Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ý | ||
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant o |
||
Check the appropriate box: |
||
ý |
Preliminary Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) |
|
o |
Definitive Proxy Statement |
|
o |
Definitive Additional Materials |
|
o |
Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 |
RITE AID CORPORATION | ||||
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) |
||||
N/A |
||||
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) |
||||
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): |
||||
o |
No fee required. |
|||
ý |
Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
|||
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: Common stock, par value $1.00 per share, of Rite Aid Corporation ("Common Stock"). |
|||
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: 1,096,139,520 shares of Common Stock as of November 19, 2015, which consists of: |
|||
(A) 1,046,467,182 shares of Common Stock outstanding; (B) 39,759,499 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options granted pursuant to the 2004 omnibus equity plan, 2006 omnibus equity plan, 2010 omnibus equity plan, 2012 omnibus equity plan and 2014 omnibus equity plan, as well as any other plans or agreements to which Rite Aid has granted equity awards; (C) 5,178,792 shares of restricted Common Stock subject to vesting conditions granted pursuant to the above Rite Aid plans; (D) 4,633,930 shares of restricted Common Stock issuable upon vesting and settlements of performance-vesting restricted units granted pursuant to the above Rite Aid plans; and (E) 100,117 time-vesting restricted stock units granted pursuant to the above Rite Aid plans. |
||||
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): Solely for the purposes of calculating the filing fee, the maximum aggregate value was determined based upon the sum of: |
|||
(A) 1,046,467,182 shares of Common Stock outstanding, multiplied by $9.00 per share, (B) 39,759,499 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of options granted pursuant to the 2004 omnibus equity plan, 2006 omnibus equity plan, 2010 omnibus equity plan, 2012 omnibus equity plan and 2014 omnibus equity plan, as well as any other plans or agreements to which Rite Aid has granted equity awards, multiplied by $6.297, which is the excess of $9.00 over $2.703, which is the weighted average exercise price of such options, (C) 5,178,792 shares of restricted Common Stock subject to vesting conditions granted pursuant to the above Rite Aid plans, multiplied by $9.00 per share, (D) 4,633,930 shares of restricted Common Stock issuable upon vesting and settlements of performance-vesting restricted units granted pursuant to the above Rite Aid plans, multiplied by $9.00 per share and (E) 100,117 time-vesting restricted stock units granted pursuant to the above Rite Aid plans, multiplied by $9.00 per share. In accordance with Section 14(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the filing fee was determined by multiplying the sum (9,757,785,754.20) calculated in the preceding sentence by 0.0001007. |
||||
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: $9,757,785,754.20 |
|||
(5) | Total fee paid: $982,609.03 |
|||
o |
Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
|||
o |
Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
|||
(1) |
Amount Previously Paid: |
|||
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
|||
(3) | Filing Party: |
|||
(4) | Date Filed: |
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENTSUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2015
[ · ], 2015
Dear Stockholder:
You are cordially invited to attend a special meeting of stockholders of Rite Aid Corporation, which we refer to as Rite Aid, to be held on [ · ], 201[ · ], at [ · ], at [ · ], [ · ] time.
At the special meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon a proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 27, 2015, which we refer to as the merger agreement, among Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., which we refer to as WBA, Victoria Merger Sub, Inc., which we refer to as Merger Sub and which is a wholly owned direct subsidiary of WBA, and Rite Aid. Pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Rite Aid, with Rite Aid surviving the merger as a wholly owned direct subsidiary of WBA. You also will be asked to consider and vote on a non-binding advisory proposal to approve compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger and a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting.
If the merger is completed, you will be entitled to receive $9.00 in cash, without interest, for each share of our common stock you own (unless you have properly exercised your appraisal rights with respect to such shares), which represents a premium of (i) approximately 48% to Rite Aid's closing stock price on October 26, 2015, the last trading day prior to the date on which public announcement of the execution of the merger agreement was made, and (ii) approximately 44% to the volume weighted average share price of our common stock during the thirty (30) days ended October 26, 2015.
Rite Aid's Board of Directors, after considering the reasons more fully described in this proxy statement, determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders, and adopted, approved and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote (i) "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (ii) "FOR" the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger and (iii) "FOR" the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting.
The enclosed proxy statement provides detailed information about the special meeting, the merger agreement and the merger. A copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to the proxy statement. The proxy statement also describes the actions and determinations of our Board of Directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger agreement and the merger. We encourage you to read the proxy statement and its annexes, including the merger agreement, carefully and in their entirety. You may also obtain more information about Rite Aid from documents we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission from time to time.
Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting in person, please complete, sign, date and return, as promptly as possible, the enclosed proxy card in the accompanying prepaid reply envelope or grant your proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone. If you attend the special meeting and
vote in person by ballot, your vote will revoke any proxy that you have previously submitted. If you hold your shares in "street name," you should instruct your broker, bank or other nominee how to vote in accordance with the voting instruction form you will receive from your broker, bank or other nominee.
Your vote is very important, regardless of the number of shares that you own. We cannot complete the merger unless the proposal to adopt the merger agreement is approved by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock. The failure of any stockholder to vote in person by ballot at the special meeting, to submit a signed proxy card or to grant a proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. If you hold your shares in "street name," the failure to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
If you have any questions or need assistance voting your shares of our common stock, please contact Innisfree M&A Incorporated, our proxy solicitor, by calling (877) 717-3929 toll-free.
On behalf of our Board of Directors, I thank you for your support and appreciate your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely, | ||
John T. Standley Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors |
Neither the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities regulatory agency has approved or disapproved of the transactions described in this document, including the merger, or determined if the information contained in this document is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
The accompanying proxy statement is dated [ · ], 2015 and, together with the enclosed form of proxy card, is first being mailed to stockholders of Rite Aid on or about [ · ], 2015.
PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENTSUBJECT TO COMPLETION
DATED NOVEMBER 23, 2015
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE YOUR SHARES PROMPTLY.
Notice is hereby given that a special meeting of stockholders of Rite Aid Corporation, a Delaware corporation, which we refer to as Rite Aid, will be held on [ · ], 201[ · ], at [ · ], at [ · ], [ · ] time for the following purposes:
1. To consider and vote on the proposal to adopt the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 27, 2015, which we refer to as the merger agreement, among Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc., which we refer to as WBA, Victoria Merger Sub, Inc., which we refer to as Merger Sub and which is a wholly owned direct subsidiary of WBA, and Rite Aid, as it may be amended from time to time (a copy of the merger agreement is attached as Annex A to the proxy statement accompanying this notice);
2. To consider and vote on the proposal to approve, by means of a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger contemplated by the merger agreement;
3. To consider and vote on the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting; and
4. To transact any other business that may properly come before the special meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote thereon is required to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Rite Aid common stock represented at the special meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote thereon is required to approve the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting. The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Rite Aid common stock represented at the special meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote thereon is required to approve the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger. The failure of any stockholder of record to submit a signed proxy card, grant a proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone or to vote in person by ballot at the special meeting will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, but will not have any effect on the adjournment proposal or the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger. If you hold your shares in "street name," the failure to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, but will not have any effect on the adjournment proposal or the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable to Rite Aid's named executive officers in connection with the merger. Abstentions will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, the adjournment proposal and the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger.
Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on [ · ], 2015 are entitled to notice of the special meeting and to vote at the special meeting or at any adjournment or postponement thereof.
A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting will be available in our offices located at 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 during regular business hours for a period of at least ten (10) days before the special meeting and at the place of the special meeting during the meeting.
Stockholders who do not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will have the right to seek appraisal of the fair value of their shares of Rite Aid common stock if they deliver a demand for appraisal before the vote is taken on the merger agreement and comply with all applicable requirements under Delaware law, which are summarized herein and reproduced in their entirety in Annex C to the accompanying proxy statement.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote (i) "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (ii) "FOR" the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger and (iii) "FOR" the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting.
By Order of the Board of Directors, | ||
James J. Comitale Secretary |
Dated: [ · ], 2015
WHETHER OR NOT YOU EXPECT TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING IN PERSON, WE ENCOURAGE YOU TO SUBMIT YOUR PROXY AS PROMPTLY AS POSSIBLE (1) BY TELEPHONE, (2) THROUGH THE INTERNET OR (3) BY MARKING, SIGNING AND DATING THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD AND RETURNING IT IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED. You may revoke your proxy or change your vote at any time before the special meeting. If your shares are held in the name of a broker, bank or other nominee, please follow the instructions on the voting instruction card furnished to you by such broker, bank or other nominee, which is considered the stockholder of record, in order to vote. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote the shares in your account. Your broker, bank or other nominee cannot vote on any of the proposals, including the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, without your instructions.
If you fail to return your proxy card, to grant your proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone, or to vote by ballot in person at the special meeting, your shares will not be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the special meeting. If you are a stockholder of record, voting in person by ballot at the special meeting will revoke any proxy that you previously submitted. If you hold your shares through a broker, bank or other nominee, you must obtain from the record holder a valid proxy issued in your name in order to vote in person at the special meeting.
We encourage you to read the accompanying proxy statement, including all documents incorporated by reference into the accompanying proxy statement, and annexes to the accompanying proxy statement, carefully and in their entirety. If you have any questions concerning the merger, the special meeting or the accompanying proxy statement, would like additional copies of the accompanying proxy statement or need help voting your shares of common stock, please contact our proxy solicitor:
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Toll Free: (877) 717-3929
Banks & Brokers may call collect: (212) 750-5833
i
ii
This summary highlights selected information from this proxy statement related to the merger of Merger Sub with and into Rite Aid with Rite Aid surviving as a wholly owned direct subsidiary of WBA, which transaction we refer to as the merger. This summary may not contain all of the information that is important to you. To understand the merger more fully and for a more complete description of the legal terms of the merger, you should read carefully this entire proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy statement, including the merger agreement, and the documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement. You may obtain the documents and information incorporated by reference in this proxy statement without charge by following the instructions under "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 114. The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement.
Except as otherwise specifically noted in this proxy statement or as the context otherwise requires, "Rite Aid," or "we," "our," "us" and similar words in this proxy statement refer to Rite Aid Corporation including, in certain cases, its subsidiaries. Throughout this proxy statement we refer to Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. as WBA and to Victoria Merger Sub, Inc. as Merger Sub. In addition, throughout this proxy statement we refer to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 27, 2015, as it may be amended from time to time, among WBA, Merger Sub and Rite Aid, as the merger agreement.
Parties Involved in the Merger (page 30)
Rite Aid is a leading retail drugstore chain in the United States. As of October 24, 2015, Rite Aid operated 4,561 stores in 31 states across the country and in the District of Columbia.
Rite Aid sells prescription drugs and a wide assortment of other merchandise, which Rite Aid calls "front-end" products. Front-end products include over-the-counter medications, health and beauty aids, personal care items, cosmetics, household items, food and beverages, greeting cards, seasonal merchandise and numerous other everyday and convenience products.
On June 24, 2015, we completed our acquisition of Envision Topco Holdings, LLC which we refer to as EnvisionRx, pursuant to the terms of that certain Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 10, 2015, by and among Rite Aid, Eagle Merger Sub 1 LLC, Eagle Merger Sub 2 LLC, TPG VI Envision BL, LLC, Envision Topco Holdings, LLC and Shareholder Representative Services LLC, in its capacity as sellers' representative, which we refer to as the EnvisionRx Agreement. EnvisionRx is a full-service pharmacy services provider. EnvisionRx provides both transparent and traditional pharmacy benefit manager options through its EnvisionRx and MedTrak pharmacy benefit managers, respectively. EnvisionRx also offers fully integrated mail-order and specialty pharmacy services through Orchard Pharmaceutical Services; access to a leading cash pay infertility discount drug program via Design Rx; an innovative claims adjudication software platform in Laker Software; and a national Medicare Part D prescription drug plan through Envision Insurance Company's EnvisionRx Plus Silver product for the low income auto-assign market and its Clear Choice product for the chooser market. EnvisionRx operates as our 100 percent owned subsidiary.
Rite Aid was incorporated in Delaware on April 15, 1968. Rite Aid's common stock is currently listed on the New York Stock Exchange, which we refer to as the NYSE, under the symbol "RAD."
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
WBA is the first global, pharmacy-led health and wellbeing enterprise with net sales of $103.4 billion in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2015. Together with its equity method investments, WBA employs more than 370,000 people and has over 13,100 stores in 11 countries and a pharmaceutical wholesale and a distribution network that includes over 350 distribution centers delivering to more than 200,000 pharmacies, doctors, health centers and hospitals each year.
1
WBA's portfolio of retail and business brands includes Walgreens, Duane Reade, Boots and Alliance Healthcare, as well as increasingly global health and beauty product brands, such as No7, Botanics, Liz Earle and Soap & Glory.
WBA was created through the combination of Walgreen Co. and Alliance Boots GmbH in December 2014. WBA was incorporated in Delaware in 2014 and is the successor of Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation, which was formed in 1909 as a successor to a business founded in 1901. Its principal executive offices are located at 108 Wilmot Road, Deerfield, Illinois 60015. WBA's common stock trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol "WBA."
Merger Sub is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of WBA, formed on October 23, 2015 for the purpose of entering into the merger agreement and completing the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Upon completion of the merger, Merger Sub will cease to exist.
Certain Effects of the Merger on Rite Aid (page 31)
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Rite Aid, with Rite Aid continuing as the Surviving Corporation and a wholly owned direct subsidiary of WBA. Throughout this proxy statement, we use the term Surviving Corporation to refer to Rite Aid as the surviving corporation following the merger. If the merger is completed, you will not own any shares of the capital stock of the Surviving Corporation, and instead will only be entitled to receive the merger consideration, as described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementMerger Consideration" beginning on page 86.
Effect on Rite Aid if the Merger is Not Completed (page 31)
If the merger agreement is not adopted by Rite Aid stockholders or if the merger is not completed for any other reason, Rite Aid stockholders will not receive any payment for their shares of common stock. Instead, Rite Aid will remain a public company, Rite Aid's common stock will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE and registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which we refer to as the Exchange Act, and Rite Aid will continue to file periodic reports with the SEC.
Under certain specified circumstances, Rite Aid will be required to reimburse certain of WBA's expenses incurred in respect of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, will be required to pay WBA a termination fee upon the termination of the merger agreement or will be entitled to receive a termination fee from WBA, as described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementTermination of the Merger AgreementTermination Fees" beginning on page 106 and "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementExpense Reimbursement" beginning on page 107.
Merger Consideration (page 32)
At the time at which the merger will become effective, which we refer to as the effective time of the merger, each share of Rite Aid common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger (other than shares owned by (i) WBA, Merger Sub or Rite Aid (which will be cancelled), (ii) stockholders who have properly exercised and perfected appraisal rights under Delaware law, or (iii) any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rite Aid or WBA; collectively we refer to all such shares in this proxy statement as excluded shares) will be converted into the right to receive $9.00 per share in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding taxes, which we refer to as the per share merger consideration, and will cease to be outstanding, will automatically be cancelled and will cease to exist, and each certificate that immediately prior to the effective time of the merger represented any of the shares of Rite Aid common stock (other than the excluded shares) or
2
non-certificated shares held in book-entry form representing any such Rite Aid common stock will thereafter represent only the right to receive the per share merger consideration. As described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementExchange Procedures" beginning on page 87, at or prior to the effective time of the merger, WBA will deposit, or cause to be deposited, with a designated paying agent, a cash amount in immediately available funds sufficient in the aggregate to provide all funds necessary to pay the aggregate per share merger consideration.
After the merger is completed, under the terms of the merger agreement, you will have the right to receive the per share merger consideration, but you no longer will have any rights as a Rite Aid stockholder as a result of the merger (except for the right to receive the per share merger consideration and except that stockholders who properly exercise and perfect their demand for right of appraisal will instead have the right to receive a payment for the "fair value" of their shares as determined pursuant to an appraisal proceeding as contemplated by Delaware law, as described under "The MergerAppraisal Rights" beginning on page 75).
The special meeting of our stockholders will be held on [ · ], 201[ · ] at the [ · ] at [ · ].
At the special meeting, we will ask our stockholders of record as of the close of business on [ · ], 2015, which we refer to as the record date, to vote on proposals (i) to adopt the merger agreement, (ii) to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger, and (iii) to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting.
Record Date; Shares Entitled to Vote
You are entitled to vote at the special meeting if you owned shares of our common stock on the record date. You will have one vote at the special meeting for each share of our common stock you owned at the close of business on the record date.
As of the record date, there were approximately [ · ] shares of Rite Aid common stock outstanding and entitled to be voted at the special meeting. A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a special meeting. The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting, either present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the special meeting. As a result, [ · ] shares must be represented by proxy or by stockholders present and entitled to vote at the special meeting to have a quorum.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote thereon is required to adopt the merger agreement. Approval of the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Rite Aid common stock represented at the special meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote thereon. Approval of the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the
3
special meeting, whether or not a quorum is present, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Rite Aid common stock represented at the special meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote thereon.
Share Ownership of Rite Aid Directors and Executive Officers
At the close of business on [ · ], 2015, the record date, Rite Aid directors and executive officers beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, [ · ] shares of Rite Aid common stock (excluding any shares of Rite Aid common stock that would be delivered upon exercise or conversion of stock options or other equity-based awards), which represented approximately [ · ]% of the outstanding shares of Rite Aid common stock on that date. Our directors and executive officers have informed us that they currently intend to vote all of their shares of Rite Aid common stock (i) "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (ii) "FOR" the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger and (iii) "FOR" the proposal to approve one or more adjournments or postponements of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of approval of the merger agreement.
Any Rite Aid stockholder of record entitled to vote at the special meeting may submit a proxy by returning a signed proxy card by mail or voting electronically over the Internet or by telephone, or may vote in person by appearing at the special meeting. If you are a beneficial owner and hold your shares of Rite Aid common stock in "street name" through a broker, bank or other nominee, you should instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how you wish to vote your shares of Rite Aid common stock using the instructions provided by your broker, bank or other nominee. Under applicable stock exchange rules, if you fail to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares, your broker, bank or other nominee only has discretion to vote your shares on routine matters. Proposals 1, 2 and 3 in this proxy statement are non-routine matters, and brokers, banks and other nominees therefore cannot vote on these proposals without your instructions. Therefore, it is important that you cast your vote or instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how you wish to vote your shares.
If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the special meeting by submitting a new proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone after the date of the earlier submitted proxy, signing another proxy card with a later date and returning it to us prior to the special meeting or attending the special meeting and voting in person. If you hold your shares of common stock in "street name," you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee for instructions regarding how to change your vote.
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger (page 50)
The Board of Directors, after considering various factors described herein, unanimously among directors present (with one director absent due to medical reasons) determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders, and approved, adopted and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
The Board of Directors unanimously among those directors that were present (with one director absent due to medical reasons) recommends that you vote (i) "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (ii) "FOR" the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger and
4
(iii) "FOR" the proposal to approve one or more adjournments or postponements of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of approval of the merger agreement.
Opinion of Rite Aid's Financial Advisor (page 55)
In connection with the merger, Rite Aid's financial advisor, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., which we refer to as Citi, delivered a written opinion, dated October 27, 2015, to the Board of Directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of the opinion, of the merger consideration to be received by holders of Rite Aid common stock pursuant to the merger agreement. The full text of Citi's written opinion, dated October 27, 2015, which describes the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations and qualifications on the review undertaken, is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The description of Citi's opinion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Citi's opinion. Citi's opinion was provided for the information of the Board of Directors (in its capacity as such) in connection with its evaluation of the merger consideration from a financial point of view and did not address any other aspects or implications of the merger. Citi expressed no view as to, and its opinion does not address, the underlying business decision of Rite Aid to effect the merger, the relative merits of the merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for Rite Aid or the effect of any other transaction in which Rite Aid might engage or consider. Citi's opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote or act on any matters relating to the merger or otherwise.
Financing of the Merger (page 74)
WBA's obligation to complete the merger is not subject to the receipt of financing. Concurrently with the signing of the merger agreement, WBA entered into a bridge facility commitment letter, which we refer to as the Commitment Letter, dated October 27, 2015 and amended and restated as of November 19, 2015, with UBS Securities LLC, which we refer to as UBS Securities, and UBS AG, Stamford Branch, providing for a $12.8 billion fully-committed senior unsecured bridge loan facility (which may be increased by up to $2.0 billion at WBA's option at any time prior to the closing date of the merger, and which may be reduced as further described under "The MergerRecommendation of Our Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger" beginning on page 50), which we refer to as the Facility, which Commitment Letter and the commitments contemplated thereby will terminate upon the first to occur of (a) the consummation of the merger with or without funding of the Facility, (b) the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms, (c) the execution of a credit agreement documenting the Facility and (d) the date which is one (1) year following the date of the merger agreement (coinciding with the termination date with respect to the merger agreement), subject to an automatic three (3) month extension of the Commitment Letter and the commitments contemplated thereby in the event that the termination date with respect to the merger agreement is so extended in accordance with its terms. WBA currently expects (a) to finance the merger consideration and/or the refinancing of a portion of the indebtedness of Rite Aid and (b) to pay related fees and expenses with a combination of (i) the issuance of new debt securities, (ii) new term loans and (iii) existing cash on WBA's balance sheet. If WBA is unable to issue and sell such debt securities, WBA expects it will instead use borrowings under the Facility.
Borrowings under the Facility will bear interest at a fluctuating rate equal to, at WBA's option, LIBOR or the applicable base rate plus a margin. WBA will also pay certain customary fees. The Facility, if funded, will mature three hundred and sixty four (364) days after the initial borrowings; provided that WBA can extend up to $3.0 billion of the Facility for an additional ninety (90) day period if desired. The closing of the Facility and the availability of the loans thereunder are subject to the satisfaction of certain customary conditions. The definitive loan documentation for the Facility will contain certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative, negative and financial covenants
5
and events of default and will be substantially consistent with the terms set forth in WBA's existing revolving credit agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014, unless otherwise mutually and reasonably agreed.
Treatment of Equity and Equity-Based Awards (page 86)
The merger agreement provides that Rite Aid's equity awards that are outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be subject to the following treatment at the effective time of the merger:
Upon completion of the merger, each vested option to purchase Rite Aid common stock (including any option subject to accelerated vesting upon completion of the merger) with a per share exercise price less than $9.00 that is outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the merger, which we refer to as a cash-out option, will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive, without interest, an amount in cash equal to the product of (x) the total number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such cash-out option and (y) the excess, if any, of $9.00 over the per share exercise price of such cash-out option, less applicable withholding taxes.
Upon completion of the merger, each unvested option to purchase Rite Aid common stock, and each vested option to purchase Rite Aid common stock with a per share exercise price equal to or greater than $9.00, that is outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the merger, which we refer to as a rollover option, will be converted into an option to acquire, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the completion of the merger, a number of shares of WBA common stock equal to the product of (x) the number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such rollover option and (y) a fraction, the numerator of which is $9.00 and the denominator of which is the volume weighted average trading price of WBA common stock on the five (5) consecutive trading days immediately preceding the closing date of the merger, which fraction we refer to as the conversion ratio, with any fractional shares rounded down to the next lower whole number of shares after aggregating each individual holder's option with the same exercise price. The exercise price of each converted rollover option will be equitably adjusted to be equal to the quotient (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) of (x) the exercise price per share of Rite Aid common stock subject to such rollover option and (y) the conversion ratio (rounded up to the nearest whole cent).
Treatment of Restricted Stock and Performance Stock Units
Upon completion of the merger, each share of Rite Aid restricted stock and each Rite Aid performance stock unit that is outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the merger, which we refer to as a rollover stock award, will be converted into a WBA restricted share award or a WBA performance stock unit, as applicable, relating to the number of shares of WBA common stock equal to the product of (x) the number of shares of Rite Aid common stock relating to such rollover stock award (which, in the case of performance stock units for which the applicable performance period has not completed, will be the target number of shares) and (y) the conversion ratio, with any fractional shares rounded down to the next lower whole number of shares (with such rounding applied on an aggregate basis to each individual holder), and with each such converted rollover stock award generally subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the completion of the merger. With respect to each rollover stock award that is a performance stock unit, following the completion of the merger: (i) the performance goals or conditions will not apply with respect to a pro-rata portion of such award (with such portion based on the number of days elapsed in the performance period through the completion of the merger), and such portion of the rollover stock award will continue to be subject to service-based vesting on the same schedule as applied prior to the completion of the merger, and (ii) the remaining portion of the performance stock unit will continue to
6
be subject to performance-based vesting (based on the achievement of adjusted performance goals) and service-based vesting on the same schedule as applied prior to the completion of the merger.
Treatment of Restricted Stock Units
Upon completion of the merger, each Rite Aid restricted stock unit outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the merger, whether or not vested, will automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (x) the total number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such restricted stock unit and (y) $9.00, less applicable withholding taxes.
Treatment Under Rite Aid Stock Plans
Pursuant to the terms of Rite Aid's stock plans, the vesting of each rollover option and rollover stock award outstanding as of the date of the merger agreement, including the rollover options and rollover stock awards then held by any executive officer, will accelerate and vest (with any performance conditions deemed achieved at target levels) upon the occurrence of both (i) a change in control and (ii) a qualifying termination during the two (2) year period following a change in control, which we refer to as "double-trigger" vesting. The merger will be treated as a change in control for purposes of Rite Aid's stock plans with respect to any rollover options and rollover stock awards that are granted prior to the date of the merger agreement, but will not be treated as a change in control for purposes with respect to any rollover options and rollover stock awards that are granted following the date of the merger agreement and prior to completion of the merger (which will be subject to the vesting provisions of the executive officer's employment agreement, as described below).
Interests of the Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the Merger (page 63)
When considering the recommendation of the Board of Directors that you vote to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, you should be aware that our directors and executive officers may have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, your interests as a stockholder. The Board of Directors was aware of and considered these interests to the extent such interests existed at the time, among other matters, in evaluating and overseeing the negotiation of the merger agreement, in approving the merger agreement and the merger and in recommending that the merger agreement be adopted by the stockholders of Rite Aid. These interests may include the following:
7
If the proposal to adopt the merger agreement is approved by our stockholders and the merger closes, under the terms of the merger agreement, any shares of common stock held by our directors and executive officers, including such shares held following the vesting or settlement of equity and equity-based awards, will be treated in the same manner as outstanding shares of common stock held by all other stockholders of Rite Aid entitled to receive the per share merger consideration.
8
If the merger agreement is adopted by Rite Aid stockholders, stockholders who do not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and who properly exercise and perfect their demand for appraisal of their shares will be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger under Section 262 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, which we refer to as the DGCL. This means that holders of Rite Aid common stock are entitled to have their shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment in cash of the "fair value" of the shares of Rite Aid common stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with interest to be paid upon the amount determined to be fair value, if any, as determined by the court. Stockholders who wish to seek appraisal of their shares are in any case encouraged to seek the advice of legal counsel with respect to the exercise of appraisal rights due to the complexity of the appraisal process.
Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares as determined pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL could be more than, the same as or less than the value of the consideration they would receive pursuant to the merger if they did not seek appraisal of their shares.
To exercise your appraisal rights, you must submit a written demand for appraisal to Rite Aid before the vote is taken on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, you must not submit a blank proxy or otherwise vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and you must continue to hold the shares of Rite Aid common stock of record through the effective time of the merger. Your failure to follow the procedures specified under the DGCL will result in the loss of your appraisal rights. The DGCL requirements for exercising appraisal rights are described in further detail in this proxy statement, and the relevant section of the DGCL regarding appraisal rights is reproduced and attached as Annex C to this proxy statement. If you hold your shares of Rite Aid common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your broker, bank or other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal by such broker, bank or other nominee.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger (page 80)
The receipt of cash for shares of Rite Aid common stock pursuant to the merger generally will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The receipt of cash by a U.S. Holder (as defined under "The MergerU.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page 80) in exchange for such U.S. Holder's shares of Rite Aid common stock in the merger generally will result in the recognition of gain or loss in an amount measured by the difference between the cash such U.S. Holder receives in the merger and such U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the shares of Rite Aid common stock surrendered in the merger. A Non-U.S. Holder (as defined under "The MergerU.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page 80) generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax with respect to the exchange of our common stock for cash in the merger unless such Non-U.S. Holder has certain connections to the United States. Stockholders should refer to the discussion under "The MergerU.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger" beginning on page 80 and consult their tax advisors concerning the U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the merger in light of their particular circumstances and any consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign taxing jurisdiction.
Regulatory Approvals (page 82)
Rite Aid and WBA have agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to take, and to assist and cooperate with each other in taking, all actions and to use their reasonable best efforts to do all things
9
reasonably necessary, proper or advisable, to consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, subject to certain specified limitations under the merger agreement. These approvals include approval under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, which we refer to as the HSR Act. Although we expect that all required regulatory clearances and approvals will be obtained, we cannot assure you that these regulatory clearances and approvals will be timely obtained or obtained at all, or that the granting of these regulatory clearances and approvals will not involve the imposition of additional conditions on the completion of the merger, including the requirement to divest assets, or require changes to the terms of the merger agreement. These conditions or changes could result in the conditions to the closing of the merger not being satisfied.
HSR Act and U.S. Antitrust Matters
Under the merger agreement, the merger cannot be completed until the applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act have expired or been terminated. Rite Aid and WBA filed their respective HSR Act notifications on November 10, 2015, resulting in an initial waiting period ending on December 10, 2015, unless the parties decide that WBA should voluntarily pull and refile WBA's HSR Act notification, which would initiate a new initial thirty (30) calendar day waiting period beginning on the day that WBA refiled its HSR Act notification. If the Federal Trade Commission, which we refer to as the FTC, or the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice, which we refer to as the DOJ, issues a Request for Additional Information and Documentary Material, which we refer to as a second request, prior to the expiration of the initial waiting period, the parties must observe a second thirty (30) calendar day waiting period or such additional time as the parties may agree, which would begin to run only after both parties have substantially complied with the second request, unless such waiting period is terminated earlier.
Approval (or non-objection, grant of exemption or, in certain circumstances, alternative resolution, as the case may be) will be sought from (i) the state insurance regulator in the State of Ohio for the change of control of Envision Insurance Company, (ii) the Department of Managed Health Care of the State of California with respect to the change of control of Envision Insurance Company as a Knox-Keene licensed health care service plan, (iii) the Board of Pharmacy of the State of California with respect to a change in ownership of Orchard Pharmaceutical Services, LLC, (iv) the Insurance Department of the State of Texas with respect to the change of control of Rite Aid's subsidiary licensed as a third-party administrator in Texas, and (v) the state insurance regulator in the State of Utah with respect to the change of ownership of Rite Aid's subsidiary licensed as a health discount program operator. In addition, a response letter from the Department of Insurance of the State of Missouri will be sought confirming that the merger falls below the threshold requirements for filing a Form E (pre-acquisition notification form regarding the potential competitive impact of a proposed merger) in Missouri. To obtain these approvals, WBA, or the applicable Rite Aid subsidiary, as the case may be, has filed or will file, acquisition of control and material modification or similar statements, notices or applications (or requests for grants of exemption relating thereto), as required by the insurance and health care laws and regulations of each applicable state or jurisdiction. In addition, either prior to or following the completion of the merger, WBA or Rite Aid will be required to make change of control notification filings with various state regulators pursuant to applicable insurance and health care laws and regulations (none of which notification filings are conditions to the completion of the merger).
Legal Proceedings Regarding the Merger (page 83)
As of November 20, 2015, Rite Aid is aware of eight (8) putative class action lawsuits, filed by purported Rite Aid stockholders against Rite Aid, the directors of Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub,
10
challenging the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. For a more detailed description of the litigation, see "The MergerLegal Proceedings Regarding the Merger" beginning on page 83.
Except as otherwise provided in the merger agreement, Rite Aid will not, and will cause its subsidiaries and its and its subsidiaries' directors, officers and employees not to, and will instruct its and its subsidiaries' representatives not to, directly or indirectly:
At any time before obtaining the stockholder approval for the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, in the event that Rite Aid receives a bona fide acquisition proposal from any third party in circumstances not otherwise involving a breach of the merger agreement by Rite Aid and that the Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, that such acquisition proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a superior proposal Rite Aid may:
Change of Recommendation (page 95)
The Board of Directors has made the recommendation that the holders of Rite Aid shares vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger.
The merger agreement provides that the Board of Directors may generally not effect a change of recommendation unless, prior to obtaining the stockholder approval, a bona fide acquisition proposal is made after the date of the merger agreement and the Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisor and outside legal counsel, that such acquisition proposal constitutes a superior proposal and determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel, that the failure to effect a change of recommendation would be reasonably likely to be inconsistent with the Board of Directors' fiduciary duties under applicable law (provided that the
11
acquisition proposal was not initiated, solicited, encouraged or facilitated in, and did not otherwise result from a, material violation of the merger agreement by Rite Aid).
If the Board of Directors effects a change of recommendation under the merger agreement, WBA may terminate the merger agreement and receive a termination fee from Rite Aid as further described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementTermination of the Merger AgreementTermination Fees" beginning on page 106.
Conditions to the Closing of the Merger (page 103)
The following are some of the conditions that must be satisfied or, where permitted by law, waived before the merger may be consummated:
Termination of the Merger Agreement (page 104)
The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the merger:
12
termination right will not be available to a party whose breach of the merger agreement was the primary cause of, or primarily resulted in, the issuance of such legal restraint;
Under the merger agreement, Rite Aid will be required to pay to WBA a termination fee of $325 million (less WBA expenses of up to $45 million, to the extent previously paid by Rite Aid) if the merger agreement is terminated under specified circumstances. Under the merger agreement, WBA will be required to pay Rite Aid a termination fee of $325 million if the merger agreement is terminated under specified circumstances, which will be increased to $650 million under specified circumstances.
13
In no event will Rite Aid or WBA be required to pay the termination fees described above on more than one occasion.
Expense Reimbursement (page 107)
If the merger agreement is terminated by either party because Rite Aid's stockholders do not approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, Rite Aid would be required to reimburse WBA for up to $45 million in documented out-of-pocket expenses incurred by WBA and Merger Sub in connection with or related to the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. The amount of any termination fee payable by Rite Aid to WBA would be reduced by any such expense reimbursement amount paid.
Except for the provision described above under "SummaryExpense Reimbursement," or as specified in the merger agreement, each party will bear its own expenses in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
Specific Performance (page 107)
The parties are entitled to injunctions, specific performance and other equitable relief to prevent breaches or threatened breaches of the merger agreement and to enforce specifically the terms of the merger agreement in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or equity.
Market Prices and Dividend Data (page 110)
Rite Aid's common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol "RAD." On October 26, 2015, the last trading day prior to the date on which the public announcement of the execution of the merger agreement was made, the closing price of our common stock was $6.08 per share. On [ · ], 2015, the latest practicable trading day before the printing of this proxy statement, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE was $[ · ] per share.
Under the terms of the merger agreement, from the date of the merger agreement until the earlier of the effective time of the merger or the termination of the merger agreement, we may not declare or pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock without WBA's written consent. Under our current dividend policy, we have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and have retained any future earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business.
Neither the SEC nor any state securities regulatory agency has approved or disapproved of the transactions described in this document, including the merger, or determined if the information contained in this document is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
14
The following questions and answers are intended to address some commonly asked questions regarding the merger, the merger agreement and the special meeting. These questions and answers may not address all questions that may be important to you as a Rite Aid stockholder. We encourage you to read carefully the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy statement, including the merger agreement, and the documents we incorporate by reference in this proxy statement. You may obtain the documents and information incorporated by reference in this proxy statement without charge by following the instructions under "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 114. The merger agreement is attached as Annex A to this proxy statement.
15
16
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote (i) "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (ii) "FOR" the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger and (iii) "FOR" the proposal to approve one or more adjournments or postponements of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of approval of the merger agreement.
Under specified circumstances, Rite Aid will be required to reimburse certain of WBA's expenses incurred in respect of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, will be required to pay WBA a termination fee upon the termination of the merger agreement or will be entitled to receive a termination fee from WBA, as described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementTermination of the Merger AgreementTermination Fees" beginning on page 106
17
and "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementExpense Reimbursement" beginning on page 107.
The failure of any stockholder of record to submit a signed proxy card, grant a proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone or to vote in person by ballot at the special meeting will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. If you hold your shares in "street name," the failure to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. An abstention will also have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
As of [ · ], 201[ · ], the record date for determining who is entitled to vote at the special meeting, there were approximately [ · ] shares of Rite Aid common stock issued and outstanding. Each holder of Rite Aid common stock is entitled to one vote per share of stock owned by such holder as of the record date.
The failure of any stockholder of record to submit a signed proxy card, grant a proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone or to vote in person by ballot at the special meeting will not have any effect on the adjournment proposal or the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger. If you hold your shares in "street name," the failure to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares will not have any effect
18
on the adjournment proposal or the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger. An abstention will have the same effect as a vote "AGAINST" the adjournment proposal and the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger.
If your shares are held through a broker, bank or other nominee, you are considered the "beneficial owner" of the shares of Rite Aid common stock held in "street name." In that case, this proxy statement has been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, to be the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares by following their instructions for voting. You are also invited to attend the special meeting. However, because you are not the stockholder of record, you may not vote your shares in person at the
19
special meeting unless you request and obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee.
A control number, located on your proxy card, is designed to verify your identity and allow you to vote your shares of common stock, and to confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded when voting electronically over the Internet or by telephone. Please be aware that, although there is no charge for voting your shares, if you vote electronically over the Internet or by telephone, you may incur costs such as telephone and Internet access charges for which you will be responsible.
Even if you plan to attend the special meeting in person, you are strongly encouraged to vote your shares of common stock by proxy. If you are a stockholder of record or if you obtain a valid proxy to vote shares which you beneficially own, you may still vote your shares of common stock in person at the special meeting even if you have previously voted by proxy. If you are present at the special meeting and vote in person, your previous vote by proxy will not be counted.
If your shares are held in "street name" through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote through your broker, bank or other nominee by completing and returning the voting form provided by your broker, bank or other nominee, or electronically over the Internet or by telephone through your broker, bank or other nominee if such a service is provided. To vote via the Internet or via telephone through your broker, bank or other nominee, you should follow the instructions on the voting form provided by your broker, bank or other nominee.
20
important that you instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how you wish to vote your shares.
If you hold your shares of common stock in "street name," you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee for instructions regarding how to change your vote. You may also vote in person at the special meeting if you obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee.
If you properly sign and return your proxy card but do not mark the boxes showing how your shares should be voted on a matter, the shares represented by your properly signed proxy will be voted as recommended by the Board of Directors with respect to each proposal.
21
Upon completion of the merger, each rollover option will be converted into an option to acquire, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the completion of the merger, a number of shares of WBA common stock equal to the product of (x) the number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such rollover option and (y) the conversion ratio, with any fractional shares rounded down to the next lower whole number of shares after aggregating each individual holder's option with the same exercise price. The exercise price of each rollover option will be equitably adjusted to be equal to the quotient (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) of (x) the exercise price per share of Rite Aid common stock subject to such rollover option and (y) the conversion ratio (rounded up to the nearest whole cent).
Upon completion of the merger, each rollover stock award will be converted into a WBA restricted share award or a WBA performance stock unit, as applicable, relating to the number of shares of WBA common stock equal to the product of (x) the number of shares of Rite Aid common stock relating to such rollover stock award (in the case of performance stock units for which the applicable performance period has not completed, the target number of shares) and
22
(y) the conversion ratio, with any fractional shares rounded down to the next lower whole number of shares (with such rounding applied on an aggregate basis to each individual holder), and with each such converted rollover stock award generally subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the completion of the merger. With respect to each rollover stock award that is a performance stock unit, following the completion of the merger (i) the performance goals or conditions will not apply with respect to a pro-rata portion of such award (with such portion based on the number of days elapsed in the performance period through the completion of the merger), and such portion of the rollover stock award will continue to be subject to service-based vesting on the same schedule as applied prior to the completion of the merger, and (ii) the remaining portion of the performance stock unit will continue to be subject to performance-based vesting (based on the achievement of adjusted performance goals) and service-based vesting on the same schedule as applied prior to the completion of the merger.
Upon completion of the merger, each Rite Aid restricted stock unit outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the merger will automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (x) the total number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such restricted stock unit and (y) $9.00, less applicable withholding taxes.
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Toll Free: (877) 717-3929
Banks & Brokers may call collect: (212) 750-5833
23
This proxy statement, and the documents to which we refer you in this proxy statement, as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements made or to be made by us or on our behalf, contain "forward-looking statements" that do not directly or exclusively relate to historical facts. You can typically identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking words, such as "may," "could," "should," "estimate," "project," "forecast," "intend," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "target," "plan," "providing guidance" and similar expressions that are intended to identify information that is not historical in nature. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the risks detailed in our filings with the SEC, including in our most recent filing on Form 10-K and subsequent periodic and interim reports, factors and matters described or incorporated by reference in this proxy statement, and the following factors:
No assurance can be given that these are all of the factors that could cause actual results to vary materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of the particular statement.
24
All of the forward-looking statements we make in this proxy statement are qualified by the information contained or incorporated by reference herein, including, but not limited to, (a) the information contained under this heading and (b) the information contained under the headings "Risk Factors" and information in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in our most recent filing on Form 10-K and subsequent periodic and interim report filings (see "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 114).
Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Rite Aid stockholders are advised, however, to consult any future disclosures we make on related subjects as may be detailed in our other filings made from time to time with the SEC.
The enclosed proxy is solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors for use at the special meeting of stockholders or at any adjournments or postponements thereof.
We will hold the special meeting on [ · ], 201[ · ] at the [ · ] at [ · ].
Purpose of the Special Meeting
At the special meeting, we will ask our stockholders of record as of the record date to vote on proposals (i) to adopt the merger agreement, (ii) to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger, and (iii) to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting.
Record Date; Shares Entitled to Vote; Quorum
Only stockholders of record as of the close of business on [ · ] are entitled to notice of the special meeting and to vote at the special meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof. A list of stockholders entitled to vote at the special meeting will be available in our offices located at 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011, during regular business hours for a period of at least ten (10) days before the special meeting and at the place of the special meeting during the special meeting.
As of the record date, there were approximately [ · ] shares of Rite Aid common stock outstanding and entitled to be voted at the special meeting.
A quorum of stockholders is necessary to hold a special meeting. The holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting, either present in person or represented by proxy, will constitute a quorum at the special meeting. As a result, [ · ] shares must be represented by proxy or by stockholders present and entitled to vote at the special meeting to have a quorum.
In the event that a quorum is not present at the special meeting, it is expected that the meeting would be adjourned or postponed to a later date to solicit additional proxies.
25
Vote Required; Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock entitled to vote thereon is required to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Adoption of the merger agreement by our stockholders is a condition to the closing of the merger.
Approval of the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting, whether or not a quorum is present, requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Rite Aid common stock represented at the special meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote thereon. Approval of the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Rite Aid common stock represented at the special meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote thereon.
If a Rite Aid stockholder abstains from voting, the abstention will have the same effect as if the stockholder voted "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, the adjournment proposal and the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger.
If you hold your shares in "street name," the failure to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares will count as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, but will have no effect on the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting and the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger.
Broker non-votes are shares held by a broker, bank or other nominee that are present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting, but with respect to which the broker, bank or other nominee is not instructed by the beneficial owner of such shares on how to vote on a particular proposal and the broker does not have discretionary voting power on such proposal. Because brokers, banks and other nominee holders of record do not have discretionary voting authority with respect to any of the three proposals, if a beneficial owner of shares of Rite Aid common stock held in "street name" does not give voting instructions to the broker, bank or other nominee with respect to any of the proposals, then those shares will not be present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting. If there are any broker non-votes, then such broker non-votes will be counted as a vote "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, but will have no effect on the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting and the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger.
Shares Held by Rite Aid's Directors and Executive Officers
As of the record date, Rite Aid directors and executive officers beneficially owned and were entitled to vote, in the aggregate, [ · ] shares of Rite Aid common stock (excluding any shares of Rite Aid common stock that would be delivered upon exercise or conversion of stock options or other equity-based awards), which represented approximately [ · ]% of the outstanding shares of Rite Aid common stock on that date. The directors and executive officers of Rite Aid have informed Rite Aid that they currently intend to vote all of their shares of Rite Aid common stock (i) "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (ii) "FOR" the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in
26
connection with the merger and (iii) "FOR" the proposal to approve one or more adjournments or postponements of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of approval of the merger agreement.
If your shares are registered in your name with our transfer agent, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., you may cause your shares to be voted by returning a signed proxy card, or you may vote in person at the special meeting. Additionally, you may submit electronically over the Internet or by phone a proxy authorizing the voting of your shares by following the instructions on your proxy card. You must have the enclosed proxy card available, and follow the instructions on the proxy card, in order to submit a proxy electronically over the Internet or by telephone. Based on your proxy cards or Internet and telephone proxies, the proxy holders will vote your shares according to your directions.
If you plan to attend the special meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be given a ballot at the meeting. If your shares are registered in your name, you are encouraged to vote by proxy even if you plan to attend the special meeting in person. If you attend the special meeting and vote in person, your vote by ballot will revoke any proxy previously submitted.
Voting instructions are included on your proxy card. All shares represented by properly executed proxies received in time for the special meeting will be voted at the special meeting in accordance with the instructions of the stockholder. Properly executed proxies that do not contain voting instructions will be voted (i) "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (ii) "FOR" the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger and (iii) "FOR" the proposal to approve one or more adjournments or postponements of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of approval of the merger agreement. No proxy that is specifically marked against the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will be voted in favor of the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger, unless it is specifically marked "FOR" the approval of such proposal.
If your shares are held in "street name" through a broker, bank or other nominee, you may vote through your broker, bank or other nominee by completing and returning the voting form provided by your broker, bank or other nominee, or by the Internet or telephone through your broker, bank or other nominee if such a service is provided. To vote via the Internet or telephone through your broker, bank or other nominee, you should follow the instructions on the voting form provided by your broker, bank or other nominee. Under applicable stock exchange rules, brokers, banks or other nominees have the discretion to vote your shares on routine matters if you fail to instruct your broker, bank or other nominee on how to vote your shares with respect to such matters. Proposals 1, 2 and 3 in this proxy statement are non-routine matters, and brokers, banks and other nominees therefore cannot vote on these proposals without your instructions. If you do not return your broker's, bank's or other nominee's voting form, do not vote via the Internet or telephone through your broker, bank or other nominee, if applicable, or do not attend the special meeting and vote in person with a proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee, such actions will have the same effect as if you voted "AGAINST" the proposal to adopt the merger agreement but will not have any effect on the adjournment proposal or the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger.
27
If you are a stockholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted at the special meeting by:
Please note that to be effective, your new proxy card, internet or telephonic voting instructions or written notice of revocation must be received by our Secretary prior to the special meeting and, in the case of Internet or telephonic voting instructions, must be received before 11:59 p.m., Eastern time on [ · ], 2015. If you have submitted a proxy, your appearance at the special meeting, in the absence of voting in person or submitting an additional proxy or revocation, will not have the effect of revoking your prior proxy.
If you hold your shares of common stock in "street name," you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee for instructions regarding how to change your vote. You may also vote in person at the special meeting if you obtain a valid proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee. Any adjournment of the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies will allow Rite Aid stockholders who have already sent in their proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use at the special meeting, as adjourned.
Board of Directors' Recommendation
The Board of Directors, after considering various factors described under "The MergerRecommendation of Our Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger" beginning on page 50, unanimously among directors present (with one director absent due to medical reasons) determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders, and adopted, approved and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
The Board of Directors unanimously among those directors that were present (with one director absent due to medical reasons) recommends that you vote (i) "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, (ii) "FOR" the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger and (iii) "FOR" the proposal to approve one or more adjournments or postponements of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of approval of the merger agreement.
The expense of soliciting proxies in the enclosed form will be borne by Rite Aid. We have retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated, a proxy solicitation firm, to solicit proxies in connection with the special meeting at a cost of approximately $20,000 plus expenses. In addition, we may reimburse brokers, banks and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries representing beneficial owners of shares for their expenses in forwarding soliciting materials to such beneficial owners. Proxies may also be solicited by
28
some of our directors, officers and employees, personally or by telephone, facsimile or other means of communication. No additional compensation will be paid for such services.
Anticipated Date of Completion of the Merger
Assuming timely satisfaction of necessary closing conditions, including the approval by our stockholders of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, we anticipate that the merger will be consummated in the second half of calendar year 2016.
Rights of Stockholders Who Seek Appraisal
If the merger is adopted by Rite Aid stockholders, stockholders who do not vote in favor of the adoption of the merger agreement and who properly exercise and perfect their demand for appraisal of their shares will be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger under Section 262 of the DGCL. This means that holders of Rite Aid common stock are entitled to have their shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment in cash of the "fair value" of the shares of Rite Aid common stock, exclusive of any elements of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with interest to be paid upon the amount determined to be fair value, if any, as determined by the court. Stockholders who wish to seek appraisal of their shares are in any case encouraged to seek the advice of legal counsel with respect to the exercise of appraisal rights due to the complexity of the appraisal process.
Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares as determined pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL could be more than, the same as or less than the value of the consideration they would receive pursuant to the merger if they did not seek appraisal of their shares.
To exercise your appraisal rights, you must submit a written demand for appraisal to Rite Aid before the vote is taken on the adoption of the merger agreement, you must not submit a proxy or otherwise vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and you must continue to hold the shares of Rite Aid common stock of record through the effective time of the merger. Your failure to follow the procedures specified under the DGCL will result in the loss of your appraisal rights. The DGCL requirements for exercising appraisal rights are described in further detail in this proxy statement, and the relevant section of the DGCL regarding appraisal rights is reproduced and attached as Annex C to this proxy statement. If you hold your shares of Rite Aid common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your broker, bank or other nominee to determine the appropriate procedures for the making of a demand for appraisal by such broker, bank or other nominee.
At this time, we know of no other matters to be submitted at the special meeting.
Householding of Special Meeting Materials
We may send a single copy of this proxy statement to any household at which two or more stockholders reside in accordance with SEC rules, unless we have received contrary instructions. Each stockholder in the household will continue to receive a separate proxy card. This process, known as "householding," reduces the volume of duplicate information received at your household and helps to reduce our expenses.
If, at any time, you no longer wish to participate in "householding" and would prefer to receive a separate proxy statement, please notify your broker or direct your written request to Rite Aid Corporation, Attention: Byron Purcell, Senior Director, Treasury Services & Investor Relations,
29
30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, PA 17011, or by telephone at (717) 975-5809. We will promptly deliver upon written or oral request a separate copy of the proxy statement to a stockholder at a shared address to which a single copy of the proxy statement was delivered. Stockholders who currently receive multiple copies of the proxy statement at their addresses and would like to request "householding" of their communications should contact their broker.
This discussion of the merger is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement, which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A and incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. You should read the entire merger agreement carefully as it is the legal document that governs the merger.
Parties Involved in the Merger
30 Hunter Lane
Camp Hill, PA 17011
Phone: (717) 761-2633
Rite Aid is a leading retail drugstore chain in the United States. As of October 24, 2015, Rite Aid operated 4,561 stores in 31 states across the country and in the District of Columbia.
Rite Aid sells prescription drugs and a wide assortment of other merchandise, which Rite Aid calls "front-end" products. Front-end products include over-the-counter medications, health and beauty aids, personal care items, cosmetics, household items, food and beverages, greeting cards, seasonal merchandise and numerous other everyday and convenience products.
On June 24, 2015, we completed our acquisition of EnvisionRx, pursuant to the terms of the EnvisionRx Agreement. EnvisionRx is a full-service pharmacy services provider. EnvisionRx provides both transparent and traditional pharmacy benefit manager options through its EnvisionRx and MedTrak pharmacy benefit managers, respectively. EnvisionRx also offers fully integrated mail-order and specialty pharmacy services through Orchard Pharmaceutical Services; access to a leading cash pay infertility discount drug program via Design Rx; an innovative claims adjudication software platform in Laker Software; and a national Medicare Part D prescription drug plan through Envision Insurance Company's EnvisionRx Plus Silver product for the low income auto-assign market and its Clear Choice product for the chooser market. EnvisionRx operates as our 100 percent owned subsidiary.
Rite Aid was incorporated in Delaware on April 15, 1968. Rite Aid's common stock is currently listed on the NYSE under the symbol "RAD."
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc.
108 Wilmot Road
Deerfield, IL 60015
Phone: (847) 315-2500
WBA is the first global, pharmacy-led health and wellbeing enterprise with net sales of $103.4 billion in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2015. Together with its equity method investments, WBA employs more than 370,000 people and has over 13,100 stores in 11 countries and a pharmaceutical wholesale and a distribution network that includes over 350 distribution centers delivering to more than 200,000 pharmacies, doctors, health centers and hospitals each year.
30
WBA's portfolio of retail and business brands includes Walgreens, Duane Reade, Boots and Alliance Healthcare, as well as increasingly global health and beauty product brands, such as No7, Botanics, Liz Earle and Soap & Glory.
WBA was created through the combination of Walgreen Co. and Alliance Boots GmbH in December 2014. WBA was incorporated in Delaware in 2014 and is the successor of Walgreen Co., an Illinois corporation, which was formed in 1909 as a successor to a business founded in 1901. Its principal executive offices are located at 108 Wilmot Road, Deerfield, Illinois 60015. WBA's common stock trades on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol "WBA."
Merger Sub is a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of WBA, formed on October 23, 2015 for the purpose of entering into the merger agreement and completing the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Upon completion of the merger, Merger Sub will cease to exist.
Certain Effects of the Merger on Rite Aid
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the merger agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Rite Aid, with Rite Aid continuing as the Surviving Corporation and a wholly owned direct subsidiary of WBA. Rite Aid expects to de-list its common stock from the NYSE and de-register its common stock under the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable following the effective time of the merger. Thereafter, Rite Aid would no longer be a publicly traded company. However, Rite Aid may continue to voluntarily file periodic reports with the SEC to the extent it is required to do so pursuant to any of its indentures that remain effective after the closing of the merger. WBA may take actions to modify these continued reporting obligations, and pursuant to the merger agreement, Rite Aid is obligated to assist with any of these actions. If the merger is completed, you will not own any shares of the capital stock of the Surviving Corporation, and instead will only be entitled to receive the merger consideration, as described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementMerger Consideration" beginning on page 86.
The effective time of the merger will occur upon the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware (or at such later time as Rite Aid and WBA may agree and specify in the certificate of merger).
Effect on Rite Aid if the Merger is Not Completed
If the merger agreement is not adopted by Rite Aid stockholders or if the merger is not completed for any other reason, Rite Aid stockholders will not receive any payment for their shares of common stock. Instead, Rite Aid will remain a public company, Rite Aid's common stock will continue to be listed and traded on the NYSE and registered under the Exchange Act and Rite Aid will continue to file periodic reports with the SEC.
Furthermore, if the merger is not consummated, and depending on the circumstances that would have caused the merger not to be consummated, it is likely that the price of Rite Aid's common stock will decline significantly. If that were to occur, it is uncertain when, if ever, the price of Rite Aid's common stock would return to the price at which it trades as of the date of this proxy statement.
Accordingly, if the merger is not consummated, there can be no assurance as to the effect of these risks and opportunities on the future value of your shares of Rite Aid common stock. If the merger is not consummated, the Board of Directors will continue to evaluate and review Rite Aid's business operations, properties, dividend policy and capitalization, among other things, make such changes as are deemed appropriate and continue to seek to enhance stockholder value. If the merger agreement is
31
not adopted by Rite Aid's stockholders or if the merger is not consummated for any other reason, there can be no assurance that any other transaction acceptable to Rite Aid will be offered or that Rite Aid's business, prospects or results of operation will not be adversely impacted.
In addition, under certain specified circumstances, Rite Aid will be required to reimburse certain of WBA's expenses incurred in respect of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, will be required to pay WBA a termination fee upon the termination of the merger agreement or will be entitled to receive a termination fee from WBA, as described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementTermination of the Merger AgreementTermination Fees" beginning on page 106 and "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementExpense Reimbursement" beginning on page 107.
At the effective time of the merger, each share of Rite Aid common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger (other than excluded shares) will be converted into the right to receive the per share merger consideration, and will cease to be outstanding, will automatically be cancelled and will cease to exist, and each certificate that immediately prior to the effective time of the merger represented any of the shares of Rite Aid common stock (other than the excluded shares) or non-certificated shares held in book-entry form representing any such Rite Aid common stock will thereafter represent only the right to receive the per share merger consideration. As described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementExchange Procedures" beginning on page 87, at or prior to the effective time of the merger, WBA will deposit, or cause to be deposited, with a designated paying agent, a cash amount in immediately available funds sufficient in the aggregate to provide all funds necessary to pay the aggregate per share merger consideration. After the effective time of the merger, once a stockholder has provided the paying agent with his or her stock certificates or book-entry shares, as applicable, and the other items specified by the paying agent, the paying agent will promptly pay the stockholder the per share merger consideration.
After the merger is completed, under the terms of the merger agreement, you will have the right to receive the per share merger consideration, but you no longer will have any rights as a Rite Aid stockholder as a result of the merger (except for the right to receive the merger consideration and except that stockholders who properly exercise and perfect their demand for right of appraisal will instead have the right to receive a payment for the "fair value" of their shares as determined pursuant to an appraisal proceeding as contemplated by Delaware law, as described under "The MergerAppraisal Rights" beginning on page 75).
The Board of Directors regularly reviews and assesses Rite Aid's performance, risks, opportunities and strategy at board meetings. Additionally, the Board of Directors and Rite Aid management regularly review and evaluate the possibility of pursuing various strategic alternatives and relationships as part of Rite Aid's ongoing efforts to strengthen its businesses and maximize value for its stockholders, taking into account economic, regulatory, competitive and other conditions. From time to time, at Rite Aid's request, Citi, a financial advisor to Rite Aid, has assisted Rite Aid management and the Board of Directors in evaluating various potential strategic alternatives available to Rite Aid.
Throughout 2012, 2013 and the first half of 2014, the Board of Directors met from time to time to discuss any approaches directed to Rite Aid, as well as outreaches made by Rite Aid, concerning potential strategic transactions, in each case with a number of third parties, which included, among others, discussions with retailers, including retailers that operate pharmacies, and pharmacy benefit management companies, which we refer to as PBMs, and companies that operate PBMs relating to an acquisition of, or business combination involving, Rite Aid. During this period, Rite Aid management
32
kept the Board of Directors apprised of the status of discussions with any third parties regarding a potential business combination transaction.
On August 27, 2012, at the request of Rite Aid, Mr. John Standley, Chief Executive Officer of Rite Aid, and other members of Rite Aid management, together with a representative from Citi, met with representatives of Party A and discussed, among other things, a potential business combination transaction between Rite Aid and Party A. During this meeting, Party A informed Rite Aid that it was not interested in exploring such a transaction with Rite Aid.
In early 2013, representatives of a financial advisor to Party B approached Rite Aid to explore a potential business combination transaction between Rite Aid and Party B. After several meetings among representatives of Party B, Rite Aid and their respective advisors during the first half of 2013, Party B informed Rite Aid that it was not interested in continuing with discussions regarding a potential business combination transaction with Rite Aid.
In the summer of 2013, Rite Aid management contacted Party C to discuss a possible business combination transaction. On July 29, 2013, Rite Aid and Party C executed a confidentiality agreement to protect confidential information of Rite Aid. Following Party C's due diligence review through the fall of 2013, representatives of Party C advised Rite Aid that Party C was not interested in a potential business combination transaction with Rite Aid and would only consider acquiring certain assets of Rite Aid. Rite Aid determined that it was not in Rite Aid's interests to proceed with an asset sale transaction with Party C at that time.
In the first half of 2014 through the summer of 2014, Mr. Standley, together with representatives of Citi, had discussions with representatives of Party D regarding a potential business combination transaction between Rite Aid and Party D.
On August 15, 2014, Rite Aid and Party D executed a confidentiality agreement obligating Rite Aid to protect confidential information of Party D. Subsequently, Rite Aid began conducting a due diligence review of Party D.
With the Board of Directors generally apprised of Rite Aid management's ongoing exploration of third-party interest in pursuing a business combination transaction, over the course of a series of discussions during the month of August 2014, Mr. Standley discussed various strategic alternatives with a senior executive of Party E. During these discussions, Mr. Standley concluded that Party E was not interested in exploring a potential business combination transaction with Rite Aid.
On September 30, 2014, the Board of Directors met in-person at a regular meeting, which was attended by members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi. Rite Aid management and Citi provided their respective views on the current state of, and prospects for, the retail drugstore sector, as well as Rite Aid in particular, and potential strategic alternatives available to Rite Aid, including remaining an independent company as well as potential business combinations and sale and acquisition transactions, including, among others, the potential acquisition of EnvisionRx and potential business combination transactions with Party D and Party F, including potential synergy opportunities. At this meeting, Citi informed the Board of Directors as to the nature of Citi's existing and previous relationship with Party D. Following this discussion, the Board of Directors directed Rite Aid management to continue exploratory discussions with Party D and to continue engaging with other parties that may be potentially interested in pursuing a strategic transaction, including EnvisionRx and Party F.
Shortly thereafter, Mr. Standley called a senior executive of Party F to explore a potential strategic transaction with Party F. Party F declined to consider exploration of a potential strategic transaction between Party F and Rite Aid.
33
As directed by the Board of Directors at the September 30, 2014 meeting, Mr. Standley also continued discussions with representatives of Party D regarding a potential strategic transaction with Party D.
On October 9, 2014, Rite Aid submitted a letter of interest to Party D setting forth certain preliminary terms for exploring a possible business combination transaction, including, among other terms, Rite Aid stockholders owning proportionate interests in the combined company, adjusted to provide for a control premium for Rite Aid stockholders and with the combined company's board composition reflecting such proportionate ownership.
Also on October 9, 2014, as a continuation of ongoing discussions regarding a strategic partnership with EnvisionRx, Mr. Standley and other representatives of Rite Aid met in-person with representatives of EnvisionRx to discuss a potential strategic partnership with EnvisionRx. During this meeting, the companies discussed a potential sale of EnvisionRx to Rite Aid.
On October 14, 2014, Rite Aid and Party D executed a confidentiality agreement, in addition to one previously executed on August 15, 2014, obligating Party D to protect the confidential information of Rite Aid.
Beginning on October 22, 2014, representatives of Jones Day, antitrust counsel to Rite Aid, together with antitrust counsel to Party D and third-party economic experts, began their review and discussions regarding possible regulatory issues relating to a potential business combination transaction between Rite Aid and Party D.
In the third week of October 2014, in response to inquiries from Rite Aid management, a representative of EnvisionRx contacted Mr. Standley and communicated that EnvisionRx would consider a proposal from Rite Aid regarding a potential acquisition of EnvisionRx by Rite Aid.
On October 23, 2014, representatives of Rite Aid and Party D and their respective advisors had a telephonic meeting to discuss organizational matters relating to a potential business combination transaction between Rite Aid and Party D.
On October 29, 2014, with the Board of Directors generally apprised of the development of discussions between Rite Aid management and EnvisionRx, Rite Aid submitted a non-binding preliminary indication of interest to EnvisionRx, subject to various conditions, including Rite Aid conducting a due diligence review of EnvisionRx.
On November 5, 2014, Mr. Standley and other members of Rite Aid management met in-person with the Chief Executive Officer and another representative of Party G to discuss, among other things, strategic alternatives involving Rite Aid and Party G. During this meeting, Rite Aid and Party G agreed to continue their exploration of a potential business combination transaction after further internal analysis and review with their respective boards of directors.
Throughout the summer and fall of 2014, Rite Aid management kept the Board of Directors generally apprised of Rite Aid management's ongoing exploration of third-party interest in pursuing a potential business combination transaction.
At a special telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors on December 5, 2014, which was attended by members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi, Mr. Standley informed the Board of Directors that Party D had not formally responded to Rite Aid's letter of interest submitted on October 9, 2014. Mr. Standley also reviewed with the Board of Directors his preliminary discussions with representatives of Party G regarding exploring a potential acquisition of or business combination transaction with Rite Aid. Mr. Standley also updated the Board of Directors on the status of communications with EnvisionRx regarding a potential acquisition transaction. At the request of Mr. Standley, Citi discussed with the Board of Directors preliminary financial matters related to a potential acquisition of EnvisionRx. After discussion, the Board of Directors authorized Rite Aid
34
management to communicate Rite Aid's continued interest in acquiring EnvisionRx for $2 billion, subject to the remaining terms indicated in Rite Aid's October 29, 2014 preliminary indication of interest.
During the first week of January 2015, representatives of Party D approached Mr. Standley to express Party D's interest in re-engaging in discussions to explore a potential business combination transaction with Rite Aid. In response, Mr. Standley communicated that Rite Aid was in the process of considering another transaction (which was the acquisition of EnvisionRx) but that he would review Party D's proposal with the Board of Directors.
In early 2015, with the Board of Directors generally apprised of Rite Aid management's ongoing exploration of third-party interest in pursuing a potential business combination transaction, Mr. Standley contacted Mr. Stefano Pessina, WBA's Executive Vice Chairman and Acting Chief Executive Officer at that time, to request a meeting with WBA's management to discuss a potential business combination transaction between Rite Aid and WBA.
On January 9, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting which was attended by members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi, Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, legal counsel to Rite Aid, which we refer to as Skadden, and Moelis & Company LLC, which we refer to as Moelis, which had been retained by Rite Aid in light of Party D's expression of interest in re-engaging in discussions, Citi's ongoing relationship with Party D and Rite Aid management's view that the Board of Directors should consider, given the status of discussions with each party at that time, whether to suspend discussions with EnvisionRx to further explore a potential combination transaction with Party D. Mr. Standley updated the Board of Directors regarding Party D's renewed interest in exploring a possible business combination transaction with Rite Aid. Citi and Moelis each discussed with the Board of Directors preliminary financial matters relating to a potential transaction with Party D and Rite Aid management's business and strategic rationale for a potential transaction with Party D as compared to an acquisition of EnvisionRx. The representatives of Skadden then discussed in detail with the directors their fiduciary duties in considering alternative transactions, including evaluating the benefits and risks to Rite Aid and its stockholders of each transaction and the merits of each transaction as compared to other potential strategic alternatives for Rite Aid. The Board of Directors, Rite Aid management and advisors engaged in a discussion about potential transactions with Party D and EnvisionRx, including, among other things, the business, strategic and potential value creation rationales for each transaction, the regulatory issues associated with each transaction, the assessment of the potential interest of third parties in acquiring Rite Aid and the potentially transformative nature of a transaction with Party D. After discussion, the Board of Directors directed Rite Aid management to re-engage in discussions with Party D to explore further the potential for a transaction with Party D and, at that time, suspend its consideration of the EnvisionRx transaction. The Board of Directors also directed Rite Aid management to continue to explore other potential strategic alternatives, including a possible transaction with WBA.
On January 12, 2015, during an in-person meeting, Mr. Standley and Mr. Pessina discussed a potential business combination transaction between Rite Aid and WBA. During this meeting, Mr. Pessina agreed to continue discussing a potential transaction between the two companies in the following weeks, and communicated that WBA would require an agreement from Rite Aid to negotiate exclusively with WBA as a condition to continuing discussions.
Between January 12 and January 16, 2015, representatives of Rite Aid and Party D and their respective advisors held several telephonic meetings to discuss further the potential synergies that might be realized in a business combination transaction between Party D and Rite Aid.
On January 15, 2015, representatives of Rite Aid and Party D and their respective advisors held an in-person meeting to discuss the strategic rationale, risks and opportunities in a potential merger of Party D and Rite Aid, including, among other things, costs and revenue synergies of the potential
35
combined company. During this meeting, representatives of Party D indicated that Party D was reconsidering its interest at that time in continuing with discussions regarding a potential business combination transaction between the parties.
On January 17, 2015, Party D's representatives informed Rite Aid that Party D would not be in a position to pursue a transaction with Rite Aid at that time and would not be able to re-engage in discussions with Rite Aid regarding a potential business combination transaction for at least several months.
On January 19, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting which was attended by members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi, Moelis and Skadden to discuss Party D's decision not to pursue a transaction with Rite Aid. Mr. Standley reported to the Board of Directors on his meeting with Mr. Pessina on January 12, 2015 regarding a potential business combination transaction with WBA, including that WBA would require an agreement from Rite Aid to negotiate exclusively with WBA as a condition to continuing discussions. The Board of Directors discussed at length potential strategic alternatives, including, among others, a potential transaction with WBA. Moelis and Citi discussed certain financial matters, including Rite Aid management's financial and strategic rationales, regarding a transaction with EnvisionRx, as well as the status of, and Rite Aid management's financial and strategic rationales regarding, a transaction with Party D. In addition, the Board of Directors discussed the relative merits and benefits and risks for Rite Aid and its stockholders of potential transactions with Party D, Party G and WBA and of remaining independent. Mr. Standley advised the Board of Directors of a proposed telephonic meeting scheduled the next day with Party G's Chief Executive Officer, at the request of the Chief Executive Officer of Party G, to follow-up on their discussions on November 5, 2014. The Board of Directors also discussed whether to re-engage with EnvisionRx with respect to a potential strategic transaction and the impact that an acquisition of EnvisionRx could have on a potential transaction with Party D, Party G, WBA or another potential acquiror of Rite Aid. The Board of Directors determined that it would be in the best interests of Rite Aid stockholders to pursue a transaction with EnvisionRx and authorized Rite Aid management to re-engage in discussions with EnvisionRx regarding a potential transaction with EnvisionRx, which discussions continued during the remainder of January and early February 2015.
Also on January 19, 2015, representatives of Jones Day, antitrust counsel to Party D and third-party economic experts were instructed to cease their review on a preliminary basis of possible regulatory issues related to a potential business combination transaction between Party D and Rite Aid.
On January 20, 2015, Mr. Standley had a telephonic meeting with Party G's Chief Executive Officer. During this meeting, the Chief Executive Officer of Party G indicated Party G was not interested in pursuing a business combination transaction with Rite Aid.
On January 21, 2015, as authorized by the Board of Directors during the January 19, 2015 meeting, Mr. Standley had a telephonic meeting with a representative of EnvisionRx to inform EnvisionRx of Rite Aid's continued interest in acquiring EnvisionRx.
On February 9, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting to discuss potential transactions with EnvisionRx and WBA. Members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi and Skadden also attended. During this meeting, Mr. Standley reviewed with the Board of Directors his previous discussions with WBA regarding a potential acquisition of Rite Aid by WBA, including the impact that an acquisition of EnvisionRx could have on a potential transaction with WBA or another possible acquiror of Rite Aid. Among other matters, representatives of Skadden discussed in detail with the directors their fiduciary duties in considering alternative transactions, including with EnvisionRx and WBA. The Board of Directors further discussed having a thorough review process to assess the benefits and risks to Rite Aid and its stockholders of any potential transactions, the merits of the transactions as compared to other potential strategic alternatives for Rite Aid, including a potential sale of control or merger transaction, the level of potential interest of third parties in a sale or business
36
combination transaction with Rite Aid, and the impact of pursuing an acquisition of EnvisionRx on such a potential sale or business combination transaction.
The Board of Directors, Rite Aid management and advisors discussed the significant cost and revenue synergies for Rite Aid and potential value for its stockholders that could result from a transaction with EnvisionRx and that, based on Rite Aid's previous discussions with other parties, there was no certainty that Rite Aid could enter into an alternative strategic transaction with WBA or another party. After further consideration, the Board of Directors unanimously agreed that Rite Aid should proceed with negotiating the final terms of a merger agreement with EnvisionRx.
After further negotiations and final authorization by the Board of Directors, Rite Aid and EnvisionRx entered into a merger agreement on February 10, 2015 pursuant to which Rite Aid would acquire EnvisionRx.
Following Mr. Standley and Mr. Pessina's discussion on January 12, 2015 and continuing through February 2015, representatives of Rite Aid and WBA had several discussions to explore further a potential business combination transaction between Rite Aid and WBA, including among other things, discussions regarding the form of consideration and transaction structure.
On March 3, 2015, Rite Aid and WBA entered into a mutual confidentiality agreement to allow the parties to begin due diligence and continue discussions.
On March 5, 2015, at WBA's request, members of Rite Aid's and WBA's respective management met in-person in Palm Beach, Florida. During this meeting, representatives of WBA expressed WBA's interest in exploring a potential business combination transaction with Rite Aid.
In the weeks following the meeting on March 5, 2015, representatives of Rite Aid and WBA continued with discussions regarding a potential business combination transaction, including, among other things, discussions relating to the permitted scope of WBA's due diligence of Rite Aid to complete its synergies analysis. During those discussions, Mr. Pessina proposed a two-step transaction to complete WBA's acquisition of Rite Aid, with the sale of a subset of Rite Aid stores to WBA as the first step followed by WBA's acquisition of Rite Aid's outstanding stock for an all or primarily cash price. Mr. Standley communicated that he would review WBA's proposal with the Board of Directors.
From mid-April 2015 through June 2015, WBA and its advisors continued with its due diligence review to complete its synergies analysis. Prior to this, Rite Aid management had kept the Board of Directors generally apprised of developments with WBA since preliminary discussions first began in early 2015.
On May 8, 2015, Rite Aid received a non-binding, preliminary indication of interest from WBA, which we refer to as the WBA Initial Proposal. The WBA Initial Proposal included a purchase price for all of Rite Aid's outstanding shares of $9.00 per share in all or primarily cash with the remainder in WBA's stock (representing a premium of approximately 14.5% to Rite Aid's closing stock price on May 7, 2015), subject to, among other things, confirmatory due diligence on, among other things, Rite Aid's capital structure, Rite Aid's meeting or exceeding analyst projections for financial results, the expected synergy potential from the transaction and validation of the potential value of net operating losses, which we refer to as NOLs. In the WBA Initial Proposal, WBA proposed a two-step transaction, as had been proposed in previous discussions between the parties, with the sale of a subset of Rite Aid stores to WBA as the first step. WBA also requested a 60-day period in which Rite Aid would be required to negotiate exclusively with WBA, and requested that Rite Aid terminate any ongoing discussions with any other parties and inform WBA of any unsolicited approaches Rite Aid might receive during the exclusivity period.
On May 9, 2015, Mr. Pessina called Mr. Standley to indicate that certain factors, including WBA's due diligence of Rite Aid, the takeover speculation in Rite Aid's stock price and the market pressures
37
in the retail drugstore industry, affected the purchase price and limited the premium that WBA would pay for Rite Aid. Also on May 9, 2015, a member of Rite Aid management expressed Rite Aid's disappointment with the WBA Initial Proposal to a representative of WBA, but informed the WBA representative that Rite Aid management would review the WBA Initial Proposal with the Board of Directors.
On May 11, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting which was attended by members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi and Skadden to discuss the WBA Initial Proposal and discuss and authorize the Board of Directors' proposed response to the WBA Initial Proposal. As previously reviewed with the Board of Directors, representatives of Skadden then discussed in detail with the directors their fiduciary duties in considering a transaction with WBA and the consequences of agreeing to exclusive negotiations with WBA, including, among other things, impacting Rite Aid's ability to solicit or consider transaction proposals from other bidders. After discussion of the WBA Initial Proposal with Rite Aid management and advisors, the Board of Directors determined that Rite Aid management should negotiate for a higher price. The Board of Directors also reviewed a draft of Rite Aid's response to such proposal, agreed on other responses to the WBA Initial Proposal and approved the form of the proposed response to the WBA Initial Proposal. The Board of Directors authorized Rite Aid management to proceed with discussions with WBA on the terms discussed at the meeting, but instructed Rite Aid management not to grant exclusivity.
The following day, on May 12, 2015, Rite Aid provided a written response to WBA, which we refer to as the Initial Rite Aid Response to WBA, seeking a higher purchase price than was proposed in the WBA Initial Proposal. The response also outlined Rite Aid's position on key points regarding the WBA Initial Proposal, including, among other things, that Rite Aid was willing to continue to evaluate a two-step transaction structure to determine if it was a viable alternative, that Rite Aid was not in a position to enter into exclusive negotiations with WBA, that Rite Aid could not provide WBA the right to purchase stores from Rite Aid if the second step of the transaction was not consummated and that any transaction would need to be structured to address regulatory risk for Rite Aid stockholders.
Shortly after receipt of the Initial Rite Aid Response to WBA, a representative of WBA contacted a member of Rite Aid management to reiterate WBA's request for a 60-day period in which Rite Aid would be required to negotiate exclusively with WBA, during which WBA and Rite Aid would seek to complete due diligence and negotiate a definitive merger agreement.
On May 14, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting with members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi, Skadden and Jones Day to discuss the potential WBA transaction. Mr. Standley again reviewed with the Board of Directors the WBA Initial Proposal and the Initial Rite Aid Response to WBA, including WBA's request for exclusivity. Citi discussed with the Board of Directors preliminary financial and related matters regarding a potential transaction with WBA, including, among other things, Rite Aid management's internal financial projections and initial perspectives regarding potential synergies in a transaction with WBA, Rite Aid's share price trading history, research analyst ratings and estimates, and certain transaction metrics. The Board of Directors also discussed a potential response to WBA's proposed purchase price of $9.00 per share. Rite Aid management and Citi suggested that Rite Aid continue to seek a higher purchase price from WBA, but also expressed their view that they did not expect that WBA would be willing to increase its current proposed price significantly. As previously had been reviewed with the Board of Directors, representatives of Skadden then discussed in detail with the directors their fiduciary duties in reviewing a transaction with WBA and the considerations in deciding whether to agree to exclusive negotiations. The Board of Directors, Rite Aid management and advisors further discussed synergy estimates, their views as to the seriousness of WBA's interest in pursuing a transaction with Rite Aid, Rite Aid management's and Citi's views, based on discussions to date, that none of the other parties with which Rite Aid had discussions previously regarding a potential business combination transaction would likely
38
be a viable acquiror of Rite Aid at that time, and the benefits and risks of soliciting potential interest of other parties in a possible business combination transaction with Rite Aid in terms of maximizing stockholder value. After further discussion, the Board of Directors authorized Rite Aid management to continue to negotiate with WBA the terms of a potential sale transaction as reviewed with the Board of Directors and to further evaluate whether to conduct a "pre-market" check to determine whether any other parties might be interested in pursuing a transaction with Rite Aid as discussions with WBA progressed.
During the week of May 17, 2015, Mr. Standley and Mr. Pessina continued their discussions about possible terms of a transaction and, as directed by the Board of Directors in the May 14, 2015 meeting, Mr. Standley expressed Rite Aid's request that, among other things, WBA increase its proposed per share price to a $11.00 to $12.00 per share range, and view that any definitive agreement would need to provide for a high degree of certainty in terms of WBA's obligation to obtain antitrust approvals. Mr. Standley informed Mr. Pessina that the Board of Directors had determined that it was not prepared to agree to exclusive negotiations but might consider some form of commitment at a later stage of discussions if and when appropriate and that Rite Aid management and advisors believed the two-step transaction structure proposed by WBA was not viable. Throughout these discussions, an agreement on purchase price remained unresolved.
On May 21, 2015, a member of WBA management requested that members of Rite Aid's and WBA's respective management meet in-person to further discuss the two-step transaction structure proposed by WBA. In response, the Rite Aid management representative informed the WBA management representative that Rite Aid believed the two-step transaction structure proposed by WBA was not viable and that WBA's proposed purchase price remained too low.
On May 26, 2015, members of Rite Aid management and WBA management had a telephonic meeting, during which a Rite Aid representative reiterated to WBA management that Rite Aid believed the two-step transaction structure was not viable.
On June 15, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting with members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi and Skadden and, among other things, further discussed WBA's proposal to structure a two-step transaction. The Board of Directors instructed Mr. Standley to ask Mr. Pessina for WBA's best price for a one-step transaction. Through the remainder of June 2015 and continuing into July 2015, WBA and its advisors continued a due diligence review to complete WBA's synergies analysis.
On June 17, 2015, Mr. Standley contacted Mr. Pessina to inform him that Rite Aid would not consider the two-step transaction structure proposed by WBA and that WBA should propose its best price for a one-step transaction.
On July 8, 2015, a representative of Party D contacted Mr. Standley to inform him of Party D's interest in potentially re-engaging with Rite Aid in discussions regarding a potential business combination transaction involving Party D and Rite Aid.
As a result of the discussion on July 8, 2015, with the Board of Directors generally apprised of the developments regarding Party D's potential interest in re-engaging with Rite Aid, during the period between July 9 and July 15, 2015, representatives of Rite Aid, Citi and Party D resumed discussions regarding a potential business combination transaction, with negotiations focused on the relative pro forma ownership of the stockholders of Rite Aid and Party D (and the implied exchange ratio premium for Rite Aid stockholders) in the combined company.
On July 15, 2015, representatives of Party D met with members of Rite Aid management and a representative of Citi and communicated a preliminary indication of interest to Rite Aid, which we refer to as the Party D Proposal. The Party D Proposal included, among other things, a range of pro forma ownership of each party's stockholders in the combined company and a requirement for a sizeable equity issuance by the combined company.
39
Over the several following days, representatives of Rite Aid and Party D held meetings to discuss the Party D Proposal. During these meetings, the representatives of Rite Aid and Party D discussed, among other things, the potential pro forma ownership of each party's stockholders in the combined company and governance matters, including with respect to ensuring that the stockholders of Party D would not be able to exercise control over the combined company.
On July 17, 2015, at the requests of Rite Aid and Party D, Citi and Party D's financial advisor commenced a review of potential synergies, the pro forma capital structure, the feasibility and impact of a proposed equity issuance by Party D on the combined company, and the potential utilization of Rite Aid's NOLs by the combined company in connection with a potential business combination transaction involving Rite Aid and Party D. This review continued from July 21 through early August 2015.
On July 30, 2015, Mr. Standley and a senior executive of Party H had a telephonic meeting to discuss, among other things, potential strategic alternatives between Rite Aid and Party H. During this meeting, the senior executive of Party H informed Mr. Standley that Party H was not interested in exploring a potential business combination transaction with Rite Aid.
Also on July 30, 2015, at WBA's request, and with the Board of Directors generally apprised of the developments regarding WBA's continued interest in exploring a potential business combination transaction, members of Rite Aid's and WBA's respective management met in-person in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. During this meeting, WBA communicated an increased proposed purchase price of $9.90 per share, all or primarily in cash, for shares of Rite Aid stock. As previously directed by the Board of Directors during its meeting on June 15, 2015, Rite Aid management expressed Rite Aid's willingness to consider a price of $10.25 per share, all or primarily in cash (which represented a premium of approximately 14.5% to Rite Aid's closing stock price on July 16, 2015), subject to there being a high degree of certainty of closing the transaction. Rite Aid and WBA discussed other key transaction terms, including, among others, the amount of Rite Aid's termination fee if Rite Aid were to terminate the transaction to accept a superior acquisition proposal, WBA's request for an exclusive negotiation period, WBA's requisite level of efforts to obtain antitrust approvals, including the number of store divestitures WBA would be required to accept in order to obtain such approvals, and the reverse termination fee WBA would be required to pay if it did not obtain antitrust approvals. In addition, WBA indicated in this meeting that it would no longer continue to pursue a two-step transaction structure.
On August 2, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting to discuss with members of Rite Aid management and representatives from Citi and Skadden, among other things, the status of discussions with Party D and WBA, other potential strategic alternatives, other parties that might potentially be interested in an acquisition of or business combination transaction with Rite Aid, previous discussions with such parties that had declined to pursue a transaction with Rite Aid, the strategic, business and potential value creation rationale for and terms of the Party D and WBA transactions and relative benefits and risks for Rite Aid and its stockholders, and Citi's preliminary financial perspectives concerning these transactions. Citi again discussed with the Board of Directors the nature of its relationship with Party D, including its existing and previous roles on matters involving Party D, and in light of Citi's changed relationship with Party D since January 2015, the Board of Directors did not believe there was a need to retain a second financial advisor at this time. The representatives of Skadden then reviewed with the Board of Directors legal issues with respect to the current proposals including, among other things, the directors' fiduciary duties, consideration of WBA's request for a period of exclusive negotiations and the amount and triggers for the payment to WBA of a termination fee in the event Rite Aid accepted a superior acquisition proposal and terminated the definitive merger agreement. A discussion then followed regarding the possibility of discussions with other potentially interested parties, including Party A, Party C, Party G and another potential party, Party I, with Rite Aid management and Citi expressing their view that such parties were not likely to
40
be viable acquirors of Rite Aid at that time, noting that Party C was currently engaged in a publicly announced transformative transaction. The Board of Directors determined that Rite Aid should continue discussions with Party D and WBA, renew contacts with Party A and Party G and approach Party I to determine its possible interest in pursuing an acquisition of or business combination with Rite Aid.
On August 3, 2015, Rite Aid received a revised non-binding preliminary indication of interest from WBA, which we refer to as the WBA Revised Proposal, and a draft exclusivity agreement from WBA's outside counsel, Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, which we refer to as Simpson Thacher. The terms of the WBA Revised Proposal included, among others, WBA's conditioning its proposal on Rite Aid's meeting or exceeding analyst projections for financial results, WBA's validation of potential synergies to be realized in the transaction and the value of Rite Aid's NOLs, the absence of material undisclosed liabilities or change-in-control payments, a proposal regarding the provisions limiting Rite Aid's ability to solicit and consider competing acquisition transactions in the definitive merger agreement, and providing for Rite Aid to pay a termination fee in the event a superior acquisition proposal were accepted, and a WBA reverse termination fee in the event WBA did not obtain required antitrust approvals. WBA's proposed purchase price was not specified in this proposal. WBA's draft exclusivity agreement proposed that Rite Aid would negotiate exclusively with WBA for a period of 60 days, with an option for WBA to extend such period for 30 additional days, to conduct due diligence and negotiate a definitive acquisition agreement with Rite Aid.
Also on August 3, 2015, Jones Day and Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, antitrust counsel to WBA, discussed potential regulatory matters.
Rite Aid provided WBA with its comments to the WBA Revised Proposal on August 6, 2015, which we refer to as the Rite Aid Response to the WBA Revised Proposal, consistent with guidance previously provided by the Board of Directors. Proposed changes included, among others, declining to commit to an exclusive negotiation period and counterproposals regarding regulatory approval and deal protection terms. Rite Aid also provided WBA with preliminary financial information regarding Rite Aid's capital structure at that time.
On August 7, 2015, representatives of Rite Aid management and WBA management discussed the Rite Aid Response to the WBA Revised Proposal. WBA management advised that while WBA was prepared to work to complete due diligence and negotiations within 30 days, WBA would require, in lieu of an exclusive negotiations agreement, as a condition to continuing discussions, that Rite Aid enter into a notification agreement, which we refer to as the Notification Agreement, requiring Rite Aid to advise WBA of any alternative acquisition and other alternative transaction proposals or discussions concerning such a transaction that it engaged in, initiated or received during the term of the Notification Agreement. A representative of Rite Aid management responded that Rite Aid management would need to discuss the concept of such a Notification Agreement with the Board of Directors and informed WBA that their respective counsel would need to discuss as well.
On August 7, 2015, Simpson Thacher provided Skadden with a draft of the Notification Agreement, and Skadden and Simpson Thacher discussed the draft agreement.
On August 8, 2015, members of WBA management called members of Rite Aid management to advise Rite Aid again that WBA would not pursue further discussions with Rite Aid unless Rite Aid entered into the Notification Agreement. Members of Rite Aid management responded that the Board of Directors would consider the Notification Agreement at its meeting scheduled for August 11, 2015.
Also on August 8, 2015, consistent with the direction provided by the Board of Directors, a representative of Citi contacted a representative of Party I to inquire if Party I might have interest in a potential acquisition of or business combination transaction with Rite Aid. The representative of Party I responded that Party I would provide a response regarding whether Party I might have any interest in such a transaction within the following few days.
41
On August 10, 2015, at the direction of the Board of Directors, a representative of Citi contacted a representative of Party A to inquire if Party A had interest in a potential acquisition of or business combination with Rite Aid. The Party A representative responded that Party A was likely not interested in such a transaction with Rite Aid and would confirm that position with other members of Party A management.
Also on August 10, 2015, Party D communicated to Citi a revised preliminary, non-binding indication of interest regarding a possible business combination with Rite Aid. The terms included, among others, a revised proposal by Party D on the pro forma ownership of the combined company by Rite Aid stockholders.
On August 11, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting, at which members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi and Skadden were present. At this meeting, the Board of Directors was updated on the status of discussions with WBA, Party A, Party D, Party G and Party I, the strategic, business and potential value creation rationales for potential transactions with Party D and WBA (the only two parties with which Rite Aid was actively involved in discussions at such time) and potential legal, fiduciary and regulatory issues with respect to the potential transactions with Party D and WBA, including potential fiduciary issues relating to whether Rite Aid should enter the Notification Agreement with WBA in light of Rite Aid's discussions with Party D and other parties about potential acquisition and business combination transactions. Citi discussed certain financial matters, including the revised terms of each of the potential transactions with Party D and WBA, and also provided an update on discussions with two other potential transaction partners, Party A and Party I. The Citi representatives and Mr. Standley noted that Party A had communicated that it would likely have no interest and would confirm its position, that Rite Aid was still awaiting Party I's response and that Mr. Standley was scheduled to speak with the Chief Executive Officer of Party G the next day. The Board of Directors, Rite Aid management and advisors discussed considerations relating to the proposed Notification Agreement in the context of a potential sale of Rite Aid to various potential acquirors or other counterparties to a business combination transaction, a comparison of key transaction terms, benefits and transaction consummation and other risks, certain regulatory and governance considerations relating to the proposed transactions, the potential pro forma impact of a transaction with WBA or Party D, and the difficulties in seeking to pursue both transactions at the same time. After further discussion, the Board of Directors determined that, based on discussions then to date, an all or primarily in cash offer from WBA to acquire Rite Aid at an acceptable price together with a commitment from WBA to divest up to 1,000 Rite Aid or WBA stores if required to obtain antitrust approvals and subject to satisfactory resolution of other terms would represent a more attractive transaction for Rite Aid stockholders than Party D's then-current proposal. The Board of Directors believed, with a number of threshold issues remaining unresolved, Party D's then-current proposal had greater uncertainty with respect to closing than WBA's proposal and offered Rite Aid stockholders a likely lower value than a $10.00 per share price all or primarily in cash from WBA given, among other things, the uncertainty in determining the value for Rite Aid stockholders of Party D's then-current proposal and the long-term business and execution risks associated with the proposed business combination with Party D. The Board of Directors instructed Rite Aid management to negotiate the remaining threshold terms with WBA as discussed, including seeking a purchase price in the range of $10.00 to $10.25 per share and a commitment from WBA to divest up to 1,000 Rite Aid or WBA stores if required to obtain antitrust approvals, before responding to Party D's proposal. The Board of Directors also instructed Rite Aid management to await the outcome of Rite Aid's communications with other potential acquirors, Party A, Party G and Party I, and if no such other party indicated interest in pursuing a transaction with Rite Aid, to negotiate the terms of the Notification Agreement with WBA, as reviewed with the Board of Directors.
Following the board meeting, Mr. Standley called the Chief Executive Officer of Party G to determine whether Party G might have any interest in a potential acquisition of or business
42
combination with Rite Aid. The Chief Executive Officer of Party G responded that he would discuss this with Party G's lead director and then advise Mr. Standley of Party G's position.
Also on August 11, 2015, Party I emailed a representative of Citi to request that Rite Aid sign a confidentiality agreement to explore a potential business combination transaction.
Later that day, as directed by the Board of Directors at the August 11, 2015 meeting, Mr. Standley called Mr. Pessina and communicated updated proposed terms to the Rite Aid Response to the WBA Revised Proposal. Rite Aid's revised terms included, among others, an all or primarily in cash purchase price of $10.25 per share of Rite Aid stock, WBA's agreement to divest up to 1,000 Rite Aid or WBA stores if required to obtain antitrust approvals, and completion of due diligence and negotiation of a merger agreement within 30 days after commencing diligence. Mr. Pessina responded with a counterproposal, providing for an all or primarily in cash purchase price of $10.00 per share of Rite Aid stock, WBA's commitment to divest up to 750 stores if required to obtain antitrust approvals, and an agreement that Rite Aid would agree to exclusive negotiations for a short period in the event that following the initial 30-day negotiation period the parties were close to reaching agreement on a definitive acquisition agreement. Mr. Standley responded that the Board of Directors might be willing to consider a purchase price of $10.10 per share provided WBA committed to divesting up to 1,000 Rite Aid or WBA stores if required to obtain antitrust approvals and subject to satisfactory resolution of other terms. Mr. Standley and Mr. Pessina agreed to discuss the revised proposals with members of their respective boards of directors.
Following discussions among members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Skadden and Citi regarding the likely level of Party I's interest based on discussions to date in pursuing a business combination transaction with Rite Aid, at Rite Aid's direction, a representative of Citi contacted a representative of Party I to inform Party I that it should rely on public information in its initial evaluation of whether it might have any interest in a potential business combination with Rite Aid.
From August 11, 2015 to August 16, 2015, Mr. Standley and Mr. Pessina held multiple telephonic meetings to negotiate the terms of a potential transaction. During these discussions, Mr. Pessina indicated that WBA would be willing to proceed with negotiating a transaction on the basis of an all or primarily in cash price of $10.00 per share of Rite Aid stock, a 1,000 store divestiture limitation if required in connection with obtaining antitrust approvals, a termination fee payable by Rite Aid in the event Rite Aid accepted an alternative acquisition proposal and a reverse termination fee payable by WBA if WBA did not obtain antitrust approvals for the transaction, each equal to 3% of Rite Aid's transaction equity value, and the execution by the parties of the Notification Agreement in its negotiated form. Mr. Standley advised Mr. Pessina that, among other things, the amount of the termination fees would need to remain subject to further negotiation after taking into consideration other relevant transaction, deal protection and regulatory terms in the definitive acquisition agreement. Mr. Standley further indicated that he was not authorized by the Board of Directors to enter into the Notification Agreement or to agree to any subsequent period of exclusive negotiations, but that he would discuss such matters as appropriate with the Board of Directors. During this week, at Rite Aid's direction, representatives of Citi also had telephonic meetings with representatives of WBA regarding the proposed terms of the transaction.
On August 12, 2015, Skadden sent comments to the draft Notification Agreement to Simpson Thacher.
Also on August 12, 2015, at Rite Aid's direction, a representative of Citi informed a representative of Party D on behalf of the Board of Directors that Rite Aid was in the process of considering another transaction and would provide an update to Party D during the week of August 17, 2015 regarding whether Rite Aid remained interested in proceeding with the negotiation of a possible transaction with Party D.
43
On August 13, 2015, a representative of Party A informed a representative of Citi that Party A was not interested in exploring a transaction with Rite Aid. Later that day, a representative of Party I also informed a representative of Citi that Party I was not interested in exploring a transaction with Rite Aid.
On August 13 and 14, 2015, Simpson Thacher and Skadden exchanged comments on the Notification Agreement.
On August 15, 2015, Party G's Chief Executive Officer informed Mr. Standley that Party G was not interested in a transaction with Rite Aid.
On August 16, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting, at which members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi and Skadden were present. Mr. Standley and representatives of Citi updated the Board of Directors on the status of discussions with Party A, Party D, Party G, Party I and WBA, noting that each of Party A, Party G and Party I had communicated that it was not interested in pursuing a transaction with Rite Aid. In connection with the Board of Directors' evaluation if there were any other potential transactional parties potentially interested in a transaction with Rite Aid, as previously discussed, Citi noted that Party C, another potential acquiror, was currently engaged in a publicly announced transformative transaction and that an acquisition of Rite Aid by Party C was therefore viewed as likely not viable at that time. Rite Aid management and Citi further provided their respective views to the Board of Directors that Party A, Party D, Party G and Party I were believed to be the most logical parties that would be in a position to acquire Rite Aid. Citi also indicated that it believed that private equity firms would likely not be as competitive in acquiring Rite Aid as a strategic buyer. Representatives of Citi and Rite Aid management discussed with the Board of Directors Rite Aid's current stock price, which had closed at $9.08 per share on August 14, 2015. Citi provided the Board of Directors its view that Rite Aid's then current stock price likely reflected in part the impact of takeover speculation resulting from published research reports identifying Rite Aid as an acquisition target. The representatives of Skadden reviewed with the Board of Directors the legal and fiduciary issues relating to both transactions, including determining whether or not to enter into the Notification Agreement with WBA. After further discussion regarding WBA's willingness to proceed on the basis of an all or primarily in cash offer of $10.00 per share together with a commitment from WBA to divest up to 1,000 Rite Aid or WBA stores if required to obtain antitrust approvals and subject to satisfactory resolution of other terms, the Board of Directors directed Rite Aid management to enter into the Notification Agreement with WBA on the terms reviewed with the Board of Directors and with any amendments or modifications that were advisable before execution thereof and expressed consensus that Rite Aid management and advisors should proceed with diligence and negotiation of a potential transaction with WBA and to suspend discussions with Party D during the term of the Notification Agreement.
After the board meeting, as directed by the Board of Directors, a representative of Citi informed a representative of Party D that Rite Aid was in the process of considering an alternative transaction and would provide an update to Party D at a later date as to whether Rite Aid was interested in exploring a possible business combination transaction with Party D.
After further negotiations on August 18, 2015, WBA and Rite Aid entered into the Notification Agreement.
On August 18, 2015, at Rite Aid's direction, a representative of Citi informed a representative of Party D that Rite Aid would be proceeding with negotiations involving another party.
On August 20, 2015, Rite Aid provided WBA and its advisors with access to a virtual data site established by Rite Aid, and WBA began conducting a due diligence review of materials provided by Rite Aid in the virtual data site. On September 2, 2015, Skadden received an initial draft of the merger agreement from Simpson Thacher.
44
On September 11, 2015, Skadden sent comments on the draft merger agreement to Simpson Thacher. Among other things, the comments focused on WBA's required effort to obtain antitrust approvals, WBA's commitment to obtain debt financing and deal protection terms.
On September 12, 2015, Mr. Standley called Mr. Pessina to discuss the antitrust approvals and other key provisions in the merger agreement. Mr. Pessina communicated to Mr. Standley that WBA's current analysis of the acquisition, which was still ongoing, had reaffirmed WBA's view that a portion of the merger consideration might need to be in the form of WBA stock.
On September 17, 2015, the notification period under the Notification Agreement expired and WBA did not thereafter pursue renegotiation of the term of such agreement. On September 18, 2015, Skadden received a revised draft of the merger agreement from Simpson Thacher.
On September 21, 2015, members of Rite Aid's and WBA's respective management, Skadden and Simpson Thacher, negotiated the open issues in the draft merger agreement. On September 22, 2015, Simpson Thacher informed Skadden that it did not have the authority to further negotiate the merger agreement on WBA's behalf since the parties had reached an impasse in the negotiation of certain key terms and that Simpson Thacher had been instructed to request that Skadden prepare a revised draft of the merger agreement to reflect Rite Aid's current positions. As a result of this discussion, later that same day, a representative of Rite Aid management contacted a representative of WBA management to inform WBA that Rite Aid did not believe it would be productive for Skadden to prepare a revised draft of the merger agreement without further discussing WBA's positions with Simpson Thacher and that WBA should contact Rite Aid when it was prepared to proceed with further discussions regarding the merger agreement.
During the third week of September 2015, given Rite Aid management's concern that it was possible WBA may no longer be prepared to pursue a transaction with Rite Aid on acceptable terms, at Rite Aid's direction, a representative of Citi contacted a representative of Party D regarding the possibility of exploring a potential business combination transaction. In response, Party D indicated that it was pursuing an alternative strategic direction and would not be in a position to discuss a potential transaction with Rite Aid until after completion of its alternative plan.
On September 24, 2015, the Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting at which members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi, Skadden and Jones Day were present. Mr. Standley discussed with the Board of Directors Rite Aid's stock price, which had declined by approximately 19% since Rite Aid's second quarter earnings announcement on September 17, 2015 and approximately 25% since reaching its 52-week closing day high on August 5, 2015. Rite Aid management and Citi expressed their respective views that Rite Aid's stock price decline in part may have been a result of Rite Aid's updated fiscal year 2016 guidance, announced on September 17, 2015, to reflect more recent sales trends. Rite Aid management and Citi also noted the overall recent decline in equity markets, in particular in the health care sector, and the magnified impact that this decline and Rite Aid's updated guidance may have had on Rite Aid's stock price given Rite Aid's leverage position relative to its peers. Mr. Standley also updated the Board of Directors on the status of negotiations with WBA, including the exchange of drafts of the merger agreement as well as the subsequent telephonic meetings among principals and legal counsel to negotiate terms, WBA's progress in obtaining financing for the transaction and Mr. Standley's view that WBA may seek to renegotiate its proposed purchase price in light of the recent decline in Rite Aid's stock price. Representatives of Skadden then described to the Board of Directors the impasse reached between the parties on certain key issues in WBA's draft merger agreement. Mr. Standley and Citi also provided an update on potential strategic alternatives for Rite Aid, including Citi's recent discussion with a representative of Party D. The Board of Directors provided Rite Aid management and advisors with guidance on the basis on which certain of the open issues might be resolved.
45
Between September 25 and September 28, 2015, Skadden and Simpson Thacher resumed negotiations regarding the draft merger agreement.
On October 6 and October 7, 2015, representatives from Rite Aid, WBA, Skadden and Simpson Thacher met in New York to discuss the outstanding issues in the merger agreement. During these meetings, representatives of WBA communicated WBA's need for flexibility in the rapidly changing retail drugstore and health care industry to potentially pursue other transactions during the period between entering into a transaction with Rite Aid and closing such transaction, with the understanding that WBA would agree not to acquire any retail pharmacies that would reasonably be expected to result in a material delay in obtaining, or materially increase the risk of not obtaining, antitrust approvals of the WBA/Rite Aid transaction being negotiated. In response, representatives of Rite Aid indicated that this proposal exposed Rite Aid to deal uncertainty and timing risk and that Rite Aid would need adequate protections against a material delay or risk regarding the receipt of requisite regulatory approvals. Representatives of WBA also proposed a limitation on Rite Aid's ability to incur indebtedness under its existing credit facilities, and communicated WBA's need for additional protections against a deterioration in Rite Aid's earnings between signing of the merger agreement and closing. The representatives of Rite Aid expressed their concern that such ability of WBA to pursue other transactions and limitations on the incurrence of debt and any additional protections for earnings deterioration might adversely impact the certainty of closing the transaction with Rite Aid and that Rite Aid would need adequate protections against material delays or risks in the receipt of requisite regulatory approvals. At the end of the two-day meeting, after further discussing the parties' positions on these and other open issues (other than price, which was not discussed during these meetings), the WBA team communicated that it believed the parties were at an impasse. The parties agreed to suspend their discussions with multiple business issues outstanding. On the evening of October 7, 2015, Rite Aid suspended WBA's access to the virtual data site.
On October 8, 2015, Mr. Standley called Mr. Pessina to discuss the open business issues, including certain actions WBA would have to agree to undertake in order to obtain antitrust approvals, and the limitation on WBA's right to pursue other transactions that could delay or jeopardize obtaining antitrust approvals before the closing. Over the following days, representatives of Rite Aid and WBA management had subsequent discussions regarding WBA's need for additional protections against a deterioration in Rite Aid's earnings between signing of the merger agreement and closing, including a potential limitation on the reduction in Rite Aid's earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, which we refer to as EBITDA (and with adjustments to be determined), and other open business issues.
On October 12, 2015, in response to the concerns that representatives of WBA had raised the prior week and Mr. Pessina had raised during his discussion with Mr. Standley on October 8, 2015, Rite Aid provided WBA with a preliminary proposal regarding the terms under which WBA would have the flexibility to pursue other transactions.
On October 13, 2015, representatives of WBA communicated to representatives of Rite Aid that Rite Aid's preliminary proposal did not provide WBA with sufficient flexibility to pursue other transactions. The parties' representatives then discussed other potential ways to resolve this issue.
On October 14, 2015, the board of directors of WBA held a meeting to discuss, among other things, the potential acquisition of Rite Aid by WBA. After the meeting, Mr. Barry Rosenstein, a director of WBA, called a representative of Citi and communicated that WBA's board was confident that WBA and Rite Aid could reach agreement on the contemplated merger agreement terms but that, based on the decline in Rite Aid's stock price (which had closed at $6.13 on October 13, 2015 compared to a closing day high of $9.32 per share on August 5, 2015), WBA would only be willing to acquire Rite Aid for a price in the range of $8.00 to $9.00 per share of Rite Aid stock, all or primarily
46
in cash, with the final price ultimately dependent on whether other outstanding key merger agreement issues were resolved on terms favorable to WBA.
On October 15, 2015, Mr. Pessina called Mr. Standley to reiterate that, based on WBA's due diligence review of Rite Aid, the significant decline in Rite Aid's stock price, the general decline in the trading multiples of firm value to EBITDA of companies comparable to Rite Aid and changes in the market trends in the retail drugstore industry, WBA could not justify paying the premium represented by its $10.00 per share proposal and would need to revise its purchase price proposal to a range of $8.00 to $9.00 per share of Rite Aid stock, all or primarily in cash, which would represent a premium of approximately 32% to 49% to Rite Aid's closing stock price on October 14, 2015, as compared to a premium of approximately 65% if the purchase price proposal remained at $10.00 per share. In response, Mr. Standley informed Mr. Pessina that he did not believe the Board of Directors would be willing to proceed with a transaction within such range. Mr. Pessina proposed that the management and advisors of each company meet in London, England during the following week in an effort to reach agreement on the transaction terms.
The Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting on October 17, 2015, which was also attended by members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi, Skadden and Jones Day. Mr. Standley and representatives of Skadden reviewed the status of discussions with WBA since the last board meeting, including the suspension of formal discussions with WBA on October 7, 2015 and subsequent telephonic meetings between members of Rite Aid management and WBA management.
A discussion then followed regarding the outstanding threshold issues in the merger agreement, including WBA's lower proposed purchase price in light of the decline in Rite Aid's stock price, WBA's concerns about agreeing to undertake certain actions to obtain required antitrust approvals, WBA's stated need to be able to pursue other transactions between signing of the merger agreement and closing, WBA's proposals to limit Rite Aid's ability to incur indebtedness under existing credit facilities and the potential reduction in Rite Aid's EBITDA between signing of the merger agreement and closing, and a number of employee benefit matters including, among others, Rite Aid's adoption of a retention and severance program following the announcement of a business combination transaction.
At Mr. Standley's request, Citi discussed preliminary updated financial and market perspectives relating to Rite Aid and financial aspects of the transaction, including, among other things, the volatility and decrease in Rite Aid's stock price, the decrease in the EBITDA trading multiples of selected publicly traded companies and the median EBITDA multiple implied by Rite Aid's historical EBITDA trading multiples, the potential impact of these aspects on Rite Aid's value and the transaction, and implied multiples of selected precedent retail drugstore transactions.
Following this discussion, a representative of Jones Day reviewed with the Board of Directors the remaining unresolved antitrust issues in the negotiations and the process for obtaining antitrust approvals.
Following these discussions, the Board of Directors directed Rite Aid management to attempt to resolve the issues remaining in the merger agreement with WBA at the proposed meeting in London, on the basis reviewed with the Board of Directors. In making such determination, the Board of Directors considered in consultation with Rite Aid management and advisors, among other things, changes in the market trends in the retail drugstore industry since the time that WBA had made its initial $10.00 per share proposal, including the approximate 32% decline in Rite Aid's stock price since its closing day high on August 5, 2015, the EBITDA multiples implied by WBA's current proposal range as compared to relevant precedent retail drugstore transactions, Rite Aid's business, strategic and value creation prospects if it continued to operate on a standalone basis, the current challenges within the retail drugstore industry, including, among others, the fact that reimbursement rates continue to be driven down, Rite Aid's ability to participate in Medicare Part D and other commercial networks, other risks to Rite Aid's future performance, and potential compromise positions on outstanding issues that would preserve an acceptable level of certainty for Rite Aid and its stockholders that the transaction, if entered into, would close.
47
From October 19, 2015 until the afternoon of October 21, 2015, representatives from Rite Aid, Citi, Skadden, WBA and Simpson Thacher met in London to discuss the open key terms in the merger agreement. At the end of the meeting, WBA and Rite Aid agreed in principle, subject to approval by the companies' respective boards of directors, that WBA would be able to engage in certain permitted transactions, other than with a retail pharmacy, after the seven-month anniversary of the agreement and prior to the closing of the transaction, provided that the termination fee payable by WBA to Rite Aid would double in amount if such a permitted transaction was consummated between the seven (7) month anniversary of the agreement and the twelve (12) month anniversary of the agreement and that Rite Aid would not be deemed to be in breach of its representations or interim operating covenants or to have failed to satisfy a closing condition to the extent such breach was a result of, or attributable to, such permitted transaction. The companies also agreed in principle, subject to approval of their respective boards of directors, that there would be a limit on Rite Aid's permitted borrowings under its existing credit facilities and a limit on any reduction in Rite Aid's EBITDA at the closing of the transaction. The companies also agreed to specific actions that WBA would be required to undertake in connection with obtaining antitrust approvals. Also at the meeting, WBA informed Rite Aid that it was prepared to pay a purchase price of $9.00 per share all-cash (which represented a premium of approximately 42% to Rite Aid's closing stock price on October 20, 2015), subject to finalization of due diligence and agreement on the remaining terms of the merger agreement, as well as approval by each party's board of directors.
On October 21, 2015, Rite Aid granted WBA and its advisors renewed access to the virtual data site.
Between October 21 and October 25, 2015, representatives of Skadden and Simpson Thacher exchanged drafts of the merger agreement and continued to discuss open issues and WBA continued its due diligence review.
The Board of Directors held a special telephonic meeting on October 25, 2015, with members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi, the Board of Directors' independent consultant on compensation matters, Skadden and Jones Day present. At this meeting, Mr. Standley and the representatives of Skadden and Jones Day reviewed the status of discussions with WBA, the efforts of Rite Aid management and advisors to resolve outstanding issues in the merger agreement since the last board meeting on the basis previously reviewed with the Board of Directors. The representatives of Skadden described those provisions that were still being negotiated and indicated that Skadden would provide an update on further negotiations at the Board of Directors' next meeting scheduled for October 27, 2015.
A discussion then continued regarding the resolution of remaining open issues as of the last board meeting, including the purchase price and form of consideration, provisions relating to WBA's obligation to obtain required antitrust approvals and consequences of its inability to do so, and the limitations on Rite Aid's ability to incur debt and reduction in Rite Aid's EBITDA between signing of the merger agreement and closing. With respect to the limitation on Rite Aid's indebtedness and reduction in Rite Aid's EBITDA between signing of the merger agreement and closing, Rite Aid management advised the Board of Directors that it was comfortable with the limitations subject to certain adjustments to the definition of EBITDA.
Representatives of Skadden then discussed in detail with the directors their fiduciary duties in considering a transaction with WBA, as previously reviewed with the Board of Directors.
Representatives of Skadden, the Board of Directors' independent consultant on compensation matters and the compensation committee of the Board of Directors, which we refer to as the Compensation Committee, then reviewed with the Board of Directors certain proposed compensation arrangements, including entering into, amending and authorizing such compensation arrangements for certain executives, which had been reviewed and discussed by the Compensation Committee of the
48
Board of Directors with representatives of Skadden and the Board of Directors' independent consultant on compensation matters at a prior meeting of the Compensation Committee and recommended to the Board of Directors such compensation arrangements for approval and authorization. After discussion, the independent directors of the Board of Directors present unanimously adopted resolutions to enter into, amend and authorize such compensation arrangements. The compensation arrangements authorized and approved by the Board of the Directors during this meeting are described below under "The MergerInterests of the Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the Merger" beginning on page 63.
At the request of the Board of Directors, Citi indicated that, assuming no material changes in the information considered, it believed it would be in a position to render an opinion to the Board of Directors regarding the proposed merger consideration from a financial point of view if asked to do so at the upcoming October 27, 2015 board meeting based on terms and discussions at that time. Representatives of Skadden also reviewed and discussed with the Board of Directors in detail the proposed terms of the merger agreement and the material terms of WBA's financing commitment.
Mr. Standley then reviewed with the Board of Directors, management's business, strategic, financial and stockholder value creation rationale for the transaction, including, among other things, the current environment in the retail drugstore industry, including the trend of consolidation in the healthcare industry and increased competition, Rite Aid's ability to participate in Medicare Part D and other commercial networks, the all-cash merger consideration that would provide certainty of value and liquidity to Rite Aid stockholders while eliminating long-term business and execution risk, and Rite Aid's leveraged balance sheet limiting its ability to compete effectively with other retail drugstore companies with greater financial resources to invest in the expansion of their businesses.
Between October 25 and October 27, 2015, representatives of Skadden and Simpson Thacher exchanged several drafts of the merger agreement and continued to negotiate remaining open issues and WBA completed its due diligence.
On October 27, 2015, the Board of Directors held a regular meeting at Rite Aid's headquarters in Camp Hill, Pennsylvania that was also attended by members of Rite Aid management and representatives of Citi, Skadden and Jones Day. At the meeting, representatives of Skadden reviewed in detail with the Board of Directors its fiduciary duties in considering the transaction.
Citi then reviewed its financial analysis of the merger consideration with the Board of Directors and rendered its oral opinion, confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated October 27, 2015, to the Board of Directors to the effect that, as of that date and based upon and subject to the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Citi as set forth in its written opinion, the merger consideration of $9.00 per share in cash to be received by the holders of Rite Aid stock pursuant to the merger agreement was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.
Mr. Standley and the representatives of Skadden and Jones Day then reviewed with the Board of Directors the final terms of the transaction and discussed the proposed resolutions of the final issues in the merger agreement, including, among others, the obligations of WBA to obtain regulatory approvals and consequences if it were unable to obtain such approvals. Representatives of Skadden also reviewed with the Board of Directors the possible amendment of Rite Aid's bylaws to adopt a forum selection bylaw provision.
Following this review, Mr. Standley again reviewed with the Board of Directors management's business, strategic, financial and stockholder value creation rationale for the transaction, including, among other things, the all-cash merger consideration which would provide certainty of value and liquidity to Rite Aid stockholders, enabling them to realize the value that had been created at Rite Aid in recent years, while eliminating long-term business and execution risk, Rite Aid's historical stock
49
prices and the fact that the last twelve (12) months Adjusted EBITDA (as reported by Rite Aid in its public filings and defined under "The MergerFinancial ForecastsForecasts" beginning on page 61) multiple implied by WBA's purchase price would be one of the highest among relevant precedent retail drugstore transactions, the current environment in the retail drugstore industry, including the trend of consolidation in the healthcare industry and increased competition, Rite Aid's ability to participate in Medicare Part D and other commercial networks, the challenges and risks of continuing as a stand-alone company, Rite Aid's efforts to seek other potential buyers for Rite Aid and the fact that no party other than WBA was prepared to pursue an acquisition of Rite Aid at that time and the belief that no other alternative transactions would create greater value for Rite Aid stockholders than the transaction with WBA.
Following an executive session of the independent directors, the Board of Directors unanimously (with one director absent due to medical reasons) determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement were advisable, fair to, and in the best interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders, approved, adopted and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, and resolved, subject to the terms of the merger agreement, to recommend that Rite Aid stockholders approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. In addition, the Board of Directors unanimously (with one director absent due to medical reasons) adopted resolutions to amend the Amended and Restated By-laws of Rite Aid to add an exclusive forum provision.
Following the meeting, in the late afternoon of October 27, 2015, Rite Aid and WBA executed the merger agreement. That same afternoon, Rite Aid and WBA issued a joint press release publicly announcing the entry into the merger agreement.
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors and Reasons for the Merger
Recommendation of Our Board of Directors to Approve the Merger Agreement and the Transactions Contemplated Thereby
The Board of Directors, after considering various factors described below, determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, are advisable, fair to and in the best interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders, and adopted, approved and declared advisable the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The Board of Directors' determination was unanimous among the directors present, with one director absent due to medical reasons.
The Board of Directors recommends that you vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger.
In evaluating the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the Board of Directors consulted with Rite Aid's management and legal and financial advisors and, in reaching its determinations, the Board of Directors considered a variety of factors with respect to the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the factors listed below (not necessarily in order of relative importance).
50
51
The Board of Directors also specifically considered the terms of the merger agreement, including the following:
52
Board of Directors determines in good faith constitutes a superior proposal, are reasonable and would not deter interested third parties from making a superior proposal.
The Board of Directors weighed the foregoing against a number of potentially negative factors, including:
53
The Board of Directors believed that, overall, the potential benefits of the merger to Rite Aid's stockholders outweighed the risks and uncertainties of the merger.
The foregoing discussion of factors considered by the Board of Directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but the Board of Directors believes that it includes the material factors considered by the Board of Directors. These factors are not listed in any particular order of priority. In light of the variety of factors considered in connection with its evaluation of the merger, the Board of Directors did not find it practicable to, and did not, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its determinations and recommendations. Moreover, each member of the Board of Directors present applied his or her own personal business judgment to the process and may have given different weight to different factors. The Board of Directors did not undertake to make any specific determination as to whether any factor, or any particular aspect of any factor, supported or did not support its ultimate determination. The Board of Directors based its recommendation on the totality of the information presented.
54
Opinion of Rite Aid's Financial Advisor
Rite Aid has engaged Citi as its financial advisor in connection with the merger. In connection with this engagement, Rite Aid requested that Citi evaluate the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the merger consideration to be received by holders of Rite Aid common stock pursuant to the merger agreement. On October 27, 2015, at a meeting of the Board of Directors held to evaluate the merger, Citi rendered an oral opinion, confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated October 27, 2015, to the Board of Directors to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to various assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations and qualifications described in its opinion, the merger consideration to be received by holders of Rite Aid common stock was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.
The full text of Citi's written opinion, dated October 27, 2015, which describes the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations and qualifications on the review undertaken, is attached as Annex B to this proxy statement and is incorporated herein by reference. The description of Citi's opinion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of Citi's opinion. Citi's opinion was provided for the information of the Board of Directors (in its capacity as such) in connection with its evaluation of the merger consideration from a financial point of view and did not address any other aspects or implications of the merger. Citi expressed no view as to, and its opinion does not address, the underlying business decision of Rite Aid to effect the merger, the relative merits of the merger as compared to any alternative business strategies that might exist for Rite Aid or the effect of any other transaction in which Rite Aid might engage or consider. Citi's opinion is not intended to be and does not constitute a recommendation as to how any stockholder should vote or act on any matters relating to the merger or otherwise.
In arriving at its opinion, Citi:
In rendering its opinion, Citi assumed and relied, without independent verification, upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information and data publicly available or provided to or otherwise reviewed by or discussed with Citi and upon the assurances of Rite Aid management that it was not aware of any relevant information that was omitted or that remained
55
undisclosed to Citi. With respect to the financial forecasts and other information and data relating to Rite Aid (including, without limitation, information relating to NOLs expected by Rite Aid management to be utilized by Rite Aid on a standalone basis) that Citi was directed to utilize in its analyses, Citi was advised by Rite Aid management and assumed, with Rite Aid's consent, that such forecasts and other information and data were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of Rite Aid management as to the future financial performance of Rite Aid and the other matters covered thereby. Citi also relied, at Rite Aid's direction, upon the assessments of Rite Aid management as to, among other things, (i) the potential impact on Rite Aid of certain market, competitive and other trends and developments in and prospects for, and governmental, regulatory and legislative matters relating to or otherwise affecting, the retail drugstore and pharmacy services industries and (ii) Rite Aid's existing and future contractual and other commercial arrangements and relationships with third-party payors and partners. Citi assumed, with Rite Aid's consent, that there would be no developments with respect to any such matters that would have an adverse effect on Rite Aid or the merger or that otherwise would be meaningful in any respect to Citi's analyses or opinion.
Citi did not make, and it was not provided with, an independent evaluation or appraisal of the assets or liabilities (contingent, off-balance sheet or otherwise) of Rite Aid or any other entity and Citi did not make any physical inspection of the properties or assets of Rite Aid or any other entity. Citi assumed, with Rite Aid's consent, that the merger would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement and in compliance with all applicable laws, relevant documents and other requirements, without waiver, modification or amendment of any material term, condition or agreement and that, in the course of obtaining the necessary governmental, regulatory or third-party approvals, consents, releases, waivers and agreements for the merger, no delay, limitation, restriction or condition, including any divestiture requirements, amendments or modifications, would be imposed or exist that would have an adverse effect on Rite Aid or the merger or that otherwise would be meaningful in any respect to Citi's analyses or opinion. Citi did not express any view or opinion as to the prices at which Rite Aid common stock (or any other securities of or relating to Rite Aid) may trade or otherwise be transferable at any time. Citi also did not express any opinion with respect to tax, accounting, regulatory, legal or similar matters and relied, with Rite Aid's consent, upon the assessments of representatives of Rite Aid as to such matters. In connection with its engagement, Citi was not requested to, and it did not, undertake a formal third-party solicitation process on behalf of Rite Aid; however, at Rite Aid's direction, Citi held preliminary discussions with selected third parties regarding their potential interest in a possible acquisition or other strategic transaction involving Rite Aid. Rite Aid's description of these discussions is included above under "The MergerBackground of the Merger." Representatives of Rite Aid advised Citi, and Citi also assumed, that the final terms of the merger agreement would not vary materially from those set forth in the execution version of the merger agreement that Citi reviewed.
Citi's opinion addressed only the fairness, from a financial point of view and as of the date of such opinion, of the merger consideration (to the extent expressly specified in the opinion) to the holders of Rite Aid common stock and did not address any other terms, aspects or implications of the merger, including, without limitation, the form or structure of the merger, any offer to purchase, redeem or exchange, or consent solicitation undertaken with respect to, outstanding debt securities of Rite Aid or any other agreement, arrangement or understanding to be entered into in connection with or contemplated by the merger or otherwise. Citi expressed no view as to, and its opinion did not address, the fairness (financial or otherwise) of the amount or nature or any other aspect of any compensation or other payments to any officers, directors or employees of any parties to the merger, or any class of such persons, relative to the merger consideration or otherwise. Citi's opinion was necessarily based on information available to Citi, and financial, stock market and other conditions and circumstances existing and disclosed to Citi, as of the date of its opinion. Although subsequent developments may affect its opinion, Citi is not obligated to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. The issuance of Citi's opinion was authorized by Citi's fairness opinion committee.
56
In preparing its opinion, Citi performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses, including those described below. The summary of the analyses below is not a complete description of Citi's opinion or the analyses underlying, and factors considered in connection with, Citi's opinion. The preparation of a financial opinion is a complex analytical process involving various determinations as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances and, therefore, a financial opinion is not readily susceptible to summary description. Citi arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all analyses and factors assessed as a whole, and it did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any one factor or method of analysis. Accordingly, Citi believes that the analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying such analyses and its opinion.
In its analyses, Citi considered industry performance, general business, economic, market and financial conditions and other matters existing as of the date of its opinion, many of which are beyond the control of Rite Aid. No company, business or transaction reviewed is identical or directly comparable to Rite Aid or the merger and an evaluation of these analyses is not entirely mathematical; rather, the analyses involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the public trading, acquisition or other values of the companies, business segments or transactions reviewed.
The estimates contained in Citi's analyses and the valuation ranges resulting from any particular analysis are not necessarily indicative of actual values or predictive of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those suggested by such analyses. In addition, analyses relating to the value of businesses or securities do not purport to be appraisals or to reflect the prices at which businesses or securities actually may be sold or acquired. Accordingly, the estimates used in, and the results derived from, Citi's analyses are inherently subject to substantial uncertainty.
Citi was not requested to, and it did not, recommend or determine the specific consideration payable in the merger. The type and amount of consideration payable in the merger were determined through negotiations between Rite Aid and WBA and the decision to enter into the merger agreement was solely that of the Board of Directors. Citi's opinion was only one of many factors considered by the Board of Directors in its evaluation of the merger and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of the Board of Directors or Rite Aid management with respect to the merger or the consideration payable in the merger.
The following is a summary of the material financial analyses presented to the Board of Directors in connection with Citi's opinion. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand Citi's financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of such analyses. For purposes of the analyses described below, (i) the high-end of the approximate implied per share equity value reference ranges for Rite Aid derived from such analyses include the estimated present value (as of August 29, 2015) of the NOLs that Rite Aid management expects to be utilized by Rite Aid on a standalone basis (assuming a 35% tax rate for Rite Aid as directed by Rite Aid management and utilizing a discount rate of 7.17%, which estimated present value was calculated to be approximately $0.84 per share of Rite Aid common stock) and (ii) with respect to Rite Aid, the term "Adjusted EBITDA" means, as defined by Rite Aid in its public filings, net income excluding the impact of income taxes (and any corresponding adjustments to tax indemnification assets), interest expense, depreciation and amortization, LIFO adjustments, charges or credits for facility closing and impairment, inventory write-downs related to store closings, debt
57
retirements, and other items (including stock-based compensation expense, sale of assets and investments, and revenue deferrals related to our customer loyalty program).
Selected Public Companies Analysis. Citi reviewed publicly available financial and stock market information of Rite Aid and the following four selected companies that Citi in its professional judgment considered generally relevant, consisting of two selected publicly traded companies with operations in the retail drugstore industry, which we refer to as the selected retail drugstore companies, and two selected publicly traded companies with operations in the discount retail industry, which we refer to as the selected discount retail companies, and, together with the selected retail drugstore companies, which we refer to collectively as the selected companies:
Selected Retail Drugstore Companies | Selected Discount Retail Companies | |
---|---|---|
Walgreens Boots Alliance, Inc. |
Dollar Tree, Inc. |
|
CVS Health Corporation |
Dollar General Corporation |
Citi reviewed, among other information, enterprise values, calculated as fully-diluted equity values based on closing stock prices on October 26, 2015, plus total debt and minority interests (as applicable) and less cash and cash equivalents and investments in unconsolidated affiliates (as applicable), as a multiple of calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 estimated EBITDA. The calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 estimated EBITDA multiples observed for Rite Aid, based on publicly available Wall Street research analysts' consensus estimates, and the overall low to high calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 estimated EBITDA multiples observed for the selected companies were as follows:
Citi then applied selected ranges of calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 estimated EBITDA multiples derived from the selected companies of 10.3x to 11.6x and 9.1x to 10.7x, respectively, to Rite Aid's calendar year 2015 and calendar year 2016 estimated Adjusted EBITDA, respectively, based on internal forecasts and other estimates of Rite Aid management. Financial data of the selected companies were based on publicly available Wall Street research analysts' consensus estimates, public filings and other publicly available information. Except as noted above, financial data of Rite Aid was based on internal forecasts and estimates of Rite Aid management, calendarized for comparative purposes and pro forma for the full-year EBITDA contribution in calendar year 2015 of EnvisionRx, which was acquired by Rite Aid in June 2015. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity value reference ranges for Rite Aid, as compared to the per share merger consideration:
Approximate Implied Per Share Equity Value Reference Ranges Based on: |
Per Share Merger Consideration |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CY 2015E EBITDA | CY 2016E EBITDA | |
||||
$7.22 - $9.84 | $6.39 - $9.54 | $ | 9.00 |
Selected Precedent Transactions Analysis. Using publicly available information, Citi reviewed financial data relating to the following seven selected transactions that Citi in its professional judgment
58
considered generally relevant involving target companies with operations in the retail drugstore industry, which we refer to collectively as the selected transactions:
Announcement Date
|
Acquiror | Target | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
August 2014 | Walgreen Co. |
Alliance Boots GmbH (55% interest) |
||
June 2012 | Walgreen Co. |
Alliance Boots GmbH (45% interest) |
||
February 2010 | Walgreen Co. |
Duane Reade Inc. |
||
August 2008 | CVS Health Corporation |
Longs Drug Stores Corporation |
||
August 2006 | Rite Aid Corporation |
Eckerd and Brooks retail drugstores (The Jean Coutu Group) |
||
January 2006 | CVS Health Corporation |
Sav-on and Osco drugstores (Albertson's, Inc.) |
||
December 2003 | Oak Hill Capital Partners, L.P. |
Duane Reade Inc. |
Citi reviewed, among other information, transaction values of the selected transactions, calculated as the purchase prices paid for the target companies, plus total debt and minority interests (as applicable) and less cash and cash equivalents and investments in unconsolidated affiliates (as applicable), as a multiple of such target companies' latest twelve (12) months EBITDA as of the announcement date of the relevant transaction. The overall low to high latest twelve (12) months EBITDA multiples observed for the selected transactions were 9.2x to 10.9x (or, at the high-end, 13.1x when taking into account stock price appreciation between the first and second steps of the August 2014 Walgreen Co./Alliance Boots GmbH transaction, which was a multi-step transaction). Citi then applied a selected range of latest twelve (12) months EBITDA multiples derived from the selected transactions of 9.2x to 10.9x to Rite Aid's latest twelve (12) months (as of August 29, 2015) Adjusted EBITDA. Financial data of the selected transactions were based on publicly available information. Financial data of Rite Aid was based on public filings and internal forecasts and estimates of Rite Aid management and was pro forma for the EBITDA contribution of EnvisionRx through August 29, 2015. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity value reference range for Rite Aid, as compared to the per share merger consideration:
Approximate Implied Per Share Equity Value Reference Range |
Per Share Merger Consideration |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
$5.60 - $8.63 | $ | 9.00 |
Discounted Cash Flow Analysis. Citi performed a discounted cash flow analysis of Rite Aid by calculating the estimated present value of the unlevered, after-tax free cash flows that Rite Aid was forecasted to generate during the second half of its fiscal year ending February 27, 2016 through its full fiscal year ending February 28, 2020 based on internal forecasts and estimates of Rite Aid management, pro forma for EnvisionRx and normalized to reflect capital expenditures equal to depreciation and amortization in the terminal year. Citi calculated terminal values for Rite Aid by applying to Rite Aid's fiscal year 2020 estimated Adjusted EBITDA a selected range of EBITDA multiples of 8.5x to 9.5x derived based on Citi's professional judgment and taking into account, among other things, historical EBITDA trading multiples for Rite Aid and the selected companies. The present values (as of August 29, 2015) of the cash flows and terminal values were then calculated using selected discount rates ranging from 7.00% to 7.35% derived from a weighted average cost of capital calculation. This analysis indicated the following approximate implied per share equity value reference range for Rite Aid, as compared to the per share merger consideration:
Approximate Implied Per Share Equity Value Reference Range |
Per Share Merger Consideration |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
$7.17 - $9.55 | $ | 9.00 |
59
Other Information. Citi observed certain additional information that was not considered part of its financial analyses for its opinion but was noted for informational purposes, including the following:
Rite Aid has agreed to pay Citi for its services in connection with the merger an aggregate fee estimated to be approximately $40 million, of which a portion was payable upon delivery of Citi's opinion and approximately $37 million is payable contingent upon completion of the merger. In addition, Rite Aid has agreed to reimburse Citi for Citi's expenses, including fees and expenses of counsel, and to indemnify Citi and related parties against certain liabilities, including liabilities under federal securities laws, arising out of Citi's engagement.
Citi and its affiliates in the past have provided, currently are providing and in the future may provide investment banking, commercial banking and other financial services to Rite Aid and its affiliates unrelated to the merger, for which services Citi and its affiliates received and expect to receive compensation, including, during the two (2) year period prior to the date of its opinion, having acted or acting as (i) a financial advisor to Rite Aid in connection with certain acquisition transactions, (ii) an administrative agent and/or co-lead or joint bookrunner for certain notes offerings and refinancings of Rite Aid and (iii) an administrative agent and/or co-lead arranger or joint bookrunner for, and as a lender under, certain credit facilities of Rite Aid. Although Citi and its affiliates had not provided investment banking, commercial banking and other financial services to WBA during the two (2) year period prior to the date of Citi's opinion for which Citi or its affiliates received or expect to receive compensation, Citi and its affiliates may provide such services to WBA and its affiliates in the future, for which services Citi and its affiliates would expect to receive compensation. In the ordinary course of business, Citi and its affiliates may actively trade or hold the securities of Rite Aid, WBA and their
60
respective affiliates for their own account or for the account of their customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities. In addition, Citi and its affiliates (including Citigroup Inc. and its affiliates) may maintain relationships with Rite Aid, WBA and their respective affiliates.
Rite Aid selected Citi as its financial advisor in connection with the merger based on Citi's reputation, experience and familiarity with Rite Aid and its business. Citi is an internationally recognized investment banking firm that regularly engages in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, negotiated underwritings, competitive bids, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities, private placements and valuations for estate, corporate and other purposes.
As part of its annual strategic planning process and as required by its bank group, Rite Aid management prepares a long range financial plan containing certain non-public unaudited prospective financial information, which it updates from time to time during the relevant fiscal year and which we refer to as the Forecast. Rite Aid provided the Board of Directors, and its advisors, including Citi, with the Forecast in connection with Rite Aid's evaluation and provided WBA with certain portions of the Forecast in connection with WBA's due diligence review of a possible transaction.
In addition, at Party D's request, Rite Aid provided Party D with an alternative forecast that reflected higher growth assumptions in fiscal year 2017 and beyond, which we refer to as the Alternate Forecast. The growth assumptions in the Alternate Forecast resulted in minor adjustments that increased Rite Aid's Adjusted EBITDA for fiscal years 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020 in the amounts of approximately $15 million, $32 million, $44 million and $58 million, respectively. The Alternative Forecast was reviewed by the Board of Directors, Rite Aid management and Citi at Board of Directors' meetings on August 2, 2015 and August 11, 2015, but neither the Alternate Forecast, nor any portion thereof, was subsequently relied on by the Board of Directors or Rite Aid management nor, upon Rite Aid's direction, by Citi as Rite Aid believed it was more appropriate to use and rely upon the Forecast. Accordingly, Rite Aid directed Citi to utilize and rely upon the Forecast in preparing its financial analyses and opinion summarized under "The MergerOpinion of Rite Aid's Financial Advisor" beginning on page 55.
The Forecast was not prepared with a view to public disclosure and is included in this proxy statement only because such information was made available as described above. The Forecast was not prepared with a view to compliance with generally accepted accounting principles as applied in the United States, which we refer to as GAAP, the published guidelines of the SEC regarding projections and forward-looking statements or the guidelines established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants for preparation and presentation of prospective financial information. Furthermore, Deloitte & Touche LLP, our independent auditor, has not examined, reviewed, compiled or otherwise applied procedures to the Forecast and, accordingly, assumes no responsibility for, and expresses no opinion on, the Forecast. The Forecast included in this proxy statement has been prepared by, and is the responsibility of, our management. The Forecast was prepared solely for internal use of Rite Aid and is subjective in many respects.
Although a summary of the Forecast is presented with numerical specificity, it reflects numerous assumptions and estimates as to future events made by our management, including with respect to indebtedness and capital expenditure levels for the applicable periods, that our management believed were reasonable at the time the Forecast was prepared, taking into account the relevant information available to management at the time. However, this information is not fact and should not be relied upon as necessarily indicative of actual future results. Important factors that may affect actual results and cause the Forecast not to be achieved include general economic conditions, accuracy of certain
61
accounting assumptions, changes in actual or projected cash flows, competitive pressures, changes in tax laws and other factors described or referenced under "Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page 24.
In addition, the Forecast does not take into account any circumstances or events occurring after the date that it was prepared and does not give effect to the merger. As a result, there can be no assurance that the Forecast will or would be realized, and actual results may be materially better or worse than those contained in the Forecast.
The inclusion of this information should not be regarded as an indication that the Board of Directors, Rite Aid or any of its affiliates or their respective directors, officers, employees or advisors or any other recipient of this information considered, or now considers, the Forecast to be material information of Rite Aid or predictive of actual future results nor should it be construed as financial guidance, and it should not be relied upon as such. The summary of the Forecast is not included in this proxy statement in order to induce any stockholder to vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement or any of the other proposals to be voted on at the special meeting or to influence any stockholder to make any investment decision with respect to the merger, including whether or not to seek appraisal rights with respect to shares of our common stock.
The Forecast should be evaluated, if at all, in conjunction with the historical financial statements and other information regarding Rite Aid contained in our public filings with the SEC. Our management reviewed the Forecast with the Board of Directors, which considered the Forecast in connection with its evaluation and approval of the merger agreement and the merger. In preparing its financial analyses and opinion summarized under "The MergerOpinion of Rite Aid's Financial Advisor" beginning on page 55, Citi relied on the accuracy and completeness of the information provided with respect to the Forecast and the assurances of our management that it was not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make such information inaccurate or misleading.
The Forecast constitutes a forward-looking statement. For information on factors that may cause Rite Aid's future results to materially vary, see "Forward-Looking Statements" beginning on page 24.
Except to the extent required by applicable federal securities laws, we do not intend, and expressly disclaim any responsibility, to update or otherwise revise the Forecast to reflect circumstances existing after the date when Rite Aid prepared the Forecast or to reflect the occurrence of future events or changes in general economic or industry conditions, even in the event that any of the assumptions underlying the Forecast are shown to be in error.
In light of the foregoing factors and the uncertainties inherent in the Forecast, stockholders are cautioned not to rely on the Forecast.
Certain of the measures included in the Forecast may be considered non-GAAP financial measures, as noted below. Non-GAAP financial measures should not be considered in isolation from, or as a substitute for, financial information presented in compliance with GAAP, and non-GAAP financial measures as used by Rite Aid may not be comparable to similarly titled amounts used by other companies.
62
The following table reflects selected metrics reflected on, or generated from, the Forecast:
($ in millions, except per share data) |
FY 2016E |
FY 2017E |
FY 2018E |
FY 2019E |
FY 2020E |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Revenues |
30,658 | 34,166 | 36,101 | 38,167 | 40,216 | |||||||||||
Adjusted EBITDA(1) |
1,408 | 1,585 | 1,712 | 1,847 | 1,974 | |||||||||||
Unlevered Free Cash Flow(2) |
510 | 622 | 627 | 620 | 728 | |||||||||||
Earnings Per Share |
0.15 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.40 | 0.50 | |||||||||||
NOL Utilization(3) |
95 | 165 | 206 | 252 | 312 |
Interests of the Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the Merger
When considering the recommendation of the Board of Directors that you vote to approve the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, you should be aware that some of our directors and executive officers may have interests in the merger that may be different from, or in addition to, the interests of our stockholders generally, as more fully described below. The Board of Directors was aware of and considered these interests to the extent such interests existed at the time, among other matters, in evaluating and overseeing the negotiation of the merger agreement, in approving the merger agreement and the merger and in recommending that the merger agreement be adopted by the stockholders of Rite Aid. For the purpose of each of the Rite Aid plans and agreements described below, the consummation of the merger will constitute a "change in control," "change of control" or term of similar meaning with respect to Rite Aid.
As of the date of this proxy statement, none of our executive officers has entered into any agreement with WBA or any of its affiliates regarding employment with, or the right to purchase or participate in the equity of, the Surviving Corporation or one or more of its affiliates. Prior to or following the closing, however, some or all of our executive officers may discuss or enter into agreements with WBA or Merger Sub or any of their respective affiliates regarding employment with, or the right to purchase or participate in the equity of, the Surviving Corporation or one or more of its affiliates.
63
Insurance and Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers
For six (6) years from and after the effective time of the merger, the Surviving Corporation will indemnify and hold harmless each present and former director, officer and employee of Rite Aid or any of its subsidiaries (in each case, when acting or having acted in such capacity), determined as of the effective time of the merger, against any costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees), judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages or liabilities incurred in connection with any proceeding arising out of matters existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time of the merger, to the fullest extent that Rite Aid would have been permitted under applicable law, the organizational documents of Rite Aid or its subsidiaries, as applicable, and any indemnification agreements with any directors, officers and employees of Rite Aid or any of its subsidiaries in effect on the date of the merger agreement to indemnify such person (and the Surviving Corporation will also advance expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses) as incurred to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law; provided that the person to whom expenses are advanced provides an undertaking to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to indemnification).
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Rite Aid will be permitted and, if Rite Aid fails to do so, WBA will cause the Surviving Corporation as of the effective time of the merger to, obtain and fully pay for "tail" insurance policies for the extension of the directors' and officers' liability coverage of Rite Aid's existing directors' and officers' insurance policies for a claims reporting or discovery period of at least six (6) years from and after the effective time of the merger, that will be from an insurance carrier with the same or better credit rating as Rite Aid's insurance carrier as of the date of the merger agreement with respect to directors' and officers' liability insurance with benefits and levels of coverage (including terms relating thereto) that are at least as favorable as Rite Aid's existing policies with respect to matters existing or occurring prior to the effective time of the merger (including in connection with the merger agreement, the merger or the transactions contemplated thereby). In no event will Rite Aid expend, or will WBA or the Surviving Corporation be required to expend, for such policies an aggregate premium amount in excess of three hundred percent (300%) of the annual premiums currently paid by Rite Aid for such insurance. If Rite Aid and the Surviving Corporation for any reason fail to obtain such "tail" insurance policies as of the effective time of the merger, (i) the Surviving Corporation will, and WBA will cause the Surviving Corporation to, continue to maintain in effect for a period of at least six (6) years from and after the effective time of the merger the directors and officers insurance in place as of the date of the merger agreement with benefits and levels of coverage (including terms relating thereto) that are at least as favorable as provided in Rite Aid's existing policies as of the date of the merger agreement, or (ii) the Surviving Corporation will, and WBA will cause the Surviving Corporation to, obtain directors and officers insurance for such six (6) year period with benefits and levels of coverage (including terms relating thereto) that are at least as favorable as Rite Aid's existing policies as of the date of the merger agreement. In no event will WBA or the Surviving Corporation be required to expend for such policies an annual premium amount in excess of three hundred percent (300%) of the annual premiums currently paid by Rite Aid for such insurance. If the annual premiums of such insurance coverage exceed such amount, the Surviving Corporation will obtain a policy with the best available coverage for a cost not exceeding such amount. The Surviving Corporation will maintain such policies in full force and effect, and continue to honor the obligations thereunder for a period of not less than six (6) years from and after the effective time of the merger.
Treatment of Equity and Equity-Based Awards
Cash-Out Options. Upon completion of the merger, each cash-out option will be cancelled and converted into the right to receive, without interest, an amount in cash equal to the product of (x) the total number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such cash-out option and (y) the excess, if
64
any, of $9.00 over the per share exercise price of such cash-out option, less applicable withholding taxes.
Rollover Options. Upon completion of the merger, each rollover option will be converted into an option to acquire, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the completion of the merger, a number of shares of WBA common stock equal to the product of (x) the number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such rollover option and (y) the conversion ratio, with any fractional shares rounded down to the next lower whole number of shares after aggregating each individual holder's option with the same exercise price. The exercise price of each converted rollover option will be equitably adjusted to be equal to the quotient (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) of (x) the exercise price per share of Rite Aid common stock subject to such rollover option and (y) the conversion ratio (rounded up to the nearest whole cent).
Rollover Stock Awards. Upon completion of the merger, each rollover stock award will be converted into a WBA restricted share award or a WBA performance stock unit, as applicable, relating to the number of shares of WBA common stock equal to the product of (x) the number of shares of Rite Aid common stock relating to such rollover stock award (which, in the case of performance stock units for which the applicable performance period has not completed, will be the target number of shares) and (y) the conversion ratio, with any fractional shares rounded down to the next lower whole number of shares (with such rounding applied on an aggregate basis to each individual holder), and with each such converted rollover stock award generally subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the completion of the merger. With respect to each converted rollover stock award that is a performance stock unit, following the completion of the merger (i) the performance goals or conditions will not apply with respect to a pro-rata portion of such award (with such portion based on the number of days elapsed in the performance period through the completion of the merger), and such portion of the rollover stock award will continue to be subject to service-based vesting on the same schedule as applied prior to the completion of the merger, and (ii) the remaining portion of the performance stock unit will continue to be subject to performance-based vesting (based on the achievement of adjusted performance goals) and service-based vesting on the same schedule as applied prior to the completion of the merger.
Restricted Stock Units. Upon completion of the merger, each Rite Aid restricted stock unit outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the merger, whether or not vested, will automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (x) the total number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such restricted stock unit and (y) $9.00, less applicable withholding taxes.
Accelerated Vesting of Equity and Equity-Based Awards Upon Certain Terminations
Pursuant to the terms of Rite Aid's stock plans, the vesting of each rollover option and rollover stock award outstanding as of the date of the merger agreement, including the rollover options and rollover stock awards then held by any executive officer, will accelerate and vest (with any performance conditions deemed achieved at target levels) upon the occurrence of both (i) a change in control and (ii) a qualifying termination during the two (2) year period following a change in control, which we refer to as "double-trigger" vesting. The merger will be treated as a change in control for purposes of Rite Aid's stock plans with respect to any rollover options and rollover stock awards that are granted prior to the date of the merger agreement, but will not be treated as a change in control for purposes with respect to any rollover options and rollover stock awards that are granted following the date of the merger agreement and prior to completion of the merger (which will be subject to the vesting provisions of the executive officer's employment agreement, as described below).
The table below sets forth the estimated amounts that each director, named executive officer and other executive officers of Rite Aid would be eligible to receive (without subtraction of applicable
65
withholding taxes) with regard to rollover options, rollover stock awards, and restricted stock units as of promptly following the completion of the merger or, in the case of the rollover options and rollover stock awards, assuming continued employment or service through the completion of the merger and a qualifying termination of employment or service immediately following the completion of the merger. Depending on when the merger is completed, certain outstanding equity shown in the table below may become vested in accordance with their terms without regard to the merger or, in the case of rollover options, may be exercised by the director or executive officer. Further information regarding the named executive officers may be found under "The MergerInterests of the Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the MergerGolden Parachutes" beginning on page 70.
|
Rollover Options | Rollover Stock Awards(1) | |
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Shares (#) |
Value ($) |
Restricted Stock (#) |
Value of Restricted Stock ($) |
Performance Stock Units (#) |
Value of Performance Units ($) |
RSUs (#) |
Value of RSUs ($) |
Total Value ($) |
|||||||||||||||||||
Directors |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Anderson, Jr. |
| | | | | | 299,746 | 2,697,714 | 2,697,714 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Bodaken |
| | 17,167 | 154,503 | | | 31,250 | 281,250 | 435,753 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Jessick |
| | 17,167 | 154,503 | | | 299,746 | 2,697,714 | 2,852,217 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Lofton |
| | 17,167 | 154,503 | | | 11,048 | 99,432 | 253,935 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ms. Potter |
| | 17,167 | 154,503 | | | 8,953 | 80,577 | 235,080 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Regan |
| | | | | | 299,746 | 2,697,714 | 2,697,714 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Savage |
| | | | | | 13,825 | 124,425 | 124,425 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ms. Syms |
| | | | | | 299,746 | 2,697,714 | 2,697,714 | |||||||||||||||||||
Named Executive Officers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Standley(2) |
1,891,150 | 6,728,728 | 397,299 | 3,575,691 | 1,665,074 | 14,985,666 | | | 25,290,085 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Martindale |
895,900 | 3,009,648 | 361,099 | 3,249,891 | 1,097,256 | 9,875,304 | | | 16,134,843 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Vitrano |
776,250 | 3,017,648 | 157,933 | 1,421,397 | 188,300 | 1,694,700 | | | 6,133,745 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Karst |
312,250 | 450,583 | 293,794 | 2,644,146 | 149,700 | 1,347,300 | | | 4,442,029 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Robert K. Thompson |
282,600 | 1,064,288 | 97,499 | 877,491 | 67,200 | 604,800 | | | 2,546,579 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Strassler |
263,025 | 1,040,936 | 50,632 | 455,688 | 63,900 | 575,100 | | | 2,071,724 | |||||||||||||||||||
Other Executive Officers |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Abelman |
42,175 | 45,296 | 66,432 | 597,888 | 20,100 | 180,900 | | | 824,084 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ms. Castle |
119,500 | 128,480 | 76,722 | 690,498 | 56,900 | 512,100 | | | 1,331,078 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Donley |
136,925 | 642,296 | 22,499 | 202,491 | 25,800 | 232,200 | | | 1,076,987 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Everett |
66,800 | 21,376 | 19,400 | 174,600 | 27,200 | 244,800 | | | 440,776 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ms. Konrad |
31,750 | 120,232 | 56,066 | 504,594 | 7,400 | 66,600 | | | 691,426 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Montini, Jr. |
243,375 | 971,048 | 46,666 | 419,994 | 58,400 | 525,600 | | | 1,916,642 | |||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Robert I. Thompson |
265,700 | 1,058,368 | 51,033 | 459,297 | 64,000 | 576,000 | | | 2,093,665 |
Payments to Executives upon Termination Following Change-in-Control
Executive Officer Employment Agreements
Each of Rite Aid's executive officers other than Robert K. Thompson is party to an employment agreement with Rite Aid, which we refer to collectively as the employment agreements. During the term of the employment agreements, the employment agreements provide that each executive officer
66
will be entitled to receive a severance benefit under his or her employment agreement if (i) the officer is terminated other than for cause or (ii) the officer resigns with good reason, which we refer to as a qualifying termination. For the purpose of the employment agreements, "good reason" generally includes (x) the assignment of duties or responsibilities materially inconsistent with the executive's status or position or any material adverse alteration in title or reporting relationship, (y) any decrease in base salary to which the executive has not agreed to in writing, or (z) a material breach by Rite Aid of the employment agreement. Rite Aid entered into amendments to the employment agreements with each of Messrs. Strassler, Vitrano and Robert I. Thompson that provides each executive with a new title and role with Rite Aid. The amendments provide that such changes will not constitute "good reason" under each executive's employment agreement. The receipt of the severance benefits described below is conditioned upon the executive's execution of a binding separation agreement and general release of claims in favor of Rite Aid. Additional information regarding the treatment of equity and equity-based awards may be found under "The MergerInterests of the Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the MergerTreatment of Equity and Equity-Based Awards" beginning on page 64.
Except as provided below, Mr. Standley's employment agreement provides for the following severance benefit upon a qualifying termination or upon the non-renewal of his employment agreement within six (6) months of a change in control: (i) a cash amount equal to two times the sum of his annual base salary and target annual bonus, payable in installments over the two (2) year period following the termination; (ii) if termination occurs following the start of Rite Aid's fiscal year and if the Surviving Corporation's board of directors determines that Rite Aid achieved or exceeded its annual performance targets for the fiscal year, an amount equal to the executive's target annual bonus, prorated to reflect the number of days in the fiscal year prior to termination; (iii) any accrued but unpaid salary and benefits, payable within ten (10) business days of the date of termination; and (iv) two (2) years' continued health and medical insurance coverage for Mr. Standley and his qualifying dependents.
In the event Rite Aid does not renew Mr. Standley's employment agreement, and such non-renewal does not occur within six (6) months of a change in control, Mr. Standley would receive the following severance benefit: (i) a cash amount equal to one times the sum of his annual base salary and target annual bonus, such amount payable in installments over the one (1) year period following the termination; (ii) if termination occurs following the start of Rite Aid's fiscal year and if the Surviving Corporation's board of directors determines that Rite Aid achieved or exceeded its annual performance targets for the fiscal year, an amount equal to the executive's target annual bonus, prorated to reflect the number of days in the fiscal year prior to termination; (iii) any accrued but unpaid salary and benefits payable within ten (10) business days of the date of termination; and (iv) one (1) years' continued health and medical insurance coverage for Mr. Standley and his qualifying dependents.
Mr. Standley's employment agreement provides that each then-outstanding stock option will vest upon the occurrence of a change in control. Mr. Standley's employment agreement further provides that he will receive an additional payment to reimburse him for any excise taxes imposed on "parachute payments" that may be incurred under Section 4999 of the Code and the taxes associated with such gross-up payment, as a result of Section 280G of the Code.
As it would pertain to rollover stock awards granted following the date of the merger agreement, Mr. Standley's employment agreement provides that upon a qualifying termination, all outstanding restrictions with respect to any restricted stock awards will lapse to the extent the restrictions would have lapsed had Mr. Standley remained employed by Rite Aid for a period of three (3) years (or one (1) year in the event of non-renewal where the non-renewal does not occur within six (6) months of a change in control) following the date of such termination. The occurrence of the merger will constitute a change in control for the purposes of Mr. Standley's employment agreement.
67
The employment agreements with Messrs. Martindale, Vitrano and Karst provide for the following severance benefit upon a qualifying termination: (i) a cash amount equal to two times the sum of the executive's annual base salary and target annual bonus, payable in installments over the two (2) year period following the termination; (ii) if termination occurs following the start of Rite Aid's fiscal year and if the Surviving Corporation's board of directors determines that Rite Aid achieved or exceeded its annual performance targets for the fiscal year, an amount equal to the executive's target annual bonus, prorated to reflect the number of days in the fiscal year prior to termination; (iii) any accrued but unpaid salary and benefits, payable within ten (10) business days of the date of termination; and (iv) two (2) years' continued health and medical insurance coverage for the executive and his qualifying dependents. The amendments to the employment agreements with Messrs. Martindale, Vitrano and Karst further provide that any portion of any payment that is subject to any excise taxes imposed on "parachute payments" that may be incurred under Section 4999 of Code as a result of Section 280G of the Code will be reduced to the extent necessary so that the executive will retain a greater amount on an after-tax basis than if the excise tax had been imposed on the unreduced amount of the payments.
As it would pertain to rollover options and rollover stock awards granted following the date of the merger agreement and prior to completion of the merger, the employment agreements with Messrs. Martindale, Vitrano and Karst provide that upon a qualifying termination, all outstanding option awards will immediately vest and become exercisable for a period of ninety (90) days, and the restrictions with respect to any restricted stock awards will lapse, in each case to the extent the options would have vested and the restrictions would have lapsed had the executives remained employed by Rite Aid for a period of two (2) years following the date of such termination.
Mr. Strassler's employment agreement provides for the following severance benefit upon a qualifying termination: (i) a cash amount equal to two times his annual base salary, payable in installments over the two (2) year period following the termination; (ii) if termination occurs following the start of Rite Aid's fiscal year and if the Board of Directors determines that Rite Aid achieved or exceeded its annual performance targets for the fiscal year, an amount equal to the executive's target annual bonus, prorated to reflect the number of days in the fiscal year prior to termination; (iii) any accrued but unpaid salary and benefits, payable within ten (10) business days of the date of termination; and (iv) two (2) years' continued health and medical insurance coverage for the executive and his qualifying dependents. Mr. Strassler's employment agreement further provides that any portion of any payment that is subject to any excise taxes imposed on "parachute payments" that may be incurred under Section 4999 of the Code as a result of Section 280G of the Code will be reduced to the extent necessary so that Mr. Strassler will retain a greater amount on an after-tax basis than if the excise tax had been imposed on the unreduced amount of the payments.
As it would pertain to rollover options and rollover stock awards granted following the date of the merger agreement and prior to completion of the merger, Mr. Strassler's employment agreement provides that upon a qualifying termination, all outstanding option awards will immediately vest and become exercisable for a period of ninety (90) days, and the restrictions with respect to any restricted stock awards will lapse, in each case to the extent the options would have vested and the restrictions would have lapsed had Mr. Strassler remained employed by Rite Aid for a period of two (2) years following the date of such termination.
68
David Abelman, Dedra N. Castle, Bryan Everett, Jocelyn Konrad, Enio A. Montini, Jr. and Robert I. Thompson
The employment agreements with Ms. Castle and Ms. Konrad and Messrs. Abelman, Everett, Montini and Thompson provide for the following severance benefit upon a qualifying termination: (i) a cash amount equal to two times the executive's annual base salary, such amount payable in installments over the two (2) year period following the termination; (ii) any accrued but unpaid salary and benefits payable within ten (10) business days of the date of termination; and (iii) two (2) years' continued health and medical insurance coverage for the executive and her or his qualifying dependents. The employment agreements with Ms. Castle and Ms. Konrad and Messrs. Abelman, Everett, Montini and Thompson further provide that any portion of any payment that is subject to any excise taxes imposed on "parachute payments" that may be incurred under Section 4999 of the Code as a result of Section 280G of the Code will be reduced to the extent necessary so that the executive will retain a greater amount on an after-tax basis than if the excise tax had been imposed on the unreduced amount of the payments.
The employment agreement with Ms. Castle provides that all outstanding restrictions with respect to the restricted stock award granted pursuant to Ms. Castle's employment agreement will lapse upon the occurrence of a change in control. The merger is expected to constitute a change in control for the purposes of Ms. Castle's employment agreement.
The employment agreements with Ms. Castle and Ms. Konrad and Messrs. Abelman, Everett, Montini and Thompson provide that upon a qualifying termination, all outstanding option awards will immediately vest and become exercisable for a period of ninety (90) days, and the restrictions with respect to any restricted stock awards will lapse, in each case to the extent the options would have vested and the restrictions would have lapsed had the executives remained employed by Rite Aid for a period of two (2) years following the date of such termination.
Mr. Donley's employment agreement provides for the following severance benefit upon a qualifying termination: (i) a cash amount equal to two times the sum of his annual base salary and target annual bonus, payable in installments over the two (2) year period following the termination; (ii) if termination occurs following the start of Rite Aid's fiscal year and if the Board of Directors determines that Rite Aid achieved or exceeded its annual performance targets for the fiscal year, an amount equal to the executive's target annual bonus, prorated to reflect the number of days in the fiscal year prior to termination; (iii) any accrued but unpaid salary and benefits, payable within ten (10) business days of the date of termination; and (iv) two (2) years' continued health and medical insurance coverage for Mr. Donley and his qualifying dependents.
As it would pertain to rollover options and rollover stock awards granted following the date of the merger agreement and prior to completion of the merger, Mr. Donley's employment agreement provides that upon a qualifying termination, all outstanding option awards will immediately vest and become exercisable for a period of ninety (90) days, to the extent the options would have vested had Mr. Donley remained employed by Rite Aid for a period of two (2) years following the date of such termination.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan
Each of Rite Aid's named executive officers and each of Rite Aid's other executive officers is a participant in the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, which we refer to as the SERP. Under the terms of the SERP, the unvested portions of the individual account balances of each of the executive officers will vest if the executive officer is involuntarily terminated without cause within twelve (12) months of the completion of the merger.
69
Potential Change-in-Control Payments to Executive Officers Other than Named Executive Officers
The following table shows the estimated amounts that each executive officer other than the named executive officers would receive upon a termination of employment without cause or through resignation for good reason assuming that such events occurred on the termination date of the merger agreement, October 27, 2016. The following table does not replicate information already disclosed in the "Merger-Related Payments" table above.
|
Cash Severance(1) | |
|
|
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Salary ($) | Target Bonus ($) |
Pro-Rata Bonus ($) |
Pension/NQDC ($)(2) |
Perquisites / Benefits ($)(3) |
Total ($) | |||||||||||||
Other Executive Officers |
|||||||||||||||||||
Mr. Abelman |
750,000 | | 185,702 | 104,090 | 25,376 | 1,065,168 | |||||||||||||
Ms. Castle |
850,000 | | | 150,635 | 25,532 | 1,026,167 | |||||||||||||
Mr. Donley |
771,058 | 385,529 | 127,277 | 295,344 | 25,428 | 1,604,636 | |||||||||||||
Mr. Everett |
900,000 | | 222,843 | 18,564 | | 1,141,407 | |||||||||||||
Ms. Konrad |
700,000 | | 173,322 | 118,932 | 25,272 | 1,017,526 | |||||||||||||
Mr. Montini, Jr. |
920,000 | | | | 17,472 | 937,472 | |||||||||||||
Mr. Robert I. Thompson |
500,000 | | | | 17,160 | 517,160 |
The following tables show the estimated amounts of payments and benefits that each named executive officer of Rite Aid would receive in connection with the merger, assuming consummation of the merger occurred on the termination date set forth in the merger agreement, October 27, 2016, and the employment of the named executive officer was terminated without cause or the named executive officer resigned for good reason on such date.
The first table below, entitled "Potential Change-in-Control Payments to Named Executive Officers," along with its footnotes, sets forth the information required by Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K regarding the compensation payable to Rite Aid's chief executive officer, chief financial officer, any
70
executive officer who served as Rite Aid's chief executive officer during the prior fiscal year, any executive officer who served as Rite Aid's chief executive officer during the prior fiscal year and the three other most highly compensated executive officers, as determined for purposes of its most recent annual proxy statement, each of whom we refer to as a named executive officer. This compensation is subject to an advisory vote of Rite Aid's stockholders, as described below under "Proposal 2: Advisory Vote on Merger-Related Executive Compensation Arrangements" beginning on page 108.
The calculations in the tables below do not include amounts the named executive officers were already entitled to receive or that were or would be vested as of October 27, 2016, or amounts under contracts, agreements, plans or arrangements to the extent they do not discriminate in scope, terms or operation in favor of executive officers and that are available generally to all of the salaried employees of Rite Aid. In addition to the assumptions regarding the consummation date of the merger and termination of the employment of the named executive officers, these estimates are based on certain other assumptions that are described in the footnotes accompanying the tables below. Accordingly, the ultimate values to be received by a named executive officer in connection with the merger may differ from the amounts set forth below.
Potential Change-in-Control Payments to Named Executive Officers
Officer
|
Cash ($)(1) |
Equity ($)(2),(3) |
Pension/NQDC ($)(4) |
Perquisites / Benefits ($)(5) |
Tax Reimbursement ($)(6) |
Total ($)(7) |
|||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mr. Standley |
8,418,630 | 18,830,286 | 835,917 | 27,664 | 0 | 28,112,497 | |||||||||||||
Mr. Martindale |
5,391,370 | 12,444,960 | 628,906 | 18,928 | | 18,484,164 | |||||||||||||
Mr. Vitrano |
1,997,603 | 3,286,440 | | 27,092 | | 5,311,135 | |||||||||||||
Mr. Karst |
4,207,021 | 3,042,185 | 209,967 | 19,916 | | 7,479,089 | |||||||||||||
Mr. Robert K. Thompson |
| 1,318,716 | 363,161 | | | 1,681,877 | |||||||||||||
Mr. Strassler |
659,425 | 1,071,672 | | 2,028 | | 1,733,125 |
71
Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the MergerRetention and Severance Program" beginning on page 74.
Officer
|
Salary ($) |
Target Bonus ($) |
Pro-Rata Bonus ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mr. Standley |
2,300,000 | 4,600,000 | 1,518,630 | 8,418,630 | |||||||||
Mr. Martindale |
1,800,000 | 2,700,000 | 891,370 | 5,391,370 | |||||||||
Mr. Vitrano |
1,000,000 | 750,000 | 247,603 | 1,997,603 | |||||||||
Mr. Karst |
1,580,000 | 1,975,000 | 652,021 | 4,207,021 | |||||||||
Mr. Thompson |
| | | | |||||||||
Mr. Strassler |
600,000 | | 59,425 | 659,425 |
Officer
|
Rollover Options (#) |
Rollover Options ($) |
Rollover Stock Awards (#) |
Rollover Stock Awards ($) |
Total ($) |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mr. Standley(a) |
1,000,300 | 2,248,620 | 1,842,407 | 16,581,666 | 18,830,286 | |||||||||||
Mr. Martindale |
488,150 | 1,004,856 | 1,271,123 | 11,440,104 | 12,444,960 | |||||||||||
Mr. Vitrano |
396,025 | 1,005,840 | 253,400 | 2,280,600 | 3,286,440 | |||||||||||
Mr. Karst |
221,200 | 304,559 | 304,181 | 2,737,626 | 3,042,185 | |||||||||||
Mr. Thompson |
140,225 | 294,816 | 113,767 | 1,023,900 | 1,318,716 | |||||||||||
Mr. Strassler |
127,450 | 297,972 | 85,967 | 773,700 | 1,071,672 |
72
Officer
|
Single-Trigger Payments ($) |
Double-Trigger Payments ($) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mr. Standley |
2,248,620 | 25,863,877 | |||||
Mr. Martindale |
| 18,484,164 | |||||
Mr. Vitrano |
| 5,311,135 | |||||
Mr. Karst |
| 7,479,089 | |||||
Mr. Thompson |
| 1,681,877 | |||||
Mr. Strassler |
| 1,733,125 |
Recent Adoption of Certain Compensation Arrangements
As discussed above under "The MergerBackground of the Merger" beginning on page 32, at a special telephonic meeting of the Board of Directors held on October 25, 2015, the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved role changes and related amendments to the employment agreements with Mr. Frank Vitrano, who previously served as Rite Aid's Chief Administrative Officer and Senior Executive Vice President and now serves as Chief Strategic Business Development Officer, Mr. Marc Strassler, who previously served as Rite Aid's
73
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary and now serves as Corporate Counsel, and Mr. Robert I. Thompson, who previously served as Rite Aid's Executive Vice President, Pharmacy and now serves as Senior Vice President, Healthcare Business Integration. Pursuant to the amendments to the executive's employment agreements, in light of the executive's reduced roles, Mr. Vitrano's annual base salary was reduced to $500,000 and his target annual incentive opportunity was reduced to 75% of his annual base salary; Mr. Strassler's annual base salary was reduced to $300,000 and his target annual incentive opportunity was reduced to 30% of his annual base salary; and Mr. Thompson's annual base salary was reduced to $250,000 and his target annual incentive opportunity was reduced to 50% of his annual base salary. Also as described in the Form 8-K filed by Rite Aid on October 28, 2015, in connection with the changes in role for Messrs. Vitrano and Strassler, the Board of Directors approved the promotion of Mr. Karst to the additional position of Chief Administrative Officer with an increase in his target annual incentive opportunity to 125% of base salary, but no other increases in compensation. The need for continuing roles within Rite Aid for Messrs. Vitrano and Strassler, based on the executives' extensive experience and knowledge of the Company, as well as Rite Aid's need to fill the position of Chief Administrative Officer vacated my Mr. Vitrano and the position of General Counsel vacated by Mr. Strassler, had been reviewed in detail by the Compensation Committee at a special telephonic meeting on October 25, 2015 and previously at a special telephonic meeting of the Compensation Committee on September 17, 2015, each of which was attended by members of senior management, the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant and Skadden representatives, and had also been discussed at the regular meeting of the Compensation Committee on June 24, 2015, attended in person by members of senior management and the Compensation Committee's independent compensation consultant. The Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, also authorized amendments to update the employment agreements with Messrs. Martindale and Montini as needed in order to reflect such executive officer's present titles, duties and compensation with Rite Aid. As a matter of good corporate governance, in connection with the employment agreement amendments approved for Messrs. Vitrano, Strassler, Thompson, Martindale and Montini, each executive relinquished his excise tax gross up provision, which was replaced with the requirement that any change in control payments that become payable will be reduced to the amount that is not subject to such taxes if doing so would result in a greater after-tax payment to the executive.
Retention and Severance Program
The merger agreement contemplates the adoption of a retention and severance program, the participants of which may include certain of Rite Aid's executive officers. Such retention and severance program may be agreed upon between Rite Aid and WBA within forty five (45) days of the date of the merger agreement or, if no agreement is reached, Rite Aid may adopt such program so long as the aggregate cost does not exceed $100,000,000. As of the date of this proxy statement, no such program has been adopted.
WBA's obligation to complete the merger is not subject to the receipt of financing. Concurrently with the signing of the merger agreement, WBA entered into the Commitment Letter for the Facility, which Commitment Letter and the commitments contemplated thereby will terminate upon the first to occur of (a) the consummation of the merger with or without funding of the Facility, (b) the termination of the merger agreement in accordance with its terms, (c) the execution of a credit agreement documenting the Facility and (d) the date which is one (1) year following the date of the merger agreement (coinciding with the termination date with respect to the merger agreement), subject to an automatic three (3) month extension of the Commitment Letter and the commitments contemplated thereby in the event that the termination date with respect to the merger agreement is so extended in accordance with its terms. WBA currently expects (a) to finance the merger consideration and/or the refinancing of a portion of the indebtedness of Rite Aid and (b) to pay related fees and expenses with a combination of (i) the issuance of new debt securities, (ii) new term loans and (iii) existing cash on WBA's balance sheet. If WBA is unable to issue and sell such debt securities, WBA expects it will instead use borrowings under the Facility.
74
Borrowings under the Facility will bear interest at a fluctuating rate equal to, at WBA's option, LIBOR or the applicable base rate plus a margin. WBA will also pay certain customary fees. The Facility, if funded, will mature three hundred and sixty four (364) days after the initial borrowings; provided that WBA can extend up to $3.0 billion of the Facility for an additional ninety (90) day period if desired. The closing of the Facility and the availability of the loans thereunder are subject to the satisfaction of certain customary conditions. The definitive loan documentation for the Facility will contain certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative, negative and financial covenants and events of default and will be substantially consistent with the terms set forth in WBA's existing revolving credit agreement, dated as of November 10, 2014, unless otherwise mutually and reasonably agreed.
Closing and Effective Time of the Merger
Unless another date is agreed by the parties, the closing will take place no later than the third (3rd) business day following the satisfaction or waiver in accordance with the merger agreement of all of the conditions to closing (as described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementConditions to the Closing of the Merger" beginning on page 103), other than conditions that by their terms are to be satisfied at the closing, but subject to the satisfaction or waiver of such conditions. Concurrently with the closing, the parties will file a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State for the State of Delaware as provided under the DGCL. The merger will become effective upon the filing of the certificate of merger, or at such later time as is agreed by the parties and specified in the certificate of merger.
If the merger agreement is adopted by Rite Aid stockholders, stockholders who do not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and who properly exercise and perfect their demand for appraisal of their shares will be entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger under Section 262 of the DGCL, which we refer to as Section 262.
The following discussion is not a complete statement of the law pertaining to appraisal rights under the DGCL and is qualified in its entirety by the full text of Section 262, which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex C. The following summary does not constitute any legal or other advice nor does it constitute a recommendation that stockholders exercise their appraisal rights under Section 262. Only a holder of record of shares of Rite Aid common stock is entitled to demand appraisal rights for the shares registered in that holder's name. A person having a beneficial interest in shares of common stock of Rite Aid held of record in the name of another person, such as a bank, broker, fiduciary, depositary or other nominee, must act promptly to cause the record holder to follow the steps summarized below properly and in a timely manner to perfect appraisal rights. If you hold your shares of Rite Aid common stock through a broker, bank or other nominee and you wish to exercise appraisal rights, you should consult with your broker, bank or other nominee.
Under Section 262, holders of shares of common stock of Rite Aid who do not vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, who continuously are the record holders of such shares through the effective time of the merger, and who otherwise follow the procedures set forth in Section 262 will be entitled to have their shares appraised by the Delaware Court of Chancery and to receive payment in cash of the "fair value" of the shares of Rite Aid common stock, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with interest to be paid upon the amount determined to be fair value, if any, as determined by the court.
Under Section 262, where a merger agreement is to be submitted for adoption at a meeting of stockholders, the corporation, not less than twenty (20) days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders entitled to appraisal rights that appraisal rights are available and include in the notice a
75
copy of Section 262. This proxy statement constitutes Rite Aid's notice to its stockholders that appraisal rights are available in connection with the merger, and the full text of Section 262 is attached to this proxy statement as Annex C. In connection with the merger, any holder of common stock of Rite Aid who wishes to exercise appraisal rights, or who wishes to preserve such holder's right to do so, should review Annex C carefully. Failure to strictly comply with the requirements of Section 262 in a timely and proper manner will result in the loss of appraisal rights under the DGCL. A stockholder who loses his, her or its appraisal rights will be entitled to receive the per share merger consideration described in the merger agreement. Moreover, because of the complexity of the procedures for exercising the right to seek appraisal of shares of common stock, Rite Aid believes that if a stockholder considers exercising such rights, such stockholder should seek the advice of legal counsel.
Stockholders wishing to exercise the right to seek an appraisal of their shares of Rite Aid common stock must do ALL of the following:
Any holder of shares of common stock of Rite Aid wishing to exercise appraisal rights must deliver to Rite Aid, before the vote on the adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting at which the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will be submitted to the stockholders, a written demand for the appraisal of the stockholder's shares, and that stockholder must not submit a blank proxy or vote in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. A holder of shares of common stock of Rite Aid wishing to exercise appraisal rights must hold of record the shares on the date the written demand for appraisal is made and must continue to hold the shares of record through the effective time of the merger. A proxy that is submitted and does not contain voting instructions will, unless revoked, be voted in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, and it will constitute a waiver of the stockholder's right of appraisal and will nullify any previously delivered written demand for appraisal. Therefore, a stockholder who submits a proxy and who wishes to exercise appraisal rights must submit a proxy containing instructions to vote against the proposal to adopt the merger agreement or abstain from voting on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. Neither voting against the proposal to adopt the merger agreement nor abstaining from voting or failing to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will, in and of itself, constitute a written demand for appraisal satisfying the requirements of Section 262. The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from any proxy or vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement. A proxy or vote against the proposal to adopt the merger agreement will not constitute a demand. A stockholder's failure to make the written demand prior to the taking of the vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement at the special meeting of Rite Aid's stockholders will constitute a waiver of appraisal rights.
76
Only a holder of record of shares of Rite Aid common stock is entitled to demand appraisal rights for the shares registered in that holder's name. A demand for appraisal in respect of shares of common stock of Rite Aid should be executed by or on behalf of the holder of record, and must reasonably inform Rite Aid of the identity of the holder and state that the person intends thereby to demand appraisal of the holder's shares in connection with the merger. If the shares are owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a trustee, guardian or custodian, such demand must be executed by or on behalf of the record owner, and if the shares are owned of record by more than one person, as in a joint tenancy and tenancy in common, the demand should be executed by or on behalf of all joint owners. An authorized agent, including an authorized agent for two or more joint owners, may execute a demand for appraisal on behalf of a holder of record; however, the agent must identify the record owner or owners and expressly disclose that, in executing the demand, the agent is acting as agent for the record owner or owners.
STOCKHOLDERS WHO HOLD THEIR SHARES IN BROKERAGE OR BANK ACCOUNTS OR OTHER NOMINEE FORMS, AND WHO WISH TO EXERCISE APPRAISAL RIGHTS, SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR BROKERS, BANKS AND OTHER NOMINEES, AS APPLICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE PROCEDURES FOR THE BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE HOLDER TO MAKE A DEMAND FOR APPRAISAL OF THOSE SHARES. A PERSON HAVING A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN SHARES HELD OF RECORD IN THE NAME OF ANOTHER PERSON, SUCH AS A BROKER, BANK OR OTHER NOMINEE, MUST ACT PROMPTLY TO CAUSE THE RECORD HOLDER TO FOLLOW PROPERLY AND IN A TIMELY MANNER THE STEPS NECESSARY TO PERFECT APPRAISAL RIGHTS.
All written demands for appraisal pursuant to Section 262 should be mailed or delivered to:
Rite
Aid Corporation
30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011
Attention: Secretary
Any holder of common stock of Rite Aid may withdraw his, her or its demand for appraisal and accept the consideration offered pursuant to the merger agreement by delivering to Rite Aid a written withdrawal of the demand for appraisal within sixty (60) days after the effective date of the merger. However, any such attempt to withdraw the demand made more than sixty (60) days after the effective time of the merger will require written approval of the Surviving Corporation. No appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and such approval may be conditioned upon such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just.
Notice by the Surviving Corporation
If the merger is completed, within ten (10) days after the effective time of the merger, the Surviving Corporation will notify each holder of common stock of Rite Aid who has made a written demand for appraisal pursuant to Section 262, and who has not voted in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, that the merger has become effective and the effective date thereof.
Filing a Petition for Appraisal
Within one-hundred twenty (120) days after the effective time of the merger, but not thereafter, the Surviving Corporation or any holder of common stock of Rite Aid who has complied with Section 262 and is entitled to appraisal rights under Section 262 may commence an appraisal proceeding by filing a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery, with a copy served on the Surviving Corporation in the case of a petition filed by a stockholder, demanding a determination of the fair value of the shares held by all stockholders entitled to appraisal. The Surviving Corporation is under no obligation to and has no present intention to file a petition, and holders should not assume that the
77
Surviving Corporation will file a petition or initiate any negotiations with respect to the fair value of shares of common stock of Rite Aid. Accordingly, any holders of common stock of Rite Aid who desire to have their shares appraised should initiate all necessary action to perfect their appraisal rights in respect of shares of common stock of Rite Aid within the time and in the manner prescribed in Section 262. The failure of a holder of common stock of Rite Aid to file such a petition within the period specified in Section 262 could nullify the stockholder's previous written demand for appraisal.
Within one-hundred twenty (120) days after the effective time of the merger, any holder of common stock of Rite Aid who has complied with the requirements for exercise of appraisal rights will be entitled, upon written request, to receive from the Surviving Corporation a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement and with respect to which Rite Aid has received demands for appraisal, and the aggregate number of holders of such shares. The Surviving Corporation must mail this statement to the requesting stockholder within ten (10) days after receipt of the written request for such a statement or within ten (10) days after the expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal, whichever is later. A beneficial owner of shares held either in a voting trust or by a nominee on behalf of such person may, in such person's own name, file a petition seeking appraisal or request from the Surviving Corporation the foregoing statements. As noted above, however, the demand for appraisal can only be made by a stockholder of record.
If a petition for an appraisal is duly filed by a holder of shares of common stock of Rite Aid and a copy thereof is served upon the Surviving Corporation, the Surviving Corporation will then be obligated within twenty (20) days to file with the Delaware Register in Chancery a duly verified list containing the names and addresses of all stockholders who have demanded payment for their shares and with whom agreements as to the value of their shares have not been reached. After notice to the stockholders as required by the court, the Delaware Court of Chancery is empowered to conduct a hearing on the petition to determine those stockholders who have complied with Section 262 and who have become entitled to appraisal rights thereunder. The Delaware Court of Chancery may require the stockholders who demanded payment for their shares to submit their stock certificates to the Delaware Register in Chancery for notation thereon of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings, and if any stockholder fails to comply with the direction, the Delaware Court of Chancery may dismiss such stockholder from the proceedings.
After determining the holders of common stock of Rite Aid entitled to appraisal, the Delaware Court of Chancery will appraise the "fair value" of the shares of common stock of Rite Aid, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, together with interest, if any, to be paid upon the amount determined to be the fair value. In determining fair value, the Delaware Court of Chancery will take into account all relevant factors. Unless the court in its discretion determines otherwise for good cause shown, interest from the effective date of the merger through the date of payment of the judgment will be compounded quarterly and will accrue at 5% over the Federal Reserve discount rate (including any surcharge) as established from time to time during the period between the effective date of the merger and the date of payment of the judgment. In Weinberger v. UOP, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court discussed the factors that could be considered in determining fair value in an appraisal proceeding, stating that "proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court" should be considered, and that "[f]air price obviously requires consideration of all relevant factors involving the value of a company." The Delaware Supreme Court stated that, in making this determination of fair value, the court must consider market value, asset value, dividends, earnings prospects, the nature of the enterprise and any other facts that could be ascertained as of the date of the merger that throw any light on future prospects of the merged corporation. Section 262 provides
78
that fair value is to be "exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger." In Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court stated that such exclusion is a "narrow exclusion [that] does not encompass known elements of value," but which rather applies only to the speculative elements of value arising from such accomplishment or expectation. In Weinberger, the Delaware Supreme Court also stated that "elements of future value, including the nature of the enterprise, which are known or susceptible of proof as of the date of the merger and not the product of speculation, may be considered."
Stockholders considering seeking appraisal should be aware that the fair value of their shares as so determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery could be more than, the same as or less than the consideration they would receive pursuant to the merger if they did not seek appraisal of their shares and that an opinion of an investment banking firm as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration payable in a merger is not an opinion as to, and does not in any manner address, fair value under Section 262 of the DGCL. Although Rite Aid believes that the per share merger consideration is fair, no representation is made as to the outcome of the appraisal of fair value as determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery, and stockholders should recognize that such an appraisal could result in a determination of a value higher or lower than, or the same as, the per share merger consideration. Neither Rite Aid nor WBA anticipates offering more than the per share merger consideration to any stockholder of Rite Aid exercising appraisal rights, and each of Rite Aid and WBA reserves the right to assert, in any appraisal proceeding, that for purposes of Section 262, the "fair value" of a share of common stock of Rite Aid is less than the per share merger consideration. If a petition for appraisal is not timely filed, then the right to an appraisal will cease. The costs of the appraisal proceedings (which do not include attorneys' fees or the fees and expenses of experts) may be determined by the Delaware Court of Chancery and taxed upon the parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems equitable under the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Delaware Court of Chancery may also order that all or a portion of the expenses incurred by a stockholder in connection with an appraisal, including, without limitation, reasonable attorneys' fees and the fees and expenses of experts, be charged pro rata against the value of all the shares entitled to be appraised.
If any stockholder who demands appraisal of shares of common stock of Rite Aid under Section 262 fails to perfect, or loses or successfully withdraws, such holder's right to appraisal, the stockholder's shares of common stock of Rite Aid will be deemed to have been converted at the effective time of the merger into the right to receive the per share merger consideration applicable to the shares, less applicable withholding taxes. A stockholder will fail to perfect, or effectively lose or withdraw, the holder's right to appraisal if no petition for appraisal is filed within one-hundred twenty (120) days after the effective time of the merger or if the stockholder delivers to the Surviving Corporation a written withdrawal of the holder's demand for appraisal and an acceptance of the per share merger consideration in accordance with Section 262.
From and after the effective time of the merger, no stockholder who has demanded appraisal rights will be entitled to vote the common stock of Rite Aid for any purpose, or to receive payment of dividends or other distributions on the stock, except dividends or other distributions on the holder's shares of common stock of Rite Aid, if any, payable to stockholders of Rite Aid of record as of a time prior to the effective time of the merger; provided, however, that if no petition for an appraisal is filed, or if the stockholder delivers to the Surviving Corporation a written withdrawal of the demand for an appraisal and an acceptance of the merger, either within sixty (60) days after the effective time of the merger or thereafter with the written approval of the corporation, then the right of such stockholder to an appraisal will cease. Once a petition for appraisal is filed with the Delaware Court of Chancery, however, the appraisal proceeding may not be dismissed as to any stockholder of Rite Aid without the approval of the court.
Failure to comply strictly with all of the procedures set forth in Section 262 may result in the loss of a stockholder's statutory appraisal rights. Consequently, any stockholder of Rite Aid wishing to
79
exercise appraisal rights is encouraged to consult legal counsel before attempting to exercise those rights.
The merger will be accounted for as an "acquisition" for financial accounting purposes.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Consequences of the Merger
The following discussion is a summary of the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger that are generally applicable to holders of shares of Rite Aid common stock whose shares are converted into the right to receive Per Share Merger Consideration pursuant to the merger. This discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, which, as amended, we refer to as the Code, Treasury Regulations promulgated under the Code, court decisions, published positions of the Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, and other applicable authorities, all as in effect on the date of this proxy statement and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion is limited to holders who hold their shares of Rite Aid common stock as "capital assets" within the meaning of the Code (generally, property held for investment purposes). This summary does not describe any of the tax consequences arising under the laws of any state, local or foreign tax jurisdiction and does not consider any aspects of U.S. federal tax law other than income taxation (for example, estate, gift or alternative minimum tax or the Medicare net investment income surtax). In addition, this summary does not address the U.S. federal income tax consequences to holders of shares who exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law. For purposes of this discussion, a "holder" means either a U.S. Holder or a Non-U.S. Holder (each as defined below) or both, as the context may require.
This discussion is for general information only and does not address all of the tax consequences that may be relevant to holders in light of their particular circumstances, including:
If a partnership (including an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) is a beneficial owner of shares of Rite Aid common stock, the tax treatment of a partner in such partnership will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Partnerships holding the shares of Rite Aid common stock and partners therein should consult their tax advisors regarding the tax consequences of the merger to them.
80
We have not sought, and do not intend to seek, any ruling from the IRS with respect to the statements made and the conclusions reached in the following summary. No assurance can be given that the IRS will agree with the views expressed in this summary, or that a court will not sustain any challenge by the IRS in the event of litigation.
THIS DISCUSSION OF U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES IS FOR GENERAL INFORMATION PURPOSES ONLY AND IS NOT TAX ADVICE. A HOLDER SHOULD CONSULT ITS TAX ADVISORS CONCERNING THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES RELATING TO THE MERGER IN LIGHT OF ITS PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES AND ANY CONSEQUENCES ARISING UNDER THE LAWS OF ANY STATE, LOCAL OR FOREIGN TAXING JURISDICTION.
For purposes of this discussion, a "U.S. Holder" is a beneficial owner of shares of Rite Aid common stock who or that is for U.S. federal income tax purposes:
The receipt of cash by a U.S. Holder in exchange for shares of Rite Aid common stock pursuant to the merger will be a taxable transaction for U.S. federal income tax purposes. In general, such U.S. Holder's gain or loss will be equal to the difference, if any, between the amount of cash received and the U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis in the shares surrendered pursuant to the merger. A U.S. Holder's adjusted tax basis generally will equal the amount that such U.S. Holder paid for the shares. Such gain or loss generally will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if such U.S. Holder's holding period in such shares is more than one (1) year at the time of the completion of the merger. A reduced tax rate on capital gain generally will apply to long-term capital gain of a non-corporate U.S. Holder. There are limitations on the deductibility of capital losses.
For purposes of this discussion, the term "Non-U.S. Holder" means a beneficial owner of shares of Rite Aid common stock who is neither a U.S. Holder nor an entity or arrangement treated as a partnership or other pass-through entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
Any gain realized by a Non-U.S. Holder pursuant to the merger generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless:
81
Rite Aid and WBA have agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to take, and to assist and cooperate with each other in taking, all actions and to use their reasonable best efforts to do all things reasonably necessary, proper or advisable, to consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, subject to certain specified limitations under the merger agreement. These approvals include approval under the HSR Act. Although we expect that all required regulatory clearances and approvals will be obtained, we cannot assure you that these regulatory clearances and approvals will be timely obtained or obtained at all, or that the granting of these regulatory clearances and approvals will not involve the imposition of additional conditions on the completion of the merger, including the requirement to divest assets, or require changes to the terms of the merger agreement. These conditions or changes could result in the conditions to the closing of the merger not being satisfied.
HSR Act and U.S. Antitrust Matters
Under the merger agreement, the merger cannot be completed until the applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act have expired or been terminated. Rite Aid and WBA filed their respective HSR Act notifications on November 10, 2015, resulting in an initial waiting period ending on December 10, 2015, unless the parties decide that WBA should voluntarily pull and refile WBA's HSR Act notification, which would initiate a new initial thirty (30) calendar day waiting period beginning on the day that WBA refiled its HSR Act notification. If the FTC or the DOJ issues a second request prior to the expiration of the initial waiting period, the parties must observe a second thirty (30) calendar day waiting period or such additional time as the parties may agree, which would begin to run only after both parties have substantially complied with the second request, unless such waiting period is terminated earlier.
Approval (or non-objection, grant of exemption or, in certain circumstances, alternative resolution, as the case may be) will be sought from (i) the state insurance regulator in the State of Ohio for the change of control of Envision Insurance Company, (ii) the Department of Managed Health Care of the State of California with respect to the change of control of Envision Insurance Company as a Knox-Keene licensed health care service plan, (iii) the Board of Pharmacy of the State of California with respect to a change in ownership of Orchard Pharmaceutical Services, LLC, (iv) the Insurance Department of the State of Texas with respect to the change of control of Rite Aid's subsidiary licensed as a third-party administrator in Texas, and (v) the state insurance regulator in the State of Utah with respect to the change of ownership of Rite Aid's subsidiary licensed as a health discount program operator. In addition, a response letter from the Department of Insurance of the State of Missouri will be sought confirming that the merger falls below the threshold requirements for filing a Form E (pre-acquisition notification form regarding the potential competitive impact of a proposed merger) in Missouri. To obtain these approvals, WBA, or the applicable Rite Aid subsidiary, as the case may be, has filed or will file, acquisition of control and material modification or similar statements, notices or applications (or requests for grants of exemption relating thereto), as required by the insurance and health care laws and regulations of each applicable state or jurisdiction. In addition, either prior to or following the completion of the merger, WBA or Rite Aid will be required to make change of control
82
notification filings with various state regulators pursuant to applicable insurance and health care laws and regulations (none of which notification filings are conditions to the completion of the merger).
Legal Proceedings Regarding the Merger
On November 3, 2015, Andrew Smukler, a purported Rite Aid stockholder, filed a Verified Class Action Complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which we refer to as the Smukler Complaint, against John T. Standley, Joseph B. Anderson, Jr., Bruce G. Bodaken, David R. Jessick, Kevin E. Lofton, Myrtle S. Potter, Michael N. Regan, Frank A. Savage, Marcy Syms, whom we refer to as the Individual Defendants, Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub. The Smukler Complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, agreeing to an unfair and inadequate price, agreeing to deal protection devices that preclude other bidders from making successful competing offers for Rite Aid and securing significant personal benefits as a result of the merger. The Smukler Complaint further alleges that Rite Aid, Merger Sub and WBA aided and abetted the Individual Defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duties. The Smukler Complaint seeks to enjoin the closing of the merger as well as an award of money damages and attorneys' and experts' fees.
On November 4, 2015, Archie Wilson III, a purported Rite Aid stockholder, filed a Verified Shareholder Class Action Complaint in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Cumberland County, which we refer to as the Wilson Complaint, against the Individual Defendants, Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub. The Wilson Complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, failing to obtain the highest value available and agreeing to deal protection devices that preclude other bidders from making successful competing offers for Rite Aid. The Wilson Complaint further alleges that Rite Aid, Merger Sub and WBA aided and abetted the Individual Defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The Wilson Complaint seeks to enjoin the closing of the merger as well as an award of money damages and attorneys' and experts' fees.
On November 10, 2015, Brian R. Hirschler, a purported Rite Aid stockholder, filed a Verified Class Action Complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which we refer to as the Hirschler Complaint, against the Individual Defendants, Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub. The Hirschler Complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, agreeing to an unfair and inadequate price, agreeing to deal protection devices that preclude other bidders from making successful competing offers for Rite Aid and failing to protect against certain alleged conflicts of interest in connection with the merger. The Hirschler Complaint further alleges that Rite Aid and WBA aided and abetted the Individual Defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The Hirschler Complaint seeks to enjoin the closing of the merger as well as an award of money damages and attorneys' and experts' fees.
On November 13, 2015, John Orr, a purported Rite Aid stockholder, filed a Verified Class Action Complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which we refer to as the Orr Complaint, against the Individual Defendants, Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub. The Orr Complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, agreeing to an unfair and inadequate price and agreeing to deal protection devices that preclude other bidders from making successful competing offers for Rite Aid. The Orr Complaint further alleges that Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub aided and abetted the Individual Defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The Orr Complaint seeks to enjoin the closing of the merger as well as an award of money damages and attorneys' and experts' fees.
On November 13, 2015, Robert A. Catelli, a purported Rite Aid stockholder, filed a Verified Class Action Complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which we refer to as the Catelli Complaint, against the Individual Defendants, Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub. The Catelli Complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, failing to maximize
83
the value of Rite Aid and agreeing to deal protection devices that preclude other bidders from making successful competing offers for Rite Aid. The Catelli Complaint further alleges that Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub aided and abetted the Individual Defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The Catelli Complaint seeks to enjoin the closing of the merger as well as an award of money damages and attorneys' and experts' fees.
On November 17, 2015, Dean DePietro, a purported Rite Aid stockholder, filed a Verified Class Action Complaint for Breach of Fiduciary Duty in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which we refer to as the DePietro Complaint, against the Individual Defendants, WBA and Merger Sub. The DePietro Complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, agreeing to an unfair and inadequate price and agreeing to deal protection provisions that preclude other bidders from making successful competing offers for Rite Aid. The DePietro Complaint further alleges that WBA and Merger Sub aided and abetted the Individual Defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The DePietro Complaint seeks to enjoin the closing of the merger as well as an award of money damages and attorneys' and experts' fees.
On November 18, 2015, Simon Abadi, a purported Rite Aid stockholder, filed a Verified Class Action Complaint in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which we refer to as the Abadi Complaint, against the Individual Defendants, Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub. The Abadi Complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, agreeing to an unfair and inadequate price, agreeing to deal protection devices that prevent them from obtaining higher offers from other interested buyers for Rite Aid and failing to protect against certain alleged conflicts of interest in connection with the merger. The Abadi Complaint further alleges that Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub aided and abetted the Individual Defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The Abadi Complaint seeks to enjoin the closing of the merger as well as an award of money damages and attorneys' and experts' fees.
On November 19, 2015, Frederick Mortman, a purported Rite Aid stockholder, filed a Verified Class Action Complaint for Breach of Fiduciary Duty in the Delaware Court of Chancery, which we refer to as the Mortman Complaint, against the Individual Defendants, Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub. The Mortman Complaint alleges that the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by, among other things, agreeing to an unfair and inadequate price, agreeing to deal protection devices that preclude other bidders from making successful competing offers for Rite Aid and failing to protect against certain alleged conflicts of interest in connection with the merger. The Mortman Complaint further alleges that Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub aided and abetted the Individual Defendants' alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. The Mortman Complaint seeks to enjoin the closing of the merger as well as an award of money damages and attorneys' and experts' fees.
84
PROPOSAL 1: ADOPTION OF THE MERGER AGREEMENT
The following summary describes certain material provisions of the merger agreement. This summary is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement, which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex A and incorporated into this proxy statement by reference. We encourage you to read the merger agreement carefully in its entirety because this summary may not contain all the information about the merger agreement that is important to you. The rights and obligations of the parties are governed by the express terms of the merger agreement and not by this summary or any other information contained in this proxy statement.
The representations, warranties, covenants and agreements described below and included in the merger agreement were made only for purposes of the merger agreement and as of specific dates, were solely for the benefit of the parties to the merger agreement except as expressly stated therein and may be subject to important qualifications, limitations and supplemental information agreed to by Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub in connection with negotiating the terms of the merger agreement, including certain qualifications, limitations and supplemental information disclosed in the confidential disclosure schedules to the merger agreement. In addition, the representations and warranties were included in the merger agreement for the purpose of allocating contractual risk between Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub rather than to establish matters as facts, and may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to such parties that differ from those applicable to investors. Investors and security holders are not third-party beneficiaries under the merger agreement and should not rely on the representations, warranties, covenants and agreements or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub or any of their respective affiliates or businesses except as expressly stated in the merger agreement. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties may change after the date of the merger agreement. In addition, you should not rely on the covenants in the merger agreement as actual limitations on the respective businesses of Rite Aid, WBA and Merger Sub because the parties to the merger agreement may take certain actions that are either expressly permitted in the confidential disclosure schedules to the merger agreement or as otherwise consented to by the appropriate party, which consent may be given without prior notice to the public. The merger agreement is described below, and attached as Annex A hereto, only to provide you with information regarding its terms and conditions, and not to provide any other factual information regarding Rite Aid or our business. Accordingly, the representations, warranties, covenants and other agreements in the merger agreement should not be read alone, and you should read the information provided elsewhere in this document and in our filings with the SEC regarding Rite Aid and our business. Please see "Where You Can Find More Information" beginning on page 114.
Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of the merger agreement and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the DGCL, at the effective time of the merger, Merger Sub will merge with and into Rite Aid, the separate corporate existence of Merger Sub will cease and Rite Aid will continue as the surviving corporation in the merger, which we sometimes refer to herein as the Surviving Corporation, and as a wholly owned direct subsidiary of WBA. From and after the effective time of the merger, all the properties, rights, privileges, immunities, powers and franchises of Rite Aid and Merger Sub will vest in Rite Aid as the Surviving Corporation and all claims, obligations, debts, liabilities and duties of Rite Aid and Merger Sub will become the claims, obligations, debts, liabilities and duties of Rite Aid as the Surviving Corporation.
Closing and the Effective Time of the Merger
Unless another date is agreed by the parties, the closing for the merger will take place on the third (3rd) business day following the day on which all conditions to closing (described below under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementConditions to the Closing of the Merger" beginning
85
on page 103) (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing) are satisfied or, to the extent permitted by law, waived. Concurrently with the closing, the parties will file a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware as provided under the DGCL. The merger will become effective upon the filing of the certificate of merger, or at such later time as is agreed by Rite Aid and WBA and specified in the certificate of merger.
Directors and Officers; Certificate of Incorporation; Bylaws
The directors of Merger Sub immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will, from and after the effective time of the merger, be the directors of the Surviving Corporation until their successors have been duly elected and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the certificate of incorporation and the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation. The officers of Rite Aid immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will, from and after the effective time of the merger, be the officers of the Surviving Corporation until their successors will have been duly elected or appointed and qualified or until their earlier death, resignation or removal in accordance with the certificate of incorporation and bylaws of the Surviving Corporation.
At the effective time of the merger, the certificate of incorporation of Rite Aid will be amended and restated in its entirety to be in the form of Exhibit A to the merger agreement and, as so amended and restated, such certificate of incorporation will be the certificate of incorporation of the Surviving Corporation until thereafter amended as provided therein or by applicable law. At the effective time of the merger, and without any further action on the part of Rite Aid and Merger Sub, the bylaws of Merger Sub in effect immediately prior to the effective time of the merger will be the bylaws of the Surviving Corporation until thereafter amended as provided therein or by applicable law, except that such bylaws will be amended by WBA as of the effective time of the merger to change the name of the Surviving Corporation as used therein to "Rite Aid Corporation" and to contain such provisions as are necessary to give full effect to the provisions described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementDirectors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance" beginning on page 101.
At the effective time of the merger, each share of Rite Aid common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to such time, other than (i) shares owned, directly or indirectly, by WBA, Rite Aid or Merger Sub (including shares owned by Rite Aid as treasury stock), (ii) shares owned by stockholders who are entitled to and who have exercised and perfected and not withdrawn a demand for appraisal rights pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL and (iii) shares owned by any direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Rite Aid or WBA, will be converted into the right to receive the per share merger consideration. All shares converted into the right to receive the per share merger consideration will automatically be cancelled at the effective time of the merger.
Treatment of Equity and Equity-Based Awards
Cash-out Options. Upon completion of the merger, each cash-out option will be converted into the right to receive, without interest, an amount in cash equal to the product of (x) the total number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such cash-out option and (y) the excess, if any, of $9.00 over the per share exercise price of such cash-out option, less applicable withholding taxes.
Rollover Options. Upon completion of the merger, each rollover option will be converted into an option to acquire, on the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the completion of the merger, a number of shares of WBA common stock equal to the product of (x) the number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such rollover option and (y) the conversion ratio, with any fractional shares rounded down to the next lower whole number of shares after
86
aggregating each individual holder's option with the same exercise price. The exercise price of each converted rollover option will be equitably adjusted to be equal to the quotient (rounded up to the nearest whole cent) of (x) the exercise price per share of Rite Aid common stock subject to such rollover option and (y) the conversion ratio (rounded up to the nearest whole cent).
Rollover Stock Awards. Upon completion of the merger, each rollover stock award will be converted into a WBA restricted share award or a WBA performance stock unit, as applicable, relating to the number of shares of WBA common stock equal to the product of (x) the number of shares of Rite Aid common stock relating to such rollover stock award (which, in the case of performance stock units for which the applicable performance period has not completed, will be the target number of shares) and (y) the conversion ratio, with any fractional shares rounded down to the next lower whole number of shares (with such rounding applied on an aggregate basis to each individual holder), and with each such converted rollover stock award generally subject to the same terms and conditions as were applicable immediately prior to the completion of the merger. With respect to each converted rollover stock award that is a performance stock unit, following the completion of the merger (i) the performance goals or conditions will not apply with respect to a pro-rata portion of such award (with such portion based on the number of days elapsed in the performance period through the completion of the merger), and such portion of the rollover stock award will continue to be subject to service-based vesting on the same schedule as applied prior to the completion of the merger, and (ii) the remaining portion of the performance stock unit will continue to be subject to performance-based vesting (based on the achievement of adjusted performance goals) and service-based vesting on the same schedule as applied prior to the completion of the merger.
Restricted Stock Units. Upon completion of the merger, each restricted stock unit outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the merger will automatically be cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (x) the total number of shares of Rite Aid common stock subject to such restricted stock unit and (y) $9.00, less applicable withholding taxes.
Prior to the closing, WBA will enter into an agreement with a paying agent selected by WBA and reasonably acceptable to Rite Aid, which we refer to as the paying agent, to make payments of the per share merger consideration to stockholders. At or prior to the effective time of the merger, WBA will deposit or cause to be deposited with the paying agent a cash amount sufficient to pay the aggregate per share merger consideration to stockholders.
As soon as reasonably practicable after the effective time of the merger (and in no event more than four (4) business days following the effective time of the merger), WBA will cause the paying agent to mail, or otherwise provide in the case of book-entry shares, to each holder of record of Rite Aid shares (other than excluded shares):
Upon surrender of a certificate (or an affidavit of loss in lieu thereof) to the paying agent in accordance with the terms of such transmittal materials and instructions, the holder of such certificate will be entitled to receive in exchange therefor a cash amount in immediately available funds (after giving effect to any required tax withholdings) equal to the product of (i) the number of Rite Aid shares previously represented by such certificate multiplied by (ii) the per share merger consideration. No interest will be paid or accrued on any amount payable upon due surrender of the certificates.
87
Any holder of book-entry shares will not be required to deliver a certificate or an executed letter of transmittal to the paying agent to receive the aggregate per share merger consideration that such holder is entitled to receive as a result of the merger. Instead, each holder of record of one or more book-entry shares (other than excluded shares) will be entitled to receive, upon receipt by the paying agent of an "agent's message" in customary form, a cash amount in immediately available funds (after giving effect to any required tax withholdings) equal to the product of (i) the number of Rite Aid shares previously represented by such book-entry shares multiplied by (ii) the per share merger consideration. No interest will be paid or accrued on any amount payable upon due surrender of the book-entry shares.
WBA or the Surviving Corporation will pay all charges and expenses, including those of the paying agent, in connection with the foregoing exchange procedures.
Any cash deposited with the paying agent that is not claimed within nine (9) months after the effective time of the merger will be delivered to the Surviving Corporation or its designees, and any holders of Rite Aid common stock who have not complied with the exchange procedures in the merger agreement will thereafter look only to the Surviving Corporation (subject to applicable abandoned property, escheat or similar laws) for payment of the per share merger consideration.
Each of WBA, the Surviving Corporation and the paying agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the consideration payable pursuant to the merger agreement to any holder of Rite Aid shares, cash-out options or restricted stock units such amounts as it is required to deduct and withhold with respect to the making of such payment (and, with respect to the restricted stock units, the vesting of such restricted stock units) under U.S. federal tax law or any other applicable state, local or foreign tax law.
Any Rite Aid shares that are issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger and as to which the holders thereof have properly demanded appraisal in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL and have not effectively withdrawn such demand, which we refer to as dissenting shares, will not be converted into the right to receive the per share merger consideration, unless and until such holder will have effectively withdrawn or lost such holder's right to appraisal under the DGCL, at which time such Rite Aid shares will be treated as if they had been converted into and become exchangeable for the right to receive, as of the effective time of the merger, the per share merger consideration, without interest and after giving effect to any required tax withholdings, and such Rite Aid shares will not be deemed dissenting shares, and such holder thereof will cease to have any other rights with respect to such Rite Aid shares. Each holder of dissenting shares will only be entitled to such consideration as may be due with respect to such dissenting shares pursuant to Section 262 of the DGCL.
Representations and Warranties
The merger agreement contains a number of representations and warranties made by the parties thereto that are subject in some cases to exceptions and qualifications, including "material adverse effect" qualifications. Please see the definition of "material adverse effect" beginning on page 90 of this proxy statement. The representations and warranties of Rite Aid in the merger agreement relate to, among other things:
88
The representations and warranties of WBA and Merger Sub in the merger agreement relate to, among other things:
89
Certain of the representations and warranties made by the parties are qualified as to "knowledge," "materiality" or "material adverse effect." For purposes of the merger agreement, "material adverse effect," means any event, development, circumstance, change, effect, condition, or occurrence that, individually or in the aggregate, with all other events, developments, circumstances, changes, effects, conditions or occurrences, (i) has, or would reasonably be expected to have, a material adverse effect on or with respect to the business, assets, liabilities, results of operations or financial condition of Rite Aid and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, (ii) without limiting clause (i), results in, at closing, a last twelve (12) months Adjusted EBITDA (as such term is defined in the merger agreement) of less than $1.075 billion determined as of the end of the last fiscal month ended prior to closing for which internal financial statements of Rite Aid are available or (iii) prevents, materially delays or materially impairs the ability of Rite Aid to consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. However, in the case of clause (i) or (ii), any event, development, circumstance, change, effect, condition or occurrence to the extent arising out of or resulting from any of the following after the date of the merger agreement will not be deemed, either alone or in combination, to constitute or be taken into account in determining whether there has been, a material adverse effect:
90
budgets, plans, forecasts, guidance, estimates, milestones of its revenues, earnings or other financial performance or results of operations, in and of itself;
The events, developments, circumstances, changes, effects, conditions or occurrences described in sub-sections (A), (B), (D), (E) and (H) above will be taken into account in determining whether a material adverse effect has occurred to the extent (but only to such extent) such events, developments, circumstances, changes, effects, conditions or occurrences are disproportionately adverse to the business, assets, liabilities, results of operations or financial condition of Rite Aid and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, as compared to other participants in the industries in which Rite Aid and its subsidiaries operate. In addition, the changes and failures described in sub-sections (F) and (G) above will not prevent or otherwise affect a determination that any events, developments, circumstances, changes, effects, conditions or occurrences underlying such changes or failures constitute or contribute to a material adverse effect. Furthermore, the exception described in sub-section (C) above does not apply with respect to references to material adverse effect in those portions of the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement relating to the absence of conflicts to the extent the purpose of such representations and warranties is to address the consequences resulting from the execution, delivery and performance of the merger agreement by Rite Aid or the consummation of the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.
None of the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement survive the consummation of the merger.
Conduct of Business Pending the Merger
From the date of the merger agreement until the earlier of the effective time of the merger and the termination of the merger agreement, except (i) as expressly contemplated or permitted by the merger agreement, (ii) as set forth in Rite Aid's confidential disclosure schedules or the merger agreement, (iii) as required by applicable laws or (iv) as consented to by WBA in writing (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), Rite Aid will, and will cause its subsidiaries to, (a) conduct its business in all material respects in the ordinary course, (b) use its commercially reasonable efforts to (x) preserve intact, in all material respects, its business organization, and its assets and properties, in each case, that are material to Rite Aid and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, and (y) maintain in all material respects the benefits of its existing business relationships with its customers, suppliers, distributors, significant partners, and key payors, in each case whose business relationships are material to Rite Aid and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole; and (c) not, subject to certain exceptions:
91
92
As of the date of the merger agreement, Rite Aid agreed to immediately cease all activities, discussions or negotiations with any parties that may have been ongoing prior to the date of the merger agreement with respect to an acquisition proposal (as described below), to request that such parties promptly return or destroy all confidential information relating to Rite Aid or its subsidiaries previously furnished to such persons prior to the date of the merger agreement in connection with the consideration of alternative proposals and to immediately terminate access to data rooms previously granted to such parties.
Under the merger agreement, Rite Aid is generally not permitted to solicit or discuss acquisition proposals with third parties, subject to certain exceptions.
Except as otherwise provided in the merger agreement, Rite Aid may not, and has agreed to cause its subsidiaries and its and its subsidiaries' directors, officers and employees not to, and has agreed to instruct its and its subsidiaries' representatives not to, directly or indirectly:
93
advisors for the purpose of clarifying the material terms of any such acquisition proposal or inquiry, offer or proposal and the likelihood and timing of consummation thereof) concerning, or provide access to its properties, books and records or any confidential or nonpublic information or data to, any person in connection with, relating to or for the purpose of encouraging or facilitating an acquisition proposal or any inquiry, offer or proposal that would reasonably be expected to lead to an acquisition proposal;
Notwithstanding the foregoing, prior to, but not after, obtaining the stockholder approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, Rite Aid is permitted to, in response to the receipt of a bona fide acquisition proposal made after the date of the merger agreement in circumstances not otherwise involving a breach of the merger agreement by Rite Aid and that the Board of Directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its outside legal counsel and financial advisor, that such acquisition proposal constitutes or could reasonably be expected to lead to a superior proposal:
In addition, following the receipt of an acquisition proposal made after the date of the merger agreement in circumstances not otherwise involving a breach of the merger agreement by Rite Aid, Rite Aid may contact the person who had made such acquisition proposal solely for the purpose of clarifying the material terms of any such proposal and the likelihood and timing of consummation thereof.
For purposes of the merger agreement, acquisition proposal means any proposal or offer (including a tender offer or exchange offer) from any person or group of persons (other than WBA or Merger Sub) relating to:
For purposes of the merger agreement, superior proposal means any bona fide written acquisition proposal (with all references to "twenty percent (20%) or more" in the definition of acquisition proposal being deemed to reference "fifty percent (50%) or more") that the Board of Directors in good faith, after consultation with Rite Aid's financial advisors and outside legal counsel, determines
94
would, if consummated, result in a transaction more favorable from a financial point of view to the stockholders of Rite Aid than the merger taking into account all financing (including availability thereof) and regulatory aspects of such acquisition proposal, the likelihood and timing of consummation thereof (as compared to the transactions contemplated hereby), such other matters as the Board of Directors deems relevant and any changes to the terms of the merger agreement proposed by WBA in response to such superior proposal pursuant to, and in accordance with, the merger agreement.
As described under "The Special MeetingBoard of Directors' Recommendation" beginning on page 28 of this proxy statement, and subject to the provisions described below, the Board of Directors has made the recommendation that the holders of Rite Aid shares vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger. The merger agreement provides that the Board of Directors may not effect a change of recommendation except as described below.
The merger agreement provides that prior to, but not after, obtaining the stockholder approval of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement, the Board of Directors may, in response to a bona fide, unsolicited acquisition proposal that was made after the date of the merger agreement in circumstances not otherwise involving a breach of the merger agreement by Rite Aid, effect a change of recommendation if:
Under the merger agreement, any amendment to the financial terms or any other material amendment to the terms and conditions of any superior proposal will be deemed to be a new superior proposal, except if the Board of Directors seeks to make a change of recommendation as provided above, the notice period and the period during which Rite Aid and its representatives are required, if requested by WBA, to negotiate with WBA regarding any revisions to the terms of the merger agreement proposed by WBA in response to such new acquisition proposal will expire on the later of (x) two (2) business days after Rite Aid provides notice of the new superior proposal to WBA and (y) the end of the original four (4) business day period described above.
95
In addition to the foregoing, the Board of Directors is permitted to effect a change of recommendation based on events, developments, circumstances, changes, effects, conditions or occurrences that were not known by the Board of Directors (or if known, the consequences of which were not known or reasonably foreseeable) as of the date of the merger agreement, in each case other than involving or relating to an acquisition proposal, if:
Notwithstanding the right of the Board of Directors to effect a change of recommendation under the merger agreement, Rite Aid is not entitled to terminate the merger agreement in connection therewith based on a change of recommendation alone. If the Board of Directors effects a change of recommendation under the merger agreement, WBA may either (i) terminate the merger agreement and receive the termination fee as more fully described under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementTermination of the Merger AgreementTermination Fees" beginning on page 106 or (ii) continue to require the Rite Aid stockholders be afforded the opportunity to vote on the proposal to adopt the merger agreement.
For the purpose of the merger agreement, the term change of recommendation is defined as the Board of Directors' (i) failure to include in the proxy statement its recommendation that Rite Aid stockholders adopt the merger agreement, (ii) approval, endorsement or recommendation, or public proposal to approve, endorse or recommend, or otherwise declare advisable to the stockholder of Rite Aid, an acquisition proposal, (iii) following the commencement of a tender offer or exchange offer that constitutes an acquisition proposal, failure to publish, send or give to its stockholders, pursuant to the Exchange Act, within ten (10) business days after such tender offer or exchange offer is first published, sent or given, or subsequently amended in any material respect, a statement recommending that stockholders reject such tender offer or exchange offer and affirming its recommendation that Rite Aid stockholders adopt the merger agreement or (iv) formally resolve to effect or publicly announce an intention to effect any of the foregoing, in each case prior to obtaining the approval of the stockholders.
WBA and Rite Aid have each agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, and to assist and cooperate with the other parties to the merger agreement in taking or causing to be taken, all actions and to use their reasonable best efforts to do, or cause to be done, all things reasonably necessary, proper or advisable under the merger agreement and applicable law to consummate and make effective the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement in the most expeditious manner practicable.
To the extent necessary in order to obtain the requisite consents of governmental entities and subject to the limitations described below, WBA has agreed to, and has agreed to cause its subsidiaries to:
96
agree to any sale, lease, licensing, transfer, disposal, divestiture, or other encumbrance of, or hold separate, in each case before or after the effective time of the merger, the assets, licenses, properties, businesses and interests of WBA, Rite Aid and any of their respective subsidiaries; and
Notwithstanding WBA's obligations summarized in the immediately foregoing paragraph:
As between WBA and Rite Aid, WBA may determine in its sole discretion the retail stores of WBA, Rite Aid or any of their respective subsidiaries to be so sold, transferred, disposed of, divested, held separate or subject to any restriction or limitation. WBA is not obligated to agree to any divestiture action not conditioned upon the closing or the satisfaction or (to the extent permitted by applicable law) waiver of all of the conditions to closing (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing) in a case where the closing will occur immediately following consummation of such divestiture action.
Upon WBA's reasonable request, Rite Aid will, and will cause its subsidiaries to, (i) reasonably assist WBA in any sales process with potential purchasers of any of Rite Aid's or its subsidiaries' businesses or other assets proposed by WBA to be subject to any divestiture action and (ii) enter into one or more agreements to be entered into by any of them prior to the closing with respect to any divestiture action. Rite Aid will not, and will not permit any of its representatives to, agree to any divestiture action without the prior written consent of WBA.
In addition, the parties to the merger agreement are required to not, and to not permit any of their respective subsidiaries to, engage in, publicly propose or enter into any transaction that would reasonably be expected to (i) result in any material delay in the obtaining or materially increase the risk of not obtaining any required consent from any governmental entity with respect to the
97
transactions contemplated by the merger agreement or (ii) materially increase the risk of any governmental entity entering a legal restraint prohibiting or materially delaying the consummation of the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, subject to the following exceptions. The parties agreed that nothing in the merger agreement would limit the ability of:
We refer to any such transaction as a WBA permitted transaction. Please see "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementTermination of the Merger AgreementTermination Fees" beginning on page 106 for additional information about the increased termination fee that may become payable under certain circumstances if the merger agreement is terminated and WBA had entered into a WBA permitted transaction.
The parties agreed that Rite Aid will not be deemed to have breached any of its representations or warranties, its conduct of business covenants or the related closing conditions to the extent such breach or failure is the result of, or attributable to, the entry by WBA into a WBA permitted transaction, or any public announcement by WBA of definitive plans to enter into a specific WBA permitted transaction, provided that no such breach or failure will be deemed to have result from such a transaction solely on the basis that, but for the occurrence of that transaction, the closing of the merger agreement would have occurred prior to the date of such breach.
Subject to certain exceptions, in the event that any proceeding is commenced or threatened by a governmental entity or other person challenging the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement under antitrust law, each of WBA and Rite Aid agreed to cooperate in all material respects with each other and will use their respective reasonable best efforts to contest, resist, oppose and resolve any such proceeding and avoid the entry of or have vacated, lifted, reversed or overturned any legal restraint that would reasonably be expected to prevent, make illegal, prohibit, restrain, enjoin, materially delay or materially impair consummation of the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. To the extent necessary to obtain the requisite consents of governmental entities or to take the other actions contemplated by the merger agreement sufficiently in advance of October 27, 2016 to permit the consummation of the merger by October 27, 2016 (taking into account any extension to January 27, 2017), WBA and Rite Aid will commence to take the actions described in this paragraph no later than ten (10) months after the date of the merger agreement.
In addition, WBA and Rite each agreed to:
98
In connection with the reasonable best efforts referenced above, the parties are obligated to, as applicable:
WBA may make all strategic decisions and lead all discussions, negotiations and other proceedings, and coordinate all activities with respect to any requests that may be made by, or any actions, consents, undertakings, approvals, or waivers that may be sought by or from, any governmental entity, including determining the strategy for contesting, litigating or otherwise responding to objections to, or proceedings challenging, the consummation of the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, in each case subject to good faith consultations with Rite Aid reasonably in advance and consideration of Rite Aid's views and subject to the provisions of the merger agreement. Rite Aid will not, and will not permit any of its representatives to, make any offer, acceptance or counter-offer to or otherwise engage in negotiations or discussions with any governmental entity with respect to any proposed settlement, consent decree, commitment or remedy or, in the event of
99
litigation, discovery, admissibility of evidence, timing or scheduling, except as specifically requested by or agreed with WBA.
Employees and Employee Benefits
For the twelve (12) month period following completion of the merger, WBA has agreed to provide, or cause the Surviving Corporation to provide, to the employees of Rite Aid and its subsidiaries who are not represented by a labor organization and who continue to be so employed following the completion of the merger, which we refer to as the continuing non-union employees:
Following the completion of the merger, WBA has agreed to observe, or cause the Surviving Corporation to observe, the terms of all existing collective bargaining agreements that govern the wages, hours and other terms and conditions of employment of employees of Rite Aid or its subsidiaries who are covered by such collective bargaining agreements and who continue to be employed by Rite Aid or the Surviving Corporation or any subsidiary or affiliate thereof, which we refer to as the continuing union employees.
For the twelve (12) month period following the completion of the merger, WBA has agreed to provide severance benefits which are no less favorable than the severance benefits provided to continuing non-union employees under existing Rite Aid plans or any such severance plan that may be adopted by Rite Aid following the date of the merger agreement and in consultation with WBA. Following the completion of the merger, WBA has agreed to cause the Surviving Corporation and its subsidiaries to honor certain of Rite Aid's employee benefit plans and arrangements in accordance with their terms, including the employment agreements with the named executive officers, the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, the Special Executive Retirement Plan, the retention plan that may be adopted by Rite Aid following the completion of the merger, the severance plan that may be adopted following the completion of the merger and Rite Aid's stock plans. WBA and Rite Aid agree that the occurrence of the merger will constitute a change in control for the purposes of all Rite Aid stock plans, employee benefit plans and arrangements and related trusts.
Except to the extent necessary to avoid duplication of benefits, service with Rite Aid and its subsidiaries will be treated as service with WBA and its subsidiaries for the purposes of determining eligibility to participate, vesting, accrual of and entitlement to benefits (except for pension benefits, post-employment or retiree welfare benefits, special or early retirement programs or window separation programs) for continuing non-union employees and continuing union employees, which we refer to collectively as the continuing employees, under benefit plans maintained by WBA and its subsidiaries. If any covered employee becomes eligible to participate in any benefit plan, program, practice, policy, or arrangement of WBA or the Surviving Corporation, which we refer to as a WBA plan, following the effective time of the merger, WBA will or will cause the Surviving Corporation to (i) waive any pre-existing condition exclusions and waiting periods with respect to participation and coverage requirements applicable to any covered employee under any WBA plan to the same extent such limitation would have been waived or satisfied under the corresponding Rite Aid plan; and (ii) use commercially reasonable efforts to provide each covered employee with credit for any deductibles, copayments and out-of-pocket maximums paid prior to the covered employee's coverage under any
100
WBA plan during the calendar year in which such amount was paid, to the same extent such credit was given under a corresponding Rite Aid plan, in satisfying any applicable deductible, copayment or out-of-pocket requirements under the WBA plan.
Directors' and Officers' Indemnification and Insurance
For six (6) years from and after the effective time of the merger, the Surviving Corporation will indemnify and hold harmless each present and former director, officer and employee of Rite Aid or any of its subsidiaries (in each case, when acting or having acted in such capacity), determined as of the effective time of the merger, against any costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees), judgments, fines, losses, claims, damages or liabilities incurred in connection with any proceeding arising out of matters existing or occurring at or prior to the effective time of the merger, to the fullest extent that Rite Aid would have been permitted under applicable law, the organizational documents of Rite Aid or its subsidiaries, as applicable, and any indemnification agreements with any directors, officers and employees of Rite Aid or any of its subsidiaries in effect on the date of the merger agreement to indemnify such person (and the Surviving Corporation will also advance expenses (including reasonable attorneys' fees and expenses) as incurred to the fullest extent permitted under applicable law; provided that the person to whom expenses are advanced provides an undertaking to repay such advances if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to indemnification).
Prior to the effective time of the merger, Rite Aid will be permitted and, if Rite Aid fails to do so, WBA will cause the Surviving Corporation as of the effective time of the merger to, obtain and fully pay for "tail" insurance policies for the extension of the directors' and officers' liability coverage of Rite Aid's existing directors' and officers' insurance policies for a claims reporting or discovery period of at least six (6) years from and after the effective time of the merger, that will be from an insurance carrier with the same or better credit rating as Rite Aid's insurance carrier as of the date of the merger agreement with respect to directors' and officers' liability insurance with benefits and levels of coverage (including terms relating thereto) that are at least as favorable as Rite Aid's existing policies with respect to matters existing or occurring prior to the effective time of the merger (including in connection with the merger agreement, the merger or the transactions contemplated thereby). In no event will Rite Aid expend, or will WBA or the Surviving Corporation be required to expend, for such policies an aggregate premium amount in excess of three hundred percent (300%) of the annual premiums currently paid by Rite Aid for such insurance. If Rite Aid and the Surviving Corporation for any reason fail to obtain such "tail" insurance policies as of the effective time of the merger, (i) the Surviving Corporation will, and WBA will cause the Surviving Corporation to, continue to maintain in effect for a period of at least six (6) years from and after the effective time of the merger the directors and officers insurance in place as of the date of the merger agreement with benefits and levels of coverage (including terms relating thereto) that are at least as favorable as provided in Rite Aid's existing policies as of the date of the merger agreement, or (ii) the Surviving Corporation will, and WBA will cause the Surviving Corporation to, obtain directors and officers insurance for such six (6) year period with benefits and levels of coverage (including terms relating thereto) that are at least as favorable as Rite Aid's existing policies as of the date of the merger agreement. In no event will WBA or the Surviving Corporation be required to expend for such policies an annual premium amount in excess of three hundred percent (300%) of the annual premiums currently paid by Rite Aid for such insurance. If the annual premiums of such insurance coverage exceed such amount, the Surviving Corporation will obtain a policy with the best available coverage for a cost not exceeding such amount. The Surviving Corporation will maintain such policies in full force and effect, and continue to honor the obligations thereunder for a period of not less than six (6) years from and after the effective time of the merger.
101
Please see "The MergerInterests of the Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the MergerInsurance and Indemnification of Directors and Executive Officers" beginning on page 64 for additional information.
Subject to entry into a customary joint defense agreement, Rite Aid will give WBA the opportunity to consult with Rite Aid regarding, and participate in the defense of, any litigation related to the merger agreement, the merger or the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement brought by a stockholder of Rite Aid against Rite Aid or any member of the Board of Directors after the date of the merger agreement and prior to the effective time of the merger and Rite Aid will not settle or agree to settle any such transaction litigation without WBA's prior written consent (such consent not to be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed), subject to certain exceptions not requiring consent.
SEC Reports and Financial Cooperation
The merger agreement contains certain other covenants and agreements, including:
102
Conditions to the Closing of the Merger
The respective obligations of WBA, Merger Sub and Rite Aid to effect the merger are subject to the satisfaction (or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waiver by Rite Aid and WBA) at or prior to the closing of the following conditions:
The obligations of WBA and Merger Sub to effect the merger will be further subject to the satisfaction (or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waiver by WBA) at or prior to the closing of the following conditions:
103
The obligation of Rite Aid to effect the merger will be further subject to the satisfaction (or, to the extent permitted by applicable law, waiver by Rite Aid) at or prior to the closing date of the following conditions:
Termination of the Merger Agreement
The merger agreement may be terminated and the merger may be abandoned at any time prior to the effective time of the merger:
104
in, the failure of the effective time of the merger to occur on or before the end date; provided that either party may extend the end date to January 27, 2017 if on October 27, 2016 all of the conditions set forth in the merger agreement have been satisfied (or, with respect to the conditions that by their terms must be satisfied at the closing, would have been so satisfied if the closing would have occurred) or remain capable of being satisfied except for certain closing conditions relating to the absence of legal restraints imposed by governmental entities and antitrust consents, which we refer to as the End Date Termination Right; or
If the merger agreement is terminated as described above under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementTermination of the Merger AgreementTermination" section beginning on page 104, the merger agreement will be void and have no effect, and there will not be any liability or obligation on the part of any party, except that:
105
For the purpose of the merger agreement, the term willful breach means a material breach of, or a failure to perform any of the covenants or other agreements contained in, the merger agreement, that is a consequence of an act or failure to act by the breaching or non-performing party with actual knowledge, or knowledge that a person acting reasonably under the circumstances should have, that such party's act or failure to act would, or would be reasonably expected to, result in or constitute a breach of a failure of performance under the merger agreement. In addition, the failure, for any reason, of WBA or Merger Sub to consummate the merger and the other transactions contemplated by this merger agreement on that date that the closing is required to occur constitutes a willful breach of the merger agreement.
Under the merger agreement, Rite Aid will be required to pay a termination fee of $325 million (less WBA expenses of up to $45 million, to the extent previously paid by Rite Aid) in connection with a termination of the merger agreement under the following circumstances:
Under the merger agreement, WBA will be required to pay a termination fee of $325 million in the event the merger agreement is terminated by WBA or Rite Aid pursuant to (i) the Legal Restraint Termination Right if the applicable legal restraint giving rise to such termination right is issued under or pursuant to any antitrust law or (ii) the End Date Termination Right, in each case of (i) and (ii), if on the termination date the only conditions to closing that have not been satisfied (other than those conditions that by their nature are to be satisfied at the closing which conditions would be capable of being satisfied at the closing if the closing date were on the termination date) are the Legal Restraints Condition (and the applicable legal restraint causing the Legal Restraints Condition not to be satisfied is issued under or pursuant to any antitrust law) and the condition that the applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act have expired or been earlier terminated.
106
The WBA termination fee will be increased to $650 million if the termination fee is otherwise payable and, between May 28, 2016 and October 27, 2016, a WBA permitted transaction has been consummated or entered into or WBA has announced any plans to enter into any specific WBA permitted transaction.
In no event will Rite Aid or WBA be required to pay the termination fees described above on more than one occasion.
If the merger agreement is terminated pursuant to the Stockholder Vote Termination Right, Rite Aid would be required to reimburse WBA for up to $45 million in documented out-of-pocket expenses incurred by WBA and Merger Sub in connection with or related to the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. The amount of any termination fee payable by Rite Aid to WBA would be reduced by any such expense reimbursement amount paid.
Except for the provisions described above under "Proposal 1: Adoption of the Merger AgreementExpense Reimbursement" beginning on page 107 and as specifically provided in the merger agreement, each party will bear its own expenses in connection with the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby.
The parties may modify, amend or supplement the merger agreement only by written agreement, executed and delivered by duly authorized officers of the respective parties; provided, however, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, that after the Rite Aid stockholder approval has been obtained there will be no amendment of the merger agreement that would require further approval of the stockholders of Rite Aid under applicable law without such approval having first been obtained.
At any time prior to the effective time of the merger, the parties to the merger agreement may:
The merger agreement is governed by the laws of the state of Delaware (without giving effect to choice of law principles thereof).
The parties are entitled to injunctions, specific performance and other equitable relief to prevent breaches or threatened breaches of the merger agreement and to enforce specifically the terms of the merger agreement in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or equity.
107
PROPOSAL 2: ADVISORY VOTE ON MERGER-RELATED EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION ARRANGEMENTS
The Non-Binding Advisory Proposal
Section 14A of the Exchange Act, which was enacted as part of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, requires that we provide our stockholders with the opportunity to vote to approve, on an advisory non-binding basis, the payment of certain compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger, as disclosed in the section of this proxy statement entitled "The MergerInterests of the Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the MergerPayments to Executives upon Termination Following Change-in-Control" beginning on page 66.
We are asking our stockholders to indicate their approval of the compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger. These payments are set forth in the section entitled "The MergerInterests of the Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the MergerGolden Parachutes" beginning on page 70 of this proxy statement and the accompanying footnotes. In general, the various plans and arrangements pursuant to which these compensation payments may be made formed part of Rite Aid's overall compensation program for its named executive officers, and have previously been disclosed to our stockholders as part of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and related sections of our annual proxy statements. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed solely of non-management directors, believes such compensatory arrangements to be reasonable.
The Board of Directors encourages you to review carefully the named executive officer merger-related compensation information disclosed in this proxy statement. The Board of Directors unanimously among those directors that were present (with one director absent due to medical reasons) recommends that you vote "FOR" the following resolution:
"RESOLVED, that the stockholders of Rite Aid, Inc. approve, on a nonbinding, advisory basis, the compensation that will or may become payable to Rite Aid's named executive officers that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger as disclosed pursuant to Item 402(t) of Regulation S-K in the section entitled "The MergerInterests of the Directors and Executive Officers of Rite Aid in the MergerGolden Parachutes" in Rite Aid's proxy statement for the special meeting."
Stockholders should note that this proposal is not a condition to completion of the merger, and as an advisory vote, the result will not be binding on Rite Aid, the Board of Directors or WBA. Further, the underlying plans and arrangements are contractual in nature and not, by their terms, subject to stockholder approval. Accordingly, regardless of the outcome of the advisory vote, if the merger is consummated our named executive officers will be entitled to receive the compensation that is based on or otherwise relates to the merger in accordance with the terms and conditions applicable to those payments.
Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation
Approval of the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Rite Aid common stock represented at the special meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote thereon.
The Board of Directors unanimously among those directors that were present (with one director absent due to medical reasons) recommends that you vote "FOR" the proposal to approve, by a non-binding, advisory vote, compensation that will or may become payable by Rite Aid to its named executive officers in connection with the merger.
108
PROPOSAL 3: ADJOURNMENT OF THE SPECIAL MEETING
We are asking you to approve a proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting. If our stockholders approve the adjournment proposal, we could adjourn the special meeting and any adjourned session of the special meeting and use the additional time to solicit additional proxies, including the solicitation of proxies from stockholders that have previously returned properly executed proxies voting against adoption of the merger agreement. Among other things, approval of the adjournment proposal could mean that, even if we had received proxies representing a sufficient number of votes against adoption of the merger agreement such that the proposal to adopt the merger agreement would be defeated, we could adjourn the special meeting without a vote on the adoption of the merger agreement and seek to convince the holders of those shares to change their votes to votes in favor of adoption of the merger agreement. Additionally, we may seek to adjourn the special meeting if a quorum is not present at the special meeting.
Vote Required and Board of Directors Recommendation
Approval of the proposal to approve one or more adjournments of the special meeting requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Rite Aid common stock represented at the special meeting, either in person or by proxy, and entitled to vote thereon.
The Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of Rite Aid and its stockholders to be able to adjourn the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies in respect of the proposal to adopt the merger agreement if there are insufficient votes to adopt the merger agreement at the time of the special meeting.
The Board of Directors unanimously among those directors that were present (with one director absent due to medical reasons) recommends that you vote "FOR" the proposal to approve one or more adjournments or postponements of the special meeting, if necessary or appropriate, to solicit additional proxies if there are not sufficient votes in favor of approval of the merger agreement.
109
MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND DATA
Rite Aid's common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol "RAD." As of [ · ], 201[ · ], there were [ · ] shares of our common stock outstanding, held by approximately [ · ] stockholders of record.
The following table sets forth, for the indicated periods, the high and low sales prices of Rite Aid's common stock for the periods shown as reported by the NYSE:
|
Common Stock Prices |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High | Low | |||||
FY 2016Quarter Ended |
|||||||
November 28 (through November 19, 2015) |
$ | 8.74 | $ | 5.88 | |||
August 29 |
$ | 9.47 | $ | 6.97 | |||
May 30 |
$ | 9.07 | $ | 7.22 | |||
FY 2015Quarter Ended |
|||||||
February 28 |
$ | 8.48 | $ | 5.31 | |||
November 29 |
$ | 6.69 | $ | 4.42 | |||
August 30 |
$ | 8.615 | $ | 5.87 | |||
May 31 |
$ | 8.45 | $ | 5.83 | |||
FY 2014Quarter Ended |
|||||||
March 1 |
$ | 6.87 | $ | 4.73 | |||
November 30 |
$ | 5.95 | $ | 3.46 | |||
August 31 |
$ | 3.62 | $ | 2.62 | |||
June 1 |
$ | 3.04 | $ | 1.63 |
Under Rite Aid's current dividend policy, we have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and have retained any future earnings to support operations and to finance the growth and development of our business. Under the terms of the merger agreement, from the date of the merger agreement until the earlier of the effective time of the merger or the termination of the merger agreement, we may not declare or pay quarterly cash dividends on our common stock without WBA's written consent.
The closing price of Rite Aid's common stock on the NYSE on October 26, 2015, the last trading day prior to the date on which public announcement of the merger agreement was made, was $6.08 per share. On [ · ], 2015, the latest practicable trading day before the printing of this proxy statement, the closing price of our common stock on the NYSE was $[ · ] per share. You are encouraged to obtain current market quotations for our common stock.
Following the merger, there will be no further market for Rite Aid's common stock and we anticipate that our stock will be delisted from the NYSE and deregistered under the Exchange Act. As a result, following the merger and such deregistration, we would no longer file periodic reports with the SEC.
110
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth, as of November 19, 2015 (except as otherwise noted), certain information concerning the beneficial ownership of (i) each of our directors, (ii) each of our "Named Executive Officers" (as such term is defined in Item 402(a)(3) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act), (iii) each holder known to us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock and (iv) all directors and executive officers as a group (based on 1,046,467,182 shares of common stock outstanding as of November 19, 2015). Each of the persons named below has sole voting power and sole investment power with respect to the shares set forth opposite his or her name, except as otherwise noted.
Beneficial Owners
|
Number of Common Shares Beneficially Owned(1) |
Percentage of Class | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Named Executive Officers and Directors |
|||||
Joseph B. Anderson, Jr |
369,454 |
(2) |
* |
||
Bruce G. Bodaken |
44,838 |
(3) |
* |
||
David R. Jessick |
299,476 |
(4) |
* |
||
Darren W. Karst |
430,239 |
(5) |
* |
||
Kevin E. Lofton |
40,482 |
(6) |
* |
||
Kenneth A. Martindale |
4,745,520 |
(7) |
* |
||
Myrtle S. Potter |
38,596 |
(8) |
* |
||
Michael N. Regan |
419,454 |
(9) |
* |
||
Frank A. Savage |
0 |
* |
|||
John T. Standley |
12,616,168 |
(10) |
1.21% |
||
Marc A. Strassler |
659,280 |
(11) |
* |
||
Marcy Syms |
369,454 |
(12) |
* |
||
Robert K. Thompson |
1,366,197 |
(13) |
* |
||
Frank G. Vitrano |
2,123,923 |
(14) |
* |
||
All directors and executive officers as a group (20 persons) |
26,128,599 |
(15) |
2.50% |
||
5% Stockholders |
|||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. |
63,562,151 |
(16) |
6.07% |
||
T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. |
110,158,352 |
(17) |
10.53% |
111
112
If the merger is completed, we will have no public stockholders and there will be no public participation in any of our future stockholder meetings. We intend to hold the 2016 Annual Meeting of stockholders only if the merger is not completed by that time. Any stockholder who intends to present a proposal at the 2016 Annual Meeting must have sent the proposal to the Secretary of Rite Aid at 30 Hunter Lane, Camp Hill, PA 17011, by the following dates:
113
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
The SEC allows us to "incorporate by reference" information into this proxy statement, which means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to other documents filed separately with the SEC. The information incorporated by reference is deemed to be part of this proxy statement, except for any information superseded by information in this proxy statement or incorporated by reference subsequent to the date of this proxy statement. This proxy statement incorporates by reference the documents set forth below that we have previously filed with the SEC. These documents contain important information about us and our financial condition and are incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
The following Rite Aid filings with the SEC are incorporated by reference:
We also incorporate by reference into this proxy statement additional documents that we may file with the SEC between the date of this proxy statement and the earlier of the date of the special meeting or the termination of the merger agreement. These documents include periodic reports, such as Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as well as Current Reports on Form 8-K and proxy solicitation materials. The information provided on our website is not part of this proxy statement, and therefore is not incorporated by reference herein.
You may read and copy any reports, statements or other information that we file with the SEC at the SEC's public reference room at the following location: Station Place, 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of those documents at prescribed rates by writing to the Public Reference Section of the SEC at that address. Please call the SEC at (800) SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room. These SEC filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and at www.sec.gov. In addition, stockholders may obtain free copies of the documents filed with the SEC by Rite Aid through the Investor Relations section of our website.
You may obtain any of the documents we file with the SEC, without charge, by requesting them in writing or by telephone from us at the following address:
Rite
Aid Corporation
Attn: James J. Comitale
30 Hunter Lane
Camp Hill, PA 17011
(717) 760-7867
If you would like to request documents from us, please do so by [ · ], 201[ · ], to receive them before the special meeting. If you request any documents from us, we will mail them to you by first class mail, or another equally prompt method, within one (1) business day after we receive your
114
request. Please note that all of our documents that we file with the SEC are also promptly available through the Investor Relations section of our website. The information included on our website is not incorporated by reference into this proxy statement.
If you have any questions about this proxy statement, the special meeting or the merger or need assistance with voting procedures, you should contact:
Innisfree M&A Incorporated
501 Madison Avenue, 20th Floor
New York, New York 10022
Toll Free: (877) 717-3929
Banks & Brokers may call collect: (212) 750-5833
115
Rite Aid has supplied all information relating to Rite Aid, and WBA has supplied, and Rite Aid has not independently verified, all of the information relating to WBA and Merger Sub contained under "SummaryParties Involved in the Merger" beginning on page 1, "SummaryFinancing of the Merger" beginning on page 5, "The MergerParties Involved in the Merger" beginning on page 30 and "The MergerFinancing of the Merger" beginning on page 74.
You should not send in your Rite Aid stock certificates until you receive transmittal materials after the merger is completed.
You should rely only on the information contained in this proxy statement, the annexes to this proxy statement and the documents we refer to in this proxy statement to vote on the merger. We have not authorized anyone to provide you with information that is different from what is contained in this proxy statement. This proxy statement is dated [ · ], 2015. You should not assume that the information contained in this proxy statement is accurate as of any date other than that date (or as of an earlier date if so indicated in this proxy statement) and the mailing of this proxy statement to stockholders does not create any implication to the contrary. This proxy statement does not constitute a solicitation of a proxy in any jurisdiction where, or to or from any person to whom, it is unlawful to make a proxy solicitation.
116
AGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER
Among
WALGREENS BOOTS ALLIANCE, INC.,
RITE AID CORPORATION
and
VICTORIA MERGER SUB, INC.
Dated as of October 27, 2015
A-i
A-ii
A-iii
Acceptable Confidentiality Agreement |
A-61 | |
Acquisition Proposal |
A-36 | |
Adjusted EBITDA |
A-61 | |
Adjusted Option |
A-3 | |
Adjusted Stock Award |
A-4 | |
Affiliate |
A-62 | |
Agreement |
Preamble | |
Alternative Acquisition Agreement |
A-34 | |
Antitrust Law |
A-62 | |
Applicable Date |
A-13 | |
Bankruptcy and Equity Exception |
A-11 | |
Book-Entry Share |
A-3 | |
Business Day |
A-62 | |
Bylaws |
A-2 | |
Cancelled Shares |
A-3 | |
Capitalization Date |
A-9 | |
Cash-Out Option |
A-3 | |
Certificate |
A-3 | |
Certificate of Incorporation |
A-9 | |
Certificate of Merger |
A-2 | |
Change in Control |
A-43 | |
Change of Recommendation |
A-38 | |