UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 6-K
REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER
PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-16 OR 15D-16
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
October, 2008
Barclays PLC and
Barclays Bank PLC
(Names of Registrants)
1 Churchill Place
London E14 5HP
England
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports
under cover of Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F x Form 40-F
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information
contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the
Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes No x
If "Yes" is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant
in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
This Report is a joint Report on Form 6-K filed by Barclays PLC and Barclays
Bank PLC. All of the issued ordinary share capital of Barclays Bank PLC is
owned by Barclays PLC.
This Report comprises:
Information given to The London Stock Exchange and furnished pursuant to
General Instruction B to the General Instructions to Form 6-K.
EXHIBIT INDEX
Interim Management Statement - 31 October 2008
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each of the
registrants has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
BARCLAYS PLC
(Registrant)
Date: October 31, 2008
By: /s/ Patrick Gonsalves
----------------------
Patrick Gonsalves
Deputy Secretary
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
(Registrant)
Date: October 31, 2008
By: /s/ Patrick Gonsalves
----------------------
Patrick Gonsalves
Joint Secretary
31st October 2008
Barclays PLC
Interim Management Statement
"The financial market environment has continued to be as challenging as any that we have experienced. Against this backdrop, we have stayed close to our customers and clients, managed our risks carefully, and taken advantage of opportunities to progress our strategy. The strength of our profit performance reflects the conservative stance of our major UK asset portfolios and continued distribution-led growth in retail and commercial banking outside the UK; and in Barclays Capital strong flows of client business and good progress on the integration of the acquired Lehman Brothers businesses."
John Varley, Group Chief Executive
Group Performance
Group profit before tax for the nine months ended 30th September 2008 was slightly ahead of 2007. Income growth was strong, and costs grew broadly in line with the rate of income growth. Impairment charges grew at a similar rate to the first half of the year. Third quarter 2008 results included a preliminary estimate of the net benefits arising on the acquisition of Lehman Brothers North American investment banking and capital markets businesses; and net losses from credit market writedowns of £129m, comprising writedowns of £1.2bn offset by £1.1bn gains on the fair valuation of issued notes.
Business Commentary
Global Retail and Commercial Banking
Profit before tax in Global Retail and Commercial Banking was ahead of 2007. Strong income growth reflected good progress in the UK businesses, and continued expansion outside the UK. The rate of cost growth was broadly in line with the rate of income growth. Impairment charges grew at a faster pace than in the first half, driven by both strong asset growth, and deteriorating macroeconomic factors.
There was good growth in profit before tax at UK
Retail Banking. Solid income growth reflected good performances in
Current Accounts, Savings and Local Business as
customer deposits increased.
Operating expenses were well controlled and remained in line with last year.
Barclays share of net new mortgages in the third quarter
was 32%. Impairment charges were broadly in line with the
first half.
Barclays Commercial Bank saw good growth in income. There was a moderate decline in profit before tax resulting from higher costs and impairment. Cost growth reflected investment in people and infrastructure, lower property credits and higher operating lease depreciation. Higher impairment charges were driven by a more challenging UK corporate credit outlook.
There was very strong growth in profit before tax at Barclaycard. Very strong income growth reflected progress in Barclaycard US and the inclusion of Goldfish in the UK. Cost growth was broadly in line with income growth. Impairment charges grew at a faster rate than the first half reflecting Barclaycard US book growth, the inclusion of Goldfish and the deteriorating retail environment in the US and South Africa.
Global Retail and Commercial Banking - Western Europe income and cost growth rates were consistent with the trends in the first half of the year, with very strong income growth and significant investment in the expansion of the franchise. Profit before tax declined as a result of higher impairment charges, principally in Spain.
Income, cost and impairment growth trends at Global Retail and Commercial Banking - Emerging Markets were consistent with the first half resulting in lower profit before tax. This reflected very strong income growth and continued investment in distribution points and infrastructure across all regions, and expansion into new markets. Impairment growth was driven by rapid growth in assets and some deterioration in retail and corporate lending books.
Global Retail and Commercial Banking - Absa profit before tax remained broadly in line with last year despite challenging market conditions and the depreciation of the Rand. Good income growth and well-controlled costs were broadly offset by increased retail impairment.
Investment Banking and Investment Management
Barclays Capital profit before tax was well ahead of last year. The underlying business recorded strong growth in interest rate products, emerging markets, commodities, prime services and private equity. The third quarter results also included the following specific items: a preliminary estimate of the net benefits arising on the acquisition of the Lehman Brothers businesses; and net losses from credit market writedowns of £129m, comprising writedowns of £1.2bn offset by £1.1bn gains on the fair valuation of issued notes. Excluding these specific items, net income for the nine months to end of September was well ahead of last year. Exposures related to the credit market dislocation continue to be actively managed and are set out in the Appendix to this statement, including the impact of relevant Lehman Brothers assets acquired.
Barclays Global Investors income was broadly in line with last year. Cost growth reflected a small increase in support for selected liquidity products leading to a rate of decrease in profit before tax consistent with the first half of the year. Assets under management reduced relative to the level of 30th June 2008 as the impact of asset inflows, particularly in ETFs, was more than offset by the lower equity market valuations.
Barclays Wealth profit before tax was in line with the prior year. Solid income growth reflected higher net interest income resulting from increased customer deposits and loans. Solid net client inflows were more than offset by the impact of the falling equity market. Costs remained broadly stable. The sale of the closed life assurance book is due to complete in Q4 2008.
Head Office Functions and Other Operations
The loss before tax in Head Office and Other Operations increased reflecting higher debt service costs, fees for equity raising, and increased costs related to an internal review of compliance with US economic sanctions.
October Trading
October trading has been generally consistent with the trends reported in this statement, although capital market volumes have been lower than in September. The integration of Lehman Brothers has progressed well. Credit spreads narrowed substantially leading to a reversal of £1bn gains on the fair valuation of issued notes. On 20th October 2008 Global Retail and Commercial Banking also received a distribution from the Visa IPO amounting to approximately £190m.
Capital
Excluding the impact of the capital raisings announced today, we expect our Tier 1 capital and equity Tier 1 ratios at 31st December 2008 to be broadly in line with the 30th June 2008 pro-forma ratios of 9.1% and 6.3% respectively.
Notes
1. Key
trends in the income statement set out above, unless stated otherwise, relate to
the nine months to 30th September 2008, and are compared to the
corresponding nine months of
2007. Balance sheet
references relate to 30th September 2008 and are compared to the balance
sheet as at 31st December 2007.
2. Trends in income are expressed after
the deduction of 'net claims and benefits on insurance contracts'.
3. This financial information on which this interim
management statement is based, and the credit market exposures set out in the appendix to
this statement, have been prepared in accordance
with Barclays previously stated
accounting policies, and apply the valuation methodologies described in the Interim Results
published on 7th August 2008.
Timetable
2008 Preliminary Results Announcement |
Tuesday, 17th February 2009 |
2009 Annual General Meeting |
Thursday, 23rd April 2009 |
All dates are provisional and subject to change.
For further information please contact
Investor Relations |
Media Relations |
Mark Merson/John McIvor |
Howell James/Alistair Smith |
+44 (0) 20 7116 5752/2929 |
+44 (0) 20 7116 6060/6132 |
Forward Looking Statements
This document contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the US Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the US Securities Act of 1933, as amended, with respect to certain of the Group's plans and its current goals and expectations relating to its future financial condition and performance. Barclays cautions readers that no forward-looking statement is a guarantee of future performance and that actual results could differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate only to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements sometimes use words such as "may", "will", "seek", "continue", "aim", "anticipate", "target", "expect", "estimate", "intend", "plan", "goal", "believe" or other words of similar meaning. Examples of forward-looking statements include, among others, statements regarding the Group's future financial position, income growth, impairment charges, business strategy, projected levels of growth in the banking and financial markets, projected costs, estimates of capital expenditures, and plans and objectives for future operations and other statements that are not historical fact.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk and uncertainty because they relate to future events and circumstances, including, but not limited to, UK domestic and global economic and business conditions, the effects of continued volatility in credit markets, market related risks such as changes in interest rates and exchange rates, effects of changes in valuation of credit market exposures, changes in valuation of issued notes, the policies and actions of governmental and regulatory authorities, changes in legislation, the further development of standards and interpretations under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) applicable to past, current and future periods, evolving practices with regard to the interpretation and application of standards under IFRS, progress in the integration of the North American investment banking and capital markets operations of Lehman Brothers into the Group's business and the quantification of the benefits resulting from such acquisition, the outcome of pending and future litigation, the success of future acquisitions and other strategic transactions and the impact of competition - a number of which factors are beyond the Group's control. As a result, the Group's actual future results may differ materially from the plans, goals, and expectations set forth in the Group's forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements made herein speak only as of the date they are made. Except as required by the FSA, the London Stock Exchange or applicable law, Barclays expressly disclaims any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained in this announcement to reflect any change in Barclays expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any such statement is based. The reader should, however, consult any additional disclosures that Barclays has made or may make in documents it has filed or may file with the SEC.
Q308 IMS Appendix:
Barclays Capital Credit Market Exposures
Barclays Capital's credit market exposures resulted in net losses of £2,108m in the first nine months of 2008, due to continuing dislocation in the credit markets. The net losses, which included £1,560m in impairment charges, comprised: £1,345m against ABS CDO Super Senior exposures; and £2,714m against other credit market exposures; partially offset by gains of £1,951m from the general widening of credit spreads on issued notes measured at fair value through the profit and loss account.
Exposures have been actively managed in the third quarter of 2008. This is
reflected in movements in exposures set out below, which have also been
impacted by a 12% appreciation of the US dollar against sterling since 30th June
2008 and the inclusion of £1.0bn of securities from the acquisition of
Lehman Brothers North American investment banking and capital markets businesses.
Pro-forma 1 |
Net Exposures |
||||
As at |
As at |
As at |
|||
Notes |
£m |
£m |
£m |
||
ABS CDO Super Senior |
A |
3,086 |
3,229 |
4,671 |
|
Other US sub-prime |
|||||
– Other US sub-prime |
3,063 |
3,258 |
5,037 |
||
– Whole loan sales post period end |
- |
(828) |
- |
||
Net Other US sub-prime |
B |
3,063 |
2,430 |
5,037 |
|
Alt-A |
C |
3,719 |
3,510 |
4,916 |
|
Monoline insurers |
D |
3,558 |
2,584 |
1,335 |
|
SIVs and SIV-Lites |
E |
1,066 |
429 |
784 |
|
Commercial mortgages |
F |
11,520 |
10,988 |
12,399 |
|
Leveraged finance |
|||||
– Net lending and commitments |
|
7,539 |
7,326 |
7,368 |
|
– Contingent repayment |
(2,506) |
(2,306) |
- |
||
Net leveraged finance |
G |
5,033 |
5,020 |
7,368 |
1 The above table includes net exposures as at 30th September 2008 less reductions totalling £2,506m (30th June 2008 £3,134m) that are expected to complete in the final quarter of 2008.
A. ABS CDO Super Senior
Net ABS CDO Super Senior exposures were £3,086m (30th June 2008: £3,229m). Net exposures are stated after write-downs and charges of £1,345m incurred in 2008 (30th June 2008: £875m) and hedges of £229m (30th June 2008: £204m).
ABS CDO Super Senior high grade exposure of £3,025m comprised
liquidity facilities which were fully drawn and classified within loans and receivables.
ABS CDO Super Senior mezzanine exposure of £290m (£61m net of hedges) comprised
undrawn commitments. The marks applied to the notional collateral are set out in the table
below:
As at 30.09 .08 |
As at 30.06 .08 |
|||||||
Mix of ABS Super Senior Notional Collateral |
High Grade |
Mezzanine |
Total |
Marks 1 |
Total |
Marks 1 |
||
£m |
£m |
£m |
% |
£m |
% |
|||
2005 and earlier |
1,038 |
384 |
1,422 |
71% |
1,306 |
76% |
||
2006 |
644 |
34 |
678 |
19% |
607 |
30% |
||
2007 and 2008 |
20 |
37 |
57 |
4 5 % |
51 |
49% |
||
Sub-prime |
1,702 |
455 |
2,157 |
54% |
1,964 |
61% |
||
2005 and earlier |
753 |
66 |
819 |
77% |
740 |
83% |
||
2006 |
512 |
41 |
553 |
57% |
502 |
78% |
||
2007 and 2008 |
51 |
8 |
59 |
39% |
53 |
56% |
||
Alt-A |
1,316 |
115 |
1,431 |
68% |
1,295 |
80% |
||
Prime |
645 |
82 |
727 |
87% |
657 |
98% |
||
RMBS CDO |
332 |
56 |
388 |
0% |
368 |
0% |
||
Sub-prime second lien |
115 |
- |
115 |
0% |
118 |
0% |
||
Total RMBS |
4,110 |
708 |
4,818 |
57% |
4,402 |
65% |
||
CMBS |
135 |
126 |
261 |
65% |
234 |
87% |
||
Non-RMBS CDO |
468 |
17 |
485 |
47% |
441 |
54% |
||
CLOs |
29 |
20 |
49 |
79% |
44 |
76% |
||
Other ABS 2 |
109 |
19 |
128 |
90% |
110 |
100% |
||
Total o ther AB S 2 |
741 |
182 |
923 |
60% |
829 |
69% |
||
Total n otional c ollateral |
4,851 |
890 |
5,741 |
58% |
5,231 |
66% |
||
Subordination |
(479) |
(357) |
(836) |
(755) |
||||
Gross e xposure pre impairment |
4,372 |
533 |
4,905 |
4,476 |
||||
Impairment |
(1,347) |
(243) |
(1,590) |
(1,043) |
||||
Hedges |
- |
(229) |
(229) |
(204) |
||||
Net e xposure |
3,025 |
61 |
3,086 |
3,229 |
||||
Collateral marks including liquidated structures |
38% |
44% |
1 Marks above reflect the gross exposure after impairment and
subordination and do not include the benefit of hedges.
2 30th June 2008 marks have been
restated.
A. ABS CDO Super Senior (continued)
ABS CDO Super Senior high grade and mezzanine exposure as at 31st December 2007 included exposures which contained or comprised a derivative at inception. These derivative exposures, which were measured at fair value through profit and loss, were liquidated or consolidated in 2008. The notional collateral of ABS CDOs liquidated or consolidated in 2008 was £4.8bn.
Collateral and hedges related to liquidated and consolidated exposures remaining at 30th September 2008 are stated at fair value net of hedges within 'Other US sub-prime' exposures below. The valuation for such collateral at 30th September 2008 is approximately 14% (30th June 2008: 17%). The collateral valuation for all ABS CDO Super Senior deals, including those liquidated and consolidated in 2008, was approximately 38% (30th June 2008: 44%).
Hedges of £229m (30th June 2008: £204m) comprise trades in the liquid index swap market with market counterparties. The counterparty exposure is managed through a standard derivative collateralisation process. None of the hedge counterparties are monoline insurers.
The collateral for the outstanding ABS CDO Super Senior exposures primarily comprises residential mortgage backed securities (RMBS). Within this the majority of the sub-prime and Alt-A collateral was originated in 2005 or earlier with minimal exposure to 2007 or later. The vintages of the sub-prime, Alt-A and US RMBS collateral are set out in the table below.
Sub-prime Collateral by Vintage |
As at 30.09.08 |
As at 30.06.08 |
As at 31.12.07 |
2005 and earlier |
66% |
66% |
54% |
2006 |
31% |
31% |
40% |
2007 and 2008 |
3% |
3% |
6% |
|
|
|
|
Alt-A Collateral by Vintage |
|
|
|
2005 and earlier |
57% |
57% |
49% |
2006 |
39% |
39% |
40% |
2007 and 2008 |
4% |
4% |
11% |
|
|
|
|
US RMBS Collateral by Vintage |
|
|
|
2005 and earlier |
58 % |
58% |
52% |
2006 |
3 9 % |
39% |
41% |
2007 and 2008 |
3% |
3% |
7% |
RMBS collateral for the ABS CDO
Super Senior exposures is subject to public ratings. The ratings of sub-prime,
Alt-A and total RMBS CDO
collateral as at 30th
September
2008
are set out in the table
below.
Sub-prime RMBS Ratings |
High Grade |
Mezzanine |
Total |
AAA/AA |
48% |
4% |
39% |
A/BBB |
16% |
42% |
22% |
Non-investment Grade |
36% |
54% |
39% |
Alt-A RMBS Ratings |
High Grade |
Mezzanine |
Total |
AAA/AA |
84% |
39% |
80% |
A/BBB |
6% |
24% |
8% |
Non-investment Grade |
10% |
37% |
12% |
Total RMBS Ratings |
High Grade |
Mezzanine |
Total |
AAA/AA |
64% |
18% |
55% |
A/BBB |
12% |
35% |
16% |
Non-investment Grade |
24% |
47% |
29% |
B. Other US Sub-Prime
As at |
Pro-forma1 30.06.08 |
As at |
Marks at |
Marks at |
Marks at |
||
£m |
£m |
£m |
|||||
Whole loans – performing |
1,401 |
2,145 |
2,805 |
82% |
84% |
100% |
|
Whole loans - more than 60 days past due |
245 |
272 |
372 |
44% |
50% |
65% |
|
Total whole loans |
1,646 |
2,417 |
3,177 |
72% |
78% |
94% |
|
Sales post period end |
- |
(828) |
- |
|
|||
Net exposure |
1,646 |
1,589 |
3,177 |
72% |
78% |
94% |
|
AAA securities |
517 |
360 |
481 |
49% |
54% |
88% |
|
Other US sub-prime securities |
412 |
418 |
525 |
12% |
34% |
61% |
|
Total securities gross of hedges |
929 |
778 |
1,006 |
21% |
42% |
71% |
|
Hedges |
(206) |
(689) |
(369) |
||||
Securities net of hedges |
723 |
89 |
637 |
||||
Residuals |
0 |
30 |
233 |
0% |
3% |
24% |
|
Other exposures with underlying sub-prime collateral: |
|
||||||
– Derivatives |
260 |
290 |
333 |
83% |
93% |
100% |
|
– Loans/other |
338 |
347 |
600 |
75% |
80% |
100% |
|
– Real estate |
96 |
85 |
57 |
49% |
53% |
68% |
|
Total other direct and indirect exposure |
1,417 |
841 |
1,860 |
|
|
||
Total other US sub-prime |
3,063 |
2,430 |
5,037 |
|
|
|
The majority of other US sub-prime exposures are measured at fair value through profit and loss.
Whole loans included £1,497m (30th June 2008: £2,279m) acquired on or originated since the acquisition of EquiFirst in March 2007. Of this balance £415m of new loans were originated in 2008. At 30th September 2008 the average loan to value at origination of all of the sub-prime whole loans was 80%.
In the nine months to 30th September 2008 there were net sales, pay-downs of collateral and movements in hedges and in US sub-prime collateral of liquidated and consolidated ABS CDO Super Senior structures of approximately £1,258m. This excludes the impact of assets acquired from Lehman Brothers.
Included above are senior AAA securities of £44m (30th June 2008: £44m) held by consolidated conduits on which a mark to market loss of £16m has been recognised in equity in the nine months to 30th September 2008. This is expected to reverse over time. The securities have protection provided by subordination of 16%.
Exposure is stated net of hedges traded in the liquid index swap market with market counterparties. The counterparty exposure is managed through a standard derivative collateralisation process and none of the hedge counterparties are monoline insurers.
Other exposures with underlying sub-prime collateral include counterparty derivative exposures to vehicles which hold sub-prime collateral. The majority of this exposure is the most senior obligation of the vehicles.
The 30th September 2008 figures include assets acquired from Lehman
Brothers of £92m in AAA securities and £108m in other US sub-prime
securities.
1 Pro-forma exposure represents net exposures as at 30th June 2008 less material sales agreed.
C. Alt-A
Net exposure to the Alt-A market was £3,719m (30th June 2008:
£3,510m), through a combination of whole loans, securities and residuals held on the
balance sheet, including those held in consolidated conduits.
As at |
As at |
As at |
Marks at |
Marks at |
Marks at |
||
£m |
£m |
£m |
|||||
AAA securities |
1,877 |
2,322 |
3,442 |
51% |
69% |
87% |
|
Other Alt-A securities |
814 |
149 |
208 |
7% |
30% |
75% |
|
Whole Loans |
680 |
716 |
909 |
73% |
80% |
97% |
|
Residuals |
11 |
13 |
25 |
31% |
40% |
66% |
|
Other exposures with underlying Alt-A collateral: |
|
|
|||||
– Derivatives |
202 |
184 |
221 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
– Loans/other |
135 |
126 |
111 |
73% |
76% |
97% |
|
Total |
3,719 |
3,510 |
4,916 |
|
|
Alt-A securities, whole loans and residuals are measured at fair value through profit and
loss. Alt-A securities held in conduits are categorised as available for sale.
Included above are senior securities currently rated AAA of £540m (30th June 2008: £598m) held by consolidated conduits on which a mark to market loss of £197m has been recognised in equity in the nine months to 30th September 2008. This is expected to reverse over time. The securities have protection provided by subordination of 23%.
At 30th September 2008, 89% of the Alt-A whole loan exposure was performing, and the average loan to value ratio at origination was 84%.
In the nine months to 30th September 2008 there were net sales, paydowns of collateral and movements in Alt-A collateral of liquidated and consolidated ABS CDO Super Senior structures of approximately £786m. This excludes the impact of assets acquired from Lehman Brothers.
Other exposures with underlying Alt-A collateral include counterparty derivative exposures to vehicles which hold Alt-A collateral. The majority of this exposure is the most senior obligation of the vehicle.
The 30th September 2008 figures include assets acquired from Lehman Brothers of £331m in AAA securities and £211m in other Alt-A securities.
D. Monoline Insurers
Assets are held with insurance protection or other credit enhancements from monoline insurers. Declines in fair value of the underlying assets are reflected in increases in the value of potential claims on monoline insurers. These are measured at fair value through profit and loss.
The net exposure to monoline insurers under these contracts increased to £3,558m by 30th September 2008 (30th June 2008: £2,584m) reflecting declines in fair value of the underlying asset on existing contracts. There have been no claims due under these contracts as none of the underlying assets were in default at 30th September 2008.
At 30th September 2008, 67% of the underlying assets comprised collateralised loan obligations (CLOs), 10% US RMBS and 23% other collateral, primarily US CMBS. 94% of the underlying assets are rated AAA/AA at 30th September 2008.
As at 30.0 9 .08 |
|||||
Exposure by Credit Rating of Monoline Insurer |
Notional |
Fair Value of Underlying Asset |
Fair
Value |
Credit |
Net |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
AAA/AA |
11,615 |
9,991 |
1,624 |
(120) |
1,504 |
A/BBB |
5,840 |
3,949 |
1,891 |
(373) |
1,518 |
Non-investment grade |
5,568 |
4,917 |
651 |
(115) |
536 |
Total |
23,023 |
18,857 |
4,166 |
(608) |
3,558 |
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
As at 30.06.08 |
|||||
Exposure by Credit Rating of Monoline Insurer |
Notional |
Fair Value of Underlying Asset |
Fair
Value |
Credit |
Net |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
AAA/AA |
10,738 |
9,587 |
1,151 |
(98) |
1,053 |
A/BBB |
5,592 |
4,193 |
1,399 |
(242) |
1,157 |
Non-investment grade |
5,151 |
4,684 |
467 |
(93) |
374 |
Total |
21,481 |
18,464 |
3,017 |
(433) |
2,584 |
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
As at 31.12.07 |
|||||
Exposure by Credit Rating of Monoline Insurer |
Notional |
Fair Value of Underlying Asset |
Fair
Value |
Credit |
Net |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
AAA/AA |
21,573 |
20,179 |
1,394 |
(59) |
1,335 |
D. Monoline Insurers (continued)
The notional value of the assets wrapped with insurance protection are set
out below, analysed by the current rating of the monoline. Of the US RMBS assets, 97% are
protected by monolines with investment grade ratings as at
30th September 2008.
Rating of Monoline Insurer - As at 30.09.08 |
||||
Notional Assets Wrapped by Monoline Insurers |
AAA/AA |
A/BBB |
Non- investment grade |
Total |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
2005 and earlier |
125 |
- |
- |
125 |
2006 |
398 |
625 |
- |
1,023 |
2007 and 2008 |
- |
417 |
- |
417 |
High Grade |
523 |
1,042 |
- |
1,565 |
Mezzanine - 2005 and earlier |
- |
528 |
63 |
591 |
CDO 2 - 2005 and earlier |
41 |
- |
- |
41 |
US RMBS |
564 |
1,570 |
63 |
2,197 |
CMBS |
56 |
2,673 |
348 |
3,077 |
CLOs |
9,634 |
864 |
4,909 |
15,407 |
Other |
1,361 |
733 |
248 |
2,342 |
Total |
11,615 |
5,840 |
5,568 |
23,023 |
Rating of Monoline Insurer - As at 30.06 .08 |
||||
Notional Assets Wrapped by Monoline Insurers |
AAA/AA |
A/BBB |
Non- investment grade |
Total |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
2005 and earlier |
112 |
- |
- |
112 |
2006 |
359 |
562 |
- |
921 |
2007 and 2008 |
- |
374 |
- |
374 |
High Grade |
471 |
936 |
- |
1,407 |
Mezzanine - 2005 and earlier |
- |
508 |
63 |
571 |
CDO 2 - 2005 and earlier |
38 |
- |
- |
38 |
US RMBS |
509 |
1,444 |
63 |
2,016 |
CMBS |
50 |
2,392 |
311 |
2,753 |
CLOs |
8,801 |
1,050 |
4,555 |
14,406 |
Other |
1,378 |
706 |
222 |
2,306 |
Total |
10,738 |
5,592 |
5,151 |
21,481 |
SIVs/SIV-lites |
As at 30.09.08 |
As at 30.06.08 |
As at 31.12.07 |
Marks at 30.09.08 |
Marks at 30.06.08 |
Marks at 31.12.07 |
|
£m |
£m |
£m |
% |
% |
% |
||
L iquidity facilities |
611 |
176 |
466 |
66% |
78% |
100% |
|
Bond inventory |
9 |
35 |
52 |
8% |
23% |
37% |
|
Derivatives |
446 |
218 |
266 |
99% |
98% |
100% |
|
Total |
1,066 |
429 |
784 |
|
|
|
At 30th September 2008 liquidity facilities of £611m (30th June 2008: £176m) include £482m designated at fair value through profit and loss relating to a SIV-lite which had previously been hedged with Lehman Brothers. Following the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy filing this facility has been reflected as a new exposure to the underlying assets. The remaining £129m represents drawn liquidity facilities in respect of SIV-lites and other structured investment vehicles classified as loans and receivables and are stated at cost less impairment.
Bond inventory and derivatives exposures are fair valued through profit and loss.
Movement in derivative exposure primarily relates to CDS exposure with
financial institutions as reference entities. At
30th September 2008 exposure had increased to £446m (30th
June 2008: £218m). The increase is driven by the widening of credit spreads
against all financial institutions which occurred at the end of September 2008.
F. Commercial Mortgages
Exposures in Barclays Capital's commercial mortgages portfolio, all of which are measured at fair value, comprised commercial real estate exposure of £10,335m (30th June 2008: £10,354m) and commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) of £1,185m (30th June 2008: £634m).
The commercial real estate loan exposure comprises 55% US, 42% Continental Europe and UK and 3% Asia. Of the total exposure 91% is tenanted; 6% relates to land or property under construction.
The US exposure includes two large facilities which comprise 43% of the total US exposure. These facilities have paid down approximately £768m in the first nine months of 2008. The remaining 57% of the US exposure comprises 76 facilities.
The UK and Continental European portfolio is well diversified with 76 facilities in place at 30th September 2008. In Europe protection is provided by loan covenants and annual LTV retests, which cover 90% of the portfolio. Of the Continental European exposure 61% relates to Germany. Exposure to the Spanish market represents less than 1% of total exposure at 30th September 2008.
At the start of the year exposure increased through additional drawdowns on facilities. Exposure subsequently declined following sales and paydowns of approximately £1.0bn in the UK and Continental Europe and £1.6bn in the US.
Commercial Mortgages |
As at 30.09.08 |
As at 30.06.08 |
As at 31.12.07 |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
Commercial real estate |
10,335 |
10,354 |
11,103 |
Commercial mortgage-backed securities |
1,185 |
634 |
1,296 |
Total |
11,520 |
10 , 988 |
12,399 |
Commercial Real Estate Exposure by Region |
As at 30.09.08 |
As at 30.06.08 |
As at 31.12.07 |
Marks at 30.09.08 |
Marks at 30.06.08 |
Marks at 31.12.07 |
£m |
£m |
£m |
% |
% |
% |
|
US |
5,675 |
5,558 |
5,947 |
9 5 % |
96% |
99% |
Germany |
2,079 |
2,153 |
1,783 |
98% |
98% |
100% |
Sweden |
251 |
269 |
250 |
99% |
100% |
100% |
France |
229 |
226 |
289 |
97% |
95% |
100% |
Switzerland |
142 |
137 |
127 |
100% |
98% |
100% |
Spain |
91 |
92 |
89 |
96% |
97% |
100% |
Other Continental Europe |
629 |
656 |
779 |
99% |
97% |
100% |
UK |
894 |
925 |
1,422 |
95% |
97% |
100% |
Asia |
345 |
338 |
417 |
99% |
99% |
100% |
Total |
10,335 |
10,354 |
11,103 |
|
Commercial Real Estate Exposure Metrics |
WALTV 1 |
WAM 2 |
WALA 3 |
US |
71.2% |
1.5 yrs |
1.4 yrs |
Continental Europe |
79.8% |
4.8 yrs |
1.3 yrs |
UK |
73.1% |
6.0 yrs |
1.6 yrs |
Asia |
78.7% |
5.9 yrs |
1.1 yrs |
1 Weighted-average loan-to-value based on the most recent valuation.
2 Weighted-average number of years to initial maturity.
3 Weighted-average loan age.
F. Commercial Mortgages (continued)
As at 30.09.08 |
|||||
Commercial Real Estate Exposure by Industry |
US |
Continental Europe |
UK |
Asia |
Total |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
Office |
2,361 |
1,093 |
212 |
103 |
3,76 9 |
Residential |
1,356 |
1,074 |
244 |
93 |
2,767 |
Retail |
51 |
560 |
110 |
83 |
804 |
Hotels |
857 |
396 |
35 |
19 |
1,307 |
Leisure |
- |
- |
253 |
- |
253 |
Land |
149 |
- |
- |
- |
149 |
Industrial |
468 |
217 |
40 |
10 |
735 |
Mixed/Others |
408 |
81 |
- |
37 |
526 |
Hedges |
25 |
- |
- |
- |
25 |
Total |
5,67 5 |
3,421 |
894 |
345 |
10,33 5 |
Commer
cial
Mortgage Backed Securities |
As at 30.09.08 |
As at 30.06.08 |
As at 31.12.07 |
Marks at 30.09.08 1 |
Marks at 30.06.08 1 |
Marks at 31.12.07 1 |
£m |
£m |
£m |
% |
% |
% |
|
AAA securities |
7 91 |
543 |
1,008 |
|
|
|
Other securities |
394 |
91 |
288 |
|
|
|
Total |
1,185 |
634 |
1,296 |
24 % |
68% |
98% |
Exposure is stated net of hedges traded in the liquid index swap market with market counterparties. The counterparty exposure is managed through a standard derivative collateralisation process and none of the hedge counterparties are monoline insurers.
The 30th September 2008 figures include assets acquired from Lehman Brothers
of £31m in AAA securities and £190m in other securities.
1 Marks are based on gross collateral.
G. Leveraged Finance
At 30th September 2008, the exposure relating to leveraged finance loans originated prior to 30th June 2007 was £9,489m (30th June 2008: £9,217m). This includes original targeted holds at commitment date of £1,781m (30th June 2008: £1,722m). Barclays Capital expects to hold these leveraged finance positions until redemption. Leveraged loans are classified within loans and receivables and are stated at amortised cost less impairment. The credit performance of the assets remains satisfactory.
Leveraged Finance Exposure by Region |
Pro-forma
1 |
Pro-forma 1 30.06.08 |
As at |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
UK |
4,733 |
4,436 |
4,401 |
US |
3,197 |
2,961 |
3,037 |
Europe |
1,356 |
1,609 |
1,568 |
Asia |
203 |
211 |
211 |
Total lending and commitments |
9,489 |
9,217 |
9,217 |
Original targeted hold |
(1,781) |
(1,722) |
(1,659) |
Unrecognised fees |
(169) |
(169) |
(190) |
Net lending and commitments |
7,539 |
7,326 |
7,368 |
Contingent repayment |
(2,506) |
(2,306) |
- |
Net exposure |
5,033 |
5,020 |
7,368 |
As at 30.09 .08 |
|||
Leveraged Finance Exposure by Industry |
Drawn |
Undrawn |
Total |
£m |
£m |
£m |
|
Insurance |
2,479 |
97 |
2,576 |
Telecoms |
2,457 |
179 |
2,636 |
Retail |
875 |
107 |
982 |
Healthcare |
592 |
172 |
764 |
Media |
536 |
103 |
639 |
Services |
498 |
151 |
649 |
Manufacturing |
409 |
80 |
489 |
Chemicals |
272 |
35 |
307 |
Other |
285 |
162 |
447 |
Total |
8,403 |
1,086 |
9,489 |
As at 30.06.08 |
As at 31.12.07 |
||||||
Leveraged Finance Exposure by Industry |
Drawn |
Undrawn |
Total |
Drawn |
Undrawn |
Total |
|
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
£m |
||
Insurance |
2,389 |
147 |
2,536 |
2,456 |
78 |
2,534 |
|
Telecoms |
2,192 |
222 |
2,414 |
2,259 |
240 |
2,499 |
|
Retail |
834 |
142 |
976 |
828 |
132 |
960 |
|
Healthcare |
604 |
159 |
763 |
577 |
141 |
718 |
|
Media |
489 |
130 |
619 |
469 |
127 |
596 |
|
Services |
487 |
172 |
659 |
388 |
134 |
522 |
|
Manufactur ing |
385 |
97 |
482 |
371 |
125 |
496 |
|
Chemicals |
287 |
37 |
324 |
46 |
286 |
332 |
|
Other |
211 |
233 |
444 |
233 |
327 |
560 |
|
Total |
7,878 |
1,339 |
9,217 |
7,627 |
1,590 |
9,217 |
New leveraged finance commitments originated after 30th June 2007 comprised £636m (30th June 2008: £1,275m).
1 Pro-forma represents exposures as at 30th September 2008 less leveraged finance loans of £2,506m that have become subject to an announced intention to be repaid at par. This transaction is contingent upon regulatory approvals and is likely to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2008.
H. Own Credit
The carrying amount of issued notes that are designated under the IAS 39
fair value option is adjusted to reflect the effect of changes in own credit spreads. The
resulting gain or loss is recognised in the income statement.
At 30th September 2008, the own credit adjustment arose from the fair valuation of
£56.6bn of Barclays Capital structured notes (30th June 2008: £48.1bn). The
widening of Barclays credit spreads affected the fair value of these notes and as a result
revaluation gains of £1,951m were recognised in trading income in the first nine
months of 2008. Of this, £852m was recognised in the first half of 2008.
In October 2008, credit spreads narrowed substantially leading to a reversal of £1bn gains on the fair valuation of issued notes.
- ENDS -