UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14C
INFORMATION
STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(c)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Check the
appropriate box:
x
|
Preliminary
Information Statement
|
¨
|
Confidential,
for use of the Commission only (as permitted by Rule 14c-5
(d)(2))
|
¨
|
Definitive
Information Statement
|
AUSTRALIAN FOREST
INDUSTRIES
(Name of
Registrant as Specified in the Charter)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
¨
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14c-5(g) and
0-11.
|
|
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (Set forth the amount on which the filing fee
is calculated and state how it was
determined):
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of
transaction:
|
¨
|
Fee
paid previously with preliminary
materials.
|
¨
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee
was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
(1)
|
Amount
Previously Paid:
|
|
(2)
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement
No:
|
INFORMATION
STATEMENT
OF
AUSTRALIAN
FOREST INDUSTRIES
4/95
Salmon Street, Port Melbourne, Victoria
Australia,
3207
We
Are Not Asking You For A Proxy And You Are Requested Not To Send Us A
Proxy.
This
Information Statement is to notify our shareholders of our common stock of an
action to be taken by the majority shareholders of our common stock in lieu of a
special meeting of shareholders. This Information Statement is being mailed on
or about November , 2008 to
all of our shareholders of record at the close of business on November 13, 2008
(the "Record Date"). As of the Record Date, there were 257,600,680 shares
entitled to vote on the matters set forth herein.
Holders
of 238,500,00 of our outstanding common stock have executed a written consent in
lieu of Annual Meeting (the "Written Consent"), with an effective date of
November 13, 2008 effecting the following action to take effect approximately 20
days after the mailing of this Information Statement to our shareholders on the
Record Date:
|
●
|
our
reincorporation from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware by way
of a merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary that is a Delaware corporation
as the surviving corporation (the
“Reincorporation”).
|
Because
holders of approximately 238,500,000 of our outstanding voting stock including
common stock have executed the Written Consent, no vote or consent of any other
shareholder is being, or will be, solicited in connection with the authorization
of the matters set forth in the Written Consent. Under Nevada law, the votes
represented by the holders signing the Written Consent are sufficient in number
to authorize the matters set forth in the Written Consent, without the vote or
consent of any of our other shareholders. Nevada statutes provide that any
action that is required to be taken, or that may be taken, at any annual or
special meeting of shareholders of a Nevada corporation may be taken, without a
meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a written consent, setting
forth the action taken, is signed by the holders of outstanding capital stock
having not less than the minimum number of votes necessary to authorize such
action.
Based on
the foregoing, our shareholders acted by Written Consent and no annual meeting
of our shareholders will be held in 2008. Along with the shareholders, we
believe it would not be in our best interests or those of our shareholders to
incur the costs of holding a special meeting or of soliciting proxies or
consents from additional shareholders in connection with this
action.
This
Information Statement is expected to be mailed to shareholders on or
about November , 2008.
We will bear all expenses incurred in connection with the distribution of this
Information Statement. We will reimburse brokers or other nominees for
reasonable expenses they incur in forwarding this material to beneficial
owners. The action in the Written Consent will take effect on or
shortly after [20 days after the mailing of the Definitive Information Statement
on Schedule 14C].
SHAREHOLDERS
WRITTEN CONSENT
IN
LIEU OF SPECIAL MEETING
AUSTRALIAN
FOREST INDUSTRIES
INFORMATION
ON CONSENTING SHAREHOLDERS
Pursuant
to our Bylaws and the Nevada Revised Statutes, a vote by the holders of at least
a majority of our outstanding capital stock is required to effect the action
described herein. As of the record date, we had 257,600,680 shares
entitled to vote on the matters set forth herein of which 128,800,341 shares are
required to pass any shareholder resolutions. The majority shareholders, who
consist of eleven of our current shareholders, are collectively the record and
beneficial owners of 238,500,000 of our shares of common stock, which represents
9.12% of the issued and outstanding shares of our common stock on a fully
diluted basis. Pursuant to 78.320 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, the majority
shareholders voted in favor of the action described herein in a Written Consent,
dated November 13, 2008 (the “Written Consent”). There are no cumulative voting
rights. No consideration was paid for the consent. The majority
shareholders’ names, affiliations with us, and their beneficial holdings are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Affiliation
|
|
Shares Beneficially Held
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
Timbermans
Group Pty Ltd. (1)
|
Majority
Shareholder
|
|
|
140,000,000 |
|
|
|
54.3 |
% |
Norman
Backman (2)
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Sherry
Backman (2)
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Colin
Baird (3)
|
Director,
CFO
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Lisa
Baird (3)
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Tony
Esplin (4)
|
Director,
VP Marketing
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Kary
Esplin (4)
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Roger
Timms (5)
|
Director,
VP Engineering
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Darryn
Timms (5)
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Guilia
Timms (6)
|
|
|
|
10,000,000 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
% |
Michael
Timms (5) (6)
|
Director,
Chairman, CEO, President
|
|
|
8,500,000
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Total
|
|
|
|
238,500,000 |
|
|
|
91.2 |
% |
(1)
Timbermans Group Pty. Ltd. is owned by five shareholders who are Norman Backman,
Colin Baird, Tony Esplin, Roger Timms and Michael Timms.
(2)
Norman Backman is married to Sherry Backman
(3) Colin
Baird is married to Lisa Baird
(4) Tony
Esplin is married to Kary Esplin.
(5) Roger
Timms, Michael Timms and Darryn Timms are siblings.
(6)
Michael Timms is married to Guilia Timms.
SUMMARY
OF ACTION TAKEN BY WRITTEN CONSENT
The
action that the majority shareholders consented to in the Written Consent
is:
|
●
|
our
reincorporation from the State of Nevada to the State of Delaware by way
of a merger with a wholly-owned subsidiary that is a Delaware corporation
(the “Subsidiary”) as the surviving corporation (the
“Reincorporation”).
|
The
action listed above will take effect on or shortly after [a date at least 20
days after the mailing of Definitive Information Statement], 2008.
DISSENTERS’
RIGHTS
Nevada
law generally provides that stockholders may have dissenters’ rights in
connection with a merger where the approval of the corporation’s stockholders is
required. However, Nevada law provides that there is no right of dissent with
respect to a merger in favor of holders of any class or series which, at the
record date for the stockholders’ meeting to approve the plan, were either: (i)
listed on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market
system security by the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD), or
(ii) held by at least 2,000 stockholders of record, as that term is defined in
Section 92A.330 of the Nevada Revised Statutes. Our common stock is listed for
trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, which is not designated as a national market
system by the NASD, and as of the record date we had less than 2,000
stockholders of record. Dissenters’ rights will be available to stockholders
with respect to the Reincorporation and will be governed by Chapter 92A of the
Nevada Revised Statutes. If a stockholder has not approved the merger, they are
entitled to dissent. In order to exercise dissenter’s rights provided under the
Nevada Revised Statutes, a stockholder must submit a written notice to us, not
less than 30 and not more than 60 days after the date that we send a dissenter’s
notice to our stockholders.
We are
sending a dissenter’s notice to our stockholders with this Information
Statement, attached as Exhibit B to this Information Statement. Dissenting
stockholders must, by no later than
[ ,
2008], send a written objection to the merger stating their intention to demand
payment for their shares in the form set forth in Exhibit B. The written
objection should be sent to:
Australian
Forest Industries
4/95
Salmon Street, Port Melbourne, Victoria
Australia,
3207
Telephone:
011 61 3 8645 4340
Attention: Colin
Baird
Registered
Mail, Return Receipt Requested is recommended. The objection must include (i) a
notice of election to dissent, (ii) the stockholder’s name and residence
address, (iii) the number of shares as to which the stockholder dissents (iv) a
demand for payment of the fair value of the stockholder’s shares if the merger
is consummated and (v) a certification as to whether you or the beneficial owner
on whose behalf you are dissenting, as the case may be, acquired beneficial
ownership of the shares before the date set forth in the dissenter’s
notice.
Together
with the written demand, the dissenting stockholder must submit certificates
representing all of his or her shares of stock of our company to us at the
address set forth above or to our transfer agent, Transfer Online, Inc., 317 SW
Alder Street, Portland, OR 97204, for the purpose of affixing a notation
indicating that a demand for payment has been made. Shares of our
company not represented by certificates will be restricted from transfer after
the demand for payment is received.
If the
merger is consummated, within 30 days after receiving any demands for payment,
we will pay to each dissenter who complied with the provisions of Chapter 92A of
the Nevada Revised Statues the amount we estimate to be the fair value of the
shares, plus accrued interest. The fair value of the shares is equal to the
value of the shares immediately before the consummation of the merger, excluding
any appreciation or depreciation in anticipation of the merger unless exclusion
would be inequitable. The payment will be accompanied by (i) our financial
statements for the year ended January 1, 2007, (ii) a statement of the estimate
of the fair value, (iii) an explanation of how interest was calculated, and (iv)
any other items required by Chapter 92A of the Nevada Revised
Statutes.
A
dissenting stockholder receiving such payment may (i) reject the payment and
demand payment of the fair value and accrued interest or (ii) accept the payment
after providing an estimate of the fair value plus accrued interest and
demanding payment of such estimate.
If any
demand for payment remains unsettled we must, within 60 days after receiving
such demand, petition the court to determine the fair value of the shares and
accrued interest. If we do not commence the proceeding within the 60-day period,
we must pay each dissenter whose demand remains unsettled the amount
demanded.
The
procedure to dissent is more fully described in Sections 92A.300 to 92A.500 of
the Nevada Revised Statutes, which are attached as Exhibit A to this Information
Statement. Sections 92A.300 to 92A.500 of the Nevada Revised Statues inclusive
require strict adherence to the procedures set forth therein, and failure to do
so may result in the loss of all dissenters’ rights. Accordingly, each
stockholder who might desire to exercise dissenter’s rights should carefully
consider and comply with the provisions of those sections and consult his or her
legal advisor.
FAILURE
TO DEMAND PAYMENT IN THE PROPER FORM OR TO DEPOSIT YOUR CERTIFICATES AS
DESCRIBED IN THE DISSENTER’S NOTICE, ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT B, WILL TERMINATE YOUR
RIGHT TO RECEIVE PAYMENT FOR YOUR SHARES PURSUANT TO NEVADA’S RIGHTS OF
DISSENTING OWNERS STATUTE.
SHAREHOLDERS
WRITTEN CONSENT
IN
LIEU OF ANNUAL MEETING
MANAS
PETROLEUM CORPORATION
NOTICE
TO SHAREHOLDERS OF ACTION APPROVED BY CONSENTING SHAREHOLDERS
The
following action was taken by Written Consent of the majority
shareholders:
CORPORATE
ACTION ONE
THE
REINCORPORATION
General
On
November 13, 2008, our board of directors unanimously approved the
Reincorporation. On November 13, 2008, the Reincorporation was approved by the
written consent of holders of 238,500,000 of our common shares, representing
approximately 91.2 % of our issued and outstanding common shares. Through the
Reincorporation, our state of incorporation will be changed from Nevada to
Delaware. To accomplish the Reincorporation, our board of directors has
unanimously approved and subsequently a majority of our shareholders have
approved an Agreement and Merger Agreement, which provides for our merger with
and into the Subsidiary, a wholly owned subsidiary of our company, which will be
formed pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL, for this
purpose. The Subsidiary will be the surviving entity in the merger, and as a
result, after the merger our name will be the name of the Subsidiary. To
maintain clarity in discussing the Reincorporation, we may refer to ourselves
before the merger “Australian Forest Industries” while we may refer to ourselves
after the merger as Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.
As a part
of approval of the Reincorporation, the form of the Merger Agreement, the form
of the Articles of Merger and the form of the Certificate of Merger were
approved, copies of which are attached to this Information Statement as Exhibits
C, D and E, respectively.
Our
corporate affairs are presently governed by the corporate law of Nevada, our
current state of incorporation, and by Australian Forest Industries’ Articles of
Incorporation and Bylaws. These documents are available for inspection during
business hours at our principal executive offices. In addition, copies may be
obtained by writing to us at 4/95 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne, Victoria,
Australia, 3207 or by reviewing our public filings with the US Securities and
Exchange Commission on their EDGAR database available on their website
(www.sec.gov). Once the merger is effected, we will be governed by Delaware law
and Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws. Copies
of the form of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s Certificate of Incorporation and
Bylaws are attached to this Information Statement as Exhibits F and G,
respectively. A discussion of the material similarities and differences in the
rights of our stockholders before and after the merger is provided
below.
At the
effective time of the Reincorporation, the same individuals who serve as the
directors and executive officers of Australian Forest Industries will become the
directors and executive officers of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. All employee
benefit and stock option plans of Australian Forest Industries will become Lone
Pine Holdings, Inc.’s plans, and each option or right issued by such plans will
automatically be converted into an option or right to purchase shares of Lone
Pine Holdings, Inc.’s common stock (both the number of and price of which shall
be adjusted on a 100:1 ratio to account for the exchange ratio in the merger),
upon the same terms and subject to the same conditions. Other employee benefit
arrangements of Australian Forest Industries will also be continued by Lone Pine
Holdings, Inc. upon the terms and subject to the conditions currently in effect.
We believe that the Reincorporation will not affect any of our material
contracts with any third parties and that Australian Forest Industries’ rights
and obligations under such material contractual arrangements will continue as
rights and obligations of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.
Our common stock is listed on the OTC
Bulletin Board and will continue to be listed on the OTC Bulletin Board after
the Reincorporation. Following the merger, each one hundred shares of common
stock of Australian Forest Industries will be automatically converted into one
share of common stock of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.. Stock certificates
representing every one hundred shares of Australian Forest Industries will be
deemed automatically to represent one share of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s common
stock. Following the Reincorporation, previously outstanding Australian Forest
Industries stock certificates may be delivered in effecting sales through a
broker, or otherwise, of shares of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s stock.
It will not be
necessary for you to exchange your existing Australian Forest Industries stock
certificates for stock certificates of Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc.
If our
board of directors determines that circumstances have arisen that make it
inadvisable to proceed with the Reincorporation under the original terms of the
Merger Agreement, the merger (and thus the Reincorporation) may be abandoned or
the Merger Agreement may be amended by the board notwithstanding the fact that
stockholder approval has already been obtained (except that the principal terms
may not be amended without obtaining further stockholder approval). The
discussion below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Merger
Agreement, the Articles of Merger, the Certificate of Merger, Lone Pine
Holdings, Inc.’s Certificate of Incorporation and Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s
Bylaws, copies of which are attached to this Information Statement as Exhibits
C, D, E, F and G, respectively, and by the applicable provisions of Nevada
corporate law and Delaware corporate law.
A.
|
Reasons
for and Advantages of Reincorporation in
Delaware
|
For many
years, Delaware has followed a policy of encouraging incorporation in that
state. To advance that policy, Delaware has adopted comprehensive, modern and
flexible corporate laws that are updated and revised periodically to meet
changing business needs. As a result, many major corporations have initially
chosen Delaware for their domicile or have subsequently reincorporated in
Delaware. Delaware courts have developed considerable expertise in dealing with
corporate issues. In doing so, Delaware courts have created a substantial body
of case law construing Delaware law and establishing public policies with
respect to Delaware corporations. Our board of directors believes that this
environment provides greater predictability with respect to corporate legal
affairs and allows a corporation to be managed more efficiently.
The DGCL permits a corporation to adopt
a number of measures, through amendment of the corporate certificate of
incorporation or bylaws or otherwise, designed to reduce a corporation’s
vulnerability to unsolicited takeover attempts. There is substantial judicial
precedent in the Delaware courts as to the legal principles applicable to such
defensive measures with respect to the conduct of the board under the business
judgment rule with respect to unsolicited takeover attempts. Our current
Articles of Incorporation do not include such “anti-takeover” provisions. Our board of directors has
no present intention following the Reincorporation in Delaware to further amend
the Certificate of Incorporation or Bylaws of the Surviving to include any
additional provisions which might deter an unsolicited takeover attempt.
However, in the discharge of its fiduciary obligations to the stockholders, our
board of directors may consider in the future certain anti-takeover strategies
which may enhance the board’s ability to negotiate with an unsolicited
bidder.
In the
opinion of our management, such latitude affords Delaware corporations more
opportunities to raise capital. The procedures and degree of stockholder
approval required for Delaware corporations for the authorization of additional
shares of stock, and for approval of certain mergers and other transactions,
present fewer practical impediments to the capital raising process than those
which apply to Nevada corporations. For example, a Delaware corporation has
greater flexibility in declaring dividends, which can aid a corporation in
marketing various classes or series of dividend paying securities. Under
Delaware law, dividends may be paid out of surplus, or if there is no surplus,
out of net profits from the corporation’s previous fiscal year or the fiscal
year in which the dividend is declared, or both, so long as there remains in the
stated capital account an amount equal to the par value represented by all
shares of the corporation’s stock, if any, having a preference upon the
distribution of assets. Under Nevada law, dividends may be paid by the
corporation unless after giving effect to the distribution, the corporation
would not be able to pay its debts as they come due in the usual course of
business, or (unless the corporation’s articles of incorporation permit
otherwise) the corporation’s total assets would be less than the sum of its
total liabilities, plus amounts payable in dissolution to holders of shares
carrying a liquidation preference over the class of shares to which a dividend
is declared. These and other differences between Nevada’s and Delaware’s
corporate laws are more fully explained below.
In the
opinion of our management, members of the financial services industry may be
more willing and better able to assist in capital raising programs for us if we
reincorporate in Delaware
B.
|
Disadvantages
of Reincorporation in Delaware
|
Despite
the unanimous belief of our board of directors that the Reincorporation is in
our best interests and the best interest of our stockholders, some stockholders
may find the proposal disadvantageous to the extent that it may have the effect
of discouraging a future takeover attempt which is not approved by our board of
directors, but which a majority of the stockholders deem to be in their best
interests or in which stockholders are to receive a substantial premium for
their shares over the market value or their cost basis in such shares. As a
result of these effects, stockholders who might wish to participate in a tender
offer may not have an opportunity to do so. In addition, to the extent that such
provisions enable our board of directors to resist a takeover or a change in
control of our company, they could make it more difficult to change the existing
board of directors and management or to effect a change in control of our
company which is opposed by our board of directors. This strengthened tenure and
authority of our board of directors could enable our board of directors to
resist change and otherwise thwart the desires of a majority of the
stockholders.
It should
be noted further that Delaware law has been criticized by some commentators on
the grounds that it does not afford minority stockholders the same substantive
rights and protections as are available in a number of other states. Our board
of directors has considered these potential disadvantages and has unanimously
concluded that the potential benefits of the proposed Reincorporation outweigh
the possible disadvantages.
C.
|
Comparison
of Our and Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s Capital
Stock
|
Authorized
Capital Stock
Our
authorized capital stock presently consists of 300,000,000 shares of common
stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $0.001 per share. As of November 11, there were 257,600,680 shares of our
common stock issued and outstanding and no shares of our preferred stock issued
and outstanding. As at November 11, we had issued no options outstanding and no
stock option plan for their grant.
There are
no other agreements, arrangements or understandings with anyone to sell or issue
any additional shares of our common stock.
Lone Pine
Holdings, Inc.’s authorized capital stock consists of (i) 100,000,000 shares of
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of which one share is issued and
outstanding and is owned by us, and (ii) 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock,
par value $0.001 per share, none of which are issued or outstanding. In
connection with the Reincorporation, one (1) share of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s
common stock will be issued in exchange for every one hundred shares of our
currently issued and outstanding shares of Australian Forest Industries. No
shares of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s preferred stock will be issued in
connection with the Reincorporation. All of the shares of Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc.’s common stock issued in connection with the Reincorporation will be
validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. Although, the Reincorporation
will not result in a change to the authorized number of shares of capital stock,
the number of our authorized but unissued shares of common stock will increase
from 42,399,320, or 14.3% of outstanding common stock, to 97,423,200, or 97.4%
of outstanding common stock.
Surviving
Entity’s Common Stock
The
holders of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s common stock will be entitled to one vote
for each share on all matters voted on by stockholders, including the election
of directors and, except as otherwise required by law or provided in any
resolution adopted by our board of directors with respect to any series of Lone
Pine Holdings, Inc.’s preferred stock, will exclusively possess all voting
power. The holders of Surviving Entity’s common stock will not have any
cumulative voting, conversion, redemption or preemptive rights. Subject to any
preferential rights of any outstanding series of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s
preferred stock designated by Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s board of directors from
time to time, the holders of Surviving Entity’s common stock will be entitled to
such dividends as may be declared from time to time by Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc.’s board of directors from funds available therefor, and upon liquidation
will be entitled to receive pro rata all assets of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.
available for distribution to such holders. Although we have not identified a
merger target, we believe that the decrease in issued and outstanding shares of
common stock and the correspondent increase in authorized but unissued shares of
common stock will make us a more attractive merger candidate.
“Blank
Check” Preferred Stock
The
Certificate of Incorporation of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. authorizes the issuance
of 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share. Such
preferred stock is commonly referred to as “blank check” preferred stock
because Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s board of directors has the authority, without
further action by the stockholders, to establish one or more series of preferred
stock and determine, with respect to any series of preferred stock, the terms
and rights of that series, including: (i) the designation of the series; (ii)
the number of shares of the series, which the board may, except where otherwise
provided in the preferred stock designation, increase or decrease, but not below
the number of shares then outstanding; (iii) the voting powers, if any, of the
shares of the series; and (iv) the preferences and relative, participating,
optional or other special rights, if any, and any qualifications, limitations or
restrictions thereof, of the shares of the series.
The
authorization of preferred stock alone will not have an immediate effect on the
rights of existing common stockholders. However, the issuance of preferred stock
over time may have an effect on common stockholders. Shares of preferred stock,
if and when issued, may have rights, powers and preferences superior to those of
the common stock. As a result, the ownership interest of common stockholders
could be significantly diluted by the issuance of preferred stock. While there
are no current plans, commitments or understandings to issue any preferred
stock, in the event of any issuances, common stockholders will not have any
preemptive or similar rights to acquire any preferred stock, and their ownership
interest could therefore be significantly reduced.
The
authorization of “blank
check” preferred stock could have anti-takeover ramifications. It could
discourage, or be used to impede, mergers or business combinations and possible
tender offers for shares of our common stock. Any issuance of preferred stock
with voting rights, or the adoption of a rights plan or “poison pill” granting other
stockholders additional rights or shares of stock in the event that a particular
group of stockholders obtains a designated percentage of ownership of our voting
stock, could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control by
increasing the number of outstanding shares entitled to vote or by increasing
the number of votes required to approve a change in control.
Shares of
voting or convertible preferred stock could be issued, or rights to purchase
such shares could be issued, to render more difficult or discourage an attempt
to obtain control by means of a tender offer, proxy contest, merger or other
transaction. Such issuances could therefore deprive stockholders of benefits
that could result from such an attempt, such as the realization of a premium
over the market price that such an attempt could cause. Moreover, the issuance
of such shares to persons friendly to the board of directors could make it more
difficult to remove incumbent officers and directors from office even if such
change were to be favorable to stockholders generally. We do not presently
intend to implement or adopt any such rights plans or other anti-takeover
measures.
Authorized
but unissued and unreserved shares of capital stock may be used for a variety of
corporate purposes, including future public offerings, to raise additional
capital or to facilitate acquisitions. The DGCL does not require stockholder
approval for the issuance of authorized shares.
D.
|
Summary
of Material Changes in Charter and Bylaws to be Effected by the
Reincorporation and Differences Between Nevada and Delaware Corporate
Laws
|
General
The
rights of the holders of our common stock are presently governed by our Articles
of Incorporation and Bylaws and the Nevada Revised Statutes. If the
Reincorporation is approved and the merger accomplished, holders of our common
stock will become stockholders of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. and their rights will
thereafter be governed by Delaware law, Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s Certificate
of Incorporation and Bylaws and the DGCL.
The
following discussion briefly summarizes the significant differences between the
corporate laws of Delaware and the corporate laws of Nevada and does not purport
to be a complete statement of such laws.
Fiduciary
Duties of Directors
Both
Delaware and Nevada law provide that the board of directors has the ultimate
responsibility for managing the business and affairs of a corporation. In
discharging this function, directors of Nevada and Delaware corporations owe
fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to the corporations they
serve.
With
respect to fiduciary duties, Nevada law may provide directors broader discretion
and increased protection from liability in exercising their fiduciary duties,
particularly in the context of a change in control. Delaware courts have held
that the directors of a Delaware corporation are required to exercise an
informed business judgment in performing their duties. An informed business
judgment means that the directors have informed themselves of all material
information reasonably available to them. Delaware courts have also imposed a
heightened standard of conduct on directors in matters involving a contest for
control of the corporation. A director of a Nevada business corporation must
perform his or her duties as a director in good faith and with a view to the
interests of the corporation.
A
director of a Delaware corporation, in performing his or her duties, is
protected in relying, in good faith, upon the records of the corporation and
upon such information, opinions, reports or statements presented to the
corporation by any of the corporation’s officers or employees, by a committee of
the board of directors or by any other person as to matters the director
reasonably believes are within such other person’s professional or expert
competence. Such other person must also have been selected with reasonable care
by or on behalf of the corporation. In performing his or her duties, a director
of a Nevada business corporation is entitled to rely, in good faith, on
information, opinions, reports, books of account or statements (including
financial statements and other financial data) prepared or presented by any of
the corporation’s directors, officers or employees so long as the director
reasonably believes such persons to be reliable and competent in such matters;
counsel, public accountants, financial advisers, valuation advisers, investment
bankers or other persons as to matters which the director reasonably believes to
be within the professional or expert competence of such persons; and a duly
designated committee of the board which the director reasonably believes merits
confidence and upon which the director does not serve, but only as to matters
within the committee’s designated authority. A director of a Nevada corporation
is not considered to be acting in good faith if the director has knowledge
concerning the matter in question which would cause such reliance to be
unwarranted.
Delaware
law does not contain any statutory provision permitting the board of directors,
committees of the board and individual directors, when discharging their duties,
to consider the interests of any constituencies other than the corporation or
its stockholders, or in the context of insolvency, the creditors of the
corporation. Nevada law, on the other hand, provides that in discharging their
duties, the board of directors, committees of the board and individual directors
may, in exercising their respective powers with a view to the interests of the
corporation, choose, to the extent they deem appropriate, to subordinate the
interests of stockholders to the interests of employees, suppliers, customers or
creditors of the corporation or to the interests of the communities served by
the corporation. Furthermore, the officers and directors may consider the
long-term and short-term interests of the corporation and its
stockholders.
Under Delaware law, directors of a
Delaware corporation are presumed to have acted on an informed basis, in good
faith and in the honest belief that their actions were in the best interest of
the corporation. This presumption may be overcome if a preponderance of the
evidence shows that the directors’ decision involved a breach of fiduciary duty
such as fraud, overreaching, lack of good faith, failure of the board to inform
itself properly or actions by the board to entrench itself in office. Delaware
courts have imposed a heightened standard of conduct upon directors of a
Delaware corporation who take any action designed to defeat a threatened change in control
of the corporation. The heightened standard has two elements: (i) the board must
demonstrate some basis for concluding that a proper corporate purpose is served
by implementation of any defensive measure, and (ii) that the measure must be
reasonable in relation to the perceived threat posed by the change in control.
Under Nevada law, unless there is a breach of fiduciary duty or a lack of good
faith, any act of the board of directors, any committee of the board or any
individual director is presumed to be in the corporation’s best interest. No
higher burden of proof or greater obligation to justify applies to any act
relating to or affecting an acquisition or a potential or proposed acquisition
of control of the corporation than to any other action. Nevada law imposes a
heightened standard of conduct upon directors who take action to resist a change
or potential change in control of a corporation, if such action impedes the
exercise of the stockholders’ right to vote for or remove
directors.
Anti-Takeover
Laws
Section
203 of the DGCL contains certain “anti-takeover” provisions
that apply to a Delaware corporation unless the corporation elects not to be
governed by such provisions in its certificate of incorporation or bylaws.
Section 203 prohibits a corporation from engaging in any “business combination” with
any person that owns 15% or more of its outstanding voting stock for a period of
three years following the time that such stockholder obtained ownership of more
than 15% of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation. A business
combination includes any merger, consolidation or sale of substantially all of a
corporation’s assets. The three-year waiting period does not apply, however, if
any of the following conditions are met:
|
•
|
the
board of directors of the corporation approved either the business
combination or the transaction which resulted in such stockholder owning
more than 15% of such stock before the stockholder obtained such
ownership;
|
|
•
|
after
the transaction which resulted in the stockholder owning more than 15% of
the outstanding voting stock of the corporation is completed, such
stockholder owns at least 85% of the voting stock of the corporation
outstanding at the time that the transaction commenced;
or
|
|
•
|
at
or after the time the stockholder obtains more than 15% of the outstanding
voting stock of the corporation, the business combination is approved by
the board of directors and authorized at an annual or special meeting of
stockholders (and not by written consent) by the affirmative vote of at
least 66 2/3% of
the outstanding voting stock that is not owned by the acquiring
stockholder.
|
In
addition, Section 203 does not apply to any person who became the owner of more
than 15% of a corporation’s stock if it was as a result of action taken solely
by the corporation.
Nevada
law contains certain “anti-takeover” provisions
that apply to a Nevada corporation unless the corporation elects not to be
governed by such provisions in its articles of incorporation or bylaws.
Australian Forest Industries did not elect to opt out of these
provisions. Nevada law prohibits a corporation from engaging in any
“business combination”
with any person that owns, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of its
outstanding voting stock for a period of three years following the time that
such stockholder obtained ownership of more than 10% of the outstanding voting
stock of the corporation. A business combination includes any merger,
consolidation, or sale of substantially all of a corporation’s assets. The
three-year waiting period does not apply, however, if the board of directors of
the corporation approved either the business combination or the transaction
which resulted in such stockholder owning more than 10% of such stock before the
stockholder obtained such ownership.
Furthermore,
a corporation may not engage in any business combination with an interested
stockholder after the expiration of three years from the date that such
stockholder obtained such ownership unless the combination meets all of the
requirements of the corporation’s articles of incorporation, and:
|
•
|
is
approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of stock representing a
majority of the outstanding voting power not beneficially owned by the
interested stockholder proposing the combination at a meeting called for
that purpose no earlier than three years after the interested
stockholder’s date of acquiring shares;
or
|
|
•
|
the
form and amount of consideration to be received by stockholders (excluding
the interested stockholder) of the corporation satisfy certain tests and,
with limited exceptions, the interested stockholder has not become the
beneficial owner of additional voting shares of the corporation after
becoming an interested stockholder and before the business combination is
consummated.
|
In
addition, Nevada law suspends the voting rights of the “control shares” of a
stockholder that acquires 20% or more of a corporation’s shares that are
entitled to be voted in an election of directors. The voting rights of these
control shares generally remain suspended until such time as the “disinterested” stockholders
of the company vote to restore the voting power of the acquiring
stockholder.
If full
voting rights are accorded to the shares held by the acquiring person and the
acquiring person has acquired shares amounting to or greater than a majority of
all voting power, any stockholder of record, other than the acquiring person,
who did not vote in favor of granting voting power to the shares held by the
acquiring person may demand payment for the fair value of such stockholder’s
shares. Within 10 days of the vote according the shares of the acquiring person
voting rights, the corporation is required to send notice to any stockholders
who did not vote in favor of such action notifying them of their right to demand
payment for their shares. Within a set period of time between 30 and 60 days
from receipt of such notice, a stockholder seeking payment must demand payment
for such stockholder’s shares. The corporation must then comply within 30
days.
Dividend
Rights and Repurchase of Shares
Under
Delaware law, a corporation may declare and pay dividends out of surplus or, if
no surplus exists, out of net profits, for the fiscal year in which the
dividends are declared and/or for its preceding fiscal year. Dividends may not
be paid out of net profits if the capital of the corporation is less than the
aggregate amount of capital represented by the outstanding stock of all classes
having a preference upon the distribution of assets. Surplus is defined as net
assets minus stated capital. Delaware law applies different tests to the payment
of dividends and the repurchase of shares. Delaware law generally provides that
a corporation may redeem or repurchase its shares only if such redemption or
repurchase would not impair the capital of the corporation.
Under
Nevada law, a corporation is prohibited from making a distribution (including
dividends on, or redemption or repurchase of, shares of capital stock) to its
stockholders if, after giving effect to the distribution:
|
•
|
the
corporation would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the
usual course of business; or
|
|
•
|
the
total assets of the corporation would be less than the sum of its total
liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, if that corporation were
then dissolved, to satisfy the rights of stockholders having superior
preferential rights upon dissolution to the stockholders receiving the
distribution.
|
The board
of directors of a Nevada corporation may base the above determination on
financial statements prepared on the basis of accounting principals, fair
valuation, including without limitation unrealized appreciation or depreciation,
or any other method that is reasonable under the circumstances.
Size
of the Board of Directors
Delaware law and Nevada law permit the
board of directors alone to change the authorized number or the range of
directors by amendment to the bylaws, unless the directors are not
authorized to amend the bylaws or the number of directors is fixed in
the certificate of
incorporation or
articles of
incorporation, as the case
may be, (in which case a change in the number of directors may be made only by
amendment to the certificate of
incorporation, or
articles of
incorporation, as the case
may be, following approval of such change by the stockholders). After the
Reincorporation is consummated, the four current directors of Australian Forest
Industries will continue as directors of Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc.
Cumulative
Voting
Under Delaware law and Nevada law,
cumulative voting is not mandatory, and cumulative voting rights must be
provided in a corporation’s certificate of
incorporation or
articles of
incorporation, as the case
may be, if stockholders are to be entitled to cumulative voting rights.
Cumulative voting entitles each stockholder to cast a number of votes that is
equal to the number of voting shares held by such shareholder multiplied by the
total number of directors to be elected, and to cast all such votes for one
nominee or distribute the votes among up to as many candidates as there are
positions to be filled. Without cumulative voting, a stockholder or group of
stockholders must hold a majority of the voting shares to cause the election of
one or more nominees. Cumulative voting enables a minority stockholder or group
of stockholders holding a relatively small number of shares to elect a
representative or representatives to the board. Neither of Australian Forest
Industries nor Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. permits cumulative
voting.
Classified
Board of Directors
A
classified board is one in which a certain number, but not all, of the directors
are elected on a rotating basis each year. Delaware law and Nevada law permit,
but do not require, a classified board of directors, with staggered terms.
Pursuant to the DGCL, either one-half or one-third of the directors are elected
for terms of two or three years, respectively. Pursuant to the Nevada Revised
Statutes, at least one-fourth of the directors must be elected annually. Such
method of electing directors makes changes in the composition of the board of
directors, and thus a potential change in control of a corporation, a lengthier
and more difficult process. Classification of directors is also likely to
provide the board of directors with greater continuity and experience. Neither
Australian Forest Industries’ nor Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s charter documents
contain provisions for a classified board.
Power
to Call Special Stockholder Meetings
Australian Forest Industries’
Bylaws provide that only the President or the
entire board of directors of the company may call a special meeting. Under
Delaware law, a special meeting may be called by the board of directors or by
any other person authorized to do so in the certificate of incorporation or the
bylaws. Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s
bylaws also permit its President to initiate
such a special meeting.
Elimination
of Actions by Written Consent of Stockholders
Under Nevada and Delaware law,
stockholders may execute an action by written consent in lieu of a stockholder
meeting. Delaware law and Nevada law permit a corporation to eliminate such
actions by written consent in its charter. Elimination of written consents of
stockholders could lengthen the amount of time and increase the expenditures
required to take stockholder actions since actions by written consent are not
subject to the minimum notice requirement of a stockholders’ meeting nor is
there any requirement that such a meeting be held. The elimination of
stockholders’ written consents, however, could deter hostile takeover attempts.
Without the stockholder’s written consent, a holder or group of holders
controlling a majority in interest of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s capital stock
would not be able to amend Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s bylaws or remove directors pursuant to a
stockholder’s written consent. Any such holder or group of holders would have to
call a stockholders’ meeting and wait the notice periods determined by the board
pursuant to Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s bylaws prior to taking any such action. Both
Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s Certificate of
Incorporation and
Australian Forest Industries’ charter documents permit the use of stockholders’
written consents.
Removal
of Directors
Under
Nevada law, any director or the entire board of directors may be removed with or
without cause, by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the voting
power of the issued and outstanding stock entitled to vote. However, if a
corporation has cumulative voting no director may be removed unless such removal
is approved by stockholders owning a sufficient number of shares to prevent the
director’s election under cumulative voting.
Under
Delaware law, a director of a corporation that does not have a classified board
of directors or cumulative voting may be removed with or without cause with the
approval of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote. In the case
of a Delaware corporation having cumulative voting, if less than the entire
board of directors is to be removed, a director may not be removed without cause
if the number of shares voted against such removal would be sufficient to elect
the director if then cumulatively voted at an election of the entire board of
directors. A director of a corporation with a classified board of directors may
be removed only for cause, unless the certificate of incorporation otherwise
provides.
Filling
Vacancies on the Board of Directors
Nevada law provides that all vacancies,
including those resulting from the removal of a director, may be filled by a
majority of the remaining directors unless the corporation’s articles of incorporation provide otherwise.
Under Delaware law, vacancies and newly
created directorships may be filled by a majority of the directors then in
office (even though less than a quorum) unless otherwise provided in the
certificate of
incorporation or
bylaws (and unless the certificate of
incorporation directs that a particular class is to elect such director, in
which case any other directors elected by such class, or a sole remaining
director, shall fill such vacancy).
Loans
to Officers and Employees
Under Delaware law and Nevada law, a
corporation may make loans to, guarantee the obligations of or otherwise assist
its officers or other employees and those of its subsidiaries (including directors who are also
officers or employees) when such action, in the judgment of the directors, may
reasonably be expected to benefit the corporation.
Inspection
of Stockholder Lists
Nevada
law provides an absolute right to stockholders to inspect and copy a
corporation’s shareholder list, provided the stockholder has held stock in the
corporation for at least six months or holds an aggregate of 5% or more of a
corporation’s voting shares. Under Delaware law, shareholders have a general
right to inspect and copy the stockholder list, provided the stockholder has a
proper purpose in seeking such access.
Mergers
and Major Transactions
Under Delaware law, whenever the
approval of the stockholders of a corporation is required for an agreement of
merger or consolidation, or for a sale, lease or exchange of all or
substantially all of its assets, such agreement, sale, lease or exchange
requires the affirmative vote of the owners of a majority of the outstanding
shares entitled to vote thereon. Notwithstanding the foregoing, under Delaware
law, unless required by its certificate of
incorporation, no vote of
the stockholders of a constituent corporation surviving a merger is necessary to
authorize a merger if:
|
•
|
the agreement of merger does not
amend in any respect the certificate of
incorporation of
such constituent
corporation;
|
|
•
|
each
share of stock of the constituent corporation outstanding immediately
prior to the merger is to be an identical outstanding or treasury share of
the surviving corporation after the merger;
and
|
|
•
|
either
no shares of common stock of the surviving corporation and no shares,
securities or obligations convertible into the common stock are to be
issued under such agreement of merger, or the number of shares of common
stock issued or so issuable does not exceed 20% of the number thereof
outstanding immediately prior to the
merger.
|
In
addition, Delaware law provides that a parent corporation that is the record
holder of at least 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of stock of a
subsidiary may merge the subsidiary into the parent corporation without the
approval of the subsidiary’s stockholders or board of directors and without the
approval of the parent’s stockholders.
Under
Nevada law, the sale, lease, exchange or disposal of all of the assets of a
corporation as well as any merger, consolidation or share exchange generally
must be recommended by the board of directors and requires the approval of a
majority of the shares of each class of the stock of the corporation entitled to
vote on such matters. Under Nevada law, the vote of the stockholders of a Nevada
corporation surviving a merger is not required if:
|
•
|
the articles of
incorporation of the
surviving corporation will not substantially differ from its articles of
incorporation before
the merger; and
|
|
•
|
each
stockholder of the surviving corporation before the effective date will
hold the same number of shares, with identical designations, preferences,
limitations and relative rights immediately after the merger; and the
number of voting shares outstanding immediately after the merger, plus the
number of voting shares issued as a result of the merger, will not exceed
by more than 20% the total number of voting shares of Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc. outstanding immediately before the merger; and
|
|
•
|
the
number of participating shares outstanding immediately before the merger,
plus the number of participating shares issuable as a result of the
merger, will not exceed by more than 20% the total number of participating
shares outstanding immediately before the
merger.
|
In
addition, Nevada law provides that no stockholder approval is required if, prior
to the adoption of the plan, another corporation that is a party to such merger
owns 90% or more of the outstanding shares of each class of such constituent
corporation.
Stockholder
Derivative Suits
Under
Delaware law and Nevada law, a stockholder may only bring a derivative action on
behalf of the corporation if he or she was a stockholder of the corporation at
the time of the transaction in question or his or her stock thereafter devolved
upon him or her by operation of law.
Dissenters’
Rights of Appraisal
Under
both Delaware and Nevada law, a dissenting stockholder of a corporation engaged
in certain major corporate transactions may, under certain limited
circumstances, be entitled to appraisal rights. Appraisal rights permit a
stockholder to receive cash in the amount of the fair market value of his or her
shares (as determined by agreement of the parties or a court), in lieu of the
consideration that he or she would otherwise receive in any such
transaction.
Under Delaware law, unless the
certificate of
incorporation of a
corporation provides otherwise, appraisal rights are only available with respect
to a merger or consolidation of a corporation under certain limited
circumstances. No appraisal rights are provided in the case of a sale or
transfer of all or substantially all of the corporation’s assets or an amendment
to the corporation’s certificate of incorporation. Moreover, Delaware law does
not provide appraisal rights in connection with a merger or consolidation,
unless the certificate of
incorporation provides
otherwise, to the owners of shares of a corporation that, at the record date
fixed to determine the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at
the meeting of stockholders to act upon the merger or consolidation, is
either:
|
•
|
listed
on a national securities exchange or designated as a national market
system security by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.;
or
|
|
•
|
held
of record by more than 2,000
stockholders;
|
unless
the applicable agreement of merger or consolidation requires the owners of these
shares to receive, in exchange for these shares, anything other than shares of
stock of the resulting or surviving corporation or shares of stock of any other
corporation listed on a national securities exchange, designated as described
above, or held of record by more than 2,000 holders.
In
addition, Delaware law denies appraisal rights to the stockholders of the
surviving corporation in a merger if that merger did not require for its
approval the vote of the stockholders of the surviving corporation. Under
Delaware law, no vote of the stockholders of a surviving corporation is required
if the number of shares to be issued in the merger does not exceed 20% of the
shares of the surviving corporation outstanding immediately prior to the merger
and certain other conditions are met.
Nevada
law provides that stockholders of a corporation are entitled to dissent from and
obtain payment of the fair market value of his or her shares in the event of the
following corporate actions, including:
|
•
|
consummation of a plan of merger to which the Nevada corporation
is a party (i) if approval by the stockholder is required for the merger
and he or she is entitled to vote on the merger, or (ii) in certain
circumstances, if the domestic corporation is a subsidiary and is merged
with its parent;
|
|
•
|
consummation
of a plan of exchange to which the domestic corporation is a party as the
corporation whose subject owner’s interest will be acquired, if he or she
is entitled to vote on the plan; or
|
|
•
|
any corporate action taken
pursuant to a vote of the stockholders to the extent that the articles of
incorporation,
bylaws or a resolution of the board of
directors provide that voting or nonvoting stockholders are entitled to
dissent and obtain payment for such stockholder’s
shares.
|
Under Nevada law, appraisal rights are
not provided, however, to the holders of shares of any class that is either
listed on a national securities exchange or held of record by more than 2,000
stockholders; unless the articles of incorporation of the corporation provide otherwise
or if the stockholder will receive for the stockholder’s shares, anything
except:
|
•
|
shares
of stock of the corporation surviving or resulting from such
merger;
|
|
•
|
shares
of stock of any other corporation listed on a national securities exchange
or on the national market system of the National Association of Securities
Dealers automated quotation system, or which will, upon completion of the
merger, be held by record by more than 2,000
holders;
|
|
•
|
cash
in lieu of fractional shares; or any combination of shares;
or
|
|
•
|
cash
in lieu of fractional shares.
|
Dissolution
Under
Delaware law, unless the board of directors approves the proposal to dissolve,
the dissolution must be approved by all of the stockholders entitled to vote. If
the board of directors of the corporation deems it advisable that the
corporation should be dissolved and the holders of a majority of the outstanding
shares of stock of the corporation entitled to vote votes in favor of the
proposed dissolution, the corporation shall be dissolved upon the filing of a
certificate of dissolution with the Secretary of State of the State of
Delaware.
The
corporation shall continue after dissolution for the purposes of defending suits
and settling its affairs for a three-year period. Delaware law sets forth
payment and distribution procedures a dissolving corporation must follow in
connection with winding up its affairs. Such procedures include notification
requirements and, under specified circumstances, obtaining the approval of the
Delaware Court of Chancery. Under Delaware law, directors of a dissolved
corporation that comply with the payment and distribution procedures provided
therein shall not be personally liable to the claimants of the dissolved
corporation.
Under Nevada law, if the board of
directors decides after the issuance of stock or the beginning of business that
the corporation should be dissolved, it must adopt a resolution to that effect
and such dissolution must also be approved by the affirmative vote of a majority
of the votes cast by all stockholders entitled to vote, unless a higher vote is
required by the articles
of incorporation or by the
bylaws. Australian Forest Industries does not
require a higher vote for dissolution.
Liability
of Directors and Officers
Delaware law permits a corporation to include
in its certificate of incorporation a provision limiting or eliminating the
personal liability of its directors to the corporation or its stockholders for
monetary damages arising from a breach of fiduciary duty, except
for:
|
•
|
a
breach of the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its
stockholders;
|
|
•
|
acts
or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or
a knowing violation of law;
|
|
•
|
a
declaration of a dividend or the authorization of the repurchase or
redemption of stock in violation of Delaware law;
or
|
|
•
|
any
transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit.
|
Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s bylaws each include provisions that limit the
liability of directors of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. to the maximum extent
permitted by law.
Nevada law permits a corporation to adopt any
provision in its articles
of incorporation that are
not contrary to the laws of Nevada. Under Nevada law, a director or officer is
not individually liable to a corporation or its stockholders for any damages as
a result of any act or failure to act in his capacity as a director or officer
unless it is proved that:
|
•
|
his
act or failure to act constituted a breach of his fiduciary duties;
and
|
|
•
|
his
breach of those duties involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing
violation of the law.
|
While
these provisions of Delaware and Nevada law provide officers and directors with
protection from awards for monetary damages for breaches of their duty of care,
they do not eliminate such duty. Accordingly, these provisions will have no
effect on the availability of equitable remedies such as an injunction or
rescission based on an officer’s or director’s breach of such
duties.
Indemnification
of Directors and Officers
Both
Delaware and Nevada permit a corporation to indemnify officers, directors,
employees and agents for actions taken in good faith and in a manner they
reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the
corporation, and with respect to any criminal action, which they had no
reasonable cause to believe that their conduct was unlawful.
Under
Delaware law, a corporation may indemnify any person involved in a third-party
action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or
investigative, by reason of being a director, officer, employee or agent of the
corporation, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and
settlement amounts actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such
action, suit or proceeding or incurred by reason of such persons being or having
been a representative of the corporation, if he or she acted in good faith and
reasonably believed that his or her actions were in or not opposed to the best
interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal proceeding, had
no reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful. Under
Delaware law, a corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is
threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or
suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by
reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or
agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation
as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership,
joint venture, trust of other enterprise against expenses, including attorneys’
fees, actually and reasonably incurred by such person in connection with the
defense or settlement of such action or suit if such person acted in good faith
and in a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the
best interests of the corporation. Delaware law requires, unless ordered by a
court, that the provision of any discretionary indemnification be predicated by
a finding that the officer, director, employee or agent has met the
above-described standard of conduct (a) by a majority vote of the directors who
are not parties to such action, suit or proceeding, even though less than a
quorum, (b) by a committee of such directors designated by a majority vote of
such directors, even though less than a quorum, (c) if there are no such
directors, or if such directors do direct, by independent legal counsel in a
written opinion, or (d) by the stockholders. However, no indemnification shall
be made in respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall
have been adjudged to be liable to the corporation unless and only to the extent
that the Court of Chancery or the court in which such action or suit was brought
shall determine upon application that, despite the adjudication of liability but
in view of all the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and
reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses which the Court of Chancery
or such other court shall deem proper.
Delaware
law also provides that a corporation may advance to a director or officer
expenses incurred by him in defending any action, upon receipt of an undertaking
by the present or former director or officer to repay the amount advanced if it
is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to indemnification. Delaware
law provides further that the provisions for indemnification contained therein
are nonexclusive of any other rights to which the party may be entitled under
any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders, disinterested directors or
otherwise.
The
provisions of Nevada law regarding indemnification are substantially similar to
those of Delaware law. Nevada law provides that a corporation may indemnify any
director, officer, employee or agent for any expenses incurred in connection
with such person’s position with the corporation, provided such person acted in
good faith and in a manner which they reasonably believed to be in or not
opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Nevada law requires, unless
ordered by a court, the provision of any discretionary indemnification must be
predicated by a finding that the officer, director, employee or agent has met
the above-described standard of conduct, by (a) a majority vote of the board of
directors for which the quorum does not include parties to the proceeding; (b)
independent legal counsel in a written opinion, or (c) stockholder approval.
Nevada law also provides that a corporation must advance to a director or
officer expenses incurred by him in defending any action, upon receipt of an
undertaking by the present or former director or officer to repay the amount
advanced if it is ultimately determined that he is not entitled to
indemnification.
Both
states require indemnification for any director, officer, employee or agent to
the extent that such person has been successful on the merits or otherwise in
defense of any action, suit or proceeding. Both states permit a corporation to
purchase and maintain liability insurance for its officers and
directors.
Annual
Meetings
Under
Delaware law, if the annual meeting for the election of directors is not held on
the designated date, or action by written consent to elect directors in lieu of
an annual meeting has not been taken, the directors are required to cause that
meeting to be held as soon as is convenient. If there is a failure to hold the
annual meeting or to take action by written consent to elect directors in lieu
of an annual meeting for a period of 30 days after the designated date for the
annual meeting, or if no date has been designated for a period of 13 months
after the latest to occur of the organization of the corporation, its last
annual meeting or the last action by written consent to elect directors in lieu
of an annual meeting, the Court of Chancery may summarily order a meeting to be
held upon the application of any stockholder or director.
Under
Nevada law, if the annual meeting is not held within 18 months after the
last election of directors, the district court has jurisdiction to order the
election of directors, upon application of any one or more stockholders holding
at least 15% of the voting power.
Notice
of Stockholder Meetings
Under
Delaware law, written notice of any meeting of the stockholders shall be given
not less than 10 nor more than 60 days before the date of the meeting to each
stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting. Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s bylaws
provide that written notice of a stockholder meeting shall be given not less
than 10, or in the event of a merger or consolidation, not less than 20, nor
more than 60 days between the date of the meeting to each stockholder entitled
to vote at the meeting.
Under Nevada law, written notice of any
meeting of the stockholders shall be given not less than 10 nor more than 60
days before the date of the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote at such
meeting. The Australian Forest Industries’ Bylaws provide that written notice of
a stockholder meeting shall be given not less than 10 days before the date of
the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting. Nevada law
also provides that the articles of incorporation or bylaws may require that the notice be also
published in one or more newspapers. Neither the Australian Forest Industries’
Bylaws nor the Australian Forest Industries’
charter contain such a requirement.
Advance
Notice of Director Nominations and Stockholder Proposals
Neither
Nevada law nor Delaware law specifies the manner in which nominations for
directors may be made by shareholders or the manner in which business may be
brought before a meeting. With respect to director nominations and stockholder
proposals, neither the Australian Forest Industries’ or Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc.’s charter documents contain any provisions regarding any such
matters.
Notice
of Adjournment of Stockholder Meetings and Business Transacted at Adjourned
Meeting
Under
Delaware law, if a meeting of stockholders is adjourned due to lack of a quorum
and the adjournment is for more than 30 days, or if after the adjournment a new
record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, notice of the adjourned meeting
must be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting. In
addition, at the adjourned meeting the corporation may transact any business
which might have been transacted at the original meeting regardless of whether
or not there exists a quorum.
Under
Nevada law, a corporation is not required to give any notice of an adjourned
meeting or of the business to be transacted at an adjourned meeting, other than
by announcement at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken, unless the
board fixes a new record date for the adjourned meeting, which is required if
the adjournment is for more than 60 days.
Fixing
Date for Determination of Stockholders of Record
There are
no material differences in fixing a date for determination of stockholders of
record between Delaware and Nevada law.
Amendments
to Charter
Under Delaware law, an amendment or
change to the Certificate
of Incorporation generally
requires the approval of the board of directors, followed by the approval of
such amendment by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon. When an amendment of the
certificate would adversely affect the rights of a class of stock or the rights
of a series of a class, Delaware law provides that the enactment of the
amendment also requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the
outstanding shares of such class or series.
Under
Nevada law, an amendment to the articles generally requires the approval of the
board of directors followed by the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes
cast by all stockholders entitled to vote thereon and, if any class or series of
shares is entitled to vote thereon as a class, the affirmative vote of a
majority of the votes cast in each such class vote.
Amendments to Bylaws
Under Delaware law, bylaws may be adopted, amended or repealed by
the stockholders entitled to vote thereon. A corporation may, in its
certificate of
incorporation, confer this
power upon the directors, although the power vested in the stockholders is not
divested or limited where the board of directors also has such power. Lone Pine
Holdings, Inc.’s Certificate of
Incorporation provides
that the directors have the power to adopt, amend or repeal Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc.’s Bylaws.
There is no provision in Nevada law
that expressly requires a grant of power to the board of directors in the
articles of
incorporation in order to
adopt bylaws for a corporation. Rather, Nevada law
provides that the board of directors of a corporation may make the bylaws, but that such bylaws are subject to those adopted by the
stockholders, if any. Further, although not part of Nevada law, an opinion of
the Nevada Attorney General also provides that directors may adopt bylaws for a corporation in the event that
the stockholders do not. Stockholders nevertheless retain the right to adopt
bylaws superseding those adopted by the board
of directors. The Australian Forest Industries’ Bylaws provide that the board or the
affirmative vote of two-thirds of the stockholders entitle to vote may adopt,
amend or repeal bylaws.
Interested
Director Transactions
Under Delaware law, contracts or transactions in which one or more
of a corporation’s directors has an interest are not void or voidable because of
such interest, if certain conditions are met. To meet these conditions, either
(i) the stockholders or the disinterested directors must approve any such
contract or transaction after the full
disclosure of material facts, or (ii) the contract or transaction must have been fair as
to the corporation at the time it was approved. Under Delaware law, if board
approval is sought, the contract or transactions must be approved by a
majority of the disinterested directors (even though less than a
quorum).
Nevada law does not automatically void
contracts or transactions between a corporation
and one of the corporation’s directors. Under Nevada law, a contract or transaction may not be void solely
because:
|
•
|
the contract is between the corporation and a
director of the corporation or an entity in which a director of the
corporation has a financial
interest;
|
|
•
|
an interested director is present
at the meeting of the board of directors that authorizes or approves the
contract or transaction;
or
|
|
•
|
the vote or votes of the
interested director are counted for purposes of authorizing or approving
the contract or transaction involving the
interested transaction.
|
Contracts or transactions such as those
described above are permissible if:
|
•
|
the facts surrounding the
contract or transaction are known to the
board of directors and the board of directors authorize, approve or ratify
the contract or transaction in good faith by
a vote without counting the vote of the interested director;
or
|
|
•
|
the facts or circumstances
surrounding the contract or transaction are made known to
the stockholders and they authorize, approve or ratify the contract or transaction in good faith by
a majority vote of the shares entitled to vote, including the votes, if
any, of the interested director;
or
|
|
•
|
the fact that the contract or transaction will prove to be
in the interested director’s financial interest is unknown to the
interested director at the time it is brought before the board of
directors; or
|
|
•
|
the contract or transaction is fair as to the
corporation at the time it is authorized or
approved.
|
Stockholders’
Rights to Examine Books and Records
Delaware
law provides that any stockholder of record may, in a written demand made under
oath, demand to examine a corporation’s books and records for a proper purpose
reasonably related to such person’s interest as a stockholder. If management of
the corporation refuses, the stockholder can compel an examination by court
order.
Nevada law permits any person who has
been a stockholder of record for at least six months, or any person holding at
least 5% of all outstanding shares, to inspect and copy the stockholders’ list,
articles or bylaws, if the stockholder gives at least
five business days’ prior written notice. The corporation may deny inspection if
the stockholder refuses to furnish an affidavit that the inspection is not
desired for a purpose or object other than the business of the corporation and
that he or she has not at any time offered for sale or sold any stockholders’
lists of any corporation or aided and abetted any person in procuring a list for
that purpose. In addition, a Nevada corporation must allow stockholders who own
or represent at least 15% of the corporation’s outstanding shares the right,
upon at least five days’ written demand, to inspect the books of account and
financial records of the corporation, to make copies from them and to conduct an
audit of those records, except that any corporation listed and traded on any
recognized stock exchange or any corporation that furnishes to its stockholders
a detailed, annual financial statement is exempt from this
requirement.
Committees
of the Board of Directors
Nevada
and Delaware law both allow the board of directors to delegate certain of their
duties to one or more committees elected by a majority of the board of
directors. A Delaware corporation can delegate to a committee of the board of
directors, among other things, the responsibility of nominating candidates for
election to the office of director, to fill vacancies on the board of directors,
and to authorize the acquisition of the corporation’s own stock.
Duration
of Proxies
Under
Delaware law, a proxy executed by a stockholder will remain valid for a period
of three years unless the proxy provides for a longer period. Under Nevada law,
a proxy is effective only for a period of six months unless it is coupled with
an interest or unless otherwise provided in the proxy, which duration may not
exceed seven years.
Differences
in Franchise Taxes
Nevada does not have a corporate franchise
tax, and we will not pay annual franchise taxes to Nevada for the calendar year
ended December 31,
2007. After the merger
contemplated by the Reincorporation is accomplished, we will pay annual
franchise taxes to Delaware. The Delaware franchise tax is based on a formula
involving the number of authorized shares or the asset value of the corporation,
whichever would impose a lesser tax.
Consideration
for Stock
Under
Delaware law, a corporation may accept as consideration for its stock a
combination of cash, property or past services in an amount not less than the
par value of the shares being issued, and a secured promissory note or other
binding obligation executed by the subscriber for any balance, the total of
which must equal at least the par value of the issued stock, as determined by
the board of directors.
Under Nevada law, a corporation may
issue its capital stock for less than par value and in return for certain
tangible or intangible property or benefit to the corporation, including cash,
promissory notes, services performed, promises to perform services evidenced by
a written contract, and other securities of the
corporation. Shares may be issued for less than par value.
Certain
Federal Income Tax Considerations
The
following description of federal income tax considerations is based on the
Internal Revenue Code, and applicable Treasury regulations promulgated
thereunder, judicial authority and current administrative rulings and practices
as in effect on the date of this Information Statement. This discussion should
not be considered tax or investment advice. In particular, this discussion does
not address the tax treatment of special classes of stockholders, such as banks,
insurance companies, tax-exempt entities and foreign persons. Stockholders
desiring to know their individual federal, state, local and foreign tax
considerations should consult their own tax advisers.
The
Reincorporation is intended to qualify as a tax-free reorganization under
Section 368(a)(1)(F) or 368(a)(1)(A) of the Internal Revenue Code. Assuming such
tax treatment, no taxable income, gain or loss will be recognized by us or the
stockholders as a result of the exchange of shares of common stock for shares of
Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s common stock upon consummation of the transaction.
The conversion of every one hundred shares of Australian Forest Industries
common stock into one share of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s common stock will be a
tax-free transaction, and the holding period and tax basis of Australian Forest
Industries’ common stock will be carried over to Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s
common stock received in exchange therefor.
Securities
Act Considerations
After the
merger contemplated by the Reincorporation is accomplished, Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc. will be a publicly held company, Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s common stock
will be listed for trading on the OTC Bulletin Board, and Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc. will file periodic reports and other documents with the SEC and provide to
stockholders the same types of information that we have previously filed and
provided. Stockholders whose shares of Australian Forest Industries common stock
are freely tradable before the Reincorporation will have freely tradable shares
of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s common stock. Stockholders holding restricted
shares of Australian Forest Industries common stock will have shares of Lone
Pine Holdings, Inc.’s common stock that are subject to the same restrictions on
transfer as those to which there present shares of common stock are subject, and
their stock certificates, if surrendered for replacement certificates
representing shares of Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.’s common stock, will bear the
same restrictive legend as appears on their present stock certificates.
Similarly, holders of convertible securities issued by Australian Forest
Industries, such as convertible debentures, share purchase options and share
purchase warrants will have the equivalent securities of Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc., which will be subject to the same restrictions as those to which their
present Australian Forest Industries’ securities are subject. For purposes of
computing compliance with the holding period requirement of Rule 144 under the
Securities Act of 1933, holders of securities will be deemed to have acquired
their Surviving Entity’s securities (including shares of common stock and
convertible debentures) on the date they acquired their Australian Forest
Industries securities (including shares of common stock and convertible
debentures). In summary, Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. and its stockholders will be
in the same respective positions under the federal securities laws after the
Reincorporation as they were before the Reincorporation.
INTEREST
OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN OR OPPOSITION TO MATTERS TO BE ACTED UPON
We are
aware of contracts entered into by each of our directors and their immediate
family members which would result in the sale of 235,000,000 shares of our
common stock, or approximately 91.2% of our outstanding shares of common stock
to a third party in exchange for $448,125. The sale of the shares of
common stock pursuant to these contracts is contingent upon the finalization of
the Reincorporation.
Except as
disclosed elsewhere in this Information Statement, since January 1, 2007, being
the commencement of our last completed financial year, none of the following
persons has any substantial interest, direct or indirect, by security holdings
or otherwise in any matter to be acted upon:
1. any
director or officer of our company;
2. any
proposed nominee for election as a director of our company; and
3. any
associate of affiliate of any of the foregoing persons.
The
shareholdings of our directors and officers are listed below in the section
entitled “Security Ownership
of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management”. No director has advised
that he intends to oppose the Reincorporation, as more particularly described
herein.
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
Principal
Stockholders
The
following table sets forth, as of November 13, 2008, certain information with
respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder
known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and
by each of our current directors, our chief executive officer and our four most
highly compensated executive officers (other than our chief executive officer)
as at December 31, 2007. Each person has sole voting and investment power with
respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Beneficial
ownership consists of a direct interest in the shares of common stock, except as
otherwise indicated.
The
following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of the
shares of the Common Stock (the only class of
shares previously issued by the Company) at April 14, 2008
by (i) each person known by the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than
five percent (5%) of the Company’s outstanding shares of Common
Stock, (ii) each director of the Company, (iii) the
executive officers of the Company, and (iv) by all directors and executive
officers of the Company as a group. Other than the Timbermans Group
Pty Ltd, each person named in the table, has sole voting and investment power
with respect to all shares shown as beneficially owned by such person and can be
contacted at the address of the Company.
Title
of Class
|
Name
of Beneficial Owner
|
Shares
of Common Stock
|
|
Percent
of Class
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
|
Timbermans
Group Pty Ltd1
|
140,000,000
|
|
54.47%
|
Common
|
Norman
Backman2
|
20,000,000
|
|
7.78%
|
Common
|
Colin
Baird3
|
20,000,000
|
|
7.78%
|
Common
|
Tony
Esplin4
|
20,000,000
|
|
7.78%
|
Common
|
Michael
Timms5
|
20,000,000
|
|
7.78%
|
Common
|
Roger
Timms6
|
20,000,000
|
|
7.78%
|
Directors
and Officers as a group
|
|
240,000,000
|
|
93.39%
|
1Timbermans
Group Pty Ltd is an Australian corporation with 5 shareholders who are the same
individuals as our officers and directors and Mr. Norman Backman. For the
purposes of aggregating the securities ownership of officers and directors, we
have included those shares held by Timbermans Group.
2Mr.
Backman maintains his shares in his and his wife’s name
3Mr. Baird
maintains his shares in his and his wife’s name
4Mr.
Esplin maintains his shares in his and his wife’s name
5Mr.
Michael Timms maintains his shares in his and his wife’s name
6Mr. Roger
Timms maintains his shares in his and his wife’s name
ADDITIONAL
AVAILABLE INFORMATION
We are subject to the information and
reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and in accordance
with such act we file periodic reports, documents and other information with the
Securities and Exchange Commission relating to our business, financial
statements and other matters. Such reports and other information may be
inspected and are available for copying at the offices of the Securities and
Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549 or may be
accessed at www.sec.gov.
EXHIBIT
A
DISSENT
PROCEDURE
SECTIONS
92A.300 TO 92A.500 OF THE
NEVADA
REVISED STATUTES
NRS
92A.300 Definitions. As used in NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, unless the
context otherwise requires, the words and terms defined in NRS 92A.305 to
92A.335, inclusive, have the meanings ascribed to them in those
sections.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2086)
NRS
92A.305 “Beneficial stockholder” defined. “Beneficial stockholder” means a
person who is a beneficial owner of shares held in a voting trust or by a
nominee as the stockholder of record.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS
92A.310 “Corporate action” defined. “Corporate action” means the action of a
domestic corporation.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS
92A.315 “Dissenter” defined. “Dissenter” means a stockholder who is entitled to
dissent from a domestic corporation’s action under NRS 92A.380 and who exercises
that right when and in the manner required by NRS 92A.400 to 92A.480,
inclusive.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2087; A 1999, 1631)
NRS
92A.320 “Fair value” defined. “Fair value,” with respect to a dissenter’s
shares, means the value of the shares immediately before the effectuation of the
corporate action to which he objects, excluding any appreciation or depreciation
in anticipation of the corporate action unless exclusion would be
inequitable.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS
92A.325 “Stockholder” defined. “Stockholder” means a stockholder of record or a
beneficial stockholder of a domestic corporation.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS
92A.330 “Stockholder of record” defined. “Stockholder of record” means the
person in whose name shares are registered in the records of a domestic
corporation or the beneficial owner of shares to the extent of the rights
granted by a nominee’s certificate on file with the domestic
corporation.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS
92A.335 “Subject corporation” defined. “Subject corporation” means the domestic
corporation which is the issuer of the shares held by a dissenter before the
corporate action creating the dissenter’s rights becomes effective or the
surviving or acquiring entity of that issuer after the corporate action becomes
effective.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS
92A.340 Computation of interest. Interest payable pursuant to NRS 92A.300 to
92A.500, inclusive, must be computed from the effective date of the action until
the date of payment, at the average rate currently paid by the entity on its
principal bank loans or, if it has no bank loans, at a rate that is fair and
equitable under all of the circumstances.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2087)
NRS
92A.350 Rights of dissenting partner of domestic limited partnership. A
partnership agreement of a domestic limited partnership or, unless otherwise
provided in the partnership agreement, an agreement of merger or exchange, may
provide that contractual rights with respect to the partnership interest of a
dissenting general or limited partner of a domestic limited partnership are
available for any class or group of partnership interests in connection with any
merger or exchange in which the domestic limited partnership is a constituent
entity.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS
92A.360 Rights of dissenting member of domestic limited-liability company. The
articles of organization or operating agreement of a domestic limited-liability
company or, unless otherwise provided in the articles of organization or
operating agreement, an agreement of merger or exchange, may provide that
contractual rights with respect to the interest of a dissenting member are
available in connection with any merger or exchange in which the domestic
limited-liability company is a constituent entity.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS
92A.370 Rights of dissenting member of domestic nonprofit
corporation.
1. Except
as otherwise provided in subsection 2, and unless otherwise provided in the
articles or bylaws, any member of any constituent domestic nonprofit corporation
who voted against the merger may, without prior notice, but within 30 days after
the effective date of the merger, resign from membership and is thereby excused
from all contractual obligations to the constituent or surviving corporations
which did not occur before his resignation and is thereby entitled to those
rights, if any, which would have existed if there had been no merger and the
membership had been terminated or the member had been expelled.
2. Unless
otherwise provided in its articles of incorporation or bylaws, no member of a
domestic nonprofit corporation, including, but not limited to, a cooperative
corporation, which supplies services described in chapter 704 of NRS to its
members only, and no person who is a member of a domestic nonprofit corporation
as a condition of or by reason of the ownership of an interest in real property,
may resign and dissent pursuant to subsection 1.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS
92A.380 Right of stockholder to dissent from certain corporate actions and to
obtain payment for shares.
1. Except
as otherwise provided in NRS 92A.370 and 92A.390, a stockholder is entitled to
dissent from, and obtain payment of the fair value of his shares in the event of
any of the following corporate actions:
(a)
Consummation of a plan of merger to which the domestic corporation is a
constituent entity:
(1) If
approval by the stockholders is required for the merger by NRS 92A.120 to
92A.160, inclusive, or the articles of incorporation, regardless of whether the
stockholder is entitled to vote on the plan of merger; or
(2) If
the domestic corporation is a subsidiary and is merged with its parent pursuant
to NRS 92A.180.
(b)
Consummation of a plan of exchange to which the domestic corporation is a
constituent entity as the corporation whose subject owner’s interests will be
acquired, if his shares are to be acquired in the plan of exchange.
(c) Any
corporate action taken pursuant to a vote of the stockholders to the event that
the articles of incorporation, bylaws or a resolution of the board of directors
provides that voting or nonvoting stockholders are entitled to dissent and
obtain payment for their shares.
2. A
stockholder who is entitled to dissent and obtain payment pursuant to NRS
92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive, may not challenge the corporate action creating
his entitlement unless the action is unlawful or fraudulent with respect to him
or the domestic corporation.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2087; A 2001, 1414, 3199)
NRS
92A.390 Limitations on right of dissent: Stockholders of certain classes or
series; action of stockholders not required for plan of merger.
1. There
is no right of dissent with respect to a plan of merger or exchange in favor of
stockholders of any class or series which, at the record date fixed to determine
the stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting at
which the plan of merger or exchange is to be acted on, were either listed on a
national securities exchange, included in the national market system by the
National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or held by at least 2,000
stockholders of record, unless:
(a) The
articles of incorporation of the corporation issuing the shares provide
otherwise; or
(b) The
holders of the class or series are required under the plan of merger or exchange
to accept for the shares anything except:
(1) Cash,
owner’s interests or owner’s interests and cash in lieu of fractional owner’s
interests of:
(I) The
surviving or acquiring entity; or
(II) Any
other entity which, at the effective date of the plan of merger or exchange,
were either listed on a national securities exchange, included in the national
market system by the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., or held
of record by a least 2,000 holders of owner’s interests of record;
or
(2) A
combination of cash and owner’s interests of the kind described in
sub-subparagraphs (I) and (II) of subparagraph (1) of paragraph
(b).
2. There
is no right of dissent for any holders of stock of the surviving domestic
corporation if the plan of merger does not require action of the stockholders of
the surviving domestic corporation under NRS 92A.130.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2088)
NRS
92A.400 Limitations on right of dissent: Assertion as to portions only to shares
registered to stockholder; assertion by beneficial stockholder.
1. A
stockholder of record may assert dissenter’s rights as to fewer than all of the
shares registered in his name only if he dissents with respect to all shares
beneficially owned by any one person and notifies the subject corporation in
writing of the name and address of each person on whose behalf he asserts
dissenter’s rights. The rights of a partial dissenter under this subsection are
determined as if the shares as to which he dissents and his other shares were
registered in the names of different stockholders.
2. A
beneficial stockholder may assert dissenter’s rights as to shares held on his
behalf only if:
(a) He
submits to the subject corporation the written consent of the stockholder of
record to the dissent not later than the time the beneficial stockholder asserts
dissenter’s rights; and
(b) He
does so with respect to all shares of which he is the beneficial stockholder or
over which he has power to direct the vote.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2089)
NRS
92A.410 Notification of stockholders regarding right of dissent.
1. If a
proposed corporate action creating dissenters’ rights is submitted to a vote at
a stockholders’ meeting, the notice of the meeting must state that stockholders
are or may be entitled to assert dissenters’ rights under NRS 92A.300 to
92A.500, inclusive, and be accompanied by a copy of those sections.
2. If the
corporate action creating dissenters’ rights is taken by written consent of the
stockholders or without a vote of the stockholders, the domestic corporation
shall notify in writing all stockholders entitled to assert dissenters’ rights
that the action was taken and send them the dissenter’s notice described in NRS
92A.430.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2089; A 1997, 730)
NRS
92A.420 Prerequisites to demand for payment for shares.
1. If a
proposed corporate action creating dissenters’ rights is submitted to a vote at
a stockholders’ meeting, a stockholder who wishes to assert dissenter’s
rights:
(a) Must
deliver to the subject corporation, before the vote is taken, written notice of
his intent to demand payment for his shares if the proposed action is
effectuated; and
(b) Must
not vote his shares in favor of the proposed action.
2. A
stockholder who does not satisfy the requirements of subsection 1 and NRS
92A.400 is not entitled to payment for his shares under this
chapter.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2089; 1999, 1631)
NRS
92A.430 Dissenter’s notice: Delivery to stockholders entitled to assert rights;
contents.
1. If a
proposed corporate action creating dissenters’ rights is authorized at a
stockholders’ meeting, the subject corporation shall deliver a written
dissenter’s notice to all stockholders who satisfied the requirements to assert
those rights.
2. The
dissenter’s notice must be sent no later than 10 days after the effectuation of
the corporate action, and must:
(a) State
where the demand for payment must be sent and where and when certificates, if
any, for shares must be deposited;
(b)
Inform the holders of shares not represented by certificates to what extent the
transfer of the shares will be restricted after the demand for payment is
received;
(c)
Supply a form for demanding payment that includes the date of the first
announcement to the news media or to the stockholders of the terms of the
proposed action and requires that the person asserting dissenter’s rights
certify whether or not he acquired beneficial ownership of the shares before
that date;
(d) Set a
date by which the subject corporation must receive the demand for payment, which
may not be less than 30 nor more than 60 days after the date the notice is
delivered; and
(e) Be
accompanied by a copy of NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2089)
NRS
92A.440 Demand for payment and deposit of certificates; retention of rights of
stockholder.
1. A
stockholder to whom a dissenter’s notice is sent must:
(a)
Demand payment;
(b)
Certify whether he acquired beneficial ownership of the shares before the date
required to be set forth in the dissenter’s notice for this certification;
and
(c)
Deposit his certificates, if any, in accordance with the terms of the
notice.
2. The
stockholder who demands payment and deposits his certificates, if any, before
the proposed corporate action is taken retains all other rights of a stockholder
until those rights are canceled or modified by the taking of the proposed
corporate action.
3. The
stockholder who does not demand payment or deposit his certificates where
required, each by the date set forth in the dissenter’s notice, is not entitled
to payment for his shares under this chapter.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2090; A 1997, 730)
NRS
92A.450 Uncertificated shares: Authority to restrict transfer after demand for
payment; retention of rights of stockholder.
1. The
subject corporation may restrict the transfer of shares not represented by a
certificate from the date the demand for their payment is received.
2. The
person for whom dissenter’s rights are asserted as to shares not represented by
a certificate retains all other rights of a stockholder until those rights are
canceled or modified by the taking of the proposed corporate
action.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2090)
NRS
92A.460 Payment for shares: General requirements.
1. Except
as otherwise provided in NRS 92A.470, within 30 days after receipt of a demand
for payment, the subject corporation shall pay each dissenter who complied with
NRS 92A.440 the amount the subject corporation estimates to be the fair value of
his shares, plus accrued interest. The obligation of the subject corporation
under this subsection may be enforced by the district court:
(a) Of
the county where the corporation’s registered office is located; or
(b) At
the election of any dissenter residing or having its registered office in this
state, of the county where the dissenter resides or has its registered office.
The court shall dispose of the complaint promptly.
2. The
payment must be accompanied by:
(a) The
subject corporation’s balance sheet as of the end of a fiscal year ending not
more than 16 months before the date of payment, a statement of income for that
year, a statement of changes in the stockholders’ equity for that year and the
latest available interim financial statements, if any;
(b) A
statement of the subject corporation’s estimate of the fair value of the
shares;
(c) An
explanation of how the interest was calculated;
(d) A
statement of the dissenter’s rights to demand payment under NRS 92A.480;
and
(e) A
copy of NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2090)
NRS
92A.470 Payment for shares: Shares acquired on or after date of dissenter’s
notice.
1. A
subject corporation may elect to withhold payment from a dissenter unless he was
the beneficial owner of the shares before the date set forth in the dissenter’s
notice as the date of the first announcement to the news media or to the
stockholders of the terms of the proposed action.
2. To the
extent the subject corporation elects to withhold payment, after taking the
proposed action, it shall estimate the fair value of the shares, plus accrued
interest, and shall offer to pay this amount to each dissenter who agrees to
accept it in full satisfaction of his demand. The subject corporation shall send
with its offer a statement of its estimate of the fair value of the shares, an
explanation of how the interest was calculated, and a statement of the
dissenters’ right to demand payment pursuant to NRS 92A.480.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2091)
NRS
92A.480 Dissenter’s estimate of fair value: Notification of subject corporation;
demand for payment of estimate.
1. A
dissenter may notify the subject corporation in writing of his own estimate of
the fair value of his shares and the amount of interest due, and demand payment
of his estimate, less any payment pursuant to NRS 92A.460, or reject the offer
pursuant to NRS 92A.470 and demand payment of the fair value of his shares and
interest due, if he believes that the amount paid pursuant to NRS 92A.460 or
offered pursuant to NRS 92A.470 is less than the fair value of his shares or
that the interest due is incorrectly calculated.
2. A
dissenter waives his right to demand payment pursuant to this section unless he
notifies the subject corporation of his demand in writing within 30 days after
the subject corporation made or offered payment for his shares.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2091)
NRS
92A.490 Legal proceeding to determine fair value: Duties of subject corporation;
powers of court; rights of dissenter.
1. If a
demand for payment remains unsettled, the subject corporation shall commence a
proceeding within 60 days after receiving the demand and petition the court to
determine the fair value of the shares and accrued interest. If the subject
corporation does not commence the proceeding within the 60-day period, it shall
pay each dissenter whose demand remains unsettled the amount
demanded.
2. A
subject corporation shall commence the proceeding in the district court of the
county where its registered office is located. If the subject corporation is a
foreign entity without a resident agent in the state, it shall commence the
proceeding in the county where the registered office of the domestic corporation
merged with or whose shares were acquired by the foreign entity was
located.
3. The
subject corporation shall make all dissenters, whether or not residents of
Nevada, whose demands remain unsettled, parties to the proceeding as in an
action against their shares. All parties must be served with a copy of the
petition. Nonresidents may be served by registered or certified mail or by
publication as provided by law.
4. The
jurisdiction of the court in which the proceeding is commenced under subsection
2 is plenary and exclusive. The court may appoint one or more persons as
appraisers to receive evidence and recommend a decision on the question of fair
value. The appraisers have the powers described in the order appointing them, or
any amendment thereto. The dissenters are entitled to the same discovery rights
as parties in other civil proceedings.
5. Each
dissenter who is made a party to the proceeding is entitled to a
judgment:
(a) For
the amount, if any, by which the court finds the fair value of his shares, plus
interest, exceeds the amount paid by the subject corporation; or
(b) For
the fair value, plus accrued interest, of his after-acquired shares for which
the subject corporation elected to withhold payment pursuant to NRS
92A.470.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2091)
NRS
92A.500 Legal proceeding to determine fair value: Assessment of costs and
fees.
1. The
court in a proceeding to determine fair value shall determine all of the costs
of the proceeding, including the reasonable compensation and expenses of any
appraisers appointed by the court. The court shall assess the costs against the
subject corporation, except that the court may assess costs against all or some
of the dissenters, in amounts the court finds equitable, to the extent the court
finds the dissenters acted arbitrarily, vexatiously or not in good faith in
demanding payment.
2. The
court may also assess the fees and expenses of the counsel and experts for the
respective parties, in amounts the court finds equitable:
(a)
Against the subject corporation and in favor of all dissenters if the court
finds the subject corporation did not substantially comply with the requirements
of NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive; or
(b)
Against either the subject corporation or a dissenter in favor of any other
party, if the court finds that the party against whom the fees and expenses are
assessed acted arbitrarily, vexatiously or not in good faith with respect to the
rights provided by NRS 92A.300 to 92A.500, inclusive.
3. If the
court finds that the services of counsel for any dissenter were of substantial
benefit to other dissenters similarly situated, and that the fees for those
services should not be assessed against the subject corporation, the court may
award to those counsel reasonable fees to be paid out of the amounts awarded to
the dissenters who were benefited.
4. In a
proceeding commenced pursuant to NRS 92A.460, the court may assess the costs
against the subject corporation, except that the court may assess costs against
all or some of the dissenters who are parties to the proceeding, in amounts the
court finds equitable, to the extent the court finds that such parties did not
act in good faith in instituting the proceeding.
5. This
section does not preclude any party in a proceeding commenced pursuant to NRS
92A.460 or 92A.490 from applying the provisions of N.R.C.P. 68 or NRS
17.115.
(Added to
NRS by 1995, 2092)
EXHIBIT
B
Dissenter’s
Notice of Australian Forest Industries
Delivered
Pursuant to NRS 92A.430
If a
stockholder has not approved the merger, he, she or it is entitled to
dissent.
Demand for payment must be sent by to
the Company by mail, courier, facsimile or electronic mail by [insert date of
mailing of definitive Schedule 14C plus 40 days] as follows:
Australian
Forest Industries
4/95
Salmon Street, Port Melbourne, Victoria
Australia,
3207
Telephone: 011
61 3 8645 4340
Attention: Colin
Baird
Together with written demand or on or
before [insert date of
mailing of definitive Schedule 14C plus 40 days], certificates of our company’s shares
must be deposited with our company at the address above or with our transfer
agent at:
Transfer
Online, Inc.™
317 SW
Alder Street, 2nd Floor
Portland,
OR 97204
Shares of
our company not represented by certificates will be restricted from transfer
after the demand for payment is received.
A form
for demanding payment is attached to this Dissenter’s Notice as Appendix
1.
A copy of
the dissent provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes is attached as Exhibit A
to the Information Statement to which this Dissenter’s Notice is
attached.
APPENDIX
A
EXHIBIT
1 TO DISSENTER’S NOTICE
Name and
Address of Stockholder exercising dissent rights:
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
__________________________________________
Number of
Shares of Stockholder over which Stockholder is exercising dissent
rights:
__________________________________________
The
undersigned hereby objects to the merger of Australian Forest Industries, a
Nevada corporation, and Lone Pine Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and
demand payment for the fair value of above number of shares of the Company, plus
accrued interest, if the merger is consummated.
The
undersigned hereby certifies that he/she/it acquired beneficial ownership of the
shares of the Company before November 11, 2008 being the record
date.
Dated:
_______________, 2008.
|
Signature
of Co-owners,
|
Signature
|
if
applicable
|
|
|
|
|
|
Print Name:
EXHIBIT
C
Merger
Agreement
AGREEMENT
dated as of November , 2008 (the
"Agreement"), between Australian Forest Industries, a Nevada corporation
("AUFI"), and Lone Pine Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Surviving
Entity") (AUFI and Surviving Entity are sometimes referred to herein
collectively as the "Constituent Corporations").
WHEREAS,
Surviving Entity was incorporated in the State of Delaware
on ,
2008 and is a wholly-owned subsidiary of AUFI; and
WHEREAS,
the respective Board of Directors of AUFI and Surviving Entity each believes
that it is in the best interest of AUFI and its stockholders to reincorporate in
the State of Delaware by merging with and into Surviving Entity pursuant to this
Agreement; and
WHEREAS,
the respective Board of Directors of AUFI and Surviving Entity have approved
this Agreement and the Merger (as defined below) and recommended that the
stockholders of AUFI approve and adopt this Agreement and the
Merger.
NOW,
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises, the mutual agreements and
undertakings herein given and other good and valuable consideration, the parties
hereto agree, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Nevada Revised
Statutes (the "NRS") and the Delaware General Corporation Law (the "DGCL"),
respectively, which permit such merger, AUFI will merge with and into Surviving
Entity, at the Effective Time (as defined below) (the "Merger"), and that the
terms and conditions of the Merger hereby agreed to shall be as hereinafter set
forth:
ARTICLE
I
PRINCIPAL
TERMS OF MERGER
Section
1.01 Merger. At the Effective Time, AUFI shall merge with and
into Surviving Entity, with Surviving Entity surviving as a Delaware corporation
under the name "Lone Pine Holdings, Inc." (the "Surviving Corporation"),
provided that this Agreement has not been terminated pursuant to Section
4.04.
Section
1.02 Effective Time of Merger. The Merger shall become
effective as of the completion of all filing requirements specified in Sections
4.05 and 4.06, and such date and time is hereinafter referred to as the
"Effective Time".
ARTICLE
II
CERTIFICATE
OF INCORPORATION, BY-LAWS AND DIRECTORS
Section
2.01 Certificate of Incorporation. The Certificate of
Incorporation of Surviving Entity in effect at the Effective Time of the Merger
shall be the Certificate of Incorporation of the Surviving Corporation, to
remain unchanged until amended as provided by law.
Section
2.02 By-Laws. The By-Laws of Surviving Entity in effect at the
Effective Time of the Merger shall be the By-Laws of the Surviving Corporation,
to remain unchanged until amended as provided by law.
Section
2.03 Directors. The members of the Board of Directors of AUFI
prior to the Effective Time shall thereafter be the members of the Board of
Directors of the Surviving Corporation until the earlier of their resignation or
removal or until their respective successors are duly elected or appointed and
qualified in the manner provided in the Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws
of the Surviving Corporation, or as otherwise provided by law.
Section
2.04 Officers. The officers of AUFI immediately prior to the
Effective Time shall be the initial officers of the Surviving Corporation until
the earlier of their resignation or removal or until their respective successors
are duly elected or appointed and qualified.
ARTICLE
III
EXCHANGE
AND CANCELLATION OF SHARES
Section
3.01 Exchange and Issuance. At the Effective Time of the
Merger, all issued and outstanding shares of AUFI common stock, par value $.0001
per share (the "Old Common Stock"), shall be canceled and the corporate
existence of AUFI, shall cease. For every 100 shares of AUFI common stock held
by a shareholder, one share of common stock, par value $.0001 per share (the
"New Common Stock"), of Surviving Entity shall be issued to the stockholders of
AUFI as a result of the Merger as herein provided.
Section
3.02 After the Effective Time of the Merger, the holders of all
of said issued and outstanding shares of Old Common Stock shall automatically be
and become holders of shares of New Common Stock upon the basis above specified,
whether or not certificates representing said shares are then issued and
delivered.
Section
3.03 Cancellation of Old Common Stock. After the Effective Time
of the Merger, each holder of record of any outstanding certificate or
certificates theretofore representing shares of Old Common Stock ("Old
Certificates") will be instructed on how to surrender the Old Certificates to
the Company's transfer agent, and receive in exchange therefor a certificate or
certificates representing the number of shares of New Common Stock calculated on
the basis described in this Article III. Until so surrendered, each outstanding
Old Certificate which, prior to the Effective Time of the Merger, represented
one or more shares of Old Common Stock shall be deemed for all corporate
purposes to evidence ownership of a number of shares of New Common Stock
calculated on the basis described in this Article III. Upon the surrender of an
Old Certificate or Old Certificates representing shares of Old Common Stock, the
proper officers of the Surviving Corporation shall cancel said Old Certificate
or Old Certificates.
Section
3.04 No Fractional Shares. Upon the exchange, in lieu of
issuing certificates for fractional shares, fractional shares will be rounded up
to one whole share, and a record holder entitled to receive a fractional share
will receive one whole share of New Common Stock.
ARTICLE
IV
CONDITIONS;
TERMINATION
Section
4.01 Submission to Vote of Stockholders. This Agreement shall
be submitted to the stockholders of AUFI, as provided by applicable law, and
shall take effect, and be deemed to be the Merger Agreement of the Constituent
Corporations, upon the approval or adoption thereof by said stockholders of AUFI
in accordance with the requirements of the NRS.
Section
4.02 Amendment of Charter and By-Laws. Prior to the Effective
Time of the Merger, the Certificate of Incorporation of Surviving Entity will be
amended and restated in the form set forth in Exhibit A hereto and the By-laws
of Surviving Entity will be amended and restated in the form set forth in
Exhibit B hereto.
Section
4.03 [Reserved]
Section
4.04 Termination of Agreement. Anything herein or elsewhere to
the contrary notwithstanding, this Agreement may be abandoned by AUFI by an
appropriate resolution of its Board of Directors at any time prior to the
Effective Time of the Merger if such Board of Directors believes that the Merger
is not in the best interests of AUFI.
Section
4.05 Filing of Articles of Merger in the State of Nevada. As
soon as practicable after (i) the requisite stockholder approval referenced in
Section 4.01 and (ii) the amendment and restatement of the Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws of Surviving Entity referenced in Section 4.02, a
Articles of Merger to effectuate the terms of this Agreement shall be executed
and signed on behalf of each of the Constituent Corporations and thereafter
delivered to the Department of State (the "Department") of the State of Nevada
for filing and recording in accordance with applicable law, unless this
Agreement has been terminated pursuant to Section 4.04.
Section
4.06 Filing of Certificate of Merger in the State of Delaware.
As soon as practicable after (i) the requisite stockholder approval referenced
in Section 4.01 and (ii) the amendment and restatement of the Certificate of
Incorporation and By-laws of Surviving Entity referenced in Section 4.02, a
Certificate of Merger to effectuate the terms of this Agreement shall be
executed by each of the Constituent Corporations and thereafter delivered to the
Secretary of State of the State of Delaware for filing and recording in
accordance with applicable law, unless this Agreement has been terminated
pursuant to Section 4.04.
ARTICLE
V
EFFECT OF
MERGER
Section
5.01 Effect of Merger. At the Effective Time of the Merger, the
Constituent Corporations shall be a single corporation, which shall be Surviving
Entity, and the separate existence of AUFI shall cease except to the extent
provided by the laws of the States of Nevada and Delaware. Surviving Entity
shall thereupon and thereafter possess all the rights, privileges, immunities
and franchises, of both a public and private nature, of each of the Constituent
Corporations; and all property, real, personal and mixed, and all debts due on
whatever account, including subscriptions to shares, and all other choses in
action, and all and every other interest of, or belonging to, or due to each of
the Constituent Corporations, shall be taken and deemed to be vested in
Surviving Entity without further act or deed; and the title to all real estate,
or any interest therein, vested in either of the Constituent Corporations shall
not revert or be in any way impaired by reason of the Merger. Surviving Entity
shall thenceforth be responsible and liable for all of the liabilities and
obligations of each of the Constituent Corporations and any claim existing or
action or proceeding pending by or against either of the Constituent
Corporations may be prosecuted to judgment as if the Merger had not taken place,
or the Surviving Corporation may be substituted in its place, and neither the
rights of creditors nor any liens upon the property of either of the Constituent
Corporations shall be impaired by the Merger. Surviving Entity shall assume any
stock option or similar employee benefits plan of AUFI, and all contractual
rights of AUFI for the issuance of shares of Old Common Stock, and such
issuances or reserves for issuances shall be of shares of New Common Stock on an
as-converted basis as set forth in Section 3.01.
ARTICLE
VI
POST-MERGER
UNDERTAKINGS
Section
6.01 Service of Process. Surviving Entity hereby agrees that it
may be served with process within the State of New York in any proceeding for
the enforcement of any obligation of AUFI and in any proceeding for the
enforcement of the rights of any dissenting stockholder of AUFI.
Section
6.02 Authorization of Service of Process. Surviving Entity
hereby authorizes service of process on it pursuant to Section 6.01 by
registered or certified mail return receipt requested to its principal office as
set forth in the Certificate of Merger to be filed pursuant to Section 4.05 or
as changed by notice to the Department.
ARTICLE
VII
MISCELLANEOUS
Section
7.01 [Reserved]
Section
7.02 Further Actions. Each of the Constituent Corporations
shall take or cause to be taken all action, or do, or cause to be done, all
things necessary, proper or advisable under the NRS and the DGCL to consummate
and make effective the Merger following approval of the Merger by the
stockholders of AUFI in accordance with the NRS and the DGCL.
Section
7.03 Amendments. At any time prior to the Effective Time of the
Merger (notwithstanding any stockholder approval), if authorized by their
respective Board of Directors, the parties hereto may, by written agreement,
amend or supplement any of the provisions of this Agreement. Any written
instrument or agreement referred to in this section shall be validly and
sufficiently authorized for the purposes of this Agreement if signed on behalf
of each of the Constituent Corporations by an officer of the appropriate
Constituent Corporation.
Section
7.04 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number
of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original instrument, but
all such counterparts together shall constitute one and the same
instrument.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the Constituent Corporations have caused this Agreement and
Plan of Merger to be executed by an authorized officer of each party hereto as
of the date above first written.
AUSTRALIAN
FOREST INDUSTRIES
By:
Name:
Title
Lone Pine
Holdings, Inc.
By:
Name:
Title
EXHIBIT
D
Form
of Articles of Merger
Articles
of Merger
Page
1
(PURSUANT
TO NRS 92A.200)
ROSS
MILLER
Secretary
of State
(775)
684 5708
Website:
www.nvsos.gov
204
North Carson Street, Ste 1
Carson
City, Nevada 89701-4299
1) Name and jurisdiction of
organization of each constituent entity (NRS 92A.200). If there are
more than four merging entities, check box and attach an 8 1/2" x11'' blank
sheet containing the required information for each additional
entity.
Name
of merging entity: Australian Forest Industries
Entity
type *: Corporation
Jurisdiction:
Nevada
Name
of merging entity
Entity
type *
Jurisdiction
Name
of merging entity
Entity
type *
Jurisdiction
Name
of merging entity
Entity
type *
Jurisdiction
and,
Name
of surviving entity
Entity
type *
Jurisdiction
*
Corporation, non-profit corporation, limited partnership, limited-liability
company or business trust.
This
form must be accompanied by appropriate fees.
Filing
Fee: $350.00
Articles
of Merger
Page
2
(PURSUANT
TO NRS 92A.200)
ROSS
MILLER
Secretary
of State
(775)
684 5708
Website:
www.nvsos.gov
204
North Carson Street, Ste 1
Carson
City, Nevada 89701-4299
2)
Forwarding address where copies of process may be sent by the Secretary of State
of Nevada (if a foreign entity is the survivor in the merger - NRS 92A.1
90):
Attn:
Colin Baird
c/o:
4/95 Salmon Street, Port
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3207
3)
(Choose one)
X The
undersigned declares that a plan of merger has been adopted by each constituent
entity (NRS 92A.200).
The undersigned declares that a plan
of merger has been adopted by the parent domestic entity (NRS
92A.180)
4) Owner's approval (NRS 92A.200)
(options a, b, or c must be used, as applicable, for each entity) (if there are
more than four merging entities, check box and attach an 8 1/2" x 11'' blank
sheet containing the required information for each additional
entity):
(a)
Owner's approval was not required from
Name
of merging entity, if applicable
Name
of merging entity, if applicable
Name
of merging entity, if applicable
Name
of merging entity, if applicable
and,
or;
Name
of surviving entity, if applicable
Articles
of Merger
Page
3
(PURSUANT
TO NRS 92A.200)
ROSS
MILLER
Secretary
of State
(775)
684 5708
Website:
www.nvsos.gov
204
North Carson Street, Ste 1
Carson
City, Nevada 89701-4299
(b) The
plan was approved by the required consent of the owners of *:
Name of
merging entity, if applicable: Lone Pine Holdings, Inc.
Name of
merging entity, if applicable
Name of
merging entity, if applicable
Name of
merging entity, if applicable
and,
or;
Name of
surviving entity, if applicable
* Unless
otherwise provided in the certificate of trust or governing instrument of a
business trust, a merger must be approved by all the trustees and beneficial
owners of each business trust that is a constituent entity in the
merger.
Articles
of Merger
Page
4
(PURSUANT
TO NRS 92A.200)
ROSS
MILLER
Secretary
of State
(775)
684 5708
Website:
www.nvsos.gov
204
North Carson Street, Ste 1
Carson
City, Nevada 89701-4299
(c)
Approval of plan of merger for Nevada non-profit corporation (NRS
92A.160):
The plan
of merger has been approved by the directors of the corporation and by each
public officer or other person whose approval of the plan of merger is required
by the articles of incorporation of the domestic corporation.
Name
of merging entity, if applicable
Name
of merging entity, if applicable
Name
of merging entity, if applicable
Name
of merging entity, if applicable
and,
or;
Name
of surviving entity, if applicable
Articles
of Merger
Page
5
(PURSUANT
TO NRS 92A.200)
ROSS
MILLER
Secretary
of State
(775)
684 5708
Website:
www.nvsos.gov
204
North Carson Street, Ste 1
Carson
City, Nevada 89701-4299
5)
Amendments, if any, to the articles or certificate of the surviving entity.
Provide article numbers, if available. (NRS 92A.200)*:
6)
Location of Plan of Merger (check a or b):
(a)
The entire plan of merger is attached;
or,
X
|
(b)
The entire plan of merger is on file at the registered office of the
surviving corporation, limited-liability company or business trust, or at
the records office address if a limited partnership, or other place of
business of the surviving entity (NRS
92A.200).
|
7)
Effective date (optional)**:
* Amended
and restated articles may be attached as an exhibit or integrated into the
articles of merger. Please entitle them ''Restated'' or ''Amended and
Restated,'' accordingly. The form to accompany restated articles prescribed by
the secretary of state must accompany the amended and/or restated articles.
Pursuant to NRS 92A.180 (merger of subsidiary into parent - Nevada parent owning
90% or more of subsidiary), the articles of merger may not contain amendments to
the constituent documents of the surviving entity except that the name of the
surviving entity may be changed.
** A
merger takes effect upon filing the articles of merger or upon a later date as
specified in the articles, which
must not
be more than 90 days after the articles are filed (NRS 92A.240).
Articles
of Merger
Page
6
(PURSUANT
TO NRS 92A.200)
ROSS
MILLER
Secretary
of State
(775)
684 5708
Website:
www.nvsos.gov
204
North Carson Street, Ste 1
Carson
City, Nevada 89701-4299
8) Signatures - Must be signed by: An
officer of each Nevada corporation; All general partners of each Nevada limited
partnership; All general partners of each Nevada limited-liability limited
partnership; A manager of each Nevada limited-liability company with managers or
one member if there are no managers; A trustee of each Nevada business trust
(NRS 92A.230)* (if there are more than four merging entities, check
box and attach an 8
1/2'' x 11" blank sheet containing the required information for each additional
entity.):
Name
of merging entity: Australian Forest Industries
Title:
Signature:
/s/ Colin Baird
Date
* The
articles of merger must be signed by each foreign constituent entity in the
manner provided by the law
governing
it (NRS 92A.230). Additional signature blocks may be added to this page or as an
attachment, as needed.
Name
of merging entity
Title
Signature
Date
Name
of merging entity
Title
Signature
Date
Name
of merging entity
Title
Signature
Date
Lone
Pine Holdings, Inc.
Title:
Signature:
Date
Failure
to include any of the above information and submit with the proper fees may
cause this filing to be rejected.
EXHIBIT
E
Form
of Certificate of Merger
STATE
OF DELAWARE
CERTIFICATE
OF MERGER OF
ARGENTEX
MINING CORPORATION
INTO
ARGENTEX MINING CORPORATION
Pursuant
to Title 8, Section 252 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, the undersigned
corporation executed the following Certificate of Merger:
FIRST:
|
The name of the surviving
corporation is Lone Pine Holdings,
Inc., a Delaware
corporation, and the name of the corporation being merged into this
surviving corporation is Australian Forest
Industries, a Nevada
Corporation.
|
SECOND:
|
The
Merger Agreement has been approved, adopted, certified, executed and
acknowledged by each of the constituent corporations pursuant to Title 8
Section 252 of the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware.
|
THIRD:
|
The
name of the surviving corporation is Lone Pine Holdings, Inc., a Delaware
corporation.
|
FOURTH:
|
The
Certificate of Incorporation of the surviving corporation shall be its
Certificate of Incorporation.
|
FIFTH:
|
The
authorized stock and par value of Australian Forest Industries, a Nevada
corporation, consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock with a par
value of $0.001 and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with a par value
of $0.001.
|
SIXTH:
|
The
merger is to become effective
on ,
2008.
|
SEVENTH:
|
The
Merger Agreement is on file at 4/95 Salmon Street, Port Melbourne,
Victoria, Australia, 3207, an office of the surviving
corporation.
|
EIGHTH:
|
A
copy of the Merger Agreement will be furnished by the surviving
corporation on request, without cost, to any stockholder of the
constituent corporations.
|
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said
surviving corporation has caused this certificate to be signed by an authorized
officer, the ____ day of _________________________, 2008.
By:____________________________________
Name:
Colin Baird
Title:
President
EXHIBIT
F
Form
of Surviving Entity’s Certificate of Incorporation
Article
1. The
name of the corporation is Lone Pine Holdings, Inc. (the
“Corporation”).
Article
2. The
address of the registered office of the corporation in the State of Delaware is
at CSC, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, Delaware DE 19808. The
name of its registered agent at such address is Corporation Service
Company.
Article
3. The
nature of the business or purpose to be conducted or promoted is to engage in
any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the
General Corporation Law of Delaware.
Article
4.
(a) The
total number of shares of all classes of stock which the corporation shall have
authority to issue is One Hundred and Five Million (105,000,000) shares, of
which One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shall be shares of common stock, par
value $0.001 per share, and Five Million (5,000,000) shall be shares of
preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.
(b) Holders
of common stock shall have one vote for each share on each matter submitted to a
vote of the stockholders of the corporation. Except as otherwise provided by
law, by the certificate of incorporation or by resolution or resolutions of the
board of directors providing for the issuance of any series of preferred stock,
the holders of common stock shall have sole voting power. Subject to all rights
of the preferred stock or any series thereof, the holders of common stock shall
be entitled to receive, when, as and if declared by the board of directors, out
of funds legally available therefore, dividends payable in cash, stock or
otherwise. Upon any liquidation of the corporation, and after holders of
preferred stock of each series shall have been paid in full the amounts to which
they respectively are entitled or a sum sufficient for such payment in full has
been set aside, the remaining net assets of the corporation shall be distributed
pro rata to the holders of common stock, to the exclusion of holders of
preferred stock.
(c) Preferred
stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. The board of
directors is hereby expressly granted the authority to authorize the issuance of
one or more series of preferred stock, and to fix by resolution or resolutions
providing for the issuance of each such series the voting powers, designations,
preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights, and
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, of such series, to the full
extent now or hereafter permitted by law. No holders of any series of preferred
stock will be entitled to receive any dividends thereon other than those
specifically provided for by the certificate of incorporation or the resolution
or resolutions of the board of directors providing for the issuance of such
series of preferred stock. Upon any liquidation of the corporation, whether
voluntary or involuntary, the holders of preferred stock of each series will be
entitled to receive only such amount or amounts as will have been fixed by the
certificate of incorporation or by the resolution or resolutions of the board of
directors providing for the issuance of such series.
Article
5. The
name and mailing address of the incorporator is as follows:
Name Address
Article
6. The
Corporation is to have perpetual existence.
Article
7. In
furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by statute, the board
of directors is expressly authorized to make, alter or repeal the bylaws of the
corporation.
Article
8. Elections
of directors need not be by written ballot unless the bylaws of the corporation
shall so provide.
Article
9. Meetings
of stockholders may be held in Delaware or elsewhere, as the bylaws may provide.
The books of the corporation may be kept (subject to any statutory provision) at
such place or places, whether in Delaware or elsewhere, as may be designated
from time to time by the board of directors or in the bylaws of the
corporation.
Article
10. The
corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision
contained in this certificate of incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter
prescribed by statute, and all rights, preferences and privileges conferred upon
stockholders, directors or by any other persons whomsoever herein are granted
subject to this reservation.
Article
11. The
number of directors constituting the Board of Directors shall be determined by
the Board of Directors, subject to the by-laws of the Corporation. Any vacancy
in the Board of Directors, whether arising from death, resignation, removal
(with or without cause), an increase in the number of directors or any other
cause, may be filled by the vote of either a majority of the directors then in
office, though less than a quorum, or by the stockholders at the next annual
meeting thereof or at a special meeting called for such purpose. Each director
so elected shall hold office until the next meeting of the stockholders in which
the election of directors is in the regular order of business and until his
successor shall have been elected and qualified.
Article
12. No
director of the corporation shall be liable to the corporation or its
stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director,
provided, however, that this provision shall not eliminate or limit the
liability of a director (a) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to
the corporation or its stockholders; (b) for acts or omissions not in good faith
or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law; (c) under
Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law; or (d) for any transaction
from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.
Article
13. Except
as may otherwise be specifically provided in this Certificate of Incorporation,
no provision of this Certificate of Incorporation is intended by the corporation
to be construed as limiting, prohibiting, denying or abrogating any of the
general or specific powers or rights conferred under the General Corporation Law
upon the Corporation, upon its stockholders, bondholders and security holders,
and upon its directors, officers and other corporate personnel, including, in
particular, the power of the Corporation to furnish indemnification to directors
and officers in the capacities defined and prescribed by the General Corporation
Law and the defined and prescribed rights of said persons to indemnification as
the same are conferred under the General Corporation Law. The Corporation shall,
to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Delaware, including,
but not limited to, Section 145 of the General Corporation Law, as the same may
be amended and supplemented, indemnify any and all directors and officers of the
Corporation and may, in the discretion of the board of directors, indemnify any
and all other persons whom it shall have power to indemnify under said Section
or otherwise under Delaware law from and against any and all of the expenses,
liabilities or other matters referred to or covered by said Section. The
indemnification provisions contained in the General Corporation Law shall not be
deemed exclusive of any other rights to which those indemnified may be entitled
under any by-law, agreement, resolution of stockholders or disinterested
directors, or otherwise, and shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be
a director, officer, employee or agent, both as to action in his official
capacity and as traction in another capacity while holding such office, and
shall inure to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such
person.
This Certificate of
Incorporation was duly
adopted by the sole incorporator in accordance with Sections 241 and 245 of the
General Corporation Law of the Statute of Delaware. We are incorporating before
payment of stock.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, said corporation has caused this Certificate to be signed by
its sole incorporator, this day of November
2008.
Sole
Incorporator
EXHIBIT
G
Form
of Surviving Entity’s Bylaws
BYLAWS
OF
LONE
PINE HOLDINGS, INC.
(a
Delaware corporation)
ARTICLE
1
OFFICES
1.1 Registered
Office: The registered
office shall be established and maintained at the location specified in the
Certificate of Incorporation and thereafter as the Board of Directors may from
time to time determine. The registered agent of the Corporation in charge hereof
shall be the agent specified in the Certificate of
Incorporation and
thereafter as the Board of Directors may from time to time
determine.
1.2 Other
Offices: The corporation
may have other offices, either within or outside the State of Delaware, at such
place or places as the Board of Directors may from time to time appoint or the
business of the corporation may require.
ARTICLE
2
STOCKHOLDERS
2.1 Place of
Stockholders' Meetings:
All meetings of the stockholders of the corporation shall be held at such place
or places, within or outside the State of Delaware as may be fixed by the Board
of Directors from time to time or as shall be specified in the respective
notices thereof.
2.2 Date and
Hour of Annual Meetings of Stockholders: An annual meeting of stockholders
shall be held each year within six months after the close of the fiscal year of
the Corporation.
2.3 Purpose of
Annual Meetings: At each
annual meeting, the stockholders shall elect the members of the Board of
Directors for the succeeding year. At any such annual meeting any further proper
business may be transacted.
2.4 Special
Meetings of Stockholders:
Special meetings of the stockholders or of any class or series thereof entitled
to vote may be called by the President or by the Chairman of the Board of
Directors, or at the request in writing by stockholders of record owning at
least twenty (20%) percent of the issued and outstanding voting shares of common
stock of the corporation.
2.5 Notice of
Meetings of Stockholders:
Except as otherwise expressly required or permitted by law, not less than ten
days nor more than sixty days before the date of every stockholders' meeting the
Secretary shall give to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at such
meeting, written notice, served personally by mail or by telegram, stating the
place, date and hour of the meeting and, in the case of a special meeting, the
purpose or purposes for which the meeting is called. Such notice, if mailed
shall be deemed to be given when deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid,
directed to the stockholder at his address for notices to such stockholder as it
appears on the records of the corporation.
2.6
|
Quorum of
Stockholders:
|
(a) Unless otherwise provided by
the Certificate of
Incorporation or by law,
at any meeting of the stockholders, the presence in person or by proxy of at
least one third of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting shall constitute a
quorum. The withdrawal of any shareholder after the commencement of a meeting
shall have no effect on the existence of a quorum, after a quorum has been
established at such meeting.
(b) At any meeting of the stockholders at
which a quorum shall be present, a majority of voting stockholders, present in
person or by proxy, may adjourn the meeting from time to time without notice
other than announcement at the meeting. In the absence of a quorum, the officer
presiding thereat shall have power to adjourn the meeting from time to time
until a quorum shall be present. Notice of any adjourned meeting, other than
announcement at the meeting, shall not be required to be given except as
provided in paragraph (d) below and except where expressly required by
law.
(c) At any adjourned session at which a
quorum shall be present, any business may be transacted which might have been
transacted at the meeting originally called but only those stockholders entitled
to vote at the meeting as originally noticed shall be entitled to vote at any
adjournment or adjournments thereof, unless a new record date is fixed by the
Board of Directors.
(d) If an adjournment is for more than
thirty days, or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the
adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each
stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting.
2.7 Chairman
and Secretary of Meeting:
The President shall preside at meetings of the stockholders. The Secretary shall
act as secretary of the meeting or if he is not present, then the presiding
officer may appoint a person to act as secretary of the
meeting.
2.8 Voting by
Stockholders: Except as
may be otherwise provided by the Certificate of
Incorporation or
these bylaws, at every meeting of the stockholders
each stockholder shall be entitled to one vote for each share of voting stock
standing in his name on the books of the corporation on the record date for the
meeting. Except as otherwise provided by these bylaws, all elections and questions shall be
decided by the vote of a majority in interest of the stockholders present in
person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the
meeting.
2.9 Proxies: Any stockholder entitled to vote at
any meeting of stockholders may vote either in person or by proxy. Every proxy
shall be in writing, subscribed by the stockholder or his duly authorized
attorney-in-fact, but need not be dated, sealed, witnessed or
acknowledged.
2.10
|
List of
Stockholders:
|
(a) At least ten days before every meeting
of stockholders, the Secretary shall prepare and make a complete list of the
stockholders entitled to vote at the meeting, arranged in alphabetical order, and showing the
address of each stockholder and the number of shares registered in the name of
each stockholder.
(b) During ordinary business hours, for a
period of at least ten days prior to the meeting, such list shall be open to
examination by any stockholder for any purpose germane to the meeting, either at
a place within the city where the meeting is to be held, which place shall be
specified in the notice of the meeting, or if not so specified, at the place
where the meeting is to be held.
(c) The list shall also be produced and
kept at the time and place of the meeting during the whole time of the meeting,
and it may be inspected by any stockholder who is present.
(d) The stock ledger shall be the only
evidence as to who are the stockholders entitled to examine the stock ledger,
the list required by this Section 2.10 or the books of the corporation, or to
vote in person or by proxy at any meeting of stockholders.
2.11 Procedure
at Stockholders' Meetings:
Except as otherwise provided by these bylaws or any resolutions adopted by the
stockholders or Board of Directors, the order of business and all other matters
of procedure at every meeting of stockholders shall be determined by the
presiding officer.
2.12 Action By
Consent Without Meeting:
Unless otherwise provided by the Certificate of
Incorporation, any action
required to be taken at any annual or special meeting of stockholders, or any
action which may be taken at any annual or special meeting, may be taken without
a meeting, without prior notice and without a vote, if a consent in writing,
setting forth the action so taken, shall be signed by the holders of outstanding
stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary
to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to
vote thereon were present and voted. Prompt notice of the taking of the
corporate action without a meeting by less than unanimous written consent shall
be given to those stockholders who have not consented in
writing.
ARTICLE
3
DIRECTORS
3.1 Powers of
Directors: The property,
business and affairs of the corporation shall be managed by its Board of
Directors which may exercise all the powers of the corporation except such as
are by the law of the State of Delaware or the Certificate of
Incorporation or these
bylaws required to be exercised or done by
the stockholders.
3.2 Number,
Method of Election, Terms of Office of Directors: The number of directors which shall
constitute the Board of Directors shall be a minimum of 1 (one) and a maximum of
8 (eight) unless and until otherwise determined by a vote of a majority of the
entire Board of Directors. Within the limits above specified, the number of
directors shall be determined from time to time by resolution of the Board of
Directors or by the stockholders at the annual meeting. Each Director shall hold
office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor is
elected and qualified, provided, however, that a director may resign at any
time. Directors need not be stockholders.
3.3
|
Vacancies on Board of Directors;
Removal:
|
(a) Any director may resign his office at
any time by delivering his resignation in writing to the Chairman of the Board
or to the President. It will take effect at the time specified therein or, if no
time is specified, it will be effective at the time of its receipt by the
corporation. The acceptance of a resignation shall not be necessary to make it
effective, unless expressly so provided in the resignation.
(b) Any vacancy or newly created
directorship resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors
may be filled by a majority of the directors then in office, though less than a
quorum, or by a sole remaining director, and the directors so chosen shall hold
office until the next annual election and until their successors are duly
elected and shall qualify, unless sooner displaced.
(c) Any director may be removed with or
without cause at any time by the majority vote of the stockholders given at a
special meeting of the stockholders called for that purpose.
3.4
|
Meetings of the Board of
Directors:
|
(a) The Board of Directors may hold their
meetings, both regular and special, either within or outside the State of
Delaware.
(b) Regular meetings of the Board of
Directors may be held at such time and place as shall from time to time be
determined by resolution of the Board of Directors. No notice of such regular
meetings shall be required. If the date designated for any regular meeting be a
legal holiday recognized as such in the state of Delaware, then the meeting
shall be held on the next day which is not a legal holiday.
(c) The first meeting of each newly elected
Board of Directors shall be held immediately following the annual meeting of the
stockholders for the election of officers and the transaction of such other
business as may come before it. If such meeting is held at the place of the
stockholders' meeting, no notice thereof shall be required.
(d) Special meetings of the Board of
Directors' shall be held whenever called by direction of the Chairman of the
Board or the President or at the written request of any one
director.
(e) The Secretary shall give notice to each
director of any special meeting of the Board of Directors by mailing the same at
least three days before the meeting or by telegraphing, telexing, or delivering
the same not later than the date before the meeting.
Unless
required by law, such notice need not include a statement of the business to be
transacted at, or the purpose of, any such meeting. Any and all business may be
transacted at any meeting of the Board of Directors. No notice of any adjourned
meeting need be given. No notice to or waiver by any director shall be required
with respect to any meeting at which the director is present.
3.5 Quorum and
Action: Unless provided
otherwise by law or by the Certificate of
Incorporation or
these bylaws, a majority of the Directors shall
constitute a quorum for the transaction of business; but if there shall be less
than a quorum at any meeting of the Board of Directors, a majority of those
present may adjourn the meeting from time to time. The vote of a majority of the
Directors present at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall be necessary
to constitute the act of the Board of Directors.
3.6 Presiding
Officer and Secretary of the Meeting: The President, or, in his absence a
member of the Board of Directors selected by the members present, shall preside
at meetings of the Board of Directors. The Secretary shall act as secretary of
the meeting, but in his absence the presiding officer may appoint a secretary of
the meeting.
3.7 Action by
Consent Without Meeting:
Any action required or permitted to be taken at any meeting of the Board of
Directors or of any committee thereof may be taken without a meeting if all
members of the Board of Directors or committee, as the case may be, consent
thereto in writing, and the writing or writings are filed with the minutes or
proceedings of the Board of Directors or committee.
3.8 Action by
Telephonic Conference:
Members of the Board of Directors, or any committee designated by such board,
may participate in a meeting of such board or committee by means of conference
telephone or similar communications equipment by means of which all persons
participating in the meeting can hear each other, and participation in such a
meeting shall constitute presence in person at such meeting.
3.9 Committees: The Board of Directors shall, by
resolution or resolutions passed by a majority of Directors designate one or
more committees, each of such committees to consist of one or more Directors of
the Corporation, for such purposes as the Board of Directors shall determine.
The Board of Directors may designate one or more directors as alternate members
of any committee, who may replace any absent or disqualified member at any
meeting of such committee.
3.10 Compensation
of Directors: Directors
shall receive such reasonable compensation for their service on the Board of
Directors or any committees thereof, whether in the form of salary or a fixed
fee for attendance at meetings, or both, with expenses, if any, as the Board of
Directors may from time to time determine. Nothing herein contained shall be
construed to preclude any Director from serving in any other capacity and
receiving compensation therefore.
ARTICLE
4
OFFICERS
4.1
|
Officers, Title, Elections,
Terms:
|
(a) The Board of Directors shall appoint a
President and a Secretary and may from time to time appoint one or more Vice
Presidents (to which title may be added words indicating seniority or function),
a Treasurer and such other officers as the Board of Directors may determine. The
officers shall be elected by the Board of Directors at its annual meeting
following the annual meeting of the stockholders, to serve at the
pleasure of the Board of Directors or otherwise
as shall be specified by the Board of Directors at the time of such election and
until their successors are elected and qualified.
(b) The Board of Directors may elect or
appoint at any time, and from time to time, additional officers or agents with
such duties as it may deem necessary or desirable. Such additional officers
shall serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors or otherwise as shall be
specified by the Board of Directors at the time of such election or appointment.
Two or more offices may be held by the same person.
(c) Any vacancy in any office may be filled
for the unexpired portion of the term by the Board of
Directors.
(d) Any officer may resign his office at
any time. Such resignation shall be made in writing and shall take effect at the
time specified therein or, if no time has been specified, at the time of its
receipt by the corporation. The acceptance of a resignation shall not be
necessary to make it effective, unless expressly so provided in the
resignation.
(e) The salaries of all officers of the
corporation shall be fixed by the Board of Directors.
4.2 Removal of
Elected Officers: Any
elected officer may be removed at any time, either with or without cause, by
resolution adopted at any regular or special meeting of the Board of Directors
by a majority of the Directors then in office.
(a) President: The President shall be the principal
executive officer of the corporation and, subject to the control of the Board of
Directors, shall supervise and control all the business and affairs of the
corporation. He shall, when present, preside at all meetings of the stockholders
and of the Board of Directors. He shall see that all orders and resolutions of
the Board of Directors are carried into effect (unless any such order or
resolution shall provide otherwise), and in general shall perform all duties
incident to the office of president and such other duties as may be prescribed
by the Board of Directors from time to time.
(b) Treasurer: If appointed, the Treasurer shall (1)
have charge and custody of and be responsible for all funds and securities of
the Corporation; (2) receive and give receipts for moneys due and payable to the
corporation from any source whatsoever; (3) deposit all such moneys in the name
of the corporation in such banks, trust companies, or other depositories as
shall be selected by resolution of the Board of Directors; and (4) in general
perform all duties incident to the office of treasurer and such other duties as
from time to time may be assigned to him by the President or by the Board of
Directors. He shall, if required by the Board of Directors, give a bond for the
faithful discharge of his duties in such sum and with such surety or sureties as
the Board of Directors shall determine.
(c) Secretary: The Secretary shall (1) keep the
minutes of the meetings of the stockholders, the Board of Directors, and all
committees, if any, of which a secretary shall not have been appointed, in one or
more books provided for that purpose; (2) see that all notices are duly given in
accordance with the provisions of these bylaws and as required by law; (3) be
custodian of the corporate records and of the seal of the corporation and see
that the seal of the corporation is affixed to all documents, the execution of
which on behalf of the corporation under its seal, is duly authorized; (4) keep
a register of the post office address of each stockholder which shall be
furnished to the Secretary by such stockholder; (5) have general charge of stock
transfer books of the Corporation; and (6) in general perform all duties
incident to the office of secretary and such other duties as from time to time
may be assigned to him by the President or by the Board of
Directors.
ARTICLE
5
CAPITAL
STOCK
(a) Every holder of stock in the
corporation shall be entitled to have a certificate signed by, or in the name
of, the corporation by the President and by the Treasurer or the Secretary,
certifying the number of shares owned by him.
(b) If such certificate is countersigned by
a transfer agent other than the corporation or its employee, or by a registrar
other than the corporation or its employee, the signatures of the officers of
the corporation may be facsimiles, and, if permitted by law, any other signature
may be a facsimile.
(c) In case any officer who has signed or
whose facsimile signature has been placed upon a certificate shall have ceased
to be such officer before such certificate is issued, it may be issued by the
corporation with the same effect as if he were such officer at the date of
issue.
(d) Certificates of stock shall be issued
in such form not inconsistent with the Certificate of
Incorporation as shall be
approved by the Board of Directors, and shall be numbered and registered in the
order in which they were issued.
(e) All certificates surrendered to the
corporation shall be cancelled with the date of cancellation, and shall be
retained by the Secretary, together with the powers of attorney to transfer and the assignments of the
shares represented by such certificates, for such period of time as shall be
prescribed from time to time by resolution of the Board of
Directors.
5.2 Record
Ownership: A record of the
name and address of the holder of such certificate, the number of shares
represented thereby and the date of issue thereof shall be made on the
corporation's books. The corporation shall be entitled to treat the holder of
any share of stock as the holder in fact thereof, and accordingly shall not be
bound to recognize any equitable or other claim to or interest in any share on
the part of any other person, whether or not it shall have express or other
notice thereof, except as required by law.
5.3 Transfer of
Record Ownership:
Transfers of stock shall be made on the books of the corporation only by
direction of the person named in the certificate or his attorney, lawfully
constituted in writing, and only upon the surrender of the certificate therefore
and a written assignment of the shares evidenced thereby. Whenever any transfer
of stock shall be made for collateral security, and not absolutely, it shall be
so expressed in the entry of the transfer if, when the certificates are
presented to the corporation for transfer, both the transferor and the
transferee request the corporation to do so.
5.4 Lost,
Stolen or Destroyed Certificates: Certificates representing shares of
the stock of the corporation shall be issued in place of any certificate alleged
to have been lost, stolen or destroyed in such manner and on such terms and
conditions as the Board of Directors from time to time may
authorize.
5.5 Transfer
Agent; Registrar; Rules Respecting Certificates: The corporation may maintain one or
more transfer offices or agencies where stock of the corporation shall be
transferable. The corporation may also maintain one or more registry offices
where such stock shall be registered. The Board of Directors may make such rules
and regulations as it may deem expedient concerning the issue, transfer and
registration of stock certificates.
5.6 Fixing
Record Date for Determination of Stockholders of Record: The Board of Directors may fix, in
advance, a date as the record date for the purpose of determining stockholders
entitled to notice of, or to vote at, any meeting of the stockholders or any
adjournment thereof, or the stockholders entitled to receive payment of any
dividend or other distribution or the allotment of any rights, or entitled to
exercise any rights in respect of any change, conversion or exchange of stock,
or to express consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting, or in
order to make a determination of the stockholders for the purpose of any other
lawful action. Such record date in any case shall be not more than sixty days
nor less than ten days before the date of a meeting of the stockholders, nor
more than sixty days prior to any other action requiring such determination of
the stockholders. A determination of stockholders of record entitled to notice
or to vote at a meeting of stockholders shall apply to any adjournment of the
meeting; provided, however, that the Board of Directors may fix a new record
date for the adjourned meeting.
5.7 Dividends: Subject to the provisions of the
Certificate of
Incorporation, the Board
of Directors may, out of funds legally available therefore at any regular or
special meeting, declare dividends upon the capital stock of the corporation as
and when they deem expedient. Before declaring any dividend there may be set
apart out of any funds of the corporation available for dividends, such sum or
sums as the Board of Directors from time to time in their discretion deem proper
for working capital or as a reserve fund to meet contingencies or for equalizing
dividends or for such other purposes as the Board of Directors shall deem
conducive to the interests of the corporation.
ARTICLE
6
SECURITIES
HELD BY THE CORPORATION
6.1 Voting: Unless the
Board of Directors shall otherwise order, the President or the Secretary shall
have full power and authority, on behalf of the corporation, to attend, act and
vote at any meeting of the stockholders of any corporation in which the
corporation may hold stock, and at such meeting to exercise any or all rights
and powers incident to the ownership of such stock, and to execute on behalf of
the corporation a proxy or proxies empowering another or others to act as
aforesaid. The Board of Directors from time to time may confer like powers upon
any other person or persons.
6.2
|
General Authorization to Transfer Securities Held
by the Corporation:
|
(a) Any of the following officers, to wit:
the President and the Secretary shall be, and they hereby are, authorized and
empowered to transfer, convert, endorse, sell, assign, set over and deliver any
and all shares of stock, bonds, debentures, notes, subscription warrants, stock
purchase warrants, evidence of indebtedness, or other securities now or
hereafter standing in the name of or owned by the corporation, and to make,
execute and deliver, under the seal of the corporation, any and all written
instruments of assignment and transfer necessary or proper to effectuate the
authority hereby conferred.
(b) Whenever there shall be annexed to any
instrument of assignment and transfer executed pursuant to and in accordance
with the foregoing paragraph (a), a certificate of the Secretary of the
corporation in office at the date of such certificate setting forth the
provisions of this Section 6.2 and stating that they are in full force and
effect and setting forth the names of persons who are then officers of the
corporation, then all persons to whom such instrument and annexed certificate
shall thereafter come, shall be entitled, without further inquiry or
investigation and regardless of the date of such certificate, to assume and to
act in reliance upon the assumption that the shares of stock or other securities
named in such instrument were theretofore duly and properly transferred,
endorsed, sold, assigned, set over and delivered by the corporation, and that
with respect to such securities the authority of these provisions of the
bylaws and of such officers is still in full
force and effect.
ARTICLE
7
MISCELLANEOUS
7.1 Signatories: All checks, drafts or other orders
for the payment of money, notes or other evidences of indebtedness issued in the
name of the corporation shall be signed by such officer or officers or such
other person or persons as the Board of Directors may from time to time
designate.
7.2 Seal: The seal of the corporation shall be
in such form and shall have such content as the Board of Directors shall from
time to time determine.
7.3 Notice and
Waiver of Notice: Whenever
any notice of the time, place or purpose of any meeting of the stockholders,
directors or a committee is required to be given under the law of the State of
Delaware, the Certificate
of Incorporation or
these bylaws, a waiver thereof in writing, signed
by the person or persons entitled to such notice, whether before or after the
holding thereof, or actual attendance at the meeting in person or, in the case
of any stockholder, by his attorney-in-fact, shall be deemed equivalent to the
giving of such notice to such persons.
7.4 Indemnity: The corporation shall indemnify its
directors, officers and employees to the fullest extent allowed by law,
provided, however, that it shall be within the discretion of the Board of
Directors whether to advance any funds in advance of disposition of any action,
suit or proceeding, and provided further that nothing in this section 7.4 shall
be deemed to obviate the necessity of the Board of Directors to make any
determination that indemnification of the director, officer or employee is
proper under the circumstances because he has met the applicable standard of
conduct set forth in subsections (a) and (b) of Section 145 of the Delaware
General Corporation Law.
7.5 Fiscal
Year: The fiscal year of
the corporation shall be determined by the Board of Directors from time to
time.
G-8