UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED MANAGEMENT
INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act file number: 811-05739
Name of Fund: BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN)
Fund Address: 100 Bellevue Parkway, Wilmington, DE 19809
Name and address of agent for service: John M. Perlowski, Chief Executive Officer, BlackRock
MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc., 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (800) 882-0052, Option 4
Date of fiscal year end: 04/30/2016
Date of reporting period: 04/30/2016
Item 1 Report to Stockholders
APRIL 30, 2016
ANNUAL REPORT
|
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA)
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN)
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. (MHD)
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc. (MUH)
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund, Inc. (MUS)
BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. (MUI)
BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc. (MVT)
Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value No Bank Guarantee |
Table of Contents |
Page | ||||
3 | ||||
4 | ||||
5 | ||||
5 | ||||
6 | ||||
Financial Statements: | ||||
20 | ||||
68 | ||||
70 | ||||
72 | ||||
76 | ||||
78 | ||||
85 | ||||
96 | ||||
97 | ||||
98 | ||||
101 |
2 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
The Markets in Review |
Dear Shareholder,
Diverging monetary policies and shifting economic outlooks across regions have been the overarching themes driving financial markets over the past couple of years. Investors spent most of 2015 anticipating the end of the Federal Reserves (the Fed) near-zero interest rate policy as U.S. growth outpaced other developed markets. The Fed ultimately hiked rates in December, whereas the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan took additional steps to stimulate growth, even introducing negative interest rates. The U.S. dollar had strengthened considerably ahead of these developments, causing profit challenges for U.S. companies that generate revenues overseas, and pressuring emerging market currencies and commodities prices.
Global market volatility increased in the latter part of 2015 and spilled over into early 2016. Oil prices were a key factor behind the instability after collapsing in mid-2015 due to excess global supply. China, one of the worlds largest consumers of oil, was another notable source of stress for financial markets. Signs of slowing economic growth, a depreciating yuan and declining confidence in the countrys policymakers stoked investors worries about the potential impact of Chinas weakness on the global economy. Risk assets (such as equities and high yield bonds) suffered in this environment.
After a painful start to the new year, fears of a global recession began to fade as the first quarter wore on, allowing markets to calm and risk assets to rebound. Central bank stimulus in Europe and Japan, combined with a more tempered outlook for rate hikes in the United States, helped bolster financial markets. A softening in U.S. dollar strength offered some relief to U.S. exporters and emerging market economies. Oil prices found firmer footing as global supply showed signs of leveling off.
The selloff in risk assets at the turn of the year brought valuations to more reasonable levels, creating some appealing entry points for investors in 2016. Nonetheless, slow but relatively stable growth in the United States is countered by a less optimistic global economic outlook and uncertainties around the efficacy of Chinas policy response, the potential consequences of negative interest rates in Europe and Japan, and a host of geopolitical risks.
For the 12 months ended April 30, 2016, higher-quality assets such as municipal bonds, U.S. Treasuries and investment grade corporate bonds generated positive returns, while riskier assets such as non-U.S. and small cap equities broadly declined.
At BlackRock, we believe investors need to think globally, extend their scope across a broad array of asset classes and be prepared to adjust accordingly as market conditions change over time. We encourage you to talk with your financial advisor and visit blackrock.com for further insight about investing in todays markets.
Sincerely,
Rob Kapito
President, BlackRock Advisors, LLC
Rob Kapito
President, BlackRock Advisors, LLC
Total Returns as of April 30, 2016 | ||||||||
6-month | 12-month | |||||||
U.S. large cap equities |
0.43 | % | 1.21 | % | ||||
U.S. small cap equities |
(1.90 | ) | (5.94 | ) | ||||
International equities |
(3.07 | ) | (9.32 | ) | ||||
Emerging market equities |
(0.13 | ) | (17.87 | ) | ||||
3-month Treasury bills |
0.14 | 0.15 | ||||||
U.S. Treasury securities |
3.76 | 3.74 | ||||||
U.S. investment grade bonds |
2.82 | 2.72 | ||||||
Tax-exempt municipal |
3.52 | 5.16 | ||||||
U.S. high yield bonds |
2.38 | (1.08 | ) | |||||
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. You cannot invest directly in an index. |
THIS PAGE NOT PART OF YOUR FUND REPORT | 3 |
Municipal Market Overview |
For the Reporting Period Ended April 30, 2016 |
Municipal Market Conditions
Municipal bonds generated positive performance for the period, due to falling interest rates and a favorable supply-and-demand environment. Interest rates were volatile in 2015 (bond prices rise as rates fall) leading up to a long-awaited rate hike from the U.S. Federal Reserve (the Fed) that ultimately came in December. However, ongoing reassurance from the Fed that rates would be increased gradually and would likely remain low overall resulted in strong demand for fixed income investments, with municipal bonds being one of the strongest-performing sectors for the 12-month period. Investors favored the relative stability of municipal bonds amid bouts of volatility resulting from uneven U.S. economic data, falling oil prices, global growth concerns, geopolitical risks, and widening central bank divergence i.e., policy easing outside the United States while the Fed was posturing to commence policy tightening. During the 12 months ended April 30, 2016, municipal bond funds garnered net inflows of approximately $27 billion (based on data from the Investment Company Institute).
A Closer Look at Yields
From April 30, 2015 to April 30, 2016, yields on AAA-rated 30-year municipal bonds decreased by 47 basis points (bps) from 3.05% to 2.58%, while 10-year rates fell by 51 bps from 2.12% to 1.61% and 5-year rates decreased 32 bps from 1.30% to 0.98% (as measured by Thomson Municipal Market Data). The municipal yield curve experienced significant flattening over the 12-month period with the spread between 2- and 30-year maturities flattening by 58 bps and the spread between 2- and 10-year maturities flattening by 62 bps.
During the same time period, on a relative basis, tax-exempt municipal bonds broadly outperformed U.S. Treasuries with the greatest outperformance experienced in longer-term issues. In absolute terms, the positive performance of municipal bonds was driven largely by falling interest rates as well as a supply/demand imbalance within the municipal market as investors sought income and incremental yield in an environment where opportunities became increasingly scarce. More broadly, municipal bonds benefited from the greater appeal of tax-exempt investing in light of the higher tax rates implemented in 2014. The asset class is known for its lower relative volatility and preservation of principal with an emphasis on income as tax rates rise.
Financial Conditions of Municipal Issuers
The majority of municipal credits remain strong, despite well-publicized distress among a few issuers. Four of the five states with the largest amount of debt outstanding California, New York, Texas and Florida have exhibited markedly improved credit fundamentals during the slow national recovery. However, several states with the largest unfunded pension liabilities have seen their bond prices decline noticeably and remain vulnerable to additional price deterioration. On the local level, Chicagos credit quality downgrade is an outlier relative to other cities due to its larger pension liability and inadequate funding remedies. BlackRock maintains the view that municipal bond defaults will remain minimal and in the periphery while the overall market is fundamentally sound. We continue to advocate careful credit research and believe that a thoughtful approach to structure and security selection remains imperative amid uncertainty in a modestly improving economic environment.
The opinions expressed are those of BlackRock as of April 30, 2016, and are subject to change at any time due to changes in market or economic conditions. The comments should not be construed as a recommendation of any individual holdings or market sectors. Investing involves risk including loss of principal. Bond values fluctuate in price so the value of your investment can go down depending on market conditions. Fixed income risks include interest-rate and credit risk. Typically, when interest rates rise, there is a corresponding decline in bond values. Credit risk refers to the possibility that the bond issuer will not be able to make principal and interest payments. There may be less information on the financial condition of municipal issuers than for public corporations. The market for municipal bonds may be less liquid than for taxable bonds. Some investors may be subject to Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). Capital gains distributions, if any, are taxable.
The Standard & Poors Municipal Bond Index, a broad, market value-weighted index, seeks to measure the performance of the U.S. municipal bond market. All bonds in the index are exempt from U.S. federal income taxes or subject to the AMT. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Index performance is shown for illustrative purposes only. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.
4 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging |
Derivative Financial Instruments |
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 5 |
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2016 | BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. |
Fund Overview |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc.s (MUA) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide high current income exempt from federal income taxes by investing primarily in a portfolio of medium- to lower-grade or unrated municipal obligations, the interest on which, in the opinion of bond counsel to the issuer, is exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). The Fund invests at least 65% of its assets in municipal bonds that are rated in the medium to lower categories by nationally recognized rating services (for example, Baa or lower by Moodys Investors Service, Inc. (Moodys) or BBB or lower by Standard & Poors Corporation (S&P)) or non-rated securities which are of comparable quality. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
Fund Information |
Symbol on New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) |
MUA | |
Initial Offering Date |
June 25, 1993 | |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2016 ($14.74)1 |
4.88% | |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
8.62% | |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.06 | |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.72 | |
Economic Leverage as of April 30, 20164 |
11% |
1 | Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. The current distribution rate may consist of income, net realized gains and/or a return of capital. See the Additional Information Section 19(a) Notice for estimated sources and character of distributions. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
2 | Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
3 | The monthly distribution per Common Share, declared on June 1, 2016, was decreased to $0.0575 per share. The yield on closing market price, current monthly distribution per Common Share and current annualized distribution per Common Share do not reflect the new distribution rate. The new distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change in the future. |
4 | Represents TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to TOB Trusts, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Performance |
Returns for the 12 months ended April 30, 2016 were as follows:
Returns Based On | ||||||||
Market Price | NAV | |||||||
MUA1,2 |
9.30 | % | 7.90 | % | ||||
Lipper Closed-End High Yield Municipal Debt Funds3 |
9.79 | % | 7.73 | % |
1 | All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions. |
2 | The Funds premium to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
3 | Average return. |
The following discussion relates to the Funds absolute performance based on NAV:
| A positive interest-rate backdrop helped fuel a robust gain for the U.S. municipal bond market during the annual period. U.S. Treasury yields fell (as prices rose) amid an environment of slow global growth, declining yields overseas, and an emerging consensus that the Fed would maintain a gradual approach to raising short-term interest rates. Municipals generally outperformed Treasuries, reflecting favorable supply-and-demand conditions in the market and the overall health of state and local finances outside of select areas such as Puerto Rico, Illinois and New Jersey. Longer-term municipal bonds outpaced their short-term counterparts, while lower-quality securities typically outperformed higher-quality issues. |
| Income in the form of coupon payments made up a meaningful portion of the Funds total return for the period. In addition, the Funds minimal cash position and use of leverage provided both incremental return and income. |
| The Funds duration positioning, highlighted by concentrations in longer-dated securities with maturities of 25 years and above, also aided results. (Duration is a measure of interest-rate sensitivity.) Positions in lower-rated investment-grade bonds, as well as holdings of below investment-grade and unrated bonds, further helped performance at a time of elevated demand for higher-risk, higher-yielding investments. Sector concentrations in tobacco and health care contributed strongly given their outperformance relative to the broader municipal market. The Funds performance also benefited from minimal exposure to debt issued by Puerto Rico, which lagged the broader market considerably. |
| Despite offering generous yields in comparison to the broader market, the Funds more-seasoned holdings detracted from performance due to the premium amortization that occurred as the bonds approached their first call dates. (When a bonds price trades at a premium over its face value, the difference is amortized over time. A bond premium occurs when the price of the bond has increased due to a decline in interest rates.) The Funds yield curve positioning also detracted somewhat given the more substantive decline in intermediate term yields in relation to the longer maturities in which the portfolios holdings are largely concentrated. |
| The Funds use of U.S. Treasury futures contracts to manage interest rate risk had a slightly negative impact on performance due to the overall strength in the market. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
6 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
4/30/16 | 4/30/15 | Change | High | Low | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
$ | 14.74 | $ | 14.22 | 3.66 | % | $ | 15.05 | $ | 13.22 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value |
$ | 14.45 | $ | 14.12 | 2.34 | % | $ | 14.45 | $ | 13.84 |
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years |
Overview of the Funds Total Investments* |
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 7 |
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2016 | BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. |
Fund Overview |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc.s (MEN) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests primarily in long-term municipal bonds rated investment grade quality at the time of investment and invests primarily in long-term municipal bonds with maturities of more than ten years at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
Fund Information |
Symbol on NYSE |
MEN | |
Initial Offering Date |
March 2, 1989 | |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2016 ($12.55)1 |
5.78% | |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.21% | |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.0605 | |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.7260 | |
Economic Leverage as of April 30, 20164 |
36% |
1 | Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
2 | Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
3 | The monthly distribution per Common Share, declared on June 1, 2016, was decreased to $0.0565 per share. The yield on closing market price, current monthly distribution per Common Share and current annualized distribution per Common Share do not reflect the new distribution rate. The new distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change in the future. |
4 | Represents VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VRDP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Performance |
Returns for the 12 months ended April 30, 2016 were as follows:
Returns Based On | ||||||||
Market Price | NAV | |||||||
MEN1,2 |
14.35 | % | 8.50 | % | ||||
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
13.64 | % | 8.61 | % |
1 | All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions. |
2 | The Fund moved from a discount NAV to a premium during the period, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
3 | Average return. |
The following discussion relates to the Funds absolute performance based on NAV:
| A positive interest-rate backdrop helped fuel a robust gain for the U.S. municipal bond market during the annual period. U.S. Treasury yields fell (as prices rose) amid an environment of slow global growth, declining yields overseas, and an emerging consensus that the Fed would maintain a gradual approach to raising short-term interest rates. Municipals generally outperformed Treasuries, reflecting favorable supply-and-demand conditions in the market and the overall health of state and local finances outside of select areas such as Puerto Rico, Illinois and New Jersey. Longer-term municipal bonds outpaced their short-term counterparts, while lower-quality securities typically outperformed higher-quality issues. |
| Given the decline in yields, the Funds duration exposure made a significant contribution to performance during the annual period. (Duration is a measure of interest-rate sensitivity.) |
| Income in the form of coupon payments made up a meaningful portion of the Funds total return. In addition, the Funds minimal cash position and use of leverage provided both incremental return and income. |
| The 5- to 10-year portion of the yield curve outpaced the broader market during the first half of the period, while longer-term bonds led during the second half. In this environment, the Fund benefited from its exposure to the longer end of the yield curve. The Funds performance was also helped by its allocations to the tax-backed local, school district and transportation sectors. In addition, the Fund was aided by its positions in bonds with wider yield spreads at a time in which investors displayed a preference for higher-yielding securities. |
| The Funds positions in general obligation securities issued by the city of Chicago and the state of Illinois, which trailed the broader market due to investor concerns about budget issues and pension funding liabilities, had a negative impact on performance. Yield spreads on these issues widened significantly, especially during the first half of the reporting period, resulting in slightly lower prices for the full year. |
| The Funds use of U.S. Treasury futures contracts to manage interest rate risk had a slightly negative impact on performance due to the overall strength in the market. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
8 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
4/30/16 | 4/30/15 | Change | High | Low | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
$ | 12.55 | $ | 11.67 | 7.54 | % | $ | 12.70 | $ | 10.87 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value |
$ | 12.52 | $ | 12.27 | 2.04 | % | $ | 12.57 | $ | 11.92 |
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years |
Overview of the Funds Total Investments* |
Call/Maturity Schedule4 | ||||
Calendar Year Ended December 31, |
||||
2016 |
8 | % | ||
2017 |
10 | |||
2018 |
10 | |||
2019 |
15 | |||
2020 |
4 |
4 | Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
* | Excludes short-term securities. |
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 9 |
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2016 | BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. |
Fund Overview |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc.s (MHD) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). The Fund invests, under normal market conditions, at least 75% of its assets in municipal bonds rated investment grade and invests primarily in long-term municipal bonds with a maturity of more than ten years at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
Fund Information |
Symbol on NYSE |
MHD | |
Initial Offering Date |
May 2, 1997 | |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2016 ($18.14)1 |
5.69% | |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.05% | |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.086 | |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$1.032 | |
Economic Leverage as of April 30, 20164 |
36% |
1 | Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
2 | Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
3 | The monthly distribution per Common Share, declared on June 1, 2016, was decreased to $0.081 per share. The yield on closing market price, current monthly distribution per Common Share and current annualized distribution per Common Share do not reflect the new distribution rate. The new distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change in the future. |
4 | Represents VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Performance |
Returns for the 12 months ended April 30, 2016 were as follows:
Returns Based On | ||||||||
Market Price | NAV | |||||||
MHD1,2 |
11.91 | % | 8.65 | % | ||||
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
13.64 | % | 8.61 | % |
1 | All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions. |
2 | The Fund moved from a discount to NAV to a premium during the period, which accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
3 | Average return. |
The following discussion relates to the Funds absolute performance based on NAV:
| A positive interest-rate backdrop helped fuel a robust gain for the U.S. municipal bond market during the annual period. U.S. Treasury yields fell (as prices rose) amid an environment of slow global growth, declining yields overseas, and an emerging consensus that the Fed would maintain a gradual approach to raising short-term interest rates. Municipals generally outperformed Treasuries, reflecting favorable supply-and-demand conditions in the market and the overall health of state and local finances outside of select areas such as Puerto Rico, Illinois and New Jersey. Longer-term municipal bonds outpaced their short-term counterparts, while lower-quality securities typically outperformed higher-quality issues. |
| Income in the form of coupon payments made up a meaningful portion of the Funds total return for the period. In addition, the Funds minimal cash position and use of leverage provided both incremental return and income. |
| The Funds duration positioning, highlighted by concentrations in longer-dated securities with maturities of 25 years and above, also aided results. (Duration is a measure of interest-rate sensitivity.) Positions in lower-rated investment-grade bonds, as well as holdings of below investment-grade and unrated bonds, further helped performance at a time of elevated demand for higher-risk, higher-yielding investments. Sector concentrations in transportation, health care and utilities also contributed strongly. |
| Despite offering generous yields in comparison to the broader market, the Funds more-seasoned holdings detracted from performance due to the premium amortization that occurred as the bonds approached their first call dates. (When a bonds price trades at a premium over its face value, the difference is amortized over time. A bond premium occurs when the price of the bond has increased due to a decline in interest rates). The Funds yield curve positioning also detracted somewhat given the more substantive decline in intermediate term yields in relation to the longer maturities in which the portfolios holdings are largely concentrated. |
| The Funds use of U.S. Treasury futures contracts to manage interest rate risk had a slightly negative impact on performance due to the overall strength in the market. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
10 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund, Inc. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
4/30/16 | 4/30/15 | Change | High | Low | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
$ | 18.14 | $ | 17.25 | 5.16 | % | $ | 18.68 | $ | 15.75 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value |
$ | 17.96 | 1 | $ | 17.59 | 2.10 | % | $ | 18.00 | $ | 17.08 |
1 | The net asset value does not reflect adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and therefore differs from amounts reported in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities and the Financial Highlights. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years |
Overview of the Funds Total Investments* |
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 11 |
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2016 | BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc. |
Fund Overview |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc.s (MUH) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing, under normal market conditions, at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). The Fund invests, under normal market conditions, at least 75% of its assets in municipal bonds rated investment grade and invests primarily in long-term municipal bonds with a maturity of more than ten years at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
Fund Information |
Symbol on NYSE |
MUH | |
Initial Offering Date |
February 27, 1998 | |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2016 ($16.23)1 |
5.73% | |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.12% | |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.0775 | |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.9300 | |
Economic Leverage as of April 30, 20164 |
35% |
1 | Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
2 | Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
3 | The monthly distribution per Common Share, declared on June 1, 2016, was decreased to $0.0745 per share. The yield on closing market price, current monthly distribution per Common Share and current annualized distribution per Common Share do not reflect the new distribution rate. The new distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change in the future. |
4 | Represents VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Performance |
Returns for the 12 months ended April 30, 2016 were as follows:
Returns Based On | ||||||||
Market Price | NAV | |||||||
MUH1,2 |
12.90 | % | 8.25 | % | ||||
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
13.64 | % | 8.61 | % |
1 | All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions. |
2 | The Funds discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
3 | Average return. |
The following discussion relates to the Funds absolute performance based on NAV:
| A positive interest-rate backdrop helped fuel a robust gain for the U.S. municipal bond market during the annual period. U.S. Treasury yields fell (as prices rose) amid an environment of slow global growth, declining yields overseas, and an emerging consensus that the Fed would maintain a gradual approach to raising short-term interest rates. Municipals generally outperformed Treasuries, reflecting favorable supply-and-demand conditions in the market and the overall health of state and local finances outside of select areas such as Puerto Rico, Illinois and New Jersey. Longer-term municipal bonds outpaced their short-term counterparts, while lower-quality securities typically outperformed higher-quality issues. |
| Income in the form of coupon payments made up a meaningful portion of the Funds total return for the period. In addition, the Funds minimal cash position and use of leverage provided both incremental return and income. |
| The Funds duration positioning, highlighted by concentrations in longer-dated securities with maturities of 25 years and above, also aided results. (Duration is a measure of interest-rate sensitivity). Positions in lower-rated investment-grade bonds, as well as holdings of below investment-grade and unrated bonds, further helped performance at a time of elevated demand for higher-risk, higher-yielding investments. Sector concentrations in transportation, health care and state tax-backed general obligation bonds also contributed strongly. |
| Despite offering generous yields in comparison to the broader market, the Funds more-seasoned holdings detracted from performance due to the premium amortization that occurred as the bonds approached their first call dates. (When a bonds price trades at a premium over its face value, the difference is amortized over time. A bond premium occurs when the price of the bond has increased due to a decline in interest rates.) The Funds yield curve positioning also detracted somewhat given the more substantive decline in intermediate term yields in relation to the longer maturities in which the portfolios holdings are largely concentrated. |
| The Funds use of U.S. Treasury futures contracts to manage interest rate risk had a slightly negative impact on performance due to the overall strength in the market. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
12 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Fund II, Inc. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
4/30/16 | 4/30/15 | Change | High | Low | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
$ | 16.23 | $ | 15.28 | 6.22 | % | $ | 16.56 | $ | 14.10 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value |
$ | 16.51 | $ | 16.21 | 1.85 | % | $ | 16.55 | $ | 15.76 |
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years |
Overview of the Funds Total Investments* |
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 13 |
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2016 | BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund, Inc. |
Fund Overview |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund, Inc.s (MUS) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with current income exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing primarily in long-term, investment grade municipal obligations exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 80% of its assets in investment grade municipal obligations with remaining maturities of one year or more at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
Fund Information |
Symbol on NYSE |
MUS | |
Initial Offering Date |
May 1, 1998 | |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2016 ($14.31)1 |
5.66% | |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.00% | |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.0675 | |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.8100 | |
Economic Leverage as of April 30, 20164 |
37% |
1 | Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
2 | Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
3 | The distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change. |
4 | Represents VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Performance |
Returns for the 12 months ended April 30, 2016 were as follows:
Returns Based On | ||||||||
Market Price | NAV | |||||||
MUS1,2 |
14.09 | % | 8.24 | % | ||||
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
13.64 | % | 8.61 | % |
1 | All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions. |
2 | The Funds discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
3 | Average return. |
The following discussion relates to the Funds absolute performance based on NAV:
| A positive interest-rate backdrop helped fuel a robust gain for the U.S. municipal bond market during the annual period. U.S. Treasury yields fell (as prices rose) amid an environment of slow global growth, declining yields overseas, and an emerging consensus that the Fed would maintain a gradual approach to raising short-term interest rates. Municipals generally outperformed Treasuries, reflecting favorable supply-and-demand conditions in the market and the overall health of state and local finances outside of select areas such as Puerto Rico, Illinois and New Jersey. Longer-term municipal bonds outpaced their short-term counterparts, while lower-quality securities typically outperformed higher-quality issues. |
| On a sector basis, the largest contributions to Fund performance came from transportation and tax-backed local issues. The Funds duration positioning, highlighted by concentrations in longer-dated securities with maturities of 25 years and above, also aided results. (Duration is a measure of interest-rate sensitivity.) Exposure to lower-quality bonds on the investment-grade spectrum further benefited results at a time of elevated investor demand for higher-risk, higher-yielding assets. Yield curve positioning was an additional contributor, as the Fund was positioned to capitalize on the outperformance of intermediate- and longer-term bonds versus those with maturities of five years and below. Positions in zero-coupon bonds, which delivered outstanding returns compared to current-coupon issues, also contributed positively. |
| Income in the form of coupon payments made up a meaningful portion of the Funds total return for the period. In addition, the Funds minimal cash position and use of leverage provided both incremental return and income. |
| Despite offering generous yields in comparison to the broader market, the Funds more-seasoned holdings detracted from performance due to the premium amortization that occurred as the bonds approached their first call dates. (When a bonds price trades at a premium over its face value, the difference is amortized over time. A bond premium occurs when the price of the bond has increased due to a decline in interest rates.) |
| The Funds use of U.S. Treasury futures contracts to manage interest rate risk had a slightly negative impact on performance due to the overall strength in the market. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
14 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
BlackRock MuniHoldings Quality Fund, Inc. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
4/30/16 | 4/30/15 |
Change | High | Low | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
$ | 14.31 | $ | 13.32 | 7.43 | % | $ | 14.71 | $ | 12.58 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value |
$ | 14.85 | 1 | $ | 14.57 | 1.92 | % | $ | 14.90 | $ | 14.21 |
1 | The net asset value does not reflect adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and therefore differs from amounts reported in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities and the Financial Highlights. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years |
Overview of the Funds Total Investments* |
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 15 |
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2016 | BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. |
Fund Overview |
BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc.s (MUI) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide common shareholders with high current income exempt from federal income taxes. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). Under normal market conditions, the Fund invests at least 75% of its assets in municipal bonds rated investment grade and invests at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds with a duration of three to ten years at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
Fund Information |
Symbol on NYSE |
MUI | |
Initial Offering Date |
August 1, 2003 | |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2016 ($15.19)1 |
4.78% | |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
8.45% | |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.0605 | |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.7260 | |
Economic Leverage as of April 30, 20164 |
36% |
1 | Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
2 | Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
3 | The monthly distribution per Common Share, declared on June 1, 2016, was decreased to $0.0555 per share. The yield on closing market price, current monthly distribution per Common Share and current annualized distribution per Common Share do not reflect the new distribution rate. The new distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change in the future. |
4 | Represents VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Performance |
Returns for the 12 months ended April 30, 2016 were as follows:
Returns Based On | ||||||||
Market Price | NAV | |||||||
MUI1,2 |
12.27 | % | 9.04 | % | ||||
Lipper Intermediate Municipal Debt Funds3 |
9.22 | % | 6.57 | % |
1 | All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions. |
2 | The Funds discount to NAV, which narrowed during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
3 | Average return. |
The following discussion relates to the Funds absolute performance based on NAV:
| A positive interest-rate backdrop helped fuel a robust gain for the U.S. municipal bond market during the annual period. U.S. Treasury yields fell (as prices rose) amid an environment of slow global growth, declining yields overseas, and an emerging consensus that the Fed would maintain a gradual approach to raising short-term interest rates. Municipals generally outperformed Treasuries, reflecting favorable supply-and-demand conditions in the market and the overall health of state and local finances outside of select areas such as Puerto Rico, Illinois and New Jersey. Longer-term municipal bonds outpaced their short-term counterparts, while lower-quality securities typically outperformed higher-quality issues. |
| With this as the backdrop, the Funds holdings in longer-duration and longer-dated bonds generally provided the best returns. (Duration is a measure of interest-rate sensitivity) The Funds allocations to the tax-backed (states, local and school districts), transportation and health care sectors were positive contributors to performance. Consistent with the broader market environment, the strongest returns came from the Funds holdings in higher-yielding, lower-rated investment-grade credits. With that said, positions in high-quality, pre-refunded bonds also contributed to performance. |
| Income in the form of coupon payments made up a meaningful portion of the Funds total return for the period. In addition, the Funds minimal cash position and use of leverage provided both incremental return and income. |
| The Funds use of U.S. Treasury futures contracts to manage interest rate risk had a slightly negative impact on performance due to the overall strength in the market. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
16 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
BlackRock Muni Intermediate Duration Fund, Inc. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
4/30/16 | 4/30/15 | Change | High | Low | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
$ | 15.19 | $ | 14.47 | 4.98 | % | $ | 15.19 | $ | 13.48 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value |
$ | 16.17 | 1 | $ | 15.86 | 1.95 | % | $ | 16.21 | $ | 15.51 |
1 | The net asset value does not reflect adjustments made for financial reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and therefore differs from amounts reported in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities and the Financial Highlights. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years |
Overview of the Funds Total Investments* |
Call/Maturity Schedule4 | ||||
Calendar Year Ended December 31, |
||||
2016 |
5 | % | ||
2017 |
5 | |||
2018 |
5 | |||
2019 |
8 | |||
2020 |
8 |
4 | Scheduled maturity dates and/or bonds that are subject to potential calls by issuers over the next five years. |
* | Excludes short-term securities. |
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 17 |
Fund Summary as of April 30, 2016 | BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc. |
Fund Overview |
BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc.s (MVT) (the Fund) investment objective is to provide shareholders with as high a level of current income exempt from federal income taxes as is consistent with its investment policies and prudent investment management. The Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective by investing at least 80% of its assets in municipal bonds exempt from federal income taxes (except that the interest may be subject to the federal alternative minimum tax). The Fund invests, under normal market conditions, at least 75% of its assets in municipal bonds rated investment grade and invests primarily in long-term municipal bonds with a maturity of more than ten years at the time of investment. The Fund may invest directly in such securities or synthetically through the use of derivatives.
No assurance can be given that the Funds investment objective will be achieved.
Fund Information |
Symbol on NYSE |
MVT | |
Initial Offering Date |
March 29, 1993 | |
Yield on Closing Market Price as of April 30, 2016 ($17.38)1 |
5.73% | |
Tax Equivalent Yield2 |
10.12% | |
Current Monthly Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.083 | |
Current Annualized Distribution per Common Share3 |
$0.996 | |
Economic Leverage as of April 30, 20164 |
38% |
1 | Yield on closing market price is calculated by dividing the current annualized distribution per share by the closing market price. Past performance does not guarantee future results. |
2 | Tax equivalent yield assumes the maximum marginal federal tax rate of 43.4%, which includes the 3.8% Medicare tax. Actual tax rates will vary based on income, exemptions and deductions. Lower taxes will result in lower tax equivalent yields. |
3 | The monthly distribution per Common Share, declared on June 1, 2016, was decreased to $0.079 per share. The yield on closing market price, current monthly distribution per Common Share and current annualized distribution per Common Share do not reflect the new distribution rate. The new distribution rate is not constant and is subject to change in the future. |
4 | Represents VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts as a percentage of total managed assets, which is the total assets of the Fund, including any assets attributable to VMTP Shares and TOB Trusts, minus the sum of accrued liabilities. For a discussion of leveraging techniques used by the Fund, please see The Benefits and Risks of Leveraging on page 5. |
Performance |
Returns for the 12 months ended April 30, 2016 were as follows:
Returns Based On | ||||||||
Market Price | NAV | |||||||
MVT1,2 |
13.88 | % | 7.61 | % | ||||
Lipper General & Insured Municipal Debt Funds (Leveraged)3 |
13.64 | % | 8.61 | % |
1 | All returns reflect reinvestment of dividends and/or distributions. |
2 | The Funds premium to NAV, which widened during the period, accounts for the difference between performance based on price and performance based on NAV. |
3 | Average return. |
The following discussion relates to the Funds absolute performance based on NAV:
| A positive interest-rate backdrop helped fuel a robust gain for the U.S. municipal bond market during the annual period. U.S. Treasury yields fell (as prices rose) amid an environment of slow global growth, declining yields overseas, and an emerging consensus that the Fed would maintain a gradual approach to raising short-term interest rates. Municipals generally outperformed Treasuries, reflecting favorable supply-and-demand conditions in the market and the overall health of state and local finances outside of select areas such as Puerto Rico, Illinois and New Jersey. Longer-term municipal bonds outpaced their short-term counterparts, while lower-quality securities typically outperformed higher-quality issues. |
| Income in the form of coupon payments made up a meaningful portion of the Funds total return for the period. In addition, the Funds minimal cash position and use of leverage provided both incremental return and income. |
| The Funds duration positioning, highlighted by concentrations in longer-dated securities with maturities of 25 years and above, also aided results. (Duration is a measure of interest-rate sensitivity.) Positions in lower-rated investment-grade bonds, as well as holdings of below investment-grade and unrated bonds, further helped performance at a time of elevated demand for higher-risk, higher-yielding investments. Sector concentrations in transportation, utilities and health care also contributed strongly. |
| Despite offering generous yields in comparison to the broader market, the Funds more-seasoned holdings detracted from performance due to the premium amortization that occurred as the bonds approached their first call dates. (When a bonds price trades at a premium over its face value, the difference is amortized over time. A bond premium occurs when the price of the bond has increased due to a decline in interest rates.) The Funds yield curve positioning also detracted somewhat given the more substantive decline in intermediate term yields in relation to the longer maturities in which the portfolios holdings are largely concentrated. |
| The Funds use of U.S. Treasury futures contracts to manage interest rate risk had a slightly negative impact on performance due to the overall strength in the market. |
The views expressed reflect the opinions of BlackRock as of the date of this report and are subject to change based on changes in market, economic or other conditions. These views are not intended to be a forecast of future events and are no guarantee of future results.
18 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
BlackRock MuniVest Fund II, Inc. |
Market Price and Net Asset Value Per Share Summary |
4/30/16 | 4/30/15 | Change | High | Low | ||||||||||||||||
Market Price |
$ | 17.38 | $ | 16.26 | 6.89 | % | $ | 17.78 | $ | 14.53 | ||||||||||
Net Asset Value |
$ | 16.17 | $ | 16.01 | 1.00 | % | $ | 16.21 | $ | 15.56 |
Market Price and Net Asset Value History For the Past Five Years |
Overview of the Funds Total Investments* |
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 19 |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |
Portfolio Abbreviations |
AGC | Assured Guarantee Corp. | EDA | Economic Development Authority | IDB | Industrial Development Board | |||||
AGM | Assured Guaranty Municipal Corp. | EDC | Economic Development Corp. | ISD | Independent School District | |||||
AMBAC | American Municipal Bond Assurance Corp. | ERB | Education Revenue Bonds | LRB | Lease Revenue Bonds | |||||
AMT | Alternative Minimum Tax (subject to) | GARB | General Airport Revenue Bonds | M/F | Multi-Family | |||||
ARB | Airport Revenue Bonds | GO | General Obligation Bonds | MRB | Mortgage Revenue Bonds | |||||
BARB | Building Aid Revenue Bonds | HDA | Housing Development Authority | NPFGC | National Public Finance Guarantee Corp. | |||||
BHAC | Berkshire Hathaway Assurance Corp. | HFA | Housing Finance Agency | PSF-GTD | Permanent School Fund Guaranteed | |||||
CAB | Capital Appreciation Bonds | HRB | Housing Revenue Bonds | RB | Revenue Bonds | |||||
COP | Certificates of Participation | IDA | Industrial Development Authority | S/F | Single-Family |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
20 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 21 |
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
22 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 23 |
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
24 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
Notes to Schedule of Investments |
(a) | Security exempt from registration pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. These securities may be resold in transactions exempt from registration to qualified institutional investors. |
(b) | U.S. Government securities, held in escrow, are used to pay interest on this security, as well as to retire the bond in full at the date indicated, typically at a premium to par. |
(c) | When-issued security. |
(d) | Issuer filed for bankruptcy and/or is in default of interest payments. |
(e) | Non-income producing security. |
(f) | Step-up bond that pays an initial coupon rate for the first period and then a higher coupon rate for the following periods. Rate as of period end. |
(g) | Zero-coupon bond. |
(h) | Variable rate security. Rate as of period end. |
See Notes to Financial Statements.
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 25 |
Schedule of Investments (continued) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
(i) | Represent bonds transferred to a TOB Trust in exchange of cash and residual certificates received by the Fund. These bonds serve as collateral in a secured borrowing. See Note 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details. |
(j) | All or a portion of security is subject to a recourse agreement. The aggregate maximum potential amount the Fund could ultimately be required to pay under the agreement, which expire between February 15, 2019 to November 15, 2019, is $11,849,809. See Note 4 of the Notes to Financial Statements for details. |
(k) | During the year ended April 30, 2016, investments in issuers considered to be affiliates of the Fund for purposes of Section 2(a)(3) of the 1940 Act were as follows: |
Affiliate | Shares Held at April 30, 2015 |
Net Activity |
Shares Held at April 30, 2016 |
Income | ||||||||||||||
BlackRock Liquidity Funds, MuniCash |
| 4,296,151 | 4,296,151 | $ | 435 | |||||||||||||
FFI Institutional Tax-Exempt Fund |
961,095 | (961,095 | ) | | 414 | |||||||||||||
Total |
4,296,151 | $ | 849 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
(l) | Current yield as of period end. |
Derivative Financial Instruments Outstanding as of Period End |
Futures Contracts
Contracts Short |
Issue | Expiration | Notional Value | Unrealized Appreciation |
||||||||||
(17 | ) | 5-Year U.S. Treasury Note | June 2016 | $ 2,055,539 | $ | 7,151 | ||||||||
(80 | ) | 10-Year U.S. Treasury Note | June 2016 | $10,405,000 | 70,772 | |||||||||
(27 | ) | Long U.S. Treasury Bond | June 2016 | $ 4,409,438 | 68,328 | |||||||||
(7 | ) | Ultra U.S. Treasury Bond | June 2016 | $ 1,199,406 | 20,959 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 167,210 | ||||||||||||
|
|
Derivative Financial Instruments Categorized by Risk Exposure |
As of period end, the fair values of derivative financial instruments located in the Statements of Assets and Liabilities were as follows:
Assets Derivative Financial Instruments | Commodity Contracts |
Credit Contracts |
Equity Contracts |
Foreign |
Interest Rate Contracts |
Other Contracts |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Futures contracts |
Net unrealized appreciation | 1 | | | | | $ | 167,210 | | $ | 167,210 | |||||||||||||||||||||
1 Includes cumulative appreciation (depreciation) on futures contracts, if any, as reported in the Schedule of Investments. Only current days variation margin is reported within the Statements of Assets and Liabilities. |
|
For the year ended April 30, 2016, the effect of derivative financial instruments in the Statements of Operations was as follows:
Net Realized Gain (Loss) from: | Commodity Contracts |
Credit Contracts |
Equity Contracts |
Foreign Currency Exchange Contracts |
Interest Rate Contracts |
Other Contracts |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Futures contracts |
| | | | $ | (891,260 | ) | | $ | (891,260 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Net Change in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation) on: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Futures contracts |
| | | | $ | 521,509 | | $ | 521,509 |
Average Quarterly Balances of Outstanding Derivative Financial Instruments |
Futures contracts: | ||||
Average notional value of contracts short |
$ | 15,992,732 |
For more information about the Funds investment risks regarding derivative financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
See Notes to Financial Statements.
26 | ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 |
Schedule of Investments (concluded) |
BlackRock MuniAssets Fund, Inc. (MUA) |
Fair Value Hierarchy as of Period End |
Various inputs are used in determining the fair value of investments and derivative financial instruments. For information about the Funds policy regarding valuation of investments and derivative financial instruments, refer to the Notes to Financial Statements.
The following tables summarize the Funds investments and derivative financial instruments categorized in the disclosure hierarchy:
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||
Investments: | ||||||||||||||
Long-Term Investments1 |
| $ | 579,574,952 | | $ | 579,574,952 | ||||||||
Short-Term Securities |
$ | 4,296,151 | | | 4,296,151 | |||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 4,296,151 | $ | 579,574,952 | | $ | 583,871,103 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Derivative Financial Instruments2 | ||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts |
$ | 167,210 | | | $ | 167,210 | ||||||||
1 See above Schedule of Investments for values in each state or political subdivision. |
| |||||||||||||
2 Derivative financial instruments are futures contracts. Futures contracts are valued at the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on the instrument. |
| |||||||||||||
The Fund may hold assets and/or liabilities in which the fair value approximates the carrying amount for financial statement purposes. As of period end, such assets and/or liabilities are categorized within the disclosure hierarchy as follows: | ||||||||||||||
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | Total | |||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||
Cash pledged for futures contracts |
$ | 243,950 | | | $ | 243,950 | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||
Bank overdraft |
| $ | (68,716 | ) | | (68,716 | ) | |||||||
TOB Trust Certificates |
| (66,086,523 | ) | | (66,086,523 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 243,950 | $ | (66,155,239 | ) | | $ | (65,911,289 | ) | |||||
|
|
During the year ended April 30, 2016, there were no transfers between levels.
See Notes to Financial Statements.
ANNUAL REPORT | APRIL 30, 2016 | 27 |
Schedule of Investments April 30, 2016 |
BlackRock MuniEnhanced Fund, Inc. (MEN) (Percentages shown are based on Net Assets) |