Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. AMENDED AND RESTATED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ý Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o | ||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
o |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
ý |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
ý |
No fee required. |
|||
o |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) |
Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
|||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
|||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
11825 North Pennsylvania Street
Carmel, Indiana 46032
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
To Be Held May 10, 2017
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of CNO Financial Group, Inc. (the "Company"), will be held at the CNO Conference Center, 11825 North Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana, at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 10, 2017, for the following purposes:
Holders of record of outstanding shares of the common stock of the Company as of the close of business on March 13, 2017, are entitled to notice of and to vote at the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Holders of common stock have one vote for each share held of record.
In accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), on or about March 30, 2017, we either mailed you a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials ("Notice") notifying you how to vote online and how to electronically access a copy of this Proxy Statement and the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders (together referred to as the "Proxy Materials") or mailed you a complete set of the Proxy Materials and proxy card. If you have not received but would like to receive printed copies of these documents, including a proxy card in paper format, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials contained in the Notice.
Management and the Board of Directors respectfully request that (if you received a paper copy of the Proxy Materials) you date, sign and return the enclosed proxy card in the postage-paid envelope so that we receive the proxy card prior to the Annual Meeting, or, if you prefer, follow the instructions on your proxy card or Notice for submitting a proxy electronically or by telephone. If your shares are held in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record, please follow the procedures as described in the voting form they send to you. If you attend the meeting in person you may withdraw your proxy and vote personally at the meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors | ||
Karl W. Kindig, Senior Vice President and Secretary |
March 30,
2017
Carmel, Indiana
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
11825 North Pennsylvania Street
Carmel, Indiana 46032
PROXY STATEMENT |
This Proxy Statement is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of CNO Financial Group, Inc. ("CNO" or the "Company") for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "Annual Meeting") to be held at the CNO Conference Center, 11825 North Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana on May 10, 2017, at 8:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time. We are sending the Notice or the Proxy Materials and proxy to shareholders on or about March 30, 2017.
The proxies are solicited by the Board of Directors. Proxies may be solicited by mail, telephone, internet or in person. Proxies may by solicited by the CNO Directors and officers. All expenses relating to the preparation and distribution to shareholders of the Notice, the Proxy Materials and the form of proxy are to be paid by CNO.
If the form of proxy is properly executed and delivered in time for the Annual Meeting, the named proxy holders will vote the shares represented by the proxy in accordance with the instructions marked on the proxy. Each shareholder may appoint a person (who need not be a shareholder), other than the persons named in the proxy, to represent him or her at the Annual Meeting by properly completing a proxy. In either case, such completed proxy should be returned in the envelope provided to you for that purpose (if you have requested or received a paper copy of the Proxy Materials) for delivery no later than May 9, 2017. Proxies received that are unmarked will be voted for each of the Board's nominees for director (Proposal 1), for the approval of the amendments to the Company's Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "LTIP Amendment") (Proposal 2), for ratification of the appointment of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3), for approval of the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers (Proposal 4), and for "One Year" as the frequency of future votes on executive compensation. A shareholder may revoke a proxy at any time before it is exercised by mailing or delivering to CNO a written notice of revocation or a later-dated proxy, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.
Only holders of record of shares of CNO's common stock as of the close of business on March 13, 2017, will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On such record date, CNO had 173,655,491 shares of common stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Each share of common stock will be entitled to one vote with respect to each matter submitted to a vote at the Annual Meeting. The presence in person or by proxy of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of common stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is necessary to constitute a quorum.
On or about March 30, 2017, we either mailed you a Notice notifying you how to vote online and how to electronically access a copy of the Proxy Materials or mailed you a complete set of the Proxy Materials. If you have not received but would like to receive printed copies of these documents, including a proxy card in paper format, you should follow the instructions for requesting such materials contained in the Notice.
1
The following sets forth how a shareholder can vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail:
Voting By Internet
If you hold your shares in street name (that is, if you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other holder of record), you can vote at www.proxyvote.com, 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will need the 12-digit Control Number included on your Notice or your paper voting instruction form (if you received a paper copy of the Proxy Materials).
Voting By Telephone
If you hold your shares in street name, you can vote using a touch-tone telephone by calling the toll-free number included on your paper voting instruction form (if you received a paper copy of the Proxy Materials), 24 hours a day, seven days a week. You will need the 12-digit Control Number included on your notice or your paper voting instruction form.
If you hold your shares in street name, you may also submit voting instructions to your bank, broker or other holder of record. In most instances, you will be able to do this over the Internet, by telephone, or by mail. Please refer to the information from your bank, broker or other holder of record on how to submit voting instructions.
The Internet and telephone voting procedures, which comply with Delaware law and the SEC rules, are designed to authenticate shareholders' identities, to allow shareholders to vote their shares and to confirm that their instructions have been properly recorded.
Voting By Mail
If you have received a paper copy of the Proxy Materials by mail, you may complete, sign, date and return by mail the paper proxy card or voting instruction form sent to you in the envelope provided to you with your Proxy Materials or voting instruction form.
Deadline for Submitting Votes by Internet, Telephone or Mail
If you hold your shares in street name, proxies submitted over the Internet or by telephone as described above must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on May 9, 2017.
Proxies submitted by mail should be returned in the envelope provided to you with your paper proxy card or voting instruction form, and must be received no later than May 9, 2017.
If you want to vote in person at the Annual Meeting and you hold your shares in street name, you must obtain a legal proxy from your bank, broker or other holder of record authorizing you to vote. You must then bring the legal proxy to the Annual Meeting.
Please note that you may receive multiple copies of the Notice or Proxy Materials (electronically and/or by mail). These materials may not be duplicates as you may receive separate copies of the Notice or Proxy Materials for each type of account in which you hold shares. Please be sure to vote all of your shares in each of your accounts in accordance with the directions on the proxy card(s) and/or voting instruction form(s) that you receive. In the case of duplicate votes for shares in a particular account, your last vote is the one that counts.
The election of each director (Proposal 1) will be determined by the vote of the majority of the votes cast (where the number of votes cast "for" a director exceeds the number of votes cast "against" that director) by the
2
holders of shares represented (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote on the subject matter provided a quorum is present. The vote required to approve the Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (Proposal 2), the ratification of the appointment of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3), to approve, by non-binding advisory vote, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers (Proposal 4), to approve, by non-binding advisory vote, the frequency of future votes on the compensation of the Company's named executive officers (Proposal 5), and any other proposal properly brought before the Annual Meeting, is the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented (in person or by proxy) and entitled to vote on the applicable subject matter. Abstentions from voting will have no impact on the election of directors (Proposal 1) and will have the same legal effect as voting against each other proposal.
Abstentions and shares represented by "broker non-votes", as described below, are counted as present and entitled to vote for the purpose of determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs if you hold your shares in street name and do not provide voting instructions to your broker, bank or other holder of record on a proposal and your broker, bank or other holder of record does not have discretionary authority to vote on such proposal. Under current New York Stock Exchange rules, your broker, bank or other holder of record will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting with respect to Proposal 1 (election of nine directors as listed in this Proxy Statement), Proposal 2 (approval of the Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan), Proposal 4 (advisory vote to approve executive compensation), and Proposal 5 (advisory vote on the frequency of future advisory votes on executive compensation). "Broker non-votes" will have no effect on the outcome of Proposals 1, 2, 4 and 5. Your broker, bank or other holder of record will have discretion to vote your uninstructed shares on Proposal 3 (ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2017).
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE SHAREHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 10, 2017
This Proxy Statement (including all attachments), the Company's Annual Report to Shareholders (which includes the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on February 21, 2017) (which is not deemed to be part of the official proxy soliciting materials), and any amendments to the foregoing materials that are required to be provided to shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com. Shareholders may obtain copies of the Proxy Statement, Annual Report to Shareholders (including financial statements and schedules thereto) and form of proxy relating to this or future meetings of the Company's shareholders, free of charge on our Internet website at www.CNOinc.com in the "Investors SEC Filings" section, by calling 317-817-2893 or by sending the Company an email at ir@CNOinc.com. For directions to the Company's 2017 Annual Meeting, please call us at 317-817-2893.
3
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 13, 2017 (except as otherwise noted) by each person known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of the outstanding shares of our common stock, each of our directors and nominees, each of our current executive officers that are named in the Summary Compensation Table on page 36 and all of our current directors, nominees and executive officers as a group. Shares of our common stock subject to options that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 13, 2017 are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding the options for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of that person or group of persons but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
|
|
Shares Beneficially Owned | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title of Class | Name of Beneficial Owner
|
Number | Percentage | ||||||
Common stock | BlackRock, Inc.(1) | 16,761,220 | 9.7 | % | |||||
Common stock | The Vanguard Group(2) | 13,931,302 | 8.0 | ||||||
Common stock | Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(3) | 12,148,100 | 7.0 | ||||||
Common stock | Edward J. Bonach(4) | 1,308,546 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Ellyn L. Brown | 42,842 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Robert C. Greving | 52,494 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Stephen N. David | 0 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Mary R. (Nina) Henderson | 39,052 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Charles J. Jacklin | 14,624 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Daniel R. Maurer | 14,624 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Neal C. Schneider | 90,273 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Frederick J. Sievert | 64,624 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Michael T. Tokarz | 116,814 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Gary C. Bhojwani | 234,000 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Bruce K. Baude(5) | 188,164 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Christopher J. Nickele(6) | 120,013 | * | ||||||
Common stock | Erik M. Helding(7) | 66,625 | * | ||||||
Common stock | All directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (18 persons)(8) | 3,559,491 | 2.0 | % |
4
5
PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Nine individuals will be elected to the Board at the Annual Meeting for one-year terms expiring at the 2018 annual meeting of shareholders. Each nominee listed below other than Stephen David is currently a member of the Board. As announced by the Company on February 27, 2017, Mr. David has been nominated for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting. He would fill the vacancy resulting from the retirement of director Michael Tokarz, effective at the Annual Meeting. All directors will serve until their successors are duly elected and qualified.
Director Qualifications and Experience
In considering candidates for the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the experience, skills, attributes and qualifications of the current Board members and other potential candidates to ensure that the Board has the skills and experience to properly oversee the interests of the Company. In doing so, the Governance and Nominating Committee considers the experience, skills, attributes and qualifications of candidates in these areas:
The key experiences, qualifications, attributes and skills of each of the nominees are included in their individual biographies below.
Consideration is also given to each nominee's independence, financial literacy, personal and professional accomplishments and experience in light of the needs of the Company. For incumbent directors, past performance on the Board and contributions to their respective committees are also considered. The Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board seek directors with qualities that will contribute to the goal of having a well-rounded, diverse Board that functions well as a unit and is able to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively. The Governance and Nominating Committee expects each of the directors to have proven leadership, sound judgment, high ethical standards and a commitment to the success of the Company.
The Governance and Nominating Committee does not have a specific diversity policy with respect to Board candidates, but it strongly believes that the Board should have a variety of differences in viewpoints, professional
6
experiences, educational background, skills, race, gender and age, and considers issues of diversity and background in its process of selecting candidates for the Board.
The Governance and Nominating Committee engaged a third-party search firm to identify, assist in the evaluation of, and recommend potential Board candidates. After considering candidates identified during the search process, the Governance and Nominating Committee recommended that Mr. David be nominated for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting.
Should any of the nominees become unable to accept election, the persons named in the proxy will have the right to exercise their voting power in favor of such person or persons as the Board may recommend. All of the nominees have consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and to serve if elected. The Board knows of no reason why any of its nominees would be unable to accept election.
The Governance and Nominating Committee will consider candidates for director nominees put forward by shareholders. See "Shareholder Proposals for 2018 Annual Meeting" for a description of the advance notice procedures for shareholder nominations for directors.
Set forth below is information regarding each person nominated by the Board for election as a director.
Nominees for Election as Directors:
Edward J. Bonach, 63, has been chief executive officer and a director of CNO since October 1, 2011 and served as chief financial officer of the Company from May 2007 until January 2012. Mr. Bonach joined CNO from National Life Group, where he served as executive vice president and chief financial officer. Before joining National Life in 2002, he was with Allianz Life for 23 years, where his positions included President Reinsurance Division and chief financial officer. He is a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries, a member of the American Academy of Actuaries, and a Chartered Enterprise Risk Analyst. With respect to Mr. Bonach's nomination for re-election, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee considered his experience as chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the Company and his extensive insurance, actuarial and executive management experience. | ||
Ellyn L. Brown, 67, joined our Board in May 2012. Until her retirement from full-time law practice, Ms. Brown practiced corporate and securities law, most recently as principal of Brown & Associates, a boutique law and consulting firm that provided operations, regulatory and governance services to financial services industry clients and other clients that operated in heavily regulated, high-scrutiny environments. Ms. Brown served as a member of the board of directors of NYSE Euronext (and predecessor entities) (NYSE:NYX) from 2005 until the acquisition of NYX by the Intercontinental Exchange in 2013, and also chaired the board of NYSE Regulation, Inc., the entity that oversaw market regulation at the NYSE and its affiliated exchanges. She has been a member of the board of directors of Walter Investment Management Corp. (NYSE:WAC) since 2009 and a member of the board of Brinker Capital Destinations Trust since January 2017. Ms. Brown served as a governor of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority from 2007 2012 and, from 2007 2011, was a trustee of the Financial Accounting Foundation, the parent entity of the Financial Accounting Standards Board and the Governmental Accounting Standards Board. With respect to Ms. Brown's nomination for re-election, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee considered her extensive financial industry, legal and regulatory experience. | ||
7
Stephen N. David, 68, has been nominated for election at the Annual Meeting, succeeding Michael Tokarz who is retiring from our Board. Mr. David has been a Senior Advisor with The Boston Consulting Group since 2005, providing strategic planning services in sales, marketing and technology to a variety of clients across multiple industries, including financial services. He retired in 2005 after 34 years with Procter & Gamble ("P&G"). During his P&G career Mr. David held multiple senior management positions including Chief Information Officer, Global Customer Development Officer, and Senior Vice President, Business Development. He served as a director of Checkpoint Systems, Inc., which provides merchandise availability solutions for the retail industry, encompassing loss prevention and merchandise visibility, from 2012 until the completion of the sale of the company in May 2016. He also served as a director of Iomega Corporation, a consumer technology company, from 2002 until its acquisition by EMC Corporation in 2008. With respect to Mr. David's nomination for election, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee considered his extensive leadership experience in technology, strategy, marketing and sales. | ||
Robert C. Greving, 65, joined our Board in May 2011. Mr. Greving is the retired executive vice president, chief financial officer and chief actuary for Unum Group, having held those positions from 2005 to 2009. Mr. Greving also served as president of Unum International Ltd., Bermuda. Before becoming executive vice president and chief financial officer of Unum Group in 2003, he held senior vice president, finance, and chief actuary positions with Unum Group and with The Provident Companies, Inc., which merged with Unum Group. His duties prior to retirement included directing all aspects of the finance and actuarial responsibilities for the corporate and nine insurance subsidiary insurance companies of Unum Group. He previously held senior positions with PennCorp Dallas Operations, Southwestern Life Insurance Company, American Founders Insurance Company, Aegon USA and Horace Mann Life Insurance Company during his 35 years in the insurance industry. He is a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries. With respect to Mr. Greving's nomination for re-election, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee considered his extensive experience with the management of companies in the life, health, disability and annuity lines of business and in particular with the actuarial, financial and investment disciplines. | ||
Mary R. (Nina) Henderson, 66, joined our Board in August 2012. Ms. Henderson is the managing partner of Henderson Advisory, a consulting practice providing marketing perspective and business evaluation to investment management firms in the consumer products and food industries. Previously she was a corporate vice president of Bestfoods and president of Bestfoods Grocery. During her 30-year career with Bestfoods, and its predecessor company CPC International, Ms. Henderson held a wide variety of international and North American general management and executive marketing positions. Ms. Henderson has been a director of IWG plc (formerly Regus plc) since May 2014 and has been a director of Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc since October 2016. She previously served as a director of Walter Energy, Inc. (2013 2016), Del Monte Foods Company (2002 2011), The Equitable Companies (1996 2000), AXA Financial (2001 2011), Pactiv Corporation (2000 2010), Royal Dutch Shell plc and its predecessor company The Shell Transport and Trading Company (2001 2009) and the Hunt Corporation (1991 2002). With respect to Ms. Henderson's nomination for re-election, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee considered her management leadership experience, consumer marketing background, and her experience as a director of companies in a variety of industries, including insurance. | ||
8
Charles J. Jacklin, 62, joined our Board in May 2015. Mr. Jacklin has more than 30 years of finance and investment experience. He served as Chief Executive Officer and President of Mellon Capital Management Corporation from 2006 until March 2011 and then served as Chairman until his retirement at the end of 2012. Mr. Jacklin also held several other executive management positions in his 18 years with Mellon Capital Management including chief investment strategist, where he was responsible for investment strategies and research, and director of asset allocation strategies, where he was responsible for portfolio management in domestic, international and global asset allocation strategies. He has also taught finance and investment strategy for 10 years at the University of Chicago and Stanford University Schools of Business. With respect to Mr. Jacklin's nomination for re-election, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee considered his extensive investment, investment risk management and finance experience. | ||
Daniel R. Maurer, 60, joined our Board in May 2015. Mr. Maurer was a member of the senior management team at Intuit Inc. from 2006 until his retirement in 2014. In his most recent role at Intuit, he oversaw the Small Business Solutions Group (including QuickBooks payroll, DemandForce, and QuickBase), and previously led the TurboTax®, Mint, and Quicken brands. Mr. Maurer has extensive global consumer retail sales and marketing experience with over 20 years in executive management at Procter & Gamble ("P&G"), including 15 years internationally. As General Manager of Global Customer Development at P&G's headquarters, he was tasked with building an effective marketing strategy to achieve a competitive advantage with P&G's largest global customers including Wal-Mart, Costco, Ahold, Tessco, and Carrefour. Subsequent to his tenure at P&G, Mr. Maurer was Vice President of Strategy for Global Sales and US Business at Campbell's Soup. He has served since 2012 on the board of directors of Zagg Inc, which designs, produces and distributes mobile accessory solutions, and served as a director of Checkpoint Systems, Inc., which provides merchandise availability solutions for the retail industry, encompassing loss prevention and merchandise visibility, from January 2016 until the completion of the sale of the company in May 2016. Previously, Mr. Maurer served as a director of Iomega Corporation, a consumer technology company, from 2006 until its acquisition by EMC Corporation in 2008. With respect to Mr. Maurer's nomination for re-election, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee considered his extensive experience in marketing and marketing strategy, including the use of digital marketing strategies to reach the middle market. | ||
Neal C. Schneider, 72, joined our Board in September 2003. Mr. Schneider served from 2003 until 2010 as the non-executive chairman of the board of PMA Capital Corporation, whose subsidiaries provide insurance products, including workers' compensation and other commercial property and casualty lines of insurance, as well as fee-based services. He also served on the executive, audit and governance committees for PMA Capital. Until his retirement in 2000, Mr. Schneider spent 34 years with Arthur Andersen & Co., including service as partner in charge of the Worldwide Insurance Industry Practice and the North American Financial Service Practice. Between 2000 and 2002, he was an independent consultant and between 2002 and 2003, Mr. Schneider was a partner of Smart and Associates, LLP, a business advisory and accounting firm. With respect to Mr. Schneider's nomination for re-election, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee considered his extensive knowledge and experience in accounting and financial matters, particularly with respect to insurance companies, and in corporate governance. | ||
9
Frederick J. Sievert, 69, joined our Board in May 2011. Mr. Sievert is the retired President of New York Life Insurance Company, having served in that position from 2002 through 2007. Mr. Sievert shared responsibility for overall company management in the Office of the Chairman, from 2004 until his retirement in 2007. Mr. Sievert joined New York Life in 1992 as senior vice president and chief financial officer of the individual insurance businesses. In 1995 he was promoted to executive vice president and was elected to the New York Life board of directors in 1996. Prior to joining New York Life, Mr. Sievert was a senior vice president for Royal Maccabees Life Insurance Company, a subsidiary of the Royal Insurance Group of London, England. Mr. Sievert is a Fellow of the Society of Actuaries. He has been a director of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated since 2010. With respect to Mr. Sievert's nomination for re-election, the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee considered his extensive insurance, actuarial and executive management experience. |
Voting for Directors; Required Vote
The election of each director will be determined by the vote of the majority of the votes cast (where the number of votes cast "for" a director exceeds the number of votes cast "against" that director) by the holders of shares of common stock present in person, or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting.
In an uncontested election of directors at which a quorum is present, any incumbent director who fails to receive a majority of the votes cast (where the number of votes cast "for" a director exceeds the number of votes cast "against" that director) shall offer to tender his or her resignation to the Board. In such event, the Governance and Nominating Committee will consider the offer and make a recommendation to the Board whether to accept or reject the resignation or whether other action should be taken. The Board will publicly disclose its decision and rationale within 90 days from the certification of the election results.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE ELECTION TO THE BOARD OF EACH OF THE COMPANY'S DIRECTOR NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE.
10
Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee. The Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee's functions, among others, are to recommend the appointment of independent accountants; review the arrangements for and scope of the audit by the independent accountants; review the independence of the independent accountants; consider the adequacy of the system of internal accounting controls and review any proposed corrective actions; provide oversight of the Company's internal audit department; review and monitor the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements; discuss with management and the independent accountants our draft annual and quarterly financial statements and key accounting and/or reporting matters; and oversee management's processes for managing enterprise risk. The Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee itself does not prepare financial statements or perform audits and its members are not auditors or certifiers of the Company's financial statements. The Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee currently consists of Mr. Greving, Ms. Henderson, Mr. Jacklin and Mr. Schneider, with Mr. Greving serving as chairman of the committee. Based on their experience, Mr. Greving and Mr. Schneider each qualify as an "audit committee financial expert," as defined under SEC rules promulgated under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. All current members of the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee are "independent" within the meaning of the regulations adopted by the SEC including Section 10A(m)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the listing requirements adopted by the New York Stock Exchange regarding audit committee membership. The current members also satisfy the financial literacy qualifications of the New York Stock Exchange listing standards. The committee met on 10 occasions in 2016. The duties and responsibilities of the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee are set forth in its charter, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.CNOinc.com.
Governance and Nominating Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for, among other things, establishing criteria for Board membership; considering, recommending and recruiting candidates to fill new positions on the Board; reviewing candidates recommended by shareholders; and considering questions of possible conflicts of interest involving Board members, executive officers and key employees. It is also responsible for developing principles of corporate governance and recommending them to the Board for its approval and adoption, and reviewing periodically these principles of corporate governance to insure that they remain relevant and are being complied with. The Governance and Nominating Committee currently consists of Mr. Tokarz, Ms. Brown, Mr. Maurer, Mr. Schneider and Mr. Sievert, with Mr. Tokarz serving as chairman of the committee. All current members of the Governance and Nominating Committee are "independent" within the meaning of the listing requirements adopted by the New York Stock Exchange regarding nominating committee membership. The committee held three meetings during 2016. The duties and responsibilities of the Governance and Nominating Committee are set forth in its charter, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.CNOinc.com.
Human Resources and Compensation Committee. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee is responsible for, among other things, approving overall compensation philosophy and strategy; evaluating the performance of the chief executive officer and recommending to the Board the compensation of the chief executive officer; reviewing and approving on an annual basis the evaluation process and compensation structure for the Company's other executive officers as recommended by the chief executive officer; ensuring that appropriate programs and procedures are established to provide for the development, selection, retention and succession of officers and key personnel; and reviewing and administering our incentive compensation and equity award plans. The report of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee appears on page 35 of this Proxy Statement. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee currently consists of Mr. Sievert, Ms. Brown, Mr. Maurer and Mr. Tokarz, with Mr. Sievert serving as committee chair. All current members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee are "independent" within the meaning of the listing requirements adopted by the New York Stock Exchange regarding compensation committee membership and qualify as "non-employee" directors for purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and as "outside directors" for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. The committee met on seven occasions
11
in 2016. The duties and responsibilities of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.CNOinc.com.
Investment Committee. The Investment Committee is responsible for, among other things, reviewing investment policies, strategies and programs; reviewing the procedures which the Company utilizes in determining that funds are invested in accordance with policies and limits approved by it; and reviewing the quality and performance of our investment portfolios and the alignment of asset duration to liabilities. The Investment Committee currently consists of Mr. Jacklin, Mr. Bonach, Mr. Greving and Ms. Henderson, with Mr. Jacklin serving as chairman of the committee. The committee met on four occasions in 2016. The duties and responsibilities of the Investment Committee are set forth in its charter, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.CNOinc.com.
Executive Committee. Subject to the requirements of applicable law, including our certificate of incorporation and bylaws, the Executive Committee is responsible for exercising, as necessary, the authority of the Board in the management of our business affairs during intervals between Board meetings. The Executive Committee currently consists of Mr. Schneider, Mr. Bonach and Mr. Greving, with Mr. Schneider serving as chairman of the committee. The duties and responsibilities of the Executive Committee are set forth in its charter, which is available in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.CNOinc.com.
Our non-employee directors currently receive an annual cash retainer of $88,000. Our non-executive chairman receives a fee equal to 200% of the base cash fees and equity awards paid to the other non-employee directors. The chairs of the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee and the Human Resources and Compensation Committee each currently receive an additional annual cash fee of $30,000, and directors who chair one of our other Board committees (other than the Executive Committee) receive an additional annual cash fee of $20,000. Each member of the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee (including the chair) receives an additional annual cash retainer of $15,000 and each member of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (including the chair) receives an additional annual cash retainer of $10,000. Cash fees are paid quarterly in advance. In addition to the cash payments, our non-employee directors currently receive an annual equity award of $132,000, which vests immediately upon grant. The Board's policy is to review and set the compensation of the non-employee directors each year at the Board meeting that follows the Annual Meeting and to make equity awards to those directors at that time. Directors are reimbursed for out-of-pocket expenses, including first-class airfare, incurred in connection with the performance of their responsibilities as directors. The compensation paid in 2016 to our non-employee directors is summarized in the table below:
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION IN 2016
Name
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash(1) |
Stock Awards(2) |
Total | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ellyn L. Brown |
$ | 98,000 | $ | 131,996 | $ | 229,996 | ||||
Robert C. Greving |
133,000 | 131,996 | 264,996 | |||||||
Mary R. (Nina) Henderson |
103,000 | 131,996 | 234,996 | |||||||
Charles J. Jacklin |
123,000 | 131,996 | 254,996 | |||||||
Daniel R. Maurer |
98,000 | 131,996 | 229,996 | |||||||
Neal C. Schneider |
191,000 | 263,991 | 454,991 | |||||||
Frederick J. Sievert |
128,000 | 131,996 | 259,996 | |||||||
Michael T. Tokarz |
118,000 | 131,996 | 249,996 |
12
CNO has a non-executive, independent director, who serves as chairman of the Board. Mr. Schneider has served in that capacity since 2011. The Board believes that its leadership structure, with a non-executive chairman position separate from the chief executive officer, provides appropriate, independent oversight of management and the Company. The non-executive chairman of the Board (1) presides at all meetings of the Board and shareholders; (2) presides during regularly held sessions with only the independent directors; (3) encourages and facilitates active participation of all directors; (4) develops the calendar of and agendas for Board meetings in consultation with the chief executive officer and other members of the Board; (5) determines, in consultation with the chief executive officer, the information that should be provided to the Board in advance of the meeting; and (6) performs any other duties requested by the other members of the Board.
As discussed below, each member of our Board is independent other than Mr. Bonach, our chief executive officer. As CEO, Mr. Bonach, subject to the direction of the Board, is in charge of the business and affairs of CNO and is our chief policy making officer. Our Board and its committees play an active role in overseeing the Company's business. The directors bring a broad range of leadership, business and professional experience to the Board and actively participate in Board discussions. The Board believes that having a non-executive chairman and a Board comprised almost entirely of independent, non-employee directors best serves the interests of our shareholders and the Company.
During 2016, the Board met on 12 occasions. Each director attended at least 75% of the aggregate meetings of the Board and Board committees on which he or she served. The independent directors regularly meet in executive session without the chief executive officer or any other member of management. The non-executive chairman presides at such executive sessions.
In addition, CNO has a policy that all directors attend the annual meeting of shareholders. All of our directors attended the annual meeting of shareholders held in 2016.
The Board annually determines the independence of directors based on a review by the directors. Although the Board has not adopted categorical standards of materiality for independence purposes, no director is considered independent unless the Board has determined that he or she has no material relationship with CNO, either directly or as an officer, shareholder or partner of an organization that has a material relationship with CNO. Material relationships can include commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable and familial relationships, among others. The Board considers the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, the applicable rules and regulations of the SEC and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange in making its determination regarding independence and the materiality of any relationships with CNO. The Board has determined that all current directors other than Mr. Bonach are independent.
Board's Role in Risk Oversight
Enterprise risk management is integral to our business. The Board is responsible for overseeing the Company's risk profile and management's processes for managing risk. The oversight of certain risks, including those relating to the Company's capital structure and capital management is done by the full Board. The Board
13
has delegated primary responsibility for many aspects of the Board's risk oversight to the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee. The Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee receives reports at its meetings and oversees management's processes for managing enterprise risk, including the risk management process associated with financial controls, insurance reserves, legal, regulatory and compliance risks, and the overall risk management structure, process and function. Other Board committees oversee risk management related to specific functions. The Investment Committee oversees investment and asset-liability management risk. The Human Resources and Compensation Committee oversees risks associated with our compensation programs so that incentives are not provided for inappropriate risk taking, as further discussed below.
Our leadership strongly supports an active and engaged risk management process. CNO has established an enterprise risk management committee comprised of senior management from business units and functions throughout the Company. This enterprise risk management committee meets at least once each quarter and is chaired by the chief executive officer. CNO also has an investment and asset-liability management committee comprised of senior management from various functions and the presidents of each business segment. This committee meets at least once each quarter and is chaired by the chief investment officer. The Company has a senior vice president who is responsible for the coordination of enterprise risk management activities. Reports on different aspects of the Company's enterprise risk management are provided to the Board, to the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee, to the Investment Committee and to other Board committees, as appropriate, on a regular basis.
As part of its risk oversight responsibilities, the Board and its committees review policies and processes that senior management uses to manage the Company's risk exposure. In doing so, the Board and its committees review the Company's risk appetite statement, overall risk function and senior management's establishment of appropriate systems and processes for managing insurance risk, interest rate and asset-liability management risk, credit and counterparty risk, liquidity risk, operational risk and reputational risk.
Relationship of Compensation Policies and Practices to Risk Management
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has reviewed our compensation programs and believes that they carefully and appropriately balance risks and rewards and do not incentivize inappropriate risk taking. Our incentive plans include multiple performance measures, most of which are financial in nature, and are designed to hold employees accountable for sustained improvement in the core operating performance of the Company. We structure our pay to include both fixed and variable compensation and our variable compensation is capped at no more than two times the target opportunities. In addition, our officers' compensation aligns them with shareholder interests through equity-based awards with multiple year vesting.
Approval of Related Party Transactions
Under the Company's written policy, transactions and agreements with related persons (directors, director nominees and executive officers or members of their immediate families, or shareholders owning five percent or more of the Company's outstanding stock) that meet the minimum threshold for disclosure in the proxy statement under applicable SEC rules (generally transactions involving amounts exceeding $120,000 in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest) must be approved by the Board or a committee comprised solely of independent directors. In considering the transaction or agreement, the Board or committee will consider all relevant factors including the business reason for the transaction, available alternatives on comparable terms, actual or apparent conflicts of interest and the overall fairness of the transaction to the Company. Any proposed transactions that might be considered a related person transaction are to be raised with the chairman of the Board or the chairman of the Governance and Nominating Committee. They will jointly determine whether the proposed transaction should be considered by the full Board (recusing any directors with conflicts) or by a Board committee of independent directors. Related person transactions are to be approved in advance whenever practicable, but if not approved in advance are to be ratified (if the Board or committee considers it appropriate to do so) as soon
14
as practicable after the transaction. There were no related party transactions or agreements involving the Company in 2016 or to date in 2017.
Various Company policies and procedures, including the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and annual questionnaires completed by all company directors, officers and employees, require disclosure of transactions or relationships that may constitute conflicts of interest or otherwise require disclosure under applicable SEC rules. Any related person transactions that are identified under these additional policies and procedures are to be considered under the process described above.
We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to all officers, directors and employees regarding their obligations in the conduct of the Company's affairs. A copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available under Corporate Governance in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.CNOinc.com. Within the time period specified, and to the extent required, by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, we will post on our website any amendment to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any waiver applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or principal accounting officer (there have been no such waivers).
Corporate Governance Guidelines
CNO is committed to best practices in corporate governance. The Board, upon the recommendation of the Governance and Nominating Committee, has adopted a set of Board Governance Operating Guidelines. These are reviewed by the Governance and Nominating Committee and the Board and updated periodically to reflect the Board's view of current best practices. A copy of the CNO Board Governance Operating Guidelines is available under Corporate Governance in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.CNOinc.com.
Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Board has adopted guidelines regarding ownership of CNO common stock by the directors. The amounts set forth in these guidelines provide for each director to own shares of common stock with a value of at least five times his or her annual base cash compensation. Directors are given five years from the date of their initial election to reach that level of ownership. Based on the current base cash compensation for directors of $88,000 per year, the ownership guidelines call for each director to own shares with a value of at least $440,000. As of March 13, 2017, all directors who have served on the Board for at least five years met these stock ownership guidelines, and each of the other directors met, or was on track to meet, these guidelines.
Talent Management and Succession Planning
The Board is actively involved with the Company's talent management process. At least annually, the Board reviews the Company's leadership team, which includes a detailed discussion of succession plans for the chief executive officer and other members of executive and senior management. In addition, the Board regularly discusses the Company's plans for talent development, with a focus on high potential individuals who are in the position to make the most significant contributions to the Company and to serve as its future leaders.
Shareholders and other interested parties wishing to communicate directly with the Board or any one or more individual members (including the chairman of the Board or the non-management directors as a group) are welcome to do so by writing to the CNO Corporate Secretary, 11825 North Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana, 46032. The Corporate Secretary will forward any communications to the director or directors specified by the shareholder or other interested party.
15
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2016, the directors who served on the Human Resources and Compensation Committee were the current members (Ms. Brown, Mr. Sievert, Mr. Maurer and Mr. Tokarz). None of the members of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee during 2016 is or has been one of our officers or employees. None of our executive officers serves, or served during 2016, as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of any entity that has one or more executive officers serving on our Board or Human Resources and Compensation Committee.
In addition to being available under Corporate Governance in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.CNOinc.com, we will provide to any person, without charge, a printed copy of our committee charters, Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Board Governance Operating Guidelines upon request being made to CNO Investor Relations, 11825 N. Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana 46032; or by telephone: (317) 817-2893 or email: ir@CNOinc.com.
16
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This Compensation Discussion and Analysis ("CD&A") describes the Company's executive compensation program and explains how the Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the "Committee") made compensation decisions for the following Named Executive Officers (the "NEOs") in 2016:
Named Executive Officer
|
Position with the Company in 2016
|
|
---|---|---|
Edward Bonach | Chief Executive Officer | |
Gary Bhojwani | President | |
Bruce Baude | EVP, Chief Operations & Technology Officer | |
Christopher Nickele | EVP, Chief Actuary | |
Erik Helding | EVP, Chief Financial Officer |
Mr. Bhojwani was hired on April 18, 2016, and Mr. Helding was promoted to Chief Financial Officer on April 11, 2016. Scott Perry served as Chief Business Officer until April 2016. Please see "Compensation of Former Chief Business Officer" on page 33 for additional information regarding his compensation in 2016.
Our Business
CNO Financial Group, Inc. is a Fortune 1000 company, with $4.0 billion in total revenues for the year ending December 31, 2016. CNO's insurance companies are leading providers of supplemental health insurance, life insurance and annuities to middle-income pre-retiree and retired Americans to help them protect against financial adversity and provide for a more secure retirement.
Our vision is to become the leader in meeting Middle America's needs for financial security and readiness for the life of their retirement. Our strategic plans are focused on continuing to grow and deliver long-term value for all our stakeholders. In the last year, we have continued to see change, including innovative technology, economic shifts, the presidential election, changing regulations and increasing competition. These changes impact our associates, agents, customers and our business. In determining how to achieve the level of growth we want and need, our strategy for 2017 and beyond has evolved to position CNO to deliver products and services that best meet the growing needs of middle-income Americans in this ever-changing, dynamic environment.
2016 Business Highlights
In 2016, CNO demonstrated continued financial strength, with solid earnings, net operating income, and growth in book value. Meaningful increases in first-year and total collected premiums were driven by strong annuity sales, expanded customer reach, and pricing discipline. Sustained quarter-after-quarter in-force policy growth and increased annuity account values indicate our ability to achieve enterprise growth through sales and the retention of satisfied customers.
Specific results included first-year collected premiums up 12% over 2015 to $1,344.8 million, total collected premiums up 6% to $3,610.6 million, net income per diluted share up 45% to $2.01, and net operating income per diluted share up 4% to $1.47.
We returned $258 million to shareholders in 2016, with $203 million in common stock repurchases and $55 million in common stock dividends. From the initiation of our share buyback program in 2011, we have returned over $1.9 billion to shareholders via securities repurchases and common stock dividends.
17
Our financial condition and capital generation continued to be strong in 2016. Our consolidated risk-based capital ratio increased to 459%, and book value per diluted share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)*, increased to $22.02 from $20.05 in 2015. Our debt-to-total-capital ratio, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income*, at the end of 2016, was 19.1% compared to 19.6% at the end of 2015.
Although we realized a setback in our objective to reduce long-term care exposure by recapturing a closed block of long-term care business previously ceded to a reinsurance entity, we acted swiftly with state insurance regulators to limit uncertainty and disruption to our affected policyholders, while minimizing financial risk.
We effectively executed on a number of key initiatives in 2016, including new product releases and solutions to improve our customer experience. We launched our in-house broker/dealer and registered investment advisor, Bankers Life Securities and Bankers Life Investment Advisors, offering our middle-market consumers a range of investment and planning solutions. Additionally, CNO made a strategic investment in Tennenbaum Capital Partners, an investment management firm with over $6 billion in committed capital under management. This non-controlling, minority interest transaction is a long-term opportunity for ownership in a growing platform, and allows for diversification of our income into alternative investments, and further utilization of our tax assets.
2016 Total Compensation Highlights
Our compensation programs are designed to attract, retain and motivate the executives who lead our Company. The Committee has established programs and practices that align management's interests with those of the Company's shareholders, and thus help drive the creation of long-term shareholder value. We believe our compensation program supports our belief in pay for performance by providing a significant amount of compensation in the form of equity, by balancing both short- and long-term incentives that are tied to Company performance, and by delivering both fixed and variable compensation (pay-at-risk) in appropriate measure to retain and motivate our leaders, all of which are tied to our business results and market practices. In 2016, our executive compensation program consisted of:
Long-Term Incentive Compensation (LTI). We believe performance-based equity compensation aligns our NEOs to shareholder interests and helps drive long-term shareholder value creation, while also facilitating the retention of key executive talent. In 2016, the Committee approved the following forms of equity compensation:
18
on June 1, 2017 and the remaining $400,000 to vest on June 1, 2018, in recognition of his contributions and to ensure retention of his skills, ability and leadership.
Annual Cash Incentive. Our annual incentive plan, the "P4P" Plan, is designed to focus on and reward achievement of annual performance goals. It is the broadest of our management incentive programs, covering our NEOs and approximately 600 other key employees. All participants in the P4P plan, including our NEOs, are assigned target incentive opportunities expressed as a percentage of base salary (pay-at-risk).
Base Salary. Base salary is the only fixed component of executive compensation and makes up the smallest percentage of total compensation.
These components delivered the following compensation for our NEOs in 2016:
NEO Compensation Delivered in 2016
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Named Executive Officer |
January 1, 2016 Base Salary |
December 31, 2016 Base Salary |
% Change During 2016 |
2016 P4P |
2016 Annual LTI Grant(1) |
|
||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Edward Bonach |
$ | 1,000,000 | $ | 1,000,000 | 0.0% | $ | 1,764,829 | $ | 4,607,715 | |||||||||
|
Gary Bhojwani(2) |
|
n/a |
$ | 750,000 |
|
n/a |
$ | 751,579 | $ | 4,833,325 | | |||||||
|
Bruce Baude(3) |
$ | 485,000 | $ | 600,000 | 23.7% | $ | 635,149 | $ | 1,203,825 | |||||||||
|
Christopher Nickele |
$ | 400,000 | $ | 420,000 | | 5.0% | $ | 476,485 | $ | 1,146,401 | | |||||||
|
Erik Helding(4) |
$ | 250,000 | $ | 400,000 | 60.0% | $ | 302,946 | $ | 730,162 | |||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
19
Maintaining Best Practices in Executive Compensation
The Committee strives to maintain best practices in corporate governance in our executive compensation programs. Conversely, there are several practices which we do not consider representative of good corporate governance, and therefore do not do.
| | | | | | | | |
|
What We Do | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
ü | Pay-for-Performance: The majority of NEO target total compensation is tied to Company, Business-segment and/or individual performance, and is therefore considered by the Company to be "Pay-at-Risk" (payouts contingent upon performance). 86% of Mr. Bonach's target total compensation is at risk, as is 72% of all other NEOs target total compensation, on average. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
ü | Balanced View on Performance: We take a balanced approach to measuring our performance by using both relative and absolute performance measures in our compensation programs. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
ü | Stock Ownership Guidelines: In order to align our executives with shareholder interests, our CEO and all of his direct reports (including the other NEOs) are required to maintain ownership levels in accordance with Company policy. Mr. Bonach is required to maintain ownership equal to 5x his base salary, while all other NEOs are required to maintain ownership equal to 2x their base salaries. Until the guidelines are met, the officer is required to retain ownership of not less than one-half of the net shares of CNO common stock received, after payment of applicable taxes, upon the vesting or exercise of any equity award. As of December 31, 2016, all NEOs have met or are within their allowable timeframes for meeting these guidelines. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
ü | Double-Trigger Change-in-Control: All employment agreements and equity award agreements for NEOs require a qualified termination of employment in addition to a change in control of the Company in order for change in control benefits to be triggered. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
ü | Strong Clawback Rights: Our P4P and LTI plans have clawback provisions that include recapture rights of any incentive amount paid or vested in the event that the Committee determines that the achievement of performance goals was based on incorrect data, errors, omissions or fraud. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
ü | Independence of Executive Compensation Consultant (Aon Hewitt): The Committee has engaged an independent executive compensation advisor, taking SEC and NYSE guidelines into consideration. Aon Hewitt has no business or personal relationships with our NEOs or Board members. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
ü | Independence of Committee members: All Committee members are independent of the Company. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
ü | Ongoing Succession Planning: Throughout the year, the Committee regularly engages in in-depth discussions regarding succession planning and talent development of our executives. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
ü | Strive to Understand Our Shareholders' Views on Executive Compensation: We had strong Say on Pay results from the 2016 Annual Meeting, at which approximately 99% of the votes cast were for approval of the Company's 2015 executive compensation as described in last year's proxy. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | |
|
What We Do Not Do | |||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
✘ | No Supplemental Executive Retirement Plans: We do not offer SERPs to our current executives. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
✘ | No Significant Perquisites: Our executives participate in broad-based Company-sponsored benefits programs on the same basis as other full-time associates. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
✘ | No Re-pricing of Stock Options: Re-pricing of underwater stock options without shareholder approval is prohibited (except in the event of certain permissible corporate events). |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
✘ | No Hedging: Senior executives, including NEOs, are prohibited from hedging activities related to our equity securities, including holding shares in a margin account. |
||||||
| | | | | | | | |
Role of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee
The Committee determines the components and amount of compensation for our executive officers and provides overall guidance for our employee compensation policies and programs. In addition, the Committee
20
actively monitors our executive development and succession planning activities related to our senior executives and other members of management. Currently, four members of our Board of Directors sit on the Committee, each of whom is an independent director under the New York Stock Exchange listing requirements, the exchange upon which our stock trades. From time to time, other Board members may also participate in the Committee's meetings, though these ad hoc participants do not participate in making pay decisions. The full Board of Directors receives regular reports of Committee deliberations and decisions and, at least once annually, the full Board reviews the Committee's written evaluation of the Chief Executive Officer's performance and compensation. The Committee's functions are more fully described in its charter, which can be found in the Investor Relations section of our website at www.CNOinc.com.
In making executive compensation decisions, the Committee receives advice from its independent compensation consultant, Aon Hewitt. Although Aon Hewitt is retained directly by the Committee, Aon Hewitt personnel interact with our executive officers as needed, specifically the Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President of Human Resources, Executive Vice President and General Counsel and their staffs to provide the Committee with relevant compensation and performance data for our executives and the Company. In addition, Aon Hewitt personnel may interact with management to confirm information, identify data questions, and/or exchange ideas.
As requested by the Committee, Aon Hewitt's services to the Committee in 2016 included:
The Committee has the authority under its charter to retain outside consultants or other advisors. Part of that decision process is an assessment of the advisors' independence. Relative to Aon Hewitt's independence the Committee took into account the independence factors determined by the SEC and NYSE. Included in the assessment the Committee took into consideration that for 2016, management determined to engage Aon Risk Services to assist in the placement of an Agents Errors and Omissions policy. Aon Risk Services received an estimated commission of $200,000 from the carrier of the insurance policy. Aon Risk Services and Aon Hewitt are subsidiaries of Aon plc operating under separate management structures. The Committee considered that the brokerage services were provided by a related Aon plc entity noting that the estimated commission of $200,000 was less than .01% of Aon plc's revenues and that Aon Hewitt and Aon Risk Services are separately managed subsidiaries of Aon plc. Fees paid by CNO to Aon Hewitt for executive compensation advisory services were $163,682 in 2016. The Committee determined Aon Hewitt to be independent.
In making its decisions, the Committee collects and considers input from multiple sources. The Committee may ask senior executive officers to attend Committee meetings where executive compensation, overall and individual performance are discussed and evaluated. During these meetings, executives provide insight, suggestions or recommendations regarding executive compensation. Deliberations generally occur with input from Aon Hewitt, members of management and other Board members. However, only the members of the Committee make decisions regarding executive compensation. In the case of the Chief Executive Officer's compensation, these decisions are submitted to the full Board for its review and approval.
21
Philosophy and Objectives
The Committee, which is comprised solely of independent, non-employee Directors, has developed a philosophy and a comprehensive compensation strategy to reward overall and individual performance that drives long-term success for our shareholders.
Our compensation philosophy consists of the following guiding principles:
Pay for Performance Objectives
The Committee strives to provide a clear reward program that allows us to attract, motivate and retain seasoned executive talent with the significant industry experience required to continue to improve our performance and build long-term shareholder value. To achieve this, our programs are designed to:
Target Total Rewards and Selection of the Comparator Groups
In setting target executive compensation opportunities, the Committee looks at Base Salary, Total Annual Cash (which is comprised of base salary and target cash incentives) and Total Direct Compensation (which is the sum of Total Annual Cash and long-term incentives). Our long-term incentives may include a combination of P-Shares, stock option awards, as well as restricted share awards. The Committee intends to compensate our executives at approximately the 50th percentile (meaning within a range of +/- 15% of the 50th percentile dollar
22
value) for total direct compensation, for the achievement of target performance, with additional compensation opportunities for the achievement of superior results.
The Committee assesses "competitive market" compensation annually using a number of sources. In determining the competitive compensation levels, at the recommendation of the independent compensation consultant, the Committee reviews targeted proxy data from a select group of peer companies identified below for the NEOs, and also compares our other executives to the Diversified Insurance Study published by Willis Towers Watson. Both of these sources provide a much more focused analysis of very specific industry peers with whom the Company competes for talent. We continued to use our peer companies for the NEOs as the relevant comparator group and all other executives have been compared to the Willis Towers Watson Diversified Industry Study in 2016.
Arch Capital Group Ltd. | Genworth Financial, Inc. | |
The Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. | Kemper Corporation | |
Horace Mann Educators Corporation | Lincoln National Corporation | |
Primerica, Inc. | Principal Financial Group, inc. | |
Voya Financial, Inc. | Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | |
Aflac Incorporated | Torchmark Corporation | |
American Financial Group, Inc. | Universal American Corp. | |
Assurant, Inc. | Unum Group | |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation |
Although aggregate pay levels are generally consistent with our compensation philosophy, it is possible that pay levels for specific individuals may be above or below the targeted competitive benchmark levels based on a number of factors including: each individual's role and responsibilities within our Company, the individual's experience and expertise, the pay levels for peers within the Company, and the pay levels for similar job functions in the marketplace. The Committee is responsible for approving all compensation programs for our senior executive officers. In determining executive compensation, the Committee considers all forms of compensation and benefits, and uses appropriate tools such as tally sheets and market studies to review the value delivered to each executive through each component of compensation.
These tools provide a vehicle for the Committee to examine external market practices and compare them to our internal evaluations and decisions. Our tally sheets capture and report:
Competitive market data is used as a reference point, and we avoid automatic adjustments based on annual competitive benchmarking data, since we believe a given executive's compensation should also reflect Company-specific factors such as: the relative importance of the role within the organization, the compensation for other positions at the same level, and individual factors such as experience, expertise, and individual performance.
23
In addition to the objective review of external factors, the Committee also considers internal equity among colleagues when determining executive compensation levels. This means that, although the Committee examines competitive pay data for specific positions, market data is not the sole factor considered in setting pay levels. The Committee also considers factors such as our organizational structure and the relative roles and responsibilities of individuals within that structure. The Committee believes that this approach fosters an environment of cooperation among executives that enhances sales growth, profitability and customer satisfaction.
Realized total compensation in any year may be significantly above or below the target compensation levels depending on whether our incentive goals were attained and whether shareholder value was created. In some cases, the amount and structure of compensation results from negotiations with executives at the time they were hired, which may reflect competitive pressures to attract and hire quality executive talent in the insurance industry. To help attract and retain such talent, the Committee also seeks to provide a level of benefits in line with those of comparable publicly traded companies without matching such benefits item by item.
24
Compensation Components
Our compensation program is composed of the following components:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Executive Compensation Components | | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Type of Compensation |
|
Component |
|
Description |
|
Why We Pay This Component |
|
How We Determine Amount |
|
2016 Key NEO Decisions |
|
|||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fixed Pay | | Base Salary |
Fixed Cash Compensation May be adjusted each year based on individual performance and relevant market data |
To attract, motivate and retain top talent |
Established using market data targeting the 50th percentile of market Adjusted up or down to reflect factors such as scope of position, responsibilities, experience level, unique skills and competencies |
Merit base salary increases for NEOs ranged from 0% 5.0% | |||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Pay-At-Risk (Annual) |
| Annual Cash Incentive (P4P) |
Variable Cash Compensation Earned based on Company, business segment and individual, financial and operational performance |
To incentivize achievement of annual financial and operational performance goals |
Established using market data targeting the 50th percentile of the market Target incentive opportunities are expressed as a percentage of base salary |
Mr. Bonach received an increase to his target incentive percent to 150% of his base salary in recognition of his leadership of the Company and to align with competitive market norms P4P payouts ranged from 113.7% to 119.4%, based on achievement against core performance metrics |
|||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Pay-At-Risk (Long-Term) |
| Performance Share Units (P-Shares) |
Equity Compensation Earned based on achievement of performance goals at the end of a three-year performance period Realizable value is variable based on long-term Company performance and stock price appreciation |
To focus management on long-term Company performance To balance the short-term focus of P4P by tying rewards to performance achieved over multi-year periods To align the interests of management with shareholders |
The Committee establishes annual targets for equity compensation based on competitive market data Individual awards may be adjusted up or down to reflect performance, potential and other individual considerations |
One-half of the total annual value of the equity award was granted in the form of P-Shares P-Shares were bifurcated (50%/50%) based on achievement of goals relative to (1) Operating ROE and (2) Relative TSR |
|||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Stock Options |
Equity Compensation Time-vested awards which generally vest over three years Realizable value is variable based on long-term stock price appreciation |
To balance the short-term focus of P4P by tying rewards to performance achieved over multi-year periods To focus management on long-term stock price appreciation To align the interests of management with shareholders |
The Committee establishes annual targets for equity compensation based on competitive market data Individual awards may be adjusted up or down to reflect performance, potential and other individual considerations Stock Options account for 50% of the annual target from a grant value perspective |
One-half of the total annual value of the equity award was granted in the form of Stock Options Stock options granted generally vest in equal installments on the 2nd and 3rd years from the anniversary of the grant date |
|||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Restricted Stock |
Equity Compensation Time-vested awards which generally vest over three years Realizable value is variable based on long-term stock price appreciation Restricted stock awards are not generally part of the annual grant, but are used in limited circumstances |
To encourage retention and reward for exceptional performance and/or potential To balance the short-term focus of P4P by tying rewards to performance achieved over multi-year periods To align the interests of management with shareholders |
The Committee may grant restricted stock awards to attract key talent, to enhance retention of key talent, and/or to recognize outstanding performance and or potential among our leaders |
The Committee granted restricted stock awards to four NEOs during 2016: To Mr. Bhojwani to induce him to join the Company; To Mr. Baude in recognition of continued valuable contributions; To Mr. Nickele in recognition of continued value contributions; To Mr. Helding in recognition of his promotion to CFO. |
|||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The table below summarizes information about the target level of 2016 Total Annual Cash (TAC) and Total Direct Compensation (TDC) for our NEOs. This table differs from the Summary Compensation Table on page xx in that values generally represent target amounts and equity grants which are part of our normal long-term
25
incentive program for 2016 only. Further detail about these compensation components can be found later in this section.
Summary of Components of TDC in 2016 at Target(1)
Named Executive Officer
|
Base Salary |
Target Incentive (% of Salary) |
Target Total Annual Cash |
Stock Option Value(2)(3) |
P-Share Value(2) |
Restricted Share Value(2) |
Total LTI Value(2) |
Target TDC(4) |
|||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edward Bonach |
$ | 1,000,000 | 150% | $ | 2,500,000 | $ | 2,090,778 | $ | 2,516,937 | $ | | $ | 4,607,715 | $ | 7,107,715 | ||||||||||
% Change vs. 2015 |
| 0% | | | | 6% | | | | | | | | 10% | | 5% | |||||||||
% of TDC |
14% | 35% | 65% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Gary Bhojwani |
$ | 750,000 | | 125% | $ | 1,687,500 | $ | 520,705 | $ | | $ | 4,312,620 | $ | 4,833,325 | $ | 6,520,825 | |||||||||
% Change vs. 2015 |
n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||||||||||||||||||
% of TDC |
| 12% | | | | 26% | | 8% | | | | 66% | | 74% | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Bruce Baude |
$ | 600,000 | 100% | $ | 1,200,000 | $ | 390,122 | $ | 469,161 | $ | 344,541 | $ | 1,203,824 | $ | 2,403,824 | ||||||||||
% Change vs. 2015 |
| 24% | | | | 24% | | | | | | | | 18% | | 19% | |||||||||
% of TDC |
25% | 50% | 50% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Christopher Nickele |
$ | 420,000 | | 100% | $ | 840,000 | $ | 390,122 | $ | 469,161 | $ | 287,118 | $ | 1,146,401 | $ | 1,986,401 | |||||||||
% Change vs. 2015 |
5% | 5% | 25% | 16% | |||||||||||||||||||||
% of TDC |
| 21% | | | | 42% | | | | | | | | 58% | | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Erik Helding |
$ | 400,000 | 75% | $ | 700,000 | $ | 303,152 | $ | 113,736 | $ | 313,274 | $ | 730,162 | $ | 1,430,162 | ||||||||||
% Change vs. 2015 |
| 60% | | | | 87% | | | | | | | | 135% | | 109% | |||||||||
% of TDC |
28% | 49% | 51% | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
In delivering total direct compensation to our NEOs, the Company provided both fixed (base salary) and variable (cash and equity incentives) compensation to the NEOs in 2016. The vast majority of compensation awarded to NEOs in 2016 is at risk to the executive because the compensation value that is actually paid may vary from the target compensation value that was awarded by the Compensation Committee and the payment is dependent on Company, business segment and individual performance. The amount of total target compensation at risk was significantly more than the amount of base salary. Also, the majority of total target compensation awarded in 2016 to each NEO was in the form of equity. The following charts show each element of 2016 target NEO compensation, including the mix of short-term and long-term incentives, as well as the amount of "Pay-at-Risk" for the CEO and for the other NEOs (on average excluding Mr. Bhojwani):
CEO | All Other NEOs(1) |
26
Base Salaries
Strategy
Although the Committee begins by targeting the 50th percentile of the competitive market, base salaries may range from the 25th percentile (for recently promoted employees or those who otherwise have less experience in the current position) to the 75th percentile (for high performers with significant industry experience) of the competitive market data.
In 2016, the Committee increased Mr. Helding's base salary by approximately 52% (to $400,000) in recognition of his promotion from SVP, Treasury & Investor Relations to Chief Financial Officer in April of 2016. In addition, the Committee increased Mr. Baude's base salary by 20% (to $600,000) in June of 2016, in recognition of his continued valuable contributions to the Company.
2016 Merit Increases
Annual reviews of executives' base salaries consider numerous factors, including:
No specific weighting of these factors is used. However, given our desire for a performance-based culture, the Committee's use of discretion generally results in increases for our top performers and little or no increases in base salary for average or lower performing employees.
There is no expectation on the part of the Committee for senior executives to receive base salary increases annually. The Committee awarded a base salary increase to three of the NEOs in addition to most of the other executives in February 2016. Mr. Baude received a 3.1% merit increase, while Mr. Helding received a 5.0% merit increase (prior to his promotion to Chief Financial Officer), to reflect their overall performance and base salary in relation to the market pay level for their positions. Mr. Nickele received a 5.0% merit increase to reflect his overall performance.
Annual Cash Incentives
Strategy
Our annual incentive plan, the "Pay for Performance" Plan (P4P) is the broadest of our management incentive programs, covering our NEOs and other key employees. All participants in the P4P plan, including our NEOs, are assigned target incentive opportunities expressed as a percentage of base salary.
2016 Pay for Performance (P4P) Plan Design
During February 2016, the Committee reviewed the P4P plan design for 2016 in order to ensure alignment between shareholder and participant interests, to keep senior executives focused on the financial performance of the enterprise, to improve alignment with financial metrics that participants influence and to select operational/business metrics that drive financial success. This review was accomplished by focusing on the selection of appropriate performance metrics and the determination of performance levels which would contribute to financial
27
success. As a result of this review, most performance metrics and weightings remained the same. Metrics which continued to be part of 2016 incentive plans applicable to NEOs included:
To better reflect CNO's strategic focus toward customer growth a new metric was added for 2016:
Our P4P plan design rewards a threshold level of financial performance which corresponds to 50% of a target payout; target level of performance which provides 100% of target payout; and a maximum level of performance which provides a payout of 200% of target. Any payout between these financial performance goals is determined through straight line interpolation between the appropriate levels of performance. Consistent with our compensation philosophy, target annual incentive levels are established to generate Total Annual Cash compensation at competitive market median levels.
Although we have a large net operating loss carry-forward, the Committee continues to administer the P4P and long-term incentive plans so that payments qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, the Committee does reserve the right to make awards that do not qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) to the extent it deems it advisable to do so.
28
The table below summarizes the 2016 financial metrics and weightings for our NEOs under the P4P plan.
Summary of 2016 P4P Metrics and Weightings for NEOs
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Named Executive Officer | ||||||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Performance Measures |
Edward Bonach | Gary Bhojwani | Bruce Baude | Christopher Nickele | Erik Helding | ||||||||||
|
Operating EPS |
| 40% | 30% | 30% | 25% | 40% | | ||||||||
|
Policies In-Force |
10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | 10% | ||||||||||
|
GAAP Revenue |
| 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 20% | | ||||||||
|
Combined In-Force EBIT |
20% | 20% | 20% | 25% | 20% | ||||||||||
|
Combined VNB |
| 10% | 20% | 20% | 20% | 10% | | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
2016 P4P Plan Performance Goals and Results
The primary purpose of P4P is to reward for core annual operating performance. Under the terms of the Pay For Performance Plan (P4P Plan) as approved by shareholders, the Committee has the authority to adjust performance goals or results for various items as the Committee determines to be required to properly reflect the year's operating results.
The Committee takes into account a number of factors in setting incentive performance targets as well as the threshold and maximum levels. These factors include company business plans and current forecasts, historical performance, incentive practices used by peer companies and analyst expectations. The Committee believes that the range of performance goals for the P4P metrics provide appropriate stretch. After reviewing all of these factors, the Committee determined that all of the participants with corporate measures would have the same threshold and maximum performance levels.
The table below provides a summary of 2016 performance targets and actual results for our NEOs under the P4P plan.
Summary of 2016 P4P Performance Targets and Actual Results for NEOs
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
Performance Targets | ||||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Performance Measures |
Threshold | Target | Maximum | 2016 Results | |||||||
|
Operating EPS |
$1.35 | $1.42 | $1.55 | $1.47 | | ||||||
|
Policies In-Force |
3,475.0 MM | 3,553.7 MM | 3,650.0 MM | 3,505.2 MM | |||||||
|
GAAP Revenue |
$3,750.0 MM | $3,922.8 MM | $4,100.0 MM | $3,884.0 MM | | ||||||
|
Combined In-Force EBIT |
$625.0 MM | $650.8 MM | $700.0 MM | $676.0 MM | |||||||
|
Combined VNB |
$75.0 MM | $85.5 MM | $96.0 MM | $82.1 MM | | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | | | |
29
The table below provides the threshold, target and maximum payouts for 2016 for each of our NEOs under the P4P plan.
Summary of 2016 P4P Opportunities for NEOs
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Named Executive Officer |
Threshold Payout (% of Salary) |
Target Payout (% of Salary) |
Maximum Payout (% of Salary) |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Edward Bonach |
75.0% | 150% | 300% | ||||||
|
Gary Bhojwani |
62.5% | 125% | 250% | | |||||
|
Bruce Baude |
50.0% | 100% | 200% | ||||||
|
Christopher Nickele |
50.0% | 100% | 200% | | |||||
|
Erik Helding |
37.5% | 75% | 150% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
The table below sets forth the actual bonuses paid out for 2016 to the NEOs pursuant to our P4P plan.
2016 P4P Target and Actual Bonuses
| | | | | | | | |
|
Named Executive Officer |
Target Amount | Actual Amount | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
|
Edward Bonach |
$1,500,000 | $1,764,829 | |||||
|
Gary Bhojwani |
$937,500 | $751,579 | | ||||
|
Bruce Baude |
$600,000 | $635,149 | |||||
|
Christopher Nickele |
$420,000 | $476,485 | | ||||
|
Erik Helding1 |
$300,000 | $302,946 | |||||
| | | | | | | | |
Long-term Equity Incentives
Design and Strategy
Under the Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Committee may grant a variety of long-term incentive awards, including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock or restricted stock units, and performance shares or units, settled in cash or stock.
Unless otherwise noted, grants to our NEOs have vesting schedules identical to those for other executives. To be eligible to vest in long-term equity incentive awards, associates must continue to work for us through the vesting dates or satisfy the definition of Retirement.
The Committee assesses aggregate share usage and dilution levels in comparison to general industry norms. Through this method, the Committee believes it is mindful of total cost, grants awards that are competitive within the market, promotes internal equity and reinforces our philosophy of pay for performance.
The Committee reviews and approves individual grants for the NEOs as well as all stock options, performance share (P-Share) grants and any restricted share awards made to other executives under the purview of the Committee. Annual grants for all officers are reviewed and approved at the Committee's scheduled meeting at approximately the same time each year. Stock options may be granted only with an exercise price at or above the closing market price of our common stock on the date of grant (Fair Market Value). Interim or off-cycle grants are reviewed and approved by the Committee as circumstances warrant. The Chief Executive Officer has been authorized by the Committee to utilize a designated number of shares each year to grant equity awards to non-Section 16 executives to attract, reward, motivate and/or retain such employees, as deemed appropriate by the CEO. Such awards are regularly reviewed by the Committee.
30
Equity Grants in 2016
The Committee established the annual target for all long-term equity incentive grants based on competitive market data. The approach was intended to deliver median Total Direct Compensation using a combination of stock options and P-Shares. In the 2016 annual grant, the Committee used a 30-day average of our stock price to calculate the number of shares granted to each executive and continued to use a Black-Scholes valuation model.
In 2016, the Committee continued the mix of award grants of 50% stock options and 50% P-Shares. This mix of long-term equity incentives focuses solely on performance elements and better aligns our long-term compensation with generating shareholder value. The P-Shares awarded in 2016 payout for threshold-level performance at 50% of the target award, and the up side opportunity for maximum performance was 200% of the target award. Dividends are paid on previously granted shares of restricted stock prior to vesting, and dividend equivalents are paid on P-Shares upon vesting.
The table below shows the annual equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2016.
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
2016 Equity Grant | ||||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Named Executive Officer |
Stock Options(1) | Performance Shares | Restricted Shares | ||||||
|
Edward Bonach |
382,653 | 123,926 | | | |||||
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
$2,090,778 | $2,516,937 | | ||||||
|
Gary Bhojwani(2) |
90,600 | | 234,000 | | |||||
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
$520,705 | | $4,312,620 | ||||||
|
Bruce Baude(3) |
71,400 | 23,100 | 19,824 | | |||||
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
$390,122 | $469,161 | $344,541 | ||||||
|
Christopher Nickele(4) |
71,400 | 23,100 | 16,520 | | |||||
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
$390,122 | $469,161 | $287,118 | ||||||
|
Erik Helding(5) |
53,600 | 5,600 | 17,300 | | |||||
|
Grant Date Fair Value |
$303,152 | $113,736 | $313,274 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Long-Term Incentive Program Performance for Awards Granted in 2014, 2015 and 2016
2014 2016 P-Share Performance
P-Shares for the 2014 2016 grant were bifurcated between three-year average Operating ROE and relative TSR over the performance period. The Committee believed that the combination of the two metrics would focus the management team on improving long-term earnings growth and creating value for shareholders. For the 2014 2016 grant, we intended to deliver compensation at the 50th percentile of the relevant comparator group at target performance. At the end of the performance period (December 31, 2016), the Company achieved a three-year average Operating ROE of 9.64% (the target was 9.25%), and a three-year average TSR performance result of 5.3%, which fell below the 25th percentile of our peer companies. The TSR P-Share results were below threshold performance and the Operating ROE P-Share grant was achieved above target. Accordingly, 0% of the TSR P-Shares and 126% of the three-year average Operating ROE P-Shares vested from this grant.
31
The table below shows actual Operating ROE P-Share vesting for NEOs related to the 2014 2016 award.
2014 2016 Operating ROE P-Share Award Vesting for NEOs in 2016
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Named Executive Officer |
Operating ROE P-Shares Granted |
P-Share Opportunity Earned (% of Target) |
P-Shares Vested | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Edward Bonach |
29,650 | 126% | 37,359 | | |||||
|
Bruce Baude |
5,740 | 126% | 7,232 | ||||||
|
Christopher Nickele |
6,695 | 126% | 8,435 | | |||||
|
Erik Helding |
1,820 | 126% | 2,293 | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Note: Mr. Bhojwani was not employed by the Company and Mr. Helding was not an executive officer at the time of the 2014 2016 P-Share Grant.
2015 2017 and 2016 2018 P-Share Performance Metrics and Targets
The 2015 2017 grant was bifurcated between three year average Operating ROE, with a 9.43% target for the CEO and a 9.25% target for all other NEOs, and relative TSR for our comparator group, targeting the 50th percentile for target performance.
The 2016 2018 grant was bifurcated between three year average Operating ROE, with a 9.5% target, and relative TSR for our comparator group, targeting the 50th percentile for target performance.
Continuing the use of relative Total Shareholder Return in the 2015 2017 and 2016 2018 grants provides an incentive to CNO executives to deliver shareholder value by outperforming our peers. The Company's relative TSR will be ranked for the 2015 2017 performance period against the following TSR performance peers, derived from common industry companies and those companies with competing products:
2015 2017 TSR Performance Peers (1)
Aflac, Inc. | Metlife, Inc. | |
American Financial Group, Inc. | Principal Financial Group, Inc. | |
Assurant, Inc. | Prudential Financial, Inc. | |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | Reinsurance Group of America Incorporated | |
Genworth Financial, Inc. | Torchmark Corporation | |
Kemper Corporation | Universal American Corp. | |
Lincoln National Corp. | Unum Group |
32
The Company's relative TSR will be ranked for the 2016 2018 performance period against the following TSR performance peers, derived from common industry companies and those companies with competing products:
2016 2018 TSR Performance Peers (1)
Aflac, Inc. | Kemper Corporation | |
American Financial Group, Inc. | Lincoln National Corp. | |
Arch Capital Group | Metlife, Inc. | |
Assurant, Inc. | Primerica, Inc. | |
Cincinnati Financial Corporation | Principal Financial Group, Inc. | |
Genworth Financial, Inc. | Prudential Financial, Inc. | |
Hanover Insurance Group, Inc. | Reinsurance Group of America. Incorporated | |
Hartford Financial Services | Torchmark Corporation | |
Horace Mann Educators | Unum Group | |
Voya Financial, Inc. |
The table below shows the opportunities for NEOs related to P-Share vesting, depending on the level of performance achieved in relation to the associated grant metrics.
2015 2017 and 2016 2018 P-Share Opportunities for NEOs
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Named Executive Officer |
Threshold (as a % of Granted P-Shares) |
Target (as a % of Granted P-Shares) |
Maximum (as a % of Granted P-Shares) |
||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
Edward Bonach |
50.0% | 100% | 200% | ||||||
|
Gary Bhojwani1 |
N/A | N/A | N/A | | |||||
|
Bruce Baude |
50.0% | 100% | 200% | ||||||
|
Christopher Nickele |
50.0% | 100% | 200% | | |||||
|
Erik Helding |
50.0% | 100% | 200% | ||||||
| | | | | | | | | | |
Benefits
Our NEOs are eligible to participate in all of the broad-based Company-sponsored benefits programs on the same basis as other full-time employees. These include our health and welfare benefits, such as our medical/dental plans, disability plans and life insurance. We do not offer any supplemental executive health and welfare programs. Executives may also participate in our 401(k) Plan. The Company also has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan. This plan is primarily intended as a "restoration" plan, giving participants the ability to defer their own compensation above the Internal Revenue Service limits imposed on the 401(k) Plan. At present, we do not make annual contributions to the non-qualified deferred compensation plan in addition to the amounts contributed by our executives.
Compensation of Former Chief Business Officer
Mr. Perry's base salary, target incentive, and equity compensation awards for fiscal 2016 were determined in accordance with the compensation philosophy described above, including the policy of targeting our compensation within our "competitive market" as described above.
Based upon the competitive placement of his compensation relative to his peers in the market, Mr. Perry did not receive a base salary increase or change to his target annual incentive opportunity in 2016. Through the
33
additional delivery of equity in both stock options and performance shares, the Committee sought to strengthen the alignment of Mr. Perry's total compensation level with the interests of our shareholders.
Mr. Perry's employment with the Company ended on April 11, 2016. Pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Perry received a payment of $1,332,248 in connection with his termination, representing one year of base salary, one year of P4P at target, and a prorated 2016 P4P bonus based on actual results.
Additional Information
Prohibition against Trading in Derivatives
It violates our policy for any senior personnel to purchase, sell or engage in any other transaction involving any derivative securities or hedging related to any of our equity securities. This prohibition does not, however, apply to any exercise of our stock options pursuant to our Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan or any other benefit plans that we may adopt from time to time, any sale of our stock in connection with any cashless exercise (if otherwise permitted), or payment of withholding tax upon the exercise, of any such stock option.
Clawback Rights
Our Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan contains a clawback provision relating to our long-term equity awards: stock options, P-Shares and restricted stock. Under this clawback provision, if our financial statements are required to be restated as a result of errors, omissions, or fraud, the Committee may, at its discretion, based on the facts and circumstances surrounding the restatement, direct the recovery of all or a portion of an equity award from one or more executives with respect to any fiscal year in which our financial results are negatively affected by such restatement. To do this, we may pursue various ways to recover awards from one or more executives: (1) seek repayment from the executive; (2) reduce the amount that would otherwise be payable to the executive under another benefit plan; (3) withhold future equity grants, bonus awards, or salary increases; or (4) take any combination of these actions.
Our Pay for Performance (P4P) Plan contains recapture rights of any incentive amount paid or vested in the event that the Committee determines that the achievement of performance goals was based on incorrect data.
Impact of Tax and Accounting on Compensation Decisions
As a general matter, the Committee considers the various tax and accounting implications of our compensation vehicles.
When determining amounts of long-term equity incentive grants to executives and employees, the Committee considers the accounting cost associated with the grants. Under FASB ASC Topic 718, grants of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other share-based payments result in an accounting charge that is reflected in our financial statements.
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally prohibits any publicly held corporation from taking a federal income tax deduction for compensation paid in excess of $1 million in any taxable year to the chief executive officer and the next three highest compensated officers excluding the Chief Financial Officer. Exceptions are made for qualified performance-based compensation, among other things. It is the Committee's policy to maximize the effectiveness of our executive compensation plans in this regard. However, the Committee believes that compensation and benefits decisions should be primarily driven by the needs of the business, rather than by tax policy. Therefore, the Committee may make pay decisions (such as the determination of the Chief Executive Officer's base salary) that result in compensation expense that is not fully deductible under Section 162(m). Despite our large net operating loss carry-forward, the Committee continues to administer our incentive plans so that payments qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.
34
Termination and Change in Control Arrangements
Under the terms of award agreements under our equity-based compensation plans and under our employment agreements, the NEOs are entitled to payments and benefits upon the occurrence of specified events including termination of employment for various reasons. The specific terms of these arrangements, as well as an estimate of the compensation that would have been payable had they been triggered as of fiscal year-end, are described in the section entitled "Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control" on page 45. The terms of these arrangements were set through the course of employment agreement negotiations with each of the NEOs, with an emphasis on internal consistency. The potential payments upon a change in control for the CEO and his direct reports are three times and two times, respectively, their annual base salary plus target bonus, to align with market best practices. A double trigger, both CIC and termination, continues to be required before CIC payments are made.
The termination of employment provisions of the employment agreements were entered into in order to address competitive concerns when the NEOs were recruited. Providing those individuals with a fixed amount of compensation offset the potential risk of leaving their prior employer or foregoing other opportunities in order to work for us. At the time of entering into these arrangements, the Committee considered our aggregate potential obligations in the context of the desirability of hiring the individual and the expected compensation upon joining us.
The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has reviewed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and has discussed it with management. Based on the Committee's review and discussions with management, the Committee recommended to our Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement. This report is provided by the following independent directors, who comprise the Committee:
Frederick J.
Sievert, Chair
Ellyn L. Brown
Daniel R. Maurer
Michael T. Tokarz
35
Summary Compensation Table for 2016
The following Summary Compensation Table sets forth compensation paid to (i) our chief executive officer, (ii) our chief financial officer, (iii) the other three most highly compensated individuals who served as executive officers of CNO as of December 31, 2016 and (iv) our former chief business officer (collectively, the "Named Executive Officers") for services rendered during 2016, 2015 and 2014.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE FOR 2016
Name and Principal Position
|
Year | Salary | Bonus(1) | Stock Awards(2) |
Option Awards(3) |
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation(4) |
All Other Compensation(5) |
Total | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edward Bonach |
2016 | $ | 1,000,000 | $ | | $ | 2,516,937 | $ | 2,090,778 | $ | 1,764,829 | $ | 66,377 | $ | 7,438,921 | ||||||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
2015 | 1,000,000 | | 2,052,722 | 3,065,884 | 1,070,279 | 37,753 | 7,226,638 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2014 | 1,000,000 | | 1,215,057 | 1,595,076 | 2,078,100 | 22,745 | 5,910,978 | |||||||||||||||||
Gary Bhojwani(6) |
2016 | 517,307 | | 4,312,620 | 520,705 | 751,579 | 74,843 | 6,177,054 | |||||||||||||||||
President |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bruce Baude |
2016 | 559,487 | 800,000 | 813,702 | 390,122 | 635,149 | 28,683 | 3,227,143 | |||||||||||||||||
Chief Operations & |
2015 | 497,500 | | 458,757 | 557,522 | 428,874 | 11,534 | 1,954,187 | |||||||||||||||||
Technology Officer |
2014 | 483,334 | | 235,225 | 308,796 | 744,215 | 10,698 | 1,782,268 | |||||||||||||||||
Christopher Nickele |
2016 | 416,667 | | 756,278 | 390,122 | 476,485 | 28,488 | 2,068,040 | |||||||||||||||||
Chief Actuary |
2015 | 400,000 | | 358,595 | 557,522 | 335,232 | 23,350 | 1,674,699 | |||||||||||||||||
|
2014 | 398,392 | | 424,497 | 360,198 | 573,590 | 21,891 | 1,778,568 | |||||||||||||||||
Erik Helding(7) |
2016 | 357,813 | | 427,010 | 303,152 | 302,946 | 16,289 | 1,407,210 | |||||||||||||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scott Perry(8) |
2016 | 187,613 | | 536,184 | 445,854 | 182,248 | 1,182,951 | 2,534,850 | |||||||||||||||||
Former Chief Business |
2015 | 575,000 | | 537,983 | 836,229 | 482,948 | 21,904 | 2,454,064 | |||||||||||||||||
Officer |
2014 | 573,583 | | 391,974 | 514,558 | 719,701 | 16,453 | 2,216,269 |
36
2016 grants, refer to Note 11 of the CNO financial statements in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC. For information on the valuation assumptions with respect to grants made prior to 2016, refer to the note on stockholders' equity and stock-related information to the CNO financial statements in the Form 10-K for the respective year-end. See the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table for information on options granted in 2016 and see Impact of Tax and Accounting on Compensation Decisions for additional discussion. The amounts in this column do not necessarily correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executive Officers.
The table below shows such amounts for 2016 for each Named Executive Officer:
Name
|
Group Life Insurance Premiums |
401(k) Plan Contributions |
Dividends | Severance | Spousal Travel |
Tax Reimbursement |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edward Bonach |
$ | 2,772 | $ | 7,950 | $ | 45,555 | $ | | $ | 6,342 | $ | 3,758 | |||||||
Gary Bhojwani |
368 | 7,950 | 56,160 | | 6,857 | 3,508 | |||||||||||||
Bruce Baude |
966 | 7,950 | 19,767 | | | | |||||||||||||
Christopher Nickele |
1,806 | 7,950 | 18,732 | | | | |||||||||||||
Erik Helding |
369 | 7,950 | 7,970 | | | | |||||||||||||
Scott Perry |
322 | 7,950 | 18,535 | 1,150,000 | 3,363 | 2,781 |
37
Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2016
The following table shows certain information concerning grants of plan-based awards in 2016 to the Named Executive Officers.
GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2016
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts (in Shares of Common Stock) Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards(2) |
All Other Stock Awards: Number of Shares of Stock or Units(3) |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options(4) |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards(1) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards(5) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(6) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grant Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Edward Bonach |
$ | 739,140 | $ | 1,478,279 | $ | 2,956,558 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 382,653 | $ | 17.38 | $ | 2,090,778 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 61,963 | 123,926 | 247,852 | 2,516,937 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gary Bhojwani |
330,422 | 660,844 | 1,321,688 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5-5-16 | 90,600 | 18.43 | 520,705 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5-5-16 | 234,000 | 4,312,620 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bruce Baude |
279,235 | 558,470 | 1,116,940 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 71,400 | 17.38 | 390,122 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 11,550 | 23,100 | 46,200 | 469,161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 19,824 | 344,541 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Christopher Nickele |
208,470 | 416,940 | 833,880 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 71,400 | 17.38 | 390,122 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 11,550 | 23,100 | 46,200 | 469,161 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 16,520 | 287,118 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Erik Helding |
126,238 | 252,476 | 504,952 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 5,300 | 92,114 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 17,300 | 17.38 | 94,525 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 2,800 | 5,600 | 11,200 | 113,736 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5-5-16 | 36,300 | 18.43 | 208,627 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5-5-16 | 12,000 | 221,160 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Scott Perry |
80,123 | 160,245 | 320,490 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 81,600 | 17.38 | 445,854 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2-23-16 | 13,200 | 26,400 | 52,800 | 536,184 |
38
Narrative Supplement to the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards in 2016 Table
Employment Agreements
Chief Executive Officer. We have an employment agreement with Mr. Bonach, pursuant to which he serves as our Chief Executive Officer, for a three-year term ending on October 1, 2017. His employment agreement provides for an annual base salary (currently $1,000,000), with increases from time to time based on his performance, and an annual performance-based target bonus (currently 175% of base salary, with a maximum of 350% of his annual base salary). As described more fully in "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," if Mr. Bonach's employment is terminated by us without "Cause" or if he resigns "With Reason" (as defined in his employment agreement), or his employment is terminated by reason of his death or "Disability" (as defined in his employment agreement), Mr. Bonach would be entitled to receive specified additional benefits. Mr. Bonach is subject to a non-solicitation and non-competition clause throughout the term of the agreement and for one year thereafter.
President. We have an employment agreement with Mr. Bhojwani pursuant to which he serves as President for a three-year term ending on April 18, 2019. His employment agreement provides for an annual base salary (currently $750,000), with increases from time to time based on his performance, and an annual performance-based bonus with a target of 125% of base salary and a maximum of 250% of base salary. As described more fully in "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," if Mr. Bhojwani's employment is terminated by us without "Cause" or if he resigns "With Reason" (as defined in his employment agreement), or his employment is terminated by reason of his death or "Disability" (as defined in his employment agreement), Mr. Bhojwani would be entitled to receive specified additional benefits. Mr. Bhojwani is subject to a non-solicitation and non-competition clause throughout the term of his agreement and for one year thereafter.
Chief Operations and Technology Officer. We have an employment agreement with Mr. Baude pursuant to which he serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Operations and Technology Officer, for a three-year term that expires on July 31, 2018. His employment agreement provided for an annual salary (currently $600,000), with increases from time to time based on his performance) and an annual performance-based bonus with a target of 100% of base salary and a maximum of 200% of base salary. As described more fully in "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," if Mr. Baude's employment is terminated by us without "Cause" or if he resigns "With Reason" (as defined in his employment agreement), or his employment is terminated by reason of his death or "Disability" (as defined in his employment agreement), Mr. Baude would be entitled to receive specified additional benefits. Mr. Baude is subject to a non-solicitation clause throughout the term of the agreement and for one year thereafter.
Chief Actuary. We have an employment agreement with Mr. Nickele, pursuant to which he serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Actuary, for a three-year term ending on October 31, 2017. His employment agreement provides for an annual base salary (currently $420,000), with increases from time to time based on his performance, and an annual performance-based bonus with a target of 100% of base salary and a maximum of 200% of base salary. As described more fully in "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," if
39
Mr. Nickele's employment is terminated by us without "Cause" or if he resigns "With Reason" (as defined in his employment agreement), or his employment is terminated by reason of his death or "Disability" (as defined in his employment agreement), Mr. Nickele would be entitled to receive specified additional benefits. Mr. Nickele is subject to a non-solicitation clause throughout the term of his agreement and for one year thereafter.
Chief Financial Officer. We have an employment agreement with Mr. Helding, pursuant to which he serves as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, for a three-year term ending on April 11, 2019. His employment agreement provides for an annual base salary (currently $400,000), with increases from time to time based on his performance, and an annual performance-based bonus with a target of 75% of base salary and a maximum of 150% of base salary. As described more fully in "Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control," if Mr. Helding's employment is terminated by us without "Cause" or if he resigns "With Reason" (as defined in his employment agreement), or his employment is terminated by reason of his death or "Disability" (as defined in his employment agreement), Mr. Helding would be entitled to receive specified additional benefits. Mr. Helding is subject to a non-solicitation clause throughout the term of his agreement and for one year thereafter.
Chief Business Officer. We had an employment agreement with Mr. Perry, pursuant to which he served as Chief Business Officer. In accordance with the terms of his employment agreement, Mr. Perry received the payments described in the Summary Compensation Table on page 36, in connection with the termination of his employment effective April 11, 2016.
See "Summary of Components of TDC in 2016 at Target" on page 26 of this proxy statement for information regarding the portion of total compensation for the Named Executive Officers represented by the salary and bonus payable under the executive employment agreements described above.
Terms of Equity-Based Awards
Vesting Schedule
Unless otherwise provided in the footnote disclosure to the table of Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End on pages 42 and 43 of this Proxy Statement, one-half of each option award vests on the second anniversary of the date of grant and the other one-half vests on the third anniversary of the date of grant. Options granted in 2015 and 2016 expire ten years from the date of grant, and options granted in 2010 2014 expire seven years from the date of grant.
Awards of restricted stock generally vest in three equal annual installments beginning one year after the grant, subject to continued service through the vesting dates. Performance share awards are measured over a three-year performance period at which time they will vest only if the financial goals have been achieved, subject to continued service through the vesting dates. Unless otherwise noted, grants to the Named Executive Officers have vesting schedules identical to other officers.
Forfeiture and Post-Employment Treatment
Holders of stock options generally have 90 days after termination of employment to exercise options to the extent they were vested on the date of termination. Unvested restricted stock and performance shares are generally forfeited upon termination of employment except upon retirement, disability or death. Awards outstanding under the Company's Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan will be treated as follows upon termination of employment due to an individual's retirement or disability (except as otherwise provided in the individual award agreement): (i) outstanding stock options will continue to vest on the original vesting schedule and the individual may exercise the options until the earlier of the expiration date for such options or five years after the date of retirement; (ii) any unvested restricted stock will continue to vest after retirement on the same vesting schedule as if the individual had remained employed by CNO; and (iii) a pro rata portion of any
40
performance shares will vest and will be payable to the extent the performance criteria are met at the same time as others receive payments under such performance share award. For the purpose of the Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan, "retirement" means voluntary termination of employment after achieving either 62 years of age, or 60 years of age with at least 10 years of employment with the Company. Upon an individual's death: (i) outstanding stock options will vest and be exercisable for 12 months; (ii) restricted stock will vest; and (iii) a pro rata portion of any performance shares will vest and be payable to the extent the performance criteria are met at the same time as others receive payments under such performance share award.
Option Exercise Price
Options granted under the Company's Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan have an exercise price equal to the closing price on the date of grant.
Dividends
Holders of previously granted unvested restricted stock or restricted stock units are entitled to receive any cash dividends or cash equivalents at the same times and in the same amounts per share as holders of the Company's common stock. Such payments are taxed as compensation income to the holders of restricted stock. Holders of performance share awards are entitled to dividend equivalents on any performance shares that vest. Such dividend equivalents are payable in cash at the time of vesting of the performance shares to the extent that cash dividends are paid on the common stock underlying the performance shares after the award date and prior to the issuance of shares upon vesting.
41
Outstanding Equity Awards at 2016 Fiscal Year-End
The following table sets forth certain information concerning outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of December 31, 2016.
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2016 FISCAL YEAR-END
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCK AWARDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(4) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested(3) |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
OPTION AWARDS | |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Name
|
Award Date |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable |
Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable |
Option Exercise Price |
Option Expiration Date(1) |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested(2) |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Edward Bonach |
2-28-12 | 207,900 | | $ | 7.51 | 2-28-19 | | $ | | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
|
2-27-13 | 271,900 | | 10.88 | 2-27-20 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
3-20-14 | (5) | 103,645 | 103,645 | 19.15 | 3-20-21 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-25-15 | (6) | | 282,050 | 16.42 | 2-25-25 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
3-19-15 | (7) | | | | | | | 27,210 | 521,072 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
3-19-15 | (8) | | | | | | | 108,840 | 2,084,286 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-23-16 | (9) | | 382,653 | 17.38 | 2-23-26 | | | 30,982 | 593,305 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-23-16 | (10) | | | | | | | 123,926 | 2,373,183 | ||||||||||||||||||
Gary Bhojwani |
5-5-16 | (11) | | 90,600 | 18.43 | 5-5-26 | 234,000 | 4,481,100 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Bruce Baude |
2-27-13 | 65,200 | | 10.88 | 2-27-20 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
3-20-14 | (5) | 20,065 | 20,065 | 19.15 | 3-20-21 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-25-15 | (6) | | 51,290 | 16.42 | 2-25-25 | 4,066 | 77,864 | 4,948 | 94,754 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-25-15 | (8) | | | | | | | 19,790 | 378,979 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-23-16 | (9) | | 71,400 | 17.38 | 2-23-26 | 19,824 | 379,630 | 5,775 | 110,591 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-23-16 | (10) | | | | | | | 23,100 | 442,365 | ||||||||||||||||||
Christopher Nickele |
2-27-13 | 32,600 | | 10.88 | 2-27-20 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
3-20-14 | (5) | 23,405 | 23,405 | 19.15 | 3-20-21 | 2,612 | 50,020 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-25-15 | (6) | | 51,290 | 16.42 | 2-25-25 | | | 4,948 | 94,754 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-25-15 | (8) | | | | | | | 19,790 | 378,979 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-23-16 | (9) | | 71,400 | 17.38 | 2-23-26 | 16,520 | 316,358 | 5,775 | 110,591 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-23-16 | (10) | | | | | | | 23,100 | 442,365 | ||||||||||||||||||
Erik Helding |
2-28-12 | 5,750 | | 7.51 | 2-28-19 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
2-27-13 | 15,200 | | 10.88 | 2-27-20 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
3-20-14 | (5) | 6,355 | 6,355 | 19.15 | 3-20-21 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-25-15 | (6) | | 14,530 | 16.42 | 2-25-25 | | | 1,403 | 26,867 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-25-15 | (8) | | | | | | | 5,610 | 107,432 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
9-2-15 | (12) | | | | | 1,932 | 36,998 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-23-16 | (9) | | 17,300 | 17.38 | 2-23-26 | 5,300 | 101,495 | 1,400 | 26,810 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
2-23-16 | (10) | | | | | | | 5,600 | 107,240 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
5-5-16 | (11) | | 36,300 | 18.43 | 5-5-26 | 12,000 | 229,800 | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Scott Perry(13) |
| | | | | | | | |
42
operating return on equity and achieves the threshold level with respect to the performance share awards made in 2015 and 2016 based on total shareholder return. For the 2015 and 2016 performance share awards, one-half of the aggregate award is based on the Company's three-year average operating return on equity, with a target of 9.25% for 2015 (for all Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Bonach, for whom the target is 9.43%) and 9.50% for 2016. The other half of the performance share awards made in 2015 and 2016 is based on relative total shareholder return for a comparator group, targeting the 50th percentile. For purposes of these awards, average operating return on equity is calculated based on "Operating earnings", defined as net income applicable to common stock before: (i) loss on extinguishment of debt, net of income taxes; (ii) net realized investment gains or losses, net of related amortization and income taxes; (iii) fair value changes due to fluctuations in the interest rates used to discount embedded derivative liabilities related to fixed index annuities, net of related amortization and income taxes; (iv) equity in earnings of certain non-strategic investments, earnings attributable to non-controlling interests and earnings from discontinued operations, in each case net of income taxes; (v) changes to the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets; (vi) the cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of income taxes; (vii) after-tax mark-to-market change in the agent deferred compensation liability; and (viii) unusual income or expense items, net of income taxes, that are unlikely to recur as determined by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee.
43
Option Exercises and Stock Vested in 2016
The following table provides information, for the Named Executive Officers, concerning (i) stock option exercises during 2016 and the value realized upon exercise (before payment of any applicable withholding tax) and (ii) the number of shares acquired upon the vesting of restricted stock awards in 2016 and performance share awards (for the 2014 2016 performance period) and the value realized upon vesting (in each case before payment of any applicable withholding tax).
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED IN 2016
|
OPTION AWARDS | STOCK AWARDS | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Name
|
Number of Shares Acquired On Exercise |
Value Realized Upon Exercise |
Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting |
Value Realized on Vesting |
|||||||||
Edward Bonach |
| $ | | 120,983 | $ | 2,102,685 | |||||||
Gary Bhojwani |
| | | | |||||||||
Bruce Baude |
62,890 | 693,401 | 31,058 | 541,171 | |||||||||
Christopher Nickele |
| | 36,238 | 634,722 | |||||||||
Erik Helding |
| | 7,721 | 133,000 | |||||||||
Scott Perry |
411,635 | 3,586,053 | 43,537 | 756,673 |
Nonqualified Deferred Compensation in 2016
The following table shows certain information concerning nonqualified deferred compensation activity in 2016 for our Named Executive Officers.
NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION IN 2016
Name
|
Executive Contributions in 2016 |
CNO Contributions in 2016(1) |
Aggregate Earnings (Loss) in 2016(2) |
Aggregate Withdrawals/ Distributions |
Aggregate Balance at 12/31/16(3) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edward Bonach |
$ | | $ | | $ | 12,574 | $ | | $ | 151,421 | ||||||
Gary Bhojwani |
| | | | | |||||||||||
Bruce Baude |
| 800,000 | 7,950 | | 807,950 | |||||||||||
Christopher Nickele |
104,167 | | 10,174 | | 114,341 | |||||||||||
Erik Helding |
25,220 | | 8,937 | | 92,593 | |||||||||||
Scott Perry |
| | 59 | 4,590 | |
The 2016 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table presents amounts deferred under our Deferred Compensation Plan. Participants may defer up to 100% of their base salary and annual incentive plan payments under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Deferred Amounts are credited with earnings or losses based on the return of mutual funds selected by the executive, which the executive may change at any time. We do not make
44
matching contributions to participants' accounts under the Deferred Compensation Plan. Distributions are made in either a lump sum or an annuity as chosen by the executive at the time of deferral.
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control
Each of the Named Executive Officers listed below would be entitled to certain payments upon termination of employment arising under (i) benefit plans covering all employees such as group life insurance coverage, (ii) agreements covering awards made under the Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan and (iii) the terms of an employment agreement between the Named Executive Officer and the Company or one of its subsidiaries. See "Termination and Change in Control Arrangements" on page 35 of this proxy statement for additional information regarding these arrangements. The following table estimates the amounts that would have been payable to the Named Executive Officers upon termination of employment under each of the identified circumstances as of December 31, 2016:
Name
|
Voluntary or For Cause Termination |
Disability | Death | Without Cause or With Good Reason |
Involuntary Termination within 6 months before or 2 years after Change In Control |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edward Bonach(1) |
| $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,900,000 | $ | 4,283,877 | $ | 12,932,881 | |||||||
Gary Bhojwani(2) |
| 937,500 | 1,337,500 | 2,454,815 | 8,704,283 | |||||||||||
Bruce Baude(3) |
| 600,000 | 1,000,000 | 1,835,149 | 4,159,535 | |||||||||||
Christopher Nickele(4) |
| 420,000 | 820,000 | 1,316,485 | 3,189,755 | |||||||||||
Erik Helding(5) |
| 300,000 | 700,000 | 1,002,946 | 2,275,129 | |||||||||||
Scott Perry(6) |
| | | | |
45
months in anticipation of or within two years after a change in control, an amount equal to his pro rata actual bonus for the year of termination plus two times the sum of his salary and target bonus plus continued participation for up to 24 months for Mr. Bhojwani and his family in all medical, health and life insurance plans at the same benefit level at which he and his family were participating on the date of his termination (the amount in the table includes $31,472 for 24 months of such benefits). In the event of a termination upon a change in control, in addition to the amounts payable under his employment agreement, the vesting of his awards under the Company's Long-term Incentive Plan would be accelerated and the amount shown for Mr. Bhojwani includes the value as of December 31, 2016 of the accelerated vesting of options ($65,232) and restricted stock ($4,481,000).
46
PROPOSAL 2
APPROVAL OF AMENDED AND RESTATED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
On March 16, 2017, the CNO Board of Directors approved the Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), to be effective upon the approval thereof by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting. The Company's Long-Term Incentive Plan was initially adopted and approved in 2003 and an amended plan was most recently approved by the shareholders at the 2009 annual meeting.
Summary of Material Changes to the Plan
This amendment and restatement of the Plan being submitted for approval at the 2017 Annual Meeting incorporates the provisions of the Plan as currently in effect and includes the following key modifications:
Increase in the Number of Authorized Shares. An increase in the number of shares authorized to be issued under the Plan by 4,193,237 shares, for a total number of authorized shares under the Plan of 30,039,505. As of December 31, 2016, 4,620,198 shares remained available for issuance under the Plan. Shareholder approval of the authorized share increase would bring the total amount of shares authorized and available to be issued under the Plan in 2017 and subsequent years to 8,813,435. The Compensation Committee believes that with this additional share reserve the Company will be able to provide the necessary equity incentives to employees for approximately four years.
No Payment of Dividends or Dividend Equivalents until Vesting. As amended, the Plan provides that no dividends or dividend equivalents may be paid on a future equity award under the Plan until such award has vested.
Limits on the Compensation Payable to Non-employee Directors. As amended, the Plan provides that the annual compensation paid to the non-employee directors of the Company cannot exceed $500,000 per year, with the exception of the non-executive Board chair, for whom the annual limit will be $950,000. The amounts paid to our non-employee directors during 2016 are set forth in the table on page 12 of this Proxy Statement.
Minimum Vesting for Certain Equity Awards. As amended, the Plan provides that certain awards (including restricted stock, restricted stock units and stock appreciation rights) may not vest earlier than the first anniversary of the grant date. The minimum vesting conditions need not apply (i) in the case of the death, disability or retirement of the participant or termination in connection with a change in control, and (ii) with respect to up to an aggregate of five percent of the shares of stock authorized under the Plan.
Shareholders' Re-Approval of Performance Goals. In addition to the foregoing, our shareholders are being asked to approve the performance goals under the Plan so that certain incentive awards granted under the Plan to executive officers of the Company may continue to qualify as exempt performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, which otherwise generally disallows a corporate tax deduction for certain compensation paid in excess of $1 million annually to each of the chief executive officer and certain other named executive officers ("covered employees"). We are asking our shareholders to re-approve the existing performance goals as set forth in the Plan. Code Section 162(m) generally requires such performance goals to be approved by the Company's shareholders no less frequently than every five years.
As of December 31, 2016, the Plan had 4,620,198 total shares of common stock remaining available for issuance. The Company is requesting an additional 4,193,237 shares, which would provide 8,813,435 shares for equity awards in 2017 and subsequent years. If the Plan is approved by shareholders, the new share pool would
47
represent approximately 5% of the shares outstanding as of December 31, 2016. The shareholder approved equity is designed to help the Company:
The Board and the Compensation Committee believe that awards linked to common stock and awards with terms tied to Company performance can provide incentives for the achievement of important performance objectives and promote the long-term success of the Company. Therefore, they view the Plan as a key element of the Company's overall compensation program.
Reasons for Seeking Shareholder Approval
The Company seeks approval of the Plan by shareholders to meet requirements of the New York Stock Exchange and to satisfy requirements of tax law to help preserve the Company's ability to claim tax deductions for compensation to executive officers. In addition, the board regards shareholder approval of the Plan as desirable and consistent with corporate governance best practices.
Section 162(m) of the Code limits the deductions a publicly held company can claim for compensation in excess of $1 million in a given year paid to the chief executive officer or any of its three other most highly compensated executive officers other than the chief financial officer serving on the last day of the fiscal year (generally referred to as the "named executive officers"). "Performance-based" compensation that meets certain requirements is not counted against the $1 million deductibility cap, and therefore remains fully deductible. For purposes of Section 162(m), approval of the Plan will be deemed to include approval of the general business criteria upon which performance objectives for Restricted Awards are based, described below under the caption "Performance-Based Awards." Shareholder approval of general business criteria, without specific targeted levels of performance, will permit qualification of incentive awards for full tax deductibility for a period of five years under Section 162(m). Shareholder approval of the performance goal inherent in stock options and SARs (increases in the market price of stock) is not subject to a time limit under Section 162(m).
The amendments to the Plan will not go into effect if shareholder approval is not obtained. If such approval is not obtained, the Company may continue to grant awards under the Plan in accordance with its terms and the current share reserve as they existed prior to the amendments.
The following is a summary of the Plan as amended and restated. It is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Plan, which is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement. Shareholders are encouraged to review the Plan carefully.
No awards made under the Plan prior to the date of the Annual Meeting were granted subject to shareholder approval. The number and types of awards that will be granted under the Plan in the future are not determinable, as the Compensation Committee will make these determinations in its sole discretion. The following table sets forth information with respect to the number of outstanding stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock units, and performance shares that have been granted to the Named Executive Officers and the specified groups set forth below under the Plan as of March 27, 2017. On March 27, 2017, the closing price of the underlying
48
shares of our common stock traded on the NYSE was $20.21 per share. As of December 31, 2016, the weighted average exercise price of outstanding stock options granted under the Plan was $14.73 per share.
Name and Principal Position
|
Stock Options |
Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Units |
Performance Shares(1) |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Edward Bonach |
1,528,783 | 55,560 | 343,886 | |||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
||||||||||
Gary Bhojwani |
134,850 | 247,890 | 27,780 | |||||||
President |
||||||||||
Bruce Baude |
258,990 | 24,967 | 62,330 | |||||||
Chief Operations & Technology Officer |
||||||||||
Christopher Nickele |
200,470 | 20,732 | 62,330 | |||||||
Chief Actuary |
||||||||||
Erik Helding |
137,190 | 34,134 | 33,430 | |||||||
Chief Financial Officer |
||||||||||
Scott Perry |
| | | |||||||
Former Chief Business Officer |
||||||||||
All executive officers as a group (9 persons) |
3,311,043 | 415,223 | 740,116 | |||||||
All non-executive directors as a group (8 persons) |
| | | |||||||
All employees (other than executive officers) as a group (98 persons) |
2,413,145 | 148,194 | 606,350 |
Summary Description of the Plan
Shares Available. The number of shares that may be issued under the Plan has been increased from 25,846,268 to 30,039,505 shares of common stock. This amount includes the 4,620,198 shares remaining available for grant under the Plan as of December 31, 2016, plus 4,193,237 new shares added to the share authorization and available for awards granted after the Annual Meeting, subject to adjustment in the event of a reorganization, stock split, merger or similar change in the corporate structure of the Company. Shares used for awards assumed in an acquisition do not count against the shares reserved under the Plan.
The issuance of shares pursuant to an award will reduce the total number of shares available under the Plan except that each full-value share awarded and distributed will reduce the total number of shares available under the Plan by 1.25 shares. Also, the full number of shares of common stock subject to an option or SAR will count against the number of shares remaining available for issuance pursuant to awards granted under the plan, even if fewer shares are actually delivered to a participant as a result of a net settlement. Further, any shares tendered or withheld to satisfy the exercise price or tax withholding obligations of an outstanding award shall no longer be available for issuance under the plan. Notwithstanding, shares will remain available for new awards if an award is cancelled, expired, forfeited, settled in cash, or otherwise terminated without delivery of the shares. Shares delivered under the Plan may be either newly issued or treasury shares.
Per-Person Award Limitations. The Plan includes a limitation on the amount of awards that may be granted to any one participant in a given year in order to qualify awards as "performance-based" compensation not subject to the limitation on deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code. Under this annual per-person limitation, no participant may in any year be granted share-denominated awards under the Plan relating to more than his or her "Annual Limit". The Annual Limit equals 1,000,000 shares, subject to adjustment for splits and other extraordinary corporate events. In the case of cash-denominated Awards, the Plan limits performance Awards that may be earned by a participant to the participant's defined Annual Limit, which for this purpose equals $4 million.
49
The per-person limit for cash-denominated performance Awards does not operate to limit the amount of share-based Awards, and vice versa. These limits apply only to awards under the Plan, and do not limit the Company's ability to enter into compensation arrangements outside of the Plan.
Adjustments. Adjustments to the number and kind of shares subject to the share limitations and specified in the share-based Annual Limit are authorized in the event of a large, special or non-recurring dividend or distribution, recapitalization, stock split, stock dividend, reorganization, business combination, or other similar corporate transaction or event affecting the common stock. The Company is also obligated to adjust outstanding awards upon the occurrence of these types of events to preserve, without enlarging, the rights of participants with respect to such awards. The Compensation Committee may adjust performance conditions and other terms of Awards in response to these kinds of events or to changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles, except that adjustments to Awards intended to qualify as "performance-based" generally must conform to requirements imposed by Section 162(m).
Eligibility. Executive officers and other employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, and non-employee directors, consultants and others who provide substantial services to the Company and its subsidiaries, are eligible to be granted Awards under the Plan. In addition, any person who has been offered employment by the Company or a subsidiary may be granted Awards, but such prospective grantee may not receive any payment or exercise any right relating to the Award until he or she has commenced employment or the providing of services.
Administration. The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee, except that the Board may itself act to administer the Plan. (References to the "Compensation Committee" here mean the Compensation Committee or the full Board exercising authority with respect to a given Award.) Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan, the Compensation Committee is authorized to select participants, determine the type and number of Awards to be granted and the number of shares to which Awards will relate or the amount of a performance award, specify times at which Awards will be exercisable or settled, including performance conditions that may be required as a condition thereof, set other terms and conditions of such Awards, prescribe forms of Award agreements, interpret and specify rules and regulations relating to the Plan, and make all other determinations which may be necessary or advisable for the administration of the Plan. Nothing in the Plan precludes the Compensation Committee from authorizing payment of other compensation, including bonuses based upon performance, to officers and employees, including the executive officers, outside of the Plan. The Plan provides that members of the Compensation Committee and the Board shall not be personally liable, and shall be fully indemnified, in connection with any action, determination, or interpretation taken or made in good faith under the Plan.
Stock Options and SARs. The Compensation Committee is authorized to grant stock options, including both qualified ISOs, which can result in potentially favorable tax treatment to the participant, and non-qualified stock options. SARs may also be granted, entitling the participant to receive the excess of the fair market value of a share on the date of exercise over the SAR's designated "base price." The exercise price of an option and the base price of an SAR are determined by the Compensation Committee, but generally may not be less than the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant (except as described below under "Other Terms of Awards"). The maximum term of each option or SAR will be ten years. Subject to this limit, the times at which each option or SAR will be exercisable and provisions requiring forfeiture of unexercised options (and in some cases gains realized upon an earlier exercise) at or following termination of employment or upon the occurrence of other events generally are fixed by the Compensation Committee. Options may be exercised by payment of the exercise price in cash, shares having a fair market value equal to the exercise price or surrender of outstanding awards or other property having a fair market value equal to the exercise price, as the Compensation Committee may determine. This may include withholding of option shares to pay the exercise price if that would not result in additional accounting expense. The Compensation Committee also is permitted to establish procedures for broker-assisted cashless exercises. Methods of exercise and settlement and other terms of SARs will be determined by the Compensation Committee. SARs may be exercisable for shares or for cash, as determined by the Compensation Committee. Options and SARs may be granted on terms that cause such awards not to be subject to Code
50
Section 409A ("Section 409A"). Alternatively, such awards and cash SARs may have terms that cause those awards to be deemed deferral arrangements subject to Section 409A. The Compensation Committee can require that outstanding options be surrendered in exchange for a grant of SARs with economically matching terms.
Restricted and Deferred Stock/Restricted Stock Units. The Compensation Committee is authorized to grant restricted stock and deferred stock. Prior to the end of the restricted period, shares granted as restricted stock may not be sold, and will be forfeited in the event of termination of employment in specified circumstances. The Compensation Committee will establish the length of the restricted period for awards of restricted stock. Aside from the risk of forfeiture and non-transferability, an award of restricted stock entitles the participant to the rights of a shareholder of the Company, including the right to vote the shares and to receive dividends (which may be forfeitable or non-forfeitable), unless otherwise determined by the Compensation Committee.
Deferred stock gives a participant the right to receive shares at the end of a specified deferral period. Deferred stock subject to forfeiture conditions may be denominated as an award of "restricted stock units." The Compensation Committee will establish any vesting requirements for deferred stock/restricted stock units granted for continuing services. One advantage of restricted stock units, as compared to restricted stock, is that the period during which the award is deferred as to settlement can be extended past the date the award becomes non-forfeitable, so the Compensation Committee can require or permit a participant to continue to hold an interest tied to common stock on a tax-deferred basis. Prior to settlement, deferred stock awards, including restricted stock units, carry no voting or dividend rights or other rights associated with stock ownership, but dividend equivalents (which may be forfeitable or non-forfeitable) will accrue if authorized by the Compensation Committee. No dividend equivalents may be paid prior to vesting for awards of restricted stock units made after the effective date of the amended Plan.
Other Stock-Based Awards, Stock Bonus Awards, and Awards in Lieu of Other Obligations. The Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to grant awards that are denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on or related to common stock. The Compensation Committee will determine the terms and conditions of such awards, including the consideration to be paid to exercise awards in the nature of purchase rights, the periods during which awards will be outstanding, and any forfeiture conditions and restrictions on awards. In addition, the Compensation Committee is authorized to grant shares as a bonus free of restrictions, or to grant shares or other awards in lieu of obligations under other plans or compensatory arrangements, subject to such terms as the Compensation Committee may specify.
Performance-Based Awards. The Compensation Committee may grant performance awards, which may be cash-denominated awards or share-based awards. Generally, performance awards require satisfaction of pre-established performance goals, consisting of one or more business criteria and a targeted performance level with respect to such criteria as a condition of awards being granted or becoming exercisable or settled, or as a condition to accelerating the timing of such events. Performance may be measured over a period of any length specified by the Compensation Committee. If so determined by the Compensation Committee, to avoid the limitations on tax deductibility under Section 162(m) of the Code, the business criteria used by the Compensation Committee in establishing performance goals applicable to performance awards to the named executive officers will be selected from among the following:
51
The Compensation Committee retains discretion to set the level of performance for a given business criteria that will result in the earning of a specified amount under a performance award. These goals may be set with fixed, quantitative targets, targets relative to past Company performance, or targets compared to the performance of other companies, such as a published or special index or a group of companies selected by the Compensation Committee for comparison. The Compensation Committee may provide in any performance award that any evaluation of performance shall include or exclude any of the following items:
Annual Incentive Awards. One type of performance award that may be granted under the Plan is annual incentive awards that may be settled in cash or in shares upon achievement of pre-established performance objectives achieved during a specified period of up to one year. The Compensation Committee generally must establish the terms of annual incentive awards, including the applicable performance goals and the corresponding amounts payable (subject to per-person limits), and other terms of settlement, and all other terms of these awards, not later than 90 days after the beginning of the fiscal year. As stated above, annual incentive awards granted to named executive officers are intended to constitute "performance-based compensation" not subject to the limitation on deductibility under Code Section 162(m). In order for such an annual incentive award to be earned, one or more of the performance objectives described in the second preceding paragraph will have to be achieved. The Compensation Committee may specify additional requirements for the earning of such awards.
52
Other Terms of Awards. Awards may be settled in cash, shares, other awards or other property, in the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee may require or permit participants to defer the settlement of all or part of an award, subject to compliance with Code Section 409A, in accordance with such terms and conditions as the Compensation Committee may establish, including payment or crediting of interest or dividend equivalents on any deferred amounts. The Plan allows vested but deferred awards to be paid out to the participant in the event of an unforeseeable emergency. The Compensation Committee is authorized to place cash, shares or other property in trusts or make other arrangements to provide for payment of the Company's obligations under the Plan. The Compensation Committee may condition awards on the payment of taxes, and may provide for mandatory or elective withholding of a portion of the shares or other property to be distributed in order to satisfy tax obligations. Awards granted under the Plan generally may not be pledged or otherwise encumbered and are not transferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or to a designated beneficiary upon the participant's death, except that the Compensation Committee may permit transfers of awards other than incentive stock options on a case-by-case basis. This flexibility can allow for estate planning or other limited transfers consistent with the incentive purpose of the Plan.
The Compensation Committee is authorized to impose non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality, non-disparagement and other requirements as a condition on the participant's right to retain an award or gains realized by exercise or settlement of an award. Awards under the Plan may be granted without a requirement that the participant pay consideration in the form of cash or property for the grant (as distinguished from the exercise), except to the extent required by law. The Compensation Committee may, however, grant awards in substitution for, exchange for or as a buyout of other awards under the Plan, awards under other Company plans, or other rights to payment from the Company, and may exchange or buy out outstanding awards for cash or other property. The Compensation Committee also may grant awards in addition to and in tandem with other awards or rights. In granting a new award, the Compensation Committee may determine that the in-the-money value or fair value of any surrendered award may be applied to reduce the exercise price of any option, base price of any SAR, or purchase price of any other award.
Dividend Equivalents. The Compensation Committee may grant dividend equivalents with respect to awards other than stock options (including ISOs) or SARs. These are rights to receive payments equal in value to the amount of dividends paid on a specified number of shares of common stock while an award is outstanding. These amounts may be in the form of cash or rights to receive additional Awards or additional shares of common stock having a value equal to the cash amount. The awards may be granted on a stand-alone basis or in conjunction with another award, and the Compensation Committee may specify whether the dividend equivalents will be forfeitable or non-forfeitable. However, the payout of dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested performance-based awards is prohibited as is the payment of dividends or dividend equivalents on restricted stock, restricted stock units or deferred stock granted after the adoption of the amended Plan.
Vesting, Forfeitures, and Related Award Terms. The Compensation Committee may in its discretion determine the vesting schedule of options and other awards, the circumstances that will result in forfeiture of the awards, the post-termination exercise periods of options and similar awards, and the events that will result in acceleration of the ability to exercise and the lapse of restrictions, or the expiration of any deferral period, on any Award.
In addition, the Plan provides that following a "Change in Control," the Compensation Committee may take any of the following actions with respect to an Award: provide for its full vesting, provide for its termination beyond the date of full vesting, deem performance goals to have been met, provide for the settlement of an award in cash or for termination of the Award or cause the Award to be assumed as part of the transaction. A "Change in Control" generally includes (A) a merger, reorganization, consolidation, or similar transaction in which the stockholders of the Company immediately prior to the transaction do not own more than 51% of the voting power of the surviving corporation, (B) any "person" becomes the owner, directly or indirectly of shares representing at least 51% of the Company's voting power, and (C) certain changes of more than half of the membership of the Board of Directors. Change-in-control provisions are limited, however, by applicable restrictions under Code Section 409A.
53
Amendment and Termination of the Plan. The Board may amend, suspend, discontinue, or terminate the Plan or the Compensation Committee's authority to grant awards hereunder without shareholder approval, except as required by law or regulation or under the New York Stock Exchange rules, which require shareholder approval of any material amendment to plans such as the Plan. Under these rules, however, shareholder approval will not necessarily be required for all amendments which might increase the cost of the Plan or broaden eligibility. Unless earlier terminated, the authority of the Compensation Committee to make grants under the Plan will terminate ten years after the latest shareholder approval of the Plan, and the Plan will terminate when no shares remain available and the Company has no further obligation with respect to any outstanding award.
Federal Income Tax Implications of the Plan
The Company believes that under current law the following federal income tax consequences generally would arise with respect to awards under the Plan.
Options and SARs that are not deemed to be deferral arrangements under Section 409A would have the following tax consequences: The grant of an option or an SAR will create no federal income tax consequences for the participant or the Company. A participant will not have taxable income upon exercising an option which is an ISO, except that the alternative minimum tax may apply. Upon exercising an option which is not an ISO, the participant generally must recognize ordinary income equal to the difference between the exercise price and the fair market value of the freely transferable and nonforfeitable shares acquired on the date of exercise. Upon exercising an SAR, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the cash or the fair market value of the shares received. Upon a disposition of shares acquired upon exercise of an ISO before the end of the applicable ISO holding periods, the participant must generally recognize ordinary income equal to the lesser of: (i) the fair market value of the ISO shares at the date of exercise minus the exercise price, or (ii) the amount realized upon the disposition of the ISO shares minus the exercise price. Otherwise, a participant's sale of shares acquired by exercise of an option generally will result in short-term or long-term capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the sale price and the participant's tax "basis" in such shares. The tax "basis" normally is the exercise price plus any amount he or she recognized as ordinary income in connection with the option's exercise. A participant's sale of shares acquired by exercise of an SAR generally will result in short-term or long-term capital gain or loss measured by the difference between the sale price and the tax "basis" in the shares, which generally is the amount he or she recognized as ordinary income in connection with the SAR's exercise.
The Company normally can claim a tax deduction equal to the amount recognized as ordinary income by a participant in connection with an option or SAR, but no tax deduction relating to a participant's capital gains. Accordingly, the Company will not be entitled to any tax deduction with respect to an ISO if the participant holds the shares for the applicable ISO holding periods before selling the shares.
Some options and SARs, such as those with deferral features, and an SAR that is settled in cash, may be subject to Code Section 409A, which regulates deferral arrangements. In such case, the distribution to the participant of shares or cash relating to the award would have to meet certain restrictions in order for the participant not to be subject to tax and a tax penalty at the time of vesting. One significant restriction would be a requirement that the distribution not be controlled by the participant's discretionary exercise of the option or SAR (subject to limited exceptions). If the distribution and other award terms meet applicable requirements under Code Section 409A, the participant would realize ordinary income at the time of distribution rather than earlier, with the amount of ordinary income equal to the distribution date value of the shares less any exercise price actually paid. The Company would not be entitled to a tax deduction at the time of exercise, but would become entitled to a tax deduction at the time shares are delivered at the end of the deferral period.
Awards other than options and SARs that result in a transfer to the participant of cash or shares or other property generally will be structured under the Plan to meet applicable requirements under Code Section 409A. If no restriction on transferability or substantial risk of forfeiture applies to amounts distributed to a participant, the participant generally must recognize ordinary income equal to the cash or the fair market value of shares actually
54
received. Thus, for example, if the Company grants an award of deferred stock that has vested or requires or permits deferral of receipt of cash or shares under a vested award, the participant should not become subject to income tax until the time at which shares are actually delivered, and the Company's right to claim a tax deduction will be deferred until that time. On the other hand, if a restriction on transferability and substantial risk of forfeiture applies to shares or other property actually distributed to a participant under an award (such as, for example, a grant of restricted stock), the participant generally must recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of the transferred amounts at the earliest time either the transferability restriction or risk of forfeiture lapses. In all cases, the Company can claim a tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant, except as discussed below. A participant may elect to be taxed at the time of grant of restricted stock or other property rather than upon lapse of restrictions on transferability or the risk of forfeiture, but if the participant subsequently forfeits such shares or property he or she would not be entitled to any tax deduction, including as a capital loss, for the value of the shares or property on which he or she previously paid tax.
Any award that is deemed to be a deferral arrangement (excluding certain exempted short-term deferrals) will be subject to Code Section 409A. Certain participant elections and the timing of distributions relating to such awards must meet requirements under Code Section 409A for income taxation to be deferred and tax penalties avoided by the participant upon vesting of the award.
As discussed above, compensation that qualifies as "performance-based" compensation is excluded from the $1 million deductibility cap of Code Section 162(m), and therefore remains fully deductible by the company that pays it. Under the Plan, options and SARs granted with an exercise price or base price at least equal to 100% of fair market value of the underlying stock at the date of grant, annual incentive awards to employees the Compensation Committee expects to be named executive officers at the time compensation is received, and certain other awards which are conditioned upon achievement of performance goals are intended to qualify as such "performance-based" compensation. A number of requirements must be met in order for particular compensation to so qualify, however, so there can be no assurance that such compensation under the Plan will be fully deductible under all circumstances. In addition, other awards under the Plan generally will not so qualify, so that compensation paid to named executive officers in connection with such awards may, to the extent it and other compensation subject to Code Section 162(m)'s deductibility cap exceed $1 million in a given year, not be deductible by the Company as a result of Code Section 162(m).
The foregoing provides only a general description of the application of federal income tax laws to certain awards under the Plan. This discussion is intended for the information of shareholders considering how to vote at the Annual Meeting and not as tax guidance to participants in the Plan, as the consequences may vary with the types of awards made, the identity of the recipients and the method of payment or settlement. Different tax rules may apply, including in the case of variations in transactions that are permitted under the Plan (such as payment of the exercise price of an option by surrender of previously acquired shares). The summary does not address the effects of other federal taxes (including possible "golden parachute" excise taxes) or taxes imposed under state, local, or foreign tax laws.
Required Vote
Approval of the Plan requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of common stock that are present in person, or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN.
55
PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF OUR INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") served as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016 and has been selected to serve as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. Representatives of the Company's independent registered public accounting firm are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire, and will be available to respond to appropriate questions from the shareholders.
Approval of the ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017 requires the affirmative vote of the majority of shares of common stock present in person, or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the proposal at the Annual Meeting.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017.
Evaluation of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
In considering the appointment of PwC as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee (the "Audit Committee") considered the following factors:
The Audit Committee meets regularly with the independent registered public accounting firm ("independent auditor"), including attendance by the independent auditor at all regularly scheduled Audit Committee meetings and separate executive sessions at least four meetings per year. The Audit Committee uses these interactions, as well as the factors noted above, to assess the performance of the independent auditor.
56
CNO undertakes an annual benchmarking of audit fees paid by our peers in the insurance industry. This data provides a reference point to the Audit Committee to judge the appropriateness of the audit fee. Additionally, the Audit Committee evaluates the scope of the audit, the complexity of the CNO environment, any history of prior issues and adjustments and the overall audit plan presented by the independent auditor in arriving at an appropriate fee.
Fees Paid to PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Aggregate fees (including out-of-pocket expenses) billed to the Company for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, by PwC were as follows (dollars in millions):
|
Year Ended December 31, |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2016 | 2015 | |||||
Audit fees(a) |
$ | 4.6 | $ | 4.4 | |||
Audit-related fees(b) |
| .2 | |||||
Tax fees |
| | |||||
All other fees(c) |
| .1 | |||||
| | | | | | | |
Total |
$ | 4.6 | $ | 4.7 | |||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Pre-Approval Policy and Independence
The Audit Committee has adopted an auditor independence policy that, among other things, mandates pre-approval by the Audit Committee of all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and the related fees, and that the Audit Committee be provided each quarter with a summary of the services provided by and fees paid to, PwC. These services may include work associated with the following:
Each proposed service is evaluated by the Audit Committee to ensure that it would not impair the independence of PwC under SEC and other applicable rules. In 2015 and 2016, all new engagements of PwC were pre-approved by the Audit Committee for all audit, audit-related, tax and other services.
Report of the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee
The Audit Committee provides assistance to the Board in fulfilling its responsibilities for oversight of the integrity of the financial statements, public disclosures and financial reporting practices of the Company, including the systems of internal controls. The Audit Committee has sole authority to appoint or replace the Company's
57
independent registered public accounting firm. The independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee.
In overseeing the preparation of the Company's audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with the Company's management and with PwC, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee also discussed with PwC the matters required to be discussed under Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") Auditing Standard No. 1301.
The Audit Committee has received from PwC and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable PCAOB requirements regarding PwC's communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with PwC its independence from the Company. In addition, the Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed PwC's most recent PCAOB inspection report of the firm's internal quality controls.
Based on the reviews and discussions referenced above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements be included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Submitted by the Audit and Enterprise Risk Committee:
Robert C.
Greving, Chair
Mary R. (Nina) Henderson
Charles J. Jacklin
Neal C. Schneider
58
PROPOSAL 4
NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act")) and the related rules of the SEC, we are including in these proxy materials a separate resolution subject to shareholder vote to approve, in a non-binding advisory vote, the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers as discussed on pages 17 46. While the results of the vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Board and the Compensation Committee intend to carefully consider the results of this vote. The current frequency of non-binding advisory votes on executive compensation is an annual vote and we anticipate that the next vote will be at the next Annual Meeting. The language of the resolution is as follows:
"RESOLVED, that the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed in this proxy statement pursuant to the rules of the SEC, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and any related narrative discussion, is hereby approved."
The compensation of our executive officers is based on a philosophy and a comprehensive compensation and benefits strategy developed by the Compensation Committee designed to reward overall and individual performance that drives long-term success for our shareholders. The committee strives to provide a clear award program that allows us to attract, incentivize and retain seasoned executive talent with significant industry experience required to continue to improve our performance and build long-term shareholder value. In considering their vote, shareholders are urged to read the section of this proxy statement entitled "Executive Compensation", including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, for a detailed discussion of how our compensation policies and practices implement our compensation philosophy.
The affirmative vote of the majority of shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the subject matter is required to approve the compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers. Abstentions will have the effect of a vote "against" this proposal. Broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote with respect to this proposal because the shares subject to the broker non-vote will not be entitled to vote on this matter.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "FOR" THE APPROVAL OF THE COMPENSATION PAID TO OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.
59
PROPOSAL 5
NON-BINDING ADVISORY VOTE ON THE FREQUENCY OF FUTURE ADVISORY VOTES ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
In accordance with the requirements of Section 14A of the Exchange Act (which was added by the Dodd-Frank Act) and the related rules of the SEC, we are submitting for shareholder consideration a separate resolution subject to determine, in a non-binding advisory vote, whether a shareholder vote to approve the compensation paid to our named executive officers (that is, a vote similar to the non-binding advisory vote in Proposal 4 on the previous page) should occur every one, two or three years. While the results of the vote are non-binding and advisory in nature, the Board intends to carefully consider the results of this vote.
In considering their vote, shareholders may wish to review with care the information presented in connection with Proposal 4 on the previous page, and the information on the Company's compensation policies and decisions regarding the Named Executive Officers presented in Compensation Discussion and Analysis on pages 17 to 35 of this Proxy Statement.
After consideration of the frequency alternatives and the Company's experience with annual votes on executive compensation since 2011, the Board and the Compensation Committee determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate policy for CNO at this time, and therefore the Board is recommending that you vote for future advisory votes on executive compensation to occur each year. In formulating this recommendation, the Board and the Compensation Committee recognized that the Company's executive compensation programs are designed to promote a long-term connection between pay and performance. However, because executive compensation disclosures are made annually, the Board and the Compensation Committee considered that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our shareholders to provide us with their direct input on our compensation philosophy, policies and practices as disclosed in the proxy statement each year. The compensation of the named executive officers is reviewed, adjusted and approved by the Compensation Committee every year and the Board believes that input from shareholders is a factor which should be taken into consideration by the committee as part of that process.
The vote on the frequency of shareholder votes on compensation paid to our named executive officers requires the approval of the majority of the shares of common stock present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote on the proposal.
Recommendation of our Board of Directors
OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE "ONE YEAR" WITH RESPECT TO HOW FREQUENTLY A NON-BINDING SHAREHOLDER VOTE TO APPROVE THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS SHOULD OCCUR.
60
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires CNO's directors and executive officers, and each person who is the beneficial owner of more than 10 percent of any class of CNO's outstanding equity securities, to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of CNO. Specific due dates for these reports have been established by the SEC, and CNO is required to disclose any failure by such persons to file such reports for fiscal year 2016 by the prescribed dates. Officers, directors and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners are required to furnish CNO with copies of all reports filed with the SEC pursuant to Section 16(a). To CNO's knowledge, based solely on review of the copies of the reports furnished to CNO and written representations that no other reports were required, all filings required pursuant to Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 applicable to CNO's officers, directors and greater than 10 percent beneficial owners were timely made by each such person during the year ended December 31, 2016, other than one late report each for Mr. Baude, Mr. Kline, Ms. Menzel, Mr. Nickele and Mr. Zimpfer relating to the tendering of shares to the Company in connection with the vesting of restricted stock in March 2016.
SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR 2018 ANNUAL MEETING
Any proper proposal which a shareholder wishes to have included in the Board's proxy statement and form of proxy for the 2018 Annual Meeting must be received by CNO by November 30, 2017. Such proposals must meet the requirements set forth in the rules and regulations of the SEC in order to be eligible for inclusion in the proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting. In addition to the SEC rules concerning shareholder proposals, the Company's Bylaws establish advance notice procedures with regard to certain matters, including shareholder nominations for directors, to be brought before a meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected. In the case of an annual meeting, notice must be received by the Secretary of the Company not less than 60 days nor more than 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting. In the case of a special meeting of shareholders at which directors are to be elected, notice of a shareholder nomination must be received by the Secretary of the Company no later than the close of business on the 10th day following the earlier of the day on which notice of the date of the meeting was mailed or public disclosure of the meeting was made. A nomination will not be considered if it does not comply with these notice procedures and the additional requirements set forth in our Bylaws. Please note that these bylaw requirements are separate from the SEC's requirements to have a shareholder nomination or other proposal included in our proxy statement. Any shareholder who wishes to submit a proposal to be acted upon at the 2018 Annual Meeting or who wishes to nominate a candidate for election as director should obtain a copy of these Bylaw provisions and may do so by written request addressed to the Secretary of CNO Financial Group, Inc. at 11825 North Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana 46032.
Access to CNO's Annual Report for 2016 (which includes its annual report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC) is being provided with this proxy statement to all holders of common stock as of March 13, 2017. The Annual Report is not part of the proxy solicitation material. If you wish to receive an additional copy of the Annual Report for 2016, the Form 10-K, this Proxy Statement or the Notice without charge, please contact CNO Financial Group, Inc. Investor Relations, 11825 North Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana 46032; or by telephone (317) 817-2893 or email ir@CNOinc.com.
61
HOUSEHOLDING OF PROXY MATERIALS
SEC rules permit companies and intermediaries such as brokers to satisfy delivery requirements for proxy statements and notices with respect to two or more shareholders sharing the same address by delivering a single proxy statement or a single notice addressed to those shareholders. This process, which is commonly referred to as "householding," provides cost savings for companies. Some brokers household proxy materials, delivering a single proxy statement or notice to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been received from the affected shareholders. Once you have received notice from your broker that they will be householding materials to your address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in householding and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement or notice, or if you are receiving duplicate copies of these materials and wish to have householding apply, please notify your broker. You may also call (800) 542-1061 or write to: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York, New York 11717, and include your name, the name of your broker or other nominee, and you account number(s). You can also request prompt delivery of a copy of the proxy statement and annual report by contacting CNO Financial Group, Inc. Investor Relations, 11825 North Pennsylvania Street, Carmel, Indiana 46032, (317) 817-2893 or email ir@CNOinc.com.
62
INFORMATION RELATED TO CERTAIN NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
Book value per diluted share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if outstanding stock options were exercised and restricted stock and performance units were vested. The dilution from options, restricted shares and performance units is calculated using the treasury stock method. Under this method, we assume the proceeds from the exercise of the options (or the unrecognized compensation expense with respect to restricted stock and performance units) will be used to purchase shares of our common stock at the closing market price on the last day of the period. In addition, the calculation of this non-GAAP measure differs from the corresponding GAAP measure because accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) has been excluded from the value of capital used to determine this measure. Management believes this non-GAAP measure is useful because it removes the volatility that arises from changes in the unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of our investments.
A reconciliation from book value per share to book value per diluted share, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) is as follows (dollars in millions, except per share amounts):
December 31, |
|||||||
| | | | | | | |
2016 |
2015 |
||||||
Total shareholders' equity |
$ |
4,486.9 |
$ |
4,138.5 |
|||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Shares outstanding at period end |
173,753,614 |
184,028,511 |
|||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Book value per share |
$ |
25.82 |
$ |
22.49 |
|||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Total shareholders' equity |
$ |
4,486.9 |
$ |
4,138.5 |
|||
Less accumulated other comprehensive income |
(622.4 |
) |
(402.8 |
) |
|||
| | | | | | | |
Adjusted shareholders' equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income |
$ |
3,864.5 |
$ |
3,735.7 |
|||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Shares outstanding at period end |
173,753,614 |
184,028,511 |
|||||
Dilutive common stock equivalents related to: |
|||||||
Stock options, restricted stock and performance units |
1,721,878 |
2,311,877 |
|||||
| | | | | | | |
Diluted shares outstanding |
175,475,492 |
186,340,388 |
|||||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Book value per diluted share (a non-GAAP financial measure) |
$ |
22.02 |
$ |
20.05 |
|||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
63
The debt to capital ratio, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), differs from the debt to capital ratio because accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) has been excluded from the value of capital used to determine this measure. Management believes this non-GAAP financial measure is useful because it removes the volatility that arises from changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). Such volatility is often caused by changes in the estimated fair value of our investment portfolio resulting from changes in general market interest rates rather than the business decisions made by management. A reconciliation of these ratios is as follows (dollars in millions):
December 31, |
|||||||
| | | | | | | |
2016 |
2015 |
||||||
Corporate notes payable |
$ |
912.9 |
$ |
911.1 |
|||
Total shareholders' equity |
4,486.9 |
4,138.5 |
|||||
| | | | | | | |
Total capital |
$ |
5,399.8 |
$ |
5,049.6 |
|||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
16.9 |
% |
18.0 |
% |
|||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Corporate notes payable |
$ |
912.9 |
$ |
911.1 |
|||
Total shareholders' equity |
4,486.9 |
4,138.5 |
|||||
Less accumulated other comprehensive income |
(622.4 |
) |
(402.8 |
) |
|||
| | | | | | | |
Total capital |
$ |
4,777.4 |
$ |
4,646.8 |
|||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Debt to total capital ratio, excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (a non-GAAP financial measure) |
19.1 |
% |
19.6 |
% |
|||
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Management knows of no other matters which may be presented at the Annual Meeting. If any other matters should properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof, the persons named in the form of proxy will vote in accordance with their best judgment on such matters.
By Order of the Board of Directors | ||
Karl W. Kindig Senior Vice President and Secretary |
March 30, 2017
64
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED LONG-TERM
INCENTIVE PLAN
A-1
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
A-2
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
AMENDED AND RESTATED LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
A-3
A-4
A-5
A-6
company or business acquired by the Company or a subsidiary or affiliate, or with which the Company or a subsidiary or affiliate combines, are eligible for grants of substitute awards granted in assumption of or in substitution for such outstanding awards previously granted under the Plan in connection with such acquisition or combination transaction, if so determined by the Committee.
A-7
A-8
Market Value determined by reference to the change in control price, as defined under the applicable award agreement) over (B) the exercise or settlement price of the SAR as determined by the Committee. Stock Appreciation Rights may be granted to Participants from time to time either in tandem with or as a component of other Awards granted under the Plan ("tandem SARs") or not in conjunction with other Awards ("freestanding SARs") and may, but need not, relate to a specific Option granted under Section 6(b). The per share price for exercise or settlement of SARs (including both tandem SARs and freestanding SARs) shall be determined by the Committee, but in the case of SARs that are granted in tandem to an Option shall not be less than the exercise price of the Option and in the case of freestanding SARs shall be (A) fixed as of the grant date, and (B) not less than the Fair Market Value of a share of Stock on the grant date.
A-9
Restricted Stock and the right to receive dividends thereon (subject to any mandatory reinvestment or other requirement imposed by the Committee).
A-10
A-11
based in whole or in part on performance conditions and/or the level of achievement versus such performance conditions shall be subject to a performance period of not less than one year, and any such other Stock-based Award based solely on continued employment or the passage of time shall vest over a period of not less than three years, with no portion vesting in less than one year, from the date the Award is made, provided that such vesting may occur ratably over the three-year period. The foregoing minimum vesting conditions need not apply (A) in the case of the death, disability or Retirement of the Participant or termination in connection with a Change in Control and (B) with respect to up to an aggregate of five percent of the shares of Stock authorized under the Plan, which may be granted (or regranted upon forfeiture) as other Awards without regard to such minimum vesting requirements. Cash awards, as an element of or supplement to any other Award under the Plan, may also be granted pursuant to this Section 6(h).
A-12
available to common shareholders, (3) operating earnings per common share (either basic or diluted); (4) return on assets, return on investment, return on capital, return on equity, or return on tangible equity; (5) economic value created including the value of new business; (6) operating margin or profit margin; (7) net interest margin; (8) asset quality; (9) stock price or total stockholder return; and (10) strategic business criteria, consisting of one or more objectives based on meeting specified market penetration, total market capitalization, business retention, new product generation, rate increase actions, geographic business expansion goals, cost targets (including cost of capital), investment portfolio yield, risk-based capital, statutory capital, Best Capital Adequacy Ratio, tax net operating loss utilization, customer satisfaction, employee satisfaction, agency ratings, management of employment practices and employee benefits, supervision of litigation and information technology, and goals relating to acquisitions or divestitures of subsidiaries, affiliates or joint ventures. The targeted level or levels of performance with respect to such business criteria may be established at such levels and in such terms as the Committee may determine, in its discretion, including in absolute terms, on a per share basis (either basic or diluted), as a goal relative to performance in prior periods, or as a goal compared to the performance of one or more comparable companies or an index covering multiple companies.
The Committee may provide in any Performance Award that any evaluation of performance shall include or exclude any of the following items: (1) asset write-downs; (2) litigation or claim judgments or settlements; (3) the effect of changes in tax laws, accounting principles, regulations, or other laws or regulations affecting reported results; (4) any reorganization and restructuring programs; (5) acquisitions or divestitures; (6) unusual nonrecurring or extraordinary items identified in the Company's audited financial statements, including footnotes; (7) annual incentive payments or other bonuses; or(8) capital charges.
A-13
change in control) prior to the end of a performance period or settlement of such Performance Awards.
A-14
limitation, provisions for the payment or crediting of reasonable interest on installment or deferred payments or the grant or crediting of Dividend Equivalents or other amounts in respect of installment or deferred payments denominated in Stock. In the case of any 409A Award that is vested and no longer subject to a risk of forfeiture (within the meaning of Code Section 83), such Award will be distributed to the Participant, upon application of the Participant, if the Participant has had an unforeseeable emergency within the meaning of Code Sections 409A(a)(2)(A)(vi) and 409A(a)(2)(B)(ii), in accordance with Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(ii).
A-15
of Stock at the date of such exercise (without regard to any subsequent change in the market price of shares) minus the exercise price times (Y) the number of shares as to which the Option was exercised at that date, and (ii), in respect of any other settlement of an Award granted to the Participant, the Fair Market Value of the cash or Stock paid or payable to Participant (regardless of any elective deferral) less any cash or the Fair Market Value of any Stock or property (other than an Award or award which would have itself then been forfeitable hereunder and excluding any payment of tax withholding) paid by the Participant to the Company as a condition of or in connection such settlement.
A-16
A-17
price, settlement price or purchase price relating to any Award or, if deemed appropriate, the Committee may make provision for a payment of cash or property to the holder of an outstanding Option (subject to Section 11(l)) or other Award. In addition, the Committee is authorized to make adjustments in the terms and conditions of, and the criteria included in, Awards (including performance-based Awards and performance goals and any hypothetical funding pool relating thereto) in recognition of unusual or nonrecurring events (including, without limitation, events described in the preceding sentence, as well as acquisitions and dispositions of businesses and assets, or in response to changes in applicable laws, regulations, or accounting principles) affecting any performance conditions; provided that no such adjustment shall be authorized or made if and to the extent that the existence of such authority (i) would cause Options, SARs, or Performance Awards granted under the Plan to Participants designated by the Committee as Covered Employees and intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder to otherwise fail to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder, or (ii) would cause the Committee to be deemed to have authority to change the targets, within the meaning of Treasury Regulation 1.162-27(e)(4)(vi), under the performance goals relating to Options or SARs granted to Covered Employees and intended to qualify as "performance-based compensation" under Code Section 162(m) and regulations thereunder.
A-18
The Board may otherwise, in its discretion, determine to submit other amendments to the Plan to stockholders for approval; and provided further, that, without the consent of an affected Participant, no such Board (or any Committee) action may materially and adversely affect the rights of such Participant under any outstanding Award (for this purpose, actions that alter the timing of federal income taxation of a Participant will not be deemed material unless such action results in an income tax penalty on the Participant). With regard to other terms of Awards, the Committee shall have no authority to waive or modify any such Award term after the Award has been granted to the extent the waived or modified term would be mandatory under the Plan for any Award newly granted at the date of the waiver or modification.
A-19
A-20
such Award shall conform to laws, regulations, and customs of the country in which the Participant is then resident or primarily employed, or so that the value and other benefits of the Award to the Participant, as affected by foreign tax laws and other restrictions applicable as a result of the Participant's residence or employment abroad shall be comparable to the value of such an Award to a Participant who is resident or primarily employed in the United States. An Award may be modified under this Section 11(n) in a manner that is inconsistent with the express terms of the Plan, so long as such modifications will not contravene any applicable law or regulation or result in actual liability under Section 16(b) for the Participant whose Award is modified.
A-21
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. 11825 N PENNSYLVANIA ST CARMEL, IN 46032 ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3 and 4: ForAgainst Abstain 1. Election of Directors Nominees For Against Abstain 2. Approval of the Company's Amended and Restated Long-Term Incentive Plan. 1A. Edward J. Bonach 3. Ratification of the appointment of Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2017. 1B Ellyn L. Brown 1C Stephen N. David 4. Approval, by non-binding advisory vote, of the compensation of the Company's named executive officers. 1D Robert C. Greving 1E Mary R. Henderson The Board of Directors recommends you vote1 year 2 years 3years 1 YEAR on the following proposal: Abstain 1F Charles J. Jacklin 5. Approval, by non-binding advisory vote, to determine whether a shareholder vote to approve the compensation of the Company's named executive officers should occur every one, two or three years. 1G Daniel R. Maurer 1H Neal C. Schneider NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. 1I Frederick J. Sievert Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date 0000324815_1
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report and Notice & Proxy Statement are available at www.proxyvote.com . CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. Annual Meeting of Shareholders May 10, 2017 8:00 AM This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The shareholder(s) hereby appoint(s) Erik M. Helding, Eric R. Johnson and John R. Kline, or any of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this card, all of the shares of Common Stock of CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC. that the shareholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 8:00 AM, EDT on May 10, 2017, at 11825 N. Pennsylvania St., Carmel, Indiana, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations. Continued and to be signed on reverse side 0000324815_2