain exceptions, such OP Unitholder may not transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any transferee without the consent of the general partner, which consent may be withheld in its sole and absolute discretion. After the expiration of one year, such OP Unitholder has the right to transfer all or any portion of its OP Units to any person, subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the partnership agreement, including the general partner’s right of first refusal. See “Description of Aimco OP Units; Summary of Aimco OP Partnership Agreement — Transfers and Withdrawals.” After the first anniversary of becoming a holder of OP Units, a holder has the right, subject to the terms and conditions of the partnership agreement, to require Aimco OP to redeem all or a portion of such holder’s OP Units in exchange for shares of common stock or a cash amount equal to the value of such shares, as Aimco OP may elect. See “Description of Aimco OP Units; Summary of

63


Table of Contents

     
AIP Units
 
OP Units
 
limited partner unless (a) a duly executed and acknowledged written instrument of assignment covering no less than three AIP Units (subject to certain exceptions) has been filed with AIP, (b) the assignor and assignee execute and acknowledge such other instruments as the general partner deems necessary or desirable to effect the substitution, including the written acceptance and adoption by the assignee of the provisions of the AIP partnership agreement and delivery to the general partner of a special power of attorney, (c) the consent of the general partner to the substitution is obtained, which consent may be granted or denied in the general partner’s absolute discretion, (d) a transfer fee has been paid to AIP to cover all reasonable expenses connected with the substitution, and (e) the assignment provisions of the AIP partnership agreement have been complied with. Unauthorized assignments and transfers are null and void. The AIP partnership agreement contains no redemption rights.
  Aimco OP Partnership Agreement — Redemption Rights of Qualifying Parties.” Upon receipt of a notice of redemption, Aimco OP may, in its sole and absolute discretion but subject to the restrictions on the ownership of common stock imposed under the Aimco charter and the transfer restrictions and other limitations thereof, elect to cause Aimco to acquire some or all of the tendered OP Units in exchange for common stock, based on an exchange ratio of one share of common stock for each OP Unit, subject to adjustment as provided in the partnership agreement.
The general partner and its affiliates may freely transfer partnership units between or among themselves and any partner may freely transfer units to the general partner or to the partnership (subject to the approval of the general partner).
   
 
Fiduciary Duty
California law provides that a general partner’s duty of loyalty to the limited partnership and the other partners is limited to (i) accounting to the limited partnership and holding as trustee for it any property, profit, or benefit derived by the general partner in the conduct and winding up of the limited partnership’s activities or derived from a use by the general partner of limited partnership property, including the appropriation of a limited partnership opportunity; (ii) refraining from dealing with the limited partnership in the conduct or winding up of the limited partnership’s activities as or on behalf of a party having an interest adverse to the limited partnership; and (iii) refraining from competing with the limited partnership in the conduct or winding up of the limited partnership’s activities. Under California law, a general partner’s duty of care to the limited partnership and the other partners in the conduct and winding up of the limited partnership’s activities is limited to refraining from engaging in grossly negligent or reckless conduct, intentional misconduct, or a knowing violation of law. Additionally, California law requires that a general partner discharge its duties to the partnership and the other partners consistently with the obligation of good faith and fair dealing. The AIP limited partnership agreement does not limit or enhance the fiduciary duties provided by California law.
  Delaware law provides that, except as provided in a partnership agreement, a general partner owes the fiduciary duties of loyalty and care to the partnership and its limited partners. The Aimco OP partnership agreement expressly authorizes the general partner to enter into, on behalf of Aimco OP, a right of first opportunity arrangement and other conflict avoidance agreements with various affiliates of Aimco OP and the general partner, on such terms as the general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion, believes are advisable. The Aimco OP partnership agreement expressly limits the liability of the general partner by providing that the general partner, and its officers and directors, will not be liable or accountable in damages to Aimco OP, the limited partners or assignees for errors in judgment or mistakes of fact or law or of any act or omission if the general partner or such director or officer acted in good faith.
The AIP partnership agreement provides that the general partners shall not employ or permit another to employ
   

64


Table of Contents

     
AIP Units
 
OP Units
 
the partnership funds or assets in any manner except for the benefit of the partnership.
   
 
Investment Policy
AIP was organized for the purpose of operating income- producing residential real estate. In general, the General Partner regularly evaluates AIP’s property by considering various factors, such as the partnership’s financial position and real estate and capital markets conditions. The General Partner monitors the property’s specific locale and sub-market conditions (including stability of the surrounding neighborhood), evaluating current trends, competition, new construction and economic changes. It oversees the operating performance of the property and evaluates the physical improvement requirements. In addition, the financing structure for the property (including any prepayment penalties), tax implications, availability of attractive mortgage financing to a purchaser, and the investment climate are all considered. Any of these factors, and possibly others, could potentially contribute to any decision by the General Partner to sell, refinance, upgrade with capital improvements or hold the property.   Aimco OP was formed to engage in the acquisition, ownership, management and redevelopment of apartment properties. Although it holds all of its properties for investment, Aimco OP may sell properties when they do not meet its investment criteria or are located in areas that it believes do not justify a continued investment when compared to alternative uses for capital. Its portfolio management strategy includes property acquisitions and dispositions to concentrate its portfolio in its target markets. It may market for sale certain properties that are inconsistent with this long-term investment strategy. Additionally, from time to time, Aimco OP may market certain properties that are consistent with this strategy but offer attractive returns. Aimco OP may use its share of the net proceeds from such dispositions to, among other things, reduce debt, fund capital expenditures on existing assets, fund acquisitions, and for other operating needs and corporate purposes.
 
Compensation and Distributions
 
AIP.  AIP has no employees and depends on the General Partner and its affiliates for the management and administration of all partnership activities. The AIP partnership agreement provides that the General Partner and its affiliates receive no more than 5% of gross receipts from all of AIP’s properties as compensation for providing property management services, and also provides that the General Partner and its affiliates receive certain payments for other services and reimbursement of certain expenses incurred on behalf of AIP.
 
In addition, under the AIP partnership agreement, (i) Net Cash From Operations (as defined in the AIP partnership agreement) is distributed to the partners in proportion to their interests in the partnership, and (ii) Distributable Net Proceeds of any Disposition (each as defined in the AIP partnership agreement) is distributed in the following order of priority: (v) first, to the partners according to their interests in the partnership, until the limited partners have received an amount equal to their unrecovered Capital Contributions (as defined in the AIP partnership agreement); (w) second, to the partners according to their interests in the partnership, until the limited partners have received distributions from all sources equal to the 6% Cumulative Distribution (as defined in the AIP partnership agreement), (x) third, to the general partner until it has received cumulative distributions in an amount equal to 3% of the aggregate Disposition Prices (as defined in the AIP partnership agreement) of all properties or other investments, (y) fourth, to the partners according to their interests in the partnership, until the limited partners have received distributions from all sources equal to the 8% Cumulative Distribution (as defined in the AIP partnership agreement), plus additional priority returns of 4.5%, 3%, and 1.5% to the purchasers of the first 10,000, second 10,000, and third 10,000 partnership units (subject to date of purchase limitations), respectively, and (z) with respect to the remainder, 86% to the partners according to their interests in the partnership, and 14% to the general partner. Notwithstanding the foregoing, distributions may be restricted or suspended in circumstances when the General Partner determines, in its absolute discretion, that such action is in the best interests of AIP.
 
A description of the compensation paid to the General Partner and its affiliates during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 can be found under the heading “Information About Angeles Income Properties, Ltd. 6 — Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in this information statement/prospectus. In addition, for more information, see “Note C — Transactions with Affiliated Parties” in the notes to the financial statements appearing in AIP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for

65


Table of Contents

the year ended December 31, 2010, which is included as Annex E to this information statement/prospectus and “Note B — Transactions with Affiliated Parties” in the notes to the financial statements appearing in AIP’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which is included as Annex F to this information statement/prospectus.
 
Aimco OP.  The Aimco OP partnership agreement provides that Aimco OP’s general partner shall not be compensated for its services as a general partner, other than the compensation it receives with respect to distributions and allocations in accordance with the partnership agreement. Subject to certain provisions of the partnership agreement, Aimco OP will reimburse the general partner for all sums expended in connection with the partnership’s business.
 
In addition, subject to the rights of holders of any outstanding preferred OP Units, the Aimco OP partnership agreement requires the general partner to cause Aimco OP to distribute quarterly all, or such portion of, as the general partner may in its sole and absolute discretion determine, Available Cash (as such term is defined in the partnership agreement) generated by Aimco OP during such quarter to the general partner, the special limited partner and the holders of common OP Units and HPUs on the record date established by the general partner with respect to such quarter, in accordance with their respective interests in Aimco OP on such record date. The partnership agreement requires the general partner to take such reasonable efforts, as determined by it in its sole and absolute discretion and consistent with the REIT Requirements, to cause Aimco OP to distribute sufficient amounts to enable the general partner to transfer funds to Aimco and enable Aimco to pay stockholder dividends that will (i) satisfy the requirements for qualifying as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations and (ii) avoid any U.S. Federal income or excise tax liability of Aimco.


66


Table of Contents

 
MATERIAL UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS
 
The following is a summary of the material U.S. Federal income tax consequences of the transactions, and the material U.S. Federal income tax considerations related to an investment in OP Units and Aimco stock. This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations, rulings issued by the IRS, and judicial decisions, all in effect as of the date of this information statement/prospectus and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. This summary is also based on the assumption that the operation of Aimco, Aimco OP and the limited liability companies and limited partnerships in which they own controlling interests (collectively, the “Subsidiary Partnerships”) and any affiliated entities will be in accordance with their respective organizational documents and partnership agreements. This summary is for general information only and does not purport to discuss all aspects of U.S. Federal income taxation which may be important to a particular investor, or to certain types of investors subject to special tax rules (including financial institutions, broker-dealers, regulated investment companies, holders that receive Aimco stock through the exercise of stock options or otherwise as compensation, insurance companies, persons holding Aimco stock as part of a “straddle,” “hedge,” “conversion transaction,” “synthetic security” or other integrated investment, and, except to the extent discussed below, tax-exempt organizations and Non-U.S. Holders as determined for U.S Federal income tax purposes). This summary assumes that investors will hold their OP Units and Aimco stock as capital assets (generally, property held for investment). No assurance can be given that the IRS would not assert, or that a court would not sustain, a position contrary to any of the tax aspects set forth below.
 
As used herein, a “U.S. Holder” means a person who, or that, is:
 
  1)  a citizen or resident of the United States, including an alien resident who is a lawful permanent resident of the United States or meets the “substantial presence” test under Section 7701(b) of the Internal Revenue Code;
 
  2)  a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for United States federal income tax purposes), created or organized in or under the laws of the United States, any state thereof or the District of Columbia;
 
  3)  an estate, the income of which is subject to United States federal income taxation regardless of its source; or
 
  4)  a trust if (i) (A) a United States court is able to exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and (B) one or more United States persons have authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust, or (ii) the trust has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to be treated as a United States person.
 
As used herein, a “Non-U.S. Holder” means a person who, or that, is not a U.S Holder.
 
THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF A PARTICULAR HOLDER DEPENDS UPON DETERMINATIONS OF FACT AND INTERPRETATIONS OF COMPLEX PROVISIONS OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAW FOR WHICH NO CLEAR PRECEDENT OR AUTHORITY MAY BE AVAILABLE. ACCORDINGLY, EACH HOLDER IS URGED TO CONSULT ITS TAX ADVISOR REGARDING THE FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL, AND FOREIGN TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE TRANSACTIONS, OF ACQUIRING, HOLDING, EXCHANGING, OR OTHERWISE DISPOSING OF OP UNITS AND AIMCO STOCK, AND OF AIMCO’S ELECTION TO BE SUBJECT TO TAX, FOR U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES, AS A REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUST.
 
Summary of Federal Income Tax Opinion
 
Hogan Lovells US LLP has acted as Aimco’s counsel in connection with the transactions, and has issued a tax opinion to the effect that for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and subject to the exceptions and qualifications set forth in the opinion: (i) the merger of AIP into New AIP will not result in the recognition of taxable gain to holders of AIP Units who are U.S. Holders; (ii) the holders of AIP Units who are U.S. holders that receive solely cash in the merger of the Aimco Subsidiary with and into New AIP will recognize taxable gain or loss upon the receipt of such cash; and (iii) the holders of AIP Units who are U.S. Holders that receive solely OP Units in the merger of Aimco Subsidiary with and into New AIP will generally not recognize taxable gain or loss upon the receipt of such OP Units.


67


Table of Contents

 
United States Federal Income Tax Consequences Relating to the Transactions
 
Tax Consequences of the Merger between AIP and New AIP (the “Redomestication”)
 
The merger of an existing partnership into another partnership is considered a continuation of the existing partnership if its partners, who own more than 50% of the profits and capital in the existing partnership, obtain more than 50% of the profits and capital in the resulting partnership. Because the partners of AIP will receive the same number of units of limited partnership interest in the Delaware partnership, New AIP, as they had in the California partnership, AIP, the Delaware partnership will be considered a continuation of the California partnership for tax purposes. AIP will not recognize gain as a result of contributing its assets to New AIP. New AIP will have the same federal identification number as that of AIP and will have the same tax basis, holding period, and depreciation method for each of its assets as that of AIP. The partners of AIP will not recognize any gain from the merger of AIP with and into New AIP. The bases of the partners in New AIP will be equal to their bases in the terminated partnership, AIP, and their holding periods in their units in New AIP will be the same as their holding periods in the AIP units. Aimco believes that completion of the Redomestication will not result in any tax consequences to the limited partners of AIP.
 
Tax Consequences of the Merger between New AIP and the Aimco Subsidiary
 
When the assets or operations of two partnerships such as New AIP and Aimco OP are combined in a transaction pursuant to which one of the partnerships ceases to exist as a partnership (the “terminated partnership”) for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, and the members of the terminated partnership become members of the surviving partnership (the “resulting partnership”), that combined transaction is generally treated as a partnership merger.
 
In general, New AIP would be treated as contributing all of its assets, and assigning all of its liabilities, to Aimco OP in exchange for interests in Aimco OP and any other consideration issued by Aimco OP in connection with the transaction, including cash or an assumption of liability, which may result in gain recognition under the rules described below. Immediately thereafter, New AIP is treated as distributing all of its assets to its partners in complete liquidation.
 
Tax Consequences of the Merger between New AIP and the Aimco Subsidiary to Aimco and the Aimco Entities
 
Aimco and the Aimco Entities (other than Aimco OP, which is discussed separately, above) are not expected to recognize any gain or loss on the transaction.
 
Tax Consequences of the Transaction to New AIP, Aimco OP, and Aimco
 
When the assets or operations of two partnerships such as New AIP and Aimco OP are combined in a transaction pursuant to which one of the partnerships (New AIP) ceases to exist as a partnership (the “terminated partnership”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes, and the members of the terminated partnership become members of the surviving partnership (i.e., Aimco OP), that combined transaction is generally treated as a partnership merger.
 
In general, New AIP would be treated as contributing all of its assets, and assigning all of its liabilities, to Aimco OP in exchange for interests in Aimco OP and any other consideration issued by Aimco OP in connection with the transaction, including cash or an assumption of liability, which may result in gain recognition under the rules described below. Immediately thereafter, New AIP is treated as distributing all of its assets to its partners in complete liquidation.
 
Aimco is not expected to recognize any gain or loss on the transaction.
 
Tax Consequences of Exchanging AIP Units Solely for Cash
 
For U.S. Federal income tax purposes, any payment of cash for AIP Units will be treated as a sale of such AIP Units by such holder. Each such holder of AIP Units who accepts cash must explicitly agree and consent to treat the


68


Table of Contents

payment of cash for AIP Units as a sale of such units to Aimco OP, in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement.
 
If a holder of AIP Units sells such units for cash, such holder will recognize gain or loss on the sale of his units equal to the difference between (i) such holder’s “amount realized” on the sale and (ii) such holder’s adjusted tax basis in the AIP Units sold. The “amount realized” with respect to a AIP Unit will be equal to the sum of the amount of cash such holder receives for his units plus the amount of liabilities of New AIP allocable to such AIP Units as determined under section 752 of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
Tax Consequences of Exchanging AIP Units Solely for OP Units
 
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a holder of AIP Units receiving OP Units in the merger will be treated as receiving the OP Units pursuant to a distribution in complete liquidation of such holder’s interest in New AIP.
 
The merger will not result in the recognition of taxable gain or loss at the time of the merger to a holder of AIP Units who receives only OP Units in exchange for its AIP Units and:
 
1. who is a U.S. Holder.
 
2. who does not exercise its redemption right with respect to OP Units during the two-year period beginning on the day after the merger becomes effective;
 
3. who does not receive a cash distribution in connection with the partnership merger, or a deemed cash distribution resulting from relief from liabilities or a deemed relief from liabilities, including as a result of the prepayment of indebtedness of New AIP in connection with or following the merger, in excess of such holder’s adjusted tax basis in its AIP Units at the time of the merger, and for purposes of this rule, a reduction in a holder of an AIP Unit’s share of partnership liabilities in connection with the merger could be treated as a transfer of money or property from Aimco OP to the holder that gives rise to a disguised sale, even if that reduction would not otherwise result in a taxable deemed cash distribution in excess of the holder’s basis in its AIP Units;
 
4. who is not required to recognize gain by reason of the application of Section 707(a) of the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder to the merger, because the merger is treated as part of a disguised sale, whether by reason of any transactions undertaken by New AIP prior to or in connection with the partnership merger, any debt of New AIP that is assumed or repaid in connection with the partnership merger, any cash or other consideration paid, or deemed paid, to a former holder of AIP Units in connection with or subsequent to the partnership merger, or otherwise; and
 
5. whose “at risk” amount does not fall below zero as a result of the merger.
 
Information Reporting Requirements and Backup Withholding
 
United States Holders
 
In general, backup withholding and information reporting will apply to all payments made to a U.S. Holder pursuant to the merger. A U.S. Holder will generally be subject to backup withholding at the rate of 28% with respect to payments made pursuant to the merger unless such holder, among other conditions, provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies as to no loss of exemption from backup withholding, and otherwise complies with the applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules, or otherwise establishes a basis for exemption from backup withholding. Exempt U.S. Holders (including, among others, all corporations) are not subject to these backup withholding and information reporting requirements. A holder who does not provide Aimco OP with his correct taxpayer identification number also may be subject to penalties imposed by the IRS. Any amount paid as backup withholding will be creditable against the holder’s income tax liability.
 
Non-United States Holders
 
Information reporting may apply to payments made to a Non-U.S. Holder pursuant to the merger. Copies of information returns reporting such amounts and any withholding also may be made available by the IRS to the tax authorities in the country in which a Non-U.S. Holder is resident under the provision of an applicable income tax


69


Table of Contents

treaty or other agreement. Non-U.S. Holders that receive OP Units as merger consideration should see “— Taxation of Aimco OP and OP Unitholders — Taxation of Foreign OP Unitholders,” below.
 
In general, backup withholding will not apply to payments made a Non-U.S. Holder pursuant to the merger, if, among other conditions, such Non-U.S. Holder certifies as to its non-U.S. status under penalties of perjury or otherwise establishes an exemption, provided that neither Aimco OP nor our withholding agent has actual knowledge, or reason to know, that the Non-U.S. Holder is a U.S. person or that the conditions of any other exemption are not in fact satisfied. In order to claim an exemption from or reduction of withholding tax, the Non-U.S. Holder must deliver a properly executed copy of the applicable IRS Form, claiming such exemption or reduction. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules generally will be allowed as a refund or credit against such Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. Federal income tax liability if the Non-U.S. Holder follows the required procedures.
 
Taxation of Aimco OP and OP Unitholders
 
Partnership Status
 
Aimco believes that Aimco OP is classified as a partnership, and not as an association taxable as a corporation or as a publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. If Aimco OP were treated as an association or a “publicly traded partnership” taxed as a corporation for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, material adverse consequences to the partners would result. Moreover, in such case, a holder of AIP Units receiving OP Units in the merger would be required to recognize gain or loss on the transaction. In addition, classification of Aimco OP as an association or publicly traded partnership taxable as a corporation would also result in the termination of Aimco’s status as a REIT for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, which would have a material adverse impact on Aimco and its shareholders. See “— Taxation of Aimco and Aimco Stockholders — Tax Aspects of Aimco’s Investments in Partnerships.” This discussion assumes that Aimco OP is, and will continue to be, classified and taxed as a partnership (and not as a publicly traded partnership) for U.S. Federal income tax purposes.
 
Taxation of OP Unitholders
 
In general, a partnership is treated as a “pass-through” entity for U.S. Federal income tax purposes and is not itself subject to U.S. Federal income taxation. Each partner of a partnership, however, is subject to tax on his allocable share of partnership tax items, including partnership income, gains, losses, deductions, and expenses (“Partnership Tax Items”) for each taxable year of the partnership ending within or with such taxable year of the partner, regardless of whether he receives any actual distributions from the partnership during the taxable year. Generally, the characterization of any particular Partnership Tax Item is determined at the partnership, rather than at the partner level, and the amount of a partner’s allocable share of such item is governed by the terms of the partnership agreement. An OP unitholder’s allocable share of Aimco OP’s taxable income may exceed the cash distributions to the OP unitholder for any year if Aimco OP retains its profits rather than distributing them.
 
Allocations of Aimco OP Profits and Losses
 
For U.S. Federal income tax purposes, an OP unitholder’s allocable share of Aimco OP’s Partnership Tax Items will be determined by Aimco OP’s partnership agreement, provided such allocations either have “substantial economic effect” or are determined to be in accordance with the OP unitholder’s interests in Aimco OP. If the allocations provided by Aimco OP’s partnership agreement were successfully challenged by the IRS, the redetermination of the allocations to a particular OP unitholder for U.S. Federal income tax purposes may be less favorable than the allocation set forth in Aimco OP’s partnership agreement.
 
Tax Basis of a Partnership Interest
 
A partner’s adjusted tax basis in his partnership interest is relevant, among other things, for determining (i) gain or loss upon a taxable disposition of his partnership interest, (ii) gain upon the receipt of partnership distributions, and (iii) the limitations imposed on the use of partnership deductions and losses allocable to such partner. Generally, the adjusted tax basis of an OP unitholder’s interest in Aimco OP is equal to (A) the sum of the adjusted tax basis of the property contributed by the OP unitholder to Aimco OP in exchange for an interest in Aimco OP and the amount


70


Table of Contents

of cash, if any, contributed by the OP unitholder to Aimco OP, (B) reduced, but not below zero, by the OP unitholder’s allocable share of Aimco OP partnership distributions, deductions, and losses, (C) increased by the OP unitholder’s allocable share of Aimco OP partnership income and gains, and (D) increased by the OP unitholder’s allocable share of Aimco OP partnership liabilities and decreased by the OP unitholder’s liabilities assumed by Aimco OP.
 
Cash Distributions
 
Cash distributions received from a partnership do not necessarily correlate with income earned by the partnership as determined for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. Thus, an OP unitholder’s U.S. Federal income tax liability in respect of his allocable share of Aimco OP taxable income for a particular taxable year may exceed the amount of cash, if any, received by the OP unitholder from Aimco OP during such year.
 
If cash distributions, including a “deemed” cash distribution as discussed below, received by an OP unitholder in any taxable year exceed his allocable share of Aimco OP taxable income for the year, the excess will generally constitute, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, a return of capital to the extent of such OP unitholder’s adjusted tax basis in his Aimco OP interest. Such return of capital will not be includible in the taxable income of the OP unitholder, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, but it will reduce, but not below zero, the adjusted tax basis of Aimco OP interests held by the OP unitholder. If an OP unitholder’s tax basis in his Aimco OP interest is reduced to zero, a subsequent cash distribution received by the OP unitholder will be subject to tax as capital gain and/or ordinary income, but only if, and to the extent that, such distribution exceeds the subsequent positive adjustments, if any, to the tax basis of the OP unitholder’s Aimco OP interest as determined at the end of the taxable year during which such distribution is received. A decrease in an OP unitholder’s allocable share of Aimco OP liabilities resulting from the payment or other settlement, or reallocation of such liabilities is generally treated, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, as a deemed cash distribution. A decrease in an OP unitholder’s percentage interest in Aimco OP because of the issuance by Aimco OP of additional OP Units or otherwise, may decrease an OP unitholder’s share of nonrecourse liabilities of Aimco OP and thus, may result in a corresponding deemed distribution of cash. A deemed distribution of cash resulting from the payment, settlement, or other reduction or reallocation of Aimco OP liabilities formerly allocated to an OP unitholder will result in taxable gain to such OP unitholder to the extent such deemed distribution of cash exceeds the OP unitholder’s basis in his OP Units.
 
A non-pro rata distribution (or deemed distribution) of money or property may result in ordinary income to an OP unitholder, regardless of such OP unitholder’s tax basis in his OP Units, if the distribution reduces such OP unitholder’s share of Aimco OP’s “Section 751 Assets.” “Section 751 Assets” are defined by the Internal Revenue Code to include “unrealized receivables” or “inventory items.” Among other things, “unrealized receivables” include amounts attributable to previously claimed depreciation deductions on certain types of property. To the extent that such a reduction in an OP unitholder’s share of Section 751 Assets occurs, Aimco OP will be deemed to have distributed a proportionate share of the Section 751 Assets to the OP unitholder followed by a deemed exchange of such assets with Aimco OP in return for the non-pro rata portion of the actual distribution made to such OP unitholder. This deemed exchange will generally result in the realization of ordinary income by the OP unitholder. Such income will equal the excess of (1) the non-pro rata portion of such distribution over (2) the OP unitholder’s tax basis in such OP unitholder’s share of such Section 751 Assets deemed relinquished in the exchange.
 
Tax Consequences Relating to Contributed Assets
 
If an investor contributes property to Aimco OP in exchange for OP Units, and the adjusted tax basis of such property differs from its fair market value, Partnership Tax Items must be allocated in a manner such that the contributing partner, over the life of Aimco OP, is charged with, or benefits from, the unrealized gain or unrealized loss associated with such property at the time of the contribution. This may result in a tax liability without a corresponding receipt of cash. Where a partner contributes cash to a partnership that holds appreciated property, Treasury Regulations provide for a similar allocation of such items to the other partners. For example, these rules may apply to a contribution by Aimco to Aimco OP of cash proceeds received by Aimco from the offering of its stock. Such allocations are solely for U.S. Federal income tax purposes and do not affect the book capital accounts or other economic or legal arrangements among the OP unitholders. The general purpose underlying this provision


71


Table of Contents

is to specially allocate certain Partnership Tax Items in order to place both the noncontributing and contributing partners in the same tax position that they would have been in had the contributing partner contributed property with an adjusted tax basis equal to its fair market value. Treasury Regulations provide Aimco OP with several alternative methods and allow Aimco OP to adopt any other reasonable method to make allocations to reduce or eliminate these “book-tax differences.” The general partner, in its sole and absolute discretion and in a manner consistent with Treasury Regulations, will select and adopt a method of allocating Partnership Tax Items for purposes of eliminating such disparities. The method selected by Aimco OP in its sole discretion could cause those AIP limited partners that receive OP Units in connection with the merger to incur a tax liability without a corresponding receipt of cash. Each prospective investor is urged to consult his tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of any special allocations of Partnership Tax Items resulting from the contribution of property to Aimco OP.
 
Disguised Sales Rules
 
Generally, section 721 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that neither the contributing partner nor Aimco OP will recognize a gain or loss, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, upon a contribution of property to Aimco OP solely in exchange for OP Units. If, however, in connection with such a contribution of property, the investor receives, or is deemed to receive, cash or other consideration in addition to OP Units, the receipt or deemed receipt of such cash or other consideration may be treated as part of a “disguised sale.” In that case, the investor would be treated as having sold, in a taxable transaction, a portion of the contributed property to Aimco OP in exchange for such cash or other consideration; the balance of the contributed property would, however, remain subject to the tax free contribution treatment described above.
 
The disguised sale rules further provide that, unless certain exceptions apply (including exceptions that apply to distributions of operating cash flow), transfers of money or other property between a partnership and a partner that are made within two years of each other (including AIP’s distribution of funds from the June 30, 2010 second mortgage AIP obtained on the Lazy Hollow Apartments) must be reported to the IRS and are presumed to be a “disguised sale” unless the facts and circumstances clearly establish that the transfers do not constitute a sale. The “disguised sale” rules may also apply, and give rise to taxable income without a corresponding receipt of cash where, for example, a partner contributes property to Aimco OP subject to one or more liabilities or where liabilities are assumed or paid by Aimco OP. If the “disguised sale” rules apply, all or a portion of the liabilities associated with the contributed property may be treated as consideration received by the contributing partner in a sale of the property to Aimco OP. The “disguised sale” rules also may apply if, for example, the issuance of OP Units to AIP limited partners in connection with the merger is integrated with any other acquisition between Aimco and any OP unitholder or any related party. For example, the IRS may assert that any redemption or exchange for several years following the merger transactions between Aimco OP and any OP unitholder who receives OP Units in the current transaction constitutes an “integrated disguised sale” that may result in taxation (without receipt of cash) for such OP unitholders. No assurances can be given that the IRS would not be successful in such an assertion.
 
For purposes of the disguised sale rules, either an assumption of liabilities by a partnership or a transfer of properties subject to liabilities is treated as a transfer of money or other property from a partnership to a partner which may give rise to a disguised sale, even if that transaction would not otherwise result in a taxable deemed cash distribution in excess of the partner’s basis. For purposes of this rule, a reduction in a holder of an OP Unit’s share of partnership liabilities could be treated as a transfer of money or property from Aimco OP to the holder that gives rise to a disguised sale, even if that reduction would not otherwise result in a taxable deemed cash distribution in excess of the holder’s basis in its OP Units. The method of computing the amount of any such reduction under the disguised sale rules is different from, and generally more onerous than, the method applied for purposes of the rules discussed above for purposes of Section 752 of the Internal Revenue Code.
 
However, in connection with a contribution to a partnership that is not otherwise treated as part of a disguised sale, neither the assumption of “qualified liabilities” by a partnership nor the acquisition by a partnership of properties subject to “qualified liabilities” is treated as part of a disguised sale. Under the disguised sale regulations, a qualified liability includes:


72


Table of Contents

 
  •  any liability incurred more than two years prior to the earlier of the transfer of the property or the date a partner agrees in writing to the transfer, as long as the liability has encumbered the transferred property throughout the two-year period;
 
  •  a liability that was not incurred in anticipation of the transfer of the property to a partnership, but that was incurred by a partner within the two-year period prior to the earlier of the date the partner agrees in writing to transfer the property or the date the partner transfers the property to the partnership and that has encumbered the transferred property since it was incurred;
 
  •  a liability that is traceable under applicable Treasury Regulations to capital expenditures with respect to the property; and
 
  •  a liability that was incurred in the ordinary course of the trade or business in which property transferred to a partnership was used or held, but only if all the assets related to that trade or business are transferred, other than assets that are not material to a continuation of the trade or business.
 
A liability incurred within two years of the transfer is presumed to be incurred in anticipation of the transfer unless the facts and circumstances clearly establish that the liability was not incurred in anticipation of the transfer. However, to the extent that a contributing partner incurs a refinancing liability and the proceeds thereof are allocable under the Treasury Regulations to payments discharging all or part of any other liability of that partner or of the partnership, the refinancing debt is considered the same as the other liability for purposes of the disguised sale regulations. Finally, if a partner treats a liability incurred within two years of the transfer as a qualified liability because the facts clearly establish that it was not incurred in anticipation of the transfer, such treatment must be disclosed to the Internal Revenue Service in the manner set forth in the Treasury Regulations addressing the disguised sale rules.
 
Aimco believes that all liabilities of New AIP should be considered qualified liabilities and, thus, should not result in recognition of gain under the disguised sale rules to those holders of AIP Units who have held their AIP Units for at least two years at the time of the merger of New AIP and Aimco OP. There can be no assurance, however, that the Internal Revenue Service would not contend otherwise. Each prospective investor is urged to consult its tax advisor regarding the application of the “disguised sale” rules.
 
Limitations on Deductibility of Losses
 
Basis Limitation.  To the extent that an OP unitholder’s allocable share of Aimco OP partnership deductions and losses exceeds his adjusted tax basis in his Aimco OP interest at the end of the taxable year in which the losses and deductions flow through, the excess losses and deductions cannot be utilized, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, by the OP unitholder in such year. The excess losses and deductions may, however, be utilized in the first succeeding taxable year in which, and to the extent that, there is an increase in the tax basis of the Aimco OP interest held by such OP unitholder, but only to the extent permitted under the “at risk” and “passive activity loss” rules discussed below.
 
“At Risk” Limitation.  Under the “at risk” rules of section 465 of the Internal Revenue Code, a noncorporate taxpayer and a closely held corporate taxpayer are generally not permitted to claim a deduction, for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, in respect of a loss from an activity, whether conducted directly by the taxpayer or through an investment in a partnership, to the extent that the loss exceeds the aggregate dollar amount which the taxpayer has “at risk” in such activity at the close of the taxable year. To the extent that losses are not permitted to be used in any taxable year, such losses may be carried over to subsequent taxable years and may be claimed as a deduction by the taxpayer if, and to the extent that, the amount which the taxpayer has “at risk” is increased. Provided certain requirements are met, a taxpayer is considered “at risk” for the taxpayer’s share of any nonrecourse financing secured by real property where the real property is used in the taxpayer’s activity of “holding real property”; the holding of an OP Unit generally would constitute such an activity.
 
“Passive Activity Loss” Limitation.  The passive activity loss rules of section 469 of the Internal Revenue Code limit the use of losses derived from passive activities, which generally includes an investment in limited partnership interests such as the OP Units. If an investment in an OP Unit is treated as a passive activity, an OP unitholder who is an individual investor, as well as certain other types of investors, would not be able to use losses


73


Table of Contents

from Aimco OP to offset nonpassive activity income, including salary, business income, and portfolio income (e.g., dividends, interest, royalties, and gain on the disposition of portfolio investments) received during the taxable year. Passive activity losses that are disallowed for a particular taxable year may, however, be carried forward to offset passive activity income earned by the OP unitholder in future taxable years. In addition, such disallowed losses may be claimed as a deduction, subject to the basis and at risk limitations discussed above, upon a taxable disposition of an OP unitholder’s entire interest in Aimco OP, regardless of whether such OP unitholder has received any passive activity income during the year of disposition.
 
If Aimco OP were characterized as a publicly traded partnership, each OP unitholder would be required to treat any loss derived from Aimco OP separately from any income or loss derived from any other publicly traded partnership, as well as from income or loss derived from other passive activities. In such case, any net losses or credits attributable to Aimco OP which are carried forward may only be offset against future income of Aimco OP. Moreover, unlike other passive activity losses, suspended losses attributable to Aimco OP would only be allowed upon the complete disposition of the OP unitholder’s “entire interest” in Aimco OP.
 
Section 754 Election
 
Aimco OP has made the election permitted by section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code. Such election is irrevocable without the consent of the IRS. The election will generally permit a purchaser of OP Units, such as Aimco when it acquires OP Units from OP unitholders, to adjust its share of the basis in Aimco OP’s properties pursuant to section 743(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to fair market value (as reflected by the value of consideration paid for the OP Units), as if such purchaser had acquired a direct interest in Aimco OP’s assets. The section 743(b) adjustment is attributed solely to a purchaser of OP Units and is not added to the bases of Aimco OP’s assets associated with all of the OP unitholders in Aimco OP.
 
Depreciation
 
Section 168(i)(7) of the Internal Revenue Code provides that in the case of property transferred to a partnership in a section 721 transaction, the transferee shall be treated as the transferor for purposes of computing the depreciation deduction with respect to so much of the basis in the hands of the transferee as does not exceed the adjusted basis in the hands of the transferor. The effect of this rule would be to continue the historic basis, placed in service dates and methods with respect to the depreciation of any properties contributed to Aimco OP in exchange for OP Units. However, an acquirer of OP Units that obtains a section 743(b) adjustment by reason of such acquisition (see “Section 754 Election,” above) generally will be allowed depreciation with respect to such adjustment beginning as of the date of the exchange as if it were new property placed in service as of that date.
 
Sale, Redemption, Exchange or Abandonment of OP Units
 
An OP unitholder will recognize a gain or loss upon a sale of an OP Unit, a redemption of an OP Unit for cash, an exchange of an OP Unit for shares of common stock or other taxable disposition of an OP Unit. Gain or loss recognized upon a sale or exchange of an OP Unit will be equal to the difference between (i) the amount realized in the transaction (i.e., the sum of the cash and the fair market value of any property received for the OP Unit plus the amount of Aimco OP liabilities allocable to the OP Unit at such time) and (ii) the OP unitholder’s tax basis in the OP Unit disposed of, which tax basis will be adjusted for the OP unitholder’s allocable share of Aimco OP’s income or loss for the taxable year of the disposition. The tax liability resulting from the gain recognized on a disposition of an OP Unit could exceed the amount of cash and the fair market value of property received. If Aimco redeems less than all of an OP unitholder’s OP Units, the OP unitholder would recognize taxable gain only to the extent that the cash plus the amount of Aimco OP liabilities allocable to the redeemed OP Units, exceeded the OP unitholder’s adjusted tax basis in all of such OP unitholder’s OP Units immediately before the redemption.
 
Capital gains recognized by individuals and certain other noncorporate taxpayers upon the sale or disposition of an OP Unit will be subject to taxation at long-term capital gains rates if the OP Unit is held for more than 12 months and will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates if the OP Unit is held for 12 months or less. Generally, gain or loss recognized by an OP unitholder on the sale or other taxable disposition of an OP Unit will be taxable as capital gain or loss. However, to the extent that the amount realized upon the sale or other taxable disposition of an


74


Table of Contents

OP Unit attributable to an OP unitholder’s share of “unrealized receivables” of Aimco OP exceeds the basis attributable to those assets, such excess will be treated as ordinary income. Among other things, “unrealized receivables” include amounts attributable to previously claimed depreciation deductions on certain types of property. In addition, the maximum U.S. Federal income tax rate for net capital gains attributable to the sale of depreciable real property (which may be determined to include an interest in a partnership such as Aimco OP) held for more than 12 months is currently 25% (rather than 15%) to the extent of previously claimed depreciation deductions that would not be treated as “unrealized receivables.” See also “Disguised Sales Rules” above for sales integrated with the contribution of property for OP Units.
 
The law is currently uncertain regarding the treatment of an abandoned interest in a partnership, and whether an abandonment gives rise to a deductible loss is a question of fact. Prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application, effect and method of abandoning an interest in an OP Unit.
 
Alternative Minimum Tax
 
The Internal Revenue Code contains different sets of minimum tax rules applicable to corporate and noncorporate investors. The discussion below relates only to the alternative minimum tax applicable to noncorporate taxpayers. Accordingly, corporate investors should consult with their tax advisors with respect to the effect of the corporate minimum tax provisions that may be applicable to them. Noncorporate taxpayers are subject to an alternative minimum tax to the extent the tentative minimum tax exceeds the regular income tax otherwise payable. In general, alternative minimum taxable income (“AMTI”) consists of the taxpayer’s taxable income, determined with certain adjustments, plus his items of tax preference. For example, alternative minimum taxable income is calculated using an alternative cost recovery (depreciation) system that is not as favorable as the methods provided for under section 168 of the Internal Revenue Code which Aimco OP will use in computing its income for regular U.S. Federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, an OP unitholder’s AMTI derived from Aimco OP may be higher than such OP unitholder’s share of Aimco OP’s net taxable income. Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors as to the impact of an investment in OP Units on their liability for the alternative minimum tax.
 
Information Returns and Audit Procedures
 
Aimco OP will use all reasonable efforts to furnish to each OP unitholder as soon as possible after the close of each taxable year of Aimco OP, certain tax information, including a Schedule K-l, which sets forth each OP unitholder’s allocable share of Aimco OP’s Partnership Tax Items. In preparing this information the general partner will use various accounting and reporting conventions to determine the respective OP unitholder’s allocable share of Partnership Tax Items. The general partner cannot assure a current or prospective OP unitholder that the IRS will not successfully contend in court that such accounting and reporting conventions are impermissible.
 
No assurance can be given that Aimco OP will not be audited by the IRS or that tax adjustments will not be made. Further, any adjustments in Aimco OP’s tax returns will lead to adjustments in OP unitholders’ tax returns and may lead to audits of their returns and adjustments of items unrelated to Aimco OP. Each OP unitholder would bear the cost of any expenses incurred in connection with an examination of such OP unitholder’s personal tax return.
 
The tax treatment of Partnership Tax Items generally is determined at the partnership level in a unified partnership proceeding rather than in separate proceedings with the partners. The Internal Revenue Code provides for one partner to be designated as the Tax Matters Partner for these purposes.
 
The Tax Matters Partner is authorized, but not required, to take certain actions on behalf of Aimco OP and the OP unitholders and can extend the statute of limitations for assessment of tax deficiencies against OP unitholders with respect to Aimco OP Partnership Tax Items. The Tax Matters Partner may bind an OP unitholder with less than a 1% profits interest in Aimco OP to a settlement with the IRS, unless such OP unitholder elects, by filing a statement with the IRS, not to give such authority to the Tax Matters Partner. The Tax Matters Partner may seek judicial review (to which all the OP unitholders are bound) of a final partnership administrative adjustment; if the Tax Matters Partner fails to seek judicial review, such review may be sought by any OP unitholder having at least a 1% interest in the profits of Aimco OP or by OP unitholders having in the aggregate at least a 5% profits interest.


75


Table of Contents

However, only one action for judicial review will go forward, and each OP unitholder with an interest in the outcome may participate.
 
Taxation of Foreign OP Unitholders
 
A Non-U.S. OP unitholder (see the definition of “Non-U.S. Holder” above under the introductory paragraph) will generally be considered to be engaged in a U.S. trade or business on account of its ownership of an OP Unit. As a result, a Non-U.S. OP unitholder will be required to file U.S. Federal income tax returns with respect to its allocable share of Aimco OP’s income. A Non-U.S. OP unitholder that is a corporation may also be subject to U.S. branch profit tax at a rate of 30%, in addition to regular U.S. Federal income tax, on its allocable share of such income. Such a tax may be reduced or eliminated by an income tax treaty between the U.S. and the country with respect to which the Non-U.S. OP unitholder is resident for tax purposes. Non-U.S. OP unitholders are advised to consult their tax advisors regarding the effects an investment in Aimco OP may have on information return requirements and other U.S. and non-U.S. tax matters, including the tax consequences of an investment in Aimco OP for the country or other jurisdiction of which such Non-U.S. OP unitholder is a citizen or in which such Non-U.S. OP unitholder resides or is otherwise located.
 
Taxation of Aimco and Aimco Stockholders
 
Taxation of Aimco
 
The REIT provisions of the Internal Revenue Code are highly technical and complex. The following summary sets forth certain aspects of the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that govern the U.S. Federal income tax treatment of a REIT and its stockholders. This summary is qualified in its entirety by the applicable Internal Revenue Code provisions, Treasury Regulations, and administrative and judicial interpretations thereof, all of which are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect.
 
Aimco has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1994, and Aimco intends to continue such election. Although Aimco believes that, commencing with Aimco’s initial taxable year ended December 31, 1994, Aimco was organized in conformity with the requirements for qualification as a REIT, and its actual method of operation has enabled, and its proposed method of operation will enable, it to meet the requirements for qualification and taxation as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, no assurance can be given that Aimco has been or will remain so qualified. Such qualification and taxation as a REIT depends upon Aimco’s ability to meet, on a continuing basis, through actual annual operating results, asset ownership, distribution levels, and diversity of stock ownership, the various qualification tests imposed under the Internal Revenue Code as discussed below. No assurance can be given that the actual results of Aimco’s operation for any one taxable year will satisfy such requirements. See ‘” — Taxation of REITs in General — Failure to Qualify.” No assurance can be given that the IRS will not challenge Aimco’s eligibility for taxation as a REIT.
 
Taxation of REITs in General
 
Provided Aimco qualifies as a REIT, it will generally be entitled to a deduction for dividends that it pays and therefore will not be subject to U.S. Federal corporate income tax on its net income that is currently distributed to its stockholders. This deduction for dividends paid substantially eliminates the “double taxation” of corporate income (i.e., taxation at both the corporate and stockholder levels) that generally results from investment in a corporation. Rather, income generated by a REIT is generally taxed only at the stockholder level upon a distribution of dividends by the REIT.
 
For tax years through 2012, most domestic stockholders that are individuals, trusts or estates are taxed on corporate dividends at a maximum rate of 15% (the same as long-term capital gains). With limited exceptions, however, dividends received by stockholders from Aimco or from other entities that are taxed as REITs are generally not eligible for this rate, and will continue to be taxed at rates applicable to ordinary income. See “— Taxation of Stockholders — Taxable Domestic Stockholders — Distributions.”


76


Table of Contents

Net operating losses, foreign tax credits and other tax attributes of a REIT generally do not pass through to the stockholders of the REIT, subject to special rules for certain items such as capital gains recognized by REITs. See “— Taxation of Aimco and Aimco Stockholders — Taxation of Stockholders.”
 
If Aimco qualifies as a REIT, it will nonetheless be subject to U.S. Federal income tax in the following circumstances:
 
  •  Aimco will be taxed at regular corporate rates on any undistributed REIT taxable income, including undistributed net capital gains.
 
  •  A 100% excise tax may be imposed on some items of income and expense that are directly or constructively paid between Aimco and its taxable REIT subsidiaries (as described below) if and to the extent that the IRS successfully asserts that the economic arrangements between Aimco and its taxable REIT subsidiaries are not comparable to similar arrangements between unrelated parties.
 
  •  If Aimco has net income from prohibited transactions, which are, in general, sales or other dispositions of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, other than foreclosure property, such income will be subject to a 100% tax.
 
  •  If we elect to treat property that we acquire in connection with a foreclosure of a mortgage loan or certain leasehold terminations as “foreclosure property,” we may thereby avoid the 100% prohibited transactions tax on gain from a resale of that property (if the sale would otherwise constitute a prohibited transaction), but the income from the sale or operation of the property may be subject to corporate income tax at the highest applicable rate. We do not anticipate receiving any income from foreclosure property.
 
  •  If Aimco should fail to satisfy the 75% gross income test or the 95% gross income test (as discussed below), but nonetheless maintains its qualification as a REIT because certain other requirements have been met, it will be subject to a 100% tax on an amount based on the magnitude of the failure adjusted to reflect the profit margin associated with Aimco’s gross income.
 
  •  Similarly, if Aimco should fail to satisfy the asset test or other requirements applicable to REITs, as described below, yet nonetheless maintain its qualification as a REIT because there is reasonable cause for the failure and other applicable requirements are met, it may be subject to an excise tax. In that case, the amount of the tax will be at least $50,000 per failure, and, in the case of certain asset test failures, will be determined as the amount of net income generated by the assets in question multiplied by the highest corporate tax rate if that amount exceeds $50,000 per failure.
 
  •  If Aimco should fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of (i) 85% of its REIT ordinary income for such year, (ii) 95% of its REIT capital gain net income for such year, and (iii) any undistributed taxable income from prior periods, Aimco will be required to pay a 4% excise tax on the excess of the required distribution over the sum of (a) the amounts actually distributed, plus (b) retained amounts on which income tax is paid at the corporate level.
 
  •  Aimco may be required to pay monetary penalties to the IRS in certain circumstances, including if it fails to meet the record keeping requirements intended to monitor its compliance with rules relating to the composition of a REIT’s stockholders, as described below in “— Tax Aspects of Aimco’s Investments in Partnership — General.”
 
  •  If Aimco acquires appreciated assets from a corporation that is not a REIT (i.e., a “subchapter C corporation”) in a transaction in which the adjusted tax basis of the assets in the hands of Aimco is determined by reference to the adjusted tax basis of the assets in the hands of the subchapter C corporation, Aimco may be subject to tax on such appreciation at the highest corporate income tax rate then applicable if Aimco subsequently recognizes gain on the disposition of any such asset during the ten-year period following its acquisition from the subchapter C corporation.
 
  •  Certain of Aimco’s subsidiaries are subchapter C corporations, the earnings of which could be subject to U.S. Federal corporate income tax.


77


Table of Contents

 
  •  Aimco may be subject to the “alternative minimum tax” on its items of tax preference, including any deductions of net operating losses.
 
  •  Aimco and its subsidiaries may be subject to a variety of taxes, including state, local and foreign income taxes, property taxes and other taxes on their assets and operations. Aimco could also be subject to tax in situations and on transactions not presently contemplated.
 
Requirements for Qualification
 
The Internal Revenue Code defines a REIT as a corporation, trust or association:
 
1. that is managed by one or more trustees or directors;
 
2. the beneficial ownership of which is evidenced by transferable shares, or by transferable certificates of beneficial interest;
 
3. that would be taxable as a domestic corporation, but for the special Internal Revenue Code provisions applicable to REITs;
 
4. that is neither a financial institution nor an insurance company subject to certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code;
 
5. the beneficial ownership of which is held by 100 or more persons;
 
6. in which, during the last half of each taxable year, not more than 50% in value of the outstanding stock is owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined in the Internal Revenue Code to include certain entities and as determined by applying certain attribution rules); and
 
7. that meets other tests described below (including with respect to the nature of its income and assets).
 
The Internal Revenue Code provides that conditions (1) through (4) must be met during the entire taxable year, and that the condition (5) must be met during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months, or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year.
 
Aimco believes that it has been organized, has operated and has issued sufficient shares of stock to satisfy conditions (1) through (7) inclusive. Aimco’s articles of incorporation provide certain restrictions regarding transfers of its shares, which are intended to assist Aimco in satisfying the share ownership requirements described in conditions (5) and (6) above. These restrictions, however, may not ensure that Aimco will, in all cases, be able to satisfy the share ownership requirements described in (5) and (6) above.
 
To monitor Aimco’s compliance with the share ownership requirements, Aimco is generally required to maintain records regarding the actual ownership of its shares. To do so, Aimco must demand written statements each year from the record holders of certain percentages of its stock in which the record holders are to disclose the actual owners of the shares (i.e., the persons required to include in gross income the dividends paid by Aimco). A list of those persons failing or refusing to comply with this demand must be maintained as part of Aimco’s records. Failure by Aimco to comply with these record keeping requirements could subject it to monetary penalties. A stockholder who fails or refuses to comply with the demand is required by the Treasury Regulations to submit a statement with its tax return disclosing the actual ownership of the shares and certain other information.
 
In addition, a corporation generally may not elect to become a REIT unless its taxable year is the calendar year. Aimco satisfies this requirement.
 
Effect of Subsidiary Entities
 
Ownership of Partnership Interests.  In the case of a REIT that is a partner in a partnership, the Treasury Regulations provide that the REIT is deemed to own its proportionate share of the partnership’s assets and to earn its proportionate share of the partnership’s income for purposes of the asset and gross income tests applicable to REITs as described below. Similarly, the assets and gross income of the partnership are deemed to retain the same character in the hands of the REIT. Thus, Aimco’s proportionate share of the assets, liabilities and items of income of Aimco OP and the Subsidiary Partnerships will be treated as assets, liabilities and items of income of Aimco for purposes of


78


Table of Contents

applying the REIT requirements described below. A summary of certain rules governing the Federal income taxation of partnerships and their partners is provided below in ‘‘ — Tax Aspects of Aimco’s Investments in Partnerships.”
 
Disregarded Subsidiaries.  Aimco’s indirect interests in Aimco OP and other Subsidiary Partnerships are held through wholly-owned corporate subsidiaries of Aimco organized and operated as “qualified REIT subsidiaries” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code. A qualified REIT subsidiary is any corporation, other than a “taxable REIT subsidiary” as described below, that is wholly-owned by a REIT, or by other disregarded subsidiaries, or by a combination of the two. If a REIT owns a qualified REIT subsidiary, that subsidiary is disregarded for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, and all assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the subsidiary are treated as assets, liabilities and items of income, deduction and credit of the REIT itself, including for purposes of the gross income and asset tests applicable to REITs as summarized below. Each qualified REIT subsidiary, therefore, is not subject to U.S. Federal corporate income taxation, although it may be subject to state or local taxation. Other entities that are wholly-owned by a REIT, including single member limited liability companies, are also generally disregarded as separate entities for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, including for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests. Disregarded subsidiaries, along with partnerships in which Aimco holds an equity interest, are sometimes referred to herein as “pass-through subsidiaries.”
 
In the event that a disregarded subsidiary of Aimco ceases to be wholly-owned — for example, if any equity interest in the subsidiary is acquired by a person other than Aimco or another disregarded subsidiary of Aimco — the subsidiary’s separate existence would no longer be disregarded for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. Instead, it would have multiple owners and would be treated as either a partnership or a taxable corporation. Such an event could, depending on the circumstances, adversely affect Aimco’s ability to satisfy the various asset and gross income requirements applicable to REITs, including the requirement that REITs generally may not own, directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the securities of another corporation. See “— Asset Tests” and “— Income Tests.”
 
Taxable Subsidiaries.  A REIT, in general, may jointly elect with a subsidiary corporation, whether or not wholly-owned, to treat the subsidiary corporation as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). A TRS also includes any corporation, other than a REIT, with respect to which a TRS in which a REIT owns an interest owns securities possessing 35% of the total voting power or total value of the outstanding securities of such corporation. The separate existence of a TRS or other taxable corporation, unlike a disregarded subsidiary as discussed above, is not ignored for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. As a result, a parent REIT is not treated as holding the assets of a TRS or as receiving any income that the TRS earns. Rather, the stock issued by the TRS is an asset in the hands of the parent REIT, and the REIT recognizes as income, the dividends, if any, that it receives from the subsidiary. This treatment can affect the income and asset test calculations that apply to the REIT, as described below. Because a parent REIT does not include the assets and income of such subsidiary corporations in determining the parent’s compliance with the REIT requirements, such entities may be used by the parent REIT to indirectly undertake activities that the REIT rules might otherwise preclude it from doing directly or through pass-through subsidiaries (for example, activities that give rise to certain categories of income such as management fees or foreign currency gains). As a taxable corporation, a TRS is required to pay regular U.S. Federal income tax, and state and local income tax where applicable.
 
Certain of Aimco’s operations (including certain of its property management, asset management, risk management, etc.) are conducted through its TRSs. Because Aimco is not required to include the assets and income of such TRSs in determining Aimco’s compliance with the REIT requirements, Aimco uses its TRSs to facilitate its ability to offer services and activities to its residents that are not generally considered as qualifying REIT services and activities. If Aimco fails to properly structure and provide such nonqualifying services and activities through its TRSs, its ability to satisfy the REIT gross income requirement, and also its REIT status, may be jeopardized.
 
A TRS may generally engage in any business except the operation or management of a lodging or health care facility. The operation or management of a health care or lodging facility precludes a corporation from qualifying as a TRS. If any of Aimco’s TRSs were deemed to operate or manage a health care or lodging facility, such TRSs would fail to qualify as taxable REIT subsidiaries, and Aimco would fail to qualify as a REIT. Aimco believes that none of its TRSs operate or manage any health care or lodging facilities. However, the statute provides little guidance as to the definition of a health care or lodging facility. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS


79


Table of Contents

will not contend that an Aimco’s TRS operates or manages a health care or lodging facility, disqualifying it from treatment as a TRS, and thereby resulting in the disqualification of Aimco as a REIT.
 
Several provisions of the Internal Revenue Code regarding arrangements between a REIT and a TRS seek to ensure that a TRS will be subject to an appropriate level of Federal income taxation. For example, a TRS is limited in its ability to deduct interest payments made to its REIT owner. In addition, Aimco would be obligated to pay a 100% penalty tax on certain payments that it receives from, or on certain expenses deducted by, a TRS, if the IRS were to successfully assert that the economic arrangements between Aimco and the taxable REIT subsidiary were not comparable to similar arrangements among unrelated parties.
 
A portion of the amounts to be used to fund distributions to stockholders may come from distributions made by Aimco’s TRSs to Aimco OP, and interest paid by the TRSs on certain notes held by Aimco OP. In general, TRSs pay Federal, state and local income taxes on their taxable income at normal corporate rates. Any Federal, state or local income taxes that Aimco’s TRSs are required to pay will reduce Aimco’s cash flow from operating activities and its ability to make payments to holders of its securities.
 
Income Tests
 
In order to maintain qualification as a REIT, Aimco annually must satisfy two gross income requirements:
 
  •  First, at least 75% of Aimco’s gross income for each taxable year, excluding gross income from sales of inventory or dealer property in “prohibited transactions,” must be derived from investments relating to real property or mortgages on real property, including “rents from real property,” dividends received from other REITs, interest income derived from mortgage loans secured by real property, and gains from the sale of real estate assets, as well as certain types of temporary investments.
 
  •  Second, at least 95% of Aimco’s gross income for each taxable year, excluding gross income from prohibited transactions, must be derived from some combination of such income from investments in real property (i.e., income that qualifies under the 75% income test described above), as well as other dividends, interest and gains from the sale or disposition of stock or securities, which need not have any relation to real property.
 
Rents received by Aimco directly or through Aimco OP or the Subsidiary Partnerships will qualify as “rents from real property” in satisfying the gross income requirements described above, only if several conditions are met. If rent is partly attributable to personal property leased in connection with a lease of real property, the portion of the total rent attributable to the personal property will not qualify as “rents from real property” unless it constitutes 15% or less of the total rent received under the lease. Moreover the REIT generally must not operate or manage the property (subject to certain exceptions) or furnish or render services to the tenants of such property, other than through an “independent contractor” from which the REIT derives no revenue. Aimco and its affiliates are permitted, however, to directly perform services that are “usually or customarily rendered” in connection with the rental of space for occupancy only and are not otherwise considered rendered to the occupant of the property. In addition, Aimco and its affiliates may directly or indirectly provide non-customary services to tenants of its properties without disqualifying all of the rent from the property if the payment for such services does not exceed 1% of the total gross income from the property. For purposes of this test, the income received from such non-customary services is deemed to be at least 150% of the direct cost of providing the services. Moreover, Aimco is generally permitted to provide services to tenants or others through a TRS without disqualifying the rental income received from tenants for purposes of the REIT income requirements.
 
Aimco manages apartment properties for third parties and affiliates through its TRSs. These TRSs receive management fees and other income. A portion of such fees and other income accrue to Aimco through distributions from the TRSs that are classified as dividend income to the extent of the earnings and profits of the TRSs. Such distributions will generally qualify for purposes of the 95% gross income test but not for purposes of the 75% gross income test. Any dividend Aimco receives from a REIT, however, will be qualifying income in Aimco’s hands for purposes of both the 95% and 75% income tests.
 
Any income or gain derived by Aimco directly or through Aimco OP or the Subsidiary Partnerships from instruments that hedge certain risks, such as the risk of changes in interest rates, will not constitute gross income for


80


Table of Contents

purposes of the 75% or 95% gross income tests, provided that specified requirements are met. Such requirements include that the instrument hedge risks associated with indebtedness issued by Aimco, Aimco OP or the Subsidiary Partnerships that is incurred to acquire or carry “real estate assets” (as described below under “— Asset Tests”), and the instrument is properly identified as a hedge, along with the risk that it hedges, within prescribed time periods.
 
If Aimco fails to satisfy one or both of the 75% or 95% gross income tests for any taxable year, it may nevertheless qualify as a REIT for the year if it is entitled to relief under certain provisions of the Internal Revenue Code. These relief provisions will be generally available if Aimco’s failure to meet these tests was due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect, and Aimco attaches a schedule of the sources of its income to its tax return. It is not possible to state whether Aimco would be entitled to the benefit of these relief provisions in all circumstances. If these relief provisions are inapplicable to a particular set of circumstances involving Aimco, Aimco will not qualify as a REIT. Even where these relief provisions apply, the Internal Revenue Code imposes a tax based upon the amount by which Aimco fails to satisfy the particular gross income test.
 
Asset Tests
 
Aimco, at the close of each calendar quarter of its taxable year, must also satisfy four tests relating to the nature of its assets:
 
  •  First, at least 75% of the value of the total assets of Aimco must be represented by some combination of “real estate assets,” cash, cash items, U.S. government securities, and under some circumstances, stock or debt instruments purchased with new capital. For this purpose, “real estate assets” include interests in real property, such as land, buildings, leasehold interests in real property, stock of other corporations that qualify as REITs, and some kinds of mortgage backed securities and mortgage loans. Assets that do not qualify for purposes of the 75% test are subject to the additional asset tests described below.
 
  •  Second, not more than 25% of Aimco’s total assets may be represented by securities other than those in the 75% asset class.
 
  •  Third, of the investments included in the 25% asset class, the value of any one issuer’s securities owned by Aimco may not exceed 5% of the value of Aimco’s total assets, Aimco may not own more than 10% of any one issuer’s outstanding voting securities, and, subject to certain exceptions, Aimco may not own more than 10% of the total value of the outstanding securities of any one issuer. The 5% and 10% asset tests do not apply to securities of TRSs.
 
  •  Fourth, the aggregate value of all securities of TRSs held by Aimco may not exceed 25% of the value of Aimco’s total assets.
 
Aimco believes that the value of the securities held by Aimco in its TRSs will not exceed, in the aggregate, 25% of the value of Aimco’s total assets and that Aimco’s ownership interests in its TRSs qualify under the asset tests set forth above.
 
Notwithstanding the general rule that a REIT is treated as owning its share of the underlying assets of a subsidiary partnership for purposes of the REIT income and asset tests, if a REIT holds indebtedness issued by a partnership, the indebtedness will be subject to, and may cause a violation of, the asset tests, resulting in loss of REIT status, unless it is a qualifying mortgage asset satisfying the rules for “straight debt,” or is sufficiently small so as not to otherwise cause an asset test violation. Similarly, although stock of another REIT is a qualifying asset for purposes of the REIT asset tests, non-mortgage debt held by Aimco that is issued by another REIT may not so qualify.
 
Certain securities will not cause a violation of the 10% value test described above. Such securities include instruments that constitute “straight debt,” which includes, among other things, securities having certain contingency features. A security does not qualify as “straight debt” where a REIT (or a controlled TRS of the REIT) owns other securities of the same issuer which do not qualify as straight debt, unless the value of those other securities constitute, in the aggregate, 1% or less of the total value of that issuer’s outstanding securities. In addition to straight debt, the Internal Revenue Code provides that certain other securities will not violate the 10% value test. Such securities include (a) any loan made to an individual or an estate, (b) certain rental agreements in which one or more


81


Table of Contents

payments are to be made in subsequent years (other than agreements between a REIT and certain persons related to the REIT), (c) any obligation to pay rents from real property, (d) securities issued by governmental entities that are not dependent in whole or in part on the profits of (or payments made by) a non-governmental entity, (e) any security issued by another REIT, and (f) any debt instrument issued by a partnership if the partnership’s income is of a nature that it would satisfy the 75% gross income test described above under “— Income Tests.” In applying the 10% value test, a debt security issued by a partnership is not taken into account to the extent, if any, of the REIT’s proportionate equity interest in that partnership.
 
Aimco believes that its holdings of securities and other assets comply, and will continue to comply, with the foregoing REIT asset requirements, and it intends to monitor compliance on an ongoing basis. No independent appraisals have been obtained, however, to support Aimco’s conclusions as to the value of its assets, including Aimco OP’s total assets and the value of Aimco OP’s interest in the TRSs. Moreover, values of some assets may not be susceptible to a precise determination, and values are subject to change in its future. Furthermore, the proper classification of an instrument as debt or equity for U.S. Federal income tax purposes may be uncertain in some circumstances, which could affect the application of the REIT asset requirements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the IRS will not contend that Aimco’s interests in its subsidiaries or in the securities of other issuers will cause a violation of the REIT asset requirements and loss of REIT status.
 
Certain relief provisions are available to allow REITs to satisfy the asset requirements or to maintain REIT qualification notwithstanding certain violations of the asset and other requirements. One such provision allows a REIT which fails one or more of the asset tests to nevertheless maintain its REIT qualification if (a) it provides the IRS with a description of each asset causing the failure, (b) the failure is due to reasonable cause and not willful neglect, (c) the REIT pays a tax equal to the greater of (i) $50,000 per failure, and (ii) the product of the net income generated by the assets that caused the failure multiplied by the highest applicable corporate tax rate, and (d) the REIT either disposes of the assets causing the failure within 6 months after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the failure, or otherwise satisfies the relevant asset tests within that time frame.
 
A second relief provision contained in the Internal Revenue Code applies to de minimis violations of the 10% and 5% asset tests. A REIT may maintain its qualification despite a violation of such requirements if (a) the value of the assets causing the violation do not exceed the lesser of 1% of the REIT’s total assets, and $10,000,000, and (b) the REIT either disposes of the assets causing the failure within 6 months after the last day of the quarter in which it identifies the failure, or the relevant tests are otherwise satisfied within that time frame.
 
If we should fail to satisfy the asset tests at the end of a calendar quarter, such a failure would not cause us to lose our REIT status if we (1) satisfied the asset tests at the close of the preceding calendar quarter and (2) the discrepancy between the value of our assets and the asset test requirements was not wholly or partly caused by an acquisition of non-qualifying assets, but instead arose from changes in the market value of our assets. If the condition described in (2) were not satisfied, we still could avoid disqualification by eliminating any discrepancy within 30 days after the close of the calendar quarter in which it arose.
 
Annual Distribution Requirements
 
In order for Aimco to qualify as a REIT, Aimco is required to distribute dividends, other than capital gain dividends, to its stockholders in an amount at least equal to:
 
  •  the sum of
 
(a) 90% of Aimco’s “REIT taxable income”, computed without regard to the deduction for dividends paid and net capital gain of Aimco, and
 
(b) 90% of the net income, if any, from foreclosure property (as described below), minus
 
  •  the sum of certain items of noncash income.
 
These distributions must be paid in the taxable year to which they relate, or in the following taxable year if they are declared in October, November, or December of the taxable year, are payable to stockholders of record on a specified date in any such month, and are actually paid before the end of January of the following year. In order for distributions to be counted for this purpose, and to give rise to a tax deduction by Aimco, they must not be


82


Table of Contents

“preferential dividends.” A dividend is not a preferential dividend if it is pro rata among all outstanding shares of stock within a particular class, and is in accordance with the preferences among different classes of stock as set forth in Aimco’s organizational documents.
 
To the extent that Aimco distributes at least 90%, but less than 100%, of its “REIT taxable income,” as adjusted, it will be subject to tax thereon at ordinary corporate tax rates. In any year, Aimco may elect to retain, rather than distribute, its net capital gain and pay tax on such gain. In such a case, Aimco’s stockholders would include their proportionate share of such undistributed long-term capital gain in income and receive a corresponding credit for their share of the tax paid by Aimco. Aimco’s stockholders would then increase the adjusted basis of their Aimco shares by the difference between the designated amounts included in their long-term capital gains and the tax deemed paid with respect to their shares.
 
To the extent that a REIT has available net operating losses carried forward from prior tax years, such losses may reduce the amount of distributions that it must make in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. Such losses, however, will generally not affect the character, in the hands of stockholders, of any distributions that are actually made by the REIT, which are generally taxable to stockholders to the extent that the REIT has current or accumulated earnings and profits. See “— Taxation of Stockholders— Taxable Domestic Stockholders — Distributions.”
 
If Aimco should fail to distribute during each calendar year at least the sum of:
 
  •  85% of its REIT ordinary income for such year,
 
  •  95% of its REIT capital gain net income for such year (excluding retained net capital gain), and
 
  •  any undistributed taxable income from prior periods,
 
Aimco would be subject to a 4% excise tax on the excess of such required distribution over the sum of (x) the amounts actually distributed, and (y) the amounts of income retained on which it has paid corporate income tax.
 
It is possible that Aimco, from time to time, may not have sufficient cash to meet the 90% distribution requirement due to timing differences between (i) the actual receipt of cash (including receipt of distributions from Aimco OP) and (ii) the inclusion of certain items in income by Aimco for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. In the event that such timing differences occur, in order to meet the distribution requirements, Aimco may find it necessary to arrange for short-term, or possibly long-term, borrowings, or to pay dividends in the form of taxable in-kind distributions of property.
 
Under certain circumstances, Aimco may be able to rectify a failure to meet the distribution requirement for a year by paying “deficiency dividends” to stockholders in a later year, which may be included in Aimco’s deduction for dividends paid for the earlier year. In this case, Aimco may be able to avoid losing its REIT status or being taxed on amounts distributed as deficiency dividends; however, Aimco will be required to pay interest and a penalty based on the amount of any deduction taken for deficiency dividends.
 
Prohibited Transactions
 
Net income derived by a REIT from a prohibited transaction is subject to a 100% excise tax. The term “prohibited transaction” generally includes a sale or other disposition of property (other than foreclosure property) that is held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. Aimco intends to conduct its operations so that no asset owned by Aimco or its pass-through subsidiaries will be held for sale to customers, and that a sale of any such asset will not be in the ordinary course of Aimco’s business. Whether property is held “primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business” depends, however, on the particular facts and circumstances. No assurance can be given that no property sold by Aimco will be treated as property held for sale to customers, or that Aimco can comply with certain safe-harbor provisions of the Internal Revenue Code that would prevent the imposition of the 100% excise tax. The 100% tax does not apply to gains from the sale of property that is held through a TRS or other taxable corporation, although such income will be subject to tax in the hands of the corporation at regular corporate rates.


83


Table of Contents

Penalty Tax
 
Aimco will be subject to a 100% penalty tax on the amount of certain non-arm’s length payments received from, or certain expenses deducted by, a TRS if the IRS were to successfully assert that the economic arrangements between Aimco and such TRS are not comparable to similar transactions between unrelated parties. Such amounts may include rents from real property that are overstated as a result of services furnished by a TRS to tenants of Aimco and amounts that are deducted by a TRS for payments made to Aimco that are in excess of the amounts that would have been charged by an unrelated party.
 
Aimco believes that the fees paid to its TRSs for tenant services are comparable to the fees that would be paid to an unrelated third party negotiating at arm’s-length. This determination, however, is inherently factual, and the IRS may assert that the fees paid by Aimco do not represent arm’s-length amounts. If the IRS successfully made such an assertion, Aimco would be required to pay a 100% penalty tax on the excess of an arm’s-length fee for tenant services over the amount actually paid.
 
Failure to Qualify
 
If Aimco fails to qualify for taxation as a REIT in any taxable year, and the relief provisions do not apply, Aimco will be subject to tax, including any applicable alternative minimum tax, on its taxable income at regular corporate rates. Distributions to stockholders in any year in which Aimco fails to qualify will not be deductible by Aimco nor will they be required to be made. In such event, to the extent of current and accumulated earnings and profits, all distributions to stockholders that are individuals will generally be taxable at the preferential income tax rates (i.e., the 15% maximum federal rate through 2012) for qualified dividends. In addition, subject to the limitations of the Internal Revenue Code, corporate distributees may be eligible for the dividends received deduction. Unless Aimco is entitled to relief under specific statutory provisions, Aimco would also be disqualified from re-electing to be taxed as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification was lost. It is not possible to state whether, in all circumstances, Aimco would be entitled to this statutory relief.
 
Tax Aspects of Aimco’s Investments in Partnerships
 
General
 
Substantially all of Aimco’s investments are held indirectly through Aimco OP. In general, partnerships are “pass-through” entities that are not subject to U.S. Federal income tax. Rather, partners are allocated their proportionate shares of the items of income, gain, loss, deduction and credit of a partnership, and are potentially subject to tax on these items, without regard to whether the partners receive a distribution from the partnership. Aimco will include in its income its proportionate share of the foregoing partnership items for purposes of the various REIT income tests and in the computation of its REIT taxable income. Moreover, for purposes of the REIT asset tests, Aimco will include its proportionate share of assets held by Aimco OP and the Subsidiary Partnerships. See ‘‘ — Taxation of REITs in General — Effect of Subsidiary Entities — Ownership of Partnership Interests.”
 
Entity Classification
 
Aimco’s direct and indirect investment in partnerships involves special tax considerations, including the possibility of a challenge by the IRS of the tax status of Aimco OP or any of the Subsidiary Partnerships as a partnership for U.S. Federal income tax purposes. If any of these entities were treated as an association for U.S. Federal income tax purposes, it would be taxable as a corporation and therefore could be subject to an entity-level tax on its income. In such a situation, the character of Aimco’s assets and items of gross income would change and could preclude Aimco from satisfying the REIT asset tests and gross income tests (see “— Taxation of REITs in General — Asset Tests” and “— Taxation of REITs in General — Income Tests”), and in turn could prevent Aimco from qualifying as a REIT unless Aimco is eligible for relief from the violation pursuant to relief provisions described above. See “— Taxation of REITs in General — Failure to Qualify” above for a summary of the effect of Aimco’s failure to satisfy the REIT tests for a taxable year, and of the relief provisions. In addition, any change in the status of any of the Subsidiary Partnerships for tax purposes might be treated as a taxable event, in which case Aimco might incur a tax liability without any related cash distributions.


84


Table of Contents

Tax Allocations with Respect to the Properties
 
Under the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations, income, gain, loss and deduction attributable to appreciated or depreciated property that is contributed to a partnership in exchange for an interest in the partnership must be allocated for tax purposes in a manner such that the contributing partner is charged with, or benefits from the unrealized gain or unrealized loss associated with the property at the time of the contribution. The amount of the unrealized gain or unrealized loss is generally equal to the difference between the fair market value of the contributed property at the time of contribution, and the adjusted tax basis of such property at the time of contribution (a “Book — Tax Difference”). Such allocations are solely for U.S. Federal income tax purposes and do not affect the book capital accounts or other economic or legal arrangements among the partners. Aimco OP was formed by way of contributions of appreciated property. Consequently, allocations must be made in a manner consistent with these requirements. Where a partner contributes cash to a partnership at a time that the partnership holds appreciated (or depreciated) property, the Treasury Regulations provide for a similar allocation of these items to the other (i.e., non-contributing) partners. These rules apply to the contribution by Aimco to Aimco OP of the cash proceeds received in any offerings of its stock.
 
In general, certain unitholders will be allocated lower amounts of depreciation deductions for tax purposes and increased taxable income and gain on the sale by Aimco OP or other Subsidiary Partnerships of the contributed properties. This will tend to eliminate the Book-Tax Difference over the life of these partnerships. However, the special allocations do not always entirely rectify the Book-Tax Difference on an annual basis or with respect to a specific taxable transaction such as a sale. Thus, the carryover basis of the contributed properties in the hands of Aimco OP or other Subsidiary Partnerships may cause Aimco to be allocated lower depreciation and other deductions, and possibly greater amounts of taxable income in the event of a sale of such contributed assets in excess of the economic or book income allocated to it as a result of such sale. This may cause Aimco to recognize, over time, taxable income in excess of cash proceeds, which might adversely affect Aimco’s ability to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. See “— Taxation of REITs in General — Annual Distribution Requirements.”
 
With respect to any property purchased or to be purchased by any of the Subsidiary Partnerships (other than through the issuance of units) subsequent to the formation of Aimco, such property will initially have a tax basis equal to its fair market value and the special allocation provisions described above will not apply.
 
Sale of the Properties
 
Aimco’s share of any gain realized by Aimco OP or any other Subsidiary Partnership on the sale of any property held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business will be treated as income from a prohibited transaction that is subject to a 100% penalty tax. See ‘‘— Taxation of REITs in General — Prohibited Transactions.” Under existing law, whether property is held as inventory or primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a partnership’s trade or business is a question of fact that depends on all the facts and circumstances with respect to the particular transaction. Aimco OP and the other Subsidiary Partnerships intend to hold their properties for investment with a view to long-term appreciation, to engage in the business of acquiring, developing, owning and operating the properties and to make such occasional sales of the properties, including peripheral land, as are consistent with Aimco’s investment objectives.
 
Taxation of Stockholders
 
Taxable Domestic Stockholders
 
Distributions.  Provided that Aimco qualifies as a REIT, distributions made to Aimco’s taxable domestic stockholders out of current or accumulated earnings and profits (and not designated as capital gain dividends) will generally be taken into account by them as ordinary income and will not be eligible for the dividends received deduction for corporations. With limited exceptions, dividends received from REITs are not eligible for taxation at the preferential income tax rates for qualified dividends received by individuals from taxable C corporations. Stockholders that are individuals, however, are taxed at the preferential rates on dividends designated by and received from REITs to the extent that the dividends are attributable to (i) income retained by the REIT in the prior taxable year on which the REIT was subject to corporate level income tax (less the amount of tax), (ii) dividends received by the REIT from TRSs or other taxable C corporations, or (iii) income in the prior taxable year from the


85


Table of Contents

sales of “built-in gain” property acquired by the REIT from C corporations in carryover basis transactions (less the amount of corporate tax on such income).
 
Distributions (and retained net capital gains) that are designated as capital gain dividends will generally be taxed to stockholders as long-term capital gains, to the extent that they do not exceed Aimco’s actual net capital gain for the taxable year, without regard to the period for which the stockholder has held its stock. However, corporate stockholders may be required to treat up to 20% of certain capital gain dividends as ordinary income. Long-term capital gains are generally taxable at maximum Federal rates of 15% through 2012 in the case of stockholders who are individuals, and 35% in the case of stockholders that are corporations. Capital gains attributable to the sale of depreciable real property held for more than 12 months are subject to a 25% maximum U.S. Federal income tax rate for taxpayers who are individuals, to the extent of previously claimed depreciation deductions.
 
Aimco may elect to retain and pay taxes on some or all of its net long term capital gain, in which case U.S. stockholders will be treated as having received, solely for U.S. federal income tax purposes, Aimco’s undistributed capital gain as well as a corresponding credit or refund, as the case may be, for taxes that Aimco paid on such undistributed capital gain. See “— Taxation of REITs in General — Annual Distribution Requirements.”
 
In determining the extent to which a distribution constitutes a dividend for tax purposes, Aimco’s earnings and profits generally will be allocated first to distributions with respect to preferred stock prior to allocating any remaining earnings and profits to distributions on Aimco’s common stock. If Aimco has net capital gains and designates some or all of its distributions as capital gain dividends to that extent, the capital gain dividends will be allocated among different classes of stock in proportion to the allocation of earnings and profits as described above.
 
Distributions in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits will not be taxable to a stockholder to the extent that they do not exceed the adjusted basis of the stockholder’s shares in respect of which the distributions were made, but rather will reduce the adjusted basis of such shares. To the extent that such distributions exceed the adjusted basis of a stockholder’s shares, they will be included in income as long-term capital gain, or short-term capital gain if the shares have been held for one year or less. In addition, any dividend declared by Aimco in October, November or December of any year and payable to a stockholder of record on a specified date in any such month will be treated as both paid by Aimco and received by the stockholder on December 31 of such year, provided that the dividend is actually paid by Aimco before the end of January of the following calendar year.
 
To the extent that a REIT has available net operating losses and capital losses carried forward from prior tax years, such losses may reduce the amount of distributions that must be made in order to comply with the REIT distribution requirements. See “— Taxation of REITs in General — Annual Distribution Requirements.” Such losses, however, are not passed through to stockholders and do not offset income of stockholders from other sources, nor would they affect the character of any distributions that are actually made by a REIT, which are generally subject to tax in the hands of stockholders to the extent that the REIT has current or accumulated earnings and profits.
 
Dispositions of Aimco Stock.  A stockholder will realize gain or loss upon the sale, redemption or other taxable disposition of stock in an amount equal to the difference between the sum of the fair market value of any property and cash received in such disposition, and the stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in the stock at the time of the disposition. In general, a stockholder’s tax basis will equal the stockholder’s acquisition cost, increased by the excess of net capital gains deemed distributed to the stockholder (as discussed above), less tax deemed paid on such net capital gains, and reduced by returns of capital. In general, capital gains recognized by individuals upon the sale or disposition of shares of Aimco stock will be subject to a taxation at long term capital gains rates if the Aimco stock is held for more than 12 months, and will be taxed at ordinary income rates if the Aimco stock is held for 12 months or less. Gains recognized by stockholders that are corporations are currently subject to U.S. Federal income tax at a maximum rate of 35%, whether or not classified as long-term capital gains. Capital losses recognized by a stockholder upon the disposition of Aimco stock held for more than one year at the time of disposition will be considered long-term capital losses, and are generally available only to offset capital gain income of the stockholder but not ordinary income (except in the case of individuals, who may offset up to $3,000 of ordinary income each year). In addition, any loss upon a sale or exchange of shares of Aimco stock by a stockholder who has held the shares for six months or less, after applying holding period rules, will be treated as a long-term


86


Table of Contents

capital loss to the extent of distributions received from Aimco that are required to be treated by the stockholder as long-term capital gain.
 
A redemption of Aimco stock (including preferred stock or equity stock) will be treated under section 302 of the Internal Revenue Code as a dividend subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates (to the extent of Aimco’s current or accumulated earnings and profits), unless the redemption satisfies certain tests set forth in section 302(b) of the Internal Revenue Code enabling the redemption to be treated as a sale or exchange of the stock. The redemption will satisfy such test if it (i) is “substantially disproportionate” with respect to the holder (which will not be the case if only the preferred stock is redeemed, since it generally does not have voting rights), (ii) results in a “complete termination” of the holder’s stock interest in Aimco, or (iii) is “not essentially equivalent to a dividend” with respect to the holder, all within the meaning of section 302(b) of the Internal Revenue Code. In determining whether any of these tests have been met, shares considered to be owned by the holder by reason of certain constructive ownership rules set forth in the Internal Revenue Code, as well as shares actually owned, must generally be taken into account. Because the determination as to whether any of the alternative tests of section 302(b) of the Internal Revenue Code is satisfied with respect to any particular holder of the stock will depend upon the facts and circumstances as of the time the determination is made, prospective investors are advised to consult their own tax advisors to determine such tax treatment. If a redemption of the stock is treated as a distribution that is taxable as a dividend, the amount of the distribution would be measured by the amount of cash and the fair market value of any property received by the stockholders. The stockholder’s adjusted tax basis in such redeemed stock would be transferred to the holder’s remaining stockholdings in Aimco. If, however, the stockholder has no remaining stockholdings in Aimco, such basis may, under certain circumstances, be transferred to a related person or it may be lost entirely.
 
If an investor recognizes a loss upon a subsequent disposition of stock or other securities of Aimco in an amount that exceeds a prescribed threshold, it is possible that the provisions of the Treasury Regulations involving “reportable transactions” could apply, with a resulting requirement to separately disclose the loss generating transaction to the IRS. While these Treasury Regulations are directed towards “tax shelters,” they are written quite broadly, and apply to transactions that would not typically be considered tax shelters. In addition, the Internal Revenue Code imposes penalties for failure to comply with these requirements. Prospective investors should consult their tax advisors concerning any possible disclosure obligation with respect to the receipt or disposition of stock or securities of Aimco, or transactions that might be undertaken directly or indirectly by Aimco. Moreover, prospective investors should be aware that Aimco and other participants in the transactions involving Aimco (including their advisors) might be subject to disclosure or other requirements pursuant to these Treasury Regulations
 
Taxation of Foreign Stockholders
 
The following is a summary of certain anticipated U.S. Federal income and estate tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of Aimco stock applicable to Non-U.S. Holders of securities. The discussion is based on current law and is for general information only. The discussion addresses only certain and not all aspects of U.S. Federal income and estate taxation.
 
Ordinary Dividends.  The portion of dividends received by Non-U.S. Holders payable out of Aimco’s earnings and profits which are not attributable to capital gains of Aimco and which are not effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to U.S. withholding tax at the rate of 30% (unless reduced by treaty and the Non-U.S. Holder provides appropriate documentation regarding its eligibility for treaty benefits). In general, Non-U.S. Holders will not be considered engaged in a U.S. trade or business solely as a result of their ownership of Aimco stock. In cases where the dividend income from a Non-U.S. Holder’s investment in Aimco stock is, or is treated as, effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s conduct of a U.S. trade or business, the Non-U.S. Holder generally will be subject to U.S. tax at graduated rates, in the same manner as domestic stockholders are taxed with respect to such dividends, such income must generally be reported on a U.S. income tax return filed by or on behalf of the non-U.S. holder, and the income may also be subject to the 30% branch profits tax in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation.
 
Non-Dividend Distributions.  Unless Aimco stock constitutes a U.S. real property interest (a “USRPI”) within the meaning of the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act of 1980 (“FIRPTA”), distributions by Aimco which are not dividends out of the earnings and profits of Aimco will not be subject to U.S. income tax. If it


87


Table of Contents

cannot be determined at the time at which a distribution is made whether or not the distribution will exceed current and accumulated earnings and profits, the distribution will be subject to withholding at the rate applicable to dividends. However, the Non-U.S. Holder may seek a refund from the IRS of any amounts withheld if it is subsequently determined that the distribution was, in fact, in excess of current and accumulated earnings and profits of Aimco. If Aimco stock constitutes a USRPI, distributions by Aimco in excess of the sum of its earnings and profits plus the stockholder’s basis in its Aimco stock will be taxed under FIRPTA at the rate of tax, including any applicable capital gains rates, that would apply to a domestic stockholder of the same type (e.g., an individual or a corporation, as the case may be), and the collection of the tax will be enforced by a refundable withholding at a rate of 10% of the amount by which the distribution exceeds the stockholder’s share of Aimco’s earnings and profits.
 
Capital Gain Dividends.  Under FIRPTA, a distribution made by Aimco to a Non-U.S. Holder, to the extent attributable to gains from dispositions of USRPIs held by Aimco directly or through pass-through subsidiaries (“USRPI Capital Gains”), will, except as described below, be considered effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the Non-U.S. Holder and will be subject to U.S. income tax at the rates applicable to U.S. individuals or corporations, without regard to whether the distribution is designated as a capital gain dividend. In addition, Aimco will be required to withhold tax equal to 35% of the amount of the distribution to the extent such distribution constitutes USRPI Capital Gains. Distributions subject to FIRPTA may also be subject to a 30% branch profits tax in the hands of a Non-U.S. Holder that is a corporation. A distribution is not a USRPI Capital Gain if Aimco held the underlying asset solely as a creditor. Capital gain dividends received by a non-U.S. Holder from a REIT that are attributable to dispositions by that REIT of assets other then USRPIs are generally not subject to U.S. income or withholding tax.
 
A capital gain dividend by Aimco that would otherwise have been treated as a USRPI Capital Gain will not be so treated or be subject to FIRPTA, will generally not be treated as income that is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business, and will instead be treated the same as an ordinary dividend from Aimco (see “— Taxation of Foreign Stockholders — Ordinary Dividends”), provided that (1) the capital gain dividend is received with respect to a class of stock that is regularly traded on an established securities market located in the U.S., and (2) the recipient non-U.S. Holder does not own more than 5% of that class of stock at any time during the one year period ending on the date on which the capital gain dividend is received.
 
Dispositions of Aimco Stock.  Unless Aimco stock constitutes a USRPI, a sale of Aimco stock by a Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. taxation. The stock will be treated as a USRPI if 50% or more of Aimco’s assets throughout a prescribed testing period consist of interests in real property located within the U.S., excluding, for this purpose, interests in real property solely in a capacity as a creditor. Even if the foregoing test is met, Aimco stock nonetheless will not constitute a USRPI if Aimco is a “domestically controlled qualified investment entity.” A domestically controlled qualified investment entity is a REIT in which, at all times during a specified testing period, less than 50% in value of its shares is held directly or indirectly by Non-U.S. Holders. Aimco believes that it is, and it expects to continue to be, a domestically controlled qualified investment entity. If Aimco is, and continues to be, a domestically controlled qualified investment entity, the sale of Aimco stock should not be subject to U.S. taxation. Because most classes of stock of Aimco are publicly traded, however, no assurance can be given that Aimco is or will continue to be a domestically controlled qualified investment entity.
 
Even if Aimco does not constitute a domestically controlled qualified investment entity, a Non-U.S. Holder’s sale of stock nonetheless generally will not be subject to tax under FIRPTA as a sale of a USRPI provided that:
 
  •  the stock is of a class that is “regularly traded” (as defined by applicable Treasury Regulations) on an established securities market (e.g., the NYSE, on which Aimco stock is listed), and
 
  •  the selling Non-U.S. Holder held 5% or less of such class of Aimco’s outstanding stock at all times during a specified testing period.
 
If gain on the sale of stock of Aimco were subject to taxation under FIRPTA, the Non-U.S. Holder would be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain (subject to applicable alternative minimum tax and a special alternative minimum tax in the case of nonresident alien individuals) and the purchaser of the stock could be required to withhold 10% of the purchase price and remit such amount to the IRS.
 
Gain from the sale of Aimco stock that would not otherwise be subject to taxation under FIRPTA will nonetheless be taxable in the U.S. to a Non-U.S. Holder in two cases. First, if the Non-U.S. Holder’s investment in


88


Table of Contents

the Aimco stock is effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business conducted by such Non-U.S. Holder, the Non-U.S. Holder will be subject to the same treatment as a U.S. stockholder with respect to such gain. Second, if the Non-U.S. Holder is a nonresident alien individual who was present in the U.S. for 183 days or more during the taxable year and has a “tax home” in the U.S., the nonresident alien individual will be subject to a 30% tax on the individual’s capital gain.
 
Estate Tax
 
Aimco stock owned or treated as owned by an individual who is not a citizen or resident (as specially defined for U.S. Federal estate tax purposes) of the U.S. at the time of death will be includible in the individual’s gross estate for U.S. Federal estate tax purposes, unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise. Such individual’s estate may be subject to U.S. Federal estate tax on the property includible in the estate for U.S. Federal estate tax purposes.
 
Taxation of Tax-Exempt Stockholders
 
Tax-exempt entities, including qualified employee pension and profit sharing trusts and individual retirement accounts, generally are exempt from U.S. Federal income taxation. However, they are subject to taxation on their unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”). While many investments in real estate may generate UBTI, the IRS has ruled that dividend distributions from a REIT to a tax-exempt entity do not constitute UBTI. Based on that ruling, and provided that (1) a tax-exempt stockholder has not held its Aimco stock as “debt financed property” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code (i.e., where the acquisition or holding of the property is financed through a borrowing by the tax-exempt stockholder), and (2) the Aimco stock is not otherwise used in an unrelated trade or business, Aimco believes that distributions from Aimco and income from the sale of the Aimco stock should not give rise to UBTI to a tax-exempt stockholder.
 
Tax-exempt stockholders that are social clubs, voluntary employee benefit associations, supplemental unemployment benefit trusts, and qualified group legal services plans that are exempt from taxation under paragraphs (7), (9), (17) and (20), respectively, of section 501(c) of the Internal Revenue Code are subject to different UBTI rules, which generally will require them to characterize distributions from Aimco as UBTI.
 
In certain circumstances, a pension trust that owns more than 10% of our stock could be required to treat a percentage of the dividends as UBTI if we are a “pension-held REIT.” We will not be a pension-held REIT unless (1) we are required to “look through” one or more of our pension trust stockholders in order to satisfy the REIT “closely-held test, and (2) either (i) one pension trust owns more than 25% of the value of our stock, or (ii) one or more pension trusts, each individually holding more than 10% of the value of our stock, collectively owns more than 50% of the value of our stock. Certain restrictions on ownership and transfer of Aimco’s stock generally should prevent a tax exempt entity from owning more than 10% of the value of our stock and generally should prevent us from becoming a pension-held REIT.
 
Other Tax Consequences
 
Legislative or Other Actions Affecting REITs
 
The present U.S. Federal income tax treatment of REITs may be modified, possibly with retroactive effect, by legislative, judicial or administrative action at any time. The REIT rules are constantly under review by persons involved in the legislative process and by the IRS and the U.S. Treasury Department which may result in statutory changes as well as revisions to regulations and interpretations. Changes to the U.S. Federal tax laws and interpretations thereof could adversely affect an investment in our common stock.
 
Under recently enacted legislation, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, certain U.S. holders who are individuals, estates or trusts and whose income exceeds certain thresholds will be required to pay a 3.8% Medicare tax on dividend and other income, including capital gains from the sale or other disposition of Aimco common stock.
 
Recently enacted legislation will require, after December 31, 2013, withholding at a rate of 30% on dividends in respect of, and, after December 31, 2014, gross proceeds from the sale of, Aimco common stock held by or through certain foreign financial institutions (including investment funds), unless such institution enters into an


89


Table of Contents

agreement with the Secretary of the Treasury to report, on an annual basis, information with respect to shares in the institution held by certain U.S. persons and by certain non-U.S. entities that are wholly or partially owned by U.S. persons. Accordingly, the entity through which Aimco common stock is held will affect the determination of whether such withholding is required. Similarly, dividends in respect of, and gross proceeds from the sale of, Aimco common stock held by an investor that is a non-financial non-U.S. entity will be subject to withholding at a rate of 30%, unless such entity either (i) certifies to Aimco that such entity does not have any “substantial United States owners” or (ii) provides certain information regarding the entity’s “substantial United States owners,” which Aimco will in turn provide to the Secretary of the Treasury. Non-U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult with their tax advisors regarding the possible implications of the legislation on their investment in Aimco common stock.
 
State, Local and Foreign Taxes
 
Aimco, Aimco OP, Aimco stockholders and OP Unitholders may be subject to state, local or foreign taxation in various jurisdictions, including those in which it or they transact business, own property or reside. It should be noted that Aimco OP owns properties located in a number of states and local jurisdictions, and OP Unitholders may be required to file income tax returns in some or all of those jurisdictions. The state, local or foreign tax treatment of Aimco, Aimco OP, Aimco stockholders and OP unitholders may not conform to the U.S. Federal income tax consequences discussed above. Consequently, prospective investors are urged to consult their tax advisors regarding the application and effect of state, local and foreign tax laws on an investment in Aimco.


90


Table of Contents

 
FEES AND EXPENSES
 
The costs of planning and implementing the proposed transactions, including the preparation of this information statement/prospectus, will be borne by Aimco OP without regard to whether the transactions are effectuated. Except as set forth in this information statement/prospectus, Aimco OP will not pay any fees or commissions to any broker, dealer or other person in connection with the transactions. The General Partner has retained Eagle Rock Proxy Advisors, LLC, or the Information Agent, to act as the information agent in connection with the merger transactions. The Information Agent may contact holders of AIP Units by mail, e-mail, telephone, telex, telegraph and in person and may request brokers, dealers and other nominee limited partners to forward materials relating to the transactions to the beneficial owners of AIP Units. Aimco OP will pay the Information Agent reasonable and customary compensation for its services in connection with the merger transactions, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, and will indemnify it against certain liabilities and expenses in connection therewith, including liabilities under the United States Federal securities laws. Aimco OP will also pay all costs and expenses of filing, printing and mailing the information statement/prospectus as well as any related legal fees and expenses.
 
Below is an itemized list of the estimated expenses incurred and to be incurred in connection with preparing and delivering this information statement/prospectus:
 
         
Information Agent Fees
  $ 7,500  
Printing Fees
    132,800  
Postage Fees
    12,400  
Tax and Accounting Fees
    50,000  
Financial Advisor Fees
    49,420  
Appraisal Fees
    15,900  
Legal Fees
    170,280  
         
Total
  $ 438,300  
         


91


Table of Contents

 
LEGAL MATTERS
 
The validity of the Aimco Class A Common Stock issuable upon redemption of the OP Units will be passed upon by DLA Piper LLP (US). The validity of the OP Units offered by this information statement/prospectus will be passed upon by Hogan Lovells US LLP.


92


Table of Contents

 
EXPERTS
 
The consolidated financial statements of Aimco for the year ended December 31, 2010 appearing in Aimco’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 15, 2011 (including the schedule appearing therein), and the effectiveness of Aimco’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon, included therein, and incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated financial statements and Aimco management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 are incorporated herein by reference in reliance upon such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
 
The consolidated financial statements of Aimco OP for the year ended December 31, 2010 appearing in Aimco OP’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 15, 2011 (including the schedule appearing therein), and the effectiveness of Aimco OP’s internal control over financial reporting appearing in Aimco OP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their reports thereon, included therein, and included in Annex I and Annex G to this information statement/prospectus. Such consolidated financial statements and Aimco OP management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010 are included herein in reliance upon such reports given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.
 
The consolidated financial statements of AIP appearing in AIP’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 have been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, as set forth in their report thereon, included therein, and included in Annex E of this information statement/prospectus. Such consolidated financial statements are included in reliance upon such report given on the authority of such firm as experts in accounting and auditing.


93


Table of Contents

 
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 
Information Incorporated by Reference
 
Aimco, Aimco OP and AIP are subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act, and, in accordance therewith, file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy any document so filed at the SEC’s public reference rooms in Washington, D.C., New York, New York and Chicago, Illinois. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference rooms. Aimco, Aimco OP and AIP filings are also available to the public at the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov.
 
The information that Aimco files with the SEC is incorporated by reference, which means that important information is being disclosed to you by referring you to those documents. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this information statement/prospectus. The documents listed below are incorporated by reference along with all documents filed by us with the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act (i) after the date of the initial registration statement of which this information statement/prospectus is a part, and prior to effectiveness of the registration statement, and (ii) after the date of this information statement/prospectus and prior to the completion of the offering of securities described in this information statement/prospectus.
 
  •  Proxy Statement for the 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Aimco (filed March 14, 2011);
 
  •  Aimco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (filed February 25, 2011);
 
  •  Aimco’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2011 (filed April 29, 2011), June 30, 2011 (filed August 1, 2011) and September 30, 2011 (filed October 28, 2011); and
 
  •  Aimco’s Current Reports on Form 8-K, dated January 10, 2011 (filed January 11, 2011), April 14, 2011 (filed April 14, 2011), July 26, 2011 (filed July 27, 2011), July 28, 2011 (filed July 28, 2011), August 24, 2011 (filed August 24, 2011), September 2, 2011 (filed September 2, 2011) and November 15, 2011 (filed November 15, 2011).
 
You may request a copy of these filings, at no cost, by writing or calling Aimco at the following address and telephone number:
 
ISTC Corporation
P.O. Box 2347
Greenville, South Carolina 29602
(864) 239-1029
 
If you would like to request documents, please do so by          , 2011. If you request any incorporated documents from Aimco, Aimco will mail them