UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date
of Report (Date of earliest event reported): December 29, 2008
(December 29, 2008)
EMAGEON INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
0-51149
|
|
63-1240138 |
|
|
|
|
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)
|
|
(Commission File Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
|
|
|
|
Identification No.) |
1200 Corporate Drive, Suite 200, Birmingham, Alabama 35242
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(205) 980-9222
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy
the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General
Instruction A.2. below):
o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 1.01 Entry Into a Material Definitive Agreement.
On December 29, 2008, Emageon Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), entered into an
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement Amendment) with Health
Systems Solutions, Inc., a Nevada corporation (Health Systems), and HSS Acquisition Corp., a
Delaware corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of Health Systems (Merger Sub). Under the
terms of the Merger Agreement Amendment, the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Merger
Agreement, dated October 13, 2008, by and among HSS, Merger Sub and the Company (the Merger
Agreement), is scheduled for February 11, 2009. In addition, HSS and Merger Sub irrevocably and
unconditionally waive the closing conditions set forth in Sections 6.2(a), (c) and (d) of the
Merger Agreement, including that the representations and warranties of the Company are true and
correct in all material respects, that there has occurred no Company Material Adverse Effect, as
defined in the Merger Agreement, and that certain third party consents be obtained as described in
the Merger Agreement. HSS and Merger Sub also irrevocably and unconditionally waive the closing
conditions set forth in Section 6.2(b) of the Merger Agreement as to the performance by the Company
of its obligations under the Merger Agreement and the compliance by the Company with its covenants
under the Merger Agreement other than the Companys obligations with respect to the conduct of its
business prior to the Effective Time as set forth in Section 5.1 of the Merger Agreement. Furthermore,
the Merger Agreement Amendment provides that the provisions of Section 5.3 of the Merger Agreement
(Limitations on Solicitation) shall be applicable as if the Requisite Stockholder Vote (as defined
in the Merger Agreement) had not been obtained (for purposes of the
Board of Directors right to exercise their finduciary duties). The
Merger Agreement Amendment also amends the definition of Deposit Escrow Agreement to reflect the
deposit of an additional $4,000,000 by HSS under the Deposit Escrow Agreement, dated as of October
21, 2008, by and among The Bank of New York Mellon, HSS and the Company (the Escrow Agreement).
The foregoing summary of the Merger Agreement Amendment is subject to, and qualified in its
entirety by, the full text of the Merger Agreement Amendment attached hereto as Exhibit 2.1 and
incorporated herein by reference.
Also on December 29, 2008, the Company, The Bank of New York Mellon and HSS entered into an
Amendment No. 1 to Deposit Escrow Agreement (the Escrow Amendment). Pursuant to the terms of the
Escrow Amendment, HSS has agreed to deposit an additional $4,000,000 under the Escrow Agreement,
increasing the aggregate amount deposited under the Escrow Agreement to $9,000,000. Under the
terms of the Escrow Amendment, in the event the closing under the Merger Agreement does not occur
by the close of business on February 11, 2009 for any reason other than as a result of the
termination of the Merger Agreement under certain limited circumstances, the entire amount
deposited under the Escrow Agreement, including interest and investment proceeds, shall be released
to the Company on February 12, 2009. The foregoing summary of the Escrow Amendment is subject to,
and qualified in its entirety by, the full text of the Escrow Amendment attached hereto as
Exhibit 10.1 and incorporated herein by reference.
Item 7.01. Regulation FD Disclosure.
On December 29, 2008, the Company issued a joint press release with HSS announcing that they
had extended the closing date for their pending merger to February 11, 2009. A copy of the press
release is furnished as Exhibit 99.1 hereto.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this Current Report on Form 8-K regard matters that are not
historical facts and are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended, including
statements regarding expectations as to the completion of the merger and other transactions
contemplated by the Merger Agreement and the Merger Agreement Amendment. These statements are
often identified by the use of forward-looking words such as believe, expect, potential,
continue, may, will, should, could, would, intend, plan, estimate, anticipate,
and comparable words or the negative version of these and other words. Because such
forward-looking statements contain risks and uncertainties, actual results may differ materially
from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause
actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to: (1) the occurrence of any
event, change or other circumstance that could give rise to the termination of the Merger Agreement
and the possibility that the Company could be required to pay a $3.0 million termination fee in
connection therewith; (2) the outcome of any legal proceedings that have been or may be instituted
against the Company and others related to the Merger Agreement; (3) the inability to complete the
merger due to the failure to