UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT O 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2012
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________________ to ___________________
Commission file number: 333-127635
GRYPHON GOLD CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Nevada | 92-0185596 |
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
611 N Nevada Street | |
Carson City, Nevada | 89703 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (Zip Code) |
(888) 261-2229
(Registrants Telephone
Number, including Area Code)
__________________________________________________________________
(Former name,
former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to the filing requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
[X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filer [ ] | Accelerated filer [ ] |
Non-accelerated filer [ ] | Smaller reporting company [X] |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
Yes [ ] No [X]
Number of common shares outstanding at August 14, 2012: 194,103,382
i
GRYPHON GOLD CORPORATION
June 30, 2012
INDEX
ii
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Consolidated Balance
Sheets
(Stated in U.S. dollars)
As at | As at | |||||
June 30, | March 31, | |||||
2012 (unaudited) | 2012 | |||||
ASSETS | ||||||
Current Assets | ||||||
Cash | $ | 4,533,261 | $ | 602,343 | ||
Accounts receivable | 27,179 | 358,005 | ||||
Prepaid expenses | 275,103 | 171,515 | ||||
Inventories | 6,024,646 | 6,363,016 | ||||
Deferred debt issue costs | 491,802 | 312,549 | ||||
Total Current Assets | 11,351,991 | 7,807,428 | ||||
Property, plant & equipment, net | 20,003,682 | 19,565,395 | ||||
Reclamation bonds | 2,898,359 | 2,839,559 | ||||
Total Assets | $ | 34,254,032 | $ | 30,212,382 | ||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY | ||||||
Current Liabilities | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | $ | 3,863,407 | $ | 5,004,298 | ||
Current portion of the long term debt | 3,136,500 | 583,458 | ||||
Note payable | 1,084,258 | 1,376,479 | ||||
Total Current Liabilities | 8,084,165 | 6,964,235 | ||||
Asset retirement obligation | 1,703,504 | 1,675,877 | ||||
Warrant derivative liabilities | 759,081 | 137,291 | ||||
Long-term debt, net if discount | 12,759,482 | 10,198,611 | ||||
Total Liabilities | 23,306,232 | 18,976,014 | ||||
Commitments & contingencies [Note 10, 11 and 13] | ||||||
Stockholders' Equity | ||||||
Common stock | 194,103 | 194,103 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital | 54,205,021 | 54,114,438 | ||||
Accumulated deficit | (43,451,324 | ) | (43,072,173 | ) | ||
Total Stockholders' Equity | 10,947,800 | 11,236,368 | ||||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders Equity | $ | 34,254,032 | $ | 30,212,382 |
See Note 1 Nature of Operations and Going Concern Uncertainty
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Consolidated Statement
of Operations
(Unaudited) (Stated in U.S. dollars)
Three months ended | Three months ended | |||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
Sales of product | $ | 5,889,363 | $ | - | ||
Cost of sales and other direct production costs | 5,045,815 | - | ||||
Gross profit | 843,548 | - | ||||
Other operating expenses: | ||||||
Exploration | 25,218 | 90,896 | ||||
Salaries & consulting fees | 320,935 | 233,407 | ||||
General and administrative | 153,424 | 143,079 | ||||
Legal and audit | 212,176 | 74,147 | ||||
Travel and accommodation | 26,390 | 50,473 | ||||
Depreciation | 6,632 | 3,509 | ||||
Loss (gain) on disposal of equipment | (430 | ) | - | |||
Asset retirement obligation accretion | 27,627 | (3,046 | ) | |||
Total other operating expenses | 771,972 |
592,465 |
||||
Income (loss) from operations | 71,576 | (592,465 | ) | |||
Other (income) expense: | ||||||
Foreign exchange (gain) loss | (19,400 | ) | (28,749 | ) | ||
(Gain) loss on warrant derivative liability | (417,776 | ) | - | |||
Interest income | (1,498 | ) | (66 | ) | ||
Interest expense, net of capitalized interest | 889,401 | 19,811 | ||||
Total other (income) expense | 450,727 | (9,004 | ) | |||
Net loss | $ | (379,151 | ) | $ | (583,461 | ) |
Basic and diluted loss per share: | ||||||
Net loss | Nil | Nil | ||||
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding | 194,103,382 | 141,980,549 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Consolidated Statements
of Changes in Stockholders Equity
(Unaudited) (Stated in U.S. dollars, except share data)
Common Stock | Additional | ||||||||||||||
paid in | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | capital | deficit | Total | |||||||||||
Balance, March 31, 2011 | 96,983,632 | 96,984 | 41,665,952 | (37,950,801 | ) | 3,812,135 | |||||||||
Shares issued: | |||||||||||||||
For public offering | 89,060,000 | 89,060 | 10,979,302 | | 11,068,362 | ||||||||||
Exercise of option to reduce royalty | 7,726,250 | 7,726 | 1,073,949 | | 1,081,675 | ||||||||||
Share issue costs | | | (13,177 | ) | | (13,177 | ) | ||||||||
Public offering costs | | | (1,466,723 | ) | | (1,466,723 | ) | ||||||||
Exercise of options | 150,000 | 150 | 19,930 | | 20,080 | ||||||||||
Exercise of warrants | 183,500 | 183 | 45,691 | | 45,874 | ||||||||||
Fair value of options granted | | | 277,283 | | 277,283 | ||||||||||
Fair value of warrants issued | | | 1,532,231 | | 1,532,231 | ||||||||||
Net loss for the year | | | | (5,121,372 | ) | (5,121,372 | ) | ||||||||
Balance March 31, 2012 | 194,103,382 | $ | 194,103 | $ | 54,114,438 | $ | (43,072,173 | ) | $ | 11,236,368 | |||||
Fair value of options granted | - | - | 90,583 | - | 90,583 | ||||||||||
Net loss for the period | - | - | - | (379,151 | ) | (379,151 | ) | ||||||||
Balance June 30, 2012 | 194,103,382 | $ | 194,103 | $ | 54,205,021 | $ | (43,451,324 | ) | $ | 10,947,800 |
See Note 1 Nature of Operations and Going Concern Uncertainty
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Consolidated Statements
of Cash Flows
(Unaudited) (Stated in U.S. dollars)
Three months | Three months | |||||
ended | ended | |||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
Net loss for the period | $ | (379,151 | ) | $ | (583,461 | ) |
Items not involving cash: | ||||||
Interest expense paid with debt | 149,229 | |||||
Depreciation | 394,666 | 3,509 | ||||
Asset retirement obligation accretion | 27,627 | (3,046 | ) | |||
Gain on disposal of equipment | (430 | ) | - | |||
Share based compensation | 90,583 | 18,508 | ||||
Amortization of debt offering costs | 380,822 | |||||
Amortization of notes payable discount | 242,672 | |||||
Unrealized gain on foreign exchange | 5,572 | (33,513 | ) | |||
Impairment of inventory | 60,531 | - | ||||
Change in liability of options and warrants | (417,776 | ) | - | |||
Loss on modification of debt | - | - | ||||
Changes in non-cash working | - | |||||
capital items: | ||||||
Accounts receivable | 7,256 | (2,608 | ) | |||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | (3,131,858 | ) | 150,863 | |||
Inventories | 1,881,582 | - | ||||
Prepaid expenses | (103,588 | ) | 564 | |||
Cash used in operating activities | (792,263 | ) | (449,184 | ) | ||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
Reclamation bonds purchased | (58,800 | ) | (2,000,000 | ) | ||
Purchase of property, plant & equipment | (166,049 | ) | (896,535 | ) | ||
Interest capitalized on self-constructed assets | (35,799 | ) | - | |||
Proceeds from sale of equipment | 1,000 | - | ||||
Option payment to amend and reduce royalty | - | (175,000 | ) | |||
Proceeds from note receivable | - | 2,975 | ||||
Cash used in investing activities | (259,648 | ) | (3,068,560 | ) | ||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES | ||||||
Payments on notes payable | (321,619 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from senior credit facility | 5,395,095 | |||||
Shares and warrants issued for cash | - | 11,068,362 | ||||
Share issue costs | - | (13,177 | ) | |||
Public offering costs | - | (1,185,444 | ) | |||
Debt and share issue costs | (85,075 | ) | ||||
Cash provided by financing activities | 4,988,401 | 9,869,741 | ||||
Effect of foreign exchange on cash | (5,572 | ) | 33,513 | |||
Increase (decrease) in cash during the period | 3,930,918 | 6,385,510 | ||||
Cash, beginning of year | 602,343 | $ | 837,457 | |||
Cash, end of period | $ | 4,533,261 | $ | 7,222,967 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
See Note 1 Nature of Operations and Going Concern Uncertainty
6
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINTY
Gryphon Gold Corporation was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 2003 and wholly owns its subsidiary, Borealis Mining Company, (collectively, Gryphon Gold or the Company). The Company is a production company focused on the Borealis Oxide Heap Leach Project (the Borealis Project) and exploring mineral properties. Management intends to use the cash flow generated from the Borealis Project to fund operations but may need to raise additional capital through debt or equity to help fund operations and additional capital expenditures and expansion. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in raising additional capital. Further, even if the Company raises additional capital, there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve profitability or positive cash flow. If management is unable to raise additional capital and possible future revenues do not result in positive cash flow, the Company will not be able to meet its obligations and may have to suspend or cease operations. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $43,451,324 as at June 30, 2012 ($43,072,173 as at March 31, 2012) and has cash on hand of $4,533,261. In addition, at June 30, 2012 the Company had $16,980,240 in notes payable and long-term debt. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. Such assumption contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liability in the normal course of business. The recoverability of amounts shown for mineral property interests in the Companys consolidated balance sheets are dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to arrange appropriate financing to complete the development of its properties, the receipt of necessary permitting and upon achieving future profitable production or receiving proceeds from the disposition of the properties. The timing of such events occurring, if at all, is not yet determinable.
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The unaudited financial statements have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, as well as the instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Companys management, all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial statements have been included. Operating results for the three-month period ended June 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending March 31, 2013.
For further information refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012.
Loss per share
Loss per common share is determined based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted loss per share is calculated by the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the calculation of diluted earnings per share assumes that the proceeds to be received on the exercise of diluted stock options and warrants classified as equity instruments are applied to repurchase common shares at the average market price for the period.
In addition, outstanding convertible promissory notes are assumed to be converted into common stock at the then applicable rate. Stock options and warrants are dilutive when the Company has income from continuing operations and when the average market price of the common shares during the period exceeds the exercise price of the options and warrants. The convertible promissory notes are dilutive when the Company has income from continuing operations, and the impact from the dilution exceeds the impact from the reduction in interest expense resulting from the conversion of the notes.
7
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
Fair value measurements
Accounting principles require an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instruments categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.
Level 3: applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
The table below sets forth our financial instruments measured at fair value and the input hierarchy level that we have determined applies to each.
Balance June 30, | Balance March 31, | Input | |||||||
2012 | 2012 | Hierarchy level | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 4,533,261 | $ | 602,343 | Level 1 | ||||
Reclamation bond and deposits | $ | 2,898,359 | $ | 2,839,559 | Level 1 | ||||
Warrant liabilities | $ | 759,081 | $ | 137,291 | Level 2 |
Derivative financial instruments
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC 815 Derivatives and Hedging, which requires recognition of all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and measured at fair value. Accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives held is dependent on whether the derivative instrument is designated and qualifies as an accounting hedge and on the classification of the hedge transaction. All derivative financial instruments are recognized in the balance sheet at fair value. Changes in fair value are recognized in earnings if they are not eligible for hedge accounting or other comprehensive income if they qualify for cash flow hedge accounting. At June 30, 2012, the Company had warrant derivative liabilities of $759,081, which are valued on a recurring basis and related to warrants issued to a debt holder that are exercisable in a currency other than the Companys reporting currency.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred either physically or through an irrevocable written transfer notice authorizing the transfer of metals to the buyers account, and no related obligations remain and collectability is probable.
Sales of metals products are recorded net of charges from the buyer for treatment, refining, smelting losses, and other negotiated charges. Costs charged by smelters include a metals payable fee, fixed treatment, transaction fees and refining costs per ton of product. Estimated prices of gold or silver shipped in the form of doré will be settled as the settlement occurs after delivery.
8
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES, CONTINUED:
Inventories
Material on Heap Leach Inventory
The recovery of gold and silver from certain oxide ores is achieved through the heap leaching process. Under this method, mineralized material is placed on leach pads where it is treated with a chemical solution, which dissolves the gold or silver contained in the material. The resulting pregnant solution is further processed in a plant where gold and silver are recovered. For accounting purposes, costs are added to material on leach pads based on average mining and leaching costs, including applicable depreciation, depletion and amortization relating to operations. Costs are removed from ore on leach pads as ounces are recovered based on the average cost per recoverable ounce of gold or silver on the leach pad.
Estimates of recoverable gold or silver on the leach pads are calculated from the quantities of material placed on the leach pads (measured tons added to the leach pads), the grade of material placed on the leach pads (based on assay data) and an estimated recovery percentage (based on ore type). Although the quantities of recoverable gold or silver placed on the leach pads are reconciled by comparing the grades of material placed on pads to the quantities of gold or silver actually recovered (metallurgical balancing), the nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to precisely monitor inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing process is regularly monitored and estimates are refined based on actual results over time. As of June 30, 2012, the Company had a limited operating history and actual results only over that short period of time. Due to this, estimates of recoverable gold and silver are based primarily on initial tests and only limited refinements derived from metallurgical balancing.
Variations between actual and estimated quantities resulting from changes in assumptions and estimates that do not result in write-downs to net realizable value are accounted for on a prospective basis. The ultimate recovery of gold or silver from a leach pad will not be known until the leaching process is concluded. The quantification of material inventory on the leach pad is based on estimates of the quantities of gold or silver at each balance sheet date that the Company expects to recover during the next 12 months.
9
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3. ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
At June 30, 2012, other accounts receivable represents those amounts the Company is owed for its goods and services tax return and from its former Chief Executive Officer.
Specifically, accounts receivable are detailed as follows:
As at | ||||||
As at June 30, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |||||
Due from gold and silver sales | $ | - | $ | 323,570 | ||
Other receivables | 27,179 | 34,435 | ||||
TOTAL | $ | 27,179 | $ | 358,005 |
4. INVENTORIES
During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, we purchased gold and silver loaded on carbon from Waterton Global Value LP and processed it through our Adsorption Desorption and Refining (ADR) facility. The cost to buy the carbon consisted of a payable of $1,343,197 and a reversal of accounts receivable of $323,570 that Waterton Global Value LP owed the Company for a total cost of $1,666,767. During the three months ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded an impairment to inventory of $60,531, based upon the estimated market value of carbon purchased.
At June 30, 2012, inventories were as follows:
June 30, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |||||
Material on leach pad inventory | $ | 4,037,091 | $ | 4,245,418 | ||
Gold in carbon inventory | 1,262,582 | 1,462,485 | ||||
Doré in transit inventory | 640,626 | 578,537 | ||||
Supplies inventory | 84,347 | 76,576 | ||||
Total inventory costs | $ | 6,024,646 | $ | 6,363,016 |
10
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
5. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
During the quarter ended June 30, 2012, the Company purchased assets in connection with the further development of the Borealis Project and also brought into service the ADR.
June 30, 2012 | |||||||||
Accumulated | |||||||||
Cost | Depreciation | Net Book Value | |||||||
Mineral properties | $ | 7,823,272 | $ | 265,872 | $ | 7,557,400 | |||
Borealis asset retirement obligation | 1,533,158 | 53,140 | 1,480,018 | ||||||
Leach pad | 1,897,882 | 325,365 | 1,572,517 | ||||||
Plant | 5,822,237 | 235,746 | 5,586,491 | ||||||
ADR | 3,168,448 | 12,343 | 3,156,105 | ||||||
Equipment | 963,900 | 312,749 | 651,151 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment total costs | $ | 21,208,897 | $ | 1,205,215 | $ | 20,003,682 |
March 31, 2012 | |||||||||
Accumulated | |||||||||
Cost | Depreciation | Net Book Value | |||||||
Mineral properties | $ | 7,625,883 | $ | 193,038 | $ | 7,432,845 | |||
Borealis asset retirement obligation | 1,533,158 | 38,866 | 1,494,292 | ||||||
Leach pad 1A | 1,897,882 | 222,017 | 1,675,865 | ||||||
Plant | 5,713,537 | 144,839 | 5,568,698 | ||||||
Construction in progress, ADR | 2,910,023 | - | 2,910,023 | ||||||
Equipment | 769,314 | 285,642 | 483,672 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment total costs | $ | 20,449,797 | $ | 884,402 | $ | 19,565,395 |
Total depreciation, depletion and amortization for the quarter ended June 30, 2012, was $331,642.
During the three month period ended June 30, 2012, $35,799 of interest expense was capitalized to the Companys construction of its ADR.
6. RECLAMATION BONDS
At June 30, 2012 and March 31, 2012, reclamation bonds and deposits were as follows:
June 30, | March 31, | |||||
2012 | 2012 | |||||
Reclamation bonds & deposits | $ | 2,898,359 | $ | 2,839,559 | ||
Total | $ | 2,898,359 | $ | 2,839,559 |
On June 30, 2012 the Company had $2,878,941 (March 31, 2012 - $2,820,141) on deposit to support performance bonds with the United States Forest Service. The Company also has a deposit with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) for $19,418 (March 31, 2012 - $19,418), which partially supports its potential future obligations for reclamation during the Companys exploration activities within the BLM area. These bonds are required in connection with the construction and further development of the Borealis Project and to perform infill drilling.
7. NOTE PAYABLE
Promissory note
The promissory note bears interest at 5% per annum payable monthly. Principal installments are due the last day of the month following the month production commenced and inventory was shipped offsite. Production and shipments commenced in October 2011 and the first principal installment was due on November 30, 2011. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012 the Company paid $213,193 in principal payments. All unpaid principal and accrued interest, if any, is due and payable on May 21, 2013. The aggregate balance due on the note as of June 30, 2012 is $1,084,258.
11
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
8. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
At June 30, 2012, and March 31, 2012, our asset retirement obligation was as follows:
Three months | Year ended | |||||
ended | March 31, 2012 | |||||
June 30, 2012 | ||||||
Asset retirement obligation, beginning of period | $ | 1,675,877 | $ | 51,300 | ||
Incurred | - | - | ||||
Accretion | 27,627 | 139,673 | ||||
Additions and changes in estimates | - | 1,484,904 | ||||
Asset retirement obligation, end of period | $ | 1,703,504 | $ | 1,675,877 |
The asset retirement obligation at June 30, 2012 was calculated based on estimated costs the Company expects to incur in order to reclaim certain disturbed acreage relating to exploration on the Borealis property. The asset retirement obligation at June 30, 2012 includes the Companys estimate of reclamation costs for Phase 1A of the Borealis Heap Leach Project and in fill drilling.
9. OPTION TO REDUCE ROYALTY
In August 2008, Gryphon and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Borealis Mining Company, entered into an option agreement with the lessors of the Borealis property to amend the mining lease for the Borealis Property to fix the previously gold price-based sliding scale royalty to a fixed 5% Net Smelter Royalty. Effective May 20, 2011, the Company exercised the option to fix the Net Smelter Return (NSR) royalty on its Borealis property at 5%.
Under the terms of the option agreement, as amended, Gryphon exercised the option by paying the lessors aggregate consideration of $7,000,000 (less the $250,000 previously paid by Gryphon to the lessors upon execution of the option agreement) as follows:
(a) |
$150,000 in cash; | |
(b) |
7,726,500 shares of common stock; | |
(c) |
5% promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,600,000, due May 20, 2013, with installment payments due upon commencement of production on the Borealis property; and | |
(d) |
5% convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,909,500, due May 20, 2014, convertible into shares of Gryphon common stock at $0.70 per share through May 20, 2012, $0.80 per share through May 20, 2013 and $0.90 per share through May 20, 2014. |
Accordingly, at June 30, 2012 and at March 31, 2012, the Companys mineral properties include the following payments made to the Borealis Property lessors:
Three months | Year | |||||
ended | ended | |||||
June 30, 2012 | March 31, 2012 | |||||
Balance, beginning of period | $ | 5,527,078 | $ | 760,903 | ||
Cash paid | - | 175,000 | ||||
Promissory notes payable | - | 1,600,000 | ||||
Convertible notes payable | - | 1,909,500 | ||||
Common stock issued | - | 1,081,675 | ||||
Balance, end of period | 5,527,078 | $ | 5,527,078 |
On January 31, 2012, the Company was served with a complaint alleging breach of contract that was filed in the First Judicial District Court for the State of Nevada in Carson City by Borealis royalty holders, which include the Cavell Trust, Hardrock Mining Company and John W. Whitney. The royalty holders allege that monthly advance royalties which have been paid by Gryphon Gold are not recoverable from ongoing production royalties and are payable during the duration of the mining lease. Gryphon Gold has deducted previously paid advance royalties from production royalties payable under the Borealis mining lease agreement. At June 30, 2012, the Company had deducted $389,673 of previously paid advance royalties and has deposited the amount into a trust account. The trust account is not included on the Companys balance sheet.
12
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
10. LONG TERM DEBT
Waterton bridge loan
On March 20, 2012, we entered into a Bridge Loan facility with Waterton Global LLC for $1,500,000. The loan was to be paid within 60 days or be subject to immediate repayment from the $15,000,000 Senior Credit Facility. Security for the loan was a perfected lien and a first priority security interest in all tangible and intangible properties and assets of Gryphon Gold. The loan accrued interest at a 15% rate and included a $30,000 structuring fee, $100,000 for legal and other expenses, as well as payment of 1,500,000 Series R Warrants, each entitling the lender to purchase one common share of Gryphon Gold stock at a strike price of $0.18 per share. The Series R Warrants were issued outside of our reporting currency therefore creating a liability. The fair value of the warrants on the date of the issue was $137,291, which was calculated based on the Black-Scholes model with a risk free interest rate of 0.62%, volatility of 88.06%, 1,095 days expected term, exercise price of $0.18 and a market price of $0.17. The warrants expire on March 20, 2015.
We repaid these debentures on April 20, 2012, with the Senior Credit Facility (see below).
Convertible notes
The convertible notes (see Note 9) bear interest at 5% per annum payable monthly. Monthly payments on the notes are due the first of each month commencing June 1, 2012. All unpaid principal and accrued interest, if any, is due and payable on May 21, 2014. During the quarter ended June 30, 2012 the Company paid $106,083 in principal. The aggregate balance due on the notes as of March 31, 2012 is $1,803,417, which can be converted at a price of $0.80 until May 19, 2013 and $0.90 from May 20, 2013 to May 20, 2014.
Waterton Global Value LP Senior Credit Facility
On April 18, 2012, the Company and its subsidiaries (Company) entered into a Senior Secured Gold Stream Non-Revolving Credit Facility (Credit Facility) with Waterton Global Value, LP (Lender). The Credit Facility provides for a $15 million non-revolving working capital facility. $15 million was advanced to the Company on April 19, 2012.
As part of the transaction, the Company has also entered into a gold and silver sale agreement (Gold and Silver Supply Agreement) with Lender, see Note 11.
Proceeds from the Credit Facility were used to retire the Companys $1.5 million Bridge Loan with Lender entered into March 20, 2012; in addition to our C$3 million, 10% subordinated secured notes due July 28, 2012, and C$4.5 million, 10% subordinated secured notes due November 22, 2012, with residual to be used to develop the Borealis property.
On April 18, 2012, we entered into a Senior Secured Gold Stream non-revolving credit facility (the Senior Facility), with Waterton Global Value, LP, by its Investment Manager, Altitude Management Ltd. in the aggregate amount of $15,000,000. The full $15,000,000 was advanced to us on April 19, 2012, and we used the proceeds to pay off the Bridge Loan of $1,500,000 entered into with Waterton in March 20, 2012, as well as our C$3,000,000 10% subordinated secured notes, due in July of 2013, and our C$4,500,000 10% subordinated secured notes, due November 27, 2013. The Senior Facility loan bears interest at 5% per annum and is repayable in 12 equal monthly installments commencing in May 2013. The amount of individual monthly repayments will be based on a formula using 80% of the gold spot price as the value of the gold (or cash equivalent) to be delivered to Waterton. On each repayment date, we may pay the amount in gold to Watertons gold account, or, if requested by Waterton, pay the amount in cash. The loan is secured by a first priority lien on the assets of Gryphon Gold and BMC.
We paid Waterton a non-refundable structuring fee equal to 1% of the principal amount and issued Waterton 14,062,500 Series T Warrants, exercisable to acquire shares of common stock at a price of C$0.16 per share until April 18, 2015.
The fair value of the warrants issued to note holders and brokers pursuant to the Senior Facility was $1,039,566, which was calculated using Black-Scholes model with a risk free interest rate of 0.40%, volatility of 87.35%, 1,095 days expected term and an exercise and market price of C$0.16 per share. This relative fair value resulted in a discount to the notes payable and will be amortized over the 24-month term of the notes and as at June 30, 2012, $105,380 had been amortized and charged to interest expense.
The debt offering costs in connection with the Senior Facility totaled $585,091 and at June 30, 2012, $55,466 was amortized and charged to interest expense and $37,921 charged to expense related to the warrant derivative.
13
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
10. LONG TERM DEBT, CONTINUED:
The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with various financial and non-financial covenants. The financial covenants include unaudited quarterly financial statements, annual audited financial statements, proxy statements, and any material reports. Within 10 days after the end of each calendar month, the Company shall submit to Lender a written report concerning its business and activities. Pursuant to a series of guarantees, security agreements, deed of trust, and a stock pledge agreement, the senior obligations are secured by a first priority lien on the stock of the Company and the Companys assets.
As part of the Senior Facility, we entered into a Gold and Silver Supply Agreement (see Note 11) with Waterton whereby Waterton has the right to purchase all of the gold and silver produced by BMC at the Borealis property. The Gold and Silver Supply agreement is effective from the closing date of the Senior Facility until the Borealis Property ceases operations.
As of June 30, 2012, $12.5 million was classified as long-term debt and $2.5 million as current.
11. GOLD AND SILVER SUPPLY AGREEMENT
On April 18, 2012, in connection with the Credit Facility, the Company entered into a gold and silver supply agreement (Supply Agreement) to sell refined gold and silver to Waterton Global Value, LP until operations on the Borealis property cease. The sales price for refined gold and silver is based upon the market price for each respective metal.
12. CAPITAL STOCK
[a] |
Authorized capital stock consists of 250,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share and 15,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share. |
[b] |
Warrants: |
The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding and exercisable as at June 30, 2012: |
Warrants Outstanding and Exercisable | |||
Warrants | Avg Remaining | Exercise Price | Expiry Date |
Life in Years | |||
3,250,000 | 0.6 | $0.30 | January 21, 2013 |
4,725,000 | 0.6 | $0.20 | January 27, 2013 |
3,359,250 | 0.9 | $0.40 | May 22, 2013 |
2,226,500 | 1.4 | $0.30 | November 13, 2013 |
1,500,000 | 2.7 | C$0.186 | March 19, 2015 |
14,955,308 | 1.3 | $0.164 | October 20, 2013 |
14,062,500 | 2.8 | C$0.16 | April 19, 2015 |
44,078,558 | 1.5 | $0.20* |
* Based on the June 30, 2012 exchange rate of Cdn$0.9822 equals US$1.
[c] Stock Options:
2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan
The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense over the requisite service period of the individual grants, which generally equals the vesting period. The Companys total employees are relatively few in number and turnover is considered minimal, therefore the Company currently estimates forfeitures to be 20%. Estimate of forfeitures is reviewed on a quarterly basis. Stock-based compensation is expensed on a straight-line basis.
14
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
12. CAPITAL STOCK, CONTINUED:
On September 8, 2011, at the annual general meeting of the shareholders, the shareholders approved an increase in the number of shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the grant of stock options under the Omnibus Incentive Plan. After the shareholders approved the increase, the 2006 Omnibus Incentive Plan authorizes us to grant 12,000,000 options of common stock and 1,000,000 restricted stock units.
The Company recorded total stock-based compensation expense related to stock options and restricted stock units as follows:
Three months | Three months | |||||
ended June 30, | ended June 30, | |||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||
Management, Board of Directors, and employees expense | $ | 85,144 | $ | 11,187 | ||
Consulting expense | 5,439 | 7,321 | ||||
Total | $ | 90,583 | $ | 18,508 |
Stock option activity
The following table summarizes the Companys stock option activity (excluding options issued to a consultant, above) for quarter ended June 30, 2012:
Number of Stock | Weighted Average | |||||
Options | Exercise Price | |||||
Outstanding, April 1, 2012 | 6,242,500 | $ | 0.30* | |||
Granted | 250,000 | $ | 0.14 | |||
Exercised | - | - | ||||
Forfeited | (820,000 | ) | $ | 0.67* | ||
Total outstanding at June 30, 2012 | 5,672,500 | |||||
Vested and exercisable at June 30, 2012 | 5,242,500 | 0.24* |
* Based on the March 31, 2012 exchange rate of Cdn$0.9822 equals US$1.
The weighted-average grant-date fair value of the options granted in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was $0.14.
The intrinsic value of exercisable stock options at June 30, 2012 was $40,693 and the weighted average term of the remaining exercisable options is 2.6 years.
The 250,000 options granted in the quarter ended were granted to an executive of the Company and will vest over the course of this fiscal year.
Valuation assumptions
Compensation and consulting expense recorded in the consolidated financial statements has been estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The weighted average assumptions used in the pricing model include:
3 Months | 3 Months | ||
ended | ended | ||
June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||
Dividend yield | 0% | 0% | |
Expected volatility | 87.35% | 11.26% | |
Risk free interest rate | 0.42% | 0.78% | |
Expected lives | 3 years | 3 years |
15
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
12. |
CAPITAL STOCK, CONTINUED: | |
The risk-free interest rate was determined based on the rate at the time of grant for US government zero-coupon bonds for a 2-3-year term, which is a term equal to the estimated life of the option. Dividend yield was based on the stock options exercise price and expected annual dividend rate at the time of grant. Volatility was derived by measuring the average share price fluctuation of the Companys stock. The period of historical volatility is the same period as the expected life of the options being three years. | ||
[d] |
Restricted stock units (RSUs): | |
The RSU grants entitle the recipient to receive shares of common stock of the Company upon vesting. The RSU grants can vest immediately or over a period for up to five years. | ||
The following table summarizes information about RSUs outstanding as at June 30, 2012: |
RSUs | RSUs | RSUs | RSUs | Weighted | |||||||||||
Granted | Vested | Forfeited | Cancelled | Average | |||||||||||
and Cash in | Fair Value | ||||||||||||||
lieu of | at Grant | ||||||||||||||
issued | Date | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding at April 1, 2006 | | | | | |||||||||||
Issued April 18, 2006 | 8,000 | 8,000 | | Cdn$1.63 | |||||||||||
Issued December 12, 2006 | 29,000 | 15,000 | 14,000 | Cdn$0.84 | |||||||||||
Issued January 10, 2007 | 650,000 | 488,750 | 118,750 | 42,500 | Cdn$0.82 | ||||||||||
Issued September 6, 2007 | 154,170 | 154,170 | | Cdn$0.77 | |||||||||||
Issued September 20, 2010 | 275,000 | 275,000 | | $ | 0.16 | ||||||||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2012 | 1,116,170 | 940,920 | 132,750 | 42,500 | |
All issued restricted stock units have vested.
13. COMMITMENTS & CONTINGENCIES
[a] A portion of the Borealis Property is subject to a mining lease. The Company was required to make advanced royalty payments monthly of $10,205, adjusted annually based on the Consumer Price Index. In addition, production of precious metals from the Borealis Property are subject to the payment of a royalty under the terms of the mining lease. The Company deducts advance royalty payments from production royalties due under the mining lease, pursuant to the mining lease. The Companys royalty holders have disputed this practice (see Note 9]. The Company is currently preparing a response to their complaint.
[b] The Company rents office space in Vancouver, BC for a 5-year term, commencing September 2008 (which has been sub-lease, refer to Contractual obligations), office space in Hawthorne, Nevada for a one year term, and office space in Carson City, Nevada for a three year term. The following are the remaining rental lease commitments in relation to the office leases:
June 30, | ||||
FY2013 | $ | 89,775 | ||
FY2014 | 67,518 | |||
FY2015 | 9,619 | |||
Total | $ | 116,912 |
16
Gryphon Gold Corporation
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On July 26, 2012, our Chief Financial Officer resigned. Chief Executive Officer, James T. ONeil Jr. has resumed the role of Interim Chief Financial Officer.
15. SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
|
June 30, 2012 | June 30, 2011 | ||||
Capitalized construction in progress purchased with accounts payable |
$ | 568,652 | $ | 771,131 | ||
Accounts receivable paid through purchase of carbon |
323,570 | - | ||||
Issuance of derivative warrants |
1,039,566 | - | ||||
Carbon inventory purchased with accounts payable |
1,343,197 | - | ||||
Bridge loan paid with senior credit facility debt |
1,500,000 | |||||
Subordinated secured notes paid with senior credit facility |
7,480,675 | |||||
Issuance of 7,726,500 shares at a fair value of $0.14 per share related to exercise of the option to fix the royalty at 5% |
1,081,675 | |||||
Promissory and convertible notes issued related to exercise of the option to fix the royalty at 5% |
3,509,500 |
17
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Forward-Looking Statements
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q and the exhibits attached hereto contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements concern the Companys anticipated results and developments in the Companys operations in future periods, planned exploration and development of its properties, plans related to its business and other matters that may occur in the future. These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management. Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as expects or does not expect, is expected, anticipates or does not anticipate, plans, estimates or intends, or stating that certain actions, events or results may, could, would, might or will be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements.
With respect to forward-looking statements and information contained in this annual report, we have made assumptions regarding, among other things:
the future price of gold;
estimates related to future costs of production, additional mining operations, capital requirements, operating and exploration expenditures;
continued government regulation of mining operations in accordance with past regulatory practices;
our ability to increase production at the Borealis Property to expand production within expected time frames; and
our ability to raise any additional capital required to fund our exploration, capital expenditures, and development and working capital requirements.
Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events or results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation:
the timing and possible outcome of regulatory and permitting matters and exploration and development activities;
risks related to production including, mine safety, labor and equipment costs;
the parameters and design of any additional mining facilities on the Borealis Property;
future financial or operating performances of Gryphon Gold, its subsidiaries and its projects;
the estimation of mineralization and production based on mineralization estimates;
the timing and cost of exploration, development and production activities including capital, operating and exploration expenditures;
the effect of our Senior Gold Stream Facility obligations on our cash flow and our results of operations;
the limitations on our authorized share capital and our ability to issue additional shares of common stock without an amendment to our articles of incorporation;
requirements for additional capital and our ability to raise additional capital;
government regulation of mining operations, environmental risks, reclamation and rehabilitation expenses;
title disputes or claims and disputes related to royalty payments;
limitations of insurance coverage;
the future price of gold, silver, or other minerals; and
any royalties imposed by the State of Nevada.
18
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the sections titled Risk Factors and Uncertainties, Description of the Business and Managements Discussion and Analysis of our annual report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on June 28, 2012. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as required by law.
We qualify all the forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report by the foregoing cautionary statement.
Cautionary Note Regarding Managements Discussion and Analysis
This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying interim consolidated financial statements and related notes. The discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based upon the interim consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of any contingent liabilities at the financial statement date and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, the Company reviews its estimates and assumptions. The estimates were based on historical experience and other assumptions that the Company believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results are likely to differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions, but the Company does not believe such differences will materially affect our financial position or results of operations. Critical accounting policies, the policies the Company believes are most important to the presentation of its financial statements and require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgments, are outlined below in Critical Accounting Policies, and have not changed significantly.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Regarding Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates
Certain of the technical reports, the preliminary assessment and the pre-feasibility study referenced in this annual report use the terms "mineral resource," "measured mineral resource," "indicated mineral resource" and "inferred mineral resource". We advise investors that these terms are defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101; however, these terms are not defined terms under the SECs Industry Guide 7 (Guide 7) and are normally not permitted to be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. As a reporting issuer in Canada with our primary trading market in Canada, we are required to prepare reports on our mineral properties in accordance with NI 43-101. We reference those reports in this annual report for informational purposes only and such reports are not incorporated herein by reference. Investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of mineral deposits in the above categories will ever be converted into Guide 7 compliant reserves. "Inferred mineral resources" have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of "contained pounds" in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not constitute "reserves" by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without reference to unit measures.
Overview
Business Objectives
Gryphon Gold is an exploration, development and production company focused on precious metals and is currently producing at its Borealis property, located in Nevadas Walker Lane Gold Belt. The plan for the Borealis property is to advance production of the oxide heap leachable gold and silver and to further expand and develop the significant sulphide resource through exploration, metallurgical design and sulphide project permitting and development. The Borealis property is unpatented mining claims of approximately 20 acres each, totalling about 15,020 acres, which has successful past production.
The plan for the Borealis Property is based on the Plan of Operations that has been approved by the U.S. Forest Service. The Plan of Operations does not present an economic analysis, and we have not placed any information in the Plan of Operations regarding capital expenditures, operating costs, ore grade, anticipated revenues, or projected cash flows. The Plan of Operations was based on the general economic concepts as presented in the Pre-Feasibility Study.
Phase 1A of the Borealis Project was completed in the first quarter of fiscal year 2013, which brought the ADR to completion.
19
Phase 1B is will include a leach pad expansion and mobilization of a larger crusher unit. In order to expand production mining activities we will have to commence mining in the Borealis Pit. Main activities necessary to expand the Borealis Projects production include:
Development of roads, power and other infrastructure;
Pre-stripping and development of the remaining oxide reserves; and
Efficient mining and processing of approximately 3-5 million tons per year
Phase 1B commenced construction in July 2012.
The initial mine plan is estimated at 3 years with an additional 3 years if drilling confirms our current oxide resource predictions. In year seven, reclamation will begin with heap wash down. Expansion of the mine life past the initial 6-year estimate is dependant on the expansion of current mineralization or the discovery of additional mineralization through further exploration drilling on the property.
Borealis Property
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we completed Phase 1A of the Borealis Project by completing construction of the ADR and continued to pour doré throughout the quarter.
The Company has begun construction of Phase 1B early in the second quarter of this fiscal year.
For a complete history of our Borealis Property, please see our 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 filed with the SEC.
Recent Financing Transactions
Waterton Global Value LP Senior Credit Facility
On April 18, 2012, we entered into a Senior Secured Gold Stream non-revolving credit facility (the Senior Facility), with Waterton Global Value, LP, by its Investment Manager, Altitude Management Ltd. in the aggregate amount of $15,000,000. The full $15,000,000 was advanced to us on April 19, 2012, and we used the proceeds to pay off the Bridge Loan of $1,500,000 entered into with Waterton in March 20, 2012, as well as our C$3,000,000 10% subordinated secured notes, due in July of 2013, and our C$4,500,000 10% subordinated secured notes, due November 27, 2013. The Senior Facility loan bears interest at 5% per annum and is repayable in 12 equal monthly installments commencing in May 2013. The amount of individual monthly repayments will be based on a formula using 80% of the gold spot price as the value of the gold (or cash equivalent) to be delivered to Waterton. On each repayment date, we may pay the amount in gold to Watertons gold account, or, if requested by Waterton, pay the amount in cash. The loan is secured by a first priority lien on the assets of Gryphon Gold and BMC.
We paid Waterton a non-refundable structuring fee equal to 1% of the principal amount and issued Waterton 14,062,500 Series T Warrants, exercisable to acquire shares of common stock at a price of C$0.16 per share until April 18, 2015.
The fair value of the warrants issued to note holders and brokers pursuant to the Senior Facility was $1,039,566, which was calculated using Black-Scholes model with a risk free interest rate of 0.40%, volatility of 87.35%, 1,095 days expected term and an exercise and market price of C$0.16 per share. This relative fair value resulted in a discount to the notes payable and will be amortized over the 24-month term of the notes and as at June 30, 2012, $105,380 had been amortized and charged to interest expense.
The debt offering costs in connection with the Senior Facility totaled $585,091 and at June 30, 2012, $55,466 was amortized and charged to interest expense and $37,921 charged to expense related to the warrant derivative.
The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with various financial and non-financial covenants. The financial covenants include unaudited quarterly financial statements, annual audited financial statements, proxy statements, and any material reports. Within 10 days after the end of each calendar month, the Company shall submit to Lender a written report concerning its business and activities. Pursuant to a series of guarantees, security agreements, deed of trust, and a stock pledge agreement, the senior obligations are secured by a first priority lien on the stock of the Company and the Companys assets.
As part of the Senior Facility, we entered into a Gold and Silver Supply Agreement (see Note 11) with Waterton whereby Waterton has the right to purchase all of the gold and silver produced by BMC at the Borealis property. The Gold and Silver Supply agreement is effective from the closing date of the Senior Facility until the Borealis Property ceases operations.
20
Fiscal 2013 Plan of Operations
Our long-term plan is to focus on further development of the Borealis Project, expansion of resources on the Borealis Property through exploration drill programs, and location of additional resources for the Company.
We intend to continue to take all steps necessary to preserve our rights to the Borealis Property under the existing terms of the property lease. We also expect to work with the United States Forest Service with the objectives of maintaining our permits under the Plan of Operations and to completed these goals, we intend to:.
Complete full construction of the Borealis Oxide Heap Leach Project;
Execute a drill program to expand the oxide resource within the permitted footprint of the Borealis Property; and
Execute a drill program on the three anomalies defined in the pediments of the Borealis Property for the purpose of potentially discovering additional oxide and sulphide resources.
Results of Operations
Three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to three months ended June 30, 2011
For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred a net loss of $379,151 or $0.00 from operations compared to a net loss of $583,461 or $0.00 from operations in the same period in the prior year.
Revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 was $5,889,363 with a cost of sales of $5,045,815, compared to no revenue in the prior years quarter ended June 30, 2011. The Company began sales of loaded carbon in its third quarter of fiscal year 2012, and began sales of doré in the quarter ended June 30, 2012.
Exploration expenses during the quarter ended June 30, 2012 were $25,218, compared to $90,896 in the prior year. The decrease in exploration expenses was due to Company resources being directed toward production.
Management salaries and consulting fees in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 were $320,935 compared to $233,407 compared incurred in the quarter ended June 30, 2011. Total non-cash compensation expense to the recognition of costs related to stock options was $90,583 compared to $18,508 in the quarter ended June 30, 2011. General and administrative costs increased by $13,391 over the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. Legal and audit fees for the period were $212,176 compared to $74,147. These costs increased due to the level of legal filings surrounding the Senior Credit facility and the litigation with the royalty holders.
Interest expense was $889,401 in the quarter ended June 30, 2012 compared to $19,811 in the same period in the prior year. This increase is due to the interest incurred on the promissory and convertible notes issued to reduce the potential future obligations under the royalty, the July and November notes payable, the Bridge Loan and non-cash interest expense related to the debt offering and notes payable discounts that were fully amortized in the quarter.
The company recognized a gain of $417,776 in this years first quarter for the change in the liability of warrants issued in Canadian currency.
Going Concern
The audit opinion for the Companys financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 includes a going concern qualification. Management intends to use the profit from the Borealis Project to fund operations but may need to raise additional capital to help fund the operation and further capital expenditures and expansion. No assurance can be given that the Company will be successful in raising additional capital on favourable terms or at all. Further, even if the Company raises additional capital, there can be no assurance that the Company will achieve profitability or positive cash flow. If the Company is unable to raise additional capital and possible future revenues do not result in positive cash flow, the Company will not be able to meet its obligations and may have to suspend or cease operations. The Company has an accumulated deficit of $43,451,324 as at June 30, 2012 ($43,072,173 as at March 31, 2012) and has cash on hand of $4,533,261. In addition, at June 30, 2012 the Company had $16,980,240 in notes payable and long-term debt. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern. Such assumption contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liability in the normal course of business. The recoverability of amounts shown for mineral property interests in the Companys consolidated balance sheets are dependent upon the existence of economically recoverable reserves, the ability of the Company to arrange appropriate financing to complete the development of its properties, the receipt of necessary permitting and upon achieving future profitable production or receiving proceeds from the disposition of the properties. The timing of such events occurring, if at all, is not yet determinable.
21
Royalty Obligations
On May 25, 2011, we exercised our option to fix the NSR at 5%. Under the terms of the option agreement, as amended, we exercised the option by paying the Lessors aggregate consideration of $7,000,000 (less the $250,000 previously paid by Gryphon to the Lessors upon execution of the Option Agreement) as follows:
(i) $150,000 in cash,
(ii) 7,726,500 shares of common stock at a deemed value of $0.40 per share ($3,090,500);
(iii) 5% promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,600,000, due May 20, 2013, with installment payments due upon commencement of production on the Borealis Property; and
(iv) 5% convertible notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,909,500, due May 20, 2014, convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.70 per share through May 20, 2012, $0.80 per share through May 20, 2013 and $0.90 per share through May 20, 2014.
Financial Condition and Liquidity
At June 30, 2012, we had working capital of $3,267,826. Current assets consisted of $4,533,261 in cash, $27,179 in accounts receivable, $275,103 in prepaid expenses, $6,024,646 in inventories, and $491,802 in debt issue costs. We had $3,863,407 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $3,136,500 in the current portion of the long-term debt, and $1,084,258 in note payable.
During the three months ended June 30, 2012, we used cash in operating activities of $792,263, which included our net loss during the quarter of $379,151, off-set by interest paid with debt of $149,229, depreciation of $394,666, non-cash compensation of $90,583, a gain in ARO accretion of $27,627, amortization of debt costs and note payable discount of $623,494, impairment of inventory of $60,531, change in liability in warrants of $417,776, gain on disposal of equipment of $430, $5,572 of unrealized foreign exchange, and changes in non-cash working capital of $1,346,608.
We used cash from investing activities of $259,648, including $58,800 to increase the reclamation bond, $166,049 in capital expenditures, $35,799 in interest on self-constructed assets, and $1,000 proceeds from the sale of equipment.
We received cash from financing activities of $4,988,401, including $5,395,095 from the Senior Credit Facility. We used cash of $85,075 in debt issue costs, and $321,619 in payments on notes payable for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. Cash increased during the period by $3,930,918 to $4,533,261 as at June 30, 2012.
Updated share capital as at August 14, 2012:
Basic Common Stock Issued and Outstanding | 194,103,382 | ||
Warrants, Options and other Convertible Securities | 52,880,368 | ||
Fully Diluted Common Stock | 246,983,750 |
If all of the convertible securities issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2012 are fully exercised or converted, we would issue an additional 52,880,368 shares of common stock, and our issued and outstanding share capital would increase to 246,983,750 shares.
Our authorized capital consists of 250,000,000 shares of common stock and 15,000,000 shares of preferred stock. If the 52,880,368 warrants, options and other convertible securities were converted or exercised as of June 30, 2012, this would leave us with 3,016,250 shares to issue in the future, which may adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity.
Subsequent Events
On July 26, 2012, our Chief Financial Officer resigned for personal reasons. Chief Executive Officer, James T. ONeil Jr. will resume the role of Interim Chief Financial Officer.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Please
see the notes to our audited financial statements included in our 10-K for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2012 for a complete list of our critical accounting
policies and estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Please see the notes
to our unaudited financial statements for a complete list of recent accounting
pronouncements.
Reclassification
Certain comparative figures have
been reclassified to conform to the current quarter presentation.
22
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk
Not Applicable.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
At the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of, and with the participation of, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer/Interim Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a 15(e) and Rule 15d 15(e) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer/Interim Chief Financial Officer has concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were adequately designed and effective in ensuring that (i) information required to be disclosed by us in our reports that we file or submit to the SEC under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer/ Interim Chief Financial Officer, to allow for accurate required disclosure to be made on a timely basis.
Subsequent to the quarter ended June 30, 2012, Mr. Robert L. Chapman, Chief Financial Officer resigned. The Companys Chief Executive Officer, Mr. James T. ONeil Jr. has resumed the role of Interim Chief Financial Officer. Mr. ONeil currently is performing duties for both principal roles.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the fourth quarter of the fiscal year 2012, managed concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting contained two material weaknesses. Throughout the first quarter of fiscal year 2013 we remedied these weaknesses by adding additional people to the staff, began segregation of duties amongst the accounting and administration staff, and are implementing a committee to review and research complex accounting issues prior to beginning of quarterly reviews.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
The Company has not been involved in any new legal proceedings during the three-month period ended June 30, 2012. For more information on past legal proceedings, please see our 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2012, filed with the SEC on June 28, 2012.
Item 1A. Risk Factors and Uncertainties
Other than as provided below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2012 which was filed with Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2012.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
During the three-month period ended June 30, 2012, all transactions in which we offered and sold unregistered securities pursuant to exemptions under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended were reported on current reports on Form 8-K.
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities.
None.
23
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Mining operations and properties in the United States are subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the Mine Act). Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the Dodd-Frank Act), issuers are required to disclose specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities. During our fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2012, a worker was injured at the Borealis Project worksite. The Company took immediate actions to mitigate risks of future actions and terminated three employees, who failed to comply with mine safety regulations at Borealis. On November 2, 2011, MSHA inspected our Borealis operation following the accident and issued the Company three Section 104(a) citations and three Section 104(d) citations. Section 104(a) citations, include citations for health or safety standards that could significantly and substantially contribute to a serious injury if left unabated, and Section 104(d) citations, include citations for unwarrantable failure to comply with mandatory health or safety standards. When the MSHA issues a citation or order, it generally proposes a civil penalty, or fine, because of the alleged violation, that the operator is ordered to pay. The Company has received $600 in fines and penalties. Citations and orders can be contested and appealed, and as part of that process, are often reduced in severity and amount, and are sometimes dismissed.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 31.1 | ||
|
||
Exhibit 31.2 | ||
|
||
Exhibit 32.1 | ||
|
||
Exhibit 32.2 |
24
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
GRYPHON GOLD CORPORATION
By: | /s/ James T. ONeil Jr. | |
James T. ONeil Jr. | ||
Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer | ||
(On behalf of the registrant and as | ||
Principal executive and financial officer) | ||
Date: August 14, 2012 |
25