As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 15, 2005
Registration No. 333-101562

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

(Amendment 7)

FORM SB-2/A

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

Under
The Securities Act of 1933

INSTACARE CORP.
(Name of Small Business Issuer in Its Charter)

7371
(Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number)

 

 

Nevada

2660 Townsgate Road, Suite 300

Westlake Village, CA 91361

(805) 446-1973

 

91-2105842

(State of Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(Address, and Telephone Number of

Principal Executive Offices

and Principal Place of Business)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

Corporate Agents of Nevada

8275 South Eastern Avenue, Suite 119Las Vegas, NV89123(702) 400-9973

(Name, Address, and Telephone Number of Agent for Service)

Copies of Communications to:

Thomas C. Cook, Esq.
Law Offices of Thomas C. Cook, Ltd.
2921 N. Tenaya Way, Suite 234
Las Vegas, Nevada 89128
Telephone: (702) 952-8519
Fax: (702) 952-8521

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: From time to time after this registration statement becomes effective.

If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.

If the delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are being offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, please check the following box. X


CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

Title of Each Class

Of Securities

To Be Registered

Number of Shares

To Be Registered (1)

Proposed Maximum

Offering Price

Per Share (2)

Proposed Maximum

Aggregate Offering

Price

Amount of

Registration Fee

Common Stock

518,000,000

$0.0120

$6,216,000

$1,219.37

  1. Estimated solely for purposes of calculating the registration fee pursuant to Rule 457. Represents the maximum amount of shares of our common stock that we will be required to register in accordance with our Merger Agreement as well as shares issued and distributed pursuant to consulting agreements, note conversions, and shares underlying notes and warrant conversions.

  2. Represents the average closing bid price of our common stock as of July 15, 2005.

The registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act or until the registration statement shall become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

Information contained herein is subject to completion or amendment. A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and it is not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state in which the offer or sale is not permitted.

2


Subject to Completion, Dated July 15, 2005

PROSPECTUS

INSTACARE CORP.

518,000,000 Shares of Common Stock

This prospectus relates to the registration of up to 518,000,000 shares of our common stock ("instaCare Corp." or "instaCare".) Of these shares, 400,000,000 are being registered for the benefit of Mercator Advisory Group LLC and its affiliated funds, as shares that underlie the conversion preference of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock We seek to register 300,000,000 common shares that underlie the Preferred shares and 100,000,000 common shares that underlie warrants. Some or all of these 400,000,000 shares may be issued according to the terms of the conversion preference of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock and the exercise of instaCare's common stock purchase warrants.

In addition, instaCare desires to register the 99,000,000 common stock shares it has placed in escrow, as collateral and for conditioned conversion rights owing to a promissory note and its renewal agreements with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP. instaCare also seeks to register 19,000,000 shares that have been issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP and CJR Capital, Inc.pursuant to loan fees, loan renewal agreements and finders fees that resulted from the transaction involving the promissory note and its renewals with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP.

There is no minimum number of shares that must be sold in this offering. instaCare has received the proceeds from the sale of the preferred stock and promissory note. Although we will not receive any of the proceeds from sales of the common stock by the selling stockholders under this prospectus. We only seek to have registered the shares for the benefit of the stockholders. To the knowledge of instaCare, the stockholders have not made any arrangements with any brokerage firm, underwriter or agent for the sale of the shares of common stock.

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board ("OTCBB") under the symbol INCA but it is not listed on a national securities exchange. The latest per share price , based on the average of the bid and asked price as of July 15, 2005, was $0.02 per share.

Investing in the common stock involves a high degree of risk, which is described in the "Risk Factors " beginning on page 7 of this prospectus.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

 

 

 

 

The date of this prospectus is July 15, 2005.

3


Table of Contents

Risk Factors

7

Use of Proceeds

9

Determination of Offering Price

9

Dividend Policy

9

Issuance of Securities to the Selling Stockholders

9

Plan of Distribution

10

Legal Proceedings

12

Directors and Executive Officers

13

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

14

Description of Securities

15

Market for Common Stock

16

Commission's Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities

17

Description of Business

19

     Form and year of organization

19

     Material reclassifications

19

     Business of the Issuer

22

     Product Applications

23

     Distribution Methods

24

     New Products

26

     Competition business conditions

27

     Source of principal suppliers

28

     Dependence on a few major customers

28

     Patent and trademark applications

28

     Government approval and effect on us

29

     Research and Development Expenditures

30

     Employees

30

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

31

     Overview

31

     Note payable

33

     Use of Funds

34

     Expenditure

34

     Internal and External Sources of Liquidity

35

     Critical Accounting Policy and Estimates

36

Description of Property

36

Certain Relationships And Related Transactions

37

PART II

2

4


Prospectus Summary

This summary highlights selected information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. It does not contain all of the information you should consider before investing in instaCare's common stock. You should carefully consider all information contained in this prospectus and particularly the section on Risk Factors set forth below before investing in the shares of common stock we seek to register under this prospectus.

instaCare Corp.

instaCare Corp., a Nevada corporation, was formed in July 2000 as Promedicius, Inc,. a Nevada Corporation, with a principal business objective of providing services to medical practitioners. In 2001, ATR Search Corp., a developmental stage company, was formed with a principal business objective to place part-time, temporary or project oriented workers and contractors that had specific and hard to find information technology skills required by large businesses. In June 2001, Promedicius, Inc. changed its name to Medicius, Inc. In June 2002, ATR Search Corp. merged with Medicius, Inc. Medicius, at that time, had a principal business objective to offer physicians, licensed medical service providers such as diagnostic testing laboratories, and medical insurers Internet enhanced, wireless ("Wi-Fi") information technology and data management technology (IT).. After the merger, we changed our name to CareDecision Corporation. On April 14, 2005 we changed our name from CareDecision Corp. to instaCare Corp . Subsequently, we have pursued the following business:

  1. Providing medical communication devices based on networks of personal digital assistants (PDA). These products are believed to provide benefits of on demand medical information to private practice physicians, licensed medical service providers such as diagnostic testing laboratories, and medical insurers;
  2. Building electronic commerce networks based on personal digital assistants (PDA) to the hotels, motels and single building, multi-unit apartment buildings with a desire to offer local advertising and electronic services to their tenants/guests; and
  3. Providing the cable and wireless communication industries and media enterprises with networks of personal digital assistant (PDA) technologies that link field-based installation and repair personnel with central offices for the exchange of customer order and subscription information.

On August 4, 2004 instaCare received a proposal for a possible merger with two private shareholder owned corporations based in Scottsdale, Arizona. These companies, both controlled by Mr. Ronald R. Kelly, are:

  1. 1. Futurecom Global, Inc. ("FCG"), a Nevada corporation, founded in 1998 is a distributor of personal digital assistant (PDA) products and technologies and which also has interests in the pre-paid cellular and pre-paid cash card markets.
  2. 2. CareGeneration, Inc. ("CGI"), a Nevada corporation, founded in February 2004, a newly organized distributor of prescription drugs at the wholesale and retail levels. At the time of the proposal CGI had recently acquired certain assets, rights, customer lists and transfers of certain license(s) that had been the foundation of the wholesale prescription drug business unit of Kelly Company World Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

On August 16, 2004 we completed a Preliminary Agreement to merge with these entities. On November 18, 2004 we incorporated two subsidiary companies, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation, and PDA Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation to facilitate these mergers.

On November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, we entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between instaCare, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. and CareGeneration, Inc., that when accomplished would merge CareGeneration, Inc. into instaCare's subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., whereby Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. would be the surviving entity. The parties concluded the activities surrounding this merger on January 27, 2005, and the filing of Merger certificates was completed on February 25, 2005. We have incorporated the products and services of the former CareGeneration, Inc. into our business model. On April 14, 2005 we changed our name from CareDecision Corp. to instaCare Corp.to better reflect our core business activities.

5


Talks between InstaCare and Futurecom Global, Inc. ended on April 30, 2005 at the request of Ronald Kelly, the controlling shareholder of Futurecom Global, Inc.

instaCare's fiscal year ends on December 31. Our principal executive office is located at 2660 Townsgate Road, Suite 300, Westlake Village, CA 91361. Our telephone number is (805) 446-1973. The common stock is quoted on the OTCBB under the trading symbol "INCA", but it is not listed on a national securities exchange. Because the common stock is not listed for trading on any national securities exchange there may be a limited market for instaCare's shares.

The Offering

This prospectus relates to the registration of up to 518,000,000 shares of common stock of instaCare. Of these shares, 400,000,000 are being registered for Mercator Advisory Group LLC and its affiliated funds, as shares that underlie the conversion preference of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock and common stock purchase warrants issued as a part of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock subscription agreement with Mercator Advisory Group LLC. The registrant is seeking to register 300,000,000 shares that underlie the Preferred shares and 100,000,000 shares that underlie warrants. Some or all of these 400,000,000 shares may be issued according to the terms of the conversion preference of instaCare's Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock and the exercise of instaCare's common stock purchase warrants.

In addition, instaCare desires to register the 99,000,000 common stock shares it has placed in escrow as collateral and for conditioned conversion rights owing to a promissory note and its renewal agreements with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP. instaCare also seeks to register another 19,000,000 shares that have been issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP and CJR Capital, Inc.as loan fees, loan renewal agreements and finders fees pursuant to the promissory note with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP.

Selling Stockholders

Mercator Advisory Group LLC, Mercator Momentum Fund, LP, Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd., CJR Capital, Inc. and Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP.

Net Proceeds to instaCare

instaCare will receive no proceeds from sales of common stock by the selling stockholders.

Detailed Summary Financial Information

For the three months ended

March 31,

Statement of operations data:

2005

2004

Gross profit

$ 196,649

$ 55,392

Expenses:
General & administrative expenses

174,936

59,082

Payroll expense

256,869

80,540

Professional fees

278,618

238,530

Stock-based compensation - related party

115,290

-

Stock-based compensation - consulting

346,380

485,119

Software development

-

69,641

Hardware costs

10,075

-

Impairment loss on operating assets

-

111,473

Depreciation

13,138

33,315

Other total income (expenses):

(486,251)

(734,442)

Net (loss)

$ (1,484,909)

$ (1,756,750)

Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted

$ (0.00)

$ (0.01)

6


Risk Factors

An investment in the securities being offered involves a high degree of risk. Prior to making any investment decision, prospective investors should carefully consider the following risk factors together with the other information presented in this prospectus including the financial statements and notes.

Our limited operating history could delay our growth and result in the loss of your investment.

We are considered a development stage company with an inception date of June 21, 2001 and thus have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects. Our prospects must be considered in light of the risks, expenses and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stage of development. Such risks include, but are not limited to, dependence on the growth of use of electronic medical information and services, the adoption of PDA based Internet appliances for the transmission and display of medical information, the need to establish our brand name, the ability to establish a sufficient client base, the level of use of medical providers and the management of growth. To address these risks, we must maintain and increase our customer base, implement and successfully execute our business and marketing strategy, continue to develop and improve our point of care software and patient processing system, provide superior customer service, respond to competitive developments and attract, retain, and motivate qualified personnel. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in addressing such risks, and the failure to do so could lead to an inability to meet our financial obligations and therefore result in bankruptcy and the loss of your entire investment in instaCare's common shares.

We have historically lost money and losses are expected to continue in the near future, which means that we may not be able to continue operations unless we obtain additional funding.

We have historically lost money. InstaCare incurred accumulated net losses from July 06, 2000 (inception) through the period ended March 31, 2005 of $(11,708,281). In addition, instaCare's development activities since inception have been financially sustained by capital contributions. Future losses are likely to occur. Accordingly, we may experience significant liquidity and cash flow problems if we are not able to raise additional capital as needed and on acceptable terms. No assurances can be given that we will be successful in reaching or maintaining profitable operations.

We may not be able to retain our key personnel or attract additional personnel, which could affect our ability generate revenue sufficient to continue as a going concern diminishing your return on investment.

Our performance is substantially dependent on the services and on the performance of our Management. instaCare is, and will be, heavily dependent on the skill, acumen and services of our CEO Robert Cox, interim CFO, Secretary and Treasurer, Keith Berman.. Our performance also depends on our ability to attract, hire, retain and motivate our officers and key employees. The loss of the services of our executives could result in lost revenue depending on the length of time and effort required to find a qualified replacement. We have not entered into a long-term employment agreements with our key personnel and currently have no "Key Employee" life insurance policies.

Our future success may also depend on our ability to identify, attract, hire, train, retain and motivate other highly skilled technical, managerial, marketing and customer service personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully attract, assimilate or retain sufficiently qualified personnel. If we are unable to attract, retain, and train the necessary technical, managerial, marketing and customer service personnel, our expectations of increasing our clientele could be hindered, and the profitability of instaCare reduced.

Recent, and Possible future issuances of common stock will have a dilutive affect on existing shareholders.

instaCare is authorized to issue up to 1,250,000,000 Shares of common stock. As of the most recent practicable date, there are 447,140,421 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Additional issuances of common stock may be required to raise capital, to acquire stock or assets of other companies, to compensate employees or to undertake other activities without stockholder approval. These additional issuances of common stock will increase outstanding shares and further dilute stockholders' interests. Because our common stock is subject to the existing rules on penny stocks and thinly traded, a large sale of stock, such as the shares we seek to have registered via this registration statement, may result in a large drop in the market price of our securities and substantially reduce the value of your investment.

7


Our common stock has been relatively thinly traded, may experience high price volatility and we cannot predict the extent to which a trading market will develop.

Our common stock has traded on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. Our common stock is thinly traded compared to larger more widely known companies in our industry. Thinly traded common stock can be more volatile than common stock trading in an active public market. We cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for the common stock will develop or be sustained after this offering.

Achieving market acceptance of new or newly integrated products and services is likely to require significant efforts and expenditures.

Achieving market acceptance for new or newly integrated products and services is likely to require substantial marketing efforts and expenditure of significant funds to create awareness and demand by participants in the healthcare industry. In addition, deployment of new or newly integrated products and services may require the use of additional resources for training our existing sales and customer service personnel and for hiring and training additional salespersons and customer service personnel. There can be no assurance that the revenue opportunities from new or newly integrated products and services will justify amounts spent for their development, marketing and rollout.

We could be subject to breach of warranty claims if our software products, information technology systems or transmission systems contain errors, experience failures or do not meet customer expectations.

We could face breach of warranty or other claims or additional development costs if the software and systems we sell or license to customers or use to provide services contain undetected errors, experience failures, do not perform in accordance with their documentation, or do not meet the expectations that our customers have for them. Undetected errors in the software and systems we provide or those we use to provide services could cause serious problems for which our customers may seek compensation from us. We attempt to limit, by contract, our liability for damages arising from negligence, errors or mistakes. However, contractual limitations on liability may not be enforceable in certain circumstances or may otherwise not provide sufficient protection to us from liability for damages.

If our systems or the Internet experience security breaches or are otherwise perceived to be insecure, we could lose existing clients and limit our ability to attract new clients.

A security breach could damage our reputation or result in liability. We retain and transmit confidential information, including patient health information. Despite the implementation of security measures, our infrastructure or other systems that we interface with, including the Internet, may be vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers, improper employee or contractor access, computer viruses, programming errors, attacks by third parties or similar disruptive problems. Any compromise of our security, whether as a result of our own systems or systems that they interface with, could reduce demand for our services.

We have been granted certain copyrights and have applied to receive patent rights, and trademarks relating to our software. However, patent and intellectual property legal issues for software programs, such as our products, are complex and currently evolving.

Patent applications are secret until patents are issued in the United States, or published in other countries, therefore, we cannot be sure that we are first to file any patent application. Our business model is somewhat unique in healthcare. We intend to use our technologies, primarily the technology that allows for the safe, secure and near seamless transmission of sensitive medical information from the point of care, directly to our mail order pharmacy. Should any of our patent claims be compromised or if, for example, one of our competitors has filed or obtained a patent before our claims have been prosecuted, or should a competitor with more resources desire to litigate and force us to defend or prosecute any patent rights, our ability to develop the market for our mail order pharmacy could be severely compromised.

8


Our auditors have expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

Due to our status as a developmental stage company and our lack of revenue sufficient to support existing operations, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We may need to obtain additional financing in the event that we are unable to realize sufficient revenue or collect accounts receivable when we emerge from the development stage. We may incur additional indebtedness from time to time to finance acquisitions, provide for working capital or capital expenditures or for other purposes. However, we currently anticipate that our operating cash flow along with the funds raised from financing will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses for at least the next 12 to 24 months. There can be no assurance that we will have funds sufficient to continue operations, and the failure to do so could lead to an inability to meet our financial obligations and therefore result in bankruptcy and the loss of your entire investment in instaCare's common shares.

Use of Proceeds

All net proceeds from the sale of the common stock covered by this prospectus will go to the selling stockholders. instaCare will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the common stock in this offering.

Determination of Offering Price

The prices at which the shares of common stock may actually be sold will be determined by the prevailing public market price for the shares or by negotiations in private transactions.

Dividend Policy

It is instaCare's present policy not to pay cash dividends and to retain future earnings for use in the operations of the business and to fund future growth. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will be dependent upon the amount of funds legally available; earnings, financial condition, capital requirements and other factors that the Board of Directors may think are relevant. instaCare does not contemplate or anticipate paying any cash dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future.

Issuance of Securities to the Selling Stockholders

The table below sets forth ownership information regarding the selling stockholders. For purposes of calculating the percentage of common stock outstanding, any securities not outstanding that are subject to options, warrants or conversion privileges are deemed outstanding for the purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding securities owned by the selling stockholders. Unless otherwise indicated, the selling stockholders have the sole power to direct the voting and investment over the shares owned by them.

The following table lists the preferred shares held by our Convertible "C" Preferred shareholders that were distributed pursuant to our Corporation Shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock and Common Stock Warrants Subscription Agreements at $0.02 and $0.03 cents per common share and associated agreement documents. None of the selling shareholders are broker-dealers or affiliates of broker-dealers.

   

COMMON

 
   

STOCK

AMOUNT

   

PURCHASE

INVESTORS

 

AMOUNT OF

2 CENT

WANT

INVESTOR4

INVESTMENT1

WARRANTS

REGISTERED3

       
Mercator Advisory Group LLC

$0

25,000,000

25,000,000

Mercator Momentum Fund, LP

$660,000

8,250,000

8,250,000

Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd.

$0

16,750,000

16,750,000

       

TOTAL

$660,000

50,000,000

50,000,000

9


 

   

COMMON

 
   

STOCK

AMOUNT

   

PURCHASE

INVESTORS

 

AMOUNT OF

3 CENT

WANT

INVESTOR4

INVESTMENT1

WARRANTS

REGISTERED3

       
Mercator Advisory Group LLC

$0

25,000,000

25,000,000

Mercator Momentum Fund, LP

$0

8,250,000

8,250,000

Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd.

$1,340,000

16,750,000

16,750,000

       

TOTAL

$1,340,000

50,000,000

50,000,000

After the offering is complete, Mercator Advisory Group LLC will own 11.18%, Mercator Momentum Fund, LP will own 3.69% and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. will own 7.49% of our common stock par value $0.001 based on a total of 447,140,421 shares issued and outstanding as of the most recent practicable date. None of the control person(s) listed in footnote 4 below have held any position, office, or have had any other material relationship with instaCare or any of our predecessors or affiliates. In addition, none of the selling shareholders held any shares of our common stock before the offering.

Footnotes:

  1. Consideration for our Convertible "C" Preferred Shares at $10,000.00 per share.
  2. The conversion has been calculated by converting each share of our Convertible "C" Preferred Shares into common stock shares of instaCare as calculated by the following formula:

                                $.006667 X 2,000,000

  1. Amount investors want to register in this Registration statement.
  2. The control person(s) are as follows: Mercator Advisory Group LLC - Mr. H. Harry Aharonian; Mercator Momentum Fund, LP - Mr. H. Harry Aharonian; and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. - Mr. H. Harry Aharonian.

The following table lists the shares that were issued pursuant to the making and renewals of the promissory note with CJR Capital, Inc. and Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP.

PARTY

DATE

CONSIDERATION

ESCROW SHARES

SHARES ISSUED AS FEES AND RENEWAL FEES

CJR Capital, Inc.1

3/24/04

$0

0

1,000,000

9/24/04

$0

0

2,000,000

2/10/05

$0

0

4,000,000

Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP2

3/24/04

$700,000

14,000,000

1,000,000

9/24/04

$0

2,000,000

2,000,000

2/10/05

$400,000

83,000,000

9,000,000

TOTAL

$1,100,000

99,000,000

19,000,000

  1. The principal of CJR Capital, Inc. is Mr. Chris Janish.
  2. The general partner of Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP is Chris Janish.

Plan of Distribution

The selling stockholders may, from time to time, sell any or all of their shares of common stock on any stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the shares are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. The selling stockholders may use any one or more of the following methods when selling shares:

10


  1. Ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

  2. Block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the shares as agent but may position and the resell a as principal to facilitate the transaction;

  3. Purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;

  4. An exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;

  5. Privately negotiated transactions;

  6. Short sales;

  7. Broker-dealers may agree with the selling stockholders to sell a specified number of such shares at a stipulated price per share;

  8. A combination of any such methods of sale; and

  9. Any other method permitted pursuant to applicable law.

The selling stockholders may also sell shares under Rule 144 under the Securities Act, if available, rather than under this prospectus.

The selling stockholders may also engage in short sales against the box, puts and calls and other transactions in our securities or derivatives of our securities and may sell or deliver shares in connection with these trades.

Broker-dealers engaged by the selling stockholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the selling stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of shares, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated. The selling stockholders do not expect these commissions and discounts to exceed what is customary in the types of transactions involved.

Any profits on the resale of shares of common stock by a broker-dealer acting as principal might be deemed to be underwriting discounts or commissions under the Securities Act. Discounts, concessions, commissions and similar selling expenses, if any, attributable to the sale of shares will be borne by a selling stockholder. The selling stockholders may agree to indemnify any agent, dealer or broker-dealer that participates in transactions involving sales of the shares if liabilities are imposed on that person under the Securities Act.

The selling stockholders may from time to time pledge or grant a security interest in some or all of the shares of common stock owned by them and, if they default in the performance of their secured obligations, the pledgees or secured parties may offer and sell the shares of common stock from time to time under this prospectus after we have filed an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933 amending the list of selling stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling stockholders under this prospectus.

The selling stockholders also may transfer the shares of common stock in other circumstances, in which case the transferees, pledgees or other successors in interest will be the selling beneficial owners for purposes of this prospectus and may sell the shares of common stock from time to time under this prospectus after we have filed an amendment to this prospectus under Rule 424(b)(3) or other applicable provision of the Securities Act of 1933 amending the list of selling stockholders to include the pledgee, transferee or other successors in interest as selling stockholders under this prospectus.

The selling stockholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the shares of common stock may be deemed to be "underwriters" within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the shares of common stock purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act.

11


We are required to pay all fees and expenses incident to the registration of the shares of common stock. We have agreed to indemnify the selling stockholders against certain losses, claims, damages and liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act.

The following is an estimate of the expenses incident to the registration of the shares of common stock.

Nature of Expenses

Amount

     

SEC Registration Fee

$

1,219

Accounting Fees and Expenses

$

10,500

Legal Fees and Expenses

$

15,000

Printing Expenses

$

1,000

Blue Sky Qualification Fees and Expenses

$

1,000

Transfer Agent's Fee

$

2,500

     

TOTAL

$

31,219

The selling stockholders have advised us that they have not entered into any agreements, understandings or arrangements with any underwriters or broker-dealers regarding the sale of their shares of common stock, nor is there an underwriter or coordinating broker acting in connection with a proposed sale of shares of common stock by any selling stockholder. If we are notified by any selling stockholder that any material arrangement has been entered into with a broker-dealer for the sale of shares of common stock, if required, we will file a supplement to this prospectus. If the selling stockholders use this prospectus for any sale of the shares of common stock, they will be subject to the prospectus delivery requirements of the Securities Act.

The anti-manipulation rules of Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will apply to sales of our common stock and activities of the selling stockholders.

Transfer Agent

The name and address of our transfer agent is as follows: Pacific Stock Transfer Company, 500 E. Warm Springs Road, Suite 240, Las Vegas, NV 89119; 702-361-3033.

Legal Proceedings

On July 6, 2005, instaCare filed a complaint in the United States District Court, for the Central District of California (Case Number CV 05-4932-RSWL),against Ronald Kelly, and others, seeking damages for Fraud, Breach of Fiduciary Duty, RICO violations, Conversion, Breach of Contract / Breach of Corporate Merger Agreement, Declaratory Relief,  Accounting, Injunctive Relief, and such other  Ancillary Relief as may be available. Ronald Kelly was the President and CEO of CareGeneration, which was merged with Pharatech Solutions, a subsidiary instaCare.  As a result of the merger, Ronald Kelly was appointed to the Board of Directors of instaCare.

Substantial irregularities came to the attention of other members of the Board of Directors, the facts of which are set forth in the complaint in the above referenced action.  As a result of that information, Mr. Kelly was
removed from the Board of Directors, and approximately 10 days later tendered his resignation, without explanation.   As a further result of this information, we have brought our lawsuit for damages."

We nor our subsidiaries are named defendants in any legal proceedings. Our recent acquisition target CareGeneration, Inc. ("CareGen"), was not subject to any legal proceedings at the closing of our acquisition.

However Ronald Kelly, a former director and the former controlling shareholder of the acquisition target CareGeneration, Inc, is himself a party to several actions:

Ronald Kelly is the guarantor of a contract between Kelly Company World Group, Inc., an Illinois corporation, and Purity Wholesale Grocers, Inc. d/b/a Supreme Distributors Company ("Purity"), an Illinois corporation, in which Purity demanded payment of $1,905,972. The suit was filed in the Circuit Court of McDonough County, Illinois on August 6, 2004. This Breach of Guarantee suit is related to Kelly's guarantee of a contract that disputed. Mr. Kelly's counsel represented to us that the parties to this suit were engaged in on-going settlement negotiations to resolve the matter. However, this representation was not factual and it was learned that Mr. Kelly consented to judgment in this matter in December 2004, subject to a plan of cure. Purity filed the Stipulation to Judgment in May 2005 and is now enforcing same. 2. Ronald Kelly is a named party in a suit titled World Automated Systems, Ltd. et al vs. Omni Cellular, Ltd. et al. The suit alleges Breach of Contract, Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Fraud, Consumer Fraud, and Deceptive Business Practice and Conversion in the amount of $250,000.00 plus punitive damages and costs. The case was filed in Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois on July 29, 2004. A motion to dismiss was filed on behalf of the defendants and subsequently the Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint. As of this date Plaintiffs have not filed an amended complaint. Mr. Kelly is as yet unable to evaluate the likelihood of a favorable outcome.

12


We were in the process of investigating additional litigation involving Mr. Kelly that was not disclosed to the Company while he served as a director.

In April 2004 we entered into an agreement with DataFuzion, Inc. ("Fuzion"), a Colorado based medical software and medical systems company. Among other things this agreement called for us to provide license to certain of its software and to provide introduction to agents and service organizations that were capable of assisting Fuzion's stated desire to become a fully reporting public company. The agreement called for Fuzion to render 10% of its capital stock as consideration. As a portion of its consideration, we also agreed to advance certain monies to Fuzion's chosen agents for these services. We completed the introductions and advanced the funds called for under the agreement. Although we have not yet resolved our claims, DataFuzion, Inc. has contacted us and we remain optimistic that we will be able to favorably resolve our issues.

Directors and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the name, age, positions, and offices or employments for the past three years as of December 31, 2004 for our executive officers and directors. Members of the board are elected and serve for one year terms or until their successors are elected and qualify. All of the officers serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors of instaCare.

NAME

AGE

POSITION

TERM

Robert Cox

45

President, Director, and Chief Executive Officer

Since June 2001

Keith Berman

51

Secretary, Treasurer and Director

Since January 2003

Robert Jagunich

58

Director

Since January 2003

Robert L. Cox, President and Director - prior to joining instaCare, was the Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of Tower Realty Trust, Inc., a publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust ("REIT") from October 1997 to May 2001. From March 1995 to October 1997 Mr. Cox served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Tower Equities, when Tower Equities became a public company (Tower Realty Trust, Inc.). From March 1987 to March 1995, Mr. Cox served as Vice President of Development and Construction of Tower Equities, where his main responsibilities included supervising all development and construction projects. Mr. Cox graduated in 1983 with a BA from Florida State University. Mr. Cox does not hold any directorships of other reporting companies.

Keith Berman, Secretary, Treasurer and Director - has for over the past 15 years, been involved in the development of healthcare software including Intranet and Internet systems. From July 1999 to present, Mr. Berman has held the position of President, founder and director of Caredecision.net, Inc. a private company engaged in e-health technology development. From January 1996 to June 1999 Mr. Berman was the President and founder of Cymedix, the operating division of Medix Resources, Inc., now Ramp Corp. (RCO). Cymedix was a pioneer company in what was then known as i-health (Internet healthcare) now the e-health industry. Mr. Berman received a BA in 1975 and an MBA in 1977, from Indiana University.

13


Robert Jagunich, Director - has 27 years of experience in the medical systems and device industry. From August 1992 to present, he has held the position of President at New Abilities Systems, a privately held manufacturer of advanced electronic systems used in rehabilitation. He also provides consulting services to companies such as Johnson and Johnson and has served as a senior executive in such publicly held companies as Laserscope and Acuson. From April 1996 to December 1997 Mr. Jagunich acted as a director of Cymedix Corporation, the operating entity of Medix Resources, Inc., now Ramp Corp. (AMEX:RCO). He received his BS in 1969, and his MS and MBA in 1971, from the Univ. of Michigan.

Mr. Cox and Mr. Berman, the officers, are treated as exempt employees and work whatever hours are necessary to complete company business. Both work far in excess of 40-hour weeks on company business. Mr. Jagunich attends meetings of the board of directors when held."

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the beneficial ownership of instaCare's outstanding classes of stock based on ownership information reported by the stockholders as of the latest practicable date, and on the number of shares outstanding as of the latest practicable date by each person known by instaCare to own beneficially more than 5% of each class, by each of instaCare's directors and executive officers and by all officers and directors as a group. instaCare is authorized to issue up to 1,250,000,000 shares of common stock. As of the latest practicable date, there are 447,140,421 shares of common stock issued and outstanding; therefore, 22,357,021 shares constitute a position of 5%. Unless otherwise indicated below, to instaCare's knowledge, all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares of common stock except to the extent that spouses share authority under applicable law. All shares are held directly.

The percentages are calculated on the basis of the amount of outstanding securities plus, for each person or group, any securities that person or group has the right to acquire within 60 days pursuant to options, warrants, and conversion privileges or other rights.

Common Stock

Name and Address

Shares Beneficially Owned

Percentage of Shares Outstanding

Keith Berman

1623 Elmsford

Westlake, CA 91361

8,143,991

1.82%

Robert L. Cox

16 Wood Hollow Lane

Fort Salonga, NY 11768

2,205,915

0.49%

Robert Jagunich

765 Christine Drive

Palo Alto, CA 94303

6,009,293

1.34%

Pinnacle Investment Partners LP1,2

Hank Gracin ESQ 50 Charles Lindberg Blvd,

Suite 505

Uniondale, NJ 11583

98,000,000

21.92%

Total ownership by our officers and directors (three individuals)

16,359,199

3.65%

Footnotes

  1. The control person of Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP is Chris Janish.

  2. These shares are currently held in escrow as collateral shares pursuant to a certain Promissory Note Agreement between us and Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP, Mr. Hank Gracin, Escrow Agent.

14


Description of Securities

Our authorized capital stock is 1,250,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share and 5,000,000 shares of preferred Stock, par value $.001 per share. As of the most recent practicable date, we had issued 447,140,421 of our shares of common stock, 207,526 shares of preferred stock and 20,000 shares of preferred series "C" stock.

For purposes of illustration only, assuming a hypothetical conversion of $100.00 (one share of Series C Preferred stock), while "Market Price" for our common stock is $0.02 at the time of conversion, and the "Conversion Price" per share for our Series C Preferred Stock shall be equal to eighty percent (80%) of the Market Price, the Conversion Ratio (formula) will be $100.00/$0.016, or 6,250 shares per $100.00. This hypothetical conversion will allow the 20,000 shares of Series C Preferred Stock to be converted into 125,000,000 shares of Common Stock. On the other hand, if the Market Price is $0.03 at the time of conversion, the Conversion Ratio (formula) will be $100.00/$0.024, 4,167 shares per $100.00, allowing the 20,000 shares of Preferred Stock to be converted into 83,333,333 shares of Common Stock.

The following brief description of our common stock and preferred stock is subject in all respects to Nevada law and to the provisions of our Articles of Incorporation filed with the state of Nevada on March 2, 2001, as amended filed with the state of Nevada on May 9, 2001 and our Bylaws, copies of which were submitted with our initial 10-SB Registration Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 27, 2001. In addition, to our amended Articles of Incorporation filed with the state of Nevada on August 2, 2002 copies of which were submitted with our June 30, 2002 Form 10-QSB filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Common Stock

As a holder of our common stock:

  1. You have equal rights to dividends from funds legally available, ratably, when as and if declared by our Board of Directors;
  2. You are entitled to share, ratably, in all of our assets available for distribution upon liquidation, dissolution, or winding up of our business affairs;
  3. You do not have preemptive, subscription or conversion rights and there are no redemption or sinking fund provisions applicable;
  4. You are entitled to 1 vote per share of common stock you own, on all matters that stockholders may vote, and at all meetings of shareholders.

Additionally, there is no cumulative voting for the election of directors.

Preferred Stock

We can issue shares of preferred stock in series with such preferences and designations as our board of directors may determine. Our board can, without shareholder approval, issue preferred stock with voting, dividend, liquidation, and conversion rights. This could dilute the voting strength of the holders of common stock and may help our management impede a takeover or attempted change in control.

Nevada Anti-Takeover Provisions

The anti-takeover provisions of Sections 78.411 through 78.445 of the Nevada Corporation Law apply to instaCare Section 78.438 of the Nevada law prohibits us from merging with or selling instaCare or more than 5% of our assets or stock to any shareholder who owns or owned more than 10% of any stock or any entity related to a 10% shareholder for three years after the date on which the shareholder acquired the instaCare shares, unless the transaction is approved by the Board of Directors of instaCare. The provisions also prohibit us from completing any of the transactions described in the preceding sentence with a 10% shareholder who has held the shares more than three years and its related entities unless the transaction is approved by our Board of Directors or a majority of our shares, other than shares owned by that 10% shareholder or any related entity. These provisions could delay, defer or prevent a change in control of instaCare.

15


Anti-Dilution

The shares of instaCare's preferred stock shall not be subject to dilution unless all the holders of the preferred stock vote to change this preference. In addition, the preferred stock shall maintain its status even if the common stock undertakes a reverse or forward split of its shares. The preferred stock cannot be diluted unless it is converted to common stock.

Market for Common Stock

The common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices of instaCare's common stock for the periods indicated, as reported by published sources. The prices reflect inter-deal prices without retail mark-up, markdown or commission and may not represent actual transactions.

 

Low

High

2005 Fiscal Year

       

First Quarter

$

0.013

$

0.03

2004 Fiscal Year

       

First Quarter

$

0.028

$

0.119

Second Quarter

$

0.023

$

0.083

Third Quarter

$

0.019

$

0.057

Fourth Quarter

$

0.015

$

0.03

2003 Fiscal Year

       

First Quarter

$

0.04

$

0.08

Second Quarter

$

0.04

$

0.075

Third Quarter

$

0.04

$

0.075

Fourth Quarter

$

0.03

$

0.05

2002 Fiscal Year

       

First Quarter

$

0.06

$

0.30

Second Quarter

$

0.03

$

0.08

Third Quarter

$

0.03

$

0.11

Fourth Quarter

$

0.04

$

0.11

As of the most recent applicable date, there were 268 individuals of record of our common stock. Our shares of common stock are currently traded on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board under the symbol "INCA". There is no assurance that an active trading market will develop that will provide liquidity for instaCare's existing shareholders or for the selling shareholders whose common stock is being registered through this filing.

On January 1, 2003, we adopted our "2003 Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 25,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. We issued 14,600,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the year ended December 31, 2003.

The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options under the 2003 Stock Option Plan:

 

Number

Of Shares

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

Balance, December 31, 2003

5,150,000

-

 
       

Options granted

-0-

$0.043

 

Options exercised

(-0-)

0.043

 
       

Balance, December 31, 2004

5,150,000

0.043

 
       

Exercisable, December 31, 2004

5,150,000

$0.043

 

16


The following is a summary of information about the 2003 Stock Option Plan options outstanding at December 31, 2004:

Shares Underlying Options Outstanding

Shares Underlying

Options Exercisable

Range of

Exercise Prices

Shares

Underlying

Options

Outstanding

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

Shares

Underlying

Options

Exercisable

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price

$0.040 - 0.050

5,150,000

0 years

$0.043

5,150,000

$0.043

Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share has been determined as if we had accounted for our non-employee stock-based compensation plans and other stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of each option and warrant grant are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:

 

2004

2003

Average risk-free interest rates

5.05

%

5.05

%
Average expected life (in years)

2

 

2

 
Volatility

51.0

%

51.0

%

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because our employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of our employee stock options. During 2003, there were no options granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the date of issuance.

As of December 31, 2003, outstanding stock options to acquire shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis totaled 5,150,000 at a weighted average exercise price of $.043. As of December 31, 2003, stock options in the Plan remaining to be issued totaled 5,250,000. The Plan stock options are 100% vested from the grant date.

The Commission has adopted regulations which generally define a "penny stock" to be any equity security that has a market price less than $5.00 per share. Thus, our common stock is presently a penny stock subject to rules that impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell such securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors. This would generally include institutions with assets in excess of $5,000,000 or individuals with net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 or $300,000 jointly with their spouse. Based on the above, investors who are not established customers of broker-dealers or accredited investors may find it difficult to purchase our common stock without satisfying numerous requirements.

Commission's Position on Indemnification for Securities Act Liabilities

Section 78.751 of the Nevada General Corporation Laws provides as follows: 78.751 Indemnification of officers, directors, employees and agents; advance of expenses.

1. A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorney's fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suitor proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, does not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and that, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, he had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

17


2. A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys' fees actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matter as to which such a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom, to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought or other court of competent jurisdiction determines upon application that in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper.

3. To the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in subsections 1 and 2, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he must be indemnified by the corporation against expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense.

4. Any indemnification under subsections 1 and 2, unless ordered by a court or advanced pursuant to subsection 5, must be made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances. The determination must be made: (a) By the stockholders: (b) By the board of directors by majority vote of a quorum consisting o directors who were not parties to act, suit or proceeding; (c) If a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the act, suit or proceeding so orders, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or (d) If a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the act, suit or proceeding cannot to obtained, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or

5. The Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or an agreement made by the corporation may provide that the expenses of officers and directors incurred in defending a civil or criminal, suit or proceeding must be paid by the corporation as they are incurred and in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that he is not entitled to be indemnified by corporation. The provisions of this subsection do not affect any rights to advancement of expenses to which corporate personnel other than the directors or officers may be entitled under any contract or otherwise by law.

6. The indemnification and advancement of expenses authorized in or ordered by a court pursuant to this section: (a) Does not exclude any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under the articles of incorporation or any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, for either an action in his official capacity or an action in another capacity while holding his office, except that indemnification, unless ordered by a court pursuant to subsection 2 or for the advancement of expenses made pursuant to subsection 5, may not be made to or on behalf of any director or officer if a final adjudication establishes that his act or omissions involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law and was material to the cause of action. (b) Continues for a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and endures to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

18


Insofar as indemnification for liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to our directors, officers, and controlling persons, we have been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and therefore unenforceable.

Description of Business

Business Development

Form and year of organization

instaCare Corp., a Nevada corporation, was formed July 6, 2000 as Promedicius, Inc., a development stage company.

Material reclassifications- Any material reclassification, merger, consolidation, or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of business

In June 2002, ATR Search Corp. merged with Medicius, Inc., formally Promedicius, a Nevada corporation, also a development stage company. Medicius, had a principal business objective to offer physicians, licensed medical service providers such as diagnostic testing laboratories, and medical insurers Internet enhanced, wireless ("Wi-Fi") information technology and data management technology (IT).

In January 2003, we adopted our "2003 Stock Option Plan" (the "2003 Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 25,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. We issued 14,600,000 shares of stock pursuant to the 2003 Plan during the year ended December 31, 2003. We issued an additional 10,400,000 shares of stock pursuant to the 2003 Plan during the year ended December 31, 2004.

In March and April 2004 we issued 6,510,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock in order to settle the disputes with investors and agents which arose over the M&E Note, and which allowed the M&E Note to be settled and converted. The value of the shares was $377,136 and is recorded as a loss on debt settlement during the year ended December 31, 2004.

On March 24, 2004, instaCare was loaned $700,000 from Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (Pinnacle). The Secured Convertible Promissory Note, which bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum (unless we fail to pay any installment or principal or interest when due, then the interest rate will then accrue at a rate of 24% per annum on the unpaid balance until the payment default is cured), initially matured on September 25, 2004, but was extended for an additional six months at our option, and was secured by 14,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. Under the terms of this Note, Pinnacle at its option, could have elected, at any time or from time to time, to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal amount of the Note into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.08 per share, unless such conversion would result in Pinnacle being deemed the "beneficial owner," within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. For the period ended December 31, 2004, there were no conversions.

On August 4, 2004 instaCare received a proposal for a possible merger with two private shareholder owned corporations based in Scottsdale, Arizona. These companies, both controlled by Ronald R. Kelly are:

19


  1. Futurecom Global, Inc., a Nevada corporation, founded in 1998 is a distributor of personal digital assistant (PDA) products and technologies and which also has interests in the pre-paid cellular and pre-paid cash card markets.
  2. CareGeneration, Inc., a Nevada corporation, founded in February 2004, a newly organized distributor of prescription drugs at the wholesale and retail levels. At the time of the proposal CGI had recently acquired certain assets, rights, customer lists and transfers of certain license(s) that had been the foundation of the wholesale prescription drug business unit of Kelly Company World Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation.

On August 5, 2004 we adopted our "2004 Employee Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 50,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. We issued 50,000,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the year ended December 31, 2004.

On October 12, 2004, we entered into various consulting and service agreements with Dr. Joseph Wolf, Leslie-Michelle Abraham and M. Thais Abraham to perform strategic and developmental services to facilitate our proposed merger with CareGeneration, Inc., among others. As consideration, we granted stock options to purchase 24,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under our 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $285,000, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.

On October 28, 2004, we entered into a second consulting and service agreement with Dr. Joseph Wolf to perform an enterprise value report for our proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. inclusive of that company's recent receipt of certain prescription drug distribution licenses and other considerations. As consideration, we granted stock options to purchase 6,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under our 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $72,310.00, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.

Initiated on November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, we entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between our to-be-formed subsidiary, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., and CareGeneration, Inc., the merger target that when accomplished would merge CareGeneration, Inc. into the to-be-formed subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., whereby Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. would be the surviving entity.

On November 18, 2004 we incorporated two subsidiary companies, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. a Nevada corporation, and PDA Services, Inc., a Nevada corporation, to facilitate these mergers.

On December 24, 2004 we entered into an agreement of understanding by and among InstaCare Corp. and, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., and CareGeneration, Inc. and Kelly Co. World Group, Inc. This agreement, among other things, allowed us to assume management and control over CareGeneration Inc.'s prescription drug distribution business and to do business under the previous business name as a means to facilitate the merger. The merger closed on February 25, 2005.

Pursuant to the agreements CareGeneration shareholders received 39,375,000 shares of Pharma Tech Solutions' common stock, equaling approximately 49% of the outstanding shares of Pharma Tech Solutions, and 42,500,000 of InstaCare's common stock in exchange for all of the shares of the CareGeneration's common stock and all of the CareGeneration's preferred stock. In addition, we were required at closing to place in escrow 100,000,000 common stock shares, which may be paid to CareGeneration stockholders subject to earn-out provisions based on performance. As of the date of this registration statement, after the expiration of two of the milestone dates, only 50,000,000 of these shares were still available for "earn-out."

On February 1, 2005, we entered into a financial consulting agreement with Pylon Management, Inc. expiring on December 31, 2005. Pursuant to the agreement, Pylon Management will be compensated for services in the form of option to purchase up to 18,500,000 shares of our common stock at $0.02 per share. As of the date of the registration statement, no options have been exercised.

20


On February 5, 2005, instaCare adopted our "2005 Stock Option Plan" and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 90,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock. On February 15, 2005, instaCare issued 63,000,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan to officers.

On February 7, 2005, we reached an agreement with three entities: Mercator Momentum Fund, LP, Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and Mercator Advisory Group, LLC (collectively the "investing entities"). Under this agreement, in return for a total investment of $2,000,000 USD from the investing entities, the last portion of which was received on February 22, 2005, instaCare agreed to issue and sell to the Purchasers an aggregate of: (a) Twenty Thousand (20,000) shares of our Series "C" Convertible Preferred Stock, $1000.00; and, (b) One Hundred Million (100,000,000) warrants to acquire up to One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of instaCare's common stock, 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise strike price of $.02 and 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise strike price of $.03.

Holders of series "C": convertible stock shall not have the right to vote on matters that come before the shareholders. Series "C" convertible preferred stock may be converted, the number of shares into which one share of Series "C" Preferred Stock shall be convertible shall be determined by dividing the Series "C" Purchase price by the existing conversion price which shall be equal to eighty percent of the market price rounded to the nearest thousandth, not to exceed $0.02 per share. Series "C" convertible stock shall rank senior to common stock in the event of liquidation. Holders' of Series "C" convertible stock shall be entitled to a mandatory monthly dividend equal to the share price multiplied by the prime interest rate plus five tenths percent. Series "C" convertible stock shall have a redemptions price of $100 per share, subject to adjustments resulting from stock splits, recapitalization, or share combination.

The number of shares the investing entities wish to convert and those warrant shares that any of the investing entities may acquire at any time are subject so that the aggregate number of shares of common stock of which such investing entities and all persons affiliated with the investing entities have beneficial ownership (calculated pursuant to Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) remains less than ten percent of our then outstanding common stock.

On February 7, 2005, the Board of Directors approved the issuance of warrants to purchase 100,000,000 shares of our common stock to Mercator LLP in connection with financing arrangements. Such warrants are exercisable over a period of three years at an exercise price of $0.02 for the initial 50,000,000 shares and $0.03 for the remaining 50,000,000 shares. The value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model was $100,000, which was recorded as financing costs as of March 31, 2005.

On February 7, 2005, the board of directors approved the issuance of warrants to purchase 3,500,000 shares of our common stock to Pylon Management for payment of consulting services. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.02 per share and vest over a period of three years. The value of the warrant using the Black-Scholes pricing model was $7,000, which was recorded as a consulting expense at March 31, 2005.

The weighted average of the assumptions used to value the warrants approved on February 7, 2005 were: Interest rate-3.50%, Days to expiration-1095, Stock price $0.02,Strike price-$0.02-$0.03, Volatility-0%, Yield-0%.

On February 10, 2005, we entered into a six-month consulting agreement with Victor Pallante for financial advisory services in exchange for cash in the amount of $50,000 due upon execution of the agreement and 5,000,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock to be considered earned over the term of the agreement and issued incrementally. We have expensed consulting fees in the amount of $50,000. We have delivered all of the shares required to date under this agreement.

On February 10, 2005, instaCare and Pinnacle entered into a Note Extension Agreement. Subject to the terms of this new agreement; on March 24, 2005, Pinnacle agreed to pay us $340,000 and (2) pay to Pinnacle's designee, CJR Capital, LLC, $60,000 towards Pinnacle's due diligence and legal expenses related to this new agreement. This new agreement has the following consequences: (1) the principal amount due under the Note automatically increases by $400,000 to $1,100,000; (2) the Maturity Date of the newly revised Note has been extended to April 24, 2006; and (3) the conversion price for those shares that underlie the Note was changed to $0.025.

21


In addition to the above, we agreed: (1) to deliver to Pinnacle's counsel an additional 83,000,000 shares of our common stock as additional escrow security, (2) issue to Pinnacle's designee, CJR Capital, LLC, 4,000,000 shares of our common stock towards Pinnacle's due diligence and legal expenses related to the revision of the Note; (3) issue to Pinnacle 9,000,000 shares of instaCare's common stock as a loan re-initiation fee; and (4) upon receipt of any properly crafted Seller's Representation Letter, deliver to Pinnacle an opinion of counsel to the effect that commencing March 24, 2005, Pinnacle may sell under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, shares surrendered to Pinnacle in accordance with this agreement, on condition that (1) Pinnacle uses the proceeds to pay down the indebtedness under the Note as of immediately prior to effectiveness of this agreement and (2) ceases to sell any of those Shares once that indebtedness has been paid off in full. We have recorded a financing expense in the amount of $227,500, the fair market value of the underlying shares. All of the shares required under the Note were delivered.

On April 14, 2005, after receiving affirmative votes from more than 50% of the outstanding shares, we changed our name to instaCare Corp. to better reflect our evolved mission and business focus. Moving forward we plan to incorporate the products and services of the former CareGeneration, Inc. into our business model.

Business of the Issuer

Principal products and markets

Our principal business objective is to provide information technology (IT) for use with Internet-based communication, and network software systems and applications that reside on and function through a Windows CE-Based PDA- available from most major computer brands such as Sony, Dell, IBM and Palm -to the medical fields and the real estate industry.

Our software operates on any Microsoft Windows CE "Pocket PC" based handheld device, either in a wireless or "wired" mode. The local host for our PDA devices is a Windows (9X, NT, XP or later) based PC, which, in turn, permits one to eight of the aforementioned PDAs to be linked to either a medical network or hotel/motel wide area network, or help-desk network, and allows each PDA to become a uniquely identified mobile node on that network, independent of PC linkage, thereby, assisting the professional, whether he be a doctor, hotel owner, hotel guest or satellite broadcast technician.

Our medical field objectives includes:

  1. Providing medical communication devices based on networks of personal digital assistants (PDA). These products are believed to provide benefits of on demand medical information to private practice physicians, licensed medical service providers such as diagnostic testing laboratories, and medical insurers. We have created PDA-centric products and a suite of Internet enhanced software applications that include those features that specifically respond to the requirements of the practicing physician.
  2. Provide, as an emerging Internet pharmacy, retail drug prescriptions fulfillment with the goal of delivering affordable, discounted prescriptions to the millions of uninsured and underinsured consumers in the United States.
  3. Combining our newly acquired wholesale and retail drug distribution with our PDA technologies, creating wholesale and retail ePharmacies similar in function to existing Internet pharmacies but directed to serving the large base of underinsured and uninsured Americans; and
  4. The practice of specializing in the distribution of medical diagnostic and medical disposable products associated with the on-going care of diabetes inflicted patients now that our new prescription drug distribution business is coming on-line.

22


Our real estate and hotel/motel objectives include building electronic commerce networks based on personal digital assistants (PDA) to the hotels, motels and single building, multi-unit apartment buildings with a desire to offer local advertising and electronic services to their tenants/guests.

Product Applications

Medical field Applications

Our medical technologies, the focus of one of the broad based patent applications now in the patent prosecution stage, are grounded in the central need to furnish the doctor with crucial point-of-care patient information rapidly and reliably via a PDA. The technologies utilize the power of the Internet to move large amounts of data to and from a variety of platforms securely via a powerful Windows CE based PDA designed for portability and upgradability. Totally compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA") and the regulations that have since been promulgated, this PDA technology offers complicated and real-time point of care applications, previously legacy (mainframe or PC network) system applications, on a totally portable (PDA) appliance.

Our software is designed to integrate point of service applications. The medical appliance, the longest available product, monitors treatment protocols and up to the moment patient histories coupled with real-time on-line medical insurance claims submission. Our ultimate key to success resides in providing the private practice physician with the capability to, sequentially, learn about the history of his or her patient during, or prior to, entering the examining room, treat the patient and update the insurer of the episode of care. Accomplishing these objectives resolves a major dilemma for the health care provider; instantaneous communication of vital patient related information at or before the patient encounter.

Retail prescription Applications

The retail prescription business is often subsidized or funded by government benefits which seems to be aggressively moving to take advantage of the tremendous opportunity in retail pharmacy business via direct mail order distribution of prescriptions and related products/supplies. As part of its acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. ("CGI"), PTSI, which is discussed below, acquired from CGI a proprietary, patent-pending retail mail order methodology for the distribution of pharmaceutical and healthcare supplies, which includes:

  1. Discounted pharmaceutical and healthcare supplies marketed by mail order to minority and citizen organizations (religious groups, unions, etc.)
  2. A proprietary "biometric" secured bankcard primarily targeted to the under-insured. The bankcard is honored by any FDIC bank within the United States.
  3. Discounted pharmaceutical and healthcare supplies marketed by mail order to state Medicaid and the Federal Medicare plans.

PTSI, a wholly owned subsidiary of instaCare, consists of two operating units, an active, licensed wholesale prescription drug distribution business, (license is undergoing transfer owing to the merger). PTSI is also an emerging Internet pharmacy just entering the retail drug prescriptions marketplace with the goal of delivering affordable, discounted prescriptions to the 40 million uninsured and underinsured consumers in the United States.

InstaCare's plan is to combine the newly acquired wholesale and retail drug distribution businesses now managed by Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. (PTSI) and couple these businesses with the capabilities to connect physicians, using our PDA technologies, creating wholesale and retail ePharmacies similar in function to existing Internet pharmacies but directed to serving the large base of underinsured and uninsured Americans. PTSI is also currently delivering bulk prescription drugs on a wholesale basis to clients formerly serviced by the now merged CareGeneration, Inc.

23


Real Estate and Hotel/Motel Applications

In February 2003, we introduced ResidenceWare, a collection of Internet-enhanced communication, integration, and networking software systems and applications that reside on and function through a Windows CE-based PDA.

The Wi-Fi hotel/motel and apartment software makes use of much of the foundation technologies resident in the medical software products we offer. Given the differences in the two markets that the products service, the hotel/motel product is much more cooperative oriented, offering more consumer transactional services with the compliment of advertising tools.

Our technologies and products for the hotel/motel marketplace are designed to furnish hotel and motel guests with a menu of food service, office services and other remote service (dry cleaning for instance) choices that can be electronically ordered through our PDA-based information appliance for delivery directly to the hotel/motel guest. Employing commercially available Wi-Fi technology, we wrapped the time and volume tested commercial technologies into our patent pending PDA communication networking technologies, allowing us to offer complex and real-time point of sale applications through a totally wireless (PDA) appliance.

ResidenceWare was proprietarily and internally developed to service the need for a communication tool that could capitalize on recent technological advances to facilitate the relay of vital information directly and instantaneously to occupying tenants/guests. The systems were further augmented with the addition of advertising and e-commerce transactional features allowing merchants and service providers local to a ResidenceWare installation to electronically advertise and accept electronic orders for their products and services, which benefit not only the tenants or guests, but provide a potential alternate revenue stream for the commercial and residential real estate management companies, and hotel owners; for we employ a cooperative advertising model where we will share advertising revenue and electronic commerce revenue generated with the hotel/apartment building owner or manager.

Distribution Methods

Medical field distribution methods

Since inception, we have, and will continue, to focus our marketing efforts towards general medical and pharmaceutical medical applications through our E-Health handheld information appliance (PDA) software application package, and a permanently affixed handheld information appliance and Wi-Fi (wireless) network. Specifically we have marketed our line of MD@Hand PDA-based medical communication network products to the medical insurance and pharmacy benefits management segments of the healthcare markets.

We have implemented a targeted marketing campaign to educate healthcare providers about our medical technology solutions; targeting the physician providers who specialize in care for the indigent through the provision of technology, products and services that specifically respond to the needs and requirements of that market. We market our suite of medical software products by emphasizing their simplicity, portability, convenience and ease of use. We have chosen this focus due in part that State Medicaid and state and local welfare service providers are agencies do not typically participate in electronic services networks. This is primarily because care for the poor and indigent is logistically and financially burdensome due to a lack of resources at administrative levels. Put another way, there is usually no shortage of volunteer physicians but there is a shortage of program administrators, clinics, medical supplies and patient access. And we believe that a company that enters this loop to complete the link by providing utility and value to participants will be embraced. It is incumbent on us to therefore extend our marketing strategy to facilitate this reality.

Implicit to our medical marketing strategy is the contracting of state Medicaid and welfare programs, pharmacy benefit management entities, and medical case management entities within a targeted region that provides for system integration to our products and services. Once the network has been established our IT driven mail order pharmacy services will be distributed to those physicians included within the Medicaid or welfare agency Provider Network. We will rely on those contracted agencies to support and assist in the distribution of the product to the said physicians

24


Real Estate and Hotel/Motel distribution methods

Historically hotels and motels have adopted specific technology that enhances the utility of either the in-room telephone(s) or the in-room cable linked television. Thus, most of the innovations in hotels and motels have leveraged devices where innovation is waning. The electronics in telephones and telephone systems are limited and, and the television's design tends to limit its utility to one-way communication directed at the person watching. Even add-on devices such as satellite boxes for televisions and streaming LCDs for telephones add only limited functionality. The person operating the telephone or television must do something away from that device should something of interest catch their eye. Thus local merchants who may opt to advertise their products and services via closed circuit television or a streaming LCD on a telephone hope that the person watching will remember their message and visit their establishment or call for service.

Since mid-2003, we began focusing acutely on the marketing of our applications to the lodging sector through our ResidenceWare hotel/motel products and technologies. We also changed our products to reflect regional differences in the lodging sector, and by creating brochures and marketing materials.

Our products for hotels and motels are two-way devices. Local merchants who opt to advertise via our wireless networks through the use of our wireless ResidenceWare devices are assured that if the person viewing the advertisements sees something of interest, commerce can immediately be initiated at the device.

Our hotel/motel marketing strategy targets hotel/motel owners through the provision of technology and services that specifically respond to their needs and requirements. We have designed products to furnish hotel and motel guests with a menu of food service, office services and other remote services that include those features that specifically respond to the requirements of the hotel/motel owner. We believe that the combination of unique and responsive benefits derived from our system coupled with its simplicity, portability, convenience and ease of use will initiate and propel its implementation throughout the industry.

We concentrate each of our marketing efforts in specific target geographic locations that permit the completion of our density strategy crucial to sustained penetration and long-term success. The creation of such networks will be conducted in multiple geographic locations simultaneously. Upon their completion the process employed will be introduced and replicated in other locations targeted for access. We believe that the products we market to hotels and motels are unique.

In July 2003, we formalized an informal agreement with PCHertz.com, Inc. of Fargo, ND for the installation and sales of our ResidenceWare units. To date, PCHertz.com, Inc. has received orders for approximately 2900 units of our ResidenceWare product from hotels and motels across the United States. Through the contacts and efforts of PCHertz.com, Inc. we have since placed 1287 of these units in hotels.

PCHertz.com. is a sales agent for instaCare and primarily provides sales leads and sales consulting services. They also provide after-sales support and marketing and thus share in advertising and electronic commerce revenues generated by our ResidenceWare products. PCHertz is in the business of providing wireless environments and hotspots to hotels and motels. Our products are one of several PCHertz represents. In the case of instaCare, once a lead is received from PCHertz our staff is responsible for the closing of the sale, and the eventual billing and customer support. We also pay a monthly fee to PCHertz for product installation services in Midwest located hotels. Of our original 2900 orders, we have installed or initiated installation at 1287. We have also taken in an additional 270 hotel rooms (orders). We plan to complete installation of the orders this calendar year.

In the summer of 2003, we began discussions for a possible acquisition of MDU Services, Inc. (MDU), a Texas based company that was in several businesses, but of particular interest was MDU's business of providing kiosk-style access to the Internet at hotels and apartment buildings. Envisioning a more robust line of Internet connectivity products for the lodging and apartment management marketplaces, we made an initial offer to acquire MDU in the late fall of 2003. This acquisition has never progressed past the Due Diligence phase, even after we revised our offer in February 2004. Given the time that has passed and the lack of materials provided by MDU for our review, it is questionable whether this acquisition will close, although there are no penalties associated with a delayed closure. We remain interested in MDU's businesses.

25


New Products

SateLink

The development SateLink launched instaCare into a previously unexplored industry for us. Its creation, however, is wholly consistent with our corporate mission of introducing innovative technologies that resolve electronic communication barriers within multiple and diverse markets. We remain in discussions about potential sale or license of our SateLink product. And although we are optimistic, we have yet to sell any license agreement or have any service order placed for SateLink.

SateLink is our palm computer based product system designed to facilitate wireless process control, calibration, key coding and communications within the cable and media re-broadcast industries. SateLink seeks to resolve electronic communication barriers that inhibit customer communications and service and furnishes controls over the delivery of their products.

SateLink is a collection of communication, integration, and networking software systems that reside on a Windows CE-based PDA that communicates via Wi-Fi wired or satellite network connections. We believe SateLink will capitalize on recent innovations with PDA-sized GPS receivers to consolidate one or multiple GPS channels into a WiFi network to empower real-time satellite communications between a sponsoring corporation and virtual PDAs.

Pharmaceutical

On January 4, 2005 we transacted our first commerce under PTSI. Subsequently we have accepted additional orders for future business and fulfilled these orders. We have transacted all prescription drug distribution business transacted, whether under the agreement of December 24, 2004 or subsequent to the closing of the Pharma Tech merger, through our subsidiary.

The retail prescription business - often subsidized or funded by government benefits -- is a development stage enterprise moving to take advantage of the tremendous opportunity in retail pharmacy business via direct mail order distribution of prescriptions and related products/supplies. As part of our acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. ("CGI"), PTSI also acquired from CGI a proprietary, patent-pending retail mail order methodology for the distribution of pharmaceutical and healthcare supplies which includes:

  1. Discounted pharmaceutical and healthcare supplies marketed by mail order to minority and citizen organizations (religious groups, unions, etc.)
  2. A proprietary "biometric" secured bankcard primarily targeted to the under-insured. The bankcard is honored by any FDIC bank within the United States.
  3. Discounted pharmaceutical and healthcare supplies marketed by mail order to state Medicaid and the Federal Medicare plans.

Bank Card

We has since taken this the Bank Card concept and technology and adapted the card into a powerful tool for tracking participants and processing transactions, providing a critical method for us to maintain a database of "members" or product/service receivers, and their transactions. This centrally located computer database will be used to store permanent customer history, maintain critical personal data, control and document each transaction processed, and provide the conduit for financial settlement. In addition, PTSI now has a pending agreement with a primary Chase partner/distributor to issue a collateralized debit card to each participant.

The Card will also provide a "prepayment" vehicle to eliminate any financial collection risk to us and can be used as a depository for incoming insurance payments on behalf of any member. The card will only allow funds to be extracted from the account by defined providers, for specific purpose, such as payment by insurance for prescriptions.

26


Medical Diagnostic and Medical Disposable Products

With our new prescription drug distribution business now coming on-line, we have decided to begin the practice of specializing in the distribution of medical diagnostic and medical disposable products associated with the on-going care of diabetes inflicted patients. This decision was made because the treatment and care of diabetes patients is an on-going lifetime process. To date we have entered into verbal agreements with distribution arms of two major manufactures and distributors of competing diabetic diagnostic products. We plan to add more of these diagnostic products as we further specialize into this medical niche.

Competition business conditions

Medical Field Competition

The medical industry is highly competitive in the attraction and retention of physician customers, insurers, government agency payors/sponsors and other medical providers. The number of competing companies and the size of such companies vary in different geographic areas. Generally, we are in competition with other PDA technology companies that offer medically related software suites, with the most effective competition coming from companies that possess greater capital resources, have longer operating histories, larger customer bases, greater name recognition and significantly greater financial, marketing and other resources than do we. However, only one competitor is currently using its technologies to pull through business from other ancillary products and services, and no other competitor is currently focused on healthcare services for the poor and indigent.

There are a number of small and large companies that provide some type of IT services at the point of care tying physicians to the healthcare systems:

  1. a. Large publicly traded companies: WebMD, formerly known as Healtheon (HLTH), the former MedicaLogic/Medscape (merged into HLTH) and to a slightly lesser degree Cerner/Citation (CERN), IDX Corporation (IDXC) and venerable Shared Medical (acquired by Seimens) are very broadly involved in healthcare based services including consumer services, E-commerce and connectivity
  2. b. PDA-based companies: PatientKeeper Corp. (formerly Virtmed), ePhysician, which less than two years ago was acquired in asset sale by Ramp Corp. (RCO) and is now downsized, and iScribe, which less than two years ago was reorganized and then merged into AdvacePCS, have announced products that reside on 3-Com's Palm PC. PocketScripts ("PS") is another market entrant that specializes in the electronic prescriptions. Zixcorp (ZIXI) acquired PS in 2003 and is still engaged in a consolidation.

The PatientKeeper product allows physicians to capture billing information for hospital-based accounts and purports to manage receivable transactions (a mix of a 1st generation feature on a 3rd generation technology). EPhysician's (Ramp Corp.) product offering allows prescription ordering from a PDA. On the surface, the former several of these companies provide systems that offer a few of the features of our system. However their approach involves a greater capital cost and is plagued with platform data management disadvantages compared to our product line. Most of these companies, PatientKeeper being the exception, have histories of financial troubles but nonetheless have garnered impressive valuations.

All of the technology-based companies listed above have a similar broad goal to deliver PDA based data management to physicians. One company, AllScripts (MDRX), appears to be positioned to advance to a market leadership position and is the aforementioned company employing a business model similar to us. However, this position is defined by a product distribution of less than 5000 physicians' office sites (2% of the total market) and does not possess a major factor in any medical trade area. Nonetheless, AllScripts employs a "pull-through" business model whereby their technology is employed at the physician's point of care in an effort to provide medical utility and medical content to that physician, but with the greater goal of selling that physician bulk pharmaceuticals.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and competitive pressures faced by us may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. Further, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment, management may from time to time make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions or acquisitions that could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

27


Real Estate and Hotel/Motel Competition

We have yet to experience any substantial competition for our ResidenceWare products in the motel and apartment market segments, although we expect as this market niche expands we will see products from other software device companies adapt their product lines to enter into this marketplace.

With the increasing us of internet connections in hotels cable companies, WiFi connectivity providers, and kiosks will continue to be our strongest form of competition within this market segment.

Source of principal suppliers

Our suite of software-both medical and real estate and hotel/motel related- is proprietary code and does not require raw materials or principal suppliers. Our software is utilized through over-the-counter PDA's and computer products, as previously discussed. However, our ResidenceWare product is manufactured by third parities. Of the units placed, approximately one half (1/2) are units manufactured and/or distributed by companies such as ASUS, Casio and Viewsonic. The remaining units were manufactured by Dell Computer, Inc. (Dell). Since October 1, 2004 all units placed have been Dell units; and we do not foresee a change is utilizing solely Dell units in the foreseeable future.

Dependence on a few major customers

We have had limited medical technology sales, and we are dependent on a few major customers for our Residence Ware product line. Currently, or ResidenceWare product is only offered by PCHertz.com and us directly, and our medical software is offered through us, but promoted by multiple consultants.

Patent and trademark applications

We have filed multiple broad based patent applications and intend to file derivative patent applications covering the processes, use and functionality of our technologies and products. Additionally, in July 2002 we began application and received provisional approval for a family of trademarks making use of the mark MD@. The provisional approval applies to the first six individual marks applied for by us. Management is unsure whether we will pursue these applications given the changes to our business focus. More recently we began the process of applying for marks associated with our ResidenceWare hotel/motel products and technologies and our wireless SateLink products and technologies for the satellite media market.

On November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, we entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between instaCare, our Pharma Tech Solutions Inc. subsidiary and CareGeneration, Inc. One of these transactions contemplated the transfer of a certain prescription drug distribution license. Transfers of these licenses are complicated and time consuming often involving several state regulatory agencies. To mitigate any time delays associated with the license transfer, the companies entered into an exclusive business relationship whereby instaCare and its subsidiary could operate while the license was in transfer. All closing activities surrounding the merger of the companies were completed on January 27, 2005. Merger certificates are were filed on February 15, 2005. Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., which is majority controlled by InstaCare Corp., was the surviving merger entity.

On December 27, 2004, Ronald Kelly, a former director, agreed to seek transfer to Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. of a Wholesale Drug Distribution License issued by the State of Illinois and jointly governed by regulators from the State of Illinois, the U. S. Drug Enforcement Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Also, Mr. Kelly agreed to seek transfer of a reciprocal drug distribution license issued by the State of Indiana, a client list and know-how in the form of written (published) drug distribution policies and procedures applicable to independent prescription drug and diagnostic distributors. Subsequently PTSI and our other subsidiary, PDA Services, Inc., have applied for and received additional prescription drug distribution licenses in the sates of New Jersey and North Dakota. We are in the process of establishing distribution centers in those states.

28


We have not assigned a value to the prescription drug distribution licenses. Licenses of this nature are tightly regulated and allocated by state and federal authorities and are often transferred as part of asset sales and/or sales of client lists. We have placed no value for the client list and know-how also donated.

Government approval and effect on us

Medical Applications

Recent government and industry legislation and rulemaking, especially the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ("HIPAA"), and industry groups such as the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations ("JCAHO"), require the use of standard transactions, standard identifiers, security and other standards and requirements for the transmission of certain electronic health information. New national standards and procedures under HIPAA include the "Standards for Electronic Transactions and Code Sets" (the "Transaction Standards"); the "Security Standards" (the "Security Standards"); and "Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information" (the "Privacy Standards"). The Transaction Standards require the use of specified data coding, formatting and content in all specified "Health Care Transactions" conducted electronically.  However, because all HIPAA Standards are subject to change or interpretation and because certain other HIPAA Standards, not discussed above, are not yet published, we cannot predict the future impact of HIPAA on our business and operations. Additionally, certain state laws are not pre-empted by the HIPAA Standards and may impose independent obligations upon our customers or us.

Failure to comply with HIPAA, as well as other government organizations, may have a material adverse effect on our business. Government regulation of healthcare and healthcare information technology, are in a period of ongoing change and uncertainty and creates risks and challenges with respect to our compliance efforts and our business strategies. The healthcare industry is highly regulated and is subject to changing political, regulatory and other influences. Federal and state legislatures and agencies periodically consider programs to reform or revise the United States healthcare system. These programs may contain proposals to increase governmental involvement in healthcare or otherwise change the environment in which healthcare industry participants operate. Particularly, compliance with HIPAA and related regulations are causing the healthcare industry to incur substantial cost to change its procedures. Healthcare industry participants may respond by reducing their investments or postponing investment decisions, including investments in our products and services. Although we expect these regulations to have the beneficial effect of spurring adoption of our software products, we cannot predict with any certainty what impact, if any, these and future healthcare reforms might have on our business. Existing laws and regulations also could create liability, cause us to incur additional cost or restrict our operations.

Specific risks include, but are not limited to, risks relating to:

    Electronic Prescribing. The use of our software by physicians to perform a variety of functions, including electronic prescribing, electronic routing of prescriptions to pharmacies and dispensing, is governed by state and federal law. States have differing prescription format requirements, which we have programmed into our software. Many existing laws and regulations, when enacted, did not anticipate methods of e-commerce now being developed. While federal law and the laws of many states permit the electronic transmission of prescription orders, the laws of several states neither specifically permit nor specifically prohibit the practice. Given the rapid growth of electronic transactions in healthcare, and particularly the growth of the Internet, we expect the remaining states to directly address these areas with regulation in the near future. It is possible that aspects of our MD@Hand software tools could become subject to government regulation. Compliance with these regulations could be burdensome, time-consuming and expensive. We also could become subject to future legislation and regulations concerning the development and marketing of healthcare software systems. These could increase the cost and time necessary to market new services and could affect us in other respects not presently foreseeable. We cannot predict the effect of possible future legislation and regulation; and,

Medical Devices. The United States Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") has promulgated a draft policy for the regulation of computer software products as medical devices under the 1976 Medical Device Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. To the extent that computer software is a medical device under the policy, we, as a manufacturer of such products, could be required, depending on the product, to:

29


  • register and list our products with the FDA;
  • notify the FDA and demonstrate substantial equivalence to other products on the market before marketing such products; or
  • obtain FDA approval by demonstrating safety and effectiveness before marketing a product.
  • Depending on the intended use of a device, the FDA could require us to obtain extensive data from clinical studies to demonstrate safety or effectiveness, or substantial equivalence. If the FDA requires this data, we would be required to obtain approval of an investigational device exemption before undertaking clinical trials. Clinical trials can take extended periods of time to complete. We cannot provide assurances that the FDA will approve or clear a device after the completion of such trials. In addition, these products would be subject to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act's general controls, including those relating to good manufacturing practices and adverse experience reporting. Although it is not possible to anticipate the final form of the FDA's policy with regard to computer software, we expect that the FDA is likely to become increasingly active in regulating computer software intended for use in healthcare settings.

    Anti-Kickback Regulation. As a distributor of prescription drugs along the distribution chain that ultimately supply physicians, we are subject to the federal anti-kickback statute, which applies to Medicare, Medicaid and other state and federal programs. The statute prohibits the solicitation, offer, payment or receipt of remuneration in return for referrals or the purchase, or in return for recommending or arranging for the referral or purchase, of goods, including drugs, covered by the programs.

    Licensure and Prescription Drug Distribution. As a distributor of drugs, we are subject to regulation by and licensure with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) and various state agencies that regulate wholesalers or distributors. We are subject to periodic inspections of our facilities by regulatory authorities, and adherence to policies and procedures for compliance with applicable legal requirements.

    Currently, we do not bear any costs or any effects regarding compliance with environmental laws (federal, state, and local).

    Research and Development Expenditures

    instaCare acquired much of its software technology and intellectual properties a result of its merger with Medicius, Inc. in 2002, and has expensed all of the on-going development of those technologies and properties. Additional software research and development has subsequently occurred as part of instaCare's development of its ResidenceWare software systems. From inception and through March 31, 2005, instaCare's software research and development cost is $308,711.

    Employees

    As of the date of the filing of this registration statement, instaCare has a total of nine (9) part time or contract services employees and nine (9) full staff employees inclusive of five part time and five full staff employees in its principal executive California offices. In addition we employ one full-time employee in North Dakota, one full-time employee in New York, one part-time employee is New Jersey, one full-time employee and one part-time employee based in Florida. In addition, subsequent to our acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. by instaCare's Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. subsidiary, there is one additional full-time personnel based in Scottsdale, AZ and two part-time personnel in Carthage, IL. Management foresees the immediate hiring of additional employees over the next twelve months, as we generate sufficient revenues, in management's opinion, to support hiring additional staff. No employees are covered by labor agreements or employment contracts, except for our contract laborers who we hire under contract but are nonetheless at-will. Management believes our relations with our employees are good.

    Reports to Security Holders

    We are not required to deliver an annual report to security holders, and will not voluntarily send an annual report. However, we are a reporting company and file reports, proxy and information statements, with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The public may read and copy any materials you file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC and state the address of that site (http://www.sec.gov). We have a website at http://www.instacare.net., which provides a description of our services and products.

    30


    Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

    Overview

    Due to the deficit we have accumulated deficit of $(10,223,372) since our inception on July 6, 2000 through the period ended December 31, 2004, and with insufficient revenue to support existing operations; our auditors have issued a going concern opinion.

    Recently, as discussed below, we have entered into several new business ventures, which have required the company to enter the capital markets to raise capital or to pay for expert services with our stock, so that we might continue. Because we believe we must increase our customer base for our point of care software, and indigent patient care pharmaceutical fulfillment and prescriptions processing system as well as our new ResidenceWare and SatLink product lines so as to continually to increase revenues, we aggressively implemented and are successfully executing our business and marketing strategy by retaining consultants and advisors. As in the past, we have funded these new ventures, and their relating operations by cash provided by financing activities for stock as well as paid the consultants and corporations assisting us with negotiations, marketing, to include customer introductions, primarily through the offerings of our common stock., both common and preferred, options and warrants; thus conserving our capital. Initial effects of these transactions have placed a substantial burden to the overall current value of our common stock, even to the detriment to the smaller block shareholders. However, we believe these transactions will have a long term benefit for all shareholders. We have substantially increased our capital for operations, and subsequent to recent acquisitions and introductions of our new product lines, our revenues have increased substantially.

    We will continue, if necessary, to utilize our stock in this manor until fully profitable. We believe our aggressive stock-based compensation throughout 2004 and through 2005 for the services of outside consultants, a corporate strategic planning firms and others who agreed to provide their professional services in exchange for stock, not cash, will benefit us Retaining these individuals and groups who provide capital in exchange for our stock in lieu of cash is a necessity for us achieving market acceptance for our new or newly integrated products and services; for each will require substantial expenditure of significant funds to create awareness and demand by participants in their respective industries. The deployment of new or newly integrated products and services will require the use of our financial and other resources for training our existing sales and customer service personnel and for hiring and training additional salespersons and customer service personnel.

    So although InstaCare is still considered a going concern, we have increased revenues in 2005, as evidenced in our 10QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005. We anticipate that our operating cash flow, coupled with the funds raised from financing will be sufficient to meet our operating expenses for the next 12 months. During our normal course of business, we will, however, experience net negative cash flows from operations throughout 2005, at a minimum.

    On June 10, 2005 our Board of Directors removed Ronald R. Kelly as a director as a result of certain transactions and other actions that may have lead to a breach of Mr. Kelly's fiduciary duties as a member of our Board of Directors. Mr. Kelly did not serve on any committee of our Board of Directors at the time of his removal. Further, we engaged special counsel to assist management in investigating the matters surrounding Mr. Kelly's removal and on July 6, 2004 instaCare brought suit in Federal Court against Mr. Kelly and others. On June 16, 2005, we received a letter, dated June 14, 2005, from Mr. Kelly's counsel wherein Mr. Kelly advised us of his resignation as a member of our Board of Directors effective June 1, 2005.

    In the summer of 2003, we began discussions for a possible acquisition of MDU Services, Inc. (MDU), a Texas based company that was in several businesses, but of particular interest was MDU's business of providing kiosk-style access to the Internet at hotels and apartment buildings. Envisioning a more robust line of Internet connectivity products for the lodging and apartment management marketplaces, we made an initial offer to acquire MDU in the late fall of 2003. This acquisition has never progressed past the Due Diligence phase, even after we revised our offer in February 2004. Given the time that has passed and the lack of materials provided by MDU for our review, it is questionable whether this acquisition will close, although there are no penalties associated with a delayed closure. We remain interested in MDU's businesses.

    31


    Results of Operations for period ended March 31, 2005.

    instaCare incurred net losses of $1,489,909 for the three months ended March 31, 2005. These results include the extraordinary costs incurred through our recent acquisition, However, this performance indicates that instaCare's continuation, is still dependent upon our ability to obtain adequate financing. If instaCare were unable to obtain adequate financing necessary to continue our operations, advance our plan of operations, increase our sales, increase our inventory and working capital, we would be substantially limited. If instaCare were unable to properly fund our plan of operations, our continuation would be jeopardized. Management's plan to overcome our financial difficulties consists of raising additional capital and obtaining revenues from the acquired assets of the CareGeneration, Inc. businesses. At this point, instaCare has no definite plans to return to the capital markets.

    The participation necessary to launch our integrated system will be accomplished through the costs of sale and marketing that are estimated to be 60% of revenue.

    For the three months ended

    March 31,

    Statement of operations data:

    2005

    2004

    Gross profit

    $ 196,649

    $ 55,392

    Expenses:

         General & administrative expenses

    174,936

    59,082

         Payroll expense

    256,869

    80,540

         Professional fees

    278,618

    238,530

         Stock-based compensation - related party

    115,290

    -

         Stock-based compensation - consulting

    346,380

    485,119

         Software development

    -

    69,641

         Hardware costs

    10,075

    -

         Impairment loss on operating assets

    -

    111,473

         Depreciation

    13,138

    33,315

    Other total income (expenses):

    (486,251)

    (734,442)

    Net (loss)

    $ (1,484,909)

    $ (1,756,750)

    Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted

    $ (0.00)

    $ (0.01)

    The following is an itemization of our results of operations for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 in comparison to our results of operations for the period ended March 31, 2004.

    NET REVENUE. Net revenue (revenue minus cost of sales) for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $196,649 as compared to net revenue of $55,392 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. As we emerge from the development stage, we have begun to generate more significant revenue. We cannot guarantee with certainty when we will begin to generate revenue sufficient enough to fund ongoing operations. Our future revenues will be reliant on the acceptance of our software systems, communication tools and suite of software applications.

    EXPENSES

    GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. Our general and administrative expenses relate to the operation and leasing costs of our corporate office. General and administrative expenses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 were $174,936 compared to $59,082 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. We anticipate purchases of equipment and other office related supplies in conjunction with the generation of revenues from business operations.

    32


    PAYROLL EXPENSE. Our payroll expense consists primarily of management and employee salaries. Payroll expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $256,869 compared to Payroll expense of $80,540 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. A management team has been put in place to oversee the launch of our software systems, communication tools and suite of software applications. Management is focused on controlling payroll expenses until such time as revenues are generated sufficient to increase the salary paid to our executives. Payroll expense increased due to the addition of several new employees in 2004.

    PROFESSIONAL FEES. Our professional fees include fees paid to our accountants and attorneys. Our professional fees for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 were $278,618 compared to professional fees of $238,530 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. As we have contracts with the professionals that provide support services for instaCare, our professional fees remain constant.

    STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION. Our stock-based compensation for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $346,380 compared to stock-based compensation of $485,119 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. In an effort to conserve our cash resources during fiscal 2003, 2004 and into fiscal 2005, we retained the services of outside consultants, a corporate strategic planning firm and a merchant-banking firm who agreed to provide their professional services for instaCare stock and stock options in lieu of cash. We typically retain these consultants for a period of either 90 days or 180 days duration.

    SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT. Our software development expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $-0- compared to software development expense of $69,641 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. We have maintained our investment in the development of our software as management continues to focus on integrating our software systems, communication tools and suite of software applications with those of our partners.

    HARDWARE COSTS. Our hardware costs represent the cost of goods category for our PDA based Residenceware products associated with the purchase and installation of computer server hardware at our hotel/motel customer sites. Our hardware costs for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 were $10,075 as compared to hardware costs of $0 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004.

    IMPAIRMENT LOSS ON OPERATING ASSETS. Our impairment loss on operating assets expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 was $111,473. instaCare incurred no such expense for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005.

    DEPRECIATION. Our depreciation expense was $13,138 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 compared to $36,377 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. This represents depreciation on the assets of instaCare and has decreased due to the asset impairment recognized as of December 31, 2004.

    TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES. Total operating expenses for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 were $1,195,306 compared to $1,077,700 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004. The increase in total operating expenses was mainly a result of additional overhead costs required to support the commencement of significant operations.

    Note payable

    Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP Promissory Note

    On March 24, 2004, instaCare was loaned $700,000 from Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (Pinnacle). The Secured Convertible Promissory Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum, initially matured on September 25, 2004, but was extended for an additional six months at the option of instaCare, and is secured by 14,000,000 shares ofour $0.001 par value common stock. Pinnacle may, at its option, at any time or from time to time, elect to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal amount of the Note into shares of instaCare's $0.001 par value common stock at a conversion price of $0.08 per share, unless such conversion would result in Pinnacle being deemed the "beneficial owner," within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of 4.99% or more of the then outstanding Common Shares of instaCare. In the event instaCare fails to pay any installment or principal or interest when due, the interest rate will then accrue at a rate of 24% per annum on the unpaid balance until the payment default is cured.

    33


    On February 10, 2005, instaCare entered into a "Note Extension Agreement" with Pinnacle Partners, LP. The amended Agreement will automatically increase the principal balance of the original secured promissory note dated March 24, 2004 of $700,000 to $1,100,000 and the maturity date will automatically be extended to April 26, 2006. Pursuant to the Agreement, instaCare has issued and additional 83,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as collateral for the additional principal of $400,000. In addition, instaCare has issued 13,000,000 shares of its common stock as a renewal fee to Pinnacle Partners and CJR, Capital, LLC, its designee. InstaCare has recorded a financing expense in the amount of $227,500, the fair market value of the underlying shares.

    InstaCare recorded interest expense totaling $48,699 and $22,804 during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. InstaCare also recorded financing costs totaling $441,083 during the three months ended March 31, 2005.

    Net Income (Loss)

    We had net losses of $1,484,909 for the three months ending March 31, 2005. This loss was due in large part to stock-based compensation for consulting fees and other professional fees.

    Past and Future Projected Budget Expenses and Projected Milestones

    Through March 31, 2005 instaCare spent the following (tables are approximate):

    Fees to Initiate Loan from Pinnacle Inv.

    $ 60,000

    Fees for Mercater funds investment

    $ 115,000

    Consulting Agreement (marketing)

    $ 50,000

    Cash consumed for CareGen acquisition

    $ 110,850

    Prescription Drug Inventory

    $ 266,700

    General and Administrative

    $ 36,000

    Legal and Contracts

    $ 10,000

    $ 648,550

    Our forecasted use of funds through March 31, 2006:

    Use of Funds

    Expenditure

    Anticipated Licensing and physical plant for of Retail Pharmacy

    $ 150,000

    General and Administrative

    $ 150,000

    Sales and Marketing Retail Pharmacy

    $ 275,000

    Technology Implementation (MD@Hand)

    $ 250,000

    Prescription Drug Inventory

    $ 275,000

    Education/Field Training

    $ 120,000

    Sales and Marketing Wholesale Drug Line

    $ 225,000

    Cash anticipated CareGen acquisition

    $ 95,000

     

    $1,540,000

    34


    Our anticipated milestones through March 31, 2006:

    Activity Anticipated Date
    Close Acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc.

    March 2005

    File for Retail Pharmacy license (AZ)

    April 2005

    File for additional wholesale license (NJ)

    May 2005

    Receive Retail license

    June 2005

    Receive additional wholesale license

    June 2005

    Secure supplier agreements (retail pharmacy)

    June 2005

    Secure mail order pharmacy space, build inventory

    July 2005

    Add sales and marketing staff

    August 2005

    Begin marketing HUD pilot

    October 2005

    Initiate marketing to Medicaid clinics

    January 2006

    Internal and External Sources of Liquidity

    M and E Equities, LLC Renegotiated Note

    Based on terms negotiated on March 4, 2002, and after a further documentation process that was completed on April 23, 2003, Medicius, Inc. our merger partner in our June 2002 merger was loaned $475,000 from M and E Equities, LLC (M&E). A condition of the loan stipulated that Medicius, Inc. complete its merger with us and become a fully reporting public company. As of December 31, 2003, after partial payment of interest and principal and a settlement of a legal dispute that arose over this note and other issues, the remaining value of the note and accrued interest was $522,527. On March 2, 2004, we renegotiated our debt with M&E. the terms of the agreement are stipulated as follows:

    1. $320,000 is paid to M&E by Wells & Company, Inc., Lima Capital, Inc., JC Financial and Corporate Architects, Inc. to satisfy a remaining principal amount of $400,000. We were informed that theses four entities purchased the note from M&E for investment purposes. At the time of the M&E Note transaction Wells & Company was a consultant to us providing merger and acquisition and strategic planning consultation to the officers of instaCare. Subsequently Wells & Company and Corporate Architects, Inc. have from time to time provided consulting services to us in the area of mergers, acquisitions consulting and introductory services to potential merger partners. We have no relationship with either Lima Capital, Inc. or JC Financial.
    2. M&E agreed to transfer 10,000,000 of the Class A Warrants, formerly issued by Medicius, Inc. with an expiration date of January 5, 2005 to Empyreon.net for $30,000 and 2,000,000 Class A Warrants to Mr. Moshe Mendlowitz for $20,000. We incurred financing costs during the year ended December 31, 2004 totaling $405,700, the deemed value of the Warrants on the transfer date based on the Black-Scholes Valuation Model.
    3. The outstanding note balance of $200,526 was recapitalized into 207,526 shares of our $0.001 par value Class A Convertible Preferred Stock and registered in M&E's name. Each share of Class A 2002 Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 18 shares (3,717,468 total) of our $0.001 par value common stock at $0.055556 per share. M&E agrees to hold the Preferred Shares for a minimum of one year, pursuant to Rule 144, with no conversions allowed during that period of time. After one year, M&E may convert and sell only 500,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock every 60 days as permissible by Rule 144.

    The February 2005 investment by Mercator Momentum Fund, LP and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and the additional investment by Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP raised a total of $2,400,000. These funds were raised to facilitate our acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc., which was accomplished on February 25, 2005, and the investment required to plan, acquire and market the anticipated "closed door" internet pharmacy. We believe our cash and cash equivalents of $1,849,198 will be sufficient to fund ongoing fiscal 2005 and 2006 operations and provide for our working capital needs. Our current ratio as of March 31, 2005 was 1.92 given current assets of $2,774,900 and current liabilities of 1,446,883. Current ratio is calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities. This ratio relates to our ability to pay short-term debt as it becomes due. Our ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon our ability to achieve and maintain profitable operations. Revenues generated over and above expenses will be used for further development of our services, to provide financing for marketing and promotion, to secure additional customers, equipment and personnel, and for other working capital purposes.

    35


    Net cash used by operating activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $938,048, which was primarily due to the net loss of $1,499,909 offset by shares issued for stock-based compensation of $896,530. This compares to net cash used by operating activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 of $249,760, which was primarily due to the net loss of $1,756,750 offset by shares issued for various purposes totaling $1,071,096.

    Net cash provided by investing activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and 2004 was $0. As cash flow allows, we may enter into investing activities on a case-by-case basis should management believe it prudent to do so.

    Net cash provided by financing activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 was $2,757,973 comprised of a reduction of $11,027 as payments made on an note payable to a shareholder, $400,000 in proceeds from long-term debt, a revolving line of credit in the amount of $215,950, the issuance of preferred series "C" stock in the amount of $2,000,000 and $153,050 received from the issuance of common stock. This compares to net cash provided by financing activities during the three-month period ended March 31, 2004 of $1,005,734 comprised of $5,000 in convertible notes payable to a related party, $550,000 in proceeds from long-term debts, $35,334 in proceeds from note payable to shareholder and $425,400 received from the issuance of common stock.

    To date, we have financed our cash flow requirements through an issuance of common stock and through the issuance of notes. During our normal course of business, we will experience net negative cash flows from operations, pending receipt of revenues. Further, we may be required to obtain financing to fund operations through additional common stock offerings and bank borrowings, to the extent available, or to obtain additional financing to the extent necessary to augment our available working capital.

    Critical Accounting Policy and Estimates

    Our Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation section discusses our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

    On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to accrued expenses, financing operations, and contingencies and litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The most significant accounting estimates inherent in the preparation of our financial statements include estimates as to the appropriate carrying value of certain assets and liabilities which are not readily apparent from other sources. These accounting policies are described at relevant sections in this discussion and analysis and in the notes to the financial statements included in this registration statement.

    Description of Property

    instaCare's headquarters and principal facilities are located at 2660 Townsgate Road, Suite 300, Westlake Village, CA 91361. This facility had been rented by Medicius, Inc. prior to our June 2002 merger. The lease terminated in September 2004. This 2300 sq. foot facility is currently rented on a month to month basis without a lease at a rate of $3750.00 per month. We may leave this facility at any time without penalty. In addition the CEO of instaCare, Robert Cox, at no cost to the corporation, is currently providing facilities at his offices in Ft. Salonga, New York, which are available to instaCare upon request and are used by Mr. Cox when he is not traveling.   On July 1, 2005 we agreed to a month to month sub-rental for not longer than one year of a warehouse and shipping facility in Colonia, NJ. The rental is $1500.00 per month and offers us an east coast warehouse facility for short term storage of prescription diagnostics purchased on the spot market.

    36


    Until April 30, 2005 we maintained offices in a 17,500 sq. foot facility for our Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. operations at 15945 N. 76th St. Scottsdale AZ 85260. Immediately after our acquisition of the former CareGeneration, Inc. we shared this office with Futurecom Global, Inc., a company owned and controlled by Ronald Kelly, a former director of instaCare Corp. and the former controlling shareholder of CareGeneration, Inc.

    We have entered into a one-year lease, expiring on December 31, 2005, at 96 S. Madison, Carthage, IL owing to our recent acquisitions of the prescription drug distribution businesses. The facility being rented is a specialty warehouse facility that serves instaCare as a prescription drug storage facility. The rent on this facility is $3750.00 and the lessors are Ronald R. and Linda R. Kelly. Mr. Kelly is a related party and was a former director of instaCare and the controlling shareholder of our recent acquisition CareGeneration, Inc.

    We do plan to consolidate our offices in the foreseeable future. This consolidation may require one or more physical moves. If additional facilities are needed, management believes that suitable expansion space is available to meet our future needs at commercially reasonable terms.

    Certain Relationships And Related Transactions

    In August 2002 we issued 5,725,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock to CareDecision.net, Inc. pursuant to its election to convert 750,000 Preferred shares held in Medicius, Inc. CareDecision.net, Inc, was a private corporation that previous to our June 2002 merger with Medicius, Inc., current directors Keith Berman and Robert Jagunich had served in similar positions. This election was made pursuant to the Meger Agreement between Medicius, Inc. and InstaCare.

    In November 2002 we issued 875,000 restricted shares of common stock to CareDecision.net, Inc., for purchasing their empower care software and the caredecision.net web domain. CareDecision.net, Inc, was a private corporation that previous to our June 2002 merger with Medicius, Inc., current directors Keith Berman and Robert Jagunich had served at CareDecision.net, inc. in similar positions..

    In November 2002 we issued 1,267,963 restricted shares of common stock, to Keith Berman for retiring his Note. Mr. Berman has been Secretary, Chief Financial Officer and a director of the Company since January 2003.

    In November 2002, we issued 640,000 restricted shares of common stock to Robert Jagunich for his exercising 640,000 merger warrants at a strike price of $0.05. Mr. Jagunich has been a director of the Company since January 2003.

    During the six months ended June 30, 2003, instaCare acquired fully developed software from CareDecision.net, Inc, a private corporation where previous to our June 2002 merger with Medicius, Inc., and where current directors of instaCare Keith Berman and Robert Jagunich had served in similar positions. Pursuant to the agreement, instaCare paid CareDecision.net, Inc. the sum of $181,250 with 2,500,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock.

    In December 2002 the Board of Directors agreed to issue restricted shares to Robert Cox, Keith Berman and William Lyons, pursuant to a bonus arrangement clause in the June 2002 merger agreement between the company and its merger target Medicius, Inc. These shares were issued in September 2003. Messrs. Berman and Lyons each received 1,250,000 restricted shares and Mr. Cox, the CEO of the company, 1,500,000 restricted shares. At the time of this issuance Mr. Cox was the sole officer and director. In January 2003 Messrs. Berman and Lyons were elected directors.

    37


    In September 2003 we issued 4,127,093 restricted shares of common stock to Robert Jagunich as compensation for services he had provided in October-December 2002. During the service provision period in 2002 Mr. Jagunich was neither an officer, director or affiliate of the company. Mr. Jagunich was elected as a director in January 2003.

    Ronald Kelly served instaCare as a director and consultant. He acted as Vice-President and Director of our subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. In February 2005 our subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. acquired CareGeneration, Inc. a company controlled by Mr. Kelly. Upon the closing of that acquisition, Mr. Kelly was elected as a Director of instaCare and an officer and Director of our subsidiary. Subsequently, on June 10, 2005 he was removed for cause.

    Our officers, Mr. Robert Cox and Mr. Keith Berman, serve as the sole officers for each of our two wholly owned subsidiaries: Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc PDA Services, Inc. For each subsidiary, the Mr. Cox and Mr. Berman serve in the following capacities:

    Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. PDA Services, Inc.
    President - Keith Berman President - Keith Berman
    Secretary - Robert Cox Secretary - Robert Cox
    Treasurer - Keith Berman Treasurer - Keith Berman
    Director - Keith Berman Director - Keith Berman

    There have been no other actual or proposed transaction that occurred over the past two years to which any person related to the issuer had or is to have a direct or indirect material interest as set forth in item 404 of Regulation S-B of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1933.

    Compensation Table

    The table below sets forth information concerning compensation for the named executive officer of instaCare for the periods indicated.

    SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

    Annual Compensation

    Awards

    Payouts  

    Name &

         

    Other Annual

    Restricted Securities Long-Term All Other

    Principal

     

    Salary

    Bonus

    Compen -

    Stock Underlying Incentive Plan Compen-

    Position

    Year

    ($)

    ($)

    sation ($)

    Award(s) Options (#) Payouts ($) sation ($)
                     
                     
    Robert Cox, 2004 40,450            
    President 2003 30,000    

    750,000

    750,000

       
      2002 30,000            
      2001 100,000            
                     
    Keith Berman,

    2004

    16,600

               
    Secretary

    2003

    16,600

       

    625,000

    625,000

       
    Treasurer

    2002

    16,820

               
                     

    Directors' compensation:

    As compensation for their services as members of the board of directors, in 2003 we issued to each independent board member stock options to purchase 20,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $.025 per share. These options are exercisable in full commencing December 19, 2003, and expire December 19, 2008. Outside directors are also paid a fee of $2,500 per quarter or $10,000 per year. The board members who are executives of instaCare received no additional compensation in excess of their management remuneration.

    38


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)

    March 31, 2005 Financial Statements and Footnotes

     

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

     

    PAGE

       
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

    F-1

       
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

    F-2

       
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

    F-3 to F-4

       
    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    F-5 to F-9

    40


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    Consolidated Balance Sheet
    (unaudited)

    Assets

    March 31,

     

    2005

    Current assets:

    (RESTATED)

         Cash and equivalents $

    1,849,198

         Inventory  

    433,587

         Prepaid compensation  

    110,670

         Note receivable  

    381,445

              Total current assets  

    2,774,900

         
    Fixed assets, net  

    170,412

         
    Other assets:    
         Loan fees, net of amortization  

    87,417

              Total other assets  

    87,417

         
      $

    3,032,730

         
    Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity    
         
    Current liabilities:    
         Accounts payable $

    78,385

         Customer deposits  

    52,460

         Convertible note payable  

    1,100,088

         Revolving line of credit  

    215,950

              Total current liabilities  

    1,446,883

         
         
    Stockholders' equity:    
         Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares    
              authorized, 207,526 shares issued and outstanding  

    208

         Preferred series "C" stock, $0.001 par value, 20,000 shares    
              authorized, 20,000 shares issued and outstanding  

    20

         Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,250,000,000 shares    
              authorized, 447,140,421 shares issued and outstanding  

    447,140

         Additional paid-in capital  

    12,846,759

         Current year accumulated (deficit)  

    (1,484,909)

         (Deficit) accumulated during development stage  

    (10,223,372)

       

    1,585,846

         
      $

    3,032,730

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-1


    instaCare Corp.

    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)

    Consolidated Statements of Operations

    (unaudited)

     

     

    For the three months ended

     

    March 31,

     

    2005

    2004

     
    Revenue

    $ 2,099,390

    $ 55,392

    Cost of sales

    1,902,741

    -

     
    Gross profit

    196,649

    55,392

     
    Expenses:
         General & administrative expenses

    174,936

    59,082

         Payroll expense

    256,869

    80,540

         Professional fees

    278,618

    238,530

         Stock-based compensation - related party

    115,290

    -

         Stock-based compensation - consulting

    346,380

    485,119

         Software development

    -

    69,641

         Hardware costs

    10,075

    -

         Impairment loss on operating assets

    -

    111,473

         Depreciation

    13,138

    33,315

              Total expenses

    1,195,306

    1,077,700

     
    Net operating (loss)

    (998,657)

    (1,022,308)

     
    Other income (expense):
         (Loss) on debt settlement

    -

    (317,136)

         Interest income

    3,531

    -

         Financing costs

    (441,083)

    (408,255)

         Interest (expenses)

    (48,699)

    (9,051)

     
    Net (loss)

    (1,484,909)

    (1,756,750)

     
    Weighted average number of common
         shares outstanding - basic and fully diluted

    414,096,161

    138,419,487

     
    Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted

    $ (0.00)

    $ (0.01)

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-2


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
    (unaudited)

     

    For the three months ended

    March 31,

    2005

    2004

    Cash flows from operating activities

    Net (loss)

    $

    (1,484,909)

     

    $

    (1,756,750)

    Adjustment to reconcile net (loss) to

             

         net cash (used) by operating activities:

             

    Shares issued for stock-based compensation

     

    115,290

       

    485,119

    Shares issued for consulting fees

     

    346,380

       

    162,000

    Shares issued for financing costs

     

    227,500

       

    423,977

    Warrants issued for consulting

     

    107,000

       

    -

    Loss on impairment of operating assets

     

    -

       

    111,473

    Loss on debt settlement

     

    -

       

    317,136

    Depreciation

     

    13,138

       

    33,315

    Loan amortization

     

    6,583

       

    -

    Changes in operating assets/liabilities

             

         (Increase) in accounts receivable

     

    -

       

    (55,500)

         (Increase) in inventory

     

    (232,684)

       

    -

         (Increase) in notes receivable

     

    (273,945)

       

    35,000

         (Increase) in other assets

     

    (57,657)

       

    (3,350)

         Increase in customer deposits

     

    39,960

       

    -

         (Decrease) in accounts payable

     

    (36,316)

       

    -

         (Decrease) in other liabilities

     

    -

     

     

    (2,180)

    Net cash (used) by operating activities

     

    (1,229,660)

       

    (249,760)

               

    Cash flows from financing activities

             

         Payments on note payable - shareholder

     

    (11,027)

       

    -

         Convertible notes - related party

     

    -

       

    (5,000)

         Proceeds from long-term debt

     

    400,000

       

    550,000

         Revolving line of credit

     

    114,350

       

    -

         Proceeds from note payable to shareholder

     

    -

       

    35,334

         Issuance of preferred series "C" stock

     

    2,000,000

       

    -

         Issuance of common stock

     

    153,050

     

     

    425,400

    Net cash provided by financing activities

     

    2,656,373

       

    1,005,734

    Net increase in cash

     

    1,426,713

       

    755,974

    Cash - beginning

     

    422,486

     

     

    29,273

    Cash - ending

    $

    1,849,199

     

    $

    785,247

    Supplemental disclosures:

             

         Interest paid

    $

    48,699

     

    $

    -

         Income taxes paid

    $

    -

     

    $

    -

    Non-cash transactions:

         Number of common shares issued for stock-based compensation

     

    -

       

    23,115,500

         Number of warrants issued for interest expense

     

    -

     

     

    10,000,000

         Number of common shares issued for settlement

     

    -

       

    6,510,000

         Number of stock options issued for services

     

    18,040,000

     

     

    -

         Number of common shares issued for conversion of debt to equity

     

    -

       

    7,350,000

         Number of preferred shares issued for financing costs

     

    20,000

     

     

    207,526

         Number of shares issued for financing

     

    30,500,000

       

    -

         Number of shares issued per merger agreement

     

    52,500,000

     

     

    -

         Number of stock options issued as compensation

     

    63,000,000

       

    -

         Number of warrants issued for financing

     

    103,500,000

     

    -

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-3


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    Note 1 - Basis of presentation

    The consolidated interim financial statements included herein, presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles and stated in US dollars, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

    These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. It is suggested that these consolidated interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the period ended December 31, 2004 and notes thereto included in the Company's Form 10-KSB. The Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of consolidated interim reports.

    The Company was organized July 6, 2000 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada as Promedicius, Inc. On June 21, 2002, the Company merged with ATR Search Corporation, Inc. and filed amended articles of incorporation changing its name to CareDecision Corporation and subsequently changed its name to instaCare Corp. effective April 14, 2005. The Company was in the development stage through December 31, 2004. The year 2005 will be the first year during which the Company will be considered an operating entity no longer in the development stage.

    Correction of an error

    The Company has restated its previously issued consolidated financial statements for matters related to the following previously reported items: stockbased compensation, loss on debt settlement and impairment loss. The accompanying financial statements for March 31, 2005 have been restated to reflect the error corrections. The Company's accumulated (deficit) at March 31, 2005, was increased by $116,931 as a result of prior period error corrections. The prior period errors had not effect on net income for the period ending March 31, 2005.

     

    2005

    2004

    Accumulated (deficit) at beginning of year,

    As previously reported

    $

    (10,223,372)

    $

    (4,554,644)

    Prior period adjustment - Error in valuation of

           

    Certain stock based compensation

    in 2002 and 2003

     

    -0-

     

    (116,931)

    Write-down due to impairment of fixed assets

     

       

    (1,000,770)

    Accumulated (deficit) at beginning of period,

    As restated

     

     

     

    (10,223,372)

     

    (5,672,345)

             

    Net (loss)

     

    (1,484,909)

     

    (4,551,027)

             

    Accumulated (deficit) at end of period

    $

    (11,708,281)

    $

    (10,223,372)

    Results of operations for the interim periods are not indicative of annual results.

    Note 2 - Going concern

    The Company has an accumulated deficit as of March 31, 2005, and 2004 of $11,708,281 and $7,429,095, respectively. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company needs to obtain additional financing to fund payment of obligations and to provide working capital for operations. Management is seeking additional financing, and is now looking for a merger or acquisition candidate. The Company intends to acquire interests in various business opportunities, which in the opinion of management will provide a profit to the Company. Management believes these efforts will generate sufficient cash flows from future operations to pay the Company's obligations and working capital needs. There is no assurance any of these transactions will occur. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

    F-4


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    Note 3 - Business combinations

    On November 4, 2004, the Company entered into a definitive "Agreement and Plan of Merger" whereby the Company's wholly owned subsidiary, Pharma Tech, Inc., would acquire all of the outstanding shares of CareGen, Inc., a Nevada corporation, in exchange for 39,750,000 shares of Pharma Tech's $0.001 par value common stock and 42,500,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. On February 5, 2005, the Company consummated the Merger through the exchange of shares. CareGen, Inc. ceased to exist and all assets, certain liabilities and capital accounts were assumed by Pharma Tech, Inc. as the surviving corporation. The Merger was structured as a tax-free exchange pursuant to internal revenue code 368, as amended.

    Note 4 - Fixed assets

    Depreciation expense totaled $13,138 and $33,315 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

    Note 5 - Notes payable

    Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP Promissory Note

    On March 24, 2004, the Company was loaned $700,000 from Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (Pinnacle). The Secured Convertible Promissory Note bears interest at the rate of 12% per annum, initially matured on September 25, 2004, but was extended for an additional six months at the option of the Company, and is secured by 14,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. Pinnacle may, at its option, at any time or from time to time, elect to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal amount of the Note into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at a conversion price of $0.08 per share, unless such conversion would result in Pinnacle being deemed the "beneficial owner," within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, of 4.99% or more of the then outstanding Common Shares of the Company. In the event the Company fails to pay any installment or principal or interest when due, the interest rate will then accrue at a rate of 24% per annum on the unpaid balance until the payment default is cured.

    On February 10, 2005, the Company entered into a "Note Extension Agreement" with Pinnacle Partners, LP. The amended Agreement will automatically increase the principal balance of the original secured promissory note dated March 24, 2004 of $700,000 to $1,100,000 and the maturity date will automatically be extended to April 26, 2006. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Company has issued and additional 83,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as collateral for the additional principal of $400,000. In addition, the Company has issued 13,000,000 shares of its common stock as a renewal fee to Pinnacle Partners and CJR, Capital, LLC, its designee. The Company has recorded a financing expense in the amount of $227,500, the fair market value of the underlying shares.

    The Company recorded interest expense totaling $48,699 and $22,804 during the three months ended March 31, 2005 and 2004. The Company also recorded financing costs totaling $441,083 during the three months ended March 31, 2005.

    Note 6 - Commitments

    On January 16, 2005, the Company entered into a three month consulting agreement with Steven Bayern, whereby Mr. Bayern agreed to provide business advisory and strategic planning and development services to the Company. As compensation for his services, the Company will issue Mr. Bayern 5,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock with 1,250,000 vesting 15 days after the execution of agreement. As of March 31, 2005, the Company has expensed $42,500 as consulting fees per the agreement.

    On February 1, 2005, the Company entered into a financial consulting agreement with Pylon Management, Inc. expiring on December 31, 2005. Pursuant to the agreement, Pylon Management will be compensated for services in the form of option to purchase up to 18,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock at $0.02 per share. As of March 31, 2005, no options have been granted.

    F-5


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    On February 10, 2005, the Company entered into a six-month consulting agreement with Victor Pallante for financial advisory services in exchange for cash in the amount of $50,000 due upon execution of the agreement and 5,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock to be considered earned over the term of the agreement and issued incrementally. As of March 31, 2005, the Company expensed consulting fees in the amount of $50,000.

    Note 7 - Stockholder's equity

    The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock; of which 750,000 shares are designated as Series A, 500,000 shares are designated as Series B, 20,000 shares are designated as Series C, 750 shares are designated as Series D, and 1,250,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock.

    Series "C" convertible preferred stock

    Holders of series "C": convertible stock shall not have the right to vote on matters that come before the shareholders. Series "C" convertible preferred stock may be converted, the number of shares into which one share of Series "C" Preferred Stock shall be convertible shall be determined by dividing the Series "C" Purchase price by the existing conversion price which shall be equal to eighty percent of the market price rounded to the nearest thousandth, not to exceed $0.02 per share. Series "C" convertible stock shall rank senior to common stock in the event of liquidation. Holders' of Series "C" convertible stock shall be entitled to a mandatory monthly dividend equal to the share price multiplied by the prime interest rate plus five tenths percent. Series "C" convertible stock shall have a redemptions price of $100 per share, subject to adjustments resulting from stock splits, recapitalization, or share combination.

    On February 7, 2005, the Company reached an agreement with Mercator Momentum Fund, LP and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and Mercator Advisory Group, LLC ("the Purchasers") whereby the Purchasers acquired 20,000 shares of the Company's Series "C" preferred stock for cash in the amount of $2,000,000. Each share of preferred series "C" stock is convertible into shares of the Company's common stock at a rate equal to 80% of the market price prior to conversion. The Company will also issue 100,000,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company's common stock, 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise price of $0.02 and 50,000,000 having an exercise price of $0.03. The value of the warrants, using the Black-Scholes pricing model, was $100,000 and this was recorded as a financing expense.

    Preferred stock

    The Company issued 207,526 of its $0.001 par value preferred shares for financing costs of $354,800. Each preferred share is convertible into 18 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock.

    Common stock

    The Company issued 7,350,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals to convert $522,000 in debt to equity during the year ended December 31, 2004.

    The Company issued 6,510,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in order to settle the disputes with investors and agents which arose over the M&E Note, and which allowed the M&E Note to be settled and converted. The value of the shares was $377,136 and is recorded as a loss on debt settlement during the year ended December 31, 2004.

    On July 31, 2004, a note holder elected to convert its $50,000 face value loan into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock in full satisfaction of the loan plus accrued interest.

    F-6


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 108,805,500 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for consulting services for the Company's hotel network business, consulting fees associated with the Company's proposed merger with Kelly companies, finders fees to two individuals who introduced the Company to its proposed satellite e-broadcast partner, finders' fees to two individuals who introduced the Company to the Kelly Companies, agent's fees associated with the Company's proposed acquisition of MDU Services, Inc., agent's fees for the introduction and fees associated with the Company's recent agreement with an e-business partner for the hotel product sector, contract fees associated to develop and complete certain software for its hotel sector product and technical expenses incurred associated with the agreement, documentation and initiation fees owing to the Pinnacle Note investment, collectively valued at $1,493,806 and professional fees valued at $556,165. Also as of December 31, 2004, the Company placed in escrow 17,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as security for the Pinnacle Note investment.

    During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 6,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in connection with loan renewal fees totaling $76,000.

    On November 11, 2004, the Company issued 300,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to a director of the Company in exchange for director services valued at $5,400.

    On January 13, 2005, the Company issued 7,250,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for services received in connection with financing arrangements valued at $137,750, the fair market value of the underlying shares.

    On February 2, 2005, the Company issued 10,790,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in exchange for consulting services valued at $183,430, the fair market value of the underlying shares.

    On March 14, 2005, the Company issued 42,500,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the "Agreement and Plan of Merger," entered into on November 4, 2005, to the shareholders of CareGen, Inc. (see note 2). The Company recorded and investment in the amount of $42,500. Additionally, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of common stock to various individuals for cash in the amount of $28,050 and services valued at $151,950, which were expensed as consulting fees as of March 31, 2005.

    On March 14, 2005, the Company issued 17,500,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in exchange for services rendered in connection with financial consulting, valued at $190,000, and cash in the amount of $125,000.

    There have been no other issuances of preferred or common stock.

    Note 8 - Warrants and options

    On February 7, 2005, the board of directors approved the issuance of warrants to purchase 100,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock to Mercator LLP in connection with financing arrangements. Such warrants are exercisable over a period of three years at an exercise price of $0.02 for the initial 50,000,000 shares and $0.03 for the remaining 50,000,000 shares. The value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes pricing model was $100,000, which was recorded as financing costs as of March 31, 2005.

    On February 7, 2005, the board of directors approved the issuance of warrants to purchase 3,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock to Pylon Management for payment of consulting services. The warrants are exercisable at a price of $0.02 per share and vest over a period of three years. The value of the warrant using the Black-Scholes pricing model was $7,000, which was recorded as a consulting expense at March 31, 2005

    The weighted average of the assumptions used to value the warrants in February 2005were: Interest rate-3.50%, Days to expiration-1095, Stock price $0.02,Strike price-$0.02-$0.03, Volatility-0%, Yield-0%.

    On February 5, 2005, the Company adopted its "2005 Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 90,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The Company issued 63,000,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the three months ended March 31, 2005.

    F-7


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    On February 15, 2005, the Company granted stock options to three of its officers and director, to purchase 63,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to the Company's 2005 Stock Option Plan. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $115,290, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of March 31, 2005.

    The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options under the 2005 Stock Option Plan:

     

    Number

    Of Shares

    Weighted

    Average

    Exercise

    Price

         

    Balance, January 1, 2005

    -

    -

         

    Options granted

    63,000,000

    $0.02

    Options exercised

    -

    -

         

    Balance, March 31, 2005

    63,000,000

    0.02

         

    Exercisable, March 31, 2005

    63,000,000

    $0.02

    The following is a summary of information about the 2005 Stock Option Plan options outstanding at March 31, 2005

    Shares Underlying Options Outstanding

    Shares Underlying

    Options Exercisable

    Range of

    Exercise Prices

    Shares

    Underlying

    Options

    Outstanding

    Weighted

    Average

    Remaining

    Contractual

    Life

    Weighted

    Average

    Exercise

    Price

    Shares

    Underlying

    Options

    Exercisable

    Weighted

    Average

    Exercise

    Price

    $0.002 - 0.002

    63,000,000

    3 years

    $.02

    63,000,000

    $0.02

    Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share, as disclosed in Note 1, has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its non-employee stock-based compensation plans and other stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of each option and warrant grant are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:

     

    2005

     

    2004

           
    Average risk-free interest rates

     

    3.50

    %  

     

      %
    Average expected life (in years)  

    3

             
    Volatility

     

    0

    %  

     

      %

    The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options.

    The weighted average fair value of options granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock during 2005 was approximately $0.02 per option.

    F-8


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)

    December 31, 2004 Financial Statements and Footnotes

     

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

     

    PAGE

       
    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

    F-1 & F-2

       
    CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

    F-3

       
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

    F-4

       
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

    F-5 to F-7

       
    CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

    F-8

       
    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    F-8 to F-24

    41


    Beckstead and Watts, LLP
    Certified Public Accountants

    2425 W Horizon Ridge Parkway
    Henderson, NV 89052
    702.257.1984 (tel)
    702.362.0540 (fax)

    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    Board of Directors
    InstaCare, Inc.
    (formerly CareDecision Corp.)

    We have audited the accompanying restated balance sheet of InstaCare, Inc. (formerly CareDecision Corp.) (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2004, and the related statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

    We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

    In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above, revised as described in Note 1, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of InstaCare, Inc. (formerly CareDecision Corp.) (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

    As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company's 2004 accumulated deficit and additional paid in capital previously reported as $10,106,441 and $9,629,835, respectively should have been $10,223,372 and $9,629,835. This discovery was made subsequent to the issuance of the financial statements. The balance sheet has been restated to reflect this correction.

     

    Beckstead and Watts, LLP
    Henderson, Nevada
    March 30, 2005, except for Note 1, as to which the date is July 15, 2005

    F-1


    Beckstead and Watts, LLP
    Certified Public Accountants

    2425 W Horizon Ridge Parkway
    Henderson, NV 89052
    702.257.1984 (tel)
    702.362.0540 (fax)

    Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

    Board of Directors
    InstaCare, Inc.
    (formerly CareDecision Corp.)

    We have audited the accompanying restated balance sheet of InstaCare, Inc. (formerly CareDecision Corp.) (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2003, and the related restated statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

    We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

    In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above, revised as described in Note 1, present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of InstaCare, Inc. (formerly CareDecision Corp.) (a development stage company) as of December 31, 2003, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

    As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company's 2003 net loss previously reported as $2,168,808 should have been $2,362,987. This discovery was made subsequent to the issuance of the financial statements. The financial statements have been restated to reflect this correction.

     

    Beckstead and Watts, LLP
    Henderson, Nevada
    March 29, 2004, except for Note 1, as to which the date is July 15, 2005

    F-2


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Consolidated Balance Sheets

     

    December 31,

    December 31,

     

    2004

    2003

    Assets

    (RESTATED)

    (RESTATED)

     
    Current assets:
          Cash and equivalents $

    422,486

    $

    29,273

          Inventory

    200,903

    -

          Notes receivable  

    107,500

     

    50,000

               Total current assets  

    730,889

     

    79,273

     
    Fixed assets, net  

    183,551

     

    670,288

     
       

    914,440

     

    749,561

     
    Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
     
    Current liabilities:
     Accounts payable

    114,702

    -

     Accrued expenses

    304,750

    -

     Customer deposits

    12,500

    -

     Notes payable to officers - short term portion

    -

    82,568

     Note payable

    112,628

    572,527

     Revolving line of credit  

    -

     

    2,180

     Total current liabilities  

    544,580

     

    657,275

     
    Notes payable to officers - long term portion

    -

    14,400

    Long-term debts  

    700,088

     

    -

     
       

    1,244,668

     

    671,675

    Stockholders' equity:
     Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares
     authorized, 207,526 shares issued and outstanding

    208

    -

     Common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,250,000,000 shares authorized,
     263,100,421 and 120,244,921shares issued and outstanding
     as of 12/31/04 and 12/31/03, respectively

    263,100

    120,245

     Additional paid-in capital

    9,629,835

    5,629,986

     (Deficit) accumulated during development stage  

    (10,223,372)

     

    (5,672,345)

       

    (330,228)

     

    77,886

     
      $

    914,440

    $

    749,561

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-3


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Operations

    July 6, 2000

    For the year ended

    (inception) to

    December 31,

    December 31,

    2004

    2003

    2004

    (RESTATED) 

    (RESTATED) 

    Revenue, net $ 182,112 $ 75,813 $ 259,925
    Cost of sales   -   -   22,449
                         
    Gross profit   1,555   1,555   (20,894)
    Expenses:
    Hardware costs 66,712 - 66,712
    Network and infrastructure 172,915 - 172,915
    General & administrative expenses 156,452 148,192 437,208
    Payroll expense 369,448 213,012 769,279
    Stock-based compensation for employee benefits 738,600 - 738,600
    Stock-based compensation for professional fees - 62,422 234,274
    Stock-based compensation for consulting services 1,326,269 1,433,797 4,250,581
    Stock-based compensation for software development 21,600 - 21,600
    Software development 119,640 60,971 309,611
    Impairment loss on operating assets 415,078 - 1,415,848
    Depreciation   99,910   132,587   277,807
    Total expenses   3,486,624   2,050,981   8,813,715
    Net operating (loss) (3,304,512) (1,975,168) (8,553,789)
    Other income (expense):
    Loss on settlement (377,136) (77,094) (482,090)
    Interest income 3,527 561 6,318
    Merger expenses (304,750) - (304,750)
    Financing costs (481,700) - (408,255)
    Interest expense    (86,456)   (117,107)   (365,810)
    Net (loss) $ (4,551,027) $ (2,168,808) $ (10,223,372)
    Weighted average number of
    common shares outstanding - basic and fully diluted   205,914,365   94,259,147
    Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted $ (0.02) $ (0.02)

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-4


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statement of Changes of Stockholders' Equity

    Preferred Stock

    Common Stock

    Additional

    (Deficit)

    Accumulated

    During

    Total

    Shares

    Amount

    Shares

    Amount

    Paid-in

    Capital

    Development

    Stage

    Stockholders'

    Equity

    Shares issued for cash

    -0-

    $ -0-

    6,000,000

    $ 6,000

    $ 8,695

    $ -0-

    $ 14,695

    Net (loss),

    July 6, 2000 (inception) to

    December 31, 2000

     

     

     

     

    (9,717)

    (9,917)

    Balance, December 31, 2000

    -0-

    -0-

    6,000,000

    6,000

    8,695

    (9,717)

    4,978

    Shares issued for services

    500,000

    500

    -

    500

    Shares issued to acquire intellectual property

    750,000

    750

    -

    -

    186,750

    187,500

    Shares issued for consulting services

    250,000

    250

    324,750

    325,000

    Recapitalization adjustment

    12,430,000

    12,430

    (12,430)

    -

    Net (loss), year ended December 31, 2001

     

     

     

     

     

    (374,134)

    (374,134)

    Balance, December 31, 2001 (RESTATED)

    750,000

    750

    19,180,000

    19,180

    507,765

    (383,851)

    143,844

    Shares issued for consulting services on 3/6/2002

    1,825,000

    1,825

    271,925

    273,750

    Shares issued for consulting services on 4/19/2002

    500,000

    500

    42,000

    42,500

    Warrants issued for interest expense on 4/23/2002

    -

    -

    112,800

    112,800

    Shares received and cancelled in

    satisfaction of obligation on 6/28/2002

    (1,935,000)

    (1,935)

    (94,815)

    (96,750)

    Shares issued pursuant to merger agreement on 7/9/2002

    32,968,863

    32,969

    1,473,053

    1,506,022

    Shares issued for consulting services on 8/1/2002

    3,000,000

    3,000

    147,000

    150,000

    Shares issued for Medicius shares on 8/1/2002

    (750,000)

    (750)

    1,725,000

    1,725

    (975)

    -

    Shares issued for consulting services on 8/9/2002

    2,000,000

    2,000

    138,000

    140,000

    Shares issued for consulting services on 10/2/2002

    950,000

    950

    41,800

    42,750

    Shares issued for consulting services on 10/8/2002

    6,327,737

    6,328

    310,059

    316,387

    Shares issued for cash on 11/21/2002

    2,539,574

    2,540

    197,460

    200,000

    Shares issued for consulting services on 11/21/2002

    3,515,000

    3,515

    253,080

    256,595

    Shares issued for cash on 11/21/2002

    1,267,963

    1,268

    59,594

    60,862

    Shares issued for consulting services on 12/17/2002

    1,500,000

    1,500

    94,500

    96,000

          

     

     

     

     

     

    (2,925,507)

    (2,925,507)

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-5


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statement of Changes of Stockholders' Equity

    Balance, December 31, 2002 (RESTATED)

    -

    -

    75,364,137

    75,364

    3,553,247

    (3,309,358)

    319,253

    Stock options to acquire 5,500,000 shares
    of common stock granted on January 21, 2003

    -

    -

    62,150

    62,150

    Shares issued for consulting services on 1/24/2003

    5,500,000

    5,500

    225,500

    231,000

    Shares issued for cash on 4/22/03

    1,538,500

    1,539

    48,462

    50,000

    Stock options to acquire 6,950,000 shares
    of common stock granted on July 18, 2003

    -

    -

    141,085

    141,085

    Share dividend issued on 7/21/2003

    6,469,161

    6,469

    (6,469)

    -

    Shares issued for services on 8/18/2003

    1,800,000

    1,800

    123,200

    125,000

    Shares issued for consulting services on 8/18/2003

    2,500,000

    2,500

    122,500

    125,000

    Shares issued to acquire operating software on 9/12/2003

    2,500,000

    2,500

    178,750

    181,250

    Shares issued for services on 9/12/2003

    14,521,248

    14,521

    588,940

    603,461

    Shares issued for settlement on 9/12/2003

    741,875

    742

    36,352

    37,094

    Shares issued for cash on 9/18/2003

    2,000,000

    2,000

    99,600

    101,600

    Shares issued for cash and services on 9/30/2003

    850,000

    850

    41,650

    42,500

    Shares issued for services on 9/30/2003

    1,000,000

    1,000

    49,000

    50,000

    Shares issued for cash and services on 11/8/2003

    950,000

    950

    46,550

    47,500

    Stock options to acquire 7,300,000 shares
    of common stock granted on November 24, 2003

    -

    -

    91,980

    91,980

    Cancellation of shares on 11/26/2003

    (1,290,000)

    (1,290)

    1,290

    -

    Shares issued for services on 11/26/2003

    1,000,000

    1,000

    49,000

    50,000

    Sahres issued for services on 11/26/2003

    2,500,000

    2,500

    87,500

    90,000

    Shares issued for settlement on 12/3/2003

    1,000,000

    1,000

    39,000

    40,000

    Shares issued for cash on 12/17/2003

    800,000

    800

    31,200

    32,000

    Shares issued for cash on 12/18/2003

    500,000

    500

    19,500

    20,000

    Net (loss), year ended December 31, 2003          

    (2,362,987)

    (2,362,987)

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-6


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statement of Changes of Stockholders' Equity

    Balance, December 31, 2003

    -

    -

    120,244,921

    120,245

    5,629,986

    (5,672,345)

    77,886

    Shares issued for services on January 9, 2004

    6,500,000

    6,500

    255,000

    261,500

    Shares issued for services on January 13, 2004

    1,550,000

    1,550

    65,950

    67,500

    Shares issued for services on January 20, 2004

    7,250,000

    7,250

    282,750

    290,000

    Shares issued for services on January 23, 2004

    205,000

    205

    9,020

    9,225

    Shares issued for services on February 23, 2004

    2,000,000

    2,000

    78,000

    80,000

    Shares issued for services on March 3, 2004

    900,000

    900

    35,100

    36,000

    Shares issued for debt conversion on March 3, 2004

    207,526

    208

    7,350,000

    7,350

    514,650

    522,208

    Shares issued for dispute settlement on March 10, 2004

    6,510,000

    6,510

    318,990

    325,500

    Shares issued for services on March 16, 2004

    4,660,500

    4,661

    181,760

    186,420

    Shares issued for services on April 2, 2004

    1,910,000

    1,910

    74,490

    76,400

    Shares issued for services on April 13, 2004

    20,050,000

    20,050

    257,950

    278,000

    Shares issued for services on April 20, 2004

    3,300,000

    3,300

    128,700

    132,000

    Shares issued for services on April 28, 2004

    8,000,000

    8,000

    312,000

    320,000

    Shares issued for services on May 7, 2004

    250,000

    250

    9,750

    10,000

    Shares issued for services on May 20, 2004

    750,000

    750

    29,250

    30,000

    Shares issued for services on May 28, 2004

    3,000,000

    3,000

    -

    3,000

    Shares issued for cash on June 2, 2004

    775,000

    775

    30,225

    31,000

    Shares issued for cash on June 10, 2004

    3,000,000

    3,000

    117,000

    120,000

    Stock options issued on August 8, 2004 to acquire 50,000,000 shares

    -

    -

    705,000

    705,000

    Shares issued for employee stock option plan on August 13, 2004

    1,400,000

    1,400

    32,200

    33,600

    Shares issued for services on August 13, 2004

    20,000,000

    20,000

    130,000

    150,000

    Shares issued for services on August 25, 2004

    750,000

    750

    24,750

    25,500

    Shares issued for services on September 13, 2004

    2,850,000

    2,850

    43,243

    46,093

    Shares issued for debt conversion on September 13, 2004

    2,000,000

    2,000

    48,000

    50,000

    Shares issued for services on October 12, 2004

    14,250,000

    14,250

    -

    14,250

    Shares issued for cash on October 12, 2004

    9,750,000

    9,750

    185,250

    195,000

    Shares issued for renewal fees on November 2, 2004

    4,000,000

    4,000

    34,000

    38,000

    Shares issued for cash on November 3, 2004

    3,577,778

    3,578

    60,822

    64,400

    Shares issued for services on November 3, 2004

    4,317,222

    4,317

    -

    4,317

    Shares issued for renewal fees on November 29, 2004

    2,000,000

    2,000

    36,000

    38,000

    Net (loss), year ended December 31, 2004      

    -

     

    (4,551,027)

    (4,551,027)

    Balance, December 31, 2004

    207,526

    $ 208

    263,100,421

    $ 263,100

    $ 9,629,835

    $ (10,223,372)

    $ (330,228)

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-7


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

    June 21, 2001

    For the year ended

    (inception) to

    December 31,

    December 31,

    2004

    2003

    2004

    Cash flows from operating activities (RESTATED) (RESTATED)
    Net (loss)

    $ (4,551,027)

    $ (2,168,808)

    $ (10,223,372)

    Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to
    net cash (used) by operating activities:
         Stock-based compensation for employee benefits

    738,600

    -

    738,600

         Stock-based compensation for consulting services

    1,326,269

    1,433,797

    4,519,544

         Stock-based compensation for professional fees

    -

    -

    234,274

         Stock-based compensation for software development

    21,600

    -

    21,600

         Stock-based compensation for financing costs

    481,700

    -

    481,700

         Warrants issued for interest expense

    -

    -

    112,800

         Loss on settlement

    377,136

    77,094

    482,090

         Impairment loss on operating assets

    415,078

    -

    1,415,848

         Depreciation

    99,910

    132,587

    277,807

         Changes in operating assets and liabilities
              Decrease in prepaid interest

    -

    67,680

    -

              Decrease in loan to shareholder

    -

    9,576

    -

              (Increase) in inventory

    (200,903)

    -

    (200,903)

              (Increase) in note receivable

    (57,500)

    (44,624)

    (107,500)

              Increase in accrued expenses

    304,750

    -

    304,750

              Increase in accrued interest related to long-term debts

    -

    26,422

    -

              Increase in customer deposits

    12,500

    -

    12,500

              (Decrease) in other liabilities

    -

              Increase in accounts payable - related party

    114,702

    -

    114,702

    Net cash (used) by operating activities

    (917,184)

    (466,276)

    (1,815,560)

    Cash flows from financing activities
         Convertible notes - related party

    50,000

    -

    64,400

         Proceeds from notes payable to shareholders

    51,084

    96,968

    148,053

         Payments on note payable to shareholders

    (116,175)

    -

    (138,412)

         Revolving line of credit

    -

    2,180

    -

         Proceeds from long-term debts

    700,088

    50,000

    1,043,294

         Issuance of common stock

    625,400

    235,300

    1,120,711

    Net cash provided by financing activities

    1,310,397

    384,448

    2,238,046

    Net increase in cash

    393,213

    (81,828)

    422,486

    Cash - beginning

    29,273

    111,101

    -

    Cash - ending

    $422,486

    $29,273

    $422,486

    Supplemental disclosures:
         Interest paid

    $76,856

    $-

    $76,856

         Income taxes paid

    $-

    $-

    $-

    Non-cash transactions:
         Number of shares issued for stock-based compensation

    125,573,900

    31,159,748

    176,351,385

         Number of warrants issued for interest expense

    -

    -

    24,000,000

         Number of shares issued for settlement

    6,510,000

    2,280,375

    8,790,375

         Number of shares issued to acquire software

    21,600

    2,500,000

    2,521,600

         Number of shares issued as dividend

    -

    6,469,161

    6,469,161

         Number of stock options issued as compensation

    1,400,000

    19,750,000

    21,150,000

         Number of shares issued for debt conversion

    9,350,000

    -

    9,350,000

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-8


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    Note 1 - Significant accounting policies and procedures

    Organization

    The Company was organized July 6, 2000 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada, as Promedicius, Inc. On June 21, 2002, the Company acquired as a wholly-owned subsidiary ATR Search Corporation, and filed amended articles of incorporation changing its name to CareDecision Corporation.

    The Company has a limited history of operations, and in accordance with SFAS #7, the Company is considered a development stage company.

    Correction of an error

    The Company has restated its previously issued consolidated financial statements for matters related to the following previously reported items: stockbased compensation, loss on debt settlement and impairment loss. The accompanying financial statements for March 31, 2005 have been restated to reflect the error corrections. The Company's accumulated (deficit) at March 31, 2005, was increased by $116,931 as a result of prior period error corrections. The prior period errors had not effect on net income for the period ending March 31, 2005.

     

    2005

    2004

    Accumulated (deficit) at beginning of year,

    As previously reported

    $

    (10,223,372)

    $

    (4,554,644)

    Prior period adjustment - Error in valuation of

           

    Certain stock based compensation

    in 2002 and 2003

     

    -0-

     

    (116,931)

    Write-down due to impairment of fixed assets

     

     

     

    (1,000,770)

    Accumulated (deficit) at beginning of period,

    As restated

     

     

     

    (10,223,372)

     

    (5,672,345)

             

    Net (loss)

     

    (1,484,909)

     

    (4,551,027)

             

    Accumulated (deficit) at end of period

    $

    (11,708,281)

    $

    (10,223,372)

    Acquisition agreement with Medicius, Inc. (MED)

    On June 21, 2001, the Company entered into an agreement with MED whereby the Company acquired as a wholly-owned subsidiary all of the issued and outstanding common stock of MED in exchange for 32,968,863 voting shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock, of which the MED shareholders received 22,500,000 shares and CareDecision.net received 10,468,863 shares. An additional 1,500,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock was issued to Robert Cox, the former CEO and Chairman of ATR Search Corporation, the Company's discontinued operating entity. The acquisition was accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. The value of the acquired fixed assets on the merger date was $1,704,703.

    Cash and cash equivalents

    The Company maintains a cash balance in a non-interest-bearing account that currently does not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There are no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2004 and 2003.

    Investments

    Investments in companies over which the Company exercises significant influence are accounted for by the equity method whereby the Company includes its proportionate share of earnings and losses of such companies in earnings. Other long-term investments are recorded at cost and are written down to their estimated recoverable amount if there is evidence of a decline in value, which is other than temporary.

    F-9


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    Inventory

    Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined on a standard cost basis that approximates the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Market is determined based on net realizable value. Appropriate consideration is given to obsolescence, excessive levels, deterioration, and other factors in evaluating net realizable value.

    Fixed assets

    Fixed assets are stated at the lower of cost or estimated net recoverable amount. The cost of property, plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method based on the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the lease term based on the following life expectancy:

    Computer equipment                 5 years

    Software                                   5 years

    Office furniture and fixtures        7 years

    Repairs and maintenance expenditures are charged to operations as incurred. Major improvements and replacements, which extend the useful life of an asset, are capitalized and depreciated over the remaining estimated useful life of the asset. When assets are retired or sold, the costs and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are eliminated and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations.

    Consolidation policy

    The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiary corporations, after elimination of all material intercompany accounts, transactions, and profits. Investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries representing ownership of at least 20% but less than 50%, are accounted for under the equity method. Nonmarketable investments in which the Company has less than 20% ownership and in which it does not have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee are initially recorded at cost and periodically reviewed for impairment. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company did not have nonmarketable investments.

    Revenue recognition

    The Company recognizes revenue on multi-deliverables in compliance with the requirements of EITF 00-21. As previously disclosed, the Company recognizes revenue based on contractual milestones achieved pursuant to terms outlined in each individual contract. Typical milestones would include completion of installation and functionality testing of hardware and/or software in the prescribed environment. Upon effective use, the client is invoiced, and the Company recognizes revenue. In addition, the company's business model assumes several types of follow-on sales, such as paid advertising and additional hardware/software sales. Paid advertising consists of commercial use of the Company's Residence Ware message management system whereby each company advertising on the Residence Ware pay a fee to the Company based on each sale generated through the advertisements. All revenue generated through the on-line adverting is recognized upon receipt of payment per SOP 97-2. Aftermarket sales and services are recognized upon shipment of product or completion of services.

    The cost of services, consisting of staff payroll, outside services, equipment rental, communication costs and supplies, is expensed as incurred.

    Advertising costs

    The Company expenses all costs of advertising as incurred. There was $2,500 and $0 advertising costs included in general and administrative expenses as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

    F-10


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    Use of estimates

    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

    Fair value of financial instruments

    Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2004 and 2003. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash and accounts payable. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for cash and payables because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are payable on demand.

    Impairment of long-lived assets

    The Company reviews its long-lived assets and intangibles periodically to determine potential impairment by comparing the carrying value of the long-lived assets with the estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets, including cash flows from disposition. Should the sum of the expected future cash flows be less than the carrying value, the Company would recognize an impairment loss. An impairment loss would be measured by comparing the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the long-lived assets and intangibles. The Company recognized impairment losses in the amount of $415,078 and $0 as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

    Reporting on the costs of start-up activities

    Statement of Position 98-5 (SOP 98-5), "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities," which provides guidance on the financial reporting of start-up costs and organizational costs, requires most costs of start-up activities and organizational costs to be expensed as incurred. SOP 98-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. With the adoption of SOP 98-5, there has been little or no effect on the Company's financial statements.

    Loss per share

    Net loss per share is provided in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (SFAS #128) "Earnings Per Share". Basic loss per share is computed by dividing losses available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. There were no securities considered to be dilutive in the computation of earnings (loss) per share.

    Comprehensive Income

    SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in the financial statements. The Company had no items of other comprehensive income and therefore has not presented a statement of comprehensive income.

    Segment reporting

    The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information." The Company operates as a single segment and will evaluate additional segment disclosure requirements as it expands its operations.

    F-11


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    Income taxes

    The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109") for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.

    Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

    Recent pronouncements

    In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handing costs, and spoilage. This statement requires that those items be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal" which was the criterion specified in ARB No. 43. In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of production be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. This pronouncement is effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2005. The Company does not believe adopting this new standard will have a significant impact to its financial statements.

    In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004). Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. The new standard will be effective for the Company in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company expects the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements assuming employee stock options are granted in the future.

    Stock-Based Compensation

    The Company applies Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and Related Interpretations, in accounting for stock options issued to employees. Under APB No. 25, employee compensation cost is recognized when estimated fair value of the underlying stock on date of the grant exceeds exercise price of the stock option. For stock options and warrants issued to non-employees, the Company applies SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, which requires the recognition of compensation cost based upon the fair value of stock options at the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

    The following table represents the effect on net loss and loss per share if the Company had applied the fair value based method and recognition provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS No. 123"), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, to stock-based employee compensation:

    F-12


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

                   
       

    2004

    2003

    Net (loss), as reported

    $

    (4,551,027

     )

    $

    (2,168,808

    Deduct: Total stock-based non-employee compensation expense determined under fair value based methods for all awards, net of related tax effects

     

    (29,960

    )

     

    (221,450

    )
    Pro forma net (loss)

    $

    (4,580,987

     )

    $

    (2,390,258

    Net (loss) per common share            
      Basic (loss) per share, as reported

    $

    (.022

    $

    (.02

      Basic per share, pro forma

    $

    (.022

    $

    (.025

    As required, the pro forma disclosures above include options granted during each fiscal year. Consequently, the effects of applying SFAS No. 123 for providing pro forma disclosures may not be representative of the effects on reported net income for future years until all options outstanding are included in the pro forma disclosures.

    Year end

    The Company has adopted December 31 as its fiscal year end.

    Note 2 - Impairment loss on operating assets

    The Company determined during the year ending December 31, 2004 that it should write down certain fixed assets acquired with the Medicius, Inc. merger as an impairment loss after comparing the carrying value of the assets with the estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of the assets. Accordingly, the write down resulted in the realization of a $415,078 impairment loss on operating assets recorded on the Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2004.

    Note 3 - Going concern

    As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has accumulated net losses from operations totaling $10,223,372, and as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, has had very limited revenues from operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern.

    The Company's financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, the Company has generated limited revenue from its planned principal operations. In order to obtain the necessary capital, the Company has raised funds via private placement and debt offerings. If the securities and debt offerings do not provide sufficient capital, some of the shareholders of the Company have agreed to provide sufficient funds as a loan over the next twelve-month period. However, the Company is dependent upon its ability to secure equity and/or debt financing, and there are no assurances that the Company will be successful. Without sufficient financing it would be unlikely for the Company to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

    Note 4 - Inventory

    Inventory consisted of the following at December 31:

    F-13


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

     

    2004

     

    2003

    Work-in-progress

    $ 58,587

     

    $ -0-

    Raw materials

    142,316

     

    -0-

    LIFO inventories

    $200,903

     

    $ -0-

    Note 5 - Fixed assets

    Fixed assets consists of the following:

     

    December 31, 2004

    December 31, 2003

         
    Computer and office equipment

    $ 30,387

    $ 260,286

    Software

    232,365

    583,899

         
     

    262,752

    844,185

    Less accumulated depreciation

    ( 79,202)

    ( 173,897)

         
    Total

    $ 183,550

    $ 670,288

    Depreciation expense totaled $99,910 and $132,587 for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

    Note 6 - Notes payable and long-term debt

    Related party Note

    The Company owed two of its officers and directors $112,628 as of December 31, 2004. The short-term note bears interest at 9% per annum and is due on demand.

    M and E Equities, LLC Renegotiated Note

    Based on terms negotiated on March 4, 2002, and after a further documentation process that was completed on April 23, 2003, Medicius, Inc. the Company's merger partner in its June 2002 merger, was loaned $475,000 from M and E Equities, LLC (M&E). A condition of the loan stipulated that Medicius, Inc. complete its merger with the Company and become a fully reporting public company. As of December 31, 2003, after partial payment of interest and principal and a settlement of a legal dispute that arose over this note and other issued, the remaining value of the note and accrued interest was $522,527. On March 2, 2004, the Company renegotiated its debt with M&E. the terms of the agreement are stipulated as follows:

    1. $320,000 is paid to M&E by Wells & Company, Inc., Lima Capital, Inc., JC Financial and Corporate Architects, Inc. to satisfy a remaining principal amount of $400,000.

    2. M&E agreed to transfer 10,000,000 of the Class A Warrants, formerly issued by Medicius, Inc. with an expiration date of January 5, 2005 to Empyreon.net for $30,000 and 2,000,000 Class A Warrants to Mr. Moshe Mendlowitz for $20,000. The Company incurred financing costs during the year ended December 31, 2004 totaling $405,700, the deemed value of the Warrants on the transfer date based on the Black-Scholes Valuation Model.

    3. The outstanding note balance of $200,526 was recapitalized into 207,526 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value Class A Convertible Preferred Stock and registered in M&E's name. Each share of Class A 2002 Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into 18 shares (3,717,468 total) of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at $0.055556 per share. M&E agrees to hold the Preferred Shares for a minimum of one year, pursuant to Rule 144, with no conversions allowed during that period of time. After one year, M&E may convert and sell only 500,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock every 60 days as permissible by Rule 144.

    F-14


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP Promissory Note

    On March 24, 2004, the Company was loaned $700,000 from Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP (Pinnacle). The Secured Convertible Promissory Note bears interest at a rate of 12% per annum, matures September 25, 2004, except if extended for an additional six months at the option of the Company, and was secured by 17,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. Pinnacle may, at its option, at any time from time to time, elect to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal of the Note into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at a conversion price of $0.08 per share, unless such conversion would result in Pinnacle being deemed the "beneficial owner" of 4.99% or more of the then-outstanding Common Shares within the meaning of Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In the event the Company fails to pay any installment or principal or interest when due, the interest rate will then accrue at a rate of 24% per annum on the unpaid balance until the payment default is cured.

    Between September 25, 2004 and October 18, 2004, Pinnacle and the Company negotiated an extension to the Pinnacle Note with a separate set of renewal terms. On October 19, 2004, the Pinnacle Note was extended by the parties by virtue of a renewal and settlement agreement through January 24, 2005, and under certain conditions until March 24, 2005. The Company met those conditions by executing the definitive agreement to acquire CareGeneration, Inc. As a condition of renewal the Company was required to provide additional security of 2,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock, and Pinnacle was provided with a new election to convert some or all of the then-outstanding principal of the Note into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at a conversion price of $0.045 per share. In addition, should the Company complete a merger or similar transaction prior to January 24, 2005, the Note will automatically be extended through March 24, 2005 with additional security due.

    The Company recorded interest expense of $86,456 and $117,107 during the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

    Note 7 - Income taxes

    For the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company incurred net operating losses and accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately $10,223,372 of federal and state net operating losses. The net operating loss carryforwards, if not utilized will begin to expire in 2017.

    The components of the Company's deferred tax asset are as follows:

    F-15


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

     

    As of December 31,

     

    2004

    Deferred tax assets:    
    Net operating loss carryforwards $

    10,223,372

    Total deferred tax assets  

    10,223,372

         
    Deferred tax liabilities:    
    Depreciation  

    -

         
    Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance  

    10,223,372

    Less: Valuation allowance  

    (10,223,372)

    Net deferred tax assets $

    -0-

    Note 8 - Stockholder's equity

    The Company is authorized to issue 5,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock and 1,250,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock.

    Preferred stock

    The Company issued 207,526 shares of its $0.001 par value preferred shares for financing costs of $354,800. Each preferred share is convertible into 18 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock at $1.00 per share.

    Common stock

    The Company issued a total of 32,968,863 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to its merger with Medicius, Inc. whereby each shareholder received three Company shares for every one Medicius, Inc. share held. The Company acquired approximately $1,506,022 in tangible and intangible assets as a result of the merger.

    During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 1,725,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to CareDecision.net, Inc. pursuant to its election to convert 700,000 shares of Medicius, Inc. $0.001 par value preferred stock into the Company's common stock.

    During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 2,539,574 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for cash totaling $200,000.

    During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 1,267,963 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to an officer of the Company for cash totaling $40,000.

    During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 19,617,737 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for consulting services valued at $1,405,732, the fair market value of the underlying shares on the dates of issuance.

    During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company cancelled 1,935,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to satisfy an obligation valued at $98,685.

    During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 31,159,748 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for consulting services valued at $769,840, the fair market value of the underlying shares on the dates of issuance.

    During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 5,100,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock for cash totaling $235,300.

    F-16


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    The Company issued 6,469,161 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as a dividend to its shareholders of record as of June 3, 2003, the grant date. The fair market value of the shares on the grant date was $0.061 per share resulting in compensation to the shareholders totaling $394,619.

    During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 2,500,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to acquire operating software valued at $181,250.

    During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 1,741,875 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as a dispute settlement valued at $77,094.

    The Company issued 7,350,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals to convert $522,000 in debt to equity during the year ended December 31, 2004.

    The Company issued 6,510,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in order to settle the disputes with investors and agents which arose over the M&E Note, and which allowed the M&E Note to be settled and converted. The value of the shares was $377,136 and is recorded as a loss on debt settlement during the year ended December 31, 2004.

    On July 31, 2004, a note holder elected to convert its $50,000 face value loan into shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock in full satisfaction of the loan plus accrued interest.

    During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 108,805,500 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for consulting services for the Company's hotel network business, consulting fees associated with the Company's proposed merger with Kelly companies, finders fees to two individuals who introduced the Company to its proposed satellite e-broadcast partner, finders' fees to two individuals who introduced the Company to the Kelly Companies, agent's fees associated with the Company's proposed acquisition of MDU Services, Inc., agent's fees for the introduction and fees associated with the company's recent agreement with an e-business partner for the hotel product sector, contract fees associated to develop and complete certain software for its hotel sector product and technical expenses incurred associated with this agreement, documentation and initiation fees owing to the Pinnacle Note investment, collectively valued at $1,537,532 and professional fees valued at $493,737. Also as of December 31, 2004, the Company has placed in escrow 17,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as security for the Pinnacle Note investment.

    During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 6,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock in connection with loan renewal fees totaling $76,000.

    Note 9 - Related party transactions

    On July 1, 2002, Keith Berman, a beneficial owner and officer of the Company, contributed equipment valued at $27,857. The equipment is recorded as part of the total fixed assets received from the merger with Medicius, Inc.

    Medicius, Inc. acquired operating software from CareDecision.net, Inc, a privately owned corporation that completed several transactions with the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, Medicius, Inc. paid CareDecision.net, Inc. the sum of $187,500 with 700,000 shares of its $0.001 par value preferred stock. CareDecision.net, Inc. then elected to convert its preferred shares into 1,725,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. As a result of the merger with Medicius, Inc., two of the beneficial owners of CareDecision.net are now beneficial owners of the Company.

    F-17


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    The Company received $40,000 from Keith Berman, a beneficial owner of the Company, due on December 31, 2002 and accruing interest at 8% per annum. On December 31, 2002, Mr. Berman elected to convert the note plus interest into 1,267,963 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The fair market value of the shares on December 31, 2002 was $0.048 per share resulting in deemed interest expense totaling $20,862.

    During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company acquired fully-developed operating software from CareDecision.net, Inc, a private corporation with several control persons serving in similar positions at the Company. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company paid CareDecision.net, Inc. the sum of $181,250 with 2,500,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock.

    During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company received $50,000 from Dr. Thomas Chillemi, a Company shareholder, the note is convertible into 1,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock and carried with it 1,000,000 warrants exercisable on a one-for-one basis at a strike price at $0.05 per share (Chillemi 2003 Transaction #1). On April 22, 2003 Dr. Chillemi exercised the convertible portion of his note and converted the $50,000 debt into 1,000,000 shares of the Company's $.001 par value common stock. According to the terms of Chilllemi 2003 Transaction #2 (see Note 10 below), Dr. Chillemi agreed to retire the 1,000,000 warrants.

    Note 10 - Warrants and stock options

    Warrants

    During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company issued 5,848,977 warrants in conjunction with the merger of Medicius, Inc. The warrants are convertible at a strike price of $.04, each warrant is exercisable into one share of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The fair value of the warrants has been estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The weighted average fair value of these warrants was $0.0261. The following assumptions were used in computing the fair value of these warrants: weighted average risk-free interest rate of 5.05%, zero dividend yield, volatility of the Company's common stock of 51% and an expected life of the warrants of two years. The warrants expire on June 27, 2005. Approximately $152,658 was added to the value of the assets acquired from the Medicius, Inc. merger as a result of the warrants. The added value was then written down and recorded as "impairment loss" for the year ended December 31, 2002.

    During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company's merger partner Medicius, Inc. issued a merger formula adjusted 12,000,000 Class A warrants to M and E Equities, Inc. The warrants are convertible at a strike price of $.0667, each Class A warrant exercisable into one share of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The warrants expired on January 4, 2005. Upon exercise of each of the Class A warrants, if any, the Company's merger partner Medicius, Inc. is obligated to issue one Class C warrant for each Class A warrant exercised, or a total issuance of up to 24,000,000 merger formula adjusted Class C warrants. The Class C warrants are convertible at a strike price of $.20, each Class C warrant exercisable into one share of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The warrants expired on January 4, 2005. As of December 31, 2003 the Company has reserved 36,000,000 of its common stock shares should the warrantholders decide to exercise any of the 12 million Class A warrants before they expire, and any Class C warrants, should the Class A warrants have been exercised before the Class C warrants expire.

    No warrants have been exercised through December 31, 2004.

    Stock options

    On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted its "2003 Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 25,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The Company issued 14,600,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the year ended December 31, 2003.

    F-18


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    On January 21, 2003, the Company granted stock options to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, a Company shareholder, to purchase 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $22,600, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.

    On January 21, 2003, the Company granted stock options to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, a Company shareholder, to purchase 3,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $39,550, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.

    On July 18, 2003, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Chillemi, a Company shareholder, to perform corporate development services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 3,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan (Chillemi 2003 Transaction #2). The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $60,900, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003. On October 1, 2003, Dr. Chillemi exercised 1,000,000 of his stock options as consideration for services performed valued at $50,000. On November 1, 2003, Dr. Chillemi exercised an additional 1,000,000 of his stock options as consideration for services performed valued at $50,000.

    On July 18, 2003, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Wolf, a Company shareholder, to perform medical information technology services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 950,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $19,285, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003. On October 31, 2003, Dr. Wolf exercised all 950,000 of his stock options by rendering $47,500.00 in cash.

    On July 18, 2003, the Company entered into various consulting and service agreements with unrelated individuals to perform corporate strategic and developmental services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 3,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $60,900, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.

    On November 24, 2003, the Company granted stock options to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, a Company shareholder, to purchase 2,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $31,500, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.

    On November 24, 2003, the Company granted stock options to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, a Company shareholder, to purchase 1,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $18,900, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.

    F-19


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    On November 24, 2003, the Company entered into various consulting and service agreements with unrelated individuals to perform corporate strategic and developmental services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 3,300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to the Company's 2003 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $41,580, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2003.

    As of December 31, 2003, outstanding stock options to acquire shares of common stock on a one-for-one basis totaled 5,150,000 at a weighted average exercise price of $.043. As of December 31, 2003, stock options in the Plan remaining to be issued totaled 5,250,000. The Plan stock options are 100% vested from the grant date.

    The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options under the 2003 Stock Option Plan:

           

    Weighted

           

    Average

     

    Number

    Exercise

     

    Of Shares

    Price

    Balance, December 31, 2003  

    5,150,000

       

    -

     
                 
    Options granted  

    -0-

     

    $

    0.043

     
    Options exercised  

    (-0-

    )  

    0.043

     
                 
    Balance, December 31, 2004  

    5,150,000

       

    0.043

     
                 
    Exercisable, December 31, 2004  

    5,150,000

     

    $

    0.043

     

    The following is a summary of information about the 2003 Stock Option Plan options outstanding at December 31, 2004

    Shares Underlying Options Outstanding

    Shares Underlying
    Options Exercisable

         

    Shares

    Average

    Weighted

    Shares

    Weighted

         

    Underlying

    Remaining

    Average

    Underlying

    Average

    Range of

    Options

    Contractual

    Exercise

    Options

    Exercise

    Exercise Prices

    Outstanding

    Life

    Price

    Exercisable

    Price

    $

    0.040 - 0.050

       

    5,150,000

      0 years

    $

    0.043

       

    5,150,000

     

    $

    0.043

     

    Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share, as disclosed in Note 1, has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its non-employee stock-based compensation plans and other stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of each option and warrant grant are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:

    F-20


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

     

    2004

    2003

    Average risk-free interest rates

     

    5.05

    %

     

    5.05

    %
    Average expected life (in years)  

    2

       

    2

     
    Volatility

     

    51.0

    %

     

    51.0

    %

    The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. During 2003, there were no options granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.

    The weighted average fair value of options granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock during 2004 was approximately $0.043 per option.

    On August 5, 2004 the Company adopted its "2004 Employee Stock Option Plan" (the "Plan") and granted incentive and nonqualified stock options with rights to purchase 50,000,000 shares of the Company's $0.001 par value common stock. The Company issued 50,000,000 shares of stock pursuant to the plan during the year ended December 31, 2004.

    On August 5, 2004, the Company entered into various consulting and service agreements with unrelated individuals to perform corporate strategic and developmental services for the Company. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 20,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.024 per share pursuant to the Company's 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under the Company' 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $480,000, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.

    On October 12, 2004, the Company entered into various consulting and service agreements with Dr. Joseph Wolf, Leslie-Michelle Abraham and M. Thais Abraham to perform strategic and developmental services to facilitate the Company's proposed merger with CareGeneration, Inc., among others. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 24,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to the Company's 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under the Company' 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $285,000, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.

    On October 28, 2004, the Company entered into a second consulting and service agreement with Dr. Joseph Wolf to perform an enterprise value report for the Company's proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. inclusive of that company's recent receipt of certain prescription drug distribution licenses and other considerations. As consideration, the Company granted stock options to purchase 6,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share pursuant to the Company's 2004 Stock Option Plan. The shares are registered and free-trading under the Company' 2004 Employee Stock Option plan filed via Form S-8. The value of the options on the grant date using the Black-Scholes Model is $72,310.00, which has been recorded as compensation expense on the Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2004.

    The following is a summary of activity of outstanding stock options under the 2004 Stock Option Plan:

    F-21


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

                 
           

    Weighted

           

    Average

     

    Number

    Exercise

     

    Of Shares

    Price

         
    Balance, December 31, 2003  

    -

       

    -

     
                 
    Options granted  

    50,000,000

       $

    0.0214

     
    Options exercised  

    49,750,000

       

    0.0214

     
                 
    Balance, December 31, 2004  

    250,000

       

    0.0214

     
                 
    Exercisable, December 31, 2004  

    250,000

     

    $

    0.0214

     

    The following is a summary of information about the 2004 Stock Option Plan options outstanding at December 31, 2004

    Shares Underlying Options Outstanding

    Shares Underlying
    Options Exercisable

         

    Shares

    Average

    Weighted

    Shares

    Weighted

         

    Underlying

    Remaining

    Average

    Underlying

    Average

    Range of

    Options

    Contractual

    Exercise

    Options

    Exercise

    Exercise Prices

    Outstanding

    Life

    Price

    Exercisable

    Price

    $

    0.018 - 0.024

       

    250,000

      0 years

    $

    .0214

       

    250,000

     

    $

    0.0214

     

    Pro forma information regarding net income and net income per share, as disclosed in Note 1, has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its non-employee stock-based compensation plans and other stock options under the fair value method of SFAS No. 123. The fair value of each option and warrant grant are estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants under the fixed option plan:

     

    2004

    2003

         
    Average risk-free interest rates

     

    5.25

    %

     

      %
    Average expected life (in years)  

    2

           
    Volatility

     

    57.08

    %

     

      %

    F-22


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of short-term traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. During 2004 and 2003, there were no options granted with an exercise price below the fair value of the underlying stock at the grant date.

    The weighted average fair value of options granted with exercise prices at the current fair value of the underlying stock during 2004 was approximately $0.0141 per option.

    Note 11 - Commitments and contingencies

    Litigations

    The Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings covering a wide range of matters that arise in the ordinary course of its business activities, including product liability claims. Management believes that any liability that may ultimately result from the resolution of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company.

    Note 12 - Subsequent events

    On February 10, 2005, the Company and Pinnacle Investment Partners, LP ("Pinnacle"), entered into a second Note Extension Agreement. The Company had previously issued to Pinnacle a $700,000 Secured (Convertible) Promissory Note bearing interest at the rate of 12% per annum, dated March 24, 2004 which provided for a maturity date of September 24, 2004, convertible into the Company's common stock subject to certain conditions. In a Note Extension Agreement dated September 24, 2004, the Parties amended the Note and the related Pledge and Security Agreement, and under the terms of that particular Note Extension Agreement the maturity date of the Note became January 24, 2004 and upon further performance on the part of the Company a final maturity date of March 24, 2005.

    Subject to the terms of this new agreement; on March 24, 2005, Pinnacle agreed to pay to the Company $340,000 and (2) pay to Pinnacle's designee, CJR Capital, LLC, $60,000 towards Pinnacle's due diligence and legal expenses related to this new agreement. This new agreement has the following consequences: (1) the principal amount due under the Note rises automatically increases by $400,000 to $1,100,000; (2) the Maturity Date of the newly revised Note has been extended for a period of 13 months to April 24, 2006; and (3) the conversion price for those shares that underlie the Note was changed to $0.025 from the previous conversion price of $.04.

    In addition to the above, the Company also agreed: (1) to deliver to Pinnacle's counsel an additional 83,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock as additional escrow security, (2) issue to Pinnacle's designee, CJR Capital, LLC, 4,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock towards Pinnacle's due diligence and legal expenses related to the revision of the Note; (3) issue to Pinnacle 9,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock as a loan re-initiation fee.

    F-23


    instaCare Corp.
    (formerly CareDecision Corporation)
    (a Development Stage Company)
    Notes to Restated Financial Statements

    On February 7, 2005, the Company reached an agreement with three entities, Mercator Momentum Fund, LP, and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and Mercator Advisory Group, LLC ("MAG"). Under this agreement, in return for a total investment of $2,000,000 USD from the investing entities, the last portion of which was received on February 22, 2005, the Company agreed to issue and sell to the Purchasers an aggregate of: (a) Twenty Thousand (20,000) shares of a new issue Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, $1,000 per share which shall be convertible into shares of the Company's common stock with the conversion rate pegged at 80% of the market for the Company's common stock prior to any conversion, subject to certain conditions, and (b) One Hundred Million (100,000,000) warrants to acquire up to One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of the Company's common stock, 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise strike price of $.02 and 50,000,000 of the warrants having an exercise strike price of $.03.

    On February 11, 2005, the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form SB-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission to register the common shares of the Company's common stock that underlie the Pinnacle agreement and the agreement with, Mercator Momentum Fund, LP, and Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. and Mercator Advisory Group, LLC.

    Mergers and acquisitions

    On November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, the company entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between CareDecision, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., the Company's subsidiary and CareGeneration, Inc. the acquisition target, that when accomplished would merge CareGeneration, Inc. into the company's subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. and whereby Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. would be the surviving entity. The parties concluded the activities surrounding this acquisition on January 27, 2005. The acquisition closed on February 25, 2005. Pursuant to the agreements CareGeneration shareholders will receive 39,375,000 shares of the Subsidiary's common stock, equaling approximately 49% of the outstanding shares of the Subsidiary, and 42,500,000 of the Company's common stock in exchange for all of the shares of the Target common stock and all of the Target preferred stock. In addition, Company at closing will place in escrow up to 100,000,000 common stock shares, which may be paid to CareGeneration stockholders subject to earn-out provisions.

    Issuances of Common Stock

    The Company has issued 18,040,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to various individuals and entities for cash totaling $292,500 and services valued at $50,600.00 subsequent to December 31, 2004 and through February 24, 2005.

    F-24


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    (a Development Stage Company)
    December 31, 2004 Financial Statements and Footnotes

    TABLE OF CONTENTS

     

    PAGE

       
    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

    F-1

       
    BALANCE SHEET

    F-2

       
    STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

    F-3

       
    STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

    F-4

       
    STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS

    F-5

       
    NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

    F-6 to F-10

    42


    Beckstead and Watts, LLP
    Certified Public Accountants

    2425 W Horizon Ridge Parkway
    Henderson, NV 89052
    702.257.1984 (tel)
    702.362.0540 (fax)

    REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

    We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of CareGeneration, Inc. (the "Company") (A Development Stage Company), as of December 31, 2004, and the related statement of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the period from February 18, 2004 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2004. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

    We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

    In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of CareGeneration, Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of December 31, 2004, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the period February 18, 2004 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

    The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the financial statements, the Company has had limited operations and have not commenced planned principal operations. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

    /s/ Beckstead and Watts, LLP

    March 30, 2005

    F-1


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    Balance Sheet

     

    December 31,
    2004

         
    Assets    
         
    Current assets:    
         Cash $

    3,467

         Prepaid compensation  

    147,560

              Total current assets  

    151,027

         
    Other assets:    
         Loan to affiliate  

    5,000

      $

    156,027

         
    Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity    
         
    Current liabilities:    
         Accounts payable $

    -

              Total current liabilities  

    -

         
         
    Stockholders' equity:    
         Common stock, $0.01 par value, 20,000,000 shares    
              authorized, 1,000,000 shares issued and outstanding  

    10,000

         Additional paid-in capital  

    147,560

         Deficit  

    (1,533)

       

    156,027

         
      $

    156,027

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-2


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    Statement of Operations

     

    February 18, 2004

    (Inception) to

    December 31, 2004

    Revenue

    $

    -

    Expenses:

         General and administrative expenses

    161

         Professional and consulting fees

     

    1,372

              Total expenses

     

    1,533

    (Loss) before provision for taxes

    (1,533)

    Provision for income taxes

     

    -

    Net (loss)

    $

    (1,533)

    Weighted average number of

         common shares outstanding - basic and fully diluted

     

    1,000,000

    Net (loss) per share - basic and fully diluted

    $

    (0.00)

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-3


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    Statement of Stockholders' Equity

         

    Additional

     

    Total

     

    Common Stock

    Paid-in

     

    Stockholders'

     

    Shares

     

    Capital

    Deficit

    Equity

               
    February 2004          
    Founders shares issued for cash

    1,000,000

    $10,000

    $ 147,560

    $ -

    $ 157,560

    and prepaid compensation

             
               
    Net (loss)          
    For the year ended December 31, 2004      

    (1,533)

    (1,533)

               
    Balance, December 31, 2004

    1,000,000

    $10,000

    $ 147,560

    $ (1,533)

    $ 156,027

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-4


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    Statement of Cash Flows

     

    February 18, 2004
    (Inception) to
    December 31, 2004

    Cash flows from operating activities

       
    Net (loss)

    $

    (1,533)

    Changes to operating assets and liabilities:    
         Loan to affiliate  

    (5,000)

    Net cash (used) by operating activities  

    (6,533)

         
         
    Cash flows from financing activities    
         Issuances of common stock  

    10,000

    Net cash provided by financing activities  

    10,000

         
    Net increase in cash  

    3,467

    Cash - beginning  

    -

    Cash - ending

    $

    3,467

         
    Supplemental disclosures:    
         Interest paid

    $

    -

         Income taxes paid

    $

    -

    The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

    F-5


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    Notes

    Note 1 - History and organization of the company

    The Company was organized February 18, 2004 (Date of Inception) under the laws of the State of Nevada, as CareGeneration, Inc. The Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock.

    Note 2 - Accounting policies and procedures

    Use of estimates

    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

    Cash and cash equivalents

    The Company maintains a cash balance in a non-interest-bearing account that currently does not exceed federally insured limits. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 2004.

    Revenue recognition

    The Company recognizes revenue and gains when earned and related costs of sales and expenses when incurred.

    Advertising costs

    The Company expenses all costs of advertising as incurred. There were no advertising costs included in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2004.

    Impairment of long-lived assets

    Long-lived assets held and used by the Company are reviewed for possible impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable or is impaired. No such impairments have been identified by management at December 31, 2004.

    Impairment of intangible assets

    The Company evaluates the recoverability of identifiable intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an intangible asset's carrying amount may not be recoverable. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: (1) a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, (2) a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or (3) an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition of an asset. The Company measures the carrying amount of the asset against the estimated undiscounted future cash flows associated with it. Should the sum of the expected future net cash flows be less than the carrying value of the asset being evaluated, an impairment loss would be recognized. The impairment loss would be calculated as the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair value. The fair value is measured based on quoted market prices, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value is based on various valuation techniques, including the discounted value of estimated future cash flows. The evaluation of asset impairment requires the Company to make assumptions about future cash flows over the life of the asset being evaluated. These assumptions require significant judgment and actual results may differ from assumed and estimated amounts. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company has not recorded an impairment related to its intangible asset (see Note 9).

    F-6


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    Notes

    Loss per share

    Net loss per share is provided in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128 (SFAS #128) "Earnings Per Share". Basic loss per share is computed by dividing losses available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. The Company had no dilutive common stock equivalents, such as stock options or warrants as of December 31, 2004.

    Reporting on the costs of start-up activities

    Statement of Position 98-5 (SOP 98-5), "Reporting on the Costs of Start-Up Activities," which provides guidance on the financial reporting of start-up costs and organizational costs, requires most costs of start-up activities and organizational costs to be expensed as incurred. SOP 98-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 1998. With the adoption of SOP 98-5, there has been little or no effect on the Company's financial statements.

    Estimates

    The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

    Fair value of financial instruments

    Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2004. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for cash, accounts payable and notes payable because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are payable on demand.

    Income Taxes

    The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes" ("SFAS No. 109") for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change.

    Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

    Segment reporting

    The Company follows Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130, "Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information". The Company operates as a single segment and will evaluate additional segment disclosure requirements as it expands its operations.

    Dividends

    The Company has not yet adopted any policy regarding payment of dividends. No dividends have been paid or declared since inception.

    F-7


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    Notes

    Recent pronouncements

    In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4. SFAS No. 151 amends the guidance in ARB No. 43, Chapter 4, Inventory Pricing, to clarify the accounting for abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handing costs, and spoilage. This statement requires that those items be recognized as current period charges regardless of whether they meet the criterion of "so abnormal" which was the criterion specified in ARB No. 43. In addition, this Statement requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the cost of production be based on normal capacity of the production facilities. This pronouncement is effective for the Company beginning October 1, 2005. The Company does not believe adopting this new standard will have a significant impact to its financial statements.

    In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004). Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. SFAS No. 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and amends SFAS No. 95, Statement of Cash Flows. Generally, the approach in SFAS No. 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS No. 123. However, SFAS No. 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. The new standard will be effective for the Company in the first interim or annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2005. The Company expects the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial statements assuming employee stock options are granted in the future.

    Year end

    The Company has adopted December 31 as its fiscal year end.

    Note 3 - Going concern

    The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred a net loss of ($1,533) for the period from February 18, 2004 (inception) to December 31, 2004, and had no sales. The future of the Company is dependent upon its ability to obtain financing and upon future profitable operations from the development of its new business opportunities. Management plans to raise funds via debt and/or equity financing in order to maintain operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts of and classification of liabilities that might be necessary in the event the Company cannot continue in existence.

    These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might arise from this uncertainty.

    Note 4 - Prepaid compensation

    The Company entered into an agreement with its sole officer and director whereby the Company agreed to issue 1,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock as consideration for an executive consulting contract valued at $147,500 plus $10,000 cash. The terms of the agreement allow for the prepaid compensation in the amount of $147,500 to be earned over a period of one year.

    F-8


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    Notes

    Note 5 - Income taxes

    For the years ended December 31, 2004, the Company incurred net operating losses and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At December 31, 2004, the Company had approximately $1,533 of federal and state net operating losses. The net operating loss carryforwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2023.

    The components of the Company's deferred tax asset are as follows:

     

    As of

     

    12/31/04

    Deferred tax assets:  
    Net operating loss carryforwards

    1,533

    Total deferred tax assets

    1,533

       
    Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance

    1,533

    Less: Valuation allowance

    (1,533)

    Net deferred tax assets

    $ -0-

    For financial reporting purposes, the Company has incurred a loss in each period since its inception. Based on the available objective evidence, including the Company's history of losses, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, the Company provided for a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2004.

    A reconciliation between the amounts of income tax benefit determined by applying the applicable U.S. and State statutory income tax rate to pre-tax loss is as follows:

     

    12/31/04

    Federal and state statutory rate

    $ (521)

    Change in valuation allowance on deferred tax assets

    521

     

    $ -0-

    Note 6 - Stockholders' equity

    The Company is authorized to issue 20,000,000 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock.

    On February 18, 2004, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of its $0.01 par value common stock to a sole officer and director in exchange for cash in the amount of $10,000.

    As of December 31, 2004, there have been no other issuances of common stock.

    Note 7 - Warrants and options

    As of December 31, 2004, there were no warrants or options outstanding to acquire any additional shares of common stock.

    Note 8 - Loan to affiliate

    During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company loaned $5,000 to an affiliate company with common ownership and management. The note has no interest and is due upon demand. As of December 31, 2004, the total amount owed is $5,000.

    F-9


    CareGeneration, Inc.
    Notes

    Note 9 - Prescription Drug Distribution License

    On December 27, 2004, the Company's controlling shareholder donated to the company a Wholesale Drug Distribution License issued by the State of Illinois and jointly governed by regulators from the State of Illinois, the U. S. Drug Enforcement Agency and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The same shareholder also donated a reciprocal drug distribution license issued by the State of Indiana, a client list and know-how in the form of written (published) drug distribution policies and procedures applicable to independent prescription drug and diagnostic distributors.

    The Company has not assigned a value to the prescription drug distribution licenses. Licenses of this nature are tightly regulated and allocated by state and federal authorities and are often transferred as part of asset sales and/or sales of client lists. The Company has placed no value for the client list and know-how also donated.

    Note 10 - Related party transactions

    The Company does not lease or rent any property. Office space and services are provided without charge by a director and shareholder. Such costs are immaterial to the financial statements and, accordingly, have not been reflected therein. The officers and directors of the Company are involved in other business activities and may, in the future, become involved in other business opportunities. If a specific business opportunity becomes available, such persons may face a conflict in selecting between the Company and their other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such conflicts.

    Note 11 - Subsequent events

    Mergers and acquisitions

    On November 3, 2004, and amended on December 27, 2004, the company entered into a Definitive Agreement that called for a series of transactions to be completed between CareDecision Corporation, Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., CareDecision's "Subsidiary", and the Company, that when accomplished would merge the Company into the Subsidiary and whereby the Subsidiary would be the surviving entity. The parties concluded the activities surrounding this acquisition on January 27, 2005. The acquisition closed on February 25, 2005. Pursuant to the agreements, the Company's shareholders will receive 39,375,000 shares of the Subsidiary's common stock, equaling approximately 49% of the outstanding shares of the Subsidiary, and 42,500,000 of CareDecision Corporation's common stock in exchange for all of the shares of the Company's issued and outstanding common stock and all of the Target preferred stock. In addition, CareDecision Corporation, at closing, will place into escrow up to 100,000,000 common stock shares which may be paid to the Company's stockholders subject to earn-out.

    F-10


    DEALER PROSPECTUS DELIVERY OBLIGATION

    Until ____________________, all dealers that effect transactions in these securities, whether or not participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers' obligation to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    [Balance of this page intentionally left blank.]


    PART II

    INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS

    Item 24. Indemnification of Directors and Officers

    THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION OF THE COMPANY PROVIDE FOR INDEMNIFICATION OF EMPLOYEES AND OFFICERS IN CERTAIN CASES. INSOFAR AS INDEMNIFICATION FOR LIABILITIES ARISING UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 MAY BE PERMITTED TO DIRECTORS, OFFICERS OR PERSONS CONTROLLING THE COMPANY PURSUANT TO THE FOREGOING PROVISIONS, THE COMPANY HAS BEEN INFORMED THAT IN THE OPINION OF THE SECURTIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION SUCH INDEMNIFICATION IS AGAINST PUBLIC POLICY AS EXPRESSED IN THE ACT AND IS THEREFORE UNENFORCEABLE

    Section 78.751 of the Nevada General Corporation Laws provides as follows: 78.751 Indemnification of officers, directors, employees and agents; advance of expenses.

    1. A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, except an action by or in the right of the corporation, by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, against expenses, including attorney's fees, judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the action, suitor proceeding if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement, conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent, does not, of itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation, and that, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, he had reasonable cause to believe that his conduct was unlawful.

    2. A corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to procure a judgment in its favor by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against expenses, including amounts paid in settlement and attorneys' fees actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense or settlement of the action or suit if he acted in good faith and in a manner which he reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation. Indemnification may not be made for any claim, issue or matter as to which such a person has been adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction, after exhaustion of all appeals therefrom, to be liable to the corporation or for amounts paid in settlement to the corporation, unless and only to the extent that the court in which the action or suit was brought or other court of competent jurisdiction determines upon application that in view of all the circumstances of the case, the person is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnity for such expenses as the court deems proper.

    3. To the extent that a director, officer, employee or agent of a corporation has been successful on the merits or otherwise in defense of any action, suit or proceeding referred to in subsections 1 and 2, or in defense of any claim, issue or matter therein, he must be indemnified by the corporation against expenses, including attorneys' fees, actually and reasonably incurred by him in connection with the defense.


    4. Any indemnification under subsections 1 and 2, unless ordered by a court or advanced pursuant to subsection 5, must be made by the corporation only as authorized in the specific case upon a determination that indemnification of the director, officer, employee or agent is proper in the circumstances. The determination must be made: (a) By the stockholders: (b) By the board of directors by majority vote of a quorum consisting o directors who were not parties to act, suit or proceeding; (c) If a majority vote of a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the act, suit or proceeding so orders, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or (d) If a quorum consisting of directors who were not parties to the act, suit or proceeding cannot to obtained, by independent legal counsel in a written opinion; or

    5. The Articles of Incorporation, the Bylaws or an agreement made by the corporation may provide that the expenses of officers and directors incurred in defending a civil or criminal, suit or proceeding must be paid by the corporation as they are incurred and in advance of the final disposition of the action, suit or proceeding, upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of the director or officer to repay the amount if it is ultimately determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that he is not entitled to be indemnified by corporation. The provisions of this subsection do not affect any rights to advancement of expenses to which corporate personnel other than the directors or officers may be entitled under any contract or otherwise by law.

    6. The indemnification and advancement of expenses authorized in or ordered by a court pursuant to this section: (a) Does not exclude any other rights to which a person seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled under the articles of incorporation or any bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise, for either an action in his official capacity or an action in another capacity while holding his office, except that indemnification, unless ordered by a court pursuant to subsection 2 or for the advancement of expenses made pursuant to subsection 5, may not be made to or on behalf of any director or officer if a final adjudication establishes that his act or omissions involved intentional misconduct, fraud or a knowing violation of the law and was material to the cause of action. (b) Continues for a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and endures to the benefit of the heirs, executors and administrators of such a person. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

    Item 25. Expenses of Issuance and Distribution

    The following is an itemized statement of the estimated amounts of all expenses payable by the registrant in connection with the registration of the common stock offered hereby:

    Nature of Expenses

     

    Amount

         

    SEC Registration Fee

    $

    1,219

    Accounting Fees and Expenses

    $

    10,500

    Legal Fees and Expenses

    $

    15,000

    Printing Expenses

    $

    1,000

    Blue Sky Qualification Fees and Expenses

    $

    1,000

    Transfer Agent's Fee

    $

    2,500

         

    TOTAL

    $

    31,219


    Item 26. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

    The following paragraphs set forth information with respect to all securities sold by us since inception without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). The information includes the names of the purchasers, the date of issuance, the title and number of securities sold and the consideration received by us for the issuance of these shares.

    The consulting services agreements were made with such investors that are sophisticated investors based on their financial resources and knowledge of investments. They had access to or were provided with relevant financial and other information relating to us. Accordingly, the issuance of shares was exempt from the registration requirements of the Act pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Act.

    On March 16, 2001, InstaCare issued 875,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to Mr. Michael Vogel for cash of $875 and 1,750,000 shares of par value common stock to Mr. Robert L. Cox in exchange for cash in the amount of $1,750.

    During March 2001, InstaCare issued 1,525,000 shares to G&M Management & Administrative Services, Ltd., (Andrew Pieri is the President) for $49,500. This transaction was made in accordance with Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which exempts from registration transactions by an issuer not involving a "public offering."

    During March 2001, we issued 350,000 shares to Corporate Regulatory Services, LLC in lieu of services rendered in the amount of $26,250. The issuance of shares represented payment for facilitating the preparation of the documentation necessary to become a publicly traded company. This stock issuance was made in accordance with Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The consulting company is a sophisticated purchaser. They were provided full and complete access to our corporate records, as they assisted us in preparing our offering documentation. No brokers or dealers were involved in this transaction and no discounts or commissions were paid.

    In March of 2001, we issued 3,500,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock at $0.10 per share to Sarcor Management, SA, a British Virgin Island corporation, as a $350,000 down payment on a technology licensing agreement.

    Effective May 7, 2001, we amended our articles of incorporation increasing our authorized shares from 20,000,000 to 100,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. All references to shares issued and outstanding reflect the increase of authorization of 100,000,000 issuable shares affected May 7, 2001.

    On May 26, 2001 we conducted an offering in which we issued 1,340,000 shares of common stock to 17 unaffiliated shareholders at a price of $0.10 per share, for total receipts of $134,000 in cash. This offering was made in reliance upon an exemption from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, in accordance with Regulation D, Rule 504 of the Act. In addition, this offering was made on a best efforts basis and was not underwritten. In regards to the May 2001 offering, listed below are the requirements set forth under Regulation D, Rule 504 and the facts which support the availability of Rule 504 to the May 2001 offering:

    a. Exemption. Offers and sales of securities that satisfy the conditions in paragraph (b) of this Rule 504 by an issuer that is not:

    1. subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;
    2. an investment company; or
    3. a development stage company that either has no specific business plan or purpose or has indicated that its business plan is to engage in a merger or acquisition with an unidentified company or companies, or other entity or person, shall be exempt from the provision of section 5 of the Act under section 3(b) of the Act.

    Facts: At the time of the May 2001 offering, we were not subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Further, we are not now, nor were we at the time of the May 2001 offering, considered to be an investment company. Finally, since inception, we have pursued a specific business plan of placing information technology ("IT") professionals with technology sector companies on a temporary or permanent basis and continue to do so.

    b. Conditions to be met.

    1. General Conditions. To qualify for exemption under this Rule 504, offers and sales must satisfy the terms and conditions of Rule 501 and Rule 502 (a), (c) and (d), except that the provisions of Rule 502 (c) and (d) will not apply to offers and sales of securities under this Rule 504 that are made:

    1. Exclusively in one or more states that provide for the registration of the securities, and require the public filing and delivery to investors of a substantive disclosure document before sale, and are made in accordance with those state provisions;
    2. In one or more states that have no provision for the registration of the securities or the public filing or delivery of a disclosure document before sale, if the securities have been registered in at least one state that provides for such registration, public filing and delivery before sale, offers and sales are made in that state in accordance with such provisions, and the disclosure document is delivered before sale to all purchasers (including those in the states that have no such procedure); or
    3. Exclusively according to state law exemptions from registration that permit general solicitation and general advertising so long as sales are made only to "accredited investors" as defined in Rule 501(a).

    Facts: On May 17, 2001, we were issued a permit to sell securities by the State of New York, pursuant to our application for registration by qualification of our offering of Common Stock in that state. The application for registration by qualification was filed pursuant to the provisions of Section 359-e of the New York General Business Law, which requires the public filing and delivery to investors of a substantive disclosure document before sale. On August 24, 2001, we completed a public offering of shares of our common stock pursuant to Regulation D, Rule 504 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the registration by qualification of said offering in the State of New York, whereby we sold 1,340,000 shares of Common Stock to approximately 17 unaffiliated shareholders of record, none of whom were or are officers or directors of ours. The entire offering was conducted exclusively in the State of New York, pursuant to the permit issued by the State of New York.

    2. The aggregate offering price for an offering of securities under this Rule 504, as defined in Rule 501(c), shall not exceed $1,000,000, less the aggregate offering price for all securities sold within the twelve months before the start of and during the offering of securities under this Rule 504, in reliance on any exemption under section 3(b), or in violation of section 5(a) of the Securities Act.

    Facts: The aggregate offering price for the May 2001 offering was $400,000, of which $134,000 was raised in the offering.

    In October of 2001, we issued 150,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock to Mary Lou Cox, mother of Robert Cox, InstaCare's president, for consulting services valued at $15,000. Ms. Cox provided general clerical and administrative services to InstaCare in lieu of salary or hourly wage.

    In October of 2001, we issued 500,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock to James De Luca, an independent consultant, for consulting services valued at $50,000. Mr. De Luca helped InstaCare put in place policies and procedures for its IT recruitment business and also provided InstaCare's then Vice-President with a list of IT candidates and contacts in lieu of a salary or hourly wage.


    On February 17, 2002, InstaCare executed a business consulting agreement with MLSA whereby InstaCare issued 1,350,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to Mark Lancaster for consulting services valued at $162,000. The consulting services are to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision. Previously filed via an S-8 on 3/1/02. Mr. Lancaster's services included his providing certain strategic planning services to the Corporation in the area of short term IT recruiting, aiding and assisting the Corporation as a consultant to potential strategic alliances with other similar short term IT firms.

    On February 26, 2002, InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Qurag, Inc. whereby InstaCare issued 475,000 shares to Chaim Drizin, a shareholder of InstaCare, for consulting services valued at $30,875. The consulting services are to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision. Previously filed via an S-8 on 3/1/02.

    Mr. Drizin's services include, providing certain strategic planning services to the Corporation, aiding and assisting the Corporation as a consultant to potential strategic alliances with companies in Brooklyn, NY that were primarily Orthodox Jewish owned, in particular in the insurance trade.

    On March 27, 2002, InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Promark, Inc. whereby InstaCare issued 500,000 shares to Ken Lowman for consulting services valued at $50,000. The consulting services are to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision. Mr. Lowman's services included, providing certain strategic planning services to the Corporation as it prepared to be publicly traded and aiding and assisting the Corporation as a consultant to potential strategic alliances with Canadian firms.

    On July 9, 2002, we issued a total of 32,968,863 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to its reverse merger with Medicius, Inc. whereby each shareholder received three Company common stock shares for every one Medicius, Inc. common share held, and three point five Company shares for each preferred share. In addition each shareholder received one-half warrant for each Medicius, Inc. share held.

    On July 12, 2002, InstaCare executed an addendum to the March 27, 2002, consulting agreement with Promark, Inc. whereby InstaCare issued 3,000,000 shares of its $0.001 par value common stock to Ken Lowman for consulting services valued at $150,000. The consulting services were to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision.

    On August 1, 2002, CareDecision.net, Inc. elected to convert those preferred shares that it owned in the merger target Medicius, inc. into 1,725,000 shares of our $0.001 par value common stock based upon the merger conversion formula for Medicius, Inc. preferred shares whereby CareDecision.net, Inc. received 3.5 common stock shares in InstaCare for each Medicius, Inc. preferred share.

    On August 9, 2002, we issued 2,000,000 restricted shares of our Common Stock to Barbara Asbell for consulting services valued at $80,000. We relied upon an exemption pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On September 4, 2002, we issued 950,000 shares of our Common Stock to Barbara Asbell for consulting services valued at $38,000. We relied upon an exemption pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.


    On October 8, 2002 we issued 6,327,737 shares of our Common Stock as more fully described below. Shares to the shareholders listed in Table A were issued for conversion of their pre-June 2002 Medicius, Inc. notes. Shares issued to the shareholders in Table B were issued for services provided to Medicius, Inc. prior to the June 2002 merger. In each instance when issuing these shares the Company relied upon an exemption pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    Table A

    NAME

    NUMBER OF SHARES

    MONETARY VALUE

    Catherine Dewitt

    726,000

    36,300.00

    Leon B. Eisikowitz

    38,070

    1,903.50

    Allen Zev Friedman

    152,250

    7,612.50

    Marlene Kriger

    38,070

    1,903.50

    Frady Makowsky

    43,395

    2,169.75

    Joseph Makowsky

    87,015

    4,350.75

    Benjamin Mayer

    600,000

    30,000.00

    New York Auto Mall

    217,485

    10,874,25

    P R Diamonds

    76,125

    3,806.25

    Jennifer C. Schiffman

    152,250

    7,612.50

    David Schwartz

    810,000

    40,500.00

    Morris Weiss

    61,350

    3,067.50

    Moshe Williger

    87,015

    4,350.75

    Table B

    Anfel Trading

    524,781

    26,239.05

    Barbara Asbell

    218,057

    10,902.85

    Michael Belcher

    9,722

    486.10

    Keith Berman

    848,768

    42,438.40

    Alan Binder

    5,556

    277.80

    John Garber

    365,001

    18,250.05

    Robert Jagunich

    773,768

    38,688.40

    William Lyons

    272,224

    13,611.20

    Sanjay Patel

    122,223

    6,111.15

    Michael Petras

    66,667

    3,333.35

    Tom Poff

    9,722

    486.10

    Shabnam Sharabi

    5,556

    277.80

    Leslie Wolf

    16,667

    833.35

         

     


    On November 21, 2002 we issued 875,000 restricted shares of common stock, to CareDecision.net, Inc., for purchasing the empower care software and the care.net web domain of CareDecision.net, Inc. We contracted for this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. We valued this issuance at $51,115.00. We relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On November 21, 2002 we issued 1,267,963 restricted shares of common stock, to Keith Berman for his retiring his Note. We valued this issuance at $44,532.00. We contracted for this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. We relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On November 21, 2002, we issued 640,000 restricted shares of CareDecision Corporation common stock to Robert Jagunich for his exercising 640,000 merger warrants at a strike price of $0.05. Mr. Jagunich initiated this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. The warrants underlying these shares were issued pursuant to the merger with Medicius, Inc. We relied upon an exemption to registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On November 12, 2002, we issued a total of 2,000,000 restricted shares of its Common Stock to Robert Koch for consulting services valued at $80,000. Mr. Koch also requested a transfer of 1,500,000 of his restricted shares to a third party as a part of this transaction. The total restricted shares issued was 2,000,000. We contracted with Mr. Koch for this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. We relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On November 12, 2002, we issued 2,539,574 restricted shares of its Common Stock to Paradigm Partners for consulting services valued at $101,582.96. We contracted for this transaction on September 30, 2002 but it was not completed until November 21,2002. We relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Paradigm was retained to provide information technology consulting to us to ascertain the applicability of our technologies to other markets. Paradigm had interest and expertise in certain real-estate.

    On December 17, 2002, InstaCare issued 1,500,000 shares of our Common Stock to Glen Greenfelder, Jr. for consulting services and professional services valued at $96,000.

    On January 24, 2003, InstaCare issued 2,000,000 shares of its Common Stock to Dr. Joseph Wolf for general medical, third party reimbursement, pharmacy benefits management and pharmaceutical consulting services. We valued these shares at $84,000

    On January 24, 2003, InstaCare issued 3,500,000 shares of its Common Stock to Dr. Thomas Chillemi for personal services contract for medical consulting services and medical speaking engagements. We valued these shares at $147,000.

    On August 18, 2003 InstaCare issued 75,000 shares each, to four employees as partial fulfillment of employment bonuses, for a total of 300,000 shares as follows:

    Name

    Number of Shares

    Price

    Monetary Value

           
    Alan Binder 75,000 $.0694 $5,208
    Shabnam Sharabi 75,000 $.0694 $5,208
    Dale Richter 75,000 $.0694 $5,208
    Tom Poff 75,000 $.0694 $5,208

    On August 18, 2003 InstaCare issued 1,500,000 shares of common stock to Anthony Quintiliana for contract services whereby Mr. Quintiliana would introduce InstaCare to potential commercial residential management companies in New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. The consulting services are to be rendered over a period of 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision.

    On August 18, 2003 InstaCare issued 2,500,000 shares of common stock to Barbara Asbell for contract services whereby Ms. Asbell services included the provision of certain strategic human resources services particularly in recruiting and hiring of programmers with a Microsoft Windows CE background. We valued this share issuance at $125,000.00.

    On September 12, 2003 InstaCare issued 20,801,623 restricted shares to shareholders listed below. A description of each issuance follows the table:

    Robert Jagunich

    4,127,093

    Contract services
    Wizard Enterprises

    1,888,855

    Contract services
    Wizard Enterprises

    2,500,000

    Contract services
    Barbara Asbell

    1,000,000

    Business consulting
    Robert Cox

    1,500,000

    Merger shares bonus
    Keith Berman

    1,250,000

    Merger shares bonus
    William Lyons

    1,250,000

    Merger shares bonus
    CareDecision.net, Inc.

    2,500,000

    March 2003 technology acquisition agreement
    Thomas Chillemi

    1,538,500

    Note conversion
    David Mizrahi

    741,875

    Settlement
    Sanjay Patel

    2,500,000

    Transfer upon instructions from CareDecision.net
    David Weinstein

    5,300

    Correction of issuance error

    On March 28, 2003, InstaCare received $50,000 from Dr. Thomas Chillemi, an InstaCare shareholder and consultant. Dr. Chillemi's Note was convertible into 1,538,500 shares of InstaCare's $0.001 par value common stock and carries with it 1,538,500 warrants exercisable on a one-for-one basis at a strike price at $0.0325 per share. On April 22, 2003 Dr. Chillemi exercised the convertible portion of his Note and thereby converted the $50,000 debt into 1,538,500 shares of InstaCare's $.001 par value common stock. The share certificate for this conversion was issued on September 12, 2003. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On March 31, 2003, InstaCare acquired fully-developed software from CareDecision.net, Inc, a private corporation with several control persons serving in similar positions at InstaCare. Pursuant to the agreement memorializing this transaction, InstaCare paid CareDecision.net, Inc. the sum of $181,250 by issuing 2,500,000 shares of InstaCare's $0.001 par value common stock. These shares were issued on September 12, 2003. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On May 15, 2003, InstaCare and Mr. David Mizrahi settled a dispute that arose after the merger with Medicius, Inc., but that encompassed activities that pre-dated the merger. As a settlement InstaCare issued 741,875 restricted shares to Mr. Mizrahi and valued these shares at $37,094.00. These shares were issued on September 12, 2003. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On May 15, 2003, InstaCare and Mr. David Weinstein settled a share issuance error owing to unreadable documentation. As a settlement InstaCare issued 5,300 restricted shares to Mr. Weinstein and valued these shares at $205.00. These shares were issued on September 12, 2003. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.


    On December 13, 2002, InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Barbara Asbell, a shareholder of InstaCare, whereby InstaCare was required to issue 1,000,000 restricted shares for consulting services. The consulting services were over a period of not less than 90 days with an automatic three-month renewal provision. Ms. Asbell's services included the provision of certain strategic human resources services particularly in recruiting and hiring of programmers with a Microsoft Windows CE background. The shares were issued on September 12, 2003 subsequent to Ms. Asbell's fulfillment of the contract. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. We valued these shares at $50,000.00

    On September 12, 2003, InstaCare issued shares to Wizard Enterprises ("Wizard"). On December 13, 2002, InstaCare executed a consulting agreement Wizard, whereby InstaCare was required to issue 2,500,000 restricted shares for consulting services. The consulting services were to be rendered until that agreement terminated pursuant to written notification. Wizard's consulting services related to introductions of InstaCare's then new residential management product concept. The first consulting retainer was completed for introductions in New York City. The shares were issued when the contract was fulfilled.. The value of these services was $125,000.00. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. On December 20, 2002, InstaCare executed a second consulting agreement with Wizard Enterprises ("Wizard"), whereby InstaCare was required to issue 1,888,855 restricted shares for consulting the continuation of the adduced The shares were issued when the contract was fulfilled. These shares were also issued on September 12, 2003. The value of these services was $75,554.00. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On September 12, 2003, InstaCare issued shares to Mr. Keith Berman, Mr. William Lyons and Mr. Robert Cox. On December 19, 2002 the Board of Directors agreed to issue restricted shares to Robert Cox, Keith Berman and William Lyons, pursuant to a bonus arrangement clause in the merger agreement between InstaCare and its merger target Medicius, Inc. Messrs. Berman and Lyons each were to receive 1,250,000 restricted shares and Mr. Cox, the CEO of InstaCare, 1,500,000 restricted shares. These shares were issued on September 12, 2003. The total of 4,000,000 restricted shares were valued at $160,000.00.

    On September 12, 2003, instaCare issued 4,127,093 shares of restricted stock to Mr. Robert Jagunich for consulting services rendered to the Company during the year ended December 31, 2002. The share issuance was valued at $123,813.00. The Company relied upon exemption to registration provided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Axt of 1933.

    On September 12, 2003, InstaCare Issued to Mr. Sanjay Patel 2,500,000 share of $0.001 par value common stock. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. These particular shares were issued as a result of notice received from CareDecision.net, Inc. whereby it was stated that it wished to transfer the 2,500,000 restricted shares it was to have received from the March 31, 2003 technology acquisition transaction to Mr. Sanjay Patel. CareDecision.net, Inc. asked InstaCare to provide the stock transfer agent with their transfer instructions. Upon receipt of these instructions on September 12, 2003, the transfer agent made a clerical error, issuing share certificates for the same shares to both CareDecision.net, Inc. and Mr. Patel. Upon notification to the stock transfer agent the share certificate for CareDecision.net, Inc. was canceled on September 26, 2003. Thus, InstaCare did not put a value on the share certificate for 2,500,000 shares to Mr. Patel since the shares provided to Mr. Patel had been valued upon their issue to CareDecision.net, Inc. Please see above.

    On September 18, 2003 InstaCare issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana,1,500,000 shares $0.001 par value common stock for consulting services. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares was $60,000. The consulting services were to be rendered for a period of 90 days, unless terminated pursuant to written notification by either InstaCare or Quintiliana. Quintiliana's consulting services related to introductions of InstaCare's then new residential management product concept for introductions to residential management companies on Long Island and southern New Jersey. When issuing shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On September 30, 2003 InstaCare issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for extending his September 18, 2003 consulting and introduction responsibilities. The value of the shares on the grant is $20,000. When issuing these shares we relied on an exemption to registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.

    On September 30, 2003 InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Leslie-Michelle Abraham, whereby InstaCare issued 850,000 stock options, said options exercised into common stock shares for consulting services and cash. The consulting services are to be rendered by Abraham until the Agreement terminates pursuant to written notification by either InstaCare or Abraham. Abraham's services were retained to secure a licensee or buyer for certain of InstaCare's medical software assets. On December 17, 2003 InstaCare issued an additional 500,000 shares to Abraham for her continued efforts under the same agreement.


    October 1, 2003 InstaCare executed a consulting agreement with Thomas Chillemi, a medical doctor, whereby InstaCare issued 1,000,000 stock options, said options exercised by Chillemi for consulting services and cash. The consulting services are to be rendered by Chillemi until the Agreement terminates pursuant to written notification by either InstaCare or Chillemi. Chillemi's services were retained to locate and secure a closed-door pharmacy for acquisition. On November 8, 2003, November 26, 2003 and December 3, 2003 InstaCare issued 1,000,000 stock options said options exercised by Chillemi into shares.

    On November 26, 2003 InstaCare rendered to Chillemi 2,500,000 shares for additional consulting services whereby Dr. Chillemi was retained to provide speeches, presentations and materials in structured settings to parties interested in investing or doing business with CareDecision Corporation. Chillemi agreed to limit his presentations to technical and medical issues in his area of expertise. The value of the shares on the issue date was $100,000.

    On December 17, 2003, we issued to Leslie -Michelle Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Dr. Wolf provided medical consulting services. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of the grant was $20,000.

    On December 17, 2003, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 800,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Quintiliana provided corporate development consulting. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $32,000.

    On January 9, 2004 we issued to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, an InstaCare shareholder, 2,600,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for additional consulting services whereby Dr. Chillemi was retained to provide speeches, presentations and materials in structured settings to parties interested in investing or doing business with us. Chillemi agreed to limit his presentations to technical and medical issues in his area of expertise. The value of the shares at the date of the grant was $104,000.

    On January 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Eli Mandell, an InstaCare shareholder, 150,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan to perform strategic and developmental services. The shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the grant is $7,500.

    On January 13, 2004, we issued to Armada Group USA, a consulting company, 300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock in lieu of a cash compensation for professional fees valued at $12,000.

    On January 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. David Weinstein, an InstaCare shareholder, 205,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock in lieu of 2002 merger induced costs valued at $9,225.

    On January 30, 2004 we issued to Leslie-Michelle Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Abraham performed strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $12,000.


    On January 30, 2004 we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 400,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Wolf performed strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date were $16,000.

    On January 30, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 550,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.05 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Quintilinia provided strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $27,500.

    On February 6, 2004, we issued shares to Ms. Barbra Asbell, an InstaCare shareholder, in the amounts of 550,000 and 1,000,000, and 1,750,000 (collectively 3,250,000) shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Ms. Asbell performed strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue dates are $20,000, $40,000 and $70,000, respectively, (collectively $130,000).

    On February 6, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 600,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Quintilinia provided strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $24,000.

    On February 6, 2004, we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,150,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Wolf performed strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares was registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was 46,000.

    On February 6, 2004, we issued to M. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Ms. Abraham provided strategic and developmental consulting services. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $40,000.

    On February 6, 2004 , we issued to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.04 per share pursuant to our 2003 Stock Option Plan. Dr. Thomas Chillemi provided corporate development consulting services. The shares are registered and free trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the issue date was $50,000.

    On February 23, 2004, we issued to Wells & Co., a consulting company, 1,350,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services. The value of the shares on the issue date was $54,000.

    On February 23, 2004, we issued to Lima Capital, Inc., a consulting company, 650,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services. The value of the shares was $26,000.

    On March 3, 2004, we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 400,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for merger and acquisition consulting pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the issue date was $16,000.

    On March 3, 2004, we issued to Mr. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the issue date was $20,000.

    On March 5, 2005 we completed several transactions owing from a note conversion and Note Settlement Agreement that ended a dispute with M & E Equities. An investment group paid $320,000 to M & E Equities as part of a settlement. Once the dispute was settled InstaCare was provided with a list of nominee shareholders by the investment group for the conversion of the note:


    Name

    Number of Shares

       
    Chris Knapp 1,000,000
    Corporate Architects, Inc. 1,270,000
    Tri-City, Inc. 1,270,000
    Wells and Co., Inc. 1,270,000
    JC Financial 1,270,000
    Lima Capital, Inc. 1,270,000
      7,350,000

    On March 5, 2004 we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an investor, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Knapp was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note. This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities.

    On March 5, 2004 we issued to Corporate Architects, Inc., a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Corporate Architects, Inc. was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.

    On March 5, 2004 we issued to JC Financial, a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. JC Financial was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.

    On March 5, 2004 we issued to Wells & Co., Inc., a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Wells and Co., Inc. was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.

    On March 5, 2004 we issued to Lima Capital, Inc., a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Lima Capital, Inc. was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.

    On March 5, 2004 we issued to Tri-City, Inc., a consulting company and investor, 1,270,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Tri-City, Inc. was a nominee of the investment group that purchased the M & E Equities Note ("M&E Note"). This transaction resulted from a Note Settlement Agreement with M & E Equities which allowed for said Note to convert into a total of 7,350,000 shares.

    On March 10, 2004 we issued to New Capital, Inc., a consulting company and investor, was issued 1,480,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $74,000.

    On March 10, 2004 we issued to Wells & Co., a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.

    On March 10, 2004 we issued to Tri-city, a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.

    On March 10, 2004 we issued to Corporate Architect, Inc., a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.


    On March 10, 2004 we issued to J.C. Financial, a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.

    On March 10, 2004 we issued to Lima Capital, Inc., a consulting company and investor, was issued 210,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $10,500.

    On March 10, 2004 we issued to Mr. Frank Manfredi, an InstaCare shareholder, and investor, was issued 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $50,000.

    On March 10, 2004 we issued to CareDecision.net, Inc., an affiliated company and investor, was issued 1,480,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for its part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $74,000.

    On March 10, 2004 we issued to Ms. Barbara Asbell, an InstaCare shareholder, was issued 1,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of Note warrants at a strike price of $0.05, which were issued as for her part in the dispute settlement with M&E Equities, LLC. The value of the shares was $75,000.

    On March 16, 2004, we issued to Ms. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,553,500 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $62,140.

    On March 16, 2004, we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,553,500 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $62,140.

    On March 16, 2004, we issued to Leslie-Michelle Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,553,500 shares of $0.001 par value common stock pursuant to the exercising of merger warrants at a strike price of $0.04 per share. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $62,140.

    On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 750,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered, and a cash compensation of $7,000. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $30,000.

    On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. William Walling, an InstaCare shareholder, 120,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered, and a cash compensation of $7,000. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $4,800.

    On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Gerald Turner, an InstaCare shareholder, 40,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered to improve our Web Site. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $1,600.

    On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $20,000.


    On April 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Frank Manfredi, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $20,000.

    On April 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,200,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $48,000.

    On April 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Frank Manfredi, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,200,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $48,000.

    On April 13, 2004, we issued to Tri-City, Inc., a consulting company, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $40,000.

    On April 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Peter Dunne, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $40,000.

    On April 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 650,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for services rendered and a Note settlement. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $26,000.

    On April 13, 2004, we issued to CJR Capital, a consulting company, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock as a fee for the investment they helped arrange with Pinnacle Investment Partners, LC as payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $62,000.

    On April 13, 2004, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, an investment fund, 14,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at par value, $0.001, and then placed these shares in an escrow account as collateral for a loan. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $14,000.

    On April 20, 2004, we issued to Corporate Architects, Inc., a consulting company, 3,300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04, for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $132,000.

    On April 28, 2004, we issued to Mr. Peter Dunne, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $40,000.

    On April 28, 2004, we issued to Mr. Frank Manfredi, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $20,000.

    On April 28, 2004, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an InstaCare shareholder, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $40,000.

    On April 28, 2004, we issued to JC Financial, a consulting company, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion, at a strike price of $0.04 per share for payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $20,000.

    On April 28, 2004, we issued to Desert Southwest Capital, a consulting company, 5,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $200,000.

    On April 28, 2004, we issued to SSJ Enterprises, a consulting company, 250,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $10,000.


    On May 20, 2004, we issued to SSJ Enterprises, a consulting company, 200,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $8,000.

    On May 20, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 550,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at $0.04 per share for services rendered and payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $22,000.

    On May 28, 2004, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, an investment fund, 3,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at par value to be escrowed pursuant to our financial arrangement. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $3,000.

    On June 2, 2004, we issued to Mr. Sal Amato, an InstaCare shareholder, 775,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for $31,000 cash. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $31,000.

    On June 10, 2004, we issued to DCF Group, a consulting company, 3,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock resulting from a warrant conversion at a strike price of $0.04 per share for services rendered and payment in kind. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $120,000.

    On August 13, 2004 we issued to Ms. Barbara Asbell, an InstaCare shareholder, 9,850,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for her business development consulting services. Ms. Asbell was assigned to manage the flow of our expected merger activities. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $236,400.

    On August 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 10,150,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock for his business development consulting services. Mr. Quintiliana was assigned the task of managing our ResidenceWare products for introduction into high rise and high density apartment and townhome complexes. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $243,600.

    On August 25, 2004, we issued to Mr. Edward Meyer, Jr., an InstaCare shareholder, 250,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Meyer performed strategic and developmental consulting services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $8,500.

    On August 25, 2004, we issued to Mr. Douglas Stahl, an InstaCare shareholder, 150,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Stahl represented InstaCare's interests in the transaction that resulted in the M & E Note Settlement Agreement. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $5,100.

    On August 25, 2004, we issued to Mr. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 350,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Ms. Abraham performed strategic and developmental consulting services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $11,900.

    On September 13, 2004, we issued to Dr. Thomas Chillemi, an InstaCare shareholder, 700,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Dr. Chillemi spoke for our benefit, within his area of expertise, during our road show to help promote our products and services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $18,900.

    On September 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Dorsey Tague, an InstaCare shareholder, 400,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Tague spoke for our benefit, within his area of expertise, during our road show to help promote our products and services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $10,800.

    On September 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Mr. Knapp spoke for our benefit, within his area of expertise, during our road show to help promote our products and services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $13,500.


    On September 13, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 450,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock.. Mr. Quintiliana spoke for our benefit, within his area of expertise, during our road show to help promote our products and services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $12,150.

    On September 13, 2004, we issued to Aaron Corp., a consulting company, 800,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock. Aaron Corp. provided consulting service in relation to 3rd party software they developed on our behalf. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $21,600.

    On September 13, 2004, we issued to Daivesh Sanghvi, an InstaCare shareholder, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common in exchange for the retirement of a $50,000 Note. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $50,000.

    On October 12, 2004 we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 8,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Wolf performed strategic medical advisory consulting services relating to our then proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. Each of the shares is registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $160,000.

    On October 12, 2004 we issued to Ms. Leslie-Michelle Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 8,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. Ms. Abraham performed strategic medical advisory consulting services relating to our then proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. Each of the shares are registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $160,000.

    On October 12, 2004 we issued to Mr. Thais Abraham, an InstaCare shareholder, 8,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.02 per share. Ms. Abraham performed general developmental consulting services relating to our then proposed acquisition of CareGeneration, Inc. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $160,000.

    On November 2, 2004, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, a consulting company, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at par value, $0.001. The shares were to be held in escrow, pending our Note renewal, which has occurred pursuant to our financial arrangement. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $2,000.

    On November 2, 2004, we issued to CJR Capital, a consulting company, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the strike price of $0.018 per share. The shares were issued as part of Note renewal fees pursuant to our financial arrangement with Pinnacle Investment Partners. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $36,000.

    On November 3, 2004 we issued to Dr. Joseph A. Wolf, an InstaCare shareholder, 6,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Wolf performed medical license valuation reports and consultation in relation to the then proposed CareGeneration, Inc. merger. Each of the shares is registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $117,000.

    On November 3, 2004 we issued to Mr. Mordechai Mittledorf, an InstaCare shareholder, 95,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share pursuant to our 2004 Stock Option Plan. Mr. Mittledorf performed general corporate consulting. Each of the shares is registered and free-trading via Form S-8. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $1,710.

    On November 3, 2004, we issued to Mr. Edward Meyer, Jr. an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 per share. Mr. Meyer performed strategic and developmental consulting services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $9000.00.

    On November 3, 2004, we issued to Mr. Anthony Quintiliana, an InstaCare shareholder, 500,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 for his business development consulting services. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $9,000.


    On November 3, 2004, we issued to Mr. Robert Jagunich, an InstaCare shareholder and an affiliate, 300,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at a strike price of $0.018 for Board of Director expenses. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $5,400.

    On November 29, 2004, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, a consulting company, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the strike price of $0.019 per share. The shares were issued pursuant our financial arrangement as a Note renewal fee. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $38,000.

    On January 13, 2004, we issued to Lima Capital, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.

    On January 13, 2005, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partner, a consulting company, 1,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $19,000.

    On January 13, 2005, we issued to Timko, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value per share restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.

    On January 13, 2005, we issued to Sive, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.

    On January 13, 2005, we issued to Wells Group, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.

    On January 13, 2005, we issued to BMI, Inc., a consulting company, 1,250,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $23,750.

    On February 2, 2005, we issued to Mr. Steven Bayern, a shareholder, 2,500,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for consulting services relating prescription drug sourcing The value of the shares was $42,500.

    On February 2, 2005, we issued to Mr. Nathan Kaplan, a shareholder, 1,2500,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating to prescription drug distribution licensing. The value of the shares was $21,500.

    On February 2, 2005, we issued to Lima Capital, a consulting company, 5,040,000 shares of $0.001 par value

    restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $85,680.

    On February 2, 2005, we issued to Mr. Chris Knapp, a shareholder, 2,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value restricted common stock for services relating our merger consolidation. The value of the shares was $34,000.

    On March 14 2005, we issued to nominees of our consultant PunchBuggy, Inc., a consulting company, 10,000,000 restricted shares of $0.001 par value common stock. The shares were issued pursuant to services provided to facilitate the CareGeneration merger valued at $180,000 on the date of issuance. The expensed portion of the shares on the date of issuance was $151,950 owing to $28,050 in paid cash received from Punchbuggy, Inc. We relied on an exemption to registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. Upon the date of issuance, PunchBuggy, Inc. distributed said shares to its nominee's as follows:


     

    White Capital

    1,050,000

    Daniel Wojcik

    210,000

    James Kilgoar

    1,155,000

    Robert Huston

    210,000

    David Thelen

    210,000

    Alen Baumgartner

    233,333

    Susan Baumgartner

    233,333

    Casey Baumgartner

    39,697

    Jacob Baumgartner

    23,333

    Timko, Inc.

    800,000

    Sive, Inc.

    800,000

    Lima Capital, Inc.

    800,000

    DCF, Inc.

    660,000

    Joey Baumgartner

    11,667

    Joe and Malinda Baumgartner

    23,333

    Jay Lerner

    116,667

    James DeLuca

    1,170,000

    Wendy Block

    1,170,000

    Dorsey Tague

    1,065,000

    On March 14, 2005, we issued to the shareholders of the former CareGeneration, Inc., the merger target of our subsidiary Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc., 42,500,000 restricted shares of $0.001 par value common stock, pursuant to the terms of the Definitive Agreement and Plan of Merger. The shares were valued at our par value. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $42,500.

    On March 14, 2005, we issued 17,500,000 restricted shares of $0.001 par value common stock to several consulting parties. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $315,000. The shares were issued as compensation for services provided to facilitate the closing of our CareGeneration merger. All parties involved with this issuance were familiar with us and assisted with company consolidation issues. On the date of the issuance the cost of shares was $190,000 equal to the value of the services and owing to $125,000 cash received. We relied on an exemption to registration under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The shares were distributed as follows:

    BMI Consulting, Inc.

    1,750,000

    Corporate Financial Ventures LLC

    1,750,000

    Desert Southwest Capital, Inc.

    1,750,000

    LoMoney, Inc.

    1,250,000

    Mirabel, Inc.

    1,250,000

    Mirabel Consulting, Inc.

    1,500,000

    St. Andrews, Inc.

    1,750,000

    SIVE Capital, Inc.

    1,250,000

    Timco, Inc.

    1,750,000

    Wells & Company, Inc.

    1,750,000

    Wells Group, Inc.

    1,750,000

    On March 24, 2005, we issued to CJR Capital, a consulting company, 4,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the strike price of $0.0175 per share The shares were issued for due diligence services relating the cost of the Pinnacle Note extension. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $70,000.


    On March 24, 2005, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, a consulting company, 9,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at the strike price of $0.0175 per share The shares were issued pursuant our financial arrangement as a Note extension fee. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $157,500.

    On March 24, 2005, we issued to Pinnacle Investment Partners, a consulting company, 88,000,000 shares of $0.001 par value common stock at par value, $0.001, as addition escrow shares to be held as collateral for the Note. The value of the shares on the date of issuance was $88,000.


    Item 27. Exhibits

    The following documents are filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits to this report:

    Exhibit 3a Articles of Incorporation - Filed March 2, 2001
      (Rendered as Previously Filed and Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's General Form For Registration Of Securities Of Small Business Issuers on Form 10-SB, previously filed with the Commission.)
    Exhibit 3b Articles of Amendments to Articles of Incorporation - Filed May 9, 2001
      (Rendered as Previously Filed and Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's General Form For Registration Of Securities Of Small Business Issuers on Form 10-SB, previously filed with the Commission.)
    Exhibit 3c Articles of Amendments to Articles of Incorporation - Filed August 2, 2002
      (Rendered as Previously Filed and Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's June 30, 2002 Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB, previously filed with the Commission.)
    Exhibit 3d Bylaws of CareDecision Corporation (formerly ATR Search Corporation)
      (Rendered as Previously Filed and Incorporated by reference to the exhibits to the Company's General Form For Registration Of Securities Of Small Business Issuers on Form 10-SB, previously filed with the Commission.)
    Exhibit 5* Attorney Legal Opinion and Consent Letter
    Exhibit 10.1 CDED-Mercator Advisory Group LLC Subscription (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.2 CDED-Mercator Advisory Group LLC CoD Preferred Series C (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.3 CDED-Mercator Advisory Group LLC Reg Rts Agreement (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.4 Warrant Mercator Advisory Group, LLC $.02 (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.5 Warrant Mercator Momentum Fund, LP $.02 (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.6 Warrant Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. $.02 (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.7 Warrant Mercator Advisory Group, LLC $.03 (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.8 Warrant Mercator Momentum Fund, LP $.03 (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.9 Warrant Monarch Pointe Fund, Ltd. $.03 (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.10 CDED-Pinnacle Secured Note (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.11 CDED Pinnacle Pledge Agreement (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.12 CDED-Pinnacle Securities Purchase Agreement (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.13 CDED-Pinnacle 9_24_2004 Note Extension (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.14 CDED-Pinnacle 2_10_2005 Note Extension (as previously filed with the Commission)
    Exhibit 10.15* Lease Agreement
    Exhibit 23.1* Independent Auditor's Consent For the March 31, 2005 Review and December 31, 2004 Audit

                                               
    *Filed Herewith


    Item 28. Undertakings

    1. The Registrant will, during any period in which it offers or sells securities, file a post-effective amendment to this registration statement to:

    (i) Include any prospectus required by Section 10(a)(3) of the Securities Act;

    (ii) Reflect in the prospectus any facts or events which, individually or together, represent a fundamental change in the information in the registration statement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any increase or decrease in volume of securities offered (if the total dollar value of securities offered would not exceed that which was registered) and any deviation from the low or high end of the estimated maximum offering range may be reflected in the form of prospectus filed with the Commission pursuant to Rule 424(b) if, in the aggregate, the changes in volume and price represent no more than 20 percent change in the maximum aggregate offering price set forth in the "Calculation of Registration Fee" table in the effective registration statement; and

    (iii) Include any additional or changed material information on the plan of distribution.

    2. The Registrant will, for determining liability under the Securities Act, treat each post-effective amendment as a new registration statement of the securities offered, and the offering of the securities at that time to be the initial bona fide offering.

    3. The Registrant will file a post-effective amendment to remove from registration any of the securities that remain unsold at the end of the offering.

    4. The Registrant will provide to each purchaser, if any, at the closing certificates in such denominations and registered in such names to permit prompt delivery to each purchaser.

    5. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Act") may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the small business issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the small business issuer has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. 6. For purposes of determining any liability under the Act, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the Registrant under Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time the Commission declared it effective.

     

     

     

    [balance of this page intentionally left blank]


    SIGNATURES

    In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the following persons in the capacities and on the date indicated have signed this registration statement:

     

    Signature

     

    Title

    Date

    /s/ Keith Berman

    Keith Berman

     

    Principal Accounting Officer

     

    July 18, 2005

     

     

     

     

     

    End of Filing