As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2006
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
¨ | REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2005 |
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
OR
¨ | SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 001-32221
Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Gol Intelligent Airlines Inc.
(Translation of Registrants name into English)
The Federative Republic of Brazil
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Rua Tamoios 246
Jardim Aeroporto
04630-000 São Paulo, São Paulo
Federative Republic of Brazil
(+55 11 5033-4200)
(Address, including zip code and telephone number, including area code, of registrants principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Title of each class: |
Name of each exchange on which registered: | |
Preferred Shares, without par value American Depositary Shares (as evidenced by American Depositary Receipts), each representing one share of Preferred Stock |
New York Stock Exchange* New York Stock Exchange |
* | Not for trading purposes, but only in connection with the trading on the New York Stock Exchange of American Depositary Shares representing those preferred shares. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
None
The number of outstanding shares of each class of stock of Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A. as of December 31, 2005:
109,448,497 | Shares of Common Stock | |
86,524,136 | Shares of Preferred Stock |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes x No ¨
If this is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated Filer x | Accelerated Filer ¨ | Non-acceleratedFiler ¨ |
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the Registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 ¨ Item 18 x
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Page | ||||||
1 | ||||||
2 | ||||||
3 | ||||||
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |
4 | |||||
4 | ||||||
Item 3. Key Information |
4 | |||||
4 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
Item 4. Information on the Company |
17 | |||||
17 | ||||||
17 | ||||||
43 | ||||||
43 | ||||||
Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments |
43 | |||||
43 | ||||||
45 | ||||||
56 | ||||||
57 | ||||||
58 | ||||||
58 | ||||||
58 | ||||||
58 | ||||||
58 | ||||||
62 | ||||||
63 | ||||||
65 | ||||||
66 | ||||||
66 | ||||||
66 | ||||||
67 | ||||||
68 | ||||||
Item 8. Financial Information |
68 | |||||
68 |
Page | ||||||
73 | ||||||
Item 9. The Offer and Listing |
73 | |||||
73 | ||||||
74 | ||||||
74 | ||||||
81 | ||||||
81 | ||||||
81 | ||||||
Item 10. Additional Information |
82 | |||||
82 | ||||||
82 | ||||||
88 | ||||||
89 | ||||||
90 | ||||||
98 | ||||||
98 | ||||||
98 | ||||||
99 | ||||||
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
99 | |||||
Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities |
100 | |||||
101 | ||||||
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |
101 | |||||
Item 15. Controls and Procedures |
101 | |||||
Item 16. |
101 | |||||
101 | ||||||
102 | ||||||
102 | ||||||
D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees |
102 | |||||
E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers |
102 | |||||
Item 17. Financial Statements |
103 | |||||
Item 18. Financial Statements |
103 | |||||
Item 19. Exhibits |
103 |
In this annual report, we use the terms the Registrant to refer to Gol Linhas Aéreas Inteligentes S.A., Gol to refer to Gol Transportes Aéreos S.A. and we, us and our to refer to the Registrant and Gol together, except where the context requires otherwise. References to preferred shares and ADSs refer to non-voting preferred shares of the Registrant and American depositary shares representing those preferred shares, respectively, except where the context requires otherwise.
The phrase Brazilian government refers to the federal government of the Federative Republic of Brazil, and the term Central Bank refers to the Banco Central do Brasil, or the Central Bank of Brazil. The term Brazil refers to the Federative Republic of Brazil. The terms U.S. dollar and U.S. dollars and the symbol US$ refer to the legal currency of the United States. The terms real and reais and the symbol R$ refer to the legal currency of Brazil. U.S. GAAP refers to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, and Brazilian GAAP refers to generally accepted accounting principles in Brazil, which are accounting principles derived from Law No. 6,404 of December 15, 1976, as amended and supplemented, or the Brazilian corporation law and the rules of the CVM.
This annual report contains terms relating to operating performance within the airline industry that are defined as follows:
· | Revenue passengers represents the total number of paying passengers flown on all flight segments. |
· | Revenue passenger kilometers represents the numbers of kilometers flown by revenue passengers. |
· | Available seat kilometers represents the aircraft seating capacity multiplied by the number of kilometers the seats are flown. |
· | Load factor represents the percentage of aircraft seating capacity that is actually utilized (calculated by dividing revenue passenger kilometers by available seat kilometers). |
· | Breakeven load factor is the passenger load factor that will result in passenger revenues being equal to operating expenses. |
· | Aircraft utilization represents the average number of block hours operated per day per aircraft for the total aircraft fleet. |
· | Block hours refers to the elapsed time between an aircrafts leaving an airport gate and arriving at an airport gate. |
· | Yield per passenger kilometer represents the average amount one passenger pays to fly one kilometer. |
· | Passenger revenue per available seat kilometer represents passenger revenue divided by available seat kilometers. |
· | Operating revenue per available seat kilometer represents operating revenues divided by available seat kilometers. |
· | Average stage length represents the average number of kilometers flown per flight. |
· | Operating expense per available seat kilometer represents operating expenses divided by available seat kilometers. |
1
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA
We make statements in this annual report about our competitive position and market share in, and the market size of, the Brazilian and South American airline industry. We have made these statements on the basis of statistics and other information from third-party sources, governmental agencies or industry or general publications that we believe are reliable. Although we have no reason to believe any of this information or these reports are inaccurate in any material respect, we have not independently verified the competitive position, market share and market size or market growth data provided by third parties or by industry or general publications. All industry and market data contained in this annual report is based upon the latest publicly available information as of the date of this annual report.
Certain figures included in this annual report have been subject to rounding adjustments. Accordingly, figures shown as totals in certain tables may not be an arithmetic aggregation of the figures that precede them.
The consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and reflect our financial condition and results of operations as if the Registrant had been incorporated and held all of the capital stock of Gol, with the exception of five common shares and three Class B preferred shares of Gol held by members of Gols board of directors for eligibility purposes, since January 1, 2001. See Item 10.B. Memorandum of Articles of AssociationDescription of Capital StockGeneral. We publish our consolidated financial statements in Brazil in accordance with Brazilian GAAP, which differ in certain significant respects from U.S. GAAP.
We have translated some of the real amounts contained in this annual report into U.S. dollars. The rate used to translate such amounts in respect of the year ended December 31, 2005 was R$2.3407 to US$1.00, which was the commercial rate for the purchase of U.S. dollars in effect as of December 31, 2005, as reported by the Central Bank. The U.S. dollar equivalent information presented in this annual report is provided solely for convenience of investors and should not be construed as implying that the real amounts represent, or could have been or could be converted into, U.S. dollars at such rates or at any other rate. See Exchange Rates for more detailed information regarding the translation of reais into U.S. dollars.
2
SPECIAL NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This annual report includes forward-looking statements, principally under the captions Risk Factors, Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and Business Overview. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current beliefs, expectations and projections about future events and financial trends affecting our business. Many important factors, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this annual report, could cause our actual results to differ substantially from those anticipated in our forward-looking statements, including, among other things:
· | general economic, political and business conditions in Brazil and in other South American markets we serve; |
· | managements expectations and estimates concerning our future financial performance and financing plans and programs; |
· | our limited operating history; |
· | our level of fixed obligations; |
· | our capital expenditure plans; |
· | inflation and fluctuations in the exchange rate of the real; |
· | existing and future governmental regulations, including air traffic capacity controls; |
· | increases in fuel costs, maintenance costs and insurance premiums; |
· | changes in market prices, customer demand and preferences and competitive conditions; |
· | cyclical and seasonal fluctuations in our operating results; |
· | defects or mechanical problems with our aircraft; |
· | our ability to successfully implement our growth strategy; and |
· | the risk factors discussed under Risk Factors. |
The words believe, may, will, aim, estimate, continue, anticipate, intend, expect and similar words are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include information concerning our possible or assumed future results of operations, business strategies, financing plans, competitive position, industry environment, potential growth opportunities, the effects of future regulation and the effects of competition. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they were made, and we undertake no obligation to update publicly or to revise any forward-looking statements after we distribute this annual report because of new information, future events or other factors. In light of the risks and uncertainties described above, the forward-looking events and circumstances discussed in this annual report might not occur and are not guarantees of future performance.
3
PART I
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
The following table presents summary historical consolidated financial and operating data for us for each of the periods indicated. You should read this information in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes, and the information under Selected Financial Data and Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
The Registrant is a holding company that was incorporated on March 12, 2004 and the shares of Gol, an offshore finance subsidiary, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments are currently the Registrants only material assets.
The consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and reflect our financial condition and results of operations as if the Registrant had been incorporated and held all of the capital stock of Gol since January 1, 2001, except for five common shares and three Class B preferred shares of Gol held by members of Gols board of directors for eligibility purposes. On June 29, 2004, the Registrant completed its initial public offering through the issuance of 18,750,000 preferred shares. See Item 10.B. Memorandum of Articles of AssociationDescription of Capital Stock.
Solely for the convenience of the reader, real amounts as of and for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been translated into U.S. dollars at the commercial market rate in effect as of December 31, 2005 as reported by the Central Bank of R$2.3407 to US$1.00.
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Passenger |
R$ | 223,384 | R$ | 643,549 | R$ | 1,339,191 | R$ | 1,875,475 | R$ | 2,539,016 | US$ | 1,084,725 | ||||||||||||
Cargo and other |
7,089 | 34,330 | 61,399 | 85,411 | 130,074 | 55,571 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total net operating revenues |
230,473 | 677,879 | 1,400,590 | 1,960,886 | 2,669,090 | 1,140,296 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits |
33,263 | 77,855 | 137,638 | 183,037 | 260,183 | 111,156 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aircraft fuel |
45,769 | 160,537 | 308,244 | 459,192 | 808,268 | 345,310 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aircraft rent |
58,816 | 130,755 | 188,841 | 195,504 | 240,876 | 102,908 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aircraft insurance |
7,556 | 23,186 | 25,850 | 25,575 | 29,662 | 12,672 | ||||||||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
35,299 | 96,626 | 191,280 | 261,756 | 335,722 | 143,428 | ||||||||||||||||||
Landing fees |
14,602 | 32,758 | 47,924 | 57,393 | 92,404 | 39,477 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aircraft and traffic servicing |
18,563 | 47,381 | 58,710 | 74,825 | 91,599 | 39,133 | ||||||||||||||||||
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
4,773 | 16,160 | 42,039 | 51,796 | 55,373 | 23,657 | ||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
2,383 | 7,885 | 13,844 | 21,242 | 35,014 | 14,959 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
7,741 | 22,654 | 44,494 | 54,265 | 98,638 | 42,140 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
228,765 | 615,797 | 1,058,864 | 1,384,585 | 2,047,739 | 874,840 | ||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
1,708 | 62,082 | 341,726 | 576,301 | 621,351 | 265,456 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(3,350 | ) | (16,530 | ) | (20,910 | ) | (13,445 | ) | (19,383 | ) | (8,281 | ) | ||||||||||||
Financial income (expense), net |
(1,997 | ) | 7,447 | (56,681 | ) | 24,424 | 115,554 | 49,367 | ||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(3,639 | ) | 52,999 | 264,135 | 587,280 | 717,522 | 306,542 | |||||||||||||||||
Income taxes |
| (17,642 | ) | (88,676 | ) | (202,570 | ) | (204,292 | ) | (87,279 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
R$ | (3,639 | ) | R$ | 35,357 | R$ | 175,459 | R$ | 384,710 | R$ | 513,230 | US$ | 219,263 | |||||||||||
4
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share, basic(1) |
R$ | (0.06 | ) | R$ | 0.36 | R$ | 1.07 | R$ | 2.14 | R$ | 2.66 | US$ | 1.14 | |||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per share, diluted(1) |
R$ | (0.06 | ) | R$ | 0.36 | R$ | 1.07 | R$ | 2.13 | R$ | 2.65 | US$ | 1.13 | |||||||||||
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings (loss) per share, basic (in thousands)(1) |
56,000 | 98,268 | 164,410 | 179,731 | 192,828 | 192,828 | ||||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings (loss) per share, diluted (in thousands)(1) |
56,000 | 98,268 | 164,410 | 180,557 | 193,604 | 193,604 | ||||||||||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per ADS, basic(2) |
R$ | (0.06 | ) | R$ | 0.36 | R$ | 1.07 | R$ | 2.14 | R$ | 2.66 | US$ | 1.14 | |||||||||||
Earnings (loss) per ADS, diluted(2) |
R$ | (0.06 | ) | R$ | 0.36 | R$ | 1.07 | R$ | 2.13 | R$ | 2.65 | US$ | 1.13 | |||||||||||
Dividends paid per share |
R$ | | R$ | | R$ | 0.16 | R$ | 0.32 | R$ | 0.60 | US$ | 0.26 | ||||||||||||
Dividends paid per ADS(2) |
R$ | | R$ | | R$ | 0.16 | R$ | 0.32 | R$ | 0.60 | US$ | 0.26 | ||||||||||||
As of December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance Sheet Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
R$ | 5,156 | R$ | 9,452 | R$ | 146,291 | R$ | 405,730 | R$ | 106,347 | US$ | 45,434 | ||||||||||||
Short-term investments |
| | | 443,361 | 762,688 | 325,837 | ||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable(3) |
51,685 | 105,245 | 240,576 | 386,370 | 563,958 | 240,936 | ||||||||||||||||||
Deposits for aircraft leases and aircraft and engine maintenance contracts |
27,130 | 121,980 | 180,916 | 289,416 | 408,776 | 174,638 | ||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
125,107 | 318,342 | 685,019 | 1,734,284 | 2,555,843 | 1,091,912 | ||||||||||||||||||
Short term debt |
37,045 | 22,800 | 38,906 | 118,349 | 54,016 | 23,077 | ||||||||||||||||||
Long term debt |
| | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity |
19,728 | 71,583 | 314,739 | 1,148,453 | 1,822,331 | 778,540 | ||||||||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(in thousands, except percentages) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Financial Data: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating margin(4) |
0.7 | % | 9.2 | % | 24.4 | % | 29.4 | % | 23.3 | % | 23.3 | % | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
R$ | (19,213 | ) | R$ | 17,023 | R$ | 85,235 | R$ | 239,920 | R$ | 353,745 | US$ | 151,129 | |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(29,666 | ) | (34,479 | ) | (39,263 | ) | (533,043 | ) | (801,787 | ) | (342,542 | ) | ||||||||||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
53,239 | 21,752 | 90,867 | 552,562 | 148,659 | 63,510 | ||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA(5) |
4,091 | 69,967 | 355,570 | 597,543 | 656,365 | 280,415 | ||||||||||||||||||
Aircraft rent(A) |
58,816 | 130,755 | 188,841 | 195,504 | 240,876 | 102,908 |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
||||||||||||||||
Operating Data (unaudited): |
||||||||||||||||||||
Revenue passengers (in thousands) |
2,085 | 4,847 | 7,324 | 9,215 | 13,000 | |||||||||||||||
Revenue passenger kilometers (in millions) |
1,256 | 3,156 | 4,835 | 6,289 | 9,740 | |||||||||||||||
Available seat kilometers (in millions) |
2,091 | 5,049 | 7,527 | 8,844 | 13,246 | |||||||||||||||
Load-factor |
60.1 | % | 62.5 | % | 64.2 | % | 71.1 | % | 73.5 | % | ||||||||||
Break-even load factor |
61.5 | % | 59.8 | % | 50.8 | % | 52.5 | % | 56.4 | % | ||||||||||
Aircraft utilization (block hours per day) |
11.1 | 12.3 | 12.8 | 13.6 | 13.9 | |||||||||||||||
Average fare |
R$ | 115 | R$ | 140 | R$ | 195 | R$ | 210 | R$ | 201 | ||||||||||
Yield per passenger kilometer (cents) |
17.8 | 20.4 | 27.7 | 29.8 | 26.1 | |||||||||||||||
Passenger revenue per available seat kilometer (cents) |
10.7 | 12.7 | 17.8 | 21.2 | 19.1 | |||||||||||||||
Operating revenue per available seat kilometer (cents) |
11.0 | 13.4 | 18.6 | 22.2 | 20.1 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expense per available seat kilometer (cents) |
10.9 | 12.2 | 14.1 | 15.7 | 15.5 | |||||||||||||||
Operating expense less fuel expense per available seat kilometer (cents) |
8.8 | 9.0 | 9.9 | 10.5 | 9.4 | |||||||||||||||
Departures |
24,727 | 52,665 | 75,439 | 87,708 | 122,683 | |||||||||||||||
Departures per day |
68 | 144 | 207 | 240 | 336 | |||||||||||||||
Destinations served |
16 | 22 | 25 | 36 | 45 | |||||||||||||||
Average stage length (kilometers) |
613 | 628 | 659 | 689 | 721 | |||||||||||||||
Average number of operating aircraft during period |
7.7 | 15.3 | 21.6 | 22.3 | 34.3 | |||||||||||||||
Full-time equivalent employees at period end |
1,134 | 2,072 | 2,453 | 3,307 | 5,456 | |||||||||||||||
Fuel liters consumed (in thousands) |
77,850 | 164,008 | 264,402 | 317,444 | 476,725 | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of sales through website during period |
13.2 | % | 48.7 | % | 57.9 | % | 76.4 | % | 81.3 | % | ||||||||||
Percentage of sales through website and call center during period |
81.6 | % | 72.1 | % | 74.1 | % | 83.6 | % | 88.7 | % |
(1) | Our preferred shares are not entitled to any fixed dividend preferences, but are instead entitled to receive dividends per share in the same amount of dividends per share paid to holders of our common shares. Consequently, our earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing income by the weighted average number of all classes of shares outstanding during the year. |
5
(2) | Adjusted for the ADS ratio change in December 2005, which changed the ratio of ADS per preferred share from one ADS representing two preferred shares to one ADS representing one preferred share. |
(3) | In managing our liquidity, we take into account our cash and cash equivalents, our short -term investments and our accounts receivable balances. Accounts receivable consist primarily of credit card receivables for purchased passenger tickets. We provide our customers with the option to pay in installments and therefore have to a limited extent a lag between the time that we pay our suppliers and the time that we receive payment for our services. |
(4) | Operating margin represents operating income divided by net operating revenues. |
(5) | EBITDA represents net income (loss) plus the sum of net interest and financial expense, income taxes and depreciation. EBITDA is presented as supplemental information because we believe it is a useful indicator of our operating performance and is useful in comparing our operating performance with other companies in the airline industry. However, EBITDA should not be considered in isolation, as a substitute for net income prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP or as a measure of a companys profitability. In addition, our calculation of EBITDA may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. The following table presents a reconciliation of our net income to EBITDA for the specified periods. |
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||||||||
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
EBITDA Reconciliation:(A) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
R$ | (3,639 | ) | R$ | 35,357 | R$ | 175,459 | R$ | 384,710 | R$ | 513,230 | US$ | 219,263 | |||||||||
Plus (minus) |
||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest and financial expense |
5,347 | 9,083 | 77,591 | (10,979 | ) | (96,171 | ) | (41,086 | ) | |||||||||||||
Income taxes |
| 17,642 | 88,676 | 202,570 | 204,292 | 87,279 | ||||||||||||||||
Depreciation |
2,383 | 7,885 | 13,844 | 21,242 | 35,014 | 14,959 | ||||||||||||||||
EBITDA |
R$ | 4,091 | R$ | 69,967 | R$ | 355,570 | R$ | 597,543 | R$ | 656,365 | US$ | 280,415 | ||||||||||
(A) | Aircraft rent represents a significant operating expense of our business. Because we leased all of our aircraft during the periods presented, we believe that when assessing our EBITDA you should also consider the impact of our aircraft rent expense, which was R$58,816 in 2001, R$130,755 in 2002, R$188,841 in 2003, R$195,504 in 2004, and R$240,876 in 2005. |
Exchange Rates
Prior to March 4, 2005, there were two principal legal foreign exchange markets in Brazil:
· | the commercial rate exchange market; and |
· | the floating rate exchange market. |
Most trade and financial foreign-exchange transactions were carried out on the commercial rate exchange market. These transactions included the purchase or sale of shares or payment of dividends or interest with respect to shares. Foreign currencies could only be purchased in the commercial exchange market through a Brazilian bank authorized to operate in these markets. In both markets, rates were freely negotiated.
Resolution No. 3.265 of the National Monetary Council, dated March 4, 2005, consolidated the foreign exchange markets into one single foreign exchange market, effective as of March 14, 2005. All foreign exchange transactions are now carried out through institutions authorized to operate in the consolidated market and are subject to registration with the Central Banks electronic registration system. Foreign exchange rates continue to be freely negotiated, but may be influenced by Central Bank intervention.
Since 1999, the Central Bank has allowed the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate to float freely, and during that period, the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate has fluctuated considerably. In the past, the Central Bank has intervened occasionally to control unstable movements in foreign exchange rates. We cannot predict whether the Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to let the real float freely or will intervene in the exchange rate market through a currency band system or otherwise. The real may depreciate or appreciate against the U.S. dollar substantially in the future. For more information on these risks, see Item 3. Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Brazil.
6
The following tables set forth the commercial selling rate, expressed in reais per U.S. dollar (R$/US$), for the periods indicated.
Period-end |
Average for Period |
Low |
High | ||||||
(reais per US.dollar) | |||||||||
Year Ended |
|||||||||
December 31, 2001 |
2.320 | 2.353 | (1) | 1.936 | 2.801 | ||||
December 31, 2002 |
3.533 | 2.998 | (1) | 2.271 | 3.955 | ||||
December 31, 2003 |
2.889 | 3.060 | (1) | 2.822 | 3.662 | ||||
December 31, 2004 |
2.654 | 2.917 | (1) | 2.654 | 3.205 | ||||
December 31, 2005 |
2.341 | 2.412 | (1) | 2,163 | 2.762 | ||||
Month Ended |
|||||||||
October 2005 |
2.254 | 2.261 | (2) | 2.234 | 2.289 | ||||
November 2005 |
2.207 | 2.207 | (2) | 2.163 | 2.252 | ||||
December 2005 |
2.341 | 2.277 | (2) | 2.180 | 2.374 | ||||
January 2006 |
2.216 | 2.279 | (2) | 2.212 | 2.346 | ||||
February 2006 |
2.136 | 2.170 | (2) | 2.118 | 2.222 | ||||
March 2006 (through March 10) |
2.145 | 2.146 | (2) | 2.113 | 2.178 |
Source: Central Bank
(1) | Represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period. |
(2) | Average of the lowest and highest rates in the month. |
B. Capitalization and Indebtedness
Not applicable.
C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
An investment in the ADSs or our preferred shares involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected by any of these risks. The trading price of the ADSs could decline due to any of these risks or other factors, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks described below are those that we currently believe may materially affect us.
Risks Relating to Brazil
The Brazilian government has exercised, and continues to exercise, significant influence over the Brazilian economy. This involvement, as well as Brazilian political and economic conditions, could adversely affect our business and the trading price of our ADSs and our preferred shares.
The Brazilian government frequently intervenes in the Brazilian economy and occasionally makes significant changes in policy and regulations. The Brazilian governments actions to control inflation and other policies and regulations have often involved, among other measures, increases in interest rates, changes in tax policies, price controls, currency devaluations, capital controls and limits on imports. Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in policy or regulations at the federal, state or municipal levels involving or affecting factors such as:
· | interest rates; |
· | currency fluctuations; |
7
· | inflation; |
· | liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets; |
· | tax policies; |
· | exchange controls and restrictions on remittances abroad, such as those that were imposed in 1989 and early 1990; and |
· | other political, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil. |
Developments in Brazilian government policies, including economic policy, might adversely affect us. Additionally, in recent months, members of the Executive and Legislative Powers, as well as other related persons, have been investigated for alleged illicit or unethical behavior. It is impossible to foresee the outcome of these investigations and whether it could adversely affect the Brazils economy. Such uncertainties, allegations of unethical or illegal political conduct and other future developments in the Brazilian economy may adversely affect the trading price of our ADSs and our preferred shares.
Presidential elections are to take place in Brazil in October 2006. The President of Brazil has considerable power to determine governmental policies and actions that relate to the Brazilian economy and, consequently, affect the operations and financial performance of businesses, such as our company. The run-up to the presidential election may result in changes in existing governmental policies, and the post-election administrationeven if President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva is re-electedmay seek to implement new policies. We cannot predict what policies will be adopted by the Brazilian government and whether these policies will negatively affect the economy or our business or financial performance.
Exchange rate instability may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the market price of the ADSs and our preferred shares.
As a result of inflationary pressures, among other factors, the Brazilian currency has devalued periodically during the last four decades. Throughout this period, the Brazilian government has implemented various economic plans and utilized a number of exchange rate policies, including sudden devaluations, periodic mini-devaluations during which the frequency of adjustments has ranged from daily to monthly, floating exchange rate systems, exchange controls and dual exchange rate markets. Although over long periods depreciation of the Brazilian currency generally has correlated with the rate of inflation in Brazil, devaluation over shorter periods has resulted in significant fluctuations in the exchange rate between the Brazilian currency and the U.S. dollar and other currencies.
The real depreciated against the U.S. dollar by 9.3% in 2000 and by 18.7% in 2001. In 2002, the real depreciated 52.3% against the U.S. dollar, due in part to political uncertainty surrounding the Brazilian presidential elections and the global economic slowdown. Although the real appreciated 18.2%, 8.1% and 11.8% against the U.S. dollar in 2003, 2004 and 2005 respectively, no assurance can be given that the real will not depreciate or be devalued against the U.S. dollar again. On March 10, 2006, the U.S. dollar/real exchange rate was R$2.1447 per US$1.00. See Exchange Rates.
Substantially all of our passenger revenue and cargo revenue and temporary investments are denominated in reais, and a significant part of our operating expenses, such as fuel, aircraft and engine maintenance services, aircraft rent payments and aircraft insurance, are denominated in, or linked to, U.S. dollars. We maintain U.S. dollar-denominated deposits and maintenance reserve accounts under the terms of our aircraft operating leases. For the year ended December 31, 2005, 53% of our operating expenses were either denominated in or linked to the U.S. dollar. In addition, the purchase price of the 67 737-800 Boeing Next Generation aircraft for which currently we have placed firm purchase orders and the 34 737-800 Boeing Next Generation aircraft for which we currently have purchase options are denominated in U.S. dollars. While in the past we have generally adjusted our fares in response to, and to alleviate the effect of, depreciations of the real and increases in the price of jet fuel and have entered into hedging arrangements to protect us against the effects of such developments, there can
8
be no assurance we will be able to continue to do so. To the extent we are unable to adjust our fares or effectively hedge against any such depreciation or increases in jet fuel prices, this may lead to a decrease in our profit margins or to operating losses caused by increases in U.S. dollar-denominated costs, increases in interest expense or exchange losses on unhedged fixed obligations and indebtedness denominated in foreign currency. We had total U.S. dollar-denominated future operating lease payment obligations of US$385.6 million (including long-term vendor payables) and no other U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness at December 31, 2005. We may incur substantial amounts of U.S. dollar-denominated operating lease or financial obligations, fuel costs linked to the U.S. dollar and U.S. dollar-denominated indebtedness in the future. At December 31, 2005, we had a short-term hedging program in place for a majority of our U.S. dollar-denominated operating lease obligations, our U.S. dollar-linked jet fuel expenses and our interest rate exposure.
Historically, depreciations of the real relative to the U.S. dollar have also created additional inflationary pressures in Brazil, and future depreciations could negatively affect us. Depreciations generally curtail access to foreign financial markets and may prompt government intervention, including recessionary governmental policies. Depreciations also reduce the U.S. dollar value of distributions and dividends on the ADSs and the U.S. dollar equivalent of the market price of our preferred shares and, as a result, the ADSs.
Inflation and government efforts to combat inflation may contribute significantly to economic uncertainty in Brazil and could harm our business and the market value of the ADSs and our preferred shares.
Brazil has in the past experienced extremely high rates of inflation. More recently, Brazils annual rate of inflation was 10.4% in 2001, 25.3% in 2002, 8.7% in 2003, 12.4% in 2004 and 1.2% in 2005 (as measured by Índice Geral de PreçosMercado, or the IGP-M). Inflation, and certain government actions taken to combat inflation, have in the past had significant negative effects on the Brazilian economy. Actions taken to curb inflation, coupled with public speculation about possible future governmental actions, have contributed to economic uncertainty in Brazil and heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities market. Future Brazilian government actions, including interest rate decreases, intervention in the foreign exchange market and actions to adjust or fix the value of the real may trigger increases in inflation. If Brazil experiences high inflation in the future, we may not be able to adjust the fares we charge our customers to offset the effects of inflation on our cost structure. Inflationary pressures may also hinder our ability to access foreign financial markets or lead to government policies to combat inflation that could harm our business or adversely affect the market value of our preferred shares and, as a result, the ADSs.
Developments and the perception of risk in other countries, especially emerging market countries, may adversely affect the market price of Brazilian securities, including the ADSs and our preferred shares.
The market value of securities of Brazilian companies is affected to varying degrees by economic and market conditions in other countries, including other Latin American and emerging market countries. Although economic conditions in such countries may differ significantly from economic conditions in Brazil, investors reactions to developments in these other countries may have an adverse effect on the market value of securities of Brazilian issuers. Crises in other emerging market countries may diminish investor interest in securities of Brazilian issuers, including ours. This could adversely affect the trading price of the ADSs or our preferred shares, and could also make it more difficult for us to access the capital markets and finance our operations in the future on acceptable terms or at all.
Risks Relating to Us and the Brazilian Airline Industry
Changes to the Brazilian civil aviation regulatory framework may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Law No. 11,182, enacted on September 27, 2005 and modified by the Provisional Measure No. 269, of December 15, 2005, created the National Civil Aviation Agency (Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil, or ANAC), a regulatory agency that will be linked, but not subordinated, to the Ministry of Defense and will
9
operate as an independent agency for an indefinite term. ANAC will principally have the authority to: (i) regulate, inspect and supervise services rendered by Brazilian and foreign airlines operating in Brazil, (ii) grant concessions, permits and authorizations for air transport operations and airport infrastructure services after conducting a bidding process, (iii) represent the Brazilian government before international civil aviation organizations, (iv) control, register and inspect civil aircraft, and (v) carry out a mandate under articles 48 and 49 of Law No. 11,182 to ensure that air transportation services are provided under free enterprise principles.
In accordance with Section 7 of Law No. 11,182, ANAC shall be implemented and commence its activities within 180 days from September 28, 2005. However, it is necessary that the Brazilian Government issues a decree setting forth the organizational structure of the agency as well as its internal regulatory regime. As ANAC commences its activities and begins to exercise its powers, the Civil Aviation Department (Departamento de Aviação Civil, or DAC), an organization subordinated to the Air Force Command of the Ministry of Defense, and until now responsible for coordinating and supervising Brazilian civil aviation (coordinating and supervising air transportation services and aviation and ground infrastructure), will transfer all its responsibilities and operations to the new agency and will be extinguished. ANAC will not assume any of the current responsibilities of the Civil Aviation National Council (Conselho de Aviação Civil or CONAC), which will continue to set guidelines for regulation, control the development, and generally establish policy for the air transportation sector as a whole.
Therefore, up to the date of this annual report, DAC is still in charge of approving all new flight routes, as well as modifications to existing flight routes and increases in flight frequencies. In addition, the importation of any new aircraft is subject to approval by the Commission for Coordination of Civil Air Transportation (Comissão de Coordenação de Transporte Aéreo Civil, or COTAC), a sub-department of the DAC. In recent years, the DAC has actively monitored developments in Brazils airline market and has taken certain restrictive measures that have helped to restore greater stability to the industry. For example, the DAC has addressed overcapacity by establishing stricter criteria that must be met before new routes or additional flight frequencies are awarded. Our growth plans contemplate expanding into new markets, increasing flight frequencies and operating considerably more than our existing fleet. As such, our ability to grow generally depends on receiving the required authorizations from the DAC and the COTAC. We cannot assure you that future authorizations will be granted to us. If the Brazilian civil aviation framework changes in the future, or the ANAC implements increased restrictions, our growth plans and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Several legislative initiatives have been taken, including the preparation of a draft bill of law that would replace Law No. 7,565 of December 19, 1986, the current Brazilian Aeronautical Code (Código Brasileiro de Aeronáutica). In general, this draft bill deals with matters related to civil aviation, including airport concessions, consumer protection, increased foreign shareholder participation in airlines, limitation of airlines civil liability, compulsory insurance and fines.
No assurance can be given that these or other changes in the Brazilian airline industry regulations will not have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We operate in a highly competitive industry.
We face intense competition on our domestic routes in Brazil from scheduled airlines and charter airlines. In addition, the Brazilian aviation authorities have the flexibility to permit new entrants in our market. We may face increased competition in the future.
In 2003, the Civil Aviation National Council (Conselho de Aviação Civil, or CONAC) issued guidelines regarding the need to increase barriers to the entry of new concessionaires and to limit the acquisition of new aircraft and the granting of new routes to existing concessionaires in order to protect the financial performance of the Brazilian airline industry as a whole. We cannot predict what impact the implementation of these restrictions might have on our competitive environment or our business.
10
Our existing competitors or new entrants into the market may undercut our fares in the future, increase capacity on their routes in an effort to increase their market share or attempt to conduct low-fare or low-cost airline operations of their own. In such an event, we cannot assure you that our level of fares or passenger traffic would not be adversely affected. We may also face competition from international airlines as we introduce and expand flights between Brazil and other South American destinations.
On June 17, 2005, Varig filed for bankruptcy protection in Brazil and the United States. On January 19, 2006, it presented a restructuring plan to its creditors which was approved in February 2006. We cannot foresee whether the judicial reorganization and related judicial proceedings will have a positive effect on Varigs financial condition in the short or medium term.
In addition to competition among scheduled airline companies and charter operators, the Brazilian airline industry faces competition from ground transportation alternatives, such as interstate buses. Such competition may have an adverse impact on our business and results of operations.
Because we have a limited operating history, it is difficult to evaluate an investment in the ADSs and our preferred shares.
Because we have a limited operating history, having commenced operations in January 2001, it may be difficult to evaluate our prospects and an investment in the ADSs and our preferred shares. Our prospects are uncertain and must be considered in light of the risks, uncertainties and difficulties frequently encountered by companies with a limited operating history. Our performance will depend upon a number of factors, including our ability to:
· | implement our growth strategy; |
· | continue to provide high quality, reliable customer service at low fares; |
· | choose new markets successfully; |
· | stimulate customer demand for our services; |
· | hedge against fuel price, foreign exchange and interest rate fluctuations; |
· | maintain control of our expenses; |
· | attract, train, retain and motivate qualified personnel; |
· | react to customer and market demands and industry trends; and |
· | maintain the safety of our operations. |
We cannot assure you that we will successfully address any of these factors, and our failure to do so could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
A failure to successfully implement our growth strategy would harm the market value of the ADSs and our preferred shares.
Our growth strategy involves expanding the number of markets we serve and increasing the frequency of flights to the markets we currently serve. Increasing the number of markets we serve and our flight frequencies depend on our ability to identify the appropriate geographic markets upon which to focus and to gain suitable airport access and route approval in these markets. There can be no assurance that the new markets we enter will provide passenger traffic that is sufficient to make our operations in those new markets profitable. Three of the airport facilities from which we operate, Santos Dumont in Rio de Janeiro, Congonhas in São Paulo, and Pampulha in Belo Horizonte, are highly congested and passenger processing is at or near maximum capacity. Five of the airports from which we operate, Juscelino Kubitschek in Brasília, Santos Dumont, Congonhas, Guarulhos International Airport in Guarulhos and Pampulha, are subject to slot restrictions limiting the number of landings and take-offs at these airports and when they can be made. Any condition that would prevent or delay our access to airports or routes that will be vital to our growth strategy, including the ability to process more
11
passengers or the imposition of flight capacity restrictions or our inability to maintain our existing slots, and obtain additional slots, in the Juscelino Kubitschek, Santos Dumont, Congonhas, Guarulhos and Pampulha airports, could constrain the expansion of our operations. In addition, the introduction and expansion of flights between Brazil and other South American destinations outside of Brazil requires the availability of flight capacity under, and compliance with, the criteria set forth in bi-lateral treaties governing cross-border air travel that have been negotiated between Brazil and other South American countries. To the extent that there is no available capacity or we cannot comply with the criteria contained in these treaties, our plans to introduce additional flights between Brazil and other South American destinations outside of Brazil could be constrained. In addition, our plans to further expand our operations into other South American countries could be adversely affected by political, economic and social conditions in those countries.
The expansion of our business will also require additional skilled personnel, equipment and facilities. An inability to hire and retain skilled personnel or secure the required equipment and facilities efficiently and cost- effectively may adversely affect our ability to execute our growth strategy. Expansion of our markets and flight frequencies may also strain our existing management resources and operational, financial and management information systems to the point that they may no longer be adequate to support our operations, requiring us to make significant expenditures in these areas. In light of these factors, we cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully establish new markets or expand our existing markets and operations, and our failure to do so would harm our business and the value of the ADSs and our preferred shares.
We have significant fixed costs, and we will incur significantly more fixed costs that could hinder our ability to meet our strategic goals.
We have significant fixed costs, relating primarily to operating leases for our aircraft and engines, of which approximately 9% have floating-rate rent payments based on LIBOR or U.S. interest rates. Currently, we have commitments of approximately US$4.675 billion to purchase 67 additional Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft. We expect that we will incur additional fixed obligations and debt as we take delivery of the new aircraft and other equipment to implement our growth strategy.
Having significant fixed payment obligations could:
· | limit our ability to obtain additional financing to support expansion plans and for working capital and other purposes; |
· | divert substantial cash flow from our operations to service our fixed obligations under aircraft operating leases and aircraft purchase commitments; |
· | if LIBOR or U.S. interest rates increase, require us to incur significantly more lease or interest expense than we currently do; and |
· | limit our ability to plan for or react to changes in our business and the airline industry and to general economic conditions. |
Our ability to make scheduled payments on our fixed obligations, including indebtedness we will incur, will depend on our future operating performance and cash flow, which will in turn depend on prevailing economic and political conditions and financial, competitive, regulatory, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, our ability to raise our fares to compensate for an increase in our fixed costs may be adversely affected by any imposition of fare control mechanisms by the Brazilian civil aviation authorities.
We may have to use our cash resources to finance a portion of our firm purchase order aircraft. We may not have sufficient cash resources available to do so.
We currently finance our aircraft through operating leases. As a result of our firm purchase orders to purchase 67 Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft, in the future we expect to own a portion of our fleet as well as continue to lease aircraft through long-term operating leases. The firm purchase orders represent a significant financial commitment for us. While we expect that a preliminary commitment to us from the Export- Import Bank of the United States to provide guarantees covering approximately 85% of the aggregate purchase
12
price for the firm purchase order aircraft will assist us in obtaining low-cost financing for the purchase of the firm purchase order aircraft, we may be required to use our own cash resources for the remaining 15% of the aggregate purchase price for the firm purchase order aircraft. As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately R$869.0 million of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments in overnight deposits and deposit certificates of highly-rated Brazilian banks and marketable securities, mainly highly-rated Brazilian government bonds. If the value or liquidity of these investments were to decrease, or we do not have sufficient cash resources, we may be required to modify our aircraft acquisition plans or to incur higher than anticipated financing costs, which would have an adverse impact on the execution of our growth strategy and business and could have an adverse impact on our results of operations.
Substantial increases in fuel costs or the unavailability of sufficient quantities of fuel would harm our business.
Fuel costs, which have recently been at historically high levels, constitute a significant portion of our total operating expenses, accounting for approximately 39.5% of our operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005. Historically, international and local fuel prices have been subject to wide price fluctuations based on geopolitical issues and supply and demand. Fuel availability is also subject to periods of market surplus and shortage and is affected by demand for both home heating oil and gasoline. In the event of an international or local fuel supply shortage, our fuel prices may increase.
In addition, substantially all of our fuel is supplied by one source, Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. If Petrobras Distribuidora is unable or unwilling to continue to supply fuel to us at the times and in the quantities that we require, or if Petrobras Distribuidora were to raise significantly the price it charges us for its fuel, our business and results of operations would be adversely affected. Some of our competitors may be able to obtain fuel on better terms than us, both with respect to quantity and price. Although we enter into hedging arrangements to reduce our exposure to fuel price fluctuations and have historically passed on the majority of fuel price increases by adjusting our fare structure, the price and future availability of fuel cannot be predicted with any degree of certainty. Our hedging activities or the extent of our ability to adjust our fares may not be sufficient to protect us from fuel price increases.
Insurance costs for airlines have increased substantially after 2001, and further increases would harm our business.
Due to the threat of terrorist attacks, insurance companies have in recent years dramatically increased airline insurance premiums and significantly reduced the maximum amount of insurance coverage available to airlines for liability to persons (other than passengers) for claims resulting from acts of terrorism, war or similar events, to US$150 million per aircraft. Although insurance costs have decreased since 2004, we cannot assure that these costs will continue to decrease.
Law No. 10,309 of November 22, 2001 authorized the Brazilian government to assume civil liability to third parties for any damages to persons and assets on the ground caused by terrorist attacks or acts of war against aircraft of Brazilian airlines in Brazil or abroad. This law was enacted in response to the substantial increases in insurance premiums attributable to concerns about potential terrorist attacks on aircraft operated by Brazilian airlines in Brazil and abroad after the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States. Law No. 10,744 of October 9, 2003 confirmed coverage by the Brazilian government up to an overall limit of the reais equivalent of US$1 billion for an indeterminate period of time. However, Decree No. 5,035 of April 5, 2004, which regulates the provisions of Law No. 10,744, provides that the Brazilian government may, at its sole discretion, suspend this coverage at any time, effective within seven days after the announcement by the Brazilian government of its decision to do so.
Airline insurers could reduce their coverage or increase their premiums even further in the event of additional terrorist attacks, hijackings, airline crashes, the end of the government-sponsored coverage or other events adversely affecting the airline industry abroad or in Brazil. Significant reductions in coverage or increases in insurance premiums would harm our financial condition and results of operations.
13
We have only a limited number of suppliers for our aircraft and engines.
One of the key elements of our current business strategy is to save costs by operating a simplified aircraft fleet equipped with one type of engine. After extensive research and analysis, we chose the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft and CFM 56-7B engines from CFM International. In light of our firm purchase orders to purchase 67 Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft and options to purchase an additional 34 Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft, we expect to continue to rely on Boeing and CFM International into the foreseeable future. If either Boeing or CFM International were unable to perform their contractual obligations, we would have to find another supplier for a similar type of aircraft or engines.
If we had to lease or purchase aircraft from another supplier, we could lose the benefits we derive from our current fleet composition. We cannot assure you that any replacement aircraft would have the same operating advantages as the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft or that we could lease or purchase engines that would be as reliable and efficient as the CFM 56-7B. We may also incur substantial transition costs, including costs associated with retraining our employees, replacing our manuals and adapting our facilities, to the extent that such costs would not be covered by the alternate supplier. Our operations could also be disrupted by the failure or inability of Boeing or CFM International to provide sufficient parts or related support services on a timely basis.
Our business would also be significantly harmed if a design defect or mechanical problem with the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft or the CFM 56-7B engine used on our aircraft were discovered causing our aircraft to be grounded while any such defect or problem is being corrected, assuming it could be corrected at all. The use of our aircraft could be suspended or restricted by the DAC in the event of any actual or perceived mechanical or design problems while the DAC conducts its own investigation. Our business would also be significantly harmed if the public avoids flying on our aircraft due to an adverse perception of the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft or the CFM 56-7B engine because of safety concerns or other problems, whether real or perceived, or in the event of an accident involving Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft or the CFM 56-7B engine.
We may be unable to maintain our company culture as our business grows.
We believe that our growth potential and the maintenance of our results-oriented corporate culture are directly linked to our capacity to attract and maintain the best professionals available in the Brazilian and South American airline industry. We are dedicated to providing professional, high-quality service in a positive work environment and being innovative at finding ways to improve our business. We place great emphasis on the selection and training of enthusiastic employees with potential to add value to our business and who we believe fit in with and contribute to our company culture. As we grow domestically and internationally, we may be unable to identify, hire or retain enough people who meet the above criteria, or we may have trouble maintaining this company culture as we become a larger business. Our company culture is crucial to our business plan, and failure to maintain that culture could adversely affect our business and results of operations.
The loss of our senior management and key employees could disrupt our business.
Our business also depends upon the efforts of our chief executive officer, who has played an important role in shaping our company culture and, through his interest in Aeropar Participações S.A., owns a significant number of our shares, as well as other key executives. In the event that our chief executive officer or a number of our key executives leave our company, we may have difficulty finding suitable replacements, which could harm our business and results of operations.
We rely heavily on automated systems to operate our business, and any failure of these systems could harm our business.
We depend on automated systems to operate our business, including our computerized airline ticket sales system, our telecommunication systems and our website. Unlike our competitors, which issue traditional paper tickets to some or all of their passengers, we issue only paperless tickets. Our website and ticket sales system
14
must be able to accommodate a high volume of traffic and deliver important flight information. Substantial or repeated website, ticket sales system or telecommunication systems failures could reduce the attractiveness of our services and could cause our customers to purchase tickets from another airline. Any disruption in these systems could result in the loss of important data, increase our expenses and generally harm our business.
We rely on maintaining a high daily aircraft utilization rate to increase our revenues. High aircraft utilization also makes us vulnerable to delays.
One of the key elements of our business strategy is to maintain a high daily aircraft utilization rate. High daily aircraft utilization allows us to generate more revenue from our aircraft and dilute our fixed costs, and is achieved in part by operating with quick turnaround times at airports so we can fly more hours on average in a day. Our rate of aircraft utilization could be adversely affected by a number of different factors that are beyond our control, including, among others, air traffic and airport congestion, adverse weather conditions and delays by third-party service providers relating to matters such as fueling and ground handling.
High aircraft utilization increases the risk that if an aircraft falls behind schedule during the day, it could remain behind schedule during the remainder of that day and potentially into the next day, which can result in disruption in operating performance, leading to passenger dissatisfaction related to delayed or cancelled flights and missed connections.
Our reputation and financial results could be harmed in the event of an accident or incident involving our aircraft or our aircraft type.
An accident or incident involving one of our aircraft could involve significant claims by injured passengers and others, as well as significant costs related to the repair or replacement of a damaged aircraft and its temporary or permanent loss from service. We are required by the DAC and lessors of our aircraft under our operating lease agreements to carry liability insurance. Although we believe we currently maintain liability insurance in amounts and of the type generally consistent with industry practice, the amount of such coverage may not be adequate and we may be forced to bear substantial losses in the event of an accident. Substantial claims resulting from an accident in excess of our related insurance coverage would harm our business and financial results. Moreover, any aircraft accident or incident involving our aircraft, even if fully insured, or an accident or incident involving Boeing 737 Next Generation aircraft, could cause a public perception that we are less safe or reliable than other airlines, which would harm our business and results of operations.
Our controlling shareholder has the ability to direct our business and affairs and its interests could conflict with yours.
Our controlling shareholder has the power to, among other things (i) elect a majority of our directors and (ii) determine the outcome of any action requiring shareholder approval, including transactions with related parties, corporate reorganizations, dispositions, and the timing and payment of any future dividends, subject to minimum dividend payment requirements imposed under the Brazilian corporation law. Although you are entitled to tag-along rights in connection with a change of control of our company and you will have specific protections in connection with transactions between our controlling shareholder and related parties, our controlling shareholder may have an interest in pursuing acquisitions, dispositions, financings or similar transactions that could conflict with your interests as a holder of the ADSs or our preferred shares.
We have historically faced significant fluctuations in our results of operations, and the trading price of the ADSs and our preferred shares may be affected by such variations.
Our results of operations have at times varied significantly from quarter to quarter, and we expect variations to continue in the future. Among the factors causing these variations are the seasonal nature of air travel and the airline industrys sensitivity to general economic conditions. Generally, the revenues from and profitability of our flights reach their highest levels during the January and July summer and winter vacation periods and in the final two weeks of December during the Christmas holiday season. The week during which the annual Carnival celebrations take place in Brazil is generally accompanied by a notable decrease in load factors. In addition,
15
because a substantial portion of both business and leisure airline travel is discretionary, the industry tends to experience adverse financial results during general economic downturns. Any prolonged general reduction in airline passenger traffic may adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Risks Relating to the ADSs and Our Preferred Shares
The relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may substantially limit your ability to sell the preferred shares underlying the ADSs at the price and time you desire.
Investing in securities that trade in emerging markets, such as Brazil, often involves greater risk than investing in securities of issuers in the United States, and such investments are generally considered to be more speculative in nature. The Brazilian securities market is substantially smaller, less liquid, more concentrated and can be more volatile than major securities markets in the United States. Accordingly, although you are entitled to withdraw the preferred shares underlying the ADSs from the depositary at any time, your ability to sell the preferred shares underlying the ADSs at a price and time at which you wish to do so may be substantially limited. There is also significantly greater concentration in the Brazilian securities market than in major securities markets in the United States. The ten largest companies in terms of market capitalization represented approximately 52% of the aggregate market capitalization of the BOVESPA as of December 31, 2005. The top ten stocks in terms of trading volume accounted for approximately 53%, 45% and 51% of all shares traded on the BOVESPA in 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively.
Holders of the ADSs and our preferred shares may not receive any dividends.
According to our by-laws, we must generally pay our shareholders at least 25% of our annual net income as dividends, as determined and adjusted under Brazilian GAAP. This adjusted income may be capitalized, used to absorb losses or otherwise appropriated as allowed under the Brazilian corporation law and may not be available to be paid as dividends. We may not pay dividends to our shareholders in any particular fiscal year if our board of directors determines that such distributions would be inadvisable in view of our financial condition.
If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw preferred shares, you risk losing the ability to remit foreign currency abroad and certain Brazilian tax advantages.
As an ADS holder, you benefit from the electronic certificate of foreign capital registration obtained by the custodian for our preferred shares underlying the ADSs in Brazil, which permits the custodian to convert dividends and other distributions with respect to the preferred shares into non-Brazilian currency and remit the proceeds abroad. If you surrender your ADSs and withdraw preferred shares, you will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodians electronic certificate of foreign capital registration for only five business days from the date of withdrawal. Thereafter, upon the disposition of or distributions relating to the preferred shares, you will not be able to remit abroad non-Brazilian currency unless you obtain your own electronic certificate of foreign capital registration or you qualify under Brazilian foreign investment regulations that entitle some foreign investors to buy and sell shares on Brazilian stock exchanges without obtaining separate electronic certificates of foreign capital registration. If you do not qualify under the foreign investment regulations you will generally be subject to less favorable tax treatment of dividends and distributions on, and the proceeds from any sale of, our preferred shares.
If you attempt to obtain your own electronic certificate of foreign capital registration, you may incur expenses or suffer delays in the application process, which could delay your ability to receive dividends or distributions relating to our preferred shares or the return of your capital in a timely manner. The depositarys electronic certificate of foreign capital registration may also be adversely affected by future legislative changes.
Holders of ADSs may be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to our preferred shares.
We may not be able to offer our preferred shares to U.S. holders of ADSs pursuant to preemptive rights granted to holders of our preferred shares in connection with any future issuance of our preferred shares unless a
16
registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to such preferred shares and preemptive rights, or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. We are not obligated to file a registration statement relating to preemptive rights with respect to our preferred shares, and we cannot assure you that we will file any such registration statement. If such a registration statement is not filed and an exemption from registration does not exist, The Bank of New York, as depositary, will attempt to sell the preemptive rights, and you will be entitled to receive the proceeds of such sale. However, these preemptive rights will expire if the depositary does not sell them, and U.S. holders of ADSs will not realize any value from the granting of such preemptive rights.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
A. History and Development of the Company
General
The Registrant was formed on March 12, 2004 as a sociedade por ações, a stock corporation duly incorporated under the laws of Brazil with unlimited duration. The Registrants only material assets consist of the shares of Gol, an offshore finance subsidiary, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Registrant owns all of Gols common and preferred shares, except for five common shares and three Class B preferred shares of Gol that are held by members of Gols board of directors for eligibility purposes. Our principal executive offices are located at Rua Tamoios 246, Jardim Aeroporto, 04630-000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil, and our general telephone number is +55 11 5033-4200. The telephone number of our investor relations department is +55 11 5033-4393. Our website address is www.voegol.com.br and our website is available in Portuguese, Spanish and English. Investor information can be found on our website under the caption Investor Relations. Information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, and shall not be considered a part of, this annual report.
Capital Expenditures
During 2005, capital expenditures were R$482.8 million, which included expenditures of R$169.4 million related to acquisitions of property and equipment and R$313.3 million of pre-delivery deposits for aircraft acquisitions. During 2004, capital expenditures were R$85.4 million, which included expenditures of R$42.0 million related to acquisitions of property and equipment and R$43.4 million of pre-delivery deposits for aircraft acquisitions. During 2003, capital expenditures were R$42.7 million, related to acquisitions of property and equipment.
We are one of the most profitable low-cost airlines in the world and had net revenues of R$2.7 billion and net income of R$513.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. We are the only low-fare, low-cost airline operating in Brazil providing frequent service on routes connecting all of Brazils major cities. We focus on increasing the growth and profits of our business by popularizing air travel and stimulating and meeting demand for safe, affordable, convenient air travel in Brazil and between Brazil and other South American destinations for both business and leisure passengers. We do this by offering simple, safe and efficient service while having one of the lowest operating costs in the airline industry worldwide. Our long-term business objective is to become the largest Brazilian airline and to bring affordable air travel to all significant destinations in South America.
We have flown over 36 million passengers since beginning operations in 2001 and, according to the DAC, Brazils civil aviation authority, our share of the domestic market, based on revenue passenger kilometers, grew from 4.7% in 2001 to 11.8% in 2002, 19.4% in 2003, 22.3% in 2004 and 27.3% in 2005. Our strategy involves not only capturing market share, but increasing the size of the market by attracting new passengers through our low fares and through a variety of payment mechanisms designed to make the purchase of our tickets easier for customers belonging to a much broader income class.
17
We began our operations in January 2001 with six single-class Boeing 737-700 Next Generation aircraft serving five cities in Brazil. As of the end of 2005, we operated 42 single-class Boeing 737 aircraft. Currently, we provide frequent service on routes between all of Brazils major cities and to international destinations in Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay. We placed firm purchase orders with The Boeing Company for 67 737-800 Next Generation aircraft and we have options to purchase an additional 34 737-800 Next Generation aircraft. Currently, we have 11 firm purchase orders for aircraft deliveries scheduled in 2006, 13 in 2007, 10 in 2008, 11 in 2009, 8 in 2010 and 14 after 2010. In 2005, we took delivery, under two- and three-year operating leases, of seven Boeing 737-300 aircraft, which we are using to help meet our short-term capacity needs while we await the delivery of the new 737-800 Next Generation aircraft.
Our strategy is to offer travelers in Brazil and other South American countries a low-fare transportation alternative that we believe is cost-competitive compared to conventional airline and bus transportation. We have a diversified revenue base, with customers ranging from business passengers travelling between densely populated cities in Brazil, such as São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, to leisure passengers travelling to destinations throughout Brazil and to our international destinations in Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay. We carefully evaluate opportunities to continue the growth of our business through increasing the frequency of flights to our existing high-demand markets and adding new routes to overpriced routes in Brazil and to other South American destinations. In 2005, we inaugurated nine new destinations, increasing the number of destinations served to 45 (43 in Brazil, one in Argentina and one in Bolivia). In January 2006 we commenced scheduled services to Asunción, Paraguay, and Montevideo, Uruguay and two additional destinations in Argentina: Rosario and Cordoba. We intend to further expand our service to international destinations in South America.
Our affordable, reliable and simple service and our focus on markets that were either underserved or did not have a lower-fare alternative has led to a strong awareness of our brand and a rapid increase in our market share. We offer a simplified product to our customers with single-class seating and a light snack and beverage service. Generally, our low operating costs allow us to set our fares at levels significantly lower than the average fares of our primary competitors. This approach has helped us win customer loyalty and in certain markets to stimulate demand by attracting new customers who previously used other means of travel or traveled less often due to price sensitivity. We have kept our operating costs low principally by maintaining a simplified aircraft fleet that is one of the newest in South America, which reduces maintenance and fuel costs.
We deploy aircraft in a highly efficient manner to maintain industry leading aircraft utilization, and concentrate heavily upon internet-based distribution channels and sales. The strong promotion of internet-based distribution channels and sales is an integral element of our low cost structure and efficiency and has made us one of the largest and leading e-commerce businesses in Brazil with total sales of passenger tickets of R$2.6 billion over the internet in 2005. We believe we effectively employ technology to make our operations more efficient, using real time sales and operating information, internet based sales and ticketless travel, advanced yield management systems and intelligent outsourcing.
We have developed an innovative company culture that is supported by a highly motivated and streamlined workforce. Members of our senior management team have an average of approximately 20 years of experience in the domestic and international passenger transportation industries, and we have been able to draw upon this extensive experience to develop and strengthen our low-cost operating structure.
Our emphasis on controlling costs and yield management has given us flexibility in setting our fares to achieve a balance between our load factors and yields that we believe will generate the highest profitability for us. During 2005, when the airline industry globally was suffering from historically high fuel prices, we generated net income of R$513.2 million. Our profitable results in 2005 were due largely to the economies of scale from the growth of our business and having a cost per available seat kilometer that was approximately 22% lower than that of our closest competitor in the domestic market, based upon our analysis of publicly available data. By acquiring 53 Boeing 737-800 Next Generation with increased seat capacity through 2010, we believe that we be able to more efficiently use the airport slots available to us and to further reduce our costs per seat kilometer.
18
Our operating model is a highly integrated, multiple-stop route network that is a variation on the point-to-point model used by other successful low-cost carriers worldwide. The high level of integration of flights at selected airports permits us to offer frequent, non-stop flights at low fares between Brazils most important economic centers and ample interconnections through our network linking city pairs through a combination of two or more flights with little connecting or stop-over time. Our network also allows us to increase our load factors on our strongest city pair routes by using the airports in those cities to connect our customers to their final destinations. This strategy increases our load factor by attracting customers traveling to secondary markets who prefer to pay lower fares even if this means making one or more stops before reaching their final destination. Finally, our operating model allows us to build our flight routes to add destinations to cities that would not, individually, be feasible to serve in the traditional point-to-point model, but that are feasible to serve when simply added as additional points on our multiple-stop flight network. We do this by offering low-fare early-bird or night flights to lower-traffic destinations, which are usually the first or last stops on our routes, allowing us to increase our aircraft utilization and generate additional revenues.
We believe that our operating model, when combined with our low fares and reliable service, stimulates demand for air travel, and helped us to achieve a load factor of 73.7% for domestic flights in 2005, which is higher than those of our two largest Brazilian competitors in the same period, according to the DAC. The interconnectivity of our network also resulted in approximately one-half of our passengers making connections or stops while traveling to their final destination. In December 2005, we maintained high standards of operating efficiency and customer satisfaction, completing 98% of our scheduled flights, with on-time performance of 97%, based on our internal data.
In December 2005, we entered into a joint venture to create a low-cost Mexican airline. We will hold 25% of the voting capital stock and approximately 48% of the total capital stock of the Mexican airline company, with the remaining capital being subscribed by Mexican investors. Under a service agreement, we will implement and develop the operational structure of the company and render consulting services for all operational matters to the new Mexican company in return for a performance-based service fee.
During 2005, we further improved our internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the U.S. Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, one year before this requirement becomes applicable to us as a non-U.S. company. We are one of the first Latin American companies to give the relevant officer certifications regarding these controls and procedures. The certifications are included as Exhibits 12.1 and 12.2 to this Annual Report. We expect various benefits from the implementation of these controls and procedures, such as improved risk management and better operational and financial controls.
We are controlled by Brazils Áurea group. The Áurea group has more than five decades of successful operating experience in Brazils bus transportation industry, and brings the benefits of this expertise in the Brazilian transportation industry to our strategy and operations.
Our Competitive Strengths
Our principal competitive strengths are:
We Keep Our Operating Costs Low. Our cost per available seat kilometer for the year ended December 31, 2005 was R$15.5 cents, or approximately US$6.6 cents. We believe that our cost per available seat kilometer for the year ended December 31, 2005, adjusted for the average number of kilometers flown per flight, was one of the lowest in the airline industry worldwide, and was on average approximately 22% lower than that of our closest competitor in the domestic market, based upon our analysis of data collected from publicly available information. Typically, airline operating costs per kilometer decrease as flight length increases. Our low operating costs are the result of being innovative and using best practices adopted from other leading low-cost carriers to improve our operating efficiency, including:
Efficient use of aircraft. During 2005, our aircraft utilization totaled an average of 13.9 block hours per day, the highest aircraft utilization rate in the Brazilian domestic airline industry, according to the DAC,
19
and among the highest worldwide according to airline company public filings. We achieve high aircraft utilization rates by operating a new fleet that requires less maintenance down time, accomplishing a fast turnaround on our aircraft between flights and operating more flights per day per aircraft than our competitors. The fast turnaround time for our aircraft between flights, which averages just 25 minutes, minimizes connection times for our passengers and enables our aircraft to fly approximately 11 flight legs a day, as compared to approximately eight flight legs a day by our closest competitor in the domestic market. We increase the speed of preparing our aircraft for the next flight by loading and unloading passengers through front and rear aircraft doors when possible, minimizing catering requirements and having cabin crew assist with cleaning the aircraft. Our efficient use of our fleet has helped us to generate revenue at times when the aircraft of our competitors are still on the ground and has allowed us to spread our fixed costs over a greater number of flights and available seat kilometers. As part of our aircraft utilization strategy, we introduced night flights on certain routes in December 2003 at very low fares to increase utilization, generate higher load factors and stimulate demand. Our night flights, which generated a load factor higher than that of our other flights, have helped us to make a portion of our fleet productive practically 24 hours per day. We also offer air cargo services on our flights to generate incremental revenue from space in the stronghold sections of our aircraft that would otherwise remain unutilized. With our firm purchase orders and purchase options of 101 additional Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft, we expect to be able to maintain our young fleet of aircraft, and therefore increase efficiency and reduce maintenance costs.
Operation of a simplified fleet. Currently, we operate a simplified fleet type consisting of 45 Boeing 737 aircraft. Having a fleet with minimal aircraft types reduces inventory costs, as fewer spare parts are required, and reduces the need to train our pilots to operate different types of aircraft. In addition, keeping the number of types of aircraft we operate to a minimum simplifies our maintenance and operations processes. While our focus on having the lowest operating costs means that we will periodically review our fleet composition to ensure that it is achieving our low-cost goals, any decision we may make to introduce a new fleet type will be made only after carefully weighing the performance and profitability benefits of doing so against the emphasis we place on maintaining simplified operations.
Use of efficient, low-cost distribution channels. Our effective use of technology helps us to keep our costs low and our operations highly scaleable and efficient. We seek to keep our distribution channels streamlined and convenient so as to allow our customers to interact with us directly via the internet. Approximately 81% of our ticket sales are through our website, and our customers can check-in for their flights online and by web-enabled cell phones. As a result of our emphasis on low-cost distribution channels, we generate more revenues from online ticket sales than any other airline company in Brazil. We enjoy significant cost savings associated with automated ticket sales, all while making the selection of travel options more convenient for our customers. We estimate that our distribution costs using our online ticket sales system is approximately 65% lower than our distribution costs involving more traditional means, such as the Global Distribution System, or GDS. In addition, like other low-cost carriers, but unlike our main competitors, all travel on our flights is ticketless. The elimination of paper tickets saves paper costs, postage, employee time and back-office processing expenses. Also, we do not need to maintain physical ticket sales locations outside of airports.
Flexible and efficient operating approach. We always seek the most cost-effective way of providing our services to our customers without compromising quality and safety. We constantly evaluate our operations to see if sensible cost-savings opportunities exist. As a result, we outsource the work that can be done properly and more efficiently by third parties and we internalize the functions that our employees can do more cost-efficiently. We have arrangements on competitive terms with third-party contractors at certain airports for aircraft and baggage handling, and call center customer services. We get competitive rates for these services by negotiating multi-year contracts at prices that are fixed or subject only to periodic increases linked to inflation. With our phased maintenance system, we are able to perform maintenance work every day without sacrificing aircraft revenue time and to schedule preventive maintenance with more regularity and around the utilization of our aircraft, which helps to maintain high levels of block hours per day and reduce costs. We are among the very few airlines in the world having maintenance technicians
20
capable of executing our phased maintenance system. Furthermore, we are in the final phase of building a state-of-the-art aircraft maintenance center at the airport of Confins in the State of Minas Gerais. Although not complete, the maintenance center is already operational, enabling us to internalize aircraft heavy maintenance work to reduce maintenance costs. We plan to internalize other services that are currently outsourced if we believe we can better control the quality and efficiency of these services.
We Stimulate Demand for Our Services. We believe that through our low fares and high-quality service, we provide the best value in our markets and create demand for air travel services. Our average fares are lower than the average fares of our primary competitors. We identify and stimulate a demand among both business and leisure passengers for air travel that is safe, convenient, simple and is a reasonably priced alternative to traditional air, bus and car travel. By combining low fares with simple and reliable service that treats passengers equally in a single-class environment, we have successfully increased our market share, strengthened customer loyalty and are attracting a new group of air travelers in our markets. These new travelers did not previously consider air travel due to the higher prices and more complicated sales procedures that preceded our entry into the market. For example, our night flights, for which we offer highly competitive fares, have proven to be very successful, generating load factors higher than that of our other flights. We believe our night flights attract passengers who previously relied upon bus or car travel and who have now become air travel customers. We estimate that on average, approximately 15% of the customers on our flights are either first-time flyers or have not flown for more than one year. We have developed and will further develop flexible payment mechanisms such as debit payments and long-term installment payments, with which we are growing our potential market and customer base to broader income classes in Brazil and South America and which enable us to further penetrate these markets and customers.
We Have One of the Newest Fleets in the Industry. At December 31, 2005, our fleet of 42 Boeing 737 aircraft had an average age of 8.7 years, making our fleet one of the newest in South America. We believe that the firm purchase orders and purchase options we have for the delivery of up to 101 new Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft, with expected delivery dates between 2006 and 2010, will further reduce the average age of our fleet for the next decade and help us to retain this competitive advantage. Our new fleet has enabled us to enjoy a high degree of performance reliability and to develop a reputation among customers for being an airline that delivers a safe, on-time, modern and comfortable travel experience. Our Boeing 737-800/700 Next Generation aircraft type provides us with state-of-the-art technology and aerodynamics with increased flying speed, improved fuel efficiency and simplified maintenance procedures.
We Have a Strong Brand that Is Widely Recognized Among Consumers and Investors. We believe that the Gol brand has become synonymous with innovation and value in the Brazilian domestic airline industry. Gol was chosen as the 2004 Company of the Year by the annual Melhores e Maiores (The Biggest and Best) edition of Exame magazine, one of the most important business publications in Brazil. Our customers also identify us as being safe, accessible, friendly, fair and reliable and distinguish us in Brazils domestic airline industry on the basis of our modern and simplified approach to providing air travel services. Customer satisfaction surveys conducted in 2005 by Pesquisas Inteligentes, an independent market research firm, indicated that more than nine out of every ten passengers are satisfied with Gol, would fly again with Gol and consider Gol to be an innovative, modern and practical company. Our effort at promoting our brand awareness has earned us recognition from the marketing industry in Brazil as well. In 2005, we were named one of Brazils most valuable brands by Isto é Dinheiro magazine in its fourth annual Most Valuable Brazilian Brands Ranking, with a brand value of R$326 million. We were also named Best Airline in Latin America by Global Finance magazine in 2005. In addition, we are recognized among Brazilian and international investors as a company with a very high level of disclosure and transparency, releasing financial information simultaneously in Brazilian GAAP and U.S. GAAP. We ranked first in the category of Disclosure Procedures in Latin America and top 5 in the category of Corporate Governance in Brazil at the Eighth Annual IR Global Rankings in February 2006.
We Have a Strong Financial Position. We have focused on maintaining a strong financial position with significant cash balances and a low debt to capitalization ratio. As of December 31, 2005, we had R$106.3 million of cash and cash equivalents, R$762.7 million of short-term investments, R$564.0 million of accounts
21
receivable and R$408.8 million of U.S. dollar denominated deposits for aircraft leasing and aircraft engine maintenance contracts, representing a total of R$1,841.8 million. As of December 31, 2005, our debt to capitalization ratio was 2.9%. In 2005, we received the award for the Best Financial Management in 2004, from Isto é Dinheiro magazine.
We Actively Manage Risk. We actively monitor movements in fuel prices, foreign exchange rates and interest rates to reduce our earnings volatility. We are able to adjust our fares to compensate for changes in fuel prices and the exchange rate of the real versus the U.S. dollar. Our general policy is to hedge on a short-term basis a majority of the fuel we expect to consume and our U.S. dollar exchange rate exposure, so as to minimize the effects of adverse changes in the fuel or foreign exchange markets. As part of our risk management program, we have established exposure limits and hedge ratios. We use a variety of financial instruments, including petroleum call options, petroleum fixed-price swap agreements, and foreign currency forward contracts. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. As there is not a futures market for Brazilian jet fuel, we use international crude oil derivatives to hedge our exposure to increases in fuel price. In addition, we believe that our corporate wide high standards of internal control reduce our risk exposure.
We Have a Motivated Workforce and a Proven Management Team. We benefit from a highly motivated workforce that brings a new enthusiasm to air travel and a commitment to high standards of friendly and reliable quality service that we believe distinguishes us in our markets. We believe that the positive feedback we received from our customers in our customer satisfaction surveys is directly related to the priority our employees place on delivering top quality customer service. We invest a significant amount of time and resources into carefully developing the best training practices and selecting individuals to join our team who share our focus on ingenuity and continuous improvement. We conduct ongoing training programs that incorporate industry best practices and encourage strong and open communication channels among all of the members of our team so that we can continue to improve the quality of the services we provide. We also motivate our workforce by providing our employees with profit sharing and through participation in our stock option program. Our controlling shareholder has been operating in the Brazilian passenger transportation market for over 50 years and our top managers have an average of approximately 20 years of experience in the Brazilian passenger transportation industries and this experience has helped us to develop the most effective elements of our low-cost model.
Our Strategy
To continue the growth of our business and increase its profitability, our strategy will be to further stimulate customer demand by continuing to offer a single-class of air travel service at low fares, while maintaining a high standard of quality and safety. We will strive to keep our operating costs low and continually pursue ways to make our operations more efficient. Our objectives are to provide the best travel value in the markets we serve, to encourage people to fly by making air travel accessible in our markets, and to further increase our market share. We will continue to evaluate opportunities to expand our operations by (i) adding additional flights to existing high-demand routes and night-flight domestic routes, (ii) adding new domestic routes where sufficient market demand exists, (iii) expanding into other high-traffic centers in other South American countries and (iv) seeking opportunities to grow through joint ventures, acquisitions or business combinations. Our vision is to be recognized by 2010 as the airline that popularized high-quality, low-fare air transportation in South America. The following are the key elements of our strategy:
To Expand Our Customer Base by Offering Services to High-Demand or Overpriced Routes. When planning the growth of our business, we will continue to establish bases, select our routes and build the frequency of our service based upon the extent and type of demand in the regions we serve in Brazil and other South American countries. In particular, we expect to increase our focus on business travelers from medium-sized companies, a growing customer base that tends to be more price sensitive, by closely monitoring the routes and flight frequencies that best serve their travel needs and increasing our marketing efforts directed at this segment of our customer base. For example, in response to the high volume of business travelers between Brazil´s primary financial centers, served by the Congonhas airport in São Paulo, and Santos Dumont airport in Rio de Janeiro, we have increased our flight frequency on this route from five flights per day when we began
22
transporting passengers in January 2001 to 24 in 2002, 28 in 2003, 36 during 2005 and 50 flights per day as of December 31, 2005. We are also very focused on stimulating demand and capturing market share in both the leisure and visiting friends and relatives market segments. For example, in response to a perceived demand for late evening flights linking São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro to allow travelers to avoid the need for overnight stays, we added night flight services between the two cities in December 2003 and to other cities in Brazil later on. Our night flights generated load factors higher than that of our other flights. We will continue to carefully evaluate opportunities to meet demand for leisure travel by expanding flight frequencies on existing routes, expanding successful night flight services and adding additional routes that contribute to our network and for which we perceive a market demand, such as daytime flights to and from Guarulhos airport in São Paulo, Brazils largest airport.
We believe that the same business model and route management techniques that we have successfully introduced in Brazil to help popularize air travel can also be used to capture market share and stimulate demand for air travel between Brazil and neighboring South American countries. We are pursuing opportunities to offer flights on routes between Brazil and select cities in other South American markets where growth opportunities exist. For example, we began offering daily services between Guarulhos and Buenos Aires, Argentina in December 2004. These flights quickly achieved profitability. In 2005, we inaugurated nine new destinations, increasing the number of destinations served to 45 (43 in Brazil, one in Argentina and one in Bolivia). In January 2006 we commenced scheduled services to Asunción, Paraguay, and Montevideo, Uruguay and two additional destinations in Argentina: Rosario and Cordoba. Additionally, in 2006 we commenced service of our first fully non-Brazilian city-pair between Asuncíon, Paraguay and Cordoba, Argentina. By offering international flights with stops integrated in our network we create opportunities for incremental traffic, feeding our network and increasing our competitive advantage and supporting our strategy of stimulating demand for our services. The addition of routes between Brazil and cities in neighboring South American countries will be based upon an extension of our existing network using the same growth strategy that has proven to be successful for us to date. We also expect that the introduction of these flights will add traffic to our network, increasing our overall load factor.
To Continue to Reduce Low Operating Costs and Improve Operating Efficiency. Continuing to reduce our operating costs per available seat kilometer is a key to increasing profitability. Our revenues per aircraft in 2005 were US$33.2 million, which are the highest in the low cost carrier industry according to publicly available data. Our CASK of 6.6 US$ cents was 22% lower than our closest competitor in the domestic market. We aim to remain one of the lowest cost airlines in the world. We have worked toward achieving this goal by assembling a new fleet of single-class aircraft that is capable of safely and reliably accommodating a high utilization rate, incurs low maintenance costs and is fuel-efficient. We are also working to achieve this goal by using our aircraft efficiently, concentrating on minimizing our turnaround times at airports and increasing our number of daily flights per aircraft. We will also continue to utilize technological innovations wherever possible to reduce our distribution costs and improve our operating efficiency. We expect to benefit from economies of scale and reduce our average cost per available seat kilometer as we add additional aircraft to an established and efficient operating infrastructure. Our system of phased maintenance allows us to perform maintenance work every day without sacrificing aircraft revenue time, to better determine the timing of heavy maintenance so as to help maximize aircraft utilization and to further reduce our maintenance costs. We will continue internalizing of our aircraft maintenance in our new Aircraft Maintenance Center in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais. By purchasing up to 101 new Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft, we will further reduce the average age of our fleet and therefore increase operating efficiency and lower our operating costs.
To Keep Our Customer Service Offering Simple and Convenient. We believe that we are perceived by our customers as providing excellent value at reasonable fares and acting as a catalyst for changing the way the Brazilian airline industry works. In addition to offering low fares, our strategy is to make flying a simpler, more convenient experience. We have achieved this objective largely through the elimination of unnecessary extras and common-sense applications of technology. We encourage our customers to use the internet not only to make reservations, but also to make many of the arrangements from the comfort of their home or office that they would otherwise have to make at crowded airports or airline ticket offices, such as checking-in and changing their seat
23
assignments. We provide free shuttle service between airports and drop-off zones on selected routes. We offer customers single-class, pre-assigned seating flights, do not overbook our flights and have designated female lavatories. Our strategy will be to continue to seek ways to make the Gol brand signify simplicity and convenience in the minds of air travelers.
To Stimulate Demand with Low Fares. Our widely available low fares and superior product offering are designed to popularize air travel and stimulate demand, particularly from fare-conscious leisure travelers and small- to mid-size business travelers who might otherwise have used alternative forms of transportation or would not have traveled at all. Our strategy is to continue to stimulate demand and encourage more people to fly by continuing to provide a superior product and low-fares. We will also continue to provide our customers with flexible payment mechanisms, such as debit payments, credit card installment payments and monthly installment payments in the form of direct credit. We launched in November 2005 the Voe Fácil (Fly Easy) Gol Program, which allows qualifying customers to pay for airline tickets in up to 36 monthly installments as an innovative new way to purchase airline tickets, especially designed to make the purchase of our tickets easier for customers belonging to broader income classes.
The following table shows total passengers enplaned at airports in selected cities served by us for the year ended December 31, 2000 (just before we commenced our operations) and the year ended December 31, 2005. The table also sets forth the date we commenced service at airports in selected cities and the compound annual growth rate of passengers enplaned at such airports.
Total Passenger Traffic (Arrivals and Departures) Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||
Cities |
Service Commencement Date |
2000 |
2005 |
CAGR (%) 2000-2005 | ||||
(in millions) | ||||||||
Belo Horizonte(1) |
January 2001 | 2.62 | 4.17 | 9.7 | ||||
Brasília |
January 2001 | 5.43 | 9.48 | 11.8 | ||||
Curitiba |
May 2001 | 2.07 | 3.39 | 10.3 | ||||
Florianópolis |
January 2001 | 0.72 | 1.55 | 16.5 | ||||
Fortaleza |
December 2001 | 1.44 | 2.77 | 14.0 | ||||
Porto Alegre |
January 2001 | 2.25 | 3.52 | 9.4 | ||||
Recife |
April 2001 | 2.14 | 3.60 | 11.0 | ||||
Salvador |
January 2001 | 3.02 | 4.55 | 8.5 | ||||
Vitória |
November 2001 | 0.84 | 1.52 | 12.5 |
(1) | Includes the airports of Pampulha and Confins in Belo Horizonte. A large portion of passenger flow was transferred from the airport of Pampulha to the airport of Confins in 2005. |
Source: INFRAERO
Routes and Schedules
Our aircraft fly to various points on our route network linking our destinations. A significant portion of our route network is concentrated in highly populated areas in Brazil and the southern cone of South America , where numerous major business centers are located. We generally offer direct flights between these primary business centers, which enables many of our business travelers to fly with us directly to their destinations. However, after directly connecting high-density cities along the primary business routes, our aircraft often make multiple stops to other destinations. In this way, each aircraft has a daily flight plan that includes stops at multiple destinations throughout our network. We integrate the flight plans of our aircraft to provide maximum flexibility and connectivity at each stop, so that passengers have numerous connection options to reach their final destination. We believe this model of flight scheduling has helped us to more frequently serve a greater number of cities, generate higher load factors and stimulate demand for air travel in new markets, while also enabling us to increase aircraft utilization and provide our customers with more destination options. Having implemented this
24
variation on the point to point approach successfully in Brazil, we have started adding international destinations to our flight plans in 2005, offering Brazilian and international passengers further destination options via direct flights or with one or more stops in a cost-efficient and practicable fashion. As an example, with our flight from Cordoba, Argentina to Porto Alegre, Brazil, some passengers clear customs in Porto Alegre, which is quick and simple because Porto Alegre is not a traditional hub for international traffic. For some passengers, Porto Alegre is their final destination. Continuing passengers will have access to 19 destinations in Brazil with two or fewer additional stops.
At December 31, 2005, we offered 420 daily flights in Brazil and to our international destinations. In 2005, we inaugurated nine new destinations, increasing the number of destinations served to 45 (43 in Brazil, one in Argentina and one in Bolivia). In January 2006 we commenced scheduled services to Asunción, Paraguay, and Montevideo, Uruguay and two additional destinations in Argentina: Rosario and Cordoba. By adding points of destination for our customers, we believe we can increase our overall load factor.
In addition to monitoring growing market demand for increased daily flight frequency on our existing routes, we also seek to offer services in markets with previously untapped demand. For example, the highly competitive fares we offer for travel on our night flights are set to compete with interstate bus companies for customers who may otherwise not have previously considered air travel as an option due to their price sensitivity. We are also pursuing opportunities to offer flights on routes between Brazil and select cities in other South American countries where favorable market opportunities exist using the same business model and route management techniques that have proven successful within Brazil. Since 2005, we have been increasing the number of flights to and through Guarulhos and Galeão, the two international airports serving São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, respectively, which we expect will give us additional growth opportunities in the Brazilian and South American markets and more code share opportunities with international airlines.
Customer Value
We recognize that while low fares may initially encourage people to fly with us, we must offer excellent services to ensure that a new customer will become a repeat customer. As a result, we pay particular attention to the details that help to make for a pleasant, hassle-free flying experience, including:
· | ticketless travel; |
· | convenient on-line sales, check-in, seat assignment and flight change and cancellation services; |
· | web-enabled cell phone ticket sales and check-in; |
· | self check-in at kiosks at designated airports; |
· | airport parking discounts; |
· | designated female lavatories; |
· | single-class, pre-assigned seating; |
· | friendly and efficient in-flight service; |
· | modern aircraft interiors; |
· | quick turnaround times at airport gates; and |
· | free or discounted shuttle services between airports and drop-off zones on certain routes. |
We also recognize that efficient and punctual operations are of primary importance to our customers. This emphasis resulted in our completion factor of 98% in 2004 and 2005, and on-time performance rate of 97% in 2004 and 2005, based on company data.
Based on feedback from our customers, we believe we are meeting and exceeding their service expectations, as more than nine out of every ten passengers are satisfied with Gol, would fly again with Gol and consider Gol
25
to be an innovative, modern and practical company. With regard to our service to Buenos Aires, 83% of our Argentine passengers said they were very satisfied or satisfied with our services. The survey conducted between April and July 2005 by Pesquisas Inteligentes confirmed our success in the Argentine market after just eight months of service to Buenos Aires, our first international destination.
Safety
Our most important priority is the safety of our passengers and employees. We maintain our aircraft in strict accordance with manufacturer specifications and all applicable safety regulations, and perform routine line maintenance every day. Our pilots have extensive experience, with flight captains having more than 10,000 hours of career flight time, and we conduct ongoing courses, extensive flight simulation training and seminars addressing the latest developments in safety and security issues. We closely follow the standards established by the Air Accident Prevention Program of the DAC and we have installed the Flight Operations Quality Assurance System, which maximizes proactive prevention of incidents through the systematic analysis of the flight data recorder system. All of our aircraft are also equipped with Maintenance Operations Quality Assurance, a troubleshooting program that monitors performance and aircraft engine trends. The Brazilian civil aviation market follows the highest recognized safety standards in the world. Brazil is classified as a Category 1 country in flight safety standards by the International Civil Aviation Organization, which is the same classification held by the United States and Canada. We are also an active member of the Flight Safety Foundation, a foundation for the exchange of information about flight safety.
Sales and Distribution
Our customers can purchase tickets directly from us through a number of different channels, including via our website, our call center and at airport ticket counters. For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 29.5% of our customers purchased tickets directly from us (23.3% on our website and 6.2% via call centers and directly at airports).
Our customers can also purchase tickets indirectly through travel agents, who are an important, widely-used travel service resource in Brazil and South America. Our partnership with travel agents provides us with more than 8,000 distribution outlets throughout the region. For the year ended December 31, 2005, approximately 70% of our customers purchased tickets indirectly from travel agents (approximately 7% of our sales through travel agents are made through a GDS system and approximately 63% of those sales on our website).
For the year ended December 31, 2005, 81.3% of our passenger revenues, whether directly to the customer or to travel agents, were made via the internet, making us one of the worldwide industry leaders in this area, as compared to 12.1% of our passenger revenues through call centers and airport sales counters and 6% of our total sales made through the GDS, respectively. The remaining 0.6% of our passenger revenues for the year ended December 31, 2005 were through other distribution systems. To illustrate the importance of continuing to focus on increasing internet-based ticket sales directly to our customers, it costs an average of approximately R$2.11 for each ticket sale made directly to a customer through our website. By comparison, internet ticket sales through travel agents cost an average of approximately R$3.95 per sale, call center ticket sales cost an average of approximately R$4.56 per sale and GDS ticket sales cost an average of approximately R$11.27 per sale.
We strongly promote the use of our website because it is our most efficient distribution channel in terms of cost-savings and customer convenience. By focusing on virtual distribution, we are able to streamline our ticket sales and services and eliminate the need to incur costs associated with more traditional distribution channels, such as physical ticket sale centers located outside of airports. In addition to being cost-effective, focusing on internet distribution also provides our customers with high levels of convenience, as they are better able to interact with us when they want and how they want, in either Portuguese, English or Spanish. Consistent with our philosophy of using a 24 hours a day operating strategy to generate revenues, such as through our high aircraft utilization and night flights, focusing on internet distribution allows us to conduct business with our customers
26
24 hours a day. As a result of this emphasis on virtual distribution, we have become one of the largest and leading e-commerce businesses in South America in terms of revenue from internet-based sales.
We also use GDS, which provides us several benefits including access to approximately 60,000 tourism professionals who are able to sell our tickets to customers throughout the globe. GDS also enables us to enter into code sharing agreements with other airlines to offer more flights and connection options to our passengers and add incremental passenger traffic to our network.
We currently outsource work related to our call center distribution channel to independent contractors working under the supervision of Gol employees. We intend to internalize our call center operations, as we believe we can implement measures to further reduce the cost of call center-based sales. Another measure we have taken to contain distribution and ticketing costs is to issue paperless tickets only and to provide web-based check-in procedures, which saves paper costs, postage, employee time and back-office processing expenses.
An important element of our business strategy is to cater to the corporate client, one of the most demanding customers in the market. Pesquisas Inteligentes, an independent research firm in the market, estimates that approximately 62% of our passenger traffic consists of business customers. Business travelers have provided greater stability in our demand, as they fly regularly and not only during peak travel seasons. We have increased flight frequencies, destinations and fleet size so that we can increase options for our corporate customers. To further develop our business relationship with our corporate customers, we have also entered into alliances with hotel chains and rental car service providers to offer our corporate customers the convenience of packaged transportation and accommodation arrangements. We will continue to focus on expanding our base of cost-conscious, medium-sized corporate clients who serve as a source of recurring revenues.
To increase our market and stimulate demand for our tickets, we will also continue to provide our customers with a variety of flexible payment mechanisms. We offer more than 11 payment options for online-sales, such as credit card payments, debit payments and monthly installment payments. As part of this strategy, we launched in November 2005 the Voe Fácil (Fly Easy) Gol Program, an innovative new way to purchase airline tickets, which allows customers selected based on their credit history to pay for airline tickets in up to 36 monthly installments. The program is especially designed for highly price-sensitive customers, many of which do not hold credit cards. Installment payments are a typical sales strategy in the Brazilian retail market and we are applying this sales technique to passenger transportation.
We advertise primarily through cost-efficient media, including internet websites, radio spots, local newspaper ads and billboards. When establishing a route in a new market, approximately two weeks before we begin offering air travel services, we send representatives to high-concentration areas in the new market such as shopping malls and popular restaurants to hold promotional giveaways and make people aware of their new travel option by focusing on our low fares and efficient service. Our Aqui todo mundo pode voar, or Here everyone can fly advertising campaign, commenced in July 2004, has been very effective in various related campaigns in promoting our objective to popularize air travel in Brazil. In December 2005, we successfully launched the campaign Por que viajar de outro jeito, se você pode voar?, or Why travel by other means of transportation, if you can fly?.
We also use innovative promotions to stimulate demand for air travel. For example, we first offered our night flights in December 2003 as a measure designed to attract customers who may not have previously considered air travel as an option due to their price sensitivity and also to generate revenues from our aircraft at times they would otherwise have remained idle. These flights proved to be extremely popular among customers, achieving an average load factor of 90%, and we decided to offer them on a permanent basis. In 2004, we introduced our Brasil mais perto, or Brazil is closer, campaign, which featured very low internet-based fares for weekend travel and we also offered promotional prices for certain customer segments, such as senior citizens and children. We believe that the high number of visits to our website, which averaged 1,000,000 visitors per month during 2005, are in part the result of the customer interest created by our promotions. By offering campaigns with low promotional prices, we stimulate our customers to search for opportunities to fly Gol.
27
Unlike other Brazilian airlines, we do not accept customer reservations for flights. Instead, tickets are paid for by our customers at the time their seat is secured. This eliminates the possibility of overbooking, and guarantees all of our ticketed customers a seat on our flights.
Awards
We have received a number of awards for matters such as service excellence, our website, finance, marketing and social responsibility. Among the highlights in 2005 were:
· | Air Transport Worlds (ATW)Market Leadership Award for 2006. |
· | Best Airline in Latin America by Global Finance Magazine in its November 2005 edition; |
· | No. 1 in the category of Disclosure Procedures in Latin America and top 5 in the category of Corporate Governance in Brazil at the Eighth annual IR Global Rankings in February 2006 |
· | Best Financial Management in 2004, in Isto é Dinheiro magazine; and |
· | One of Brazils most valuable brands by Isto é Dinheiro magazine in its 2005 Most Valuable Brazilian Brands Ranking. |
Pricing
Our emphasis on keeping our operating costs low has in turn allowed us to set low fares while achieving and increasing profitability. We have designed our fare structure to balance our load factors and yields in a way that we believe will generate the most profits from our flights. Our fares are below the average fares of our competitors and we dedicate most of our seats to the lower fare classes. As a result, we believe that we have established a reputation among our customers for more consistently delivering seats at our lowest advertised prices than do our competitors. Our approach to more transparent and competitive pricing has lowered fares in many of the markets that we have entered. Consistent with airline industry market practice in Brazil, with the exception of our deeply discounted night flights or special offers and promotions, we do not have advance purchase restrictions, minimum stays or required Saturday night stayovers. As provided for in the DAC regulations, passengers canceling travel plans on our flights are subject to a cancellation penalty. Passengers canceling their travel plans on our flights can either reschedule (if it occurs up to 24 hours prior to the flight and subject to the fare differential, if any), obtain a credit for future flights or be reimbursed for 80% of their fare. If the cancellation occurs less than 24 hours before the scheduled flight time, there is an additional penalty of R$50. We charge no-show customers a R$50 change fee, plus fare differential, if any, to use their ticket for another flight. If the replacement flight has a lower fare than the original flight (after giving effect to the change fee), the customer receives a credit equal to the difference.
In connection with our night flights, we set deeply discounted fares designed to compete with bus lines for travel to the same destinations. This approach has helped us to maximize our aircraft utilization rates to generate revenue during all times of the day. The night flights have also increased our customer base to include those who have previously only used other modes of transportation. The night flight fares usually require a two to five night minimum stay.
We also adjust our pricing in accordance with changes in passenger volume stemming from imbalances in the direction of traffic, such as during the holiday season. These periods often create demand peaks that result in traffic flows that are weighted heavily in one direction, causing demand for seats in the other direction to be low. During these periods, we discount fares on the lower demand flights to stimulate traffic on those routes to help offset our fixed costs.
Yield Management
Yield management involves the use of historical data and statistical forecasting models to produce knowledge about our markets and guidance on how to compete in them to maximize our operating revenues.
28
Yield management and pricing form the backbone of our revenue generation strategy and they are also strongly linked to our route and schedule planning and our sales and distribution methods. Our yield management practices enable us not only to react quickly in response to market changes but also to anticipate and help shape market changes. For example, our yield management is instrumental in helping us to identify times and the routes for which we offer promotions. By offering lower fares for seats that our yield management indicates would otherwise remain unsold, we capture additional revenue and also stimulate customer demand.
The number of seats we offer at each fare level in each market results from a continual process of analysis and forecasting. Past sales history, seasonality, the effects of competition and current sales trends are used to forecast demand. Current fares and knowledge of upcoming events at destinations that will affect traffic volumes are included in our forecasting model to arrive at optimal seat allocations for our fares on specific routes. Also, our practice of not accepting seat reservations but instead requiring customers to pay for tickets at the time their seat is secured helps to increase the accuracy of our yield management. We use a combination of approaches, taking into account yields and flight load factors, depending on the characteristics of the markets served, to arrive at a strategy for achieving the best possible revenue per available seat kilometer, balancing the average fare charged against the corresponding effect on our load factors. For this purpose, we use a sophisticated M.I.T.-developed forecasting, optimization and competitive analysis technology that proposes the optimal fare mix for a given flight based on the historical purchasing behavior of our customers. Our revenue management system is similar to that used by other successful low-cost carriers, such as Ryanair and JetBlue.
Competition
There is currently no other low cost airline in Brazil offering scheduled air passenger services. As the growth in the Brazilian low-cost, low-fare sector evolves, we may face increased competition from our primary competitors and charter airlines as well as other entrants into the market that reduce their fares to attract new passengers in some of our markets. In 2005, we became the second largest airline in the Brazilian market with a market share of 27.3%.
Airlines in Brazil compete primarily on the basis of routes, fare levels, frequency of flights, reliability of services, brand recognition, passenger amenities, such as frequent flyer programs, and customer service. We believe that our low-cost operating model and our low fares enable us to compete favorably in many of these areas. See Our Competitive Strengths.
Our competitors and potential competitors include Brazils major airlines, regional airlines, charter airlines and new entrants, which mainly have regional networks. Our primary competitors are Varig and TAM Linhas Aéreas S.A., or TAM, each of which is a full-service carrier offering flights on domestic routes and international routes. On June 17, 2005, Varig filed for bankruptcy protection in Brazil and the United States. On January 19, 2006, it presented a restructuring plan to its creditors which was approved in February 2006. We cannot foresee whether the judicial reorganization and related judicial proceedings will have a positive effect on Varigs financial condition in the short or medium term.
When we enter a new market, our primary competitors often reduce fares using capacity controls, such as limitations on the number of seats available in varying discount ranges, the use of minimum stay-over requirements and other restrictions to limit yield erosion. Our primary competitors have also used their customer loyalty plans as a competitive tool to limit the loss of their higher yield market share. We believe that the majority of our passengers are price sensitive, preferring low fares to paying for extras such as mileage programs.
29
The following table sets forth the historical market shares on domestic routes, based on revenue passenger kilometers, of the significant airlines in Brazil for each of the periods indicated:
Domestic Market Share Scheduled Airlines |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
||||||||||
Gol(1) |
4.7 | % | 11.8 | % | 19.4 | % | 22.3 | % | 27.3 | % | |||||
TAM |
33.1 | % | 34.9 | % | 33.1 | % | 35.8 | % | 43.5 | % | |||||
Varig Group(2) |
39.8 | % | 39.3 | % | 33.7 | % | 31.1 | % | 26.7 | % | |||||
Others(3) |
22.4 | % | 14.0 | % | 13.8 | % | 10.8 | % | 2.5 | % |
Source: | DACAnnual Air Transportation Report (Anuário do Transporte Aéreo)Statistical Data |
2001-2004. | Advanced Comparative Data (Dados Comparativos Avançados) 2005 |
(1) | Began operations in January 2001. |
(2) | Varig Groupincludes Varig, Rio Sul and Nordeste. |
(3) | Includes Transbrasil (ceased operations in December 2001) and VASP (ceased operations in December 2003), among others. |
We also face competition from ground transportation alternatives, primarily interstate bus companies. In 2004, interstate bus companies transported over 134 million passengers, according to the National Ground Transportation Agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres), and given the absence of meaningful passenger rail services in Brazil, travel by bus has traditionally been the only low-cost option for long-distance travel for a significant portion of Brazils population. We believe that our low-cost business model and strong capitalization has given us flexibility in setting our fares to stimulate demand for air travel among passengers who in the past have traveled long distances primarily by bus. In particular, the highly competitive fares we have offered for travel on our night flights, which have often been comparable to bus fares for the same destinations, have had the effect of providing direct competition for interstate bus companies on these routes. For example, at the end of 2005, we offered night flights between São Paulo and Porto Alegre, with a 1.5 hour flight duration, for an average fare of R$161. In comparison, interstate bus companies charged their passengers a fare of approximately R$150 for an 18.5 hour journey between the same two cities. We believe that operating night flights presents an opportunity to increase our overall load factor.
As we expand our international services, our pool of competitors will increase and we will face competition from airlines that are already established in the international market and that participate in strategic alliances and code sharing arrangements.
Aircraft
At the end of 2005, we operated a fleet of 42 aircraft comprised of 22 Boeing 737-700 Next Generation aircraft, 8 Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft and 12 Boeing 737-300 aircraft. We expect to operate approximately 88 aircraft by the end of 2010, concentrating our fleet on the 737-800 Next Generation aircraft. The composition of our fleet as of December 31, 2005 is more fully described below:
Number of Aircraft |
Average Term Remaining |
Average Age (Years) |
Seating Capacity | |||||||
Total |
Operating Lease |
|||||||||
Boeing 737-800 |
8 | 8 | 3.64 | 4.00 | 177 | |||||
Boeing 737-700 |
22 | 22 | 3.62 | 5.94 | 144 | |||||
Boeing 737-300 |
12 | 12 | 2.33 | 16.75 | 141 |
Each aircraft in our fleet is powered by two CFM International Model CFM 56-7B22 engines, two CFM International Model CFM 56-7B24 engines or two 51-3C1 engines and operates in a comfortable single-class layout. The average age of our aircraft at December 31, 2005 was 8.7 years, making ours one of the youngest fleets in South America.
We have placed firm purchase orders with The Boeing Company for 67 737-800 Next Generation aircraft and we have options to purchase an additional 34 737-800 Next Generation aircraft. Currently, we have 11 firm
30
purchase orders for aircraft deliveries scheduled in 2006, 13 in 2007, 10 in 2008, 11 in 2009, 8 in 2010 and 14 after 2010. With these firm purchase orders and purchase options, we expect to further reduce our financing costs. In addition, by purchasing aircraft, we expect to be able to maintain our young fleet of aircraft going forward, increase fuel and operating efficiency and reduce maintenance costs.
We took delivery of 4 Boeing 737-800, 4 Boeing 737-700 aircraft and 7 Boeing 737-300 in 2005. We expect to take delivery of 12 Boeing 737-800 and 4 Boeing 737-700 during 2006.
The following table shows the historical and expected development of our fleet from December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2010:
2004 |
2005 |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 | ||||||||
737-800 |
4 | 8 | 20 | 32 | 43 | 58 | 69 | |||||||
737-700 |
18 | 22 | 26 | 22 | 20 | 19 | 19 | |||||||
737-300 |
5 | 12 | 12 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | |||||||
Total fleet |
27 | 42 | 58 | 64 | 70 | 80 | 88 |
Our new and simplified fleet structure allows us to maintain a cost-efficient operation by reducing maintenance and training costs, reducing spare parts inventory requirements and supporting high reliability and high aircraft utilization rates. The average daily utilization rate of our aircraft between 2002 and 2005 has been 13.1 block hours (including 13.9 block hours in 2005), the highest average utilization rate in Brazil and one of the highest utilization rates in the industry worldwide according to airline company public filings.
The Boeing 737-700 and Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft currently comprising our fleet are fuel-efficient and very reliable. They suit our cost efficient operations well for the following reasons:
· | they have comparatively simplified maintenance routines; |
· | they require just one type of standardized training for our crews; |
· | they use an average of 7% less fuel than other aircraft of comparable size, according to Boeing; and |
· | they have one of the lowest operating costs in their class. |
In addition to being cost-efficient, the Boeing 737-700/800 Next Generation aircraft are equipped with advanced technology that promotes flight stability, providing a more comfortable flying experience for our customers. Our focus on having low operating costs means that we will periodically review our fleet composition. As a result, our fleet composition may change over time if we conclude that adding other aircraft types would contribute to this goal. However, our approach to our fleet composition is based upon having a minimal number of different aircraft types to preserve the simplicity of our operations. As a result, the introduction of any new aircraft type to our fleet will only be done if, after careful consideration, we determine that such a step will reduce our operating costs. Since 2005, some of our leased Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft have been equipped with blended winglets and all Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft we will purchase in the next years will be equipped with these winglets. With these winglets, we expect to reduce our fuel and maintenance costs. In addition, the new aircraft will have technical modifications that we expect to significantly improve airplane performance during take-off and landing on short runways and will enable us to fly with our Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft to the airport of Santos Dumont in Rio de Janeiro, an important link to highly profitable routes in Brazil.
We currently lease all of our aircraft under long-term operating lease agreements that have an average remaining term of 42 months. We believe that leasing a portion of our aircraft fleet provides us with flexibility to adjust our fleet size if we consider it to be in our best interests to do so. We make monthly rental payments, some of which are based on floating rates, but are not required to make termination payments at the end of our leases. Under our operating lease agreements, we do not have purchase options and we are required to maintain maintenance reserve accounts and to return the aircraft in the agreed condition at the end of the lease term. Title to the aircraft remains with the lessor. We are responsible for the maintenance, servicing, insurance, repair and
31
overhaul of the aircraft during the term of the lease. As of December 31, 2005, our operating leases had terms of up to 96 months from the date of delivery of the relevant aircraft. Currently, 5 of our aircraft leases expire in 2006, 7 in 2007, 5 in 2008, 15 in 2009 and 8 in 2010.
Maintenance
The maintenance performed on our aircraft can be divided into two general categories: line and heavy maintenance. Line maintenance consists of routine, scheduled maintenance checks on our aircraft, including pre-flight, daily and overnight checks and any diagnostics and routine repairs. All of our line maintenance is performed by our own highly experienced technicians at our bases in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Porto Alegre, Curitiba, Florianópolis, Brasília, Salvador, Campinas, Vitória, Navegantes, Maringa, Recife and Londrina. We believe that our practice of performing daily preventative maintenance helps to maintain a higher aircraft utilization rate and reduces maintenance costs. Heavy maintenance consists of more complex inspections and servicing of the aircraft that cannot be accomplished overnight. Heavy maintenance checks are performed following a pre-scheduled agenda of major overhauls defined by the aircrafts manual, based on the number of flights flown by the aircraft. Our continued high aircraft utilization rate will result in shorter periods of time between heavy maintenance checks for our aircraft in comparison to carriers with lower aircraft utilization rates. We do not believe that our high aircraft utilization rate will necessarily result in the need to make more frequent repairs to our aircraft, given the durability of the aircraft type in our fleet.
We have internalized heavy maintenance on our aircraft and are in the final stage of completing our new Aircraft Maintenance Center at the Tancredo Neves International Airport in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais. The centers first hangar was certified by the DAC and is already fully operational. The certification authorizes maintenance services for Boeing 737-300s and Boeing Next Generation 737-700 and 800s. We will use the new facility for airframe heavy checks, line maintenance, aircraft painting and aircraft interior refurbishment. We already make use of this new facility and expect it to be fully and permanently operational by mid-2006. We believe that the construction of the new maintenance facility will accommodate our recent fleet expansion, centralize our aircraft maintenance operations, provide cost savings and better enable us to determine the timing of the heavy maintenance so as to continue to maximize our aircraft utilization.
With our system of phased maintenance, we are able to perform maintenance work every day without sacrificing aircraft revenue time and to schedule preventive maintenance with more regularity and around the utilization of our aircraft, which helps to maintain high levels of block hours per day and reduces costs. We are one of the few airlines in the world having maintenance technicians capable of executing our system of phased maintenance.
We have also been certified by the DAC under the Brazilian Aeronautical Certification Regulations to perform heavy maintenance services for third parties. We intend to offer these services on competitive terms shortly after the completion of the new maintenance facility.
We employ 702 maintenance professionals, including engineers, supervisors, technicians and mechanics, who perform maintenance in accordance with maintenance plans that are established by Boeing and approved and certified by Brazilian aviation authorities. Our aircraft are covered by warranties that have an average term of seven years and that begin expiring in 2007, resulting in lower maintenance expenses during the period of coverage.
Facilities
We have renewable concessions with terms varying from one to five years from INFRAERO to use and operate all of our facilities at each of the major airports that we serve. Our concession agreements for our terminals passenger service facilities, which include check-in counters and ticket offices, operations support area and baggage service offices, contain provisions for periodic adjustments of the lease rates and the extension of the concession term.
32
INFRAERO has announced in 2003 its intention to invest approximately R$5 billion in the Brazilian airport system until 2008. Among the projects underway is an investment to modernize the passenger terminal and expand parking capacity at Congonhas airport in São Paulo, an investment in Guarulhos airport in São Paulo to construct two new arrival terminals and an additional runway, and an investment in Santos Dumont airport in Rio de Janeiro to construct a new arrival terminal. The airport upgrade plan does not require contributions or investments by the Brazilian airlines and is not expected to be accompanied by increases in landing fees or passenger taxes on air travel.
Our primary corporate offices are located in two buildings in São Paulo. Our commercial, operations, technology, finance and administrative staff is based primarily at our headquarters. We have concessions to use other airport buildings and hangars throughout Brazil, including a part of a hangar at Congonhas airport where we perform parts of our aircraft maintenance. In addition, we are constructing a maintenance center at the Tancredo Neves International Airport in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais.
Fuel
Our fuel costs totaled R$808.3 million in 2005, representing 39.5% of our operating expenses for the year. In 2005, we consumed approximately 477 million liters of fuel. We purchase substantially all of our fuel from Petrobras Distribuidora S.A., a retail subsidiary of Petrobras, principally under an into-plane contract under which the supplier supplies fuel and also fills our aircraft tanks. Fuel prices under our contracts are re-set every 15 days and are composed of a variable and a fixed component. The variable component is defined by the refinery and follows international crude oil price fluctuations and the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate. The fixed component is a spread charged by the supplier and is usually a fixed cost per liter during the term of the contract. We currently operate a tankering program under which we fill the fuel tanks of our aircraft in regions where fuel prices are lower. We also provide our pilots with training in fuel management techniques, such as carefully selecting flight altitudes to optimize fuel efficiency.
In July 2001, the Brazilian federal government eliminated fuel subsidies, causing a 30% increase in the price of fuel consumed domestically. Fuel costs are extremely volatile, as they are subject to many global economic and geopolitical factors that we can neither control nor accurately predict. Because international prices for jet fuel are denominated in U.S. dollars, our fuel costs, though payable in reais, are subject not only to price fluctuations but also to exchange rate fluctuations. In September 2003, we implemented a fuel and foreign exchange hedging program, based upon best practices employed by other successful low-cost carriers, under which we enter into fuel and currency hedging agreements with various counterparties providing for price protection in connection with the purchase of fuel. Our hedging practices cover short-term periods, and are adjusted weekly or more frequently as conditions require. Our hedging practices are overseen by a risk management committee at the operating level and a risk policies committee at the board of directors level. The risk management committee meets on a weekly basis to analyze price movements in the fuel and foreign exchange markets, review the impact of such changes on our revenues and expenses and determine our hedge ratio. We use risk management instruments that have a high correlation with the underlying assets so as to reduce our exposure. We require that all of our risk management instruments be liquid so as to allow us to make position adjustments and have prices that are widely disclosed. We also avoid concentration of credit and product risk. The risk policies committee of our board of directors meets quarterly to assess the effectiveness of our hedging policies and recommends amendments where appropriate. We have not otherwise entered into arrangements to guarantee our supply of fuel and we cannot provide assurance that our hedging program is sufficient to protect us against significant increases in the price of fuel. As of March 10, 2006, we have hedged approximately 55% and 65% of our projected fuel requirements and our U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate exposure, respectively, for the first quarter of 2006, and 30% of our projected fuel requirements for the year of 2006.
33
The following chart summarizes our fuel consumption and costs for the periods indicated:
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
Liters consumed (in thousands) |
164,008 | 264,402 | 317,444 | 476,725 | ||||||||||||
Total cost (in thousands) |
R$ | 160,537 | R$ | 308,244 | R$ | 459,192 | R$ | 808,268 | ||||||||
Percent of operating expenses |
26.1 | % | 29.1 | % | 33.2 | % | 39.5 | % |
Insurance
We maintain passenger liability insurance in an amount consistent with industry practice and we insure our aircraft against losses and damages on an all risks basis. We are required by the DAC to maintain insurance coverage for general liability against terrorist acts or acts of war with a minimum amount of US$600 million. We are in compliance with this requirement. We have obtained all insurance coverage required by the terms of our leasing agreements. We believe our insurance coverage is consistent with airline industry standards in Brazil and is appropriate to protect us from material loss in light of the activities we conduct. No assurance can be given, however, that the amount of insurance we carry will be sufficient to protect us from material loss.
In response to the substantial increases of insurance premiums for coverage for damages resulting from terrorist attacks to aircraft after the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, the Brazilian government enacted Law No. 10,309 on November 22, 2001, generally authorizing the Brazilian government to undertake liabilities for damages caused to third parties as a result of terrorist attacks or acts of war against aircraft of Brazilian airlines. According to Law No. 10,744 of October 9, 2003, this undertaking by the federal government is currently limited to cover damages caused to third parties resulting from terrorist attacks and acts of war to Brazilian aircraft up to US$1 billion. Decree No. 5,035 of April 5, 2004, which regulates the provisions of Law No. 10,744, provides that the Brazilian government may, at its sole discretion, suspend this coverage at any time, effective within seven days after the announcement by the Brazilian government of its decision to do so.
Social Responsibility and Cultural Sponsorship
Our values are based upon growth, respect, and incentives for teamwork for our employees, and the fulfillment of our social and environmental obligations. We are committed to being a good corporate citizen in Brazil by participating in projects dedicated to improving the education, health and nutrition of the underprivileged portion of Brazils population, particularly children. We are the largest individual sponsor of Pastoral da Criança, a non-governmental organization that has assisted in the health and education needs of more than 1.8 million children in Brazil from infancy to age six. We also support other non-governmental organizations, such as Fundação Gol de Letra, a foundation dedicated to educating underprivileged children and teenagers; Projeto Felicidade, a project that provides assistance to children with cancer; and Projeto Solidariedade ao Nordeste, a project that provides food donations to poor families in the northeastern region of Brazil. We sponsor numerous cultural and sports activities, such as theater plays and dance shows and sports events, to help promote travel and tourism in Brazil. In addition to making a difference for those in need, we also believe that our social responsibility and cultural sponsorship initiatives benefit us by enhancing our corporate image and promoting awareness of our brand. In December 2005, our shares were included in the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE) Bovespa. It is the first stock index in Latin America comprised of companies with responsible views towards the environment, society, customers, suppliers and other stakeholders.
Industry Overview
Since air transportation has historically been affordable only to the higher income segment of Brazils population, resulting in a comparatively low level of air travel, we believe that the low-cost, low-fare business model has the potential to significantly increase the use of air transportation in Brazil. According to the DAC, there were 31.1 million domestic enplanements and 4.9 million international enplanements in Brazil in 2004, out of a total population of approximately 181 million, according to the Brazilian Geographical and Statistical
34
Institute (Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e EstatísticaIBGE). In contrast, according to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the United States had 628.5 million domestic enplanements and 133.5 million international enplanements in 2004, out of a total population of approximately 293 million, according to the latest U.S. census figures.
Most long-distance public travel services within Brazil are provided by interstate bus companies. In 2004, Brazils domestic airline industry transported almost 36 million passengers, as compared to over 134 million passengers transported by interstate bus companies in 2004, according to the National Ground Transportation Agency (Agência Nacional de Transportes Terrestres). Brazil has no meaningful interstate passenger rail services.
The business travel segment is the largest component of Brazilian air transportation demand and the most profitable in the market. According to the DAC, business travel represents approximately 70% of the total demand for domestic air travel in 2005, which we believe is significantly higher than the business travel portion of domestic air travel in the global aviation sector. According to data collected from the DAC, flights between Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo accounted for 13.1% of all domestic passengers in 2004. The ten busiest routes accounted for 35.7% of all domestic air passengers in 2004 while the ten busiest airports accounted for 74.9% and 75.6% of all domestic passenger traffic through INFRAERO airports in terms of arrivals and departures in 2004 and 2005, respectively.
The table below sets forth information about the ten busiest routes for air travel in Brazil during 2004.
City Pair |
Passengers |
Route Market Share |
|||
São PauloRio de Janeiro(1) |
4,069,859 | 13.1 | % | ||
São Paulo (Congonhas)Rio de Janeiro (Santos Dumont) |
3,194,514 | 10.3 | % | ||
Rio de Janeiro (Galeão)São Paulo (Guarulhos) |
637,597 | 2.1 | % | ||
São Paulo (Congonhas)Brasília |
1,227,220 | 3.9 | % | ||
São Paulo (Congonhas)Belo Horizonte (Pampulha) |
1,142,953 | 3.7 | % | ||
São Paulo (Congonhas)Curitiba |
978,681 | 3.1 | % | ||
São Paulo (Congonhas)Porto Alegre |
966,582 | 3.1 | % | ||
São Paulo (Congonhas)Salvador |
650,857 | 2.1 | % | ||
São Paulo (Congonhas)Florianópolis |
540,074 | 1.7 | % | ||
São Paulo (Cumbica)Recife |
516,418 | 1.7 | % | ||
Rio de Janeiro (Galeão)Salvador |
515,022 | 1.7 | % |
Source: DAC, from Anuário do Transporte Aéreo 2004
(1) | Includes flights between Congonhas and Guarulhos to either Santos Dumont or Galeão airports. |
The scheduled domestic passenger airline industry in Brazil is primarily served by Gol and two main competitorsVarig and TAM. By the end of 2005, Gol, TAM and Varig accounted for over 97.7% of the market share of domestic regular routes, measured in terms of revenue passenger kilometers. On June 17, 2005, Varig filed for bankruptcy protection in Brazil and the United States. On January 19, 2006, it presented a restructuring plan to its creditors which was approved in February 2006. We cannot foresee whether the judicial reorganization and related judicial proceedings will have a positive effect on Varigs financial condition in the short or medium term.
35
Set forth in the table below is the number of passengers traveling by air between Brazil and other specified South American countries during 2004, as well as the gross domestic product and population of each listed country.
Country |
Enplanements(1) |
Percentage of Total |
GDP(2) (in billions of US$) |
Population(3) (in millions) | |||||
Argentina |
1,457,877 | 51.3 | % | 151.5 | 38.2 | ||||
Chile |
402,058 | 14.2 | % | 94.1 | 16.0 | ||||
Uruguay |
264,271 | 9.3 | % | 13.1 | 3.4 | ||||
Bolivia |
217,162 | 7.6 | % | 8.8 | 9.0 | ||||
Paraguay |
181,639 | 6.4 | % | 7.1 | 5.8 | ||||
Peru |
143,395 | 5.1 | % | 68.4 | 27.5 | ||||
Colombia |
94,673 | 3.3 | % | 97.4 | 45.3 | ||||
Venezuela |
78,347 | 2.8 | % | 109.3 | 26.1 | ||||
Total |
2,839,422 | 100 | % | 549.7 | 171.3 |
Sources: |
(1) DACAnuário de Transporte Aéreo 2004 |
(2) | World Development Bank Indicators database, August 2005. Figures as of 2004 |
(3) | World Development Bank Indicators database, August 2005. Figures as of 2004 |
When inaugurating flights between Brazil and select destinations in neighboring South American countries, we must observe the terms of bilateral air transport agreements negotiated between Brazil and foreign governments. These bilateral agreements govern the operation of scheduled services between specified destinations in each country. See Regulation of the Brazilian Civil Aviation MarketRoute RightsInternational routes.
Trends in Brazilian Civil Aviation Market
Since 1970, Brazil has for the most part had stable growth in revenue passenger kilometers. From 1970 to 2005, domestic revenue passenger kilometers grew at a compound annual rate of 8.4%. In the past 35 years, the domestic market generally experienced year over year growth in revenue passenger kilometers except in times of significant economic or political distress, such as the petroleum crisis in the 1970s, the Brazilian sovereign debt crisis in the early 1980s and the economic and political distress in Brazil in the early 1990s.
From 1997 to 2005, the compound annual growth rate in industry passenger traffic, in terms of domestic revenue passenger kilometers, was 8.3% versus a compound annual growth rate in available industry capacity, in terms of available seat kilometers, of 5.5%. Domestic industry load factors, calculated as revenue passenger kilometers divided by available seat kilometers, have averaged 60% over the same period. The table below shows the figures of domestic industry passenger traffic and available capacity for the periods indicated:
1997 |
1998 |
1999 |
2000 |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||||||||
(In millions, except percentages) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available Seat Kilometers |
31,146 | 38,121 | 40,323 | 41,437 | 45,008 | 47,109 | 41,927 | 43,034 | 47,979 | ||||||||||||||||||
Available Seat Kilometers Growth |
8.7 | % | 22.4 | % | 5.8 | % | 2.8 | % | 8.6 | % | 4.7 | % | (11.0 | )% | 2.6 | % | 11.5 | % | |||||||||
Revenue Passenger Kilometers |
17,824 | 22,539 | 22,204 | 24,284 | 26,296 | 26,780 | 25,180 | 28,214 | 33,699 | ||||||||||||||||||
Revenue Passenger Kilometers Growth |
7.5 | % | 26.5 | % | (1.5 | )% | 9.4 | % | 8.3 | % | 1.8 | % | (6.0 | )% | 12.0 | % | 19.4 | % | |||||||||
Load Factor |
57.2 | % | 59.1 | % | 55.1 | % | 58.6 | % | 58.4 | % | 56.8 | % | 60.1 | % | 65.6 | % | 70.2 | % |
Source: DAC, for 1997 to 2002 from Anuário Estatístico; and for 2003 through 2005 from Dados Comparativos Avançados.
36
Historically, domestic airline industry revenue growth has generally surpassed Brazilian GDP growth. From 1998 to 2004, domestic airline industry revenue grew at a real compound annual growth rate of 5.9% (as adjusted by the IPCA inflation index) while Brazilian GDP has grown at a real compound annual growth rate of 2.3% over the same period, according to data from the DAC and the Central Bank.
The airline industry in Brazil is regulated pursuant to Law No. 7,565, of December 19, 1986, also known as the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, as well as extensive regulations issued by the High Command of Aeronautics of the Ministry of Defense (Comando da Aeronáutica), the CONAC, and the DAC. Although the Brazilian airline sector was deregulated in the early 1990s, the DAC has imposed varying degrees of regulation since that time, and is charged with guiding, planning, stimulating and supporting the activities of public and private civil aviation as well as implementing international rules and conventions that have already been adopted by the Brazilian government. The decisions of the CONAC and the DAC at times significantly alter the regulatory environment for civil aviation. Decisions that change regulatory policy often correspond to major socio-economic events, such as the Persian Gulf War and the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, and we believe have been designed to shelter domestic carriers from major economic shocks. The DAC monitors and reacts to ongoing developments in the air transportation sector to achieve multiple competing objectives. The DAC often takes targeted action to address perceived constraints or challenges affecting civil aviation. The ad hoc policy initiatives of the DAC in the past have included moving to restrict or expand the supply of air transportation services, to reduce or decrease the availability of new routes and slots, to curtail or encourage competition in air fares, and to facilitate an orderly cessation of the activities of financially unsound carriers. Currently, the DAC imposes a series of restrictions and demands on the standards, safety, maintenance, regularity and quality of air carrier operations. Brazilian airlines are permitted to establish their own domestic fares. Domestic fares can be reviewed by the DAC in order to prevent airlines, which are public concessionaires, from operating in a way that is detrimental to their economic viability. The DAC also monitors the concession of airport slots, entry of new companies, launch of new routes, increases in route frequencies and lease or acquisition of new aircraft. The regulatory environment relating to the Brazilian civil aviation market is evolving, and a number of new laws are being discussed in Congress and within various regulatory bodies that would change the way in which the industry is regulated. See Item 4. Business OverviewRegulation of the Brazilian Civil Aviation Market.
In 2003, the CONAC issued guidelines to limit the entry of new concessionaires, the acquisition of new aircraft and the granting of new routes to existing concessionaires in order to protect the financial performance of the Brazilian airline industry as a whole. Based on these guidelines, in order to obtain authorizations for existing concessionaires to operate new routes and to change existing ones, the applicant must file with the DAC studies to justify the technical and economic viability of the requested route and the DAC will also consider the capacity of the airport infrastructure support, the increase in demand and competition among airlines.
The current regulatory environment developed following an economic slowdown in Brazil and a significant decline in passenger air traffic in late 2001. According to the DAC, the airline sector generated a R$330 million operating profit in 2004 compared to an operating loss of R$1.2 billion in 2001. We believe the current regulatory regime has benefited the recent improved financial performance of the Brazilian airline sector and helped to shift the trend back towards stability. Brazilian airline industry yields increased from R$0.29 in 2002 to R$0.35 in 2003 and R$0.36 in 2004, with load factors of 56.8% in 2002 and 60.1% in 2003 and 65.6% in 2004.
On September 27, 2005, President Luis Inácio Lula da Silva approved Law No. 11,182 relating to the creation of the National Civil Aviation Agency, or ANAC, which will replace DAC as the primary civil aviation authority. According to Law No. 11,182, ANAC will be responsible for organizing civil aviation within a coherent system (coordinating and supervising air transportation service and aviation and ground infrastructure) and for modernizing the regulation of Brazilian aviation operations. ANAC will be linked, but not subordinated, to the Ministry of Defense and will operate as an independent agency for an indefinite term. ANAC will principally have the authority to (i) regulate, inspect and supervise services rendered by Brazilian and foreign airlines operating in Brazil, (ii) grant concessions, permits and authorizations for air transport operations and airport infrastructure services after conducting a bidding process, (iii) represent the Brazilian government before international civil aviation organizations and (iv) control, register and inspect civil aircraft. Furthermore, Law
37
No. 11,182 promotes private enterprise in civil aviation. In accordance with articles 48 and 49, passenger transportation is intended to be provided by the private sector on a competitive basis. In accordance with Section 7 of Law No. 11,182, ANAC shall be implemented and commence its activities within 180 days as of September 28, 2005. However, it is necessary that the Brazilian Government issue a decree setting forth the organizational structure of the agency as well as its internal regulatory regime.
Regulation of the Brazilian Civil Aviation Market
The Brazilian Aviation Authorities and Regulation Overview
Air transportation services are considered a public service and are subject to extensive regulation and monitoring by the High Command of Aeronautics of the Ministry of Defense (Comando da Aeronáutica), the CONAC and, until ANAC commences its activities, the DAC. Air transportation services are also regulated by the Brazilian Federal Constitution and the Brazilian Aeronautical Code.
In light of the troubled financial situation of several carriers operating in Brazils domestic airline industry, the Brazilian civil aviation authorities have introduced measures and applied policies designed to reestablish the health of Brazils domestic airline industry. A principal element of this objective has been to proactively manage the balance between market supply and demand by, for example, only granting approvals to carriers to operate new routes, increase flight frequencies or lease or acquire additional aircraft upon demonstration by carriers of satisfactory levels of demand and profitability. These measures contributed towards increased health for the Brazilian domestic airline industry in 2004 and 2005. Another key feature of the decisions taken by aviation authorities has been a reliance on private sector investment in air transportation services.
The Brazilian Aeronautical Code provides for the main rules and regulations relating to airport infrastructure and operation, flight safety and protection, airline certification, lease structuring, burdening, disposal, registration and licensing of aircraft; crew training; concessions, inspection and control of airlines; public and private air carrier services, civil liability of airlines, and penalties in case of infringements.
The CONAC is an advisory body of the President of Brazil and its upper level advisory board is composed of the Minister of Defense, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister of Treasury, the Minister of Development, Industry and International Trade, the Minister of Tourism, the Minister Chief of the Civil Cabinet and the Commandant of the Air Force.
The CONAC has the authority to establish national civil aviation policies that may be adopted and enforced by the High Command of Aeronautics and by the DAC, and in the future, by the ANAC. The CONAC establishes guidelines relating to the proper representation of Brazil in conventions, treaties and other actions related to international air transportation, airport infrastructure, the granting of supplemental funds to be used for the benefit of airlines and airports based on strategic, economic or tourism-related aspects, the coordination of civil aviation, air safety, the granting of air routes and concessions, as well as permission for the provision of commercial air transportation services.
The DAC is currently Brazils highest civil aviation authority and reports directly to the High Command of Aeronautics. Until the installation of the ANAC, the DAC is responsible for guiding, planning, stimulating and supporting the activities of public and private civil aviation companies in Brazil. The DAC regulates flying operations generally and economic issues affecting air transportation, including matters relating to air safety, certification and fitness, insurance, consumer protection and competitive practices.
The Brazilian government recognized and ratified, and must comply with, the Warsaw Convention of 1929, the Chicago Convention of 1944, and the Geneva Convention of 1948, the three leading international conventions relating to worldwide commercial air transportation activities.
38
Concession for Air Transportation Services
According to the Brazilian Federal Constitution, the Brazilian government is responsible for public services related to airspace as well as airport infrastructure, and may provide these services directly or through third parties under concessions or permissions. According to the Brazilian Aeronautical Code and regulations issued by the High Command of Aeronautics, the application for a concession to operate regular air transportation services is subject to the DAC having granted to the applicant a license to operate an airline, which must be then confirmed by the High Command of Aeronautics. After the installation of the ANAC, the agency will be the only body responsible for regulation, monitoring and granting of the licenses to applicants to explore regular air transportation services. The applicant is required by the DAC to have met certain economic, financial, technical, operational and administrative requirements in order to be granted such license. Additionally, a concession applicant must be an entity incorporated in Brazil, duly registered with the Brazilian Aeronautical Registry (Registro Aeronáutico Brasileiro, or RAB), must have a valid CHETA and must also comply with certain ownership restrictions. See Restrictions to the Ownership of Shares Issued by Concessionaires of Air Transportation Services. The DAC has the authority to revoke a concession for failure by the airline to comply with the terms of the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, the complementary laws and regulations and the terms of the concession agreement.
Our concession was granted on January 2, 2001 by the High Command of Aeronautics of the Ministry of Defense. Our concession agreement has a 15-year term and is renewable at its expiration for a further 15-year term upon six months prior written notice. The concession agreement can be terminated if, among other things, we fail to meet specified service levels, cease operations or declare bankruptcy.
Article 122 of Law No. 8,666 of June 21, 1993, provides that airline concessions are to be regulated by specific procedures set forth in the Brazilian Aeronautical Code. The Brazilian Aeronautical Code and the regulations issued by the High Command of Aeronautics do not expressly provide for public bidding processes and currently it is not necessary to conduct public bidding processes prior to the granting of concessions for the operation of air transportation services.
Import of Aircraft into Brazil
The import of civil or commercial aircraft into Brazil is subject to prior authorization by the COTAC, which is a sub-department of the DAC. Such import authorizations usually follow the general procedures for import of goods into Brazil, after which the importer must request the registration of the aircraft with the RAB.
Registration of Aircraft
The registration of aircraft in Brazil is governed by the Brazilian Aeronautical Code. Under the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, no aircraft is allowed to fly in Brazilian airspace, or land in or take off from Brazilian territory, without having been properly registered. In order to be registered and continue to be registered in Brazil, an aircraft must have a certificate of registration (certificado de matrícula) and a certificate of airworthiness (certificado de aeronavegabilidade), both of which are issued by the RAB after technical inspection of the aircraft by the DAC. A certificate of registration attributes Brazilian nationality to the aircraft and is evidence of its enrollment with the competent aviation authority. A certificate of airworthiness is generally valid for six years from the date of the DACs inspection and authorizes the aircraft to fly in Brazilian airspace, subject to continuing compliance with certain technical requirements and conditions. The registration of any aircraft may be cancelled if it is found that the aircraft is not in compliance with the requirements for registration and, in particular, if the aircraft has failed to comply with any applicable safety requirements specified by the DAC or the Brazilian Aeronautical Code.
All information relating to the contractual status of an aircraft, including purchase and sale agreements, operating leases and mortgages, must be filed with the RAB in order to provide the public with an updated record of any amendments made to the aircraft certificate of registration.
39
Route Rights
Domestic routes. The DAC has the authority to grant Brazilian airlines the right to operate new routes, subject to the airline having filed studies satisfactory to the DAC demonstrating the technical and financial viability of such routes and fulfilling certain conditions in respect of the concession for such routes. For the granting of new routes and changes to existing ones, the DAC evaluates the actual capacity of the airport infrastructure from where such route is or would be operated, as well as the increase in demand and competition among airlines. In addition, route frequencies are granted subject to the condition that they are operated on a frequent basis. Any airlines route frequency rights may be terminated if the airline (a) fails to begin operation of a given route for a period exceeding 15 days, (b) fails to maintain at least 75% of flights provided for in its air transportation schedule (Horário de Transporte Aéreo, or HOTRAN) for any 90-day period or (c) suspends its operation for a period exceeding 30 days. The DAC approval of new routes or changes to existing routes is given in the course of an administrative procedure and requires no changes to existing concession agreements.
Once routes are granted, they must be immediately reflected in the HOTRAN, which is the official schedule report of all routes that an airline can operate. The HOTRAN provides not only for the routes but also the times of arrival at and departure from certain airports, none of which may be changed without the prior consent of the DAC. According to Brazilian laws and regulations, an airline cannot sell, assign or transfer its routes to another airline.
International routes. In general, requests for new international routes, or changes to existing ones, must be filed by each interested Brazilian airline that has been previously qualified by the DAC to provide international services, with the CERNAI, which decides upon each request based on the provisions of the applicable bilateral agreement and general policies of the Brazilian aviation authorities. International route rights for major city pairs, as well as the corresponding landing rights, derive from bilateral air transport agreements negotiated between Brazil and foreign governments. Under such agreements, each government grants to the other the right to designate one or more of its domestic airlines to operate scheduled service between certain destinations in each country. Airlines are only entitled to apply for new international routes when they are made available under these agreements. Since the beginning of 2005, we extended our South American network to five new destinations in Argentina, Uruguay, Paraguay and Bolivia.
Slots Policy
Under Brazilian law, a slot is a concession of the DAC, which is reflected in the airlines HOTRAN. A slot, like a route, may not be transferred by one airline to another. Each HOTRAN represents the authorization for an airline to depart from and arrive at specific airports within a predetermined timeframe. Such period of time is known as an airport slot and provides that an airline can operate at the specific airport at the times established in the HOTRAN. The most congested Brazilian airports are subject to traffic restrictions through time slot policies. An airline must request an additional slot from the DAC upon a minimum of two months prior notice.
On October 5, 2001, the Department of Control of the Air Space (Departamento de Controle do Espaço Aéreo), or DECEA, was created with the main purpose of coordinating and inspecting the infrastructure support of airports and the safety of aircraft operations. The DECEA also performs studies in all Brazilian airports to determine the maximum capacity of the operations of each airport. There are five airports in Brazil that have slot restrictions: Congonhas and Guarulhos (both of which serve São Paulo), Santos Dumont in Rio de Janeiro, Pampulha in Belo Horizonte and Juscelino Kubitschek in Brasília. Since the slots of all congested airports are fully utilized, the DAC is unable to grant the right to new slots to airlines to operate in these airports. Ongoing investment in the Brazilian aviation infrastructure should permit the increase of aircraft operations in these congested airports and consequently the concession of rights to new slots to airlines.
Airport Infrastructure
INFRAERO, a state-controlled corporation reporting to the High Command of Aeronautics, is in charge of managing, operating and controlling federal airports, including control towers and airport safety operations.
40
Smaller, regional airports may belong to states or municipalities within Brazil and, in such cases, are often managed by local governmental entities. At most Brazilian airports, INFRAERO performs safety and security activities, including passenger and baggage screening, cargo security measures and airport security.
The use of areas within federal airports, such as hangars and check-in booths, is subject to a concession by INFRAERO. If there is more than one applicant for the use of a specific airport area, INFRAERO may conduct a public bidding process for the granting of the concession.
We have renewable concessions with terms varying from one to five years from INFRAERO to use and operate all of our facilities at each of the major airports that we serve. Our concession agreements for our terminals passenger service facilities, which include check-in counters and ticket offices, operations support area and baggage service offices, contain provisions for periodic adjustments of the lease rates and the extension of the concession term.
INFRAERO has announced in 2003 its intention to invest approximately R$5 billion in the Brazilian airport system until 2008. Among the projects underway is an investment to modernize the passenger terminal and expand parking capacity at Congonhas airport in São Paulo, an investment in Guarulhos airport in São Paulo to construct two new arrival terminals and an additional runway, and an investment in Santos Dumont airport in Rio de Janeiro to construct a new arrival terminal. The airport upgrade plan does not require contributions or investments by the Brazilian airlines and is not expected to be accompanied by increases in landing fees or passenger taxes on air travel.
The table below sets forth the number of passengers at the ten busiest airports in Brazil during 2005:
Airport |
Thousands of Passengers (Inbound and Outbound) | |
São PauloCongonhas |
17,147,628 | |
São PauloGuarulhos |
15,827,708 | |
Brasília |
9,481,983 | |
Rio de JaneiroGaleão |
8,657,139 | |
Salvador |
4,554,096 | |
Recife |
3,604,652 | |
Rio de JaneiroSantos Dumont |
3,562,297 | |
Porto Alegre |
3,521,204 | |
Curitiba |
3,392,986 | |
Belo HorizonteConfins |
2,892,393 |
Source: | INFRAERO |
Pricing
Brazilian airlines are permitted to establish their own domestic fares without government regulation. However, domestic fares are monitored on a regular basis by the DAC in order to prevent airlines, which are public concessionaires, from operating in a way that is detrimental to their economic viability. Airlines are free to offer price discounts or follow other promotional strategies. Airlines must submit, with a minimum of five working days advance notice, fares that are set at greater than a 65% discount to the per kilometer reference fares index curve published by the DAC. Such reference fares index curves are based on industry average operating costs, according to DAC calculations.
International tariffs are set based upon bilateral arrangements. Fares for specific routes are submitted to the DAC for approval.
41
Civil Liability
The Brazilian Aeronautical Code and the Warsaw Convention limit the liability of an aircraft operator for damages caused to third parties during its air and ground operations, or resulting from persons or things ejected out of the aircraft. Brazilian courts, however, have occasionally disregarded these limitations by awarding damages purely based on the Brazilian Civil Code and Brazilian Consumer Protection Code, both of which do not expressly provide for limitations on the amount of such awards.
In response to the substantial increases in insurance premiums for coverage relating to damage resulting from terrorist attacks to aircraft after the September 11, 2001 attacks in the United States, the Brazilian government enacted a law which authorizes the Brazilian government to undertake liability for damages caused to third parties as a result of terrorist attacks or acts of war against aircraft of Brazilian airlines. See Item 4. Business OverviewInsurance.
Environmental Regulations
Brazilian airlines are subject to various federal, state and municipal laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, including the disposal of materials and chemical substances and aircraft noise. These laws and regulations are enforced by various governmental authorities, each of which may impose administrative sanctions in case of violation, in addition to any eventual criminal or civil liabilities. For example, according to a DAC ordinance, the operation of scheduled commercial flights to and from the Congonhas airport is subject to a noise curfew from 11:00 p.m. to 6:00 a.m. because of its proximity to residential areas in São Paulo. Our scheduled flights to Congonhas airport are in full compliance with the noise curfew limits.
Restrictions on the Ownership of Shares Issued by Concessionaires of Air Transportation Services
According to the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, in order to be eligible for a concession for operation of regular services, the entity operating the concession must have at least 80% of its voting stock held directly or indirectly by Brazilian citizens and must have certain management positions entrusted to Brazilian citizens. The Brazilian Aeronautical Code also imposes certain restrictions on the transfer of capital stock of concessionaires of air transportation services, such as Gol, including the following:
· | the voting shares have to be nominative and non-voting shares cannot be converted into voting shares; |
· | prior approval of the Brazilian aviation authorities is required for any transfer of shares, regardless of the nationality of the investor, which results in the change of the companys corporate control, causes the assignee to hold more than 10% of the companys capital stock or represents more than 2% of the companys capital stock; |
· | the airline must file with the DAC, in the first month of each semester, a detailed stockholding interest chart including a list of shareholders, as well as a list of all share transfers effected in the preceding semester; and |
· | based on its review of the airlines stock interest chart, the DAC has the authority to subject any further transfer of shares to its prior approval. |
The Registrant holds substantially all of the shares of Gol, which is a public concessionaire of air transportation services in Brazil. Under the Brazilian Aeronautical Code, the restrictions on the transfer of shares described above apply only to companies that hold concessions to provide regular air transportation services. Therefore, the restrictions do not apply to the Registrant.
Pending Legislation
In addition, on March 28, 2001, CONAC published for public consultation a draft of a bill to replace the Brazilian Aeronautical Code and modernize the basic laws and regulations relating to the industry. In general, this draft deals with matters related to civil aviation, including airport concessions, consumer protection, increased foreign shareholding participation in airlines, limitation of airlines civil liability, compulsory insurance and fines.
42
Cape Town Convention
The Cape Town Convention aims at promoting investments in aircraft by facilitating the granting of guarantees on aircraft lease and purchase transactions. The Brazilian government has not yet ratified the Cape Town Convention. In case the convention is ratified, aircraft financing costs for Brazilian airlines could decrease by about one percent.
The Registrant is a holding company, which owns shares of three subsidiaries: Gol, GOL Finance LLP and GTI S/A. Gol is the Registrants operating subsidiary, under which we conduct our business. GOL Finance LLP is a United Kingdom-based financing vehicle established for the purpose of facilitating cross-border transactions, including the lease and the purchase of aircraft. GTI S/A is a Brazilian company and has not had any activities since its incorporation.
D. Property, Plants and Equipment
Our primary corporate offices are located in two buildings in São Paulo. Our commercial, operations, technology, finance and administrative staff is based primarily at our headquarters. We have concessions to use other airport buildings and hangars throughout Brazil, including a part of a hangar at Congonhas airport where we perform aircraft maintenance. We are in the final stage of building our new state-of-the-art Aircraft Maintenance Center in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais. The centers first hangar was certified by the DAC to begin maintenance services and received its first aircraft. The certification authorizes maintenance services for Boeing 737-300s and Boeing Next Generation 737-700 and 800s. We will use the new facility for airframe heavy checks, line maintenance, aircraft painting and aircraft interior refurbishment. We expect the new facility to be operational by mid-2006.
ITEM 4A. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
You should read this discussion in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the other financial information included elsewhere in this annual report.
We are one of the most profitable low-cost airlines in the world and had net revenues of R$2.7 billion and net income of R$513.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. We are the only low-fare, low-cost airline operating in Brazil providing frequent service on routes connecting all of Brazils major cities. We focus on increasing the growth and profits of our business by popularizing air travel and stimulating and meeting demand for safe, affordable, convenient air travel in Brazil and between Brazil and other South American destinations for both business and leisure passengers. We do this by offering simple, safe and efficient service while having one of the lowest operating costs in the airline industry worldwide. Our long-term business objective is to become the largest Brazilian airline and to bring affordable air travel to all significant destinations in South America.
The Registrant is a holding company that was incorporated on March 12, 2004. Shares of Gol, an off-shore finance subsidiary, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments are currently the Registrants only material assets.
Gol was incorporated in August 2000 and began transporting passengers in January 2001 with six single-class Boeing 737-700 Next Generation aircraft serving five cities in Brazil. By the end of 2005, we were operating 42 single-class Boeing 737 Next Generation aircraft serving 43 cities in Brazil, one in Argentina and one in Bolivia. We have flown over 36 million passengers since commencing operations and 13 million in 2005, an increase of 41% to the number of passengers flown in 2004. According to the DAC, Brazils civil aviation authority, our share of the domestic market based on revenue passenger kilometers grew from 11.8% in 2002 to
43
19.4% in 2003, 22.3% in 2004 and 27.3% in 2005. The increase in our fleet size and flight frequencies, entry into new markets and new customer segments have been primarily accountable for yearly increases in our revenues (40.0% between 2003 and 2004 and 36.1% between 2004 and 2005) and operating costs (30.8% between 2003 and 2004 and 47.9% between 2004 and 2005).
We offer travelers a low-fare, high-quality transportation alternative that we believe is an attractive value compared to conventional airline and bus transportation. We have a diversified passenger base, with customers ranging from business passengers traveling within densely populated centers in Brazil, such as São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Belo Horizonte, to leisure passengers traveling to destinations throughout Brazil and from Brazil to Argentina, Bolivia, Paraguay and Uruguay.
We are the lowest cost provider of passenger air transportation in South America, and one of the lowest cost airlines in the world based on publicly available data. Our low costs have helped us to become the most profitable airline in South America and one of the most profitable low-cost carriers in the world, based on results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Set forth in the table below is information about key performance indicators for select leading low-cost carriers worldwide and other South American carriers.
Company |
Operating Income (in Millions of US$) |
Net Income (Loss) (in Millions of US$) |
Operating Margin |
Net Income Margin |
|||||||
Low-cost carriers: |
|||||||||||
Southwest Airlines(1) |
820.0 | 548.0 | 10.8 | % | 7.2 | % | |||||
Ryanair(2) |
456.9 | 372.2 | 23.5 | % | 19.1 | % | |||||
Gol(3) |
265.5 | 219.3 | 23.3 | % | 19.2 | % | |||||
Virgin Blue(4) |
117.0 | 80.2 | 8.8 | % | 6.0 | % | |||||
Jet Blue Airways(1) |
47.6 | (20.3 | ) | 2.8 | % | (1.2 | )% | ||||
EasyJet(5) |
86.2 | 75.4 | 3.6 | % | 3.2 | % | |||||
Air Asia(6) |
32.2 | 48.7 | 15.7 | % | 23.7 | % | |||||
South American carriers: |
|||||||||||
Copa Airlines(7) |
97.2 | 77.2 | 18.1 | % | 14.4 | % | |||||
LanChile(8) |
141.6 | 146.6 | 5.7 | % | 5.8 | % | |||||
TAM(3) |
261.4 | 182.2 | 10.8 | % | 7.6 | % | |||||
Varig(9) |
155.1 | (239.4 | ) | 4.2 | % | (6.4 | )% |
(1) | U.S. GAAP figures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. |
(2) | U.S. GAAP figures for the 12 month period ended September 30, 2005. Based on a US Dollar/Euro exchange rate of 1.1796 as of December 31, 2005. |
(3) | U.S. GAAP figures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. Based on a Brazilian Real/US Dollar exchange rate of 2.3407 as of December 31, 2005. |
(4) | Australian GAAP figures for the 9 month period ended September 30, 2005. Based on an US Dollar/Australian Dollar exchange rate of 0.7636 as of September 30, 2005. |
(5) | UK GAAP figures for the 12 month period ended September 30, 2005. Based on a US Dollar/British Pound exchange rate of 1.7691 as of September 30, 2005. |
(6) | Malaysian GAAP figures for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. Based on a US Dollar/Malaysian Ringitt exchange rate of 0.2646 as of December 31, 2005. |
(7) | U.S. GAAP figures for the 12 month period ended September 30, 2005. |
(8) | U.S. GAAP figures in US Dollars, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005. |
(9) | Brazilian GAAP figures for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005. Based on a Brazilian Real/US Dollar exchange rate of 2.2222 as of September 30, 2005. |
44
The following table demonstrates the growth of our operations, on a quarterly basis, since we commenced our operations in January 2001:
At Period Ended |
Cities Served |
Number of Departures |
Operating Aircraft(1) | |||
March 31, 2001 |
7 | 3,771 | 6 | |||
June 30, 2001 |
10 | 5,493 | 7 | |||
September 30, 2001 |
11 | 6,540 | 9 | |||
December 31, 2001 |
16 | 8,923 | 10 | |||
March 31, 2002 |
16 | 9,791 | 15 | |||
June 30, 2002 |
20 | 13,040 | 15 | |||
September 30, 2002 |
20 | 13,880 | 16 | |||
December 31, 2002 |
21 | 15,954 | 19 | |||
March 31, 2003 |
24 | 17,349 | 21 | |||
June 30, 2003 |
25 | 18,298 | 21 | |||
September 30, 2003 |
25 | 19,685 | 22 | |||
December 31, 2003 |
28 | 20,107 | 22 | |||
March 31, 2004 |
28 | 20,825 | 22 | |||
June 30, 2004 |
28 | 20,838 | 22 | |||
September 30, 2004 |
30 | 22,299 | 23 | |||
December 31, 2004 |
36 | 23,746 | 27 | |||
March 31, 2005 |
37 | 25,513 | 30 | |||
June 30, 2005 |
41 | 28,750 | 34 | |||
September 30, 2005 |
42 | 32,237 | 38 | |||
December 31, 2005 |
45 | 34,192 | 42 |
(1) | Currently, all of our aircraft are leased. |
Revenues
We derive our revenues primarily from transporting passengers on our aircraft. Approximately 95% of our revenues are derived from passenger fares, and the remaining 5% of our revenues are derived principally from our cargo and other business, which utilizes available cargo space on our passenger flights. Nearly all of our passenger revenue and cargo revenue is denominated in reais. Passenger revenue is recognized either when transportation is provided or when the ticket expires unused. Cargo revenue is recognized when transportation is provided. Other revenue consists primarily of charter services, ticket change fees and excess baggage charges. Passenger revenues are based upon our capacity, load factor and yield. Our capacity is measured in terms of available seat kilometers, which represents the number of seats we make available on our aircraft multiplied by the number of kilometers the seats are flown. Load factor, or the percentage of our capacity that is actually used by paying customers, is calculated by dividing revenue passenger kilometers by available seat kilometers. Yield is the average amount that one passenger pays to fly one kilometer.
The following table sets forth our capacity, load factor and yield for the periods indicated.
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
||||||||||
Capacity (in available seat kilometers, in millions) |
7,526.6 | 8,843.9 | 13,245.9 | |||||||||
Revenue per available seat kilometers (in R$ cents) |
18.6 | 22.2 | 20.2 | |||||||||
Load factor |
64.2 | % | 71.1 | % | 73.5 | % | ||||||
Yield (in R$ cents) |
R$ | 27.7 | R$ | 29.8 | R$ | 26.1 | ||||||
Growth in passenger revenues per available seat kilometer |
38.6 | % | 19.2 | % | (9.6 | )% |
45
We have increased our revenues by increasing our capacity (in terms of fleet size and departures), load factor and yield. We believe that our careful focus on serving specific segments of the domestic air travel market, the value that we offer our customers and our low fares distinguish us from other airlines and enable us to continue increasing our capacity to take advantage of strong, untapped demand for low-cost, low-fare services.
We are optimizing our revenues per available seat kilometer due to strong demand for our services, quick aircraft turnaround times, our efficient route network and our modern fleet, our high aircraft utilization rate and effective revenue management strategies that balance our fares and load factors. In 2005, however, our revenue per available seat kilometer decreased by 9.1% from R$22.2 cents in 2004 to R$20.2 cents mainly due to a decrease in yield of 12.6% from R$29.8 cents in 2004 to R$26.1 cents. Our yield decreased mainly due to a fare re-alignment in March 2005 and the appreciation of the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar. Our load factors for domestic flights increased by 3.4% from 71.1% in 2004 to 73.7% in 2005.
The DAC and the aviation authorities of the other South American countries in which we operate, may influence our ability to generate revenues. In Brazil, the DAC approves the concession of slots, entry of new companies, launch of new routes, increases in route frequencies and lease or acquisition of new aircraft. As an element of government measures designed to improve the financial health of the Brazilian major carriers operating in the Brazilian civil aviation industry, since March 2003 airlines have been required to demonstrate satisfactory levels of demand and profitability before the DAC will approve requests for new routes, increases in flight frequencies or the lease or acquisition of additional aircraft. Our ability to grow and to increase our revenues is dependent on the receipt of approvals for new routes, increased frequencies and additional aircraft from the DAC.
Our revenues are net of certain taxes, including state-value added taxes, Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços, or ICMS; federal social contribution taxes, including Programa de Integração Social, or PIS, and the Contribuição Social para o Financiamento da Seguridade Social, or COFINS. ICMS does not apply to passenger revenues. The average rate of ICMS on cargo revenues varies by state from 4% to 12%. As a general rule, PIS and COFINS are imposed at rates of 1.65% and 7.6%, respectively, of total revenues.
Generally, the revenues from and profitability of our flights reach their highest levels during the January and July summer and winter vacation periods and in the final two weeks of December during the Christmas holiday season. The week during which the annual Carnival celebrations take place in Brazil is generally accompanied by a decrease in load factors. Given our high proportion of fixed costs, this seasonality is likely to cause our results of operations to vary from quarter to quarter. We generate most of our revenue from ticket sales through our website, and we are one of the largest and leading e-commerce companies in Brazil in terms of net sales through the internet.
Operating Expenses
We have lower operating expenses than other airlines because we operate a simplified fleet with a single-class of service, have one of the newest fleets in the industry, utilize our aircraft efficiently, use and encourage low-cost ticket sales and distribution processes. The main components of operating expenses include those related to aircraft fuel, aircraft rent, aircraft maintenance, sales and marketing, and salaries, wages and benefits provided to employees, including provisions for our profit sharing plan.
Our aircraft fuel expenses are higher than those of low-cost airlines in the United States and Europe because there is only one significant supplier of jet fuel in Brazil and taxes applicable to the sale of jet fuel are very high and are passed along to us. Our aircraft fuel expenses are variable and fluctuate based on global oil prices. From January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2005, the price of West Texas Intermediate crude oil, a benchmark widely used for crude oil prices that is measured in barrels and quoted in U.S. dollars, increased by 128% from US$26.80 per barrel to US$61.04 per barrel. Since global oil prices are U.S. dollar-based, our aircraft fuel costs are also linked to fluctuations in the exchange rate of the real versus the U.S. dollar. As we can generally adjust our fares to offset fuel price increases and real exchange rate declines over a period of several months, we currently enter into short-term arrangements to hedge against increases in oil prices and foreign exchange fluctuations.
46
Our aircraft rent expenses are in U.S. dollars and have increased in line with the expansion of our operations. We also use short-term arrangements to hedge against exchange rate exposure related to our lease payment obligations. In addition, approximately 9% of our aircraft operating leases have floating-rate payment obligations that are based on fluctuations in international interest rates. We currently have a hedging program in place to manage our interest rate exposure.
Our maintenance, material and repair expenses consist of light and scheduled heavy maintenance of our aircraft. Maintenance and repair expenses, including overhaul of aircraft components, are charged to operating expenses as incurred. Our aircraft require a low level of maintenance because the average age of the aircraft in our fleet at December 31, 2005 was 8.7 years. We also currently incur lower maintenance expenses because most of the parts on our aircraft are under multi-year warranties. If the age of our fleet increases and our warranties expire, our maintenance expenses under U.S. GAAP will increase. For an explanation of the treatment of maintenance and repair expenses under U.S. GAAP, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements. We have maintenance reserve accounts denominated in U.S. dollars to cover a portion of our future maintenance costs. In October 2005, we completed the first phase of our new Aircraft Maintenance Center in Confins, in the State of Minas Gerais. The centers first hangar was certified by the DAC to begin maintenance services and received its first aircraft. The certification authorizes maintenance services for Boeing 737-300s and Boeing Next Generation 737-700 and 800s. We will use the new facility for airframe heavy checks, line maintenance, aircraft painting and aircraft interior refurbishment. We expect the new facility to be fully operational by mid-2006. We believe that the construction of the new maintenance facility and the internalization of our aircraft maintenance operations will provide cost savings.
Our sales and marketing expenses include commissions paid to travel agents, fees paid for our own and third-party reservations systems and agents, fees paid to credit card companies and advertising. Our distribution costs are lower than those of other airlines in Brazil on a per available seat kilometer basis because a higher proportion of our customers purchase tickets from us directly through our website instead of through traditional distribution channels, such as ticket offices, and we have comparatively fewer sales made through higher cost global distribution systems. We generated 57.9%, 76.4% and 81.3% of our passenger revenues through our website in the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively, including internet sales through travel agents.
Salaries, wages and benefits paid to our employees increase as the number of our employees grows and include annual cost of living adjustments and provisions made for our profit sharing plan. We have no seniority-related increases in these costs due to our salary structure.
Aircraft and traffic servicing expenses include ground handling and the cost of airport facilities. Other operating expenses consist of general and administrative expenses, purchased services, equipment rentals, passenger refreshments, communication costs, supplies and professional fees.
During the period between the beginning of 2001 and December 31, 2005, we reduced our break-even load factor, which is the passenger load factor that will result in operating revenues being equal to operating expenses, from 61.5% to 56.4%. This decrease has been primarily due to increases in yield and revenues per available seat kilometer due to our effective revenue management system, combined with the spreading of fixed costs over a greater number of available seat kilometers.
Our operating margin, which measures operating income as a percentage of operating revenues, has consistently improved during the first five years of our operations and was among the highest in the airline industry worldwide in 2005, according to publicly-filed company reports.
Brazilian Economic Environment
As a company with substantially all of its operations currently in Brazil, we are affected by general economic conditions in the country. While our growth since 2001 has been primarily driven by our expansion into new markets and increased flight frequencies, we have also been affected by macroeconomic conditions in
47
Brazil. Our growth outpaced that of our primary competitors because of strong demand for our lower fare service. In 2005, we grew 54.9% in terms of revenue passenger kilometers. We believe the rate of growth in Brazil will become increasingly important in determining our future growth capacity and our results of operations, primarily because the DACs approval of requests for new routes and increases in flight frequencies will depend in part on its perception of Brazils macroeconomic environment.
Our results of operations are affected by currency fluctuations. Almost all of our revenues are denominated in reais (with a small portion of our revenues from our international flights being denominated in other currencies), but a significant part of our operating expenses are either payable in or affected by the U.S. dollar, such as our aircraft operating lease payments, related maintenance reserves and deposits, and jet fuel expenses. Based on a statistical analysis of our first five years of operations, we believe that our revenues are highly correlated with the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate and jet fuel prices because real depreciations and increases in jet fuel prices are generally incorporated into the fare structures of Brazilian airlines. Approximately 53% of our operating expenses (including aircraft fuel) are denominated in, or linked to, U.S. dollars and therefore vary with the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate. We believe that our foreign exchange and fuel hedging programs protect us against short-term swings in the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate and jet fuel prices. Overall, we believe that the combination of our revenue stream, with its correlation to movements in the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate, and short-term hedges on the U.S. dollar-linked portion of our expenses, will mitigate the adverse effect on our operating expenses of abrupt movements in the real/ U.S. dollar exchange rate.
Inflation has also had, and may continue to have, effects on our financial condition and results of operations. Approximately 47% of our operating expenses (excluding aircraft fuel) are denominated in reais, and the suppliers and service providers of these expense items generally attempt to increase their prices to reflect Brazilian inflation.
Since presidential elections were held in Brazil in 2002, the Brazilian economy has moved towards increased stability. The country went through a period of market turmoil in the second half of 2002 as investors feared that, if elected, the Labor Party led by Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva would change the economic policies of the previous administration. The real fluctuated significantly as a result, depreciating by 52.3% during the year and closing at R$3.5333 to US$1.00 on December 31, 2002. Inflation for the year, as measured by the IGP-M, was 25.3% and real GDP grew by 1.9%.
The Labor Party government administration has largely continued the macroeconomic policies of the previous administration, focusing on fiscal responsibility. In 2003, investor confidence rebounded as a result and the real appreciated by 18.2% against the U.S. dollar to R$2.8892 per US$1.00 at December 31, 2003. Inflation in 2003, as measured by the IGP-M, decreased to 8.7%. However, Brazils real gross domestic product, or GDP, increased 0.5% to US$507 billion during 2003, despite the very high interest rates that prevailed at the beginning of 2003 to combat inflationary pressures, which also acted to constrain economic growth.
During 2004, Brazils GDP increased 4.9% to US$604 billion and the country achieved a trade surplus of US$33.7 billion, its highest trade surplus ever. Inflation in 2004, as measured by the IGP-M, was 12.4% and 7.6% as measured by the IPCA. The Brazilian Central Banks year-end inflation target for each of 2005 and 2006 is 4.5%, based on the IPCA index, within a band of 2.5 and 2.0 percentage points, respectively. Interest rates continued to be high, with the CDI rate at the end of 2004 equaling an annualized rate of 17.8%. By end of 2004, the real appreciated by 8.1% against the U.S. dollar, reflecting continued investor confidence. On December 31, 2004, the U.S. dollar/real exchange rate was R$2.6544 per US$1.00.
During 2005, Brazils GDP increased 2.3% and the country achieved a trade surplus of US$44.8 billion, its highest trade surplus ever. Inflation in 2005, as measured by the IGP-M, was 1.2% and 5.7% as measured by the IPCA. The Brazilian Central Banks year-end inflation target for each of 2006 and 2007 is 4.5%, based on the IPCA index, within a band of 2 percentage points. Interest rates continued to be high, with the CDI rate at the end
48
of 2005 equaling an annualized rate of 18.0%. In 2005, the real appreciated by 11.8% against the U.S. dollar, reflecting continued investor confidence. On March 10, 2006, the U.S. dollar/real exchange rate was R$2.1447 per US$1.00.
The following table shows data for real GDP growth, inflation, interest rates, the U.S. dollar exchange rate and crude oil prices for and as at the periods indicated.
December 31, |
||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
||||||||||
Real growth in gross domestic product |
0.5 | % | 4.9 | % | 2.3 | % | ||||||
Inflation (IGP-M)(1) |
8.7 | % | 12.4 | % | 1.2 | % | ||||||
Inflation (IPCA)(2) |
9.3 | % | 7.6 | % | 5.7 | % | ||||||
CDI rate(3) |
16.3 | % | 17.8 | % | 18.0 | % | ||||||
LIBOR rate(4) |
1.1 | % | 2.4 | % | 4.5 | % | ||||||
Depreciation (appreciation) of the real vs. U.S. dollar |
(18.2 | )% | (8.1 | )% | (11.8 | )% | ||||||
Period-end exchange rateUS$1.00 |
R$ | 2.8892 | R$ | 2.6544 | R$ | 2.3407 | ||||||
Average exchange rateUS$1.00(5) |
R$ | 3.0600 | R$ | 2.9171 | R$ | 2.4125 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in West Texas intermediate crude (per barrel) |
4.2 | % | 33.6 | % | 40.5 | % | ||||||
West Texas intermediate crude (per barrel) |
US$ | 32.52 | US$ | 43.45 | US$ | 61.04 | ||||||
West Texas intermediate crude (average per barrel during period) |
US $ | 31.06 | US$ | 41.51 | US$ | 56.59 |
Sources: | Fundação Getúlio Vargas, the Central Bank and Bloomberg |
(1) | Inflation (IGP-M) is the general market price index measured by the Fundação Getúlio Vargas. |
(2) | Inflation (IPCA) is a broad consumer price index measured by the Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. |
(3) | The CDI rate is average of inter-bank overnight rates in Brazil (accumulated for period-end month, annualized). |
(4) | Three-month U.S. dollar LIBOR rate as of the last date of the period. The LIBOR rate is the London inter-bank offer rate, which is the rate applicable to the short-term international inter-bank market. |
(5) | Represents the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires our management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and judgments to develop amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes. We strive to maintain a process to review the application of our accounting policies and to evaluate the appropriateness of the estimates that are required to prepare our consolidated financial statements. We believe that our estimates and judgments are reasonable; however, actual results and the timing of recognition of such amounts could differ from those estimates. In addition, estimates routinely require adjustment based on changing circumstances and the receipt of new or better information.
Critical accounting policies and estimates are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different outcomes under different assumptions and conditions. The policies and estimates discussed below have been reviewed with our independent auditors. For a discussion of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition. Passenger revenue is recognized either when transportation is provided or when the ticket expires unused. Tickets sold but not yet used are recorded as air traffic liability. Air traffic liability primarily represents tickets sold for future travel dates and estimated refunds and exchanges of tickets sold for past travel dates. A small percentage of tickets (or partial tickets) expire unused. We estimate the amount of future refunds and exchanges, net of forfeitures, for all unused tickets once the flight date has passed. These estimates are based on historical data and experience. Estimated future refunds and exchanges included in the air traffic liability account are constantly evaluated based on subsequent refund and exchange activity to validate the accuracy of our revenue recognition method with respect to forfeited tickets. Revenue from the shipment of
49
cargo is recognized when transportation is provided. Other revenue includes charter services, ticket change fees and other incidental services, and is recognized when the service is performed. Our revenues are net of certain taxes, including state value-added and other state and federal taxes that are collected from customers and transferred to the appropriate government entities. Such taxes in 2005, 2004 and 2003 were R$109.0 million, R$93.8 million and R$96.8 million, respectively.
Accounting for Long-lived Assets. In accounting for long-lived assets, we make assumptions about the expected useful lives of our assets and the potential for impairment. Our long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment when events and circumstances indicate that the assets may be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. Indicators include operating or cash flow losses, significant decreases in market value or changes in technology. If impairment occurs, any loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its net book value. As our assets are all relatively new and we continue to have positive cash flow, we have not identified any impairments related to long-lived assets.
Financial Derivative Instruments. We account for financial derivative instruments utilizing Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 (SFAS 133), Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended. As part of the our risk management program, we use a variety of financial instruments, including petroleum call options, petroleum collar structures, petroleum fixed-price swap agreements, and foreign currency forward contracts. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.
As there is not a futures market for Brazilian jet fuel, we use international crude oil derivatives to hedge our exposure to increases in fuel prices. Historically, there is high correlation between international crude oil prices and Brazilian jet fuel prices, making crude oil derivatives effective at offsetting jet fuel prices to provide some short-term protection against a sharp increase in average fuel prices. We measure the effectiveness of the hedging instruments in offsetting changes to those prices, as required by SFAS 133. Since the majority of our financial derivative instruments for fuel are not traded on a market exchange, we estimate their fair values. The fair value of fuel derivative instruments, depending on the type of instrument, is determined by the use of present value methods or standard option value models with assumptions about commodity prices based on those observed in underlying markets. Also, since there is not a reliable forward market for jet fuel, we must estimate the future prices of jet fuel in order to measure the effectiveness of the hedging instruments in offsetting changes to those prices, as required by SFAS 133.
Our outstanding derivative contracts are designated as cash flow hedges for accounting purposes. While outstanding, these contracts are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet with the effective portion of the change in their fair value being recorded in other comprehensive income. All changes in fair value that are considered to be effective, as defined, are recorded in Accumulated other comprehensive income until the underlying exchange exposure is realized and fuel is consumed. Changes in fair value that are not considered to be effective are recorded to other gains and losses in the income statement. See Note 12 for further information on SFAS 133 and financial derivative instruments.
Accounting for stock-based compensation. We account for stock-based compensation in coordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations. Compensation expense for a stock option grant is recognized when the exercise price is less than the fair value of our preferred shares on the grant date.
Pro forma information regarding our net profit and net profit per share is required by SFAS No. 123 Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and has been determined as if we accounted for employee stock options under the fair value method prescribed by SFAS No. 123. Considering the amounts involved, the application of SFAS No. 123 would not result in a material effect on our net income and earnings per share.
In December 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Statement No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, (SFAS 123(R)), which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123. SFAS 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and amends FASB
50
Statement No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in SFAS 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However, SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values.
As permitted by SFAS 123(R), we currently account for share-based payments to employees using APB Opinion 25s intrinsic value method and, as such, generally recognize compensation cost for employee stock options equal to their intrinsic values at the award date. Accordingly, the adoption of SFAS 123(R)s fair value method will impact our results of operations, although it will not have a significant impact on our overall financial position. The impact of adoption cannot be predicted at this time because it will depend on levels of share-based payments granted in the future. However, had we adopted SFAS 123(R) in prior periods, the impact of that standard would have approximated the impact of SFAS 123 as described in the disclosure of pro forma net income and earnings per share in Note 2 to our financial statements.
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain components of our income for the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
2005 |
|||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net operating revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Passenger |
R$ | 1,339,191 | R$ | 1,875,475 | R$ | 2,539,016 | US$ | 1,084,725 | ||||||||
Cargo and other |
61,399 | 85,411 | 130,074 | 55,571 | ||||||||||||
Total net operating revenues |
1,400,590 | 1,960,886 | 2,669,090 | 1,140,296 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits |
137,638 | 183,037 | 260,183 | 111,156 | ||||||||||||
Aircraft fuel |
308,244 | 459,192 | 808,268 | 345,310 | ||||||||||||
Aircraft rent |
188,841 | 195,504 | 240,876 | 102,908 | ||||||||||||
Aircraft insurance |
25,850 | 25,575 | 29,662 | 12,672 | ||||||||||||
Sales and marketing |
191,280 | 261,756 | 335,722 | 143,428 | ||||||||||||
Landing fees |
47,924 | 57,393 | 92,404 | 39,477 | ||||||||||||
Aircraft and traffic servicing |
58,710 | 74,825 | 91,599 | 39,133 | ||||||||||||
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
42,039 | 51,796 | 55,373 | 23,657 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
13,844 | 21,242 | 35,014 | 14,959 | ||||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
44,494 | 54,265 | 98,638 | 42,140 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
1,058,864 | 1,384,585 | 2,047,739 | 874,840 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
341,726 | 576,301 | 621,351 | 265,456 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(20,910 | ) | (13,445 | ) | (19,383 | ) | (8,281 | ) | ||||||||
Financial income (expense), net |
(56,681 | ) | 24,424 | 115,554 | 49,367 | |||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
264,135 | 587,280 | 717,522 | 306,542 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
(88,676 | ) | (202,570 | ) | (204,292 | ) | (87,279 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
R$ | 175,459 | R$ | 384,710 | R$ | 513,230 | US$ | 219,263 | ||||||||
Earnings per share, basic(1) |
R$ | 1.07 | R$ | 2.14 | R$ | 2.66 | US$ | 1.14 | ||||||||
Earnings per share, diluted(1) |
R$ | 1.07 | R$ | 2.13 | R$ | 2.65 | US$ | 1.13 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per share, basic (in thousands)(1) |
164,410 | 179,731 | 192,828 | 192,828 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average shares used in computing earnings per share, diluted (in thousands)(1) |
164,410 | 180,557 | 193,604 | 193,604 | ||||||||||||
Earnings per ADS, basic(2) |
R$ | 1.07 | R$ | 2.14 | R$ | 2.66 | US$ | 1.14 | ||||||||
Earnings (loss) per ADS, diluted(2) |
R$ | 1.07 | R$ | 2.13 | R$ | 2.65 | US$ | 1.13 |
51
(1) | Our preferred shares are not entitled to any fixed dividend preferences, but are instead entitled to receive dividends per share in the same amount of dividends per share paid to holders of our common shares. However, our preferred shares are entitled to receive distributions prior to holders of the common shares. Consequently, our earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing income by the weighted average number of all classes of shares outstanding during the year. Preferred shares are excluded during any loss period. |
(2) | Adjusted for the ADS ratio change in December 2005, which changed the ratio of ADS per preferred share from one ADS representing two preferred shares to one ADS representing one preferred share. |
Year 2005 Compared to Year 2004
Our net income for the year 2005 increased to R$513.2 million from R$384.7 million for 2004, an increase of R$128.5 million. We had operating income of R$621.4 million, an increase of R$45.1 million over 2004, and our operating margin was 23.3%, a decrease of 6.1% from 2004. Income before income tax increased 22.2% to R$717.5 million.
Net Operating Revenues. Net operating revenues increased 36.1%, or R$708.2 million, due primarily to increased passenger revenues. Increased passenger revenues, resulted primarily from a 54.9% increase in revenue passenger kilometers, which was due to a 39.9% increase in departures, an increase in the average number of aircraft in service from 22.3 to 34.3 and a 3.4% increase in our load factor from 71.1% to 73.5%. The increase in revenues passenger kilometers was partially offset by a 12.6% decrease in our yield due to a 4.1% decrease in our average fares and an increase in our average stage length. Cargo and other revenue increased by R$44.7 million due primarily to increases in revenues from our cargo service operations.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses increased 47.9%, or R$663.2 million, due primarily to the operation of an average 12 additional aircraft during 2005, increased flight departures during the period, an increase in the average cost and number of liters of jet fuel consumed and an increase in salaries, wages and benefits and sales and marketing expenses. Operating capacity increased by 49.8% to 13.25 billion available seat kilometers due to scheduled capacity increases and high aircraft utilization at 13.9 block hours per day. Operating expenses per available seat kilometer decreased 1.3% to R$15.46 cents primarily due to a reduction in maintenance expense on a per available seat kilometer basis and the spreading of our fixed costs over a larger fleet, despite a 17.5% increase in the average cost of jet fuel and an 7.5% increase in landing fees, each on a per seat kilometer basis. The breakdown of our operating expenses on a per available seat kilometer basis for 2005 compared to 2004 is as follows (percent changes are based on unrounded numbers):
Year Ended December 31, |
Percent Change |
Percentage of (2005) |
||||||||||
2004 |
2005 |
|||||||||||
(cost per R$ cents) |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits |
2.07 | 1.96 | (5.1 | )% | 9.7 | % | ||||||
Aircraft fuel |
5.19 | 6.10 | 17.5 | % | 30.3 | % | ||||||
Aircraft rent |
2.21 | 1.82 | (17.7 | )% | 9.0 | % | ||||||
Aircraft insurance |
0.29 | 0.22 | (22.6 | )% | 1.1 | % | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
2.96 | 2.53 | (14.4 | )% | 12.6 | % | ||||||
Landing fees |
0.65 | 0.70 | 7.5 | % | 3.5 | % | ||||||
Aircraft and traffic servicing |
0.85 | 0.69 | (18.3 | )% | 3.4 | % | ||||||
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
0.59 | 0.42 | (28.6 | )% | 2.1 | % | ||||||
Depreciation |
0.24 | 0.26 | 10.1 | % | 1.3 | % | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
0.61 | 0.74 | 21.4 | % | 3.7 | % | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
15.66 | 15.46 | (1.3 | )% | 76.7 | % | ||||||
Cost per flight hour |
14.94 | 14.77 | (1.2 | )% | | |||||||
Break-even load factor |
52.5 | % | 56.4 | % | 12.3 | % | |
52
Salaries, wages and benefits increased 42.1%, or R$77.1 million, due to (i) a 65.0% increase in full-time equivalent employees from 3,307 at the end of 2004 to 5,456 at the end of 2005 due to a higher number of employees in training, the international expansion of our operations and the internalization of certain services, (ii) an increases in wage rates of 6.0% due to cost of living increase and (iii) an increase of R$3.4 million in provisions for our profit sharing plan. Salaries, wages and benefits per available seat kilometer decreased 5.1% due to increased productivity and higher capacity.
Aircraft fuel expense increased 76.0%, or R$349.1 million, primarily due to 159.3 million more liters of fuel being consumed (a 50.2% increase from 2004) and an increase in average fuel cost per liter (a 17.2% increase per liter from 2004), partially offset by the appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar and the effects of our exchange rate hedging program. Aircraft fuel per available seat kilometer increased 17.5% due primarily to the increase in the average fuel cost per liter.
Aircraft rent, which we incur in U.S. dollars, increased 23.2%, or R$45.4 million, due to an increase in the average size of our fleet to 34.3 aircraft from 22.3, partially offset by the 11.8% appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar during the year and the effects of our exchange rate hedging program. Aircraft rent per available seat kilometer decreased 17.7% due to the appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar and higher aircraft utilization.
Aircraft insurance expense, which we incur in U.S. dollars, increased 16.0%, or R$4.1 million, due to a larger fleet size, partially offset by the 11.8% appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar during the year, a decrease in average insurance premium rates and the effects of our exchange rate hedging program. Aircraft insurance per available seat kilometer decreased 22.6% due to the appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar and the decrease in average insurance premium rates.
Sales and marketing expense increased 28.3%, or R$74.0 million, primarily due to higher bookings through travel agents, increased advertising expenses, costs due to the opening of four new operating bases, and higher credit card fees resulting from increased passenger revenues. We booked a substantial majority of our ticket sales through a combination of our website (81.3% in 2005 compared to 76.4% in 2004). Travel agents accounted for approximately 70% of our sales in 2005, 63% of which through the internet. Sales and marketing per available seat kilometer decreased 14.4% due to increased internet sales, lower sales and travel agent commissions and higher aircraft utilization rates.
Landing fees increased 61.0%, or R$35.0 million, due to a 39.9% increase in departures and a 26% increase in average landing tariffs because of increased international traffic, partially offset by increased average stage length. Landing fees per available seat kilometer increased 7.5%.
Aircraft and traffic servicing expense increased 22.4%, or R$16.8 million, primarily due to an increase in our operations from 38 to 45 airports served and a 39.9% increase in departures, partially offset by a reduction in technology costs. Aircraft and traffic servicing per available seat kilometer decreased 18.3% as a result of fixed costs being spread over a higher number of available seat kilometers.
Maintenance, materials and repairs increased 6.9%, or R$3.6 million, due to 12 average additional aircraft in operation as well as 34.3 airframe checks and engine repairs in 2005 as compared to 27 airframe checks and engine repairs in 2004. Maintenance, materials and repairs per available seat kilometer decreased 28.6% due to the appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar and lower maintenance costs for airframe checks and engine repairs.
Depreciation increased 64.8%, or R$13.8 million, due primarily to an increase in our inventory of aircraft spare parts and, to a lesser extent, an increase in computer equipment resulting from the expansion of our operations. Depreciation per available seat kilometer increased 10.1% due to increased depreciable assets, offset by higher aircraft utilization rates.
Other operating expenses increased 81.8%, or R$44.4 million, due to an increase in general and administrative expenses related to the expansion of our operations, the increased lodging of flight crews, increased direct passenger expenses and interrupted flights. Other operating expenses per available seat kilometer increased 21.4% due to the expansion of our operations.
53
Other Income (Expense). Interest expense and financial income (expense), net increased R$85.2 million, due to increases of R$106.0 million in interest income on cash balances, and an increase of R$13.9 million in capitalized interest, partially offset by an increase of R$5.9 million in interest expenses due to increased working capital financing.
Income Taxes. Income taxes, as a percentage of income before taxes, decreased to 28% in 2005 from 34% in 2004. The reduction was principally due to the payment of a portion of a mandatory minimum dividend as interest in shareholders equity, which is deductible for corporate income tax purposes.
Year 2004 Compared to Year 2003
Our net income for the year 2004 increased to R$384.7 million from R$175.5 million for 2003, an increase of R$209.2 million. We had operating income of R$576.3 million in 2004, an increase of R$234.6 million from 2003, and our operating margin was 29.4%, an increase of 5.0% from 2003. Income before income taxes increased 122.3% to R$587.3 million, resulting in increased income and social contribution taxes to R$202.6 million in 2004 from R$88.7 million in 2003. Our effective tax rate was 34% in 2004 and 2003, respectively.
Net Operating Revenues. Net operating revenues increased 40.0%, or R$560.3 million, due primarily to increased passenger revenues. Increased passenger revenues resulted from an 7.6% increase in our yield, a 16.3% increase in capacity and a 6.7% increase in our load factor from 64.3% to 71.1%. The increase in capacity was driven by the addition of over 100 regularly-scheduled departures. A 28.6% increase in revenue passenger kilometers resulted in an increase of our market share to 22.3% from 19.2% in 2003. Cargo and other revenue increased by R$24.0 million due primarily to increases in revenues from our cargo service operations. Revenue growth was facilitated by the average number of aircraft in service increasing from 21.6 to 22.3.
Operating Expenses. Operating expenses increased 30.8%, or R$325.7 million, due primarily to a 49.0% increase in the average cost of jet fuel and a 36.8% increase in our sales and marketing expenses. Operating expense increases were partially offset by higher productivity and decreases in average aircraft rents and aircraft insurance premiums as a result of the 8.1% appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar. Operating capacity increased by 16.3% to 8.84 billion available seat kilometers due to scheduled capacity that allowed us to add over 100 additional regularly scheduled flight frequencies. Additionally, we increased aircraft utilization from 12.8 block hours per day in 2003 to 13.6 block hours per day in 2004. Operating expenses per available seat kilometer increased 12.4% to R$15.66 cents, primarily as a result of the increase in the average cost of jet fuel and the increase in sales and marketing expense, partially offset by spreading our fixed costs over more available seat kilometers. The breakdown of our operating expenses for 2004 compared to 2003 is as follows (percent changes are based on unrounded numbers):
Year Ended December 31, |
Percent |
Percentage of (2004) |
||||||||||
2003 |
2004 |
|||||||||||
(cost per available seat kilometer in R$ cents) |
||||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits |
1.83 | 2.07 | 13.1 | % | 9.3 | % | ||||||
Aircraft fuel |
4.10 | 5.19 | 26.6 | % | 23.4 | % | ||||||
Aircraft rent |
2.51 | 2.21 | (12.0 | )% | 10.0 | % | ||||||
Aircraft insurance |
0.34 | 0.29 | (14.7 | )% | 1.3 | % | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
2.54 | 2.96 | 16.5 | % | 13.4 | % | ||||||
Landing fees |
0.64 | 0.65 | 1.6 | % | 2.9 | % | ||||||
Aircraft and traffic servicing |
0.78 | 0.85 | 9.0 | % | 3.8 | % | ||||||
Maintenance, materials and repairs |
0.56 | 0.59 | 5.4 | % | 2.7 | % | ||||||
Depreciation |
0.18 | 0.24 | 33.3 | % | 1.1 | % | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
0.60 | 0.61 | 1.7 | % | 2.8 | % | ||||||
Total operating expenses |
14.07 | 15.66 | 11.3 | 70.6 | % | |||||||
Cost per flight hour |
13.45 | 14.94 | 11.1 | % | | |||||||
Break-even load factor |
50.8 | % | 52.5 | % | 3.3 | % | |
54
Salaries, wages and benefits increased 33.0%, or R$45.4 million, due to a 34.7% increase in full-time equivalent employees from 2,453 at the end of 2003 to 3,307 at the end of 2004, a 5.8% increase in wage rates due to cost of living increases, R$27.2 million in provisions for our profit sharing plan and crew training costs to support the addition of five Boeing 737-300 aircraft in the second half of 2004. Salaries, wages and benefits per available seat kilometer increased 13.2% due to the provision for profit sharing, partially offset by increased productivity per employee and higher capacity.
Aircraft fuel expense increased 49.0%, or R$150.9 million, primarily due to an increase in average fuel cost per liter of 24.2% and 53.0 million more liters of fuel being consumed (a 20.0% increase from 2003), partially offset by our fuel efficient fleet and pricing power, which helped to mitigate the increase in jet fuel prices. Aircraft fuel per available seat kilometer increased 26.6% due primarily to the increase in the average fuel cost per liter.
Aircraft rent, which we incur in U.S. dollars, increased 3.5%, or R$6.7 million, due to an increase in the average size of our fleet to 22.3 aircraft from 21.6, partially offset by a lower average rent for the five additional Boeing 737-300 aircraft that we are leasing on two- and three-year contracts to meet short-term capacity needs and the 8.1% appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar. Aircraft rent per available seat kilometer decreased 12.0% due to high aircraft utilization of 13.6 block hours per day.
Aircraft insurance, which we incur in U.S. dollars, expense decreased 1.1%, or R$0.3 million, primarily due to the appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar during the year and a decrease in our average insurance premium rates. Aircraft insurance per available seat kilometer decreased 14.7% due to the same reasons.
Sales and marketing expense increased 36.8%, or R$70.5 million, primarily due to increased ticket sales per real of passenger revenues, increased advertising expenses related to the opening of 11 new bases and higher credit card fees resulting from higher passenger revenues, partially offset by reductions in travel agency commissions. We sold 76.4% of our tickets through our website in 2004 as compared to 57.9% in 2003. Travel agents accounted for 74.9% of our online ticket sales in 2004 as compared to 75.9% in 2003. Sales and marketing per available seat kilometer increased 16.5% as a result of these factors.
Landing fees increased 19.8%, or R$9.5 million, due to a 16.2% increase in departures and a 3.0% increase in average landing tariffs. Landing fees per available seat kilometer increased 1.6%.
Aircraft and traffic servicing expense increased 27.4%, or R$16.1 million, due to the start-up of 11 new bases. Aircraft and traffic servicing per available seat kilometer increased 9.0% as a result of fixed costs relating to the new bases.
Maintenance, materials and repairs increased 23.2%, or R$9.8 million, due to 0.7 average additional aircraft in operation as well as 27 scheduled airframe checks and engine repairs in 2004, as compared to 19 performed in 2003. Maintenance, materials and repairs per available seat kilometer increased 5.4% due to the same reasons.
Depreciation increased 53.4%, or R$7.4 million, due primarily to a R$6.0 million depreciation of inventoried aircraft spare parts. Depreciation per available seat kilometer increased 33.3% due to the depreciation of the aircraft spare parts.
Other operating expenses increased 22.0%, or R$9.8 million, due to an increase in general and administrative expenses related to the expansion of our operations. Other operating expenses per available seat kilometer increased 4.9% due to the expansion of our operations.
Other Income (Expense). Interest expense and financial income (expense), net decreased R$88.6 million, due to increases of R$32.3 million in interest income on cash balances and R$32.3 million in hedging gains, and decreases of R$10.7 million in interest expenses and R$11.0 million in exchange variation losses.
55
B. Liquidity and Capital Resources
In managing our liquidity, we take into account our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments as well as our accounts receivable balances. Our accounts receivable balance is affected by the payment terms of our credit card receivables. Our customers can purchase seats on our flights using a credit card and pay in installments, typically creating a one- or two-month lag between the time that we pay our suppliers and expenses and the time that we receive payment for our services. When necessary, we obtain working capital loans, which can be secured by our receivables, to finance the sale-to-cash collection cycle. At December 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of R$106.3 million, short-term investments of R$762.7 million and accounts receivable of R$564.0 million, as compared to cash and cash equivalents of R$405.7 million, short-term investments of R$443.4 million and accounts receivable of R$386.4 million at December 31, 2004.
At December 31, 2005, we had 11 revolving lines of credit with six financial institutions, which allowed for total borrowings of up to R$340.0 million. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, there were R$54.0 million (US$23.1 million) and R$112.3 million outstanding under these facilities, respectively. One of the revolving lines of credit is secured by the Companys credit card receivables and allows for borrowing of up to R$50.0 million. As of December 31, 2005, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility.
Operating Activities. We rely primarily on cash flows from operations to provide working capital for current and future operations. Cash flows from operating activities totaled R$353.7 million in 2005, R$239.9 million in 2004 and R$85.2 million in 2003. The increase in operating cash flows over these periods was primarily due to the growth of our business. Net cash used for investing and financing activities was (R$653.1) million in 2005 and net cash provided by investing and financing activities was R$19.5 million in 2004. Net cash used in investing and financing activities was R$51.6 million in 2003. The increase in cash provided by financing activities in 2005 was due primarily to the capital we raised in our follow-on offering in May 2005.
Our operating cash flows are affected by the requirement under the terms of our aircraft operating leasing agreements that we establish maintenance reserve accounts for our aircraft that must be funded at specified levels. At December 31, 2005, we had R$408.8 million of deposits under our aircraft operating leases for aircraft and engine maintenance. We believe the amounts deposited in these reserve accounts currently exceed the amounts actually required to maintain our aircraft, given the young age of our fleet. As our fleet ages and maintenance costs increase, funds will be drawn from the maintenance reserve accounts to pay for structural maintenance. The amount we will be required to deposit in the maintenance reserve accounts will be affected by a number of factors in addition to our fleet size and number of hours flown, including changes in maintenance rates and the potential to substitute other instruments for cash deposits. We believe the amounts to be deposited will be sufficient to service our future aircraft and maintenance costs for the duration of the applicable operating leases.
We believe that we can meet our existing financial commitments and aircraft rent obligations with our cash and cash equivalents, and cash from operations, short-term investments and accounts receivable collected.
Investing Activities. During 2005, capital expenditures were R$482.8 million, which included expenditures of R$169.4 million related to acquisitions of property and equipment and R$313.3 million of pre-delivery deposits for aircraft acquisitions. Our investing activities totaled R$801.8 million, which included the capital expenditures described before and R$319.3 million of purchases of short term investments. During 2004, capital expenditures were R$85.4 million, which included expenditures of R$42.0 million related to acquisitions of property and equipment and R$43.4 million of pre-delivery deposits for aircraft acquisitions. Our investing activities totaled R$533.0 million, which included the capital expenditures described before and R$443.4 million of purchases of short term investments. During 2003, capital expenditures were R$42.7 million, related to acquisitions of property and equipment.
Financing Activities. Financing activities during 2005 consisted primarily of a reduction in short-term borrowings of R$64.3 million offset by the proceeds from the issuance of R$279.1 million of preferred shares in our follow-on offering in May 2005. Financing activities during 2004 consisted primarily of short-term borrowings of R$79.4 million and the issuance of R$470.4 million of preferred shares of Gol in our initial public offering in June 2004. Financing activities during 2003 consisted primarily of short-term borrowings of R$16.1 million and the issuance of R$94.2 million of preferred shares of Gol. We intend to increase our funded debt principally in the form of loans from government development banks and private financial institutions and finance leases related to the acquisition of aircraft.
56
We declared dividends of R$117.9 million for the fiscal year 2005. We declared R$60.7 million and R$26.5 million of dividends for the fiscal years 2004 and 2003, respectively, which were accrued on our balance sheet as Other Current Liabilities and paid in March 2004 and 2003, respectively. Under our by-laws, at least 25% of our adjusted net income, as calculated under Brazilian GAAP and adjusted under the Brazilian corporation law (which differs significantly from net income as calculated under U.S. GAAP), for the preceding fiscal year must be distributed as a mandatory annual dividend. The most significant adjustment to U.S. GAAP net income in arriving at adjusted net income under Brazilian GAAP relates to the accounting for additions to our maintenance deposits. Under U.S. GAAP, additions to our maintenance deposits are deferred and such deposits are charged to operating expense as maintenance is incurred. Under Brazilian GAAP, additions to our maintenance deposits are charged to operating expenses when made.
Capital Resources. We typically finance our leased aircraft through operating lease financings. Although we believe that debt and/or operating lease financings should be available for our future aircraft deliveries, we cannot assure you that we will be able to secure financings on terms attractive to us, if at all. To the extent we cannot secure financing, we may be required to modify our aircraft acquisition plans or incur higher than anticipated financing costs. We expect to continue to require working capital investment due to the use of credit card installment payments by our customers. We have one line of credit that is secured by our accounts receivable. We expect to meet our operating obligations as they become due through available cash and internally generated funds, supplemented as necessary by short-term credit lines.
We structure our growth plans in a way that is mindful of the DACs criteria for the granting of new routes and frequencies. Our growth plans contemplate operating approximately 88 aircraft by the end of 2010. On December 31, 2005 we had firm purchase orders with The Boeing Company for 65 737-800 Next Generation aircraft and we have options to purchase an additional 36 737-800 Next Generation aircraft. On December 31, 2005 we had 11 firm order aircraft scheduled to be delivered in 2006, 13 in 2007, 9 in 2008, 10 in 2009, 8 in 2010 and 14 after 2010. The purchase options are exercisable for deliveries between 2007 and 2010. Committed expenditures for these aircraft, based on aircraft list price and including estimated amounts for contractual price escalations and pre-delivery deposits, are US$775.4 million in 2006, US$859.7 million in 2007, US$540.1 million in 2008, US$700.2 million in 2009, US$585.7 million in 2010 and US$1,073.8 million after 2010. We expect to meet our pre-delivery deposits by using cash from operations or borrowings under short-term credit facilities and/or vendor financing. We expect to finance the balance of the purchase price of the Boeing 737-800 Next Generation aircraft through a combination of means, such as cash and funds generated from operations, low-interest bank financing and credit agreements, sale and leaseback transactions, additional equity or debt offerings and/or vendor financing. The firm orders represent a significant financial commitment for us. Pending the application of the proceeds from our public offerings, we have invested these proceeds in overnight deposits and deposit certificates with highly-rated Brazilian banks and temporary investments, mainly highly-rated Brazilian government bonds. As of December 31, 2005, we had approximately R$869.0 million of these temporary investments. Most of the temporary investments are held in an account managed by an unaffiliated, independent third party. Although the account manager has the discretion in selecting investment instruments for the managed account, this discretion is limited by the charter of the managed account and the cash management policies approved by our risk policies committee. See note 4 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report. While we expect that a preliminary commitment to us from the Export-Import Bank of the United States to provide guarantees covering approximately 85% of the aggregate purchase price for the firm order aircraft will assist us in obtaining low-cost financing for the purchase of the firm order aircraft, we may be required to use our own cash resources for the remaining 15% of the aggregate purchase price for the firm order aircraft. To the extent that we do not have sufficient cash resources to do so, we may be required to modify our aircraft acquisition plans or to incur higher than anticipated financing costs, which would have an adverse impact on the execution of our growth strategy and business.
C. Research and Development, Patents and Licenses, etc.
We believe that the Gol brand has become synonymous with innovation and value in the Brazilian airline industry. We have filed requests for registration of the trademarks GOL and GOL LINHAS AÉREAS
57
INTELIGENTES with trademark offices in Brazil and in other countries, and have already been granted final registration of these trademarks in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Colombia, the European Union, the United States, Paraguay and Uruguay. A study conducted by the business magazine Isto e Dinheiro revealed that our trademark Gol is already on the eighth place of the most valuable trademarks in Brazil, with a brand value of R$326 million.
We expect to expand our operations by adding additional flights to existing domestic routes, adding new domestic routes where sufficient market potential exists and expanding into high-traffic centers in other South American countries. In 2005, we added nine destinations to our network and we intend to continue this growth strategy in Brazil and South America. As in previous years, in 2006 we will also concentrate on keeping our operating costs low and pursuing ways to make our operations more efficient.
Given the demand for our services, we believe that we will continue to have significant growth opportunities. We expect to benefit from economies of scale and reduce our average cost per available seat kilometer as we add additional aircraft to an established and efficient operating infrastructure. We currently have applications with the DAC to add additional routes and flight frequencies. We expect our operating capacity to increase 45% with the addition of up to 16 aircraft in 2006, which will increase our available seat kilometers and operating costs on an aggregate basis.
We expect jet fuel prices will continue to be high in 2006 and we plan to use our fuel and foreign exchange hedging programs to help protect us against short-term movements in crude oil prices and the real/ U.S. dollar exchange rate.
E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
None of our operating lease obligations are reflected on our balance sheet. We are responsible for all maintenance, insurance and other costs associated with operating these aircraft; however, we have not made any residual value or other guarantees to our lessors.
F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
Our non-cancelable contractual obligations at December 31, 2005 included the following (in millions of reais):
Total |
Less than 1 Year |
1-3 Years |
3-5 Years |
More than 5 Years | |||||||||||
Aircraft and engine operating leases |
R$ | 902.7 | R$ | 266.9 | R$ | 435.0 | R$ | 172.8 | R$ | 28.0 | |||||
Short-term borrowings |
R$ | 54.0 | R$ | 54.0 | | | | ||||||||
Total |
R$ | 956.7 | R$ | 320.9 | R$ | 435.0 | R$ | 172.8 | R$ | 28.0 | |||||
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
A. Directors and Senior Management
Under our by-laws, we are managed by our Conselho de Administração, or board of directors, which is composed of at least five members and at most 11 members, and a Diretoria, or board of executive officers, which is composed of at least two and at most six members. According to the Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices (Level 2) introduced by BOVESPA, at least 20% of the members of our board of directors shall be independent directors, as defined by the BOVESPA.
Our by-laws provide for the establishment of a non-permanent Conselho Fiscal, or fiscal committee, to be comprised of three to five members. We also have corporate governance and nomination, audit, compensation,
58
risk policies and financial policy committees comprised of members of our board of directors and non-board members, and management, executive policy, budget, investment, corporate governance and risk management and finance committees, comprised of members of our board of executive officers and senior managers.
We are committed to achieving and maintaining high standards of corporate governance. In working towards this goal, we have established a corporate governance and nomination committee to monitor and make recommendations with respect to corporate governance best practices to our board of directors. In addition, in connection with listing as a Level 2 company on the BOVESPA, we have entered into an agreement with the BOVESPA to grant certain additional rights not required of Level 2 companies to our shareholders, such as tag-along rights offering our preferred shareholders 100% of the price paid per common share of controlling block shareholders. We conduct our business with a view towards transparency and the equal treatment of all of our shareholders. We have implemented policies to help to ensure that all material information that our shareholders require to make informed investment decisions is made available to the public promptly and that we at all times accurately reflect the state of our operations and financial position through press releases, filings with the SEC and CVM, and by keeping the investor relations section of our website current and complete. We have also adopted formal policies that restrict trading in our preferred shares by company insiders.
In addition, according to the Level 2 practices, the company shall cause all new members of the board of directors to sign a statement of consent in which they undertake to comply with the regulations of the Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices (Level 2), their taking office is conditioned to signing of such document.
Also the members of the fiscal committee shall sign a statement of consent, in which they undertake to refer to arbitration rules, instituted by BOVESPA Arbitration Chamber, for resolution of disputes and/or controversies arising out of the application of the listing rules of the Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices, the listing agreement with the latter, the regulations of the BOVESPA, the provisions of the Brazilian corporation law, guidelines issued by the Brazilian authorities and the other rules applicable to the capital markets in general, involving the company, the shareholders, the managers and the members of the fiscal committee. The taking office of the members or the fiscal committee is also conditioned upon signing of such document.
Board of Directors
Our board of directors is dedicated to providing our overall strategic guidelines and, among other things, is responsible for establishing our general business policies and for electing our executive officers and supervising their management. Currently, our board of directors is comprised of eight members. Each of the new board members qualifies as independent based upon New York Stock Exchange criteria. The board of directors meets six times per year or whenever requested by the president or three members of our board of directors.
Under the Brazilian corporation law, each director must hold at least one of our common or preferred shares, may reside outside of Brazil, and is elected by the holders of our common shares at the Assembléia Geral, or the annual general meeting of shareholders. There are no provisions in our by-laws restricting (i) a directors power to vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which such director is materially interested, or (ii) the borrowing powers exercisable by our directors from us. However, under the Brazilian corporation law, a director is prohibited from voting on any matter that would result in such director having a conflict of interest with our company.
Under the Brazilian corporation law, shareholders of publicly traded companies, such as we are, who together hold non-voting or voting-right restricted preferred shares representing at least 10% of our total share capital for at least three months, are entitled to appoint one member of our board of directors.
Under our by-laws, the members of the board of directors are elected by the holders of our common shares at the annual general meeting of shareholders. Members of our board of directors serve the same one-year terms and may be re-elected. The terms of our current directors expire in 2006. Our by-laws do not provide for a mandatory retirement age for our directors.
59
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each member of our board of directors. A brief biographical description of each member of our board of directors follows the table.
Name |
Age |
Position | ||
Constantino de Oliveira |
74 | Chairman | ||
Constantino de Oliveira Junior |
37 | Director | ||
Henrique Constantino |
34 | Director | ||
Joaquim Constantino Neto |
39 | Director | ||
Ricardo Constantino |
41 | Director | ||
Alvaro de Souza |
56 | Director | ||
Antonio Kandir |
51 | Director | ||
Luiz Kaufmann |
59 | Director |
Constantino de Oliveira is the chairman of our board of directors and has served in this capacity since March 2004. Mr. Oliveira has also been the chairman of the board of directors of Gol since 2002. Mr. Oliveira is founder and president of the Áurea group. He founded his first company, Expresso União, a bus transportation company, in 1957 in the state of Minas Gerais. Mr. Oliveira was the principal architect in our creation.
Constantino de Oliveira Junior is a member of our board of directors and our Chief Executive Officer. He has served in both capacities since March 2004. Mr. Oliveira has also been the chief executive officer and a member of the board of directors of Gol since 2001. Mr. Oliveira introduced the low-cost, low-fare concept to the Brazilian airline industry and was elected the Most Valuable Executive in 2001 and 2002 by the Brazilian newspaper Valor Econômico and was also elected the Leading Executive in the logistics sector in 2003 by the readers of Gazeta Mercantil, a Brazilian financial newspaper. From 1994 to 2000, Mr. Oliveira served as an officer of the Áurea group. Mr. Oliveira studied Business Administration at the Universidade do Distrito Federal and he attended the Executive Program on Corporate Management for Brazil conducted by the Association for Overseas Technical Scholarships.
Henrique Constantino has been a member of our board of directors since March 2004. Mr. Constantino has also been a member of the board of directors of Gol since 2003. He has been the financial officer of the Áurea group since 1994. He participated in the creation of Gol and served as its financial officer from January 2001 to March 2003, when he became a member of the board. Mr. Constantino has a law degree from CEUBCentro de Ensino Unificado de Brasília and has a Master in Business Administration degree from EAESPFGV (Fundação Getúlio VargasSão Paulo).
Joaquim Constantino Neto has been a member of our board of directors since March 2004. Mr. Constantino has been a member of the board of directors of Gol since 2001. He has been the operations officer of the Áurea group since 1994. From 1984 to 1990, he was in charge of operations of Reunidas Paulista. Since 1990 to the present, he has been the President of Breda Turismo, a transportation company. Since 1998, Mr. Constantino has also been a member of the board of directors of Metra, a metropolitan bus company serving the cities of São Paulo, Santo André, São Bernardo do Campo and Diadema.
Ricardo Constantino has been a member of our board of directors since March 2004. Mr. Constantino has been a member of the board of directors of Gol since 2001. He has been the technical and maintenance officer of the Áurea group since 1994. Since 2000, Mr. Constantino is also a member of the board of directors of Mercabenco S.C., a consortium of Mercedes automobile dealers.
Alvaro de Souza has been a member of our board of directors since August 2004. Mr. Souza is an officer of AdSGestão, Consultoria e Investimentos Ltda. and member of the board of directors of SAG do Brasil S.A., World Wildlife Group (WWF), Comgás, British Gas Group, AMBEV and Roland Berger do Brasil. He was the Chief Executive Officer of Citibank Brasil from 1993 to 1994 and an Executive Vice-President of Citigroup from
60
1995 to 2003. Mr. Souza holds a bachelors degree in Economics and Business Administration from Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo. Mr. Souza is an independent member of our board of directors under the requirement of the SEC and NYSE listing standards and is a member of our audit committee.
Antonio Kandir has been a member of our board of directors since August 2004. Mr Kandir is an economic consultant and is a member of the board of directors of AVIPAL/ELEGÊ and the consulting board of Portugal Telecom. Mr. Kandir served in the Brazilian government as a Congressional Representative for two terms of office, and served as Planning and Budget Minister and Secretary of Economic Policy and President of the Privatization Council. He has a bachelors degree in production engineering from the Escola Politécnica at USP and bachelors, masters and PHD degrees in Economics from Unicamp. Mr. Kandir is an independent member of our board of directors under the requirement of the SEC and NYSE listing standards and is a member of our audit committee.
Luiz Kaufmann has been a member of our board of directors since December 2004. Mr Kaufmann has presided over several companies such as Aracruz Celulose S.A., Vésper, Petropar, Grupo Multiplic, Arthur D. Little, and was a partner at GP Investimentos. He was a member of several companies board of directors, including Pioneer Hi-Bred International, América Latina Logística, and Lojas Americanas. Luiz Kaufmann is also a member of Medial Saúdes and VIVOs Board of Directors, and chief executive officer of L. Kaufmann Consultores. He was a member of the Global Corporate Governance Advisory Board, which was comprised of 20 internationally renowned business leaders from 16 different countries, created to advance knowledge on the roles and responsibilities of boards of directors of international companies. Mr. Kaufmann is an independent member of our board of directors under the requirement of the SEC and NYSE listing standards. He is a member of our audit committee and our audit committee financial expert as defined by the current SEC rules.
Constantino de Oliveira Junior, Henrique Constantino, Joaquim Constantino Neto and Ricardo Constantino are brothers and Constantino de Oliveira is their father. Constantino de Oliveira Junior, Henrique Constantino, Joaquim Constantino Neto and Ricardo Constantino control Aeropar Participações S.A. and Comporte Participações S.A. on an equal basis.
Executive Officers
Our executive officers have significant experience in the domestic and international passenger transportation industries, and we have been able to draw upon this extensive experience to develop our low-cost operating structure. The executive officers are responsible for our day-to-day management. The executive officers have individual responsibilities established in our by-laws and by our board of directors. The business address of each of our executive officers is the address of our principal executive offices.
According to the Level 2 practices, the company shall cause all new members of the executive office to sign a statement of consent in which they undertake to comply with the regulations of the Level 2, their taking office is conditioned upon signing of such document.
Under our by-laws, we must have at least two and at most five executive officers that are elected by the board of directors for a one-year term. Any executive officer may be removed by the board of directors before the expiration of his term. The current term of all our executive officers ends in May 2006.
61
The following table sets forth the name, age and position of each of our executive officers elected in May 2005. A brief biographical description of each of our executive officers follows the table.
Name |
Age |
Position | ||
Constantino de Oliveira Junior |
37 | President and Chief Executive Officer | ||
David Barioni Neto |
47 | Vice President-Technical | ||
Richard F. Lark, Jr |
39 | Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer | ||
Tarcisio Geraldo Gargioni |
59 | Vice President-Marketing and Services | ||
Wilson Maciel Ramos |
59 | Vice President-Planning and Information Technology |
Constantino de Oliveira Junior. See Board of Directors.
David Barioni Neto has been an officer since May 2004. Mr. Barioni has been an officer of Gol since 2001. Mr. Barioni has been an aircraft pilot for 25 years and worked as an aircraft pilot for VASP from 1982 to 2000. Mr. Barioni is a civil aviation inspector, flight instructor and aeronautical accident investigator. He also specializes in restricted and dangerous cargo.
Richard F. Lark, Jr. has been an officer since May 2004. Mr. Lark has been an officer of Gol since 2003. From 2000 to 2003, Mr. Lark was a founding director and served as Chief Financial Officer of Americanas.com, one of the leading Brazilian e-commerce companies. Prior to joining Americanas.com, Mr. Lark was a Vice President in the investment banking division of Morgan Stanley, where he was responsible for the Brazilian transportation sector. Mr. Lark holds a Master in Business Administration degree from the Anderson School at The University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and bachelor degrees in philosophy and finance and business economics from The University of Notre Dame.
Tarcisio Geraldo Gargioni has been an officer since May 2004. Mr. Gargioni has been an officer of Gol since 2001. From 1990 to 2000, Mr. Gargioni served as Commercial Director of VASP. Mr. Gargioni received a degree in Business Administration and a post-graduate degree in transport engineering from COOPEAD/ RJ, Brazil. Mr. Gargioni received a certificate in marketing from Fundação Getúlio VargasSão Paulo.
Wilson Maciel Ramos has been an officer since March 2004. Mr. Ramos has been an officer of Gol since 2001. From 1999 to 2000, Mr. Ramos was an independent consultant for urban transportation companies. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Ramos was the President of Transurb, a syndicate of urban transportation companies in São Paulo. From 1993 to 1997, Mr. Ramos served as Chief Information Officer at VASP. Mr. Ramos received a degree in mechanical engineering from the Universidade do Rio Grande do Sul and a masters degree in production engineering from the Universidade de Santa Catarina.
Under our by-laws, our shareholders are responsible for establishing the aggregate amount we pay to the members of our board of directors and our executive officers. Once our shareholders establish an aggregate amount of compensation for our board of directors and executive officers, the members of our board of directors are then responsible for setting individual compensation levels in compliance with our by-laws.
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, the aggregate compensation, including cash and benefits-in-kind, that we paid to the members of our board of directors and executive officers was approximately R$2.9 million.
Executive Stock Options
At a shareholders meeting held on May 25, 2004, our shareholders approved an executive stock option plan for key senior executive officers. Under this plan, we have issued to executive officers stock options to purchase
62
up to 937,412 of our preferred shares at an exercise price of R$3.04 per share. One half of the options vested on October 25, 2004, with the remaining 50% vesting at the end of each quarter subsequent to October 25, 2004. Each option will expire two years after its vesting date. The preferred shares reserved for issuance pursuant to these options are in addition to and separate from those shares that are reserved for issuance under the plan described in the paragraph immediately below. During 2005, our executive officers exercised stock options for an aggregate of 703,579 preferred shares. For further information regarding our stock option plans, see Note 9 of our notes to our consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2004.
Stock Option Plan
Our stock option plan was approved at a special shareholders meeting held on December 9, 2004. The stock option plan is aimed at promoting our interests by encouraging management employees to contribute substantially to our success, by motivating them with stock options. The plan is managed by both our compensation committee and our board of directors.
Participants in the plan are selected by the compensation committee, provided that they have been either president, vice-president, officer, advisor to the president or to the vice-president, or general manager for at least six months prior to the date on which the option is granted. The stock options to be granted under the plan confer rights related only to our preferred shares, and over a number of preferred shares that does not, at any time, exceed 5% of our shares. The compensation committee establishes the strike price of the options to be granted, which must be equal to the average price of the preferred shares recorded in the last 60 trading sessions prior to the granting date, adjusted pursuant to the IGP-M inflation index. The options that can be freely exercised may be exercised up to the tenth anniversary of the granting date.
The plan is valid for a ten-year term. In case of termination of our legal relationship with the option holder, with or without cause (except in the case of retirement, permanent disability or death) all options that have been granted to the participant, and which were not yet exercisable, automatically expire.
In 2005, we issued stock options of up to 87,418 of our preferred shares to our directors and certain employees, at a weighted average exercise price of R$33.06 per share.
In 2006, we issued stock options of up to 12,398 of our preferred shares to our directors and certain employees, at a weighted average exercise price of R$47.30 per share.
Currently, our board of directors is comprised of eight members. The terms of our current directors will expire in 2006. See Board of Directors.
Fiscal Committee
Under the Brazilian corporation law, the Conselho Fiscal, or fiscal committee, is a corporate body independent of management and a companys external auditors. The fiscal committee may be either permanent or non-permanent, in which case it is appointed by the shareholders to act during a specific fiscal year. A fiscal committee is not equivalent to, or comparable with, a U.S. audit committee. The primary responsibility of the fiscal committee is to review managements activities and a companys financial statements, and to report its findings to a companys shareholders. The Brazilian corporation law requires fiscal committee members to receive as remuneration at least 10% of the average annual amount paid to a companys executive officers. The Brazilian corporation law requires a fiscal committee to be composed of a minimum of three and a maximum of five members and their respective alternates.
Under the Brazilian corporation law, our fiscal committee may not contain members that (i) are on our board of directors, (ii) are on the board of executive officers, (iii) are employed by us or a controlled company or a company of the Áurea group, or (iv) are spouses or relatives of any member of our management, up to the third
63
degree. Our by-laws provide for a non-permanent fiscal committee to be elected only by our shareholders request at a general shareholders meeting. The fiscal committee, when elected, will be comprised of a minimum of three and a maximum of five members and an equal number of alternate members. We currently do not have an active fiscal committee and, therefore, no members have been appointed.
Committees of the Board of Directors and Board of Executive Officers
Our board of directors also has corporate governance and nomination, audit, compensation and risk policies committees. Our board of executive officers has management, executive policy, budget, investment, corporate governance and risk policies committees. Members of the committees do not need to be members of our board of directors or board of executive officers. The charters of the corporate governance and nomination, audit and compensation committees specify that each committee shall include one member to be appointed by our minority shareholders, as well as one independent member. The responsibilities and composition of these committees are described below.
Corporate Governance and Nomination Committee. The corporate governance and nomination committee is responsible for the coordination, implementation and periodic review of best practices of corporate governance and for monitoring and keeping our board of directors informed about legislation and market recommendations addressing corporate governance. The committee also proposes individuals for consideration for election to our board of directors. The committee consists of up to five members elected by our board of directors for a one-year term. The corporate governance and nomination committee currently consists of Charles Barnsley Holland, Paulo César Aragão and Betania Tanure de Barros.
Audit Committee. Our audit committee, which is not equivalent to, or comparable with, a U.S. audit committee, provides assistance to our board of directors in matters involving our accounting, internal controls, financial reporting and compliance. The audit committee recommends the appointment of our independent auditors to our board of directors and reviews the compensation of and coordinates with our independent auditors. The audit committee also evaluates the effectiveness of our internal financial and legal compliance controls. The audit committee is comprised of up to three members elected by the board of directors for a one-year term. The current members of our audit committee are Álvaro Souza, Antonio Kandir and Luiz Kaufmann. All members of the audit committee satisfy the audit committee membership independence requirements of the SEC and the independence and other standards of the NYSE. Luiz Kaufmann is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of the rules adopted by the SEC relating to the disclosure of financial experts on audit committees in periodic filings pursuant to the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Compensation Committee. The compensation committee reviews and recommends to our board of directors the forms of compensation, including salary, bonus and stock options, to be paid to our directors and executive officers. The compensation committee also reviews and recommends revisions to the compensation policies applicable to our directors and executive officers and reviews our managements career and succession plans. The compensation committee is comprised of up to three members elected by our board of directors for a one-year term. The compensation committee currently consists of Henrique Constantino, member of our board of directors, Marco Antonio Piller, Human Recourses Director of Gol and Marcos Roberto Morales.
Risk Policies Committee. The risk policies committee conducts periodic reviews of the measures we take to protect the company against foreign exchange, jet fuel price and interest rate changes and analyzes the effect of such changes on our revenues and expenses, cash flow and balance sheet. The risk policies committee assesses the effectiveness of hedging measures taken during the previous quarter and approves recommendations for future changes and also conducts reviews of cash management activities. The risk policies committee meets on a quarterly basis and is comprised of our chief financial officer and two other members elected by our board of directors. The risk policies committee currently consists of Richard F. Lark, Jr., our chief financial officer, Henrique Constantino, one of our directors, and Barry Siler, a fuel hedging specialist and the chief executive officer of Kodiak Fuels.
64
Financial Policy Committee. The financial policy committee prepares and approves our corporate finance policies, and examines their effectiveness and implementation; periodically examines our investment and financing plans, and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors; assesses the impact of the investment and financing plans on the capital structure of the company, and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors; and determines parameters for the maintenance of desired capital and liquidity structures, monitors their enforcement and approves the policies to be used in the subsequent quarter. The financial policy committee meets quarterly and is comprised of our chief financial officer and two other members elected by our board of directors. The financial policy committee currently consists of Richard F. Lark, Jr., our chief financial officer, and Henrique Constantino, a member of our board of directors.
We believe that our growth potential and the achievement of our results-oriented corporate goals are directly linked to our ability to attract and maintain the best professionals available in the airline business. We place great emphasis on the selection and training of enthusiastic employees with potential to add value to our business and who we believe fit in with and contribute to our business culture.
As of December 31, 2005, we had 5,456 active employees, compared to 3,307, 2,453 and 2,072 active employees as of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 respectively. As of December 31, 2005, we employed only full-time employees, which consisted of 720 pilots, 1,179 flight attendants, 889 mechanics, customer service representatives (including sales and marketing personnel and reservation agents), 2,219 airport and flight operations personnel and 449 management and administrative personnel. We also subcontract certain services, such as cargo handling, information technology, call center personnel and runway handling operations personnel.
We invest significant resources promoting the well being of our employees. In 2005, we allocated approximately 4% of our net income to health and safety matters, training, social contributions, employee meals and transportation, and profit sharing.
We train our own pilots and have promoted 28 co-pilots during 2005. We also provide extensive ongoing training for our pilots, flight attendants and customer service representatives. In addition to the required technical training, which follows the strictest international standards, we also provide comprehensive managerial training to our pilots and flight attendants through Crew Resource Management and Line Oriented Flight Training programs, emphasizing the importance of resource management to provide the best service to our passengers.
In order to help retain our employees, we encourage open communication channels between our employees and management and offer career development opportunities in the company and periodic evaluations. We offer in-house post-graduate business school training in conjunction with the Fundação Getúlio Vargas, a leading Brazilian business school, to provide management training to selected employees. Our compensation strategy reinforces our determination to retain talented and highly motivated employees and is designed to align the interests of our employees with our shareholders. Our compensation packages include competitive salaries and participation in our profit sharing program. We have agreements with medical and insurance companies to offer affordable health and pension plan options to our employees.
A national aviators union represents Brazils pilots and flight attendants, and six other regional aviation unions represent ground employees of air transportation companies. Approximately 4% of our employees are members of unions. Negotiations in respect of cost of living wage and salary increases are conducted annually between the workers unions and a national association of airline companies. There is no salary differential or seniority pay escalation among our pilots. Work conditions and maximum work hours are regulated by government legislation and are not the subject of labor negotiations. Since the commencement of our operations, we have not had a work stoppage by our employees and we believe that our relationship with our employees is good.
65
To motivate our employees and align their interests with our results of operations, we provide an annual profit sharing program to all of our employees. Under Brazilian law, companies may provide profit sharing programs that define mechanisms for distributing a portion of a companys profits based upon the achievement of pre-defined targets established by the company. Our annual profit sharing programs are negotiated with a commission formed by our employees and approved by labor unions for the benefit of all of our unionized and non-unionized employees. For the purposes of our profit sharing program, a portion of profit sharing distributions are based upon the achievement of corporate profit targets and a portion of the distributions are based on the achievement of operational targets set for each of our departments. Based on the achievement of our annual profit targets, we made a profit sharing payment equivalent to 17% of one months salary, 3.7 months salary and over four months salary to each of our employees in 2003, 2004 and 2005, respectively. We have established a stock option plan for 18 of our management employees vesting over a 10 year period. In 2006, an additional 25 employees will be granted stock options under this plan.
The members of our board of directors and our executive officers, on an individual basis and as a group, own less than 1% of our common stock. See Item 7A.Major Shareholdings and Related Party TransactionsMajor Shareholders. Aeropar Participações S.A., our largest shareholder, is a company indirectly controlled by Messrs. Constantino de Oliveira Júnior, Henrique Constantino, Joaquim Constantino Neto and Ricardo Constantino, respectively. Comporte Participações S.A., which holds 3.9% of our preferred shares, is controlled equally by Constantino de Oliveira Junior, Henrique Constantino, Joaquim Constantino Neto and Ricardo Constantino.
For a description of stock options granted to our board of directors and our executive officers, see CompensationExecutive Stock Options and CompensationStock Option Plan.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The following table sets forth information relating to the beneficial ownership of our common shares and preferred shares as of December 31, 2005, by each person known by us to beneficially own 5% or more of our common shares or preferred shares and all our directors and officers as a group.
Each shareholders percentage ownership in the following table is based on the 109,448,497 common shares and 86,524,136 preferred shares outstanding as of December 31, 2005.
Common Shares |
Preferred Shares Beneficially Owned |
Common and Preferred Shares Beneficially Owned |
||||||||||||||
Shares |
(%) |
Shares |
(%) |
Shares |
(%) |
|||||||||||
Aeropar Participações S.A.(1) |
109,448,477 | 100.0 | % | 31,493,863 | 36.4 | % | 140,942,340 | 71.9 | % | |||||||
Comporte Participações S.A.(2) |
| | 3,351,775 | 3.9 | % | 3,351,775 | 1.7 | % | ||||||||
Executive officers and directors as a group (8 persons) |
14 | (3) | * | 703,587 | 0.8 | % | 703,601 | 0.4 | % | |||||||
Free Float |
6 | * | 50,974,911 | 58.9 | % | 50,974,917 | 26.0 | % | ||||||||
Total |
109,448,497 | 100.0 | % | 86,524,136 | 100.0 | % | 195,972,633 | 100.0 | % |
* | Represents ownership of less than 1%. |
(1) | Aeropar Participações S.A. is a company controlled by Aller Participações S.A., a closely-held corporation headquartered in the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, at Rua Funchal, No. 551, 10th floor, part, enrolled with C.N.P.J. under No. 07.058.533/0001-73, Vaud Participações S.A., a closely-held corporation headquartered in the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, at Rua Funchal, No. 551, 10th floor, part, enrolled with C.N.P.J. under No. 07.058.553/0001-44, Thurgau Participações S.A., a closely-held corporation headquartered in the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, at Rua Funchal, No. 551, 10th floor, part, enrolled with C.N.P.J. under No. 07.061.067/0001-85 and Limmat |
66
Participações S.A., a closely-held corporation headquartered in the City of São Paulo, State of São Paulo, at Rua Funchal, No. 551, 10th floor, part, enrolled with C.N.P.J. under No. 07.058.544/0001-53, which, in turn, are controlled by Messrs. Constantino de Oliveira Júnior, Henrique Constantino, Joaquim Constantino Neto and Ricardo Constantino, respectively. |
(2) | Comporte Participações S.A. is controlled equally by Constantino de Oliveira Junior, Henrique Constantino, Joaquim Constantino Neto and Ricardo Constantino. The address of Comporte Participações S.A. is Avenida Dom Jaime de Barros Câmara 300, suite 08, São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo, 09895-400, Brazil. |
(3) | Shares transferred to members of the board of directors for eligibility purposes. |
According to our internal share record, which contains information regarding the ownership of our shares and the ADSs as filed by the holders of such shares and ADS, there were, at December 31, 2005, approximately 4 record holders of ADSs in the United States.
According to the Level 2 regulations, the company shall forward and disclose to BOVESPA the information regarding every and any agreement entered by and between Gol and its affiliates and associate companies, its administrators, its controlling shareholder, as the case may be, as well as other corporations that make a group with any such persons, whether factual or by law, whenever they reach, with a single agreement or with successive agreements, with or without the same purpose, at any period of one year, an amount of R$0.2 million or more, or a value of 1% or more over the net equity of the company, whichever is higher.
Such announced information shall describe the scope of the agreement, the term, the price, the termination or completion conditions and any possible influence of the agreement upon administration or company business conducting.
We have engaged in a number of transactions with related parties, none of which have involved the issuance of guarantees.
Shareholders Agreement
Under the terms of our former shareholders agreement, five of the members of our board of directors have been appointed by Aeropar Participacoes S.A. BSSF Air Holdings LLC has the right to elect one member of our board of directors under the terms of our shareholders agreement as long as BSSF Air Holdings holds 5% or more of our total share capital. None of the current members of our board of directors had been elected by BSSF Air Holdings. Upon the exercise by our minority shareholders of any minority rights set forth under the Brazilian corporation law, BSSF Air Holdings right to elect one member of our board of directors would have only prevailed to the extent that Aeropar Participacoes S.A. still retained the right to appoint the majority of our board of directors. The shareholders agreement terminated upon the sale by BSSF Air Holdings LLC of 9,179,189 of our preferred shares in our global public offering that closed on May 3, 2005.
Agreements with Áurea Administração e Participações S.A.
Headquarters lease agreement
On April 1, 2003 Gol entered into a five-year lease agreement with Áurea Administração e Participações S.A. for the lease of our headquarters located at Rua Tamoios, 246. The lease agreement provides for monthly payments of R$25,000, adjusted annually for inflation by the IGP-M index.
Transportation agreement
Gol has entered into exclusive bus transportation agreements with Expresso União Ltda. and Breda Serviços, which are companies controlled by Áurea Administração e Participações S.A. for the transportation of
67
Gols passengers, their baggage and Gols employees. In 2004 and 2005, Gol made total payments of approximately R$967,000 and approximately R$1,998,000, respectively, under these bus transportation agreements.
Subscription and Option Agreement
On January 20, 2003, Áurea Administração e Participações S.A., BSSF II Holdings Ltda., BSSF Air Holdings Ltd. and Gol entered into a Subscription and Option Agreement under which BSSF II Holdings Ltda. agreed to subscribe and pay for 7,675,748 of Gols Class A preferred shares and BSSF Air Holdings Ltd. agreed to subscribe and pay for 2,699,252 of Gols Class A preferred shares and 8,408,206 of Gols Class B preferred shares.
In February 2004, Áurea Administração e Participações S.A. exercised its call option pursuant to the Subscription and Option Agreement. As a result, on March 29, 2004, Áurea Administração e Participações S.A. acquired all of BSSF Air Holdings Ltd.s share ownership in Gol and 140,350 Class A preferred shares of Gol from BSSF II Holdings Ltda.
C. Interests of Experts and Counsel
Not applicable.
A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
See Item 3. Key InformationSelected Financial Data and Item 18. Financial Statements.
Legal Proceedings
In the ordinary course of our business, we are party to various legal actions, which we believe are incidental to our operations, in large part linked to the routine demands related to the rights of consumers. As of December 31, 2005, we had R$21.6 million of provisions for legal and administrative actions. We believe that the outcome of the proceedings to which we are currently a party will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
ICMS
We are currently challenging the levy of Brazils state value added tax (the Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços, or ICMS) on the import of our leased aircraft and engines from foreign countries. It is the understanding of our administration that the ICMS does not apply to these operations because of their status as leases, which by contractual obligation requires the return of the aircraft and engines. We believe that, by not having circulated the aircraft and engines, we are exempt from the ICMS.
On December 31, 2005, there were 29 judicial suits of this nature in the second instance, and seven in the first instance. The aggregate value of the ongoing disputes at December 31, 2005 was R$45.0 million.
We have not constituted provisions in regards to these processes because we understand that the possibility of loss in these instances are remote and that practices adopted in financial preparation, consistent with international patterns, do not require provisions for losses.
Dividends and Dividend Policy
Amounts Available for Distribution
At each annual general shareholders meeting, our board of directors is required to propose how our earnings for the preceding fiscal year are to be allocated. For purposes of Brazilian corporation law, a companys
68
non-consolidated net income after federal income tax and social contribution on net income for such fiscal year, net of any accumulated losses from prior fiscal years and amounts allocated to employees and managements participation in earnings, represents its income for such fiscal year. In accordance with the Brazilian corporation law, an amount equal to the companys income, as adjusted (the distributable amount), will be available for distribution to shareholders in any particular year. The distributable amount will be affected by the following:
· | reduced by amounts allocated to the legal reserve; |
· | reduced by amounts allocated to the statutory reserve, if any; |
· | reduced by amounts allocated to the contingency reserve, if any; |
· | reduced by amounts allocated to the unrealized profits reserve established by the company in compliance with applicable law (as discussed below); |
· | reduced by amounts allocated to the reserve for investment projects (as discussed below); and |
· | increased by reversals of reserves recorded in prior years. |
Our by-laws do not provide for statutory or contingency reserves. Under the Brazilian corporation law and according to our by-laws, we are required to maintain a legal reserve to which we must allocate 5% of our income for each fiscal year until the amount of the reserve equals 20% of paid-in capital. We are not required to make any allocations to our legal reserve in respect of any fiscal year in which such reserve, when added to our capital reserves, exceeds 30% of our capital. Accumulated losses, if any, may be charged against the legal reserve. Other than that, the legal reserve can only be used to increase our capital. The legal reserve is subject to approval by the shareholders voting at the annual shareholders meeting and may be transferred to capital but is not available for the payment of dividends in subsequent years. Our calculation of net income and allocations to reserves for any fiscal year are determined on the basis of our non-consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with the Brazilian corporation law.
Under the Brazilian corporation law, a portion of a corporations income may be allocated for discretionary appropriations for plant expansion and other fixed or working capital investment projects, the amount of which is based on a capital budget previously presented by management and approved by the shareholders in a general shareholders meeting. After completion of the relevant capital projects, the company may retain the appropriation until shareholders vote to transfer all or a portion of the reserve to capital or retained earnings. The Brazilian corporation law provides that, if a project to which the reserve for investment projects account is allocated has a term exceeding one year, the budget related to the project must be submitted to the shareholders meeting each fiscal year until the relevant investment is completed.
Under the Brazilian corporation law, the amount by which the mandatory distribution exceeds the realized portion of net income for any particular year may be allocated to the unrealized profits reserve and the mandatory distribution may be limited to the realized portion of net income. The realized portion of net income is the amount by which income exceeds the sum of (a) our net positive results, if any, from the equity method of accounting for earnings and losses of our subsidiaries and certain affiliates, and (b) the profits, gains or income obtained on transactions maturing after the end of the following fiscal year. As amounts allocated to the unrealized income reserve are realized in subsequent years, such amounts must be added to the dividend payment relating to the year of realization.
Under Brazilian tax legislation, a portion of the income taxes payable may also be transferred to a general fiscal incentive reserve in amounts equivalent to the reduction in the companys income tax liability which results from the option to deposit part of that liability into investment in approved projects in investment incentive regions established by government.
Under the Brazilian corporation law, any company may create a statutory reserve, which reserve must be described in the companys by-laws. Those by-laws which authorize the allocation of a percentage of a
69
companys net income to the statutory reserve must also indicate the purpose, the criteria for allocation and the maximum amount of the reserve. The Brazilian corporation law provides that all discretionary allocations of income, including the unrealized profits reserve and the reserve for investment projects, are subject to approval by the shareholders voting at the general shareholders meeting and may be transferred to capital or used for the payment of dividends in subsequent years. The fiscal incentive reserve and the legal reserve are also subject to approval by the shareholders voting at the general shareholders meeting and may be transferred to capital or used to absorb losses, but are not available for the payment of dividends in subsequent years.
The amounts available for distribution may be further increased by a reversion of the contingency reserve for anticipated losses constituted in prior years but not realized. Allocations to the contingency reserve are also subject to approval by the shareholders voting at the general shareholders meeting. The amounts available for distribution are determined on the basis of our non-consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian GAAP.
The balance of the profit reserve accounts, except for the contingency reserve and unrealized profits reserve, may not exceed the share capital. If this happens, a shareholders meeting must resolve whether the excess will be applied to pay in the subscribed and unpaid capital, to increase and pay in the subscribed stock capital or to distribute dividends.
Pursuant to Law No. 10,303, net income unallocated to the accounts mentioned above must be distributed as dividends.
Mandatory Distribution
The Brazilian corporation law generally requires that the by-laws of each Brazilian corporation specify a minimum percentage of the amounts available for distribution by such corporation for each fiscal year that must be distributed to shareholders as dividends, also known as the mandatory distribution.
The mandatory distribution is based on a percentage of adjusted non-consolidated net income, not lower than 25%, rather than a fixed monetary amount per share. If the by-laws of a corporation are silent in this regard, the percentage is deemed to be 50%. Under our by-laws, at least 25% of our adjusted non-consolidated net income, as calculated under Brazilian GAAP and adjusted under the Brazilian corporation law (which differs significantly from net income as calculated under U.S. GAAP), for the preceding fiscal year must be distributed as a mandatory annual dividend. Adjusted net income means the net income after any deductions for the legal reserve and contingency reserves and any reversals of the contingency reserves created in previous fiscal years. The Brazilian corporation law, however, permits a publicly held company, such as we are, to suspend the mandatory distribution of dividends in any fiscal year in which the board of directors reports to the shareholders meeting that the distribution would be inadvisable in view of the companys financial condition. The suspension is subject to the approval at the shareholders meeting and review by members of the fiscal committee. While the law does not establish the circumstances in which payment of the mandatory dividend would be inadvisable based on the companys financial condition, it is generally agreed that a company need not pay the mandatory dividend if such payment threatens the existence of the company as a going concern or harms its normal course of operations. In the case of publicly held corporations, the board of directors must file a justification for such suspension with the CVM within five days of the relevant general meeting. If the mandatory dividend is not paid and funds are available, those funds shall be attributed to a special reserve account. If not absorbed by subsequent losses, those funds shall be paid out as dividends as soon as the financial condition of the company permits.
Payment of Dividends
We are required by the Brazilian corporation law to hold an annual general shareholders meeting by no later than April 30 of each year, at which time, among other things, the shareholders have to decide on the payment of an annual dividend. Additionally, interim dividends may be declared by the board of directors. Any
70
holder of record of shares at the time of a dividend declaration is entitled to receive dividends. Dividends on shares held through depositaries are paid to the depositary for further distribution to the shareholders. Commencing in the first quarter of 2006, we intend to pay dividends quarterly.
Under the Brazilian corporation law, dividends are generally required to be paid to the holder of record on a dividend declaration date within 60 days following the date the dividend was declared, unless a shareholders resolution sets forth another date of payment, which, in either case, must occur prior to the end of the fiscal year in which such dividend was declared. Pursuant to our by-laws, unclaimed dividends do not bear interest, are not monetarily adjusted and revert to us three years after dividends were declared. See Item 10.B. Memorandum of Articles of AssociationDescription of Capital Stock.
In general, shareholders who are not residents of Brazil must register their equity investment with the Central Bank to have dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to their shares eligible to be remitted outside Brazil. The preferred shares underlying the ADSs are held in Brazil by Banco Itaú S.A., also known as the custodian, as agent for the depositary, that is the registered owner on the records of the registrar for our shares. The current registrar is Banco Itaú S.A. The depositary registers the preferred shares underlying the ADSs with the Central Bank and, therefore, is able to have dividends, sales proceeds or other amounts with respect to the preferred shares remitted outside Brazil.
Payments of cash dividends and distributions, if any, are made in reais to the custodian on behalf of the depositary, which then converts such proceeds into U.S. dollars and causes such U.S. dollars to be delivered to the depositary for distribution to holders of ADSs. In the event that the custodian is unable to convert immediately the Brazilian currency received as dividends into U.S. dollars, the amount of U.S. dollars payable to holders of ADSs may be adversely affected by depreciations of the Brazilian currency that occur before the dividends are converted. Under the current Brazilian corporation law, dividends paid to persons who are not Brazilian residents, including holders of ADSs, will not be subject to Brazilian withholding tax, except for dividends declared based on profits generated prior to December 31, 1995, which will be subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at varying tax rates. See Item 10. TaxationMaterial Brazilian Tax Considerations.
Holders of ADSs have the benefit of the electronic registration obtained from the Central Bank, which permits the depositary and the custodian to convert dividends and other distributions or sales proceeds with respect to the preferred shares represented by ADSs into foreign currency and remits the proceeds outside Brazil. In the event the holder exchanges the ADSs for preferred shares, the holder will be entitled to continue to rely on the depositarys certificate of registration for five business days after the exchange. Thereafter, in order to convert foreign currency and remit outside Brazil the sales proceeds or distributions with respect to the preferred shares, the holder must obtain a new certificate of registration in its own name that will permit the conversion and remittance of such payments through the commercial rate exchange market. See Item 10.B. Memorandum of Articles of AssociationDescription of Capital StockRegulation of Foreign Investment and Exchange Controls.
If the holder is not a duly qualified investor and does not obtain an electronic certificate of foreign capital registration, a special authorization from the Central Bank must be obtained in order to remit from Brazil any payments with respect to the preferred shares through the commercial rate exchange market. Without this special authorization, the holder may currently remit payments with respect to the preferred shares through the floating rate exchange market, although no assurance can be given that the floating rate exchange market will be accessible for these purposes in the future.
71
Under current Brazilian legislation, the federal government may impose temporary restrictions of foreign capital abroad in the event of a serious imbalance or an anticipated serious imbalance of Brazils balance of payments.
Interest Attributable to Shareholders Equity
Under Brazilian tax legislation effective January 1, 1996, Brazilian companies are permitted to pay interest to holders of equity securities and treat such payments as an expense for Brazilian income tax purposes and, beginning in 1998, for social contribution purposes. The purpose of the tax law change is to encourage the use of equity investment, as opposed to debt, to finance corporate activities. Payment of such interest may be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to the approval of the shareholders at a general shareholders meeting. The amount of any such notional interest payment to holders of equity securities is limited in respect of any particular year to the daily pro rata variation of the TJLP, as determined by the Brazilian Central Bank from time to time, and may not exceed the greater of:
· | 50% of net income (after the deduction of the provisions for social contribution on net profits but before taking into account the provision for income tax and the interest attributable to shareholders equity) for the period in respect of which the payment is made; or |
· | 50% of the sum of retained earnings and profit reserves as of the beginning of the year in respect of which such payment is made. |
For Brazilian GAAP accounting purposes, although the interest charge must be reflected in the statement of operations to be tax deductible, the charge is reversed before calculating net income in the statutory financial statements and deducted from shareholders equity in a manner similar to a dividend. Any payment of interest in respect of preferred shares (including the ADSs) is subject to Brazilian withholding income tax at the rate of 15%, or 25% in the case of a shareholder domiciled in a tax haven jurisdiction (see Item 10. TaxationMaterial Brazilian Tax Considerations). If such payments are accounted for, at their net value, as part of any mandatory dividend, the tax is paid by the company on behalf of its shareholders, upon distribution of the interest. In case we distribute interest attributed to shareholders equity in any year, and that distribution is not accounted for as part of mandatory distribution, Brazilian income tax would be borne by the shareholders. For U.S. GAAP accounting purposes, interest attributable to shareholders equity is reflected as a dividend payment.
Under our by-laws, interest attributable to shareholders equity may be treated as a dividend for purposes of the mandatory dividend.
The following table sets forth the distributions out of net income that we made or will make to our shareholders in respect of our 2003, 2004 and 2005 net income. All these amounts distributed or to be distributed were or will be in the form of interest attributed to shareholders equity.
Year Ended December 31, |
Payment Dates |
Payment per Share |
Payment per ADS |
Aggregate Amount Distributed(1) |
Pay-out Ratio(2) |
|||||||||||
2003 |
March 2004 | R$ | 0.16 | R$ | 0.16 | (3) | R$ | 26.5 | 25.0 | % | ||||||
2004 |
April 2005 | R$ | 0.32 | R$ | 0.32 | (3) | R$ | 60.7 | 26.6 | % | ||||||
2005 |
April 2006 | * | R$ | 0.60 | R$ | 0.60 | (3) | R$ | 117.9 | 29.2 | % |
(1) | In millions of reais. |
(2) | Represents distribution divided by net income, as calculated under Brazilian GAAP and adjusted under the Brazilian corporation law. |
(3) | Adjusted for the 2:1 ADS ratio change in December 2005. |
* | Expected payment date |
72
Dividend Policy
We intend to declare and pay dividends and/or interest attributed to shareholders equity, as required by the Brazilian corporation law and our by-laws. Commencing in the first quarter of 2006, we intend to pay dividends quarterly. Our board of directors may approve the distribution of dividends and/or interest attributed to shareholders equity, calculated based on our non-consolidated semiannual or quarterly financial statements. The declaration of annual dividends, including dividends in excess of the mandatory distribution, requires approval by the vote of the majority of the holders of our common shares. The amount of any distributions will depend on many factors, such as our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, prospects and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors and shareholders. Within the context of our tax planning, we may in the future continue determining that it is to our benefit to distribute interest attributed to shareholders equity.
None.
In the United States, our preferred shares trade in the form of ADS. Since December 2005 each ADS represents one preferred share, issued by The Bank of New York, as Depositary pursuant to a Deposit Agreement. On December 13, 2005, we executed a 2:1 ADS split, changing to ratio of one ADS representing two preferred shares to one ADS representing one preferred share, as approved by a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Company on November 8, 2005. The ADSs commenced trading on the NYSE on June 24, 2004. As of December 31, 2005, the ADSs represented approximately 52% of our preferred shares and 88% of our current global public float. The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sales prices for the ADSs on the NYSE for the periods indicated.
US$ per ADS(1) | ||||||
Low |
High |
Average(2) | ||||
2004 |
||||||
Annual |
8.20 | 16.45 | 10.47 | |||
First quarter |
| | ||||
Second quarter |
8.50 | 9.11 | 8.72 | |||
Third Quarter |
8.20 | 10.61 | 9.08 | |||
Fourth Quarter |
9.68 | 16.45 | 12.02 | |||
2005 |
||||||
Annual |
12.20 | 28.74 | 16.57 | |||
First quarter |
12.57 | 16.51 | 14.60 | |||
Second quarter |
12.20 | 16.56 | 14.62 | |||
Third Quarter |
14.06 | 18.00 | 15.88 | |||
Fourth Quarter |
15.50 | 28.74 | 21.17 | |||
Last Six Months |
||||||
September 2005 |
15.25 | 16.65 | 15.93 | |||
October 2005 |
15.50 | 17.61 | 16.69 | |||
November 2005 |
18.79 | 22.76 | 20.83 | |||
December 2005 |
23.47 | 28.74 | 25.77 | |||
January 2006 |
25.25 | 30.68 | 27.39 | |||
February 2006 |
29.08 | 34.12 | 31.52 |
Source: Bloomberg
(1) | Reflecting the ADS ratio change from one ADS representing two preferred shares to one ADS representing one preferred share, occurred in December 2005. |
(2) | Calculated as average of closing prices for the period. |
73
Our preferred shares began trading on the São Paulo Stock Exchange on June 24, 2004. The following table sets forth the reported high and low closing sale prices for our preferred shares on the BOVESPA, for the periods indicated.
Reais per Preferred Share | ||||||
Low |
High |
Average(1) | ||||
2004 |
||||||
Annual |
25.00 | 44.31 | 29.83 | |||
First quarter |
| | | |||
Second quarter |
26.31 | 28.45 | 27.10 | |||
Third Quarter |
25.00 | 30.11 | 26.78 | |||
Fourth Quarter |
27.25 | 44.31 | 33.18 | |||
2005 |
||||||
Annual |
32.24 | 66.90 | 40.00 | |||
First quarter |
34.00 | 42.60 | 38.89 | |||
Second quarter |
32.24 | 39.88 | 36.29 | |||
Third Quarter |
33.53 | 42.00 | 37.19 | |||
Fourth Quarter |
35.05 | 66.90 | 47.64 | |||
Last Six Months |
||||||
September 2005 |
35.20 | 39.00 | 36.80 | |||
October 2005 |
35.05 | 40.00 | 37.44 | |||
November 2005 |
42.00 | 50.45 | 46.06 | |||
December 2005 |
51.90 | 66.90 | 58.96 | |||
January 2006 |
58.70 | 67.81 | 62.12 | |||
February 2006 |
63.67 | 72.00 | 67.68 |
Source: Bloomberg
(1) | Calculated as average of closing prices for the period. |
Not applicable.
Trading on the BOVESPA
In 2000, the BOVESPA was reorganized through the execution of memoranda of understanding by the Brazilian stock exchanges. Under the memoranda, all securities are now traded only on the BOVESPA, with the exception of electronically traded public debt securities and privatization auctions, which are traded on the Rio de Janeiro Stock Exchange.
When shareholders trade in common and preferred shares on the BOVESPA, the trade is settled in three business days after the trade date without adjustment of the purchase price for inflation. The seller is ordinarily required to deliver the shares to the exchange on the second business day following the trade date. Delivery of and payment for shares are made through the facilities of the clearinghouse, Companhia Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia, or CBLC.
The BOVESPA is a nonprofit entity owned by its member brokerage firms. Trading on the BOVESPA is limited to member brokerage firms and a limited number of authorized nonmembers. The BOVESPA has two open outcry trading sessions each day from 11:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., São Paulo time, for all securities traded on all markets, except during daylight savings time in the United States. During daylight savings time in the United States, usually the sessions are from 10:00 a.m. to 17:00 p.m., São Paulo time, to closely mirror the NYSE trading hours. Trading is also conducted between 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., or between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m.
74
during daylight savings time in the United States, on an automated system known as the Computer Assisted Trading System (Sistema de Negociação Assistida por Computador) on the BOVESPA and on the National Electronic Trading System (Sistema Eletrônico de Negociação Nacional). This system is a computerized system that links electronically with the seven smaller regional exchanges. The BOVESPA also permits trading from 6:45 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. on an online system connected to traditional and internet brokers called the after market. Trading on the after market is subject to regulatory limits on price volatility and on the volume of shares transacted through internet brokers. There are no specialists or officially recognized market makers for our shares in Brazil.
In order to better control volatility, the BOVESPA adopted a circuit breaker system pursuant to which trading sessions may be suspended for a period of 30 minutes or one hour whenever the indices of the BOVESPA falls below the limits of 10% or 15%, respectively, in relation to the index registered in the previous trading session.
The BOVESPA is significantly less liquid than the NYSE or other major exchanges in the world. As of December 2005, the aggregate market capitalization of the 381 companies listed on the BOVESPA was equivalent to R$1,128 billion and the 10 largest companies listed on the BOVESPA represented approximately 52% of the total market capitalization of all listed companies. In contrast, as of December 2005, the aggregate market capitalization of the nearly 2,800 companies listed on the NYSE was US$21.4 trillion and the 10 largest companies listed on the NYSE represented approximately 11.1% of the total market capitalization of all listed companies. The average daily trading volume of BOVESPA and NYSE for December 2005 was approximately R$1,783 million and US$55,168 millions, respectively. Although any of the outstanding shares of a listed company may trade on the BOVESPA, in most cases fewer than half of the listed shares are actually available for trading by the public, the remainder being held by small groups of controlling persons, by government entities or by one principal shareholder. See Item 3. Risk FactorsRisks Relating to the ADSs and Our Preferred SharesThe relative volatility and illiquidity of the Brazilian securities markets may substantially limit your ability to sell the preferred shares underlying the ADSs at the time and price you desire.
Trading on the BOVESPA by a holder not deemed to be domiciled in Brazil for Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes, a non-Brazilian holder, is subject to certain limitations under Brazilian foreign investment legislation. With limited exceptions, non-Brazilian holders may only trade on Brazilian stock exchanges in accordance with the requirements of Resolution No. 2,689, of January 26, 2000, of the National Monetary Council (Conselho Monetário Nacional, or CMN), or Resolution No. 2,689. Resolution No. 2,689 requires that securities held by non-Brazilian holders be maintained in the custody of, or in deposit accounts with, financial institutions and be registered with a clearinghouse. Such financial institutions and clearinghouses must be duly authorized to act as such by the Central Bank and the CVM. In addition, Resolution No. 2,689 requires non-Brazilian holders to restrict their securities trading to transactions on Brazilian stock exchanges or qualified over-the-counter markets. With limited exceptions, non-Brazilian holders may not transfer the ownership of investments made under Resolution No. 2,689 to other non-Brazilian holders through a private transaction. See Item 10. TaxationMaterial Brazilian Tax ConsiderationsTaxation on Gains for a description of certain tax benefits extended to non-Brazilian holders who qualify under Resolution No. 2,689.
Corporate Governance Practices
In 2000, the BOVESPA introduced three special listing segments, known as Level 1 and 2 of Differentiated Corporate Governance Practices and New Market (Novo Mercado), aiming at fostering a secondary market for securities issued by Brazilian companies with securities listed on the BOVESPA, by prompting such companies to follow good practices of corporate governance. The listing segments were designed for the trading of shares issued by companies voluntarily undertaking to abide by corporate governance practices and disclosure requirements in addition to those already imposed by Brazilian law. These rules generally increase shareholders rights and enhance the quality of information provided to shareholders.
To become a Level 1 (Nível 1) company, in addition to the obligations imposed by current Brazilian law, an issuer must agree to (a) ensure that shares of the issuer representing 25% of its total capital are effectively
75
available for trading, (b) adopt offering procedures that favor widespread ownership of shares whenever making a public offering, (c) comply with minimum quarterly disclosure standards including cash flow statements, (d) follow stricter disclosure policies with respect to transactions made by controlling shareholders, directors and officers involving securities issued by the issuer; (e) submit any existing shareholders agreements and stock option plans to the BOVESPA; and (f) make an annual calendar announcing scheduled corporate events, bringing information on the company, the event, date and time it is going to take place; any changes in the schedule shall be promptly forwarded to BOVESPA and published.
To become a Level 2 (Nível 2) company, in addition to the obligations imposed by current Brazilian law, an issuer must agree to (a) comply with all of the listing requirements for Level 1 companies, (b) grant tag-along rights for all shareholders in connection with a transfer of control of the company, offering the same price paid per share for controlling block common shares and 80% of the price paid per share for controlling block preferred shares, (c) grant voting rights to holders of preferred shares in connection with certain corporate restructurings and related party transactions, such as: (i) any transformation of the company into another corporate form, (ii) any merger, consolidation or spin-off of the company, (iii) approval of any transactions between the company and its controlling shareholder, including parties related to the controlling shareholder, (iv) approval of any valuation of assets to be delivered to the company in payment for shares issued in a capital increase, (v) appointment of an independent company, with renowned expertise, to ascertain the economic value of the company in connection with any deregistration and delisting tender offer, and (vi) any changes to these voting rights, (d) have a board of directors comprised of at least five members, of which at least 20% shall be independent, as defined by the BOVESPA, with a term limited to two years, (e) if it elects to delist from the Level 2 segment, hold a tender offer by the companys controlling shareholder (the minimum price of the shares to be offered will be the economic value determined by an appraisal process), and, for the same purposes, in the case of companies with diffuse control (controlling power exercised by the shareholder holding less than 50% of the voting capital and per group of shareholders who are not signatories of voting agreements and which is not under a common control and does not act as a representative of a common interest) to comply with complementary rules to be issued by BOVESPA,; (f) disclose: (i) quarterly financial statements in English or prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP or International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS); and (ii) annual financial statements in English, including cash flow statements, prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP or International Financial Reporting Standards ( IFRS), in American Dollars or reais, and (g) adhere exclusively to the rules of the BOVESPA Arbitration Chamber for resolution of disputes involving the controlling shareholders, the managers and the members of the fiscal committee.
To be listed in the Novo Mercado, an issuer must meet all of the requirements described above, in addition to (a) issuing only voting shares and ensure that all the shares will be composed exclusively of common shares, (b) granting tag-along rights for all shareholders in connection with a transfer of control of the company, offering the same price paid per share for controlling block common shares.
In May 2004, we entered into an agreement with the BOVESPA to comply with the requirements to become a Level 2 company. Upon the closing of our global public offering of our preferred shares on May 3, 2005, we are in compliance with the requirement to achieve a free float of 25% of our preferred shares. In addition to complying with Level 2 requirements, we have also granted tag-along rights to holders of our preferred shares in connection with a transfer of control of our company, offering preferred shareholders 100% of the price paid per common share of controlling block shareholders. Furthermore, we prepare quarterly financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. In 2005, we were included in the following indexes: IbrX100 (Índice Brasil, Index Brazil), IGC (Índice de Ações com Governanca Corporativa Diferciada, Special Corporate Governance Index), ITAG (Índice de Ações com Tag Along Diferciado, Special Tag Along Stock Index) and MSCI (Morgan Stanley Capital International Index), which reflects our increased market capitalization and liquidity of our preferred shares.
Regulation of the Brazilian Securities Market
The Brazilian securities markets are regulated by the CVM, which has regulatory authority over the stock exchanges and securities markets, as well as by the Central Bank, which has, among other powers, licensing
76
authority over brokerage firms and regulates foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions. The Brazilian securities markets are governed by Law No. 10,198 dated February 14, 2001, Law No. 10,303 dated October 31, 2001, known as Law No. 10,303, and Law No. 10,411 dated February 26, 2002, which introduced new concepts and several changes to Law No. 6,385 dated December 7, 1976, as amended and supplemented, the principal law governing the Brazilian securities markets, by Brazilian corporation law, and by regulations issued by the CVM, the CMN and the Central Bank. These laws and regulations, among others, provide for disclosure requirements applicable to issuers of traded securities, criminal sanctions for insider trading and price manipulation, and protection of minority shareholders. They also provide for licensing and oversight of brokerage firms and governance of Brazilian stock exchanges. However, the Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as U.S. securities markets.
Under the Brazilian corporation law, a company is either publicly held, a companhia aberta, or privately held, a companhia fechada. All listed companies are registered with the CVM and are subject to reporting and regulatory requirements. A company registered with the CVM may trade its securities either on the BOVESPA or in the Brazilian over-the-counter market. Shares of companies listed on the BOVESPA may not simultaneously trade on the Brazilian over-the-counter market. The shares of a listed company may also be traded privately, subject to several limitations. To be listed on the BOVESPA, a company must apply for registration with the BOVESPA and the CVM.
The trading of securities on the BOVESPA may be halted at the request of a company in anticipation of a material announcement. Trading may also be suspended on the initiative of the BOVESPA or the CVM, among other reasons, based on or due to a belief that a company has provided inadequate information regarding a significant event or has provided inadequate responses to inquiries by the CVM or the BOVESPA.
Trading on the BOVESPA by non-residents of Brazil is subject to limitations under Brazilian foreign investment and tax legislation. The Brazilian custodian for the preferred shares underlying the ADSs must, on behalf of the depositary for the ADSs, obtain registration from the Central Bank to remit U.S. dollars abroad for payments of dividends, any other cash distributions, or upon the disposition of the shares and sales proceeds thereof. If you exchange your ADSs for preferred shares, you will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodians electronic certificate of foreign capital registration for five business days after the exchange. Thereafter, you may not be able to obtain and remit abroad non-Brazilian currency upon the disposition of or distributions relating to the preferred shares, and will be subject to a less favorable tax treatment on gains with respect to the preferred shares, unless you obtain a new electronic certificate of foreign capital registration or qualify under Brazilian foreign investment regulations that entitle some foreign investors to buy and sell shares on the BOVESPA without obtaining separate electronic certificates of foreign capital registration. See Item 10.B. Memorandum of Articles of AssociationDescription of Capital StockRegulation of Foreign Investment.
Disclosure Requirements
Pursuant to CVM Rule No. 358, of January 3, 2002, the CVM revised and consolidated the requirements regarding the disclosure and use of information related to material facts and acts of publicly held companies, including the disclosure of information in the trading and acquisition of securities issued by publicly held companies.
Such requirements include provisions that:
· | establish the concept of a material fact that gives rise to reporting requirements. Material facts include decisions made by the controlling shareholders, resolutions of the general meeting of shareholders and of management of the company, or any other facts related to the companys business (whether occurring within the company or otherwise somehow related thereto) that may influence the price of its publicly traded securities, or the decision of investors to trade such securities or to exercise any of such securities underlying rights; |
· | specify examples of facts that are considered to be material, which include, among others, the execution of shareholders agreements providing for the transfer of control, the entry or withdrawal of |
77
shareholders that maintain any managing, financial, technological or administrative function with or contribution to the company, and any corporate restructuring undertaken among related companies; |
· | oblige the officer of investor relations, controlling shareholders, other officers, directors, members of the audit committee and other advisory boards to disclose material facts; |
· | require simultaneous disclosure of material facts to all markets in which the corporations securities are admitted for trading; |
· | require the acquirer of a controlling stake in a corporation to publish material facts, including its intentions as to whether or not to de-list the corporations shares, within one year; |
· | establish rules regarding disclosure requirements in the acquisition and disposal of a material stockholding stake; and |
· | forbid the use of insider information. |
Changes in the Brazilian Corporation Law
On October 31, 2001, Law No. 10,303, amending the Brazilian corporation law, was enacted. The main goal of Law No. 10,303 is to broaden the rights of minority shareholders. Law No. 10,303:
· | obligates our controlling shareholders to make a tender offer for our shares if it increases its interest in our share capital to a level that materially and negatively affects the liquidity of our shares, as defined by the CVM; |
· | requires any acquirer of control to make a tender offer for our common shares at a price equal to 80% of the per share price paid for the controlling block of shares; |
· | authorizes us to redeem minority shareholders shares if, after a tender offer, our controlling shareholders increase their participation in our total share capital to more than 95%; |
· | entitles dissenting or, in certain cases, non-voting shareholders to obtain redemption upon a decision to conduct a spin-off that results in (a) a change of our corporate purpose, (b) a reduction in the mandatory dividend or (c) any participation in a group of companies (as defined by the Brazilian corporation law); |
· | requires that the preferred shares have one of the following advantages in order to be listed and to trade on a stock exchange: (a) priority in receipt of dividends corresponding to at least 3% of the book value per share (after this priority condition is met, equal conditions apply to common shares); (b) dividends 10% higher than those paid for common shares; or (c) a tag-along right at 80% of the price paid to the controlling shareholder in case of a transfer control. No withdrawal rights arise from such amendments made before December 31, 2002; |
· | entitles shareholders that are not controlling shareholders but that together hold (a) preferred shares representing at least 10% of our total share capital or (b) common shares representing at least 15% of our voting capital the right to appoint one member and an alternate to our board of directors. If no group of common or preferred shareholders meets the thresholds described above, shareholders holding preferred or common shares representing at least 10% of our total share capital are entitled to combine their holdings to appoint one member and an alternate to our board of directors. Until 2005, the board members that may be elected pursuant to (a) above or by the combined holdings of holders of preferred and common shares are to be chosen from a list of three names drawn up by the controlling shareholder. Any such members elected by the minority shareholders will have veto powers on the selection of our independent auditors; |
· | requires controlling shareholders, shareholders that appoint members of our board of directors or fiscal council and members of our board of directors, board of executive officers or fiscal council to file immediately with the CVM and the stock exchanges (or the over-the-counter markets on which our securities are traded) a statement of any change in their shareholdings; and |
78
· | requires us to send copies of the documentation we submit to our shareholders in connection with shareholders meetings to the stock exchanges on which our shares are most actively traded. |
Significant Differences between our Corporate Governance Practices and NYSE Corporate Governance Standards
We are subject to the NYSE corporate governance listing standards. As a foreign private issuer, the standards applicable to us are considerably different than the standards applied to U.S. listed companies. Under the NYSE rules, we are required only to: (a) have an audit committee or audit board, pursuant to an applicable exemption available to foreign private issuers, that meets certain requirements, as discussed below, (b) provide prompt certification by our chief executive officer of any material non-compliance with any corporate governance rules, and (c) provide a brief description of the significant differences between our corporate governance practices and the NYSE corporate governance practice required to be followed by U.S. listed compa