UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

N-2

608 - 1199 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 2R1
Telephone: (604) 687-0300 and Facsimile: (604) 687-0151

This proxy statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the board of directors (the "Board of Directors") of Passport Potash Inc. ("we", the "Company" or "Passport") for use in connection with the Company's 2012 annual general and special meeting of stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held on November 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. (Pacific Time) at the offices of McMillan LLP, Suite 1500, 1055 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, for the purposes set forth in the accompanying notice of Annual Meeting.

This proxy statement, the notice of Annual Meeting and the enclosed form of proxy are expected to be mailed to our stockholders on or about October 29, 2012. Our annual report for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012, including financial statements for the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012, will also be mailed to our stockholders with this proxy statement, but such annual report does not constitute a part of this proxy statement.

Our principal executive office is located at 608 - 1199 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 2R1.

This proxy solicitation is made on behalf of our Board of Directors. Solicitation of proxies may be made by our directors, officers and employees personally, by telephone, mail, facsimile, e-mail, internet or otherwise, but they will not be specifically compensated for these services. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting. Upon request, we will also reimburse brokers, dealers, banks or similar entities acting as nominees for their reasonable expenses incurred in forwarding copies of the proxy materials to the beneficial owners of the shares of our common stock as of October 9, 2012 (the "Record Date").

Our Board of Directors has fixed the close of business on October 9, 2012, as the Record Date for the determination of stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual

-2-

Meeting. As of the Record Date there were approximately 172,751,863 shares of our common stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Holders of common stock are entitled to one vote at the Annual Meeting for each share of common stock held of record as of the Record Date. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors.

A quorum is necessary to hold a valid meeting of our stockholders. The required quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting is at least one person who is, or who represents by proxy, one or more shareholders who, in the aggregate, hold at least 5% of the issued shares as of the Record Date.

In order to be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists at the Annual Meeting, shares must be present at the Annual Meeting either in person or represented by proxy. Shares that will be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists will include:

• shares represented by properly executed proxies for which voting instructions have been given, including proxies which are marked "Abstain" or "Withhold" for any matter;
• shares represented by properly executed proxies for which no voting instruction has been given; and
• broker non-votes.

Broker non-votes occur when shares held by a broker for a beneficial owner are not voted with respect to a particular proposal because the broker has not received voting instructions from the beneficial owner and the broker does not have discretionary authority to vote such shares.

If you are a registered holder of shares of our common stock on the Record Date, you may vote those shares of our common stock in person at the Annual Meeting or by proxy in the manner described below under "Voting of Proxies." If you hold shares of our common stock in "street name" through a broker or other financial institution, you must follow the instructions provided by your broker or other financial institution regarding how to instruct your broker or financial institution to vote your shares.

Registered Shareholders may wish to vote by proxy whether or not they are able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Registered Shareholders electing to submit a proxy may do so by:

-3-

in all cases ensuring that the proxy is received at least 48 hours (excluding Saturdays, Sundays and holidays) before the Annual Meeting or the adjournment thereof at which the proxy is to be used.

The following information is of significant importance to shareholders who do not hold shares of Company's common stock ("Common Shares") in their own name (each a "Beneficial Shareholder"). Beneficial Shareholders should note that the only proxies that can be recognized and acted upon at the Annual Meeting are those deposited by registered shareholders (those whose names appear on the records of the Company as the registered holders of Common Shares) or as set out in the following disclosure.

If Common Shares are listed in an account statement provided to a shareholder by a broker, then in almost all cases those Common Shares will not be registered in the shareholder's name on the records of the Company. Such Common Shares will more likely be registered under the names of intermediaries. In the United States, the vast majority of such Common Shares are registered under the name of Cede & Co. as nominee for The Depository Trust Company (which acts as depositary for many U.S. brokerage firms and custodian banks), and in Canada, under the name of CDS & Co. (the registration name for The Canadian Depository for Securities Limited, which acts as nominee for many Canadian brokerage firms).

Intermediaries are required to seek voting instructions from Beneficial Shareholders in advance of meetings of shareholders. Every intermediary has its own mailing procedures and provides its own return instructions to clients.

There are two kinds of Beneficial Shareholders - those who object to their name being made known to the issuers of securities which they own (called "OBOs" for Objecting Beneficial Owners) and those who do not object to the issuers of the securities they own knowing who they are (called "NOBOs" for Non-Objecting Beneficial Owners).

The Company is taking advantage of the provisions of National Instrument 54-101 "Communication with Beneficial Owners of Securities of a Reporting Issuer" that permit it to deliver proxy-related materials directly to its NOBOs. As a result NOBOs can expect to receive a scannable Voting Instruction Form ("VIF") from our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company of Canada ("Computershare"). The VIF is to be completed and returned to Computershare as set out in the instructions provided on the VIF. Computershare will tabulate

-4-

the results of the VIFs received from NOBOs and will provide appropriate instructions at the Annual Meeting with respect to the shares represented by the VIFs they receive.

These securityholder materials are being sent to both registered and non-registered owners of the securities of the Company. If you are a non-registered owner, and the Company or its agent has sent these materials directly to you, your name, address and information about your holdings of securities, were obtained in accordance with applicable securities regulatory requirements from the intermediary holding securities on your behalf.

By choosing to send these materials to you directly, the Company (and not the intermediary holding securities on your behalf) has assumed responsibility for (i) delivering these materials to you, and (ii) executing your proper voting instructions. Please return your VIF as specified in the request for voting instructions that was sent to you.

Beneficial Shareholders who are OBOs should follow the instructions of their intermediary carefully to ensure that their Common Shares are voted at the Annual Meeting.

The form of proxy supplied to you by your broker will be similar to the proxy provided to registered shareholders by the Company. However, its purpose is limited to instructing the intermediary on how to vote your Common Shares on your behalf. Most brokers delegate responsibility for obtaining instructions from clients to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. ("Broadridge") in the United States and in Canada. Broadridge mails a VIF in lieu of a proxy provided by the Company. The VIF will name the same persons as the Company's Proxy to represent your Common Shares at the Annual Meeting. You have the right to appoint a person (who need not be a Beneficial Shareholder of the Company), other than any of the persons designated in the VIF, to represent your Common Shares at the Annual Meeting and that person may be you. To exercise this right, insert the name of the desired representative (which may be yourself) in the blank space provided in the VIF. The completed VIF must then be returned to Broadridge by mail or facsimile or given to Broadridge by phone or over the internet, in accordance with Broadridge's instructions. Broadridge then tabulates the results of all instructions received and provides appropriate instructions respecting the voting of Common Shares to be represented at the Annual Meeting and the appointment of any shareholder's representative. If you receive a VIF from Broadridge, the VIF must be completed and returned to Broadridge, in accordance with its instructions, well in advance of the Annaul Meeting in order to have your Common Shares voted or to have an alternate representative duly appointed to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your Common Shares at the Annual Meeting.

A stockholder who has given a proxy may revoke it at any time in so far as it has not been exercised. A proxy may be revoked, as to any matter on which a vote shall not already have been cast pursuant to the authority conferred by such proxy, by instrument in writing executed by the stockholder or by his attorney authorized in writing or, if the stockholder is a body corporate, by an officer or attorney thereof duly authorized, and deposited either with the Company or to Computershare Investor Services Inc., 510 Burrard Street, Vancouver, B.C. V6C 3B9 at any time up to and including 48 hours preceding the Meeting (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, and holidays), or any adjournment thereof, at which the proxy is to be used or with the Chairman of such Annual Meeting preceding the commencement of such Annual Meeting or any adjournment

-5-

thereof, and upon either of such deposits the proxy is revoked. A proxy may also be revoked in any other manner permitted by law.

The persons named in the enclosed form of proxy will vote the Common Shares in respect of which they are appointed in accordance with the direction of the stockholders appointing them on any ballot that may be called for. The enclosed form of proxy confers discretionary authority upon the persons named therein with respect to:

Proposal One - Number of Directors: The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our common stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required for the approval of the number of directors. Stockholders may vote in favor or against this proposal, or they may abstain. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Abstentions are deemed to be "votes cast", and have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, have no effect on the vote with respect to this proposal.

Proposal Two - Election of Directors: The affirmative vote of the holders of a plurality of our shares of common stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required for the election of our directors. This means that the nominees who receive the greatest number of votes for each open seat will be elected. Votes may be cast in favor of the election of directors or withheld. A vote is withheld when a properly executed proxy is marked WITHHOLD for the election of one or more directors. Votes that are withheld and broker non-votes will be counted for the purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum but will have no other effect on the election of directors. Further, brokers may not cast discretionary "uninstructed" votes in any election of directors.

Proposal Three - Appointment of Accountants: The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our common stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required for the ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accountants. Stockholders may vote in favor or against this proposal, or they may abstain. Abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted for purposes of determining the presence or absence of a quorum. Abstentions are deemed to be "votes cast", and have the same effect as a vote against this proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, have no effect on the vote with respect to this proposal.

-6-

Proposal Four - Approval of the Continuation of the 2011 Rolling Share Option Plan: The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our common stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required for the approval of the continuation of the Company's 2011 Rolling Share Option Plan. Stockholders may vote in favor or against this Proposal or they may abstain. Abstentions are deemed to be "votes cast" and will have the same effect as a vote against this Proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, will have no effect on the vote with respect to this Proposal.

Proposal Five- Share Consolidation: The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required for the approval of a consolidation of the Company's common shares on a basis of 1 new share for up to each 10 old shares. Stockholders may vote in favor or against this Proposal or they may abstain. Abstentions are deemed to be "votes cast" and will have the same effect as a vote against this Proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, will have no effect on the vote with respect to this Proposal.

Proposal Six - Amendment to Quorum Requirements of Articles: The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy is required for the approval of an amendment to the quorum requirement in our Articles. Stockholders may vote in favor or against this Proposal or they may abstain. Abstentions are deemed to be "votes cast" and will have the same effect as a vote against this Proposal. Broker non-votes are not deemed to be votes cast and, therefore, will have no effect on the vote with respect to this Proposal.

No proposals have been received from any stockholder to be considered at the Annual Meeting.

It is not expected that any matters other than those referred to in this proxy statement will be brought before the Annual Meeting. If other matters are properly presented, however, the persons named as proxy appointees will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters. The grant of a proxy also will confer discretionary authority on the persons named as proxy appointees to vote in accordance with their best judgment on matters incident to the conduct of the Annual Meeting.

-7-

None of the following persons has any substantial or material interest, direct or indirect, by way of beneficial ownership of securities or otherwise, in any matter to be acted on at the Annual Meeting, except in so far as they may be elected to office:

• each person who has been one of our directors or executive officers at any time since the beginning of our last fiscal year;
• each nominee for election as one of our directors; or
• any associate of any of the foregoing persons.

None of the above persons has received any extra or special benefit in their capacity as a security holder of the Company.

The following table sets forth information as of October 9, 2012 regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock by:

• each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our shares of common stock; and
• each named executive officer, each director, and all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

The number of shares beneficially owned and the percentage of shares beneficially owned are based on 172,751,863 shares of common stock outstanding as of October 9, 2012.

For the purposes of the information provided below, shares that may be issued upon the exercise or conversion of options, warrants and other rights to acquire shares of our common stock that are exercisable or convertible within 60 days following October 9, 2012, are deemed to be outstanding and beneficially owned by the holder for the purpose of computing the number of shares and percentage ownership of that holder, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

-8-

(*)     Less than 1%.

-9-

The following table sets forth, as of October 9, 2012, certain information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding common stock.

-10-

We have no knowledge of any arrangements, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in our control.

We are not, to the best of our knowledge, directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another corporation or foreign government.

The Board is presently comprised of eight members. Stockholders will be requested to approve an ordinary resolution that the number of directors elected be fixed at eight.

-11-

We propose to elect eight directors, each to hold office until each director's successor is elected and qualified at our next Annual Meeting.

The persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote for the election of the nominees listed under "Nominees for Election of Directors" below unless you instruct them otherwise, or unless a nominee is unwilling to serve as a director of our Company. Our Board of Directors has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unwilling to serve, but if a nominee should determine not to serve, the persons named in the proxy may vote for another candidate nominated by our Board of Directors.

The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors is required for the election of each nominee as a director.

Joshua Bleak, Laara Shaffer, Ali Rahimtula, R. Dennis Ickes, Matthew Salmon, David J. Salisbury, John Eckersley and Jerry Aiken, each of whom is a current director, have been nominated by our Board of Directors for election. It is the intention of the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy to vote proxies for the election of these individuals and each of the nominees has consented to being named in this proxy statement and to serve, if elected. In the event that any or all of these individuals should for some reason, presently unknown, become unavailable for election, the persons named in the form of proxy intend to vote for substitute nominees.

The following table provides information regarding our directors (each of whom is a nominee for re-election to our Board of Directors) and executive officers:

-12-

The following is a description of the business background of the directors and director nominees of our Company:

Joshua Bleak. Mr. Bleak has been our President, Chief Executive Officer since January 11, 2011 and a director of our Company since April 12, 2010. Mr. Bleak is experienced in the mining and exploration industry as well as being fourth generation in a family with a rich mining and exploration background. From December 24, 2009 to current, Mr. Bleak serves as President, CEO, Treasurer and a director of Continental Resources Group, Inc. (OTCBB: CRGC) which is involved in exploring and developing uranium prospects. Since January 26, 2012, Mr. Bleak has served as a director of American Strategic Minerals Corporation (OTCBB: ASMC) which is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of properties that may contain uranium mineralization. Since October 2008, Mr. Bleak has served as the President and a director of North American Environmental Corp., a consulting company specializing in mining project management, permitting, lobbying and land tenure. From February 2007 to September 2008, he served as Manager of NPX Metals, Inc., an exploration and mining company. Since January 2005 he has served as Secretary and a director of Pinal Realty Investments Inc., a real estate development company. Mr. Bleak's qualification to serve on our Board of Directors is based on his experience in the mining industry in general.

Ali Rahimtula. Mr. Rahimtula has served as a director of our Company since October 28, 2011.  Since 1979, Mr. Rahimtula has served as the President and founder of Transnational Enterprises LTD., d/b/a Transfert America. Transnational Enterprises LTD. is a member of the Rahimtula Group. The Rahimtula Group was a pioneer of the fertilizer business in India, and has been a domestic industry leader since the 1960's. They are a global company, recognized for

-13-

their extensive business networks to supply international fertilizer manufacturers for their critical raw materials such as sulphur, rock phosphate, ammonia, phosphoric acid and potash.  The Rahimtula group has operated in the traditional markets of India and Pakistan but has also expanded its area of operations into other countries such as Brazil, Vietnam, China, Thailand, Philippines, and South Africa. They are also experienced in executing joint-venture fertilizer production and marketing contracts in the Middle East, Asia, and Africa as well as in Europe and the CIS. Mr. Rahimtula's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors is based on his experience and expertise in the fertilizer industry. He has and can contribute by securing large customers of international repute for the Company as joint venture partners who can buy potash on long term off take agreements. Also, Mr. Rahimtula brings to the Company his experience in logistics, such as port infrastructure developments and organizing export shipping in containers and bulk vessel chartering.

Dennis Ickes, Mr. Ickes has served as a director of our Company since December 14, 2011. Mr. Ickes is an internationally known lawyer, legal scholar, trial attorney and business leader. Mr. Ickes holds a Juris Doctorate from the University of Utah. He served in the U.S. Department of Justice where he co-founded the Office of Indian Rights in 1973. Mr. Ickes was also a principal negotiator on behalf of the federal government in the violent standoff with Indian activists at Wounded Knee, South Dakota in 1973.

In 1976, President Gerald R. Ford and Secretary Thomas Kleppe selected Mr. Ickes to serve as Deputy Under Secretary of the Interior. During his tenure Mr. Ickes was responsible for developing and implementing public policy related to public lands, Indian relations, national parks and monuments, federal reserved water rights, fish and wildlife, and Trust Territories of the Pacific.

While Mr. Ickes was in the U.S. Department of Justice he brought the first federal voting rights case on behalf of American Indians when he supported the right of residents of the Navajo Nation to run for county office in Apache County, Arizona.

Upon leaving the Federal service in 1977, he represented northern plains and Southwest tribes and organizations until the late 1980s when lawyers who were tribal members began assuming tribal representations.

As a legal consultant, Mr. Ickes has advised state and county governments, Indian tribes, Indian individuals, Indian-owned companies, and non-Indian owned companies, including financial institutions concerning the conduct of business within tribal jurisdictions. Mr. Ickes wrote the first law review article in the Nation that urged tribes to turn from relying upon federal appropriations to seeking private capital to develop their opportunities.

Mr. Ickes previously founded, owned and operated a barite mining and processing facility in Nevada. He is currently one of two members in an exploration stage beryllium project in Utah. He has served on the board of a publicly owned independent oil and gas company and a mining exploration company. As a consultant Mr. Ickes advised the President and CEO of Resolution Copper Mining, a Rio Tinto company, on issues related to Indian tribes. He is the founder and President of Native 17, LLC, a company which assists tribes with economic development

-14-

opportunities both on and off the reservation through a proprietary system developed by him. He is the past chairman of the Federal Bar Association, Indian Law Section, the Utah State Bar Association, Natural Resource Section and the chairman of the Indian Law Section. Mr. Ickes qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors is based on his extensive experience in government relations, business, mining and Indian matters.

Matthew Salmon. Mr. Salmon has served as a director of our Company since February 1, 2012. Mr. Salmon began his career in public service as an Arizona State Senator, a position in which he served from 1991 to 1995. While in the Senate, he served as the Assistant Majority Leader and chaired the Rules Committee.

From 1995 to 2001 Mr. Salmon represented Arizona in the United States House of Representatives, where he served on the International Relations, Education, Small Business, and Science Committees. He also served for six years on the Helsinki Commission and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) where he developed myriad and key relationships with parliamentary members from OSCE. He was an active and influential member of both those organizations. In 2000, Mr. Salmon did not stand for reelection, honoring a pledge made in his first Congressional campaign to serve only three terms.

While in Congress, he led several U.S. Congressional delegations to China to improve trade relations and bilateral relationships. He was the only Member of the U.S. Congress in America's history who speaks Mandarin Chinese. This expertise served him well as one of the leading advocates of a positive U.S. and China relationship. During this period Mr. Salmon was instrumental in obtaining the release of a U. S. based academic researcher, Song Yongyi, who had been detained in China on charges of spying.

Mr. Salmon has over twenty years of experience in both the public and private sector. During his career he has emphasized managing relations at all levels of government and in the process has garnered significant media relations experience. Mr. Salmon formed Upstream Consulting Inc. ("Upstream"), a political consulting firm with offices in Washington, DC and Phoenix, Arizona. Upstream focuses on the development of intelligent, strategic and highly effective messaging strategies for their clients. Since June 2011, Upstream has served as a consultant for the Company. Mr. Salmon's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors is based on his extensive business and political relationships.

David J. Salisbury.  Mr. Salisbury has served as our Chairman of the board and a director of our Company since January 16, 2012.  Mr. Salisbury has had an extensive career in the mining industry, spanning four decades, including seventeen years with Rio Tinto PLC.  During his career he has had experience in almost all phases of mine development and operation, including:  operating and capital budget development, operating cost control, product quality, profit/loss analysis, engineering, safety, field operations and maintenance, strategic planning, environmental compliance, market development, merger and acquisition analysis, employee relations, community relations, public relations and government relations at both the state and federal levels.

-15-

Mr. Salisbury was President and CEO of Resolution Copper Mining ("Resolution Copper") (Resolution Copper Mining is a joint venture between Rio Tinto and BHP and is not publicly traded), from 2008 to his retirement on January 31, 2011.  At Resolution Copper he was responsible for the development of a deep underground copper mine in Superior, Arizona.  One of his primary responsibilities was a legislative land exchange involving 3,025 acres of federal land in exchange for 5,500 acres of ecologically important private land.  His role at Resolution Copper required significant interaction and engagement with members of the U.S. Congress, federal agencies, the Governor of the State of Arizona and State legislators.  He was also responsible for leading the activities of integrating all engineering studies and design with environmental permitting, progressive development of the future operations culture and working environment, health and safety, project budget controls and community relations.

From 2006 through 2008, Mr. Salisbury was President and CEO of Kennecott Minerals Company (Kennecott Minerals is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Rio Tinto and is not publicly traded), where he was responsible for the comprehensive management of underground operations in Juneau, Alaska; open cut/heap leach gold in Nevada; and the development and construction of an underground nickel operation in Michigan.

Mr. Salisbury was a leader for the Rio Tinto global improvement program, Improving Performance Together, from 2004 through 2006.  He led one of four major streams of work aimed at bringing about radical change in the way Rio Tinto conducts business.  This responsibility covered the engineering and operation of processing operations at all Rio Tinto operations and involved leading a team of eight general managers and managers in diagnosing current state, formulating solutions, implementing pilot trials and ultimately rolling out change across the global group.

Mr. Salisbury was Managing Director and CEO of Rössing Uranium Ltd. (Rossing Uranium is majority owned by Rio Tinto and is not publicly traded) from 2001 through 2004.  The Rössing mine employed 1,200 people and produces U₃O₈ for the global nuclear fuel industry, representing 8% of the global primary supply.  During his tenure the mine achieved its historical best safety performance while increasing production and decreasing staff by 33%.

While with Rio Tinto, Mr. Salisbury also held Senior Executive positions with Kennecott Ridgeway Mining Company and Kennecott Energy Company.

Prior to joining Rio Tinto Mr. Salisbury was the President of Cordero Mining Company/Sun Coal Company (1992 to 1993) and responsible for the operation of the Cordero Mine, the seventh largest coal mine in the United States.  At Cordero he completed a major organizational restructuring to reduce cost and improve efficiency, dropping operating costs by 10%.

Mr. Salisbury served as President and COO of the Al Hamilton Operating Company/Bradford Coal Company (1990 to 1992) where he was responsible for the operation of 9 active mines in a 30 mile radius of Clearfield, PA.  During his tenure he improved the financial performance of this operation and was able to bring it into profitability.  

-16-

From 1989 to 1990, Mr. Salisbury served as President of The Coteau Properties Company/North American Coal Corporation where he was responsible for the construction, management and operation of a 12 million tons per year surface lignite mine near Beulah, North Dakota.  The Coteau Properties Company/North American Coal Corporation had annual sales of $86 million US dollars to the only commercial coal gasification plant in the United States.  Mr. Salisbury administered a 20 year contract with the sole coal customer, and negotiated a new contract extension adding a new coal field and additional production up to 16 million tons per year.

Mr. Salisbury served in various management positions with The Coteau Properties Company/North American Coal Corporation from 1978 through 1989.  He was the project manager responsible for the oversight of design, contract administration and construction management of the Freedom Mine, a greenfield mine facility valued at $186 million.  The project was completed on time and under budget.

Mr. Salisbury's qualification to serve on our Board of Directors is based on his extensive experience in the mining industry in general.

John Eckersley. Mr. Eckersley has served as our Vice President, Legal and Corporate Affairs since December 2010 and has served as a director of our Company since July 15, 2011. Mr. Eckersley has practiced law as a solo practitioner since 1999. His practice focuses on securities compliance, corporate governance and estate planning. Mr. Eckersley served as the Executive Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer of Digital Business Resource, Inc., a telecommunications company, from 1996 to 1999, where he was a founder, and was responsible for developing systems for office management, accounting, client services, vendor coordination and marketing. Mr. Eckersley served as the General Counsel of TIMI, a public finance advisory company, where he advised the company on corporate strategy and was responsible for the company's compliance filings. Mr. Eckersley has served as a director of Silver Horn Mining Ltd. (OTCBB: SILV) since July 21, 2011, which is involved in the acquisition and exploration of properties that may contain mineral resources, principally silver. Mr. Eckersley received his Bachelor of Science, cum laude, and his Juris Doctorate from the University of Utah. Mr. Eckersley's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors is based on his corporate experience and knowledge of the resources industry.

Jerry Aiken. Mr. Aiken has served as a director of our Company since May 15, 2012. Mr. Aiken has more than 41 years of experience in mineral exploration involving base metals, precious metals, and industrial minerals. He has been involved in project generation, geologic mapping, geochemical evaluation, drill program supervision, and regional program management throughout the western United States, Canada, Mexico, South America and parts of Europe.

Since 2005, Mr. Aiken has been working as a consulting geologist involved in the evaluation of mineral properties and the writing and reviewing of Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 technical reports and PFS/FS technical reports. Prior to beginning work as a consulting geologist, Mr. Aiken worked for 29 years for US Borax (Rio Tinto Exploration) ("Borax") in Tucson, Arizona and Valencia, California. Before focusing his career in borates, potash and lithium he worked for five years for ASARCO Exploration

-17-

beginning in 1970. Mr. Aiken has conducted and implemented exploration programs for borates, potash, lithium and other industrial minerals.

A review of Mr. Aiken's potash experience, beginning in the mid-1970s, shows that he has evaluated several potash holdings and mines located in the Carlsbad district, New Mexico, and the Paradox Basin, Utah. His experience in that regard resulted in his evaluating the brine potential in the Paradox Basin.

Subsequent to his work in the Paradox Basin, Mr. Aiken evaluated potash projects in the South American Alta Plano and a number of brine projects for potash and other industrial minerals. In addition to his potash evaluation, several 'hard rock' projects were evaluated by Mr. Aiken in both South America, (Argentina) and North America (both in the US and Canada).

Mr. Aiken graduated in 1966 with a Bachelor of Science degree in Geology from Western Michigan University. He also completed coursework in the Masters Program in Exploration Geology from the University of Idaho. Mr. Aiken is a Registered Professional Geologist in the State of Washington.

Mr. Aiken's qualifications to serve on our Board of Directors is based on his extensive experience in the mining industry in general.

We do not have any significant employees other than our executive officer.

None of our directors or our executive officer is related.

Except as disclosed in this proxy statement, during the past ten years none of the following events have occurred with respect to any of our proposed nominees for election as a director or was a director or executive officer of any company (including our Company):

-18-

-19-

There are currently no legal proceedings to which any of our directors or officers is a party adverse to us or in which any of our directors or officers has a material interest adverse to us.

The Company's Board of Directors held four meetings during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2012. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate of: (i) the total number of board meetings held while he was a director; and (ii) the total number of meetings held by committees on which he served during the periods that he served.

The Company does not have a formal policy with respect to director attendance at annual stockholders meetings, however, all directors are encouraged to attend. A total of two directors from the Board of Directors as it was comprised at the time attended the annual stockholders meeting last year.

Our Board of Directors currently only has an Audit Committee. The Audit Committee was established in August, 2007.

The following provides information regarding the Company's Audit Committee and summarizes the functions of such committee.

-20-

National Instrument 52-110 of the Canadian Securities Administrators ("NI 52-110") requires the Company, as a venture issuer, to disclose annually in its information circular (proxy statement) certain information concerning the constitution of its audit committee and its relationship with its independent auditor, as set forth in the following.

The Company's audit committee is governed by an audit committee charter, the text of which is attached as Schedule A to the management information circular for the annual and special general meeting held on August 9, 2007 and filed on www.Sedar.com on July 17, 2007.

The Company's audit committee is currently comprised of three directors, Laara Shaffer, David Salisbury, and Jerry Aiken. Laara Shaffer is the Company's Chief Financial Officer and Secretary. All of the audit committee members are "financially literate". The Company is relying upon the exemption in section 6.1 of NI 52-110 in respect of the composition of its audit committee and in respect of its reporting obligations under NI 52-110 for the year ended February 29, 2012. This exemption exempts a "venture issuer" from the requirement to have 100% of the members of its audit committee independent, as would otherwise be required by NI 52-110.

See heading "Election of Directors" for disclosure on relevant experience for each member of the audit committee. Each member of the audit committee has

• an understanding of the accounting principles used by the issuer to prepare its financial statements, and the ability to assess the general application of those principles in connection with estimates, accruals and reserves;
• experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements that present a breadth and level of complexity of accounting issues that are generally comparable to the breadth and complexity of issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the issuer's financial statements, or experience actively supervising individuals engaged in such activities; and
• an understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial reporting.

Since the commencement of the Company's most recently completed financial year, the Company's Board has not failed to adopt a recommendation of the audit committee to nominate or compensate an external auditor.

The Company has not relied on the exemptions contained in sections 2.4 or 8 of NI 52-110. Section 2.4 which provides an exemption from the requirement that the audit committee must pre-approve all non-audit services to be provided by the auditor, where the total amount of fees related to the non-audit services are not expected to exceed 5% of the total fees payable to the auditor in the fiscal year in which the non-audit services were provided. Section 8 permits a company to apply to a securities regulatory authority for an exemption from the requirements of NI 52-110, in whole or in part.

The audit committee has not adopted specific policies and procedures for the engagement of non-audit services. Subject to the requirements of NI 52-110, the engagement of non-audit services is considered by the Company's Board of Directors, and where applicable the audit committee, on a case-by-case basis.

-21-

The Audit Committee discharged its mandate in respect of the financial year ended February 29, 2012, including the review and recommendation to the Board in respect of all financial disclosure contained in our company's public documents.

The Audit Committee held four meetings during the year ended February 29, 2012, and also acted through the adoption of written consent resolutions.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended February 29, 2012 with the Company's management. In addition, the Audit Committee has discussed with the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte, LLP, the matters required by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, Communication with Audit Committees. The Audit Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte, LLP required by Public Accounting Oversight Board Rule No. 3526, Communications with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and has discussed, with Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte, LLP, their independence. The Audit Committee considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the auditors' independence. Based on the discussions and reviews referenced above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company's Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended February 29, 2012 be included in the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10, as amended. The Audit Committee has selected Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte, LLP to serve as the Company's Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year 2013.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of Passport Potash Inc.:

The Board considers its size each year when it considers the number of directors to recommend to the shareholders for election at the annual meeting of shareholders, taking into account the number required to carry out the Board's duties effectively and to maintain a diversity of views and experience.

The Board does not have a nominating committee, and these functions are currently performed by the Board as a whole. However, if there is a change in the number of directors required by the Company, this policy will be reviewed.

The Board, as a whole, determines compensation for the directors and executive officers.

-22-

Stockholders may contact the Board of Directors of the Company either by: (a) writing to Passport Potash Inc., 608-1199 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia V6E 2R1, Attn: Board of Directors; or (b) sending an e-mail message to info@passportpotash.com.

Our Secretary will conduct an initial review of all such stockholder communications and will forward the communications to the appropriate person, to the appropriate committee of the Board of Directors, or the entire Board of Directors depending on the nature of the communication. Such communications will be assessed by the recipients as soon as reasonably practical taking into consideration the nature of the communication and whether expedited review is appropriate.

Except as described herein, none of the following parties (each a "Related Party") has, in our fiscal years ended February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction with us or in any presently proposed transaction that has or will materially affect us:

• any of our directors or officers;
• any person proposed as a nominee for election as a director;
• any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 10% of the voting rights attached to our outstanding shares of common stock; or
• any member of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings and in- laws) of any of the above persons.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid CAD$19,908 to David Salisbury, a director of the Company, for consulting fees. Mr. Salisbury receives $10,000 per month for consulting services pursuant to a Consulting Agreement, dated January 16, 2012.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid CAD$45,352.50 to Joshua Bleak, a director and officer of the Company, for management fees. In addition, during the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid $21,815 to North American Environmental Corp. ("NAEC"), a company controlled by Joshua Bleak, for exploration services (site preparation, drilling, site reclamation and materials transportation) and owed this company CAD$22,196.54 as at February 29, 2012. During the year ended February 28, 2011, the Company paid a total of CAD$139,047.44 to NAEC and owed this company CAD$76,075.33 as at February 28, 2011. There is no written contract between the Company and NAEC, and NAEC issues invoices when work is performed based on the activity and/or the equipment used to perform the work.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid CAD$27,836.17 to Dennis Ickes, a director of the Company, for professional services. Mr. Ickes currently receives $5,000 per month pursuant to a Professional Services Agreement, dated December 14, 2011.

-23-

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company owed CAD$4,200 to Gary Zak, a former director of the Company, for consulting fees. During the year ended February 28, 2011, the Company paid CAD$2,100 to Gary Zak, a director of the Company at that time, for consulting fees and owed Mr. Zak CAD$4,200 as at February 28, 2011 for consulting fees.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid CAD$109,090.35 to John Eckersley, a director and officer of the Company, for consulting fees and the Company owed Mr. Eckersley CAD$13,500 as at February 29, 2012.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid CAD$12,700 to Laara Shaffer, a director and officer of the Company, for administration fees. In addition, during the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid CAD$5,000 to Timeline Filing Services Ltd., a company controlled by Laara Shaffer, for administration fees. Furthermore, during the year ended February 28, 2011, the Company paid CAD$9,800 to Laara Shaffer, a director and officer of the Company, for consulting fees.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid CAD$10,000 to Transnational Enterprises Ltd., a company controlled by Ali Rahimtula, for consulting fees, and the Company owed Transnational Enterprises Ltd. CAD$11,200 as at February 29, 2012. Mr. Rahimtula receives CAD$5,000 per month through a Consulting Agreement between Transnational Enterprises Ltd. and the Company, dated January 1, 2012.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid CAD$49,589 to Upstream Consulting Inc., a company controlled by Matthew Salmon, a director of the Company, for consulting fees pursuant to a Consulting Agreement.

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company owed CAD$15,600.43 to Stephen Butrenchuk, a director of the Company at that time, for consulting fees. During the year ended February 28, 2011, the Company paid CAD$27,765.56 to Mr. Butrenchuk for consulting fees and owed Mr. Butrenchuk CAD$13,048 as at February 28, 2011.

Our Board of Directors reviews any proposed transactions involving Related Parties and considerers whether such transactions are fair and reasonable and in the Company's best interests.

Other than compensatory arrangements described above under "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and below under "Executive Compensation," we have no other transactions, directly or indirectly, with our promoters, directors, senior officers or principal stockholders, which have materially affected or will materially affect us.

To our knowledge, and other than as disclosed in this proxy statement, there are no known existing or potential conflicts of interest among us, our promoters, directors and officers, or other members of management, or any proposed director, officer or other member of management as a result of their outside business interests except that certain of the directors and officers serve as directors and officers of other companies, and therefore it is possible that a conflict may arise between their duties to us and their duties as a director or officer of such other companies.

-24-

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of our equity securities, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of our common stock and our other equity securities with the SEC. During the fiscal years ended February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011, our directors and officers were not required to file under Section 16(a).

The Board has not appointed a compensation committee and the responsibilities relating to executive and director compensation, including reviewing and recommending director compensation, overseeing our base compensation structure and equity-based compensation program, recommending compensation of our officers and employees, and evaluating the performance of officers generally and in light of annual goals and objectives, is performed by the Board as a whole.

The Board also assumes responsibility for reviewing and monitoring the long-range compensation strategy for our senior management. The Board reviews the compensation of senior management on a semi-annual basis taking into account compensation paid by other issuers of similar size and activity.

The Company is a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is a junior resource company and has limited resources. The compensation program for the senior management of the Company is designed within this context with a view that the level and form of compensation achieves certain objectives, including:

In compensating its senior management, the Company has arranged for equity participation through its stock option plan.

-25-

The Company's objective is to achieve certain strategic objectives and milestones. The Board will consider executive bonus compensation dependent upon the Company meeting those strategic objectives and milestones and sufficient cash resources being available for the granting of bonuses. The Board approves executive bonus compensation dependent upon compensation levels based on recommendations of the Chief Executive Officer. Such recommendations are generally based on information provided by issuers that are similar in size and scope to the Company's operations.

The Company believes that encouraging its executives and employees to become shareholders is the best way of aligning their interests with those of its shareholders. Equity participation is accomplished through the Company's stock option plan. Stock options are granted to executives and employees taking into account a number of factors, including the amount and term of options previously granted, base salary and bonuses and competitive factors. The amounts and terms of options granted are determined by the Board of Directors based on recommendations put forward by the Chief Executive Officer. Due to the Company's limited financial resources, the Company emphasises the provisions of option grants to maintain executive motivation.

The Company is aware that compensation practices can have unintended risk consequences. At the present time, the Board is satisfied that the current executive compensation program does not encourage the executives to expose the business to inappropriate risk.

Although the Company has not adopted a policy disallowing insiders from purchasing financial instruments designed to hedge or offset any decrease in market value of Common Shares or any other securities of the Company, the Company is not aware of any insiders having adopted such practice.

Given the evolving nature of the Company's business, the Board continues to review and redesign the overall compensation plan for senior management so as to continue to address the objectives identified above.

Laara Shaffer was re-appointed to the Board of Directors on June 25, 2012. Ms. Shaffer had served on the Company's board from 1996 and resigned February 1, 2012.

Particulars of compensation awarded to, earned by or paid during the last two fiscal years to:

-26-

(individually a "named executive officer" and collectively, the "named executive officers") are set out in the summary compensation table below.

-27-

The following table summarizes the outstanding equity awards as of February 29, 2012 for each of our named executive officers:

On July 20, 2011, our Board of Directors approved the adoption of a new share option plan (the "2011 Plan") to comply with the current policies of the TSXV and the amendments to the Income Tax Act (Canada) which impose withholding obligations on taxable benefits arising at the time options are exercised. The 2011 Plan was subject to approval of the TSXV and the shareholders of the Company. On August 25, 2011, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2011 Plan. On November 24, 2011, the TSXV approved the 2011 Plan.

The following table summarizes the compensation of our Company's directors for the year ended February 29, 2012:

The Company has not entered into any employment contracts with its executive officers. There is no contract, agreement, plan or arrangement, whether written or unwritten, that provides for payment to a named executive officer at, following, or in connection with the resignation, retirement or other termination of a named executive officer, or a change in control of the Company or a change in the named executive officer's responsibilities following a change in control, with respect to each named executive officer.

Management Contracts

During the year ended February 29, 2012, the Company paid aggregate fees of $175,000 (2011 -$152,500) to Tarmac Management Ltd. ("Tarmac"), a private British Columbia company. Of these fees, $8,000 was paid for administration services rendered by Tarmac and its employees, and the balance represented reimbursements for rent and other expenses incurred by Tarmac on behalf of the Company. Payment of these fees to Tarmac has been reflected in the notes to the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 as "Related Party Transactions", as Tarmac provides a high level of involvement in the daily management of the Company's affairs.

-32-

Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP has been appointed as our independent registered public accountants for the year ending February 28, 2013. Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP audited the Company's financial statements for the years ended February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011.

The Company anticipates that a representative of Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting. The representative will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so. It is expected the representative will not be available to respond to questions.

In the event ratification by the stockholders of the appointment of Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP as the Company's independent registered public accountants is not obtained, our Board of Directors will reconsider such appointment.

Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP performed the services listed below and was paid the fees listed below for the fiscal years ended February 29, 2012 and February 28, 2011:

Audit Fees, of which 100% thereof were approved by the Company's audit committee, consist of fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements, reviews of interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, services performed in connection with filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and related comfort letters and other services that are normally provided by Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

-33-

Tax Fees consist of fees billed for professional services for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. These services include assistance regarding federal, state and local tax compliance and consultation in connection with various transactions and acquisitions.

Effective May 6, 2003, the Securities and Exchange Commission adopted rules that require that before an independent registered public accounting firm is engaged by a company to render any auditing or permitted non-audit related service, the engagement be:

• approved by the audit committee; or
• entered into pursuant to pre-approval policies and procedures established by the audit committee, provided the policies and procedures are detailed as to the particular service, the audit committee is informed of each service, and such policies and procedures do not include delegation of the audit committee's responsibilities to management.

The Company's audit committee was formed in August 2007, and has assumed responsibility for the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services to be performed by the Company's independent auditor. The audit committee will, on an annual basis, consider and, if appropriate, approve the provision of audit and non-audit services by Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP. Thereafter, the audit committee will, as necessary, consider and, if appropriate, approve the provision of additional audit and non-audit services by Dale Matheson Carr-Hilton Labonte LLP which are not encompassed by the audit committee's annual pre-approval and are not prohibited by law.

-34-

On July 20, 2011, our Board of Directors approved the adoption of a new share option plan (the "2011 Plan") to comply with the current policies of the TSXV and the amendments to the Income Tax Act (Canada) which impose withholding obligations on taxable benefits arising at the time options are exercised. The 2011 Plan was subject to approval of the TSXV and the shareholders of the Company. On August 25, 2011, the shareholders of the Company approved the 2011 Plan. On November 24, 2011, the TSXV approved the 2011 Plan.

The purpose of the 2011 Plan is to provide incentive to qualified parties to increase their proprietary interest in the Company and thereby encourage their continuing association with the Company. The 2011 Plan is administered by the Board of Directors. The 2011 Plan provides that options will be issued to directors, officers, employees or consultants of the Company or a subsidiary of the Company. The 2011 Plan also provides that the number of Common Shares issuable under the 2011 Plan, together with all of the Company's other previously established or proposed share compensation arrangements, may not exceed 10% of the total number of issued and outstanding Common Shares (considered to be a "rolling" stock option plan). Pursuant to the 2011 Plan all options expire on a date not later than 10 years after the date of grant of an option. All options outstanding under any existing share plan were rolled into the 2011 Plan.

The TSXV policies also require shareholders approve the continuation of the 2011 Plan at every subsequent annual meeting of the Company by ordinary resolution.

The 2011 Plan is subject to the following restrictions:

-35-

The following is a summary of the material terms of the 2011 Plan:

The Board has determined that, in order to reasonably protect the rights of participants, as a matter of administration, it is necessary to clarify when amendments to the 2011 Plan may be

-36-

made by the Board without further shareholder approval. Accordingly, the Board may, without shareholder approval:

The foregoing summary of the 2011 Rolling Share Option Plan is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the 2011 Rolling Share Option Plan, a copy of which has been included in the Company's Registration Statement on Form 10, as amended, as filed electronically with the SEC, which is available under the Company's filings at www.sec.gov.

-37-

The Board of Directors has approved a consolidation (reverse stock split) of the outstanding shares of common stock (the "Common Stock") on the basis of one share for up to every ten shares currently issued and outstanding, which final ratio is to be determined by the Board of Directors following stockholder approval. If approved and the Board determines to implement the reverse stock split, each ten shares, or such lesser number of shares as is determined by the Board, of Common Stock outstanding as of the effective date (the "Effective Date") will be converted automatically into a single share of Common Stock. There will not be a change in the par value of the Common Stock of the Company as the Company's authorized shares of common stock is without par value. To avoid the existence of fractional shares of Common Stock, if a stockholder would otherwise be entitled to receive a fractional share, such stockholder will be entitled to receive an additional whole share. The reverse stock split will occur automatically on the Effective Date without any action on the part of stockholders and without regard to the date certificates representing shares of Common Stock are physically surrendered for new certificates. The Board, in its sole discretion, may elect to abandon the reverse stock split in its entirety even if the stockholders approve the reverse stock split, if the Board does not deem it to be advisable and in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

The reverse stock split will not have any dilutive effect on the Company's stockholders as each stockholder will hold the same percentage interest in the Company as they held prior to the reverse stock split, but their interest will be represented by up to one-tenth as many shares. For instance, if a stockholder presently owns 100 shares, after the reverse stock split they will own 10 shares (100 divided by 10 equals 10 shares). The relative voting and other rights that accompany the Common Stock will not be affected by the reverse stock split.

Generally, a reduction in the number of outstanding shares of Common Stock caused by the reverse stock split is anticipated initially to increase the per share market price of the Common Stock, however, because some investors may view the reverse stock split negatively, there can be no assurance that the market price of the Common Stock will reflect proportionately the reverse stock split, that any particular price may be achieved, or that any price gain will be sustained in the future.

An increase in per share price of the Company's Common Stock, which the Company expects as a consequence of the reverse stock split, may enhance the acceptability of the Common Stock to the financial community and the investing public and potentially broaden the investor pool from which the Company might be able to obtain additional financing. Because of the trading volatility often associated with low-priced stocks, as a matter of policy, many institutional investors are prohibited from purchasing such stocks. For the same reason, brokers often discourage their customers from purchasing such stocks. To the extent that the per share price of the Common Stock increases as a result of the reverse stock split, some of these concerns may be ameliorated.

-38-

Additionally, because broker's commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher-priced stocks, the current per share price of the Company's Common Stock can result in individual stockholders paying transaction costs representing a higher percentage of their total share value than would be the case if the share price were higher. On the other hand, if the reverse stock split is implemented, the number of holders of fewer than 100 shares of common stock ("odd-lots") may be increased.

Typically, brokerage fees charged on the transfer of odd lots are proportionately higher than those charged on the transfer of 100 or more shares of common stock ("round-lots").

If the reverse stock split is approved by the stockholders but is not subsequently implemented by the Board of Directors by November 23, 2013, then the proposed reverse stock split shall be deemed abandoned without any further effect.

If the reverse stock split is implemented, the number of shares of Common Stock owned by each stockholder will be reduced in the same proportion as the reduction in the total number of shares outstanding, such that the percentage of the Company's Common Stock owned by each stockholder will remain unchanged except for any de minimis change resulting from rounding up to the nearest number of whole shares so that the Company is not obligated to issue cash in lieu of any fractional shares that such stockholder would have received as a result of the reverse stock split. The number of shares of our common stock that may be purchased upon exercise of outstanding warrants, options or any other securities convertible into, or exercisable or exchangeable for, shares of the Company's common stock, and the exercise or conversion prices for these securities, will also be ratably adjusted in accordance with their terms as of the Effective Date.

The table below sets forth the number of shares of our common stock that would be issued and outstanding upon the implementation of the reverse stock split at each ratio in the range from 1-for-2 to 1-for-10 based on our capitalization at October 9, 2012.

If the proposed reverse stock split is implemented, our Common Stock will continue to be reported on the TSXV under the symbol "PPI" and on the OTCQX under the symbol "PPRT",

-39-

although the letter "D" may be added to the end of the trading symbol on the OTCQX for a period of 20 trading days from the effective date of the reverse stock split to indicate that the reverse stock split has occurred.

The Board believes that the increased market price of the Common Stock expected as a result of implementing the reverse stock split will improve the marketability and liquidity of the Common Stock and will encourage interest and trading in the Common Stock. Because of the trading volatility often associated with low-priced stocks, many brokerage houses and institutional investors have internal policies and practices that either prohibit them from investing in low-priced stocks or tend to discourage individual brokers from recommending low-priced stocks to their customers. Some of those policies and practices may function to make the processing of trades in low-priced stocks economically unattractive to brokers. Additionally, because brokers' commissions on low-priced stocks generally represent a higher percentage of the stock price than commissions on higher-priced stocks, the current average price per share of the Common Stock can result in individual stockholders paying transaction costs representing a higher percentage of their total share value than would be the case if the share price were substantially higher. It should be noted that the liquidity of the Common Stock may be adversely affected by the reverse stock split given the reduced number of shares that would be outstanding after the reverse stock split. The Board anticipates, however, that the expected higher market price will reduce, to some extent, the negative effects on the liquidity and marketability of the Common Stock inherent in some of the policies and practices of institutional investors and brokerage houses described above.

Reduced Market Capitalization. Theoretically, the overall value of the Company will not change as a result of the reverse stock split so that reducing the number of shares outstanding by a factor of ten would increase the per share price by a value of ten. However, a reverse stock split is often viewed negatively by the market and, consequently, can lead to a decrease in the overall market capitalization of the Company. As a result, there is no mathematical certainty as to the increase in the price per share that might be expected as result of the reverse stock split, and there can be no assurance that the per share price will increase proportionately to the reverse stock split. If the per share price increases by a factor less than the one-for-ten reverse stock split, then the overall market capitalization of the Company will be reduced.

Increased Volatility. The reverse stock split will reduce our outstanding Common Stock to approximately 17,275,187 shares of Common Stock on a 1 for 10 basis. Of this amount, approximately 6,526,883 shares will be held by officers, directors, and stockholders owning in excess of 10% of the outstanding Common Stock. This will result in approximately 10,748,304 shares being held in the public float. This reduced number of shares could result in decreased liquidity in the trading market and potential mismatches between supply and demand in the market for the Common Stock at any given time, which could result in changes in the trading price unrelated to the activities or prospects of the Company.

-40-

Increased Transaction Costs. As a result of the reverse stock split, the number of shares held by each individual stockholder will be reduced to one-tenth of the number previously held. This may increase the number of stockholders who hold less than a "round lot," or 100 shares. Typically, the transaction costs to stockholders selling "odd lots" are higher on a per share basis. Consequently, the reverse stock split could increase the transaction costs to existing stockholders in the event they wish to sell all or a portion of their position.

If the reverse stock split is effected, stockholders who hold uncertificated shares (i.e., shares held in book-entry form and not represented by a physical certificate), either as direct or beneficial owners, will have their holdings electronically adjusted automatically by our transfer agent (and, for beneficial owners, by their brokers or banks that hold in "street name" for their benefit, as the case may be) to give effect to the reverse stock split. Stockholders who hold uncertificated shares as direct owners will be sent a statement of holding from our transfer agent that indicates the number of post-reverse split shares of our common stock owned in book-entry form. Stockholders holding certificated shares (i.e., shares represented by one or more physical stock certificates) will receive a transmittal letter from our transfer agent promptly after the effective time of the reverse stock split. The transmittal letter will be accompanied by instructions specifying how stockholders holding certificated shares can exchange certificates representing the pre-reverse split shares of the Company's Common Stock for a statement of holding.

Beginning on the Effective Date, each certificate representing pre-reverse split shares will be deemed for all corporate purposes to evidence ownership of post-reverse split shares.

Holders of pre-reverse split shares are asked to surrender to the Company's transfer agent certificates representing pre-reverse split shares in exchange for certificates representing post-reverse split shares in accordance with the procedures set forth in a letter of transmittal to be provided to each stockholder following the Effective Date. No new certificates will be issued to a stockholder until that stockholder has surrendered the stockholder's outstanding certificate(s) together with the properly completed and executed letter of transmittal.

Stockholders will not have to pay any service charges in connection with the exchange of their certificates. YOU SHOULD NOT DESTROY ANY PHYSICAL STOCK CERTIFICATES AND YOU SHOULD NOT SUBMIT ANY CERTIFICATES UNTIL DIRECTED TO DO SO BY A TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM OUR TRANSFER AGENT.

The following summary describes certain material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the reverse stock split for holders of the Company's Common Stock.

Unless otherwise specifically indicated herein, this summary addresses the tax consequences only to a beneficial owner of Common Stock that is a citizen or individual resident of the United States, a corporation organized in or under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia or otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net income basis in respect of the Company's Common Stock (a "U.S. holder"). This summary

-41-

does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to any particular stockholder, including tax considerations that arise from rules of general application to all taxpayers or to certain classes of taxpayers or that are generally assumed to be known by investors. This summary also does not address the tax consequences to (a) persons that may be subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law, such as banks, insurance companies, thrift institutions, regulated investment companies, real estate investment trusts, tax-exempt organizations, U.S. expatriates, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, traders in securities that elect to mark to market and dealers in securities or currencies, (b) persons that hold our common stock as part of a position in a "straddle" or as part of a "hedging," "conversion" or other integrated investment transaction for federal income tax purposes, or (c) persons that do not hold our common stock as "capital assets" (generally, property held for investment).

This summary is based on the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("IRC"), U.S. Treasury regulations, administrative rulings and judicial authority, all as in effect as of the date hereof. Any of these authorities could be repealed, overruled, or modified at any time. Any such change could be retroactive and, accordingly, could cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the consequences described herein. No ruling from the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") with respect to the matters discussed herein has been requested, and there is no assurance that the IRS would agree with the conclusions set forth in this discussion. Accordingly, you should consult with your tax advisor. Subsequent developments in U.S. federal income tax law, including changes in law or differing interpretations, which may be applied retroactively, could have a material effect on the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the reverse stock split.

If a partnership (or other entity classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is the beneficial owner of the Company's Common Stock, the U.S. federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership will generally depend on the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships that hold the Company's Common Stock, and partners in such partnerships, should consult their own tax advisors regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the reverse stock split.

U.S. Holders. The reverse stock split should be treated as a recapitalization for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Therefore, no gain or loss will be recognized upon the reverse stock split. Accordingly, the aggregate tax basis in the common stock received pursuant to the reverse stock split should equal the aggregate tax basis in the common stock surrendered (excluding the portion of the tax basis that is allocable to any fractional share), and the holding period for the common stock received should include the holding period for the common stock surrendered.

Non-U.S. Holders. The discussion in this section is addressed to "non-U.S. holders." A non-U.S. holder is a beneficial owner of the Company's Common Stock who is a foreign corporation or a non-resident alien individual. Generally, non-U.S. holders will not recognize any gain or loss upon the reverse stock split.

-42-

Stockholders of the Company will be asked to approve the consolidation of its current issued and outstanding Common Shares without par value on a basis of one (1) post-consolidated share of Common Stock for up to ten (10) pre-consolidated shares of Common Stock, or such lesser whole number of pre-consolidated shares of Common Stock as the directors may determine, in its authorized share structure, the text of which is set out below. To be effective the ordinary resolution must be passed by a majority of the shares of the Company's Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy. The consolidation is also subject to applicable regulatory approval, including the approval of the TSXV.

-43-

-44-

Stockholders of the Company will be asked to approve certain amendments to the Company's Articles. The amendments are considered necessary to ensure that the Company's corporate governance practices relating to quorum requirements align with those of any potential national securities exchange under Section 6(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that the Company may make application to list its Common Stock.

The proposed amendments to be made to the Company's current Articles (the "Article Amendments") are detailed below in the ordinary resolution. To be effective the ordinary resolution must be passed by a majority of the shares of the Company's Common Stock represented at the Annual Meeting in person or by proxy.

"RESOLVED as an ordinary resolution that:

-45-

The purpose of the Article Amendments are to increase the quorum requirement for stockholders meetings from one or more shareholders who, in the aggregate, hold at least 5% of the issued shares entitled to be voted at the meeting to be one-third (33.33%) of the issued and outstanding shares and entitled to be voted at the meeting. The Board approved the Article Amendments, and is recommending approval of the Article Amendments to the stockholders of the Company, in order to ensure that the Company's corporate governance practices relating to quorum requirements align with those of any potential national securities exchange under Section 6(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that the Company may make application to list its Common Stock.

-46-

Certain statements contained in this proxy statement that are not historical facts constitute "forward-looking statements". These statements are based, among other things, on the Company's current plans and expectations relating to expectations of anticipated growth in the future and future success under various circumstances. As such, these forward-looking statements involve uncertainty and risk.

Other factors and assumptions not identified above could also cause the actual results to differ materially from those set forth in any forward-looking statement. Our Company does not undertake any obligation to update the forward-looking statements contained in this proxy statement to reflect actual results, changes in assumptions, or changes in other factors affecting these forward-looking statements.

Any stockholder who intends to present a proposal at the 2013 Annual Meeting of stockholders (anticipated to be held in November 2013) for inclusion in our proxy statement and proxy form relating to such Annual Meeting must submit such proposal to us at our principal executive offices no later than June 15, 2013. Our Company reserves the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and all other applicable requirements.

In addition, in the event a stockholder proposal is not received by the Company by June 15, 2013, the proxy to be solicited by the Board of Directors for the 2013 Annual Meeting will confer discretionary authority on the holders of the proxy to vote the shares if the proposal is presented at the 2013 Annual Meeting without any discussion of the proposal in the proxy statement for such meeting.

SEC rules and regulations provide that if the date of our 2013 Annual Meeting is advanced or delayed more than 30 days from first anniversary of the 2012 Annual Meeting, stockholder proposals intended to be included in the proxy materials for the 2013 Annual Meeting must be received by us within a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail the proxy materials for the 2013 Annual Meeting.

Proposals or notices of intention to present proposals should be addressed to: Laara Shaffer, Chief Financial Officer, Passport Potash Inc., 608-1199 West Pender Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 2R1.

-47-

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We file reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. You may read and copy these reports, proxy statements and other information at the SEC's Public Reference Section at One Station Place, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet website, located at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding our company.

Financial information is provided in the audited financial statements of the Company for the year ended February 29, 2012 and in the related management discussion and analysis and filed on www.Sedar.com.

Additional information relating to the Company is filed on www.Sedar.com and upon request from Laara Shaffer, CFO of the Company, Secretary at telephone no.: (604) 687-0300 or fax no.: (604) 687-0151. Copies of documents will be provided free of charge to security holders of the Company. The Company may require the payment of a reasonable charge from any person or company who is not a security older of the Company, who requests a copy of any such document.

-48-

PASSPORT POTASH INC.
608 - 1199 West Pender Street
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6E 2R1

The undersigned hereby appoints Laara Shaffer (Chief Financial Officer of the Company) and Linda Hogg, of McMillan LLP (legal counsel to the Company), as proxies, each with full power of substitution, to represent and vote as designated on the reverse side, all the shares of common stock of Passport Potash Inc. held of record by the undersigned on October 9, 2012, at the Annual General and Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held at Suite 1500, 1055 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, on Friday, November 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. (Vancouver Time) or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder
Meeting to Be Held on November 23, 2012.

The Proxy Statement and form of Proxy, as well as the
Company's Annual Report
for the year ended February 29, 2012
are available on the Internet at:

(Continued and to be signed on the reverse side.)

Please date, sign and mail your proxy card in the envelope provided as soon as possible.