UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
(Rule
14a-101)
INFORMATION
REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE
14A INFORMATION
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by
the Registrant [X]
Filed by
a Party other than the Registrant [ ]
Check the
appropriate box:
[X] Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
[ ] Confidential,
For Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
|
[ ] Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
[ ] Definitive
Additional Materials
|
[ ] Soliciting
Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12
|
GHL
ACQUISITION CORP.
(Name of
Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of
Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
[ ] No
fee required.
[ ] Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and
0-11.
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is
calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
$8.92
per share of GHQ common stock based on the average of the high and low
prices reported on the NYSE Alternext U.S. on
_____________
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
(5)
|
Total
fee paid:
|
|
|
[X] Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
[ ] Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)
and identify the filing for which theoffsetting fee was paid
previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement
number, or the form or schedule and thedate of its filing.
(1)
|
Amount
previously paid:
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing
Party:
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date
Filed:
|
|
|
GHL
ACQUISITION CORP.
300
Park Avenue, 23rd Floor
New
York, NY 10022
,
2009
Dear
Stockholder:
You are
cordially invited to attend a special meeting of the stockholders of GHL
Acquisition Corp. (“GHQ”) relating to our proposed acquisition of Iridium
Holdings LLC (“Iridium Holdings”). The special meeting will be held
at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on
, 2009, at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel,
301 Park Avenue, New York, NY.
At the
special meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon the following
proposals:
1. to
approve our acquisition of Iridium Holdings (the “acquisition”) pursuant to the
Transaction Agreement dated as of September 22, 2008 among GHQ, Iridium Holdings
and the sellers listed on the signature pages thereof, as amended on April 28,
2009 (the “transaction agreement”), and the related transactions contemplated by
the transaction agreement (the “acquisition proposal”);
2. to
approve an amended and restated certificate of incorporation for GHQ (the
“proposed certificate”), to be effective upon completion of the acquisition (the
“certificate proposal”), to, among other things:
·
|
change
our name to “Iridium Communications
Inc.”;
|
·
|
permit
our continued existence after February 14,
2010;
|
·
|
increase
the number of our authorized shares of common stock;
and
|
·
|
eliminate
the different classes of our board of
directors;
|
3. to
approve the issuance of shares of our common stock in the acquisition and
related transactions that would result in an increase in our outstanding common
stock by more than 20% (the “share issuance proposal”);
4. to
adopt a proposed stock incentive plan, to be effective upon completion of the
acquisition (the “stock incentive plan proposal”); and
5. to
adopt a proposal to authorize the adjournment of the special meeting to a later
date or dates, including, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in favor
of the foregoing proposals if there are not sufficient votes in favor of any of
these proposals (the “adjournment proposal”).
The
approval of the acquisition proposal is conditioned upon the approval of the
certificate proposal, the share issuance proposal and the stock incentive plan
proposal, but not the adjournment proposal. The approval of the
certificate proposal, the share issuance proposal and the stock incentive plan
proposal, but not the adjournment proposal, is conditioned upon the approval of
the acquisition proposal. The adjournment proposal does not require
the approval of any other proposal to be effective.
Our board
of directors has fixed the close of business on
, 2009 as the record date for the
determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special
meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. Record
holders of GHQ warrants do not have voting rights.
Stockholders
holding a majority of our issued and outstanding common stock (whether or not
held by public stockholders) at the close of business on the record date must be
present, in person or by proxy, to constitute a
quorum,
and a quorum is required to approve our proposals. In addition,
approval of the acquisition proposal requires that holders of a majority of the
common stock voted by all holders of common stock issued in our initial public
offering (such holders, the “public stockholders”) must vote, in person or by
proxy, in favor of the acquisition proposal, but the acquisition proposal cannot
be approved if public stockholders owning 30% or more of the common stock issued
in our initial public offering (“IPO”) vote against the acquisition proposal and
properly exercise their conversion rights. In connection with the
vote on the acquisition proposal and the certificate proposal, Greenhill &
Co., Inc. (“Greenhill” or our “founding stockholder”) and GHQ’s directors to
whom founding stockholder’s units were transferred (collectively, our “initial
stockholders”) have agreed to vote their shares in accordance with the majority
of common stock voted by the public stockholders.
Assuming
the acquisition proposal is approved by the requisite vote of our stockholders,
the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of
our common stock is required to approve our certificate proposal, and the
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares of our common stock
that are present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote at the
special meeting is required to approve the share issuance proposal, the stock
incentive plan proposal and the adjournment proposal.
You have
the right, subject to the limitation described in the next sentence, to convert
any shares that you own that were sold in our IPO into cash if you vote against
the acquisition proposal and the acquisition proposal is approved and the
acquisition is completed. To the extent you, together with any of
your affiliates or any other person with whom you are acting in concert or as a
partnership, syndicate or other group for the purpose of acquiring, holding or
disposing of your GHQ securities, own collectively more than 10% of the shares
that were sold in our IPO, you and they will be limited to seeking conversion
rights for only up to 10% of the IPO shares. If you properly exercise
your conversion rights, you will be entitled to receive a conversion price per
share equal to the aggregate amount then on deposit in our trust account (before
payment of deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and including
interest earned on their pro rata portion of our trust account, net of income
taxes payable on such interest, net of franchise taxes and net of interest
income of up to $5.0 million, subject to certain adjustments, on the trust
account balance previously released to us to fund our working capital
requirements), calculated as of two business days prior to the proposed
completion of the acquisition, divided by the number of shares sold in our
IPO. As of March 31, 2009, the per-share conversion price would have
been approximately $10.01 without taking into account any interest or expenses
accrued after such date.
You may
request conversion of your shares at any time after the mailing of this proxy
statement by following the procedures described in this proxy statement, but the
request will not be granted unless you vote against the acquisition proposal and
the acquisition proposal is approved and the acquisition is
completed. Voting against the acquisition proposal alone will not
result in the conversion of your shares into a pro rata share of the trust
account; to convert your shares, you must also follow the specific procedures
for conversion set forth in this proxy statement. See “The Special
Meeting –– Conversion Rights” on page 111. Prior to exercising your
conversion rights, you should verify the market price of GHQ’s common stock, as
you may receive higher proceeds from the sale of your common stock in the public
market than from exercising your conversion rights if the market price per share
is higher than the conversion price.
GHQ
units, common shares and warrants are listed and traded on the NYSE Alternext US
LLC (“NYSE Alternext U.S.”) under the trading symbol GHQ.U, GHQ and GHQ.WS,
respectively. On May 28, 2009, the closing price of GHQ units, common
stock and warrants were, respectively, $10.45, $9.73 and $0.70.
AFTER
CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ALL OF THE PROPOSALS, OUR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED ALL OF THE PROPOSALS AND UNANIMOUSLY
RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” EACH OF THE PROPOSALS.
YOUR
VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT. WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE SPECIAL
MEETING, PLEASE PROMPTLY VOTE YOUR SHARES AND SUBMIT YOUR PROXY BY COMPLETING,
SIGNING, DATING AND RETURNING YOUR PROXY FORM IN THE ENCLOSED
ENVELOPE. IF YOU RETURN A PROXY WITH YOUR SIGNATURE BUT WITHOUT AN
INDICATION OF HOW YOU WISH TO VOTE ON ANY PROPOSAL, YOUR PROXY WILL BE VOTED
“FOR” EACH SUCH PROPOSAL. EVEN IF YOU RETURN THE PROXY, YOU MAY
ATTEND THE SPECIAL MEETING AND VOTE YOUR SHARES IN PERSON.
The
accompanying proxy statement contains detailed information regarding the
acquisition and related transactions, including each of our
proposals. The proxy statement also provides detailed information
about Iridium Holdings because, upon completion of the acquisition, Iridium
Holdings will become a subsidiary of GHQ.
WE
ENCOURAGE YOU TO READ THIS ENTIRE PROXY STATEMENT CAREFULLY, INCLUDING THE
SECTION DISCUSSING “RISK FACTORS,” FOR A DISCUSSION OF VARIOUS FACTORS THAT YOU
SHOULD CONSIDER IN CONNECTION WITH OUR PROPOSED ACQUISITION.
Sincerely,
Scott L.
Bok
Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer
NEITHER
THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION NOR ANY STATE SECURITIES REGULATORY
AGENCY HAS APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE TRANSACTIONS DESCRIBED IN THIS PROXY
STATEMENT OR ANY OF THE SECURITIES TO BE ISSUED IN THE ACQUISITION, PASSED UPON
THE MERITS OR FAIRNESS OF THE ACQUISITION OR RELATED TRANSACTIONS OR PASSED UPON
THE ADEQUACY OR ACCURACY OF THE DISCLOSURE IN THIS PROXY
STATEMENT. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY CONSTITUTES A CRIMINAL
OFFENSE.
This
proxy statement is dated , 2009 and is
first being mailed to GHQ stockholders on or about
, 2009.
GHL
ACQUISITION CORP.
300
Park Avenue, 23rd
Floor
New
York, NY 10022
__________________________________________________________
NOTICE
OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
TO
BE HELD ON
, 2009
___________________________________________________________
To the
Stockholders of GHL Acquisition Corp.:
You are
cordially invited to attend a special meeting of the stockholders of GHL
Acquisition Corp. (“GHQ”) relating to our proposed acquisition of Iridium
Holdings LLC (“Iridium Holdings”). The special meeting will be held
at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on
, 2009, at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel,
301 Park Avenue, New York, NY.
At the
special meeting, you will be asked to consider and vote upon the following
proposals:
1. to
approve our acquisition of Iridium Holdings (the “acquisition”) pursuant to the
Transaction Agreement dated as of September 22, 2008 among GHQ, Iridium Holdings
and the sellers listed on the signature pages thereof, as amended on April 28,
2009 (the “transaction agreement”), and the related transactions contemplated by
the transaction agreement (the “acquisition proposal”);
2. to
approve an amended and restated certificate of incorporation for GHQ (the
“proposed certificate”), to be effective upon completion of the acquisition (the
“certificate proposal”), to, among other things:
·
|
change
our name to “Iridium Communications
Inc.”;
|
·
|
permit
our continued existence after February 14,
2010;
|
·
|
increase
the number of our authorized shares of common stock;
and
|
·
|
eliminate
the different classes of our board of
directors;
|
3. to
approve the issuance of shares of our common stock in the acquisition and
related transactions that would result in an increase in our outstanding common
stock by more than 20% (the “share issuance proposal”);
4. to
adopt a proposed stock incentive plan, to be effective upon completion of the
acquisition (the “stock incentive plan proposal”); and
5. to
adopt a proposal to authorize the adjournment of the special meeting to a later
date or dates, including, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in favor
of the foregoing proposals if there are not sufficient votes in favor of any of
these proposals (the “adjournment proposal”).
The
approval of the acquisition proposal is conditioned upon the approval of the
certificate proposal, the share issuance proposal and the stock incentive plan
proposal, but not the adjournment proposal. The approval of the
certificate proposal, the share issuance proposal and the stock incentive plan
proposal, but not the adjournment proposal, is conditioned upon the approval of
the acquisition proposal. The adjournment proposal does not require
the approval of any other proposal to be effective.
Our board
of directors has fixed the close of business on
, 2009 as the record date for the
determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special
meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. Record
holders of GHQ warrants do not have voting rights.
Your vote
is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the special meeting,
please complete, sign, date and return your proxy card as soon as possible to
ensure that your shares are represented at the special meeting or, if
you are a
stockholder of record of our common stock on the record date, you may cast your
vote in person at the special meeting. If your shares are held in an
account at a brokerage firm or bank, you must instruct your broker or bank on
how to vote your shares. If you do not vote or do not instruct your
broker or bank how to vote, it will have the same effect as voting against the
acquisition proposal and the certificate proposal.
Any proxy
may be revoked at any time prior to its exercise by delivery of a later dated
proxy, by notifying in writing
before the special meeting, or by voting in person at the special
meeting. By authorizing your proxy promptly, you can help us avoid
the expense of further proxy solicitations.
Your
attention is directed to the proxy statement accompanying this notice (including
the annexes thereto) for a more complete description of the proposed acquisition
and related transactions and each of our proposals. We encourage you
to read this proxy statement carefully. If you have any questions or
need assistance voting your shares, please call our proxy solicitor, MacKenzie
Partners, Inc. at (800) 322-2885 or by email at
proxy@mackenziepartners.com.
By Order
of the Board of Directors,
Jodi B.
Ganz
Secretary
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|
|
SUMMARY TERM
SHEET
|
1
|
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE
ACQUISITION
|
4
|
WHO CAN HELP ANSWER YOUR
QUESTIONS
|
10
|
SUMMARY OF PROXY
STATEMENT
|
11
|
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
OF GHQ
|
22
|
SELECTED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA
OF IRIDIUM HOLDINGS
|
23
|
SELECTED UNAUDITED PRO FORMA
CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
|
26
|
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT CONCERNING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
|
35
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
36
|
PROPOSAL I – APPROVAL OF THE
ACQUISITION
|
59
|
General
|
59
|
Background of the
Acquisition
|
59
|
Factors Considered by the Iridium
Holdings Board in Approving the Acquisition
|
66
|
Factors Considered by the GHQ
Board in Approving the Acquisition
|
66
|
GHQ Senior Management Team and
Board of Directors
|
72
|
Recommendation of the GHQ Board;
Additional Considerations of the GHQ Board
|
72
|
Accounting
Treatment
|
74
|
Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
for Holders Exercising Conversion Rights
|
74
|
Regulatory
Matters
|
76
|
No Appraisal or Dissenters’
Rights
|
77
|
Consequences if Acquisition
Proposal Is Not Approved
|
77
|
Necessity of Stockholder
Approval
|
78
|
Required
Vote
|
78
|
Recommendation of GHQ’s Board of
Directors
|
78
|
Federal Securities Laws
Consequences
|
78
|
Stock Transfer
Restrictions
|
78
|
PROPOSAL II – APPROVAL OF THE
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
|
80
|
Necessity of Stockholder
Approval
|
81
|
Required
Vote
|
81
|
Recommendation
|
81
|
PROPOSAL III – APPROVAL OF THE
SHARE ISSUANCE PROPOSAL
|
82
|
Share Issuance
Proposal
|
82
|
Necessity of Stockholder
Approval
|
82
|
Required
Vote
|
82
|
Recommendation
|
82
|
PROPOSAL IV – ADOPTION OF THE
STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
|
83
|
Summary of the Iridium
Communications Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan
|
83
|
U.S. Federal Income Tax
Consequences
|
86
|
New Plan
Benefits
|
87
|
Necessity of Stockholder
Approval
|
87
|
Required
Vote
|
87
|
Recommendation
|
88
|
PROPOSAL V – ADOPTION OF THE
ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL
|
89
|
Adjournment
Proposal
|
89
|
Required
Vote
|
89
|
Recommendation
|
89
|
MARKET PRICE OF GHQ COMMON
STOCK
|
90
|
INTERESTS OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN
THE ACQUISITION
|
91
|
THE TRANSACTION
AGREEMENT
|
92
|
OTHER TRANSACTION
AGREEMENTS
|
106
|
Note Purchase
Agreement
|
106
|
Registration Rights
Agreement
|
106
|
Pledge
Agreements
|
107
|
Letter
Agreements
|
107
|
THE SPECIAL
MEETING
|
108
|
General
|
108
|
Date, Time and
Place
|
108
|
Purpose of the Special
Meeting
|
108
|
Recommendation of the GHQ
Board
|
108
|
Record Date; Who Is Entitled to
Vote
|
109
|
Quorum
|
109
|
Voting Your
Shares
|
109
|
Who Can Answer Your Questions
About Voting Your Shares
|
109
|
No Additional Matters May Be
Presented at the Special Meeting
|
109
|
Revoking Your
Proxy
|
110
|
Vote Required of GHQ’s
Stockholders
|
110
|
Abstentions and Broker
Non-Votes
|
110
|
Conversion
Rights
|
111
|
Solicitation
Costs
|
112
|
Stock Ownership of Directors and
Executive Officers
|
112
|
Other Business;
Adjournments
|
112
|
Householding
|
113
|
INFORMATION ABOUT
GHQ
|
114
|
GHQ MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
116
|
INFORMATION ABOUT IRIDIUM
HOLDINGS
|
120
|
IRIDIUM HOLDINGS MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
141
|
BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF
SECURITIES
|
165
|
DESCRIPTION OF GHQ’S SECURITIES
FOLLOWING THE ACQUISITION
|
168
|
MANAGEMENT FOLLOWING THE
ACQUISITION
|
171
|
GHQ COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND
ANALYSIS
|
175
|
IRIDIUM HOLDINGS COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
|
177
|
IRIDIUM HOLDINGS EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
182
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
189
|
TRANSFER AGENT AND
REGISTRAR
|
192
|
SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
|
192
|
APPRAISAL
RIGHTS
|
192
|
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
|
192
|
FUTURE STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS
|
192
|
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE
INFORMATION
|
193
|
|
|
INDEX
TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
F-1
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
F-2
|
LIST OF
ANNEXES
Annex
A
|
Transaction
Agreement and Amendment to Transaction
Agreement
|
|
Annex
B
|
Amended
and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation
|
Annex
D
|
Registration
Rights Agreement
|
|
Annex
E
|
Iridium
Communications Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive
Plan
|
SUMMARY
TERM SHEET
This
Summary Term Sheet, together with the sections entitled “Questions and Answers
About the Acquisition” and “Summary of Proxy Statement,” summarize certain
information contained in this proxy statement, but do not contain all of the
information that is important to you. You should carefully read this
entire proxy statement, including the attached Annexes and the documents to
which we refer you, for a more complete understanding of the matters to be
considered at the special meeting of stockholders. In this proxy statement, the
terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “GHQ” refer to GHL Acquisition Corp., the term
“Iridium Holdings” refers to Iridium Holdings LLC and the term “transaction
agreement” refers to the Transaction Agreement dated as of September 22, 2008
among GHQ, Iridium Holdings and the sellers named therein (“Sellers” or
“sellers”), as amended on April 28, 2009.
·
|
GHQ
is a special purpose acquisition company formed for the purpose of
acquiring one or more businesses or assets. For more
information about GHQ, see the section entitled “Information About GHQ”
and “GHQ Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” beginning on pages 114 and 116,
respectively.
|
·
|
Iridium
Holdings, through its subsidiaries, is a provider of mobile voice and data
communications services via satellite. For more information
about Iridium Holdings, see the sections entitled “Information About
Iridium Holdings,” and “Iridium Holdings Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” beginning on
pages 120 and 141, respectively.
|
·
|
Pursuant
to a transaction agreement signed on September 22, 2008 by approximately
99.5% of the equityholders of Iridium Holdings (“original agreement”) as
amended on April 28, 2009 by GHQ, Iridium Holdings and the sellers’
committee of the Sellers (“amendment”, and together with the original
agreement, the “transaction agreement”), GHQ proposes to acquire Iridium
Holdings from such equityholders on the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth therein. For more information about the
acquisition, see the sections entitled “Proposal I—Approval of the
Acquisition” beginning on page 59, “The Transaction Agreement” beginning
on page 92 and the original agreement and amendment that are attached as
Annex A to this proxy statement.
|
·
|
Under
the terms of the transaction agreement, GHQ agreed to pay for the purchase
of 100% of Iridium Holdings’ equity, $77.1 million in cash, subject to
certain adjustments, issue to the sellers 29,443,500 shares of GHQ common
stock (valued at $271.8 million based on a price per share of $9.23 on
September 22, 2008, the last trading day before the acquisition was
announced and at $286.5 million based on a price per share of $9.73 on May
28, 2009 on the NYSE Alternext U.S.) and assume approximately $145.8
million net debt of Iridium Holdings. In addition, 90 days
following the closing of the acquisition, if Iridium Holdings has in
effect a valid election under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the “Code”) with respect to the taxable year in which
the closing of the acquisition occurs, GHQ will make a tax benefit payment
of up to $25.5 million in aggregate to sellers (other than the sellers of
the equity of Baralonco and Syncom) to compensate them for the tax basis
step-up. For more information about the transaction agreement
and the other transaction agreements, see the sections entitled “The
Transaction Agreement” and “Other Transaction Agreements” beginning on
page 92 and 106 respectively.
|
·
|
Following
the acquisition, the current stockholders of GHQ are expected to own
approximately 60.0% of the outstanding shares of common stock of
GHQ. The current owners of Iridium Holdings are expected to own
approximately 37.5% of the outstanding common stock of GHQ and Greenhill
& Co. Europe Holdings Limited (“Greenhill Europe”) is expected to own
approximately 2.5% as a result of a $22.9 million convertible subordinated
promissory note of Iridium Holdings (the “note”) convertible into
1,946,500 shares of common stock of GHQ. The single-largest
stockholder of GHQ, following the acquisition, is expected to be Baralonco
Limited with approximately 13.6% ownership and the second-largest
stockholder of GHQ is expected to be Greenhill with approximately 11.3%
ownership, including Greenhill Europe’s approximately 2.5%
ownership. These ownership percentages are calculated on an
outstanding basis and assume that (i) no holders of shares of our common
stock issued in our IPO (“IPO shares”) vote against the acquisition
proposal and properly exercise their rights to convert their shares into
cash, (ii) no holders of warrants exercise their rights to acquire GHQ
shares, and (iii) the conversion of the note by Greenhill Europe into
1,946,500 shares of common stock, in accordance with its
terms. Assuming the maximum number of GHQ stockholders holding
IPO shares (30% minus one share) vote against the
acquisition
|
proposal
and properly exercise their rights to convert their shares into cash, the
current stockholders of GHQ are expected to own approximately 52.8% of the
outstanding shares of common stock of GHQ, the current owners of Iridium
Holdings are expected to own approximately 44.3% of the outstanding common stock
of GHQ and Greenhill Europe is expected to own approximately 2.9% of the
outstanding common stock of GHQ. For more information, see section
entitled “Proposal I – Approval of the Acquisition” beginning on page
59.
·
|
GHQ’s
management and board of directors considered various factors in
determining whether to acquire Iridium Holdings and to approve the
transaction agreement, including the fact that Iridium Holdings has a fair
market value equal to at least 80% of the balance in GHQ's trust account
(excluding deferred underwriting discounts and
commissions). For more information about our decision-making
process, see the section entitled “Proposal I—Approval of the
Acquisition—Factors Considered by the GHQ Board in Approving the
Acquisition” beginning on page 66.
|
·
|
Each
holder of IPO shares has a right to convert its IPO shares into cash if
such holder votes against the acquisition proposal, the acquisition is
completed and the holder properly exercises its conversion rights as
described below. Such IPO shares would then be converted into cash at a
per-share conversion price on the closing date of the
acquisition. To exercise conversion rights, a holder of IPO
shares, whether being a record holder or holding the IPO shares in “street
name,” must tender its IPO shares to our transfer agent, American Stock
Transfer & Trust Company, and deliver written instructions to our
transfer agent: (i) stating that the holder wishes to convert the IPO
shares into a pro rata share of the trust account and (ii) confirming that
the holder has held the IPO shares since the record date and will continue
to hold them through the special meeting and the completion of the
acquisition.
|
·
|
In
addition to voting on the acquisition proposal at the special meeting, the
stockholders of GHQ will vote on proposals to approve a second amended and
restated certificate of incorporation for GHQ, a share issuance proposal,
a stock incentive plan proposal and a proposal to adjourn the special
meeting, if necessary to permit further solicitation of proxies in the
event that there are insufficient votes for, or otherwise in connection
with, the approval of the acquisition proposal and the transactions
contemplated thereby. See the sections entitled “Proposal
II—Approval of the Amended and Restarted Certificate of Incorporation,”
“Proposal III—Approval of the Share Issuance Proposal,” “Proposal IV—
Adoption of the Stock Incentive Plan,” “Proposal V—Adoption of the
Adjournment Proposal” and the “The Special Meeting” on pages 80, 82, 83,
89 and 108, respectively.
|
·
|
Upon
the closing of the acquisition, our board of directors will be expanded to
ten directors and six new individuals will be appointed to our board of
directors. All of our existing board members, with the exception of Kevin
P. Clarke, will remain members of our board of directors. See
the sections entitled “Proposal I—Approval of the Acquisition” and
“Management Following the Acquisition” on pages 59 and 171,
respectively.
|
·
|
The
closing of the acquisition is subject to a number of conditions set forth
in the transaction agreement. For more information about the
closing conditions to the acquisition, see the section entitled “The
Transaction Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Acquisition”
beginning on page 101.
|
·
|
Our
acquisition of Iridium Holdings involves numerous risks. For
more information about these risks, see the section entitled “Risk
Factors” beginning on page 36.
|
·
|
In
considering the recommendation of GHQ’s board of directors to vote for our
proposals, you should be aware that our executive officers and members of
our board of directors have interests in the acquisition that are
different from, or in addition to, the interests of GHQ’s stockholders
generally. The members of our board of directors were aware of these
differing interests and considered them, among other matters, in
evaluating and negotiating the transaction agreement and in recommending
to our stockholders that they vote in favor of the acquisition proposal
and other proposals. These interests include, among other
things:
|
·
|
Our
directors, Messrs. Bok, Niehaus, Rush, Canfield and Clarke, and our
founding stockholder own 200,000, 200,000, 43,479, 43,479, 43,479 and
8,369,563 units of GHQ, respectively. Each of Messrs. Rush, Canfield and
Clarke purchased his units prior to our IPO for an aggregate price of
$128.00 and had an aggregate market value of approximately $423,051, based
upon the last sale price of $9.73 on
|
the NYSE
Alternext U.S. on May 28, 2009. If our proposals are not approved and
GHQ is unable to complete another business combination by February 14, 2010, GHQ
will be required to liquidate. In such event, the 8.5 million units held by
Messrs. Rush, Canfield and Clark and our founding stockholder will be worthless
because Messrs. Rush, Canfield and Clarke and our founding stockholder have
agreed that they will not receive any liquidation proceeds with respect to such
shares. Accordingly, Messrs. Rush, Canfield and Clarke and our founding
stockholder have a financial interest in the completion of the
acquisition. The 400,000 shares purchased by Messrs. Bok and Niehaus
in the IPO would receive liquidation proceeds. Messrs. Bok and
Niehaus each purchased 200,000 units in the IPO.
·
|
In
addition to the shares of GHQ common stock, our founding stockholder
purchased for $8.0 million warrants to purchase up to 8.0 million shares
of GHQ common stock at $1.00 per share. These warrants have an
exercise price of $7.00 per share. If GHQ is unable to complete
a business combination by February 14, 2010 and liquidates its assets,
there will be no distribution with respect to these warrants, and the
warrants will expire worthless.
|
·
|
Two
of our directors, Messrs. Bok and Niehaus purchased units in our
IPO. In addition, Messrs. Bok and Niehaus own shares in our
founding stockholder that give them indirect ownership interests in GHQ.
Because of their indirect ownership interests, each of Messrs. Bok and
Niehaus has financial interests in the completion of the acquisition in
addition to their interests as holders of our
units.
|
·
|
If
the acquisition is completed, certain of our current directors will
continue as directors of GHQ. These non-executive directors will be
entitled to receive any cash fees, stock options, stock awards or other
compensation arrangements that our board of directors determines to
provide to our non-executive
directors.
|
QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE ACQUISITION
Q: Why
am I receiving this proxy statement?
A: GHQ
has agreed to acquire Iridium Holdings under the terms of the transaction
agreement that is described in this proxy statement. A copy of the
original agreement and the amendment are attached to this proxy statement as
Annex A, which GHQ and Iridium Holdings encourage you to read.
You are
receiving this proxy statement because we are soliciting your vote to approve
the acquisition and related matters at a special meeting of our
stockholders. This proxy statement contains important information
about the acquisition and related matters. You should read it
carefully.
Your vote
is important. We encourage you to vote as soon as possible after
carefully reviewing this proxy statement.
Q: When
and where is the stockholder meeting?
A: GHQ’s
special meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on
, 2009 at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel,
301 Park Avenue, New York, NY.
Q: Why
is GHQ proposing the acquisition?
A: GHQ
is a blank check company formed for the purpose of effecting an acquisition,
through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase,
reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more businesses
or assets.
GHQ
completed its IPO on February 21, 2008, generating net proceeds of approximately
$400 million. As of March 31, 2009 the balance in the trust account
was approximately $401.9 million. GHQ holds these funds in the trust
account pending completion of the acquisition of Iridium Holdings and the
payment of the deferred underwriting commissions and discounts.
GHQ is
now proposing to acquire Iridium Holdings pursuant to the transaction
agreement. If the acquisition proposal and related proposals are
approved by our stockholders and the other conditions to completion of the
acquisition are satisfied, GHQ will acquire substantially all the units of
Iridium Holdings. Upon the closing of the acquisition, Iridium
Holdings will become a subsidiary of GHQ, and GHQ will be renamed “Iridium
Communications Inc.” and will apply for listing on the New York Stock Exchange
(“NYSE”).
Iridium
Holdings is a leading provider of mobile voice and data communications services
via satellite, and the only provider in the world offering 100% global
coverage. Based upon publicly available information and information
provided by TMF Associates, Iridium Holdings is the second largest provider of
mobile satellite services and related equipment with an estimated 25% market
share of the principal industry players in 2008, based on
revenue. Iridium Holdings’ mobile satellite services address the
increasing demand from customers for connectivity and reliability in all
locations. Iridium Holdings offers voice and data communications
services to U.S. and international government agencies, businesses and other
customers on a global basis using 66 in-orbit constellation satellites, seven
in-orbit spares and related ground infrastructure, including a primary
commercial gateway. The U.S. government, which owns and operates a
dedicated gateway, is Iridium Holdings’ largest customer, representing 21.1% and
24.4% of Iridium Holdings’ revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the
three months ended March 31, 2009, respectively.
As part
of the acquisition, we would acquire two entities, Syncom-Iridium Holdings Corp.
(“Syncom”) and Baralonco N.V. (“Baralonco”), which are holders of a significant
number of Iridium Holdings units. We will execute a pledge agreement
with the sellers of the equity of each entity in connection with the closing of
the acquisition under which the sellers of the equity of each entity would
pledge certain of the shares of GHQ common stock they receive in the transaction
to cover certain of their indemnification obligations under the transaction
agreement. The sellers of the equity of Syncom would pledge 300,000
GHQ shares and the sellers of the equity of Baralonco would pledge 1.5 million
GHQ shares received in the transaction.
If the
acquisition and related transactions are approved by our stockholders, the
warrants issued in our IPO will become exercisable in accordance with their
terms since such warrants become exercisable at any time commencing on the
completion of our initial business combination.
If the
acquisition and related transactions are not approved, and GHQ is unable to
complete another business combination by February 14, 2010, GHQ will be required
to liquidate.
Q: What
will the owners of Iridium Holdings receive in the proposed
transactions?
A: Upon
completion of the acquisition, the owners of Iridium Holdings are expected to
receive an aggregate of approximately 29.3 million shares of GHQ common stock
and $76.7 million of cash, subject to certain adjustments (based on a
consideration of 29,443,500 shares of common stock of GHQ and $77.1 million of
cash, subject to certain adjustments, for 100% of the equity of Iridium
Holdings). In addition, 90 days following the closing of the
acquisition, if Iridium Holdings has in effect a valid election under Section
754 of the Code with respect to the taxable year in which the closing of the
acquisition occurs, GHQ will make a tax benefit payment of up to $25.2 million
in aggregate to sellers (other than the sellers of the equity of Baralonco and
Syncom) (based on a payment of $25.5 million to owners of 100% of the equity of
Iridium Holdings).
Concurrently
with the signing of the transaction agreement, Iridium Holdings and Greenhill
Europe a subsidiary of Greenhill, entered into an agreement with Iridium
Holdings to purchase a $22.9 million convertible subordinated promissory note of
Iridium Holdings. The closing of the purchase of the note occurred on
October 24, 2008, following the receipt by Iridium Holdings of the consent of
its lenders to the issuance of the note. Greenhill Europe has the
option to convert the note into Iridium Holdings units upon the later to occur
of (i) October 24, 2009 (“first anniversary”) and (ii) the closing of the
acquisition or the termination of the transaction agreement. If the
closing of the acquisition occurs after the first anniversary, upon the exercise
of its conversion rights, Greenhill Europe will be entitled to receive 1,946,500
shares of GHQ common stock. If the closing occurs prior to September
22, 2009, GHQ and Greenhill Europe will enter into an agreement which will
entitle Greenhill Europe to exchange, upon the first anniversary of the issuance
of the note, each Iridium Holding unit into which the note is convertible for
23.1936 shares of GHQ common stock, subject to adjustments.
Q: Will
GHQ stockholders receive anything in the proposed transactions?
A: If
the acquisition is completed and you do not properly elect to convert your GHQ
common stock into cash, you will continue to hold GHQ common stock and warrants
that you currently own and do not sell. If the acquisition is
completed but you vote your shares against the acquisition proposal and properly
elect to convert your shares into cash, your GHQ common stock will be canceled
and you will receive cash as described below, but you will continue to hold any
warrants that you currently own and do not sell.
Q: Who
will own GHQ after the proposed acquisition?
A: If
the proposed acquisition is completed, the current stockholders of GHQ are
expected to own approximately 60.0% of the outstanding shares of common stock of
GHQ. The current owners of Iridium Holdings are expected to own
approximately 37.5% of the outstanding common stock of GHQ and Greenhill Europe
is expected to own approximately 2.5% as a result of the conversion of the
note. The single-largest stockholder of GHQ, following the
acquisition, is expected to be Baralonco Limited with approximately 13.6%
ownership and the second-largest stockholder of GHQ is expected to be Greenhill
with approximately 11.3% ownership, including Greenhill Europe’s 2.5%
ownership. These ownership percentages are calculated on an
outstanding basis and assume that (i) no holders of IPO shares vote against the
acquisition proposal and properly exercise their rights to convert their shares
into cash, (ii) no holders of warrants exercise their rights to acquire GHQ
shares, and (iii) the conversion of the note by Greenhill Europe into 1,946,500
shares of common stock, in accordance with its terms. Assuming the
maximum number of GHQ stockholders holding IPO shares (30% minus one share) vote
against the acquisition proposal and properly exercise their rights to convert
their shares into cash, the current stockholders of GHQ are expected to own
approximately 52.8% of the outstanding shares of common stock of GHQ, the
current owners of Iridium Holdings are expected to own approximately 44.3% of
the outstanding common stock of GHQ and Greenhill Europe is expected to own
approximately 2.9% of the outstanding common stock of GHQ.
Q: What
is being voted on at the meeting?
A: You
are being asked to vote on five proposals:
·
|
a
proposal to approve the acquisition of Iridium Holdings pursuant to the
transaction agreement and the other transactions contemplated by the
transaction agreement;
|
·
|
a
proposal to adopt a second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation for GHQ, to be effective upon completion of the acquisition,
to, among other things, change our name to “Iridium Communications Inc.”
and permit our continued existence after February 14,
2010;
|
·
|
a
proposal to approve the issuance of shares of our common stock in the
acquisition and related transactions that would result in an increase in
|
our
outstanding common stock by more than 20%;
·
|
a
proposal to adopt a stock incentive plan, to be effective upon completion
of the acquisition; and
|
·
|
a
proposal to authorize the adjournment of the special meeting to a later
date or dates, including if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in
favor of the foregoing proposals if there are not sufficient votes in
favor of any of these proposals.
|
This
proxy statement provides you with detailed information about each of these
proposals. We encourage you to carefully read this entire proxy
statement, including the attached annexes. YOU SHOULD ALSO CAREFULLY CONSIDER
THOSE FACTORS DESCRIBED UNDER THE HEADING “RISK FACTORS.”
Q: What
is the record date for the special meeting? Who is entitled to
vote?
A: The
record date for the special meeting is
, 2009. Record holders of
GHQ common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to
vote or have their votes cast at the special meeting. On the record
date, there were outstanding shares
of our common stock, which includes
IPO shares and shares owned by our
founding stockholder, officers and directors.
Each
share of GHQ common stock is entitled to one vote per share at the special
meeting. GHQ’s outstanding warrants do not have voting
rights.
Q: How
do the founding stockholder, our officers and directors intend to vote their
shares?
A: With
respect to the acquisition proposal, our founding stockholder, officers and
directors, to the extent they own GHQ common stock, have agreed to vote their
shares of GHQ common stock, in accordance with the majority of the votes cast by
the public stockholders. Our founding stockholder, officers and
directors, to the extent they own GHQ common stock, have also informed GHQ that
they intend to vote all of their shares “FOR” the other
proposals. The directors and officers of GHQ who purchased units in
our IPO are Messrs. Bok, Niehaus and Harold J. Rodriguez. Mr. Bok has
informed GHQ that he intends to vote the 200,000 shares of common stock
purchased as part of the units in our IPO “FOR” the proposals detailed in this
proxy statement. Mr. Niehaus has informed GHQ that he intends to vote
the 200,000 shares of common stock purchased as part of the units in our IPO
“FOR” the proposals detailed in this proxy statement. Mr. Rodriguez
has informed GHQ that he intends to vote the 15,000 shares of common stock
purchased as part of the units in our IPO “FOR” the proposals detailed in this
proxy statement.
Q: What
vote is required to approve the acquisition proposal?
A: The
affirmative vote of stockholders owning a majority of the IPO shares voted at
the special meeting represented in person or by proxy is required to approve the
acquisition proposal. However, the acquisition proposal will not be
approved if the holders of 30% or more of the IPO shares vote against the
acquisition proposal and properly exercise their rights to convert such IPO
shares into cash. Because the approval of the acquisition proposal is
a condition to the approval of the other proposals (other than the adjournment
proposal), if the acquisition proposal is not approved, the other approvals will
not take effect (other than the adjournment proposal). No vote of the
Iridium Holdings’ unitholders is required.
Q: What
vote is required to approve the certificate proposal?
A: The
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our
common stock is required to approve the certificate proposal, and approval is
conditioned upon approval of the acquisition proposal. No vote of the
Iridium Holdings’ unitholders is required.
Q: What
vote is required to approve the share issuance proposal?
A: The
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or
by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting is required to
approve the share issuance proposal, and approval is conditioned upon approval
of the acquisition proposal. No vote of the Iridium Holdings’
unitholders is required.
Q: What
vote is required to adopt the stock incentive plan proposal?
A: The
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or
by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting is required to
adopt the proposed stock incentive plan of GHQ, and approval is conditioned upon
approval of the acquisition proposal. No vote of the Iridium
Holdings’ unitholders is required.
Q: What
vote is required to adopt the adjournment proposal?
A: The
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or
by proxy and entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting is required to
adopt the adjournment proposal. The approval of the adjournment
proposal is not conditioned on the approval of the acquisition proposal or any
of the other proposals. No vote of the Iridium Holdings’ unitholders
is required.
Q: Do
I have appraisal or dissenters’ rights?
A: No
appraisal or dissenters’ rights are available under the Delaware General
Corporation Law (“Delaware law”) for holders of GHQ common stock or warrants in
connection with the proposals described in this proxy statement.
Q: Do
I have conversion or redemption rights?
A: Yes. Each
holder of IPO shares has a right to convert his or her IPO shares into a pro
rata share of the cash on deposit in our trust account (before payment of
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and including interest earned on
their pro rata portion of the trust account, net of income taxes payable on such
interest, net of franchise taxes and net of interest income of up to $5.0
million, subject to certain adjustments, on the trust account balance previously
released to us to fund our working capital requirements) if such holder votes
against the acquisition proposal, properly exercises the conversion rights and
the acquisition is completed. Such IPO shares would then be converted
into cash at the per-share conversion price on the completion date of the
acquisition. It is anticipated that the funds to be distributed to
each holder who properly elects to convert any IPO shares will be distributed
promptly after completion of the acquisition.
Notwithstanding
the foregoing, a stockholder, together with any affiliate of his, her or it or
any person with whom he, she or it is acting in concert or as a partnership,
syndicate or other group for the purpose of acquiring, holding, disposing, or
voting of GHQ’s securities, will be restricted from seeking conversion rights
with respect to more than 10% of the IPO shares.
The
actual per-share conversion price will be equal to the quotient determined by
dividing (i) the amount then on deposit in the trust account (before payment of
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and including accrued interest
net of income taxes on such interest and net of franchise taxes, after
distribution of interest income on the trust account balance to us as described
above), that has not been distributed to GHQ to cover its working capital
expenses as set forth in GHQ’s certificate of incorporation (“certificate”),
calculated as of two business days prior to the closing by (ii) the total number
of IPO shares. As of March 31, 2009, the per-share conversion price
would have been approximately $10.01, without taking into account any interest
or expenses accrued after such date.
Voting
against the acquisition proposal alone will not result in the conversion of your
IPO shares into a pro rata share of the trust account. To convert
your IPO shares, you must also exercise your conversion rights and follow the
specific procedures for conversion summarized below and set forth under “The
Special Meeting—Conversion Rights.”
Holders
of IPO shares who convert their IPO shares into cash would still have the right
to exercise any warrants that they continue to hold and do not
sell.
Prior to
exercising your conversion rights, you should verify the market price of GHQ
shares because you may receive higher proceeds from the sale of your IPO shares
in the public market than from exercising your conversion rights if the market
price per IPO share is higher than the conversion price.
Q: How
do I exercise my conversion rights?
A: To
exercise conversion rights, a holder of IPO shares, whether being a record
holder or holding the IPO shares in “street name,” must tender the IPO shares to
our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, and deliver
written instructions to our transfer agent: (i) stating that the
holder wishes to convert the IPO shares into a pro rata share of the trust
account and (ii) confirming that the holder has held the IPO shares since the
record date and will continue to hold them through the special meeting and the
completion of the acquisition.
To tender
IPO shares to our transfer agent, the holder must deliver the IPO shares either
(i) at any time before the start of the special meeting (or any adjournment or
postponement thereof), electronically using the Depository Trust Company’s DWAC
(Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) system or (ii) at any time before the day of
the special meeting (or any adjournment or postponement thereof), physically by
delivering a share certificate. Any holder who holds IPO shares in
street name will have to coordinate with his or her bank or broker to arrange
for the IPO shares to be delivered electronically or physically. Any
holder who desires to physically tender to our transfer agent IPO shares that
are held in street name must instruct the account
executive
at his or her bank or broker to withdraw the IPO shares from the holder’s
account and request that a physical certificate be issued in such holder’s
name. Our transfer agent will be available to assist with this
process.
If a
holder does not deliver written instructions and tenders his or her IPO shares
(either electronically or physically) to our transfer agent in accordance with
the above procedures, those IPO shares will not be converted into
cash.
Any
request for conversion, once made, may be withdrawn or revoked at any time
before the start (in case of electronic tendering) or at any time before the day
(in case of physical tendering) of our special meeting (or any adjournment or
postponement thereof), in which case the IPO shares will be returned
(electronically or physically) to such holder. Holders of IPO shares
who have exercised conversion rights may not thereafter withdraw or revoke their
decision to convert their IPO shares into a pro rata portion of the trust
account.
If any
holder tenders IPO shares (electronically or physically) and the acquisition is
not completed, the IPO shares will not be converted into cash and they will be
returned (electronically or physically) to such holder.
Q: What
happens after the acquisition to the funds from the IPO deposited in our trust
account?
A: Upon
completion of the acquisition, any funds remaining in the trust account after
payment of amounts, if any, to GHQ stockholders exercising their conversion
rights, will be used for the prepayment of all or a portion of Iridium Holdings’
debt, payment of transaction expenses and to fund Iridium Holdings’ working
capital after the closing of the acquisition.
Q: Who
will manage the acquired business?
A: Following
the acquisition, GHQ, to be renamed “Iridium Communications Inc. ”, will be
overseen by its board of directors, which will be comprised of: two directors
selected by Greenhill who currently serve on GHQ’s board of directors, three of
Iridium Holdings’ current directors, the current CEO of Iridium Holdings, one
representative of Baralonco, one representative of Syncom and two of the current
independent directors of GHQ. The current officers of GHQ shall have
resigned and the current officers of Iridium Holdings will continue to serve in
their current positions. Robert H. Niehaus, Senior Vice President of
GHQ, will become chairman of the board of directors.
Q: What
happens if the acquisition is not completed?
A: If
the acquisition proposal and related matters are not approved by our
stockholders, we will not acquire Iridium Holdings, our certificate will not be
amended and we will continue to seek other potential business
combinations. If we do not consummate a business combination by
February 14, 2010, our corporate existence will cease except for the purpose of
winding up our affairs and liquidating. In connection with our
dissolution and liquidation, all amounts in the trust account plus any other net
assets of GHQ not used for or reserved to pay obligations and claims or such
other corporate expenses relating to or arising from GHQ’s plan of dissolution,
including costs of dissolving and liquidating GHQ, would be distributed on a pro
rata basis to the holders of IPO shares. GHQ will pay no liquidating
distributions with respect to any shares of capital stock of GHQ other than the
IPO shares.
Q: What
do I need to do now?
A: Indicate
on your proxy card how you want to vote on each of our proposals, sign it and
mail it in the enclosed return envelope, as soon as possible, so that your
shares may be represented at our special meeting. If you sign and
send in your proxy card and do not indicate how you want to vote on any of our
proposals, we will count your proxy card as a vote in favor of all such
proposals. You may also attend our special meeting and vote your
shares in person. You should contact your bank or broker to request
assistance in attending the meeting.
Q: How do I vote via the
Internet?
A: Stockholders
who hold their shares through a bank or broker may be able to vote via the
Internet. If available, internet voting instructions will be provided
on the proxy card provided by your bank or broker, accompanying this proxy
statement.
Q: What
do I do if I want to change my vote?
A: Send
in a later-dated, signed proxy card to your bank or broker. If you’ve
previously voted via telephone or Internet you may change your vote by either of
these methods up to 11:59 p.m. Eastern Daylight Time the day prior to
our special meeting. You may also attend our meeting in person and
vote at that time. You should contact your bank or broker to request
assistance in attending the meeting. You may also revoke your proxy
by sending a notice of revocation to
at the address under “Who Can Help Answer Your Questions” included elsewhere in
this proxy statement. You can find further details on
how to
revoke your proxy under “The Special Meeting—Revoking Your Proxy.”
Q: If
my shares are held in “street name” by my bank or broker, will my broker vote my
shares for me?
A: If
you do not provide your bank or broker with instructions on how to vote your
“street name” shares, your bank or broker will not be able to vote them on the
acquisition proposal or the other proposals described in this proxy statement,
other than the issuance proposal and the adjournment proposal. You
should therefore instruct your bank or broker how to vote your shares, following
the directions provided by your bank or broker on the enclosed proxy
card. Please check the voting form used by your bank or broker to see
if it offers telephone or Internet voting.
If you do
not give voting instructions to your bank or broker, you will not be counted as
voting, unless you appear in person at the special meeting. Please
contact your bank or broker for assistance in attending the special meeting to
vote your shares.
Q: Should
I send in my stock certificates now?
A: No. If
the acquisition is completed, GHQ stockholders will keep their existing stock
certificates.
Q: What
will happen if I abstain from voting or fail to vote?
A: An
abstention, since it is not an affirmative vote in favor of any proposal but
adds to the number of shares present in person or by proxy, will have the same
effect as a vote against the certificate proposal, the share issuance proposal,
the stock incentive plan proposal and the adjournment proposal. An
abstention will have no effect on the acquisition proposal. A failure
to vote will make it more difficult for us to achieve the quorum necessary for
us to conduct business at the special meeting and, because approval of the
certificate proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of our
outstanding shares (not the shares actually voted) will have the same effect as
a vote against the certificate proposal.
Q: When
do you expect to complete the acquisition?
A: We
are working to complete the acquisition as soon as possible. We hope
to complete the acquisition shortly after the special meeting, if we obtain the
required stockholder approvals at the special meeting and if we receive the
necessary regulatory approvals prior to the special meeting. We
cannot predict the exact timing of the closing of the acquisition or whether the
acquisition will be consummated because it is subject to conditions that are not
within our control, such as approvals from domestic and foreign regulatory
authorities including, the Federal Communications Commission
(“FCC”). Both GHQ and Iridium Holdings possess the right to terminate
the transaction agreement in certain situations.
The
closing of the acquisition is subject to the conditions and approvals described
in this proxy statement. We expect to complete the acquisition and the related
transactions during the third quarter of 2009.
WHO
CAN HELP ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS
If you
have more questions about the acquisition, you should contact:
GHL
Acquisition Corp.
300 Park
Avenue, 23rd Floor
New York,
NY 10022
Attention:
James Babski
Phone
Number: (212) 372-4180
If you
would like additional copies of this document,
or if you
have questions about the acquisition, you should contact:
105
Madison Avenue
New York,
New York 10016
proxy@mackenziepartners.com
Call
Collect: (212) 929-5500
or
Toll-Free
(800) 322-2885
SUMMARY
OF PROXY STATEMENT
This
summary contains selected information from this proxy statement and may not
contain all of the information that is important to you. To
understand the acquisition fully and to obtain a more complete description of
the legal terms of the acquisition, you should carefully read this entire
document, including the Annexes, and the documents to which we refer
you. See “Where You Can Find More Information” on page
193. In this proxy statement, the terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “GHQ”
refer to GHL Acquisition Corp., the term “Iridium Holdings” refers to Iridium
Holdings LLC, including its operating subsidiaries, and the term “transaction
agreement” refers to the Transaction Agreement dated September 22, 2008 by and
among GHQ, Iridium Holdings and the Sellers, as amended on April 28, 2009.
The
Special Meeting (See page 108)
This
proxy statement is being furnished to holders of GHQ’s common stock for use at
the special meeting, and at any adjournments or postponements of that
meeting. At the special meeting, GHQ’s stockholders will be asked to
consider and vote upon proposals (1) to approve the acquisition of Iridium
Holdings pursuant to the transaction agreement and to approve the other
transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement; (2) to approve a second
amended and restated certificate of incorporation of GHQ, to be effective upon
the closing of the acquisition; (3) to approve the issuance of shares of our
common stock in the acquisition and related transactions; (4); to adopt a
proposed stock incentive plan; and (5); to adopt a proposal to authorize the
adjournment of the special meeting to a later date or dates, including, if
necessary, to permit further solicitation and voting of proxies if there are
insufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to adopt any of these
proposals. The special meeting will be held on
, 2009, at 10:00 a.m.,
Eastern Daylight Time, at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, 301 Park Avenue, New York,
NY.
Our board
of directors has fixed the close of business on
, 2009 as the record date for the
determination of stockholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special
meeting and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. Record
holders of GHQ warrants do not have voting rights.
Recommendation
of Board of Directors and Reasons for the Acquisition
Our board
of directors has unanimously approved the acquisition and related transactions,
and unanimously recommends that our stockholders vote “FOR” each of our
proposals.
The
Parties
GHL Acquisition Corp. We are
a blank check company formed on November 2, 2007 for the purpose of acquiring,
through a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock purchase,
reorganization or other similar business combination, one or more businesses or
assets, which we refer to as our “initial business combination.” Our
efforts in identifying prospective target businesses have not been limited to a
particular industry. Instead, we focused on various industries and
target businesses in the United States and Europe that would provide significant
opportunities for growth.
On
February 21, 2008, we completed our IPO, generating gross proceeds of
approximately $400 million. On February 21, 2008, we also consummated
a private placement of 8.0 million warrants to our founding stockholder at $1.00
per warrant, generating gross proceeds of $8.0 million. A total of
approximately $400 million, including $375.6 million of the IPO proceeds net of
the underwriters’ discounts and commissions and offering expenses, $16.4 million
of deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and $8.0 million from the
sale of warrants to our founding stockholder, was placed into a trust account at
Wachovia Securities, LLC, with the American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
serving as trustee. Except for a portion of the interest income
permitted to be released to us, the proceeds held in trust will not be released
from the trust account until the earlier of the completion of our initial
business combination and our liquidation. Based on our certificate of
incorporation, up to a total of $5.0 million of interest income, subject to
adjustment, may be released to us to fund our working capital requirements and
additional interest income may be released to fund tax
obligations. For the period from inception to March 31, 2009,
approximately $4.3 million has been released to us in accordance with these
terms. As of March 31, 2009, the balance in the trust account was
approximately $401.9 million.
All of
our activity to date relates to our formation, our IPO and efforts to identify
prospective target businesses. We are not presently engaged in, and we will not
engage in, any substantive commercial business until we consummate our initial
business combination. If the proposals set forth in this proxy statement are not
approved, the acquisition of Iridium Holdings will not be consummated and we
will continue to search for businesses or assets to acquire. If we do not
complete an initial business combination by February 14, 2010, our corporate
existence will cease except for purposes of winding up our affairs and
liquidating.
The GHQ
units, common stock and warrants are traded on the NYSE Alternext U.S. under the
symbols “GHQ.U,” “GHQ” and “GHQ.WS,” respectively.
Our
executive offices are located at 300 Park Avenue, 23rd Floor,
New York, New York 10022. We file reports with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which are available free of charge at
www.sec.gov. For more information about GHQ, please see the section
entitled “Information About GHQ.”
Iridium Holdings
LLC. Iridium Holdings is a leading provider of mobile voice
and data communications services via satellite, and the only provider in the
world offering 100% global coverage. Based upon publicly available
information and information provided by TMF Associates, Iridium Holdings is the
second largest provider of mobile satellite services and related equipment with
an estimated 25% market share of the principal industry players in 2008, based
on revenue.
Iridium
Holdings maintains a website at www.iridium.com. For more information
about Iridium Holdings, please see the section entitled “Information About
Iridium Holdings.”
The
Acquisition (see page 59)
GHQ is
proposing to acquire Iridium Holdings pursuant to a transaction agreement that
provides for the acquisition of 99.5% of the outstanding units of Iridium
Holdings, with Iridium Holdings continuing as a subsidiary of
GHQ. Following the acquisition, GHQ will rename itself “Iridium
Communications Inc.”
Organizational
Structure
The
following diagram sets forth our organizational structure immediately following
the acquisition of Iridium Holdings.
*
Assuming that (i) no holders of our IPO shares vote against the acquisition
proposal and properly exercise their rights to convert their shares into cash,
(ii) no holders of GHQ warrants exercise their rights to acquire GHQ shares, and
(iii) the conversion of the note by Greenhill Europe into 1,946,500 shares of
common stock, in accordance with its terms.
**
Includes Greenhill Europe’s holding of approximately 2.5% of the outstanding GHQ
common stock as a result of the conversion of the note.
Structure
of the Acquisition (see page 92 and Annex A)
The
transaction agreement provides that upon the closing of the acquisition, GHQ
will own, directly or indirectly, all or substantially all of the units of
Iridium Holdings, and Iridium Holdings will become a subsidiary of
GHQ. Equityholders owning approximately 99.5% of Iridium Holdings’
equity (including the equityholders of Baralonco and Syncom) have signed the
transaction agreement. As part of the acquisition, GHQ will acquire
all of the equity of two of Iridium Holdings largest equityholders, Baralonco
and Syncom. For additional information, please see the section
entitled “The Transaction Agreement.”
Consideration
to be Paid in the Acquisition (see page 92)
The
aggregate consideration to be paid in the acquisition and related transactions
was based upon a total enterprise value for Iridium Holdings of $517.3 million
(calculated as $77.1 million of cash to be paid to 100% of the Iridium Holdings’
equityholders plus $294.4 million of GHQ common stock to be issued to the
Iridium Holdings’ equityholders based on a price per share of $10.00, plus net
indebtedness of Iridium Holdings of $145.8 million as of December 31, 2008,
including the $22.9 million convertible note held by Greenhill
Europe). Upon completion of the acquisition, the Sellers party to the
transaction agreement will receive $76.7 million in cash, subject to certain
adjustments, and GHQ will issue to such Sellers approximately 29.3 million
shares of GHQ common stock. The shares of common stock issued to the
Sellers will not be registered under the Securities Act, in reliance upon the
exemptions from the registration requirements as provided in Regulation D of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the
representations and warranties of the Sellers that they are “accredited
investors” within the meaning of Regulation D.
GHQ has
agreed in the transaction agreement that it will cause the funds in our trust
account to be disbursed at the closing of the acquisition: (1) to pay
the cash consideration to the Sellers; (2) pay the conversion price to any
stockholders of GHQ who vote against the acquisition and properly exercise their
conversion rights; (3) to pay deferred underwriting fees and commissions to the
underwriters of our IPO; (4) to pay GHQ’s reasonable out-of-pocket documented
third party fees and expenses that are incurred prior to the closing in
connection with the transaction agreement and related transaction documents, to
the extent not paid prior to the closing; and (5) prepay all or a portion of
Iridium Holdings’ outstanding indebtedness. GHQ will then contribute
the funds remaining in our trust account to Iridium Holdings, and Iridium
Holdings will use such funds for working capital and general corporate
matters.
Additionally,
90 days following the closing of the acquisition, if Iridium Holdings has in
effect a valid election under Section 754 of the Code with respect to the
taxable year in which the closing of the acquisition occurs, GHQ will make a tax
benefit payment of up to $25.2 million in aggregate to the Sellers (other than
the sellers of the equity of Baralonco and Syncom) (based on a payment of $25.5
million to owners of 100% of the equity of Iridium Holdings) to compensate for
the tax basis step-up.
Conditions
to the Closing of the Acquisition (see page 101 and Annex A)
The
obligation of GHQ, Iridium Holdings and the Sellers to complete the acquisition
and related transactions is subject to the requirement that specified conditions
must be satisfied or waived by the parties, including the
following:
·
|
GHQ
stockholder approval of the acquisition, the issuance of GHQ common stock
to the Sellers, the amendment of the GHQ certificate of incorporation and
the adoption of a stock incentive plan have been obtained and less than
30% of GHQ stockholders have voted against the acquisition and elected to
convert their shares of GHQ common stock into
cash;
|
·
|
no
law or injunction shall prohibit the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the transaction
agreement;
|
·
|
the
expiration or termination of any applicable waiting periods under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976 (the “HSR Act”) (early
termination of the applicable waiting period was granted on October 10,
2008);
|
·
|
all
FCC consents with respect to the transactions contemplated by the
transaction agreement have been obtained;
and
|
·
|
all
actions by or in respect of filings with any other governmental authority
required to permit the consummation of the transactions contemplated by
the transaction agreement have been taken, made or obtained other than
actions or filings the failure of which to take, make or obtain would not
reasonably expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect on Iridium Holdings or
GHQ.
|
The
obligation of GHQ to complete the acquisition and related transactions is
subject to the requirement that specified conditions must be satisfied or waived
by GHQ, including the following:
·
|
Iridium
Holdings’ and the Sellers’ representations and warranties must be true and
correct in all respects (without giving effect to any limitations as to
materiality or Iridium Holdings Material Adverse Effect contained therein)
at and as of the closing of the acquisition (or, to the extent any such
representation and warranty specifically states that it refers to an
earlier date, and on as of such earlier date), except where the failures
of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct, in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have an Iridium Holdings
Material Adverse Effect;
|
·
|
Iridium
Holdings and the Sellers must have performed, in all material respects,
their respective obligations to be performed at or prior to the closing of
the acquisition;
|
·
|
each
Seller which is receiving shares of GHQ common stock at the closing of the
acquisition has executed and delivered the registration rights
agreement;
|
·
|
the
Sellers of Baralonco and Syncom which are receiving shares of GHQ common
stock at the closing of the acquisition have executed and delivered pledge
agreements;
|
·
|
the
Sellers have effected the contribution of 100% of the issued and
outstanding equity interests of Iridium Carrier Holdings LLC and Iridium
Carrier Services LLC to Iridium
Holdings;
|
·
|
GHQ
has received a certification from Iridium Holdings certifying that 50% or
more of the value of the gross assets of Iridium Holdings does not consist
of U.S. real property interests, or that 90% or more of the value of the
gross assets of Iridium Holdings does not consist of U.S. real property
interests plus cash or cash
equivalents;
|
·
|
GHQ
has received a certification from Baralonco and Syncom that each of them
is not, and has not been, a United States real property holding
corporation as defined in the Code;
|
·
|
GHQ
has received an affidavit by the custodians of the shares of Baralonco,
substantially to the effect that in its capacity as custodian, each has
actual knowledge of the ultimate beneficial owner of the shares who has
been the ultimate beneficial owner of the shares of Baralonco from the
date of Baralonco’s formation to the closing of the acquisition;
and
|
·
|
Baralonco
has delivered evidence to GHQ that it has repaid all of its outstanding
debt and all other liabilities.
|
The
obligation of Iridium Holdings and the Sellers to complete the acquisition and
the related transactions is subject to the requirement that specified conditions
must be satisfied or waived by Iridium Holdings and the Sellers, including the
following:
·
|
GHQ’s
representations and warranties must be true and correct in all respects
(without giving effect to any limitations as to materiality or GHQ
Material Adverse Effect contained therein) at and as of the closing of the
acquisition (or, to the extent any such representation and warranty
specifically states that it refers to an earlier date, on and as of such
earlier date), except where the failures of such representations and
warranties to be so true and correct, in the aggregate, would not
reasonably be expected to have a GHQ Material Adverse
Effect;
|
·
|
GHQ
must have performed, in all material respects, its obligations to be
performed at or prior to the closing of the
acquisition;
|
·
|
the
current officers of GHQ have resigned and the current officers of Iridium
Holdings have been duly appointed as officers of GHQ and the directors
described above have been duly appointed as directors of
GHQ;
|
·
|
GHQ
has made appropriate arrangements to have the trust account disbursed to
GHQ immediately prior to the closing of the
acquisition;
|
·
|
GHQ
and its affiliates have executed and delivered the registration rights
agreement; and
|
·
|
GHQ
has executed and delivered the pledge
agreements.
|
Termination
of Transaction Agreement (see page 103 and Annex A)
The
transaction agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the closing of the
acquisition in the following circumstances:
·
|
by
mutual written consent of Iridium Holdings and
GHQ;
|
·
|
by
either Iridium Holdings or GHQ if the acquisition is not consummated by 75
days from April 28, 2009 (if all required regulatory approvals have been
obtained) or February 14, 2010 (if the only condition to closing still not
fulfilled as of 75 days from April 28, 2009, is the obtaining of all
regulatory approvals) (the “End
Date”);
|
·
|
by
either Iridium Holdings or GHQ if any material law or final,
non-appealable order prohibits the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the transaction
agreement;
|
·
|
by
either Iridium Holdings or GHQ if the stockholders of GHQ fail to approve
at the GHQ special meeting or any adjournment thereof the adoption of the
transaction agreement, the issuance of GHQ common stock to the Sellers,
the amendment of GHQ’s certificate of incorporation and the adoption of
the a stock incentive plan;
|
·
|
by
GHQ if there has been a breach by Iridium Holdings or a Seller of any
representation or warranty or failure to perform any covenant or
obligation that would result in the failure of that party to satisfy a
condition to the closing, and such condition is incapable of being
satisfied by the End Date;
|
·
|
by
Iridium Holdings if there has been a breach by GHQ of any representation
or warranty or failure to perform any covenant or obligation that would
result in the failure of GHQ to satisfy a condition to the closing, and
such condition is incapable of being satisfied by the End Date;
or
|
·
|
by
Iridium Holdings if the special meeting has not been held within 90 days
of this proxy statement being cleared by the
SEC.
|
The
Second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of GHQ (See page 80 and
Annex B)
Assuming
the acquisition proposal is approved, GHQ’s stockholders are also being asked to
approve the amendment and restatement of our certificate of incorporation, to be
effective immediately prior to closing of the acquisition. The second amended
and restated charter will, among other things:
·
|
change
our name to “Iridium Communications
Inc.”;
|
·
|
permit
our continued existence after February 14,
2010;
|
·
|
increase
the number of our authorized shares of common stock;
and
|
·
|
eliminate
the different classes of our board of
directors.
|
We
encourage you to read the second amended and restated certificate of
incorporation of GHQ in its entirety.
The
Issuance of Shares of Common Stock of GHQ (See page 82)
You are
being asked to approve the issuance of up to 31,390,000 common shares as part of
the consideration for the acquisition and related transactions. As of
the date of this proxy statement, there are 48,500,000 shares of GHQ’s common
stock outstanding, so this issuance would represent more than 20% of our
outstanding shares, which requires a stockholder vote under the NYSE Alternext
U.S. Company Guide.
The
Stock Incentive Plan (See page 83 and Annex E)
The stock
incentive plan proposal proposes to reserve 8.0 million shares of our common
stock for issuance in accordance with awards under the plan. We are proposing
the stock incentive plan, which would be effective upon closing of the
acquisition, as a means of securing and retaining key employees and others of
outstanding ability and to motivate such individuals to exert their best efforts
on behalf of GHQ (or “Iridium Communications Inc.” following the closing of the
acquisition) and its affiliates by providing incentives through the grant of
options to acquire shares of our common stock and, if so determined by the
compensation committee of our board of directors, other stock-based awards and
performance incentive awards. GHQ believes that it will benefit from
the added interest that these individuals will have in the welfare of GHQ as a
result of their proprietary interest in GHQ’s success, see “Proposal IV—Adoption
of the Stock Incentive Plan.” Additionally, the stock incentive plan
is attached as Annex E to this proxy statement. We encourage you to read the
stock incentive plan in its entirety.
GHQ’s
Founding Stockholder Ownership
As of May
28, 2009, our directors, Scott L. Bok, Robert H. Niehaus, Parker W. Rush, Thomas
C. Canfield and Kevin P. Clarke, and our founding stockholder own 200,000,
200,000, 43,479, 43,479, 43,479 and 8,369,563 units of GHQ,
respectively. Messrs. Rush, Canfield and Clarke purchased their
shares prior to our IPO. Messrs. Bok and Niehaus purchased their
units in the IPO. In addition to the units of GHQ owned prior to the
IPO, our founding stockholder purchased, concurrently with the IPO, for $8.0
million warrants to purchase up to 8.0 million shares of GHQ common stock at
$1.00 per share. At the closing of the acquisition, our founding stockholder has
agreed to forfeit the following GHQ securities which it currently
owns: (1) 1,441,176 shares of our common stock purchased as part of
the unit purchase on November 31, 2007; (2) 8,369,563 warrants purchased as part
of the unit purchase on November 13, 2007; and (3) 4.0 million warrants
purchased in a private placement on February 21, 2008.
Consideration
Offered to GHQ’s Stockholders
Existing
GHQ stockholders will not receive any cash or property as a result of the
acquisition, but instead will continue to hold their shares of GHQ common
stock. Upon completion of the acquisition, our stockholders
collectively are expected to own approximately 60% of the outstanding shares of
common stock of GHQ, assuming that (i) no GHQ stockholders vote against the
acquisition proposal and properly exercise their conversion rights, (ii) no
holders of GHQ warrants exercise their rights to acquire GHQ shares and (iii)
the conversion of the note by Greenhill Europe into 1,946,500 shares of common
stock of GHQ, in accordance with its terms.
Conversion
Rights (See page 111)
Each
holder of IPO shares has a right to convert its IPO shares into cash if such
holder votes against the acquisition proposal, the acquisition is completed and
the holder properly exercises its conversion rights as described below. Such IPO
shares would then be converted into cash at the per-share conversion price
described below on the closing date of the acquisition.
Voting
against the acquisition proposal alone will not result in the conversion of the
IPO shares into a pro rata share of the trust account. To convert IPO
shares, the holder must also properly exercise his or her conversion rights by
following the specific procedures for conversion set forth below and the
acquisition must be completed.
We will
not complete the acquisition and will not convert any IPO shares into cash if
stockholders owning 30% or more of the IPO shares both vote against the
acquisition proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights. It is anticipated that the funds to be distributed to each
holder who properly elects to convert any IPO shares will be distributed
promptly after completion of the acquisition.
Holders
of IPO shares who convert their IPO shares into cash would still have the right
to exercise any warrants that they continue to hold and do not
sell.
The
actual per-share conversion price will be equal to the quotient determined by
dividing (i) the amount then on deposit in the trust account (before payment of
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and including accrued interest
net of income taxes on such interest and net of franchise taxes, after
distribution of interest income on the trust account balance to us as described
above), that has not been distributed to GHQ to cover its working capital
expenses as set forth in GHQ’s certificate of incorporation (“certificate”),
calculated as of two business days prior to the closing by (ii) the total number
of IPO shares. As of March 31, 2009 the per-share conversion price
would have been approximately $10.01, without taking into account any interest
or expenses accrued after such date.
Prior to
exercising conversion rights, holders of IPO shares should verify the market
price of the IPO shares as they may receive higher proceeds from the sale of the
IPO shares in the public market than from exercising conversion rights if the
market price per IPO share is higher than the conversion price.
To
exercise conversion rights, a holder of IPO shares, whether being a record
holder or holding the IPO shares in “street name,” must tender its IPO shares to
our transfer agent, American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, and deliver
written instructions to our transfer agent: (i) stating that the holder wishes
to convert the IPO shares into a pro rata share of the trust account and (ii)
confirming that the holder has held the IPO shares since the record date and
will continue to hold them through the special meeting and the completion of the
acquisition.
To tender
IPO shares to our transfer agent, the holder must deliver its IPO shares either
(i) at any time before the start of the special meeting (or any adjournment or
postponement thereof), electronically using the Depository Trust Company’s DWAC
(Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) system or (ii) at any time before the day of
the special meeting (or any adjournment or postponement thereof), physically by
delivering a share certificate. Any holder who holds IPO shares in
“street name” will have to coordinate with his or her bank or broker to arrange
for the IPO shares to be delivered electronically or physically. Any
holder who desires to physically tender to our transfer agent IPO shares that
are held in “street name” must instruct the account executive at his or her bank
or broker to withdraw the IPO shares from the holder’s account and request that
a physical certificate be issued in such holder’s name. Our transfer
agent will be available to assist with this process.
If a
holder does not deliver written instructions and tenders his or her IPO shares
(either electronically or physically) to our transfer agent in accordance with
the above procedures, those IPO shares will not be converted into
cash.
Any
request for conversion, once made, may be withdrawn or revoked at any time
before the start (in case of electronic tendering) or at any time before the day
(in case of physical tendering) of our special meeting (or any adjournment or
postponement thereof), in which case the IPO shares will be returned
(electronically or physically) to such holder. Holders of IPO shares
who have exercised conversion rights may not thereafter withdraw or revoke their
decision to convert their IPO shares into a pro rata portion of the trust
account.
If any
holder tenders IPO shares (electronically or physically) and the acquisition is
not completed, the IPO shares will not be converted into cash and they will be
returned (electronically or physically) to such holder.
Interests
of Certain Persons in the Acquisition (See page 91)
In
considering the recommendation of GHQ’s board of directors to vote for our
proposals, you should be aware that our executive officers and members of our
board of directors have interests in the acquisition that are different from, or
in addition to, the interests of GHQ’s stockholders generally. The members of
our board of directors were aware of these differing interests and considered
them, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the transaction
agreement and in recommending to our stockholders that they vote in favor of the
acquisition proposal and other proposals. These interests include, among other
things:
·
|
Our
directors, Messrs. Bok, Niehaus, Rush, Canfield and Clarke, and our
founding stockholder own 200,000, 200,000, 43,479, 43,479, 43,479 and
8,369,563 units of GHQ, respectively. Each of Messrs. Rush, Canfield and
Clarke purchased his units prior to our IPO for an aggregate price of
$128.00 and had an aggregate market value of approximately $423,051, based
upon the last sale price of $9.73 on the NYSE Alternext U.S. on May 28,
2009. If our proposals are not approved and GHQ is unable to
complete another business combination by February 14, 2010, GHQ will be
required to liquidate. In such event, the 8.5 million units held by
Messrs. Rush, Canfield and Clark and our founding stockholder will be
worthless because Messrs. Rush, Canfield and Clarke and our founding
stockholder have agreed that they will not receive any liquidation
proceeds with respect to such shares. Accordingly, Messrs. Rush, Canfield
and Clarke and our founding stockholder have a financial interest in the
completion of the acquisition. The 400,000 shares purchased by
Messrs. Bok and Niehaus in the IPO would receive liquidation
proceeds. Messrs. Bok and Niehaus each purchased 200,000 units
in the IPO.
|
·
|
In
addition to the shares of GHQ common stock, our founding stockholder
purchased for $8.0 million warrants to purchase up to 8.0 million shares
of GHQ common stock at $1.00 per share. These warrants have an
exercise price of $7.00 per share. If GHQ is unable to complete
a business combination by February 14, 2010 and liquidates its assets,
there will be no distribution with respect to these warrants, and the
warrants will expire worthless.
|
·
|
Two
of our directors, Messrs. Bok and Niehaus purchased units in our
IPO. In addition, Messrs. Bok and Niehaus own shares in our
founding stockholder that give them indirect ownership interests in GHQ.
Because of their indirect ownership interests, each of Messrs. Bok and
Niehaus has financial interests in the completion of the acquisition in
addition to their interests as holders of our
units.
|
·
|
If
the acquisition is completed, certain of our current directors will
continue as directors of GHQ. These non-executive directors will be
entitled to receive any cash fees, stock options, stock awards or other
compensation arrangements that our board of directors determines to
provide to our non-executive
directors.
|
No
Appraisal or Dissenters’ Rights
No
appraisal or dissenters’ rights are available under Delaware law for holders of
GHQ common stock in connection with the proposals described in this proxy
statement.
Regulatory
Matters
U.S.
Antitrust. Under the HSR Act and the rules that have been
promulgated thereunder by the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), the
acquisition may not be consummated unless GHQ and Iridium Holdings furnish
certain information to the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of
Justice (the “Antitrust Division”) and the FTC and specified waiting period
requirements have been satisfied. Pursuant to the requirements of the
HSR Act, GHQ and Iridium Holdings each filed a Notification and Report Forms
with respect to the acquisition with the Antitrust Division and the FTC. GHQ
filed its notification on October 3, 2008 and Iridium Holdings filed
its
notification on October 6, 2008. Early termination of the waiting
period applicable to the acquisition was granted by the FTC on October 10,
2008.
The
Antitrust Division and the FTC frequently scrutinize the legality under the
antitrust laws of transactions such as the acquisition. At any time
before or after consummation of the acquisition, the Antitrust Division or the
FTC could take such action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary or
desirable in the public interest, including seeking to enjoin the completion of
the acquisition or seeking the divestiture of substantial assets of GHQ or
Iridium Holdings. Private parties (including individual states) may
also bring legal actions under the antitrust laws. We do not believe
that the consummation of the acquisition will result in a violation of any
applicable antitrust laws. However, there can be no assurance that a
challenge to the acquisition on antitrust grounds will not be made or, if this
challenge is made, what the result will be. See “The Transaction
Agreement—Conditions to the Closing” for certain conditions to the acquisition,
including conditions with respect to litigation and certain governmental actions
and “The Transaction Agreement—Termination” for certain termination rights
pursuant to the transaction agreement in connection with legal prohibitions to
completing the acquisition.
Foreign Competition Law
Filings. Iridium Holdings and its subsidiaries own property
and conduct business in a number of foreign countries. In connection
with the acquisition, the laws of certain of these foreign countries may require
the filing of information with, or the obtaining of the approval of,
governmental authorities therein. The parties do not believe that any
such filings or approvals are required by these laws, but intend to take such
action as they may require.
FCC
Licenses. Certain subsidiaries and affiliates of Iridium
Holdings hold one or more licenses or authorizations (each an “FCC License” and
collectively the “FCC Licenses”) issued by the FCC. Under the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the
FCC, prior to completion of the acquisition, the FCC must approve the transfer
of control of these subsidiaries and affiliates and their FCC Licenses to
GHQ. Therefore, GHQ and each subsidiary or affiliate of Iridium
Holdings that holds one or more FCC License must file an application with the
FCC requesting such approval (each an “Application” and collectively the
“Applications”). The FCC will review each Application to determine
whether GHQ’s control of the pertinent subsidiary or affiliate and its FCC
Licenses would comply with applicable law and whether it would be consistent
with the public interest, convenience and necessity. GHQ and Iridium
Holdings jointly filed the Applications with the FCC on October 21,
2008.
On
November 26, 2008, the FCC issued a public notice (the “Public Notice”)
announcing the filing of the Applications, summarizing the information contained
therein, and inviting petitions to deny, oppositions and other comments by third
parties with respect to the Applications. On December 29, 2008,
Cornell University (“Cornell”) and International Communications Group, Inc.
(“ICG”) filed comments with respect to the Applications. The
commenters did not oppose the proposed transfer of control of Iridium Holdings
but asked the FCC to adopt certain conditions in connection with its grant of
the Applications. Also, on December 29, 2008, Globalstar License LLC
(“Globalstar License”) filed a petition to deny the Applications.
On
January 12, 2009, GHQ and Iridium Holdings jointly filed a consolidated
opposition and response with respect to the comments of Cornell and ICG and the
petition to deny the Applications by Globalstar License. The
opposition and response asserted that the comments and petition to deny provide
no basis for the FCC to deny, condition its approval or delay its consideration
of the Applications. On January 21, 2009, Globalstar License filed a
reply to the opposition and response. Pursuant to the Public Notice,
the pleading cycle ended on January 12, 2009. Parties may, however,
continue to make ex parte submissions to the FCC until the FCC acts on the
Applications, and on April 29, 2009, Rockwell Collins, Inc. (“Rockwell Collins”)
filed an ex parte
letter advocating the same general positions taken by ICG in its
comments. On March 12, 2009, GHQ and Iridium Holdings received a
request for certain additional information from the FCC to assist in its review
of the proposed foreign ownership of Iridium Carrier Services
LLC. GHQ and Iridium Holdings jointly submitted a response to the
FCC’s request on June 2, 2009.
The FCC
has developed an informal timetable for acting upon transfer of control
applications. Pursuant to this informal timetable, it will endeavor
to take action on any such application (i.e., grant, deny, or designate the
application for hearing) within 180 days from the initial public notice
accepting the application for filing. The FCC
reserves
the right to stop the 180-day “clock” at its discretion. We cannot
assure you that the FCC will act on the Applications in a timely manner or that
the FCC will not deny the Applications or impose conditions on the parties in
connection with granting its approval.
Other U.S. Regulatory
Filings. Iridium Holdings engages in several business areas
that are regulated by the U.S. Government on national security
grounds. In particular, it is registered with the U.S. State
Department as a manufacturer or exporter of satellite-related items that are
controlled under the International Traffic in Arms Regulations
(“ITAR”). In connection with the acquisition, appropriate notice and
other filings will be required to be made with the Departments of State and
Defense. On December 23, 2008, the Department of Justice, the Federal
Bureau of Investigation, and the Department of Homeland Security (the “Executive
Agencies”) asked the FCC to defer action on the Applications until such time
that any national security, law enforcement, or public safety concerns raised by
the proposed transaction have been addressed. Such a request is
routine in transactions involving satellite carriers or other providers of
telecommunications services. In order to address any such concerns,
GHQ may be required to enter into a national security agreement with the
Executive Agencies, compliance with which will be a condition of FCC grant of
the FCC Applications.
Foreign Licenses and
Authorizations. Iridium Holdings, either directly or
indirectly through certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, provides
communications services to subscribers in foreign countries in all regions of
the world. In many of these countries, Iridium Holdings, its
subsidiaries and/or affiliates have received government licenses or other
authorizations to provide such services. In certain of these
countries, completion of the acquisition may require either government approval
or notification of the change in control over the pertinent licenses or
authorizations. No assurance can be given that, if any such approvals
are required, they will be obtained.
General. It is
possible that governmental authorities having jurisdiction over GHQ and Iridium
Holdings may seek regulatory concessions as conditions for granting approval of
the acquisition. A regulatory body’s approval may contain terms or
impose conditions or restrictions relating or applying to, or requiring changes
in or limitations on, the operation or ownership of any asset or business of
GHQ, Iridium Holdings or any of their subsidiaries, or GHQ’s ownership of
Iridium Holdings, or requiring asset divestitures, which conditional approval
could reasonably be expected to result in a substantial detriment to GHQ,
Iridium Holdings and their subsidiaries, taken as a whole, after the closing of
the acquisition. If this kind of approval occurs, in certain
circumstances, GHQ can decline to close under the transaction
agreement. We can give no assurance that the required regulatory
approvals will be obtained on terms that satisfy the conditions to closing of
the acquisition or are within the time frame contemplated by GHQ and Iridium
Holdings. See “The Transaction Agreement—Conditions to the Closing”
on page 101.
Risk
Factors (See page 36)
In
evaluating each of the proposals set forth in this proxy statement, you should
carefully read this proxy statement and consider the factors discussed in the
section entitled “Risk Factors.”
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF GHQ
The
following selected historical financial data as of December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2008, for the three months ended March 31, 2008 (unaudited) and
March 31, 2009 (unaudited) and from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to March 31,
2009 (unaudited) was derived from the financial statements of GHQ and GHQ’s
unaudited interim financial statements. GHQ is a development stage
enterprise. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for the
full year. The selected financial data below should be read in
conjunction with GHQ’s financial statements and related notes beginning on page
F-2 and “GHQ - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” included in this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended March 31 (unaudited)
|
|
|
For
the Period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to March 31,
2009 (unaudited)
|
|
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income (interest)
|
|
$ |
--------- |
|
|
$ |
5,604,554 |
|
|
$ |
1,213,016 |
|
|
$ |
523,034 |
|
|
$ |
6,127,588 |
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
2,592,185 |
|
|
|
112,267 |
|
|
|
462,733 |
|
|
|
3,058,730 |
|
Income
before income taxes
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
3,012,369 |
|
|
|
1,100,749 |
|
|
|
60,301 |
|
|
|
3,068,858 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
------- |
|
|
|
1,356,551 |
|
|
|
556,357 |
|
|
|
27,155 |
|
|
|
1,383,706 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
1,655,818 |
|
|
|
544,392 |
|
|
|
33,146 |
|
|
|
1,685,152 |
|
Net
income per share (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
0.02 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding (basic and diluted)
|
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
|
|
43,268,238 |
|
|
|
27,485,989 |
|
|
|
48,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of March 31, 2009 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
$ |
403,150,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
403,363,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
478,812 |
|
|
|
12,898,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,079,364 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock, subject to possible conversion (11,999,999 shares at conversion
value)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
119,987,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,987,999 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
21,188 |
|
|
|
270,263,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
270,296,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
403,150,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
403,363,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
SELECTED
HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF IRIDIUM HOLDINGS
The
following selected historical financial data for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2008 was derived from Iridium Holdings’ audited
financial statements and the financial information for the three months ended
March 31, 2008 and 2009 was derived from Iridium Holdings’ unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this proxy
statement. Iridium Holdings’ unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to state fairly its
financial position at March 31, 2008 and 2009 and its income and cash flows for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2009. The information for
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005 was derived from Iridium Holdings’
audited financial statements not included in this proxy
statement. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results
for the full year and historical results are not necessarily indicative of
results to be expected in any future period. The selected financial
data below should be read in conjunction with Iridium Holdings’ financial
statements and related notes beginning on page F-30 and “Iridium
Holdings—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations” included in this proxy statement.
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31
|
|
Statement
of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
Services
|
|
|
45,069 |
|
|
|
48,347 |
|
|
|
50,807 |
|
|
|
57,850 |
|
|
|
67,759 |
|
|
|
14,105 |
|
|
|
18,468 |
|
Commercial
Services
|
|
|
49,611 |
|
|
|
60,690 |
|
|
|
77,661 |
|
|
|
101,172 |
|
|
|
133,247 |
|
|
|
29,044 |
|
|
|
36,818 |
|
Subscriber
Equipment
|
|
|
26,811 |
|
|
|
78,663 |
|
|
|
83,944 |
|
|
|
101,879 |
|
|
|
119,938 |
|
|
|
31,151 |
|
|
|
20,503 |
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of subscriber equipment sales
|
|
|
26,463 |
|
|
|
62,802 |
|
|
|
60,068 |
|
|
|
62,439 |
|
|
|
67,570 |
|
|
|
18,397 |
|
|
|
11,315 |
|
Network
and satellite operations and maintenance (a)
|
|
|
50,248 |
|
|
|
56,909 |
|
|
|
60,685 |
|
|
|
60,188 |
|
|
|
63,878 |
|
|
|
15,393 |
|
|
|
15,951 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative(a)
|
|
|
32,487 |
|
|
|
30,135 |
|
|
|
33,468 |
|
|
|
46,350 |
|
|
|
55,105 |
|
|
|
11,340 |
|
|
|
14,665 |
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
9,044 |
|
|
|
4,334 |
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
|
|
17,370 |
|
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
|
|
15,061 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
7,132 |
|
|
|
7,722 |
|
|
|
8,541 |
|
|
|
11,380 |
|
|
|
12,535 |
|
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
Transaction
costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,959 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
Satellite
system development refund
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(14,000 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
125,374 |
|
|
|
147,902 |
|
|
|
167,181 |
|
|
|
197,727 |
|
|
|
245,825 |
|
|
|
52,838 |
|
|
|
61,364 |
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
|
|
(3,883 |
) |
|
|
39,798 |
|
|
|
45,231 |
|
|
|
63,174 |
|
|
|
75,119 |
|
|
|
21,462 |
|
|
|
14,425 |
|
Other
(expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
(9,122 |
) |
|
|
(5,106 |
) |
|
|
(15,179 |
) |
|
|
(21,771 |
) |
|
|
(21,094 |
) |
|
|
(5,169 |
) |
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
Interest
expense recovered
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2,526 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest
and other income
|
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
Total
other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(8,639 |
) |
|
|
(203 |
) |
|
|
(13,417 |
) |
|
|
(19,401 |
) |
|
|
(21,240 |
) |
|
|
(4,740 |
) |
|
|
(4,707 |
) |
Net
(loss) income
|
|
|
(12,522 |
) |
|
|
39,595 |
|
|
|
31,814 |
|
|
|
43,773 |
|
|
|
53,879 |
|
|
|
16,722 |
|
|
|
9,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
59,921 |
|
|
|
65,385 |
|
|
|
84,035 |
|
|
|
80,342 |
|
|
|
99,955 |
|
|
|
94,513 |
|
|
|
115,589 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
|
150,514 |
|
|
|
129,397 |
|
|
|
161,525 |
|
|
|
167,581 |
|
|
|
189,169 |
|
|
|
175,282 |
|
|
|
203,037 |
|
Total
long term obligations (b)
|
|
|
(119,781 |
) |
|
|
(53,848 |
) |
|
|
(208,225 |
) |
|
|
(178,324 |
) |
|
|
(155,845 |
) |
|
|
(179,818 |
) |
|
|
(148,288 |
) |
Total
members’ deficit
|
|
|
(90,008 |
) |
|
|
(57,262 |
) |
|
|
(121,189 |
) |
|
|
(78,447 |
) |
|
|
(62,230 |
) |
|
|
(64,317 |
) |
|
|
(51,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
|
10,107 |
|
|
|
30,742 |
|
|
|
39,499 |
|
|
|
36,560 |
|
|
|
61,438 |
|
|
|
16,916 |
|
|
|
21,671 |
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
(1,608 |
) |
|
|
(9,661 |
) |
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
|
|
(19,787 |
) |
|
|
(13,913 |
) |
|
|
(2,607 |
) |
|
|
(2,283 |
) |
Financing
activities
|
|
|
(5,542 |
) |
|
|
(18,887 |
) |
|
|
(8,032 |
) |
|
|
(26,526 |
) |
|
|
(44,820 |
) |
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
EBITDA
(c)
|
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
49,595 |
|
|
|
54,243 |
|
|
|
74,732 |
|
|
|
86,163 |
|
|
|
24,424 |
|
|
|
18,032 |
|
Certain
other items included in EBITDA (d)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
22,072 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
9,538 |
|
(a)
|
Iridium
Holdings’ selected historical financial data for the year ended December
31, 2004 does not include a reclassification of operating expenses between
“network and satellite operations and maintenance” and “selling, general
and administrative.” Therefore, Iridium Holdings’ selected
historical financial data for the operating expenses described above for
the year ended December 31, 2004 is not directly comparable to the
selected historical financial data for subsequent
periods.
|
(b)
|
Long-term
obligations are presented net of an unamortized discount associated with a
commitment fee to Motorola in connection with the transition services,
products and assets agreement. The balance of the unamortized
discount was $3.0 million at December 31, 2004, $2.7 million at December
31, 2005, $2.3 million at December 31, 2006, $1.8 million at December 31,
2007, $1.3 million at December 31, 2008, $1.7 million at March 31, 2008
and $1.1 million at March 31, 2009.
|
(c)
|
“EBITDA”
represents net income before interest expense, interest income, income tax
provision and depreciation and amortization. EBITDA does not represent and
should not be considered as an alternative to net income or cash flow from
operations, as determined in accordance with United States generally
accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and Iridium Holdings’
calculations thereof may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures
reported by other companies. Iridium Holdings presents EBITDA
because it believes it is a useful indicator of its profitability. Iridium
Holdings’ management uses EBITDA principally as a measure of its operating
performance and believes that EBITDA is useful to investors because it is
frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested
parties in their evaluation of companies in industries similar to its own.
Iridium Holdings also believes EBITDA is useful to its management and
investors as a measure of comparative operating performance between time
periods and among companies as it is reflective of changes in pricing
decisions, cost controls and other factors that affect operating
performance. Iridium Holdings’ management also uses EBITDA for planning
purposes, including the preparation of its annual operating budget,
financial projections and compensation
plans.
|
EBITDA
does not represent and should not be considered as an alternative to results of
operations under GAAP and has significant limitations as an analytical tool.
Although Iridium Holdings uses EBITDA as a measure to assess the performance of
its business, the use of EBITDA is limited because it excludes certain material
costs. For example, it does not include interest expense, which is a necessary
element of its costs and ability to generate revenue, because Iridium Holdings
has borrowed money in order to finance its operations. Because Iridium Holdings
uses capital assets, depreciation expense is a necessary element of its costs
and ability to generate revenue. Because EBITDA does not account for
these expenses, its utility as a measure of Iridium Holdings’ operating
performance has material limitations. As a limited liability company that is
treated as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, Iridium Holdings is
generally not subject to federal income tax directly and therefore no adjustment
is required for income taxes. Because of these limitations Iridium
Holdings’ management does not view EBITDA in isolation or as a primary
performance measure and also uses other measures, such as net income, revenue
and operating profit, to measure operating performance. Iridium
Holdings’ calculations of EBITDA may also differ from the calculation of EBITDA
by its competitors and other companies and as such, its utility as a comparative
measure is limited.
The
following is a reconciliation of net (loss) income to EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
(loss) income
|
|
|
(12,522 |
) |
|
|
39,595 |
|
|
|
31,814 |
|
|
|
43,773 |
|
|
|
53,879 |
|
|
|
16,722 |
|
|
|
9,718 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
9,122 |
|
|
|
5,106 |
|
|
|
15,179 |
|
|
|
21,771 |
|
|
|
21,094 |
|
|
|
5,169 |
|
|
|
4,622 |
|
Interest
expense recovered
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,526 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(302 |
) |
|
|
(1,291 |
) |
|
|
(2,192 |
) |
|
|
(1,345 |
) |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
17 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
7,132 |
|
|
|
7,722 |
|
|
|
8,541 |
|
|
|
11,380 |
|
|
|
12,535 |
|
|
|
2,968 |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
EBITDA
|
|
|
3,554 |
|
|
|
49,595 |
|
|
|
54,243 |
|
|
|
74,732 |
|
|
|
86,163 |
|
|
|
24,424 |
|
|
|
18,032 |
|
(d)
|
The
following table details certain items, which are included in EBITDA:
non-recurring expenses relating to Iridium Holdings’ proposed transaction
with GHQ and expenses incurred in the development of Iridium Holdings’
second generation constellation, Iridium NEXT. This table does not
represent and should not be considered as an alternative to net income or
cash flow from operations, as determined in accordance with GAAP and
Iridium Holdings’ calculations thereof may not be comparable to similarly
entitled measures reported by other companies. Iridium Holdings believes
this table, when reviewed in connection with its presentation of EBITDA
provides another useful tool to investors and its management for measuring
comparative operating performance between time periods and among companies
as it is further reflective of cost controls and other factors that affect
operating performance. In addition to EBITDA, Iridium Holdings’ management
assesses the adjustments presented in this table when preparing its annual
operating budget, financial projections and compensation plans. Because of
the significant expenses resulting from the abovementioned transaction and
Iridium NEXT, Iridium Holdings believes that the presentation of the
adjustments relating to acquisition and Iridium NEXT expenses enables its
management and investors to assess the impact of such expenses on its
operating performance and provides a consistent measure of its operating
performance for periods subsequent to the transaction and the full
deployment of Iridium NEXT.
|
This
table is not intended to comply with GAAP and has significant limitations as an
analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation, or as a substitute
for analysis of Iridium Holdings’ results of operations under GAAP. Although
Iridium Holdings uses this table as a financial measure to assess the
performance of its business, the use of this table is limited because, in
addition to the costs excluded in its presentation of EBITDA, it excludes
certain material costs that Iridium Holdings has incurred over the periods
presented. Because this table does not account for these expenses, its utility
as a measure of Iridium Holdings’ operating performance has material
limitations.
EBITDA,
as defined above, was decreased by the following non-recurring and certain other
items, each of which is further discussed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended
March
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-recurring
transaction expenses (1)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,959 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
697 |
|
Iridium
NEXT expenses (2)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
14,113 |
|
|
|
1,663 |
|
|
|
8,841 |
|
Total
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
22,072 |
|
|
|
1,899 |
|
|
|
9,538 |
|
(1)
Consists of non recurring legal, regulatory and accounting expenses relating to
Iridium Holdings’ financing activities, including the proposed transaction with
GHQ.
(2)
Consists of expenses, net of customer revenues, incurred in connection with the
design, manufacture and deployment of Iridium NEXT, including certain milestone
payments paid to the two companies vying to serve as the prime system
contractor. Iridium Holdings expects to incur such expenses through 2016 until
the deployment of the new constellation, with the majority of these expenses
incurred during the capital intensive launch phase between 2014 and 2016. In the
future, Iridium Holdings may capitalize a portion of these costs.
SELECTED
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL DATA
The
following unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of March 31,
2009 and the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and for the year ended December 31, 2008
are based on the historical financial statements of GHQ and Iridium Holdings
after giving effect to the acquisition in which GHQ will acquire Iridium
Holdings. The acquisition will be accounted for using the acquisition
method of accounting in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board
(“FASB”) Statement No. 141R, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”).
The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined statements of operations for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008 give effect to the acquisition as if it had occurred on
January 1, 2008. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet as of
March 31, 2009 assumes that the acquisition took place on March 31,
2009.
The unaudited condensed combined balance
sheet and statement of operations as of and for the three months ended March 31,
2009 were derived from GHQ’s unaudited condensed financial statements and
Iridium Holdings’ unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of
and for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The unaudited condensed statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 was derived from GHQ’s and
Iridium Holdings’ audited statements of income for the year ended December 31,
2008.
GHQ will consummate the acquisition only
if (i) holders of a majority of the IPO shares voting in person or by proxy
approve the acquisition and (ii) stockholders holding no more than 30% of the
IPO shares less one share exercise their conversion rights. The unaudited pro
forma condensed combined financial statements have been prepared using the
assumptions below with respect to the number of outstanding shares of GHQ common
stock:
• Assuming Minimum Conversion: This
presentation assumes that no GHQ stockholders seek to convert their IPO shares
into a pro rata portion of the trust account;
• Assuming Maximum Conversion: This
presentation assumes that GHQ stockholders holding 30% of the IPO shares less
one share (11,999,999 shares) vote against the acquisition and elect to exercise
their conversion rights.
The pro forma condensed combined
financial statements reflect management’s best estimate of the fair value of the
tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on a
preliminary valuation study performed by an independent third party valuation
firm based on information currently available. As final valuations
are performed, increases or decreases in the fair value of assets acquired and
liabilities assumed will result in adjustments, which may be material, to the
balance sheet and/or statement of operations.
As required, the unaudited pro forma
condensed combined financial data includes adjustments which give effect to the
events that are directly attributable to the acquisition, expected to have a
continuing impact and are factually supportable. Hence any planned
adjustments affecting the balance sheet, statement of operations or changes in
common stock outstanding, subsequent to the assumed closing date of the
acquisition are not included.
The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements are provided for informational purposes only and
are subject to a number of uncertainties and assumptions and do not purport to
represent what the companies’ actual performance or financial position would
have been had the acquisition occurred on the dates indicated and does not
purport to indicate the financial position or results of
operations as of any future date or for any future period. Please refer to the
following information in conjunction with the accompanying
notes to these pro forma financial statements and the historical financial
statements and the accompanying notes thereto and the sections entitled “GHQ
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations” and “Iridium Holdings Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this proxy
statement.
|
|
GHL
Acquisition Corp.
|
|
|
|
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
As
of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
Pro Forma
(assuming minimum
|
|
Additional
Pro Forma
Adjustments (assuming
maximum
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
Pro Forma
(assuming maximum
|
|
|
|
GHQ
|
|
|
Iridium
|
|
|
conversion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
conversion)
|
|
|
conversion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
conversion)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
42,305 |
|
|
$ |
(101,871 |
) |
|
|
A
|
|
|
$ |
242,986 |
|
|
$ |
(120,000 |
) |
|
|
P |
|
|
$ |
128,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,902 |
|
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,175 |
) |
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,827 |
) |
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,350 |
) |
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120 |
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
41,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,927 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
27,254 |
|
|
|
9,885 |
|
|
|
G
|
|
|
|
37,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,139 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
3,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,066 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
115,589 |
|
|
|
210,564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
326,238 |
|
|
|
(114,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,301 |
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
62,231 |
|
|
|
349,534 |
|
|
|
H
|
|
|
|
411,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
411,765 |
|
Restricted
cash, net of current portion
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,400 |
|
Deferred
financing costs and other assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,817 |
|
|
|
(4,405 |
) |
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
5,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,412 |
|
Investments
held in trust at broker
|
|
|
401,902 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(401,902 |
) |
|
|
B
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
1,401 |
|
|
|
I
|
|
|
|
2,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,778 |
|
Intangible
assets
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
57,228 |
|
|
|
J
|
|
|
|
57,228 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,228 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
73,209 |
|
|
|
K
|
|
|
|
73,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,209 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
403,364 |
|
|
$ |
203,037 |
|
|
$ |
285,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
892,029 |
|
|
$ |
(114,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
777,092 |
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
6,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
6,746 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
36,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,391 |
|
Credit
facility, current portion
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
35,149 |
|
|
|
(3,753 |
) |
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
16,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,396 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,000 |
) |
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
revenue, current portion
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
27,721 |
|
|
|
(14,878 |
) |
|
|
L
|
|
|
|
12,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,843 |
|
Deferred
underwriter commissions
|
|
|
11,288 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(11,288 |
) |
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
13,079 |
|
|
|
106,216 |
|
|
|
(44,919 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,376 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,376 |
|
Accrued
satellite operations and maintenance expense, net of
current portion
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
9,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,279 |
|
Motorola
payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11,140 |
|
|
|
(740 |
) |
|
|
F
|
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
Credit
facility
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
99,878 |
|
|
|
(4,530 |
) |
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
30,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65,000 |
) |
|
|
D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
subordinated note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
Other
long-term liability
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
Income
tax reserve
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
I
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
Deferred
tax liability
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
69,624 |
|
|
|
I
|
|
|
|
69,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,624 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
13,079 |
|
|
|
254,504 |
|
|
|
(44,984 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,599 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222,599 |
|
Common
stock subject to possible conversion
|
|
|
119,988 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(119,988 |
) |
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Stockholders'
equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
P |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
268,563 |
|
|
|
4,591 |
|
|
|
3,113 |
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
665,351 |
|
|
|
(119,988 |
) |
|
|
P |
|
|
|
550,426 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,827 |
) |
|
|
C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,350 |
) |
|
|
E
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,063 |
|
|
|
C |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,988 |
|
|
|
M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
284,864 |
|
|
|
N
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,591 |
) |
|
|
O
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
earnings/(accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
(53,779 |
) |
|
|
53,779 |
|
|
|
O
|
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
|
2,279 |
|
|
|
O
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
Total
parent stockholders' equity
|
|
|
270,297 |
|
|
|
(51,467 |
) |
|
|
448,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
667,114 |
|
|
|
(114,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
552,177 |
|
Noncontrolling
interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
V
|
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,316 |
|
Total
stockholders' equity
|
|
|
270,297 |
|
|
|
(51,467 |
) |
|
|
450,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
669,430 |
|
|
|
(114,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
554,493 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$ |
403,364 |
|
|
$ |
203,037 |
|
|
$ |
285,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
892,029 |
|
|
$ |
(114,937 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
777,092 |
|
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined
financial statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GHL
Acquisition Corp.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GHQ
|
|
|
Iridium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Inthousands,
except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
55,286 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
55,286 |
|
|
|
Subscriber
equipment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
20,503 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
20,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,503 |
|
|
|
Total
revenue
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
75,789 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
75,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
75,789 |
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of subscriber equipment sales
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
11,315 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
11,315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,315 |
|
|
|
Network
operations and maintenance
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,951 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
15,951 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,951 |
|
|
|
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
14,665 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
15,128 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,128 |
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
|
17,489 |
|
|
H |
|
|
|
24,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
J |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
15,061 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,061 |
|
|
|
Transaction
Costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
61,364 |
|
|
|
20,352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
82,179 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
14,425 |
|
|
|
(20,352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(6,390 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
(6,390 |
) |
|
|
Other
(expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
|
|
1,233 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(3,389 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,389 |
) |
|
|
Interest
and other income
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(398 |
) |
|
R |
|
|
|
(483 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
R |
|
|
|
(674 |
) |
|
|
Total
other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
(4,707 |
) |
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(4,063 |
) |
|
|
Income
(loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
9,718 |
|
|
|
(20,040 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(10,262 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(191 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(10,453 |
) |
|
|
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(3,850 |
) |
|
S |
|
|
|
(3,822 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
T |
|
|
|
(3,898 |
) |
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
9,718 |
|
|
$ |
(16,190 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,440 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,555 |
) |
|
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
V |
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,408 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(6,522 |
) |
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic
|
|
|
48,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,400 |
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,400 |
|
|
U |
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
48,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,400 |
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,400 |
|
|
U |
|
Earnings
(loss) per share - basic
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share - diluted
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.08 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.10 |
) |
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements.
|
|
GHL
Acquisition Corp.
Unaudited
Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of
Operations
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GHQ
|
|
|
Iridium
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In
thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
201,006 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
|
|
$ |
201,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
201,006 |
|
|
|
Subscriber
equipment
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
119,938 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
119,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,938 |
|
|
|
Total
revenue
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
320,944 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
320,944 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
320,944 |
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of subscriber equipment sales
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
67,570 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
67,570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,570 |
|
|
|
Network
operations and maintenance
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
63,878 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
63,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,878 |
|
|
|
Selling,
general, and administrative
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
55,105 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
57,697 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,697 |
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
12,535 |
|
|
|
69,910 |
|
|
H |
|
|
|
93,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,450 |
|
|
J |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
Transaction
Costs
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
7,959 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,959 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,959 |
|
|
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
2,592 |
|
|
|
245,825 |
|
|
|
81,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
329,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
Operating
profit (loss)
|
|
|
(2,592 |
) |
|
|
75,119 |
|
|
|
(81,360 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(8,833 |
) |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
(8,833 |
) |
|
|
Other
(expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,094 |
) |
|
|
6,941 |
|
|
D |
|
|
|
(14,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,153 |
) |
|
|
Interest
and other income
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,605 |
) |
|
Q |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
1,429 |
|
|
R |
|
|
|
1,283 |
|
|
|
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
R |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
Total
other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
5,605 |
|
|
|
(21,240 |
) |
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,870 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(13,617 |
) |
|
|
Income
(loss) before provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3,013 |
|
|
|
53,879 |
|
|
|
(78,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(21,703 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(747 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(22,450 |
) |
|
|
Provision
(benefit) for income taxes
|
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(5,713 |
) |
|
S |
|
|
|
(4,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(298 |
) |
|
T |
|
|
|
(4,655 |
) |
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,656 |
|
|
$ |
53,879 |
|
|
$ |
(72,882 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(17,346 |
) |
|
|
|
$ |
(449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
(17,795 |
) |
|
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87 |
) |
|
V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
V |
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to controlling interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(17,259 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(17,706 |
) |
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - basic
|
|
|
43,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,400 |
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,400 |
|
|
U |
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding - diluted
|
|
|
43,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,400 |
|
|
U |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,400 |
|
|
U |
|
Earnings
(loss) per share - basic
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per share - diluted
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(0.28 |
) |
|
|
|
See
accompanying notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial
statements.
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Combined Pro Forma Financial Statements
1.
Description of the Acquisition and Basis of Presentation
The
Acquisition
On
September 22, 2008, GHQ entered into a Transaction Agreement, as amended on
April 28, 2009, with Iridium Holdings and its members whereby GHQ agreed to
purchase 99.5% of Iridium Holdings member units (Class A and Class B) for 29.3
million shares of GHQ common stock, $76.7 million in cash, subject to certain
adjustments, and, within 90 days of the closing of the acquisition, a tax
benefit payment of $25.2 million in cash to sellers (other than the sellers of
the equity of Baralonco and Syncom), if Iridium Holdings has in effect a valid
IRC Section 754 election with respect to the taxable year in which the closing
occurs. Upon the closing of the acquisition, Iridium Holdings will become a
subsidiary of GHQ and GHQ will be renamed “Iridium Communications
Inc.”
Pursuant
to the Transaction Agreement, GHQ will acquire two entities, Baralonco and Syncom, which
are holders of a significant number of Iridium Holdings units. After the
closing of the acquisition, Baralonco and Syncom will become wholly-owned
subsidiaries of GHQ. No pro forma adjustments have been made for the acquisition
of Syncom and Baralonco because, although they currently have cash and certain
immaterial assets and liabilities, the Transaction Agreement contemplates that
these entities will have no assets or liabilities at the closing other than
Iridium Holdings units. The only historical operations of these entities have
been the ownership of Iridium Holdings units and, in the case of Baralonco,
certain previously disposed investments.
In
connection with the terms of the acquisition, all outstanding equity awards of
Iridium Holdings will immediately vest upon the closing of the
acquisition. The estimated reduction to Iridium Holdings’ equity at
the close of the acquisition related to the accelerated vesting is approximately
$3.2 million. Following the closing of the acquisition, GHQ will
record a compensation charge in the amount $1.3 million and a capital
contribution related to the transfer at cost of founding stockholder’s units to
certain of GHQ’s directors. The impact of the acceleration of Iridium
Holdings’ equity incentive awards and GHQ’s compensation charge and related
capital contribution are not reflected in the pro forma condensed combined
financial statements.
On
October 24, 2008, Greenhill Europe purchased a convertible note for $22.9
million in cash from Iridium Holdings. Greenhill Europe has the
option to convert the convertible note into Class A units of Iridium Holdings
upon the later of (i) October 24, 2009 and (ii) the earlier of closing of the
acquisition pursuant to the transaction agreement or the termination of the
transaction agreement. The convertible note matures in seven years
and bears interest at 5% per annum, compounded quarterly, beginning on April 24,
2009. The pro forma condensed combined financial statements do not
reflect the convertible note on an as-converted basis because the earliest date
that Greenhill Europe can convert the convertible note is October 24,
2009.
In
conjunction with the issuance of the convertible note, Iridium Holdings executed
amendments to the first and second lien credit facilities, (the “Credit
Amendments”) which were completed in October 2008. Following the
execution of the Credit Amendments a net distribution of $36.3 million was made
to current Iridium Holdings unit holders. Iridium Holdings also
prepaid $22.0 million of the outstanding balance on the first lien term loan at
the signing of the Credit Amendments. The Credit Amendments provide
for: (a) an increase in the applicable interest rate margin for Eurodollar loans
by 75 basis points (5% for first lien and 9% for second lien); (b) an increase
in permitted capital expenditures for 2009; (c) a prepayment of $80.0 million of
the outstanding balance on the first lien term loan under the agreement by
Iridium Holdings if the proposed transaction with GHQ is consummated ($15.0
million if stockholder approval is not obtained by June 29, 2009 or, if
stockholder approval is obtained by June 29, 2009, the transaction is not
consummated by September 30, 2009); and (d) an amendment to the definition of
“Change of Control” under the agreement to include the public company in
existence after the proposed transaction with GHQ.
Basis of
Presentation
The unaudited pro forma condensed
combined financial statements have been prepared based on GHQ’s
and Iridium Holdings’
historical financial
information. Certain disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles
in the United States have been condensed or omitted as permitted by SEC rules
and regulations.
These unaudited pro forma
condensed combined
financial statements are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations
that would have been achieved had the acquisition actually taken place at the
dates indicated and do not purport to be indicative of future financial condition or operating
results.
2. Acquisition Method
The pro forma condensed combined
financial statements reflect the accounting for the transaction in accordance
with SFAS 141R. Under the acquisition method, the purchase
price is allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their
estimated fair values, with any excess of the purchase price over the estimated
fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired recorded as
goodwill.
The fair value of GHQ’s shares of common
stock issued was calculated using GHQ’s closing stock price of $9.73 at May 28, 2009. Daily closing prices for GHQ's
common stock have ranged between $8.60 and $9.75 since GHQ's common stock began
to trade
publicly on March 20, 2008.
The consequence of a change in stock price to the bottom or top end of this range would adjust the fair value
of GHQ’s common stock issued as a result of the transaction downward by
$33.1 million or upward by
$0.6 million, respectively, with the offsetting amount being
recorded to goodwill.
The following represents the
purchase price of the
transaction (in
millions):
Value
of 29.3 million GHQ shares issued
|
|
$ |
284.9 |
|
Cash
consideration
|
|
$ |
101.9 |
|
Purchase
price
|
|
$ |
386.8 |
|
The
following represents the allocation of the purchase price (in
millions):
Purchase
price
|
|
$ |
386.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets acquired and liabilities
assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment
|
|
$ |
411.8 |
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
125.5 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
73.2 |
|
Identifiable
intangible assets
|
|
|
57.2 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
689.8 |
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Senior
term loan facility
|
|
$ |
(126.7 |
) |
Deferred
tax liability
|
|
|
(69.6 |
) |
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
(104.4 |
) |
Total
Liabilities
|
|
$ |
(300.7 |
) |
non-controlling
interest
|
|
$ |
(2.3 |
) |
3. Pro Forma
Adjustments and Assumptions
A)
|
Represents the cash
component of the purchase price of $101.9 million consisting of a $76.7
million cash payment and $25.2 million of tax benefit
payments.
|
B)
|
Reflects
the release of $401.9 million of GHQ investments held in trust that will
be available for the operating activities of the combined company and
distributions related to the acquisition. Possible uses for the remaining cash
may include the pay down of amounts due under the credit facility and
capital expenditures for the development and expansion of the combined
company’s operations.
|
C)
|
Reflects
original deferred underwriting commissions of $16.4 million as a liability
of $11.3 million, with $5.1 million included in common stock subject to
possible conversion. The deferred underwriting commissions will
be reduced pro rata as a result of the exercise of any stockholder
conversion rights. On June 2, 2009, the underwriter agreed to
reduce the deferred underwriting commissions payable upon the closing of
the acquisition by approximately $8.2 million. Accordingly, the
deferred underwriting commissions payable upon closing will range between
approximately $3.1 million (assuming maximum conversion) to $8.2 million
(assuming no conversion) depending upon the number of stockholders who
exercise their conversion rights. In addition, pursuant to an
agreement dated June 2, 2009, GHQ will purchase 3.7 million warrants from
the underwriter or its affiliate for $1.8
million.
|
D)
|
Reflects
the required prepayment of $80.0 million ($15.0 million for current and
$65.0 million for non-current portion) of the outstanding balance on the
first lien term loan in connection with the closing of the acquisition and
the write-off of $4.4 million of deferred financing
costs. Also, reflects the fair value adjustment to the credit
facility of $3.8 million and $4.5 million (current and non-current
portion, respectively). The fair value of the credit facilities
was derived by multiplying the face amount by the median of independent
market data for debt trading on March 31, 2009. The reduction
in interest expense related to the pay down of the credit facility is $1.2
million and $6.9 million for the three months ended
|
March 31,
2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, respectively. Interest
expense has been calculated based on the revised interest rates set forth in the
Credit Amendments.
E)
|
Reflects
the payment of $9.4 million of fees to financial advisors payable upon the
closing of the acquisition. Depending upon the post-closing
capitalization, the combined company will be required to pay up to an
additional $4.0 million of fees to financial
advisors.
|
F)
|
Reflects the preliminary fair
value adjustment to the Motorola Inc. (“Motorola”) payable
acquired, of $(0.7)
million.
|
G)
|
Reflects the pro forma
impact of the preliminary fair value adjustment to inventory acquired of
$9.9
million.
|
H)
|
Reflects the pro forma impact of
the acquired property and equipment of Iridium
Holdings. The preliminary fair value adjustment and related
depreciation is as follows (in
millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional depreciation
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the three
|
|
For
the year
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
months
ended
|
|
ended
December
|
|
Remaining
|
amounts
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
adjustment
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
31,
2008
|
|
useful
lives
|
$
|
62.23
|
$
|
411.76
|
$
|
349.53
|
$17.48
|
$69.91
|
5
|
I)
|
Reflects the pro forma adjustment
to deferred taxes which represents the estimated impact of the pro forma
adjustments at a statutory tax rate of approximately 38.4%. A deferred tax
liability of $69.6
million has been reflected based on the preliminary
adjustment of $181.2
million (the excess
of the preliminary book step up of $412 million and the preliminary tax step up of
$230.8 million). The book step
up adjustment is determined based on the excess of the fair value of the assets
($621.4 million) over the book value of
the assets ($209.4 million). The tax step
up of the assets is based upon IRC Section 743 and the tax gain that
the sellers (other
than the sellers of the equity of Baralonco or Syncom) will recognize in the
transaction. The book and tax step ups increase the basis of
the assets. Under FAS 109 and FAS 141R, the difference between the book
basis of the assets and the tax basis of the assets is treated as a
deferred tax item. A deferred tax asset adjustment of $1.4 million has been
reflected based on
the Iridium Holdings book-tax differences existing on the balance
sheet date. An income tax reserve of $0.6 million has been
reflected.
|
J)
|
Reflects the pro forma impact of
the identified intangible assets of Iridium Holdings which have been
allocated to trade names, customer relationships, spectrum / license
agreements, internally developed, internal use software and developed
technology assuming remaining useful lives of five
years.
|
The preliminary fair value adjustment
and related amortization is as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the three
|
|
For
the year
|
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
months
ended
|
|
ended
December
|
|
Remaining
|
|
Intangible
|
|
amounts
|
|
Fair
value
|
|
adjustment
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
31,
2008
|
|
useful
lives
|
|
Customer
relationships
|
|
$0.00
|
|
$41.62
|
|
$41.62
|
|
$2.08
|
|
$8.32
|
5
|
|
Core/developed
technology
|
|
$0.00
|
|
$5.65
|
|
$5.65
|
|
$0.28
|
|
$1.13
|
5
|
|
Spectrum
/ license agreements
|
|
$0.00
|
|
$5.38
|
|
$5.38
|
|
$0.27
|
|
$1.08
|
5
|
|
Trade
names/marks
|
|
$0.00
|
|
$4.40
|
|
$4.40
|
|
$0.22
|
|
$0.88
|
5
|
|
Internally
developed software
|
|
$0.00
|
|
$0.18
|
|
$0.18
|
|
$0.01
|
|
$0.04
|
5
|
|
Total
|
|
$0.00
|
|
$57.23
|
|
$57.23
|
|
$2.86
|
|
$11.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K)
|
Reflects the pro forma adjustment
to goodwill of $73.2 million,
representing the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net
assets to be acquired.
|
L)
|
Reflects the preliminary fair value
adjustment to deferred revenues of $(14.9) million. The
deferred revenue liability reflects fair value assumptions based on total
costs to satisfy the legal performance obligation assumed by
GHQ. The fair value is calculated as the present value of
direct and indirect costs
|
required
to service the obligation. It also includes an estimated, normal profit
margin of 18% based on the perspective of a market participant. A
risk-free rate of 4.5% was used to discount the aforementioned figures to
present value given the fact that the obligation will be serviced over time
(generally a one year period).
M)
|
Assuming minimum conversion,
reflects the
reclassification of common stock subject to conversion to permanent
equity. This amount, which immediately prior to this
transaction was being held in trust, represents the value of 11,999,999
shares of common stock which may be converted into cash by GHQ
stockholders at an estimated $10.00 conversion price. The
$10.00 conversion price was determined by forecasting the balance of GHQ's
trust account at the time of the closing of the acquisition taking into
account expected interest income on the trust account balance, applicable
taxes, and the expenses and working capital needs of
GHQ.
|
N)
|
Reflects the fair value of the
29.3 million shares issued as
consideration for Iridium Holdings. The shares were valued
using GHQ’s closing market price of its common stock of $9.73 at May 28,
2009.
|
O)
|
Reflects the elimination of
Iridium Holdings’ historical net equity of approximately $(51.5) million as a result of the
acquisition.
|
P)
|
Represents maximum conversion and
that GHQ stockholders
holding 30%
of the IPO shares
less one share
(11,999,999 shares) vote against the transaction and elect to exercise
their conversion rights and convert their shares of common stock subject
to conversion into cash at an estimated $10.00
conversion price.
|
Q)
|
Reflects the reduction of interest
income related to the release of cash from trust which would no longer
earn interest.
|
R)
|
Reflects the increase of interest
income earned at an average annualized rate of 0.65% on the remaining cash
after distributions and payments related to the acquisition are made of
$0.4 million and $1.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the year ended December 31,
2008, respectively, assuming minimum conversion. Also, reflects
the reduction of interest income of $(0.2) million and $(0.8) million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and for the year ended December 31,
2008, respectively, assuming maximum
conversion.
|
S)
|
Reflects an income tax benefit of
$3.8 million and $5.7
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and for the year ended
December 31, 2008, respectively, for the combined entity,
assuming the
transaction occurred on January 1, 2008. The adjustments
are calculated based on the difference between the income tax
expense/(benefit) calculated under FAS 109 for the combined entity and the
income tax expense/(benefit) recorded under FAS 109 in the separate entity
financial statements. In the separate entity financial
statements, because Iridium Holdings is a partnership for tax purposes,
the entity is not subject to income tax. Consequently, no
income tax expense has been recorded in its financial
statements. The combined entity will record income tax expense
related to Iridium Holdings’ taxable
income.
|
T)
|
Reflects an income tax benefit
related to the pro forma adjustments to interest income and expense of
$0.08 million and
$0.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and for the year
ended December 31, 2008, respectively, of the combined entity, assuming
maximum conversion.
|
U)
|
Pro forma earnings per share
(EPS), basic and diluted, are based on the following calculations of the
number of shares of common stock. Loss per share is computed by
dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period. The effect of the 10.9
million shares underlying the outstanding warrants, calculated based on
the treasury stock method and the 44.0 million warrants issued in
connection with GHQ's IPO (net of the 4.0 million warrants which Greenhill
has agreed to forfeit), have not been considered in diluted loss per share
since the effect of the warrants would be
anti-dilutive.
|
|
|
Minimum Conversion
|
|
|
Maximum Conversion
|
|
Basic and diluted shares (in millions)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GHQ
shares after IPO issuance
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
|
|
48.5
|
|
GHQ
shares subject to redemption
|
|
|
0.0
|
|
|
|
-12.0
|
|
Issuance
of GHQ shares as purchase consideration
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
|
|
29.3
|
|
Founder
shares forfeited
|
|
|
-1.4
|
|
|
|
-1.4
|
|
Total
|
|
|
76.4
|
|
|
|
64.4
|
|
V)
|
Reflects 0.5% non-controlling
interest of $2.3 million for the units of Iridium Holdings
that GHQ is not acquiring pursuant to the transaction. The fair value of the
non-controlling interest was derived by considering the fair value of the
acquired business as a whole and adjusting for an estimated control
premium.
|
CAUTIONARY
STATEMENT CONCERNING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.
This
proxy statement may contain statements about future events and expectations
known as “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the
Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (the “Exchange Act”). We have based these statements on
current expectations and projections about future results.
The words
“anticipates,” “may,” “can,” “believes,” “expects,” “projects,” “intends,”
“likely,” “will,” “to be” and other expressions that are predictions of or
indicate future events, trends or prospects and which do not relate to
historical matters identify forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and
other factors that may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of
GHQ and/or Iridium Holdings to differ materially from any future results,
performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. All statements other than statements of historical fact
are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements. These
risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, uncertainties regarding
the timing of the proposed transaction with Iridium Holdings, whether the
transaction will be approved by GHQ’s stockholders, whether the closing
conditions will be satisfied (including receipt of regulatory approvals), as
well as industry and economic conditions, competitive, legal, governmental and
technological factors. There is no assurance that GHQ’s or Iridium
Holdings’ expectations will be realized. If one or more of these
risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove
incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those expected, estimated or
projected.
Readers
are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which speak only as of the date hereof. Except for our ongoing
obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws,
we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any
forward-looking statements after the date they are made, whether as a result of
new information, future events or otherwise.
RISK
FACTORS
You
should carefully consider the risk factors described below, together with the
other information contained in this proxy statement, before you decide whether
to vote or instruct your vote to be cast to approve the acquisition proposal and
the other proposals. If any of the following events occur, our
business, financial condition and operating results may be materially adversely
affected. In that event, the trading price of our securities could
decline and you could lose all or part of your investment. This proxy
statement also contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those
anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of specific factors,
including the risks described below.
For
purpose of this Section, the term “Iridium Holdings” refers to Iridium Holdings
LLC and its operating subsidiaries.
Risks
Related to Iridium Holdings’ Business
The
success of Iridium Holdings’ business plan depends on increased demand for
mobile satellite services and its ability to successfully implement
it.
The
business plan of Iridium Holdings is predicated on growth in demand for mobile
satellite services. Demand for mobile satellite services may not
grow, or may even shrink, either generally or in particular geographic markets,
for particular types of services, or during particular time
periods. A lack of demand could impair its ability to sell its
products and services, develop and successfully market new products and
services, and/or could exert downward pressure on prices. Any such
decline would decrease its revenues and profitability and negatively affect its
ability to generate cash for investments and other working capital
needs.
The
success of Iridium Holdings’ business plan will also depend on a number of other
factors, including:
·
|
its
ability to maintain the health, capacity and control of its existing
satellite network;
|
·
|
its
ability to contract for the design, construction, delivery and launch of
its second-generation satellite constellation (Iridium NEXT) and, once
launched, its ability to maintain the health, capacity and control of the
satellite constellation;
|
·
|
the
level of market acceptance and demand for its products and
services;
|
·
|
its
ability to introduce innovative new products and services that satisfy
market demand;
|
·
|
its
ability to obtain additional business using its existing spectrum
resources both in the United States and
internationally;
|
·
|
its
ability to maintain its relationship with U.S. government customers,
particularly the Department of Defense
(“DoD”);
|
·
|
the
ability of Iridium Holdings’ distributors to market and distribute its
products and services effectively and their continued development of
innovative and improved solutions and applications integrating its product
and service offerings;
|
·
|
the
effectiveness of Iridium Holdings’ competitors in developing and offering
similar services and products;
and
|
·
|
its
ability to maintain competitive prices for Iridium Holdings’ products and
service offerings and control
costs.
|
Iridium
Holdings may be negatively affected by current global economic conditions and
the related tightening of the credit markets.
Iridium
Holdings’ operations and performance depend significantly on worldwide economic
conditions. Uncertainty about current global economic conditions
poses a risk as individual consumers, businesses and
governments
may postpone spending in response to tighter credit, negative financial news,
declines in income or asset values and/or budgetary constraints. Reduced demand
for its products and services would adversely affect its business, financial
condition and results of operations. While Iridium Holdings expects to continue
to increase its number of subscribers and revenues, it expects its future growth
rate will be slower than its historical growth. Iridium Holdings expects its
future growth rate will be impacted by the current economic slowdown, increased
competition, increasing subscribers deactivations, maturation of the satellite
communications industry and the difficulty in sustaining high growth rates as
Iridium Holdings increases in size. The recent appreciation of the U.S. dollar
may also negatively impact its growth by increasing the cost of its products and
services in foreign countries. Iridium Holdings also expects its subscriber
equipment revenue to decrease in the future as it introduces lower priced units
in order to drive an increase in its service revenues and due to an anticipated
decrease in unit sales as a result of increased competition and the continued
maturation of the market.
The
recent global economic crisis and related tightening of credit markets has also
made it more difficult and expensive to raise capital. Iridium Holdings’ ability
to obtain additional capital to finance Iridium NEXT and other capital
requirements may be adversely impacted by the continuation of these market
conditions. If Iridium Holdings is unable to access additional capital on
acceptable terms or at all, it may not be able to fully implement its business
strategy which would limit the development of its business and its future
growth.
Iridium
Holdings’ satellites have a limited life and may fail prematurely, which would
cause its network to be compromised and materially and adversely affect its
business, prospects and profitability.
Since
Iridium Holdings reintroduced commercial services in 2001, six of its satellites
have failed in orbit which have resulted in either the complete loss of the
affected satellites or the loss of the ability of the satellite to carry traffic
on the network, and one
satellite was lost as a result of a collision with a non-operational Russian
satellite. In the future, additional satellites may fail or collide
with space debris or other satellites. In-orbit failure may result
from various causes, including component failure, loss of power or fuel,
inability to control positioning of the satellite, solar or other astronomical
events, including solar radiation and flares, and space debris. Other
factors that could affect the useful lives of its satellites include the quality
of construction, gradual degradation of solar panels and the durability of
components. Radiation induced failure of satellite components may
result in damage to or loss of a satellite before the end of its expected
life. As a result, fewer than 66 of its in-orbit satellites may be
fully functioning at any time. As Iridium Holdings’ constellation has
aged, some of its satellites have experienced individual component failures
affecting their coverage and/or transmission capacity and other satellites may
experience such failures in the future, adversely affecting the reliability of
its service, which could adversely affect its results of operations, cash flow
and financial condition. Although Iridium Holdings does not incur any
direct cash costs related to the failure of a satellite, if a satellite fails,
Iridium Holdings records an impairment charge reflecting its net book
value.
Iridium
Holdings has categorized three types of anomalies among the satellites in its
constellation that, if they materialize throughout the satellite constellation,
have the potential for a significant operational impact. These include: (i) a
non-recoverable anomalous short circuit in a satellite’s Integrated Bus
Electronics (“IBE”); (ii) excessive power subsystem degradation resulting from
satellite battery wear-out or excessive loss of solar array power output and
(iii) failures to critical payload electronic parts arising from accumulated
radiation total dose.
Iridium
Holdings experienced its first satellite failure in July 2003. This
failure has been attributed to a non-recoverable anomalous short circuit in the
satellite’s IBE. Two additional satellites failed as a result of this
anomaly in August 2005 and December 2006. In part, as a response to
this anomaly, Iridium Holdings has implemented several procedures across its
constellation to attempt to mitigate the severity of a similar anomaly in the
future and/or prevent it from resulting in mission-critical failures of its
other satellites. These procedures include reducing the peak
operating temperature of the IBE during portions of the solar season, as well as
modifying the on-board software of its satellites to immediately carry out
certain autonomous actions upon detecting future occurrences of this type of
anomaly. However, there can be no assurance such procedures will be
effective.
Iridium
Holdings has experienced three additional satellite failures unrelated to IBE
short circuits. In April 2005,
one of its satellites failed as a result of a radiation-induced single event
upset anomaly, which corrupted the satellite’s on-board time
reference. Accurate time reference is critical to determine a
satellite’s ephemeris (its orbital location with respect to the earth), attitude
(its pointing direction) and the sun’s position. In December 2005,
Iridium Holdings was unable to remedy a failure in the crosslink digital
reference oscillator of another of its satellites, resulting in the satellite’s
failure. Failure of the digital reference oscillator disables the
affected satellite’s
crosslinks
and, thus, its ability to communicate with the rest of the satellite
constellation. More recently, in July 2008, another of Iridium
Holdings’ satellites experienced an attitude control anomaly as a result of
sudden loss of communications between its IBE and its primary space vehicle and
routing computer. The nature of this anomaly coupled with the
software state of the vehicle at the time (resulting from an on-board software
fault response to a prior anomaly) resulted in the inability of the on-board
software to correct the computer communications anomaly and control of the
satellite was lost.
Iridium
Holdings has experienced one satellite to satellite collision. On February 10,
2009, Iridium Holdings lost an operational satellite (SV33) as a result of a
collision with a non-operational Russian satellite (Cosmos 2251). If
Iridium Holdings’ constellation experiences additional satellite failures and/or
collisions, its ability to operate its business may be impaired, which would
have a material adverse effect on Iridium Holdings’ business.
Iridium
Holdings has been occasionally advised by its customers and others of temporary
intermittent losses of signal cutting off calls in progress, preventing
completions of calls when made or disrupting the transmission of
data. If the magnitude or frequency of such problems increase, they
could materially adversely affect its business and its ability to complete its
business plan.
Iridium
Holdings may be required in the future to make further changes to its
constellation to maintain or improve its performance. Any such changes may
require prior FCC approval. In addition, from time to time Iridium
Holdings may reposition its satellites within the constellation in order to
optimize its service, which could result in degraded service during the
repositioning period. Although there are some remote tools Iridium
Holdings uses to remedy certain types of problems affecting the performance of
its satellites, the physical repair of its satellites in space is not
feasible.
Additional
Iridium Holdings’ satellites may collide with space debris or another
spacecraft, which could adversely affect the performance of its constellation
and business.
On
February 10, 2009, Iridium Holdings lost an operational satellite (SV33) as a
result of a collision with a non-operational Russian satellite (Cosmos
2251). Although Iridium Holdings has some ability to actively
maneuver its satellites to avoid potential collisions with space debris or other
spacecraft, this ability is limited by, among other factors, insufficient and
unreliable data to predict potential collisions and the inaccuracy of
conjunction assessments. If Iridium Holdings’ constellation
experiences additional satellite collisions with space debris or other
spacecrafts, its ability to operate its constellation may be impaired and its
business may suffer.
The
space debris created by the recent satellite collision may cause damage to other
spacecraft positioned in a similar orbital altitude.
The
collision of an Iridium Holdings satellite with a non-operational Russian
satellite increased the amount of space debris in the orbital altitude where the
collision occurred, and thus increased the risk of space debris damaging or
interfering with the operation of satellites owned by third parties, such as
U.S. or foreign governments or agencies and other satellite operators. Although
there are tools used by Iridium Holdings and providers of tracking services
(such as the U.S. Joint Space Operations Center) to detect, track and identify
space debris, Iridium Holdings may not be able to maneuver Iridium
Holdings' satellites in a timely manner. Any such collision
could potentially expose Iridium Holdings to significant liability.
If
Iridium Holdings experiences operational disruptions with respect to its
commercial gateway or operations center, Iridium Holdings may not be able to
provide service to its customers.
Iridium
Holdings’ commercial satellite network traffic is supported by a primary ground
station gateway in Tempe, Arizona. In addition, Iridium Holdings
operates its satellite constellation from its satellite network operations
center in Leesburg, Virginia. Currently, Iridium Holdings does not
have a back-up facility that could adequately replace its Arizona gateway or
immediately replace its Virginia operations center if either experienced
catastrophic failure. Both facilities are subject to the risk of
significant malfunctions or catastrophic loss due to unanticipated events and
would be difficult to replace or repair and could require substantial lead-time
to do so. Material changes in the operation of these facilities may be subject
to prior FCC approval. Iridium Holdings may also in the future
experience service shutdowns or periods of reduced service as a result of
regulatory issues,
equipment
failure or delays in deliveries. Any such failure would impede its
ability to provide service to its customers.
If
Iridium Holdings is unable to effectively develop and deploy its
second-generation satellite constellation before its current satellite
constellation ceases to provide continuity of service, Iridium Holdings’
business will suffer.
Iridium
Holdings is currently developing its second-generation satellite constellation,
Iridium NEXT, which Iridium Holdings expects to commence launching in
2014. While Iridium Holdings expects its current constellation to
provide continuity of service through 2014, Iridium Holdings cannot guarantee it
will provide continuity of service through the transition period to Iridium
NEXT. If Iridium Holdings is unable, for any reason, including
manufacturing or launch delays, launch failures, in-orbit satellite failures,
delays in receiving regulatory approvals or insufficient funds, to deploy
Iridium NEXT before its current constellation ceases to provide continuity of
service or if Iridium Holdings experiences backward compatibility problems with
its new constellation once deployed, Iridium Holdings likely will lose
customers, and will incur a decline in revenues and profitability as its ability
to provide continuity of services is impaired.
Iridium
Holdings’ second-generation satellite constellation may not be completed on
time, and the costs associated with it may be greater than
expected.
Iridium
Holdings may not complete Iridium NEXT on time, on budget or at
all. Design, manufacture and launch of satellite systems are highly
complex and historically have been subject to delays and cost
over-runs. Development of Iridium NEXT may suffer from delays,
interruptions or increased costs due to many factors, some of which may be
beyond its control, including:
·
|
lower
than anticipated demand for mobile satellite services resulting in market
prices that significantly impact its
profitability;
|
·
|
lower
than expected secondary payload
funding;
|
·
|
its
inability to access capital to finance Iridium NEXT on acceptable terms or
at all;
|
·
|
engineering
and/or manufacturing performance falling below expected levels of output
or efficiency;
|
·
|
denial
or delays in receipt of regulatory approvals, or non-compliance with
conditions imposed by regulatory
approvals;
|
·
|
the
breakdown or failure of equipment or
systems;
|
·
|
non-performance
by third-party contractors, including the prime system
contractor;
|
·
|
licensing
costs for necessary technology;
|
·
|
launch
delays or failures, or in-orbit satellite failures once
launched;
|
·
|
labor
disputes or disruptions in labor productivity or the unavailability of
skilled labor;
|
·
|
increases
in the costs of materials;
|
·
|
changes
in project scope;
|
·
|
additional
requirements imposed by changes in laws;
or
|
·
|
severe
weather or catastrophic events such as fires, earthquakes, storms or
explosions.
|
While
Iridium Holdings plans to fund the majority of the costs associated with Iridium
NEXT from internally generated cash flows and secondary payload funding as well
as proceeds from its proposed transaction with GHQ, Iridium Holdings will need
to raise additional debt or equity to finance the rest of such costs, including
any
amounts arising from cost-overruns or if internally generated funds or secondary
payloads fundings are less than anticipated. Such capital may not be available
to Iridium Holdings on acceptable terms or at all.
If any of
the above events occur, they could have a material adverse effect on Iridium
Holdings’ ability to continue to develop Iridium NEXT, which would materially
adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Iridium
Holdings may not be able to launch its second-generation satellites
successfully. Loss of any such satellites during launch could delay
or impair its ability to offer its services, and launch insurance, to the extent
available, will not fully cover this risk.
The
launch of Iridium Holdings’ second-generation satellites could be subject to
delays and risks relating to launch, including launch failure or incorrect
orbital placement, impairing its ability to offer continuity of
services. Iridium Holdings may insure all or a portion of the launch
of its second-generation satellites. Launch insurance currently costs
approximately 10% to
20% of the insured value of the satellites launched (including launch costs),
but may vary depending on market conditions and the safety record of the launch
vehicle. In addition, Iridium Holdings expects any launch insurance
policies that it obtains to include specified exclusions, deductibles and
material change limitations. Typically, these insurance policies
exclude coverage for damage arising from acts of war, lasers, and other similar
potential risks for which exclusions are customary in the
industry. If launch insurance rates were to rise substantially,
Iridium Holdings’ future launch costs could increase. It is also
possible that insurance could become unavailable or prohibitively expensive,
either generally or for a specific launch vehicle, or that new insurance could
be subject to broader exclusions on coverage or limitations on losses, in which
event Iridium Holdings would bear the risk of launch failures. Even
if a lost satellite is fully insured, acquiring a replacement satellite may be
difficult and time consuming and could delay the deployment of Iridium
NEXT. Furthermore, launch insurance typically does not cover lost
revenue.
Iridium
Holdings may need additional capital to maintain its network, develop,
manufacture and launch Iridium NEXT and pursue additional growth
opportunities. If Iridium Holdings fails to obtain sufficient
capital, it will not be able to successfully implement its business
plan.
Iridium
Holdings’ business plan calls for the development of Iridium NEXT, the
development of new product and service offerings, upgrades to its current
services, hardware and software upgrades to maintain its ground infrastructure
and upgrades to its business systems. While Iridium Holdings believes
internally generated cash flows, proceeds from debt and equity offerings as well
as its proposed transaction with GHQ and secondary payload funding will be
sufficient to enable Iridium Holdings to fund its capital requirements, it may
not be able to due to increased costs, lower revenues or inability to access
additional financing. If Iridium Holdings does not have such funds,
its ability to maintain its network, develop, manufacture and launch Iridium
NEXT and pursue additional growth opportunities will be impaired, which would
adversely affect its business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Iridium
Holdings may be unable to obtain and maintain in-orbit liability insurance, and
the insurance Iridium Holdings obtains may not cover all liabilities to which
Iridium Holdings may become subject.
Pursuant
to Iridium Holdings’ and Iridium Satellite’s transition services, products and
asset agreement with Motorola, and the agreement between Iridium Satellite, The
Boeing Company (“Boeing”), Motorola and the U.S. government, Iridium Satellite
is required to maintain an in-orbit liability insurance policy with a
de-orbiting endorsement. The current policy (together with the
de-orbiting endorsement) covers amounts that Iridium Satellite and certain other
named parties may become liable to pay for bodily injury and/or property damages
to third parties related to processing, maintaining and operating its satellite
constellation and, in the case of the de-orbiting endorsement, de-orbiting its
satellite constellation. The current policy has a one-year term,
which expires December 12, 2009. The price, terms and availability of
insurance have fluctuated significantly since Iridium Holdings began offering
commercial satellite services. The cost of obtaining insurance can
vary as a result of either satellite failures or general conditions in the
insurance industry. Higher premiums on insurance policies would
increase its costs. In-orbit liability insurance policies on
satellites may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms or
at all. In addition to higher premiums, insurance policies may
provide for higher deductibles, shorter coverage periods and additional policy
exclusions. Iridium Holdings’ failure to renew its current in-orbit
liability insurance policy or obtain a replacement policy would trigger certain
de-orbit rights held by the U.S. government, Motorola and Boeing, adversely
affecting its ability to provide continuity of services. See “The
U.S. government,
Motorola
and Boeing may unilaterally require Iridium Holdings to de-orbit its
constellation upon the occurrence of certain events” below for more
information. In addition, even if Iridium Satellite continues to
maintain any in-orbit liability insurance policy this insurance coverage may not
protect it against all third-party losses, materially and adversely affecting
its financial condition and results of operations if any such third-party losses
were to occur.
Iridium
Satellites’ current in-orbit liability insurance policies contain, and any
future policies are expected to contain, specified exclusions and material
change limitations customary in the industry. These exclusions may
relate to, among other things, losses resulting from acts of war, insurrection,
terrorism or military action, government confiscation, strikes, riots, civil
commotions, labor disturbances, sabotage, unauthorized use of the satellites and
nuclear or radioactive contamination, as well as claims directly or indirectly
occasioned as a result of noise, pollution, electrical and electromagnetic
interference and interference with the use of property.
In
addition to Iridium Satellites’ in-orbit liability insurance policy, Motorola
maintains product liability insurance to cover its potential liability as
manufacturer of the satellites. Motorola may not in the future be
able to renew its product liability coverage on reasonable terms and conditions,
or at all. Any failure to maintain such insurance could expose
Iridium Holdings to third-party damages that may be caused by any of its
satellites.
Iridium
Holdings does not maintain in-orbit insurance covering losses from satellite
failures or other operational problems affecting its constellation.
Iridium
Holdings does not maintain in-orbit insurance covering losses that might arise
as a result of a satellite failure or other operational problems affecting its
constellation. As a result, a failure of one or more if Iridium
Holdings’ satellites or the occurrence of equipment failures and other related
problems would constitute an uninsured loss and could have a material adverse
effect on its financial condition and results of operations.
Iridium
Holdings could lose market share and revenues as a result of increasing
competition from companies in the wireless communications industry, including
cellular and other satellite operators, and from the extension of land-based
communication services.
Iridium
Holdings faces intense competition in all of its markets, which could result in
a loss of customers and lower revenues and make it more difficult for Iridium
Holdings to enter new markets. Iridium Holdings competes primarily on
the basis of coverage, quality, portability and pricing of services and
products.
There are
currently seven other satellite operators providing services similar to Iridium
Holdings’ on a global or regional basis: Inmarsat plc. (“Inmarsat”), Globalstar,
Inc. (“Globalstar”), ORBCOMM Inc. (“Orbcomm”), Mobile Satellite Ventures, Mobile
Satellite Ventures Canada, Thuraya Satellite Telecommunications Company
(“Thuraya”) and Asia Cellular Satellites. In addition, several
regional mobile satellite services companies, including ICO Global Communication
(Holdings) Limited (“ICO”), TerreStar Networks, Inc. (“TerreStar”) and Mobile
Satellite Ventures are attempting to exploit their spectrum positions into a
U.S. consumer mobile satellite services business. The provision of
satellite-based services and products is subject to downward price pressure when
capacity exceeds demand or as a result of irrational pricing behavior by certain
operators under financial pressure to expand their respective market
share. Certain satellite operators, for example, subsidize the prices
of their products, such as satellite handsets. In addition, Iridium
Holdings may face competition from new competitors or new technologies, which
may materially adversely affect its business plan. For example,
Iridium Holdings may face competition for its land-based services in the United
States from incipient Ancillary Terrestrial Component (“ATC”) service providers
who are currently raising capital and designing a satellite operating business
and a terrestrial component around their spectrum holdings. As a
result of competition, Iridium Holdings may not be able to successfully retain
its existing customers and attract new customers.
In
addition to its satellite-based competitors, terrestrial voice and data service
providers, both wireline and wireless, are expanding into rural and remote areas
and providing the same general types of services and products that Iridium
Holdings provides through its satellite-based system. Although
satellite communications services and terrestrial communications services are
not perfect substitutes, the two compete in certain markets and for certain
services. Consumers generally perceive terrestrial wireless voice
communication products and services as cheaper and more convenient than
satellite-based ones. Many of its terrestrial competitors have
greater resources, wider name recognition and newer technologies than Iridium
Holdings does. In addition, industry consolidation could adversely
affect Iridium Holdings by increasing the scale or scope of its competitors and
thereby making it more difficult for Iridium Holdings to compete.
Use
by Iridium Holdings’ competitors of L-band spectrum for terrestrial services
could interfere with its services.
In
February 2003, the Federal Communication Commission, or FCC, adopted rules that
permit satellite service providers to establish ATC networks. ATC
frequencies are designated in previously satellite-only bands at 1.5 GHz, 1.6
GHz, 2 GHz and 2.5 GHz. The implementation of ATC services by
satellite service providers in the United States or other countries may result
in increased competition for the right to use L-band spectrum, which Iridium
Holdings uses to provide its services, and such competition may make it
difficult for Iridium Holdings to obtain or retain the spectrum resources
Iridium Holdings requires for its existing and future services. In
addition, the FCC’s decision to permit ATC services was based on certain
assumptions, particularly relating to the level of interference that the
provision of ATC services would likely cause to other satellite service
providers, which use the L-band spectrum. If the FCC’s assumptions
prove inaccurate, or the level of ATC services provided exceeds those estimated
by the FCC, ATC services could interfere with its satellites and devices, which
may adversely impact its services. Outside the United States, other
countries are actively considering implementing regulations to facilitate ATC
services.
Rapid
and significant technological changes in the satellite communications industry
may impair Iridium Holdings’ competitive position and require Iridium Holdings
to make significant additional capital expenditures.
Much of
the hardware and software utilized in operating Iridium Holdings’ gateway was
designed and manufactured over ten years ago and portions are becoming
obsolete. As they continue to age, they may become less reliable and
will be more difficult and expensive to service, upgrade or
replace. Although Iridium Holdings maintains inventories of certain
spare parts, it nonetheless may be difficult or impossible to obtain all
necessary replacement parts for the hardware. Its business plan
contemplates updating or replacing certain hardware and software in its network,
but Iridium Holdings may not be successful in these efforts, and the cost may
exceed its estimates. Iridium Holdings may face competition in the
future from companies using new technologies and new satellite
systems. The space and communications industries are subject to rapid
advances and innovations in technology. New technology could render
its system obsolete or less competitive by satisfying customer demand in more
attractive ways or through the introduction of incompatible
standards. Particular technological developments that could adversely
affect Iridium Holdings include the deployment by its competitors of new
satellites with greater power, greater flexibility, greater efficiency or
greater capabilities, as well as continuing improvements in terrestrial wireless
technologies. For Iridium Holdings to keep up with technological
changes and remain competitive, it may need to make significant capital
expenditures. Customer acceptance of the services and products that
Iridium Holdings offers will continually be affected by technology-based
differences in its product and service offerings. New technologies
may be protected by patents or other intellectual property laws and therefore
may not be available to Iridium Holdings.
Sales
to U.S. government customers, particularly the DoD, represent a significant
portion of Iridium Holdings’ revenues.
The U.S.
government, through a dedicated gateway owned and operated by the DoD, has been
and continues to be Iridium Holdings’ largest customer, representing 21.1% and
24.4% of Iridium Holdings’ revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the
three months ended March 31, 2009, respectively. Iridium Holdings
provides the majority of its products and services to the U.S. government
pursuant to two one-year agreements, both of which are renewable for three
additional one-year terms. The U.S. government may terminate these
agreements, in whole or in part, at any time. If the U.S. government
terminates its agreements with Iridium Holdings or fails to renew such
agreements, Iridium Holdings’ business, results of operations and financial
condition could be materially and adversely affected.
In
addition, Iridium Holdings’ relationship with the U.S. government is subject to
the overall U.S. government budget and appropriation decisions and
processes. U.S. government budget decisions, including with respect
to defense spending, are based on changing government priorities and objectives,
which are driven by numerous factors, including geopolitical events and
macroeconomic conditions, and are beyond Iridium Holdings’
control. Significant changes to U.S. defense spending, including as a
result of the resolution of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, could
negatively impact Iridium Holdings’ business, results of operations and
financial condition.
Iridium
Holdings is dependent on third parties to market and sell its products and
services.
Iridium
Holdings relies on third-party distributors to market and sell its products and
services to end-users and to determine the prices end-users
pay. Iridium Holdings also depends on its distributors to develop
innovative and improved solutions and applications integrating its product and
service offerings. As a result of these arrangements, Iridium
Holdings is dependent on the performance of its distributors to generate
substantially all of its revenues. Its distributors operate
independently of Iridium Holdings, and Iridium Holdings has limited control over
their operations, which exposes Iridium Holdings to significant
risks. Distributors may not commit the necessary resources to market
and sell Iridium Holdings’ products and services and may also market and sell
competitive products and services. In addition, its distributors may
not comply with the laws and regulatory requirements in their local
jurisdictions, which may limit their ability to market or sell Iridium Holdings’
products and services. If current or future distributors do not
perform adequately, or if Iridium Holdings is unable to locate competent
distributors in particular countries and secure their services on favorable
terms, or at all, Iridium Holdings may be unable to increase or maintain its
revenues in these markets or enter new markets, and Iridium Holdings may not
realize its expected growth, adversely affecting its profitability, liquidity
and brand image.
In
addition, Iridium Holdings may lose distributors due
to competition, consolidation, regulatory developments, business developments
affecting its partners or their customers, or for other reasons. Any
future consolidation of its distributors such as the acquisition of Stratos
Global Corporation by Inmarsat, also increases its reliance on a few key
distributors of its services and the amount of volume discounts that Iridium
Holdings may have to give such distributors. Iridium Holdings’ top
ten distributors for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended
March 31, 2009, accounted for, in the aggregate, approximately 52.0% and 46.0%
of its total revenues of $320.9 million and $75.8 million,
respectively. The loss of any of these distributors could
reduce the distribution of Iridium Holdings’ products and services as well the
development of new product solutions and applications.
Iridium
Holdings relies on a limited number of key vendors for timely supply of
equipment and services.
Celestica
Corporation (“Celestica”) is the manufacturer of all Iridium Holdings’ current
and next generation devices, including its mobile handsets, L-Band transceivers
and short burst data modems. Celestica may choose to terminate its business
relationship with Iridium Holdings when its current contractual obligations are
completed in January 1, 2010. If Celestica terminates this
relationship, Iridium Holdings may not be able to find a replacement
supplier. In addition, as its sole supplier, Iridium Holdings is very
dependent on Celestica’s performance. If Celestica has difficulty
manufacturing or obtaining the necessary parts or material to manufacture
Iridium Holdings’ products, its business would be materially
affected. Although Iridium Holdings may replace Celestica with
another supplier, there could be a substantial period of time in which its
products are not available and any new relationship may involve a significantly
different cost structure, development schedule and delivery times.
In
addition, Iridium Holdings depends on Boeing to provide operations and
maintenance services with respect to its satellite network (including
engineering, systems analysis and operations and maintenance services) from its
technical support center in Chandler, Arizona and its satellite network
operations center in Leesburg, Virginia. Boeing provides these
services pursuant to a long-term agreement that is concurrent with the expected
useful life of its constellation. Technological competence is
critical to Iridium Holdings’ business and depends, to a significant degree, on
the work of technically skilled employees, such as its Boeing
contractors. If Boeing’s performance falls below expected levels or
if Boeing has difficulties retaining the employees or contractors servicing
Iridium Holdings’ network, Iridium Holdings’ business would be materially
affected. In addition, if Boeing terminates its agreement with
Iridium Holdings, Iridium Holdings may not be able to find a replacement
provider on favorable terms or at all, which could materially and adversely
affect the operations and performance of its network. Boeing’s
replacement as the operator of its satellite system could also trigger certain
de-orbit rights held by the U.S. government, adversely affecting Iridium
Holdings’ ability to offer continuity of services. See “—The U.S.
government, Motorola and Boeing may unilaterally require Iridium Holdings to
de-orbit its constellation upon the occurrence of certain events” below for more
information.
Iridium
Holdings is dependent on intellectual property licensed from third
parties.
Iridium
Holdings licenses substantially all system technology, including software and
systems to operate and maintain its network as well as technical information for
the design and manufacture of its devices, from
Motorola.
Iridium Holdings maintains its licenses with Motorola pursuant to several
long-term agreements. Iridium Holdings also licenses additional system
technology from several other third parties. If Motorola or any such
third party were to cease to support and service this technology, or if Iridium
Holdings is unable to renew such licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at
all, it may be difficult, more expensive or impossible to obtain such services
from alternative vendors. Any substitute technology may also have
lower quality or performance standards, which would adversely affect the quality
of its products and services.
Iridium
Holdings has been and may in the future become subject to claims that its
products violate the patent or intellectual property rights of others, which
could be costly and disruptive to Iridium Holdings.
Iridium
Holdings operates in an industry that is susceptible to significant intellectual
property litigation. As a result, Iridium Holdings or its products
may become subject to intellectual property infringement claims or
litigation. The defense of intellectual property suits, are both
costly and time consuming and may divert management’s attention from other
business concerns. An adverse determination in litigation to which
Iridium Holdings may become a party could, among other things:
·
|
subject
Iridium Holdings to significant liabilities to third parties, including
treble damages;
|
·
|
require
disputed rights to be licensed from a third party for royalties that may
be substantial;
|
·
|
require
Iridium Holdings to cease using such technology;
or
|
·
|
prohibit
Iridium Holdings from selling certain of its
products.
|
Any of
these outcomes could have a material adverse effect on Iridium Holdings’
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Conducting
and expanding its operations outside the United States involves special
challenges that Iridium Holdings may not be able to meet and may adversely
affect its business.
International
revenues account for a significant proportion of Iridium Holdings’ total
revenues, representing 51.4% of its total revenues for the year ended December
31, 2008 and 50.0% of its total revenues for the three months ended March 31,
2009. Its major international markets include Canada and
France. Iridium Holdings is also focusing on opportunities in China,
Russia, Mexico and India. International operations and any foreign
business expansion Iridium Holdings may undertake include numerous risks,
including:
·
|
difficulties
in penetrating new markets due to established and entrenched
competitors;
|
·
|
difficulties
in developing products and services that are tailored to the needs of
local customers;
|
·
|
lack
of local acceptance or knowledge of its products and
services;
|
·
|
lack
of recognition of its products and
services;
|
·
|
unavailability
of or difficulties in establishing relationships with
distributors;
|
·
|
significant
investments, including the development and deployment of dedicated
gateways;
|
·
|
instability
of international economies and
governments;
|
·
|
changes
in laws and policies affecting trade and investment in other
jurisdictions;
|
·
|
exposure
to varying legal standards, including intellectual property protection and
foreign state ownership laws, in other
jurisdictions;
|
·
|
difficulties
in obtaining required regulatory
authorizations;
|
·
|
difficulties
in enforcing legal rights in other
jurisdictions;
|
·
|
changing
and conflicting national and local regulatory requirements;
and
|
·
|
foreign
currency exchange rates and exchange
controls.
|
These
risks could affect Iridium Holdings’ ability to successfully compete and expand
internationally, which may adversely affect its business.
The
prices for all of its products and services are denominated in U.S.
dollars. Any appreciation of the U.S. dollar against other currencies
will increase the cost of its products and services to its international
customers and, as a result, may reduce the competitiveness of its international
offerings and its international growth.
Iridium
Holdings currently is unable to offer service in important regions of the world
due to the absence of gateways in those areas, which is limiting its growth and
its ability to compete.
Iridium
Holdings’ ability to provide service in certain regions is limited by local
regulations as certain countries, such as China, Russia and India, require
physical gateways within their jurisdiction to connect traffic coming to and
from their territory. While Iridium Holdings is currently in
discussions with parties in such countries to build or purchase additional
gateways for integration into its network, Iridium Holdings may not be able to
reach an agreement to develop such additional gateways or the cost of developing
and deploying such gateways may be prohibitive, which could impair its ability
to expand its product and service offerings in such areas and undermine its
value for potential users who require service in these areas.
The
U.S. government, Motorola and Boeing may unilaterally require Iridium Holdings
to de-orbit its constellation upon the occurrence of certain
events.
Pursuant
to an agreement between Iridium Satellite, Boeing, Motorola and the U.S.
government, the U.S. government obtained the right to, in its sole discretion,
require Iridium Satellite to de-orbit the Iridium Holdings’ constellation upon
the occurrence of any of the following with respect to Iridium Satellite LLC
(“Iridium Satellite”): (a) its failure to pay certain insurance premiums or
maintain insurance; (b) its bankruptcy; (c) its sale or the sale of any major
asset in Iridium Holdings’ satellite system; (d) Boeing’s replacement as the
operator of its satellite system; (e) its failure to provide certain notices as
contemplated by the agreement; or (g) at any time after June 5, 2009, unless
extended by the U.S. government. The U.S. government also has the right to
require Iridium Holdings to de-orbit any of its individual functioning
satellites (including in-orbit spares) that have been in orbit for more than
seven years, unless the U.S. government grants a postponement. As of
May 28, 2009, all but two of Iridium Holdings’ functioning satellites have been
on orbit for more than seven years. Iridium Holdings is currently in
discussions with the U.S. government to extend or remove the 2009
deadline.
Motorola
also has the right to de-orbit the Iridium Holdings constellation pursuant to
its transition services, products and asset agreement with Iridium Holdings and
Iridium Satellite and pursuant to the operations and maintenance agreement
between Iridium Constellation LLC (“Iridium Constellation”) and
Boeing. Under these agreements, Motorola may require the de-orbit of
the Iridium Holdings constellation upon the occurrence of any of the following:
(a) Iridium Holdings bankruptcy or the bankruptcy of Iridium Constellation or
Iridium Satellite; (b) Iridium Satellite’s breach of the transition services,
products and asset agreement; (c) Boeing’s breach of its operations and
maintenance agreement and other related agreements with Iridium Constellation or
its affiliates; (d) an order from the U.S. government requiring the de-orbiting
of Iridium Holdings’ satellites; (e) Motorola’s determination that changes in
law or regulation that may require it to incur certain costs relating to the
operation, maintenance, re-orbiting or de-orbiting of Iridium Holdings’
constellation; or (f) Motorola’s failure to obtain on commercially reasonable
terms, product liability insurance to cover its position as manufacturer of the
satellites, provided the U.S. government has not agreed to cover what would have
otherwise been paid by such policy.
Pursuant
to Iridium Constellation’s operations and maintenance agreement with Boeing,
Boeing similarly has the unilateral right to de-orbit of its constellation upon
the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) Iridium Constellation’s or
Iridium Satellite’s bankruptcy; (b) the existence of reasonable grounds for
Boeing to question the financial stability of Iridium Constellation; (c) Iridium
Constellation’s failure to maintain certain insurance policies; (d) Iridium
Constellation’s failure to provide Boeing certain quarterly financial
statements; (e) Iridium Constellation’s breach of the operations and maintenance
agreement, including its payment obligation thereunder; or
(f)
changes in law or regulation that may increase the risks or costs associated
with the operation and/or re-orbit process or the cost of operation and/or
re-orbit of the constellation.
Iridium
Holdings cannot guarantee that the U.S. government, Motorola and/or Boeing will
not unilaterally exercise such de-orbiting rights upon the occurrence of any of
the above events. A decision by any of the U.S. government, Motorola
or Boeing to de-orbit Iridium Holdings’ constellation would affect its ability
to provide continuity of services, materially and adversely affecting its
business, prospects and profitability.
Wireless
devices may pose health and safety risks and, as a result, Iridium Holdings may
be subject to new regulations, demand for its services may decrease and Iridium
Holdings could face liability based on alleged health risks.
There has
been adverse publicity concerning alleged health risks associated with radio
frequency transmissions from portable hand-held telephones that have
transmitting antennae. Lawsuits have been filed against participants
in the wireless industry alleging various adverse health consequences, including
cancer, as a result of wireless phone usage. The U.S. Supreme Court
recently declined to review a lower federal court’s decision remanding for trial
in state courts several cases alleging such injuries. Although
Iridium Holdings has not been party to any such lawsuits, Iridium Holdings may
be exposed to such litigation in the future. While Iridium Holdings
complies with applicable standards for radio frequency emissions and power and
does not believe that there is valid scientific evidence that use of its phones
poses a health risk, courts or governmental agencies could find
otherwise. Any such finding could reduce its revenues and
profitability and expose Iridium Holdings and other wireless providers to
litigation, which, even if not successful, could be costly to
defend.
If
consumers’ health concerns over radio frequency emissions increase, they may be
discouraged from using wireless handsets. Further, government
authorities might increase regulation of wireless handsets as a result of these
health concerns. The actual or perceived risk of radio frequency
emissions could reduce the number of Iridium Holdings’ subscribers and demand
for its products and services.
Iridium
Holdings’ business is subject to extensive government regulation, which mandates
how Iridium Holdings may operate its business and may increase its cost of
providing services, slow its expansion into new markets and subject its services
to additional competitive pressures or regulatory requirements.
Iridium
Holdings’ ownership and operation of a satellite communication system is subject
to significant regulation in the United States by the FCC and in foreign
jurisdictions by similar local authorities. The rules and regulations
of the FCC or these foreign authorities may change and not continue to permit
Iridium Holdings’ operations as presently conducted or as Iridium Holdings plans
to conduct such operations. Failure to provide services in accordance
with the terms of its licenses or failure to operate its satellites or ground
stations as required by its licenses and applicable laws and government
regulations could result in the imposition of government sanctions on Iridium
Holdings, up to and including cancellation of its licenses.
Iridium
Holdings’ system must be authorized in each of the markets in which it provides
its services. Iridium Holdings may not be able to obtain or retain
all regulatory approvals needed for its operations. Regulatory
changes, such as those resulting from judicial decisions or adoption of
treaties, legislation or regulation in countries where Iridium Holdings operates
or intends to operate, including the United States, may also significantly
affect its business. Because regulations in each country are
different, Iridium Holdings may not be aware if some of its distribution
partners and/or persons with which Iridium Holdings or they do business do not
hold the requisite licenses and approvals.
Iridium
Holdings’ current regulatory approvals could now be, or could become,
insufficient in the view of domestic or foreign regulatory authorities, any
additional necessary approvals may not be granted on a timely basis, or at all,
in all jurisdictions in which Iridium Holdings wishes to offer services, and
applicable restrictions in those jurisdictions could become unduly
burdensome.
Iridium
Holdings’ operations are subject to certain regulations of the United States
State Department’s Office of Defense Trade Controls (i.e., the export of
satellites and related technical data), United States Treasury Department’s
Office of Foreign Assets Control (i.e., financial transactions) and the United
States Commerce Department’s Bureau of Industry and Security (i.e., its gateway
and phones). Iridium Holdings is also required to provide certain
U.S. and foreign government law enforcement and security agencies with call
interception services.
These
regulations may limit or delay Iridium Holdings’ ability to operate in a
particular country. As new laws and regulations are issued, Iridium
Holdings may be required to modify its business plans or
operations. If Iridium Holdings fails to comply with these
regulations in the United States or any other country, Iridium Holdings could be
subject to sanctions that could affect, materially and adversely, its ability to
operate in the United States or such other country. Imposition of
sanctions, losses of licenses and failure to obtain the authorizations necessary
to use its assigned radio frequency spectrum and to distribute its products in
certain countries could have a material adverse effect on Iridium Holdings’
ability to generate revenue and on its overall competitive
position.
Pursuing
strategic transactions may cause Iridium Holdings to incur additional
risks.
Iridium
Holdings may pursue acquisitions, joint ventures or other strategic transactions
on an opportunistic basis, although no such transactions that would be
financially significant to Iridium Holdings are probable at this
time. Iridium Holdings may face costs and risks arising from any such
transactions, including integrating a new business into its business or managing
a joint venture. These may include legal, organizational, financial,
loss of key customers and distributors, diversion of management’s time, and
other costs and risks.
In
addition, if Iridium Holdings were to choose to engage in any major business
combination or similar strategic transaction, Iridium Holdings may require
significant external financing in connection with the
transaction. Depending on market conditions, investor perceptions of
Iridium Holdings and other factors, Iridium Holdings may not be able to obtain
capital on acceptable terms, in acceptable amounts or at appropriate times to
implement any such transaction. Any such financing, if obtained, may
further dilute existing stockholders.
Iridium
Holdings indebtedness could impair its ability to react to changes in its
business and may limit its ability to use debt to fund future capital
needs.
As of
March 31, 2009, Iridium Holdings had $169.1 million of
indebtedness. Its indebtedness could adversely affect its financial
condition by, among others:
·
|
requiring
Iridium Holdings to dedicate a substantial portion of its cash flow from
operations to principal and interest payments on its debt, thereby
reducing the availability of its cash flow to fund working capital,
capital expenditures and other general corporate
expenditures;
|
·
|
resulting
in an event of default if Iridium Holdings fails to comply with the
restrictive covenants contained in its credit agreements, which event of
default could result in all of its debt becoming immediately due and
payable;
|
·
|
increasing
its vulnerability to adverse general economic or industry conditions
because its debt could mature at a time when those conditions make it
difficult to refinance and its cash flow is insufficient to repay the debt
in full, forcing Iridium Holdings to sell assets at disadvantageous prices
or to default on the debt, and because a decline in its profitability
could cause Iridium Holdings to be unable to comply with the forward fixed
charge coverage ratio in its credit agreement, resulting in a default on,
and acceleration of, its debt;
|
·
|
limiting
its flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, competition and/or
changes in its business or its industry by limiting its ability to incur
additional debt, to make acquisitions and divestitures or to engage in
transactions that could be beneficial to Iridium
Holdings;
|
·
|
restricting
Iridium Holdings from making strategic acquisitions, introducing new
products or services or exploiting business opportunities;
and
|
·
|
placing
Iridium Holdings at a competitive disadvantage relative to competitors
that have less debt or greater financial
resources.
|
Furthermore,
if an event of default were to occur with respect to its credit agreements or
other indebtedness, its creditors could accelerate the maturity of its
indebtedness. Iridium Holdings’ indebtedness under these credit
agreements is secured by a lien on substantially all of its assets and the
lenders could foreclose on these assets to repay the indebtedness.
Iridium
Holdings’ ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance indebtedness
obligations depends on its financial condition and operating performance, which
are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain
financial, business and other factors beyond its control. Iridium
Holdings may not be able to maintain a level of cash flows from operating
activities sufficient to permit Iridium Holdings to pay the principal, premium,
if any, and interest on its indebtedness. If its cash flows and
capital resources are insufficient to fund its debt service obligations, Iridium
Holdings could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to sell
assets, seek additional capital or seek to restructure or refinance its
indebtedness. These alternative measures may not be successful or
feasible. Its credit agreements restrict its ability to sell
assets. Even if Iridium Holdings could consummate those sales, the
proceeds that Iridium Holdings realizes from them may not be adequate to meet
any debt service obligations then due.
In
October 2008, Iridium Holdings prepaid $22 million of indebtedness under its
first lien credit facility. In addition, Iridium Holdings has agreed
to prepay another $80.0 million of the outstanding balance of its first lien
credit facility at the closing of this transaction ($15.0 million if stockholder
approval is not obtained by June 29, 2009 or, if stockholder approval is
obtained by June 29, 2009, the transaction is not consummated by September 30,
2009). Following these mandatory prepayments, approximately $55.0
million of indebtedness will be outstanding and all or a portion of this amount
may be prepaid out of the trust proceeds.
Iridium
Holdings may be able to incur additional indebtedness or other obligations in
the future, which would exacerbate the risks discussed above.
While
Iridium Holdings’ credit agreements limit its ability to incur additional debt,
Iridium Holdings may still incur significant amounts of debt and other
obligations. For example, Iridium Holdings may need to incur a
significant amount of debt to finance the development of Iridium
NEXT. To the extent additional debt or other obligations are added to
its current debt levels, the substantial indebtedness risks described above
would increase.
Restrictive
covenants in Iridium Holdings’ credit agreements impose restrictions that may
limit its operating and financial flexibility.
Iridium
Holdings’ first and second lien credit agreements contain a number of
significant restrictions and covenants that limit its ability to, among other
things:
·
|
incur
or guarantee additional
indebtedness;
|
·
|
pay
dividends or make distributions to its
unitholders;
|
·
|
make
investments, acquisitions or capital
expenditures;
|
·
|
grant
liens on its assets;
|
·
|
enter
into transactions with its
affiliates;
|
·
|
merge
or consolidate with other entities or transfer all or substantially all of
its assets; and
|
●
|
transfer
or sell assets.
|
In
addition, Iridium Holdings must maintain compliance with specified financial
covenants. Complying with these restrictive covenants, as well as
those that may be contained in any agreements governing future indebtedness, may
impair Iridium Holdings’ ability to finance its operations or capital needs or
to take advantage of other favorable business opportunities. Iridium Holdings’
ability to comply with these restrictive covenants will depend on its future
performance, which may be affected by events beyond its control. If Iridium
Holdings violates any of these covenants and is unable to obtain waivers,
Iridium Holdings would be in default under the agreement and payment of the
indebtedness could be accelerated. The acceleration of its indebtedness under
one agreement may permit acceleration of indebtedness under other agreements
that contain cross-default or cross-acceleration provisions. If its indebtedness
is accelerated, Iridium Holdings may not be able to repay its indebtedness or
borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if Iridium Holdings is able to
obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms or on terms
that are acceptable to Iridium Holdings. If its indebtedness is in default for
any reason, its business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
In
addition, complying with these covenants may also cause Iridium Holdings to take
actions that are not favorable to holders of the common stock and may make it
more difficult for Iridium Holdings to successfully execute its business plan
and compete against companies who are not subject to such
restrictions.
Spectrum
values historically have been volatile, which could cause the value of Iridium
Holdings to fluctuate.
Iridium
Holdings’ business
plan is evolving and it may in the future include forming strategic partnerships
to maximize value for its spectrum, network assets and combined service
offerings in the United States and internationally. Values that Iridium Holdings
may be able to realize from such partnerships will depend in part on the value
ascribed to its spectrum. Valuations of spectrum in other frequency bands
historically have been volatile, and Iridium Holdings cannot predict at what
amount a future partner may be willing to value its spectrum and other assets.
In addition, to the extent that the FCC takes action that makes additional
spectrum available or promotes the more flexible use or greater availability
(e.g., via spectrum
leasing or new spectrum sales) of existing satellite or terrestrial spectrum
allocations, the availability of such additional spectrum could reduce the value
of its spectrum authorizations and the value of Iridium Holdings’ business and
the price of its common stock.
Iridium
Holdings’ ability to operate its company effectively could be impaired if
Iridium Holdings loses members of its senior management team or technical
personnel.
Iridium
Holdings depends on the continued service of key managerial and technical
personnel, as well as its ability to continue to attract and retain highly
qualified personnel. Iridium Holdings competes for such personnel
with other companies, academic institutions, government entities and other
organizations. In addition, after the proposed acquisition, few of
Iridium Holdings’ employees will have equity interests in GHQ. Any
loss or interruption of the services of its key personnel could significantly
reduce its ability to effectively manage its operations and meet its strategic
objectives, because Iridium Holdings may be unable to find an appropriate
replacement, if necessary.
If
Iridium Holdings becomes subject to unanticipated foreign tax liabilities, it
could materially increase its costs.
Iridium
Holdings operates in various foreign tax jurisdictions. Iridium Holdings
believes that it has complied in all material respects with its obligations to
pay taxes in these jurisdictions. However, its position is subject to review and
possible challenge by the taxing authorities of these jurisdictions. If the
applicable taxing authorities were to challenge successfully Iridium Holdings’
current tax positions, or if there were changes in the manner in which Iridium
Holdings conducts its activities, Iridium Holdings could become subject to
material unanticipated tax liabilities. Iridium Holdings may also become subject
to additional tax liabilities as a result of changes in tax laws, which could in
certain circumstances have retroactive effect.
Risks
Associated with the Proposed Acquisition
If
the acquisition’s benefits do not meet the expectations of the marketplace,
investors, financial analysts or industry analysts, the market price of our
securities may decline.
The
market price of our common stock may decline as a result of the acquisition if
“Iridium Communications Inc.” (the post-acquisition entity) does not perform as
expected or if we do not otherwise achieve the perceived benefits of the
acquisition as rapidly as, or to the extent anticipated by, the marketplace,
investors, financial analysts or industry analysts. If such a decline
in our stock price occurs, investors may experience a loss and we may not be
able to raise future capital, if necessary, in the equity markets.
Upon
the consummation of the acquisition, our stockholders will be solely dependent
on a single business.
Upon the
consummation of the acquisition, our stockholders will be solely dependent upon
the performance of Iridium Holdings and its business. Iridium
Holdings will be subject to a number of risks that relate generally to the
satellite industry and other risks that relate specifically to Iridium Holdings,
including the risks relating to its industry and business explained
above.
A
substantial number of new shares of GHQ common stock will be issued in
connection with the acquisition and related transactions, which will result in
substantial dilution of our current stockholders and could have an adverse
effect on the market price of our shares.
We expect
to issue an aggregate of approximately 29,443,500 shares of common stock in
connection with the acquisition to the current owners of Iridium Holdings and
will issue an additional 1,946,500 shares of GHQ common stock to Greenhill
Europe, a subsidiary of Greenhill, when Greenhill Europe exercises its right to
convert the convertible subordinated promissory note into shares of GHQ common
stock. As a result of these transactions, the ownership of our
existing stockholders is expected to be reduced to approximately 60% and the
owners of Iridium Holdings are expected to own approximately 40% of the
outstanding shares of common stock of GHQ following the closing of the
acquisition (including the conversion of the note by Greenhill Europe), assuming
that (i) no holders of our IPO shares vote against the acquisition proposal and
properly exercise their rights to convert their shares into cash, and (ii) no
holders of warrants exercise their rights to acquire GHQ shares.
In
addition, we have issued warrants to purchase approximately 44.1 million shares
of our common stock to our founding stockholder and in our IPO, all of which
warrants are currently outstanding (net of warrants that our founding
stockholder has agreed to forfeit upon closing of the
acquisition). The warrants issued in our IPO will become exercisable
upon the completion of our initial business combination, although such warrants
may not be exercised unless we have an effective registration statement covering
the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current
prospectus relating to them is available. The warrants issued to our
founding stockholder will become exercisable upon the completion of our initial
business combination if the last sales price of our common stock equals or
exceeds $14.25 per share for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading-day
period beginning 90 days after such initial business combination and there is an
effective registration statement covering the shares of common stock issuable
upon exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus relating to them is
available.
Sales of
substantial numbers of shares of GHQ common stock issued upon the exercise of
the warrants in the public market could adversely affect the market price of
such shares and warrants. All of the sellers and we and our
affiliates have agreed to a one-year “lock-up” for the shares of our common
stock they will hold following the closing of the acquisition, except for
underwritten secondary offerings approved by our Board of Directors anytime
after six months from the closing of the acquisition.
If the
stock incentive plan proposal is approved by our stockholders, GHQ will reserve
8.0 million shares of our common stock for the grant of incentive stock options,
nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights and other
stock-based awards (which
includes restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based awards
payable both in cash and in shares of our common stock) to eligible
individuals under the plan. Exercise of the stock options and
stock rights by the eligible individuals will have a dilutive effect on our
current stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of our shares of
common stock.
The
holders of our common stock issued in our IPO may vote against the proposed
acquisition and exercise their rights to convert their shares to cash, thereby
reducing the cash available to fund the acquisition and related transactions and
provide working capital for Iridium Holdings after the acquisition.
The
holders of our IPO shares have certain rights to convert their IPO shares into
cash in connection with the completion of our initial business
combination. The actual per share conversion price will be equal to
the aggregate amount then on deposit in the trust account (before payment of
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and including accrued interest,
net of any income taxes payable on such interest, which shall be paid from the
trust account, and net of interest income of up to $5.0 million on the trust
account balance previously released to us to fund our working capital
requirements), calculated as of two business days prior to the completion of the
acquisition, divided by the total number of IPO shares.
If the
holders of no more than 30% (minus one share) of the IPO shares vote against the
acquisition and properly exercise their conversion rights, the acquisition may
be completed (if our certificate, share issuance and stock incentive plan
proposals are approved and the other conditions to closing the acquisition are
satisfied or waived) but any cash required to convert the IPO shares would
reduce the cash balances available to us to prepay certain Iridium Holdings
debt, pay transaction expenses and conduct Iridium Holdings’ business after
completion of the acquisition.
Registration
rights granted to the owners of Iridium Holdings may have an adverse effect on
the market price of our common stock.
We have
agreed to enter into a registration rights agreement as a condition to the
closing of the acquisition to provide the Sellers who receive shares of our
common stock at the closing of the acquisition certain rights to register those
shares of common stock under the Securities Act. Pursuant to that
registration rights agreement, we will be required to file a shelf registration
statement as soon as reasonably practicable from the closing of the acquisition
and related transactions, with a view to such registration statement becoming
effective six months from the date of the closing of the
acquisition. Certain holders of the registration rights, subject to
certain limitations, may exercise a demand registration right in order to permit
such holders to sell their registrable shares of common stock in an underwritten
public offering from the shelf registration statement. Additionally,
whenever we propose to register any of our securities under the Securities Act,
holders of registration rights will have the right to request the inclusion of
their registrable shares of common stock in such registration.
The
resale of shares of our common stock in the public market upon exercise of these
registration rights could adversely affect the market price of our common stock
or impact our ability to raise additional equity capital.
Because
our initial stockholders and directors will not participate in liquidation
distributions if we do not complete a business combination by February 14, 2010,
our initial stockholders, directors and management team may have conflicts of
interest in approving the proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings.
Our
initial stockholders have waived their rights to receive any liquidation
proceeds with respect to the founding stockholders’ shares if we fail to
complete a business combination by February 14, 2010 and thereafter
liquidate. Accordingly, their shares of GHQ common stock and warrants
to purchase GHQ common stock will be worthless if we do not complete the
acquisition of Iridium Holdings or another business combination by February 14,
2010. Because Messrs. Bok, Niehaus and Rodriguez have ownership
interests in Greenhill and consequently an indirect ownership interest in our
founding stockholder and us, they also have a conflict of interest in
determining whether Iridium Holdings is an appropriate target business for us
and our stockholders. These ownership interests may influence their
motivation in identifying and selecting Iridium Holdings as an appropriate
target business for our initial business combination and in timely completing
the acquisition of Iridium Holdings. The exercise of discretion by
our officers and directors in identifying and selecting one or more suitable
target businesses may result in a conflict of interest when determining whether
the terms, conditions and timing of the acquisition of Iridium Holdings are
appropriate and in our stockholders’ best interest. For a more
detailed discussion of these interests, see “Interests of Certain Persons in the
Acquisition.”
The
exercise of our directors’ and officers’ discretion in agreeing to changes or
waivers in the terms of the acquisition may result in a conflict of interest
when determining whether such changes to the terms of the acquisition or waivers
of conditions are appropriate and in our stockholders’ best
interest.
In the
period leading up to the closing of the acquisition, events may occur that,
pursuant to the transaction agreement, would require us to agree to further
amendments to the transaction agreement, to consent to certain actions taken by
Iridium Holdings or to waive rights that we are entitled to under the
transaction agreement. Such events could arise because of changes in
the course of Iridium Holdings’ business, a request by Iridium Holdings to
undertake actions that would otherwise be prohibited by the terms of the
transaction agreement or the occurrence of other events that would have a
material adverse effect on Iridium Holdings’ business and would entitle us to
terminate the transaction agreement. In any of such circumstances, it
would be discretionary to us, acting through our board of directors, to grant
our consent or waive our rights. The existence of the financial and
personal interests of the directors described in the preceding risk factor may
result in a conflict of interest on the part of one or more of the directors
between what he may believe is best for us and what he may believe is best for
himself in determining whether or not to take the requested action.
If
Iridium Holdings has breached any of its representations, warranties or
covenants set forth in the transaction agreement, we may not have a remedy for
losses arising therefrom.
None of
Iridium Holdings, its owners or any other persons will indemnify us for any
losses we realize as a result of any breach by Iridium Holdings of any of its
representations, warranties or covenants set forth in the transaction
agreement. Moreover, none of representations, warranties or
pre-closing covenants of Iridium Holdings
contained
in the transaction agreement will survive the closing of the acquisition, so our
rights to purse a remedy for breach of any such representations, warranties or
pre-closing covenants will terminate upon the closing of the
acquisition.
If
any of the Sellers have breached any of their representations, warranties or
covenants set forth in the transaction agreement, our remedies for losses may be
limited and we may be limited in our ability to collect for such
losses.
Each
Seller has agreed to indemnify us for breaches of its individual
representations, warranties and covenants, subject to certain limitations,
including that each Seller’s maximum liability for all indemnification claims
against it will not exceed the sum of (i) the cash consideration received by
such Seller and (ii) the product of the number of shares of our common stock
received by such Seller and $10. Except for the pledge arrangements
we have entered into with the sellers of the “blocker” holding companies
(described below), there are no escrow or other similar arrangements with any of
the Sellers and, in the event we suffer losses from a breach of a Seller’s
representations, warranties or covenants, there can be no assurances that such
Seller will have the cash consideration or shares of our common stock received
by such Seller, or other available assets, to compensate us for our
losses.
Certain
Sellers under the transaction agreement hold their interests in Iridium Holdings
shares via “blocker” corporations, and in those circumstances we are purchasing
ownership of those “blocker” corporations (Baralonco and Syncom) instead of
directly purchasing the Iridium Holdings units held by such “blocker”
corporations. After the closing of the acquisition, Baralonco and
Syncom will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of GHQ. Each of the
sellers of Baralonco and Syncom have agreed to indemnify GHQ for the pre-closing
tax liabilities of Baralonco and Syncom respectively, subject to certain
limitations. The maximum liability for the seller of Syncom shall not
exceed $3 million and the maximum liability for the seller of Baralonco shall
not exceed $15 million. In support of their respective indemnity
obligations under the transaction agreement, the seller of Syncom has agreed to
pledge 300,000 shares of GHQ common stock it will receive at closing for a
period of nine months post-closing and the seller of Baralonco has agreed to
pledge 1.5 million shares of GHQ common stock it will receive at closing for a
period of two years post-closing. These pledged shares may not fully
cover all pre-closing tax liabilities of Baralonco and Syncom.
The
transaction costs associated with our proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings
will be substantial, whether or not this acquisition is completed.
We have
already incurred significant costs, and expect to incur significant additional
costs, associated with our proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings, whether or
not this acquisition is completed. These costs will reduce the amount
of cash otherwise available for the payment of Iridium Holdings debt and other
corporate purposes. We estimate that we will incur direct transaction
costs of approximately $12.3 million associated with the acquisition of Iridium
Holdings and related transactions. There is no assurance that the
actual costs may not exceed these estimates.
The
completion of the acquisition could result in disruptions in business, loss of
clients or contracts or other adverse effects to Iridium Holdings’ business
operations.
The
completion of the acquisition may cause disruptions, including potential loss of
clients and other business partners, in the business of Iridium Holdings, which
could have material adverse effects on the combined post-closing company’s
business and operations. Although we believe that Iridium Holdings’
business relationships are and will remain stable following the acquisition,
Iridium Holdings’ clients and other business partners, in response to the
completion of the acquisition, may adversely change or terminate their
relationships with GHQ following the closing of the acquisition, which could
have a material adverse effect on the business of Iridium Holdings or GHQ
following the closing of the acquisition.
The
completion and timing of the acquisition is subject to the receipt of approvals
from government entities.
Completion
of the acquisition is conditioned upon, among other things, the receipt of
certain regulatory approvals, including from the FCC and antitrust approval
under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvement Act of 1976, as amended, which
was obtained on October 10, 2008. An interested party has filed a
petition to deny, which asks the FCC to disapprove the
transaction. In addition, three parties, while not asking the FCC to
disapprove
the
transaction, have asked the FCC to impose conditions on its approval of the
transaction. If the requested conditions are adopted, the licensee
subsidiaries of Iridium Holdings would be required to comply with an existing
frequency coordination agreement and would be prohibited from entering into
exclusive manufacturing arrangements with respect to certain consumer
equipment. In addition, the Department of Justice, the Federal Bureau
of Investigation and the Department of Homeland Security have asked the FCC to
defer action on the FCC Applications until they have had an opportunity to
review the transaction. There is no assurance that we will receive
the necessary approvals, including the approval of the FCC, or satisfy the other
conditions to the completion of the acquisition. Failure to complete
the proposed acquisition would prevent GHQ from realizing the anticipated
benefits of the acquisition. Moreover, the terms and conditions of
the approvals that are granted may impose requirements, limitations or costs or
place restrictions on the conduct of GHQ’s business following the closing of the
acquisition. We can provide no assurance that these conditions,
terms, obligations or restrictions will not result in the delay or abandonment
of the acquisition. See “Proposal I – The Acquisition – Regulatory
Matters” on page 76.
The
price of our common stock after the acquisition might be less than what you
originally paid for your shares of common stock prior to the
acquisition.
The
market price of our common stock may decline as a result of the acquisition if,
among other things:
·
|
the
market for common shares of companies in Iridium Holdings’ industry is
volatile;
|
·
|
Iridium
Holdings does not perform as
expected;
|
·
|
there
are mergers, consolidations or strategic alliances in the satellite
industry;
|
·
|
market
conditions in the satellite industry
fluctuate;
|
·
|
we
do not achieve the perceived benefits of the acquisition as rapidly as, or
to the extent anticipated by, financial or industry
analysts;
|
·
|
the
effect of the acquisition on our financial results is not consistent with
the expectations of financial or industry analysts;
or
|
·
|
the
capital markets are in a distressed
state.
|
Accordingly,
stockholders may experience a loss as a result of a decreasing stock price and
we may not be able to raise future capital, if necessary, in the equity
markets.
We
do not have any operations, and Iridium Holdings has never operated as a public
company. Fulfilling Iridium Holdings’ obligations as a public company
after the acquisition will be expensive and time consuming.
Iridium
Holdings, as a private company, has not been required to prepare or file
periodic and other reports with the SEC under applicable federal securities
laws, to comply with the requirements of the federal securities laws applicable
to public companies, or to document and assess the effectiveness of its internal
control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Sarbanes-Oxley”). Although we have
maintained disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over
financial reporting as required under the federal securities laws with respect
to our activities, we have not been required to establish and maintain such
disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial
reporting as will be required with respect to a public company with substantial
operations. Under Sarbanes-Oxley and the related rules and
regulations of the SEC, we will be required to implement additional corporate
governance practices and adhere to a variety of reporting requirements and
accounting rules. Compliance with these obligations will require
significant time and resources from our management and our finance and
accounting staff and will significantly increase our legal, insurance and
financial compliance costs. As a result of the increased costs
associated with being a public operating company after the acquisition, the
operating income as a percentage of revenue of Iridium Holdings’ operations will
likely be lower after the acquisition than if it had remained a private
company.
The
loss of key executives could adversely affect our operations up to and following
the closing of the acquisition.
The
success of the acquisition will be dependent upon the continued service of a
relatively small group of our key executives consisting of Mr. Bok, our Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Niehaus, our Senior Vice President and Mr.
Rodriguez, our Chief Financial Officer. Following the closing of the
acquisition, we expect the current Iridium Holdings executive management team to
remain with the company post-closing. The unexpected loss of the
services of one or more of these executives could adversely affect our ability
to manage the business going forward and to manage our operations following the
closing of the acquisition.
Claims
for indemnification by our officers and directors may reduce the funds available
to satisfy successful third-party claims against us and may reduce the amount of
money in the trust account.
Under our
certificate, we have agreed to indemnify our officers and directors against a
variety of expenses (including attorneys’ fees) to the fullest extent permitted
under Delaware law.
We will
seek to have all vendors, service providers and prospective target businesses or
other entities with which we execute agreements waive any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the trust account for the
benefit of our public stockholders. However, there is no guarantee
that such entities will agree to waive any claims they may have in the future
or, even if such entities agree to waive such claims, that such waiver would be
enforceable. Accordingly, the proceeds held in trust could be subject
to claims that could take priority over the claims of our public
stockholders. To date, the only vendors and/or service providers who
have not executed a waiver of any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in
or to any monies held in the trust account are Eisner LLP , Ernst & Young
LLP and Duff & Phelps, LLC (“Duff & Phelps”). The amounts not
covered by waivers of any right, title, interest or claim to any monies held in
the trust account are not material.
Our
founding stockholder has agreed that it will be liable to us if and to the
extent claims by third parties reduce the amounts in the trust account available
for payment to our stockholders in the event of a liquidation and the claims are
made by a vendor for services rendered or products sold to us, by a third party
with which we entered into a contractual relationship following consummation of
our IPO or by a prospective target business, except (i) as to any claimed
amounts owed to a third party who executed a waiver (even if such waiver is
subsequently found to be invalid and unenforceable), or (ii) as to any claims
under our indemnity of Banc of America Securities LLC of our IPO offering
against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities
Act. We believe that our board of directors would be obligated to
pursue a potential claim for reimbursement from our founding stockholder
pursuant to the terms of its agreements with us if it would be in the best
interest of our stockholders to pursue such a claim. Such a decision
would be made by a majority of our disinterested directors based on the facts
and circumstances at the time.
Risks
Associated with Our Organizational Structure After the Acquisition of Iridium
Holdings
We
may not acquire 100% of Iridium Holdings.
Approximately
99.5% of the unitholders of Iridium Holdings have entered into the transaction
agreement. Since holders of Iridium Holdings units who have not entered into the
transaction agreement will not be entitled to participate in the closing of the
acquisition, GHQ will not acquire 100% ownership of Iridium Holdings at the
closing of the acquisition. Accordingly, in the event we are not successful in
acquiring the remaining interest in Iridium Holdings following the closing of
the acquisition, Iridium Holdings might not be wholly owned by GHQ.
After
we complete our proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings, our only material
assets will be the units of Iridium Holdings, and we will accordingly be
dependent upon distributions from Iridium Holdings to pay our expenses and
taxes.
After the
completion of the acquisition, we will be a holding company and will conduct all
of our operations through our subsidiary, Iridium Holdings and its
subsidiaries. We will have no material assets other than our direct
ownership of Iridium Holdings’ units, and no independent means of generating
revenue. To the extent we need funds and Iridium Holdings is
restricted from making distributions under applicable law or regulation or any
other agreement, or is otherwise unable to provide such funds, we may have
difficulty meeting our corporate obligations, which would materially adversely
affect our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of
operations.
Greenhill
Europe might elect not to convert the note.
In the
event Greenhill Europe does not elect to convert the note, the note will
continue to accrue interest at the rate of 5% per annum, beginning April 24,
2009, and would be repayable by Iridium Holdings upon the maturity date, which
is October 24, 2015, or upon Iridium Holdings’ election to redeem the note in
accordance with its terms.
Risks
Associated with a Failure to Complete the Proposed Acquisition
If
our proposals are not approved or if stockholders holding 30% or more of the IPO
shares vote against the acquisition proposal and properly exercise their
conversion rights, we may ultimately be forced to liquidate, in which case you
may receive less than $10.00 per share for your common stock and your warrants
may expire worthless.
If our
proposals are not approved or if stockholders holding 30% or more of our IPO
shares vote against the acquisition proposal and properly exercise their rights
to convert their IPO shares into cash, our acquisition of Iridium Holdings will
not be completed and we will not convert any IPO shares into
cash. While we will continue to search for a suitable target
business, a failure to complete the proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings
could negatively impact the market price of our common stock and may make it
more difficult for us to attract another acquisition candidate and any future
acquisition candidates may use our time constraints to our detriment in
negotiating acquisition terms.
If we do
not complete a business combination by February 14, 2010, we will be required to
liquidate. In any liquidation, the net proceeds of our IPO held in
the trust account, plus any interest earned thereon, will be distributed on a
pro rata basis to the holders of our IPO shares. If we are required
to liquidate, the per-share liquidation value to be distributed to the holders
of our IPO shares may be less than $10.00 if the expenses of the IPO, our
general and administrative expenses and the costs of seeking an initial business
combination are greater than the interest accrued on the proceeds
deposited in the trust account until the date of liquidation. The
proceeds deposited in the trust account could, however, become subject to claims
of our creditors that are in preference to the claims of our
stockholders. Furthermore, our outstanding warrants are not entitled
to participate in a liquidation distribution and the warrants will therefore
expire worthless if we liquidate before completing an initial business
combination. As a result, purchasers of our warrants will not receive
any money for such warrants in the event of our liquidation.
We
may have insufficient time or funds to complete an alternate business
combination if the acquisition proposal is not adopted by our stockholders or
the acquisition is otherwise not completed.
Pursuant
to our certificate, we must liquidate and dissolve if we do not complete a
business combination with a business having a fair market value of at least 80%
of the balance in the trust account (excluding deferred underwriting discounts
and commissions) at the time of such business combination, by February 14,
2010. If the acquisition is not approved by our stockholders, we will
not complete the acquisition and may not be able to consummate an alternate
business combination within the required time frame, either due to insufficient
time or insufficient operating funds.
If
we are required to liquidate, our stockholders may be held liable for third
parties’ claims against us to the extent of distributions received by them
following our liquidation.
If we
have not completed an initial business combination by February 14, 2010, our
corporate existence will cease except for the purposes of winding up our affairs
and dissolving our corporate existence. Under Delaware law,
stockholders of a dissolved corporation may be held liable for claims by third
parties against the corporation to the extent of distributions received by those
stockholders in the dissolution. However, if the corporation complies
with certain procedures intended to ensure that it makes reasonable provision
for all claims against it, the liability of stockholders with respect to any
claim against GHQ is limited to the lesser of such stockholder’s pro rata share
of the claim or the amount distributed to the stockholder. In
addition, if the corporation undertakes additional specified procedures,
including a 60-day notice period during which any third-party claims can be
brought against the corporation, a 90-day period during which the corporation
may reject any claims brought, and an additional 150-day waiting period before
any liquidation distributions are made to stockholders, any liability of
stockholders would be barred with respect to any claim on which an action, suit
or proceeding is not brought by the third anniversary of the dissolution (or
such longer period directed by the Delaware Court of Chancery). While
we intend, if we have not
completed
an initial business combination by February 14, 2010, to adopt a plan of
dissolution making reasonable provision for claims against us in compliance with
Delaware law, we do not intend to comply with these additional procedures, as we
instead intend to distribute the balance in the trust account to our public
stockholders as promptly as practicable following termination of our corporate
existence. Accordingly, any liability our stockholders may have could
extend beyond the third anniversary of our dissolution. We cannot
assure you that any reserves for claims and liabilities that we believe to be
reasonably adequate when we adopt our plan of dissolution will
suffice. If such reserves are insufficient, stockholders who receive
liquidation distributions may subsequently be held liable for claims by
creditors of the company to the extent of such distributions.
Risks
Associated with Our Securities
We
may choose to redeem our outstanding warrants at a time that is disadvantageous
to our warrant holders.
Subject
to there being an effective registration statement covering the shares of common
stock issuable upon the exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus
relating to them is available, we may redeem the warrants issued in our IPO at
any time after the warrants become exercisable, in whole and not in part, at a
price of $0.01 per warrant, upon a minimum of 30 days’ prior written notice of
redemption, and if and only if, the last sale price of our common stock equals
or exceeds $14.25 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading-day
period ending three business days before we send the notice of
redemption. Redemption of the warrants could force the warrant
holders (i) to exercise the warrants and pay the exercise price therefor at a
time when it may be disadvantageous for the holders to do so, (ii) to sell the
warrants at the then current market price when they might otherwise wish to hold
the warrants or (iii) to accept the nominal redemption price which, at the time
the warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than
the market value of the warrants.
An
effective registration statement may not be in place when an investor desires to
exercise warrants, thus precluding such investor from being able to exercise
their warrants and causing such warrants to be practically
worthless.
No
warrant will be exercisable and we will not be obligated to issue shares of
common stock unless we have (i) a registration statement under the Securities
Act and (ii) a current prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrant and that common stock has been registered or qualified
or deemed to be exempt under the securities laws of the state of residence of
the holder of the warrants. Under the terms of the warrant agreement
between American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, as warrant agent, and us,
we have agreed to use our best efforts to meet these conditions and to maintain
a current prospectus relating to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the
warrants until the expiration of the warrants. However, we cannot
assure you that we will be able to do so, and if we do not maintain a current
prospectus related to the common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants,
holders will be unable to exercise their warrants and we will not be required to
settle any such warrant exercise whether by net cash settlement or
otherwise. If the prospectus relating to the common stock issuable
upon the exercise of the warrants is not current or if the common stock is not
qualified or exempt from qualification in the jurisdictions in which the holders
of the warrants reside, the warrants may have no value, the market for the
warrants may be limited and the warrants may expire worthless.
Failure
to complete the acquisition could negatively impact the market price of our
common stock and may make it more difficult for us to attract another
acquisition candidate, resulting, ultimately, in the disbursement of the trust
proceeds, causing stockholders to experience a loss on their
investment.
If the
acquisition is not completed for any reason, we may be subject to a number of
material risks, including:
·
|
the
market price of our common stock may decline to the extent that the
current market price of our common stock reflects a market assumption that
the acquisition will be
consummated;
|
·
|
costs
related to the acquisition, such as legal and accounting fees and the
costs of an opinion, must be paid even if the acquisition is not
completed; and
|
·
|
charges
will be made against our earnings for transaction-related expenses, which
could be higher than expected.
|
Such
decreased market price and added costs and charges of the failed acquisition,
together with the history of failure in consummating an acquisition, may make it
more difficult for us to attract another target business, resulting, ultimately,
in the disbursement of the trust proceeds, causing stockholders to experience a
loss on their investment in our securities.
The
NYSE Alternext U.S. may delist our securities, which could make it more
difficult for our stockholders to sell their securities and subject us to
additional trading restrictions.
Our
securities are currently listed on the NYSE Alternext U.S. We intend
to seek to have our securities approved for listing on the NYSE following completion of
the acquisition. We cannot assure you that our securities will
continue to be listed on the NYSE Alternext U.S., as we might not meet certain
continued listing standards such as income from continuing operations, or that
our securities will be approved for listing on the
NYSE. Additionally, until such time as we voluntarily delist from the
NYSE Alternext U.S. in connection with our acquisition of Iridium Holdings, the
NYSE Alternext U.S. may require us to file a new initial listing application and
meet its initial listing requirements as opposed to its more lenient continued
listing requirements. We cannot assure you that we will be able to
meet those initial listing requirements at that time.
If we
fail to have our securities listed on the NYSE and the NYSE Alternext U.S.
delists our securities from trading, we could face significant consequences
including:
·
|
limited
availability for market quotations for our
securities;
|
·
|
reduced
liquidity with respect to our
securities;
|
·
|
a
determination that our common stock is a “penny stock” which will require
brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and
possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary
trading market for our common stock;
and
|
·
|
a
decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional
financing in the future.
|
Forward-looking
statements may prove inaccurate.
We have
made forward-looking statements in this proxy statement about GHQ, Iridium
Holdings and GHQ following the closing of the acquisition that are subject to
risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include the
information regarding:
· revenue
enhancements
|
· capital
spending
|
· capital
productivity
|
· the
timetable for completing the acquisition
|
· returns
on capital employed
|
· launch
of the new satellite system
|
The
sections in this document that have forward-looking statements include “Summary
Term Sheet, ” “Questions and Answers About the Acquisition,” “Summary,”
“Selected Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data,” “The Acquisition—Background
of the Acquisition,” and “Selected Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined
Financial Statements”. Our forward-looking statements are also
identified by such words as “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,”
“intends” or similar expressions.
For those
statements, we claim the protection of the safe harbor for forward-looking
statements provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995.
In making
these statements, we believe that our expectations are based on reasonable
assumptions. Yet you should understand that the following important
factors (some of which are beyond GHQ’s and Iridium Holdings’ control), in
addition to those discussed elsewhere in this proxy statement and in the
documents that we have incorporated by reference, could affect the future
results of GHQ and Iridium Holdings following the closing of the
acquisition. These factors could also cause the results or other
outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in our forward-looking
statements:
Economic
and Industry Conditions
·
|
materially
adverse changes in economic or industry conditions generally or in the
markets served by our companies
|
·
|
product
and raw material prices, fluctuations in exchange rates and currency
values
|
·
|
capital
expenditure requirements
|
Political/Governmental
Factors
·
|
political
stability in relevant areas of the world, as affected by war, civil unrest
or terrorism
|
·
|
political
developments and law and regulations, such as legislative or regulatory
requirements, particularly concerning environmental matters,
telecommunications and national security
matters
|
Technology
Advances
·
|
the
development and use of new
technology
|
Operating
Factors
·
|
changes
in operating conditions and costs
|
·
|
access
to capital markets
|
Transaction
or Commercial Factors
·
|
the
process of, or conditions imposed in connection with, obtaining regulatory
approvals for the acquisition.
|
PROPOSAL
I – APPROVAL OF THE ACQUISITION
General
We are
furnishing this document to holders of GHQ common stock in connection with the
solicitation of proxies by GHQ’s board of directors at the special GHQ
stockholders’ meeting, and at any adjournments or postponements of the
meeting.
Transaction
Description
The
transaction agreement provides for the acquisition of 99.5% of Iridium Holdings’
outstanding units with Iridium Holdings continuing as a subsidiary of
GHQ. After the acquisition, GHQ will rename itself “Iridium
Communications Inc.” We have attached a copy of the original
agreement and the amendment as Annex A to this proxy statement which is
incorporated in this proxy statement by reference. We urge you to
read the transaction agreement in its entirety because it is the legal document
governing the acquisition.
Blocker
Entity Acquisition
Baralonco
N.V. and Syncom-Iridium Holdings Corp. currently own approximately 36.1% and
13.7% of Iridium Holdings’ outstanding units, respectively. Rather
than acquire the Iridium Holdings units owned by each of Baralonco and Syncom,
pursuant to the transaction agreement, GHQ has agreed to purchase all of the
capital stock of Baralonco and Syncom. Upon the closing of the
acquisition, both Baralonco and Syncom will become wholly owned subsidiaries of
GHQ.
Baralonco
was formed as a privately held limited liability company in the Netherlands
Antilles in 1978 with the purpose of making investments. From its
formation and until 2000, it made investments in the United States oil and gas
industry. In 2000, Baralonco made its first investment in Iridium
Holdings. Baralonco is owned by Baralonco Limited which is currently
owned and controlled by Khalid bin Abdullah bin Abdulrahman, a national and
subject of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Since the divestiture of all
its other investments during 2008, the only activity of Baralonco has been its
ownership of Iridium Holdings units.
Syncom is
a Delaware corporation and has not engaged in any activities since its formation
other than the ownership of the Iridium Holdings units. Syncom is
wholly owned and controlled by Syndicated Communications Venture Partners IV,
L.P.
Pursuant
to the transaction agreement, Baralonco and Syncom have agreed to indemnify GHQ
for pre-closing tax liabilities. Please see page 102 for more
information regarding Baralonco’s and Syncom’s indemnification
obligations.
Background
of the Acquisition
The terms
of the transaction agreement and related documents are the result of
arm’s-length negotiations between our representatives and those of Iridium
Holdings. The following is a brief discussion of the background of
these negotiations and the proposed acquisition.
We are a
blank check company and were incorporated in Delaware on November 2, 2007 for
the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition,
stock purchase, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or
more businesses or assets, which we refer to as our initial business
combination.
On
November 13, 2007, our founding stockholder, Greenhill, purchased an aggregate
of 11,500,000 founder’s units (each one consisting of one share of common stock
and one warrant to purchase one share of common stock) for $25,000 in cash, at a
purchase price of approximately $0.003 per unit. On January 10, 2008,
we cancelled 1,725,000 units, which were surrendered by our founding stockholder
in a recapitalization, leaving our founding stockholder with a total of
9,775,000 units (of which 1,275,000 were subject to forfeiture). On
February 1, 2008, our founding stockholder transferred at cost an aggregate of
150,000 of these founder’s units to Messrs. Canfield, Clarke and Rush (of which
19,563 were forfeited because the underwriter did not exercise the
over-allotment option), each of whom is a director, in connection with their
agreement to serve as a director. On March 27, 2008, following the
expiration of the over-allotment option of the underwriters of our IPO,
1,275,000 founder’s units were
forfeited
pursuant to the terms of the applicable purchase agreement in order to maintain
our initial stockholders’ approximately 17.5% ownership interest in our common
stock after giving effect to the IPO.
The
registration statement for our IPO was declared effective February 14,
2008. We consummated our IPO of 40 million units on February 21,
2008. Each unit consisted of one share of our common stock and one
warrant to purchase one share of our common stock at an exercise price of $7.00
per share, subject to adjustment. The units were sold at an offering
price of $10.00 per unit, generating gross proceeds of $400
million. On February 21, 2008, we also consummated at private
placement of 8.0 million warrants to our founding stockholder at $1.00 per
warrant with an exercise price of $7.00 per share, generating gross proceeds of
$8.0 million. A total of approximately $400 million, including $375.6
million of the initial public offering proceeds net of the underwriters’
discounts and commissions and offering expenses, $16.4 million of deferred
underwriting discounts and commissions and $8.0 million from the sale of
warrants to our founding stockholder, was placed into a trust account at
Wachovia Securities, LLC, with the American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
serving as trustee. Except for a portion of the interest income
permitted to be released to us, the proceeds held in trust will not be released
from the trust account until the earlier of the completion of our initial
business combination and our liquidation. Based on our certificate of
incorporation, up to a total of $5.0 million of interest income, subject to
adjustment, may be released to us to fund our working capital requirements and
additional interest income may be released to fund tax
obligations. For the period from inception to December 31, 2008,
approximately $4.3 million has been released to us in accordance with these
terms. As of March 31, 2009, the balance in the trust account was
approximately $401.9 million.
Prior to
our IPO, neither GHQ nor any of its officers, directors, advisors, consultants
or affiliates contacted any prospective target business or engaged in any
substantive discussions, formal or otherwise, with respect to a business
combination with us. Nor did we seek, nor did we engage or retain any
agent or other representative, to identify or locate any suitable acquisition
candidate, conduct any research or take any measures, directly or indirectly, to
locate or contact a target business.
After our
IPO, our officers and directors commenced an active search for prospective
businesses and assets to acquire in our initial business
combination. Our efforts in identifying prospective target businesses
have not been limited to a particular industry. Instead, we focused
on various industries and target businesses in the United States and Europe that
would provide significant opportunities for growth. Representatives
of GHQ were contacted by numerous individuals and entities who offered to
present ideas for acquisition opportunities, including investment bankers and
other members of the financial community. Our officers and directors and their
affiliates also brought to our attention target business
candidates. During this search process, GHQ reviewed more than 190
acquisition opportunities and entered into detailed discussions with three
possible target businesses (or their representatives). Two of the
potential target companies were engaged in the alternative asset management
(hedge fund) industry. In both cases, representatives of GHQ
approached representatives of the companies directly and engaged in discussions
regarding the asset management industry, their respective businesses and
valuation trends of comparable companies. We decided to approach both
companies because of our direct relationships with principals of those
businesses, as well as their favorable performance relative to the overall asset
management industry. Ultimately, as valuation levels in the asset
management industry declined dramatically in spring of 2008, we decided to
abandon discussions with these potential targets. The third potential
target company was engaged in the packaging industry and was introduced to us by
an investment banker representing the company. After discussing the
opportunity and potential transaction structures with the investment banker, in
May 2008 we were unable to agree to a price level at which both parties were
willing to move forward and we decided to abandon further
discussions. We ultimately determined to abandon each of our other
potential acquisition opportunities either because we concluded that the target
business or the terms of a potential business combination would not be a
suitable acquisition for GHQ or because of lack of interest of the possible
target businesses and their owners, particularly in comparison to the
acquisition of Iridium Holdings.
GHQ
initially became aware of the opportunity to potentially acquire Iridium
Holdings when contacted by Michael J. Price, a senior managing director of
Evercore Partners, one of Iridium Holdings’ financial
advisors. Evercore Partners and Fieldstone Partners had been retained
by Iridium Holdings to assist in raising capital and will be paid a fee by
Iridium Holdings upon the closing of the acquisition. No other
“finders’ fees” will be paid as a result of the acquisition. As part
of the capital raising effort, representatives of Evercore and Fieldstone
approached various private equity firms and special purpose acquisition
companies (“SPACs”). The amount of cash and industry focus of SPACs
was publicly available on various databases. In addition, Evercore
and Fieldstone were aware that Greenhill had made successful investments in
communications companies and had expertise and interest in this
industry.
On April
28, 2008, Scott L. Bok, our chief executive officer, spoke with Mr. Price
regarding Iridium Holdings as a potential acquisition candidate for
GHQ. Mr. Price indicated that Iridium Holdings was currently in
discussions with a private equity firm regarding a minority investment in
Iridium Holdings, but that it would be interested in gauging GHQ’s interest in
acquiring Iridium Holdings in order to provide it with access to a larger amount
of growth capital and a publicly traded currency, as well as providing Iridium
Holdings’ owners with greater liquidity going forward.
On May 1,
2008, we entered into a confidentiality agreement with Iridium Holdings and
thereafter we received certain background materials from Evercore Partners and
Iridium Holdings.
On May 5,
2008, representatives of GHQ, including Mr. Bok, Robert H. Niehaus, Ulrika Ekman
and James Babski met with members of Iridium Holdings’ management, including
Matthew J. Desch, its chief executive officer, Eric Morrison, its chief
financial officer, and Don Thoma, its executive vice president, marketing, and
representatives of Iridium Holdings’ financial advisors, Evercore Partners,
including Mr. Price and Daniel Mendelow, at GHQ’s offices in New York to discuss
a potential acquisition of Iridium Holdings.
Over the
next two weeks, various conversations took place between representatives of GHQ
and members of Iridium Holdings’ management and its financial advisors where
information and materials were exchanged to assist GHQ in gaining a better
understanding of Iridium Holdings’ business. During this time, GHQ was given
access to Iridium Holdings’ electronic data room and began to review the
information made available in the data room.
On May
22, 2008, Messrs. Bok, Niehaus and Babski and Ms. Ekman met with Messrs. Desch,
Morrison and Thoma and representatives of Iridium Holdings’ financial advisors
at GHQ’s offices in New York to learn more about Iridium Holdings’ business and
operations and to continue discussions regarding a potential acquisition of
Iridium Holdings.
On May
29, 2008, after analysis of the information provided by Iridium Holdings to
date, Mr. Bok gave an oral indication to Mr. Price of GHQ’s interest in
purchasing Iridium Holdings for an equity value of $435 million (plus assumption
of debt), consisting of $150 million of cash and $285 million of GHQ’s common
stock (valued at $10.00 per share). As part of this indication,
Greenhill offered to forfeit approximately 1.4 million and 8.4 million of its
founding stockholder’s shares and founding stockholder’s warrants,
respectively. Mr. Bok also indicated that GHQ would be willing to
compensate those holders of Iridium Holdings who facilitated a tax basis step-up
in the assets of Iridium Holdings in an unspecified amount, subject to
confirming the value of such a step-up to GHQ.
Subsequent
to providing this oral indication of interest to Iridium Holdings, a
representative of Evercore Partners contacted Messrs. Bok and Niehaus to clarify
that two significant owners of Iridium Holdings would only agree to a
transaction if GHQ would purchase the holding companies owned by each of them
that in turn held their interests in Iridium Holdings (which we refer to as the
blocker entities). Messrs. Bok and Niehaus agreed to such a
structure, subject to conducting satisfactory accounting and tax due diligence
on the blocker entities GHQ was being asked to purchase.
On June
4, 2008, certain members of Iridium Holdings’ board of directors met to consider
certain strategic alternatives being considered by the company and its owners,
including a review of the oral indication of interest from GHQ. The
members discussed the pros and cons of signing a deal with a private equity
investor or a SPAC. Representatives of
Iridium Holdings then indicated to GHQ that its proposal, while interesting to
Iridium Holdings, was too low.
On June
10, 2008, Messrs. Bok and Niehaus communicated to Mr. Price a revised indication
of interest to purchase Iridium Holdings for $442.5 million equity value (plus
assumption of debt), consisting of $150 million of cash and $292.5 million of
GHQ’s common stock (valued at $10.00 per share). Additionally, GHQ
included details in its revised indication of interest of a management incentive
plan to be put in place after closing of the acquisition. This
incentive plan consisted of 1.8 million options to purchase GHQ’s common stock
at $10.50 per share and 1.8 million options to purchase GHQ’s common stock at
$14.25 per share. Greenhill also made the same offer to forfeit
securities it owned as in the May 29th
proposal.
Representatives
of Iridium Holdings then advised GHQ that Iridium Holdings was continuing to
consider a proposal from a private equity firm which had previously been made,
pursuant to which that firm would invest $100 million in convertible debt
securities of Iridium Holdings. Representative of Iridium Holdings
explained that while
that
offer was for a considerably smaller amount of total capital than GHQ’s offer,
certain of Iridium Holdings’ unitholders were very interested in receiving more
cash in a transaction that could be consummated more quickly than the proposed
transaction with GHQ.
During
the week of June 16, 2008, in a series of conversations, Messrs. Bok and Niehaus
and Messrs. Price and Mendelow discussed the possibility of a joint transaction
with a third-party private equity investor making an initial minority equity
investment in Iridium Holdings to provide certain of the unitholders of Iridium
Holdings with near-term liquidity which would be used in part to meet tax
obligations in respect of Iridium Holdings.
On June
20, 2008, Mr. Bok sent a letter to Mr. Desch communicating a revised offer of
$470 million equity value (plus assumption of debt), consisting of $100 million
of cash and $370 million of GHQ’s common stock (valued at $10.00 per
share). The revised offer included a management incentive plan to be
put in place after closing of the acquisition consisting of 2.0 million options
to purchase shares of GHQ’s common stock at $10.50 per share and 2.0 million
options to purchase shares of GHQ’s common stock at $14.25 per
share. All other terms remained the same as in the June 10th
proposal. Greenhill also offered to forfeit 4.0 million private placement
warrants, in addition to the securities forfeitures it had offered
previously.
On June
24, 2008, the Iridium Holdings’ board of directors met to review and evaluate
various proposals. Iridium Holdings’ board expressed a desire to
couple a minority investment with the GHQ transaction.
During
the last week of June and through the end of July, representatives of GHQ and
Iridium Holdings had discussions with five private equity firms about the
possibility of making a minority equity investment in Iridium Holdings to
address the concerns of the Iridium Holdings’ unitholders regarding their
upcoming tax obligations. The discussions involved the consideration
of possible equity and debt investments ranging from $22.9 million to $100
million and at equity valuations for Iridium Holdings ranging from $408 million
to $480 million. When it became apparent that the parties involved
were not going to be able to reach agreement on the proposed terms of any such
investment or, in the case of some of the private equity firms, that an
investment in Iridium Holdings did not meet their investment criteria,
representatives of GHQ also held discussions with our founding stockholder about
the possibility of it making an initial investment in Iridium
Holdings. Ultimately, because it was clear that Iridium Holdings’
unitholders were otherwise unwilling to consider GHQ’s proposal, our founding
stockholder, through one of its wholly-owned subsidiaries, agreed to invest up
to $22.9 million in Iridium Holdings in the form of a convertible note at an
equity valuation for Iridium Holdings of $460 million, which is the same equity
valuation for Iridium Holdings represented by the cash and GHQ common stock
consideration to be made in the acquisition.
In June
2008, GHQ engaged Davis Polk & Wardwell and Covington & Burling LLP as
its legal advisors on legal and regulatory matters and Ernst & Young to
assist with accounting and tax matters. These advisors began to
conduct due diligence investigations, reviewing materials in the data room and
discussing various matters with representatives of Iridium
Holdings.
On June
30, 2008, Messrs. Bok, Niehaus and Babski and Ms. Ekman met with senior members
of management of Iridium Holdings at Iridium Holdings’ headquarters in Bethesda,
Maryland to get an update on Iridium Holdings’ business and operations and to
conduct on-site business due diligence.
On June
30, 2008, Iridium Holdings’ financial advisors provided GHQ with an initial
draft of a transaction agreement for the proposed acquisition of Iridium
Holdings. Over the course of the next several weeks, GHQ, Iridium
Holdings and our respective legal advisors negotiated the terms of the
transaction agreement and related transaction documents.
On July
3, 2008, our board of directors met to receive an update from Messrs. Bok,
Niehaus and Babski and Ms. Ekman on the discussions with Iridium
Holdings. Mr. Bok provided an overview of Iridium Holdings, its
business and operating history, and compared the opportunity to certain
potential acquisitions GHQ had considered previously. Mr. Niehaus
provided a summary of the mobile satellite services industry and Iridium
Holdings’ major competitors. Mr. Babski provided a preliminary review
of Iridium Holdings’ valuation, including a comparison to the public market
valuation of its primary competitors. Ms. Ekman provided a review of
legal issues relating to the acquisition and a summary of remaining issues and
next steps. At the meeting, our board of directors authorized our
management team to continue pursuing a possible acquisition of Iridium
Holdings.
On July
10, 2008, Mr. Babski, together with representatives from Ernst & Young,
conducted on-site business and accounting due diligence at the offices of
Iridium Holdings in Tempe, Arizona.
Discussions
between representatives of Iridium Holdings and GHQ regarding the merits and the
value of GHQ’s proposal continued during July and August. On July 23,
2008, representatives of GHQ communicated to representatives of Iridium Holdings
a revised offer of $460 million for the equity of Iridium Holdings (plus assumed
debt), consisting of $22.9 million of cash to be invested by Greenhill in the
form of a convertible note, $77.1 million of cash from GHQ, and $360 million of
GHQ’s common stock (valued at $10.00 per share). GHQ also offered to
pay $30 million to those owners of Iridium Holdings who facilitated a step-up in
the tax basis of the assets of the company as part of the
transaction. Greenhill also offered to forfeit approximately 1.4
million founding stockholder’s shares, 8.4 million founding stockholder’s
warrants and 2.0 million private placement warrants upon consummation of the
acquisition.
On July
28, 2008, Mr. Bok sent a letter to Iridium Holdings’ board of directors
reiterating GHQ’s interest in consummating a transaction and the benefits of
partnering with GHQ, including various financial benefits of the transaction for
Iridium Holdings and its unitholders, GHQ’s affiliation with Greenhill and the
track record of investing and public market success of GHQ’s and Greenhill’s
employees.
On July
30, 2008, Iridium Holdings’ board of directors met to consider certain strategic
alternatives being considered by the company and its owners. The
Iridium Holdings’ board discussed the difficulty of coupling the GHQ transaction
with a minority investment. The board decided Iridium Holdings should
pursue the GHQ transaction and minority investment as separate
transactions. Messrs. Bok and Niehaus were given the opportunity to
present the merits of a SPAC transaction with GHQ. In addition, a
representative from a private equity firm was given the opportunity to present
the merits of a minority investment.
On July
31, 2008, our board of directors met to receive an update from Messrs. Bok and
Niehaus on the discussions with Iridium Holdings and to discuss the terms and
conditions of the proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings
On August
4, 2008, Iridium Holdings board of directors met to receive an update from
Messrs. Desch and Morrison and John S. Brunette, Iridium Holdings’ Chief Legal
and Administrative Officer on the discussions with GHQ. Iridium
Holdings’ board determined it should concentrate its time and resources on the
proposed transaction with GHQ.
Over the
next two weeks, representatives of GHQ, Ernst & Young and Davis Polk &
Wardwell conducted due diligence on the blocker entities. GHQ
continued to conduct its business due diligence on Iridium
Holdings. Representatives of GHQ and Iridium Holdings also began to
discuss communications and public relations matters in anticipation of being
able to reach agreement on the proposed acquisition.
On August
12, 2008, our board of directors retained Duff & Phelps to provide an
opinion as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, to the holders of
GHQ common stock (other than Greenhill) of the consideration to be paid in the
acquisition and whether Iridium Holdings had a fair market value equal to at
least 80% of the balance in our trust account (excluding deferred underwriting
discounts and commissions). Representatives of Duff & Phelps
began their review of the acquisition.
On August
26, 2008, Iridium Holdings’ board of directors met to receive an update on the
status of negotiations with GHQ.
On
September 3, 2008, GHQ engaged Banc of America Securities LLC to provide certain
services related to coordinating and facilitating meetings with institutional
investors and other parties after announcement of the acquisition should the
parties reach agreement. Banc of America Securities agreed to provide
its services without compensation and will be paid deferred underwriting
commissions upon completion of the acquisition in connection with its role as
sole bookrunning manager and as an underwriter in our initial public
offering.
On
September 4, 2008, Messrs. Bok, Niehaus and Babski and Ms. Ekman, Daniel
Colussy, Iridium Holdings’ Chairman, Messrs. Desch and Brunette, Messrs. Price
and Mendelow, representatives of Baralonco and Syncom, the blocker entities, as
well as representatives of the parties’ legal advisors met at the offices of
Evercore Partners in New York to negotiate outstanding issues on the transaction
agreement and related transaction documents. During
the
period following that meeting through September 22, 2008, the parties and their
respective legal advisors worked to finalize the drafts of the transaction
agreement and related transaction documents.
On
September 11, 2008, our board of directors met to receive an update from Messrs.
Bok and Niehaus on the discussions with Iridium Holdings and an update on its
business. Ms. Ekman also discussed the material terms and conditions
of the proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings. Representatives from
Duff & Phelps also presented their preliminary analysis regarding the
acquisition with our board of directors.
On
September 19, 2008, Iridium Holdings’ board of directors met to approve the
transaction agreement with GHQ and other related documents.
On
September 22, 2008, our board of directors met to consider approval of the
proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings and related transactions. At
this meeting, Duff & Phelps provided its fairness presentation and orally
delivered its opinion, confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated
September 22, 2008, to our board of directors subject to the qualifications,
limitations and assumptions set forth therein that as of that date, the
consideration to be paid by GHQ in the acquisition is fair, from a financial
point of view to the holders of GHQ’s common stock (other than Greenhill) and
Iridium Holdings has a fair market value equal to at least 80% of the balance in
GHQ’s trust account (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and
commissions).
After
review and discussion, the members of our board unanimously approved the
transaction agreement and related transaction documents, determined that it was
advisable and in the best interests of GHQ and our stockholders to consummate
the acquisition and other transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement
and related transaction documents and determined to recommend the approval of
the acquisition to our stockholders, subject to the negotiation of the final
terms of the transaction agreement and the related transaction
documents. Our board of directors also determined that Iridium
Holdings has a fair market value that will represent at least 80% of the
estimated balance of the trust account (excluding deferred underwriting
discounts and commissions) at the time of the proposed acquisition and that upon
consummation of the acquisition and related transactions, we would own at least
50.1% of the voting equity interests of Iridium Holdings – two requirements for
an initial business combination under our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation.
On
September 22, 2008, after the financial markets closed in New York, the parties
executed the transaction agreement and related transaction
documents.
On
September 23, 2008, GHQ and Iridium Holdings issued a press release announcing
the proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings by GHQ and related transactions and
filed the press release and the investor presentation with the
SEC. Following the filing of the press release and the investor
presentation with the SEC, GHQ and Iridium Holdings held a conference call for
analysts, investors and other interested parties and, following the call, filed
a copy of the transcript of the call with the SEC.
On
October 3, 2008, GHQ made its notification filing under the HSR Act, and on
October 6, 2008, Iridium Holdings made its notification filing under the HSR
Act. On October 10, 2008, GHQ and Iridium Holdings received notice
from the FTC of the early termination of the waiting period under the HSR Act
applicable to the acquisition.
On
October 21, 2008, GHQ and Iridium Holdings jointly filed an application with the
FCC seeking its approval of the transfer of control of certain of Iridium
Holdings’ affiliates and subsidiaries and the transfer of licenses and
authorizations held by such affiliates and subsidiaries. On November 26, 2008,
the FCC issued a Public Notice announcing the filing of the Applications,
summarizing the information contained therein, and inviting petitions to deny,
oppositions and other comments by third parties with respect to the
Applications.
On
December 29, 2008, Cornell and ICG filed comments with respect to the
Applications. The commenters did not oppose the proposed transfer of
control of Iridium Holdings but asked the FCC to adopt certain conditions in
connection with its grant of the Applications. Also on December 29,
2008, Globalstar License filed a petition to deny the Applications.
On
January 12, 2009, GHQ and Iridium Holdings jointly filed a consolidated
opposition and response with respect to the comments of Cornell and ICG and the
petition to deny of Globalstar License. The opposition and response
asserted that the comments and petition to deny provide no basis for the FCC to
deny, condition its approval or delay its consideration of the
Applications. On January 21, 2009, Globalstar License filed a reply
to the
opposition
and response. Pursuant to the Public Notice, the pleading cycle
ended on January 12, 2009. Parties may, however, continue to make ex
parte submissions to the FCC until the FCC acts on the Applications, and on
April 29, 2009, Rockwell Collins filed an ex parte letter advocating the
same general positions taken by ICG in its comments. On March 12,
2009, GHQ and Iridium Holdings received a request for certain additional
information from the FCC to assist in its review of the proposed foreign
ownership of Iridium Carrier Services LLC. GHQ and Iridium Holdings
jointly submitted a response to the FCC’s request on June 2, 2009.
During
the period from February 2, 2009 to April 28, 2009, a series of discussions were
held between the representatives of GHQ and Iridium Holdings concerning
potential modifications that could be made to the contemplated acquisition in
light of the significant deterioration in prevailing economic and market
conditions. The parties discussed ways to lower the consideration
being paid to the sellers of Iridium Holdings, either by cash or stock and to
reduce the tax benefit payment to be made by GHQ to sellers (other than the
sellers of the equity of Baralonco and Syncom) and to possibly extend the date
allowing for termination under the original agreement if the acquisition is not
consummated.
By April
28, 2009, the specific mechanisms for achieving the above changes were agreed to
and documented. These changes which are reflected under “The Transaction
Agreement” section, consisted, among other things, of reducing the stock
consideration paid to the sellers of Iridium Holdings from 36,000,000 to
29,443,500; reducing the tax benefit payment to be made by GHQ to the sellers
(other than the sellers of the equity of Baralonco and Syncom) if Iridium Holdings has in effect a valid election
under Section 754 of the Code with respect to the taxable year in which the
closing of the acquisition occurs from $30 million to $25.5 million,
reducing the number of shares of GHQ common stock the convertible note held by
Greenhill Europe would be convertible into from 2,290,000 to 1,946,500 and
extending the date allowing for termination of the original agreement if the
acquisition is not consummated. Additionally, on April 28, 2009,
pursuant to a letter agreement among GHQ, Greenhill and Iridium Holdings,
Greenhill agreed to forfeit an additional 2,000,000 warrants. Separately, GHQ
withdrew its plans to launch a tender offer for GHQ common stock concurrently
with the closing of the acquisition.
After
review and discussion, the members of our board unanimously approved the
amendment and determined that it was advisable and in the best interests of GHQ
and our stockholders to consummate the acquisition under its amended
terms. Our board of directors also determined that Iridium Holdings
has a fair market value that will represent at least 80% of the estimated
balance of the trust account (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and
commissions) at the time of the amendment, a requirement for an initial business
combination under our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation. Our board of directors determined that it was not
necessary to obtain a new fairness opinion because the members of the board had
the requisite financial expertise to evaluate the amendment and the revised
terms were favorable to GHQ’s stockholders.
On April
28, 2009 the parties executed the amendment.
On April
28, 2009, GHQ and Iridium Holdings issued a press release announcing the
amendment of the original agreement and filed the press release with the
SEC. Following the filing of the press release with the SEC, GHQ and
Iridium Holdings held a conference call for analysts, investors and other
interested parties and, following the call, filed a copy of the transcript of
the call with the SEC.
On June
2, 2009, GHQ entered into an agreement with Banc of America Securities LLC, the
underwriter of GHQ’s IPO offering, and its affiliate, pursuant to which Banc of
America Securities LLC has agreed to reduce the deferred underwriting
commissions payable upon the closing of the acquisition by approximately $8.2
million. Accordingly, the deferred underwriting commissions payable
upon closing by GHQ to Banc of America Securities LLC will range between
approximately $3.1 million (assuming maximum conversion) to $8.2 million
(assuming no conversion) depending upon the number of stockholders who exercise
their conversion rights. In addition, Banc of America Securities LLC
or its affiliate agreed to sell to GHQ, immediately after the closing of the
acquisition, approximately 3.7 million of GHQ warrants for approximately $1.8
million. GHQ may, subject to market conditions, engage in various
open-market and privately negotiated transactions in its common stock and
warrants, such as this transaction with Banc of America Securities LLC and its
affiliate. Further, on June 2, 2009, GHQ entered into an agreement
with Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. pursuant to which Deutsche Bank Securities
Inc. will provide financial advisory services to GHQ in connection with the
acquisition.
Factors
Considered by the Iridium Holdings Board in Approving the
Acquisition
In the
course of determining to enter into the transaction agreement with GHQ, the
Iridium Holdings board of directors, in consultation with Iridium Holdings’
senior management and with Iridium Holdings’ financial and legal advisors,
considered a number of factors, including the following:
·
|
Iridium
Holdings’ unitholders will have significant ownership of GHQ following the
acquisition;
|
·
|
Iridium
Holdings’ unitholders will receive shares in a publicly-traded
company;
|
·
|
the
amount of cash Iridium Holdings’ unitholders will receive pursuant to the
acquisition (including the cash distributions permitted prior to the
closing);
|
·
|
the
additional compensation to be received by Iridium Holdings’ unitholders
(other than Baralonco and Syncom) for the step-up in tax basis of Iridium
Holdings’ assets;
|
·
|
the
amount of cash that Iridium Holdings will receive from GHQ’s trust
account, which will be sufficient to pay off all of Iridium Holdings’
indebtedness;
|
·
|
a
traditional initial public offering or other public capital markets
transaction would be difficult in the near
future;
|
·
|
the
transaction provides for public ownership of Iridium Holdings without the
management distraction, business interruption and underwriting fees
incurred in an initial public
offering;
|
·
|
the
amount of funds available in GHQ’s trust account was larger than the
proposed investments from potential private equity
investors;
|
·
|
the
proceeds from future exercise of the outstanding GHQ warrants will provide
a potential funding resource to offset the costs associated with Iridium
NEXT;
|
·
|
the
willingness of Greenhill Europe to invest $22.9 million into Iridium
Holdings in the form of a convertible note and the willingness of
Greenhill to forfeit certain shares and warrants received as sponsor of
GHQ; and
|
·
|
the
business and financial expertise of
Greenhill.
|
The
Iridium Holdings board of directors also considered a variety of risks and other
potentially negative factors concerning the acquisition, including the
following:
·
|
the
risks and costs to Iridium Holdings if the acquisition does not close,
including the diversion of management time, and the potential effect on
business and customer
relationships;
|
·
|
the
restrictions on the conduct of Iridium Holdings’ business prior to the
completion of the acquisition, generally requiring Iridium Holdings to
conduct its business only in the ordinary course, subject to specific
limitations, which could impact Iridium Holdings’ ability to undertake
business opportunities that may arise pending completion of the
acquisition that have not been expressly addressed in the transaction
agreement; and
|
·
|
the
fact that, while the acquisition is expected to be completed, there can be
no assurance that all conditions to the parties’ obligations to complete
the acquisition will be satisfied, and, as a result, it is possible that
the acquisition may not be
completed.
|
Factors
Considered by the GHQ Board in Approving the Acquisition
In
seeking out candidates for our initial business combination, our board of
directors and management considered a variety of criteria to identify a
potential opportunity including the following (not listed in any particular
order):
·
|
financial
condition and historical results of
operations;
|
·
|
profit
margin and cash flow conversion
opportunities;
|
·
|
experience
and skill of management;
|
·
|
reputation
and quality of management team and
brand;
|
·
|
stage
of development of the business and its products or
services;
|
·
|
existing
distribution arrangements and the potential for geographic and product
expansion;
|
·
|
degree
of current or potential market acceptance of the products or
services;
|
·
|
competitive
dynamics in the industry within which the target business
competes;
|
·
|
proprietary
aspects of products and the extent of intellectual property or other
protection for products or
formulas;
|
·
|
impact
of regulation on the business;
|
·
|
costs
associated with effecting the business
combination;
|
·
|
industry
leadership, sustainability of market share and attractiveness of market
sectors in which target business
participates;
|
·
|
degree
to which GHQ and Greenhill investment professionals have investment
experience in the target business’s industry;
and
|
·
|
ability
of GHQ and Greenhill to add value post business
combination.
|
These
criteria were not intended to be exhaustive, but our board of directors and
management believed that these considerations should be of particular
importance.
In
evaluating the potential acquisition of Iridium Holdings, our board of directors
considered a wide range of business, financial and other factors and believes
that the non-exhaustive list below, which are all of the material factors
considered by our board of directors, strongly supports its determination to
approve the acquisition and related transactions. Our board of
directors did not consider it practicable to, nor did it attempt to, quantify or
otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in
reaching its decision. In addition, individual members of our board
of directors may have given different weight to different factors.
Business
Factors
·
|
High-quality business.
Iridium Holdings delivers reliable, secure, real-time, mission-critical
communications services to and from areas where landlines and
terrestrial-based wireless services are either unavailable or
unreliable. Iridium Holdings’ constellation consists of 66
low-earth-orbiting, cross-linked satellites operating as a fully meshed
network and supported by seven in-orbit spares. Based upon
publicly available information and information provided by TMF Associates,
Iridium Holdings is the second largest provider of mobile satellite
services and related equipment with an estimated 25% market share of the
principal industry players in 2008, based on revenue. GHQ
believes that Iridium Holdings’ management has developed a successful
business model which provides ample opportunity for further organic
growth.
|
·
|
History of strong
growth. Iridium Holdings has experienced strong growth
in recent years, having grown its revenues and subscriber base at compound
annual rates of 29% and 32%, respectively, between
|
December
31, 2002 and December 31, 2008. Additionally, since most newly added
subscribers generate service revenue over an extended period after they initiate
service, Iridium has in-place a significant base of recurring
revenues.
·
|
Attractive, industrial-focused
business model with diversified revenue streams. Iridium
Holdings benefits from a highly diverse subscriber base, comprising U.S.
and foreign governments, corporations in many industries and
individuals. The company’s business model is focused on
business customers (as opposed to consumers) and therefore requires less
sales, marketing and customer care expenditures, and supports a wide range
of value-added applications globally, rather than simply providing
consumer voice and data services. Additionally, the subscriber
base is geographically diverse and often uses Iridium Holdings’ services
for mission-critical applications, providing a buffer against economic
conditions in any particular
region.
|
·
|
Compelling growth
opportunities. Iridium Holdings has several attractive
opportunities for additional growth, including: (i) further building its
presence in machine-to-machine (“M2M”) data services; (ii) selling its
services in new geographic markets including China, Russia, India and
Mexico where its satellites provide coverage, but where it currently is
not licensed to actually sell its services; (iii) exploiting new
regulatory mandates in aviation, fisheries, homeland security and marine
transportation; (iv) capturing market share from competitors such as
Globalstar; (v) increasing the range of its DoD applications to include
embedded devices for asset and target tracking and intelligence; and (vi)
expanding new products and services through Iridium Holdings’ network of
distributors and Iridium Holdings’ own research and development (e.g.,
Iridium Holdings’ Iridium OpenPort marine communications system and its
advanced iGPS system, which is being developed in conjunction with the
Boeing Company and the DoD).
|
·
|
Growing marketplace for mobile
satellite services. Iridium Holdings competes in a
market which is growing rapidly and where there is significant potential
for additional penetration of the existing market. A
significant number of applications into which Iridium Holdings’ services
are integrated contain both cellular and satellite capabilities, which
provide services when ordinary cellular coverage is unavailable or
unreliable. In a 2008 report, Northern Sky Research estimated
that mobile satellites services wholesale revenues are expected to grow at
a compound annual growth rate of 13% in the five year period between 2007
and 2011.
|
·
|
Growing mobile satellite
services market share. Iridium has expanded its market
share in the mobile satellite services market from 9% in 2001 to 25% in
2008, primarily at the expense of its larger competitor,
Inmarsat.
|
·
|
Low cost, highly scalable
subscriber acquisition model. Iridium Holdings has
primarily utilized a wholesale distribution model and sold its products
and services through service providers, value added resellers, value-added
manufacturers and value-added developers. Iridium Holdings has
relationships with nearly 235 such partners. These value-added
relationships often provide solutions to specific vertical markets such as
aviation, trucking, military and maritime. Because these
partners understand the unique needs of their target markets and spend
significant time and resources integrating Iridium Holdings’ services into
those offerings, incremental applications and, consequently, new
subscriber additions are made at very low incremental cost to Iridium
Holdings.
|
·
|
High barriers to
entry. Iridium Holdings operates a low-earth-orbiting
constellation of 66 satellites with worldwide
coverage. Building this type of infrastructure not only
requires significant upfront capital expenditures, but also significant
lead time (six to eight years) from conceptualization to
launch. In addition, launching and operating a satellite
network requires procuring a number of regulatory and governmental
licenses and approvals. These include securing orbital slots,
spectrum rights, DoD approvals and rocket launch
approvals. Additionally, Iridium Holdings’ roster of clients
and partners, built over the course of many years, serves as a significant
barrier to entry for any new entrant. The combination of
Iridium Holdings’ relationship with the DoD and its network of
distributors would be extremely difficult to
replicate.
|
·
|
Experienced management
team. Led by CEO Matthew Desch, who joined Iridium
Holdings in 2006, senior management has significant experience in the
telecommunications and satellite space and has been
|
successful
in leading Iridium Holdings to profitability over the last several
years. The team consists of several senior executives hired by Mr.
Desch since 2006 and others who have been involved in the Iridium project since
its conception under the Motorola umbrella.
·
|
Development of the “Iridium
NEXT” system. Iridium Holdings has begun planning its
next generation satellite network (“Iridium NEXT”) that will enable
increased capabilities. This new system is currently under
development by Iridium Holdings system engineers in conjunction with a
number of experienced aerospace companies. Iridium NEXT will be
built using similar architecture to Iridium Holdings’ existing satellite
constellation, while adding incremental capabilities to support new
products and services. Iridium NEXT will be backward compatible
with Iridium Holdings’ current handsets and devices, and will also
interface new devices that can deliver more bandwidth and end-to-end IP
technology to subscribers.
|
·
|
Significant subscriber
stickiness. Iridium Holdings handsets retail for
$1,200-1,500, creating significant switching costs for traditional voice
subscribers. Voice systems also are often installed on vessels
or aircraft, which require significant expense to replace the installed
system with a competitor’s system. Iridium Holdings’
fast-growing M2M business also enjoys significant subscriber stickiness
since Iridium Holdings devices are often integrated into expensive
machinery such as military equipment, sophisticated monitoring devices or
heavy machinery and are generally much smaller than devices offered by
competitors. Moreover, regulations requiring certain types of
service providers (maritime and aviation) to utilize satellite
communication/tracking devices are being adopted, further bolstering
Iridium Holdings’ subscriber
growth.
|
·
|
Opportunities to benefit from
access to capital markets. Access to capital through the
public equity market should enable Iridium Holdings’ management team to
execute Iridium Holdings’ objectives for expansion of its existing
facilities and to capitalize on acquisition opportunities to expand the
scope of scale of its operations.
|
Financial
Factors
·
|
Attractive purchase price
relative to comparable public companies. The transaction
enterprise valuation of $517.3 million implies a multiple of 4.8x
full-year 2008 operational earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization or EBITDA. Iridium Holdings’ closest
comparable, Inmarsat, at the time the acquisition was approved by our
board of directors in September 2008, traded at approximately 14.8x
annualized first-half 2008 EBITDA. As of April 27, 2009,
Inmarsat traded at 8.9x full-year 2008 EBITDA. While Inmarsat
is a larger entity and has less imminent capital needs, we believe the
proposed transaction represents an attractive investment entry
point. In addition, we believe that Iridium Holdings is growing
at a faster pace than its competitors, including Inmarsat, Globalstar,
Thuraya and Orbcomm.
|
·
|
Strong earnings
momentum. Iridium Holdings has recently been
experiencing strong growth, having added approximately 86,000 new
subscribers in the year ending December 31, 2008, reaching a subscriber
count of approximately 320,000. Consequently, Iridium Holdings
has also experienced record revenues and earnings. For the year
ending December 31, 2008, Iridium Holdings reported revenues of $320.9
million (up 23% from the same period in 2007) and operational EBITDA of
$108.2 million (up 41% from the same period in 2007). As a
result of the company’s largely fixed operating cost model, as recent
subscriber additions begin generating service revenues, we expect that a
significant portion of those incremental revenues will be converted into
profits.
|
·
|
Fixed operating cost
structure. A large portion of Iridium Holdings’
operating costs are fixed in nature, which allows a large percentage of
any incremental revenues to be converted into pre tax
profits. Therefore, similar to other satellite services
providers, as Iridium Holdings grows its revenues, a significant portion
of that growth will be converted into profits by virtue of this operating
leverage.
|
·
|
Significant Cash
Flow. Given that the fixed costs of the current
satellite constellation have essentially already been paid for, each
incremental dollar of revenue generates significant profit for Iridium
Holdings, and given its low level of debt, generates significant free cash
flow.
|
·
|
The fair market value of
Iridium Holdings. The fact that, based on the board’s
valuation of Iridium Holdings, Iridium Holdings has a fair market value
equal to at least 80% of the balance in GHQ ‘s trust
|
account
(excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions), a requirements for
an initial business combination under our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation.
Other
Factors
·
|
Continuing ownership of
Iridium Holdings owners. The current owners of Iridium
Holdings will receive and hold shares of GHQ in the transaction,
reflecting their continued support for Iridium
Holdings.
|
·
|
Alignment of interests between
Iridium Holdings unitholders and our stockholders. As a
result of the acquisition, the holders of Iridium Holdings’ units are
expected to collectively own approximately 40% (including the conversion
of the note by Greenhill Europe) and GHQ’s existing stockholders are
expected to collectively own approximately 60% of the outstanding shares
of common stock of the combined entity, assuming that (i) no holders of
our IPO shares vote against the acquisition proposal and properly exercise
their rights to convert their shares into cash and (ii) no holders of
warrants exercise their rights to acquire GHQ
shares.
|
·
|
Favorable due diligence
outcome. GHQ and its advisors conducted a significant
amount of due diligence on Iridium Holdings, and the results of the due
diligence effort were favorable.
|
Negative
factors
Our board
of directors also considered certain negative factors associated with the
proposed acquisition and related transactions but determined that the positive
factors cited above strongly outweighed these negative factors. The
negative factors considered by the GHQ board included:
·
|
Potential for operational
issues. Due to the nature of the complexity of the
operation of satellites and telephony systems, there is a potential for
disruptions and failures that could result in lost revenue and significant
repair costs. GHQ has conducted investigations and analyses
with the aid of internal and external data and believes that the current
constellation will have a full complement of 66 operational satellites
until approximately 2014, when Iridium Holdings plans to begin launching
new satellites under its Iridium NEXT program. This continued
service is expected to be provided by a combination of the existing 66
operational satellites and seven spare satellites already launched in a
storage orbit. Additionally, Iridium Holdings believes the
constellation can be operated with fewer than 66 satellites while
experiencing some level of service degradations until Iridium NEXT
launches are conducted. Certain in-orbit failures can also be
mitigated by the implementation of software solutions which can be
uploaded to satellites after failures. Iridium Holdings’
satellites have not been subject to the kinds of failures which have
caused Globalstar’s system to lose its functionality, in part because
Iridium Holdings’ satellites, which orbit the earth at lower altitudes
than Globalstar’s satellites, are less exposed to
radiation. However, there can be no assurance that satellites
will not fail faster than expected.
|
·
|
Costs and risks related to
building new satellite constellation (Iridium NEXT). In
order to replace its existing constellation, Iridium Holdings must
undertake the design, construction and launch of a new constellation of
satellites. Iridium Holdings estimates the total cost of this
effort at approximately $2.7 billion. While Iridium Holdings is
currently working with two potential providers to design a satellite
constellation at this price level, the design process is still at an early
stage and the ultimate total cost of the project cannot be
predicted. Iridium Holdings believes it can offset a portion of
this cost by contracting with third parties to include secondary payloads
on the new satellites. These third parties would offset the
costs of the new satellites either through contributions to construction
and launch costs, or in the form of incremental service revenues to
Iridium Holdings. Iridium Holdings anticipates funding a large
part of the costs of this new system from internally generated cash flows
and secondary payloads, with the remainder from outside
financing. However, to the extent the cost of the system
increases or secondary payload opportunities do not materialize,
additional funding may be required. We also considered the
risks associated with the launch of new satellites, which we weighed
against the fact that (i) Iridium Holdings and its predecessor experienced
no launch failures in the launch of its first generation of satellites
(ii) the smaller size of Iridium Holdings’ satellites compared to
geostationary satellites implies reduced launch
risk.
|
·
|
Projected growth in new M2M
subscribers is unproven. A large portion of Iridium
Holdings’ future growth in revenues and profits is dependent upon the
addition of significant numbers of new M2M subscribers. This
market is currently seeing rapid growth, both in the commercial and
government markets, and Iridium Holdings believes its truly global
coverage and low-latency network has a significant competitive
advantage. However, to the extent growth in the M2M marketplace
slows or other companies launch competing offerings, Iridium Holdings’
growth may be adversely impacted by a combination of lower subscriber
additions and/or lower pricing.
|
·
|
Competitors launching new
constellations and potentially developing other
technologies. Iridium Holdings is currently gaining
subscribers as a result of the degraded service quality of certain of its
competitors. Globalstar’s satellites have experienced higher
than expected space radiation and have lost a significant degree of their
functionality. Globalstar is planning on launching initial
replacement satellites to be in operation by 2010, which will improve its
service and allow it to further compete with Iridium
Holdings. Additionally, Inmarsat has launched next-generation
data-capable GEO satellites which will provide additional competition,
though focused more on applications not requiring a low-latency low earth
orbit constellation. To the extent competitors are able to
finance, build and launch these new satellites and provide improved
service, Iridium Holdings may experience some slowdown in new subscriber
additions. While Iridium Holdings does not believe there are
any land-based technologies currently in use or in development which pose
a significant competitive challenge to its business model, we cannot
exclude the possibility that there are one or more competing new
technologies that will emerge in the long
term.
|
·
|
DoD revenue concentration
risk. The DoD generated
approximately 21% of Iridium Holdings’ revenues in
2008. Additionally, Iridium Holdings believes it gains
significant credibility with customers, vendors and financing sources as a
result of its anchor customer relationship with the DoD. The
DoD has invested significantly in its dedicated gateway to the Iridium
Holdings network, and continues to invest significant sums in new
product/service development for use on the Iridium Holdings
network. However, if the DoD were to develop its own
low-earth-orbiting communications network, or switch more of its service
to other providers, it would have an adverse effect on Iridium Holdings’
business. Iridium Holdings believes the DoD has no such
plans.
|
·
|
Satellite sector history may
limit public investor attractiveness. Historically, the
satellite services sector has suffered from numerous business failures and
bankruptcies. Iridium Holdings’ network was built with
approximately $3.4 billion of capital and was acquired in 2000 for $25
million. Other satellite companies that have experienced
similar issues historically include Globalstar, Orbcomm and Loral Space
& Communications Inc. Iridium Holdings believes that many
of these failures occurred because the initial business model focused on
the consumer sector and that its current focus on government and
industrial subscribers through a wholesale sales model is significantly
more profitable because of lower subscriber acquisition costs, lower churn
and higher average revenue per unit or “ARPU” resulting from the
mission-critical nature of the applications utilizing Iridium Holdings’
network.
|
·
|
Lack of public reporting
capability. Iridium Holdings’ corporate staff, who will
become employees of GHQ at the closing of the acquisition, does not to our
knowledge have experience with the requirements of public reporting since
Iridium Holdings is a private company. After the completion of
the acquisition, we will need to build new reporting capabilities for
Iridium Holdings to meet the requirements of a publicly traded
company.
|
·
|
Limited remedies if Iridium
Holdings breaches the transaction agreement. None of
Iridium Holdings, its owners or any other persons will indemnify us for
any losses we realize as a result of any breach by Iridium Holdings of any
of its representations, warranties or covenants set forth in the
transaction agreement. Moreover, none of the representations,
warranties or pre-closing covenants of Iridium Holdings contained in the
transaction agreement will survive the closing of the acquisition, so our
rights to purse a remedy for breach of any such representations,
warranties or pre-closing covenants will terminate upon the closing of the
acquisition.
|
·
|
Regulatory
approvals. Our board of directors considered the
regulatory approvals required to complete the proposed transactions and
the risk that governmental authorities and third parties might seek to
impose
|
unfavorable
terms or conditions on the required approvals or that such approvals may not be
obtained at all. Our board of directors further considered the
potential length of the regulatory approval process.
Upon the
closing of the acquisition, the current senior management of Iridium Holdings
will become the senior management of GHQ. The senior management team
will be comprised of the following:
·
|
Matthew
J. Desch, Chief Executive Officer
|
·
|
Eric
Morrison, Chief Financial Officer
|
·
|
John
S. Brunette, Chief Legal and Administrative
Officer
|
·
|
Greg
Ewert, Executive Vice President, Global Distribution
Channels
|
·
|
John
Campbell, Executive Vice President, Government
Programs
|
·
|
Don
Thoma, Executive Vice President,
Marketing
|
·
|
John
Roddy, Executive Vice President, Ground Operations and Product
Development
|
·
|
Lee
Demitry, Executive Vice President, “Iridium
NEXT”
|
Immediately
following the closing of the acquisition, our board of directors plans to expand
the size of our board of directors and to appoint the following individuals to
GHQ’s board of directors:
·
|
Matthew
J. Desch, current chief executive officer of Iridium
Holdings
|
·
|
Alvin
B. Krongard, current member of Iridium Holdings’ board of
directors
|
·
|
Steven
Pfeiffer, current member of Iridium Holdings’ board of
directors
|
·
|
An
individual to be named by Baralonco prior to the closing of the
acquisition (who shall be reasonably satisfactory to
GHQ)
|
·
|
Terry
Jones, current member of Iridium Holdings’ board of
directors
|
·
|
J.
Darrel Barros, representative of
Syncom
|
Immediately
following the closing of the acquisition, Kevin P. Clarke, one of our existing
directors, will resign as a director.
Recommendation
of the GHQ Board; Additional Considerations of the GHQ Board
At its
meetings on September 22, 2008 and April 8, 2009, GHQ’s board of directors
unanimously:
·
|
determined
that the acquisition, the transaction agreement, the amendments to GHQ’s
certificate and the related transactions are advisable, fair to and in the
best interests of GHQ and its
stockholders;
|
·
|
approved
the transaction agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby
(including the acquisition of Iridium Holdings by GHQ), the amendments to
GHQ’s certificate, the registration rights agreement and the pledge
agreements and other related transactions;
and
|
·
|
determined
to recommend that stockholders of GHQ approve and adopt the transaction
agreement and the acquisition, including the amendments to the certificate
and the issuance of GHQ common shares in the
acquisition.
|
In
approving the acquisition and making these recommendations, GHQ’s board of
directors consulted with its outside legal counsel, and it carefully considered
the following material factors:
·
|
all
the reasons described above under “Factors Considered by the GHQ Board in
Approving the Acquisition,” including the added capital and management
expertise available to Iridium
Holdings;
|
·
|
information
concerning the business, assets, capital structure, financial performance
and condition and prospects of GHQ and Iridium Holdings, focusing in
particular on the quality of Iridium Holdings’ assets and
operations;
|
·
|
the
possibility, as alternatives to the acquisition, of pursuing an
acquisition of or an initial business combination with a firm other than
Iridium Holdings and the GHQ board’s conclusion that a transaction with
Iridium Holdings is more feasible, and is expected to yield greater
benefits, than the likely alternatives. The GHQ board reached
this conclusion for various reasons, including Iridium Holdings’ interest
in pursuing a transaction with GHQ, GHQ’s view that the transaction could
be acceptably completed from a timing and regulatory standpoint, and GHQ
management’s assessment of the alternatives and the expected benefits of
the acquisition and compatibility of the companies, as described under
“Factors Considered by the GHQ Board in Approving the Acquisition”
above;
|
·
|
the
anticipated growth opportunities available to Iridium Holdings and the
limited number of competitors in the satellite telephony and services
industry;
|
·
|
the
composition and strength of the expected senior management of GHQ
following the closing of the
acquisition;
|
·
|
the
likelihood of the enhancement of the strategic position of GHQ following
the acquisition;
|
·
|
the
fact that GHQ stockholders would hold approximately 60% of the outstanding
shares of GHQ after the acquisition, assuming that (i) no holders of IPO
shares vote against the acquisition proposal and properly exercise their
rights to convert their shares into cash, (ii) no holders of warrants
exercise their rights to acquire GHQ shares, and (iii) the conversion of
the note by Greenhill Europe into 1,946,500 shares of common stock, in
accordance with its terms;
|
·
|
the
fact that our board has determined that Iridium Holdings has a fair market
value equal to at least 80% of the balance in GHQ ‘s trust account
(excluding deferred underwriting discounts and
commissions).
|
·
|
the
challenges of successfully completing the acquisition and the attendant
risks of not achieving the expected cost savings, other financial and
operating benefits or improvement in earnings, and of diverting management
focus and resources from other strategic opportunities and from
operational matters for an extended period of
time;
|
·
|
that,
while the acquisition is likely to be completed, there are risks
associated with obtaining necessary approvals, and, as a result of certain
conditions to the completion of the acquisition, it is possible that the
acquisition may not be completed even if approved by the GHQ stockholders
(see “The Transaction Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the
Acquisition”); and
|
·
|
the
terms and structure of the acquisition and the terms and conditions of the
transaction agreement, including the consideration to be paid for the
acquisition and the size of the termination fee (see “The Transaction
Agreement—Conditions to the Closing of the Acquisition” and “The
Transaction
Agreement—Termination”).
|
In view
of the number and wide variety of factors considered in connection with its
evaluation of the acquisition and the complexity of these matters, GHQ’s board
of directors did not find it practicable to, nor did it attempt to, quantify,
rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors that it
considered. In addition, our board of directors did not undertake to
make any specific determination as to whether any particular factor was
favorable or unfavorable to its ultimate determination or assign any particular
weight to any factor, but conducted an overall analysis of the factors described
above, including through discussions with and questioning of GHQ’s management
and management’s analysis of the proposed acquisition based on information
received from GHQ’s legal, financial
and
accounting advisors. In considering the factors described above,
individual members of GHQ’s board of directors may have given different weight
to different factors. GHQ’s board of directors considered all these
factors together and, on the whole, thought them to be favorable to, and to
support, its determination.
GHQ
intends to account for the acquisition under the purchase method of accounting
in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting No.
141(R), “Business Combinations.” Under this accounting method, GHQ
will record at its fair value the assets of Iridium Holdings less the
liabilities assumed, with the excess of the purchase price over the estimated
fair value of such net assets reflected as goodwill. GHQ’s statement
of income will include the operations of Iridium Holdings after the effective
date of the acquisition.
The
following is a summary of material U.S. federal income tax considerations for
holders of our IPO shares or warrants who hold their IPO shares as capital
assets within the meaning of the Code and exercise their rights to convert their
IPO shares into cash if the acquisition is completed.
This
discussion does not address all of the U.S. federal income tax considerations
that may be relevant to a holder in light of the holder’s particular
circumstances, and it does not describe all of the tax consequences that may be
relevant to holders subject to special rules, such as:
·
|
certain
financial institutions;
|
·
|
dealers
and certain traders in securities;
|
·
|
persons
holding our IPO shares or warrants as part of a hedge, straddle,
conversion transaction or other integrated
transaction;
|
·
|
U.S.
persons (within the meaning of the Code) whose functional currency for
U.S. federal income tax purposes is not the U.S.
dollar;
|
·
|
partnerships
or other entities classified as partnerships for U.S. federal income tax
purposes;
|
·
|
persons
liable for the alternative minimum
tax;
|
·
|
tax-exempt
organizations; and
|
·
|
Converting
Non-U.S. holders (as defined below) that own, have owned or are deemed to
own or have owned: (1) more than 5% of our shares, (2) more than 5% of our
warrants, or (3) warrants with a fair market value of more than 5% of the
fair market value of our shares.
|
The
following does not discuss any aspect of U.S. federal estate or gift, state,
local or non-U.S. taxation. This discussion is based on current
provisions of the Code, Treasury regulations, judicial opinions, published
positions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) and all other
applicable authorities, all as of the date hereof and all of which are subject
to change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion is not
intended as and does not constitute tax advice.
If a
partnership holds our IPO shares and exercises its conversion rights, the tax
treatment of a partner will generally depend on the status of the partner and
the activities of the partnership. If you are a partner of a
partnership holding our IPO shares, you should consult your tax
advisor.
WE URGE
HOLDERS OF OUR IPO SHARES CONTEMPLATING EXERCISE OF THEIR CONVERSION RIGHTS TO
CONSULT THEIR TAX ADVISORS REGARDING THE U.S. FEDERAL, STATE, LOCAL AND NON-U.S.
INCOME, ESTATE AND OTHER TAX CONSIDERATIONS THEREOF.
U.S.
Holders Converting IPO Shares into a Right to Receive Cash
This
section is addressed to U.S. holders of our IPO shares or warrants that convert
their IPO shares into the right to receive cash pursuant to the exercise of a
conversion right as described in “The Special Meeting ─ Conversion
Rights.” For purposes of this discussion, a “Converting U.S. Holder”
is a beneficial owner that so converts its IPO shares and is:
·
|
a
citizen or resident of the United
States;
|
·
|
a
corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or
organized in, or under the laws of, the United States or any political
subdivision of the United States;
or
|
·
|
an
estate or trust the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income
taxation regardless of its source.
|
Except as
discussed in the following paragraph, a Converting U.S. Holder will generally
recognize capital gain or loss equal to the difference between its tax basis in
the IPO share and the amount realized on the conversion. The
deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations. Any
capital gain or loss realized on a sale or other disposition of our IPO share
will be long-term capital gain or loss if the “holding period” for the IPO share
is more than one year. However, because of the conversion right, a
Converting U.S. Holder may be unable to include the time period prior to the
approval of the acquisition in the holder’s “holding period.”
Cash
received upon conversion will be treated as a distribution, however, if the
conversion does not effect a meaningful reduction of the Converting U.S.
Holder’s percentage ownership in us (including shares such Converting U.S.
Holder is deemed to own under certain attribution rules, which provide, among
other things, that it is deemed to own any shares that it holds a warrant to
acquire). Any such distribution will be treated as a dividend for
U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent of our current or accumulated
earnings and profits. However, for the purposes of the
dividends-received deduction and of “qualified dividend” treatment, due to the
conversion right, a Converting U.S. Holder may be unable to include the time
period prior to the approval of the acquisition in the holder’s “holding
period.” Any distribution in excess of our earnings and profits will
reduce the Converting U.S. Holder’s basis in the IPO share (but not below zero),
and any remaining excess will be treated as gain realized on the sale or other
disposition of the IPO share. If, taking into account the effect of
conversion by other stockholders, the Converting U.S. Holder’s percentage
ownership in us is reduced as a result of the conversion by at least 20%, the
holder will generally be regarded as having incurred a meaningful reduction in
interest. Furthermore, if a Converting U.S. Holder has a relatively
minimal stock interest and, such percentage interest is reduced by any amount as
a result of the conversion, the Converting U.S. Holder should generally be
regarded as having incurred a meaningful reduction in interest. For
example, the IRS has ruled that any reduction in a stockholder’s proportionate
interest is a “meaningful reduction” if the stockholder owns less than 1% of the
shares of a corporation and did not have management control over the
corporation.
Holders
of IPO shares considering exercising their conversion rights should consult
their own tax advisors as to whether conversion will be treated as a sale or as
a distribution under the Code and, if a holder actually or constructively owns
5% or more of our IPO shares before conversion, whether such holder is subject
to special reporting requirements with respect to such conversion.
Non-U.S.
Holders Converting IPO Shares into a Right to Receive Cash
This
section is addressed to non-U.S. holders of our IPO shares or warrants that
convert their IPO shares into the right to receive cash pursuant to the exercise
of a conversion right as described in “The Special Meeting ─ Conversion
Rights.” For purposes of this discussion, a “Converting Non-U.S.
Holder” is a beneficial owner (other than a partnership) that so converts its
IPO shares and is not a Converting U.S. Holder. A “Converting
Non-U.S. Holder” does not include an individual who is present in the United
States for 183 days or more in the taxable year of disposition and is not
otherwise a resident of the United States for U.S. federal income tax
purposes. Such an individual should consult his or her own tax
advisor regarding the U.S. federal income tax consequences of the
conversion.
Conversion
by a Converting Non-U.S. Holder generally will be treated as a sale of the IPO
share (rather than as a distribution) and will not be subject to U.S. federal
income tax. However, cash received upon conversion will be treated as
a distribution if the conversion does not effect a meaningful reduction of the
Converting Non-U.S. Holder’s percentage ownership in us (including shares such
Converting Non-U.S. Holder is deemed to own under certain attribution rules,
which provide, among other things, that it is deemed to own any shares that it
holds a
warrant
to acquire). See the discussion above under “U.S. Holders Converting
IPO Shares into a Right to Receive Cash.” Any such distribution will
generally be subject to U.S. withholding tax at a rate of 30%, unless the
Converting Non-U.S. Holder is entitled to a reduced rate of withholding under an
applicable income tax treaty.
Non-U.S.
holders of IPO shares considering exercising their conversion rights should
consult their own tax advisors as to whether conversion of IPO shares will be
treated as a sale or as a distribution under the Code as well as the potential
applicability of escrow and certification requirements with regard
thereto.
U.S.
Antitrust. Under the HSR Act and the rules that have been
promulgated thereunder by the FTC, the acquisition may not be consummated unless
GHQ and Iridium Holdings furnish certain information to the Antitrust Division
and the FTC and specified waiting period requirements have been
satisfied. Pursuant to the requirements of the HSR Act, GHQ and
Iridium Holdings each filed a Notification and Report Forms with respect to the
acquisition with the Antitrust Division and the FTC. GHQ filed its notification
on October 3, 2008 and Iridium Holdings filed its notification on October 6,
2008. Early termination of the waiting period applicable to the
acquisition was granted by the FTC on October 10, 2008.
The
Antitrust Division and the FTC frequently scrutinize the legality under the
antitrust laws of transactions such as the acquisition. At any time
before or after consummation of the acquisition, the Antitrust Division or the
FTC could take such action under the antitrust laws as it deems necessary or
desirable in the public interest, including seeking to enjoin the completion of
the acquisition or seeking the divestiture of substantial assets of GHQ or
Iridium Holdings. Private parties (including individual states) may
also bring legal actions under the antitrust laws. We do not believe
that the consummation of the acquisition will result in a violation of any
applicable antitrust laws. However, there can be no assurance that a
challenge to the acquisition on antitrust grounds will not be made or, if this
challenge is made, what the result will be. See “The Transaction
Agreement—Conditions to the Closing” for certain conditions to the acquisition,
including conditions with respect to litigation and certain governmental actions
and “The Transaction Agreement—Termination” for certain termination rights
pursuant to the transaction agreement in connection with legal prohibitions to
completing the acquisition.
Foreign Competition Law
Filings. Iridium Holdings and its subsidiaries own property
and conduct business in a number of foreign countries. In connection
with the acquisition, the laws of certain of these foreign countries may require
the filing of information with, or the obtaining of the approval of,
governmental authorities therein. The parties do not believe that any
such filings or approvals are required by these laws, but intend to take such
action as they may require.
FCC
Licenses. Certain subsidiaries and affiliates of Iridium
Holdings hold one or more FCC Licenses issued by the FCC. Under the
Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations of the
FCC, prior to completion of the acquisition, the FCC must approve the transfer
of control of these subsidiaries and affiliates and their FCC Licenses to
GHQ. Therefore, GHQ and each subsidiary or affiliate of Iridium
Holdings that holds one or more FCC License must file an Application with the
FCC. The FCC will review each Application to determine whether GHQ’s
control of the pertinent subsidiary or affiliate and its FCC Licenses would
comply with applicable law and whether it would be consistent with the public
interest, convenience and necessity. GHQ and Iridium Holdings jointly
filed the Applications with the FCC on October 21, 2008.
On
November 26, 2008, the FCC issued a Public Notice announcing the filing of the
Applications, summarizing the information contained therein, and inviting
petitions to deny, oppositions and other comments by third parties with respect
to the Applications. On December 29, 2008, Cornell and ICG filed
comments with respect to the Applications. The commenters did not
oppose the proposed transfer of control of Iridium Holdings but asked the FCC to
adopt certain conditions in connection with its grant of the
Applications. Also, on December 29, 2008, Globalstar License filed a
petition to deny the Applications.
On
January 12, 2009, GHQ and Iridium Holdings jointly filed a consolidated
opposition and response with respect to the comments of Cornell and ICG and the
petition to deny the Applications by Globalstar License. The
opposition and response asserted that the comments and petition to deny provide
no basis for the FCC to deny, condition its approval or delay its consideration
of the Applications. On January 21, 2009, Globalstar License filed a
reply to the opposition and response. Pursuant to the Public Notice,
the pleading cycle ended on January 12, 2009. Parties may, however,
continue to make ex parte submissions to the FCC until the FCC acts on the
Applications, and
on April
29, 2009, Rockwell Collins filed an ex parte letter advocating the same general
positions taken by ICG in its comments. On March 12, 2009, GHQ and
Iridium Holdings received a request for certain additional information from the
FCC to assist in its review of the proposed foreign ownership of Iridium Carrier
Services LLC. GHQ and Iridium Holdings jointly submitted a response
to the FCC’s request on June 2, 2009.
The FCC
has developed an informal timetable for acting upon transfer of control
applications. Pursuant to this informal timetable, it will endeavor
to take action on any such application (i.e., grant, deny, or designate the
application for hearing) within 180 days from the initial public notice
accepting the application for filing (i.e., by May 25, 2009). The FCC
reserves the right to stop the 180-day “clock” at its discretion. We
cannot assure you that the FCC will act on the Applications in a timely manner
or that the FCC will not deny the Applications or impose conditions on the
parties in connection with granting its approval.
Other U.S. Regulatory
Filings. Iridium Holdings engages in several business areas
that are regulated by the U.S. Government on national security
grounds. In particular, it is registered with the U.S. State
Department as a manufacturer or exporter of satellite-related items that are
controlled under the ITAR. In connection with the acquisition,
appropriate notice and other filings will be required to be made with the
Departments of State and Defense. On December 23, 2008, the Executive
Agencies asked the FCC to defer action on the Applications until such time that
any national security, law enforcement, or public safety concerns raised by the
proposed transaction have been addressed. Such a request is routine
in transactions involving satellite carriers or other providers of
telecommunications services. In order to address any such concerns,
GHQ may be required to enter into a national security agreement with the
Executive Agencies, compliance with which will be a condition of FCC grant of
the FCC Applications.
Foreign Licenses and
Authorizations. Iridium Holdings, either directly or
indirectly through certain of its subsidiaries and affiliates, provides
communications services to subscribers in foreign countries in all regions of
the world. In many of these countries, Iridium Holdings, its
subsidiaries and/or affiliates have received government licenses or other
authorizations to provide such services. In certain of these
countries, completion of the acquisition may require either government approval
or notification of the change in control over the pertinent licenses or
authorizations. No assurance can be given that, if any such approvals
are required, they will be obtained.
General. It is
possible that governmental authorities having jurisdiction over GHQ and Iridium
Holdings may seek regulatory concessions as conditions for granting approval of
the acquisition. A regulatory body’s approval may contain terms or
impose conditions or restrictions relating or applying to, or requiring changes
in or limitations on, the operation or ownership of any asset or business of
GHQ, Iridium Holdings or any of their subsidiaries, or GHQ’s ownership of
Iridium Holdings, or requiring asset divestitures, which conditional approval
could reasonably be expected to result in a substantial detriment to GHQ,
Iridium Holdings and their subsidiaries, taken as a whole, after the closing of
the acquisition. If this kind of approval occurs, in certain
circumstances, GHQ can decline to close under the transaction
agreement. We can give no assurance that the required regulatory
approvals will be obtained on terms that satisfy the conditions to closing of
the acquisition or are within the time frame contemplated by GHQ and Iridium
Holdings. See “The Transaction Agreement—Conditions to the Closing”
on page 101.
No
appraisal or dissenters’ rights are available under Delaware law for holders of
GHQ common stock in connection with the proposals described in this proxy
statement.
Consequences
if Acquisition Proposal Is Not Approved
If our
acquisition proposal and other proposals are not approved by the requisite vote
of our stockholders, or if stockholders holding 30% or more of the IPO shares
vote against the acquisition proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights, we will not acquire Iridium Holdings, none of the IPO shares will be
converted into cash and we will not seek approval of the certificate proposal,
the share issuance proposal or the stock incentive plan
proposal. Although we will continue to seek other potential business
combinations, a failure to complete the proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings
may make it more difficult for us to attract another acquisition candidate and
we may not be able to complete an alternate business combination by February 14,
2010, either because of insufficient time or insufficient operating
funds. If we do not consummate a business combination by February 14,
2010, our corporate existence will cease except for the purposes of winding up
our affairs and liquidating.
Necessity
of Stockholder Approval
We are
required by our certificate to obtain the approval of holders of a majority of
our IPO shares voting in person or by proxy at the special meeting to enter into
an initial business combination.
Prior to
voting, each stockholder should consider the fact that stockholder approval of
the acquisition proposal is necessary for us to complete the acquisition and
related transactions. Each stockholder should consider the fact that
if we do not complete the acquisition, GHQ will continue as a blank check
company until we find another suitable operating company to acquire, or GHQ will
be liquidated if an initial business combination is not consummated by February
14, 2010.
Required
Vote
The
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the IPO shares voted at the special
meeting, represented in person or by proxy is required to approve the
acquisition proposal. However, in accordance with our certificate and
the terms governing the trust account, we will not be able to complete the
acquisition if the holders of 30% or more of the total number of IPO shares vote
against the acquisition and properly exercise their rights to convert such IPO
shares into a pro rata portion of our trust account. Broker
non-votes, abstentions or a failure to vote on the acquisition proposal will
have no impact upon the approval of the acquisition proposal and will have no
effect of converting your shares into a pro rata share of the trust account. You
must affirmatively vote against the acquisition proposal in order to properly
exercise your conversion rights as described in this proxy statement and the
acquisition must be completed.
Recommendation
of GHQ’s Board of Directors
AFTER
CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, GHQ’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY DETERMINED THAT
THE TRANSACTION AGREEMENT AND THE ACQUISITION ARE ADVISABLE, FAIR TO, AND IN THE
BEST INTERESTS OF GHQ AND ITS STOCKHOLDERS AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS TO ITS
STOCKHOLDERS THAT THEY VOTE “FOR” THE ACQUISITION PROPOSAL.
Federal
Securities Laws Consequences
This
proxy statement does not cover any resales of the GHQ common shares to be
received by Iridium Holdings’ stockholders upon completion of the acquisition,
and no person is authorized to make any use of this document in connection with
such resale.
Stock
Transfer Restrictions
Lock-up
Provisions. Our initial stockholders have agreed not to sell
or transfer the founding stockholder’s GHQ units, founding stockholder’s shares
and founding stockholder’s warrants (and the underlying shares) until 180 days
after the consummation of our initial business combination except to permitted
transferees and not to sell or transfer any of the 8.0 million warrants
purchased by our founding stockholder (“private placement warrants”) (and the
underlying shares) until after we complete our initial business combination,
except to permitted transferees. All of the founding stockholder’s GHQ units,
founding stockholder’s shares and founding stockholder’s warrants and underlying
shares will cease to be subject to the transfer restrictions if, after
consummation of our initial business combination, (i) the last sales price of
our common stock equals or exceeds $14.25 per share for any 20 trading days
within any 30-trading-day period beginning 90 days after our initial business
combination or (ii) we consummate a subsequent liquidation, merger, stock
exchange or other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders
having the right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities
or other property. Permitted transferees must agree to be bound by the same
transfer restrictions, waiver and forfeiture provisions, and to vote the
founding stockholder’s shares in accordance with the majority of the shares of
common stock voted by the public stockholders in connection with the stockholder
vote required to approve our initial business combination and in connection with
an amendment to our certificate to provide for our perpetual existence. We refer
to these agreements as “lock-up agreements.”
The
permitted transferees under the lock-up agreements are our executive officers,
directors and employees, our founding stockholder, and other persons or entities
associated or affiliated with our founding stockholder.
During
the lock-up period, our initial stockholders and any permitted transferees to
whom they transfer shares of common stock will retain all other rights of
holders of our common stock, including, without limitation, the right to vote
their shares of common stock (except that our initial stockholders have agreed
to vote their founder’s shares in accordance with the majority of the shares of
common stock voted by the public stockholders in connection with the stockholder
vote required to approve our initial business combination and in connection with
the related amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
to provide for our perpetual existence, and our founding stockholder, executive
officers and directors have agreed to vote any shares of common stock acquired
as part of the IPO or thereafter, in favor of our initial business combination
and related amendment to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation
to provide for our perpetual existence) and the right to receive cash dividends,
if declared. If dividends are declared and payable in shares of common stock,
such dividends will also be subject to the lock-up agreement. If we are unable
to effect our initial business combination and liquidate, our initial
stockholders have waived the right to receive any portion of the liquidation
proceeds with respect to the founder’s shares. Any permitted transferees to whom
the founder’s shares are transferred will also agree to waive that
right.
As part
of the consummation of the acquisition, the lock-up agreements and the above
provisions will be terminated and replaced by the transfer restrictions
contained in new registration rights agreement described below.
Upon the
consummation of the acquisition, GHQ, the initial stockholders and the Iridium
Holding’s sellers (each a “restricted stockholder”) will enter into a
registration rights agreement (“new registration rights agreement”), which
provides that each of the stockholders party to the new registration rights
agreement will not sell, pledge, establish a “put equivalent position,”
liquidate or decrease a “call equivalent position,” or otherwise dispose of or
transfer any GHQ securities for a period of one year after the closing date of
the acquisition; provided that, the board of directors of GHQ may authorize an
underwritten public offering at any time beginning six months after the closing
date and that each such stockholder may pledge up to 25% of its GHQ shares as
collateral to secure cash borrowing from a third-party financial institution so
long as such financial institution agrees to be subject to these transfer
restrictions. In addition, GHQ will be required to conduct
underwritten public offerings to permit holders of at least 3.0 million shares
of common stock to sell their shares upon demand, but GHQ will not be required
to effect more than one demand registration in any six-month period following an
effective registration statement. All of the stockholders party to
the registration rights agreement will also be permitted to include their GHQ
common stock in certain registered offerings conducted by GHQ after the closing
of the acquisition.
FCC Regulatory
Limitations. Under the proposed certificate, and if the
certificate proposal is approved by our stockholders, GHQ shall have the right
to restrict the ownership or proposed ownership of its common stock or preferred
stock by any person, if such ownership or proposed ownership: (i) is or could be
inconsistent with, or in violation of, any provision of the Communications Act
of 1934 and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (“FCC Laws”); (ii)
will or may limit or impair GHQ’s business activities under the FCC Laws; or
(iii) will or could subject GHQ to any specific rule, regulation or policy under
the FCC Laws, to which GHQ was not subject prior to such ownership or proposed
ownership (collectively, “FCC Limitation”).
The
proposed certificate also gives GHQ the right to request from our stockholders
or proposed stockholders (by transfer of stock or otherwise), certain
information, including information relating to such stockholder’s or proposed
stockholder’s citizenship, affiliations and ownership or interest in other
companies, if GHQ believes that such stockholder’s or proposed stockholder’s
ownership of our securities may result in an FCC Limitation.
If GHQ
does not receive the information it requests from any specific stockholder or
concludes that a person’s ownership or proposed ownership or the exercise by any
person of any ownership right may result in an FCC Limitation, GHQ will have the
right to, and until GHQ determines in its sole discretion that no FCC Limitation
will occur: (i) refuse to permit a transfer of stock to a proposed stockholder;
(ii) suspend rights of stock or equity ownership which could cause an FCC
Limitation; and/or (iii) redeem the common stock or preferred stock of GHQ held
by any person.
PROPOSAL
II – APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE
OF
INCORPORATION
Assuming
the acquisition proposal is approved, GHQ stockholders are also being asked to
approve the amendment and restatement of our amended and restated certificate of
incorporation. This proposed certificate is required to effect the
acquisition and, in the judgment of our board of directors, the proposed
certificate is necessary to adequately address the post-acquisition needs of
GHQ.
The
following table sets forth a summary of the material differences between our
current certificate and the proposed certificate. This summary is
qualified by reference to the complete text of the proposed certificate, a copy
of which is attached to this proxy statement as Annex B. All
stockholders are encouraged to read the proposed certificate in its entirety for
a more complete description of its terms.
|
|
|
|
Name
|
Our
current certificate provides that our name is “GHL Acquisition
Corp.”
|
|
The
proposed certificate provides that our name is “Iridium Communications
Inc.”
|
Duration
of Existence
|
Our
current certificate provides that GHQ’s existence will terminate on
February 14, 2010.
|
|
The
proposed certificate provides for the perpetual existence of our
corporation.
|
Provisions
Specific to a Blank Check Company
|
Under
our current certificate, Article Sixth sets forth various provisions
related to our operations as a blank check company prior to the
consummation of an initial business combination.
|
|
The
proposed certificate does not include these blank check company provisions
because, upon consummation of the acquisition, we will operate Iridium
Holdings and cease to be a blank check company. Further,
provisions requiring that proceeds from GHQ’s IPO be held in a trust
account until a business combination or liquidation of GHQ has occurred
and that the terms of a proposed business combination be submitted for
approval by GHQ stockholders will not be applicable following consummation
of the acquisition.
|
Authorized
Shares
|
Under
our current certificate, GHQ is authorized to issue up to 201,000,000
shares, of which 200,000,000 shares are common stock with a par value of
US$ 0.001 each and 1,000,000 shares are preferred stock with a par value
US$ 0.0001 each.
|
|
Under
the proposed certificate GHQ shall be authorized to issue up to
shares, of which
shares are common stock with a par value of $0.001 each and
shares are preferred stock with a par value of $ 0.0001 each.
|
Dividends
|
Our
current certificate is silent as to the payment of
dividends.
|
|
The
proposed certificate provides that, subject to applicable law or the
rights of the preferred stock, if any, dividends may be declared and paid
on the common stock as the board of directors shall determine in its
discretion.
|
Conversion
Rights
|
If
a majority of the shares issued in our IPO approve a business combination,
any GHQ stockholder holding shares of common stock issued at the IPO who
votes against a business combination and exercises its conversion rights
may demand that we convert the stockholder’s IPO shares to cash, all
subject to certain maximum percentage conversion rights.
|
|
The
proposed certificate does not provide for conversion
rights.
|
Action
by Consent of the Stockholders
|
Under
Delaware law, unless a company’s certificate provides otherwise,
stockholders may act by written consent in lieu of any annual or special
meeting. Our current certificate is silent with respect to
action by written consent.
|
|
The
proposed certificate generally prohibits stockholders from taking any
action by written consent, so stockholders must take any actions at a duly
called annual or special meeting of the stockholders.
|
|
|
|
|
Classes
of Board of Directors
|
In
our current certificate, the board of directors is divided into three
classes. Members of each class are elected for specific
terms.
|
|
The
proposed certificate does not expressly provide for different classes of
the board of directors, and, therefore, our board of directors will not be
divided into different classes.
|
Restrictions
on Stock Ownership and Transfer
|
Our
current certificate does not include specific restrictions on ownership
and transfer.
|
|
The
proposed certificate allows GHQ to restrict ownership or proposed
ownership of its common stock or preferred stock if such ownership or
proposed ownership could result in an FCC Limitation. GHQ may
request information from any stockholder or proposed stockholder if it
believes such stockholder’s ownership of stock may result in an FCC
Limitation. In addition, if GHQ concludes that stock ownership
or proposed stock ownership may result in an FCC Limitation or does not
receive sufficient requested information from a stockholder, GHQ has the
option to either refuse to permit a transfer of shares by a stockholder,
suspend rights of stock or equity ownership or redeem stock in accordance
with the provisions of the proposed
certificate.
|
We are
required by Delaware law to obtain the approval of holders of a majority of our
outstanding shares to amend our certificate. Because the acquisition
and related transactions cannot be completed unless we amend our certificate,
stockholder approval of the proposed certificate is necessary.
Prior to
voting, each stockholder should consider the fact that stockholder approval of
the proposed certificate is necessary for us to complete the acquisition and
related transactions. Each stockholder should also consider the fact
that if we do not complete the acquisition, GHQ will continue as a blank check
company until we find another suitable operating company to acquire, or GHQ will
be liquidated if an initial business combination is not consummated by February
14, 2010.
Required
Vote
The
affirmative vote of holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our
common stock is required to approve our proposed certificate. Broker
non-votes, abstentions or the failure to vote on the certificate proposal will
have the same effect as a vote against the certificate proposal. The
approval of our amended and restated certificate proposal is a condition to the
approval of our acquisition proposal.
Recommendation
AFTER
CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, GHQ’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AND
DECLARED ADVISABLE OUR PROPOSED CERTIFICATE AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT
STOCKHOLDERS VOTE OR INSTRUCT THEIR VOTE TO BE CAST “FOR” THE CERTIFICATE
PROPOSAL.
PROPOSAL
III – APPROVAL OF THE SHARE ISSUANCE PROPOSAL
Share
Issuance Proposal
GHQ’s
stockholders are being asked to approve the issuance of up to 31,390,000 common
shares as part of the consideration for the acquisition and related
transactions. As of the date of this proxy statement, there are
48,500,000 shares of GHQ’s common stock outstanding, so this issuance would
represent more than 20% of our outstanding shares.
Necessity
of Stockholder Approval
The NYSE
Alternext U.S. Company Guide requires stockholder approval as a prerequisite to
approval of applications to list additional shares to be issued as sole or
partial consideration for an acquisition of the stock or assets of another
company where the present or potential issuance of common stock, or securities
convertible into common stock, could result in an increase in outstanding common
shares of 20% or more. Because the acquisition and related
transactions will require the issuance by us of shares of common stock that
would represent more than 20% of our currently outstanding common stock,
stockholder approval of the share issuance proposal is required to maintain our
listing on the NYSE Alternext U.S.
Prior to
voting, each stockholder should consider the fact that the share issuance
proposal is a prerequisite to the issuance of shares of common stock that will
be used to complete the acquisition and related transactions. Each
stockholder should consider the fact that if we do not complete the acquisition,
GHQ will continue as a blank check company until we find another suitable
operating company to acquire, or GHQ will be liquidated if an initial business
combination is not consummated by February 14, 2010.
Required
Vote
The
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented in
person or by proxy and entitled to vote at the special meeting is required to
approve the share issuance proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes
will have the same effect as a vote against the share issuance
proposal. Failing to vote on the share issuance proposal will have no
impact upon the approval of the share issuance proposal. The approval
of our share issuance proposal is a condition to the approval of our acquisition
proposal.
Recommendation
AFTER
CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, GHQ’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AND
DECLARED ADVISABLE THE SHARE ISSUANCE PROPOSAL AND UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT
STOCKHOLDERS VOTE OR INSTRUCT THEIR VOTE TO BE CAST “FOR” THE SHARE ISSUANCE
PROPOSAL.
PROPOSAL
IV – ADOPTION OF THE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN
GHQ is
seeking stockholder approval for the Iridium Communications Inc. 2009 Stock
Incentive Plan, to be effective upon the closing of the acquisition (the “2009
Plan”). Our board of directors believes that it is in the best
interest of GHQ and its stockholders for GHQ to adopt the 2009
Plan. The purpose of the 2009 Plan is to aid GHQ following the
acquisition in securing and retaining key employees and others of outstanding
ability and to motivate such individuals to exert their best efforts on behalf
of GHQ and its affiliates by providing incentives through the grant of options
to acquire shares of our common stock and, if so determined by the compensation
committee of our board of directors (“compensation committee”), other
stock-based awards and performance incentive awards. GHQ believes
that it will benefit from the added interest that these individuals will have in
the welfare of GHQ as a result of their proprietary interest in GHQ’s
success.
Summary
of the Iridium Communications Inc. 2009 Stock Incentive Plan
|
|
|
|
•
|
The 2009 Plan has a ten-year
term.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
The 2009 Plan provides for the
grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock
appreciation rights and other stock-based awards (which includes
restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance-based awards
payable both in cash and in shares of our common stock) to eligible
individuals.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
8.0 million shares of common stock
in the aggregate are authorized for issuance pursuant to awards under the
2009 Plan.
|
The 2009 Plan will be administered by
the compensation committee of our board of directors. The compensation committee
may delegate to a committee of one or more members of our board or one or more
of our officers the authority to grant or amend awards to participants other
than our senior executives who are subject to Section 16 of the Exchange Act or
employees who are “covered employees” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of
the Code. Unless otherwise determined by our board, the compensation
committee shall consist solely of two or more members of the board, each of whom
is an “outside director” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m), a
“non-employee director” within the meaning of the Exchange Act, and an
“independent director” under the rules of the NYSE (or other principal securities market
on which shares of our common stock are traded).
The compensation committee will have the power to determine
eligibility, the types and sizes of awards, the price and timing of awards and
the acceleration or waiver of any vesting restriction.
Persons eligible to
participate in the 2009
Plan include all non-employee members of our board of directors, and employees
and consultants of GHQ and its subsidiaries and affiliates, in each case as
determined by the compensation committee (“participants”).
Limitation on Awards
and Shares Available
An aggregate of 8.0 million shares of common stock are available
for grant pursuant to the 2009 Plan. The shares of our common stock covered by
the 2009 Plan may be treasury shares or authorized but unissued
shares.
To the extent that an award terminates,
expires, or lapses for any reason, or an award is settled in cash without
delivery of shares to the participant, then any shares subject to the award may
be used again for new grants under the 2009 Plan.
The maximum number of shares of common
stock that may be subject to one or more awards granted to any one participant
pursuant to the 2009 Plan
during any calendar year is 2 million and the maximum amount that may be paid
in cash during any calendar year with respect to any performance-based award is
$2 million.
The 2009 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock
options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation
rights, other stock-based awards, and performance-based awards. No determination
has been made as to the types or amounts of awards that will be granted to
specific individuals pursuant to the 2009 Plan.
Options. Stock options, including incentive
stock options, as defined under Section 422 of the Code, and nonqualified stock
options may be granted pursuant to the 2009 Plan. The option exercise price of
all stock options granted pursuant to the 2009 Plan will not be less than 100%
of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Stock options
may be exercised as determined by the compensation committee, but in no event
may a stock option have a term extending beyond the tenth anniversary of the
date of grant. Incentive stock options granted to any employee who owns, as of
the date of grant, stock possessing more than ten percent of the total combined
voting power of all classes of outstanding stock, however, shall have an
exercise price that is not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common
stock on the date of grant and may not have a term extending beyond the fifth
anniversary of the date of grant. The aggregate fair market value of the shares
with respect to which options intended to be incentive stock options are
exercisable for the first time by an employee in any calendar year may not
exceed $100,000, or such other amount as the Code provides.
The compensation committee will
determine the methods by which payments by any award holder with respect to any
awards may be paid, including, without limitation: (i) cash, (ii) shares of
common stock held for such period of time as may be required by the compensation committee in order
to avoid adverse accounting consequences and having a fair market value on the
date of delivery equal to the aggregate payments required, and/or (iii) another
method acceptable to the compensation committee (including through a
broker-assisted cashless exercise mechanism or a net exercise
method).
Restricted
Stock. Restricted stock may be
granted pursuant to the 2009 Plan. A restricted stock award is the grant of
shares of common stock at a
price determined by the compensation committee (including $0.00), that is
nontransferable and may be subject to substantial risk of forfeiture until
specific conditions are met. Conditions may be based on continuing employment
and/or achieving performance goals. During the period of restriction,
participants holding shares of restricted stock may have full voting and
dividend rights with respect to such shares. The restrictions will lapse in
accordance with a schedule or other conditions determined by the compensation
committee.
Performance Based
Awards and Other Equity Awards. Other types of
equity awards that may be
granted under the 2009 Plan include stock appreciation rights, restricted stock
units and performance-based awards. Performance based awards are
either stock-based awards or cash bonus awards payable upon the attainment of
pre-established performance goals based on established performance criteria and
are intended to be performance-based awards within the meaning of Section 162(m)
of the Code. The goals are established and evaluated by the compensation
committee and may relate to performance over any periods as determined by the
compensation committee. Following is a brief discussion of the requirements for
awards, including performance bonus awards, to be treated as performance-based
awards within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code.
The compensation committee may grant
awards to employees who are or may be “covered employees,” as defined in Code
Section 162(m), that are intended to be performance-based awards within the
meaning of Code Section 162(m) in order to preserve the deductibility of these
awards for federal income tax. Under the 2009 Plan, these performance-based
awards may be either stock-based awards or performance bonus awards payable in
cash. Participants are only entitled to receive payment for a performance-based
award for any given performance period to the extent that pre-established
performance goals set by the Compensation Committee for the period are
satisfied. These pre-established performance goals must be based on one or more
of the following performance criteria:
·
|
consolidated
earnings before or after taxes (including earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation and
amortization)
|
·
|
return
on stockholders’ equity;
|
·
|
improvements
in capital structure;
|
·
|
profitability
of an identifiable business unit or
product;
|
·
|
maintenance
or improvement of profit
margins;
|
·
|
total
stockholder return;
|
·
|
capital
expenditures; and
|
·
|
progress
toward or attaining milestones on key
projects.
|
The compensation committee shall
determine whether, with respect to a performance period, the applicable
performance goals have been met with respect to a given participant and, if they
have, shall so certify and ascertain the amount of the applicable performance
based award. No performance based awards will be paid for such
performance period until such certification is made by the compensation
committee. The amount of the performance based award actually paid to
a given participant may be less than the amount determined by the applicable
performance goal formula, at the discretion of the compensation
committee. The amount of the performance-based award determined by
the compensation committee for a performance period shall be paid to the
participant at such time as determined by the compensation committee in its sole
discretion after the end of such performance period.
Adjustments upon Certain
Events
In the event of any change in the
outstanding shares of
common stock by reason of any stock dividend or split, reorganization,
recapitalization, merger, consolidation, spin-off, combination, transaction or
exchange of shares or other corporate exchange, or any distribution to
stockholders of shares other than regular cash dividends or any transaction
similar to the foregoing, the compensation committee in its sole discretion
shall make such substitution or adjustment, if any, as it deems to be equitable,
as to the number or kind of shares or other securities issued or reserved for
issuance pursuant to the 2009 Plan or pursuant to outstanding awards,
the maximum number of shares for which options or stock appreciation rights may
be granted during a calendar year to any participant in the 2009 Plan, the maximum amount of a
performance based award that may be granted during a calendar year to any
participant, the option exercise price or exercise price of any stock
appreciation right and/or any other affected terms of such awards.
In the event of a change in control of
GHQ, the compensation committee may accelerate, vest or cause the restrictions
to lapse with respect to all or any portion of an award, cancel such awards for
fair value (as determined by the compensation committee in its sole discretion)
which, in the case of options and stock appreciation rights, may equal the
excess, if any, of value of the consideration to be paid in the change in
control transaction to holders of the same number of shares subject to such
options or stock appreciation rights (or, if no consideration is paid in any
such transaction, the fair market value of the shares subject to options or
stock appreciation rights) over the aggregate option exercise price of the
options or exercise price of the stock appreciation rights, provide for the
issuance of substitute awards that will substantially preserve the otherwise
applicable terms of any affected awards previously granted as determined by the
compensation committee in its sole discretion, and/or provide that for a period
of at least 15 days prior to the change in control, the options shall be fully
exercisable and that upon the occurrence of the change in control, the options
shall terminate.
Amendment and
Termination
Our board
of directors may amend, alter or discontinue the 2009 Plan, but no amendment,
alteration or discontinuation shall be made, without the approval of our
stockholders, if (i) stockholder approval of such action is required by exchange
rules or applicable law, or (ii) such action would increase the total number of
shares of our common stock reserved under the 2009 Plan or change the maximum
number of shares for which awards may be granted to any participant, or, without
the consent of a participant, if such action would materially adversely affect
any of the rights of the participant under any award. However, the compensation
committee may amend the 2009
Plan in
such manner as it deems necessary to permit the granting of awards meeting the
requirements of the Code or other applicable laws.
U.S.
Federal Income Tax Consequences
The
following is a general summary of the material U.S. federal income tax
consequences of the grant and exercise and vesting of awards under the 2009 Plan
and the disposition of shares acquired pursuant to the exercise of such awards
and is intended to reflect the current provisions of the Code and the
regulations thereunder. This summary is not intended to be a complete
statement of applicable law, nor does it address foreign, state, local and
payroll tax considerations. Moreover, the U.S. federal income tax
consequences to any particular participant may differ from those described
herein by reason of, among other things, the particular circumstances of such
participant.
Options. The Code
requires that, for treatment of an option as an incentive stock option, common
stock acquired through the exercise of an incentive stock option cannot be
disposed of before the later of (i) two years from the date of grant of the
option, or (ii) one year from the date of exercise. Holders of
incentive stock options will generally incur no federal income tax liability at
the time of grant or upon exercise of those options. However, the
spread at exercise will be an “item of tax preference,” which may give rise to
“alternative minimum tax” liability for the taxable year in which the exercise
occurs. If the holder does not dispose of the shares before two years
following the date of grant and one year following the date of exercise, the
difference between the exercise price and the amount realized upon disposition
of the shares will constitute long-term capital gain or loss, as the case may
be. Assuming both holding periods are satisfied, no deduction will be
allowed to GHQ for federal income tax purposes in connection with the grant or
exercise of the incentive stock option. If, within two years
following the date of grant or within one year following the date of exercise,
the holder of shares acquired through the exercise of an incentive stock option
disposes of those shares, the participant will generally realize taxable
compensation at the time of such disposition equal to the difference between the
exercise price and the lesser of the fair market value of the share on the date
of exercise or the amount realized on the subsequent disposition of the shares,
and that amount will generally be deductible by GHQ for federal income tax
purposes, subject to the possible limitations on deductibility under Code
Sections 280G and 162(m) for compensation paid to executives designated in those
Sections. Finally, if an incentive stock option becomes first
exercisable in any one year for shares having an aggregate value in excess of
$100,000 (based on the grant date value), the portion of the incentive stock
option in respect of those excess shares will be treated as a non-qualified
stock option for federal income tax purposes.
No income
will be realized by a participant upon grant of a nonqualified stock
option. Upon the exercise of a non-qualified stock option, the
participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in an amount equal to
the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the underlying exercised shares
over the option exercise price paid at the time of exercise. GHQ will
be able to deduct this same amount for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but
such deduction may be limited under Code Sections 280G and 162(m) for
compensation paid to certain executives designated in those
Sections.
Restricted
Stock. A participant will not be subject to tax upon the grant
of an award of restricted stock unless the participant otherwise elects to be
taxed at the time of grant pursuant to Code Section 83(b). On the
date an award of restricted stock becomes transferable or is no longer subject
to a substantial risk of forfeiture, the participant will have taxable
compensation equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares
on that date over the amount the participant paid for such shares, if any,
unless the participant made an election under Code Section 83(b) to be taxed at
the time of grant. If the participant made an election under Code
Section 83(b), the participant will have taxable compensation at the time of
grant equal to the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the
date of grant over the amount the participant paid for such shares, if
any. (Special rules apply to the receipt and disposition of
restricted stock received by officers and directors who are subject to Section
16(b) of the Exchange Act). GHQ will be able to deduct, at the same
time as it is recognized by the participant, the amount of taxable compensation
to the participant for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but such deduction may
be limited under Code Sections 280G and 162(m) for compensation paid to certain
executives designated in those Sections.
Restricted Stock
Units. A participant will not be subject to tax upon the grant
of a restricted stock unit award. Rather, upon the delivery of shares
or cash pursuant to a restricted stock unit award, the participant will have
taxable compensation equal to the fair market value of the number of shares (or
the amount of cash) the participant actually receives with respect to the
award. GHQ will be able to deduct the amount of taxable compensation
to the
participant
for U.S. federal income tax purposes, but the deduction may be limited under
Code Sections 280G and 162(m) for compensation paid to certain executives
designated in those Sections.
Stock Appreciation
Rights. No income will be realized by a participant upon grant
of a stock appreciation right (“SAR”). Upon the exercise of a SAR,
the participant will recognize ordinary compensation income in an amount equal
to the fair market value of the payment received in respect of the
SAR. GHQ will be able to deduct this same amount for U.S. federal
income tax purposes, but such deduction may be limited under Sections 280G and
162(m) of the Code for compensation paid to certain executives designated in
those Sections.
Other Stock-Based
Awards. A participant will have taxable compensation equal to
the difference between the fair market value of the shares on the date the
common stock subject to the award is transferred to the participant over the
amount the participant paid for such shares, if any. GHQ will be able
to deduct, at the same time as it is recognized by the participant, the amount
of taxable compensation to the participant for U.S. federal income tax purposes,
but such deduction may be limited under Code Sections 280G and 162(m) for
compensation paid to certain executives designated in those
Sections.
Code Section
162(m). In general, Code Section 162(m) (as interpreted by IRS
Notice 2007-49) denies a publicly held corporation a deduction for U.S. federal
income tax purposes for compensation in excess of $1.0 million per year per
person to its principal executive officer and the three other officers (other
than the principal executive officer and principal financial officer) whose
compensation is disclosed in its proxy statement as a result of their total
compensation, subject to certain exceptions. The 2009 Plan is
intended to satisfy an exception with respect to grants of options or stock
appreciation rights to covered employees under Code Section
162(m). In addition, the 2009 Plan is designed to permit certain
awards of restricted stock, restricted stock units, cash bonus awards and other
awards to be awarded as performance based awards intended to qualify under the
“performance-based compensation” exception to Code Section 162(m).
THE
FOREGOING IS ONLY A SUMMARY OF THE EFFECT OF FEDERAL INCOME TAXATION UPON
PARTICIPANTS AND GHQ WITH RESPECT TO THE GRANT AND EXERCISE OF AWARDS UNDER THE
2009 PLAN. IT DOES NOT PURPORT TO BE COMPLETE, AND DOES NOT DISCUSS
THE TAX CONSEQUENCES OF A PARTICIPANT’S DEATH OR THE PROVISIONS OF THE INCOME
TAX LAWS OF ANY MUNICIPALITY, STATE OR FOREIGN COUNTRY IN WHICH THE PARTICIPANT
MAY RESIDE.
New
Plan Benefits
Future
grants under the 2009 Plan will be made at the discretion of the compensation
committee and, accordingly, are not yet determinable. In addition,
the value of the awards granted under the 2009 Plan will depend on a number of
factors, including the fair market value of our common stock on future dates,
the exercise decisions made by the participants and/or the extent to which any
applicable performance goals necessary for vesting or payment are
achieved. Consequently, it is not possible to determine the benefits
that might be received by participants receiving discretionary grants under, or
having their annual bonus paid pursuant to, the 2009 Plan.
Necessity
of Stockholder Approval
Prior to
voting, each stockholder should consider the fact that stockholder approval of
the stock incentive plan proposal is necessary for us to complete the
acquisition and related transactions, as the acquisition proposal is conditioned
upon the stock incentive plan proposal. Each stockholder should
consider the fact that if we do not complete the acquisition, GHQ will continue
as a blank check company until we find another suitable operating company to
acquire or GHQ will be liquidated if an initial business combination is not
consummated by February 14, 2010.
Required
Vote
The
affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of shares represented in person or
by proxy and entitled to vote at the special meeting will be required to approve
the stock incentive plan proposal. Abstentions will have the effect
of a vote against the stock incentive plan proposal but broker non-votes or a
failure to vote will have no effect upon the stock incentive plan
proposal. The approval of the stock incentive plan proposal is a
condition to the approval of the acquisition proposal.
Recommendation
AFTER
CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, GHQ’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AND
DECLARED ADVISABLE THE ADOPTION OF THE PROPOSED STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN AND
UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE OR INSTRUCT THEIR VOTE TO BE CAST
“FOR” THE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN PROPOSAL.
PROPOSAL
V – ADOPTION OF THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL
Adjournment
Proposal
If there
are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the
acquisition proposal, the certificate proposal, the share issuance proposal or
the stock incentive plan proposal, the board of directors may submit a proposal
to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if necessary, to permit
further solicitation of proxies.
Required
Vote
The
adoption of the adjournment proposal will require the affirmative vote of the
holders of a majority of the shares represented in person or by proxy and
entitled to vote thereon at the special meeting. Abstentions and
broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the adjournment
proposal, but a failure to vote will have no impact upon the approval of the
adjournment proposal. Approval of the adjournment proposal is not
conditioned upon approval of the acquisition proposal or any other
proposal.
Recommendation
AFTER
CAREFUL CONSIDERATION, GHQ’S BOARD OF DIRECTORS HAS UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED AND
DECLARED ADVISABLE THE ADOPTION OF THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL AND UNANIMOUSLY
RECOMMENDS THAT STOCKHOLDERS VOTE OR INSTRUCT THEIR VOTE TO BE CAST “FOR” THE
ADOPTION OF THE ADJOURNMENT PROPOSAL.
MARKET
PRICE OF GHQ COMMON STOCK
GHQ
units, common shares and warrants are listed and traded on the NYSE Alternext
U.S. under the trading symbol “GHQ.U”, “GHQ” and “GHQ.WS”,
respectively. GHQ units commenced trading on February 15, 2008 while
its common stock and warrants began public trading on March 20,
2008. Prior to this date, there was no established public trading
market for GHQ securities. Each GHQ Unit consists of one share of GHQ
common stock and one warrant. The following table sets forth, for the
periods indicated, the high and low closing sales prices per GHQ Unit, common
share and warrant, as reported on the NYSE Alternext U.S.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second
Quarter*
|
|
$ |
10.45 |
|
|
$ |
9.50 |
|
|
$ |
9.75 |
|
|
$ |
9.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
First
Quarter
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
|
$ |
9.42 |
|
|
$ |
9.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
|
|
$ |
9.80 |
|
|
$ |
8.60 |
|
|
$ |
9.19 |
|
|
$ |
8.60 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
Third
Quarter
|
|
$ |
10.02 |
|
|
$ |
9.71 |
|
|
$ |
9.41 |
|
|
$ |
9.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
Second
Quarter
|
|
$ |
10.07 |
|
|
$ |
9.65 |
|
|
$ |
9.35 |
|
|
$ |
9.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.85 |
|
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
First
Quarter**
|
|
$ |
9.85 |
|
|
$ |
9.60 |
|
|
$ |
9.10 |
|
|
$ |
9.05 |
|
|
$ |
0.59 |
|
|
$ |
0.55 |
|
|
**
Units commenced public trading on February 15, 2008. Common stock and
warrants commenced public trading on March 20,
2008.
|
The
closing price for each share of common stock, unit and warrant of GHQ on
September 22, 2008, the last full trading day before the announcement of the
proposed acquisition, was $9.23, $9.75 and $0.54, respectively. On
May 28, 2009, the most recent practicable date prior to the printing of this
document, the reported closing sales price per each share of common stock, unit
and warrant of GHQ was $9.73, $10.45 and $0.70, respectively. You should obtain current market
quotations for GHQ common shares, units and warrants in deciding whether to vote
for the acquisition.
Holders
As of May
28, 2009, there were five holders of record of GHQ units, one holder of record
of GHQ common stock and two holders of record of GHQ warrants. Such
number does not include beneficial owners holding shares through nominee
names.
Dividends
Since our
IPO and the listing of our shares on the NYSE Alternext U.S., GHQ has not paid
dividends on our common stock and does not intend to pay any dividends prior to
the completion of the proposed acquisition. After we complete the
proposed acquisition, the payment of dividends will depend on our revenues and
earnings, if any, our capital requirements and our general financial
condition. The payment of dividends after the proposed acquisition
will be within the discretion of our board of directors at that
time. Our board of directors currently intends to retain any earnings
for use in our business operations and, accordingly, we do not anticipate that
our board will declare any dividends in the foreseeable future.
INTERESTS
OF CERTAIN PERSONS IN THE ACQUISITION
In
considering the recommendation of GHQ’s board of directors to vote for our
proposals, you should be aware that our executive officers and members of our
board of directors have interests in the acquisition that are different from, or
in addition to, the interests of GHQ’s stockholders generally. The members of
our board of directors were aware of these differing interests and considered
them, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the transaction
agreement and in recommending to our stockholders that they vote in favor of the
acquisition proposed and other proposals. These interests include, among other
things:
·
|
Our
directors, Messrs. Bok, Niehaus, Rush, Canfield and Clarke, and our
founding stockholder own 200,000, 200,000, 43,479, 43,479, 43,479 and
8,369,563 units of GHQ, respectively. Each of Messrs. Rush, Canfield and
Clarke purchased his units prior to our IPO for an aggregate price of
$128.00 and had an aggregate market value of approximately $423,051, based
upon the last sale price of $9.73 on the NYSE Alternext U.S. on May 28,
2009. If our proposals are not approved and GHQ is unable to
complete another business combination by February 14, 2010, GHQ will be
required to liquidate. In such event, the 8.5 million units held by
Messrs. Rush, Canfield and Clark and our founding stockholder will be
worthless because Messrs. Rush, Canfield and Clarke and our founding
stockholder have agreed that they will not receive any liquidation
proceeds with respect to such shares. Accordingly, Messrs. Rush, Canfield
and Clarke and our founding stockholder have a financial interest in the
completion of the acquisition. The 400,000 shares purchased by
Messrs. Bok and Niehaus in the IPO would receive liquidation
proceeds. Messrs. Bok and Niehaus each purchased 200,000 units
in our IPO.
|
·
|
In
addition to the shares of GHQ common stock, our founding stockholder
purchased for $8.0 million warrants to purchase up to 8.0 million shares
of GHQ common stock at $1.00 per share. These warrants have an
exercise price of $7.00 per share. If GHQ is unable to complete
a business combination by February 14, 2010 and liquidates its assets,
there will be no distribution with respect to these warrants, and the
warrants will expire worthless.
|
·
|
Two
of our directors Messrs. Bok and Niehaus purchased units in our
IPO. In addition, Messrs. Bok and Niehaus, own shares in our
founding stockholder that give them indirect ownership interests in GHQ.
Because of their indirect ownership interests, each of Messrs. Bok and
Niehaus has financial interests in the completion of the acquisition in
addition to their interests as holders of our
units.
|
·
|
If
the acquisition is completed, certain of our current directors may
continue as directors of GHQ. These non-executive directors will be
entitled to receive any cash fees, stock options, stock awards or other
compensation arrangements that our board of directors determines to
provide to our non-executive
directors.
|
The
following summary of the material provisions of the transaction agreement dated
as of September 22, 2008 among GHQ, Iridium Holdings and the sellers listed on
the signature pages thereof, as amended on April 28, 2009, does not purport to
describe all of the terms of the transaction agreement. The following
summary is qualified by reference to the complete text of the original agreement
and the amendment, copies of which are attached as Annex A to this proxy
statement and incorporated herein by reference. We urge you to read
the full text of the original agreement and the amendment in their entirety for
a more complete description of the terms and conditions of the
acquisition. For the avoidance of doubt, the term transaction
agreement incorporates both the original agreement and the amendment and the
terms of the transaction agreement summarized herein reflect the terms set forth
in the original agreement as later amended by the amendment.
Explanatory
Note Regarding Summary of Transaction Agreement and Representations and
Warranties in the Transaction Agreement
The
following summary of the transaction agreement is intended to provide
information about the terms and conditions of our proposed acquisition of
Iridium Holdings as reflected in the original agreement and the
amendment. Neither this summary, nor the terms and conditions of the
transaction agreement, are intended to be, and should not be relied upon as,
disclosures or any factors or circumstances regarding GHQ or Iridium
Holdings. The provisions of the transaction agreement (such as the
representations and warranties) govern the contractual rights and relationships,
and allocate risks, between the parties in relation to the
acquisition. In particular, the representations and warranties made
by the parties to each other in the transaction agreement have been negotiated
between the parties with the principal purpose of setting forth their respective
rights with respect to their obligation to close the acquisition should events
or circumstances change or otherwise be different from those stated in the
representations and warranties. The representations and warranties
may be subject to important qualifications and limitations agreed to by the
parties in connection with negotiating its terms, including contractual
standards of materiality that are different from those generally applicable to
stockholders under the federal securities laws. Matters may change
from the state of affairs contemplated by the representations and
warranties.
Structure
of the Acquisition
The
transaction agreement provides that upon the closing of the acquisition, GHQ
will own, directly or indirectly, all or substantially all of the units of
Iridium Holdings, and Iridium Holdings will become a subsidiary of
GHQ. Equityholders owning approximately 99.5% of Iridium Holdings’
equity have signed the original agreement. Additionally, GHQ will
acquire all of the equity of two of Iridium Holdings largest equityholders,
Baralonco and Syncom. As a result of the acquisition, all of the
Sellers’ ownership interests in Iridium Holdings held prior to the acquisition
will be exchanged for approximately 29.3 million shares of GHQ common stock and
$76.7 million of cash, subject to certain adjustments.
Timing
of the Closing of the Acquisition
The
closing of the acquisition will take place no later than the fifth business day
after the conditions to closing set forth in the transaction agreement, which
are described below under “– Conditions to the Closing of the Acquisition,” are
satisfied, unless GHQ and Iridium Holdings agree in writing to postpone the
closing to another time. The closing of the acquisition is expected
to occur as soon as legally permitted and practicable after our stockholders
approve the proposals described in this proxy statement.
Acquisition
Consideration
The
aggregate consideration to be paid in the acquisition and related transactions
is based upon a total enterprise value for Iridium Holdings of $517.3 million
(calculated as $77.1 million of cash to be paid to 100% of the Iridium Holdings’
equityholders, plus $294.4 million of GHQ common stock to be issued to 100% of
the Iridium Holdings’ equityholders (based on an assumed price per share of
$10.00), plus net indebtedness of Iridium Holdings of approximately $145.8
million as of December 31, 2008, including the $22.9 million convertible note
held by Greenhill Europe). Upon completion of the acquisition, the
Sellers who have signed the transaction agreement will receive $76.7 million in
cash, subject to certain adjustments, and GHQ will issue to such Sellers
approximately 29.3 million shares of GHQ common stock. The shares of
common stock issued to the Sellers will not be registered
under the
Securities Act, in reliance upon the exemptions from the registration
requirements as provided in Regulation D of the Securities Act and the
representations and warranties of the Sellers that they are “accredited
investors” within the meaning of Regulation D.
GHQ has
agreed in the transaction agreement to cause the funds in our trust account to
be disbursed at the closing of the acquisition: (1) to pay the cash
consideration to the Sellers; (2) to pay the conversion price to any
stockholders of GHQ who vote against the acquisition and properly exercise their
conversion rights; (3) to pay deferred underwriting fees and commissions to the
underwriters of our IPO; (4) to pay GHQ’s reasonable out-of-pocket documented
third party fees and expenses that are incurred prior to the closing in
connection with the transaction agreement and related transaction documents, to
the extent not paid prior to the closing; and (5) to prepay all or a portion of
Iridium Holdings’ outstanding indebtedness. GHQ will then contribute
the funds remaining in our trust account to Iridium Holdings, and Iridium
Holdings will use such funds for working capital and general corporate
matters.
Additionally,
90 days following the closing of the acquisition, if Iridium Holdings has in
effect a valid election under Section 754 of the Code with respect to the
taxable year in which the closing of the acquisition occurs, GHQ will make a tax
benefit payment of up to $25.2 million in aggregate to the Sellers (other than
the sellers of the equity of Baralonco and Syncom) (based on a payment of $25.5
million to owners of 100% of the equity of Iridium Holdings) to compensate for
the tax basis step-up.
Principal
Representations and Warranties
The
transaction agreement contains a number of representations and warranties made
by Iridium Holdings, the Sellers and GHQ to each other.
The
representations and warranties made by Iridium Holdings relate, among other
things, to:
·
|
proper
corporate organization and similar corporate
matters;
|
·
|
authorization,
performance and enforceability of the transaction agreement and related
transaction documents;
|
·
|
governmental
authorizations and filings;
|
·
|
absence
of any conflicts or violations under organizational documents, material
contracts, material laws or regulations as a result of the execution,
delivery and performance of the transaction agreement and related
transaction documents;
|
·
|
capital
structure and subsidiaries;
|
·
|
absence
of certain changes since December 31, 2007 (including absence of an
“Iridium Holdings Material Adverse
Effect”);
|
·
|
absence
of any undisclosed material
liabilities;
|
·
|
compliance
with laws and court orders;
|
·
|
employees,
employee benefit plans and labor
matters;
|
·
|
environmental
matters; and
|
·
|
the
provision of information for inclusion in the proxy
statement.
|
The
representations and warranties made by the Sellers as to themselves relate,
among other things, to:
·
|
proper
corporate organization and similar corporate
matters;
|
·
|
authorization,
performance and enforceability of the transaction agreement and the
related transaction documents;
|
·
|
absence
of any conflicts or violations under organizational documents, material
contracts, material laws or regulations as a result of the execution,
delivery and performance of the transaction agreement and related
transaction documents;
|
·
|
ownership
of the Iridium Holdings units;
|
·
|
purchase
of GHQ common stock for investment and not with a view to sell or
distribute; and
|
·
|
compliance
with the Securities Act and status of the Sellers as “accredited
investors” under Regulation D of the Securities
Act.
|
The
representations and warranties made by Baralonco and Syncom as to themselves
relate, among other things, to:
·
|
proper
corporate organization and similar corporate
matters;
|
·
|
compliance
with laws and orders; and
|
The
representations and warranties made by GHQ relate, among other things,
to:
·
|
proper
corporate organization and similar corporate
matters;
|
·
|
authorization,
performance and enforceability of the acquisition agreement and the
related transaction documents;
|
·
|
unanimous
approval and recommendation of its board of
directors;
|
·
|
governmental
authorizations and filings;
|
·
|
absence
of any conflicts or violations under organizational documents, material
contracts, material laws or regulations as a result of the execution,
delivery and performance of the transaction agreement and related
transaction documents;
|
·
|
capital
structure and subsidiaries;
|
·
|
SEC
filings and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act;
|
·
|
absence
of certain changes since February 21, 2008 (including absence of a “GHQ
Material Adverse Effect”;
|
·
|
compliance
with laws and court orders;
|
·
|
transactions
with affiliates;
|
·
|
employees
and employee matters;
|
·
|
opportunity
for independent investigation; and
|
·
|
GHQ’s
qualification to own and operate Iridium Holdings and its subsidiaries
under applicable laws, including the Communications Act of 1934, as
amended.
|
Materiality
and Material Adverse Effect
Many of
the representations and warranties contained in the transaction agreement are
qualified by materiality or material adverse effect. For purposes of
the transaction agreement, an “Iridium Holdings Material Adverse Effect” or “GHQ
Material Adverse Effect” means a material adverse effect on (x) the financial
condition, business, assets or results of operations of Iridium Holdings and its
subsidiaries or GHQ and its subsidiaries, as the case may be, taken as a whole
or (y) the ability of Iridium Holdings or GHQ, as the case may be, to perform
its obligations under or to consummate the transactions contemplated by the
transaction agreement. However, any effect to the extent it results
from any of the following will not be considered when determining whether an
Iridium Holdings Material Adverse Effect or GHQ Material Adverse Effect has
occurred:
·
|
the
negotiation, execution, announcement or performance of the transaction
agreement or the consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby,
including the impact thereof on relationships, contractual or otherwise,
with customers, suppliers, distributors, partners, financing sources,
employees, revenue and profitability (other than any effect resulting from
breach of certain specified representations and warranties of Iridium
Holdings or GHQ, as the case may
be);
|
·
|
changes
in the economy or credit, debt, financial or capital markets, in each
case, in the United States or elsewhere in the world, including changes in
interest or exchange rates, except to the extent Iridium Holdings and its
subsidiaries or GHQ and its subsidiaries, as the case may be, taken as a
whole, are disproportionately affected compared to other companies in the
same industry;
|
·
|
changes
in any laws, GAAP or accounting standards or interpretations thereof; or
changes in the general legal, regulatory or political conditions, except
to the extent Iridium Holdings and its subsidiaries or GHQ and its
subsidiaries, as the case may be, taken as a whole, are disproportionately
affected compared to other companies in the same
industry;
|
·
|
act
of war, sabotage or terrorism, or any escalation or worsening of any such
acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, except to the extent Iridium Holdings
and its subsidiaries or GHQ and its subsidiaries, as the case may be,
taken as a whole, are disproportionately affected compared to other
companies in the same industry;
|
·
|
earthquakes,
hurricanes, tornados or other natural disasters; except to the extent
Iridium Holdings and its subsidiaries or GHQ and its subsidiaries, as the
case may be, taken as a whole, are disproportionately affected compared to
other companies in the same
industry;
|
·
|
any
failure, in and of itself, to meet any internal or public projections,
forecasts or estimates of revenue, capital expenditures or earnings or the
issuance of revised projections that are not as optimistic as those in
existence as of September 22, 2008, so long as the underlying causes of
any such failure or issuance may be taken into consideration in
determining whether such material adverse effect has occurred;
and
|
·
|
changes
affecting the industries generally in which Iridium Holdings or its
subsidiaries or GHQ and its subsidiaries, as the case may be, conduct
business, except to the extent Iridium Holdings and its subsidiaries or
GHQ and its subsidiaries, as the case may be, taken as a whole, are
disproportionately affected compared to other companies in the same
industry.
|
The
occurrence of an Iridium Holdings Material Adverse Effect or a GHQ Material
Adverse Effect provides grounds for the other party not to consummate the
acquisition and to terminate the transaction agreement if such occurrence of an
Iridium Holdings Material Adverse Effect or a GHQ Material Adverse Effect would
cause the conditions set forth in the transaction agreement not to be satisfied
and such condition is incapable of being satisfied by the End Date (as defined
below).
Principal
Covenants
General
Iridium
Holdings, GHQ and the Sellers have agreed to perform certain covenants in the
transaction agreement. The principal covenants are as
follows:
·
|
use
reasonable best efforts to obtain, as promptly as practicable, all
approvals and consents that are required to be obtained in order to
complete the acquisition;
|
·
|
promptly
notify the other parties when a party becomes aware that any consent or
approval is required in connection with the transactions contemplated by
the transaction agreement, any notice or other communication from any
governmental authority with respect to the transactions contemplated by
the transaction agreement is received, or any material actions, suits,
claims, investigations or proceedings are commenced or to its knowledge
threatened against Iridium Holdings or its subsidiaries or against GHQ
before any arbitrator or governmental
authority;
|
·
|
make
the filings required under the HSR Act with respect to the acquisition and
cooperate with the other parties in making their respective
filings;
|
·
|
cooperate
and make all filings with the FCC for its consent to the transactions
contemplated by the transaction
agreement;
|
·
|
use
reasonable best efforts to prepare, file and diligently prosecute all
applications required to be filed with non-U.S. governmental authorities
for consent to the transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement,
to cooperate in the filing of such applications and keep the other parties
promptly appraised of any inquiries or requests for information from any
non-U.S. governmental authorities;
|
·
|
cooperate
and use reasonable best efforts to make filings with or deliver required
notifications, to the extent legally required or deemed appropriate by the
parties, to the DoD and U.S. security agencies, the Committee on Foreign
Investment in the United States, the Office of Foreign Assets Control,
Department of the Treasury and any filings or notifications required to be
made under the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 and the
ITAR;
|
·
|
cooperate
with one another in connection with the preparation of the filing of this
proxy statement; and
|
·
|
consult
with each other prior to issuing any press release, making any public
statement or scheduling any press conference or conference call with
investors with respect to the transaction agreement and the transactions
contemplated thereby, except as may be required by law or any listing
agreement or rule of any national securities exchange or
association.
|
Each
party has agreed to comply with any condition imposed on it by the FCC in
connection with the granting of its consent to the consummation of the
transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement and with any condition
imposed on it by any similar order of a non-U.S. governmental authority, except
that no party shall be required to comply with a condition if the condition was
imposed as a result of a circumstance the existence of which does not constitute
a breach by the party of its representations, warranties, covenants obligations
or agreement under the transaction agreement or the compliance with the
condition would result in or cause an Iridium Holdings Material Adverse Effect
or a GHQ Material Adverse Effect.
Interim covenants relating to
Iridium Holdings, Baralonco and Syncom. Under the transaction
agreement, Iridium Holdings is required to, and has agreed to use its reasonable
best efforts to cause its subsidiaries to, conduct its business in the ordinary
course consistent with past practice, maintain in effect all of its licenses and
permits and manage its working capital (including the timing of collection of
accounts receivable and of the payment of accounts payable) in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice. The most
significant activities that each of Iridium Holdings, Baralonco and Syncom have
agreed not to do, and to not permit any of their respective subsidiaries to do,
except with the consent of GHQ (which consent cannot be unreasonably withheld or
delayed) and subject to certain exceptions, are as follows:
·
|
amend
its charter documents (whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise);
|
·
|
split,
combine or reclassify any shares of its capital stock or of any subsidiary
or declare, set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution in respect
of any shares of its capital stock or of any subsidiary or redeem or
repurchase or otherwise acquire or offer to redeem or repurchase any
shares of its capital stock (or securities convertible or exchangeable for
capital stock) or of any
subsidiary;
|
·
|
issue,
deliver or sell or authorize the issuance, delivery or sale of any shares
of capital stock (or securities convertible into or exchangeable for
capital stock);
|
·
|
acquire
(by merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock or assets or otherwise),
directly or indirectly, any material assets, securities, material
properties, other than in the ordinary course of business in a manner
consistent with past practice;
|
·
|
sell,
lease or otherwise transfer or incur any lien on any material assets,
securities, material properties or businesses, other than in the ordinary
course of business in a manner consistent with past
practice;
|
·
|
make
any loans, advances, capital contributions to or investments in any other
person, other than in the ordinary course of business in a manner
consistent with past practice;
|
·
|
with
respect to Iridium Holdings and its subsidiaries, create, incur, assume,
suffer to exist or otherwise be liable with respect to any indebtedness
for borrowed money or guarantees thereof having an aggregate principal
amount (together with all other indebtedness for borrowed money or
guarantees thereof of Iridium Holdings or its subsidiaries) outstanding at
any time greater than the sum of Iridium Holdings’ existing credit
facilities and the note and, with respect to Baralonco and Syncom, create,
incur, assume, suffer to exist or otherwise be liable with respect to any
indebtedness for borrowed money or any guarantees
thereof;
|
·
|
enter
into any hedging arrangements;
|
·
|
enter
into any agreement or arrangement that limits or otherwise restricts in
any material respect Iridium Holdings and its subsidiaries and affiliates
or Baralonco and Syncom and their respective subsidiaries and affiliates,
from engaging in or competing in any line of business, in any location, or
with any person except in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, waive, release or assign any material rights, claims or
benefits;
|
·
|
except
as required by any pre-existing contractual obligation expressly disclosed
to GHQ, law or existing employee benefits plan of Iridium Holdings (i)
grant or increase any severance or termination pay (or amend any existing
arrangement with) any director or officer, (ii) increase benefits payable
under any existing severance or termination pay policies or employment
agreements in respect of any officer or director, (iii) enter into any
employment or deferred compensation or other similar agreement (or amend
any such existing agreement) with any director or officer, (iv) establish
or adopt or amend any collective bargaining, bonus, profit-sharing,
thrift, pension, retirement, deferred compensation, compensation, stock
option, restricted stock or other benefit plan or arrangement covering any
director or officer or (v) increase material compensation, bonus or other
benefits payable to any director of officer, in each case, other than in
the ordinary course of business in a manner consistent with past
practice;
|
·
|
change
methods of accounting, except as required by concurrent changes in law or
GAAP;
|
·
|
settle
or propose to settle (i) any material litigation, investigation,
arbitration, proceeding or other claim before any arbitrator or
governmental authority, (ii) any equityholder litigation against Iridium
Holdings, Baralonco or Syncom or any of their respective current or former
officers or directors before any governmental authority or (iii) any
litigation, arbitration or proceeding that relates in any way to the
transaction contemplated by the transaction agreement before any
arbitrator or governmental
authority;
|
·
|
make
or change any material tax election, change any annual tax accounting
period, adopt or change any method of tax accounting, materially amend any
tax returns or file claims for material tax refunds, enter any material
closing agreement, settle any material tax claim, audit or assessment, or
surrender any right to claim a material tax refund, offset or other
reduction in tax liability;
|
·
|
apply
to the FCC or any non-U.S. governmental authority for any license,
construction permit, authorization or any modification thereto that would
materially restrict the present operations of any satellites owned by
Iridium Holdings or its subsidiaries;
or
|
·
|
agree,
resolve or commit to do any of the
foregoing.
|
Interim covenants relating to
GHQ. Under the transaction agreement, GHQ is required to, and
has agreed to use its reasonable best efforts to, conduct its business in the
ordinary course consistent with past practice and maintain in effect all of its
licenses and permits in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice. The most significant activities that GHQ has agreed not to
do, are as follows:
·
|
amend
its charter documents (whether by acquisition, consolidation or
otherwise);
|
·
|
split,
combine or reclassify any shares of capital stock of GHQ or other equity
securities or declare, set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution
in respect of the capital stock of GHQ or other equity securities, or
redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire or offer to redeem, repurchase or
otherwise acquire any capital stock or other equity securities of
GHQ;
|
·
|
issue,
deliver or sell or authorize the issuance, delivery or sale of, any
capital stock or other equity securities of GHQ or amend any term of any
capital stock or other equity securities of GHQ (in each case whether by
acquisition, consolidation or
otherwise);
|
·
|
acquire
(by acquisition, consolidation, acquisition of stock or assets or
otherwise), directly or indirectly, any assets, securities, properties or
businesses, other then in the ordinary course of business in a manner
consistent with past practice;
|
·
|
sell,
lease or otherwise transfer, or to create or incur any lien on, any
assets, securities, properties, or businesses, other than in the ordinary
course consistent with past
practice;
|
·
|
make
any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any
other person;
|
·
|
create,
incur, assume, suffer to exist or otherwise be liable with respect to any
indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantees
thereof;
|
·
|
enter
into any hedging arrangements;
|
·
|
enter
into any agreement or arrangement that limits or otherwise restricts in
any respect GHQ or any successor thereto that could, after the closing of
the acquisition, limit or restrict in any respect GHQ or any of its
subsidiaries from engaging or competing in any line of business in any
location with any person or, except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, otherwise waive, release or assign any
material rights, claim or benefits of
GHQ;
|
·
|
increase
compensation or bonus payable to any director or
officer;
|
·
|
change
methods of accounting, except as required by concurrent changes in law or
GAAP;
|
·
|
settle
or offer or propose to settle, (i) any material litigation, investigation,
arbitration, proceeding or other claim involving or against GHQ, (ii) any
equityholder litigation against GHQ or (iii) any litigation, arbitration,
proceeding or dispute that relates to the transactions contemplated by the
transaction agreement;
|
·
|
make
or change any material tax election, change any annual tax accounting
period, adopt or change any method of tax accounting, materially amend any
tax returns or file claims for material tax refunds, enter any material
closing agreement, settle any material tax claim, audit or assessment, or
surrender any right to claim a material tax refund, offset or other
reduction in tax liability; or
|
·
|
agree,
resolve or commit to do any of the
foregoing.
|
Prior to
or on the date of the closing of the acquisition, GHQ has agreed to adopt a
long-term equity incentive plan pursuant to which options to purchase GHQ common
stock and/or awards of restricted shares of GHQ common stock will be
granted. Under the 2009 Plan, GHQ will reserve 8.0 million shares of
its common stock for issuance under the 2009 plan and will register those shares
under the Securities Act. Please see Proposal IV – Adoption of the
Incentive Option Plan.
Access
to Information
Until the
closing date, the Sellers agree to provide GHQ and its representatives
reasonable access during normal business hours, upon prior notice, to the
office, properties, books and records of Iridium Holdings, its subsidiaries and
of Baralonco and Syncom, furnish financial and operating data as GHQ or its
representatives may reasonably request and to cause the employees, counsel and
financial advisors of Iridium Holdings and its subsidiaries to cooperate with
GHQ. GHQ has also agreed to provide Iridium Holdings and its
representatives reasonable access during normal business hours, upon prior
notice, to the office, properties, books and records of GHQ, furnish financial
and operating data as Iridium Holdings or its representatives may reasonably
request and to cause the employees, counsel and financial advisors of GHQ, as
applicable, and its subsidiaries to cooperate with GHQ.
Sales
and Transfer Taxes
All
transfer, documentary, sales, use, stamp, registration and other taxes and fees
(including any penalties and interest) incurred in connection with the
transactions contemplated by the transaction agreement will be borne equally by
GHQ, on the one hand, and the Sellers, on the other hand. The party
having responsibility for the payment of the tax will prepare and file all
necessary tax returns and other documentation, with the cost of the preparation
of the filing to be borne by Iridium Holdings.
Distributions
Iridium
Holdings is not permitted to, directly or indirectly, pay any cash or other
dividends or make any cash or other distributions to any of its equityholders at
any time prior to the closing of the acquisition, except Iridium
Holdings
may make cash distributions to its equityholders of up to an aggregate of $37.9
million. On November 3, 2008, Iridium Holdings made distributions
totaling $13,568,393 to Baralonco and $5,136,346 to Syncom as part of the cash
distributions of an aggregate of $37.9 million that Iridium Holdings made to its
equityholders. Baralonco and Syncom may distribute their allocable
portion of any permitted Iridium Holdings distribution and may distribute any
net cash to their equityholders.
Directors
and Officers of GHQ After the Acquisition
GHQ and
Iridium Holdings have each agreed to take all necessary action to ensure that
two individuals designated by Greenhill who currently serve on GHQ’s board of
directors, three of Iridium Holdings’ current directors, the current chief
executive officer of Iridium Holdings, one representative of Baralonco, one
representative of Syncom and two of the current independent directors of GHQ
continue to serve or are appointed to serve, as the case may be, as directors of
GHQ, to be effective immediately after the closing of the
acquisition. The current officers of GHQ will resign at the closing
of the acquisition and the current officers of Iridium Holdings will continue to
serve in their current positions after the closing of the
acquisition.
Indemnification
for Officers and Directors
All
rights to indemnification for acts or omissions occurring through the closing
date that now exist in favor of current officers and directors of Iridium
Holdings and GHQ will survive the closing of the acquisition and continue in
full force and effect. To the fullest extent allowed by applicable
law, from the closing to the sixth anniversary of the closing of the
acquisition, GHQ will cause Iridium Holdings, its subsidiaries and any successor
to GHQ to indemnify and hold harmless each former and present (as of the closing
of the acquisition) officer and director of GHQ, Iridium Holdings and its
subsidiaries against any costs incurred in connection with any claim, action,
suit, proceeding or investigation arising out of actions taken by them in their
capacity as an officer or director prior to the closing of the
acquisition.
For a
period of six years following the closing of the acquisition, GHQ will cause to
be maintained in effect the current directors’ and officers’ liability insurance
policies (or policies of at least the same coverage amounts containing terms and
conditions which are no less advantageous) of Iridium Holdings and GHQ with
respect to claims arising from facts and circumstances prior to the closing of
the acquisition. In the case of Iridium Holdings’ insurance policy,
GHQ shall not be required to pay an aggregate premium for the directors’ and
officers’ liability insurance in excess of 300% of the annual premium Iridium
Holdings paid in its last full fiscal year.
Amendment
and Restatement of GHQ’s Certificate
Prior to
closing of the acquisition, GHQ has agreed to amend and restate our certificate
to, among other things, change our name to “Iridium Communications Inc.”, permit
GHQ’s continued existence after February 14, 2010 and increase the number of our
authorized shares of common stock. See “Proposal II—Approval of the
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.”
Exclusivity;
No Solicitation
Iridium
Holdings and the Sellers have agreed and have agreed to cause their respective
affiliates, employees and representative not to, directly or indirectly, solicit
or enter into discussions or transactions with, or encourage or provide
information to any person (other than GHQ) concerning any recapitalization,
merger, sale (directly or indirectly) of Iridium Holdings or its
assets. Additionally, GHQ has agreed, and has agreed to cause its
affiliates, employees and representatives not to, directly or indirectly,
solicit or enter into discussions or transactions or encourage or provide
information to any person (other than Iridium Holdings) concerning a business
combination or similar transaction. Iridium Holdings, the Sellers and
GHQ have also agreed to terminate and cause their respective affiliates,
employees and representatives to terminate any discussions with any person
concerning a possible business combination.
Special
Meeting of GHQ Stockholders
GHQ has
agreed to call and hold a special meeting of its stockholders as soon as
practicable in accordance with applicable law for the purpose of seeking the
approval of our stockholders of the acquisition and other proposals described in
this proxy statement.
Fees
and Expenses
The
parties to the transaction agreement agreed that each party will bear its own
fees and expenses. To the extent any fees and expenses are incurred
by Iridium Holdings in connection with the transaction agreement and other
related agreements and the transactions contemplated thereby, those fees and
expenses will be discharged by Iridium Holdings in full on or prior to the
closing of the acquisition.
Convertible
Subordinated Promissory Note
The
parties have agreed that in the event the closing of the acquisition occurs
after September 22, 2009, Greenhill Europe, the holder of the $22.9 million
convertible subordinated promissory note issued by Iridium Holdings will, upon
the exercise of its conversions rights under the note be considered a Seller
under the transaction agreement and have the right to receive 1,946,500 shares
of GHQ common stock at the closing of the acquisition. If the closing
of the acquisition occurs prior to September 22, 2009, GHQ and Greenhill Europe
will enter into an agreement which will entitle Greenhill Europe to exchange the
Iridium Holdings unit into which the note is convertible for shares of GHQ
common stock upon the first anniversary of the issuance of the note at an
exchange ratio of 23.1936 shares of GHQ common stock per Iridium Holdings
unit.
Conditions
to the Closing of the Acquisition
The
obligation of GHQ, Iridium Holdings and the Sellers to complete the acquisition
and related transactions is subject to the requirement that specified conditions
must be satisfied or waived by the parties, including the
following:
·
|
GHQ
stockholder approval of the acquisition, the issuance of GHQ common stock
to the Sellers, the amendment of the GHQ certificate of incorporation and
the adoption of a stock incentive plan have been obtained and less than
30% of GHQ stockholders have voted against the acquisition and elected to
convert their Parent stock into
cash;
|
·
|
no
law or injunction shall prohibit the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the transaction
agreement;
|
·
|
the
expiration or termination of any applicable waiting periods under the HSR
Act (early termination of the applicable waiting period was granted on
October 10, 2008);
|
·
|
all
FCC consents with respect to the transactions contemplated by the
transaction agreement have been obtained;
and
|
·
|
all
actions by or in respect of filings with any other governmental authority
required to permit the consummation of the transactions contemplated by
the transaction agreement have been taken, made or obtained other than
actions or filings the failure of which to take, make or obtain would not
reasonably expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a Material
Adverse Effect on Iridium Holdings or
GHQ.
|
The
obligation of GHQ to complete the acquisition and related transactions is
subject to the requirement that specified conditions must be satisfied or waived
by GHQ, including the following:
·
|
Iridium
Holdings’ and the Sellers’ representations and warranties must be true and
correct in all respects (without giving effect to any limitations as to
materiality or Iridium Holdings Material Adverse Effect contained therein)
at and as of the closing of the acquisition (or, to the extent any such
representation and warranty specifically states that it refers to an
earlier date, and on as of such earlier date), except where the failures
of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct, in the
aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have an Iridium Holdings
Material Adverse Effect;
|
·
|
Iridium
Holdings and the Sellers must have performed, in all material respects,
their respective obligations to be performed at or prior to the closing of
the acquisition;
|
·
|
each
Seller which is receiving shares of GHQ common stock at the closing of the
acquisition has executed and delivered the registration rights
agreement;
|
·
|
the
Sellers of Baralonco and Syncom which are receiving shares of GHQ common
stock at the closing of the acquisition have executed and delivered pledge
agreements;
|
·
|
the
Sellers have effected the contribution of 100% of the issued and
outstanding equity interests of Iridium Carrier Holdings LLC and Iridium
Carrier Services LLC to Iridium
Holdings;
|
·
|
GHQ
has received a certification from Iridium Holdings certifying that 50% or
more of the value of the gross assets of Iridium Holdings does not consist
of U.S. real property interests, or that 90% or more of the value of the
gross assets of Iridium Holdings does not consist of U.S. real property
interests plus cash or cash
equivalents;
|
·
|
GHQ
has received a certification from Baralonco and Syncom that each of them
is not, and has not been, a United States real property holding
corporation as defined in the Code;
|
·
|
GHQ
has received an affidavit by the custodians of the shares of Baralonco,
substantially to the effect that in its capacity as custodian, each has
actual knowledge of the ultimate beneficial owner of the shares who has
been the ultimate beneficial owner of the shares of Baralonco from the
date of Baralonco’s formation to the closing of the acquisition;
and
|
·
|
Baralonco
has delivered evidence to GHQ that it has repaid all of its outstanding
debt and all other liabilities.
|
The
obligation of Iridium Holdings and the Sellers to complete the acquisition and
the related transactions is subject to the requirement that specified conditions
must be satisfied or waived by Iridium Holdings and the Sellers, including the
following:
·
|
GHQ’s
representations and warranties must be true and correct in all respects
(without giving effect to any limitations as to materiality or GHQ
Material Adverse Effect contained therein) at and as of the closing of the
acquisition (or, to the extent any such representation and warranty
specifically states that it refers to an earlier date, on and as of such
earlier date), except where the failures of such representations and
warranties to be so true and correct, in the aggregate, would not
reasonably be expected to have a GHQ Material Adverse
Effect;
|
·
|
GHQ
must have performed, in all material respects, its obligations to be
performed at or prior to the closing of the
acquisition;
|
·
|
the
current officers of GHQ have resigned and the current officers of Iridium
Holdings have been duly appointed as officers of GHQ and the directors
described above have been duly appointed as directors of
GHQ;
|
·
|
GHQ
has made appropriate arrangements to have the trust account disbursed to
GHQ immediately prior to the closing of the
acquisition;
|
·
|
GHQ
and its affiliates have executed and delivered the registration rights
agreement; and
|
·
|
GHQ
has executed and delivered the pledge
agreements.
|
We cannot
assure you that all of the conditions above will be satisfied or waived or that
the acquisition will occur. It is the intent of our board of
directors to resolicit stockholders approval for the acquisition if either party
waives a material condition to closing detailed above.
Indemnification
The
transaction agreement contains indemnification provisions pursuant to which each
of the Sellers will indemnify GHQ for the following:
·
|
any
breaches of representations and warranties made by such Seller (determined
without regard to any qualification or exception contained therein
relating to materiality or any similar qualification or standard);
and
|
·
|
any
breaches of covenants or agreement made or performed by such Seller
pursuant to the transaction
agreement.
|
Each
Seller’s maximum liability for all claims for indemnification pursuant to the
transaction agreement shall not exceed the sum of (i) the cash consideration
received by such Seller and (ii) the product of the number of shares of GHQ
common stock received by Seller and $10. Baralonco and Syncom have
indemnification obligations with respect to pre-closing tax
liabilities. In the case of the pre-closing tax indemnity given by
each of Baralonco and Syncom, the maximum liability for Syncom shall not exceed
$3 million and for Baralonco shall not exceed $15 million. In support
of their indemnity obligations under the transaction agreement, the seller of
the Syncom shares has agreed to pledge to GHQ 300,000 shares of GHQ common stock
it receives at the closing of the acquisition for a period of nine months
post-closing and the seller of the Baralonco shares agrees to pledge 1.5 million
shares of GHQ common stock it receives at closing for a period of two years
post-closing.
Termination
The
transaction agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the closing of the
acquisition in the following circumstances:
·
|
by
mutual written consent of Iridium Holdings and
GHQ;
|
·
|
by
either Iridium Holdings or GHQ if the acquisition is not consummated by 75
days from April 28, 2009 (if all required regulatory approvals have been
obtained) or February 14, 2010 (if the only condition to closing still not
fulfilled as of 75 days from April 28, 2009, is the obtaining of all
regulatory approvals) (the “End
Date”);
|
·
|
by
either Iridium Holdings or GHQ if any material law or final,
non-appealable order prohibits the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by the transaction
agreement;
|
·
|
by
either Iridium Holdings or GHQ if the stockholders of GHQ fail to approve
at the GHQ special meeting or any adjournment thereof the adoption of the
transaction agreement, the issuance of GHQ common stock to the Sellers,
the amendment of GHQ’s certificate of incorporation and the adoption of a
stock incentive plan;
|
·
|
by
GHQ if there has been a breach by Iridium Holdings or a Seller of any
representation or warranty or failure to perform any covenant or
obligation that would result in the failure of that party to satisfy a
condition to the closing, and such condition is incapable of being
satisfied by the End Date;
|
·
|
by
Iridium Holdings if there has been a breach by GHQ of any representation
or warranty or failure to perform any covenant or obligation that would
result in the failure of GHQ to satisfy a condition to the closing, and
such condition is incapable of being satisfied by the End Date;
or
|
·
|
by
Iridium Holdings if the special meeting has not been held within 90 days
of this proxy statement being cleared by the
SEC.
|
Effect
of Termination and Remedies
If the
transaction agreement is validly terminated, there will be no liability or
obligation on the part of any party (or any stockholder, member, director,
officer, employee, agent, consultant or representative of such party) to the
other parties thereto, except certain limited provisions of the transaction
agreement will survive such termination. In addition, each party will
be responsible for its breach of the transaction agreement if such termination
shall result from the willful:
·
|
failure
of any party to fulfill a condition to the performance of the obligations
of the other party; or
|
·
|
failure
of any party to perform a covenant in the transaction
agreement.
|
Each
party to the transaction agreement has agreed that the other parties will be
entitled to seek an injunction to prevent breaches of the transaction agreement
and to seek specific performance of the provisions of the transaction
agreement.
Termination
Fee
GHQ
agrees to pay a termination fee of $5 million in cash, shares of GHQ common
stock or a combination thereof if the transaction agreement is terminated under
all of the following circumstances:
·
|
stockholders
of GHQ fail to approve at the GHQ special meeting or any adjournment
thereof the adoption of the transaction agreement, the issuance of GHQ
common stock to the Sellers, the amendment of GHQ’s certificate of
incorporation and the adoption of a stock incentive
plan;
|
·
|
GHQ
fails to use reasonable best efforts to obtain the necessary approvals to
consummate the acquisition, including obtaining stockholder approval, SEC
clearance of the proxy statement and antitrust clearance;
and
|
·
|
and
thereafter, GHQ consummates an initial business combination (other than
with Iridium Holdings).
|
The
receipt of such cash or shares of GHQ stock, as the case may be, shall be the
exclusive remedy of Iridium Holdings and the Sellers and their respective
affiliates with respect to a failure to use reasonable best efforts as described
above and Iridium Holdings and the Sellers and their respective affiliates shall
have waived any other rights and claims they may have against GHQ, whether in
law or in equity, relating to the transaction agreement following receipt of
such cash or shares of GHQ stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if
prior to ten business days immediately following the termination of the
transaction agreement, Iridium Holdings notifies GHQ in writing that it believes
in good faith that GHQ has committed a willful breach of this Agreement, then
the termination fee obligation of GHQ shall not come into effect and Iridium
Holdings shall have the right to pursue its remedies for willful breach of the
transaction agreement against GHQ, subject to other limitations set forth in the
transaction agreement.
Waiver
of Claims Against the Trust Account
The
Sellers and Iridium Holdings have waived any claims against GHQ’s trust account,
and have agreed that prior to closing of the acquisition they do not have,
directly or indirectly, any right, title, interest or claim of any kind to the
monies in the trust account and have waived any such claim they may have in the
future as a result of or arising out of, the transaction agreement, and other
transaction documents or any negotiations, contracts, or agreements with GHQ or
any of its affiliates or representatives and will not seek recourse, directly or
indirectly, against the trust account for any reason whatsoever.
Governing
Law
The
acquisition agreement is governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without
giving effect to any conflict or choice of law provision that would result in
the imposition of another state’s law.
Jurisdiction
Prior to
the closing of the acquisition, any suit, action or proceeding seeking to
enforce any provision of, or based on any matter arising out of or in connection
with, the transaction agreement or the transactions contemplated under the
transaction agreement will be brought in the U.S. District Court located in the
state of Delaware or any Delaware state court.
Tax
Matters
GHQ and
the Sellers agree to reasonably cooperate on certain tax
matters. Iridium Holdings agrees to have in effect an election under
Section 754 of the Code for the taxable year with respect to which the closing
of the acquisition will occur. With respect to tax periods ending on
or before the date of the closing of the acquisition, the transaction agreement
sets forth certain procedures to be followed by GHQ and the Sellers with respect
to (a) the
filing of
tax returns of each blocker entity and the payment by each blocker entity Seller
of pre-closing tax liability of the applicable blocker entity and (b) tax audits
of Iridium Holdings.
OTHER
TRANSACTION AGREEMENTS
The following is a summary of the
material terms of other agreements that the parties to the transaction agreement
or their affiliates will enter into immediately prior to or as of the
closing of the
acquisition. For more information, you should read each such
transaction agreement filed as an annex to this proxy
statement.
Note
Purchase Agreement
Concurrently
with the signing of the original agreement, Iridium Holdings and Greenhill
Europe entered into an agreement to purchase the note. The closing of
the purchase of the note occurred on October 24, 2008, following receipt by
Iridium Holdings of the consent of its lenders to the issuance of the
note. The representations and warranties of Iridium Holdings in the
note purchase agreement are substantially the same as those in the transaction
agreement. These representations and warranties survive until the
earlier of October 24, 2009 and the closing of transactions contemplated by the
transaction agreement.
Greenhill
Europe has the option to convert the note into Iridium Holdings units upon the
later to occur of (i) October 24, 2009 and (ii) the closing or the termination
of the transaction agreement. If the closing of the acquisition occurs after
September 22, 2009, upon the exercise of its conversion rights, Greenhill Europe
will be entitled to receive 1,946,500 shares of GHQ common stock. If the closing
occurs prior to September 22, 2009, GHQ and Greenhill Europe will enter into an
agreement which will entitle Greenhill Europe to exchange, upon the first
anniversary of the issuance of the note, each Iridium Holding unit into which
the note is converted for 23.1936 shares of GHQ common stock.
Registration
Rights Agreement
At the
closing of the acquisition, GHQ will enter into a registration rights agreement
with each Seller who receives GHQ common stock at the closing, our founding
stockholder and our initial other stockholders, pursuant to which each such
person will be granted certain registration rights with respect to the
registration of its GHQ common stock.
This
registration rights agreement will supersede the existing registration rights
agreement among GHQ, our founding stockholder and our initial
stockholders.
GHQ will
be required to file a shelf registration statement and will use its reasonable
best efforts to have the shelf registration statement declared effective by the
SEC within six months of the closing of the acquisition to permit these holders
to sell their GHQ common stock.
GHQ will
be required to conduct underwritten public offerings to permit holders of at
least 3.0 million shares of common stock to sell their shares upon demand, but
GHQ will not be required to effect more than one demand registration in any
six-month period following an effective registration statement.
All of
the stockholders party to the registration rights agreement will also be
permitted to include their GHQ common stock in certain registered offerings
conducted by GHQ after the closing of the acquisition.
Each of
the stockholders party to this registration rights agreement will not sell,
pledge, establish a “put equivalent position,” liquidate or decrease a “call
equivalent position,” or otherwise dispose of or transfer any GHQ securities for
a period of one year after the closing date of the acquisition; provided that
the board of directors of GHQ may authorize an underwritten public offering at
any time beginning six months after the closing date, which will be subject to
the registration rights detailed in the preceding paragraph. In
addition, each stockholder may pledge up to 25% of its GHQ shares as collateral
to secure cash borrowing from a third party financial institution so long as
such financial institution agrees to be subject to these transfer
restrictions.
The full
text of the form of the registration rights agreement to be entered into at the
closing of the acquisition is attached to this proxy statement as Annex
D.
Pledge
Agreements
At the
closing of the acquisition, GHQ will enter into pledge agreements with each of
the sellers of the stock of Baralonco and Syncom to secure their indemnification
obligations under the transaction agreement. Pursuant to the terms of
the pledge agreements, the sellers of the stock of Baralonco and Syncom will
pledge their shares of GHQ common stock that they receive at the closing of the
acquisition to GHQ. The seller of Baralonco will pledge 1.5 million
shares of GHQ common stock for a period of two years following the closing of
the acquisition, and the seller of Syncom will pledge 300,000 shares of GHQ
common stock for a period of nine months following the closing of the
acquisition.
The full
text of the form of the pledge agreement to be entered into at the closing of
the acquisition is attached to this proxy statement as Annex C.
Letter
Agreements
At the
closing of the acquisition, our founding stockholder has agreed to forfeit the
following GHQ securities which it currently owns: (1) 1,441,176 shares of our
common stock purchased as part of the unit purchase on November 13, 2007; (2)
8,369,563 warrants purchased as part of the unit purchase on November 13, 2007;
and (3) 4,000,000 warrants purchased in a private placement on February 21,
2008.
General
This
proxy statement is being furnished to our stockholders as part of our
solicitation of proxies for use at the special meeting in connection with our
proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings. This document provides you
with the information you need to know to be able to vote or instruct your vote
to be cast at the special meeting.
Date,
Time and Place
GHQ will
hold the special meeting at 10:00 a.m., Eastern Daylight Time, on ,
2009, at the Waldorf-Astoria Hotel, 301 Park Avenue, New York, NY, to vote on
the proposals described below and elsewhere in this proxy
statement.
Purpose
of the Special Meeting
At the
special meeting, we are asking holders of GHQ’s common stock to:
·
|
approve
the acquisition of Iridium Holdings pursuant to the transaction agreement
and the transactions contemplated by the transaction
agreement;
|
·
|
approve
an amended and restated certificate of incorporation for GHQ, to be
effective upon completion of the acquisition, to, among other
things:
|
·
|
change
our name to “Iridium Communications
Inc.,”
|
·
|
permit
our continued existence after February 14,
2010,
|
·
|
increase
the number of authorized shares of common stock,
and
|
·
|
eliminate
the different classes of our board of
directors;
|
·
|
approve
the issuance of GHQ shares in the
acquisition;
|
·
|
adopt
a proposed stock incentive plan to be effective upon completion of the
acquisition; and
|
·
|
adopt
a proposal to authorize the adjournment of the special meeting to a later
date or dates, including, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in
favor of the foregoing proposals if there are not sufficient votes in
favor of any of our proposals.
|
Recommendation
of the GHQ Board
The GHQ
board of directors has unanimously determined that it is advisable and in the
best interests of GHQ and its stockholders to approve the acquisition of Iridium
Holdings pursuant to the transaction agreement and the other transactions
contemplated by the acquisition agreement, and that the fair market value of
Iridium Holdings is equal to at least 80% of the balance in GHQ’s trust account
(excluding deferred underwriting discounts and commissions at the time of the
acquisition). In addition, our board of directors has unanimously
approved and declared advisable and in the best interests of GHQ and its
stockholders to approve or adopt our certificate proposal, share issuance
proposal, stock incentive plan proposal and adjournment
proposal. Accordingly, the GHQ board of directors unanimously
recommends that GHQ’s common stockholders:
·
|
vote
“FOR” the acquisition proposal;
|
·
|
vote
“FOR” the amended and restated certificate
proposal;
|
·
|
vote
“FOR” the share issuance proposal;
|
·
|
vote
“FOR” the stock incentive plan proposal;
and
|
·
|
vote
“FOR” the adjournment proposal.
|
Record
Date; Who Is Entitled to Vote
The
record date for the special meeting is ,
2009. Record holders of GHQ’s common stock at the close of business
on the record date are entitled to vote or have their votes cast at the special
meeting. On the record date, there were 48,500,000 outstanding shares
of GHQ’s common stock, which includes 8,369,563 shares held by our founding
stockholder.
Each
share of GHQ’s common stock is entitled to one vote per share at the special
meeting. GHQ’s outstanding warrants do not have voting
rights.
Quorum
Stockholders
holding a majority of our outstanding common stock (whether or not held by
public stockholders) at the close of business on the record date must be
present, in person or by proxy, to constitute a quorum and a quorum is required
to approve our proposals.
Voting
Your Shares
Each
share of GHQ’s common stock that you own in your name of the close of business
on the record date entitles you to one vote. Your proxy card shows
the number of shares of GHQ’s common stock that you own. There are
two ways to vote your shares of GHQ’s common stock at the special
meeting:
·
|
You can vote by signing and
returning the enclosed proxy card. If you vote by proxy
card, your “proxy,” whose name is listed on the proxy card, will vote your
shares as you instruct on the proxy card. If you sign and
return the proxy card but do not give instructions on how to vote your
shares, your shares will be voted as recommended by GHQ’s board of
directors “FOR” the approval of the acquisition proposal, the certificate
proposal, the share issuance proposal, the stock incentive plan proposal
and the adjournment proposal. If you hold your shares through a
bank or broker you may also be able to vote via telephone or
Internet. Please follow the instructions on the proxy card sent
by your bank or broker for
directions.
|
·
|
You can attend the special
meeting and vote in person. We will give you a ballot
when you arrive. However, if your shares are held in the name
of your broker, bank or other nominee, you must get a proxy from the
broker, bank or other nominee. That is the only way we can be
sure that the broker, bank or nominee has not already voted your
shares. Please contact your bank, broker or other nominee for
assistance in attending the special
meeting.
|
IF YOU DO
NOT VOTE YOUR GHQ SHARES IN ANY OF THE WAYS DESCRIBED ABOVE, IT WILL HAVE THE
SAME EFFECT AS A VOTE AGAINST THE ACQUISITION PROPOSAL BUT YOU WILL NOT HAVE THE
RIGHT TO EXERCISE YOUR CONVERSION RIGHTS TO RECEIVE A PRO RATA PORTION OF THE
CASH VALUE OF YOUR SHARES IN THE TRUST ACCOUNT OF GHQ.
Who
Can Answer Your Questions About Voting Your Shares
If you
have any questions about how to vote or direct a vote in respect of GHQ’s common
stock, you may call MacKenzie
Partners, Inc. our proxy solicitor, toll free at (800) 322-2885 or
collect at (212) 929-5500 or via email:
proxy@mackenziepartners.com.
No
Additional Matters May Be Presented at the Special Meeting
The
special meeting has been called only to consider the approval of the acquisition
proposal, the certificate proposal, the share issuance proposal, the stock
incentive plan proposal, and the adjournment proposal and any other matters that
may be properly brought before the special meeting or at any adjournments or
postponements thereof. Under GHQ’s bylaws, no other matters may be
considered at the special meeting if they are not included in the notice of the
meeting.
If you
give a proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is exercised by doing any
one of the following:
·
|
You
may send another proxy card with a later
date;
|
·
|
If
you have voted via telephone or Internet you may recast your vote using
either method by following the instruction on the proxy card sent by your
bank or broker;
|
·
|
You
may notify GHQ in writing before the special meeting that you have revoked
your proxy; or
|
·
|
You
may attend the special meeting, revoke your proxy and vote in
person.
|
Vote
Required of GHQ’s Stockholders
·
|
Acquisition
proposal. The affirmative vote of holders of a majority
of the IPO shares voted at the special meeting represented in person or by
proxy is required to approve the acquisition proposal. However,
the acquisition proposal will not be approved if the holders of 30% or
more of the IPO shares vote against the acquisition proposal and properly
exercise their rights to convert such IPO shares into
cash.
|
·
|
Certificate
proposal. The affirmative vote of holders of a majority
of our outstanding shares of our common stock is required to approve the
certificate proposal, and approval is conditioned upon approval of the
acquisition proposal.
|
·
|
Share issuance
proposal. The affirmative vote of holders of a majority
of our outstanding shares of our common stock represented in person or by
proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote thereon is required to
approve the share issuance proposal, and approval is conditioned upon
approval of the acquisition
proposal.
|
·
|
Stock incentive plan
proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of our outstanding shares of our common stock represented in
person or by proxy at the special meeting and entitled to vote thereon is
required to approve the stock incentive plan proposal, and approval is
conditioned upon approval of the acquisition
proposal.
|
·
|
Adjournment
proposal. The affirmative vote of the holders of a
majority of our outstanding shares of our common stock represented in
person or by proxy at the special meeting is required to approve the
adjournment proposal.
|
Because
the approval of the acquisition proposal is a condition to the approval of the
other proposals (other than the adjournment proposal), if the acquisition
proposal is not approved, the other approvals will not take effect (other than
the adjournment proposal).
Abstentions
and Broker Non-Votes
An
abstention is not an affirmative vote in favor of any proposal but adds to the
number of shares present in person or by proxy and counted for purposes of
determining the presence of a quorum. If you abstain from voting, it
will have the same effect as a vote against the certificate proposal, the share
issuance proposal, the stock incentive plan proposal and the adjournment
proposal.
A failure
to vote by not returning a signed proxy card, voting by telephone or Internet or
not voting in person at the special meeting will have no impact upon the
acquisition proposal, the share issuance proposal, the stock incentive plan
proposal or the adjournment proposal. Because the certificate
proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares,
a failure to vote will have the effect of a vote against the certificate
proposal.
If you
hold shares of our common stock in “street name” through a broker or other
nominee, your broker or nominee will not vote your shares on the acquisition
proposal, the certificate proposal and the stock incentive plan proposal unless
you provide instructions on how to vote. You should instruct your
broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the directions your
broker or nominee will provide to you. If you do not provide
instructions to your broker or nominee, your broker will not vote your shares on
the acquisition proposal, the
certificate
proposal and the stock incentive plan proposal. If you do not give
your broker voting instructions and the broker does not vote your shares, this
is referred to as a “broker non-vote.” Broker non-votes are counted
for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but are not treated as
shares entitled to vote on the matter as to which authority to vote is withheld
by the broker. Because the certificate proposal requires an
affirmative vote of a majority of the outstanding shares, a broker non-vote will
have the same effect as a vote against the proposal. Broker non-votes
will have the same effect as a vote against the share issuance proposal and the
adjournment proposal, but will have no effect on the acquisition proposal and
the stock incentive plan proposal.
Conversion
Rights
Each
holder of IPO shares has a right to convert the IPO shares into a pro rata
portion of our trust account (before payment of deferred underwriting discounts
and commissions and including interest earned on their pro rata portion of the
trust account, net of income taxes payable on such interest, net of franchise
taxes and net of interest income of up to $5.0 million, subject to adjustment,
on the trust account balance previously released to us to fund our working
capital requirements), payable in cash, if such holder votes against the
acquisition proposal, such holder follows the specific procedures for conversion
set out in this section and the acquisition is completed. Such IPO
shares would then be converted into cash at the per share conversion price on
the completion date of the acquisition. It is anticipated that the
funds to be distributed to holders who properly elect to convert their IPO
shares will be distributed promptly after completion of the
acquisition.
Voting
against the acquisition proposal alone will not result in the conversion of IPO
shares into a pro rata portion of the trust account; to convert their IPO
shares, a holder of IPO shares must properly exercise the conversion rights as
described below by following the specific procedures for conversion set forth
below.
In
connection with a vote on our acquisition proposal, the holders of IPO shares
may elect to vote a portion of their shares for and a portion of their IPO
shares against the acquisition proposal. If the acquisition proposal
is approved and completed, the holders of IPO shares who vote against the
acquisition proposal and properly elect to convert a portion of the IPO shares
will receive the conversion price with respect to those shares and may retain
any other shares they own.
Notwithstanding
the foregoing, a stockholder, together with any affiliate of his, her or it or
any person with whom he, she or it is acting in concert or as a partnership,
syndicate or other group for the purpose of acquiring, holding, disposing, or
voting of GHQ’s securities, will be restricted from seeking conversion rights
with respect to more than 10% of the IPO shares.
We will
not complete the acquisition and will not convert any IPO shares into cash if
stockholders owning 30% or more of the IPO shares both vote against
the acquisition proposal and properly exercise their conversion
rights.
Holders
of IPO shares who convert their IPO shares into cash would still have the right
to exercise any warrants that they continue to hold.
The
actual per-share conversion price will be equal to the quotient determined by
dividing (i) the amount then on deposit in our trust account (before payment of
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and including accrued interest
net of income taxes on such interest and net of franchise taxes, after
distribution of interest income on the trust account balance to us as described
above) calculated as of two business days prior to the completion of the
acquisition (ii) by the total number of IPO shares. As of March 31,
2009, the per-share conversion price would have been approximately $10.01,
without taking into account any interest or expenses accrued after such
date.
By
exercising these conversion rights, a holder of IPO shares will be exchanging
the IPO shares for cash and will no longer own the IPO shares.
Prior to
exercising conversion rights, holders of IPO shares should verify the market
price of our shares because such holder may receive higher proceeds from the
sale of the IPO shares in the public market than from exercising conversion
rights if the market price per IPO share is higher than the conversion
price.
To
exercise conversion rights, a holder of IPO shares, whether being a record
holder or holding the IPO shares in “street name,” must tender the IPO shares to
our transfer agent and deliver written instructions to our transfer
agent: (1) stating that such holder wishes to convert the IPO shares
into a pro rata share of the trust account and (2)
confirming
that such holder has held the IPO shares since the record date and will continue
to hold them through the special meeting and the completion of the
acquisition.
To tender
IPO shares to our transfer agent, the holder must deliver the IPO shares either
(1) at any time before the start of the special meeting (or any adjournment or
postponement thereof), electronically using the Depository Trust Company’s DWAC
(Deposit/Withdrawal At Custodian) system or, (2) at any time before the day of
the special meeting (or any adjournment or postponement thereof), physically by
delivering a share certificate. Any holder who holds IPO shares in
street name will have to coordinate with his or her broker to arrange for the
IPO shares to be delivered electronically or physically. Any holder
who desires to physically tender to our transfer agent IPO shares that are held
in street name must instruct the account executive at his or her bank or broker
to withdraw the IPO shares from such holder’s account and request that a
physical certificate be issued in such holder’s name. Our transfer
agent will be available to assist with this process.
If holder
does not deliver written instructions and tenders his or her IPO shares (either
electronically or physically) to our transfer agent in accordance with the above
procedures, those IPO shares will not be converted into cash.
Any
request for conversion, once made, may be withdrawn or revoked at any time
before the start (in case of electronic tendering) or at any time before the day
(in case of physical tendering) of our special meeting (or any adjournment or
postponement thereof), in which case the IPO shares will be returned
(electronically or physically) to such holder. Holders of IPO shares
who have exercised conversion rights may not thereafter withdraw or revoke their
decision to convert their IPO shares into a pro rata portion of the trust
account.
If any
holder tenders IPO shares (electronically or physically) and the acquisition is
not completed, the IPO shares will not be converted into cash and they will be
returned (electronically or physically) to such holder.
Solicitation
Costs
GHQ is
soliciting proxies on behalf of GHQ’s board of directors. This
solicitation is being made by mail, but also may be made by telephone, email or
in person. GHQ and its directors, officers and employees may also
solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by other electronic
means. These persons will not be paid for doing this. GHQ
has hired MacKenzie Partners, Inc. to assist in the proxy
solicitation process. GHQ will pay all fees and expenses related to
the retention of this proxy solicitation firm and anticipates that such fees and
expenses will be approximately $15,000.
GHQ will
ask banks, brokers and other institutions, nominees and fiduciaries to forward
its proxy materials to their principals and to obtain their authority to execute
proxies and voting instructions. GHQ will reimburse them for their
reasonable expenses.
Stock
Ownership of Directors and Executive Officers
At the
close of business on the record date, executive officers and directors of GHQ
and their affiliates owned and were entitled to vote
shares of GHQ common stock, or
approximately % of the aggregate
voting power of GHQ’s common stock entitled to vote at the special
meeting. In connection with the vote on the acquisition proposal, our
founding stockholder, officers and directors, to the extent they own GHQ common
stock, have agreed to vote their shares in accordance with the majority of
common stock voted by the public stockholders. Our founding
stockholder, officers and directors, to the extent they own GHQ common stock,
have informed GHQ that it and they intend to vote all of its and their shares
“FOR” the other proposals.
Other
Business; Adjournments
We are
not currently aware of any other business to be acted upon at the special
meeting. If, however, any other matters are properly brought before
the special meeting, or any adjourned meeting, the persons named in the enclosed
form of proxy, and acting under that proxy, will have discretion to vote or act
on those matters in accordance with their best judgment, including to adjourn
the meeting.
Adjournments
may be made for the purpose of, among other things, soliciting additional
proxies. Any adjournment may be made from time to time by approval of
the holders of shares representing a majority of the
votes
present in person or by proxy at the meeting, whether a quorum exists, without
further notice other than by an announcement at the meeting.
Householding
Under SEC
rules, a single set of annual reports and proxy statements may be sent to any
household at which two or more GHQ’s stockholders reside if they appear to be
members of the same family. Each GHQ stockholder will continue to
receive a separate proxy card. The procedure, referred to as
householding, reduces the volume of duplicate information GHQ’s stockholders
receive and reduces mailing and printing expenses for GHQ. Brokers
with accountholders who are GHQ stockholders may be householding GHQ’s proxy
materials. As indicated in the notice previously provided by these
brokers to GHQ’s stockholders, a single proxy statement will be delivered to
multiple stockholders sharing an address unless contrary instructions have been
received from an affected GHQ stockholder. Once you have received
notice from your broker that it will be householding communications to your
address, householding will continue until you are notified otherwise or until
you revoke your consent. If, at any time, you no longer wish to
participate in householding and would prefer to receive a proxy statement,
please notify your broker. GHQ stockholders who currently receive
multiple copies of the proxy statement at their address and would like to
request householding of their communications should contact their
broker.
Business
General
We are a
blank check company formed on November 2, 2007 for the purpose of effecting an
acquisition, through a merger capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock
purchase, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more
businesses or assets, which we refer to as our initial business
combination. The registration statement for our IPO was declared
effective February 14, 2008.
We
completed the IPO on February 21, 2008 of 40,000,000 GHQ units and recorded
gross proceeds of approximately $408.0 million consisting of $400 million from
the public offering and $8.0 million from the sale of private placement warrants
to our founding stockholder. Upon the closing of the IPO, GHQ paid
$6.9 million of underwriting fees and placed $400 million of the total proceeds
into the trust account. The remaining approximately $1.1 million were
used to pay offering costs. Each GHQ unit consists of one share of
common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and one warrant to purchase one share
of our common stock at an initial exercise price of $7.00 per share, subject to
adjustment. The GHQ units were sold at an offering price of $10.00
per GHQ unit.
GHQ is
not presently engaged in, and will not engage in, any substantive commercial
business until the completion of its initial business
combination. GHQ intends to utilize the funds held in its trust
account and GHQ Common Stock in effecting the acquisition of Iridium
Holdings.
Offering
Proceeds Held in Trust
A total
of approximately $400.0 million, including $375.6 million of the net proceeds
from the IPO, $8.0 million from the sale of warrants to our founding stockholder
and $16.4 million of deferred underwriting discounts and commissions, was placed
in a trust account at Wachovia Securities, LLC, with American Stock Transfer
& Trust Company serving as trustee. The proceeds held in trust
will not be released from the trust account until the earlier of the completion
of an initial business combination or the liquidation of GHQ. Based
on our certificate of incorporation up to a total of $5.0 million of interest
income, subject to adjustment, may be released to GHQ to fund GHQ’s working
capital requirements, subject to availability. If the acquisition
with Iridium Holdings is completed, the trust account will be released to GHQ,
less amounts to be paid to stockholders of GHQ who do not approve the
acquisition with Iridium Holdings and properly elect to convert their shares of
common stock into their pro rata share of the trust account. As of
March 31, 2009, the balance in the trust account was approximately $401.9
million.
Fair
Market Value of Target Business
The
initial target business that GHQ acquires must have a fair market value equal to
at least 80% of the balance of the trust account (excluding deferred
underwriting discounts and commissions incurred during our IPO) at the time of
such acquisition.
The fair
market value of Iridium Holdings’ business was determined by GHQ’s board of
directors based upon standards generally accepted by the financial community,
such as actual and potential sales, earnings, cash flow and book
value. It was determined that Iridium Holdings had a fair market
value equal to at least 80% of the balance in GHQ’s trust account (excluding
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions).
Stockholder
Approval of Initial Business Combination
The
affirmative vote of stockholders owning a majority of the IPO shares voting in
person or by proxy at the special meeting is required to approve our initial
business combination. However, our initial business combination will
not be approved if the holders of 30% or more of the IPO shares vote against our
initial business combination and properly exercise their rights to covert such
IPO shares into cash. In connection with this vote, our founding
stockholder, officers and directors, to the extent they own GHQ common stock,
have agreed to vote their shares in
accordance
with the majority of the shares of common stock voted by the public
stockholders. Our founding stockholder, officers and directors, to
the extent they own GHQ common stock, have also informed us that they intend to
vote all their shares “FOR” the other proposals.
Conversion
Rights
In
connection with the proposed acquisition, each holder of IPO shares has the
right to have their IPO shares converted into a pro rata portion of our trust
account, payable in cash, if such holder votes against the acquisition proposal,
such holder properly exercises the conversion rights and the acquisition is
completed. The actual per-share conversion price will be equal to the
quotient determined by dividing (i) the amount then on deposit in our trust
account (before payment of deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and
including accrued interest net of income taxes on such interest and net of
franchise taxes, after distribution of interest income on the trust account
balance to us as described above), calculated as of two business days prior to
the completion of the acquisition, (ii) by the total number of IPO
shares. As of March 31, 2009, the per-share conversion price would
have been approximately $10.01, without taking into account any interest or
expenses accrued after such date. See “The Special Meeting—Conversion
Rights.”
Liquidation
if No Business Combination
Our
certificate provides that we will continue in existence only until February 14,
2010. If our certificate proposal is approved and we complete the
proposed acquisition of Iridium Holdings, we will amend this provision in order
to permit for our continued existence. If we do not complete an
initial business combination by February 14, 2010, our corporate existence will
cease except for the purpose of winding up our affairs and liquidating pursuant
to Section 278 of Delaware law. Because of this provision in our
certificate, no resolution by our board of directors and no vote by our
stockholders to approve our dissolution would be required for us to dissolve and
liquidate.
Property
We do not
own any real estate or other physical properties materially important to our
operation. Our executive offices are currently located at 300 Park
Avenue, 23rd Floor, New York, New York 10022. The cost for this space
is included in the $10,000 per-month fee that our founding stockholder charges
us for general and administrative services. We believe, based on
rents and fees for similar services in the New York City area that the fee
charged by our founding stockholder is at least as favorable as we could have
obtained from an unaffiliated person. We consider our current office
space adequate for our current operations.
Employees
Scott L.
Bok, Robert H. Niehaus, Harold J. Rodriguez, Jr. and Jodi B. Ganz are the four
officers of GHQ, and GHQ has no direct employees.
Legal
Proceedings
There is
no litigation currently pending against GHQ or any of its executive officers or
directors in their capacity as such.
GHQ
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview
We are a
blank check company formed on November 2, 2007 for the purpose of effecting an
acquisition, through a merger capital stock exchange, asset acquisition, stock
purchase, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or more
businesses or assets, which we refer to as our initial business
combination. The registration statement for our IPO was declared
effective February 14, 2008.
We have
neither engaged in any operations nor generated any revenues from operations to
date. Our entire activity since inception has been to prepare for and
consummate our IPO and thereafter to identify and investigate potential targets
for a business combination. We will not generate any operating
revenues until completion of a business combination. We will
generate, and have generated, non-operating income in the form of interest and
dividend income on cash and cash equivalents.
Net
income for the period from November 2, 2007 (date of inception) to December 31,
2008 was approximately $1.7 million, which consisted of approximately $5.6
million of interest income primarily from the trust account offset by
approximately $2.6 million of formation, general and operating costs and
approximately $1.4 million of provision for income taxes. Net income
for year ended December 31, 2008 was approximately $1.7 million, which consisted
of approximately $5.6 million of interest income primarily from the trust
account offset by approximately $2.3 million of professional fees
related to due diligence work incurred in conjunction with our proposed business
combination, as well as operating expenses of $0.3 million and a provision for
income taxes of approximately $1.4 million.
Following
the closing of the acquisition, GHQ will record a compensation charge in the
amount $1.3 million and a capital contribution related to the transfer at cost
of founding stockholder’s units to certain of GHQ’s directors.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Following
our IPO, a total of approximately $400.0 million, including $375.6 million of
the net proceeds from the IPO, $8.0 million from the sale of warrants to our
founding stockholder and $16.4 million of deferred underwriting discounts and
commissions, was placed in a trust account. If the acquisition is
completed, we anticipate that most of the proceeds held in the trust account
will be used to acquire the Iridium Holdings units from the Sellers, to pay
transaction expenses and to fund capital expenditures for the development and
expansion of our operations. In addition, all or a portion of Iridium
Holdings’ debt will be prepaid.
Upon the
closing of our IPO, we had $1.1 million in funds available to us outside of the
trust account. That amount, together with (i) interest income of up to $5.0
million on the balance of the trust account that may be released to us for
working capital requirements and (ii) additional amounts that may be released to
fund our tax liabilities, will be sufficient to allow us to operate through
February 14, 2010, assuming that our initial business combination is not
consummated during that time. Over this time period, we anticipate making the
following expenditures:
|
•
|
approximately
$240,000 of expenses in fees relating to our office space and certain
general and administrative
services;
|
|
•
|
approximately
$4.8 million for general working capital that will be used for
miscellaneous expenses including expenses for a proposed initial business
combination), such as legal, accounting and other expenses, including due
diligence expenses and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred in
connection with the investigation, structuring and negotiation of our
initial business combination, director and officer liability insurance
premiums and reserves and expenses of our initial public offering to the
extent they exceeded the estimates, legal and accounting fees relating to
SEC reporting obligations, brokers’ retainer fees, consulting fees and
finder’s fees; and
|
|
•
|
approximately
45% of our net income before tax to fund federal, state and local income
taxes.
|
On March
31, 2009, approximately $401.9 million was held in trust, of which GHQ had the
right to withdraw $5 million to fund working capital needs relating to the
proposed business combination. Since the IPO, GHQ has
withdrawn
approximately $4.3 million in total from the trust account; approximately $1.6
million for working capital purposes and approximately $2.7 million for the
payment of federal, state and local income taxes.
GHQ has
remaining authority to withdraw approximately $3.6 million of total earnings
from the trust account for working capital purposes and to consummate the
purchase of our initial business. GHQ is entitled to make additional withdrawals
from earnings to the extent necessary, for the payment of federal, state and
local income taxes.
We do not
believe we will need additional financing following our IPO to meet the
expenditures required for operating our business before our initial business
combination. However, we will rely on interest earned on the trust account to
fund such expenditures and, to the extent that the interest earned is below our
expectation, we may have insufficient funds available to operate our business
before our initial business combination.
Critical Accounting
Policies
We have
identified the following as our critical accounting policies:
Cash and Cash
Equivalents — We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities
of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash
equivalents.
Concentration of
Credit Risk — We maintain our cash and cash equivalents with a financial
institution with high credit ratings. At times, we may maintain deposits in
federally insured financial institutions in excess of federally insured (FDIC)
limits. However, management believes that we are not exposed to significant
credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institution in which
those deposits are held. We do not believe the cash
equivalents held in the trust account are subject to significant credit risk as
the portfolio is invested in assets, which meet the applicable conditions of
2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. We have not experienced
any losses on the trust.
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments — Cash and cash equivalents, investments held in
the trust account and notes payable are carried at cost, which approximates fair
value due to the short-term nature of these investments.
Use of Estimates
— The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
materially from those estimates.
Earnings per
Share — We
calculate earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with FASB Statement No. 128,
“Earnings per Share” (“SFAS 128”). Basic and diluted EPS is
calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the period.
Warrants
issued by us in our IPO and private placement are contingently exercisable at
the later of one year from the date of the offering and the consummation of a
business combination, provided, in each case, there is an effective registration
statement covering the shares issuable upon exercise of the
warrants. Hence, these are presented in the pro forma diluted
EPS.
Pro forma
diluted EPS includes the determinants of basic and diluted EPS plus to the
extent dilutive, the incremental number of shares of common stock to settle
outstanding common stock purchase warrants, as calculated using the treasury
stock method.
Income Taxes
— We comply with
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation N.
48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an interpretation of FASB
Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”), which provides criteria for the recognition
measurement, presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax position. A
tax benefit from an uncertain position may be recognized only if it is “more
likely than not” that the position is sustainable based on its
technical merits. We filed our first income tax return on September
15, 2008. Management does not plan on taking any uncertain tax
positions when filing our company’s tax returns and consequently we have not
recognized any liabilities under FIN 48. We will recognize interest
expense and penalties related to uncertain tax positions as an operating expense
in our condensed statements of income.
Deferred
income taxes are provided for the differences between bases of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. A
valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets
to the amount expected to be realized.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Effective
January 1, 2008, GHQ adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), for assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157
accomplished the following key objectives:
·
|
Defines
fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
at the measurement date;
|
·
|
Establishes
a three-level hierarchy (“valuation hierarchy”) for fair value
measurements;
|
·
|
Requires
consideration of GHQ’s creditworthiness when valuing liabilities;
and
|
·
|
Expands
disclosures about instruments measured at fair
value.
|
The
valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of
an asset or liability as of the measurement date. A financial
instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value
measurement. The three levels of the valuation hierarchy and the
distribution of GHQ’s financial assets within it are as follows:
·
|
Level
1 — inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for
identical assets or liabilities in active
markets.
|
·
|
Level
2 — inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable
for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the financial
instrument.
|
·
|
Level
3 — inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant
to the fair value measurement
|
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB Statement No.
115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits an entity to elect fair value as
the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for many financial assets and
liabilities. Entities electing the fair value option would be
required to recognize changes in fair value in earnings. Entities
electing the fair value option would be required to distinguish, on the face of
the balance sheet, the fair value of assets and liabilities for which the fair
value option has been elected and similar assets and liabilities measured using
another measurement attribute. SFAS 159 became effective beginning
January 1, 2008. GHQ elected not to measure any eligible items using
the fair value option in accordance with SFAS No. 159 and therefore, SFAS No.
159 did not have an impact on GHQ’s condensed balance sheets, condensed
statements of income and condensed statements of cash flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R. SFAS 141R provides revised
guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the consideration transferred,
identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interests, and
goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS 141R also expands
required disclosures surrounding the nature of financial effects of business
combinations. SFAS 141R is effective, on a prospective basis, for
companies for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2009. GHQ is
currently assessing the potential effect of SFAS 141R on its balance sheets,
condensed statements of income and condensed statements of cash
flows.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 establishes
requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than
GHQ (sometimes called “minority interests”) be clearly identified, presented,
and disclosed in the condensed balance sheet within equity, but separate from
the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests
are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any
noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be
measured initially at fair value. SFAS 160 is effective, on a
prospective
basis, for companies for fiscal years beginning January
2009. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be
retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. GHQ is
currently assessing the impact of SFAS 160 on its condensed balance sheets and
condensed statements of income.
In April
2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of
Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS 142-3”). FSP FAS 142-3 amends the
factors that should be considered in developing a renewal or extension
assumptions used for purposes of determining the useful life of a recognized
intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”
(“SFAS 142”). FSP FAS 142-3 is intended to improve the consistency
between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the
period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under
SFAS 141R and other U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008. Earlier application is not
permitted. GHQ will be assessing the potential effect of FSP FAS
142-3 if applicable, once we enter into a business combination.
In
October, 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of a
Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active” (“FSP
FAS 157-3”) which provided additional interpretative guidance on the
application of SFAS No. 157 in markets that are not active and provided an
illustrative example to demonstrate how the fair value of a financial asset is
determined when the market for the financial asset is inactive. FSP
FAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including for prior periods for which
financial statements have not yet been issued. The issuance of
interpretative guidance on the application of SFAS No. 157 did not have a
material impact on GHQ’s condensed financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements
We have
not entered into any off-balance sheet financing arrangements and have not
established any special purpose entities. We have not guaranteed any
debt or commitments of other entities or entered into any options on
non-financial assets.
INFORMATION
ABOUT IRIDIUM HOLDINGS
For
purposes of this Section, the term “Iridium Holdings” refers to Iridium Holdings
LLC and its operating subsidiaries.
Business
Overview
Iridium
Holdings is a leading provider of mobile voice and data communications services
via satellite, and the only provider in the world offering 100% global
coverage. Based on publicly available information and information
provided by TMF Associates, Iridium Holdings is the second largest provider of
mobile satellite services and related equipment with an estimated 25% market
share of the principal industry players in 2008, based on
revenues. Iridium Holdings’ mobile satellite services address the
increasing demand from customers for connectivity and reliability in all
locations. Iridium Holdings offers voice and data communications
services to U.S. and international government agencies, businesses and other
customers on a global basis using 66 in-orbit constellation satellites, seven
in-orbit spares and related ground infrastructure, including a primary
commercial gateway. The U.S. government, which owns and operates a
dedicated gateway, is its largest customer, providing 21.1% and 24.4% of Iridium
Holdings’ revenue for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months
ended March 31, 2009, respectively.
Iridium
Holdings sells the majority of its products and services on a wholesale basis
via a well-established, global network of distribution partners, who provide
Iridium Holdings’ product and service solutions directly to end-users, or
indirectly through dealers. Iridium Holdings’ distributors often
combine its products with other technologies, such as GPS and terrestrial
wireless technology, to provide integrated communications solutions for
customers in defined market niches. These distributors include
dedicated satellite service providers such as Vizada and Stratos Global
Corporation as well as some of the largest communications companies in the
world, such as the Telstra Corporation in Australia, the SingTel Group in
Singapore and the KDDI Corporation in Japan. Iridium Holdings
believes that its distribution network provides broad coverage over its target
customer base as well as a platform for developing new applications and
solutions for its products and services, supporting its growth. At
March 31, 2009, Iridium Holdings’ product and service solutions had
approximately 328,000 subscribers and represented a 31.2% increase in the number
of subscribers since March 31, 2008. Iridium Holdings’ subscriber base has grown
consistently since it reintroduced commercial services in 2001, growing at a
compound annual growth rate of 40.1% between December 31, 2001 and December 31,
2008, and at a compound annual growth rate of 27.8% between December 31, 2003
and December 31, 2008. Iridium Holdings has a diverse customer base,
including end-users in the following five vertical markets: land-based handset,
maritime, aviation, asset tracking and monitoring, or machine-to-machine, and
government.
Iridium
Holdings is currently in the process of designing and developing its
second-generation satellite constellation, Iridium NEXT. Iridium
Holdings expects to enter into a definitive agreement with a prime contractor
for the design, manufacture and deployment of Iridium NEXT during
2009. Iridium Holdings believes its current constellation will
provide continuity service through the transition period to Iridium
NEXT. Iridium Holdings believes that its second-generation satellites
will improve its ability to support new applications and services, including
higher-speed data rates. Iridium Holdings expects these services to
be available on a broad range of new customer devices that will be significantly
smaller in size, lighter in weight and less expensive than existing mobile
satellite services equipment. Iridium Holdings believes this expanded
service portfolio and advanced equipment offering will significantly expand the
target market for its services.
Iridium
Holdings recorded $320.9 million and $75.8 million in revenue and $53.9 million
and $9.7 million in net income during the year ended December 31, 2008 and the
three months ended March 31, 2009, respectively, compared to
$260.9 million and $74.3 million in revenue and $43.8 million and
$16.7 million in net income for the year ended December 31, 2007 and the three
months ended March 31, 2008, respectively.
Industry
Iridium
Holdings competes in the mobile satellite services sector of the global
communications industry. Mobile satellite services operators provide
voice and data services using a network of satellites and ground
facilities. Mobile satellite services are usually complementary to,
and interconnected with, other forms of terrestrial
communications
services and infrastructure and are intended to respond to users’ desires for
connectivity in all locations. Customers typically use satellite
voice and data communications in situations where existing terrestrial wireline
and wireless communications networks are impaired or do not
exist. Further, many regions of the world benefit from satellite
networks, such as rural and developing areas that lack adequate wireless or
wireline networks, and ocean and Polar Regions (defined as those
regions at or above 70 degrees latitude) where few alternatives exist, and
regions where the telecommunications infrastructure has been affected by
political conflicts and natural disasters.
Worldwide,
government organizations, military and intelligence agencies, natural disaster
aid associations, event-driven response agencies and corporate security teams
depend on mobile and fixed voice and data communications services on a regular
basis. Businesses with global operations require reliable
communications services when operating in remote locations around the
world. Mobile satellite services users span the forestry, maritime,
government, utilities, oil and gas, mining, leisure, emergency services,
construction and transportation sectors, among others. Many existing
customers increasingly view satellite communications services as critical to
their daily operations.
Iridium
Holdings believes that the increasing penetration and continued growth of the
terrestrial wireless industry provide a significant market opportunity for the
mobile satellite services industry. According to GSM Association
& Europa Technologies, there were 2.8 billion global cellular subscribers
served by 930 networks throughout the world as of January
2008. Iridium Holdings believes that growth in the terrestrial
wireless industry has increased awareness for the need for reliable, mobile
voice and data communication services among customers. In addition,
despite significant penetration and competition, terrestrial wireless systems
only serve a small fraction of the earth’s surface and are focused mainly in
those areas where people live, excluding oceans and other remote regions where
ships, airplanes and other remote assets are located. By offering
mobile communications services with global voice and data coverage, mobile
satellite service providers address the increasing demand from governments,
businesses and individuals for connectivity and reliability in locations not
consistently served by wireline and wireless terrestrial networks. In
a 2008 report, Northern Sky Research estimated that mobile satellites services
wholesale revenues are expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate of 13%
in the five year period between 2007 and 2011.
The
mobile satellite services industry also benefits from the continued development
of innovative, lower cost technology and applications integrating mobile
satellite products and services. Growth in demand for mobile
satellite voice services is driven in large part by the declining cost of these
services, the diminishing size and lower costs of voice, data and
machine-to-machine devices, as well as the rollout of new applications tailored
to the specific needs of customers across a variety of markets.
Communications
industry sectors include:
·
|
mobile
satellite services, which provide customers with voice and data
connectivity to mobile and fixed devices using ground facilities and
networks of geostationary satellites (located approximately 22,300 miles
above the earth’s surface), medium earth orbit satellites (located between
approximately 6,400 and 10,000 miles above the earth’s surface), or low
earth orbit satellites (located between approximately 300 and 1,000 miles
above the earth’s surface), such as Iridium Holdings’ satellite
constellation;
|
·
|
fixed
satellite services, which use geostationary satellites to provide
customers with broadband communications links between fixed points on the
earth’s surface; and
|
·
|
terrestrial
services, which use a terrestrial network to provide wireless or wireline
connectivity and are complementary to satellite
services.
|
Within
the major satellite sectors, fixed satellite services and mobile satellite
services operators differ significantly from each other with respect to size of
antenna, types of services offered and quality of services. Fixed
satellite services providers, such as Intelsat Ltd., Eutelsat S.A.
Communications and SES S.A. are characterized by large, often stationary or
“fixed,” ground terminals that send and receive high-bandwidth signals to and
from the satellite network for video and high speed data customers and
international telephone markets. On the other hand, mobile satellite
services providers, such as Iridium Holdings, Inmarsat, Globalstar, and Orbcomm
focus more on voice and data services, where mobility or small sized terminals
are essential.
A low
earth orbit system, such as the system Iridium Holdings currently operates, has
lower transmission delays than a geosynchronous system such as that operated by
Inmarsat due to the shorter distance signals have to travel, which enables the
use of smaller antennas on devices. Iridium Holdings believes the
interlinked architecture of its constellation combined with the global footprint
of its satellites provides it with a unique advantage over other low earth
mobile satellite operators like Globalstar and Orbcomm, allowing Iridium
Holdings to route voice and data transmissions to and from anywhere on the
earth’s surface via a single gateway. As a result, Iridium Holdings
is the only mobile satellite services operator offering real-time, low latency
services with 100% global coverage. Furthermore, Iridium Holdings is
the only mobile satellite services with full coverage of the Polar Regions,
which represented approximately 11% of its traffic between 2006 and
2008.
Currently,
Iridium Holdings’ principal mobile satellite services global competitors are
Inmarsat, Globalstar and Orbcomm. United Kingdom-based Inmarsat owns
and operates a geostationary satellite network and U.S.-based Globalstar and
Orbcomm own and operate low earth orbit satellite networks. Iridium
Holdings also competes with several regional mobile satellite services providers
that operate geostationary satellites, such as Thuraya, principally in Europe,
the Middle East, Africa, Australia and several countries in Asia; and Mobile
Satellite Ventures and Mobile Satellite Ventures Canada in the
Americas. In addition, several regional mobile satellite services
companies, including ICO, TerreStar and Mobile Satellite Ventures are attempting
to exploit their spectrum positions into a U.S. consumer mobile satellite
services business; however such operators currently offer limited or no
services.
History
Iridium
Holdings is the successor to Iridium LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
formed in 1996 by Motorola and several other partners. Motorola
launched Iridium LLC with the mission of providing global mobile satellite
services through a network of 66 low earth orbit satellites, which was completed
and deployed for a cost of approximately $3.4 billion. Motorola
invested significantly in research and development, the acquisition of spectrum
and global licenses and in market development efforts during the development of
the constellation. Beginning in 1997, after seven years of planning
and development, Iridium LLC successfully launched its constellation, including
active satellites and in-orbit spares. In November 1998, Iridium LLC
began offering commercial services principally focused on the retail consumer
market, launching the first commercially available global satellite phone
service. On August 13, 1999, Iridium LLC filed voluntary petitions
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the District of Delaware. Iridium LLC remained in possession of
its assets and properties and continued to operate its businesses as a
debtor-in-possession.
On
December 7, 2000, Iridium Holdings LLC, its wholly owned subsidiary, Iridium
Satellite, and Iridium Constellation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Iridium
Satellite, were organized as limited liability companies under the laws of the
State of Delaware. On December 11, 2000, these entities acquired
Iridium LLC’s operating assets, including the satellite constellation, certain
portions of the terrestrial network, ground spare satellites and real
property. In addition, they also acquired from Motorola, either
outright or by license, all of the intellectual property rights necessary to
operate the system and produce related equipment and took assignment of
applicable licenses from the FCC. In connection with the acquisition
of these assets, Iridium Holdings entered into a transition services, products
and asset agreement with Motorola and an operations and maintenance agreement
with Boeing relating to the operations of its constellation. Iridium
Holdings was also awarded its first services contract with the
DoD. In March 2001, Iridium Holdings reintroduced commercial
satellite services through its subsidiary, Iridium Satellite. In
2002, Iridium Holdings launched into orbit an additional seven spare
satellites.
Distribution
Channels
Iridium
Holdings sells its products and services to its commercial customers exclusively
through a wholesale distribution network of approximately 61 service providers,
102 value-added resellers and 52 value-added manufacturers. These
distributors sell Iridium Holdings’ products and services to the end-user,
either directly or indirectly through service providers, value-added resellers
or dealers. Iridium Holdings’ distributors often integrate its
products and services with other complementary hardware and software and have
developed over 200 unique solutions targeting its main vertical
markets. Iridium Holdings also sell its services directly to U.S.
government customers, including the DoD, pursuant to fixed-fee
arrangements. The U.S. government and international government
agencies purchase additional services as well as Iridium Holdings’ products and
related applications through its network of distributors.
Iridium
Holdings provides its distributors with certain support services, including
assistance with coordinating end-user sales, strategic planning and training, as
well as helping them respond to new opportunities for its products
and
services. Iridium Holdings has representatives covering three regions
around the world to better manage its distributor relationships: the Americas,
which includes North, South and Central America; Asia Pacific, which includes
Australia and Asia; and Europe, Russia, the Middle East and
Africa. Iridium Holdings also maintains various online management
tools that allow it to communicate efficiently with its
distributors. Iridium Holdings similarly provides support services to
its U.S. government customers. By relying on its distributors to
manage end-user sales, Iridium Holdings believes its model reduces certain risks
and costs related to its business, such as consumer credit risk and sales and
marketing costs, while providing it with a broad and expanding distribution
network for its products and services with access to diverse and geographically
dispersed niche markets. Iridium Holdings is also able to rely on the
specialized expertise of its distributors, who continue to develop innovative
and improved solutions and applications integrating its product and service
offerings, providing it with a unique platform to support its
growth.
Commercial
Markets
Iridium
Holdings’ service providers and value-added resellers are the main distribution
channel for its products and services. Service providers and
resellers purchase Iridium Holdings’ products and services and market them
directly to their customers or indirectly through independent
dealers. They are each responsible for customer billing, end-user
customer care, managing credit risk and maintaining all customer account
information. If Iridium Holdings’ service providers or value-added
resellers provide Iridium Holdings’ services through dealers, these dealers will
often provide such services directly to the end-user. Service providers
typically purchase Iridium Holdings’ most basic products and services, such as
mobile voice services and related satellite handsets, offering additional
services such as email. Unlike service providers, Iridium Holdings’
resellers provide a broader array of value-added services specifically targeted
to the niche markets they serve, integrating Iridium Holdings’ handsets,
transceivers, high-speed data devices and short burst data modems with other
hardware and software to create packaged solutions for
end-users. Examples of these applications include cockpit voice and
data solutions for use by the aviation sector and voice, data and tracking
applications for industrial customers, the DoD and other U.S. and international
government agencies. Many of Iridium Holdings’ resellers specialize
in niche vertical markets such as maritime, aviation, machine-to-machine and
government markets where high-use customers with specialized needs are
concentrated. Iridium Holdings’ principal service providers include
dedicated satellite service providers such as Vizada and Stratos Global
Corporation, as well as some of the largest telecommunications companies in the
world, such as Telstra Corporation, KDDI Corporation and the SingTel Group.
Iridium Holdings’ principal resellers include ARINC Incorporated, Blue Sky
Network, EADS N.V., General Dynamics Corporation, Honeywell International Inc.,
NAL Research Corporation and Zunibal S.A.
Iridium
Holdings also sells its products to value-added manufacturers, which integrate
its transceivers and short burst data devices into their propriety hardware and
software. These manufacturers produce specialized equipment,
including integrated ship communication systems and secure satellite handsets,
such as handsets with National Security Agency Type I encryption capability,
which they offer to end-users in maritime, government and machine-to-machine
markets. As with Iridium Holdings’ service providers and resellers,
manufacturers sell their product solutions either directly or through other
distributors, including some of Iridium Holdings’ service providers and
resellers, for customer sales. These manufacturers sell services on the product
solutions to endorsers only through other distributors. Iridium
Holdings’ principal manufacturers include AirCell Inc., ITT Corporation, General
Dynamics Corporation and Thrane & Thrane A/S.
In
addition to resellers and manufacturers, Iridium Holdings maintains
relationships with approximately 31 value-added developers. Iridium
Holdings typically licenses these companies with technical information on its
products, which they then use to develop new software and hardware that
complements its products and services in line with the specifications of its
resellers and manufacturers. These products include airline tracking
and flight management applications and crew email applications for the maritime
industry. Iridium Holdings believes that working with value-added
developers allows Iridium Holdings to create new platforms for its products and
services and increases its market opportunity while reducing its overall
research and development expenses. Iridium Holdings’ principal
value-added developers include Active Web Solutions, Boeing, Global Marine
Networks and Ontec Co. Ltd.
Iridium
Holdings maintains a stable pricing model for its commercial products and
services with a consistent wholesale rate structure. Under its
distribution agreements, Iridium Holdings charges its distributors wholesale
rates for commercial products and services, based on volume of data transmitted
or duration of voice calls according to the types of services they distribute to
end-users, subject to discount arrangements. Iridium Holdings also
charges
fixed
monthly access fees per subscriber for certain services. Iridium
Holdings’ distributors are in turn responsible for setting their own pricing to
their customers. Iridium Holdings’ agreements with distributors
typically have terms of one year and are automatically renewable for additional
one year terms, subject to termination rights. This model results in
attractive margins for airtime usage, monthly access fees and subscriber
equipment sales. Iridium Holdings believes this high margin model
provides incentives for distributors to focus on selling its commercial product
and service portfolio and developing additional applications. An
additional benefit of this model is simplicity. Iridium Holdings’
distributors are assured of a global service with no complicated roaming
agreements and a flat wholesale billing model. This efficient model lessens back
office complexities and costs and allows distributors to remain focused on
revenue generation.
Vizada
and Stratos Global Corporation represented 14.9% and 12.6% of Iridium Holdings’
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008, and 12.3% and 9.3% of Iridium
Holdings’ revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
respectively. During April 2009, Inmarsat, one of Iridium Holdings’
main competitors, acquired Stratos Global Corporation. No other
distributor represented more than 10% of Iridium Holdings’ revenue for the year
ended December 31, 2008 or the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Government
Markets
Iridium
Holdings provides mission critical mobile satellite products and services to all
military branches of the DoD as well as other U.S. government
customers. Military forces deployed abroad contribute significantly
and increasingly to the demand for mobile satellite product and service
solutions. These users require voice and two way data capability
with, global coverage, low latency, mobility and security; and often have no
alternate terrestrial communication capability, or rely on mobile satellite
services as an important backup system. Iridium Holdings believes it
is well positioned to take advantage of increased demand from such
users. Its satellite handsets are one of the few commercial handsets
available on the market that are capable of Type I encryption accredited by the
National Security Agency for “Top Secret” communications. In
addition, the DoD has made significant investments to build a dedicated secure
gateway in Hawaii to allow DOD users to access Iridium Holdings’ network; and
Iridium Holdings estimates that the DoD has purchased approximately $100 million
of its handsets and devices to be used on its system. These handsets and devices
are only compatible with Iridium Holdings’ network.
Iridium
Holdings provides airtime and airtime support to U.S. government customers
pursuant to an Enhanced Mobile Satellite Services (EMSS) contract managed by the
Defense Information Systems Agency (“DISA”), which administers the contract on
behalf of DoD and other U.S. government and international customers authorized
by DoD to use EMSS services. The contract, entered into in April
2008, provides for a one year base term and up to four additional one year
options exercisable at the election of the U.S. government. Prior to
the expiration of the base term on March 31, 2009, the U.S. government elected
to exercise the first of the four additional one year options. The
current term of the EMSS contract will expire on March 31, 2010, subject to
further extension by the U.S. government as described above. Under this
agreement, Iridium Holdings provides U.S. government customers bulk access to
its airtime services through the DoD’s dedicated gateway, receiving from
subscribers (i) fixed monthly fees on a per user basis for airtime services and
voice usage, (ii) fixed monthly fee per user for paging services, and (iii) a
tiered pricing plan, based on usage per device for data services. The
U.S. government is not required to guarantee a minimum number of users pursuant
to this agreement. Services furnished under the agreement include
voice, data, messaging and paging services. Iridium Holdings does not sell its
products and related applications directly to U.S. government customers under
the existing agreement. These products are sold to U.S. government
customers through its network of distributors, which typically integrate them
with other products and technologies.
Iridium
Holdings also provides maintenance services to the DoD’s dedicated secure
gateway in Hawaii pursuant to the Gateway Maintenance and Support Services
Agreement (GMSSA) which is a separate contract managed by DISA, which also was
entered into in April 2008. As with the EMSS contract, GMSSA provides
for a one year base term and up to four additional one year options exercisable
at the election of the U.S. government. Prior to the expiration of
the one year base term on March 31, 2009, the U.S. government elected to
exercise the first of the four additional one year options. The
current term of the maintenance contract will expire on March 31, 2010, subject
to further extension by the U.S. government as described above. The U.S.
government may terminate either of its contracts, in whole or in part, at any
time.
U.S.
government services accounted for approximately 21.1% and 24.4% of its total
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March
31, 2009, respectively. Iridium Holdings’ U.S. government
revenue
includes only revenue derived from its two agreements with the DISA as well as
other contract revenue related to research and development projects with the
DoD. Such revenues do not include services to U.S. government agencies,
including the DoD and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (“FEMA”),
purchased through its distributors and offered through its commercial
gateway. They also do not include revenues from services to most
non-U.S. government agencies worldwide, including defense
agencies. Iridium Holdings considers such services commercial
services, as they are provided through its commercial gateway. Although Iridium
Holdings cannot determine the amount of U.S. government revenues derived from
its commercial gateway, it does not believe that such revenues are
material.
Vertical
Markets
The
specialized needs of Iridium Holdings’ global customers span many
markets. Its system is able to offer its customers cost-effective
communications solutions with 100% global coverage in areas underserved or
unserved by existing telecommunications infrastructures. Its mission
critical communication solutions have become an integral part of the
communications and business infrastructure of its end-users. In many
cases, its service is the only connectivity for these critical applications or
is used to complement terrestrial applications to provide a full extension to
their mobile communications solutions.
Iridium
Holdings’ current principal markets include land-based handset, maritime,
aviation, machine-to-machine and government.
Land-based
Handset
Iridium
Holdings is one of the leading global providers of mobile satellite
communications services to the land-based handset sector, providing handset
services to areas not served or inconsistently served by existing terrestrial
communications networks. As of November 2008, TMF Associates estimates that
approximately 687,000 satellite handsets were in operation
industry-wide. Mining, forestry, construction, oil and gas,
utilities, heavy industry and transport companies as well as public safety and
disaster relief agencies constitute the largest land-based handset
end-users. Iridium Holdings believes that increasing demand for
mobile communications devices operating outside the coverage of terrestrial
networks, combined with its small, lightweight, durable handsets with 100%
global coverage, including its recently launched next generation handsets, will
allow it to continue to capitalize on growth opportunities among such
users.
Iridium
Holdings’ land-based handset end-users utilize its satellite communications
services for:
·
|
Voice and
data: Multinational corporations in various sectors use
its services for business telephony, email and data transfer services and
to provide pay telephony services for employees in communities
inadequately served by terrestrial networks. Oil and gas and
mining companies, for example, provide their personnel with its equipment
solutions to survey new drilling and mining opportunities and for
conducting routine operations in remote areas that are not served by
cellular communications networks. In addition, a number of
recreational, scientific and other outdoor segments rely on its mobile
satellite handsets and services for use when beyond terrestrial wireless
coverage;
|
·
|
Mobile and remote office
connectivity: A variety of enterprises use its services
to access voice calls, data, email, internet and corporate network
connections;
|
·
|
Public safety and disaster
relief: Relief agencies, such as FEMA, have built its
products and services into their emergency response plans, particularly in
the aftermath of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma and Ike, the Asian
tsunami and other natural disasters. These agencies generate
significant demand for both its voice and data products, especially during
the late summer months in anticipation of the hurricane season in North
America. Government responses to natural disasters continue to
increase demand for its products and services in this sector;
and
|
·
|
Public telephone
infrastructure: Telecommunications providers use its services to
satisfy regulatory mandates to provide communications services to rural
populations currently not served by terrestrial
infrastructure. Telstra Corporation, for example, uses its
services to comply with its obligations to provide communications services
to customers in certain remote parts of
Australia.
|
Maritime
The
maritime market is one of Iridium Holdings’ most significant
markets. Currently, its principal competitor in this market is
Inmarsat. End-users of its services in the maritime sector include
companies engaged in merchant shipping, passenger transport, fishing, energy and
leisure. Merchant shipping accounts for a significant portion of its maritime
revenues, as those ships spend the majority of their time at sea away from
coastal areas and out of reach of terrestrial communication
services. Its products and services targeting the maritime market are
high value with high average revenue per subscriber with multiple users
utilizing a single device. Once a system is installed on a vessel, it
typically generates a long-term recurring revenue stream from the
customer.
Iridium
Holdings believes increased regulatory mandates and increased demand for
higher-speed, low-cost data services will allow it to capitalize on significant
growth opportunities in this growing market. Iridium Holdings expects the recent
introduction of its new high-speed data service, Iridium OpenPort, which offers
speeds of up to 128 kilobits per second (“kbps”) and up to three voice lines,
will present a cost competitive, high speed communication alternative to
end-users in the maritime market, which will allow it to compete with Inmarsat’s
strong position in the maritime data sector.
Maritime
end-users utilize Iridium Holdings’ satellite communications services for the
following:
·
|
Data and information
applications: Ship crews and passengers use its services to send
and receive email and data files as well as facsimiles, and to receive
other information services such as electronic newspapers, weather reports,
emergency bulletins and electronic charts. Iridium Holdings
believes the introduction of Iridium OpenPort will provide a particularly
attractive alternative for shipping operators looking for cost savings as
a result of building economic pressures as well as luxury yachts, tug
boats and other fishing and cruising vessels for which traditional marine
satellite systems have typically been too
costly;
|
·
|
Voice services for passengers
and crew: Maritime global voice services are used for
both vessel operations and social communications for crew
welfare. Merchant shipping operators, such as Stolt-Nielsen
S.A., increasingly use its services to provide phone cards and or
payphones for crew use with preferential rates during off peak times
during the day;
|
·
|
Vessel management, procurement
and asset tracking: Shipping operators, such as Exmar
Shipmanagement N.V., Lauritzen Fleet Management A/S and Zodiac Shipping
Ltd., use its services to manage inventory on board ships and to transmit
data, such as course, speed and fuel stock. Iridium Holdings’
services can be integrated with a global positioning system to provide a
position reporting capability. Many fishing vessels are
required by law to carry terminals using approved mobile satellite
services for tracking purposes as well as to monitor catches and to ensure
compliance with geographic fishing restrictions. European Union
regulations, for example, require EU-registered fishing vessels of over 15
meters, to carry terminals for the purpose of positional reporting of
those vessels. Furthermore, new security regulations in certain
jurisdictions are expected to require tracking of merchant vessels in
territorial waters which will drive further growth;
and
|
·
|
Safety applications:
Ships in distress, including potential piracy, hijack or terrorist
activity, rely on mobile satellite voice and data services. The
Ship Security and Alert Systems (“SSAS”) regulations were adopted by
International Maritime Organization (“IMO”) to enhance maritime security
in response to the increasing threat from terrorism and
piracy. After July 1, 2004, most deep-sea passenger and cargo
ships must be fitted with a device that can send an alert message
containing the ship’s ID and position whenever the ship is under threat or
has been compromised. Iridium Holdings and its partners are
developing several solutions to meeting this requirement for merchant
vessels. The Global Maritime Distress and Safety System
(“GMDSS”) is an application built to alert a maritime rescue coordination
center of their situation and position, which then coordinates rescue
efforts among ships in the area. The IMO requires all cargo
vessels over 300 gross tons and certain passenger vessels, irrespective of
size, that travel in international waters to carry distress and safety
terminals that use GMDSS applications. Iridium Holdings’
products and services are currently not certified to be used in GMDSS
applications. However, Iridium Holdings is currently working on
obtaining such certification and expect to offer such services once these
are obtained.
|
Aviation
Iridium
Holdings is one of the leading global providers of mobile satellite
communications services to the aviation sector. In the aviation
sector, its satellite communications services are used principally by corporate
jets, corporate and government helicopter fleets, specialized general aviation
fleets, such as medevac companies and fire suppression and other specialized
transport fleets, and high-end personal aircraft. Increasingly, its
services are being employed by airline operators for passenger and cockpit voice
services and safety applications. Iridium voice and data devices from its
manufacturers and developers have become factory options for a range of airframe
manufacturers and fractional operators in business aviation and air transport,
such as NetJets Inc., Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, Bombardier Inc., Cessna
Aircraft Company and Embraer, and have become standard equipment on some of
their aircraft fleets. Its devices are also installed in the
aftermarket on a variety of aircraft. As of March 31, 2009, Iridium
Holdings estimates that approximately 20,500 active Iridium systems were
installed on aircraft.
According
to Euroconsult, there were approximately 338,000 commercial airplanes, business
jets, helicopters and high-end general aviation aircraft in active use around
the world as of December 31, 2006. Based on internal studies and
public documents, Iridium Holdings estimates that approximately 30,800 aircraft
have installed mobile satellite systems as of March 31, 2009. Iridium
Holdings believes the low level of penetration in this market, combined with
recent regulatory changes and the continued development of innovative,
cost-effective applications by its distributors, will provide it with
significant growth opportunities in the future.
Aviation
end-users utilize its satellite communications services for:
·
|
Aviation operational
communications: Aircraft crew and airline ground
operations use its services for air-to-ground telephony and data
communications. This includes the automatic reporting of an
aircraft’s position and “mission critical” condition data to the ground
and controller-pilot data link communication for clearance and information
services. Iridium Holdings provides critical communications
applications for airlines and air transport customers such as Continental
Airlines, Cathay Pacific Airways and El Al Airlines. Many of these
operators rely on Iridium Holdings’ services and applications because
there is no other communications service available to them in areas such
as the Polar Regions. Iridium Holdings maintains relationships
with ARINC Incorporated and SITA, two of the leading providers of voice
and data network communications service and applications to the airline
sector, which integrate its products and services into their
offerings;
|
·
|
Aviation passenger
communications: Commercial and private fleet aircraft
passengers use its services for air-to-ground telephony, fax services and
data communications. Operators are currently using Iridium Holdings’
services to allow passengers to email using their own Wi-Fi enabled mobile
phones, including Blackberry devices or other similar smartphones, without
causing interference to aircraft controls. Iridium Holdings believes its
distributors’ small, lightweight cost-effective solutions offer an
attractive alternative for airlines and operators, particularly small
fleet operators;
|
·
|
Rotary and general aviation
applications: Iridium Holdings is also a major supplier
for rotary aviation applications to end-users including medevac, law
enforcement, oil and gas, and corporate work fleets, among others.
Companies such as Air Logistics, EagleMed and Air Evac Lifeteam rely on
applications from its distributors for traditional voice communications,
fleet monitoring and management and real time flight diagnostics;
and
|
·
|
Air traffic control
communications (“safety applications”): In November 2007, the
International Civil Aviation Organization (“ICAO”), approved standards and
recommended practices allowing Iridium Holdings to provide Aeronautical
Mobile Satellite (Route) Services to commercial aircraft on long-haul
routes, many of which fly over the Polar Regions. The ICAO decision
permits member states to approve Iridium Holdings’ equipment for
communications on transoceanic flights, pending certification. The first
certification trials are currently underway. Upon receiving
such certification, aircraft crew and air traffic controllers will be able
to use its services for data and voice communication between the flight
deck and ground based control facilities. Iridium Holdings is the only
provider capable of offering such critical flight safety applications
around the entire globe, including the Polar Regions. Iridium
Holdings believes this particular sector of the market will present it
with significant growth prospects, as its services and
|
applications
will serve as a lower cost alternative to the current aging high frequency radio
systems that are more expensive to operate.
Machine-to-Machine
Iridium
Holdings is one of the leading providers of machine-to-machine services.
According to Euroconsult, an estimated 19 million long-haul trucks, rail cars
and industrial fixed and mobile assets, including personnel, capable of
supporting machine-to-machine services were in operation as of December 31,
2006. Of these assets, only an estimated 700,000, or 4%, employed such services
as of that date, according to the same report. Although its
machine-to-machine services and related devices have exhibited strong growth
since their introduction, Iridium Holdings believe the significant
under-penetration of this market presents considerable opportunities for future
growth. As with land-based handsets, Iridium Holdings’ largest
machine-to-machine users include mining, forestry, construction, oil and gas,
utilities, heavy industry and transport companies as well as public safety and
disaster relief agencies. Iridium Holdings believe the increasing
demand for automated data collection processes from mobile and remote assets
operating outside the coverage of terrestrial wireline and wireless networks as
well as the continued push to integrate the operation of such assets into
enterprise management and information technology systems will continue
increasing demand for its machine-to-machine applications.
Machine-to-machine
users utilize Iridium Holdings’ machine-to-machine services for:
·
|
Transportation fleet
management: Iridium Holdings’ global coverage permits
its products and services to be used to monitor the location of transport
fleets, hours of service and engine telemetry data, as well as to conduct
two-way communications with drivers around the entire
world. Long distance drivers need reliable communication with
both dispatchers and their destinations to coordinate changing business
needs, and its satellite network provides continuous communications
coverage while they are in transit. Iridium Holdings expects
the push for more efficient, cost-effective and safer fleet operations as
well as the imposition of regulatory mandates related to driver safety,
such as drive time monitoring, will continue driving demand for its
services in this area;
|
·
|
Fixed-asset
monitoring: Multinational corporations, such as
oil-field service companies like Schlumberger Limited and Conoco Phillips,
use its services to run applications that allow remote monitoring and
operation of equipment and facilities around the globe, such as oil
pipelines and off-shore drilling
platforms;
|
·
|
Asset
tracking: Leveraging machine-to-machine applications
developed by several of its distributors, companies use its services and
related devices to track assets, including personnel, for logistics,
theft-prevention and safety purposes. Transportation companies,
such as Horizon Lines, Inc., for example, employ machine-to-machine
applications developed by Impeva Labs, Inc. to track containers while in
transit. Premier GPS Inc. similarly develops applications that allow
companies to monitor the safety of personnel operating in remote regions
of Canada;
|
·
|
Resource management:
Iridium Holdings’ global coverage and data throughput capabilities support
natural resource management applications such as fishing management
systems. Zunibal S.A., one of its resellers, has developed
applications for the fishing industry to assist fishing fleets in pursuing
more efficient fishing practices;
and
|
·
|
Scientific data
monitoring: The global coverage of its network supports
many scientific data collection applications such as the National
Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration’s (“NOAA’s”) Argo float
program. This program relies on its machine-to-machine services
to collect climate data from buoys located throughout the world’s oceans
for monitoring and analysis. Iridium Holdings believes the
increased need for monitoring climate and environmental data associated
with global climate change and its impact on the planet will increase
demand for such services.
|
Government
Iridium
Holdings is one of the leading global providers of mobile satellite
communications services to the U.S. government, principally, the
DoD. It provides mission critical mobile satellite products and
services to all branches of the U.S. armed forces. In addition to
voice products used by soldiers for primary and backup communication solutions,
its products and related applications are installed on ground vehicles, unmanned
aerial vehicles, aircraft
and
helicopters, embedded in unattended sensors and used for command and control and
situational awareness. Global security concerns, such as the current
conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq, continue to increase demand for its products
and services in this sector.
Services
and Products
At March
31, 2009, Iridium Holdings’ product and service solutions had approximately
328,000 subscribers (96% of which were generating monthly access or usage fees,
while the remaining 4% were subscribers who maintained a suspended account at
the time but were not generating any fees). Iridium Holdings expects that, in
the future, a higher percentage of its subscribers will generate fees as it
intends to begin charging a nominal monthly fee for suspended
accounts. Iridium Holdings’ principal services are mobile satellite
services, including mobile voice and data services and machine-to-machine
services. Sales of its commercial services collectively accounted for
approximately 41.5% and 48.6% of its total revenues for the year ended December
31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009,
respectively. Iridium Holdings also sells related voice and data
equipment to its customers, which accounted for approximately 37.4% and 27.0% of
its total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months
ended March 31, 2009, respectively. In addition, it offers services
to U.S. government customers, including the DoD. These services
accounted for approximately 21.1% and 24.4% of its total revenues for
the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009,
respectively.
Iridium
Holdings’ Commercial Services
Post-paid
Mobile Voice and Data Satellite Communications Services
Iridium
Holdings sells its mobile voice and data services to service providers and
resellers who in turn offer such services to end-users, either directly or
indirectly through dealers, through various packaged solutions such as monthly
plans with differing price levels that vary depending upon expected
usage. In exchange for these services, Iridium Holdings typically
charges service providers and resellers a monthly access fee per subscriber as
well as usage fees for airtime minutes used by their respective
subscribers. A small number of its post-paid customers purchase
monthly blocks of airtime minutes which must be used in a given month or are
forfeited.
Prepaid
Mobile Voice Satellite Communications Services
Iridium
Holdings also offers mobile voice services to service providers and resellers
through prepaid plans. Service providers and resellers pay Iridium
Holdings in advance for blocks of airtime minutes with expiration periods in
various configurations, typically one year. Unused minutes are
forfeited at the applicable expiration date. These services are then typically
sold to subscribers in the form of prepaid scratch cards and e-vouchers that
enable subscribers to use Iridium Holdings’ services on a per minute
basis. Iridium Holdings believes service providers and resellers are
drawn to these services as they enable greater cost control, since they
eliminate the need for monthly billings and reduce collection costs, and can be
sold in cash economies where credit is not readily available. Iridium
Holdings’ distributors often offer its prepaid mobile voice services through
fixed devices to subscribers in rural villages, at remote industrial, commercial
and residential sites and on ships at sea, among other places. Fixed
voice satellite communications services are in many cases an attractive
alternative to handheld mobile satellite communications services in situations
where multiple users will access the service within a defined geographic area
and terrestrial wireline or wireless service is not available. Fixed
phones, for example, can be configured as pay phones (installed at a central
location, for example, in a rural village or maritime vessel) that accept
prepaid scratch cards and e-vouchers.
High-Speed
Data Services
Iridium
Holdings recently introduced its new high-speed data maritime service, Iridium
OpenPort, which offers maritime end-users speeds of up to 128 kbps and up to
three voice lines which can be used simultaneously without
interference. Data rates on this service can easily be adjusted up or
down at any time without making hardware or software changes, giving subscribers
options that allow them to balance needs for data transmission speeds against
cost considerations on a real-time basis. In conjunction with its distributors,
Iridium Holdings intends to develop additional services that will permit service
provider and resellers to offer complete integrated solutions for ship-to-shore
crew calling, email and IP-based data communications. Iridium Holdings believes
Iridium OpenPort, its first high-speed data service in the maritime market,
offers a competitive alternative to other marine satellite services that offer
fewer features at higher costs, allowing it to grow its share of this
sector. For its Iridium OpenPort service,
Iridium
Holdings typically charges service providers and resellers a monthly access fee
per subscriber as well as usage fees for airtime minutes used by the respective
subscribers above their monthly quotas.
Machine-to-Machine
Services
Introduced
in 2003, Iridium Holdings’ machine-to-machine services are designed to address
the market need for a small and cost-effective solution for sending and
receiving data (such as location) from fixed and mobile assets in remote
locations to a central monitoring station. This service operates
through a two-way burst data transmission between its network and a telemetry
unit, which may be located, for example, on a container in transit or a buoy
monitoring oceanographic conditions. The small size of the units
makes them attractive for use in applications such as tracking asset shipments,
monitoring unattended remote assets, including oil and gas assets, vehicle
tracking and mobile security. Iridium Holdings sells its
machine-to-machine services to its distributors who in turn offer such services
to end-users such as various U.S. and international governmental agencies,
including NOAA, as well as commercial and other entities such as Schlumberger
Limited, Continental Airlines and Conoco Phillips. As with its mobile
voice and data offerings, Iridium Holdings typically charges service providers
and resellers a monthly access fee per subscriber as well as usage fees for
airtime minutes used by their respective subscribers.
Other
Services
In
addition to access and usage fees, Iridium Holdings generates revenue from
several ancillary services related to its core service offerings such as inbound
connections from the public switched telephone networks (“PSTN”), short message
services (“SMS”), subscriber identity module (“SIM”) activation, customer
reactivation, roaming and other peripheral services. Iridium Holdings
also provides certain research and development services to assist customers in
developing new technologies compatible with its system which it may leverage for
use in commercial service and product offerings in the
future. Iridium Holdings charges its distributors certain fees for
these services.
In the
future, Iridium Holdings expects to provide secondary payload services to
customers before and during the life of its next-generation constellation,
Iridium NEXT, which will replace its current satellite
constellation. Currently, Iridium Holdings is providing research and
development services to potential secondary payload customers.
Iridium
Holdings’ Products
Iridium
Holdings offers a broad array of voice and data equipment products for customers
that work on all points of the globe. Iridium Holdings’ devices must
be outside, within direct view of satellites, to be able to properly access its
network.
Satellite
Handsets
Iridium
Holdings’ principal product offering has been its Iridium 9505A satellite
handset phone, which is similar in functionality to an ordinary cellular phone
but with the solid, durable feel that many satellite phone users
demand. This phone weighs 13.2 ounces and is capable of up to three
hours of talk time without being recharged. The Iridium 9505A
provides voice, SMS and data connectivity. Iridium believes its
reputation for industrial strength products is critical for customers, many of
whom are located in the most inhospitable spots on the planet and require tough
and reliable communications equipment.
In
October 2008, Iridium Holdings launched its next generation satellite handset,
the Iridium 9555. This new model introduces several new features, including a
larger, brighter screen, improved SMS and email capabilities, integrated antenna
and speakerphone and is smaller, lighter (weighing 9.4 ounces) and more user
friendly than the Iridium 9505A model. The Iridium 9555 also offers up to four
hours of talk time. The new model maintains the industrial feel of
its predecessors, with a rugged housing to protect its sophisticated satellite
transceiver. Iridium believes the Iridium 9555 satellite handset is a
significant improvement over its earlier-generation equipment and that its
advantages will drive increased adoption from prospective users.
Voice
and Data Modems
Iridium
Holdings also offers a combined voice transceiver and data modem which its
distributors integrate into a variety of communications solutions that are
deployed in different applications around the world. Iridium
Holdings’ Iridium 9522A L-Band transceiver is effectively the core of its
Iridium 9505A satellite handset without a
key pad,
display, earpiece and microphone. Iridium Holdings’ principal
customers for its Iridium 9522A L-Band transceivers are value-added
manufacturers who integrate it into specialized devices that access its
network. These specialized products are often the highest generators
of traffic on Iridium Holdings’ network. On-board crew calling
terminals built around the Iridium 9522A, which are used as payphones on
maritime vessels, for example, have ten to 20 times the average usage of a
handheld phone, in part because they are shared across a large group of
users. The Iridium 9522A has also been integrated into mobile data
applications providing email services on maritime vessels.
In
November 2008, Iridium Holdings launched its next generation transceiver, its
Iridium 9522B L-Band transceiver. This new model is smaller and less
expensive than its previous Iridium 9522A model, which allows its customers to
integrate it into smaller devices while improving its margins as well as the
margins of its distributors. The Iridium 9522B is functionally
equivalent to the Iridium 9522A, which will allow Iridium Holdings’ distributors
to easily integrate it into existing applications.
High-Speed
Data Devices
In
October 2008, Iridium Holdings began shipping its Iridium OpenPort high-speed
data terminal to its customers. This device provides dynamic
allocation of three independent telephone lines and a high-speed data port
configurable from 9.6 to 128 kbps. All voice and data capabilities can be used
at the same time. The terminal relies on a relatively compact omni-directional
antenna array about the size of a typical small-boat radar dome and contains no
moving parts, which greatly reduces cabling, maintenance and repair costs.
Iridium Holdings’ principal customers for Iridium OpenPort are its value-added
resellers who integrate the device with their own hardware and software products
to provide a suite of customer-focused voice and IP-based data packages for ship
business, crew calling and email. Iridium Holdings believes the low
cost of its OpenPort terminal, combined with its high bandwidth and flexible
configuration options, will allow it to grow its share of the existing maritime
market while opening up new market sectors, such as luxury yachts, tug boats and
other fishing and cruising vessels for which traditional marine satellite
systems have typically been too costly.
Machine-to-Machine
Data Devices
In 2005,
Iridium Holdings introduced its Iridium 9601 short burst data modem, which
provides its machine-to-machine services. The Iridium 9601 is a small data
device with two-way transmission capable of sending packet data to and from any
point in the world with low latency. Iridium Holdings’ principal
customers for its Iridium 9601 data modems are value-added resellers and
manufacturers, who embed the Iridium 9601 into their tracking, sensor, and data
applications and systems, such as asset tracking systems. The Iridium
9601 is often combined with a GPS receiver to provide location information
across Iridium Holdings’ system to customer applications. In
addition, an increasing number of resellers and manufacturers are including a
terrestrial global system for mobile communication (“GSM”) packet radio service
modem in their applications to provide low cost cellular data transmission when
available. These applications are used by end-users that require the
ability to transfer large volumes of data but operate in areas with inconsistent
cellular coverage. Iridium Holdings provides gap-filler coverage for
such applications allowing such users to operate anywhere on the globe in
locations where cellular coverage is unavailable or unreliable.
Device
Manufacturing
Currently,
Iridium Holdings contracts with Cambridge Consulting Ltd. (“Cambridge
Consulting”) to develop all of its devices, which are manufactured by Celestica
in facilities in Malaysia and the United States. Iridium Holdings maintains
long-term agreements with both Cambridge Consulting and Celestica, which are set
to expire on August 2, 2009 and January 1, 2010, respectively. Pursuant to the
contract with Celestica, Iridium Holdings may be required to purchase excess
materials from Celestica at cost plus a contractual markup if the materials are
not used in production within the periods specified in the agreement. Celestica
will then generally repurchase such materials from Iridium Holdings at the same
price paid by Iridium Holdings, as required for the production of the devices.
Iridium Holdings’ agreement with Celestica is automatically
renewable for additional one year terms unless terminated by either
party. Iridium Holdings provides limited warranties to first
end-users for a period of one year from the time of sale on all devices, except
for OpenPort devices that have a two year warranty period for first
end-users.
In
addition to its principal products, Iridium Holdings also offers a selection of
accessories for its devices, including holsters, earbuds, portable auxiliary
antenna, antenna adaptors, USB data cables and charging units, among
others. Iridium Holdings purchases these products from several
third-party suppliers off the shelf at market prices and, as such, do not
maintain any long-term agreements with such suppliers.
Iridium
Holdings currently has sufficient inventory of all its voice and data devices to
meet customers’ demands.
U.S.
Government Services
Iridium
Holdings provides U.S. government customers bulk access to its services,
including unlimited voice, data, messaging and paging services, as well as
maintenance services for the DoD’s dedicated gateway in Hawaii. U.S.
government customers also rely on its voice and data products, which they
purchase from its network of distributors. Resellers and
manufacturers typically integrate Iridium Holdings’ products with other
products, which they then offer to U.S. government customers as customized
product solutions. To conform with U.S. government regulations,
Iridium Holdings ensures devices sold to its distributors for use in certain
U.S. government applications are manufactured by Celestica wholly in the United
States. Such customized voice and data solutions
include:
·
|
personnel
tracking devices, such as personal locator
beacons;
|
·
|
asset
tracking devices for equipment, vehicles and
aircraft;
|
·
|
over-the-horizon
(beyond line of sight) fighter aircraft communications
applications;
|
·
|
submarine
communications applications;
|
·
|
specialized
communications solutions for high-value
individuals;
|
·
|
command
and control and data backhaul options for unmanned aerial vehicles;
and
|
·
|
specialized,
secure, mobile communications and data devices for the military and
intelligence community, such as secure satellite handsets with Type I
encryption capability.
|
Iridium
Holdings, with funding support from the DoD, continues to invest in research and
development to develop new products and applications for use by all branches of
the U.S. armed forces. In conjunction with the Marine Corps
Warfighting Lab, Iridium Holdings is currently expanding the capabilities of its
satellite handsets to permit netted (push-to-talk) group calling radio services,
providing over-the-horizon user-defined tactical radio nets to DoD
users. This development program has been fully funded by the
DoD. Iridium Holdings expects the development of the Netted Group
Calling application to provide it with the potential for new commercial
applications in public safety, fishing and field worker communications in
conjunction with Boeing and with funding from the U.S. government. Iridium
Holdings is also developing a high integrity GPS service (“iGPS”), which will be
used as an embedded component in several DoD applications. Iridium
Holdings iGPS technology is expected to provide centimeter level accuracy and
important anti-jamming capability for GPS signals. Iridium Holdings
expects the development of iGPS to provide it the potential for new commercial
applications in enhanced navigation services such as precision farming, high
accuracy navigation for oil and gas exploration and construction
services.
Iridium
Holdings’ Spectrum
Iridium
Holdings holds licenses to use 8.725 MHz of continuous spectrum in the L-Band,
which operates at 1.6 GHz, and allows for two-way communication between its
devices and its satellites. In addition, for feeder and
inter-satellite links, Iridium Holdings is authorized to use 600 MHz of Ka-Band
and K-Band spectrum. Of this spectrum, it uses 200 MHz of K-Band
spectrum for satellite-to-satellite communications, and 400 MHz of Ka-Band
spectrum for two-way communication between its satellites and its
gateways. Iridium Holdings’ spectrum position is globally coordinated
and recorded by the International Telecommunication Union
(“ITU”). Iridium Holdings’ L-Band is authorized for operation in over
100 countries, and Iridium Holdings continues to seek authorizations in
additional countries. Access to this spectrum enables it to design
satellites, network and terrestrial infrastructure enhancements cost effectively
because each product and service can be deployed and sold worldwide. This broad
spectrum assignment also enhances its ability to capitalize on existing and
emerging wireless and broadcast applications.
The FCC initially licensed Iridium
Holdings to operate on 5.15 MHz of the 10.5 MHz of spectrum which Motorola
originally designed Iridium Holdings’ system to operate within and later
increased its license spectrum to include an additional 3.1 MHz on a shared
basis with Globalstar. In November 2007, an FCC order increased
Iridium Holdings’ exclusive spectrum to 7.775 MHz with an additional 0.95 MHz
shared with Globalstar. On May 1, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for
the D.C. Circuit denied a petition for review filed by Globalstar of the FCC’s
decision to reallocate L-band spectrum from Globalstar to
Iridium. The FCC’s reallocation decision should become final and
non-reviewable on July 30, 2009, unless Globalstar seeks rehearing en banc with
the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit or files a petition for
certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. Globalstar has also
filed a petition before the FCC asking for reconsideration of the global
effects of the license modification, contending that the FCC’s decision should
not have affected Globalstar’s operations outside of the United
States. Iridium Holdings has opposed the reconsideration request as
without merit, and no decision has been issued by the FCC. The
disposition by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit does not directly
impact Globalstar’s pending petition for reconsideration of the FCC decision to
modify Globalstar’s license on a global basis. Notwithstanding these
challenges by Globalstar at the FCC, modifications to Iridium’s and Globalstar’s
licenses consistent with the November 2007 spectrum change took effect on a
global basis on December 14, 2008, in accordance with federal
law. After the modifications became effective, Globalstar filed
before the FCC a request for waivers and special temporary authority to continue
operating on spectrum licensed to Iridium Holdings in certain gateways outside
of the United States. Iridium Holdings filed a petition to deny the waiver and
special temporary authority requests on January 21, 2009. Briefing on
the petition was completed by February 9, 2009, but the FCC has not yet taken
any action.
Iridium
Holdings’ use of satellite spectrum is subject to the frequency rules and
regulations of the ITU. The ITU is the United Nations organization
responsible for worldwide co-operation in the telecommunications
sector. In order to protect satellite systems from harmful radio
frequency interference from other satellite systems, the ITU maintains a Master
International Frequency Register of radio frequency assignments. Each
ITU administration is required to give notice of, coordinate and record its
proposed use of radio frequency assignments with the ITU’s Radiocommunication
Bureau. The coordination negotiations are conducted by the national
administrations with the assistance of satellite operators. When the
coordination process is completed, the ITU formally notifies all proposed users
of frequencies and orbital locations in order to protect the recorded
assignments from subsequent nonconforming or interfering uses by member states
of the ITU. Only member states have full standing within this
inter-governmental organization.
Filings to the ITU for its current
constellation have been made on Iridium Holdings’ behalf by the United
States. Iridium Holdings has coordinated frequencies in the mobile
satellite services spectrum at L-band (1.6 GHz) for communication between its
satellites and end-user devices, frequencies in the Ka-Band (19.4 GHz to 19.6
GHz and 29.1 to 29.3 GHz) for communications between Iridium Holdings’ and the
gateways and its satellites, as well as frequencies in the K-Band (23 GHz) for
its inter-satellite links.
The ITU controls the assignment of
country codes used for placing telephone calls between different
countries. Iridium Holdings’ network is assigned the 8816 and 8817
country codes, and uses these numbers for calling and communications between
terminals.
Domestic and Foreign
Revenue
Iridium
Holdings supplies services and products to customers in a number of foreign
countries. It allocates revenues geographically based on where it
invoices its distributors, whom it bills for mobile satellite services and
related equipment sales. These distributors sell services directly or
indirectly to end-users, who may be located elsewhere. It is not
possible for Iridium Holdings to provide the geographical distribution of
end-users, as Iridium Holdings does not contract directly with them. Nearly all of Iridium Holdings’ revenues
are invoiced in U.S. dollars. While U.S. revenues accounted for approximately
48.3% of Iridium Holdings’ revenues between 2006 and 2008, approximately 91% of
commercial traffic has originated outside the United States during the same
period, including the Polar Regions which represented approximately 11% of
Iridium Holdings’ traffic between 2006 and 2008. The table below sets
forth the percentage of Iridium Holdings’ revenues by country for the period
indicated:
|
|
Three
Months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2008
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2007
|
|
Year
ended
December
31, 2006
|
United
States
|
50.0%
|
|
48.6%
|
|
48.0%
|
|
48.1%
|
Canada
|
13.1%
|
|
17.2%
|
|
16.9%
|
|
15.8%
|
Other
Countries(1)
|
36.9%
|
|
34.2%
|
|
35.1%
|
|
36.1%
|
_______________
(1) No
other country represents more than 10% of Iridium Holdings’ revenue for any of
the periods indicated.
For more
information Iridium Holdings’ revenue from sales to foreign and domestic
customers, see Note 7 to its consolidated financial statements contained
herein.
Iridium
Holdings’ Network
Current
Constellation
Iridium
Holdings’ satellite network includes 66 in-orbit low earth orbit satellites, in
addition to seven in-orbit spares. Iridium Holdings also maintains a
non-service in-orbit spare which it uses for testing purposes. The
satellites operate in six orbital planes of eleven vehicles each in nearly
circular polar orbits. Iridium Holdings’ satellites orbit at an altitude of
approximately 483 miles (778 kilometers) above the earth and travel at 16,689
mph resulting in a complete orbit of the earth approximately every 100
minutes. The design of Iridium Holdings’ constellation ensures that
generally at least one satellite is visible to subscribers from any point on the
earth’s surface, covering all of the world’s population. While Iridium Holdings’
constellation offers 100% global coverage, satellite services are not available
in locations where a satellite signal cannot be transmitted or received (e.g.,
inside a building).
Iridium
Holdings’ constellation is unique in its usage of radio frequency crosslinks
between its satellites. These crosslinks enable each satellite to communicate
with up to four other satellites in space—two in the same orbital plane and two
in adjacent planes. All of Iridium Holdings’ traffic is routed
between satellites, which minimizes the ground infrastructure necessary to
support the constellation. This interlinked architecture enables a
single ground station gateway to support all commercial traffic globally. This
allows the satellite that is then passing over the ground station to transmit
all traffic to and from the rest of the satellite constellation to
terrestrial-based networks such as the public switch telecommunication
network.
Iridium
Holdings believes its interlinked satellite infrastructure provides several
advantages over networks that rely on terrestrial gateways like Globalstar’s and
Orbcomm’s networks. Iridium Holdings has the only satellite network
with 100% global coverage, and its constellation is less vulnerable to single
points of failure, since traffic can be routed around any one satellite problem
to complete the communications path. In addition, the lack of ground
stations increases the security of its constellation, a factor that makes its
network particularly attractive to government institutions and large enterprises
that require secure voice and data communications. The low orbit of
its constellation also allows Iridium Holdings’ network to operate with low
latency due to the proximity of its satellites to the earth.
All of
Iridium Holdings’ satellites are virtually identical in design and
functionality, which allows satellite diversity for mitigation of service gaps
from individual satellite outages. Each satellite has a high degree
of on-board subsystem redundancy, an on-board fault detection system and
isolation and recovery for safe and quick risk mitigation. Iridium
Holdings’ ability to reconfigure the orbital location of each satellite provides
Iridium Holdings with operating flexibility and continuity of
service. If a satellite should fail or become unusable in most cases,
Iridium Holdings can also reposition one of its in-orbit spare satellites to
take over its functions. If there is an in-orbit spare located in the
orbital plane of the failed satellite, such repositioning can be accomplished
within days with minimal impact on its services. If there is no in-orbit spare
located in the relevant orbital plane, redeploying an in-orbit spare into the
affected plane will take at least one year. The design of its space and ground
control system facilitates the real time intervention and management of the
satellite constellation and service upgrades via software
enhancements.
Iridium
Holdings’ commercial gateway is located in Tempe, Arizona. This
gateway has multiple antennas that communicate with its satellites and pass
calls seamlessly between gateway antennas and satellites as the satellites
traverse the gateway, thereby connecting signals from the terminals of end-users
to its gateways. Additional gateways can be added to the network to
enable dedicated communications links that are not dependant on localized
terrestrial telecommunications infrastructure where subscribers are using its
services. Such gateways would be able to generate and control all
user information pertaining to its registered users, such as user identity,
geo-location and call detail records. The DoD owns and operates a
dedicated gateway in Hawaii for U.S government users to take advantage of this
unique capability. This gateway provides an interface between voice
and data devices and the Defense Information Systems Network, providing DoD
users with secure communications capabilities. Iridium Holdings
is also in discussions with parties in countries that require physical gateways
within their jurisdiction to build or reactivate additional gateways to connect
the traffic coming to and from their territory, including China and
Russia.
Iridium
Holdings operates its satellite constellation from its satellite network
operations center in Leesburg, Virginia. This facility manages the
performance and status of each of its satellites, developing and distributing
routing tables for use by the satellites and gateways, directing traffic routing
through the network and controlling the formation of coverage areas by the
satellites’ main mission antennas. Iridium Holdings also operates telemetry,
tracking, and control stations and satellite earth station facilities in
Fairbanks, Alaska and Chandler, Arizona in the United States, and northern
Canada and Norway. The Alaskan ground station also provides earth
terminal backup capability for its Tempe Gateway.
From time
to time, individual satellites in Iridium Holdings’ constellation experience
operating problems that may result in a temporary satellite outage, but due to
satellite diversity within its constellation, the individual satellite outages
typically do not negatively affect its customers’ use of its system for a
prolonged period. In addition, most system processing related to
Iridium Holdings’ service is performed using software onboard each satellite
instead of on the ground. Iridium Holdings believes this has provided
it with significant flexibility and has contributed to the longevity of the
system by enabling engineers to develop additional functionality and
software-based solutions to occasional faults and anomalies in the
system.
Iridium
Holdings has experienced six satellite failures since it reintroduced commercial
satellite services in 2001 which have resulted in the complete loss of the
affected satellites or the loss of the ability of the satellite to carry traffic
on the network. Iridium Holdings experienced its first satellite
failure in July 2003. This failure has been attributed to a
non-recoverable anomalous short circuit in the satellite’s Integrated Bus
Electronics (“IBE”). Two additional satellites failed as a result of
this anomaly in August 2005 and December 2006. In part, as a response
to this anomaly, Iridium Holdings has implemented several procedures across the
constellation to attempt to mitigate the severity of a similar anomaly in the
future and/or prevent it from resulting in mission-critical failures of its
other satellites. These procedures include reducing the peak
operating temperature of the IBE during portions of the solar season, as well as
modifying the on-board software of its satellites to immediately carry out
certain autonomous actions upon detecting future occurrences of this type of
anomaly.
Iridium
Holdings has experienced three additional satellite failures unrelated to IBE
short circuits. In April 2005, one of its satellites failed as a
result of a radiation-induced single event upset anomaly, which corrupted the
satellite’s on-board time reference. Accurate time reference is
critical to determine a satellite’s ephemeris (its orbital location with respect
to the earth), attitude (its pointing direction) and the sun’s
position. In December 2005, Iridium Holdings was unable to remedy a
failure in the crosslink digital reference oscillator of another of its
satellites, resulting in its failure. Failure of the digital
reference oscillator disables the affected satellite’s crosslinks and, thus, its
ability to communicate with the rest of the satellite
constellation. More recently, in July 2008, another of Iridium
Holdings’ satellites experienced an attitude control anomaly as a result of
sudden loss of communications between its IBE and its primary space vehicle and
routing computer. The nature of this anomaly coupled with the
software state of the vehicle at the time (resulting from an on-board software
fault response to a prior anomaly) resulted in the inability of the on-board
software to correct the computer communications anomaly and control of the
satellite was lost.
Iridium
Holdings has experienced one satellite to satellite collision. On
February 10, 2009 Iridium Holdings lost an operational satellite (SV33) as a
result of a collision with a non-operational Russian satellite (Cosmos
2251). On March 4, 2009, Iridium Holdings completed the replacement
of SV33 with an in-orbit spare. The unique architecture of Iridium
Holdings’ fully-meshed network of 66 satellites enabled the continuity of
service to
customers
with only limited service disruption while the in-orbit spare was prepared and
maneuvered into the constellation.
Iridium
Holdings has categorized three types of anomalies among the satellites in its
constellation that, if they materialize throughout the satellite constellation,
have the potential for a significant operational impact. These include: (a) a
non-recoverable anomalous short circuit in a satellite’s IBE, as discussed
above; (b) excessive power subsystem degradation resulting from satellite
battery wear-out or excessive loss of solar array power output and (c) failures
to critical payload electronic parts arising from accumulated radiation total
dose.
Based on
the failures and anomalies Iridium Holdings has experienced to date, and
considering the potential for future anomalies related to the three categories
discussed above, Iridium Holdings believes its in-space constellation will
provide continuity of service into 2014. In addition, Iridium
Holdings believes its constellation can be operationally functional with less
than 66 satellites while experiencing some service
degradation. Iridium Holdings expects to be able to mitigate
satellite failures through the use of the remaining seven in-orbit spares, the
implementation of software solutions, and by landing communications traffic at
its ground station in Alaska and backhauling traffic to the Tempe gateway for
processing and termination. However, there can be no assurance that
Iridium Holdings’ satellites will not fail faster than expected or that it will
be able to mitigate any future failures.
In
addition to its seven spare satellites, Iridium Holdings owns spare parts for
certain equipment in its gateway. Iridium Holdings selectively
replaces parts for its gateway as necessary and maintains an inventory of spare
parts which it continuously monitors. In addition, when it does not
have necessary spares in inventory or such spares become obsolete, Iridium
Holdings relies on third parties to develop necessary parts.
Iridium
Holdings uses the services of third-party Boeing contractors to operate its
constellation pursuant to a long-term operations and maintenance agreement with
Boeing. Under the terms of this agreement, Boeing provides operations
and maintenance services with respect to Iridium Holdings’ satellite network
(including engineering, systems analysis and operations and maintenance
services) from Iridium Holdings’ technical support center in Iridium Holdings’
Chandler, Arizona control station and Iridium Holdings’ satellite network
operations center in Leesburg, Virginia. Through subsequent
amendments, the life of the agreement has been extended to be concurrent with
the estimated useful life of its constellation.
Pursuant
to its transition services, products and asset agreement with Motorola, the
original system architect and prior owner, and a separate agreement with the
U.S. government, Iridium Holdings is required to maintain an in-orbit liability
insurance policy with a de-orbiting endorsement to cover the de-orbiting of its
satellite constellation in the amount of $500 million per occurrence, and $1
billion annually. The current policy (together with the de-orbiting
endorsement) covers amounts that Iridium Holdings and certain other named
parties may become liable to pay for bodily injury and/or property damages to
third parties related to processing, maintaining and operating its satellite
constellation and, in the case of the de-orbiting endorsement, de-orbiting the
satellite constellation. The policy covers Iridium Holdings, the U.S.
government, Boeing, as operator of its system, Motorola and other named
beneficiaries. The policy has been renewed annually since the
expiration of the original policy’s three-year term in 2003. The
current policy has a one-year term, which expires December 12, 2009. In
addition, Motorola maintains a separate $1 billion product liability policy to
cover its potential liability as manufacturer of the
satellites. Iridium Holdings pays the premium for Motorola’s
policy.
In
addition, Iridium Holdings does not maintain in-orbit insurance covering losses
from satellite failures or other operational problems affecting its
constellation.
Constellation
De-Orbiting Rights
Pursuant
to an agreement between Iridium Satellite, Boeing, Motorola and the U.S.
government, the U.S. government obtained the right to, in its sole discretion,
require Iridium Holdings to de-orbit its constellation upon the occurrence of
any of the following with respect to Iridium Satellite: (a) its failure to pay
certain insurance premiums or maintain insurance; (b) its bankruptcy; (c) its
sale or the sale of any major asset in its satellite system; (d) Boeing’s
replacement as the operator of its satellite system; (e) its failure to provide
certain notices as contemplated by the agreement; or (g) at any time after June
5, 2009, unless extended by the U.S. government. The U.S. government also has
the right to require Iridium Holdings to de-orbit any of its individual
functioning satellites (including in-orbit spares) that has been in orbit for
more than seven years, unless the U.S. government grants a
postponement. As of May 2009, all but two of Iridium Holdings’
functioning satellites have been in orbit for more
than
seven years. Iridium Holdings
is currently in discussions with the U.S. government to extend or remove the
2009 deadline.
Motorola
also has the right to de-orbit Iridium Holdings’ constellation pursuant to the
transition services, products and asset agreement with Iridium Holdings and
Iridium Satellite and pursuant to the operations and maintenance agreement
between Iridium Constellation and Boeing. Under these agreements,
Motorola may require the de-orbit of Iridium Holdings’ constellation upon the
occurrence of any of the following: (a) Iridium Holdings’ bankruptcy or the
bankruptcy of Iridium Constellation or Iridium Satellite; (b) Iridium Holdings’
breach of the transition services, products and asset agreement; (c) Boeing’s
breach of its operations and maintenance agreement and other related agreements
with Iridium Constellation or its affiliates; (d) an order from the U.S.
government requiring the de-orbiting of Iridium Holdings’ satellites; (e)
Motorola’s determination that changes in law or regulation that may require it
to incur certain costs relating to the operation, maintenance, re-orbiting or
de-orbiting of Iridium Holdings’ constellation; or (f) Motorola’s failure to
obtain, on commercially reasonable terms, product liability insurance to cover
its position as manufacturer of the satellites, provided the U.S. government has
not agreed to cover what would have otherwise been paid by such
policy.
Pursuant
to the operations and maintenance agreement between Iridium Constellation and
Boeing, Boeing similarly has the unilateral right to de-orbit its constellation
upon the occurrence of any of the following events: (a) Iridium Constellation’s
or Iridium Satellite’s bankruptcy; (b) the existence of reasonable grounds for
Boeing to question the financial stability of Iridium Constellation; (c) Iridium
Constellation’s failure to maintain certain insurance policies; (d) Iridium
Constellation’s failure to provide Boeing certain quarterly financial
statements; (e) Iridium Constellation’s breach of the operations and maintenance
agreement, including its payment obligation thereunder; or (f) changes in law or
regulation that may increase the risks or costs associated with the operation
and/or re-orbit process or the cost of operation and/or re-orbit of the
constellation. Pursuant to an orbital debris mitigation plan filed
with the FCC and incorporated into its space station license in 2001, Iridium
Holdings is required to lower each satellite to an orbit with a perigee of
approximately 250 kilometers as it reaches the end of its useful life and
coordinate these orbit-lowering maneuvers with the United States Space
Command. Iridium Holdings has applied to modify its license to
conform these requirements to the less stringent de-orbit standards adopted by
the FCC in 2004 for all new satellite applications. Iridium Holdings’
modification application remains pending.
Iridium
NEXT
Iridium
Holdings is currently developing its next-generation satellite constellation,
Iridium NEXT, which it expects to commence launching in 2014. The
current constellation is expected to provide continuity of service
until 2014 and Iridium Holdings expects it to provide continuation of
service during the transition period to Iridium NEXT. The new
satellite constellation will be backward compatible with Iridium Holdings’ first
generation system and will replace the existing constellation with what it
believes will be a more powerful and capable network of
satellites. Iridium NEXT will maintain Iridium Holdings’ current
system’s unique attributes, including low earth orbit architecture, global
coverage, high security, low latency and high availability, and will continue to
support existing applications and equipment, while providing new and enhanced
capabilities, such as:
·
|
higher
speeds and greater flexibility for core voice and data
services;
|
·
|
the
ability to host lower cost, private network gateways, providing greater
control of voice and data traffic;
and
|
·
|
regional
broadcast capabilities, enabling global paging and point-to-multi-point
broadcasting of data services to select
groups.
|
Iridium
Holdings will also be able to leverage the launch of its new constellation to
host secondary payloads for U.S. and international government and commercial
customers, including remote sensing and climate monitoring
applications.
In 2007,
Iridium Holdings conducted a request for information with over 60 companies for
the development and launch of the new system. It has since narrowed
its search for a prime system contractor to two companies, Lockheed Martin
Corporation and Thales Alenia Space. These companies are currently working with
input from
Iridium
Holdings’ engineers to design a system that satisfies its technical, timing and
cost requirements. Iridium Holdings expects to enter into a definitive agreement
with a prime contractor for the design, manufacture and deployment of its new
constellation during 2009. Iridium Holdings estimates the gross costs
associated with Iridium NEXT to be approximately $2.7 billion, including the
manufacture of satellites, launch costs and gateway infrastructure
upgrades. Iridium Holdings expects to fund the majority of these
costs from internally generated cash flows, including potential revenues from
secondary payloads, and proceeds from its proposed transaction with
GHQ. Iridium Holdings expects to finance the remaining cost by
raising additional debt and/or equity financing.
Competition
The
global communications industry is highly competitive. Iridium
Holdings currently faces substantial competition from other service providers
that offer a range of mobile and fixed communications
options. Iridium Holdings’ most direct competition comes from other
global mobile satellite services providers. Its three largest global
competitors are Inmarsat, Globalstar and Orbcomm. Iridium Holdings competes
primarily on the basis of coverage, quality, mobility and pricing of services
and products.
Iridium
Holdings’ main competitor, Inmarsat, has been a provider of communications
services, including voice and data services, since 1982. Inmarsat
owns and operates a fleet of geostationary satellites. Unlike low
earth orbit satellites, geostationary satellites orbit the earth at
approximately 22,300 miles above the equator and are able to cover approximately
70% of the earth’s surface. Geostationary operators require substantially larger
and more expensive antennas, and typically have higher transmission delays than
low earth orbit operators. Due to its geostationary system, Inmarsat’s coverage
area extends and covers most bodies of water except for a majority of the Polar
Regions. Accordingly, Inmarsat is the leading provider of satellite
communications services to the maritime sector. Inmarsat also offers
land-based and aviation communications services. During April 2009,
Inmarsat acquired Stratos Global Corporation, one of Iridium’s main
distributors. Inmarsat generally does not sell directly to
end-users.
Globalstar
owns and operates a fleet of low earth orbit satellites. Globalstar
began commercial services in 2000. In addition, Globalstar’s service
is available only on a multi-regional basis as a result of its bent pipe
architecture, which requires that voice and data transmissions be routed from
satellites immediately to nearby ground stations. This design
requires the use of multiple ground stations, which are impractical in extreme
latitudes or over oceans. Unlike Inmarsat and Iridium Holdings,
Globalstar sells a higher percentage of its products and services directly to
end-users. Globalstar has recently indicated that satellite failures and other
problems affecting its constellation are affecting and will continue to affect
its ability to provide two-way services in the future. Globalstar is also in the
process of building its second-generation satellite constellation, which is
expected to be launched between 2009 and 2014.
Orbcomm
also provides commercial services using a fleet of low earth orbit
satellites. Like Globalstar, Orbcomm’s network also has a bent pipe
architecture, which limits its coverage area. Orbcomm’s principal
focus is low-cost data and machine-to-machine services, where it directly
competes with Iridium Holdings’ machine-to-machine
offerings. Orbcomm’s services generally have a certain amount of
latency, which may limit their use in certain mission critical applications. It
does not offer voice service or high-speed data services. Orbcomm is
similarly developing its second-generation satellite constellation.
Iridium
Holdings competes with regional mobile satellite communications services in
several geographic markets. In these cases, the majority of Iridium
Holdings’ competitors’ customers require regional, not global, mobile voice and
data services, so its competitors present a viable alternative to Iridium
Holdings’ services. All of these competitors operate geostationary
satellites. Iridium Holdings’ regional mobile satellite services competitors
currently include Thuraya, principally in Europe, the Middle East, Africa,
Australia and several countries in Asia; and Mobile Satellite Ventures and
Mobile Satellite Ventures Canada in the Americas. In addition,
several regional mobile satellite services companies, including ICO, TerreStar
and Mobile Satellite Ventures, are attempting to exploit their spectrum
positions into a U.S. consumer mobile satellite services business; however such
operators currently offer limited or no services.
Iridium
Holdings competes indirectly with terrestrial wireline (landline) and wireless
communications networks. Iridium Holdings provides service in areas
that are inadequately covered by these ground systems. To the extent
that terrestrial communications companies invest in underdeveloped areas,
Iridium Holdings will face increased competition in those
areas. Iridium Holdings believes that local telephone companies
currently are
reluctant
to invest in new switches, landlines and cellular towers to expand their
networks in rural and remote areas due to high costs and limited
usage. Many of the underdeveloped areas are sparsely populated so it
would be difficult to generate the necessary returns on the capital expenditures
required to build terrestrial wireless networks in such
areas. Iridium Holdings believes that its solutions offer a
cost-effective and reliable alternative to terrestrial-based wireline and
wireless systems and that continued growth and utilization will allow it to
further lower costs to consumers.
Iridium
Holdings will also face competition for its land-based services in the United
States from incipient ATC services providers. In February 2003, the
FCC adopted rules that permit satellite service providers to establish ATC
networks. ATC authorization enables the integration of a satellite-based service
with terrestrial wireless services, resulting in a hybrid mobile satellite
services/ATC network designed to provide advanced services and broad coverage
throughout the United States. The ATC network would extend satellite
services to urban areas and inside buildings where satellite services currently
are impractical. Outside the United States, other countries are
considering implementing regulations to facilitate ATC services.
The
mobile satellite services industry has significant barriers to entry, including
the cost and difficulty associated with obtaining spectrum licenses and
successfully building and launching a satellite network. In addition
to cost, there is a significant amount of lead-time associated with obtaining
the required licenses, building the satellite constellation and deploying the
ground network technology.
Employees
As of
March 31, 2009, Iridium Holdings had 165 full-time employees, none of whom is
subject to any collective bargaining agreement. Iridium Holdings
considers its employee relations to be good.
Properties
Iridium
Holdings’ principal headquarters are located in Bethesda, Maryland, where it
currently leases 13,417 square feet of office space. It also owns or leases the
facilities described in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chandler,
Arizona
|
|
USA
|
|
129,303
|
|
Technical
Support Center, Distribution Center and Warehouse
|
|
Leased
|
Leesburg,
Virginia
|
|
USA
|
|
40,434
|
|
Satellite
Network Operations Center
|
|
Owned
|
Tempe,
Arizona
|
|
USA
|
|
30,985
|
|
Gateway
Earth Station
|
|
Owned
Building on Leased Land
|
Tempe,
Arizona
|
|
USA
|
|
25,457
|
|
Operations
and Finance Centers
|
|
Leased
|
Fairbanks,
Alaska
|
|
USA
|
|
3,960
|
|
Satellite
Earth Station Facility
|
|
Owned
|
Svalbard
|
|
Norway
|
|
1,800
|
|
Satellite
Earth Station Facility
|
|
Owned
Building on Leased Land
|
Yellowknife,
Northwest Territories
|
|
Canada
|
|
1,750
|
|
Telemetry,
Tracking and Control Station
|
|
Owned
Building on Leased Land
|
Iqaluit,
Nunavut
|
|
Canada
|
|
1,750
|
|
Telemetry,
Tracking and Control Station
|
|
Owned
Building on Leased Land
|
Intellectual
Property
At March
31, 2009, Iridium Holdings held eight U.S. patents with no additional U.S.
patents pending and no foreign patents with two additional foreign patents
pending. These patents cover several aspects of its satellite system,
its global network and its devices. Iridium Holdings continues to
maintain all of its important patents.
In
addition to its owned intellectual property, Iridium Holdings also licenses
substantially all system technology, including software and systems to operate
and maintain its network as well as technical information for the design and
manufacture of its devices, from Motorola. Iridium Holdings maintains
its licenses with Motorola pursuant to several long-term agreements. Iridium
Holdings also licenses other system technology from additional third
parties. Iridium Holdings expects to license additional technology
from Motorola and other third parties in connection with the development of
Iridium NEXT.
Legal
Proceedings
From time
to time, Iridium Holdings is involved in various litigation matters involving
ordinary and routine claims incidental to its business. Management currently
believes that the outcome of these proceedings, either individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on its business, results of
operations or financial conditions. Iridium Holdings is involved in the
litigation matters discussed below.
On July
31, 2007, Thomas Alabakis, a former member of Iridium Holdings’ board of
directors and a current director of Baralonco Limited, commenced a lawsuit
against Iridium Holdings, one of its directors and a former
officer. Baralonco Limited is the sole shareholder of Baralonco, one
of its shareholders, and will become a significant shareholder in GHQ after the
closing of this transaction. Alabakis’ lawsuit alleges, among other
things, defamation and tortuous interference with the plaintiff’s
economic/business relationship with his principal and Iridium Holdings, an
investor in Iridium Holdings. These actions seek compensatory,
consequential and punitive damages of approximately $50.0 million, and costs and
expenses associated with the litigation, although the plaintiff has indicated in
court filings that it would settle the action for $10.0 million. In
April 2008, Iridium Holdings’ motion to dismiss this lawsuit was granted in
part, with the Court dismissing a related assault claim, and denied in all other
respects. On May 21, 2009, the claim was settled and the parties
voluntarily dismissed this lawsuit.
IRIDIUM
HOLDINGS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of
operations for Iridium Holdings relates to periods prior to the closing of the
acquisition by GHQ. Accordingly, the following discussion and
analysis of historical periods does not reflect the significant impact that the
acquisition by GHQ will have on Iridium Holdings.
You
should read the following discussion and analysis of Iridium Holdings’ financial
condition and results of operations in conjunction with Iridium Holdings’
audited and unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes
appearing elsewhere in this proxy statement. The following discussion may
contain predictions, estimates and other forward-looking statements that involve
a number of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under “Risk
Factors” and elsewhere in this proxy statement. These risks could cause Iridium
Holdings’ actual results to differ materially from any future performance
suggested below. Accordingly, you should read “Cautionary Notice Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements” and “Risk Factors” appearing elsewhere in this proxy
statement.
For
purposes of this Section, the term “Iridium Holdings” refers to Iridium Holdings
LLC and its operating subsidiaries.
Overview
Iridium
Holdings is a leading provider of mobile voice and data communications services
via satellite, and the only provider in the world offering 100% global coverage.
Based on publicly available information and information provided by TMF
Associates, Iridium Holdings is the second largest provider of mobile satellite
services and related equipment with an estimated 25% market share of the
principal industry players in 2008, based on revenues. Iridium Holdings’ mobile
satellite services address the increasing demand from customers for connectivity
and reliability in all locations. Iridium Holdings offers voice and data
communications services to U.S. and international government agencies,
businesses and other customers on a global basis using 66 in-orbit constellation
satellites, seven in-orbit spares and related ground infrastructure, including a
primary commercial gateway. The U.S. government, through a dedicated gateway
owned and operated by the DoD, is Iridium Holdings’ largest customer, providing
21.1% and 24.4% of Iridium Holdings’ revenue for the year ended December 31,
2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009, respectively.
Iridium
Holdings sells the majority of its products and services on a wholesale basis
via a well-established, global network of distribution partners, who provide
Iridium Holdings’ product and service solutions directly to end-users, or
indirectly through dealers. Iridium Holdings’ distributors often
combine Iridium Holdings’ products with other technologies, such as GPS and
terrestrial wireless technology, to provide integrated communications solutions
for customers in defined market niches. Iridium Holdings believes that its
distribution network provides broad coverage over its target customer base as
well as a platform for developing new applications and solutions for its
products and services, supporting its growth. At March 31, 2009, Iridium
Holdings’ product and service solutions had approximately 328,000 subscribers
and represented a 31.2% increase since March 31, 2008. Iridium Holdings’
subscriber base has grown consistently since it reintroduced commercial services
in 2001, growing at a compound annual growth rate of 40.1% between December 31,
2001 and December 31, 2008, and at a compound annual growth rate of 27.8%
between December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2008. Iridium Holdings has a diverse
customer base, including end-users in the following five vertical markets:
land-based handset, maritime, aviation, asset tracking and monitoring, or
machine-to-machine, and government.
While
Iridium Holdings expects to continue to increase its number of subscribers and
revenues, it expects its future growth rate will be slower than its historical
growth. Iridium Holdings expects its future growth rate will be impacted by the
current general economic slowdown, increased competition, increasing subscriber
deactivations, maturation of the satellite communications industry and the
difficulty in sustaining high growth rates as Iridium Holdings increases in
size. The recent appreciation of the U.S. dollar may also negatively impact its
growth by increasing the cost of its products and services in foreign
countries. Iridium Holdings also expects its subscriber equipment
revenue to decrease in the future as it introduces lower priced units in order
to drive an increase in its service revenues and due to an anticipated decrease in
unit sales as a result of increased competition and the continued maturation of
the market.
Iridium
Holdings is the successor to Iridium LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
formed in 1996 by Motorola and several other partners. Motorola launched Iridium
LLC with the mission of providing global mobile satellite services through a
network of 66 low earth orbit satellites, which was completed and deployed for a
cost of approximately $3.4 billion. Motorola invested significantly in research
and development, the acquisition of spectrum and global licenses and in market
development efforts during the development of the constellation. Beginning in
1997, after seven years of planning and development, Iridium LLC successfully
launched its constellation, including active satellites and in-orbit spares. In
November 1998, Iridium LLC began offering commercial services principally
focused on the retail consumer market, launching the first commercially
available global satellite phone service. On August 13, 1999, Iridium LLC filed
voluntary petitions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. Iridium LLC remained
in possession of its assets and properties and continued to operate its
businesses as a debtor-in-possession.
On
December 7, 2000, Iridium Holdings, its wholly owned subsidiary, Iridium
Satellite, and Iridium Constellation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Iridium
Satellite, were organized as limited liability companies under the laws of the
State of Delaware. On December 11, 2000, these entities acquired Iridium LLC’s
operating assets, including the satellite constellation, certain portions of the
terrestrial network, ground spare satellites and real property. In addition,
they also acquired from Motorola, either outright or by license, all of the
intellectual property rights necessary to operate the system and produce related
equipment and took assignment of applicable licenses from the FCC. In connection
with the acquisition of these assets, Iridium Holdings entered into a transition
services, products and asset agreement with Motorola and an operations and
maintenance agreement with Boeing relating to the operations of its
constellation. Iridium Holdings was also awarded its first services contract
with the DoD. In March 2001, Iridium Holdings reintroduced commercial satellite
services through its subsidiary, Iridium Satellite. In 2002, Iridium Holdings
launched an additional seven spare satellites.
On
September 22, 2008, Iridium Holdings and the owners of its units executed a
transaction agreement with GHQ, as amended on April 28, 2009, whereby
GHQ agreed to acquire approximately 99.5% of Iridium Holdings’ outstanding units
for 29.3 million shares of GHQ common stock and $76.7 million of cash, subject
to certain adjustments (based on a consideration of 29.4 million shares of GHQ
common stock and $77.1 million of cash, subject to certain adjustments, for 100%
of the equity of Iridium Holdings). Upon the closing of the
transaction, Iridium Holdings will become a subsidiary of GHQ. GHQ will be
renamed “Iridium Communications Inc.” and will be a publicly traded
corporation.
Iridium
Holdings’ acquisition by GHQ will be accounted for as a business combination
pursuant to SFAS 141R and will be accounted for under the purchase method of
accounting. Under the purchase method of accounting, the purchase price will be
allocated to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and
liabilities assumed based on their respective fair value, with the remainder
being allocated to goodwill. The increase in the basis of these assets will
result in increased depreciation and amortization charges in future periods.
Based on preliminary estimates, which are subject to material revision, Iridium
Holdings expects the carrying value of property and equipment and intangible
assets to increase by approximately $349.5 million and $57.2 million,
respectively. The effect of these increases will be to increase operating
expenses and thereby reduce operating profit and operating profit margin in
future periods. Iridium Holdings will also record significant
transaction-related expenses during the quarter when the acquisition closes,
including an estimated $3.2 million related to the accelerated vesting of equity
incentive awards for certain employees. In addition, Iridium Holdings has
recorded $8.7 million of transaction costs and expects to incur approximately
$9.6 million of additional transaction costs. Iridium Holdings will be required
to make a prepayment of $15.0 million in June 2009 and $65.0 million on closing
of the acquisition, of the outstanding
balance under its first lien credit agreement, which will cause interest expense
to decrease in the short term. However, Iridium Holdings’ interest expense is
expected to increase significantly above historical levels in the future when it
incurs additional debt to fund, in part, Iridium NEXT. Additionally, following
the closing of the acquisition, GHQ will record a compensation charge in the
amount $1.3 million and a capital contribution related to the transfer at cost
of founding stockholder’s units to certain of GHQ’s directors. After
the completion of the acquisition, Iridium Holdings will also incur income taxes
as it will no longer be treated as a partnership for federal income tax
purposes.
Material
Trends and Uncertainties
Both
Iridium Holdings’ industry and its customer base have been growing rapidly as a
result of:
·
|
demand
for remote and reliable mobile communication
services;
|
·
|
increased
demand for mission critical communication services by the DoD and disaster
and relief agencies and emergency first
responders;
|
·
|
a
broad and expanding wholesale distribution network with access to diverse
and geographically dispersed niche
markets;
|
·
|
a
growing number of new products and services and related
applications;
|
·
|
improved
data transmission speeds for mobile satellite service
offerings;
|
·
|
regulatory
mandates requiring the use of mobile satellite services, particularly
among maritime end-users;
|
·
|
a
general reduction in prices of mobile satellite services equipment;
and
|
●
|
the
receipt of licenses in additional
countries.
|
·
|
Constellation life and
health. Iridium Holdings’ current satellite
constellation was launched commencing in 1997. Iridium Holdings believes
its current satellite constellation will provide continuity of
service through the transition period to Iridium NEXT, which Iridium
Holdings expects to deploy beginning in 2014. However, since reintroducing
commercial services in 2001, six of Iridium Holdings’ satellites have
failed in orbit and others have encountered problems. In addition, on
February 10, 2009, Iridium Holdings lost an operational satellite (SV33)
as a result of a collision with a non-operational Russian satellite
(Cosmos 2251). While SV33 has been replaced by one of Iridium
Holdings’ in-orbit spares, the collision resulted in an increase in the
risk of space debris damaging or interfering with the operation of
satellites owned by Iridium Holdings or others. Although Iridium Holdings
has been able to mitigate the impact of previous events with the use of
in-orbit spares, and it believes it will be able to continue to rely on
such spares in the future, if the health of its current constellation were
to decline more rapidly than expected and it was unable to offer
continuity of service until it deploys Iridium NEXT, its business, revenue
and cash flow would be negatively
impacted.
|
·
|
Capital
expenditures. The majority of Iridium
Holdings’ future capital expenditures will relate to the development of
its second generation satellite constellation, Iridium NEXT. In 2007,
Iridium Holdings conducted a request for information with over 60
companies for the development and launch of Iridium NEXT. Iridium Holdings
has since narrowed its search for a prime system contractor to two
companies, Lockheed Martin Corporation and Thales Alenia Space. These
companies are currently working with input from Iridium Holdings’
engineers to design a system that satisfies its technical, timing and cost
requirements. Iridium Holdings expects to enter into a definitive
agreement with a prime contractor for the design, manufacture and
deployment of its new constellation during 2009. Iridium Holdings
currently expects that the future cash costs associated with Iridium NEXT
under this agreement will be approximately $2.7 billion, including the
manufacture of satellites, launch costs and gateway infrastructure
upgrades. While Iridium Holdings expects a portion of such costs will be
capitalized, until the definitive agreement is finalized, all such costs
will be expensed as research and development costs. Iridium
Holdings has currently not capitalized any costs relating to Iridium
NEXT. All such expenses to date, including certain milestone
payments to Lockheed Martin Corporation and Thales Alenia Space in
connection with their preliminary work, have been recorded as research and
development expenses. To the extent any such costs are
capitalized, depreciation will
increase.
|
·
|
Iridium NEXT
funding. Iridium Holdings plans to fund the majority of
the costs associated with Iridium NEXT from internally generated cash
flows and secondary payload funding as well as proceeds from its proposed
acquisition. Iridium Holdings expects to finance the remaining
cost by raising additional debt and/or equity financing. If future
internally generated cash flows and revenues from hosting secondary
payloads are below expectations, Iridium Holdings will require additional
external funding. There can be no assurance that additional
debt and/or equity financing will be
|
available
to Iridium Holdings on acceptable terms or at all. An inability to
fund such expenditures would have a material adverse effect on Iridium Holdings’
future business and results of operations.
·
|
Current Economic
Conditions. Iridium Holdings’ expects it will be
negatively affected by the current economic conditions. Uncertainty about
current global economic conditions poses a risk as individual consumers,
businesses and governments may postpone spending in response to tighter
credit, negative financial news, declines in income or asset values and/or
budgetary constraints. Reduced demand for its products and services would
adversely affect its business, financial condition and results of
operations.
|
·
|
Reliance on a single primary
gateway and satellite network operations
center. Currently Iridium Holdings’ commercial satellite
network traffic is supported by a single ground station gateway in Tempe,
Arizona. In addition, Iridium Holdings operates its satellite
constellation from its satellite network operations center in Leesburg,
Virginia. Currently, Iridium Holdings does not have back-up
facilities that could adequately or quickly replace its Arizona gateway
and Virginia operations center if either experienced catastrophic
failures. If a significant malfunction or catastrophic event
were to occur in either or both of these facilities, Iridium Holdings’
ability to provide service to its customers would be negatively affected,
decreasing its revenues, profitability and cash
flows.
|
·
|
Competition and pricing
pressures. Iridium Holdings faces increased
competition from other mobile satellite service providers and, to a lesser
extent, from the expansion of terrestrial-based cellular phone systems.
Increased numbers of competitors and the introduction of new services and
products by Iridium Holdings’ competitors may result in loss of customers,
decreased revenue and, ultimately, decreased profitability and cash
flows.
|
·
|
Reliance on U.S. government
customers. The U.S. government, through the
DoD’s dedicated gateway, has been and continues to be Iridium Holdings’
largest customer, representing 21.1% and 24.4% of Iridium Holdings’
revenues for the year ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended
March 31, 2009, respectively. Iridium Holdings provides such
services to the U.S. government pursuant to two one year agreements with
DISA, both of which became effective in April 2008 and are renewable for
three additional one-year periods. The U.S. government is not
required to guarantee a minimal number of users pursuant to these
agreements. If the U.S. government reduces its utilization of
Iridium Holdings’ services under these agreements, or if it terminates its
agreements with Iridium Holdings or fails to renew such agreements,
Iridium Holdings’ revenue and cash flow would be negatively impacted. In addition, from
time to time, Iridium Holdings enters into agreements with U.S. government
agencies to provide engineering and research and development services
related to Iridium Holdings’ product and service
offerings.
|
·
|
Technological
changes. It is difficult for Iridium
Holdings to promptly match major technological innovations by its
competitors because substantially modifying or replacing its technology,
satellites or gateways as well as its product and service offerings is
expensive and requires significant lead time. Although Iridium Holdings
believes its current technology, fixed assets and products and services
are competitive with those of its competitors, and it plans to procure and
deploy its second-generation satellite constellation, Iridium NEXT, as
well as its next-generation voice and data offerings, Iridium Holdings is
vulnerable to the introduction of superior technology by its
competitors.
|
·
|
Wholesale distribution network
model. Iridium Holdings relies on
third-party distributors to market and sell its commercial products and
services to end-users and to determine the prices end-users
pay. Iridium Holdings also depends on its distributors to
develop innovative and improved solutions and applications integrating its
product and service offerings. As a result of these arrangements, Iridium
Holdings is dependent on the performance of such distributors to generate
substantially all of its revenues and support its
growth. Iridium Holdings’ top ten distributors for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009,
accounted for, in the aggregate, approximately 52.0% and 46.0% of its
total revenues, respectively. During April 2009, Inmarsat, one
of Iridium Holdings’ main competitors, acquired Stratos Global
Corporation, one of Iridium Holdings’ largest distributors, which
represented 12.6% and 9.3% of Iridium Holdings’ revenues for both the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009,
respectively. Loss of its distributors due to competition,
consolidation, regulatory developments, business developments affecting
them or
|
their
customers, or for other reasons, or failure by its distributors to perform
adequately, could reduce the distribution of Iridium Holdings’ products and
services as well the development of new product solutions and applications,
negatively affecting Iridium Holdings’ revenues.
Components
of Results of Operations
Revenues
Iridium
Holdings earns revenues primarily from: (i) the sale of commercial mobile
satellite services to third-party distributors, who provide its product and
service solutions to end-users, either directly or indirectly through dealers;
(ii) the sale of mobile satellite services to U.S. government customers,
particularly the DoD and (iii) sales of related voice and data equipment capable
of accessing Iridium Holdings’ network.
From 2006
to 2008, Iridium Holdings’ revenues increased at a compound annual growth rate
of 23%. Iridium Holdings’ revenues grew during that time primarily
due to:
·
|
increased
overall subscribers resulting from heightened demand for mobile satellite
services across all vertical markets, including emerging global markets,
accelerated by increased demand from U.S. government and relief agencies
in the wake of Hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Wilma and Ike, the Asian tsunami
and other natural disasters. Iridium Holdings’ total subscribers grew at a
compound annual growth rate of 36% during the period, from 174,219 in 2006
to 319,874 in 2008;
|
·
|
the
introduction of new product and service offerings, particularly its
Iridium 9601 short burst data modem and related machine-to-machine
services, as well as the continued development of innovative and improved
solutions and applications integrating Iridium Holdings’ product and
service offerings by Iridium Holdings’ distributors. Sales of Iridium
Holdings’ short burst data modems grew from 14,650 in 2006 to 42,600 in
2008;
|
·
|
increased
U.S. government revenue resulting from greater demand from the DoD related
to global security concerns, such as the conflicts in Afghanistan and
Iraq. Iridium Holdings’ U.S. government revenue grew at a compound annual
growth rate of 15.5% during the period, from $50.8 million in 2006 to
$67.8 million in 2008;
|
·
|
increased
subscriber growth resulting from the degradation of Globalstar’s voice and
data services as a result of satellite failures and other problems
relating to its constellation, particularly in the North American market.
Iridium Holdings views Globalstar as its primary competitor in North
America; and
|
·
|
an
increase in access fees for Iridium Holdings’ commercial services as well
as an increase in user fees for its U.S. government
customers.
|
The
largest portion of Iridium Holdings’ revenues is generated from sales of voice
and data equipment to its distributors, including service providers, value-added
resellers and value added-manufacturers. U.S. government customers purchase
Iridium Holdings’ equipment and related applications indirectly through such
distributors. Such revenues also include previously deferred
equipment revenues. Through December 31, 2004, Iridium Holdings
considered the sale of its equipment and services as a single unit of accounting
due primarily to the fact that Iridium Holdings’ equipment was not considered to
have stand-alone value to end-users. As a result, when equipment was sold,
revenue from these transactions was deferred and recognized ratably over the
four-year estimated average life of the end-user relationship. See “—Critical
Accounting Policies—Revenue Recognition—Subscriber Equipment
Revenue”. Fiscal 2008 was the last year Iridium Holdings recognized
previously deferred equipment revenues. From 2006 to 2008, revenues
from subscriber equipment sales have decreased in absolute terms, from 39.5% of
total revenues in 2006 to 37.4% of total revenues in 2008, and from 42.3% of
total revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006 to 27.0% for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, primarily as a result of the change of the method
of accounting for subscriber equipment described below. Iridium Holdings also
expects its subscriber equipment revenue to decrease in the future as it
introduces lower priced units in order to drive an increase in its service
revenues and due to an anticipated decrease in unit sales as a result of
increased competition and the continued maturation of the market. Commercial
mobile satellite services to Iridium Holdings’ third-party distributors, which
include mobile voice and data services and machine-to-machine services, account
for the second
largest
portion of Iridium Holdings’ total revenues. Iridium Holdings’
commercial service revenues increased in absolute terms between 2006 and
2008. In addition, such revenues increased as a percentage of total
revenues from approximately 36.6% to 41.5% of Iridium Holdings’ total revenues
during the period. Such revenues represented 48.6% of Iridium Holdings’ total
revenues for the first three months of 2009.
Iridium
Holdings derives its remaining revenues from sales of mobile satellite services
and other related services to U.S. government customers. These services include
mission critical mobile satellite services to all branches of the U.S. armed
forces as well as services for other U.S. and international government agencies.
Iridium Holdings’ U.S. government revenue is derived from both its agreements
with the DISA as well as other contract revenue related to research and
development projects with the DoD, including assessing the feasibility of
incorporating secondary payloads in Iridium NEXT, and other U.S. government
agencies (either directly or through a prime contractor). Such revenues do not
include services to U.S. and international government agencies, including the
DoD, purchased through Iridium Holdings’ distributors and offered through
Iridium Holdings’ commercial gateway. Although Iridium Holdings
cannot determine the amount of U.S. and international government revenues
derived from Iridium Holdings’ commercial gateway, Iridium Holdings does not
believe such revenues are material. U.S. government revenues also
increased in absolute terms from 2006 to 2008 but decreased as a percentage of
total revenues from approximately 23.9% to 21.1% during the
period. Such revenues represented 24.4% of Iridium Holdings’ total
revenues for the first three months of 2009.
This
increase in the proportion of commercial services revenues relative to Iridium
Holdings’ other sources of revenue from 2006 to 2008 is principally attributable
to a growth in total subscribers and associated access fees resulting from
increased overall demand. The proportion of total revenues from
subscriber equipment sales during this period decreased slightly, primarily as a
result of a change of the method of accounting for subscriber equipment and a
change in Iridium Holdings’ product mix, with lower priced devices accounting
for a greater share of total sales. Iridium Holdings’ Iridium 9601 short burst
data modem has exhibited continued growth in sales since its introduction in
2005 accounting for a greater proportion of total sales. During the
same period, sales of Iridium Holdings’ satellite handsets, which have
historically been Iridium Holdings’ highest priced devices, have decreased as a
proportion of Iridium Holdings’ total equipment sales. Iridium
Holdings expects continued growth in revenues from commercial services and U.S.
government services in the future, although Iridium Holdings anticipates growth
in U.S. government revenues to be more moderate than growth from its other
revenue sources.
The table
below sets forth the geographic distribution of Iridium Holdings’ revenues for
the periods indicated based on the location invoiced.
Revenue
by Country (in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Year
ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Year
ended
December
31,
2006
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
37,915 |
|
|
$ |
155,923 |
|
|
$ |
125,251 |
|
|
$ |
102,194 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
9,909 |
|
|
|
55,271 |
|
|
|
44,211 |
|
|
|
33,576 |
|
Other
Countries(1)
|
|
|
27,965 |
|
|
|
109,750 |
|
|
|
91,439 |
|
|
|
76,642 |
|
Total
|
|
$ |
75,789 |
|
|
$ |
320,944 |
|
|
$ |
260,901 |
|
|
$ |
212,412 |
|
_________________
(1) No
other country represents more than 10% of Iridium Holdings’ revenue for any of
the periods indicated.
Nearly
all of Iridium Holdings’ revenues are invoiced in U.S. dollars.
Operating
Expenses
Iridium
Holdings’ operating expenses are comprised principally of:
·
|
Cost
of sales, which includes both cost of current year subscriber equipment
sales and cost of recognizing previously deferred subscriber equipment
sales. Cost of current year subscriber equipment sales is the recognition
of inventory carrying cost into expense when equipment is sold. Until
sold, inventory is recorded as an asset on Iridium Holdings’ balance
sheet. Cost of recognizing previously deferred subscriber equipment sales
is the recognition of costs related to equipment sales from previous
years. Inventory consists of subscriber equipment, which
includes satellite handsets, L-Band transceivers, short burst data devices
and a selection of accessories for Iridium Holdings’ devices, including
holsters, earbud remotes and charging units, to be sold to customers to
access Iridium Holdings’ services. Iridium Holdings outsources
manufacturing of satellite handsets, L-Band transceivers and short burst
data devices and purchase accessories from third-party
suppliers. Cost allocations of overhead (including salary and
benefits of Iridium Holdings’ logistics personnel, which manage its
relationships with its vendors and prepare inventory for sale), scrap,
obsolescence, shrinkage, tooling, freight and warehouse distribution
charges are included as cost components of these manufactured
items;
|
·
|
Network
and satellite operations and maintenance expenses, which are costs
directly related to the operation and maintenance of Iridium Holdings’
network, such as satellite tracking and monitoring, gateway monitoring,
trouble shooting and sub-system maintenance. The majority of these
expenses relate to payments under Iridium Holdings’ operations and
maintenance agreement with Boeing. These expenses also include variable
telecommunication termination costs, which are the costs paid to
telecommunications providers to originate and terminate voice or data
calls from customers using Iridium Holdings’ network to terrestrial
wireline or wireless networks. Personnel expenses for Iridium Holdings’
Operations Group, which oversees the operation of Iridium Holdings’
satellite network, are similarly included in network and satellite
operations and maintenance
expenses;
|
·
|
Depreciation
and amortization, which represent the depreciation of Iridium Holdings
space and ground facilities, property and equipment. Because the
acquisition cost of these assets was substantially below their historic
cost or replacement cost, current depreciation and amortization costs have
been reduced substantially for GAAP purposes, thereby increasing net
income or decreasing net loss. As Iridium Holdings begins to capitalize
its capital expenditures in connection with Iridium NEXT, especially to
procure and launch its second-generation satellite constellation, Iridium
Holdings expects GAAP depreciation to increase substantially starting in
2014 and 2015 after Iridium Holdings launches the first set of
satellites. In addition, as a result of the application of
purchase accounting in connection with Iridium Holdings’ proposed
acquisition, Iridium Holdings’ depreciation and amortization expense will
increase in future periods following the consummation of the
acquisition;
|
·
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses, which are the salaries, commissions
and other personnel-related expenses for employees engaged in sales and
marketing and the marketing costs of Iridium Holdings’ business. This also
includes expenses for its executive, finance, legal, regulatory,
administrative, information technology and human resource departments;
and
|
·
|
Research
and development expenses, which represent expenses incurred in the
development, design and testing of new products and services, product and
service enhancements and new applications for Iridium Holdings’ existing
products and services. Expenses related to research and development
contracts with certain distributors and U.S. government agencies,
including the DoD, are similarly included in Iridium Holdings’ research
and development expenses. Currently, this also includes all expenses
relating to the development of Iridium NEXT, including certain milestone
payments paid to the two companies vying to serve as the prime system
contractor. Once Iridium Holdings signs a full scale development contract
for Iridium NEXT with a prime contractor, Iridium Holdings expects a
portion of such expenses will be
capitalized.
|
Due to
the fixed nature of Iridium Holdings’ network costs, Iridium Holdings’ network
and satellite operations and maintenance expenses have has been fairly
consistent over the past three fiscal years. From 2006 to 2008, its operating
expenses have grown primarily due to:
·
|
increased
cost of sales due to subscriber growth and the related sales of Iridium
Holdings’ voice and data devices;
|
·
|
increased
research and development expenses resulting from investments in new
products and services, such as its Iridium 9601 short burst data modem and
related machine-to-machine services, the Iridium 9555 next generation
satellite handset and L-Band transceiver and its high-speed data service,
Iridium OpenPort, as well the development of Iridium
NEXT;
|
·
|
increased
personnel and related costs to support Iridium Holdings’ growth,
principally as a result of a 25.9% increase in its total employees during
the period, from 101 in 2006 to 160 in 2008;
and
|
·
|
increased
administrative and related costs, including licensing, regulatory and
legal expenses, to support Iridium Holdings’
growth.
|
Most of
Iridium Holdings’ service contracts with third parties are denominated in U.S.
dollars; however, Iridium Holdings entered into a development agreement with a
third party manufacturer, which is denominated in pounds sterling.
Expenses under this contract amounted to $27.2 million from 2006 to 2008
(based on the average exchange rate for the period of US$1.90 per £1.00), and as
such, do not account for a significant proportion of Iridium Holdings’ total
operating expenses during the period. Iridium Holdings has entered into foreign
currency forward exchange contracts in an attempt to manage its exposure to
pounds sterling relating to this agreement; such forward exchange contracts do
not qualify for hedge accounting.
Operating
Profit (Loss)
Iridium
Holdings’ operating profit has grown over the past three years due primarily to
increased service and subscriber equipment revenues resulting from growth in
equipment sales, particularly its high margin satellite handsets, and an
increase in overall subscribers. Iridium Holdings’ satellite handsets have and
continue to comprise Iridium Holdings’ highest margin products. Although the
proportion of satellite handset sales relative to sales of Iridium Holdings’
other devices decreased from 2006 to 2008, sales of its handsets grew in
absolute terms during the period, contributing significantly to growth in
Iridium Holdings’ operating profit. These increases in operating profit were
partially offset by increased cost of sales, research and development expenses
and selling, general and administrative expenses as described above. As a
percentage of total revenue, operating profit has also increased during this
period. Iridium Holdings expects equipment sales to decline both as a result of
reduced satellite handset prices and its expected decrease in the number of
units sold, which may have a material effect on future
profitability.
Interest
Expense
Interest
expense consists primarily of interest and fees on borrowings under Iridium
Holdings’ first and second lien credit agreements and convertible note, as well
as certain payments related
to Iridium Holdings’ agreements with Motorola, including Iridium Holdings’
transition services, products and asset agreement and a senior subordinated term
loan. Principal and interest on the senior subordinated term loan with Motorola
were paid in full in May 2005; however Iridium Holdings continues to accrue
certain deferred payment obligations under such documents. Iridium
Holdings expects its interest expenses to decrease significantly in the short
term because it will prepay, under its first lien credit agreement, $15.0
million in June 2009, and $65.0 million on closing of the acquisition. See
“—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Cash and Indebtedness” below. In
October 2008, Iridium Holdings prepaid $22 million of outstanding borrowings in
connection with an amendment to its first lien credit
facility. Iridium Holdings may incur significant debt in the future
to finance NEXT and other capital requirements, and as a result, interest
expense may increase significantly in the future.
Interest
and Other Income
Interest
and other income is comprised of interest income earned on Iridium Holdings’
cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments, consisting primarily of
certain investments that have contractual maturities no greater than nine months
at the time of purchase. Other income and expense includes gains and losses on
Iridium Holdings’ foreign exchange forward contracts related to its agreement
with Cambridge Consulting. Prior to 2007, miscellaneous revenue related to call
intercept services provided pursuant to subpoenas received from various U.S. and
foreign government agencies was recorded under other income. In 2007,
this revenue was reclassified and is now recorded as commercial service
revenue.
Income
Taxes
As a
limited liability company that is treated as a partnership for federal income
tax purposes, Iridium Holdings is generally not subject to federal income tax
directly. However, Iridium Holdings will be subject to such taxes in
the future upon the consummation of Iridium Holdings’ proposed
acquisition.
Net
Income
During
the past three years, Iridium Holdings’ net income has increased as a result of
the factors cited above. In future periods, Iridium Holdings expects
its net income to be affected by the changes to research and development,
depreciation, amortization and interest expense and income taxes, as discussed
above.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
Iridium Holdings’ discussion and analysis of its
financial condition and results of operations are based upon its consolidated
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these
financial statements requires Iridium Holdings to make estimates and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing
basis, Iridium Holdings evaluates its estimates including those related to
revenue recognition, property and equipment, long-lived assets, inventory,
interest rate swaps, income taxes and equity-based compensation. Iridium
Holdings bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other
assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual
results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
The
accounting policies Iridium Holdings believes to be most critical to
understanding its financial results and condition and that require complex and
subjective management judgments are discussed below. Refer to the
notes to Iridium Holdings’ consolidated financial statements for a full
discussion of its significant accounting policies.
Revenue
Recognition
Wholesaler
of satellite communications products and services
Pursuant
to wholesale agreements, Iridium Holdings sells its products and services to
service providers who, in turn, sell the products and services to other
distributors or directly to the end users. Generally, Iridium Holdings
recognizes revenue when services are performed or delivery has occurred,
evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, and
collection is probable, as follows:
Contracts
with multiple elements
Iridium
Holdings sells voice and data equipment (or subscriber equipment) through
multi-element contracts that bundle subscriber equipment along with airtime
services. Iridium Holdings follows the guidance contained in EITF 00-21
when it sells subscriber equipment in bundled arrangements. Pursuant to
EITF 00-21, Iridium Holdings allocates the bundled contract price among the
various contract deliverables based on each deliverable’s relative fair
value. Iridium Holdings determines vendor specific objective evidence of
fair value by assessing sales prices of subscriber equipment and airtime
services when they are sold to customers on a stand alone basis.
Prior to
2005, Iridium Holdings considered the sale of bundled subscriber equipment and
services as a single unit of accounting due primarily to the fact that its
subscriber equipment was not considered to have stand-alone value to end-users.
As a result, when subscriber equipment was sold, revenue from these transactions
was deferred and recognized ratably over the four-year estimated average life of
the end-user relationship.
Airtime Revenues sold on a stand
alone basis
Airtime
revenue is generated from Iridium Holdings’ service providers through usage of
the Iridium Holdings satellite system and through fixed monthly access fees per
user charged by Iridium Holdings to each service
provider.
Revenue for usage is recognized when usage occurs and revenue for the
fixed-per-user access fee is recognized ratably over the period in which the
service is provided to the end user. Revenue from prepaid services is recognized
on an estimated basis when usage occurs or when the customer’s right to access
the unused prepaid services expires. Iridium Holdings does not offer refunds for
unused prepaid services. Deferred prepaid service revenue and access fees are
typically earned and recognized as income within one year of customer
prepayment.
Subscriber
Equipment sold on a stand alone basis
Iridium
Holdings recognizes subscriber equipment sales and the related costs when
equipment title (and the risks and rewards of ownership) passes to the
customer.
Airtime
and subscriber equipment sold to the U.S. government
Iridium
Holdings provides airtime to U.S. government subscribers through (i) fixed
monthly fees on a per user basis for airtime services and voice usage, (ii)
fixed monthly fee per user for paging services and (iii) a tiered pricing plan
(based on usage) per device for data services. Revenues related to the services
provided under this contract are recognized ratably over the periods in which
the services are provided; costs are expensed as incurred. The U.S.
Government purchases its equipment from a third-party service
provider.
Contract
services to commercial and government customers
Government
contract services
Iridium
Holdings currently is a party to contracts with the U.S. government. One of
these contracts provides for the maintenance by Iridium Holdings of the U.S.
government’s satellite gateway in Hawaii. Revenues related to the services
provided under this contract are recognized ratably over the periods in which
the services are provided; costs are expensed as incurred.
Other
Government and Commercial contract services
Iridium
Holdings also provides certain engineering services to assist customers in
developing new technologies for use on the Iridium
Holdings’ satellite system. The revenues associated with these
services are recorded when the services are rendered, typically on a percentage
of completion method of accounting based on Iridium Holdings’ estimate of total
costs expected to complete the contract; costs are expensed as incurred.
Revenue on cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts is recognized to the extent of
estimated costs incurred plus the applicable fees earned. Iridium Holdings
considers fixed fees under cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts to be earned in
proportion to the allowable costs incurred in performance of the
contract.
Inventory
Inventory
consists of subscriber equipment, which includes handsets, L-Band transceivers
and data devices and related accessories to be sold to customers to access
Iridium Holdings services. Iridium Holdings outsources manufacturing of
handsets, L-Band transceivers, and data devices to a third party manufacturer
and purchases accessories from third party suppliers. Iridium Holdings’ cost of
inventory includes an allocation of overhead (including salaries and benefits of
employees directly involved in bringing inventory to its existing condition,
scrap, tooling, and freight). All inventories are valued using the average cost
method, and are carried at the lower of cost or market.
Warranty
Expense
Iridium
Holdings generally provides its customers a warranty on subscriber equipment for
one year from the date of activation. Warranties are accounted for in accordance
with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies," such that an accrual is
made when it is estimable and probable that a loss has been incurred. A warranty
reserve is maintained based on historical experience of warranty costs and
expected occurrences of warranty coverage on equipment. Costs associated with
warranties are recorded as cost of subscriber equipment sales and include
equipment replacements, repairs and program administration.
Financial
Instruments
The
condensed consolidated balance sheets include various financial instruments
(primarily cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities, long-term debt,
derivative instruments, and other obligations). The fair values of short-term
financial instruments approximate their carrying values because of their
short-term nature. The fair value of the credit facilities was approximately 88%
for the First Lien Tranche A, 96% for the First Lien Tranche B and 96% for the
Second Lien, respectively, of their carrying amount as of March 31, 2009, based
on rates currently available to Iridium Holdings for debt with similar terms and
remaining maturities. The fair value of these credit facilities at December 31,
2008 was approximately 88% of their carrying amount.
Iridium
Holdings has determined that it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of
its $22.9 million subordinated convertible note. The note is due to an
affiliate of GHQ, and due to the lack of quoted market prices, Iridium Holdings
was unable to identify any similar instruments in the market place. The note is
carried at its face amount. The note bears interest at 5% beginning in April
2009 and it is convertible into approximately 84,000 Class A Units.
Convertible
Subordinated Promissory Note
In
October 2008, Iridium Holdings issued to Greenhill Europe, a
$22.9 million 5% convertible subordinated promissory note due
October 2015. Iridium Holdings has determined that the embedded derivatives
contained in the promissory note (including the conversion option, the holder’s
put options and Iridium Holdings’ call option) do not require separate
accounting under the FASB’s SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and that there were no beneficial conversion
features associated with the note pursuant to EITF 98-5, Accounting for
Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently
Adjustment Conversion Ratios. Accordingly, Iridium Holdings is accounting for
the note pursuant to the guidance contained in Accounting Principal Board’s
Opinion No. 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock
Purchase Warrants.
Interest
on the note accrues beginning in April 2009 at 5% per year. Iridium
Holdings is recording periodic interest cost using the effective interest rate
method.
Accounting
for Equity-Based Compensation
Iridium
Holdings uses SFAS No. 123(R), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, for
all share-based payments granted. Iridium Holdings uses the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model (Black-Scholes) as its method of valuation under SFAS
No. 123(R). This fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over
the requisite service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting
period. The fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant as
determined by the Black-Scholes model is affected by Iridium Holdings’
assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, the expected
stock price volatility over the term of the awards and expected forfeitures. The
fair value of employee interests was estimated using the Black-Scholes
model.
The
following table summarizes the ranges used in the model for grants in the year
ended December 31, 2008:
Expected
volatility
|
52.6%
– 57.9%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.0%
– 2.5%
|
Expected
dividends
|
0.0%
|
Expected
term
|
1-
2 years
|
There
were no grants in the three months ending March 31, 2009.
The
expected volatility assumption was based on a review of the expected volatility
of publicly traded entities similar to Iridium Holdings, which Iridium Holdings
believes is a reasonable indicator of its expected volatility. The risk-free
interest rate assumption is based upon U.S. Treasury Bond interest rates with
terms similar to the expected term of the award. The dividend yield assumption
is based on Iridium Holdings’ history of not declaring and paying
dividends.
The expected term is based on Iridium Holdings’ best estimate for the period of
time for which the instrument is expected to be outstanding.
Given the
limited number of employees who have been granted equity interests, Iridium
Holdings has estimated there will be no forfeitures.
Under
Statement No. 123(R), a nonpublic entity can make a policy decision of
whether to measure all of its liabilities incurred under share-based payment
arrangements at fair value or to measure all such liabilities at intrinsic
value. Iridium Holdings’ policy is to measure all liabilities under SFAS
No. 123(R) using the intrinsic method. This intrinsic value is then
amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the
awards, which is generally the vesting periods.
Long-Lived
Assets
Iridium
Holdings assesses the impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of
impairment are present. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the
carrying amounts of the assets to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to
be generated by the assets. Any impairment loss would be measured as the excess
of the assets’ carrying amount over their fair value. Fair value is based on
market prices where available, an estimate of market value, or various valuation
techniques.
The
carrying value of a satellite lost as a result of an in-orbit failure would be
charged to operations upon the occurrence of the loss. In February 2009, Iridium
Holdings lost the use of a satellite and recorded an impairment charge of
$0.1 million, which represents the carrying value of the
satellite.
Results
of Operations
Comparison
of Results of Operations for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009
and 2008
Revenue. Total
revenue increased by $1.5 million, or approximately 2.0%, to $75.8 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $74.3 million for the same period in
2008, due principally to increased commercial services revenue and increased
contract revenue from the DoD as well as the renewal of its service agreements
with the U.S. government and the related fee increases. These
increases were offset by a decline in subscriber equipment
revenue. Total subscribers increased 31.2% during the period, from
250,000 at March 31, 2008 to 328,000 at March 31, 2009.
Government Services
Revenue. Government services revenue increased by
$4.4 million, or approximately 30.9%, to $18.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from $14.1 million for the same period in 2008. This growth
was driven by an increase in contract revenue relating to several research and
development agreements with the DoD and other U.S. government agencies,
including iGPS and secondary payload research projects. The remaining growth was
attributable to a 5% increase in user fees and higher gateway maintenance
revenue as provided in Iridium Holdings’ recently renewed agreements with the
U.S. government, which became effective April 1, 2008. As a
percentage of total revenues, government services revenue increased from 19.0%
for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 24.4% for the same period in
2009.
Commercial Services
Revenue. Commercial services revenue increased by
$7.8 million, or approximately 26.8%, to $36.8 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from $29.0 million for the same period in 2008, due
principally to growth in subscribers and associated access and usage fees
resulting from increased overall demand. In addition, the greater demand for
Iridium Holdings’ machine-to-machine and pre-paid services contributed to the
overall increase in commercial services revenue. As a percentage of
total revenues, commercial services revenue (which has generally a higher margin
than equipment sales) increased from 39.1% for the three months ended March 31,
2008 to 48.6% for the same period in 2009.
Subscriber Equipment
Sales. Subscriber equipment sales decreased by
$10.7 million, or approximately 34.2%, to $20.5 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from $31.2 million for the same period in 2008. Decreased
subscriber equipment sales were driven principally by reduced demand for
satellite handsets caused by the current economic downturn and the change of the
method of accounting for subscriber equipment. Sales
of its Iridium 9601 short burst data modem continued to exhibit strong
growth. As a result, the proportion of satellite handset sales
relative to sales of Iridium Holdings’ other lower priced devices decreased
during the period contributing significantly to the decline in its revenue from
subscriber equipment sales. Until the introduction of its Iridium OpenPort
terminals, Iridium Holdings’ satellite handsets have been its highest priced
devices. In addition to
decreased
sales, Iridium Holdings recognized $2.0 million of previously deferred revenue
under EITF-0021 in the first quarter of 2008. As a percentage of total revenues,
subscriber equipment sales decreased from 41.9% for the three months ended March
31, 2008 to 27.0% for the same period in 2009, primarily due to decreased sales
and as a result of the change of the method of accounting for subscriber
equipment.
Operating
Expenses. Total operating expenses increased by
$8.6 million, or approximately 16.1%, to $61.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from $52.8 million for the same period in 2008. This
increase was due primarily to increased research and development expenses
related to the development of new subscriber equipment and services and Iridium
NEXT, as well as costs associated with contract revenue relating to several
research and development agreements with the DoD and other U.S. government
agencies. Total operating expenses for the period also increased as a
result of higher selling, general and administrative expenses resulting from
Iridium Holdings’ capital raising activities and increased personnel expenses
from growth in total employees resulting from its expansion. These
cost increases were partially offset by lower cost of sales on equipment due to
a decrease in sales of Iridium Holdings’ voice and data devices, particularly
its satellite handsets. As a percentage of total revenues, operating
expenses increased from 71.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 81.0%
for the same period in 2009.
Cost of
Sales. Cost of sales decreased by $7.1 million, or
approximately 38.5%, to $11.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009
from $18.4 million for the same period in 2008 primarily as a result of the
decrease in sales of Iridium Holdings’ voice and data devices, particularly its
satellite handsets as noted above. Prior to the introduction of OpenPort,
Iridium Holdings’ handsets have had the highest production cost of all its
devices. In addition to decreased sales, Iridium Holdings recognized
$1.6 million of previously deferred subscriber equipment cost of sales under
EITF-0021 in the first quarter of 2008. All previously deferred
revenue was recognized during 2008. As a percentage of total
revenues, cost of sales decreased from 24.8% for the three months ended March
31, 2008 to 14.9% for the same period in 2009.
Network and Satellite Operations and
Maintenance. Network and satellite operations and
maintenance expenses increased by $0.6 million, or approximately 3.6%, to $16.0
million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $15.4 million for the
same period in 2008, primarily as a result of increased maintenance expenses
with respect to Iridium Holdings’ satellite network due to the annual price
escalation in its operations and maintenance agreement with Boeing, higher fees
for software licensing and maintenance, an increase in variable network costs -
including termination costs - and increased personnel expenses related to the
growth of Iridium Holdings’ Operations Group. As a percentage of
total revenues, network and satellite operations and maintenance expenses
increased from 20.7% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 21.0% for the
same period in 2009.
Depreciation and
Amortization. Depreciation and amortization
expenses increased by $0.7 million, or approximately 23.8%, to $3.7 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $3.0 million for the same period in
2008, primarily as a result of additional depreciation associated with new
equipment placed in service, primarily equipment for Iridium Holdings’ satellite
network operations center and gateway. As a percentage of total
revenues, depreciation and amortization expenses increased from 4.0% for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 to 4.8% for the same period in
2009.
Selling, General and
Administrative. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased by $3.8 million, or approximately 32.7%, to
$15.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from $11.6 million for
the same period in 2008, primarily as a result of higher legal, regulatory and
accounting expenses in 2009 resulting from Iridium Holdings capital raising
activities, including its proposed transaction with GHQ, as well increased
personnel and other administrative expenses related to its growth and pursuit of
expansion opportunities. Total employees (excluding satellite and
network personnel) grew 32.1% during the period, from 109 at March 31, 2008 to
144 at March 31, 2009. As a percentage of total revenues, selling,
general and administrative expenses increased from 15.6% for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 to 20.3% for the same period in 2009.
Research and
Development. Research and development expenses
increased by $10.6 million, or approximately 234.4%, to $15.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 from $4.5 million for the same period in
2008, primarily as
a result of increased expenses related to investments in new subscriber
equipment and services, including Iridium Holdings’ new Short Burst Data
transceiver, as well as the development of Iridium NEXT. This also includes
increased expenses related to the abovementioned research and development
contracts with the DoD and other U.S. government agencies. As a
percentage of total revenues, research and development expenses increased from
6.1% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 19.9% for the same period in
2009.
Operating Profit
(Loss). Operating profit decreased by $7.1
million, or approximately 32.8%, to $14.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 from $21.5 million for the same period in 2008. This decrease was
due primarily to decreased subscriber equipment revenues, particularly Iridium
Holdings’ high margin satellite handsets, and an increase in research and
development costs related to Iridium NEXT. These decreases in operating profit
were partially offset by increased commercial and government service revenues as
described above. As a percentage of total revenues, operating profit
decreased from 28.9% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 19.0% for the
same period in 2009.
Interest
Expense. Interest expense decreased by $0.6
million or approximately 10.6%, to $4.6 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 from $5.2 million for the same period in 2008. This decrease resulted
from lower outstanding balances on Iridium Holdings’ first and second lien
credit agreements.
Interest and Other
Income. Interest and other income decreased by
$0.5 million, or approximately 119.8%, to ($0.1) million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 from $0.4 million for the same period in 2008. This
decrease was due to lower interest income resulting from a decrease in the
interest rate earned on Iridium Holdings’ cash and cash equivalents and short
term investments offset by increased foreign currency losses.
Net
Income. Iridium Holdings’ net income decreased by
$7.0 million, or approximately 41.9%, to $9.7 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 from $16.7 million for the same period in 2008, as a result of
the factors described above. As a percentage of total revenues, net
income decreased from 22.5% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 to 12.8%
for the same period in 2009.
Comparison
of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2008 and
2007
Revenue. Total
revenue increased by $60.0 million, or approximately 23%, to $320.9 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008 from $260.9 million for 2007, due principally
to a growth in total subscribers, an increase of commercial services, an
increase in Iridium Holdings’ subscriber equipment sales and increased contract
revenue from the DoD as well as the renewal of its service agreements with the
U.S. government and the related fee increases. Total subscribers increased 37%
during the period, from 234,162 at December 31, 2007 to 319,874 at December 31,
2008.
Government Services
Revenue. Government services revenue increased by
$9.9 million, or approximately 17%, to $67.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2008 from $57.9 million for 2007. This growth was driven by an increase in
contract revenue relating to several research and development agreements with
the DoD and other U.S. government agencies, including secondary payload
research. The remaining growth was attributable to a 5% increase in user fees
and higher gateway maintenance revenue as provided in Iridium Holdings’ recently
renewed agreements with the U.S. government, which became effective April 1,
2008. As a percentage of total revenues, government services revenue
decreased from 22.2% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 21.1% for
2008.
Commercial Services
Revenue. Commercial services revenue increased by
$32.0 million, or approximately 32%, to $133.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $101.2 million for 2007, due principally to growth
in subscribers and associated access fees resulting from increased overall
demand, accelerated by the popularity of Iridium Holdings’ machine-to-machine
services and customer defections from Globalstar. The increase in commercial
services revenue was offset by lower revenues from usage fees resulting from an
increase in the proportion of machine-to-machine services relative to voice
services, as machine-to-machine services account for lower average revenue per
unit than voice services. As a percentage of total revenues,
commercial services revenue increased from 38.8% for the year ended December 31,
2007 to 41.5% for 2008.
Subscriber Equipment
Sales. Subscriber equipment sales increased by
$18.0 million, or approximately 18%, to $119.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $101.9 million for 2007. Increased subscriber equipment
sales were driven principally by subscriber growth and the related increased in
sales of Iridium Holdings’ satellite handsets and Iridium 9601 short burst data
modem. Despite being introduced in late 2005, sales of its Iridium 9601 short
burst data modem continued to exhibit strong growth. Although the proportion of
satellites handset sales relative to sales of Iridium Holdings’ other lower
priced devices decreased during the period, sales of Iridium Holdings’ higher
priced handsets grew in absolute terms, contributing significantly to growth in
its revenue from subscriber equipment sales. Until the introduction of its
Iridium OpenPort terminals, Iridium Holdings’ satellite handsets have been its
highest priced devices. As a percentage of total revenues, subscriber
equipment sales decreased from 39.0% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to
37.4% for 2008.
Operating
Expenses. Total operating expenses increased by
$48.1 million, or approximately 24%, to $245.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $197.7 million for 2007. This increase was due primarily
to increased costs of sales resulting from a growth in sales of Iridium
Holdings’ voice and data devices as well as increased research and development
expenses related to the development of new subscriber equipment and services and
Iridium NEXT. Total operating expenses for the period also increased
as a result of higher selling, general and administrative expenses resulting
from Iridium Holdings’ capital raising activities, including its proposed
acquistion in the third quarter of 2008 and increased personnel expenses from
growth in total employees resulting from its expansion. As a
percentage of total revenues, operating expenses increased from 75.8% for the
year ended December 31, 2007 to 76.6% for 2008.
Cost of
Sales. Cost of sales increased by $5.2 million, or
approximately 8%, to $67.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from
$62.4 million for 2007 primarily as a result of subscriber growth and the
related increase in sales of Iridium Holdings’ voice and data devices,
particularly its satellite handsets. Iridium Holdings’ handsets have the highest
production costs of all its devices. This increase in costs of sales was offset
by a decrease in the cost of recognizing previously deferred subscriber
equipment sales of $8.4 million, or approximately 70%, to $3.4 million for the
period ended December 31, 2008, from $11.8 million in 2007. Effective January 1,
2005, Iridium Holdings began recognizing equipment sales and related costs when
equipment title passes to the customer. As a percentage of total
revenues, cost of sales decreased from 23.9% for the year ended December 31,
2007 to 21.1% for 2008.
Network and Satellite Operations and
Maintenance. Network and satellite operations and
maintenance expenses increased by $3.7 million, or approximately 6%, to $63.9
million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $60.2 million for 2007,
primarily as a result of increased maintenance expenses with respect to Iridium
Holdings’ satellite network due to the annual price escalation clause in its
operations and maintenance agreement with Boeing, higher fees for software
licensing and maintenance, an increase in variable network costs, including
termination costs, and increased personnel expenses related to the growth of
Iridium Holdings’ Operations Group. As a percentage of total
revenues, network and satellite operations and maintenance expenses decreased
from 23.1% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 19.9% for 2008.
Depreciation and
Amortization. Depreciation and amortization
expenses increased by $1.1 million, or approximately 10%, to $12.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2008 from $11.4 million for 2007, primarily as a
result of additional depreciation associated with new equipment placed in
service, including a new satellite earth station facility in Norway and certain
equipment for Iridium Holdings’ satellite network operations center and
gateway. As a
percentage of total revenues, depreciation and amortization expenses decreased
from 4.4% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 3.9% for 2008.
Selling, General and
Administrative. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased by $16.7 million, or approximately 36.1%, to
$63.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 from $46.4 million for 2007,
primarily as a result of higher legal, regulatory and accounting expenses in
2008 resulting from Iridium Holdings capital raising activities, including its
proposed acquisition, as well increased personnel and other administrative
expenses related to its growth and pursuit of expansion opportunities. Total
employees (excluding satellite and network personnel) grew 41.4% during the
period, from 99 at December 31, 2007 to 140 at December 31, 2008. As
a percentage of total revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses
increased from 17.8% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 19.6% for
2008.
Research and
Development. Research and development expenses
increased by $21.4 million, or approximately 123%, to $38.8 million for the year
ended December 31, 2008 from $17.4 million for 2007, primarily as a result of
increased expenses related to investments in new subscriber equipment and
services, including Iridium Holdings’ next generation satellite handset, L-Band
transceiver and short burst data modem and Iridium OpenPort, as well as the
development of Iridium NEXT. This also includes increased expenses related to
the abovementioned research and development contracts with the DoD and other
U.S. government agencies. As a percentage of total revenues, research
and development expenses increased from 6.7% for the year ended December 31,
2007 to 12.1% for 2008.
Operating Profit
(Loss). Operating profit increased by $11.9
million, or approximately 19%, to $75.1 million for the period ended December
31, 2008 from $63.2 million for 2007. This increase was due primarily to
increased service and subscriber equipment revenues resulting from growth in
equipment sales, particularly Iridium Holdings’ high margin satellite handsets
and an increase in total subscribers. Although the proportion of satellites
handset sales
relative
to sales of Iridium Holdings’ other devices decreased during the period, as
discussed above, handsets sales grew in absolute terms, contributing
significantly to growth in its operating profit. These increases in operating
profit were partially offset by increased cost of sales, research and
development expenses and selling, general and administrative expenses as
described above. As a percentage of total revenues, operating profit
decreased slightly from 24.2% for the year ended December 31, 2007 to 23.4% for
2008.
Interest
Expense. Interest expense decreased by $0.7
million, or approximately 3.2%, to $21.1 million for the year ended December 31,
2008 from $21.8 million for 2007. This decreased resulted from lower outstanding
balances on Iridium Holdings’ first and second lien credit
agreements.
Interest and Other
Income. Interest and other income decreased by
$2.5 million, or approximately 106.2%, to ($0.1) million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $2.4 million for 2007. This decrease was due to lower
interest income resulting from a decrease in the interest earned on Iridium
Holdings’ cash and cash equivalents and short term investments offset by
increased foreign currency losses.
Net
Income. Iridium Holdings’ net income increased by
$10.1 million, or approximately 23.1%, to $53.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2008 from $43.8 million for 2007, as a result of the factors
described above. As a percentage of total revenues, net income
remained consistent at 16.8% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to
2008.
Comparison
of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2007 and
2006
Revenue. Total
revenue increased by $48.5 million, or approximately 22.8%, to
$260.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from
$212.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2006, due principally
to a growth in total subscribers, an increase of commercial services, an
increase in Iridium Holdings’ subscriber equipment sales and increased contract
revenue from the DoD. Total subscribers increased 34.0% during the period, from
174,219 at December 31, 2006 to 234,162 at December 31, 2007.
Government Service
Revenue. Government service revenue increased by
$7.1 million, or approximately 13.9%, to $57.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $50.8 million in 2006. This growth was driven by an
increase in contract revenue from an agreement with a prime contractor of the
U.S. government to assess the feasibility of incorporating secondary payloads in
Iridium NEXT as well as an increase in the number of subscribers. As
a percentage of total revenues, government services revenue decreased from 23.9%
for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 22.2% in 2007.
Commercial Service
Revenue. Commercial service revenue increased by
$23.5 million, or approximately 30.3%, to $101.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $77.7 million for 2006. This growth was driven by a
growth in subscribers and associated access fees resulting from increased
overall demand, accelerated by the popularity of Iridium Holdings’
machine-to-machine services and customer defections from Globalstar. Further
contributing to this increase, in August 2006, Iridium Holdings increased
monthly access fees for voice subscribers by $5 per month. As a
percentage of total revenues, commercial services revenue increased from 36.6%
for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 38.8% in 2007.
Subscriber Equipment
Sales. Subscriber equipment sales increased by
$18.0 million, or approximately 21.4%, to $101.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $83.9 million for 2006. Increased subscriber equipment
sales were driven principally by subscriber growth and the related increase in
sales of Iridium Holdings’ satellite handsets and Iridium 9601 short burst data
modem. Sales of Iridium Holdings’ Iridium 9601 short burst data modem continued
to exhibit strong growth two years after its introduction. Sales of Iridium
Holdings’ higher priced handsets also grew, contributing significantly to growth
in Iridium Holdings’ revenue from subscriber equipment sales. As a
percentage of total revenues, subscriber equipment sales decreased from 39.5%
for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 39.1% in 2007.
Operating
Expenses. Total operating expenses increased by
$30.5 million, or approximately 18.3%, to $197.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $167.2 million for 2006. This increase was due
primarily to increased research and development expenses related to the
development of new subscriber equipment and services as well as increased costs
of sales resulting from a growth in sales of Iridium Holdings’ voice and data
devices. Total operating expenses for the period also increased as a
result of higher personnel and other administrative expenses largely from growth
in total employees resulting from its expansion. As a percentage of
total revenues, operating expenses decreased from 78.7% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 to 75.8% in 2007.
Cost of
Sales. Cost of sales increased by $2.3 million, or
approximately 3.9%, to $62.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007
from $60.1 million for 2006, primarily as a result of subscriber growth and the
related increase in sales of Iridium Holdings’ voice and data devices,
particularly its higher cost satellite handsets. This increase was
offset by a decrease in the cost of recognizing previously deferred subscriber
equipment sales, which decreased by $9.5 million, or approximately 44.4%, to
$11.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $21.3 million for
2006. As a percentage of total revenues, cost of sales decreased from
28.3% for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 23.9% in 2007.
Network and Satellite Operations and
Maintenance. Network and satellite operations and
maintenance expenses decreased by $0.5 million, or approximately 0.8%, to $60.2
million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $60.7 million for 2006,
primarily as a result of a decrease in the amount of consulting expenditures
incurred related to Iridium Holdings’ current satellite system, partially offset
by increased maintenance expenses with respect to its satellite network due to
the annual price escalation clause in Iridium Holdings’ operations and
maintenance agreement with Boeing, an increase in variable network costs,
including termination costs and higher personnel expenses related to the growth
of its Operations Group. As a percentage of total revenues, network
and satellite operations and maintenance expenses decreased from 28.6% for the
year ended December 31, 2006 to 23.1% in 2007.
Depreciation and
Amortization. Depreciation and amortization
expenses increased by $2.9 million, or approximately 33.2%, to $11.4 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007 from $8.5 million for 2006, primarily as a
result of additional depreciation associated with new equipment placed in
service in 2007, including equipment upgrades at Iridium Holdings’ satellite
network operations center and technical support center as well as business
systems, including a new data warehouse and call intercept system. As
a percentage of total revenues, depreciation and amortization expenses increased
from 4.0% for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 4.4% in 2007.
Selling, General and
Administrative. Selling, general and
administrative expenses increased by $12.9 million, or approximately 38.5%, to
$46.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 from $33.5 million for
2006, primarily as a result of increased personnel and other administrative
expenses to accompany Iridium Holdings’ growth. Total employees (excluding
satellite and network personnel) grew 30.3% during the period, from 76 at
December 31, 2006 to 99 at December 31, 2007. As a percentage of
total revenues, selling, general and administrative expenses increased from
15.9% for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 17.8% in 2007.
Research and
Development. Research and development expenses
increased by $13.0 million, or approximately 293.1%, to $17.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from $4.4 million for 2006, primarily as a
result of expenditures related to the development of new subscriber equipment
and services, including Iridium Holdings’ next generation satellite handset and
L-Band transceiver and Iridium OpenPort. This also includes increased expenses
related to the abovementioned research and development contract with the U.S.
government. As a percentage of total revenues, research and
development expenses increased from 2.1% for the year ended December 31, 2006 to
6.7% in 2007.
Operating Profit
(Loss). Operating profit increased by $17.9
million, or approximately 39.7%, to $63.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $45.2 million for 2006. This increase was due
primarily to increased service and subscriber equipment revenues resulting from
growth in equipment sales, particularly Iridium Holdings’ high margin satellite
handsets, and an increase in total subscribers. As discussed above, handsets
sales grew during the period, contributing significantly to growth in Iridium
Holdings’ operating profit. These increases in operating profit were partially
offset by increased cost of sales, research and development expenses and
selling, general and administrative expenses as described above. As a
percentage of total revenues, operating profit increased from 21.3% for the year
ended December 31, 2006 to 24.2% in 2007.
Interest
Expense. Interest expense increased by $6.6
million, or approximately 43.4%, to $21.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2007 from $15.2 million for 2006. This increase resulted from recognizing a
full year of interest expense associated with Iridium Holdings’ first and second
lien credit agreements, which it entered into in July 2006.
Interest and Other
Income. Interest and other income increased by
$0.6 million, or approximately 34.5%, to $2.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $1.8 million for 2006. This increase resulted from higher
interest income resulting from increased cash balances on hand. This increase
was offset by a decrease in other
income
due to lower revenues from intercept services provided pursuant to U.S.
government subpoenas, which were reclassified as commercial service revenues in
2007.
Net
Income. Iridium Holdings’ net income increased by
$12.0 million, or approximately 37.6%, to $43.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from $31.8 million for 2006, as a result of the factors
described above. As a percentage of total revenues, net income
increased from 15.0% for the year ended December 31, 2006 to 16.8% in
2007.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Iridium
Holdings’ principal sources of liquidity are existing cash, internally generated
cash flow and borrowings under its first and second lien credit
agreements. Iridium Holdings will also receive cash from the GHQ
trust account upon the consummation of its proposed
acquisition. Iridium Holdings believe that these sources will provide
sufficient liquidity for it to meet its liquidity requirements for the next
12 months. Iridium Holdings’ principal liquidity requirements are to meet
its working capital, research and development and capital expenditure needs,
including the development of Iridium NEXT, and to service its debt. In addition,
Iridium Holdings will prepay $15.0 million in June 2009, and $65.0 million on
closing of the transaction, under its first lien credit facility. Iridium
Holdings may, however, require additional liquidity as it continues to execute
its business strategy. Iridium Holdings’ liquidity and its ability to fund its
liquidity requirements is also dependent on its future financial performance,
which is subject to general economic, financial, regulatory and other factors
that are beyond its control. Iridium Holdings anticipates that to the extent
that it requires additional liquidity, it will raise additional debt and/or
equity financing. Iridium Holdings’ ability to obtain additional liquidity may
be adversely impacted by a number of factors, including the recent global
economic crisis and related tightening of the credit markets. Iridium Holdings
cannot assure you that it will be able to obtain such additional liquidity on
reasonable terms, or at all.
In
addition, Iridium Holdings plans to fund the majority of the costs associated
with Iridium NEXT from internally generated cash flows and secondary payload
funding, as well as proceeds from its proposed acquisition. Iridium
Holdings expects to finance the remaining cost of Iridium NEXT with additional
debt and/or equity financing. If future internally generated cash flows and
revenues from hosting secondary payloads are below expectations or the cost of
developing Iridium NEXT is higher than anticipated, Iridium Holdings will
require additional external funding.
Cash
Flows
The
following table shows Iridium Holdings’ consolidated cash flows from operating,
investing and financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2007 and 2008 and the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
Year
Ended
December
31,
2008
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Three
months ended
March
31, 2009
|
|
|
Three
months ended
March
31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
flows provided by operating activities
|
|
$ |
61.4 |
|
|
$ |
36.6 |
|
|
$ |
39.5 |
|
|
$ |
21.7 |
|
|
$ |
16.9 |
|
Cash
flows used in investing activities
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
|
(19.8 |
) |
|
|
(9.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
Cash
flows used in financing activities
|
|
|
(44.8 |
) |
|
|
(26.5 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2.7 |
|
|
$ |
(9.8 |
) |
|
$ |
22.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash
provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2009
increased to $21.7 million from $16.9 million for the same period in
2008. This increase was attributable primarily to an increase in
working capital of $11.3 million offset by a $7.0 million decrease, in part, in
net income.
Net cash
provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased
to $61.4 million from $36.6 million for 2007. This increase was attributable
primarily to a $10.1 million increase in net income, a $11.1 million increase in
working capital and a $2.6 million increase in non-cash adjustments during the
period. The increase in working capital primarily relates to a payment made to
Boeing in 2007 in connection with Iridium Holdings’ purchase of their right to
receive distributions, which consequentially reduced its working capital for
that period, as well as an increase in deferred revenues resulting from higher
sales of its prepaid services and an increase in accounts payable due to the
timing of payments to vendors. The increase in non-cash adjustments consists
primarily of increases in depreciation and amortization and increases in equity
and profits interest compensation.
Net cash
provided by operating activities for 2007 decreased to $36.6 million from $39.5
million for 2006. This decrease was attributable primarily to a $23.2 million
decrease in working capital partially offset by a $12.0 million increase in net
income and a $6.7 million increase in non-cash adjustments during the period.
The decrease in working capital is the result of the abovementioned 2007 payment
to Boeing. Adjustments for non-cash items increased during the period due to
increases in depreciation and amortization and increases in equity and profits
interest compensation.
Cash
Flows Used in Investment Activities
Net cash
used in investment activities for the three months ended March 31, 2009
decreased to $2.3 million from $2.6 million for the same period in
2008. This decrease was attributable primarily to lower development
expenses related to Iridium Holdings’ new high-speed data service, Iridium
OpenPort, which was recently introduced.
Net cash
used in investment activities for the year ended December 31, 2008
decreased to $13.9 million from $19.8 million for 2007. This decrease was
attributable primarily to lower development expenses related to Iridium
Holdings’ new high-speed data service, Iridium OpenPort, which it recently
introduced.
Net cash
used in investment activities for 2007 increased to $19.8 million from $9.5
million for 2006. This increase was attributable primarily to increased
development expenses related to Iridium OpenPort as well as the procurement and
implementation of a more robust customer billing system.
Cash
Flows Used in Financing Activities
Net cash
used in financing activities for the months ended March 31, 2009 decreased to
$1.9 million from $2.9 million for the same period in 2008. This
decrease was attributable primarily to cash distributions to current investors
made in 2008 offset by principal payments of $1.9 million on Iridium Holdings’
first lien credit agreement made in the first quarter of 2009.
Net cash
used in financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased
to $44.8 million from $26.5 million for 2007. This increase was
attributable primarily to principal payments of $27.5 million on Iridium
Holdings’ first lien credit agreement, and cash distributions to its current
investors partially offset by proceeds from the issuance of a convertible
subordinated note to Greenhill Europe.
Net cash
used in financing activities for 2007 increased to $26.5 million from $8.0
million for 2006. This increase was attributable primarily to increased debt
payments resulting from Iridium Holdings’ first and second lien credit
agreements, which it entered into in July 2006.
Capital
Expenditures
Iridium
Holdings’ capital expenditures consist primarily of the hardware and software
upgrades to maintain its ground infrastructure and a portion of the expenses
related to the development of Iridium OpenPort. These also include upgrades to
its business systems, including the development of a data warehouse to analyze
call data and records, upgrades to its billing system to enable customer billing
of Iridium OpenPort as well as offering promotional pricing to distributors, and
computers for new employees. Once a prime contractor is selected for Iridium
Holdings’ next generation system, Iridium NEXT, and a full scale development
contract is signed, Iridium Holdings expects that the majority of its future
capital expenditures will relate to the development of Iridium NEXT through
2016.
Iridium
Holdings’ capital expenditures were $9.5 million, $19.8 million, $13.9 million
and $2.3 million in 2006, 2007, 2008 and the first three months in 2009,
respectively.
Iridium
Holdings plans to fund the majority of the costs associated with Iridium NEXT
from internally generated cash flows and secondary payload funding, as well as
proceeds from its proposed acquisition. Iridium Holdings expects to
finance the remaining cost of Iridium NEXT with additional debt and/or equity
financing. If future internally generated cash flows and revenues from hosting
secondary payloads are below expectations or the cost of developing Iridium NEXT
is higher than anticipated, Iridium Holdings will require additional external
funding.
Cash
and Indebtedness
Iridium
Holdings’ total cash and cash equivalents were $31.9 million at December 31,
2006, $22.1 million at December 31, 2007, $24.8 million at December 31, 2008 and
$42.3 million at March 31, 2009. Iridium Holdings had total indebtedness
(including the Motorola payable) of $199.9 million at December 31, 2006, $174.2
million at December 31, 2007, $170.7 million at December 31, 2008 and $169.1
million at March 31, 2009.
On July
27, 2006, Iridium Holdings entered into a $170.0 million first lien credit
agreement and $40.0 million second lien credit agreement. The agreements include
a $98.0 million four-year first lien Tranche A term loan, a $62.0 million
five-year first lien Tranche B term loan, a $40.0 million six-year second lien
term loan and a $10.0 million three-year first lien revolving credit facility.
As of March 31, 2009, Iridium Holdings had $36.0 million outstanding under
Iridium Holdings’ Tranche A term loan, $59.0 million outstanding under its
Tranche B term loan, $40.0 million outstanding under the second lien term loan
and it had no borrowings and availability of $5 million under its revolving
credit facility.
The
following table sets forth the amounts outstanding under Iridium Holdings’
Tranche A term loan, its Tranche B term loan, its second lien term loan and its
revolving credit facility, the effective interest rates on such outstanding
amounts and amounts available for additional borrowing thereunder as of March
31, 2009.
First
and Second Lien Credit Agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
Available
for
Additional
Borrowing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars
in millions)
|
|
Tranche
A Term Loan
|
|
|
6.18 |
% |
|
$ |
36.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
Tranche
B Term Loan
|
|
|
6.18 |
% |
|
|
59.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Second
Lien Term Loan
|
|
|
10.18 |
% |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Revolving
Credit Facility(1)
|
|
|
6.18 |
% |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
135.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
(1)
|
On
October 5, 2008, Lehman Brothers Inc., a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers
Holdings Inc., filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Federal
Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of
New York. Lehman Brothers Inc. is a joint lead arranger under Iridium
Holdings’ revolving credit facility and had, as of March 31, 2009,
committed to provide $5.0 million under Iridium Holdings’ $10 million
revolving credit facility. Iridium Holdings currently does not expect to
be able to draw on the $5.0 million and, as a result, Iridium Holdings has
$5 million available under the revolving credit facility. Iridium Holdings
does not believe, however, that this reduction in availability will have a
material adverse effect on its liquidity and capital
resources.
|
First
Lien Tranche A Term Loan
Iridium
Holdings’ $98.0 million first lien Tranche A term loan bears interest at the
Eurodollar base interest rate plus 5.0 % and requires quarterly principal and
interest payments. Quarterly principal payments on the loan range
from $0.1 million to $6.7 million. The term loan matures on June 30, 2010. In
October 2008, upon execution of the amendment to the first lien credit
agreement, Iridium repaid $22 million of the outstanding Tranche A
balance. Due
to this
payment, no additional principal payments are required until June 2009. Iridium
Holdings can prepay the term loan, in whole or in part, at par.
First
Lien Tranche B Term Loan
Iridium
Holdings’ $62.0 million first lien Tranche B term loan bears interest at the
Eurodollar base interest rate plus 5.0% and requires quarterly principal and
interest payments. Quarterly principal payments start on September 30, 2010 in
the amount of $13.3 million. The term loan matures on July 27, 2011. Iridium
Holdings can prepay the term loan, in whole or in part, at par.
Second
Lien Term Loan
Iridium
Holdings’ $40 million second lien term loan bears interest at the Eurodollar
base interest rate plus 9.0% and requires quarterly interest payments. The term
loan matures on July 27, 2012, at which time the entire $40 million principal
amount is due. Iridium Holdings can prepay the term loan, in whole or
in part, at par (plus a premium if prepaid before July 27, 2009), provided that
no amounts remain outstanding under its first lien Tranche A and B term
loans.
First
Lien Revolving Credit Facility
Iridium
Holdings’ $10.0 million first lien revolving credit facility matures on July 27,
2009. Iridium Holdings paid an up-front fee of 2% on the revolving facility of
$200,000 and is required to pay a quarterly commitment fee in respect of the
unutilized commitments at an initial rate equal to 0.5% per annum on the
available balance of the commitment. On October 5, 2008, Lehman
Brothers Inc., a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., filed for
protection under Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York. Lehman Brothers Inc. is
a joint lead arranger under Iridium Holdings’ revolving credit facility and had,
as of March 31, 2009, committed to provide $5.0 million under Iridium Holdings’
$10.0 million revolving credit facility. Iridium Holdings currently does not
expect to be able to draw on Lehman Brothers Inc.’s $5.0 million commitment and,
as a result, Iridium Holdings has $5 million available under the First Lien
Revolving Credit Facility. Iridium Holdings does not believe, however, that this
reduction in availability will have a material adverse effect on its liquidity
and capital resources.
Iridium
Holdings’ first and second lien credit agreements also contain certain customary
covenants, agreements and events of default, including restrictions on its
ability to incur indebtedness, grant liens, pay dividends, sell all of its
assets, use funds for capital expenditures, make investments, make optional
payments or modify debt instruments, or enter into sale and leaseback
transactions, among others. In addition, Iridium Holdings’ first and second lien
credit agreements require it to maintain compliance with specified financial
covenants. Iridium Holdings must also maintain hedge agreements in order to
provide interest rate protection on a minimum of 50% of the aggregate principal
amounts outstanding during the first three years of the credit agreement. As of
March 31, 2009, Iridium Holdings was in compliance with all of its financial
covenants specified in its senior secured credit facilities.
The
indebtedness under Iridium Holdings’ first and second lien credit agreements is
secured by a pledge on all of its tangible and intangible assets.
On
October 17, 2008, Iridium Holdings entered into an amendment to each of its
first and second lien credit agreements with its respective lenders. The
amendment to its first lien credit agreement provides for, among other things:
(a) an increase in the applicable interest rate margin for Eurodollar loans by
75 basis points to 5%; (b) an increase in permitted capital expenditures for
2008 and 2009; (c) distributions of up to $37.9 million to Iridium Holdings’
members in 2008; (d) a prepayment of $80.0 million of the outstanding balance
under the agreement by Iridium Holdings if the proposed acquisition is
consummated ($15.0 million if stockholder approval is not obtained by June 29,
2009 or, if stockholder approval is obtained by June 29, 2009, the transaction
is not consummated by September 30, 2009); and (e) an amendment to the
definition of “Change of Control” under the agreement to include the public
company in existence after the proposed acquisition. Upon execution
of the amendment to Iridium Holdings’ first lien credit agreement, it prepaid
$22.0 million of its outstanding balance under its first lien credit
agreement.
The
amendment to Iridium Holdings’ second lien credit agreement similarly provides
for, among other things: (a) an increase in the applicable interest rate margin
for Eurodollar loans by 75 basis points to 9%; (b) an increase in
permitted
capital expenditures for 2008 and 2009; (c) distributions of up to $37.9 million
to Iridium Holdings’ members in 2008; and (d) an amendment to the definition of
“Change of Control” under the agreement to include the public company in
existence after the proposed acquisition.
Convertible
Subordinated Promissory Note
Concurrently
with the signing of the transaction agreement, Greenhill Europe entered into an
agreement with Iridium Holdings to purchase a $22.9 million convertible
subordinated promissory note. The closing of the purchase of the note
occurred on October 24, 2008, following the execution of the amendments to the
first and second lien credit facilities described above. Under the
terms of the note, Greenhill Europe has the option to convert the note into
Iridium Holdings’ units upon the later to occur of (a) October 24, 2009 and (b)
the closing or the termination of the transaction agreement. If the
closing occurs after October 24, 2009, upon the exercise of its conversion
rights, Greenhill Europe will be entitled to receive 1.947 million shares of GHQ
common stock. If the closing occurs prior to September 22, 2009, GHQ
and Greenhill Europe will enter into an agreement which will entitle Greenhill
Europe to exchange each of Iridium Holdings’ units into which the note is
convertible for 23.1936 shares of GHQ common stock, subject to certain
adjustments. A portion of the $22.9 million in cash proceeds from the
issuance of the note and an additional $15 million in cash from Iridium Holdings
was distributed to certain holders of its units in November 2008.
Cash
from the GHQ Trust Account
GHQ’s
only significant asset is approximately $401.9 million in cash, which is held in
a trust account pending completion of the acquisition of Iridium
Holdings. GHQ will use $76.7 million of the trust account balance to
pay unitholders, up to $8.2 million to pay the deferred underwriting commissions
and discounts and $9.4 million to pay transaction expenses. GHQ may
also be required to use up to $120.0 million of the trust account balance to pay
holders of GHQ IPO shares who elect to convert into a portion of the trust
account. In addition, 90 days following the closing of the
acquisition, if Iridium Holdings makes a valid election under Section 754 of the
Code with respect to the taxable year in which the closing of the acquisition
occurs, GHQ will make a tax benefit payment of up to $25.2 million in aggregate
out of the trust account funds to sellers (other than the sellers of the equity
of Baralonco and Syncom) of Iridium Holdings’ units to compensate them for the
tax basis step-up. Iridium Communications Inc., the combined
enterprise, will have an increase of approximately $165.7 million to $280.6
million in cash, depending on the number of holders of GHQ IPO shares who elect
to convert into a portion of the trust account, following the consummation of
the acquisition. As a result, in addition to the $80.0 million
required to be prepaid at the closing of the acquisition, Iridium Holdings will
be able to prepay all or a portion of its remaining outstanding debt balance,
although it has not yet decided to do so.
Contractual
Obligations and Commitments
The
following table summarizes Iridium Holdings’ outstanding contractual obligations
as of December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt obligations(1)
|
|
$ |
81.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.0 |
|
|
$ |
40.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.0 |
|
|
$ |
136.9 |
|
Operating
lease obligations
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Unconditional
purchase obligations(2)
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
100.1 |
|
|
|
100.1 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
284.0 |
|
Total(3)
|
|
$ |
167.5 |
|
|
$ |
119.0 |
|
|
$ |
143.8 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
432.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Iridium
Holdings’ long-term debt obligations are comprised of payments due under
Iridium Holdings’ first and second lien credit agreements. This
table reflects
Iridium Holdings’ required prepayment of $80.0 million of the outstanding
balance under its credit agreements if it consummates its proposed
acquisition ($15.0 million if stockholder approval is not obtained by June
29, 2009 or, if stockholder approval is obtained by June 29, 2009, the
transaction is not consummated by September 30,
2009).
|
(2)
|
Iridium
Holdings’ unconditional purchase obligations include payments under its
operations and maintenance agreement with the Boeing, its agreement with
Celestica for the manufacturing of Iridium Holdings’ devices and various
commitments with other vendors.
|
(3)
|
Certain
bonus payments shall be payable to Lockheed Martin Corporation and Thales
Alenia Space if certain milestones are reached. However, Iridium Holdings
is currently unable to estimate the amount of any such payment, since a
number of criteria would have to be met before any such amount becomes due
and determinable. As of December 31, 2008, no bonus payments were due by
Iridium Holdings to Lockheed Martin Corporation or Thales Alenia
Space.
|
Off-Balance
Sheet Transactions
Iridium
Holdings does not currently have, nor has it had in the last three years, any
relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as
entities referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which
would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet
arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.
Seasonality
Iridium
Holdings’ results of operations are subject to seasonal usage changes for its
commercial customers. April through October are typically Iridium
Holdings’ peak months for commercial service revenues and subscriber equipment
sales. Iridium Holdings’ U.S. Government revenues are not subject to
seasonal usage changes since such revenues are derived from fixed fees per user
rather than usage fees.
Related
Party Transactions
For a
description of Iridium Holdings’ related party transactions, see “Certain
Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,
or FIN
No. 48. FIN No. 48 applies to taxes based substantially on income. The
FASB deferred the effective date of FIN No. 48 for certain non-public
enterprises to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008. Iridium
Holdings will adopt the provisions of FIN No. 48 effective January 1,
2009. Because Iridium Holdings is not subject to federal or state income tax in
the United States, and its foreign affiliate operations are immaterial, the
adoption of FIN No. 48 is not expected to have a material impact on Iridium
Holdings’ financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115, or SFAS No. 159. SFAS No. 159 permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Unrealized
gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are
reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 does not affect any existing accounting
literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair
value. Iridium Holdings has chosen not to adopt the alternative provided in this
statement.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations, or
SFAS No. 141R. SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business
combination to record all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their
respective acquisition-date fair values, changes the recognition of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, changes the
recognition and measurement of contingent consideration, and requires the
expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS No. 141R also
requires additional disclosure of information surrounding a business
combination, such that users of the entity’s financial statements can fully
understand the nature and financial impact of the business combination. SFAS
No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The provisions of SFAS
No. 141R will only impact Iridium Holdings if it is a party to a business
combination.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133, or SFAS No. 161. SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced
disclosures about the objectives of derivative instruments and hedging
activities, the method of accounting for such instruments under SFAS
No. 133 and its related interpretations, and a tabular disclosure of the
effects of such instruments and related hedged items on an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, as such, will be
effective beginning in Iridium Holdings’ fiscal year 2009. Iridium Holdings
adopted SFAS No. 161 in the first quarter of 2009 and the adoption did not have
a material impact on Iridium Holdings’ consolidated financial
results.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles, or SFAS No. 162. SFAS No. 162 identifies
the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the
principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP. SFAS
No. 162 will become effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU Section 411,
The Meaning of Present Fairly
in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. Iridium
Holdings’ adoption of SFAS No. 162 will not have a material impact on its
financial statements.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure Regarding Market Risk
Iridium
Holdings is exposed to interest rate risk in connection with Iridium Holdings’
variable rate debt under its first and second lien credit agreements, under
which loans bear interest at floating rate based on Eurodollar applicable
borrowing margin. For variable rate debt, interest rate changes generally do not
affect the fair value of the debt instrument, but do impact future earnings and
cash flows, assuming other factors are held constant. Assuming that Iridium
Holdings borrowed the entire $210.0 million in revolving and term debt available
under its credit agreements, and without giving effect to the hedging
arrangement described in the next sentence, a 1.0% change in interest rates
would result in a change to interest expense of approximately $2.1 million
annually. As required by Iridium Holdings’ credit agreements, it currently
maintains two interest rate swap agreements with respect to $86.0
million portion of the principal amount to hedge a portion of its interest rate
risk.
The
following table sets forth, (1) as of May 28, 2009, the actual beneficial
ownership of our common stock and (2) the expected beneficial ownership of our
common stock immediately following completion of the acquisition by (a) each
person owning (or expected to own) greater than 5% of our outstanding common
stock; (b) each current director and executive officer of GHQ; (c) each current
director and executive officer as a group prior to the acquisition; (d) each
person that is expected to be a director or named executive officer following
the completion of the acquisition; and (e) each person that is expected to be a
director or executive officer following completion of the acquisition as a
group. For purposes of calculating this information, we have made two
alternative sets of assumptions:
·
|
Assuming
No Exercise of Conversion Rights: This presentation assumes
that none of the GHQ stockholders exercise their conversion rights;
and
|
·
|
Assuming
Maximum Exercise of Conversion Rights: This presentation
assumes that the holders of 30% of the IPO shares minus one share exercise
their conversion rights.
|
The
unaudited pro forma financial statements contain important information regarding
the assumptions used in calculating this information. See “Selected
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Financial Data.”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming
Maximum Conversion
|
|
Name
and Address of Beneficial Owner and Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
%(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officers and
Directors (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greenhill
& Co., Inc. (4)
|
|
|
8,369,563 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
% |
|
|
12,874,887 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
12,874,887 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
% |
Parker
W. Rush
|
|
|
43,479 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
86,958 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
86,958 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Kevin
P. Clarke
|
|
|
43,479 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
86,958 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
86,958 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Thomas
C. Canfield
|
|
|
43,479 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
86,958 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
86,958 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Harold
J. Rodriguez, Jr. (4)(5)
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Robert
H. Niehaus (4)
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Scott
L. Bok (4)
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
** |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
All
executive officers and directors as a group (6
individuals)
|
|
|
545,437 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
1,090,874 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
1,090,874 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
5%
Holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank
of America Corporation (6)
|
|
|
3,655,500 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
3,655,500 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
3,655,500 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
Citigroup
Incorporated (7)
|
|
|
2,555,928 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
4,065,728 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
4,065,728 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Westchester
Capital Management Inc. (8)
|
|
|
2,219,900 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
% |
|
|
2,219,900 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
% |
|
|
2,219,900 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
Fidelity
Management & Research (9)
|
|
|
2,132,500 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
3,507,620 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
% |
|
|
3,507,620 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
% |
Pine
River Capital Management L.P. (10)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
7,840,233 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
7,840,233 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matthew
J. Desch
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
151,992 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
151,992 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Alvin
B. Krongard
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
130,420 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
130,420 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Steven
Pfeiffer
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Terry
Jones
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
J.
Darrel Barros
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Eric
Morrison
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
280,446 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
280,446 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
John
S. Brunette
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Greg
Ewert
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
277,789 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
277,789 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Lt.
Gen. John Campbell, (ret.)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
29,642 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
29,642 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
Don
Thoma
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
148,515 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
|
|
148,515 |
|
|
|
*** |
|
John
Roddy
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Lee
Demitry
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Syndicated
Communications Venture Partners IV, L.P (11)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,030,824 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
% |
|
|
4,030,824 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
% |
Syndicated
Communications, Inc.(11)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
5,280,539 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
|
5,280,539 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Baralonco
Limited (12)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
9,311,362 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
9,311,362 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
All
directors and executive officers as a group (19 persons after the
acquisition)
|
|
|
545,437 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
% |
|
|
2,109,678 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
2,109,678 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
% |
* Figures
before the acquisition assume no exercise of our warrants since such warrants
become exercisable only at the closing of the acquisition. In
addition, figures before the acquisition do not include forfeiture of common
stock or warrants by our founding stockholder or the conversion of the note by
Greenhill Europe.
** Figures
after the acquisition assume the exercise of our warrants and the forfeiture of
1,441,176 founding stockholder’s shares, 8,369,533 founder warrants and
4,000,000 private placement warrants, the conversion of the $22.9 million note
held by Greenhill Europe into 1,946,500 shares of GHQ common stock and the
repurchase of 3,655,500 GHQ warrants from Bank of America
Corporation.
*** Less
than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock.
(1)
|
Reflects
the sale of 48,500,000 units under certain purchase agreements and in our
IPO.
|
(2)
|
Assumes
11,999,999 shares are converted but that none of the holders listed on
this table converted their
shares.
|
(3)
|
Unless
otherwise indicated, the business address of each of the individuals is
300 Park Avenue, 23rd Floor, New York, New York
10022.
|
(4)
|
Mr.
Bok is our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and is the Co-Chief
Executive Officer and a managing director of Greenhill. Mr.
Niehaus is our Senior Vice President and is Chairman of Greenhill Capital
Partners and a managing director of Greenhill. Mr. Rodriguez is
our Chief Financial Officer and is Chief Administrative Officer, Chief
Compliance Officer, and a managing director of
Greenhill.
|
(5)
|
These
shares are held by Jacquelyn F.
Rodriguez.
|
(6)
|
Derived
from Schedule 13F filed by Bank of America Corporation reporting power to
vote or direct the vote over and shared power to dispose or direct the
disposition of 3,655,500 units. Reflects repurchase by GHQ,
upon the closing of the acquisition, of all 3,655,500 warrants associated
with those units, pursuant to an agreement dated June 2,
2009. The business address of such reporting person is 100
North Tryon Street, Floor 25, Bank of America Corporate Center, Charlotte,
NC 28255.
|
(7)
|
Derived
from Schedule 13F filed by Citigroup Incorporated reporting power to vote
or direct the vote over and shared power to dispose or direct the
disposition of 1,509,800 units and an additional 1,046,128 shares. The
business address of such reporting person is 399 Park Avenue, New York, NY
10043.
|
(8)
|
Derived
from Schedule 13F filed by Westchester Capital Management Inc. reporting
power to vote or direct the vote over and shared power to dispose or
direct the disposition of 2,219,900 shares. The business address of such
reporting person is 100 Summit Lake Drive, Valhalla, NY
10595.
|
(9)
|
Derived
from Schedule 13F filed by Fidelity Management & Research reporting
power to vote or direct the vote over and shared power to dispose or
direct the disposition of 1,375,120 units and an additional 757,380
shares. The business address of such reporting person is 82 Devonshire
Street, Boston, MA 02109.
|
(10)
|
Derived
from Schedule 13F filed by Pine River Capital Management reporting power
to vote over and dispose or direct the disposition of no shares and
7,840,233 warrants. Address: 601 Carlson Parkway, Suite 330,
Minnetonka, MN 55305.
|
(11)
|
Address:
8515 Georgia Avenue, Suite 725, Silver Spring, MD
20910.
|
(12)
|
Address:
c/o Fulbright & Jaworski LLP, 801 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.,
Washington, DC 20004.
|
DESCRIPTION
OF GHQ’S SECURITIES FOLLOWING THE ACQUISITION
The
following summary of the material terms of the GHQ securities following the
acquisition is not intended to be a complete summary of the rights and
preferences of such securities. We urge you to read our proposed
certificate in their entirety for a complete description of the rights and
preferences of the GHQ securities following the acquisition. The
proposed amendments to our certificate are described in “Proposal II—Approval of
the Amended and Restated Certificate” beginning on page 80 and the full text of
the proposed second and amended certificate is attached as Annex B to this proxy
statement.
General
Authorized
and Outstanding Stock
Our
proposed second amended and restated certificate authorizes the issuance of
shares of common stock, par value $0.001, and
shares of preferred stock, par value of $0.0001. As of the
record date, there were
shares of common stock outstanding and no shares of preferred stock
outstanding. The outstanding shares of GHQ’s common stock are, and
the shares of GHQ common stock issued in the acquisition will be, duly
authorized, validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Units
Each GHQ
unit consists of one share of common stock and one warrant. Each
warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise
price of $7.00 per share of common stock, subject to adjustment. The
GHQ units commenced trading on February 15, 2008.
Common
Stock
Holders
of GHQ’s common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record on
all matters to be voted on by stockholders. Holders of common stock
have exclusive voting rights for the election of our directors and all other
matters requiring stockholder action, except with respect to amendments to our
certificate that alter or change the powers, preferences, rights or other terms
of any outstanding preferred stock if the holders of such affected series of
preferred stock are entitled to vote on such an amendment.
Holders
of GHQ’s common stock are entitled to receive such dividends, if any, as may be
declared from time to time by our board of directors in its discretion out of
funds legally available therefor. The payment of dividends, if ever,
on the common stock is subject to the prior payment of dividends on any
outstanding preferred stock, of which there is currently none.
We have
not paid any dividends on our common stock to date and do not intend to pay
dividends prior to the completion of the acquisition. The payment of
dividends in the future will depend on our revenues and earnings, if any,
capital requirements and general financial condition after our initial business
combination is completed. The payment of any dividends subsequent to
a business combination will be within the discretion of our then-board of
directors. It is the intention of our present board of directors to
retain any earnings for use in our business operations and, accordingly, we do
not anticipate the board declaring any dividends in the foreseeable
future.
In the
event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up and
after payment or provision for payment of the debts and other liabilities of GHQ
and of the preferential and other amounts, if any, to which the holders of any
preferred stock will be entitled, the holders of all outstanding common shares
will be entitled to receive the remaining assets of GHQ available for
distribution ratably in proportion to the number of common shares held by each
stockholder.
Our
proposed certificate allows GHQ to restrict the ownership or proposed ownership
of its common stock or preferred stock by any person, if such ownership or
proposed ownership: (i) is or could be inconsistent with, or in violation of,
any provision of FCC laws; (ii) will or may limit or impair GHQ’s business
activities under the FCC laws; or (iii) will or could subject GHQ to any FCC
Limitation.
Our
proposed certificate also gives GHQ the right to request from our stockholders
or proposed stockholders (by transfer of stock or otherwise), certain
information, including information relating to such stockholder’s or
proposed
stockholder’s citizenship, affiliations and ownership or interest in other
companies, if GHQ believes that such stockholder’s or proposed stockholder’s
ownership of our securities may result in an FCC Limitation.
If GHQ
does not receive the information it requests from any specific stockholder or
concludes that a person’s ownership or proposed ownership or the exercise by any
person of any ownership right may result in an FCC Limitation, GHQ will have the
right to, and until GHQ determines in its sole discretion that no FCC Limitation
will occur: (i) refuse to permit a transfer of stock to a proposed stockholder;
(ii) suspend rights of stock or equity ownership which could cause an FCC
Limitation; and/or (iii) redeem the common stock or preferred stock of GHQ held
by any person.
Holders
of GHQ’s common stock have no conversion, preemptive or other subscription
rights and there are no sinking fund or redemption provisions applicable to the
common stock.
Founding
Stockholder’s Shares
On
November 13, 2007, our founding stockholder purchased an aggregate of 11,500,000
GHQ units for $25,000 in cash, at a purchase price of approximately $0.003 per
unit. On January 10, 2008, we canceled 1,725,000 units, which were
surrendered by our founding stockholder in a recapitalization, leaving our
founding stockholder with a total of 9,775,000 units (of which 1,275,000 were
subject to forfeiture). On February 1, 2008, our founding stockholder
transferred at cost an aggregate of 150,000 of these founding stockholder’s GHQ
units to Thomas C. Canfield, Kevin P. Clarke and Parker W. Rush (of which 19,563
were forfeited because the underwriter did not exercise the over-allotment
option), each of whom is a director. Of the 9,775,000 GHQ units
purchased, 1,275,000 GHQ units were forfeited on March 27, 2008, following the
expiration of the over-allotment option granted to the underwriters in our
IPO. Pursuant to a letter agreement, dated September 22, 2008, our
founding stockholder has agreed to forfeit 1,441,476 shares of common stock and
8,369,563 warrants obtained in the November 13, 2007 unit purchase, upon the
closing of the acquisition. Therefore, upon the closing of the
acquisition, our founding stockholder will own 6,928,387 shares (not including
any shares that may result from conversion of the note).
Preferred
Stock
Our
proposed certificate provides that shares of preferred stock may be issued from
time to time in one or more series. Our board of directors is
authorized to fix the voting rights, if any, designations, powers, preferences,
the relative, participating, optional or other special rights and any
qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof, applicable to the shares
of each series. Our board of directors may, without stockholder
approval, issue preferred stock with voting and other rights that could
adversely affect the voting power and other rights of the holders of the common
stock and could have anti-takeover effects. The ability of our board
of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval could have
the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of us or the
removal of existing management. We have no preferred stock
outstanding at the date hereof. Although we do not currently intend
to issue any shares of preferred stock, we cannot assure you that we will not do
so in the future.
Warrants
Public
Stockholders’ Warrants
GHQ sold
40.0 million warrants in the IPO, which will remain outstanding following the
closing of the acquisition. The warrants started trading separately
as of the opening of trading on March 20, 2008. Each warrant entitles
the registered holder to purchase one share of our common stock at a price of
$7.00 per share, subject to adjustment, as discussed below, at any time
commencing on the completion of our initial business combination, provided that
we have an effective registration statement under the Securities Act covering
the shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current
prospectus relating to them is available.
The
warrants will expire on February 14, 2013 at 5:00 p.m., New York time, or
earlier upon redemption. Once the warrants become exercisable, we may
call the warrants for redemption, in whole and not in part, at a redemption
price of $0.01 per warrant if, and only if, the reported last sale price of our
common stock equals or exceeds $14.25 per share for any 20 trading days within a
30-trading-day period ending on the third business day prior to the date on
which the notice of redemption is given, and only if on the date we give notice
of redemption and during the entire period thereafter until the time we redeem
the warrants we have an effective registration statement covering the shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus
relating to them is available.
If the
foregoing conditions are satisfied and we issue a notice of redemption, each
warrant holder can exercise his or her warrant prior to the scheduled redemption
date. However, there is no guarantee that the price of the common
stock will exceed the $14.25 trigger price or the $7.00 exercise price after the
redemption notice is issued.
The
exercise price and number of shares of common stock issuable on exercise of the
warrants may be adjusted in certain circumstances including in the event of a
stock dividend, or our recapitalization, reorganization, acquisition or
consolidation. However, the exercise price and number of shares of
common stock issuable on exercise of the warrants will not be adjusted for
issuances of common stock at a price below the warrant exercise
price.
The
warrants may be exercised upon surrender of the warrant certificate on or prior
to the expiration date at the offices of the warrant agent, with the exercise
form on the reverse side of the warrant certificate completed and executed as
indicated, accompanied by full payment of the exercise price, by certified check
payable to us, for the number of warrants being exercised. Holders of
warrants will not be entitled to a net cash settlement upon exercise of the
warrants. Warrant holders do not have the rights or privileges of
holders of common stock, including voting rights, until they exercise their
warrants and receive shares of common stock. After the issuance of
shares of common stock upon exercise of the warrants, each holder will be
entitled to one vote for each share held of record on all matters to be voted on
by stockholders.
No
warrants will be exercisable unless at the time of exercise we have an effective
registration statement under the Securities Act covering the shares of common
stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants and a current prospectus relating
to them is available. Under the warrant agreement, we have agreed to
use our best efforts to have an effective registration statement covering shares
of common stock issuable on exercise of the warrants and to maintain a current
prospectus relating to the common stock from the date the warrants become
exercisable to the date the warrants expire or are redeemed.
Founding
Stockholder’s Warrants
In
addition to the warrants obtained in the unit purchase described above, our
founding stockholder purchased 8,000,000 warrants in a private placement that
closed simultaneously with the closing of our IPO. Pursuant to letter
agreements, dated September 22, 2008 and April 28, 2009, our founding
stockholder has agreed to forfeit upon the closing of the acquisition, 4,000,000
of the founding stockholder’s warrants originally purchased in the private
placement. Therefore, upon the closing of the acquisition, there will
be 4,000,000 founding stockholder’s warrants outstanding.
Our
founding stockholder’s warrants are identical to those issued in the IPO, except
that the founding stockholder’s warrants are non-redeemable so long as they are
held by our founding stockholder or its permitted transferees and the shares of
common stock issued upon exercise of such founding stockholder’s warrants by our
founding stockholder or its permitted transferees will not be registered under
the Securities Act.
Registration
Rights
At the
closing of the acquisition, a Registration Rights Agreement will be entered into
among GHQ and certain persons receiving GHQ shares in the acquisition and
related transactions, the founding stockholder and each other initial
stockholders of GHQ, pursuant to which each such person will be granted certain
registration rights with respect to their shares of common stock and will be
subject to certain transfer restrictions. See “Other Transaction
Agreements—Registration Rights Agreement.” Such Registration Rights
Agreement will supersede the existing registration rights agreement to which the
founding stockholder is a party.
The
transfer agent for the shares of GHQ’s common stock, warrants and units is
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
Listing
Currently,
our units, common stock and our warrants are listed on the NYSE Alternext U.S.
under the symbols “GHQ.U,” “GHQ” and “GHQ.WS,”
respectively. Following the completion of the acquisition, we intend
to seek approval to list our securities on the NYSE.
MANAGEMENT
FOLLOWING THE ACQUISITION
As of the
completion of the acquisition, the board of directors, executive officers and
significant employees of GHQ, which will be renamed “Iridium Communications
Inc.,” will be as set forth below:
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
Robert
H. Niehaus
|
53
|
Director
and Chairman
|
Scott
L. Bok
|
50
|
Director
|
Thomas
C. Canfield
|
53
|
Director
|
Parker
W. Rush
|
49
|
Director
|
Matthew
J. Desch
|
51
|
Director
and Chief Executive Officer
|
Alvin
B. Krongard
|
72
|
Director
|
Steven
Pfeiffer
|
62
|
Director
|
Terry
Jones
|
62
|
Director
|
J.
Darrel Barros
|
48
|
Director
|
Eric
H. Morrison
|
44
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
John
S. Brunette
|
50
|
Chief
Legal and Administrative Officer
|
Greg
Ewert
|
47
|
Executive
Vice President, Sales, Global Distribution Channels
|
Lt.
Gen. John H. Campbell, (ret.)
|
62
|
Executive
Vice President, Government Programs
|
Don
L. Thoma
|
48
|
Executive
Vice President, Marketing
|
John
Roddy
|
54
|
Executive
Vice President, Ground Operations and Product
Development
|
Lee
F. Demitry
|
56
|
Executive
Vice President, “Iridium NEXT”
|
|
|
|
(*) The
board of directors shall also include a representative of
Baralonco.
Management
Executive
Officers
Matthew J.
Desch, Age 51, Director and Chief
Executive Officer. Mr. Desch has more than 27 years of experience in
telecommunications management, and more than 16 years in the global wireless
business. Mr. Desch joined the company in 2006 as Chief Executive
Officer of Iridium Holdings. Previously, he was CEO of Telcordia
Technologies, a telecom software services provider, from
2002-2005. Prior to Telcordia, he spent 13 years at Nortel Networks,
most recently as president for its fast-growing wireless networks business where
he was responsible for its global carrier customers in Europe, the Middle East,
Asia and Latin America. Mr. Desch served on the board of directors of
Starent Networks and Airspan Networks. He has a Bachelor of Science
in computer science from The Ohio State University and a Master of Business
Administration from the University of Chicago.
Eric
Morrison, Age 44, Chief Financial
Officer. Mr. Morrison has been CFO since 2006. Prior to
becoming CFO, Mr. Morrison served as Vice President, Finance and Treasurer of
Iridium Satellite from 2004-2006. Mr. Morrison has worked on the
Iridium program over the last 14 years. He was the controller, and
was later promoted to CFO, at Iridium North America. Even before he
joined Iridium North America, Mr. Morrison worked on the Iridium program at
Motorola. While at Motorola, he was part of the negotiation and
management team on the Raytheon Main Mission Antenna and Khrunichev launch
vehicle contracts and served as the lead accountant for the satellite
manufacturing facility. He graduated with a Master of Business
Administration and a Master of Accountancy from the University of Illinois at
Champaign-Urbana. He graduated from Southern Illinois University with
a Bachelor’s degree in finance and he is also a certified public
accountant.
John
S. Brunette, Age 50, Chief Legal and
Administrative Officer. Mr. Brunette was appointed to his current
position in 2007. Mr. Brunette provides a broad-based business and
legal perspective on a wide range of strategic, tactical, operational and
administrative matters. Prior to joining Iridium Holdings, Mr. Brunette served
as a consultant to technology start up companies from 2006-2007. Mr.
Brunette was previously with Teleglobe Inc., a global voice and data services
provider, where he served as CEO. From 1998-2002, prior to his
appointment as CEO, he was Teleglobe’s executive vice president, chief legal and
administrative officer. Mr. Brunette was also at
MCI
Communications Corporation for twelve years where he led the company’s corporate
legal group. He began his career with the Satellite Business Services
division of IBM Corporation until MCI acquired it in 1986. He holds
both a Bachelor of Arts and a Juris Doctorate from The Catholic University of
America and is a member of the Maryland State Bar Association.
Significant Employees
Greg
Ewert, Age 47,
Executive Vice President Global Distribution Channels. Mr. Ewert
joined Iridium Holdings in 2004 and is responsible for marketing and business
development for Iridium Holdings and its relationship with its distribution
channels. He is also responsible for the product management for
Iridium Holdings’ new product offerings. Mr. Ewert brings 19 years of
experience at senior-level positions in the global communications
industry. Prior to joining Iridium Holdings from 2002-2004, he served
as Executive Vice President for Marketing, Sales, Product Development, Business
Development and Customer Service for COMSAT International. Prior to
COMSAT from 1998-2002, he held executive positions within Teleglobe Inc.,
ranging from Senior Vice President of Global Data Services to Vice President and
General Manager of Carrier and Emerging Markets. Before Teleglobe, he
worked for Sprint from 1987-1997, where he held various positions including
President of Sprint International of Canada. He holds a Bachelor's degree in
Finance from Canisius College, Buffalo, New York.
Lt. Gen. John H.
Campbell, (ret.), Age
62, Executive Vice President Government Programs. General John
Campbell, U.S. Air Force (Retired), joined Iridium Holdings in 2006 from Applied
Research Associates (ARA), where he served as Principal, Defense and
Intelligence, since 2004. General Campbell is responsible for all
aspects of Iridium Holdings’ relationship with its U.S. Government
customers. General Campbell joined ARA after retiring from the United
States Air Force after a 32-year career. In the United States Air Force, General
Campbell served in a variety of operational and staff assignments around the
world. From 1998 to 2000, he was Vice Director of the Defense
Information Systems Agency (DISA) and as the first commander of the Joint Task
Force - Computer Network Defense. From 1997 to 1998, he served on the
Joint Staff as Deputy Director for Operations. Between 1971 and 1997, General
Campbell served around the world in a variety of operational assignments as an
F-15 and F-16 fighter pilot and commander. General Campbell is the
recipient of numerous military and intelligence community awards, including the
Defense Distinguished Service Medal, the Legion of Merit, the Air Medal, the
National Imagery and Mapping Agency Award, the National Reconnaissance
Distinguished Medal, and the National Security Agency Award. He is a
graduate of the University of Kentucky with a degree in Computer Science and a
Master of Business Administration.
Don L.
Thoma, Age 48,
Executive Vice President Marketing. Mr. Thoma was appointed to his current
position in 2008. Mr. Thoma is responsible for leading new Iridium
Holdings corporate initiatives such as Iridium NEXT. He brings to
Iridium a strong and versatile background in both management and business
development. Prior to joining Iridium Holdings, he served as Vice President of
Marketing and Business Development for ObjectVideo, Inc. Prior to
working at ObjectVideo, he held various positions of responsibility for ORBCOMM,
ranging from Senior Director of Transportation to Founder and General Manager of
the Vantage Tracking Solutions business unit and Vice President, Business
Development. Prior to ORBCOMM, he was the director of integration and launch
operations for Orbital Sciences Corporation. Previously, he served as a Captain
in the United States Air Force Space Division. He holds a Bachelor's
degree in Aeronautical Engineering from the Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, a
Master's degree in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Southern
California and a Masters of Business Administration from the Harvard Business
School.
John
Roddy, Age 54,
Executive Vice President Ground Operations and Product
Development. Mr. Roddy joined Iridium Holdings in 2006, bringing with
him more than 27 years of telecommunications industry experience. Mr.
Roddy is responsible for developing Iridium Holdings’ corporate operations model
and program management culture. Prior to joining Iridium Holdings,
Mr. Roddy held numerous executive positions at Telcordia Technologies including
President, Telcordia Global Services; Senior Vice President, Global Operations;
and Chief Information Officer. Mr. Roddy built the Global Services
business, implemented the company’s global operations capability, and rebuilt
its IT organization as part of a major company transition. Prior to
joining Telcordia Technologies, at Nortel Networks, he was Vice President and
General Manager of the Carrier Professional Services Business Unit serving the
CLEC and new market entrants. Prior to that, he was Vice President,
Technology and Director, Ottawa Laboratories for Public Carrier
Networks. He also held the position of Vice President, Canadian
Technical Services and Global Product Support, responsible for the engineering,
installation and emergency/field services of the switching and transmission
product lines for the carrier customers. He began his
telecommunications career in sales
and
marketing, holding varied positions including Product Manager, Dynamic Routing;
Regional Sales Director; and Director of Services Marketing. He holds
a Master of Business Administration from McMaster University, Hamilton,
Canada.
Lee
Demitry, Age 56,
Executive Vice President “Iridium NEXT.” Mr. Demitry is responsible
for the development and introduction of Iridium NEXT as well as the ongoing
support of the existing constellation. He has 30 years of experience
in aerospace and satellite technology, 20 years of which were in the U.S. Air
Force and ten in the private sector. Mr. Demitry has worked on and
successfully led some of the most complex and advanced space and satellite
programs within the United States Government. He has experience in
systems engineering, program management, systems procurement and
contracts. Prior to joining Iridium Holdings, Mr. Demitry was the
Vice President of Engineering at GeoEye, where he lead an extended organization
in developing, deploying and maintaining a $700 million enterprise consisting of
commercial imaging satellites, production and mission planning systems, and
global ground stations. He holds a Masters of Science in
Astronautical Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a
Master’s degree and Masters of Business Administration from Golden Gate
University. Mr. Demitry served in the United States Air Force until
he retired as a Colonel (select).
Directors
Robert
H.
Niehaus, Age 53, Director and Chairman. Mr. Niehaus has
been the Chairman of Greenhill Capital Partners since June 2000. Mr.
Niehaus has been a member of Greenhill’s Management Committee since its
formation in January 2004. Mr. Niehaus joined Greenhill in January
2000 as a managing director to begin the formation of Greenhill Capital
Partners. Prior to joining Greenhill, Mr. Niehaus spent 17 years at
Morgan Stanley & Co., where he was a managing director in the merchant
banking department from 1990 to 1999. Mr. Niehaus was vice chairman
and a director of the Morgan Stanley Leveraged Equity Fund II, L.P., a $2.2
billion private equity investment fund, from 1992 to 1999, and was vice chairman
and a director of Morgan Stanley Capital Partners III, L.P., a $1.8 billion
private equity investment fund, from 1994 to 1999. Mr. Niehaus was
also the chief operating officer of Morgan Stanley’s merchant banking department
from 1996 to 1998. Mr. Niehaus is a director of Exco Holdings, Inc.
and various private companies.
Scott
L.
Bok, Age 50, Director. Mr. Bok has served as
Greenhill’s Co-Chief Executive Officer since October 2007, served as its
Co-President between 2004 and 2007 and has been a member of Greenhill’s
Management Committee since its formation in January 2004. In
addition, Mr. Bok has been a director of Greenhill since its incorporation in
March 2004. From January 2004 until October 2007, Mr. Bok was
Greenhill’s U.S. President. From 2001 until the formation of
Greenhill’s Management Committee, Mr. Bok participated on the two-person
administrative committee responsible for managing Greenhill’s
operations. Mr. Bok has also served as a Senior Member of Greenhill
Capital Partners since its formation. Mr. Bok joined Greenhill as a
managing director in February 1997. Before joining Greenhill, Mr. Bok
was a managing director in the mergers, acquisitions and restructuring
department of Morgan Stanley & Co., where he worked from 1986 to 1997, based
in New York and London. From 1984 to 1986, Mr. Bok practiced mergers
and acquisitions and securities law in New York with Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen &
Katz. Mr. Bok is a member of the board of directors of various
private companies. Mr. Bok is also a member of the Investment
Committee of Greenhill Capital Partners.
Thomas
C.
Canfield, Age 53. Director. Mr. Canfield has
served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel of Spirit Airlines since
October 2007. Previously, Mr. Canfield was General Counsel of Point
Blank Solutions, Inc. and was Chief Executive Officer and Plan Administrator for
AT&T Latin America Corp. Prior to assuming those roles, Mr. Canfield was
General Counsel and Secretary of AT&T Latin America following its
acquisition with FirstCom Corporation. Mr. Canfield became General
Counsel of FirstCom in May 2000. Prior to joining FirstCom, Mr.
Canfield was Counsel in the New York office of Debevoise & Plimpton LLP,
where for nine years he practiced in the areas of corporate, securities and
international transactions. Mr. Canfield also is a member of the
Boards of Directors of Tricom SA and Birch Telecom Inc.
Parker
W.
Rush, Age 49, Director. Mr. Rush has
served as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a member of the Board
of Directors of Republic Companies, Inc., a provider of property and casualty
insurance, since December 2003. Prior to his employment with
Republic, Mr. Rush served as a Senior Vice President and Managing Director at
The Chubb Group of Insurance Companies in charge of the Southern U.S. based in
Dallas, Texas and in various other capacities since February
1980.
Alvin B.
Krongard, Age
72, Director. Mr. Krongard is the Former CEO and Chairman of the Board of
Alex. Brown Incorporated, the nation's oldest investment banking
firm. Mr. Krongard also served as Vice Chairman of the Board of
Bankers Trust in addition to holding other financial industry
posts. He has served as Counselor to the Director of the U.S. Central
Intelligence Agency (CIA), then as Executive Director of the CIA. Mr.
Krongard received a B.A. degree with honors from Princeton University and a
Juris Doctorate degree with honors from the University of Maryland School of
Law. He served three years of active duty as an infantry officer with
the U.S. Marine Corps.
Steven
Pfeiffer, Age
62, Director. Mr. Pfeiffer has been a partner in the law firm of
Fulbright & Jaworski LLP since 1983 and has served as the elected Chair of
the firm's Executive Committee since 2003. He previously served as
the Partner-In-Charge of the Washington, DC and London offices, and headed the
firm's International Department. In addition to serving on the Board
of Iridium Holdings, Mr. Pfeiffer is a Non-Executive Director of Barloworld
Limited in South Africa, Chairman Emeritus of Wesleyan University, a trustee of
The Africa-America Institute in New York, a Director of Project HOPE in
Washington, D.C., and a Director of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational
Fund, Inc. Mr. Pfeiffer received a B.A. degree from Wesleyan
University in Middletown, Connecticut and studied at Oxford University as a
Rhodes Scholar, completing a B.A. and a M.A. in jurisprudence. He
also holds a M.A. in Area Studies (Africa) from the School of Oriental and
African Studies of the University of London and holds a Juris Doctorate from
Yale University. Mr. Pfeiffer served as an officer on active and
reserve duty in the United States Navy.
Terry
Jones, Age 62,
Director. Mr. Jones is a General Partner in Syncom Funds. Prior to
joining Syncom in 1978, he was co-founding stockholder and Vice President of
Kiambere Savings and Loan in Nairobi, and a Lecturer at the University of
Nairobi. He also worked as a Senior Electrical Engineer for
Westinghouse Aerospace and Litton Industries. He is a member of the
board of directors for several Syncom portfolio companies including Radio One,
Inc., Iridium Holdings and TV One LLC. He formerly served on the
Board of the Southern African Enterprise Development Fund, a presidential
appointment, and is on the Board of Trustees of Spellman College. Mr.
Jones received a B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Trinity College, an
M.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from George Washington University and a
Master of Business Administration from Harvard University.
J. Darrel
Barros, Age: 48,
Director. Mr. Barros is the President of Syndicated Communications, Inc., a
private equity fund focused on media and communications. Prior to
joining the SCI team, he was President of VGC, PC, a Washington, DC based law
firm specializing in private equity and early-stage investments. Mr.
Barros also served as a corporate and securities attorney in the venture capital
practice group of DLA Piper US LLP. He is currently Executive
Chairman of Haven Media Group, LLC, a music-media company, and Chairman of
Prestige Resort Properties, Inc., a resort and hospitality
company. Mr. Barros is also a director of TMX Interactive, Simplink
Corporation and Maya Cinemas. Mr. Barros received a B.S. degree from
Tufts University, a Master in Business Administration from the Amos Tuck School
of Business in Dartmouth College, and a Juris Doctorate degree from the
University of Michigan.
GHQ
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
None of
our officers or directors has received any compensation for service rendered to
us, and it is not expected that any such compensation will be paid prior to the
date of the special meeting to which this proxy statement relates. If
our stockholders approve the acquisition, the directors of the post-combination
business will determine executive and director compensation.
Discussion and
Analysis of Post-Acquisition Compensation Scheme
Overall. Following closing of
the acquisition, GHQ intends to develop executive compensation packages that are
competitive in terms of potential value to its executives, and which are
tailored to its unique characteristics and needs within its industry to reward
its executives for their roles in creating value for shareholders. GHQ intends
to be competitive with other similarly situated companies in its industry
following completion of the acquisition.
It is
anticipated that decisions on executive compensation policies and programs
following the closing of the acquisition will be made by a compensation
committee of GHQ’s board of directors. Since that compensation
committee will not be established until the closing of the acquisition, no
formal or informal policies or guidelines now exist for allocating compensation
between long-term and currently paid out compensation, between cash and non-cash
compensation, or among different forms of compensation have been adopted as of
the date hereof. The following discussion is based on the present expectations
as to the policies and programs to be adopted by the compensation committee. The
policies and programs actually adopted will depend on the application of the
judgment of the members of the compensation committee and may differ from those
reflected in the following discussion.
It is
anticipated that the compensation decisions regarding executives will be based
on the need to retain and attract individuals with the skills necessary for GHQ
to achieve its business objectives, to reward those individuals fairly, and to
retain those individuals who continue to perform at or above
expectations.
It is
also anticipated that compensation for executives will have three primary
components -salary, cash incentive bonus and stock-based awards in the form of
stock options. These components of executive compensation would be
related but distinct. GHQ anticipates determining the appropriate level for each
compensation component based in part, but not exclusively, on its view of
internal equity and consistency, individual performance and other information
deemed relevant and timely.
In
addition to the guidance provided by its compensation committee, GHQ may utilize
the services of independent third parties from time to time in connection with
the hiring and compensation awarded to executive employees. This could include
subscriptions to executive compensation surveys and other
databases.
It is
expected that the compensation committee will be charged with performing an
annual review of executive officers’ cash compensation and equity holdings to
determine whether they provide adequate incentives and motivation to executive
officers and whether they adequately compensate the executive officers relative
to comparable officers in other companies.
Benchmarking
of Cash and Equity Compensation. GHQ expects that the compensation
committee will stay apprised of the cash and equity compensation practices of
publicly held companies in related industries through data obtained from such
companies’ public reports and from other resources. It is expected that any
companies chosen for inclusion in any benchmarking group would have business
characteristics comparable to GHQ following the closing of the acquisition,
including one or more of
the following: revenues, financial growth metrics, stage of development,
employee headcount and market capitalization. While benchmarking may not always
be appropriate as a stand-alone tool for setting compensation due to the aspects
of the post-acquisition business and objectives that may be unique to
GHQ. GHQ expects gathering this information will be an important part
of its compensation-related decision-making process.
Compensation
Components.
Base
Salary. It is expected
that executive base salaries will be set at levels generally comparable with
those of executives in similar positions and with similar responsibilities at
comparable companies as necessary to motivate executives to meet corporate
goals. It is anticipated that base salaries will generally be reviewed annually,
subject to terms of any employment agreements.
Annual
Bonuses. GHQ intends to
utilize cash incentive bonuses for executives to focus them on achieving key
operational and financial objectives within a yearly time horizon. It expects
that, near the beginning of each
year, the
compensation committee, subject to the terms of any applicable employment
agreements, will determine performance parameters for appropriate executives. It
also expects that, at the end of each year, the compensation committee will
determine the level of achievement for each corporate goal.
It is
anticipated that the performance parameters for eligibility to receive cash
bonuses under the terms of any employment agreements to be executed following
the consummation of the acquisition will be set by the compensation committee
each year, within 45 days of approval of such year’s annual budget.
Equity
Awards. GHQ also intends
to use stock options and other stock-based awards to reward long-term
performance. GHQ believes that providing a meaningful portion of an executive’s
total compensation package in stock options and other stock-based awards will
align the incentives of its executives with the interests of shareholders and
with GHQ’s long-term success and will serve to retain, motivate and adequately
award the executives.
Equity
awards will be granted through the 2009 Plan, which has been adopted by GHQ’s
board and is being submitted to our stockholders for approval in the section of
this proxy statement entitled “Proposal IV- Adoption of the Stock Incentive
Plan.” All employees, directors, officers and consultants will be eligible to
participate in the 2009 Plan.
Severance
Benefits. GHQ may enter
into new employment agreements with its executive officers following
consummation of the acquisition. Any new employment agreements, which
will be subject to compensation committee approval, may provide severance
benefits that are greater than those described below under “Potential Payments
on Termination or Change-in-Control”.
Other
Compensation. It
is currently anticipated that GHQ will establish and maintain various employee
benefit plans, including medical, dental, life insurance and 401(k)
plans.
Deductibility of
Executive Compensation/ Code Section 162(m). At this time, it
is anticipated that one or more executive officer’s annual compensation may
exceed $1.0 million. Code Section 162(m) (as interpreted by IRS
Notice 2007-49) denies a federal income tax deduction for certain compensation
in excess of $1.0 million per year paid to the chief executive officer and the
three other most highly-paid executive officers (other than a company’s chief
executive officer and chief financial officer) of a publicly-traded corporation.
Certain types of compensation, including compensation based on performance
criteria that are approved in advance by stockholders, are excluded from the
deduction limit. GHQ’s policy is to qualify compensation paid to our executive
officers for deductibility for federal income tax purposes to the extent
feasible. However, to retain highly skilled executives and remain competitive
with other employers, the compensation committee may authorize compensation that
would not be deductible under Section 162(m) or otherwise if it determines that
such compensation is in the best interests of GHQ and its
stockholders.
Accounting
Considerations.
Any equity
compensation expense will
be accounted for under the rules of Statement of SFAS No. 123R, which requires a
company to estimate and record an expense for each award of equity compensation
over the service period of the award.
IRIDIUM
HOLDINGS COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The
following constitutes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis of Iridium
Holdings’ executive compensation program prior to the transactions contemplated
by the acquisition and does not necessarily represent compensation decisions
that will be made by Iridium Holdings following completion of the acquisition,
except where otherwise noted.
Named
Executive Officers.
Iridium Holdings’ Chief Executive
Officer, Chief Financial Officer and three other most highly compensated
executive officers who were serving as executive officers on December 31, 2008
are:
·
|
Matthew
J. Desch, Chief Executive Officer;
|
·
|
Eric
Morrison, Chief Financial Officer;
|
·
|
John
S. Brunette, Chief Legal and Administrative
Officer;
|
·
|
Greg
Ewert, Executive Vice President of Global Distribution Channels;
and
|
·
|
John
Roddy, Executive Vice President for Ground Operations and Product
Development.
|
Throughout this Section, these executive
officers are referred to as the “named executive officers” or
“NEOs”.
Overview of Pre-Acquisition Compensation
Scheme
Prior to the closing of the acquisition,
Iridium Holdings has been a privately held company, operating under the
direction of its Chief Executive Officer and its board of
directors. Historically, Iridium Holdings has generally not
used, and has not had the need to use, many of the more formal compensation
practices and policies employed by publicly traded companies subject to the
executive compensation disclosure rules of the SEC and Section 162(m) of the
Code.
Role
of the Chief Executive Officer. Prior to the acquisition,
all compensation decisions have been recommended by Iridium Holdings’ Chief
Executive Officer for the review and approval of the compensation committee of
Iridium Holdings’ board of directors (the “Committee”), with the exception of
the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer which has been determined by the
Committee with input from the Chief Executive Officer. The current
members of the Committee are Steven Pfeiffer, Alvin B. Krongard and Terry
Jones.
Use
of Compensation Consultant. In 2007, Iridium Holdings
engaged compensation consultant Frederic W. Cook & Co. (the “compensation
consultant”) to review its executive compensation structure in anticipation of
becoming a publicly traded company. The compensation consultant
delivered reports to the Committee during the first quarter of 2008 comparing
the base salary, bonus, equity compensation, long-term incentives and
perquisites paid or provided to Iridium Holdings’ executive officers to the
compensation and benefits provided to the executive officers of the following
communications and technology companies:
·
|
J2 Global Communications
Inc.
|
·
|
Loral Space & Communications
Inc.
|
·
|
Premiere Global Services
Inc.
|
·
|
Time Warner Telecom
Inc.
|
The companies listed above were chosen
for comparison purposes because they are considered to be of similar size (in
terms of enterprise value and revenue) to Iridium Holdings and/or competitors
with Iridium Holdings for talent and/or business (the same group of companies
will not necessarily be used by GHQ as a “peer group” for purposes of comparing
executive compensation levels following the closing of the
acquisition). The compensation consultant’s reports were used to
adjust the NEO’s base salaries and target bonus amounts in 2008 as described
below.
Objectives of
Iridium Holdings’ Compensation Program.
Iridium Holdings’ executive compensation
program is designed to achieve the following three primary
objectives:
·
|
to provide a competitive
compensation package to attract and retain talented individuals to manage
and operate all aspects of its
business;
|
·
|
to reward the achievement of
corporate and individual objectives that promote the growth and
profitability of Iridium Holdings’ business;
and
|
·
|
to align the interests of
executive officers with those of Iridium Holdings’ unitholders by
providing long-term equity-based
compensation.
|
To meet these objectives, Iridium
Holdings’ executive compensation package has generally consisted of a mix of
base salary, performance-based annual cash bonuses, standard employee benefits
and long-term incentives in the form of equity-based awards. Iridium
Holdings believes that performance-based compensation is an important component
of the total executive compensation package for attracting, motivating and
retaining high quality executives. Accordingly, a significant portion of the
NEOs’ compensation is in the form of cash compensation that is subject to the
achievement of annual performance goals and equity-based compensation which
enables the NEOs to share in the growth of Iridium Holdings’ above
pre-established threshold amounts.
Elements of Compensation of Executive
Officers.
The compensation received by Iridium
Holdings’ NEOs in 2008 consists of the following
elements:
Base
Salary. Base salaries for Iridium Holdings’
executive officers are established based on the scope of their responsibilities,
historical performance and individual experience. Base salaries are reviewed
annually, and adjusted from time to time. During 2008, Mr. Desch’s
base salary was increased from $556,000 to $675,000, Mr. Morrison’s base salary
was increased from $270,000 to $325,000, Mr. Brunette’s base salary was
increased from $335,000 to $430,000, Mr. Ewert’s base salary was increased from
$247,000 to $340,000, and Mr. Roddy’s base salary was increased from $260,000 to
$320,000. The base salary of each NEO was increased because the
reports delivered to the Committee by the compensation consultant indicated that
the annual cash compensation (base salary and target bonus) paid to the NEOs was
low relative to the annual cash compensation paid to the executive officers of a
number of companies in the group of companies surveyed by the compensation
consultant. Following the increase, the base salaries of the NEOs
fall between the 25th and 50th percentile of the median base salaries
for each applicable position in the group of companies surveyed. Mr.
Desch’s base salary increase factored in his entitlement to an annual base
salary increase of at least the percentage that the consumer price index for the
Washington D.C.-Baltimore metro area increases for that year, as set forth in
his employment agreement with Iridium Holdings.
Annual
Incentive Cash Compensation. Iridium Holdings maintains a corporate
bonus plan in which all of its employees, including the NEOs, participated in
2008. Under the terms of the bonus plan, each participant is assigned
a target bonus amount expressed as a percentage of such employee’s base
salary.
NEOs’ Target
Bonuses. The target bonus
amounts for 2008 for each NEO are as follows:
·
|
Mr.
Desch’s target bonus is equal to 90% of his base salary compared to 70%
for 2007;
|
·
|
the
target bonus for each of Messrs. Morrison and Brunette is equal to
75% each such officer’s base salary compared to 35% for
2007;
|
·
|
Mr.
Ewert’s target bonus is equal to 75% of his base salary compared to 60%
for 2007;
|
·
|
Mr.
Roddy’s target bonus is equal to 60% of his base salary compared to 35%
for 2007.
|
The target bonus of each NEO was
increased for 2008 because the reports delivered to the Committee by the
compensation consultant referenced above indicated that the annual cash
compensation (base salary and target bonus) paid to the NEOs was low relative to
the annual cash compensation paid to the executive officers of a number of
companies in the group of companies surveyed by the compensation
consultant. Following the increase, the target bonus amounts of the
NEOs fall between the 25th and 75th percentile of the median target bonus
amounts for each applicable position in the group of companies surveyed and the
NEO’s total annual cash compensation (base salary and target bonus) falls
between the 50th and 75th percentile of the median total annual
cash compensation for each applicable position in the group of companies
surveyed.
Determination of the
2008 Bonus Pool. The individual bonus
targets of each employee in the bonus plan are added together to establish the
annual bonus pool target for the plan. The actual bonus pool for the
applicable year is funded based on the level of achievement of pre-established
financial performance goals and organizational imperatives. The
financial performance goals for 2008 are comprised of a company-wide revenue
target of $275.25 million (weighted at 15% of target bonus pool) and adjusted
Operational EBITDA (i.e., GAAP EBITDA less Iridium NEXT expenses) target of $98.1 million
(weighted at 45% of the target bonus pool). In the event of
performance between the company-wide revenue target and a stretch revenue target
of $329.25 million, the amount of the actual bonus pool funded based on the
achievement of the revenue target will be determined based on a sliding scale,
with a maximum of 45% of the bonus pool (i.e., three times the 15% of the target
bonus pool that is funded if the company-wide revenue target is achieved) being
funded if the full stretch goal is achieved or exceeded. Similarly,
the funding of the actual bonus pool for performance between the adjusted
Operational EBITDA target and a stretch Operational EBITDA target of $128.20
million is determined on a sliding scale, with a maximum of 135% of the bonus
pool (i.e., three times the 45% of the target bonus pool that is funded if the
Operational EBITDA target is achieved) being funded if the full stretch goal is
achieved or exceeded. The organizational imperatives comprise the
remaining 40% of the target bonus pool. The organizational
imperatives (which vary from year to year) include the following imperatives for
2008: the core organizational imperatives consist of facilitating a new external
equity investment in Iridium Holdings (weighted at 10% of the target bonus
pool), successful and timely introduction of new products and inventory
management and customer perception in connection with Iridium Holdings’ new
handset introduction (weighted at 10% of the target bonus pool), and the
completion of milestones on Iridium NEXT (weighted at 10% of the target
bonus pool); and the stretch organizational imperatives consist of progress made
on Sarbanes-Oxley compliance and corporate controls in anticipation of becoming
a publicly traded company (which could add an additional 10% to the bonus pool),
achievement of sales goals for new and existing products and increase in
year-end backlog for certain strategic products (which could add an additional
10% to 30% the bonus pool), and the successful closing of a secondary payload
agreement (which could add an additional 20% to the bonus pool). The
organizational imperatives are individually weighted (as shown above) and will
contribute between 0% (if no organizational imperatives are achieved) and 90%
(if all organizational imperatives are achieved) of the total funding of the
bonus pool. When the level of achievement of financial performance
goals and organizational imperatives has been verified by the Committee, the
achieved financial performance goals and organizational imperatives are added
together to comprise the total “corporate target bonus factor,” typically
expressed as a percentage between 0% and the maximum potential computed factor
of 270%. This corporate target bonus factor is multiplied by
the annual bonus pool target to compute the total 2008 bonus
pool. The 2008 bonus pool was funded at 125% of the target bonus pool based upon
the achievement of (i) 116.6% of the company-wide revenue target (or
$320,944,000), (ii) 111% of the adjusted Operational EBITDA target (or
$108,933,000),and (iii) certain operational imperatives including facilitating a
new external equity investment in Iridium Holdings and the attainment of sales
goals for new and existing products.
Determination of
Individual NEO Bonuses for 2008. Once the actual amount of
the bonus pool is determined, the Committee has historically awarded Mr. Desch a
bonus exactly equal to the percentage at which the annual bonus pool is funded
(for example, if the pool were funded at 150% of the target bonus pool, Mr.
Desch would be awarded a bonus equal to 150% of his target bonus (which is 90%
of his base salary), or 135% of his base salary). The Committee
followed this practice for 2008, so Mr. Desch’s 2008 bonus is $759,375 (calculated as his target bonus (which
was 90% of his base salary) multiplied by 125%) . Mr. Desch has the
discretion to recommend to the Committee that it vary the bonus amount payable
to each of the other NEOs above or below the amount such NEO would otherwise
earn based on the percentage at which the bonus pool is actually funded
according to his assessment of the NEO’s performance during the year and the
Committee then makes its own determination as to
whether to accept Mr. Desch’s
recommendation. In making their respective assessments, Mr. Desch and
the Committee independently consider certain individual performance goals
communicated to the NEO during the year which include factors such as the
introduction of new products, the achievement of sales goals for existing
products, exhibiting strong leadership skills, improved tax planning, expanding
international licenses, execution of new partnering agreements, increasing
inventory efficiency, improving customer perceptions regarding transitioning to
next generation products, improving overall customer satisfaction and/or overall
compensation levels. None of these goals is individually weighted and
Mr. Desch may take other factors into account in recommending to the Committee
the amount of bonus to award and the Committee may utilize these or other
factors in determining whether or not to alter Mr. Desch’s
recommendation. Accordingly, an NEO can be awarded a bonus of between
0% and 150% of his personal target bonus percentage multiplied by the percentage
at which the annual bonus pool is funded. For example, if an NEO had
a base salary of $200,000 and a target bonus equal 50% of his base salary, such
NEO’s target bonus would be $100,000. If Iridium Holdings achieves a
“corporate target bonus factor” of 150%, the NEO’s bonus should equal 150% of
his target bonus (i.e., 50% of base salary), for a total of
$150,000. However, Mr. Desch may recommend or the Committee may apply
a personal bonus factor of 0-150% to the annual bonus the NEO would have
otherwise earned. In this example, if Mr. Desch recommended a
personal factor of 90% for the NEO, and the Committee agreed with his
recommendation, the NEO’s annual bonus would be 90% of $150,000, or
$135,000. For 2008, Messrs. Morrison, Brunette, Ewert and Roddy
earned a bonus of
$304,688, $258,000, $318,750, and $240,000, respectively. In the case of
Messrs. Morrison, Ewert and Roddy, the bonus was calculated by multiplying such
named executive officer’s target bonus by 125%. The Committee awarded
Mr. Brunette a bonus equal to 60% of his base salary, after considering the
degree to which each NEO had achieved his individual performance goals and the
total amount of compensation earned by Mr. Brunette for 2008 compared to the
other named executive officers (other than Mr. Desch).
Equity-Based Incentive
Compensation.
Phantom
Profits
Interests in Iridium Holdings. In 2006, Iridium Holdings granted
phantom profits interests to Messrs. Desch and Roddy in connection with their
employment. The phantom profits interests provide that Messrs. Desch
and Roddy will be entitled to receive cash payments as if they held a 2.5% and a
0.5% ownership interest in Iridium Holdings respectively and were therefore
entitled to receive distributions from Iridium Holdings, but in each case only
once such distributions exceeded a designated threshold amount. In 2008, in
connection with the grant of Employee Holdings LLC units described below, Mr.
Desch agreed to a cap on the payments he would be entitled to receive under his
phantom profits interest. Each of the phantom profits interests was
granted subject to a time-based vesting schedule (with vesting over four years
in the case of Mr. Desch and over three years in the case of Mr. Roddy) but will
become fully vested upon the closing of the acquisition. The phantom profits
interests will be cashed out upon the closing of the acquisition, at which point
they will terminate. The amount of these cash payments are expected
to be $4,483,698 in the case of Mr. Desch and $183,983 in the case of Mr.
Roddy.
Employee
Holdings LLC Units. In 2008, Messrs. Desch and Brunette were
awarded 39,582 units and 8,057 units in Employee Holdings LLC,
respectively. The assets of Employee Holdings LLC are comprised
entirely of Class B units in Iridium Holdings. Each Employee Holdings
LLC unit represents one Iridium Holdings Class B unit. The units
provide that Messrs. Desch and Brunette will be indirectly entitled to receive
distributions from Iridium Holdings, but in each case only once such
distributions exceed a designated threshold amount (currently $7,663,499 in the case of Mr. Desch and $2,028,141
in the case of Mr. Brunette). The units were granted subject to a
time-based vesting schedule (with 25% of the units granted to Mr. Desch being
fully vested on the grant date and the remaining 75% vesting ratably over three
years and the units granted to Mr. Brunette vesting ratably over four years),
but the units will become fully vested upon the closing of the
acquisition. Immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition, the
units that remain subject to a threshold amount will be reduced to a lesser
number of units not subject to a threshold amount based on a ratio that
maintains the same economic benefit for all such units. Such reduced
number of units (estimated to be 7,996 Iridium Holdings Class B units in the
case of Mr. Desch and zero Iridium Holdings Class B units in the case of Mr.
Brunette) will be sold to GHQ pursuant to the acquisition.
Iridium Employee
Holdings LLC Units. Messrs. Morrison and
Ewert were awarded units in Iridium Employee Holdings LLC (“Iridium Employee
Holdings”). Mr. Morrison was granted a total of three awards, two,
each of 125 units in 2001 and 2005 respectively and one of 750 units in
2006. Mr. Ewert was granted an award of 1,000 units
in 2005. The assets of Iridium Employee Holdings are comprised
entirely of Class B units in Iridium Holdings. Each Iridium Employee
Holdings unit represents 15.484 Iridium Holdings Class B units. The
units provide that Messrs. Morrison and Ewert will be indirectly entitled to
receive distributions from Iridium Holdings, but in each case only once such
distributions exceed a designated threshold amount (currently $242,736 in the
case of Mr. Ewert and $212,378 in the aggregate in the case of Mr.
Morrison). The units
have already become vested
pursuant to their time-based vesting
schedule, other than 250 units held by Mr. Morrison that will become vested upon
the earlier of January 1, 2009 or the closing of the
acquisition. Immediately prior to the closing of the
acquisition, the units that remain subject to a threshold amount will be reduced
to a lesser number of units not subject to a threshold amount based on a ratio
that maintains the same economic benefit for all such units. Such
reduced number of units (estimated to be 14,621 Iridium Holdings Class B units
in the case of Mr. Morrison and 14,483 Iridium Holdings Class B units in the
case of Mr. Ewert) will be sold to GHQ pursuant to the acquisition.
Severance
Benefits. In connection with his commencement of
employment, each of the NEOs individually negotiated the severance provisions
set forth in their respective employment agreements or employment letter
agreements that are applicable under various termination scenarios including
termination without cause, termination for good reason (or constructive
discharge) and termination in connection with a change in
control. These provisions are discussed more fully in the section
below under the heading “Potential Payments upon Termination or
Change-in-Control” below.
Other
Benefits. Under the terms of his
employment agreement, Iridium Holdings provides Mr. Desch with a leased
automobile and pays the leasing expenses related thereto
and reimburses Mr. Desch for the annual dues at a Washington D.C.-area country
club. Mr. Roddy was reimbursed for the expenses he incurred in
relocating at Iridium Holdings’ request from Canada to the United States in 2007
and 2008. Iridium
Holdings does not currently, and has not previously, made available to any
employees any defined benefit pension or nonqualified deferred compensation plan
or arrangement.
IRIDIUM
HOLDINGS EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Fiscal Year 2008 Summary Compensation Table.
The following table shows compensation
earned by Iridium Holdings’ NEOs in 2008.
Name and Principal
Position
|
Year
|
Salary ($)
|
Bonus ($)
(1)
|
Equity Awards
(2)
|
All Other
Compensation
|
Total
|
Matthew J. Desch, Chief Executive
Officer
|
2008
|
$675,000
|
$759,375
|
$1,512,266
|
$32,389(3)
|
$2,979,030
|
Eric Morrison, Chief Financial
Officer
|
2008
|
$325,000
|
$304,688
|
$56,567
|
$11,500(4)
|
$697,755
|
John S. Brunette, Chief Legal
& Administrative Officer
|
2008
|
$430,000
|
$258,000
|
$134,936
|
$4,480(5)
|
$827,416
|
Greg Ewert, Executive Vice
President of Global Distribution Channels
|
2008
|
$340,000
|
$318,750
|
$55,306
|
$11,500(4)
|
$725,556
|
John Roddy, Executive Vice
President for Ground Operations and Product
Development
|
2008
|
$320,000
|
$240,000
|
$157,229
|
$40,871(6)
|
$758,100
|
(1)
|
The
amounts in this column reflect bonuses earned in 2008, and paid during the
first quarter of
2009.
|
(2)
|
The
amounts in this column reflect the dollar amount of expense recognized for
financial statement reporting purposes in fiscal year 2008 with respect to
LLC units and phantom profits interests granted in fiscal year 2008 as
well as prior years in accordance with FAS 123R. Pursuant to SEC rules,
the amounts shown exclude the impact of estimated forfeitures related to
service-based vesting conditions. Assumptions used in the calculation of
these amounts are included in Note 2 to Iridium Holdings’ Consolidated
Financial Statements for the year ended December
31,
2008.
|
(3)
|
Includes
401(k) matching contributions of $11,500, $8,889 of company-paid expenses
for a leased automobile and $12,000 in reimbursement of country club
dues.
|
(4)
|
Composed
entirely of 401(k) matching contributions of
$11,500.
|
(5)
|
Composed
entirely of 401(k) matching contributions of
$4,480.
|
(6)
|
Includes
401(k) matching contributions of $11,500 and relocation assistance valued
at $29,371.
|
Grants of Plan-Based Awards for 2008.
The following table sets forth
information relating to grants of equity-based incentive awards to the
NEOs in 2008.
Name
|
Grant
Date
|
Stock
Awards (#)
|
Grant
Date Fair Value of Stock Awards (3)
|
Matthew J.
Desch
|
1/21/2008
|
39,582
(1)
|
$
3,573,953
|
John S.
Brunette
|
2/27/2008
|
8,057
(2)
|
$
539,741
|
(1)
|
The
39,582 Employee Holdings LLC units are currently subject to an aggregate
threshold amount of$7,663,499.
Immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition, the units that remain
subject to a threshold amount will be reduced to a lesser number of units
not subject to a threshold amount based on a ratio that maintains the same
economic benefit for all such units. Such reduced number of
units (estimated to be 7,996 Iridium Holdings Class B units) will be sold
to GHQ pursuant to the acquisition.
|
(2)
|
The
8,057 Employee Holdings LLC units are currently subject to an aggregate
threshold amount of $2,028,141. Immediately prior to the
closing of the acquisition, the units that remain subject to a threshold
amount will be reduced to a lesser number of units not subject to a
threshold amount based on a ratio that maintains the same economic benefit
for all such units. Such reduced number of units (estimated to
be zero Iridium Holdings Class B units) will be sold to GHQ pursuant to
the acquisition.
|
(3)
|
Calculated
based on the aggregate grant date fair market value computed in accordance
with FAS 123R.
|
Outstanding Stock Awards at 2008 Fiscal-Year
End.
The
following table sets forth
the equity-based awards made to the NEOs that were outstanding on December 31,
2008, the last day of Iridium Holdings’ fiscal year. No NEO has been
granted options.
Name
|
Number
of Units That Have Not Vested (#)
|
Market
Value of Units That Have Not Vested ($) (3)
|
Matthew J. Desch
(1)
|
19,791
Units of Employee Holdings LLC (2)
|
$941,534
|
Eric
Morrison
|
250
Units of Iridium Employee Holdings (2)
|
$868,304
|
John S.
Brunette
|
6,042.75
Units of Employee Holdings LLC (2)
|
N/A
|
John Roddy
(1)
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
(1) As
described above, Messrs. Desch and Roddy were also granted phantom profits
interests entitling them to receive cash payments as if they held a 2.5% and a
0.5% ownership interest in Iridium Holdings respectively and were therefore
entitled to receive distributions from Iridium Holdings, but in each case only
once such distributions exceed a designated threshold amount. These
phantom profits interests vest over time as described above, but will fully vest
and be cancelled and cashed out upon the consummation of the
acquisition. The value of the unvested portion of each such phantom
profits interest on December 31, 2008 is $2,241,849 in the case of Mr. Desch and
$118,833 in the case of Mr. Roddy.
(2) These
units vest over time as described above, but will fully vest and be cancelled
and cashed out upon the closing of the acquisition. Immediately prior
to the closing of the acquisition, the units that remain subject to a threshold
amount will be reduced to a lesser number of units not subject to a threshold
amount based on a ratio that maintains the same economic benefit for all such
units. Such reduced number of units will be sold to GHQ pursuant to
the acquisition. As described above, all of Mr. Ewert’s units vested before
December 31, 2008.
(3) Footnote
2 of the table under “Estimated Current Value of Accelerated Vesting of
Equity-Based Compensation Upon a Change in Control of Iridium Holdings” shows
how these amounts are calculated.
Employment
Agreements
Mr.
Desch’s Employment Agreement. Iridium Holdings entered into an
employment agreement with Mr. Desch in September 2006 pursuant to which he
serves as Iridium Holdings’ Chief Executive Officer. The agreement has an
initial term of four years commencing on September 18, 2006 and ending September
17, 2010 and will automatically renew for an additional two year term unless Iridium Holdings
or Mr. Desch give written notice of intent not to renew the agreement at least
six months prior to the renewal date. The employment agreement
provides for payment of a base salary of no less than $550,000, which must be
increased each year by at least the same percentage the consumer price index for
the Washington D.C - Baltimore metro area increases for that
year. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Desch is entitled to
participate in Iridium Holdings annual incentive plan with a target award of up
to 70% of his then base salary as determined by the Committee and based upon
performance goals set by the Committee for the year. Mr. Desch’s base salary for
2008 was $675,000 and his target annual incentive compensation award for 2008
was 90% of his base salary.
Mr. Desch is eligible to participate in
employee benefit plans made available to other senior executives. In addition,
Iridium Holdings is required to provide him with an automobile and pay all the
related automobile expenses and reimburse him for the cost of annual dues for a
private club of his choice in the metropolitan Washington D.C.
area.
In his employment agreement, Mr. Desch
has agreed not to compete with Iridium Holdings nor solicit Iridium Holdings
employees for alternative employment during the term of his agreement and for a
period of one year after termination of employment by the company for cause or
if he voluntarily terminates his employment without good
reason.
Mr. Desch’s employment agreement
provides for payments upon certain terminations of his employment. For a
description of these termination provisions, whether or not following a
change-in-control, and a quantification of benefits that would be received see
the heading “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control”
below.
Other than the agreement with Mr. Desch,
Iridium Holdings has not entered into any other employment agreements with other
NEOs. However, the company has entered into employment letter
agreements with the other NEOS as described below.
Employment Letter Agreements for Other NEOs.
Mr.
Morrison’s Employment letter agreement. Mr. Morrison entered into an employment
letter agreement with Iridium Holdings on April 25, 2006, pursuant to which he
serves as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. The
employment letter agreement provides for an initial base salary of $260,000 and
participation in Iridium Holdings annual incentive plan with a target award of
up to 35% of base salary as determined by the Committee and based upon
performance goals set by the Committee for the year. Mr. Morrison’s
base salary for 2008 was $325,000 and his target annual incentive compensation
award for 2008 was 75% of base salary.
Mr.
Brunette’s Employment letter agreement. Mr. Brunette entered into an
employment letter agreement with Iridium Holdings on December 6, 2007 to serve
as its Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel. The employment letter
agreement provides for payment of a base salary of $335,000 and participation in
Iridium Holdings annual incentive plan with a target award of up to 35% of his
then base salary as determined by the Committee and based upon performance goals
set by the Committee for the year. Mr. Brunette’s base salary for
2008 was $430,000 and his annual incentive compensation award for 2008 was 75%
of base salary.
Mr.
Ewert’s Employment letter agreement. Mr. Ewert entered into an employment
letter agreement with Iridium Holdings on September 30, 2004 to serve as its
Executive Vice President of Marketing and Business Development. The employment
letter agreement provides for payment of a base salary of $200,000 and
participation in Iridium Holdings annual incentive plan with a target award of
up to 60% of his then base salary as determined by the Committee and based upon
performance goals set by the Committee for the year. Mr. Ewert’s base
salary for 2008 was $340,000 and his annual incentive compensation award for
2008 was 75% of base salary.
Mr.
Roddy’s Employment letter agreement. Mr. Roddy entered into an
employment letter agreement with Iridium Holdings on August 1, 2007 to serve as
its Executive Vice President of Customer Care, Gateway and Network Operations.
The employment letter agreement provides for payment of a base salary of
$260,000 and participation in Iridium Holdings annual incentive plan with a
target award of up to 35% of his then base salary as determined by the Committee
and based upon performance goals set by the Committee for the
year. Mr. Roddy’s base salary for 2008 was $320,000 and his annual
incentive compensation award for 2008 was 60% of base
salary.
Each of the employment letter agreements
provides for payments upon certain terminations of the NEO’s
employment. For a description of these termination provisions, and a
quantification of benefits that would be received see the heading “Potential
Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control” below.
Potential
Payments on Termination or Change-in-Control
Severance
Payments. The
section below describes the payments that may be made to Iridium Holdings NEOs
in connection with a change-in-control or pursuant to certain termination
events. In the absence of an employment agreement or employment letter agreement
to the contrary, Iridium Holdings’ NEOs are employed “at-will” and are not
entitled to any payments upon termination or a change-in-control other than
their accrued but unpaid salary or benefits.
Matthew
J. Desch. The
employment agreement for Mr. Desch, described above, has certain provisions that
provide for payments to him in the event of the termination of his employment in
the scenarios described below.
Termination
by reason of death. In the case of Mr. Desch’s
death, Iridium Holdings is required to continue to pay to Mr. Desch’s estate his
base salary as of the date of death for a period of six months following his
death and continue benefits to his spouse in accordance with the terms of the
Iridium Holdings’ benefit plans.
Termination
without cause, for good reason or in connection with a change in
control. In the event that Iridium Holdings
terminates Mr. Desch’s employment without “cause”, Mr. Desch terminates
employment for “good reason,” or his employment is terminated in connection with
a “change in control” (each as defined below) Iridium Holdings is required to
pay, or provide, to him: in a lump sum, the sum of (i) 100% of his base salary
as in effect on the date of termination of employment, and (ii) 100% of his
annual bonus amount under his employment agreement for the year of termination
(assuming all performance targets and objectives had been met). Also,
Iridium Holdings must provide Mr. Desch with health insurance (or reimburse him
for the cost of his COBRA payments) for one year following termination of
employment or until he is covered under a new employer’s health plan, whichever
comes first.
Definitions. For purposes of Mr. Desch’s employment
agreement the following definitions apply:
“Cause” means any of the
following:
·
|
Mr.
Desch’s knowing and willful violation of Iridium Holdings’ policies that
causes a material adverse effect or continued failure, after not less than
30 days' written notice, to perform his duties, including failure to
follow lawful directions of the Board of Directors, except where his
repeated failure is caused by or attributable to a
disability;
|
·
|
The
issuance of an indictment or filing of a criminal information charging Mr.
Desch with the commission of a crime constituting a felony or
involving moral turpitude or his conviction of such a
crime;
|
·
|
The
embezzlement or criminal diversion of funds by Mr. Desch;
or
|
·
|
Mr.
Desch's failure to perform or to comply with any material term or
condition of his employment agreement, if he fails to cure the failure or
fails to commence and diligently seek to cure the failure within 30 days
after written notice.
|
“Good
Reason" means the occurrence of any of the following which is not cured within
15 days after written notice:
·
|
Iridium
Holdings assignment to Mr. Desch of duties that are materially
inconsistent with his position, authority, duties, or
responsibilities;
|
·
|
Iridium
Holdings failure to comply with any material term of Mr. Desch’s
employment agreement.
|
|
“Change of Control” means any of
the following:
|
·
|
Any
person (other than a person or an affiliate of such person who as of the
effective date of Mr. Desch’s employment agreement owns an interest in
Iridium Holdings)
becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of interests in
Iridium Holdings
representing more than 50% of the combined voting power of Iridium
Holdings’ then-outstanding equity
interests;
|
·
|
The
consummation of a consolidation, merger or share or unit exchange
involving Iridium Holdings
in which Iridium
Holdings is not the continuing or surviving entity or pursuant to
which Iridium Holdings’ equity interests would be converted into cash,
securities, or other property, other than a merger in which the holders of
Iridium Holdings voting interests immediately before the merger own 50% or
more of the voting interests in the surviving entity immediately after the
merger;
|
·
|
The
consummation of any sale, lease, exchange, or other transfer (in one
transaction or a series of related transactions) of substantially all of
Iridium Holdings assets, other than to one or more of Iridium Holdings
wholly-owned subsidiaries or to an entity in which the persons holding
Iridium Holdings voting interests immediately before the consummation of
the acquisition own 50% or more of the voting interests after the
transaction.
|
Eric
Morrison. The
employment letter agreement for Mr. Morrison provides that he may be terminated
by Iridium Holdings for any reason upon 30 days’ written
notice. However, in the event he is terminated without cause by
Iridium Holdings or he terminates his employment as a result of a constructive
discharge, he will be entitled to three months of salary continuation based upon
his then current rate of pay. In addition, in the event his
employment is terminated without cause by Iridium Holdings or he terminates his
employment as a result of constructive discharge, he will be entitled receive a
pro-rated portion of his target bonus amount for the year of termination based
upon the actual achievement of plan targets for the year of
termination. For purposes of his employment letter agreement,
constructive discharge is defined as the assignment of duties materially
inconsistent with Mr. Morrison’s position, authority, duties or
responsibilities, or a substantially adverse alteration in the nature or status
of his responsibilities.
John
S. Brunette. The employment letter agreement for Mr.
Brunette provides that he may be terminated by Iridium Holdings for any reason
upon 30 days’ written notice. In addition, in the event his
employment is terminated without cause by Iridium Holdings or he terminates his
employment as a result of constructive discharge, he will be entitled receive a
pro-rated portion of his target bonus amount for the year of termination based
upon the
actual achievement of plan targets for
the year of termination. For purposes of his employment letter
agreement, constructive discharge is defined as the assignment of duties
materially inconsistent with Mr. Brunette’s position, authority, duties or
responsibilities, or a substantially adverse alteration in the nature or status
of his responsibilities.
Greg
Ewert. The employment letter agreement for Mr.
Ewert provides that in the event his employment is terminated as a result of a
change in control, he will be entitled to continuation of his then current base
salary for a period of six months following termination of
employment.
John
Roddy. The
employment letter agreement for Mr. Roddy provides that he may be terminated by
Iridium Holdings for any reason upon 30 days’ written
notice. However, in the event he is terminated without cause by
Iridium Holdings or he terminates his employment as a result of constructive
discharge, he will be entitled to salary continuation for a period of six
months’ following termination of employment. If after the six month
period Mr. Roddy has not found suitable employment, the salary continuation
payments will continue for up to an additional three months or until Mr. Roddy
finds suitable employment, whichever comes first. In addition, in the event
his employment is terminated without cause by Iridium Holdings or he terminates
his employment as a result of constructive discharge, he will be entitled
receive a pro-rated portion of his target bonus amount for the year of
termination based upon the actual achievement of plan targets for the year of
termination. For purposes of his employment letter agreement,
constructive discharge is defined as the assignment of duties materially
inconsistent with Mr. Roddy’s position, authority, duties or responsibilities,
or a substantially adverse alteration in the nature or status of his
responsibilities.
Estimated
Current Value of Post-Employment Non-Equity Related
Severance Benefits.
The following table shows payments that
would be made to each NEO in the event of a termination of employment on
December 31, 2008 under different scenarios.
Executive
|
Death
|
Without Cause or for Good Reason/
Constructive Discharge
|
Involuntary termination in
connection with a Change in Control
|
Matthew J.
Desch
|
$337,500(1)
|
$1,158,711(2)
|
$1,158,711(3)
|
Eric
Morrison
|
$0
|
$81,250(4)
|
$81,250(5)
|
John S.
Brunette
|
$0
|
$258,000(6)
|
$35,833(7)
|
Greg Ewert
|
$0
|
$0
|
$170,000(8)
|
John Roddy
|
$0
|
$240,000(9)
|
$240,000(10)
|
(1)
|
Equal
to 6 months of salary.
|
(2)
|
Equal
to the sum of 12 months of base salary, annual bonus at target level and
continuation of health benefits for 12
months.
|
(3)
|
Equal
to the sum of 12 months of base salary, annual bonus at target level and
continuation of health benefits for 12
months.
|
(5)
|
Equal
to 3 months of salary.
|
(6)
|
Equal
to Mr. Brunette’s bonus for 2008.
|
(7)
|
Equal
to 3 months of salary.
|
(8)
|
Equal
to 6 months of salary.
|
(9)
|
Equal
to 9 months of salary.
|
(10)
|
Equal
to 9 months of salary.
|
Acceleration
of Equity-Based Incentive Compensation Awards.
Phantom
Profits
Interests in Iridium Holdings. Mr. Desch is contractually
entitled to receive accelerated vesting of his phantom profits interest award if
he experiences an involuntary termination resulting from a change of control of
Iridium Holdings (however, as described above, the unvested portion of Mr.
Desch’s phantom profits interest will fully vest and be cashed out upon the
consummation of the acquisition). Mr. Roddy is contractually entitled
to receive accelerated vesting of his phantom profits interest awards upon a
change of control of Iridium Holdings (but he is not entitled to any accelerated
vesting upon termination of employment for any reason).
Employee
Holdings LLC and Iridium Employee Holdings Units. The Employee Holdings units granted to
Mr. Desch and Mr. Brunette both contain provisions that accelerate the vesting
of the units under certain circumstances. In the case of both Mr. Desch and Mr.
Brunette, their unvested units will vest completely upon an involuntarily
termination of employment as a result of a change in control of Iridium Holdings
(but upon any other
termination,
all unvested units are automatically
forfeited). Mr. Desch’s unit award also provides that his unvested
units will vest upon the occurrence of a change in control to the extent
necessary to bring the total number of vested units up to 50% of the total
number of units granted (However,
as described above, the unvested units will fully vest in connection with the
consummation of the acquisition).
All of the Iridium Employee Holdings
Units held by Messrs. Morrison and Ewert were fully vested prior to
December 31, 2008 other than 250 units granted to Mr. Morrison that vested on
January 1, 2009. The award letter pursuant to which these units were
granted provides for the accelerated vesting of the units in the event of a
change in control of Iridium Holdings (but does not provide for any accelerated
vesting upon a termination of employment).
Estimated Current
Value of Accelerated Vesting of Equity-Based Compensation Upon a Change in
Control of Iridium Holdings. The following table shows the value
attributable to the accelerated vesting of units held by each NEO in the event
of a change in control of Iridium Holdings on December 31, 2008 (Neither Mr.
Desch nor Mr. Brunette is entitled to full accelerated vesting of his unit award
(or, in the case of Mr. Desch, his phantom profits interest award) upon a change
in control of Iridium Holdings.
Executive
|
Value of
Accelerated Vesting of Employee Holdings LLC or Iridium
Employee Holdings Units (1)
|
Value of Accelerated Vesting of
Phantom Profits Interests
|
Matthew J.
Desch
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Eric
Morrison
|
$868,304
|
N/A
|
John S.
Brunette
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Greg Ewert
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
John Roddy
|
N/A
|
$118,833
(2)
|
(1) The
value of the accelerated vesting has been calculated as the difference between:
(a) the value of the granted units, which is determined by multiplying the
number of granted units held by the NEO on December 31, 2008 by the difference
between (i) $242.62, which in the event of full acceleration we believe to be
the fair market value of a Class B Unit on December 31, 2008, and (ii) the
remaining threshold amount on a per unit basis as of December 31, 2008 and (b)
the value of the vested units, which is determined by multiplying the number of
vested units held by the NEO on December 31, 2008 by the difference between (i)
$244.06, which we believe to be the fair market value of a Class B Unit on
December 31, 2008, and (ii) the remaining threshold amount on a per unit basis
as of December 31, 2008.
(2) The
value of the accelerated vesting of Mr. Roddy’s profits interest has been
calculated by deeming the phantom profits interest to be converted in the
equivalent number of Class B Units (7,976) and then applying the calculation
described in note 1 above.
Director
Compensation for 2008.
The
following table provides summary information concerning compensation paid or
accrued by us to or on behalf of the non-employee directors of Iridium Holdings
as of the end of the last fiscal year for services rendered to us during the
last fiscal year.
Name
|
Fees
Earned
or
Paid
in
Cash
($)
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
Total
($)
|
Alvin
B. Krongard
|
$100,000
(1)
|
$128,380(2)
|
$228,380
|
Thomas
J. Ridge
|
$100,000
(1)
|
$129,628(2)
|
$229,628
|
(1) Each
of Mr. Krongard and, prior to his resignation from the board of Iridium Holdings
effective as of February 25, 2009, Mr. Ridge was contractually entitled to
receive annual director’s fees equal to $100,000 in the
aggregate.
(2) Reflects
the dollar amount recognized for financial statement reporting purposes for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 in accordance with FASB Statement 123(R)
with respect to the 3,958 Class B units of Iridium Holdings granted to each of
Messrs. Krongard and Ridge in 2008. The FASB Statement 123(R) grant date value
of each such Class B unit grant was $357,384
for the grant to Mr. Krongard and $363,101 for the grant to Mr.
Ridge. The Class B units granted to Messrs. Krongard and Ridge are
only entitled to receive distributions from Iridium Holdings once such
distributions exceed a designated threshold amount (currently, $766,415 for each
director). The units are subject to forfeiture if the director
voluntarily resigns or is removed from the Iridium Holdings board of directors
before the expiration of his then current term. Accordingly, Mr.
Ridge forfeited all of his Class B units upon his
resignation. Immediately prior to the closing of the acquisition, the
units held by Mr. Krongard will
cease
to be subject to forfeiture and will be reduced to a lesser number of units not
subject to a threshold amount based on a ratio that maintains the same economic
benefit for all such units. Such reduced number of units (in each
case, estimated to be 1,249 Iridium Holdings Class B units) will be sold to GHQ
pursuant to the acquisition.
GHQ
On
November 13, 2007, our founding stockholder purchased an aggregate of 11,500,000
GHQ units for $25,000 in cash, at a purchase price of approximately $0.003 per
unit. On January 10, 2008, we canceled 1,725,000 units, which were
surrendered by our founding stockholder in a recapitalization, leaving our
founding stockholder with a total of 9,775,000 units (of which 1,275,000 were
subject to forfeiture). On February 1, 2008, our founding stockholder
transferred at cost an aggregate of 150,000 of these founding stockholder’s GHQ
units to Thomas C. Canfield, Kevin P. Clarke and Parker W. Rush, each of whom is
a director. Of the 9,775,000 GHQ units purchased, 1,275,000 GHQ units
were forfeited on March 27, 2008, following the expiration of the over-allotment
option granted to the underwriters in our IPO. In addition at the
time of the closing of our IPO our founding stockholder purchased 8,000,000
private placement warrants at a price of $1.00 per warrant with an exercise
price of $7.00 per share. The private placement warrants were
purchased separately and not in combination with common stock or in the form of
GHQ units. The proceeds from the sale price of the private placement
warrants were added to the proceeds from the IPO to be held in the trust account
at Wachovia Securities, LLC, to be maintained by American Stock Transfer &
Trust Company pending our completion of an initial business
combination. If we do not complete an initial business combination
that meets the criteria described in the Prospectus, then the $8.0 million
purchase price of the private placement warrants will become part of the
liquidation distribution to our public stockholders and the private placement
warrants will expire worthless. Our founding stockholder has agreed
to forfeit at the closing of the acquisition: (1) 1,441,176 shares of our common
stock purchased as part of the unit purchase on November 31, 2007; (2) 8,369,563
warrants purchased as part of the unit purchase on November 13, 2007; and (3)
4,000,000 warrants purchased in a private placement on February 21,
2008.
The
founding stockholder’s shares are identical to the shares of common stock
included in the GHQ units sold in our IPO under a prospectus (the “Prospectus”)
dated February 14, 2008, as filed with the SEC on February 14, 2008, except that
the initial stockholders have agreed:
·
|
that
the founding stockholder’s shares are subject to the transfer restrictions
described below;
|
·
|
to
vote the founding stockholder’s shares in the same manner as the majority
of the holder of the IPO shares in connection with the vote required to
approve the acquisition proposal and to certificate proposal to provide
for GHQ’s perpetual existence; and
|
·
|
to
waive their rights to participate in any liquidation distribution with
respect to the founding stockholder’s shares if GHQ fails to consummate a
business combination.
|
In
addition, the founding stockholder and each of our executive officers and
directors have agreed that if it, he or she acquired shares of common stock in
or following our IPO, it, he or she will vote all such shares in favor of an
initial business combination and the related amendment to our certificate to
provide for our perpetual existence. (Any such purchases of stock
following the IPO are expected to be effected through open market purchases or
in privately negotiated transactions.) As a result, neither our initial
stockholders, nor our executive officers or directors will be able to exercise
the conversion rights with respect to any of our shares that it, he or she has
acquired before, in or following our IPO.
The
founding stockholder’s warrants are identical to those included in the GHQ units
sold in the IPO, except that:
·
|
the
founding stockholder’s warrants, including the common stock issuable upon
exercise of the warrants, are subject to the transfer restrictions
described below;
|
·
|
the
founding stockholder’s warrants will become exercisable upon the later of
(i) the date that is one year after the date of the Prospectus or (ii)
after the consummation of our initial business combination, in each case,
if (x) the last sales price of our common stock equals or exceeds $14.25
per share for any 20 trading days within any 30-trading-day period
beginning 90 days after such business combination and (y) there is an
effective registration statement covering the shares of common stock
issuable upon exercise of the warrants contained in the GHQ units included
in the IPO;
|
·
|
the
founding stockholder’s warrants will not be redeemable so long as they are
held by the founding stockholder or its permitted transferees;
and
|
·
|
the
founding stockholder’s warrants may be exercised by the founding
stockholder or its permitted transferees on a cashless
basis.
|
Although
the shares of common stock issuable pursuant to the founding stockholder’s
warrants will not be issued pursuant to a registration statement, so long as
they are held by our founding stockholder and its permitted transferees, the
warrant agreement provides that the founding stockholder’s warrants may not be
exercised unless a registration statement relating to the common stock issuable
upon exercise of the warrants purchased in the IPO is effective and a related
current prospectus is available.
The
private placement warrants, including the common stock issuable upon exercise of
these warrants, are subject to the transfer restrictions described
below. The private placement warrants will be non-redeemable so long
as they are held by our founding stockholder or its permitted transferees and
may be exercised by our founding stockholder or its permitted transferees on a
cashless basis. With the exception of the terms noted above, the
private placement warrants have terms and provisions that are identical to those
of the warrants sold as part of the units in the IPO.
Our
initial stockholders have agreed not to sell or transfer the founding
stockholder’s GHQ units, founding stockholder’s shares or founding stockholder’s
warrants, including the common stock issuable upon exercise of these warrants,
until 180 days after the consummation of our initial business combination except
to certain permitted transferees who must agree to be bound by the same transfer
restrictions and voting, waiver and forfeiture provisions. All of the
founding stockholder’s GHQ units, founding stockholder’s shares and founding
stockholder’s warrants and shares issuable upon exercise of the founding
stockholder’s warrants will cease to be subject to the transfer restrictions if,
after our initial business combination, (i) the last sales price of our common
stock equals or exceeds $14.25 per share for any 20 trading days within any 30
trading day period beginning 90 days after our initial business combination or
(ii) we consummate a subsequent liquidation, acquisition, stock exchange or
other similar transaction that results in all of our stockholders having the
right to exchange their shares of common stock for cash, securities or other
property. Our founding stockholder has agreed not to sell or transfer
the private placement warrants until after we complete our initial business
combination except to certain permitted transferees.
Concurrently
with the issuance and sale of the securities in the IPO, we entered into an
agreement with our initial stockholders and certain employees of the founding
stockholder with respect to securities held by them from time to time, including
the founding stockholder’s GHQ units, founding stockholder’s shares, founding
stockholder’s warrants, private placement warrants, underlying shares and any
GHQ units purchased in the IPO (including the shares, warrants and underlying
shares included therein) by managing directors and senior advisors of the
founding stockholder, granting them and their permitted transferees the right to
demand that we register the resale of any of our securities held by them on a
registration statement filed under the Securities Act. The
registration rights are exercisable with respect to the securities at any time
commencing 30 days after the consummation of our initial business combination,
provided that such registration statement would not become effective until after
the expiration of the lock-up period applicable to the securities being
registered and with respect to all of the warrants and the underlying shares of
common stock, after the relevant warrants become exercisable by their
terms. We will bear the expenses incurred in connection with the
filing of any such registration statements.
As part
of the consummation of the acquisition, the lock-up agreements and the existing
registration rights agreement will be terminated and replaced by the new
registration rights agreement described below.
Upon the
consummation of the acquisition, GHQ, the initial stockholders and the Iridium
Holding’s sellers (each a “restricted stockholder”) will enter into a
registration rights agreement (“new registration rights agreement”), terminating
and replacing the lock-up agreements described above. Under the new registration
rights agreement, each of the stockholders party to this registration rights
agreement will not sell, pledge, establish a “put equivalent position,”
liquidate or decrease a “call equivalent position,” or otherwise dispose of or
transfer any GHQ securities for a period of one year after the closing date of
the acquisition; provided that, the board of directors of GHQ may authorize an
underwritten public offering at any time beginning six months after the closing
date. In addition, each such stockholder may pledge up to 25% of its
GHQ shares as collateral to secure cash borrowing from a third party financial
institution so long as such financial institution agrees to be subject to these
transfer restrictions.
Managing
directors and senior advisors of our founding stockholder have purchased an
aggregate of 1,247,500 GHQ units at the IPO price through a directed unit
program.
On
November 19, 2007, we issued a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount
of $250,000 to our founding stockholder. This note accrued interest
at the rate of 8.5% per annum, was unsecured and was due at the earlier of
December 30, 2008, or the consummation of the IPO. The note was
repaid out of the proceeds of the IPO not placed in our trust
account.
We have
entered into and agreement with Greenhill for the payment of an aggregate of
$10,000 per month for office space, secretarial and administrative services that
will terminate upon the closing of the acquisition.
On
October 24, 2008, a subsidiary of our founding stockholder acquired the note
from Iridium Holdings, see “Other Transaction Agreements – Note Purchase
Agreement”.
Iridium
Holdings
Please
see “Information about Iridium Holdings – Legal Proceedings”.
TRANSFER
AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The
transfer agent for our securities and warrant agent for our warrants is American
Stock Transfer & Trust Company.
SUBMISSION
OF STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
GHQ’s
board of directors is aware of no other matter that may be brought before the
GHQ special meeting. Under Delaware law, only business that is
specified in the notice of special meeting to stockholders may be transacted at
the special meeting.
APPRAISAL
RIGHTS
GHQ
stockholders do not have appraisal rights in connection with the acquisition or
the issuance of GHQ shares pursuant to the acquisition under Delaware
law.
INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
Representatives
of GHQ’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP,
will be present at the special meeting of the stockholders. The
representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire
and they are expected to be available to respond to appropriate
questions.
FUTURE
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS
If you
are a stockholder and you want to include a proposal in the proxy statement for
GHQ’s annual meeting, presently expected to be held in ,
under applicable rules of the SEC, a stockholder proposal must be received a
reasonable time before a company begins to print and mail its annual meeting
proxy materials.
GHQ files
annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information
with the SEC under the Exchange Act. You may read and copy this
information at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549. You may also obtain copies of this information by mail
from the Public Reference Section of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington,
D.C. 20549, at prescribed rates. The SEC also maintains an Internet
website that has reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers,
like Iridium Holdings and GHQ, that make electronic filings with the
SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.
Information
and statements contained in this proxy statement are qualified in all respects
by reference to the copy of the relevant contract or other annex filed as an
exhibit to this proxy statement.
GHQ has
supplied all information contained in this proxy statement relating to GHQ, and
Iridium Holdings has supplied all information relating to Iridium
Holdings. Information provided by one does not constitute any
representation, estimate or projection of the other.
If you
have any questions about any of the proposals set forth herein or need
additional copies of proxy materials, you may contact GHQ in writing or by
telephone:
GHL
Acquisition Corp.
300 Park
Avenue, 23rd Floor
New York,
NY 10022
Telephone:
(212) 372-4180
You can
also get more information by visiting and Iridium Holdings’ website at
www.iridium.com. Website materials are not part of this proxy
statement
Or you
may contact our proxy solicitor:
105
Madison Avenue
New
York, New York 10016
proxy@mackenziepartners.com
Call
Collect: (212) 929-5500
or
Toll-Free
(800) 322-2885
|
If you
would like to request documents from us, please do so by ,
2009 to receive them before the stockholders’ meetings. We shall send
the documents by first-class mail within one business day of receiving your
request.
YOU
SHOULD RELY ONLY ON THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT TO VOTE ON
THE PROPOSALS DISCUSSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT. WE HAVE NOT
AUTHORIZED ANYONE TO PROVIDE YOU WITH INFORMATION THAT IS DIFFERENT FROM WHAT IS
CONTAINED IN THIS
DOCUMENT. THIS
PROXY STATEMENT IS DATED ,
2009. YOU SHOULD NOT ASSUME THAT THE INFORMATION IN IT IS ACCURATE AS
OF ANY DATE OTHER THAN THAT DATE, AND NEITHER ITS MAILING TO STOCKHOLDERS NOR
THE ISSUANCE OF GHQ COMMON SHARES IN THE ACQUISITION SHALL CREATE ANY
IMPLICATION TO THE CONTRARY.
Index
to Financial Statements
GHQ
Acquisition Corp.
Reports
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms
|
F-2
|
Statements
of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2008 and 2007
|
F-4
|
Statements
of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the Period from
November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31, 2007 and for the Period from
November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December
31, 2008
|
F-5
|
Statements
of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Period from November 2, 2007
(Inception) to
December 31, 2008
|
F-6
|
Statements
of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2008 and for the Period from
November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31, 2007 and for the Period from
November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December
31, 2008
|
F-7
|
Notes
to Financial Statements
|
F-8
|
Statements
of Financial Condition as of March 31, 2009 (unaudited) and December 31,
2008
|
F-18
|
Unaudited
Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008,
and for the Period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to March 31,
2009
|
F-19
|
Unaudited
Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for the Period from November 2, 2007
(Inception) to March 31, 2009
|
F-20
|
Unaudited
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 and for the Period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to March 31,
2009
|
F-21
|
Notes
to Unaudited Financial Statements
|
F-22
|
|
|
Iridium
Holdings LLC
|
|
|
|
Report
of Independent Auditors
|
F-30
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007
|
F-31
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006
|
F-32
|
Consolidated
Statements of Members’ Deficit and Comprehensive Income for the years
ended December
31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
F-33
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006
|
F-34
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-35
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008
|
F-74
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-75
|
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended
March
31, 2009 and 2008
|
F-76
|
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-77
|
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholder
of
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
We have audited the accompanying
statement of financial condition of GHL Acquisition Corp. (A We have audited the
accompanying statement of financial condition of GHL Acquisition Corp. (A
Corporation in the Development Stage) (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008,
and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and
cash flows for the year then ended, and for the period from November 2, 2007
(Inception) to December 31, 2008. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. The financial
statements as of December 31, 2007, and for the period from November 2, 2007
(Inception) to December 31, 2007, were audited by other auditors whose report
dated March 28, 2008 expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements. The
financial statements for the period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to
December 31, 2007 include a net loss of $3,812. Our opinion on the
statements of operations, changes in stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) through December 31,
2008, insofar as it relates to amounts for prior periods to December 31, 2007,
is based solely on the report of other auditors.
We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits
included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis
for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but
not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no
such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, based on our audit and
the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of GHL Acquisition
Corp. at December 31, 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for the year then ended and the period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to
December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
New York, New York
March 23, 2009
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholder
of
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
We have audited the accompanying
statement of financial condition of GHL Acquisition Corp. (A Corporation in
the Development Stage) (the ‘‘Company’’) as of December 31, 2007, and the
related statements of operations, changes in stockholder’s equity and cash flows
for the period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31, 2007.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based
on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform and
we did not perform, an audit of the Company's internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements
referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of GHL Acquisition Corp. as of December 31, 2007, and the results
of its operations and its cash flows for the period from November 2, 2007
(Inception) to December 31, 2007 in conformity with United States generally accepted accounting
principles.
New York, New York
March 28, 2008
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(A Corporation in the Development
Stage)
Statements of Financial
Condition
As of December 31,
Assets:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
129,140 |
|
|
$ |
184,378 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Income
tax receivable
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
143,474 |
|
|
|
184,378 |
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
1,168,232 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Deferred
offering costs
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
315,622 |
|
Investments
held in trust at broker, including accrued interest of
$110,490
|
|
|
401,838,554 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
403,150,260 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note
payable – stockholder, including interest
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
252,538 |
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
1,610,848 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
Accrued
offering costs
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
225,000 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
1,610,848 |
|
|
|
478,812 |
|
Deferred
underwriter commissions
|
|
|
11,288,137 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
12,898,985 |
|
|
|
478,812 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock subject to possible conversion (11,999,999 shares, at conversion
value)
|
|
|
119,987,999 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $0.0001 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
1,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
issued and outstanding
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
200,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
and outstanding 48,500,000 (including 11,999,999 shares of common
stock subject to possible conversion presented above) and 11,500,000
shares as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively
|
|
|
48,500 |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
268,562,770 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
Retained
earnings (deficit) accumulated during the development
stage
|
|
|
1,652,006 |
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
270,263,276 |
|
|
|
21,188 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
403,150,260 |
|
|
$ |
500,000 |
|
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(A Corporation in the Development
Stage)
Statements of
Operations
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
For
the Period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,
2007
|
|
|
For
the Period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional
fees
|
|
$ |
2,314,149 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,314,149 |
|
Other
operating expenses
|
|
|
278,036 |
|
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
281,848 |
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
2,592,185 |
|
|
|
3,812 |
|
|
|
2,595,997 |
|
Other
income – interest
|
|
|
5,604,554 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,604,554 |
|
Income
(loss) before provision for taxes
|
|
|
3,012,369 |
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
3,008,557 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
1,356,551 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,356,551 |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,655,818 |
|
|
$ |
(3,812 |
) |
|
$ |
1,652,006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding – basic and diluted
|
|
|
43,268,238 |
|
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
|
|
|
|
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(A Corporation in the Development
Stage)
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
For the Period
November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During
the
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
Development
|
|
|
Stockholders’
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
|
Stage
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance
at November 2, 2007 (Inception)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Issuance
of units to Founder on November 13, 2007 at approximately $0.002 per
unit
|
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
21,188 |
|
Sale
of 40,000,000 units through public offering at $10.00 per unit, net
of underwriter’s discount and offering expenses and excluding $119,987,999
of proceeds allocable to 11,999,999 shares of common stock subject to
possible conversion
|
|
|
40,000,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
260,546,270 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
260,586,270 |
|
Sale
of private placement warrants
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
Forfeiture
of 1,725,000 units by Founder on January 10, 2008
|
|
|
(1,725,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Forfeiture
of 1,275,000 units by Founder on March 27, 2008
|
|
|
(1,275,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,655,818 |
|
|
|
1,655,818 |
|
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
48,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,500 |
|
|
$ |
268,562,770 |
|
|
$ |
1,652,006 |
|
|
$ |
270,263,276 |
|
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(A Corporation in the Development
Stage)
Statements of Cash
Flows
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
For
the Period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,
2007
|
|
|
For
the Period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,
2008
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
1,655,818 |
|
|
$ |
(3,812 |
) |
|
$ |
1,652,006 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
items included in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
taxes
|
|
|
(1,168,232 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,168,232 |
) |
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income receivable
|
|
|
(110,490 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(110,490 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
(11,667 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(11,667 |
) |
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
1,609,574 |
|
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,610,848 |
|
Accrued
interest expense
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
2,538 |
|
|
|
5,844 |
|
Income
tax receivable
|
|
|
(2,667 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,667 |
) |
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
1,975,642 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,975,642 |
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
invested in Trust Account
|
|
|
(400,000,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(400,000,000 |
) |
Interest
income in Trust Account
|
|
|
(1,728,064 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,728,064 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(401,728,064 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(401,728,064 |
) |
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from public offering
|
|
|
400,000,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
400,000,000 |
|
Proceeds
from issuance of private placement warrants
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
Payment
of underwriting fee
|
|
|
(6,900,000 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6,900,000 |
) |
Payment
of costs associated with offering
|
|
|
(1,146,972 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,146,972 |
) |
Proceeds
from note payable to related party
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Deferred
offering costs
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(90,622 |
) |
|
|
(90,622 |
) |
Payment
of note payable to related party
|
|
|
(255,844 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(255,844 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of Founder Units
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
399,697,184 |
|
|
|
184,378 |
|
|
|
399,881,562 |
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(55,238 |
) |
|
|
184,378 |
|
|
|
129,140 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
|
|
|
184,378 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, at end of period
|
|
$ |
129,140 |
|
|
$ |
184,378 |
|
|
$ |
129,140 |
|
Supplemental
disclosure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
|
$ |
5,844 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
5,844 |
|
Taxes
paid
|
|
$ |
2,527,395 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
2,527,395 |
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
deferred offering costs
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
225,000 |
|
|
$ |
225,000 |
|
Accrued
deferred underwriter commissions
|
|
$ |
11,288,137 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
11,288,137 |
|
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(A Corporation in the Development
Stage)
Notes to Financial
Statements
Note 1 — Organization, Business
Operations, and Basis of Presentation
GHL Acquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’),
a blank check company, was incorporated in Delaware on November 2, 2007 for
the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition,
stock purchase, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or
more businesses or assets (‘‘Business Combination’’). The Company is considered
in the development stage and is subject to the risks associated with development
stage companies.
At December 31, 2008, the Company
had not yet commenced any operations. All activity through December
31, 2008 relates to the Company’s formation, initial public offering (the
“Public Offering”) and proposed business combination as described in
Notes 3 and 10, respectively.
The registration statement for the
Public Offering was declared effective February 14, 2008. The Company
consummated the Public Offering on February 21, 2008 and received gross
proceeds of approximately $408,000,000, consisting of $400,000,000 from the
Public Offering and $8,000,000 from the sale of the private placement warrants
to the Company’s founder, Greenhill & Co., Inc. (the “Founder”). Upon
the closing of the Public Offering, the Company paid $6,900,000 of underwriting
fees to a third party
and placed $400,000,000 of
the total proceeds into a trust account (“Trust Account”). The remaining
proceeds of $1,100,000 were used to pay a portion of the offering costs.
The Company’s management has broad
discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of the
Public Offering, although substantially all of the net proceeds of the Public
Offering are intended to be generally applied toward consummating a Business
Combination. Up to $5,000,000 of interest, subject to adjustment, earned on the
Trust Account balance may be released to the Company to fund working
capital requirements and additional interest earnings may be released to fund
income tax obligations. As used herein, “Target Business” shall mean one or more
businesses that at the time of the Company’s initial Business Combination has a
fair market value of at least 80% of the Company’s net assets (which includes
all of the Company’s assets, including the funds held in the Trust Account,
less the Company’s liabilities (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and
commissions of $11,288,137). There is no assurance that the Company will be able
to successfully effect a Business Combination.
The Company, after signing a definitive
agreement for a Business Combination, is required to submit such transaction for
stockholder approval. In the event that (i) a majority of the outstanding
shares of common stock sold in the Public Offering that vote in connection with
a Business Combination vote against the Business Combination or the proposal to
amend the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation to provide
for its perpetual existence or (ii) public stockholders owning 30% or more
of the shares sold in the Public Offering vote against the Business Combination
and exercise their conversion rights described below, the Business Combination
will not be consummated. The Company’s stockholders prior to the Public Offering
(“Insiders”) agreed to vote their 8,500,000 Founder’s shares of common stock in
accordance with the vote of the majority of the shares voted by all the holders
of the shares sold in the Public Offering (“Public Stockholders”) with respect
to any Business Combination and related amendment to the Company’s amended and
restated certificate of incorporation to provide for the Company’s perpetual
existence. Moreover, the Company’s stockholders prior to the Public Offering and
the Company’s officers and directors agreed to vote any shares of common stock
acquired in, or after, the Public Offering in favor of the Business Combination
and related amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of
incorporation to provide for the Company’s perpetual existence. After
consummation of a Business Combination, these voting provisions will no longer
be applicable.
With respect to a Business Combination
which is approved and consummated, any Public Stockholder who votes against the
Business Combination may demand that the Company convert his or her shares into
cash. The per share conversion price will equal the amount in the
Trust Account, calculated as of two business days prior to the consummation
of the proposed Business Combination, inclusive of any interest, net of any
taxes due on such interest and net of franchise taxes, and net of up to
$5,000,000 in interest income on the
Trust Account balance previously released to us to fund working capital
requirements, divided by the number of shares of common stock held by Public
Stockholders at the consummation of the Public Offering. The Company will
proceed with the Business Combination if Public Stockholders owning no more than
30% (minus one share) of the shares sold in the Public Offering both vote
against the Business Combination and exercise their conversion rights.
Accordingly, Public Stockholders holding 11,999,999 shares sold in the
Public Offering may seek conversion of their shares in the event of a Business
Combination. Such Public Stockholders are entitled to receive their per share
interest in the Trust Account computed without regard to the shares of
common stock held by the Company’s stockholders prior to the consummation of the
Public Offering.
The Company’s amended and restated
certificate of incorporation provides that the Company will continue in
existence only until February 14, 2010. If the Company has not completed a
Business Combination by such date, its corporate existence will cease and it
will liquidate. In the event of liquidation, it is possible that the per share
value of the residual assets remaining available for distribution (including
Trust Account assets) will be less than the Public Offering price per share in the Public
Offering (assuming no value is attributed to the Warrants contained in the units
to be offered in the Public Offering discussed in
Note 3).
Note 2 — Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash
Equivalents — The Company
considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less
at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments — Cash, investments held in trust at
broker and notes payable are carried at cost, which approximates fair value due
to the short-term nature of these investments.
Use of
Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ
materially from those estimates.
Earnings per
Share — The
Company calculates earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with FASB Statement
No. 128, “Earnings per Share” (“SFAS 128”). Basic and diluted EPS is
calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the period.
Warrants
issued by the Company in the initial public offering and private placement are
contingently exercisable at the later of one year from the date of the offering
and the consummation of a business combination, provided, in each case, there is
an effective registration statement covering the shares issuable upon exercise
of the warrants. Hence, the shares of common stock underlying the warrants are
excluded from basic and diluted EPS.
Income
Taxes — The Company accounts for taxes in accordance with FASB
Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”), which requires
the recognition of tax benefits or expenses
on the
temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of its
assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to
reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company
also complies with FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes,” an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(“FIN 48”), which provides criteria for the recognition, measurement,
presentation and disclosure of uncertain tax position. A tax benefit from an
uncertain position may be recognized only if it is “more likely than not” that
the position is sustainable based on its technical merits.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2008, the
Company adopted FASB
Statement No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), for assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 accomplished the following key
objectives:
|
•
|
Defines fair value as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date;
|
|
•
|
Establishes a three-level
hierarchy (“valuation hierarchy”) for fair value
measurements;
|
|
•
|
Requires consideration of the
Company’s creditworthiness when valuing
liabilities; and
|
|
•
|
Expands disclosures about
instruments measured at fair
value.
|
The valuation hierarchy is based upon
the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the
measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation
hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement. The three levels of the valuation hierarchy and the
distribution of the Company’s financial assets within it are as
follows:
|
•
|
Level 1 — inputs to the
valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets
or liabilities in active
markets.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 — inputs to the
valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the
assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the financial
instrument.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 — inputs to the
valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value
measurement.
|
The Company’s assets carried at fair
value on a recurring basis are its investments in money market securities under
the caption “Investments held in trust at broker”. The securities have been
classified within level 1, as their valuation is based on quoted prices for
identical assets in active markets.
The estimated fair value at December 31, 2008 including accrued interest is as
follows:
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
|
Balance
as of
December
31, 2008
|
|
Investments
|
|
$ |
401,838,554 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
401,838,554 |
|
Total
investments
|
|
$ |
401,838,554 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
401,838,554 |
|
In February 2007, FASB Statement No. 159, “Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”) was issued. SFAS 159 permits an entity to
elect fair value as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for many
financial assets and liabilities. Entities electing the fair value option would
be required to recognize changes in fair value in earnings. Entities electing
the fair value option would be required to distinguish, on the face of the
balance sheet, the fair value of assets and liabilities for which the fair value
option has been elected and similar assets and liabilities measured using
another measurement attribute. SFAS 159 became effective beginning
January 1, 2008. The Company did not elect the fair value measurement
option for financial instruments or other items upon adoption of SFAS 159 and therefore,
SFAS 159 did not have an impact on the
Company’s financial
statements.
In December 2007, FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business
Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”) was issued. SFAS 141R provides revised
guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the consideration transferred,
identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interests, and
goodwill acquired in a business combination. SFAS 141R also expands
required disclosures surrounding the nature of financial effects of business
combinations. SFAS 141R is effective, on a prospective basis, for companies
for fiscal years beginning January 1, 2009. The Company is currently
applying the transitional
guidance, which allows transactional costs to be expensed when it becomes
probable that the acquisition will not close until after the effective date of
SFAS 141R (see Note 8).
In April 2008, FASB Staff Position No. FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of
the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP FAS 142-3”) was issued. FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors
that should be considered in developing a renewal or extension assumptions used
for purposes of determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset
under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”
(“SFAS 142”). FSP FAS 142-3 is intended to improve the consistency
between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and
the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset
under SFAS 141R and other U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. Earlier application is not permitted. The Company will
be assessing the potential effect of FSP FAS 142-3, if applicable, once the Company enters into a business
combination.
Note 3 —Public
Offering
The Company sold in its Public Offering
40,000,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit. Each unit (a “Unit”)
consists of one share of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value, and
one Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant (a “Warrant”). Each Warrant will
entitle the holder to purchase from the Company one share of common stock at an
exercise price of $7.00 commencing on the later of the completion of a Business
Combination or 12 months from the effective date of the Public Offering and
expiring five years from the effective date of the Public Offering or earlier
upon redemption or liquidation of the Trust Account. The Company may redeem
all of the Warrants, at a price of $.01 per Warrant upon 30 days’ prior
notice while the Warrants are exercisable, and there is an effective
registration statement covering the common stock issuable upon exercise of the
Warrants current and available, only if the last sales price of the common stock
is at least $14.25 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading-day period ending on the third day prior
to the date on which notice of redemption is given. The Company will not redeem
the Warrants unless an effective registration statement covering the shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants is current and available
throughout the 30-day redemption period. If the Company calls the Warrants for
redemption as described above, the Company’s management will have the option to
adopt a plan of recapitalization pursuant to which all holders that wish to
exercise Warrants would be required to do so on a “cashless basis”. In such event, each exercising holder
would surrender the Warrants for that number of shares of common stock equal to
the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the product of the number of shares
of common stock underlying the Warrants, multiplied by the difference
between the exercise price of the
Warrants and the “fair market value” (defined below) by (ii) the fair
market value. The “fair market value” means the average reported last sales
price of the Company’s common stock for the 10 trading days ending on the third
trading day prior to the date on which the notice of redemption is sent to the
holders of Warrants. In accordance with the Warrant Agreement relating to the
Warrants sold and issued in the Public Offering, the Company will only be
required to use its best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of the
registration statement covering the common stock issuable upon exercise of the
Warrants. The Company will not be obligated to deliver securities, and there are
no contractual penalties for failure to deliver securities, if a registration
statement is not effective at the time of exercise. Additionally, if a
registration statement is not effective at the time of exercise, the holder of
such Warrant shall not be entitled to exercise such Warrant and in no event
(whether in the case of a registration statement not being effective or
otherwise) will the Company be required to net cash settle the Warrant exercise.
Consequently, the Warrants may expire unexercised and unredeemed. The number of
Warrant shares issuable upon the exercise of each Warrant is subject to
adjustment from time to time upon the occurrence of the events enumerated in the
Warrant Agreement.
The Warrants are classified within
stockholders’ equity since, under the terms of the Warrants, the Company cannot
be required to settle or redeem them for cash.
Total underwriting fees, including contingent fees,
related to the Public
Offering aggregate to $23,251,500. The Company paid $6,900,000 upon closing of
the Public Offering,
$11,288,137 is payable only
upon the consummation of a Business Combination, and $5,063,363 is payable only upon
the consummation of a Business Combination less any pro-rata reductions
resulting from the exercise of the stockholder conversion rights. Specifically, Banc of America
Securities LLC and other underwriters have agreed that approximately 70% of the
underwriting discounts will not be payable unless and until the Company
completes a Business Combination and has waived its right to receive such
payment upon the Company’s liquidation if it is unable to complete a Business
Combination. The deferred underwriting commission paid will be less pro-rata
reductions resulting from the exercise of the stockholder conversion rights as
described in the Proxy Statement. Accordingly, on the statement of financial condition,
the $11,288,137 liability
for deferred underwriting commission excludes $5,063,363, which is included
net in common stock subject to possible
conversion.
The Company also granted Banc of America
Securities LLC and other underwriters a 30-day over-allotment option to purchase
up to 6,000,000 Units, which expired on March 27, 2008. Following the
expiration of the over-allotment option, the Company’s initial stockholders
returned at no cost, 1,275,000 of Units pursuant to the terms of the applicable
purchase agreement in order for the Founders to maintain its approximately 17.3%
ownership interest in our common stock after giving effect to the Public
Offering.
On December 31, 2008, $401,838,554 was held in trust, of which the Company
had the right to withdraw $1,838,554 to fund working capital needs
and the payment of income and franchise taxes. The Company also had $129,140 of
unrestricted cash available.
Note 4 — Note
Payable
On November 19, 2007, the Company issued
a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $250,000 to the Founder.
The note accrued interest at the rate of 8.5% per annum, was unsecured and the
principal was due at the earlier of (i) December 30, 2008, or (ii) the
consummation of the offering. On February 26, 2008, the Company paid off the
principal amount of $250,000 of the promissory note including accrued interest
in the amount of $5,844, for a total of $255,844. The Company recorded interest
expense amounting to $3,306 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and $2,538 for
the period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31, 2007, which is
included in other operating expenses on the statements of
operations.
Note 5 — Related Party Transactions and
Commitments
The Company presently occupies office
space provided by the Founder. The Founder has agreed that, until the Company
consummates a Business Combination, it will make such office space, as well as
certain office and secretarial services, available to the Company, as may be
required by the Company from time to time. The Company has agreed to pay the
Founder a total of $10,000 per month for such services commencing on the
effective date of the Public Offering and will terminate upon the earlier of (i)
the consummation of a Business Combination, or (ii) the liquidation of the
Company. The Company paid a total of $105,172 with respect to this commitment
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
From time to time, the Founder funds
administrative expenses, such as travel expenses, meals and entertainment and
office supplies, incurred in the ordinary course of business. Such expenses are
to be reimbursed by the Company to the Founder. As of December 31, 2008, the Founder has funded a total
of $27,487 of administrative expenses,
all of which were repaid during
2008.
On January 10, 2008, the Company
cancelled 1,725,000 Founder’s Units, which were surrendered in a
recapitalization, leaving the Founder with a total of 9,775,000 Units. Of the
9,775,000 Founder’s Units, an aggregate of 1,275,000 Founder’s Units, including
the common stock included therein, were forfeited on March 27, 2008,
following the expiration of the over-allotment option of Banc of America
Securities LLC and the other underwriters pursuant to the terms of the
applicable purchase agreement.
On February 1, 2008, the Founder
transferred at cost an aggregate of 150,000 of the Founder’s Units to certain of
the Company’s directors (together with the Founder, the “Initial Stockholders”).
These transferred Units have the same terms and are subject to the same
restrictions on transfers as the Founder’s Units. The restrictions on transfer
on these Units will lapse 180 days after the consummation of a Business
Combination by the Company (if any) (considered a performance condition). In
accordance with the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123
(Revised 2004) “Share Based Payments”, the restrictions are not being taken into
account for purposes of determining the value of the transferred Units and the
Company will record a compensation charge and a related capital contribution (at
the time a Business Combination is consummated) for the difference between the
consideration received by the Founder in the transfer and the price of $10.00
per Unit paid by the Public Stockholders which acquired Units in our
Public Offering.
On February 21, 2008, in connection
with the Public Offering, the Founder purchased a total of 8,000,000 Warrants
(“Private Placement Warrants”) at $1.00 per Warrant (for an aggregate purchase
price of $8,000,000) privately from the Company. All of the proceeds received
from the purchase were placed in the Trust Account. The Private Placement
Warrants are identical to those included in the Units sold in our Public Offering, except
that:
|
•
|
the Private Placement Warrants,
including the common stock issuable upon exercise of these Warrants, are
subject to certain transfer
restrictions;
|
|
•
|
the Private Placement Warrants
will not be redeemable by the Company so long as they are held by the
Initial Stockholders or their permitted
transferees; and
|
|
•
|
the Private Placement Warrants may
be exercised by the Initial Stockholders or their permitted transferees on
a cashless basis.
|
As of December 31, 2008, the Founder
owns approximately 17.3% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock
and collectively, the Initial Stockholders own approximately
17.5%.
Note 6 — Income
Taxes
The components of the provision for
income taxes for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to
December 31, 2007 are set
forth below:
|
|
For the Year
Ended
December 31,
2008
|
|
|
For the Period Ended November 2,
2007 (Inception) to December 31, 2007
|
|
Current
taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$ |
1,587,578 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
State and
local
|
|
|
937,205 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
current tax expense
|
|
$ |
2,524,783 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Deferred
taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$ |
(734,582 |
) |
|
|
|
|
State and
local
|
|
|
(433,650 |
) |
|
$ |
433 |
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
Total deferred tax
expense
|
|
|
(1,168,232 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Total provision for income
taxes
|
|
$ |
1,356,551 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured
using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such
differences are expected to reverse.
The
Company recorded a deferred income tax asset for the tax effect of temporary
differences aggregating $1,168,232 at December 31, 2008. The Company has not
provided a valuation allowance at December 31, 2008, as the Company expects the
benefit to be fully recoverable. At December 31, 2007, the deferred income tax
asset for the tax effect of temporary differences amounted to $433. In
recognition of the uncertainty regarding the ultimate amount of income tax
benefits to be derived, the Company recorded a full valuation allowance at
December 31, 2007.
The
Company filed its first income tax return on September 15, 2008. The Company has
not recognized any liabilities under FIN 48.
The effective tax rate of 45% differs
from the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of
34% due to the provision
for state and local taxes. There was no income tax provision in 2007 due to the
net loss.
Note 7 —
Earnings per Share
The
computations of basic, diluted, and diluted earnings per share are set forth
below:
|
|
For
the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
For
the Period Ended November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,
2007
|
|
Numerator
for basic and diluted earnings per share — net income (loss)
available to common stockholders
|
|
$ |
1,655,818 |
|
|
$ |
(3,812 |
) |
Denominator
for basic and diluted earnings per share — weighted average number of
common shares
|
|
|
43,268,238 |
|
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
Earnings
(loss) per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
Warrants
issued by the Company in the Public Offering and private placement are
contingently exercisable at the later of one year from the date of the offering
and the consummation of a business combination, provided, in each case, there is
an effective registration statement covering the shares issuable upon exercise
of the warrants. Hence, these are excluded from basic and diluted
EPS.
Note 8 —
Transactions Costs
For the
year ended December 31, 2008, the Company has incurred transaction costs
relating to the proposed business combination (as disclosed in Note 10) in the
amount of $1,908,663. Such transaction costs were expensed as professional fees,
as permitted under the transitional guidance of SFAS 141R referred to above, as
it is probable that the proposed business combination will close after the
effective date of SFAS 141R.
Note 9 —
Market/Credit Risks
The
Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions with
high credit ratings. At times, the Company may maintain deposits in federally
insured financial institutions in excess of federally insured (FDIC) limits.
However, management believes that the Company is not exposed to significant
credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institution in which
those deposits are held. The Company does not believe the cash equivalents held
in trust at broker are subject to significant credit risk as the portfolio is
invested in assets, which meet the applicable conditions of 2a-7 of the
Investment Company Act of 1940. The Company has not experienced any losses on
this account.
The $401,838,554 in the Trust Account is invested
in assets which all meet the conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under
the Investment Company Act of 1940. The placing of funds in the
Trust Account may not protect those funds from third party claims against
the Company. Although the Company will seek to have all vendors (other than its
independent auditors), prospective target businesses and other entities it
engages, execute agreements with the Company waiving any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the Trust Account, there
is no guarantee that they will execute such agreements. The Founder has agreed
that it will be liable under certain circumstances to ensure that the proceeds
in the Trust Account are not reduced by the claims of target businesses or
vendors, service providers or other entities that are owed money by the Company
for services rendered to or contracted for or products sold to the Company.
There can be no assurance that it will be able to satisfy those
obligations.
Note 10 —
Proposed Business Combination
On
September 22, 2008, the Company announced that it had entered in an agreement
(the “Transaction Agreement”) to acquire Iridium Holdings LLC (“Iridium
Holdings”), a leading provider of voice and data mobile satellite services (the
“Proposed Business Combination”).
Under the
terms of the Transaction Agreement, the Company will acquire Iridium Holdings in
exchange for 36,000,000 shares of its common stock, $77,100,000 of cash, subject
to adjustment and assume approximately $130,771,602 of net debt of Iridium
Holdings. In addition, 90 days following the closing of the Proposed
Business Combination, if Iridium Holdings has in effect a valid election under
Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Company will
make a tax benefits payment of up to $30,000,000 in aggregate to certain sellers
to compensate for the tax basis step-up. Upon the closing of the
Proposed Business Combination, Iridium Holdings will become a subsidiary of the
Company and the combined enterprise will be renamed “Iridium Communications
Inc.” and intends to apply for listing on NYSE.
The
Transaction Agreement and related documents have been unanimously approved by
the board of directors of the Company and Iridium Holdings. The
closing of the Proposed Business Combination is subject to customary closing
conditions including the expiration or termination of waiting periods under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, Federal Communications Commission approval, other
regulatory approvals and the approval of the Company’s stockholders, including a
majority of the shares of the Company’s common stock issued in its Public
Offering. The Company was granted early termination of the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act in October 2008. In addition, the closing of
the Proposed Business Combination is conditioned on the requirement that
stockholders owning not more than 11,999,999 shares of the Company’s common
stock (such number representing 30 percent minus one share of the 40,000,000
shares of issued in its Public Offering) vote against the Proposed Business
Combination and validly exercise their conversion rights to have their shares
converted into cash, as permitted by the Company’s certificate of
incorporation. The Company’s Initial Stockholders have agreed to vote
the 8,500,000 shares they already own, which were issued to them prior to the
Company’s Public Offering, in accordance with the vote of the holders of a
majority of the shares issued in the Public Offering. The Proposed
Business Combination is expected to close in the second quarter of
2009.
If (a)
the Transaction Agreement is terminated either by the Company or Iridium
Holdings because the Company’s stockholders shall have failed to approve the
Proposed Business Combination, (b) the Company breaches its obligations to hold
a stockholder meeting or to use its reasonable best efforts to consummate the
Proposed Business Combination contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, and (c)
the Company consummates an initial business combination (other than with Iridium
Holdings), the Company will be obligated to pay to Iridium Holdings within two
business days of the consummation of such other business combination, a break-up
fee consisting of $5,000,000 in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or
combination thereof, at the Company’s election (the “Termination Fee”). The
Termination Fee will be the exclusive remedy of Iridium Holdings, the Sellers
and their respective affiliates with respect to any such breach except in the
case where, prior to 10 business days immediately following the termination of
the Transaction Agreement, Iridium Holdings notifies the Company in writing that
it believes in good faith the Company has committed willful breach of the
Transaction Agreement. In that case, the Company need not pay the Termination
Fee and Iridium Holdings shall have the right to pursue its remedies for willful
breach against the Company, subject to other limitations set forth in the
Transaction Agreement.
The
Company may launch a tender offer for its common shares which will close
concurrent with completion of the Proposed Business Combination, pursuant to
which shares will be acquired at a price per share of $10.50, up to an aggregate
purchase price of $120,000,000 reduced by the amount of cash distributed to
stockholders who vote against the Proposed Business Combination and elect
conversion of their shares.
On
September 22, 2008, the Company entered into a side letter agreement (the “Side
Letter”) with the Founder whereby the Founder has agreed to forfeit at the
closing of the Proposed Business Combination the following securities of the
Company which it currently owns: (1) 1,441,176 common shares; (2) 8,369,563
founder warrants; and (3) 2,000,000 private placement warrants. These
forfeitures will reduce the Company’s shares and warrants outstanding
immediately post-closing.
Supplemental Financial
Information
Quarterly Results
(unaudited)
The
following represents the Company’s unaudited quarterly results for the year
ended December 31, 2008 and for the period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to
December 31, 2007. These quarterly results were prepared in accordance with U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles and reflect all adjustments that are,
in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of
results.
|
|
For
the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income – interest
|
|
$ |
1,213,016 |
|
|
$ |
1,780,206 |
|
|
$ |
1,943,075 |
|
|
$ |
668,257 |
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
112,267 |
|
|
|
81,730 |
|
|
|
106,198 |
|
|
|
2,291,990 |
|
Income
(loss) before provision for taxes
|
|
|
1,100,749 |
|
|
|
1,698,476 |
|
|
|
1,836,877 |
|
|
|
(1,623,733 |
) |
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
556,357 |
|
|
|
791,572 |
|
|
|
739,834 |
|
|
|
(731,212 |
) |
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
544,392 |
|
|
$ |
906,904 |
|
|
$ |
1,097,043 |
|
|
$ |
(892,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
$ |
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
For
the Period from November 2, 2007 (Inception) to December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
income – interest
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
3,812 |
|
Income
(loss) before provision for taxes
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
Net
income (loss)
|
|
$ |
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
(loss) per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.00 |
) |
Part I. Financial
Information
Item 1. Financial Statements
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(A Corporation in the Development
Stage)
Statements of Financial
Condition
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
2,249 |
|
|
$ |
129,140 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
83,333 |
|
|
|
11,667 |
|
Income
tax receivable
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
85,582 |
|
|
|
143,474 |
|
Deferred
tax asset
|
|
|
1,376,614 |
|
|
|
1,168,232 |
|
Investments
held in trust at broker, including accrued interest of $146,297 and
$110,490 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
401,901,589 |
|
|
|
401,838,554 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
403,363,785 |
|
|
$ |
403,150,260 |
|
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
expenses
|
|
$ |
1,658,357 |
|
|
$ |
1,610,848 |
|
Income
tax payable
|
|
|
132,870 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
1,791,227 |
|
|
|
1,610,848 |
|
Deferred
underwriter commissions
|
|
|
11,288,137 |
|
|
|
11,288,137 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
13,079,364 |
|
|
|
12,898,985 |
|
Common
stock subject to possible conversion (11,999,999 shares, at conversion
value)
|
|
|
119,987,999 |
|
|
|
119,987,999 |
|
Preferred
stock, $0.0001 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
1,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Common
stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized
200,000,000 shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued
and outstanding 48,500,000 shares (including 11,999,999 shares of common
stock subject to possible conversion presented above) at March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008
|
|
|
48,500 |
|
|
|
48,500 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
268,562,770 |
|
|
|
268,562,770 |
|
Retained
earnings accumulated during the development stage
|
|
|
1,685,152 |
|
|
|
1,652,006 |
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
270,296,422 |
|
|
|
270,263,276 |
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$ |
403,363,785 |
|
|
$ |
403,150,260 |
|
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(A Corporation in the Development
Stage)
Statements of Income
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months
ended
March
31,
2008
|
|
|
For
the Period from November 2,
2007
(Inception)
to
March
31,
2009
|
|
Professional
fees
|
|
$ |
253,044 |
|
|
$ |
63,726 |
|
|
$ |
2,567,193 |
|
Other
operating expenses
|
|
|
209,689 |
|
|
|
48,541 |
|
|
|
491,537 |
|
Total
expenses
|
|
|
462,733 |
|
|
|
112,267 |
|
|
|
3,058,730 |
|
Other
income – interest
|
|
|
523,034 |
|
|
|
1,213,016 |
|
|
|
6,127,588 |
|
Income
before provision for taxes
|
|
|
60,301 |
|
|
|
1,100,749 |
|
|
|
3,068,858 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
27,155 |
|
|
|
556,357 |
|
|
|
1,383,706 |
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
33,146 |
|
|
$ |
544,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,685,152 |
|
Weighted
average shares outstanding – basic and diluted
|
|
|
48,500,000 |
|
|
|
27,485,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings
per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(A Corporation in the Development
Stage)
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’
Equity (unaudited)
For the Period from November
2, 2007 (Inception) to March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
(Deficit)
Accumulated
during the
Development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Paid-in
Capital
|
|
|
Stage
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
Balance
at November 2, 2007 (Inception)
|
|
|
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
Issuance
of units to Founder on November 13, 2007 at approximately $0.002 per
unit
|
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
11,500,000 |
|
|
|
11,500 |
|
|
|
13,500 |
|
|
|
(3,812 |
) |
|
|
21,188 |
|
Sale
of 40,000,000 units through public offering at $10.00 per unit, net of
underwriter’s discount and offering expenses and excluding $119,987,999 of
proceeds allocable to 11,999,999 shares of common stock subject to
possible conversion
|
|
|
40,000,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
260,546,270 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
260,586,270 |
|
Sale
of private placement warrants
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
Forfeiture
of 1,725,000 units by Founder on January 10, 2008
|
|
|
(1,725,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,725 |
) |
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Forfeiture
of 1,275,000 units by Founder on March 27, 2008
|
|
|
(1,275,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
1,655,818 |
|
|
|
1,655,818 |
|
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
48,500,000 |
|
|
|
48,500 |
|
|
|
268,562,770 |
|
|
|
1,652,006 |
|
|
|
270,263,276 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
33,146 |
|
|
|
33,146 |
|
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
|
|
48,500,000 |
|
|
$ |
48,500 |
|
|
$ |
268,562,770 |
|
|
$ |
1,685,152 |
|
|
$ |
270,296,422 |
|
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(A Corporation in the Development
Stage)
Statements of Cash
Flows
(unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months
ended
March
31,
2009
|
|
|
Three
Months
ended
March
31,
2008
|
|
|
For
the Period from November 2, 2007
(Inception)
to
March
31, 2009
|
|
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
33,146 |
|
|
$ |
544,392 |
|
|
$ |
1,685,152 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
items included in net income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
taxes
|
|
|
(208,382 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,376,614 |
) |
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income receivable
|
|
|
(146,297 |
) |
|
|
(709,445 |
) |
|
|
(256,787 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
(71,666 |
) |
|
|
(116,667 |
) |
|
|
(83,333 |
) |
Accrued
expenses
|
|
|
47,509 |
|
|
|
38,726 |
|
|
|
1,658,357 |
|
Accrued
interest expense
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,306 |
|
|
|
5,844 |
|
Due
to related party
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
21,506 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Income
tax payable
|
|
|
132,870 |
|
|
|
556,357 |
|
|
|
132,870 |
|
Income
tax receivable
|
|
|
2,667 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(210,153 |
) |
|
|
338,175 |
|
|
|
1,765,489 |
|
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
invested in Trust Account
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(400,000,000 |
) |
|
|
(400,000,000 |
) |
Interest
income in Trust Account
|
|
|
83,262 |
|
|
|
(503,571 |
) |
|
|
(1,644,802 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
83,262 |
|
|
|
(400,503,571 |
) |
|
|
(401,644,802 |
) |
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from public offering
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
400,000,000 |
|
|
|
400,000,000 |
|
Proceeds
from issuance of private placement warrants
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
|
|
8,000,000 |
|
Payment
of underwriting fee
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(6,900,000 |
) |
|
|
(6,900,000 |
) |
Payment
of costs associated with offering
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(135,042 |
) |
|
|
(1,146,972 |
) |
Proceeds
from note payable to related party
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Deferred
offering costs
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(90,622 |
) |
Payment
of note payable to related party
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(255,844 |
) |
|
|
(255,844 |
) |
Proceeds
from sale of Founder units
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
400,709,114 |
|
|
|
399,881,562 |
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
|
(126,891 |
) |
|
|
543,718 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, at beginning of period
|
|
|
129,140 |
|
|
|
184,378 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, at end of period
|
|
$ |
2,249 |
|
|
$ |
728,096 |
|
|
$ |
2,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
paid
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
5,844 |
|
|
$ |
5,844 |
|
Taxes
paid
|
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
$ |
395 |
|
|
$ |
2,770,050 |
|
Supplemental
disclosure of non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
deferred underwriter commissions
|
|
$ |
11,288,137 |
|
|
$ |
11,288,137 |
|
|
$ |
11,288,137 |
|
GHL Acquisition
Corp.
(a corporation in the development
stage)
NOTES TO UNAUDITED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Note 1 — Organization, Business
Operations, and Basis of Presentation
GHL Acquisition Corp. (the ‘‘Company’’),
a blank check company, was incorporated in Delaware on November 2, 2007 for
the purpose of effecting a merger, capital stock exchange, asset acquisition,
stock purchase, reorganization or other similar business combination with one or
more businesses or assets (‘‘Business Combination’’). The Company is considered
in the development stage and is subject to the risks associated with development
stage companies.
At March 31, 2009, the Company had
not yet commenced any operations. All activity through March 31, 2009
relates to the Company’s formation, initial public offering (the “Public
Offering”) and proposed business combination as described in Notes 3 and 9,
respectively.
The registration statement for the
Public Offering was declared effective February 14, 2008. The Company
consummated the Public Offering on February 21, 2008 and received gross
proceeds of approximately $408,000,000, consisting of $400,000,000 from the
Public Offering and $8,000,000 from the sale of the private placement warrants
to the Company’s founder, Greenhill & Co., Inc. (the “Founder”). Upon
the closing of the Public Offering, the Company paid $6,900,000 of underwriting
fees to a third party
and placed $400,000,000 of
the total proceeds into a trust account (“Trust Account”). The remaining
proceeds of $1,100,000 were used to pay a portion of the offering costs.
The Company’s management has broad
discretion with respect to the specific application of the net proceeds of the
Public Offering, although substantially all of the net proceeds of the Public
Offering are intended to be generally applied toward consummating a Business
Combination. Up to $5,000,000 of interest, subject to adjustment, earned on the
Trust Account balance may be released to the Company to fund working
capital requirements and additional interest earnings may be released to fund
income tax obligations. As used herein, “Target Business” shall mean one or more
businesses that at the time of the Company’s initial Business Combination has a
fair market value of at least 80% of the Company’s net assets (which includes
all of the Company’s assets, including the funds held in the Trust Account,
less the Company’s liabilities (excluding deferred underwriting discounts and
commissions of $11,288,137). There is no assurance that the Company will be able
to successfully effect a Business Combination.
The Company, after signing a definitive
agreement for a Business Combination, is required to submit such transaction for
stockholder approval. In the event that (i) a majority of the outstanding
shares of common stock sold in the Public Offering that vote in connection with
a Business Combination vote against the Business Combination or the proposal to
amend the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation to provide
for its perpetual existence or (ii) public stockholders owning 30% or more
of the shares sold in the Public Offering vote against the Business Combination
and exercise their conversion rights described below, the Business Combination
will not be consummated. The Company’s stockholders prior to the Public Offering
(“Insiders”) agreed to vote their 8,500,000 Founder’s shares of common stock in
accordance with the vote of the majority of the shares voted by all the holders
of the shares sold in the Public Offering (“Public Stockholders”) with respect
to any Business Combination and related amendment to the Company’s amended and
restated certificate of incorporation to provide for the Company’s perpetual
existence. Moreover, the Company’s stockholders prior to the Public Offering and
the Company’s officers and directors agreed to vote any shares of common stock
acquired in, or after, the Public Offering in favor of the Business Combination
and related amendment to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of
incorporation to provide for the
Company’s perpetual existence. After
consummation of a Business Combination, these voting provisions will no longer
be applicable.
With respect to a Business Combination
which is approved and consummated, any Public Stockholder who votes against the
Business Combination may demand that the Company convert his or her shares into
cash. The per share conversion price will equal the amount in the
Trust Account, calculated as of two business days prior to the consummation
of the proposed Business Combination, inclusive of any interest, net of any
taxes due on such interest and net of franchise taxes, and net of up to
$5,000,000 in interest income on the
Trust Account balance previously released to us to fund working capital
requirements, divided by the number of shares of common stock held by Public
Stockholders at the consummation of the Public Offering. The Company will
proceed with the Business Combination if Public Stockholders owning no more than
30% (minus one share) of the shares sold in the Public Offering both vote
against the Business Combination and exercise their conversion rights.
Accordingly, Public Stockholders holding 11,999,999 shares sold in the
Public Offering may seek conversion of their shares in the event of a Business
Combination. Such Public Stockholders are entitled to receive their per share
interest in the Trust Account computed without regard to the shares of
common stock held by the Company’s stockholders prior to the consummation of the
Public Offering.
The Company’s amended and restated
certificate of incorporation provides that the Company will continue in
existence only until February 14, 2010. If the Company has not completed a
Business Combination by such date, its corporate existence will cease and it
will liquidate. In the event of liquidation, it is possible that the per share
value of the residual assets remaining available for distribution (including
Trust Account assets) will be less than the Public Offering price per share in the Public
Offering (assuming no value is attributed to the Warrants contained in the units
to be offered in the Public Offering discussed in
Note 3).
Note 2 — Summary of Significant
Accounting Policies
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid
investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to
be cash equivalents.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Effective
January 1, 2008, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), for assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. SFAS 157 accomplished the following key
objectives:
|
•
|
Defines fair value as the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in
an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement
date;
|
|
•
|
Establishes a three-level
hierarchy (“valuation hierarchy”) for fair value
measurements;
|
|
•
|
Requires consideration of the
Company’s creditworthiness when valuing
liabilities; and
|
|
•
|
Expands disclosures about
instruments measured at fair
value.
|
The valuation hierarchy is based upon
the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the
measurement date. A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation
hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement. The three levels of the valuation hierarchy and the
distribution of the Company’s financial assets within it are as
follows:
|
•
|
Level 1 — inputs to the
valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets
or liabilities in active
markets.
|
|
•
|
Level 2 — inputs to the
valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the
assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the
full term of the financial
instrument.
|
|
•
|
Level 3 — inputs to the
valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value
measurement.
|
The Company’s assets carried at fair
value on a recurring basis are its investments in money market securities
within investments held in trust at
broker on the statements of
financial condition. The
securities have been classified within level 1, as their valuation is based
on quoted prices for identical assets in active markets.
The estimated fair value at March 31, 2009 including accrued interest is as
follows:
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Balance as of March 31, 2009
|
|
Investments
|
|
$ |
401,901,589 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
401,901,589 |
|
Total
investments
|
|
$ |
401,901,589 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
401,901,589 |
|
Use of
Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during
the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially from those
estimates.
Earnings
per Share
The
Company calculates earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with FASB Statement
No. 128, “Earnings per Share” (“SFAS 128”). Basic and diluted EPS is
calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of shares of
common stock outstanding during the period.
Warrants
issued by the Company in the initial public offering and private placement are
contingently exercisable at the later of one year from the date of the offering
and the consummation of a business combination, provided, in each case, there is
an effective registration statement covering the shares issuable upon exercise
of the warrants. Hence, the shares of common stock underlying the warrants are
excluded from basic and diluted EPS.
Income
Taxes
The
Company accounts for taxes in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109,
“Accounting for Income Taxes” (“SFAS 109”), which requires the recognition of
tax benefits or expenses on the temporary differences
between
the financial reporting and tax bases of its assets and liabilities. A valuation
allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the
amount expected to be realized. The Company also complies with FASB
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”), which provides
criteria for the recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of
uncertain tax position. A tax benefit from an uncertain position may be
recognized only if it is “more likely than not” that the position is sustainable
based on its technical merits.
Transaction
Costs
Effective January 1, 2009, the Company
adopted FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations”
(“SFAS 141R”). Under SFAS 141R, the Company recognizes as expense the
direct costs of a business combination in the period in which the expense is
incurred. The Company has expensed transaction costs incurred prior to January
1, 2009 in accordance with the transitional guidance under SFAS 141R, which
allows transaction costs to be expensed for an acquisition that will not close
until after the effective date of SFAS 141R.
Business
Combinations
In April 2008, FASB Staff Position No.
FSP FAS 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets”
(“FSP FAS 142-3”) was issued. FSP FAS 142-3 amends the factors that
should be considered in developing a renewal or extension assumptions used for
purposes of determining the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under
SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”
(“SFAS 142”). FSP FAS 142-3 is intended to improve the consistency
between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and
the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset
under SFAS 141R and other U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. FSP FAS 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008. The Company will assess the potential effect of FSP
FAS 142-3, if applicable, once the Company enters into a business
combination.
Note 3 —Public
Offering
The Company sold in its Public Offering
40,000,000 units at a price of $10.00 per unit. Each unit (a “Unit”)
consists of one share of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value, and
one Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant (a “Warrant”). Each Warrant will
entitle the holder to purchase from the Company one share of common stock at an
exercise price of $7.00 commencing on the later of the completion of a Business
Combination or 12 months from the effective date of the Public Offering and
expiring five years from the effective date of the Public Offering or earlier
upon redemption or liquidation of the Trust Account. The Company may redeem
all of the Warrants, at a price of $.01 per Warrant upon 30 days’ prior
notice while the Warrants are exercisable, and there is an effective
registration statement covering the common stock issuable upon exercise of the
Warrants current and available, only if the last sales price of the common stock
is at least $14.25 per share for any 20 trading days within a 30-trading-day period ending on the third day prior
to the date on which notice of redemption is given. The Company will not redeem
the Warrants unless an effective registration statement covering the shares of
common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants is current and available
throughout the 30-day redemption period. If the Company calls the Warrants for
redemption as described above, the Company’s management will have the option to
adopt a plan of recapitalization pursuant to which all holders that wish to
exercise Warrants would be required to do so on a “cashless basis”. In such event, each exercising holder
would surrender the Warrants for that number of shares of common stock equal to
the quotient obtained by dividing (i) the product of the number of shares
of common stock underlying the Warrants, multiplied by the difference between
the exercise price of the Warrants and the “fair market value” (defined below)
by (ii) the fair market value. The “fair market value” means the average
reported last sales price of the Company’s common stock for the 10 trading days
ending on the third trading day prior to the date on which the notice of
redemption is sent to the holders of Warrants. In accordance with the Warrant
Agreement relating to the Warrants sold
and issued in the Public Offering, the Company will only be required to use its
best efforts to maintain the effectiveness of the registration statement
covering the common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants. The Company
will not be obligated to deliver securities, and there are no contractual
penalties for failure to deliver securities, if a registration statement is not
effective at the time of exercise. Additionally, if a registration statement is
not effective at the time of exercise, the holder of such Warrant shall not be
entitled to exercise such Warrant and in no event (whether in the case of a
registration statement not being effective or otherwise) will the Company be
required to net cash settle the Warrant exercise. Consequently, the Warrants may
expire unexercised and unredeemed. The number of Warrant shares issuable upon
the exercise of each Warrant is subject to adjustment from time to time upon the
occurrence of the events enumerated in the Warrant
Agreement.
The Warrants are classified within
stockholders’ equity since, under the terms of the Warrants, the Company cannot
be required to settle or redeem them for cash.
Total underwriting fees, including contingent fees,
related to the Public
Offering aggregate to $23,251,500. The Company paid $6,900,000 upon closing of
the Public Offering,
$11,288,137 is payable only
upon the consummation of a Business Combination, and $5,063,363 is payable only upon
the consummation of a Business Combination less any pro-rata reductions
resulting from the exercise of the stockholder conversion rights. Specifically, Banc of America
Securities LLC and other underwriters have agreed that approximately 70% of the
underwriting discounts will not be payable unless and until the Company
completes a Business Combination and have waived their right to receive such payment upon the
Company’s liquidation if the Company is unable to complete a Business
Combination. The deferred underwriting commission paid will be less pro-rata
reductions resulting from the exercise of the stockholder conversion rights as
described in the Proxy Statement. Accordingly, on the statement of financial condition,
the $11,288,137 liability
for deferred underwriting commission excludes $5,063,363, which is included
net in common stock subject to possible
conversion.
On March 31, 2009, $401,901,589 was held in trust, of which the Company
had the right to withdraw $1,901,589 to fund working capital needs and the
payment of income and
franchise taxes. The
Company also had $2,249 of unrestricted cash
available.
Note 4 — Related Party Transactions and
Commitments
The Company presently occupies office
space provided by the Founder. The Founder has agreed that, until the Company
consummates a Business Combination, it will make such office space, as well as
certain office and secretarial services, available to the Company, as may be
required by the Company from time to time. The Company has agreed to pay the
Founder a total of $10,000 per month for such services commencing on the
effective date of the Public Offering and will terminate upon the earlier of (i)
the consummation of a Business Combination, or (ii) the liquidation of the
Company. The Company paid a total of $30,000 with respect to this commitment for
the period ended March 31, 2009.
From time to time, the Founder funds
administrative expenses, such as travel expenses, meals and entertainment and
office supplies, incurred in the ordinary course of business. Such expenses are
to be reimbursed by the Company to the Founder. As of December 31, 2008, the Founder has funded a total
of $7,857 of administrative expenses,
all of which were repaid during the period ended
March 31, 2009.
On January 10, 2008, the Company
cancelled 1,725,000 Founder’s Units, which were surrendered in a
recapitalization, leaving the Founder with a total of 9,775,000 Units. Of the
9,775,000 Founder’s Units, an aggregate of 1,275,000 Founder’s Units, including
the common stock included therein, were forfeited on March 27, 2008,
following the expiration of the over-allotment option of Banc of America
Securities LLC and the other underwriters pursuant to the terms of the
applicable purchase agreement.
Note 5 — Income Taxes
The components of the provision for
income taxes for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are set forth below:
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
For the Three
Months
Ended
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Current
taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
$ |
148,105 |
|
|
$ |
353,586 |
|
State and
local
|
|
|
87,432 |
|
|
|
202,771 |
|
Total current tax
expense
|
|
|
235,537 |
|
|
|
556,357 |
|
Deferred
taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. federal
|
|
|
(131,030 |
) |
|
|
(34,285 |
) |
State and
local
|
|
|
(77,352 |
) |
|
|
(14,310 |
) |
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
48,595 |
|
Total deferred tax
expense
|
|
|
(208,382 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Total provision for income
taxes
|
|
$ |
27,155 |
|
|
$ |
556,357 |
|
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured
using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when such
differences are expected to reverse.
The
Company has a deferred income tax asset for the tax effect of temporary
differences of $1,376,614 at March 31, 2009. The Company has not provided a
valuation allowance, since it expects the benefit to be fully
recoverable.
The effective tax rate of 45% differs
from the statutory U.S. federal income tax rate of
34% due to the provision
for state and local taxes.
For the quarters ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, the Company performed a tax analysis in accordance with FIN 48. Based
upon that analysis the Company was not required to accrue any liabilities
pursuant to FIN 48.
Note 6 —
Earnings per Share
The
computations of basic and diluted EPS are set forth below:
|
|
For the Three Months
Ended
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
For the Three
Months
Ended
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator
for basic and diluted earnings per share — net income available to
common stockholders
|
|
$ |
33,146 |
|
|
$ |
55,392 |
|
Denominator
for basic and diluted earnings per share — weighted average number of
common shares
|
|
|
48,500,000 |
|
|
|
27,485,989 |
|
Earnings
per common share – basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
0.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
Note 7 —
Transaction Costs
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company incurred transaction costs
relating to the proposed business combination (as disclosed in Note 9) in the
amount of $139,691. Such transaction costs were expensed as professional fees,
as permitted under SFAS 141R, since the proposed business combination will close
after January 1, 2009, the effective date of SFAS 141R. No transaction costs
were incurred for the three months ended March 31, 2008.
Note 8 —
Market/Credit Risks
The
Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions with
high credit ratings. At times, the Company may maintain deposits in federally
insured financial institutions in excess of federally insured (FDIC) limits.
However, management believes that the Company is not exposed to significant
credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institution in which
those deposits are held. The Company does not believe the investments held in
trust at broker are subject to significant credit risk as the portfolio is
invested in money market securities, which meet the applicable conditions of
2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Company has not experienced any
losses on this account.
The placing of funds in the
Trust Account may not protect those funds from third party claims against
the Company. Although the Company will seek to have all vendors (other than its
independent auditors), prospective target businesses and other entities it
engages, execute agreements with the Company waiving any right, title, interest
or claim of any kind in or to any monies held in the Trust Account, there
is no guarantee that they will execute such agreements. The Founder has agreed
that it will be liable under certain circumstances to ensure that the proceeds
in the Trust Account are not reduced by the claims of target businesses or
vendors, service providers or other entities that are owed money by the Company
for services rendered to or contracted for or products sold to the Company.
There can be no assurance that it will be able to satisfy those
obligations.
Note 9 —
Proposed Business Combination
On
September 22, 2008, the Company announced that it had entered into an agreement
(the “Transaction Agreement”) to acquire Iridium Holdings LLC (“Iridium
Holdings”), a leading provider of voice and data mobile satellite services (the
“Proposed Business Combination”). On April 28, 2009, the Company and Iridium
Holdings announced the signing of an amendment to the Transaction Agreement.
Under the terms of the amendment, the aggregate consideration payable by the
Company to Iridium Holdings’ existing shareholders will be reduced by 15%. The
amended agreement, unanimously approved by the Board of Directors of the Company
and Iridium Holdings, as well as Iridium Holdings’ major shareholders, values
Iridium Holdings at an enterprise value of approximately $517.3 million. The
Company will acquire Iridium Holdings in exchange for 29,400,000 shares of its
common stock (36,000,000 shares under the original Transaction Agreement), $77.1
million of cash, subject to adjustment, and assume approximately $145.8 million
of net debt of Iridium Holdings ($130.8 million of net debt under the original
agreement). In addition, 90 days following the closing of the
Proposed Business Combination, if Iridium Holdings has in effect a valid
election under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the
Company will make a tax benefits payment of $25.5 million in aggregate to
certain sellers to compensate for the tax basis step-up (up to $30.0 million
under the original agreement). Upon the closing of the Proposed
Business Combination, Iridium Holdings will become a
subsidiary
of the Company and the combined enterprise will be renamed “Iridium
Communications Inc.” and intends to apply for listing on NYSE.
The
closing of the Proposed Business Combination is subject to customary closing
conditions including the expiration or termination of waiting periods under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act, Federal Communications Commission approval, other
regulatory approvals and the approval of the Company’s stockholders, including a
majority of the shares of the Company’s common stock issued in its Public
Offering. The Company was granted early termination of the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Act in October 2008. In addition, the closing of
the Proposed Business Combination is conditioned on the requirement that
stockholders owning not more than 11,999,999 shares of the Company’s common
stock (such number representing 30 percent minus one share of the 40,000,000
shares of issued in its Public Offering) vote against the Proposed Business
Combination and validly exercise their conversion rights to have their shares
converted into cash, as permitted by the Company’s certificate of
incorporation. The Company’s Initial Stockholders have agreed to vote
the 8,500,000 shares they already own, which were issued to them prior to the
Company’s Public Offering, in accordance with the vote of the holders of a
majority of the shares issued in the Public Offering. The Proposed
Business Combination is expected to occur during the summer of
2009.
If (a)
the Transaction Agreement is terminated either by the Company or Iridium
Holdings because the Company’s stockholders shall have failed to approve the
Proposed Business Combination, (b) the Company breaches its obligations to hold
a stockholder meeting or to use its reasonable best efforts to consummate the
Proposed Business Combination contemplated by the Transaction Agreement, and (c)
the Company consummates an initial business combination (other than with Iridium
Holdings), the Company will be obligated to pay to Iridium Holdings within two
business days of the consummation of such other business combination, a break-up
fee consisting of $5,000,000 in cash, shares of the Company’s common stock or
combination thereof, at the Company’s election (the “Termination Fee”). The
Termination Fee will be the exclusive remedy of Iridium Holdings, the Sellers
and their respective affiliates with respect to any such breach except in the
case where, prior to 10 business days immediately following the termination of
the Transaction Agreement, Iridium Holdings notifies the Company in writing that
it believes in good faith the Company has committed willful breach of the
Transaction Agreement. In that case, the Company need not pay the Termination
Fee and Iridium Holdings shall have the right to pursue its remedies for willful
breach against the Company, subject to other limitations set forth in the
Transaction Agreement.
Effective
upon completion of the Proposed Business Combination, the Founder has agreed to
forfeit the following securities of the Company which it currently owns: (1)
1,441,176 common shares; (2) 8,369,563 founder warrants; and (3) 4,000,000
private placement warrants. These forfeitures will reduce the
Company’s shares and warrants outstanding immediately post-closing.
Note 10 —
Subsequent Event
On April
13, 2009, the Company withdrew $800,000 from the trust account; $650,000 of
which was used for working capital purposes and $150,000 of which was used for
the payment of federal, state and local income taxes and franchise taxes. On May
6, 2009, the Company withdrew another $170,000 from the trust account for
working capital purposes. As of May 8, 2009, after giving effect to the
Company’s withdrawal of interest on the funds held in the trust account,
approximately $401,051,908 was held in the trust and the Company had
approximately $30,795 of unrestricted cash equivalents available.
Report
of Independent Auditors
Unit
Holders and Board of Directors
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Iridium Holdings LLC
(the Company) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of income, members’ deficit and comprehensive income,
and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2008. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in
the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of
material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also
includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the consolidated financial position of Iridium Holdings LLC
at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2008, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States.
McLean,
Virginia
February 23,
2009
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands, Except Unit Data)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
24,810 |
|
|
$ |
22,105 |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
3,020 |
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
41,031 |
|
|
|
35,114 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
29,847 |
|
|
|
14,156 |
|
Deferred
cost of sales
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
3,408 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
|
|
2,539 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
99,955 |
|
|
|
80,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
63,090 |
|
|
|
59,959 |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
15,400 |
|
|
|
15,400 |
|
Deferred
financing costs and other assets
|
|
|
10,724 |
|
|
|
11,880 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
189,169 |
|
|
$ |
167,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and members’ deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
6,650 |
|
|
$ |
2,361 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
22,573 |
|
|
|
19,415 |
|
Accrued
compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
10,586 |
|
|
|
8,843 |
|
Credit
facility, current portion
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
|
|
12,933 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
25,366 |
|
|
|
24,152 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
95,554 |
|
|
|
67,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
satellite operations and maintenance expense, net of current
portion
|
|
|
9,898 |
|
|
|
12,372 |
|
Motorola
payable
|
|
|
10,849 |
|
|
|
9,761 |
|
Credit
facility
|
|
|
106,541 |
|
|
|
151,542 |
|
Convertible
subordinated note
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
5,657 |
|
|
|
4,649 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
251,399 |
|
|
|
246,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members’
deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members’
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
A Units (1,083,872 units issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Class
B Units (518,012 and 455,209 units issued and outstanding,
respectively)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,429 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(63,497 |
) |
|
|
(75,576 |
) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(3,162 |
) |
|
|
(3,632 |
) |
Total
members’ deficit
|
|
|
(62,230 |
) |
|
|
(78,447 |
) |
Total
liabilities and members’ deficit
|
|
$ |
189,169 |
|
|
$ |
167,581 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Consolidated
Statements of Income
|
|
Year
Ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
$ |
67,759 |
|
|
$ |
57,850 |
|
|
$ |
50,807 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
133,247 |
|
|
|
101,172 |
|
|
|
77,661 |
|
Subscriber
equipment
|
|
|
119,938 |
|
|
|
101,879 |
|
|
|
83,944 |
|
Total
revenue
|
|
|
320,944 |
|
|
|
260,901 |
|
|
|
212,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of subscriber equipment sales
|
|
|
67,570 |
|
|
|
62,439 |
|
|
|
60,068 |
|
Network
and satellite operations and maintenance
|
|
|
63,878 |
|
|
|
60,188 |
|
|
|
60,685 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
55,105 |
|
|
|
46,350 |
|
|
|
33,468 |
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
38,778 |
|
|
|
17,370 |
|
|
|
4,419 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
12,535 |
|
|
|
11,380 |
|
|
|
8,541 |
|
Transaction
costs (Note 1)
|
|
|
7,959 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
245,825 |
|
|
|
197,727 |
|
|
|
167,181 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
profit
|
|
|
75,119 |
|
|
|
63,174 |
|
|
|
45,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
(expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net of capitalized interest of $1.3 million,
$0.8 million and $0.6 million, respectively
|
|
|
(21,094 |
) |
|
|
(21,771 |
) |
|
|
(15,179 |
) |
Interest
and other (expense) income
|
|
|
(146 |
) |
|
|
2,370 |
|
|
|
1,762 |
|
Total
other expense
|
|
|
(21,240 |
) |
|
|
(19,401 |
) |
|
|
(13,417 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
$ |
53,879 |
|
|
$ |
43,773 |
|
|
$ |
31,814 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Consolidated
Statements of Members’ Deficit and Comprehensive Income
|
|
Class
A Units
|
|
|
Class
B Units
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of Units
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
of Units
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Number
of Units
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In Capital
|
|
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
|
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
|
|
Subscription
Receivable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands, Except Unit Data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2005
|
|
|
595,514 |
|
|
$ |
127,610 |
|
|
|
227,727 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
488,358 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
(119,985 |
) |
|
$ |
(65,138 |
) |
|
$ |
(57,262 |
) |
Net
Income
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
31,814 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
31,814 |
|
Other
comprehensive loss—swap
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(2,375 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(2,375 |
) |
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
29,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-based
compensation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
284 |
|
Credit
enhancements contributed
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
65,138 |
|
|
|
65,138 |
|
Cash
capital contributions returned
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(62,472 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(62,472 |
) |
Credit
enhancements returned
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(65,138 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(65,138 |
) |
Class
A and B Units distributions
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(31,178 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(31,178 |
) |
Class
B Units issued
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
11,397 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Anti-dilution
adjustment
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
196,579 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Warrant
exercise
|
|
|
488,358 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(488,358 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Balance
at December 31, 2006
|
|
|
1,083,872 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
435,703 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
(2,375 |
) |
|
|
(119,349 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(121,189 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
43,773 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
43,773 |
|
Other
comprehensive loss—swap
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,257 |
) |
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
42,516 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-based
compensation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Class
B Units issued
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
15,390 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Class
B Units forfeited
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Anti-dilution
adjustment
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
5,655 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Balance
at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
1,083,872 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
455,209 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
(3,632 |
) |
|
|
(75,576 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(78,447 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
53,879 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
53,879 |
|
Other
comprehensive income—swap
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
470 |
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
54,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity-based
compensation
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
Exchange
of profits interests for B Units
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
59,382 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,704 |
|
Class
A and B Units distributions
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(41,800 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(41,800 |
) |
Anti-dilution
adjustment
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
3,421 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,083,872 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
518,012 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
4,429 |
|
|
$ |
(3,162 |
) |
|
$ |
(63,497 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
(62,230 |
) |
See
accompanying notes.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Year
ended December 31
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
53,879 |
|
|
$ |
43,773 |
|
|
$ |
31,814 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
12,535 |
|
|
|
11,380 |
|
|
|
8,541 |
|
Other
non-cash amortization and accretion
|
|
|
5,425 |
|
|
|
2,862 |
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
Equity
and profits interest compensation
|
|
|
2,867 |
|
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
Change
in certain operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
(6,192 |
) |
|
|
(9,943 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,608 |
) |
|
|
(692 |
) |
|
|
(586 |
) |
Inventory
|
|
|
(15,691 |
) |
|
|
(3,852 |
) |
|
|
(5,232 |
) |
Deferred
cost of sales
|
|
|
3,408 |
|
|
|
11,836 |
|
|
|
21,278 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
1,214 |
|
|
|
(10,256 |
) |
|
|
(20,872 |
) |
Other
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
(3,206 |
) |
|
|
(5,790 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
|
(2,631 |
) |
|
|
(1,755 |
) |
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
5,249 |
|
|
|
(5,919 |
) |
|
|
5,347 |
|
Accrued
compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
5,366 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
Accrued
satellite operations and maintenance expense
|
|
|
(2,474 |
) |
|
|
(2,475 |
) |
|
|
(2,474 |
) |
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
61,438 |
|
|
|
36,560 |
|
|
|
39,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(13,913 |
) |
|
|
(19,787 |
) |
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(13,913 |
) |
|
|
(19,787 |
) |
|
|
(9,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
under credit facilities
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
Repayments
under credit facilities
|
|
|
(27,554 |
) |
|
|
(26,526 |
) |
|
|
(59,611 |
) |
Deferred
operations and maintenance fees
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(31,277 |
) |
Proceeds
from issuance of Convertible Subordinated Note
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Payments
of deferred financing fees
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(7,974 |
) |
Distributions
to Class A and B members
|
|
|
(41,378 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(31,178 |
) |
Transfers
from (to) restricted cash for letters of credit
|
|
|
2,900 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(15,520 |
) |
Return
of Class A members’ capital contributions
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(62,472 |
) |
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(44,820 |
) |
|
|
(26,526 |
) |
|
|
(8,032 |
) |
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,705 |
|
|
|
(9,753 |
) |
|
|
22,000 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
22,105 |
|
|
|
31,858 |
|
|
|
9,858 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$ |
24,810 |
|
|
$ |
22,105 |
|
|
$ |
31,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary
cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$ |
16,991 |
|
|
$ |
20,643 |
|
|
$ |
9,843 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary
disclosure of non-cash investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease
incentives in the form of leasehold improvements
|
|
$ |
1,171 |
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
Property
and equipment received but not paid for at year-end
|
|
$ |
581 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2008
1.
|
Organization
and Business
|
Iridium
Holdings LLC (the Parent), its wholly owned subsidiary Iridium Satellite LLC
(Satellite), and Satellite’s wholly owned subsidiary, Iridium Constellation LLC
(Constellation) (Parent, Satellite and Constellation, together with all other
direct and indirect subsidiaries of Parent, are referred to as the Company or
Iridium) were formed under the laws of the State of Delaware in 2000 and were
organized as limited liability companies pursuant to the Delaware Limited
Liability Company Act. On December 11, 2000, the Company acquired certain
satellite communication assets from Iridium LLC, a debtor in possession,
pursuant to an asset purchase agreement. The Company holds various licenses from
the Federal Communications Commission (the FCC) and from international
regulatory bodies that permit the Company to conduct its business, including the
operation of its satellite constellation.
Iridium
is a provider of mobile voice and data communications services via satellite.
The Company’s mobile satellite services address the demand from customers for
connectivity and reliability at all times and in all locations. Iridium offers
voice and data communications services to U.S. and international government
agencies, businesses and other customers on a global basis using 66 in-orbit
constellation satellites, eight in-orbit spares and related ground
infrastructure, including a primary commercial gateway. In February 2009,
the Company lost the use of a satellite reducing the total number of in-orbit
spares to seven.
Iridium
sells the majority of its products and services on a wholesale basis via a
global network of distribution partners, who provide Iridium’s product and
service solutions directly to end-users, or indirectly through dealers.
Iridium’s distributors often combine its products with other technologies, such
as GPS and terrestrial wireless technology, to provide integrated communications
solutions for customers in defined market niches. The U.S. government, which
owns and operates a dedicated gateway, is its largest customer.
Iridium
is currently in the process of designing and developing its second-generation
satellite constellation, Iridium NEXT (Iridium NEXT).
On
September 22, 2008, a transaction agreement was executed among Parent, GHL
Acquisition Corp. (GHQ) and certain direct and indirect owners of equity
interests in Parent (Sellers), pursuant to which GHQ will acquire the Sellers’
equity interests of Parent, and the equity interest
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
1.
|
Organization
and Business (continued)
|
in two
third party entities (Acquisition). GHQ is a blank check company formed on
November 2, 2007, for the purpose of acquiring one or more businesses or
assets. The Acquisition must be
approved by a majority of the GHQ public stockholders. In addition, the
Acquisition will only be
approved if GHQ public stockholders owning 11,999,999 shares or less vote
against the proposal and seek to exercise their conversion rights. Upon completion of the
Acquisition, the Sellers are expected to receive an aggregate of
35.8 million shares of GHQ common stock and $76.7 million of cash,
subject to adjustment. In addition, 90 days following the close of the
Acquisition, if Parent has in effect a valid election under Section 754 of the
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, GHQ will make a tax benefits payment
of up to $30.0 million in aggregate to certain sellers to compensate them
for tax basis step-up, if applicable. Costs associated with the transaction
agreement have been expensed as incurred. For the year ended December 31,
2008, transaction costs were $8.0 million.
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of
Presentation
|
Principles
of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
The
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) and
include the accounts of the Parent and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the
associated amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
Certain
prior-year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
The
Company derives its revenues as a wholesaler of satellite communication products
and services. Pursuant to wholesale agreements, the Company sells its products
and services to service providers, who in turn, sell the products and services
to other distributors or directly to end users. The Company does not have direct
billing or other responsibilities for the end users, as the service providers
set customer pricing, execute subscription agreements, and are generally
responsible for maintaining customer relations. The Company’s primary customers
are these service providers. The primary types of revenue include airtime
revenue (fixed- and flat-rate, and usage based), contract services revenue and
subscriber equipment sales revenue.
The
Company recognizes revenue when services are performed or delivery has occurred,
evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is fixed or determinable, and
collection is probable, as follows:
When an
end user activitates service on a particular device, the Company begins charging
the service provider a monthly access fee and a usage fee based on airtime used.
Airtime revenue from fixed-rate and flat-rate arrangements is recognized ratably
over the service period. Revenue from usage-based arrangements is recognized as
the service is provided.
Government
Contract Revenue
The
Company has been under contract with the U.S. government since the inception of
the Company. The U.S. Government purchases its equipment from a third-party
service provider and has a fixed-fee arrangement with the Company for services.
The Company currently is party to two contracts with the U.S. government, both
of which expire as of March 31, 2009, subject to renewal by the U.S.
government as described below. Under the terms of the first contract, the
Company provides airtime and airtime support to U.S. government subscribers.
Services furnished under this contract include Short Burst Data (SBD) services
and unlimited monthly voice, data, messaging, and paging services. The second
contract provides for the maintenance by the Company of the U.S. government’s
gateway in Hawaii. The U.S. government has the unilateral right to extend the
term of each of these contracts for up to four additional one-year periods.
Revenues related to the services provided under both contracts are recognized
ratably over the periods in which the services are provided. On February 4,
2009, the Company received notification from the U.S. Government of its intent
to exercise the first option on both contracts. If exercised, the first option
period will begin April 1, 2009 and expire as of March 31,
2010.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Revenue
Recognition (continued)
Contract
Services Revenue
The
Company also provides certain engineering services to assist customers in
developing new technologies for use on the Company’s satellite system. The
revenues associated with these services are recorded when the services are
rendered and the expenses are recorded when incurred. Contract services revenue
pertains to all contract revenue, including both government and non-government
customers. Revenue on cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts is recognized to the extent
of estimated costs incurred plus the applicable fees earned. The Company
considers fixed fees under cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts to be earned in
proportion to the allowable costs incurred in performance of the
contract.
Subscriber
Equipment Revenue
The
Company follows the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue
No. 00-21, Revenue
Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (EITF No. 00-21), for sales of subscriber
equipment. EITF No. 00-21 requires that revenue arrangements with multiple
deliverables be divided into separate units of accounting, only if the
deliverables meet certain criteria, and that all elements of an arrangement
should be considered a single unit of accounting if the criteria are not met.
The Company considers its contracts that provide for both the sale of subscriber
equipment and airtime usage to contain multiple deliverables and therefore are
subject to the guidance contained in EITF No. 00-21.
The
Company allocates consideration to the separate units of accounting using the
relative fair value method. Accordingly, the Company recognizes equipment sales
and the related cost when equipment title passes to the customer. Revenue from
airtime usage is recognized over the service period or based on usage, as
applicable.
Airtime
revenue is generated from the Company’s service providers through usage of the
Company’s satellite system and through fixed monthly access fees per user
charged by the Company to each service provider. Revenue for usage is recognized
when usage occurs and revenue for the fixed-per-user access fee is recognized
ratably over the period in which the service is provided to the end user.
Revenue from prepaid services is recognized when usage occurs or when the
customer’s right to access the unused prepaid services expires. The
Company
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Deferred
Revenue (continued)
does not
offer refund privileges for prepaid services. As of December 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 unused prepaid services and access fees of
$24.7 million and $19.8 million, respectively, were recorded in
deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets. Deferred service and access
fees are typically earned and recognized as income within one year of customer
prepayment.
Inventory
consists of subscriber equipment, which includes handsets, L-Band transceivers
and data devices and related accessories to be sold to customers to access
Company services. The Company outsources manufacturing of handsets, L-Band
transceivers, and data devices to a third party manufacturer and purchases
accessories from third party suppliers. The Company’s cost of inventory includes
cost allocations of overhead (including salaries and benefits of employees
directly involved in bringing inventory to its existing condition, scrap,
tooling, and freight) are included as cost components of these manufactured
items. All inventories are valued using the average cost method, and are carried
at the lower of cost or market.
The
consolidated balance sheets include various financial instruments (primarily
cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued
expenses and other liabilities, long-term debt, derivative instruments, and
other obligations). The fair values of short-term financial instruments
approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature. The fair
value of the credit facility is approximately 88% of its carrying amount as of
December 31, 2008, based on rates currently available to the Company for
debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. Additional information
regarding the fair value of our cash and cash equivalents, and information
regarding the fair value of our derivative instruments, is disclosed in
Note 2 under Fair Value Measurements.
It was
not practicable to estimate the fair value of our $22.9 million
subordinated convertible note (the Note). The Note is due to an affiliate of
GHQ, and due to the lack of quoted market prices, we were unable to identify any
similar instruments in the market place. The Note is carried at its face amount.
The Note bears interest at 5% beginning in April 2009 and it is convertible into
approximately 84,000 Class A Units. Additional information on the Note is
provided in Note 7.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The
Company has adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 as of the beginning of the first
quarter of 2008 for financial assets and liabilities. FASB Staff Position (FSP)
157-2, Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157, amends SFAS 157 by excluding lease transactions
from its scope and deferring the effective date of the adoption of SFAS 157 for
non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are nonrecurring in
nature. Pursuant to FSP 157-2, the Company will adopt similar requirements
related to non-recurring nonfinancial assets and liabilities in
2009.
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair
value hierarchy, which
prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers
include:
·
|
Level
1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets;
|
·
|
Level
2, defined as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted
prices for similar assets; quoted prices in markets that are not active;
or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities;
and
|
·
|
Level
3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data
exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own
assumptions.
|
Pursuant
to SFAS 157, “fair value” is the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability that assumes an orderly transaction in the most
advantageous market at the measurement date. At December 31, 2008, the
Company’s financial assets and liabilities were measured using either Level 1 or
Level 2 inputs.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
The
following table summarizes information about our financial assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at
December 31, 2008 and 2007:
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2008
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
24,810 |
|
|
$ |
24,810 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
15,520 |
|
|
|
15,520 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Interest
rate swaps
|
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(3,243 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
$ |
37,087 |
|
|
$ |
40,330 |
|
|
$ |
(3,243 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
22,105 |
|
|
$ |
22,105 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
18,420 |
|
|
|
18,420 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Interest
rate swaps
|
|
|
(3,737 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(3,737 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
$ |
36,788 |
|
|
$ |
40,525 |
|
|
$ |
(3,737 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
Cash,
Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash
All cash
and cash equivalents are recorded at fair market value at December 31, 2008
and 2007. The inputs used in measuring the fair value of these instruments are
considered to be Level 1 in accordance with the SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy.
The fair market values are based on period-end statements supplied by the
various banks and brokers that held the majority of the Company’s funds
deposited in institutional money market mutual funds (for overnight sweep
account funds) and the remainder held in regular interest bearing and
non-interest bearing depository accounts and certificates of deposits with
commercial banks.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
The
Company accounts for its interest rate swaps using the guidance contained in
SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (SFAS
No. 133). SFAS No. 133, as amended, requires that all derivative
instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their respective fair values. As
required by the Company’s credit facility, management executed four pay-fixed
receive-variable interest rate swaps in 2006, two of which were still open at
December 31, 2008 (three were open at December 31, 2007), and mature
within two years. The Company hedged $86.0 million of variable interest
rate debt as of December 31, 2008 and $146.0 million as of
December 31, 2007. The interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow
hedges under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. The objective for holding
these instruments is to manage variable interest rate risk related to the
Company’s $210.0 million credit facilities, by synthetically converting a
portion of the variable rate risk to fixed rate interest rate risk. The swaps
are structured so that the Company will pay a fixed rate of interest and receive
a variable interest payment, which, to the extent hedged, should offset the
variable interest that is being paid on its debt.
The
principal market in which the Company executes interest rate swap contracts is
the retail market. For recognizing the most appropriate value the highest and
best use of the Company’s derivatives are measured using an in-exchange
valuation premise that considers the assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing the derivatives. The Company has elected to use the income
approach to value the derivatives, using observable Level 2 market expectations
at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future
amounts to a single present amount (discounted) assuming that participants are
motivated, but not compelled to transact. Level 2 inputs for the swap valuations
are limited to quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets
(specifically futures contracts on LIBOR for the first two years) and inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
(specifically LIBOR cash and swap rates, and credit default swap rates at
commonly quoted intervals). Mid-market pricing is used as a practical expedient
for fair value measurements. Key inputs, including the cash rates for very short
term, futures rates for up to two years and LIBOR swap rates beyond the
derivative maturity are compared to provide spot rates at resets specified by
each swap as well as to discount those future cash flows to present value at
measurement date. Inputs are collected on the last market day of the period. The
same rates used to compare the yield curve are used to discount the future cash
flows. A credit default swap basis available at commonly quoted intervals are
collected and applied to all cash flows when the swap is in an asset position
pre-credit effect.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
Interest
Rate Swaps (continued)
The
variable interest rates on the swaps reset every quarter concurrent with the
reset of the variable rate on the debt. The fixed rate will not change over the
life of the swap. Each quarter-end, the swaps are measured against current
interest rates to determine a fair market value. The fair market value is
recorded on the balance sheet and the offset to the value, to the extent
effective, is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.
The
effectiveness of the swaps in offsetting the gain or loss on the debt is
assessed on a contract by contract basis quarterly, by regressing historical
changes in the value of the swap against the historical change in value of the
underlying debt. To establish a value for the underlying debt a “hypothetical“
derivative is created with terms that match the debt (e.g., notional amount,
reset rates and terms, maturity) and had a zero fair value at
designation.
The
change in the swaps’ fair market value from the designation date to
December 31, 2008, was compared with the hypothetical change in fair market
value for the same period. Since the change in the value of the hypotheticals
was less than the change in the value of the swaps, a $0.1 million loss
associated with ineffectiveness was accrued as of December 31, 2008. A
$3.3 million loss on the derivative was recorded to interest rate swap
liability (included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet) and a $3.2 million
offset is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying
December 31, 2008 consolidated balance sheet. A $0.1 million loss
associated with ineffectiveness was accrued as of December 31, 2007; a
$3.7 million loss on the derivative was recorded to interest rate swap
liability (included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying
December 31, 2007 consolidated balance sheet) and a $3.6 million
offset was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss in the accompanying
December 31, 2007 consolidated balance sheet. There was no ineffectiveness
in 2006.
At
December 31, 2008 and 2007, $2.5 million and $1.9 million,
respectively, was expected to be reclassified from accumulated other
comprehensive loss to earnings as additional interest expense over the ensuing
12 months in conjunction with lower variable rate interest payments on the debt.
The net interest expense should equal the fixed rate on the swaps, thus meeting
the original objective of the hedge program.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Convertible
Subordinated Note
In
October 2008, the Company issued to Greenhill & Co. Europe Holdings
Limited (Holder), a $22.9 million 5% convertible subordinated note due
October 2015. The Company has determined that the embedded derivatives
contained in the Note (including the conversion option, the holder’s put options
and the Company’s call option) do not require separate accounting under the
FASB’s SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and that there were no beneficial
conversion features associated with the Note pursuant to EITF 98-5, Accounting for Convertible
Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustment
Conversion Ratios. Accordingly, the Company is accounting for the Note
pursuant to the guidance contained in Accounting Principal Board’s Opinion
No. 14, Accounting for
Convertible Debt and Debt Issued with Stock Purchase
Warrants.
Interest
on the Note accrues beginning in April 2009 at 5% per year. The Company is
recording periodic interest cost using the effective interest rate method per
Accounting Principal Board’s Opinion No. 12, Omnibus Opinion –
1967.
Costs
incurred in connection with securing debt financing have been deferred and are
amortized as additional interest expense using the effective interest method
over the term of the related debt.
Trade
accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear
interest. Amounts collected on trade accounts receivable are included in net
cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash
flows. Accounts receivable are stated net of allowances for uncollectible
accounts; however, the Company determined that it did not need an allowance for
uncollectible accounts at December 31, 2007 or 2008. Management develops
its estimate of this allowance based on the Company’s experience with specific
customers, its understanding of their current economic circumstances and its own
judgment as to the likelihood that the Company will ultimately receive payment.
When a specific account receivable is determined to be uncollectible, the
Company reduces both its accounts receivable and allowances for uncollectible
accounts accordingly.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Research
and development costs are charged as an expense in the period in which they are
incurred. Research and development costs consisted primarily of costs related to
the development of Iridium NEXT, new subscriber equipment and new maritime
broadband services.
The
Company provides its customers a warranty on subscriber equipment for one year
from the date of activation. Costs associated with the warranty
program—including equipment replacements, repairs, and program
administration—are expensed as incurred. Warranty expenses were
$0.3 million, $0.6 million and $0.2 million during the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. A warranty reserve
based on an expected return rate for handsets, L-Band transceivers and data
devices has been recorded in the amount of $0.4 million and
$0.5 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
Accounting
for Equity-Based Compensation
Effective
January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which
supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, using the “modified prospective” method.
Under this method, the Company recognizes compensation cost beginning with the
effective date (i) based on the requirements of SFAS No. 123(R) for all
share-based payments granted after the effective date and (ii) based on the
requirements of APB Opinion No. 25 for all awards granted to employees
prior to the effective date of Statement No. 123(R) that remain unvested on
the effective date.
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model (Black-Scholes) as its
method of valuation under SFAS No. 123(R). This fair value is then
amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the
awards, which is generally the vesting period. The fair value of equity-based
payment awards on the date of grant as determined by the Black-Scholes model is
affected by the Company’s assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not
limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and
expected forfeitures. The fair value of employee interests was estimated using
the Black-Scholes model.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Accounting
for Equity-Based Compensation (continued)
The
following table summarizes the ranges used in the model for grants in the year
ended December 31, 2006:
Expected
volatility
|
63.0%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
4.5%
|
Expected
dividends
|
0.0%
|
Expected
term
|
6
years
|
There
were no grants in 2007.
The
following table summarizes the ranges used in the model for grants in the year
ended December 31, 2008:
Expected
volatility
|
52.6%
– 57.9%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.0%
– 2.5%
|
Expected
dividends
|
0.0%
|
Expected
term
|
1-
2 years
|
The
expected volatility assumption was based on a review of the expected volatility
of publicly traded entities similar to the Company, which the Company believes
is a reasonable indicator of its expected volatility. The risk-free interest
rate assumption is based upon U.S. Treasury Bond interest rates with terms
similar to the expected term of the award. The dividend yield assumption is
based on the Company’s history of not declaring and paying dividends. The
expected term is based on the Company’s best estimate for the period of time for
which the instrument is expected to be outstanding.
Given the
limited number of employees who have been granted equity interests, the Company
has estimated there will be no forfeitures, which is consistent with the
Company’s historical experience.
Under
Statement No. 123(R), a nonpublic entity can make a policy decision of
whether to measure all of its liabilities incurred under share-based payment
arrangements at fair value or to measure all such liabilities at intrinsic
value. The Company’s policy is to measure all liabilities under SFAS
No. 123(R) using the intrinsic method. This intrinsic value is then
amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the
awards, which is generally the vesting periods.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Property
and equipment is carried at acquired cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
Satellite
system assets
|
14
years
|
Terrestrial
system assets
|
7
years
|
Equipment
|
3 –
5 years
|
Gateway
systems assets
|
5
years
|
Internally
developed software and purchased software
|
3 –
7 years
|
Building
|
39
years
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
Shorter
of estimated useful life or remaining lease
term
|
The
Company capitalizes interest costs associated with the construction of capital
assets and amortizes the cost over the assets’ useful lives beginning when the
assets are placed in service.
Repair
and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
The
Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of
impairment are present. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the
carrying amounts of the assets to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to
be generated by the assets. Any impairment loss would be measured as the excess
of the assets’ carrying amount over their fair value. Fair value is based on
market prices where available, an estimate of market value, or various valuation
techniques.
The
carrying value of a satellite lost as a result of an in-orbit failure would be
charged to operations upon the occurrence of the loss. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, the Company recorded the carrying value of
$0.1 million related to the failure of one satellite as an impairment loss.
There were no impairment losses recorded in 2007. For the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company recorded the carrying value of
$0.1 million for one failed satellite as an impairment loss.
In
February 2009, the Company lost the use of a satellite and recorded an
impairment charge of $0.1 million, which represents the carrying value of
the satellite.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
As a
limited liability company (LLC) that is treated as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes, the Company is generally not subject to federal income tax
directly. Rather, each member is subject to income taxation based on the
member’s portion of the Company’s income or loss (as defined in Parent’s amended
and restated limited liability company agreement (LLC Agreement)). The Company
is subject to income taxes in certain state and local jurisdictions in the
United States and in non-US jurisdictions in which the Company
operates.
The
Company is subject to federal excise, withholding, and payroll taxes; to state
and local taxes in the United States; and to value-added, or other taxes in
non-U.S. jurisdictions in which the Company operates.
The
Company regularly assesses the potential outcome of current and future
examinations in each of the jurisdictions where the Company is subject to
taxation when determining the adequacy of accruals for tax, penalties, and
interest.
The
Company has established accruals that it believes are adequate in relation to
the potential for additional assessments. The Company does not believe any such
tax, penalties, or interest would have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position.
Costs
associated with advertising and promotions are expensed as incurred. Advertising
expenses, primarily consisting of print media, were $0.5 million,
$0.4 million and $0.2 million in each of the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and receivables. The
majority of this cash is swept nightly into a money market fund with a
diversified portfolio. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers’
financial condition and records reserves to provide for estimated credit losses.
Accounts receivable are due from both domestic and international
customers.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Significant
Customers, Supplier, and Service Providers
The
Company derived approximately 21%, 22%, and 24% of its total revenue during the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 respectively, from one customer,
an agency of the U.S. government. Such agency also accounted for approximately
29% and 41% of the Company’s accounts receivable balances at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The Company’s two largest commercial customers accounted
for 27%, 25% and 23% of total revenue for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. The two largest commercial customers also
accounted for approximately 23% and 20% of the Company’s accounts receivable
balances at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
The
Company acquires all of its subscriber equipment from one manufacturer. Should
events or circumstances prevent the manufacturer from producing the equipment,
the Company’s business could be adversely affected until the Company is able to
move production to other facilities of the manufacturer or secure a replacement
manufacturer.
All
satellite operations and maintenance services are provided by The Boeing Company
(Boeing). Should events or circumstances prevent Boeing from providing these
services, the Company’s business could be adversely affected until the Company
is able to assume operations and maintenance responsibilities or secure a
replacement service provider.
SFAS
No. 131, Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes
standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual
financial statements. SFAS No. 131 also establishes standards for related
disclosures about products and services and geographic areas. Operating segments
are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete
financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating
decision maker, or decision-making group, in making decisions regarding the
allocation of resources and asset performance. Pursuant to SFAS No. 131,
the Company operates in one segment providing global satellite communication
products and services.
Asset
Retirement Obligations
SFAS
No. 143, Accounting for
Asset Retirement Obligations, requires that legal obligations associated
with retirement of long-lived assets should initially be measured at fair value
and recorded as a liability. Upon initial recognition of a liability for
retirement obligations, a company must record an asset, which is depreciated
over the life of the asset to be retired.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Asset
Retirement Obligations (continued)
Under certain circumstances, each of the
U.S. government, Boeing and Motorola
Inc. (Motorola)
has the unilateral right to
require the de-orbit of the Company’s satellite constellation. In the
event the Company was required to effect a mass de-orbit, the Company, pursuant to the amended and restated operations and
maintenance agreement with Boeing (the Amended and Restated
Agreement) would be
required to pay Boeing $15.6 million plus an amount equivalent to the premium
for inception of Section B de-orbit insurance coverage ($2.5 million as of
December 31, 2008) as described further in Note 4 below. The Company
has concluded that each of the foregoing de-orbit rights meet the definition of
a legal obligation. Management does not believe the U.S. government, Boeing or
Motorola will exercise their respective de-orbit rights. As a result, management
believes the likelihood of any future cash outflows associated with the mass
de-orbit obligation to be remote.
There are other circumstances in which
the Company could be required, either by the U.S. government or for technical reasons, to
de-orbit an individual satellite; however, management believes that such costs
would not be significant in the ordinary operations of the satellite
constellation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN
No. 48). FIN No. 48 applies to taxes based substantially on income.
The FASB deferred the effective date of FIN No. 48 for certain non-public
enterprises to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2008. The
Company will adopt the provisions of FIN No. 48 effective January 1,
2009. Because the Company is not subject to federal or state income tax in the
United States, and its foreign affiliate operations are immaterial, the adoption
of FIN No. 48 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s
financial statements.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities, including an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 115 (SFAS No. 159). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to
choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair
value that are not currently required to be measured at fair value. Unrealized
gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are
reported in earnings. SFAS No. 159 does not affect any existing accounting
literature that requires certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair
value. The Company has chosen not to adopt the alternative provided in this
statement.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS
No. 141R). SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business
combination to record all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their
respective acquisition-date fair values, changes the recognition of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, changes the
recognition and measurement of contingent consideration, and requires the
expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS No. 141R also
requires additional disclosure of information surrounding a business
combination, such that users of the entity’s financial statements can fully
understand the nature and financial impact of the business combination. SFAS
No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply
SFAS No. 141R before that date. The provisions of SFAS No. 141R will only
impact the Company if it is a party to a business combination for which the
acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced
disclosures about the objectives of derivative instruments and hedging
activities, the method of accounting for such instruments under SFAS
No. 133 and its related interpretations, and a tabular disclosure of the
effects of such instruments and related hedged items on an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, as such, will be
effective beginning in the Company’s fiscal year 2009. The Company is evaluating
the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 161; however, the adoption of SFAS
No. 161 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial results.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (SFAS No. 162). SFAS No. 162 identifies
the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the
principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of
nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP. SFAS
No. 162 will become effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) amendments to AU Section 411,
The Meaning of Present Fairly
in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The
Company’s adoption of SFAS No. 162 will not have a material impact on its
financial statements.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
3.
|
Transition
Services, Products and Asset
Agreement
|
On
December 11, 2000, Parent and Satellite entered into a Transition Services,
Products and Asset Agreement (TSA) with Motorola. Certain obligations under the
TSA have been fully performed, including Motorola’s provision of services and
transfers of assets, but other obligations are on-going, as described
below.
The TSA
requires that the Company use Boeing to provide continuing steady-state
operations and maintenance services with respect to the Satellite Network
Operations Center, Telemetry, Tracking and Control stations and the on-orbit
satellites (collectively, the Iridium System) (see Note 4). These services
include the removal of satellites in the constellation from operational or
storage orbits and preparation for re-entry into the earth’s atmosphere. In
addition, the Company must (i) obtain and pay the premium for an in-orbit
insurance policy on behalf of Boeing and certain other beneficiaries, (ii) pay
the premiums for an aviation products liability insurance policy obtained by
Motorola, and (iii) maintain on deposit with Motorola an amount that at all
times equals 150% of the current year’s annual premium. The deposit of
$0.8 million is classified within deferred financing costs and other assets
in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In addition, pursuant to the TSA and the Amended and
Restated Agreement, Motorola has the right to cause the de-orbit of the constellation upon the
occurrence of certain enumerated events.
Pursuant
to the TSA, Class B Units were issued to Motorola in consideration of Motorola’s
transfer of certain licenses and equipment. These units have certain limited
anti-dilution provisions (as described in the TSA).
The TSA
also provides for the payment to Motorola of $7.25 million plus certain
accrued interest upon the occurrence of a “triggering event.“ A triggering event
is defined as the occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the TSA), the
consummation of an initial public offering by Parent or Satellite, a sale of all
or a material portion of the assets of Parent or Satellite, or upon reaching the
date of December 11, 2010. This amount consists of two components: (i) a
$6.0 million commitment fee and (ii) $1.25 million of deferred
equipment financing (plus accrued interest from the effective date of the TSA to
the date of payment at an annual interest rate of prime plus 3%).
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
3.
|
Transition
Services, Products and Asset Agreement
(continued)
|
Motorola
Payables (continued)
The
Company discounted the $6.0 million commitment fee at an imputed rate of
12.5% over 10 years, resulting in an original issue discount of
$4.2 million. The net liability is included in the Motorola payable in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The $1.25 million deferred equipment financing including
accrued interest described above is also included in the Motorola payable at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The fair value of the liability
approximates its carrying value as of December 31, 2008.
4.
|
Boeing
Operations and Maintenance
Agreement
|
On
December 11, 2000, Constellation entered into an operations and maintenance
agreement (the original O&M Agreement) with Boeing, pursuant to which Boeing
agreed to provide transition services and continuing steady-state operations and
maintenance services with respect to the Iridium System (including engineering,
systems analysis, and operations and maintenance services). Since entering into
the original O&M Agreement, there have been a number of amendments,
including the Amended and Restated Agreement. As a result of these various
amendments, the period of performance has been extended to be concurrent with
the useful life of the satellite constellation, the schedule of monthly payments
has been revised and a cost escalation according to a prescribed formula is now
included. In addition, pursuant to the Amended and Restated Agreement, Boeing
has the unilateral right to commence the de-orbit of the constellation upon the
occurrence of certain enumerated events.
The
Amended and Restated Agreement incorporates a revised de-orbit plan, which, if
exercised, would cost approximately $15.6 million plus an amount equivalent
to the premium of Section B de-orbit insurance coverage to be paid to Boeing in
the event of a mass de-orbit of the satellite constellation. The Company caused
to be issued to Boeing a $15.4 million letter of credit as collateral for
de-orbit costs. This letter of credit is cash collateralized, which is included
in long-term restricted cash in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheets.
Under the
Amended and Restated Agreement, the Company incurred expenses of
$48.7 million, $47.0 million, and $47.2 million relating to
satellite operations and maintenance costs for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
4.
|
Boeing
Operations and Maintenance Agreement
(continued)
|
The
Amended and Restated Agreement previously provided for Boeing to receive an
additional fee of 5% of any amounts distributed to Class A or Class B members of
the Company to the extent that such distributions did not constitute a return of
members’ capital contributions or distributions in respect of the members’ tax
liabilities. Boeing was entitled to receive, upon any sale or exchange of
substantially all of the interests of the Class A and B members to an unrelated
third party, 5% of the aggregate amount received by the Class A and B members.
In 2007, the Company and Boeing agreed to terminate Boeing’s right to this
additional fee in exchange for a payment of $7.8 million, which was
recorded as a prepaid expense. During the years ended December 31, 2008 and
2007, related amortization expense included in network and satellite operations
and maintenance was $1.2 million and $0.9 million respectively. The
remaining balance of $5.7 million is included in prepaid expenses
($1.1 million in current assets and $4.6 million in long term) in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, and will
be amortized ratably to network and satellite operations and maintenance expense
through December 2013.
5.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property
and equipment consists of the following at December 31:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Space
system assets
|
|
$ |
47,052 |
|
|
$ |
47,332 |
|
Terrestrial
system assets
|
|
|
8,958 |
|
|
|
9,453 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
18,985 |
|
|
|
15,490 |
|
Gateway
system assets
|
|
|
10,971 |
|
|
|
9,308 |
|
Internally
developed software and purchased software
|
|
|
27,465 |
|
|
|
10,599 |
|
Building
and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
11,299 |
|
|
|
9,160 |
|
|
|
|
124,730 |
|
|
|
101,342 |
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(66,514 |
) |
|
|
(57,426 |
) |
|
|
|
58,216 |
|
|
|
43,916 |
|
Land
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
Construction
in process
|
|
|
3,594 |
|
|
|
14,763 |
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
63,090 |
|
|
$ |
59,959 |
|
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
5.
|
Property
and Equipment (continued)
|
At
December 31, 2007, construction in process consisted of assets being
constructed for various uses including: equipment of $1.2 million, gateway
system assets of $0.1 million, internally developed software of
$13.3 million, and terrestrial system assets of $0.2 million. At
December 31, 2008, construction in process consisted of assets being
developed or constructed for various uses including: equipment of
$0.7 million, gateway system assets of $2.3 million, internally
developed software of $0.5 million, and terrestrial system assets of
$0.1 million.
On
July 27, 2006, the Company entered into a $170.0 million first lien
credit facility and $40.0 million second lien credit facility
(collectively, the Credit Facility). The Credit Facility includes a
$98.0 million four-year first lien Tranche A term loan facility, a
$62.0 million five-year first lien Tranche B term loan facility, and a
$40.0 million six-year second lien term loan facility. In addition, the
facilities include a $10.0 million three-year revolving credit facility.
The proceeds of the Credit Facility were used to repay the Company’s then
existing credit facilities, provide cash collateral for letters of credit,
return capital to the Company’s equity investors and for general corporate
purposes including development of new and advanced devices and services. The
Company elected the Eurodollar base interest rate for the calculation of
interest and currently uses the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which is
an acceptable substitute to the Eurodollar base rate according to the Credit
Facility agreement.
Mandatory
principal prepayments are required based on net cash proceeds related to debt or
equity issuances and certain dispositions, as is a mandatory prepayment of 75%
of excess cash flow, determined by a defined formula. The Company must also
maintain hedge agreements in order to provide interest rate protection on a
minimum of 50% of the aggregate principal amounts outstanding during the first
three years of the Credit Facility. As a result, the Company entered into four
interest rate swap agreements upon the closing of the Credit Facility that
ranged in duration from one to four years and collectively in July 2006
provided interest rate protection on $170.0 million (see
Note 2).
The First
and Second Lien Credit Agreements require the Company to abide by various
covenants primarily related to limitations on liens, indebtedness, sales of
assets, investments, dispositions, distributions to members, transactions with
affiliates and certain financial covenants with respect to its consolidated
leverage ratio on a quarterly basis. The Company was compliant with all
covenants required by the First and Second Lien Credit Agreements at
December 31, 2008 and 2007. Substantially all of the Company’s assets are
pledged as collateral for the Credit Facility.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
6.
|
Credit
Facility (continued)
|
On
October 17, 2008, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the
first lien credit facility (First Lien Amendment) and Amendment No. 1 to
the second lien credit facility (Second Lien Amendment). The First Lien
Amendment and Second Lien Amendment included the consent of the respective
lenders to the issuance of the Convertible Subordinated Note with Greenhill
& Co. Europe Holdings Limited (see Note 7).
Pursuant
to the First Lien Amendment, the Company and its requisite lenders agreed to,
among other things: (i) increase the applicable margin for Eurodollar loans by
75 basis points to 5%; (ii) increase permitted capital expenditures for 2008 and
2009; (iii) permit distributions of up to $37.9 million to the members of
the Company in 2008; (iv) require the Company to prepay $80.0 million of
the outstanding balance if the Acquisition is consummated and $15.0 million
if the Acquisition is not consummated by June 29, 2009. If the Acquisition
is consummated after June 29, 2009 the Company will be required to prepay
the remaining $65.0 million; and (v) to amend the definition of “Change of
Control“ to apply to the post-acquisition public company. Upon the execution of
the First Lien Amendment, the Company prepaid $22.0 million of the
outstanding balance under the first lien credit facility.
Pursuant
to the Second Lien Amendment, the Company and its requisite lenders agreed to,
among other things: (i) increase the applicable margin for Eurodollar loans by
75 basis points to 9%; (ii) increase permitted capital expenditures for 2008 and
2009; (iii) permit distributions of up to $37.9 million to the members of
the Company in 2008; and (iv) amend the definition of “Change of Control” to
apply to the post-Acquisition public company.
$10.0 million
First Lien Revolving Credit Facility
The
proceeds of the revolving credit facility may be used for general corporate
purposes of the Company. The revolving credit facility matures on July 27,
2009. The Company paid an up-front fee of 2% on the revolving facility
($0.2 million) and pays an annual unused facility fee of 0.5% on the
available balance of the commitment on a quarterly basis. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company had not drawn any amounts under the
revolving credit facility. Notwithstanding the Company’s rights to access the
credit facility, the Company is subject to counterparty risk associated with
future access to the revolving credit facility, as one of the counterparties to
the revolving credit facility filed for bankruptcy during 2008.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
6.
|
Credit
Facility (continued)
|
$98.0 million
First Lien Tranche A Term Loan
The
Tranche A term loan matures on June 30, 2010, and requires quarterly
principal payment amounts ranging from $2.25 million to $9.75 million.
Quarterly interest payments are also made. LIBOR, including the applicable
margin of 5.00% and 4.25%, was 8.47% and 9.24% at December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The Company can prepay the First Lien Tranche A term loan in
its entirety for par. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, the outstanding
principal balance was $37.2 million and $63.9 million,
respectively.
$62.0 million
First Lien Tranche B Term Loan
The
Tranche B term loan matures on July 27, 2011, and requires quarterly
principal payment amounts starting on September 30, 2010 in the amount of
$14.9 million. Quarterly interest payments are also made. LIBOR including
the applicable margin of 5.00% and 4.25%, was 8.47% and 9.24% at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The Company can prepay the First
Lien Tranche B term loan in its entirety at par. At December 31, 2008 and
2007, the outstanding balance was $59.7 million and $60.5 million,
respectively.
$40.0 million
Second Lien Term Loan
The
Second Lien term loan matures on July 27, 2012, at which time the entire
$40.0 million principal amount is due. LIBOR including the applicable
margin of 9.00% and 8.25%, was 12.47% and 13.24% at December 31, 2008 and
2007, respectively. The Company is required to make quarterly interest payments.
The Second Lien term loan can be prepaid in its entirety at 101% through
July 27, 2009, and at par thereafter. At December 31, 2008 and 2007,
the outstanding balance was $40.0 million.
Commitments
Under First and Second Lien Credit Facilities at December 31,
2008
The
scheduled annual principal payments on the First and Second Lien Credit
Agreements for each of the next four years are as follows (in
thousands):
2009
|
|
$ |
30,379 |
|
2010
|
|
|
39,969 |
|
2011
|
|
|
26,572 |
|
2012
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
$ |
136,920 |
|
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
6.
|
Credit
Facility (continued)
|
Commitments
Under First and Second Lien Credit Facilities at December 31, 2008
(continued)
Interest
payable associated with the Credit Facility was $2.4 million and
$2.9 million (included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheet) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
Deferred
financing costs associated with the Credit Facility were $4.4 million and
$5.2 million (included in deferred financing costs and other assets in the
consolidated balance sheet) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
7.
|
Convertible
Subordinated Note
|
In
October 2008, the Company issued to Greenhill & Co. Europe Holdings
Limited (Holder), an affiliated company to GHQ, a $22.9 million 5%
convertible subordinated note due October 2015. Interest accrues beginning
in April 2009 and is payable if and when the principal balance is paid in
full. Under certain circumstances as described below, the Note is convertible,
at the option of the holder, into a number of Class A Units equal to the
principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest divided by the conversion
price in effect at that time. The initial conversion price is $272.87, resulting
in approximately 84,000 Class A Units due to the holder upon conversion of the
Note. The conversion price is adjustable in certain circumstances, including as
a result of the Company issuing additional equity or equity-linked securities at
an effective price less the conversion price then in effect.
The Note
is convertible in full at the option of the Holder, at any time and from time to
time beginning on the later of (a) October 24, 2009, and (b) the earlier of
the occurrence of a defined Termination Event or the closing of the transactions
contemplated by the Transaction Agreement (if notice of exercise of the right to
convert is given at least one business day before such closing).
If the
closing of the Acquisition occurs prior to October 24, 2009, and the Holder
has not converted the Note prior to the earlier of (i) the closing of such
transactions (unless notice of exercise of the right to convert has been given
by the Holder) or (ii) the closing of a defined qualified initial public
offering of the Company’s equity securities, then the Holder’s right to convert
terminates and the company has the right to redeem the note at an amount equal
to the principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest. If the Acquisition
has not occurred
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
7.
|
Convertible
Subordinated Note (continued)
|
prior to
October 24, 2009, and the holder has not converted the Note within five
business days of such date, then the holder’s right to convert terminates and
the Company has the right (for a limited time) to redeem the note at an amount
equal to the principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
The
Holder may require, at its option, the Company to repurchase the Note (i) upon a
defined change in control of the Company and (ii) in the event of a defined
Termination Event occurring after January 31, 2013, at an amount equal to
the principal amount plus any accrued and unpaid interest.
In
May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt
Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial
Cash Settlement), (FSP). The FSP clarifies that
(1) convertible debt instruments that may be settled in cash upon
conversion, including partial cash settlement, are not considered debt
instruments within the scope of APB 14 and (2) issuers of such instruments
should separately account for the liability and equity components of those
instruments by allocating the proceeds from issuance of the instrument between
the liability component and the embedded conversion option (i.e., the equity
component). The FSP is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2008, and is required to be applied retrospectively to
convertible debt instruments that are within the scope of this guidance and were
outstanding during any period presented in the financial statements. The Company
has determined that the FSP does not apply to the Note.
Deferred
financing costs associated with the Note were $0.5 million (included in
deferred financing costs and other assets in the consolidated balance sheet) at
December 31, 2008.
8.
|
Motorola
Note Agreement
|
On
December 11, 2000, the Company entered into a Senior Subordinated Term Loan
Agreement (the Note Agreement), pursuant to which the Company borrowed
$30 million from Motorola, as evidenced by a senior subordinated term note
(Motorola Note) dated December 11, 2000. The principal amount of, and all
interest accrued on, the Motorola Note, was paid in full on May 27, 2005.
However, as detailed below, certain payment obligations survive this
repayment.
Under the
Note Agreement, the Company is required to pay Motorola a commitment fee of
$5.0 million upon the earlier of December 11, 2010, and the occurrence
of a “trigger event.” A “trigger event” means the first to occur of: (a) the
occurrence of a change of control (as defined in the Note Agreement), (b) the
consummation of an initial public offering by Parent or Satellite,
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
8.
|
Motorola
Note Agreement (continued)
|
or (c)
the sale of all or a material portion of the assets of Parent or Satellite. The
Company is accruing the commitment fee through December 2010 using the
effective-interest method. As of December 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, the Company’s liability approximated $4.0 million and
$3.5 million, respectively, and is included in the Motorola payable (see
Note 3) in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of
the liability approximates its carrying value as of December 31,
2008.
Additionally,
in the event of a “distribution event,” Satellite is required to pay Motorola a
loan success fee equal to the amount that a holder of Class B units in the
Parent constituting 5% of the total number of issued and outstanding units (both
Class A and B) would have received in the distribution event. A “distribution
event” means the (i) direct or indirect (a) payment of any dividend or other
distribution (in the form of cash or otherwise) in respect of the equity
interests of Parent or (b) purchase, conversion, redemption or other acquisition
for value or otherwise by Parent of any equity interest in Parent or (ii)
initial public or any secondary offering by Parent or Satellite in which any
holders of equity interests in Parent are afforded the opportunity to
participate as a selling equity holder in such offering. The Company paid
Motorola $2.2 million in loan success fees as required in 2008, $0 in 2007
and $1.6 million in 2006 (Note 11).
Finally,
in addition to the above obligations, upon the first to occur of (a) any change
of control (as defined in the Note Agreement) or (b) the sale of all or a
material portion of the assets of Parent or Satellite, Satellite is required to
pay a cash amount equal to the lesser of (i) an amount to be determined based on
a multiple of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization
less capital contributions not returned to Class A Unit holders and the amount
of the $5.0 million commitment fee discussed above which has been or is
concurrently being paid and (ii) the value of the consideration that a holder of
Class B Units in Parent constituting 5% of the total number of issued and
outstanding units (both Class A and B) would receive in the
transaction.
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The
Company entered into a manufacturing agreement with the Celestica Corporation to
manufacture subscriber equipment, which contains minimum monthly purchase
requirements of 2,000 L-Band transceivers, short burst data devices and/or
satellite phones per month. As a result of customer demand for subscriber
equipment, the Company’s purchases have exceeded the
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (continued)
|
Purchase
Commitments (continued)
monthly
minimum requirement since inception. The Company previously issued a
$2.9 million letter of credit to Celestica Corporation as collateral for
certain purchase commitments Celestica makes on behalf of the Company for
component parts required. In 2008, the Company and Celestica reached an
agreement to release the $2.9 million letter of credit, which is no longer
classified as restricted cash in the Company’s balance sheet at
December 31, 2008.
Unconditional
purchase obligations for subscriber equipment and various goods and services
totaled $22.5 million at December 31, 2008, and are expected to be
fulfilled within one year.
Unconditional
purchase obligations under the Boeing Amended and Restated Agreement totaled
$250.3 million at December 31, 2008. The Company expects to make
annual cash payments of $50.1 million through December 31, 2013, in
fulfillment of these purchase obligations.
Due to
various contractual requirements, the Company is required to maintain an
in-orbit insurance policy with a de-orbiting endorsement to cover potential
claims relating to operating or de-orbiting the satellite constellation. This
includes the possibility of a planned or unplanned de-orbiting of one or more of
the satellites in the satellite constellation or the maintenance in orbit of one
or more of the satellites after a decision is made to de-orbit the satellite
constellation. The policy covers Satellite, Boeing as operator (see
Note 4), Motorola (the original system architect and prior owner), Lehman
Commercial Paper, Inc., contractors and subcontractors of the insured, the U.S.
government, and certain other sovereign nations.
The
current policy has a one-year term, which expires December 12, 2009. The
policy coverage is separated into Sections A and B. Liability limits for claims
under each of Sections A and B are $500 million per occurrence and
$1 billion in the aggregate. The deductible for claims is $250,000 per
occurrence.
Section A
coverage is currently in effect and covers risks in connection with in-orbit
satellites. Section B coverage is effective once requested by the Company (the
Attachment Date) and covers risks in connection with a decommissioning of the
satellite system. The term of the coverage under Section B is 12 months from the
Attachment Date. The premium for Section B coverage is $2.5 million and is
payable on or before the Attachment Date. As of December 31, 2008, the
Company had not requested Section B coverage since no decommissioning activities
are currently anticipated.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (continued)
|
In-Orbit
Insurance (continued)
The
balance of the unamortized premium payment for Section A coverage is included in
prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. The Company has not accrued for any deductible amounts related
to either Section A or B of the policy as of December 31, 2008, since
management believes that the likelihood of an occurrence is remote.
The
Company leases land, office space, and office and computer equipment under
noncancelable operating lease agreements. Most of the leases contain renewal
options of 1 to 10 years. The Company’s obligations under the current terms of
these leases extend through 2016.
Additionally,
several of the Company’s leases contain clauses for rent escalation including
but not limited to a pro-rata share of increased operating and real estate tax
expenses. Rent expense is recognized pursuant to SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases, on a
straight-line basis over the lease term.
Future
minimum lease payments, by year and in the aggregate, under noncancelable
operating leases at December 31, 2008, are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
Operating
Leases
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$ |
1,763 |
|
2010
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
2011
|
|
|
1,973 |
|
2012
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
2013
|
|
|
1,744 |
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,960 |
|
|
|
$ |
11,381 |
|
Lease
expense for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was
$1.5 million, $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively. In
2008, the Company commenced the lease of a new corporate facility in Tempe,
Arizona. The facility will be used primarily for administrative purposes and is
approximately 25,500 square feet. The lease term will expire in
March 2016.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (continued)
|
From time
to time, the Company is involved in various litigation matters involving
ordinary and routine claims incidental to our business. Management currently
believes that the outcome of these proceedings, either individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business,
results of operations or financial condition. The Company is involved in certain
litigation matters as discussed below.
The
Company, a director, and a former officer were named as defendants in a lawsuit
commenced in 2007 by a former member of the Company’s Board of Directors
(Plaintiff). The lawsuit alleges, among other things, defamation and tortuous
interference with the Plaintiff’s economic/business relationship with his
principal, an investor in the Company. These actions seek compensatory and other
damages, and costs and expenses associated with the litigation. Management
believes that the lawsuit is without merit, although no assurance can be given
in this regard, or as to what relief, if any, might be granted if the Plaintiff
were to be successful in this lawsuit. The Company is in the process of
attempting to settle this claim and has recorded an estimate of the loss in the
financial statements.
Satellite
was named as a defendant in a lawsuit commenced in December 2008 by a
vendor alleging copyright infringement by Satellite of certain software owned by
the vendor. The lawsuit seeks (i) actual damages and any infringer’s
profits of Satellite attributable to the alleged infringement,
(ii) punitive damages, (iii) statutory damages, including certain enhanced
damages based on Satellite’s alleged willful conduct (as an alternative to the
damages specified in (i) and (ii) above), (iv) a permanent injunction, and
(v) costs and attorney’s fees under applicable law. The Company is
presently investigating the allegations and intends to vigorously defend against
the claim. No provision for losses have been recorded in the Company’s financial
statements as this action is in its preliminary stages and the Company is unable
to predict the outcome. As a result, it is not probable that a liability has
been incurred and the amount of the loss, if any, is not reasonably
estimable.
The
Company has selected two contractors to participate in the final phase of its
procurement process for Iridium NEXT. This final phase is expected to end with
the Company awarding a full-scale development agreement for Iridium NEXT to one
prime contractor by mid-2009. The contractor not selected as the prime
contractor will be paid a bonus payment if they have
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
9.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (continued)
|
successfully
completed all milestones and deliverables required under this phase of the
contract. The potential bonus payments range from $0 to $10 million. As of
December 31, 2008, the Company has accrued $3.9 million in connection
with this potential bonus payment.
10.
|
Equity
Based Compensation
|
Interests
in Iridium Employee Holdings LLC
Satellite,
in its role as manager of Iridium Employee Holdings LLC (Iridium Employee
Holdings), has granted certain key employees equity interests in Iridium
Employee Holdings. Iridium Employee Holdings was created solely to own certain
Class B non-voting units of Parent and has no other operations. Each interest in
Iridium Employee Holdings represents and is equivalent to ownership of 15.484
Class B Units of Parent. Interests in Iridium Employee Holdings generally vest
over a three to five year period and Iridium Employee Holdings is only required
to make distributions with respect to vested portions thereof. If an employee
terminates employment with the Company, unvested interests are forfeited.
Additionally, all interests fully vest in the event of a change in control of
Parent or Satellite. With respect to some of the
interests granted to employees, a designated threshold amount must be
exceeded before employees becomes entitled to receive distributions with respect
to their Iridium Employee Holdings equity interests (and all distributions are
first applied (without regard to vesting) against the threshold amount until it
has been fully satisfied). The Class B Units of Parent held by Iridium Employee
Holdings are subject to the same vesting and threshold amount provisions that
apply to the Iridium Employee Holdings equity interests granted to
employees.
Interests
in Employee Holdings LLC
In 2008,
Satellite, in its role as manager of Employee Holdings LLC (Employee Holdings),
granted certain executive-level employees equity interests in Employee Holdings.
A total of 51,466 equity interests in Employee Holdings were issued as a result
of this grant. Employee Holdings was created solely to own certain Class B
non-voting units of Parent and has no other operations. Each interest in
Employee Holdings is intended to represent and is equivalent to ownership of one
Class B Unit of the Parent. Certain grants in Employee Holdings are fully vested
on the date of grant; others vest over a three- to four-year period, in each
case subject to the continued employment of the recipient. The equity interests
in Employee Holdings contain restrictions on transfer and a right of first
refusal and Employee Holdings has repurchase rights
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
10.
|
Equity
Based Compensation (continued)
|
Interests
in Employee Holdings LLC (continued)
from the
recipients in the event of a termination of service. Equity interests in
Employee Holdings have a right to equivalent distributions to those paid to
Class B Unit holders of Parent, provided, however, that all such distributions
are first applied toward the satisfaction of a designated threshold amount
(without regard to vesting). Once the threshold amount is satisfied,
distributions to holders of interests in Employee Holdings are paid with respect
to vested portions of the grant and deferred with respect to unvested portions.
If an employee terminates his employment with the Company, unvested equity
interests are forfeited. Additionally, equity interests fully vest in certain
cases in the event of a change in control of Parent or Satellite and in other
cases in the event of a termination of service as a result of such a change in
control of Parent or Satellite. The Class B Units of Parent held by Employee
Holdings are subject to the same vesting and threshold amount provisions that
apply to the Employee Holdings equity interests granted to
employees.
During
the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006 the Company recognized
$2.0 million, $0.2 million, and $0.3 million, respectively, of
equity-based compensation expense related to the interests granted to certain
key employees (recognized within general and administrative expenses in the
accompanying consolidated statements of income). At December 31, 2008,
there was $3.0 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to
non-vested equity-based compensation awards that will be recognized over a
weighted-average period of approximately one year.
The
following schedule provides a summary of the Company’s nonvested Class B Units
at December 31, 2008 and changes during the year-ended December 31,
2008:
|
|
Nonvested Class B
Units
|
|
|
Wtd.
Avg. Grant Date Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested
Class B Units at December 31, 2007
|
|
|
35,485 |
|
|
$ |
36.83 |
|
Exchange
of profits interests for Class B Units
|
|
|
59,382 |
|
|
$ |
90.31 |
|
Vested
|
|
|
(53,844 |
) |
|
$ |
65.94 |
|
Nonvested
Class B Units at December 31, 2008
|
|
|
41,023 |
|
|
$ |
76.04 |
|
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
10.
|
Equity
Based Compensation (continued)
|
The
Company has granted certain key executives and non-employee members of Parent’s
board of directors’ (Board) cash payment rights entitled “profits interests.“
These interests do not give the holder any equity ownership interest in the
Company, but are intended to convey to the holder an economic interest similar
to the appreciation in value of Class B Units in Parent. Certain profits
interest grants were fully vested at the date of grant, others vest over a three
to four year period, in each case subject to the continued employment or Board
service of the recipient. The profits interests grants set forth a pro-rata
threshold equity valuation of Parent. All distributions received by Class B
holders after the date of grant of the profits interests are aggregated, and
once the pro-rata threshold value is exceeded, the recipient of the profits
interests becomes entitled to receive, upon an applicable payment event, cash
equal to the aggregate distributions he would have received if he had held Class
B Units of Parent from the date of grant of the profits interest through the
date on which the applicable payment event occurs. Vested profits interest
rights will remain outstanding following termination of employment or Board
service and will become payable upon the earlier of a “change in control event,“
within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury
regulations issued thereunder, or December 31, 2017 (at which time the
profits interest rights will terminate).
During
the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company recognized
$0.9 million and $2.7 million, respectively, of compensation expense
related to profits interests (recognized within general and administrative
expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of income). There was no
such expense during the year ended December 31, 2006. As of
December 31, 2008, there was $1.6 million of unrecognized compensation
expense related to non-vested profits interests awards that will be recognized
over a weighted-average period of approximately 1.7 years. The Company will
re-measure its liabilities under these payment arrangements at each reporting
date until the profits interest are terminated or otherwise settled. The
liability balance for profits interests was $1.9 million at
December 31, 2008.
In 2008,
in consideration for terminating their profit interest awards, certain employees
received grants in Employee Holdings, as discussed above, and two non-employee
Board members received grants of Class B units in Parent (which units are only
entitled to receive distributions from Parent once such distributions exceed a
designated threshold amount and are subject to forfeiture if the Board member
voluntarily resigns or is removed from the Board before the expiration of his
then current term). As a result, the corresponding “profits interests“ liability
of $1.7 million was reclassified to members’ deficit during 2008. Only two
employees currently hold profits interest awards at December 31,
2008.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
11.
|
Members’
Equity in Parent
|
Classes
of Membership Units
Pursuant
to the LLC Agreement, the members’ interests in the Parent are divided into
Class A and Class B Units. There are 1,083,872 Class A Units outstanding and
518,012 Class B Units outstanding at December 31, 2008.
A
description of each of the classes of membership units follows:
Class A
Units—All voting rights of the members are vested in the Class A Units.
Class A members whose agreed capital commitments were at least
$10.0 million or $20.0 million are entitled to appoint, remove, or
replace one or two directors to the Board, respectively. Those directors
designated by a Class A member who is not in default of its obligations to make
capital contributions or provide credit enhancements for the benefit of the
Company are entitled to cast, in the aggregate, such number of votes as equals
the member’s agreed capital commitment divided by $10.0 million, rounded
down to the nearest whole number, allocated among the directors (if such member
has appointed more than one) as the member may specify. In addition, the current
Chairman of the Parent is entitled to cast one vote.
The Class
A members may manage the Company only through their designated directors and
have no authority in their capacity as members to act on behalf of or bind the
Company. The Board may issue additional Class A Units, but the Class A members
have the preemptive right to participate unless such offering involves a
business acquisition or combination. To the extent a Class A member declines to
exercise its preemptive right, the other Class A members succeed to such right
on a proportionate basis. In addition, Class A members have a right of first
refusal on proposed sales of both Class A and Class B Units by other
members.
Each
Class A member has the right to receive the return of its capital contributions
before any distributions are made to Class B members. As of December 31,
2008, all capital contributions had been repaid to Class A members.
Class B
Units— Pursuant to the LLC Agreement, members holding Class B Units have
rights that expressly exclude any right to vote for or appoint directors.
Additionally, Class B members receive no distributions until such time as the
Class A members have received the return of their full capital contributions.
Distributions to certain Class B members are also subject to limitations
regarding vesting conditions and satisfaction of threshold amounts (see
Note 10). The Board may issue additional Class B Units provided, however, that
without the approval of two-thirds of the number of votes entitled to be cast by
the directors, the number of Class B Units issued or
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
reserved
for issuance may not exceed a certain percentage of the total number of Class A
Units and Class B Units then issued or reserved for issuance.
11.
|
Members’
Equity in Parent (continued)
|
Options
to Acquire Class A Units
Pursuant
to the terms of the LLC Agreement, in June 2002, the Board granted Class A
members who furnished credit enhancements on the Company’s behalf options to
acquire a total of 303,972 Class A Units of the Parent at a price of $214.29 per
Unit. These options were exercisable only if the credit enhancement provided by
the Class A member for the benefit of the Company was called and the Parent did
not reimburse the Class A member within 10 business days.
In
July 2006, the Parent’s Class A members assigned their rights in respect of
the credit enhancements to the Parent in response to a capital call and their
capital accounts were increased accordingly. Shortly thereafter, in connection
with the Company’s execution of a new Credit Facility (see Note 6), the
credit enhancements were returned to the members and recorded as a distribution
to the Class A members in an amount equal to the face amount of the credit
enhancements. As a result of the refinancing, the credit enhancements were no
longer outstanding and therefore, the options issued in respect of such credit
enhancements were canceled. There are no options outstanding as of
December 31, 2008.
Warrants
to Acquire Class A Units
In
June 2002, certain members received warrants to acquire 488,358 additional
Class A Units. In July 2006, the holders exercised all outstanding warrants
and an additional 488,358 Class A Units were issued. There are no warrants to
acquire Class A Units outstanding at December 31, 2007 and
2008.
Allocation
of Profits and Losses
The LLC
Agreement provides that Parent profits or losses for any fiscal year will be
allocated among the members as follows: For losses (i) to each of the members to
the extent of (1) the aggregate amount of profit allocated to such member for
prior fiscal years reduced by (2) the aggregate amount of loss allocated to such
member in prior fiscal years, in proportion to the aggregate net profit for
prior years of all the members then, (ii) to each of the members having a
positive capital account balance to the extent of and in proportion to such
balances, thereafter, (iii) in accordance with the members’ respective
percentage interests. For profits, (i) to each of the members to the extent of
(1) the aggregate amount of losses allocated to such member in
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
prior
fiscal years reduced by (2) the aggregate amount of profit allocated to such
member in prior fiscal years in proportion to the aggregate net loss for prior
years of all the members, thereafter (ii) in accordance with the members’
respective percentage interests.
11.
|
Members’
Equity in Parent (continued)
|
The Board
determines available cash flow for distribution, but any such distribution may
be made only in accordance with the following priorities: (i) to return to the
Class A members their capital contributions not previously returned in
proportion to the aggregate amount then remaining unreturned, then (ii) after
the capital contributions of the Class A members have been returned in full, to
all of the members in accordance with their respective percentage
interests.
It is the
Parent’s intent to distribute to all of the members, such amounts as the Board
from time to time determines are necessary, to defray the federal, state, and
local income tax liabilities incurred by the members as a result of including in
their gross income their distributive share of the Parent’s income and gain.
However, the Company’s Credit Facility (see Note 6) contains covenants that
restrict the amount of distributions the Parent can make to its
members.
The net
proceeds of a liquidation of the Parent’s assets and properties in connection
with the winding up of the Company are applied as follows: (i) payment of the
debts and liabilities of the Parent (including those owed to members) and the
expenses of liquidation; (ii) setting up of such reserves as the person charged
with winding up the Parent’s affairs may reasonably deem necessary for any
contingent liabilities or obligations. The balance of such reserves, if any,
shall be distributed to the members in the priority set forth
above.
In
July 2006, in connection with the execution of the Company’s Credit
Facility (see Note 6), and in accordance with the LLC Agreement, the Parent
distributed $127.6 million (in the form of cash and return of previously
contributed credit enhancements) to the Class A members as a return of capital
and distributed an additional $31.2 million to both the Class A and the
Class B members on a pro rata basis.
In 2008,
the Company made distributions of $41.8 million to Class A and B members on
a pro-rata basis.
Except
for a transfer to an affiliate, no member has the right to transfer all or any
part of such member’s units in the Parent, and no transferee is entitled to
become a substituted member or to
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
exercise
any of the rights of a member, except with the consent of two-thirds of the
total number of votes entitled to be cast by all of the directors of the
Parent.
11.
|
Members’
Equity in Parent (continued)
|
The LLC
Agreement provides that the Parent will indemnify its members, officers,
directors and employees for liability and expenses incurred by any such person
to the fullest extent permitted by law for actions taken in good faith on behalf
of the Parent if such actions were reasonably believed to be within the scope of
authority conferred to the person by the Parent or in accordance with the LLC
Agreement.
Issuance/Forfeitures
of Class B Units
During
the year ended December 31, 2006, the Parent issued (subject to vesting
requirements) an additional 11,397 Class B Units to Employee Holdings for the
benefit of management personnel (representing 0.75% of the total outstanding
units of the Parent at December 31, 2006).
During
the year ended December 31, 2007, the Parent issued (subject to vesting
requirements) an additional 15,390 Class B Units for the benefit of management
personnel (representing 1.0% of the total outstanding units of the Parent at
December 31, 2007). A member of Employee Holdings left the Company during
2007 forfeiting an equivalent of 1,539 unvested units in the Parent
(representing 0.1% of the total outstanding units of the Parent at
December 31, 2007).
During
the year ended December 31, 2008 the Company issued (subject to vesting
requirements) an additional 59,382 Class B Units (representing 3.71% of the
total outstanding units of the Parent at December 31, 2008). The Class B
Units were issued in exchange for certain profits interest awards that were held
by key executives and members of the Board. The exchange resulted in canceling
the majority of outstanding profits interest awards and the issuance of Class B
Units in return. The economic interest of the canceled profits interest awards
are consistent with the replacement Class B Units.
Class B
Units issued to key executives and members of the board are typically subject to
designated threshold amounts. Distributions are first applied toward the
satisfaction of the designated threshold (without regard to vesting). Once the
threshold amount is satisfied, distributions are paid with respect to the vested
portions of the grant. Designated thresholds vary by grant and are up to
$4.3 million.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
12.
|
Geographic
Information
|
Net
property and equipment by geographic area, are as follows at
December 31,
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
44,332 |
|
|
$ |
38,486 |
|
Satellites
in orbit
|
|
|
16,547 |
|
|
|
19,820 |
|
All
others
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
$ |
63,090 |
|
|
$ |
59,959 |
|
All
others includes subscriber equipment in international waters.
Revenue
by geographic area for the years ended December 31:
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
155,923 |
|
|
$ |
125,251 |
|
|
$ |
102,194 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
55,271 |
|
|
|
44,211 |
|
|
|
33,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
countries (1)
|
|
|
109,750 |
|
|
|
91,439 |
|
|
|
76,642 |
|
|
|
$ |
320,944 |
|
|
$ |
260,901 |
|
|
$ |
212,412 |
|
(1)
|
No
other country represents more than 10% of our revenue for any of the
periods presented.
|
Revenues
are attributed to geographic area based on the billing location of the customer.
The Company does not bear foreign exchange risk on sales, as invoices are
denominated in United States dollars.
13.
|
Employee
Benefit Plan
|
The
Company sponsors a defined-contribution 401(k) retirement plan (Plan) that
covers all employees of the Company. Employees are eligible to participate in
the Plan on the first of the month following date of hire, and participants are
100% vested from the date of eligibility. The Company matches employees’
contributions equal to 100% of the salary deferral contributions up to 5% of the
employees’ compensation. Company-matching contributions to the Plan were
$0.8 million, $0.6 million, and $0.5 million for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The Company pays all
administrative fees related to the Plan.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
14.
|
Indemnification
Agreement
|
Satellite,
Boeing, Motorola and the U.S. government entered into an indemnification
agreement, effective December 5, 2000, that provides, among other things,
that: (a) Satellite will maintain satellite liability insurance (see
Notes 4 and 9); (b) Boeing will maintain aviation and space liability
insurance; and (c) Motorola will maintain aviation products – completed
operations liability insurance. Pursuant to the
indemnification agreement, the U.S. government may, in its sole discretion,
require Satellite,
Boeing
or either of them to immediately de-orbit the Iridium satellites at no
expense to the U.S.
government upon the occurrence of certain enumerated events. However,
as discussed in Note 2, management does not believe the U.S. government
will exercise this right.
15.
|
Selected
Quarterly Information (Unaudited)
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Quarter
Ending
|
|
|
|
31-Mar
|
|
|
30-Jun
|
|
|
30-Sep
|
|
|
31-Dec
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
74,300 |
|
|
$ |
81,678 |
|
|
$ |
88,213 |
|
|
$ |
76,753 |
|
Operating
profit
|
|
|
21,462 |
|
|
|
22,893 |
|
|
|
21,699 |
|
|
|
9,065 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
16,722 |
|
|
|
18,676 |
|
|
|
16,937 |
|
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Quarter
Ending
|
|
|
|
31-Mar
|
|
|
30-Jun
|
|
|
30-Sep
|
|
|
31-Dec
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
52,658 |
|
|
$ |
66,713 |
|
|
$ |
74,237 |
|
|
$ |
67,293 |
|
Operating
profit
|
|
|
11,296 |
|
|
|
17,586 |
|
|
|
20,488 |
|
|
|
13,804 |
|
Net
income
|
|
|
6,124 |
|
|
|
12,811 |
|
|
|
15,660 |
|
|
|
9,178 |
|
The above
quarterly financial data is unaudited, but in the opinion of management, all
adjustments necessary for fair presentation of the selected data for these
interim periods presented have been included. The results are not necessarily
indicative of future quarterly results.
The
Company’s results of operations are subject to seasonal usage changes for its
commercial customers. April through October is typically the Company’s
peak months for commercial service revenues and subscriber equipment sales. The
Company’s U.S. government revenues are
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
not
subject to seasonal usage changes since such revenue is derived from fixed fees
per user rather than usage fees.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands, Except Unit Data)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
42,305 |
|
|
$ |
24,810 |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
41,927 |
|
|
|
42,431 |
|
Inventory
|
|
|
27,254 |
|
|
|
29,847 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
3,983 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
115,589 |
|
|
|
101,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
|
62,231 |
|
|
|
63,090 |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
15,400 |
|
|
|
15,400 |
|
Deferred
financing costs and other assets
|
|
|
9,817 |
|
|
|
10,724 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
203,037 |
|
|
$ |
190,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and members’ deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
6,746 |
|
|
$ |
6,650 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
31,577 |
|
|
|
23,973 |
|
Accrued
compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
5,023 |
|
|
|
10,586 |
|
Credit
facility, current portion
|
|
|
35,149 |
|
|
|
30,379 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
27,721 |
|
|
|
25,366 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
106,216 |
|
|
|
96,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
satellite operations and maintenance expense, net of current
portion
|
|
|
9,279 |
|
|
|
9,898 |
|
Motorola
payable
|
|
|
11,140 |
|
|
|
10,849 |
|
Credit
facility
|
|
|
99,878 |
|
|
|
106,541 |
|
Convertible
subordinated note
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
|
|
22,900 |
|
Other
long-term liabilities
|
|
|
5,091 |
|
|
|
5,657 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
254,504 |
|
|
|
252,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members’
deficit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members’
units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
A Units (1,083,872 units issued and outstanding)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Class
B Units (514,054 and 518,012 units issued and outstanding as
of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively)
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
4,591 |
|
|
|
4,429 |
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
|
|
(53,779 |
) |
|
|
(63,497 |
) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(2,279 |
) |
|
|
(3,162 |
) |
Total
members’ deficit
|
|
|
(51,467 |
) |
|
|
(62,230 |
) |
Total
liabilities and members’ deficit
|
|
$ |
203,037 |
|
|
$ |
190,569 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government
|
|
$ |
18,468 |
|
|
$ |
14,105 |
|
Commercial
|
|
|
36,818 |
|
|
|
29,044 |
|
Subscriber
equipment
|
|
|
20,503 |
|
|
|
31,151 |
|
Total
revenue
|
|
|
75,789 |
|
|
|
74,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of subscriber equipment sales
|
|
|
11,315 |
|
|
|
18,397 |
|
Network
and satellite operations and maintenance
|
|
|
15,951 |
|
|
|
15,393 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative
|
|
|
14,665 |
|
|
|
11,340 |
|
Research
and development
|
|
|
15,061 |
|
|
|
4,504 |
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
|
2,968 |
|
Transaction
costs
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Total
operating expenses
|
|
|
61,364 |
|
|
|
52,838 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
profit
|
|
|
14,425 |
|
|
|
21,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
(expense) income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense, net of capitalized interest of $0.1 million and
$0.4 million, respectively
|
|
|
(4,622 |
) |
|
|
(5,169 |
) |
Interest
income and other (expense) income, net
|
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
429 |
|
Total
other (expense) income
|
|
|
(4,707 |
) |
|
|
(4,740 |
) |
Net
income
|
|
$ |
9,718 |
|
|
$ |
16,722 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Operating
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
9,718 |
|
|
$ |
16,722 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
|
2,968 |
|
Other
non-cash amortization and accretion
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
738 |
|
Equity
and profits interest compensation
|
|
|
386 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
Change
in certain operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable, net
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
(1,688 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
(6,064 |
) |
Inventory
|
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
3,320 |
|
Deferred
cost of sales
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,625 |
|
Deferred
revenue
|
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
(1,812 |
) |
Other
noncurrent assets
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
5,750 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
Accrued
expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
7,421 |
|
|
|
(2,213 |
) |
Accrued
compensation and employee benefits
|
|
|
(5,787 |
) |
|
|
(2,797 |
) |
Accrued
satellite operations and maintenance expense
|
|
|
(619 |
) |
|
|
(619 |
) |
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
21,671 |
|
|
|
16,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
expenditures
|
|
|
(2,283 |
) |
|
|
(2,607 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,283 |
) |
|
|
(2,607 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing
activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments
under credit facilities
|
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
Distributions
to Class A and B members
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(1,893 |
) |
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
17,495 |
|
|
|
11,363 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
|
|
24,810 |
|
|
|
22,105 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
|
$ |
42,305 |
|
|
$ |
33,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary
cash flow information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
$ |
3,874 |
|
|
$ |
4,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary
disclosure of non-cash investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment received but not paid for at period end
|
|
$ |
533 |
|
|
$ |
114 |
|
See
accompanying notes.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
Organization
and Business
|
Iridium
Holdings LLC (the Parent), its wholly owned subsidiary Iridium Satellite LLC
(Satellite), and Satellite’s wholly owned subsidiary, Iridium Constellation LLC
(Constellation) (Parent, Satellite and Constellation, together with all other
direct and indirect subsidiaries of Parent, are referred to as the Company or
Iridium) were formed under the laws of the State of Delaware in 2000 and were
organized as limited liability companies pursuant to the Delaware Limited
Liability Company Act. On December 11, 2000, the Company acquired certain
satellite communication assets from Iridium LLC, a debtor in possession,
pursuant to an asset purchase agreement. The Company holds various licenses from
the Federal Communications Commission (the FCC) and from international
regulatory bodies that permit the Company to conduct its business, including the
operation of its satellite constellation.
Iridium
is a provider of mobile voice and data communications services via satellite.
The Company’s mobile satellite services address the demand from customers for
connectivity and reliability in all locations. Iridium offers voice and data
communications services to U.S. and international government agencies,
businesses and other customers on a global basis using 66 in-orbit constellation
satellites, seven in-orbit spares and related ground infrastructure, including a
primary commercial gateway.
Iridium
sells the majority of its products and services on a wholesale basis via a
global network of distribution partners, who provide Iridium’s product and
service solutions directly to end-users, or indirectly through dealers.
Iridium’s distributors often combine its products with other technologies, such
as Global Positioning System (GPS) capability and terrestrial wireless
technology, to provide integrated communications solutions for customers in
defined market niches. The U.S. government, which owns and operates a dedicated
gateway, is its largest customer.
Iridium
is currently in the process of designing and developing its second-generation
satellite constellation, Iridium NEXT (Iridium NEXT).
On
September 22, 2008, a transaction agreement, as amended on April 28, 2009,
was executed among Parent, GHL Acquisition Corp. (GHQ) and certain direct and
indirect owners of equity interests in Parent (Sellers), pursuant to which GHQ
will acquire the Sellers’ equity interests of Parent, and the equity interest in
two third-party entities that hold equity interests in Parent (Acquisition). GHQ
is a blank
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
1.
|
Organization
and Business (continued)
|
check
company formed on November 2, 2007, for the purpose of acquiring one or more
businesses or assets. The
Acquisition must be approved by a majority of the GHQ public stockholders. In
addition, the Acquisition will only be approved if GHQ public stockholders
owning 11,999,999 shares or
less vote against the proposal and seek to exercise their conversion
rights. Upon
completion of the Acquisition, the Sellers are expected to receive an aggregate
of 29.3 million shares of GHQ common stock and $76.7 million of cash, subject to
adjustment. In addition, 90 days following the close of the Acquisition, if
Parent has in effect a valid election under Section 754 of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, GHQ will make a tax benefits payment of up to $25.2
million in aggregate to certain sellers to compensate them for tax basis
step-up. Costs associated with the transaction agreement have been expensed as
incurred.
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of
Presentation
|
Principles
of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation
We have prepared the condensed consolidated
financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United
States (U.S. GAAP) for
interim financial information. We have continued to follow the accounting
policies disclosed in the consolidated financial statements
included in our 2008 audited financial statements. In the opinion of management,
the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all normal
recurring adjustments that the Company considers necessary for the fair presentation of its results of
operations and cash flows for the interim periods covered, and of the financial
position of the Company at the date of the interim condensed consolidated
balance sheet. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual consolidated
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed
or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The operating results
for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for the entire year. While
the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to not make the
information misleading, these interim condensed consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes included in its 2008
audited financial statements.
Certain
prior-year balances have been reclassified to conform to the current year
presentation.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2.
|
Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
|
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the
associated amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
We derive
our revenues primarily as a wholesaler of satellite communications products and
services. The primary types of revenue include (i) airtime revenue (both fixed-
and flat-rate, as well as usage-based) and (ii) subscriber equipment sales
revenue. Additionally, we generate sales from the provisioning of contract
services to commercial and government customers.
Wholesaler
of satellite communications products and services
Pursuant
to wholesale agreements, we sell our products and services to service providers
who, in turn, sell the products and services to other distributors or directly
to the end users. Generally, we recognize revenue when services are
performed or delivery has occurred, evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee
is fixed or determinable, and collection is probable, as follows:
Contracts with multiple
elements. We sell voice and data equipment (or subscriber
equipment) through multi-element contracts that bundle subscriber equipment
along with airtime services. We follow the guidance contained in EITF
00-21 when we sell subscriber equipment in bundled arrangements. Pursuant
to EITF 00-21, we allocate the bundled contract price among the various contract
deliverables based on each deliverable’s relative fair value. We determine
vendor specific objective evidence of fair value by assessing sales prices of
subscriber equipment and airtime services when they are sold to customers on a
stand alone basis.
Prior to
2005, we considered the sale of bundled subscriber equipment and services as a
single unit of accounting due primarily to the fact that our subscriber
equipment was not considered to have stand-alone value to end-users. As a
result, when subscriber equipment was sold, revenue from these transactions was
deferred and recognized ratably over the four-year estimated average life of the
end-user relationship.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2. Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation (continued)
Revenue
Recognition (continued)
Airtime Revenue sold on a
stand alone basis. Airtime revenue is
generated from our service providers through usage of the Company’s satellite
system and through fixed monthly access fees per user charged by us to each
service provider. Revenue for usage is recognized when usage occurs and revenue
for the fixed-per-user access fee is recognized ratably over the period in which
the service is provided to the end user. Revenue from prepaid services is
recognized when usage occurs or when the customer’s right to access the unused
prepaid services expires. We do not offer refund privileges for prepaid
services. Deferred prepaid service revenue and access fees are typically earned
and recognized as income within one year of customer prepayment.
Subscriber Equipment sold on
a stand alone basis. We recognize
subscriber equipment sales and the related costs when equipment title (and the
risks and rewards of ownership) passes to the customer.
Airtime and Subscriber
Equipment sold to the U.S. government. The Company provides
airtime to U.S. government subscribers through (i) fixed monthly fees on a per
user basis for airtime services and usage for voice, (ii) fixed monthly fee per
user for paging services, and (iii) a tiered pricing plan (based on usage) per
device for data services. Revenues related to the services provided under this
contract are recognized ratably over the periods in which the services are
provided; costs are expensed as incurred. The U.S. Government purchases
its equipment from a third-party service provider.
Contract
services to commercial and government customers
Government contract
services.
We currently are party to a contract with the U.S. government pursuant to
which the Company provides maintenance services to the U.S. government’s
satellite gateway in Hawaii. Revenues related to the services provided under
this contract are recognized ratably over the periods in which the services are
provided; costs are expensed as incurred.
Other Government and
Commercial contract services. We also provide
certain engineering services to assist customers in developing new technologies
for use on the Company’s satellite system. The revenues associated with these
services are recorded when the services are rendered, typically on a percentage
of completion method of accounting based on our estimate of total costs expected
to complete the contract; costs are expensed as incurred. Revenue on
cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts is recognized to the extent of estimated costs
incurred plus the applicable fees earned. We consider fixed fees under
cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts to be earned in proportion to the allowable costs
incurred in performance of the contract.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2. Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation (continued)
Inventory
consists of subscriber equipment, which includes handsets, L-Band transceivers
and data devices and related accessories to be sold to customers to access
Company services. The Company outsources manufacturing of handsets, L-Band
transceivers, and data devices to a third party manufacturer and purchases
accessories from third party suppliers. The Company’s cost of inventory includes
an allocation of overhead (including salaries and benefits of employees directly
involved in bringing inventory to its existing condition, scrap, tooling, and
freight). All inventories are valued using the average cost method, and are
carried at the lower of cost or market.
The
Company generally provides its customers a warranty on subscriber equipment for
one year from the date of activation. Warranties are accounted for in accordance
with SFAS No. 5, "Accounting for Contingencies," such that an accrual is
made when it is estimable and probable that a loss has been incurred. A warranty
reserve is maintained based on historical experience of warranty costs and
expected occurrences of warranty coverage on equipment. Costs associated with
warranties are recorded as cost of subscriber equipment sales and include
equipment replacements, repairs, and program administration. The following is a
summary of the activity in the warranty reserve account:
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
2009
|
|
|
March
31,
2008
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Balance
at beginning of period
|
|
$ |
(381 |
) |
|
$ |
(483 |
) |
Provision
|
|
|
(736 |
) |
|
|
(352 |
) |
Utilization
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
352 |
|
Balance
at end of period
|
|
$ |
(796 |
) |
|
$ |
(483 |
) |
The
condensed consolidated balance sheets include various financial instruments
(primarily cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable,
accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities,
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2.
Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
Financial
Instruments (continued)
long-term
debt, derivative instruments, and other obligations). The fair values of
short-term financial instruments approximate their carrying values because of
their short-term nature. The fair value of the credit facilities were
approximately 88% for the First Lien Tranche A, 96% for the First Lien Tranche B
and 96% for the Second Lien of their carrying amount as of March 31, 2009,
respectively, based on rates currently available to the Company for debt with
similar terms and remaining maturities. The fair value of these credit
facilities at December 31, 2008 were approximately 88% of their carrying amount.
Additional information regarding the fair value of our cash and cash
equivalents, and information regarding the fair value of our derivative
instruments, is disclosed in Note 8 under Fair Value
Measurements.
The
Company has determined that it is not practicable to estimate the fair value of
our $22.9 million subordinated convertible note (the Note). The Note is due
to an affiliate of GHQ, and due to the lack of quoted market prices, we were
unable to identify any similar instruments in the market place. The Note is
carried at its face amount. The Note bears interest at 5% beginning in April
2009 and it is convertible into approximately 84,000 Class A Units.
Concentrations
of Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit
risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents and receivables. The
majority of this cash is swept nightly into a money market fund with a
diversified portfolio. The Company performs credit evaluations of its customers’
financial condition and records reserves to provide for estimated credit losses.
Accounts receivable are due from both domestic and international
customers.
Convertible
Subordinated Note
In
October 2008, the Company issued to Greenhill & Co. Europe Holdings
Limited (Holder), a $22.9 million 5% convertible subordinated note due
October 2015. The Company has determined that the embedded derivatives
contained in the Note (including the conversion option, the holder’s put options
and the Company’s call option) do not require separate accounting under the
FASB’s SFAS No. 133, Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities, and that there were no beneficial
conversion features associated with the Note pursuant to EITF 98-5, Accounting for Convertible
Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustment
Conversion Ratios. Accordingly, the Company is accounting for the Note
pursuant to the guidance contained in Accounting
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2.
Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
Convertible
Subordinated Note (continued)
Principal
Board’s Opinion No. 14, Accounting for Convertible Debt and
Debt Issued with Stock Purchase Warrants.
Interest
on the Note accrues beginning in April 2009 at 5% per year. The Company is
recording periodic interest cost using the effective interest rate
method.
Costs
incurred in connection with securing debt financing have been deferred and are
amortized as additional interest expense using the effective interest method
over the term of the related debt.
Trade
accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear
interest. Amounts collected on trade accounts receivable are included in net
cash provided by operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash
flows. Accounts receivable are stated net of allowances for uncollectible
accounts; the Company’s allowance for uncollectible
accounts was $0.1 million at March 31, 2009 and $0 at December 31, 2008.
Management develops its estimate of this allowance based on the Company’s
experience with specific customers, its understanding of their current economic
circumstances and its own judgment as to the likelihood that the Company will
ultimately receive payment. When a specific account receivable is determined to
be uncollectible, the Company reduces both its accounts receivable and
allowances for uncollectible accounts accordingly.
Research
and development costs are charged as an expense in the period in which they are
incurred. Research and development costs consisted primarily of costs related to
the development of Iridium NEXT, new subscriber equipment and new maritime
broadband services.
Accounting
for Equity-Based Compensation
The
Company uses SFAS No. 123(R), Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, for all
share-based payments granted. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model (Black-Scholes) as its method of valuation under SFAS No. 123(R).
This fair value is then amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite
service periods of the awards, which is generally the vesting period. The fair
value of
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2.
Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
Accounting
for Equity-Based Compensation (continued)
equity-based
payment awards on the date of grant as determined by the Black-Scholes model is
affected by the Company’s assumptions. These assumptions include, but are not
limited to, the expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and
expected forfeitures. The fair value of employee interests was estimated using
the Black-Scholes model.
The
following table summarizes the ranges used in the model for grants in the year
ended December 31, 2008:
Expected
volatility
|
52.6%
– 57.9%
|
Risk-free
interest rate
|
2.0%
– 2.5%
|
Expected
dividends
|
0.0%
|
Expected
term
|
1-
2 years
|
There
were no grants in the three months ending March 31, 2009.
The
expected volatility assumption was based on a review of the expected volatility
of publicly traded entities similar to the Company, which the Company believes
is a reasonable indicator of its expected volatility. The risk-free interest
rate assumption is based upon U.S. Treasury Bond interest rates with terms
similar to the expected term of the award. The dividend yield assumption is
based on the Company’s history of not declaring and paying dividends. The
expected term is based on the Company’s best estimate for the period of time for
which the instrument is expected to be outstanding.
Given the
limited number of employees who have been granted equity interests, the Company
has estimated there will be no forfeitures.
Under
Statement No. 123(R), a nonpublic entity can make a policy decision of
whether to measure all of its liabilities incurred under share-based payment
arrangements at fair value or to measure all such liabilities at intrinsic
value. The Company’s policy is to measure all liabilities under SFAS
No. 123(R) using the intrinsic method. This intrinsic value is then
amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service periods of the
awards, which is generally the vesting periods.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2.
Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
Property
and equipment is carried at acquired cost less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the following
estimated useful lives:
Satellite
system assets
|
14
years
|
Terrestrial
system assets
|
7
years
|
Equipment
|
3 –
5 years
|
Gateway
systems assets
|
5
years
|
Internally
developed software and purchased software
|
3 –
7 years
|
Building
|
39
years
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
Shorter
of estimated useful life or remaining lease
term
|
The
Company capitalizes interest costs associated with the construction of capital
assets and amortizes the cost over the assets’ useful lives beginning when the
assets are placed in service.
Repair
and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.
The
Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of
impairment are present. Recoverability of assets is measured by comparing the
carrying amounts of the assets to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to
be generated by the assets. Any impairment loss would be measured as the excess
of the assets’ carrying amount over their fair value. Fair value is based on
market prices where available, an estimate of market value, or various valuation
techniques.
The
carrying value of a satellite lost as a result of an in-orbit failure would be
charged to operations upon the occurrence of the loss. In February 2009, the
Company lost the use of a satellite and recorded an impairment charge of
$0.1 million, which represents the carrying value of the
satellite.
As a
limited liability company (LLC) that is treated as a partnership for federal
income tax purposes, the Company is generally not subject to federal income tax
directly. Rather, each member is subject to
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2. Significant
Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation (continued)
Income
and Other Taxes (continued)
income
taxation based on the member’s portion of the Company’s income or loss (as
defined in Parent’s amended and restated limited liability company agreement
(LLC Agreement)). The Company is subject to income taxes in certain state and
local jurisdictions in the United States and in non-US jurisdictions in which
the Company operates.
Costs
associated with advertising and promotions are expensed as incurred. Advertising
expenses, primarily consisting of print media, were $0.1 million and
$0.1 million in each of the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
Comprehensive
income for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
9,718 |
|
|
$ |
16,722 |
|
Increase
(decrease) to fair value of interest rate swaps
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
(1,833 |
) |
Comprehensive
income
|
|
$ |
10,601 |
|
|
$ |
14,889 |
|
Asset
Retirement Obligations
SFAS
No. 143, Accounting for
Asset Retirement Obligations, requires that legal obligations associated
with retirement of long-lived assets should initially be measured at fair value
and recorded as a liability. Upon initial recognition of a liability for
retirement obligations, a company must record an asset, which is depreciated
over the life of the asset to be retired.
Under certain circumstances, each of the
U.S. government, The Boeing Company (Boeing) and Motorola Inc. (Motorola) has
the unilateral right to require the de-orbit of the Company’s satellite constellation. In the
event the Company was required to effect a mass de-orbit, the Company, pursuant to the amended and
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2.
Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
Asset
Retirement Obligations (continued)
restated operations and maintenance
agreement with Boeing (the
Amended and Restated
Agreement) would be
required to pay Boeing $15.6 million plus an amount equivalent to the premium
for inception of Section B de-orbit insurance coverage ($2.5 million as of
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008). The Company has concluded that each
of the foregoing de-orbit rights meet the definition of a legal obligation.
Management does not believe the U.S. government, Boeing or Motorola will
exercise their respective de-orbit rights. As a result, management believes the
likelihood of any future cash outflows associated with the mass de-orbit
obligation to be remote.
There are other circumstances in which
the Company could be required, either by the U.S. government or for technical reasons, to
de-orbit an individual
satellite; however, management believes that such costs would not be significant
in the ordinary operations of the satellite constellation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141R, Business Combinations (SFAS
No. 141R). SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business
combination to record all assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their
respective acquisition-date fair values, changes the recognition of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed arising from contingencies, changes the
recognition and measurement of contingent consideration, and requires the
expensing of acquisition-related costs as incurred. SFAS No. 141R also
requires additional disclosure of information surrounding a business
combination, such that users of the entity’s financial statements can fully
understand the nature and financial impact of the business combination. SFAS
No. 141R applies prospectively to business combinations for which the
acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting
period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The provisions of SFAS
No. 141R will impact the Company only if it is a party to a business
combination.
In
March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities — an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS No. 161). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced
disclosures about the objectives of derivative instruments and hedging
activities, the method of accounting for such instruments under SFAS
No. 133 and its related interpretations, and a tabular disclosure of the
effects of such instruments and related hedged items on an entity’s financial
position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, as such, will be
effective beginning in the Company’s fiscal year 2009. The
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
2.
Significant Accounting Policies and Basis of Presentation
(continued)
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements (continued)
Company
adopted SFAS No. 161 in the first quarter of 2009 and the adoption did not
have a material impact on the financial statements other than
disclosures.
3.
|
Property
and Equipment
|
Property
and equipment consists of the following at:
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Space
system assets
|
|
$ |
46,771 |
|
|
$ |
47,052 |
|
Terrestrial
system assets
|
|
|
9,029 |
|
|
|
8,958 |
|
Equipment
|
|
|
19,627 |
|
|
|
18,985 |
|
Gateway
system assets
|
|
|
10,998 |
|
|
|
10,971 |
|
Internally
developed software and purchased software
|
|
|
27,740 |
|
|
|
27,465 |
|
Building
and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
11,562 |
|
|
|
11,299 |
|
|
|
|
125,727 |
|
|
|
124,730 |
|
Less:
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(69,913 |
) |
|
|
(66,514 |
) |
|
|
|
55,814 |
|
|
|
58,216 |
|
Land
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
1,280 |
|
Construction
in process
|
|
|
5,137 |
|
|
|
3,594 |
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
|
$ |
62,231 |
|
|
$ |
63,090 |
|
At
December 31, 2008, construction in process consisted of assets being
constructed for various uses including: equipment of $0.7 million, gateway
system assets of $2.3 million, internally developed software of
$0.5 million, and terrestrial system assets of $0.1 million. At
March 31, 2009, construction in process consisted of assets being developed
or constructed for various uses including: equipment of $0.6 million,
gateway system assets of $3.6 million, internally developed software of
$0.8 million, and terrestrial system assets of
$0.1 million.
$10.0 million
First Lien Revolving Credit Facility
Iridium
Holdings’ $10.0 million first lien revolving credit facility matures on July 27,
2009. The Company did not have any borrowings outstanding at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008. The Company paid an up-front fee of 2% on the revolving
facility of $0.2 million and is required to pay a quarterly commitment fee in
respect of the unutilized commitments at an initial rate equal to 0.5% per annum
on the available balance of the commitment. On October 5, 2008, Lehman Brothers
Inc., a subsidiary of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., filed for protection under
Chapter 11 of the Federal Bankruptcy Code in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the
Southern District of New York. Lehman Brothers Inc. is a joint lead arranger
under Iridium Holdings’
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
revolving
credit facility and had, as of December 31, 2008, committed to provide $5.0
million of the total Iridium Holdings’ $10.0 million revolving credit facility.
Iridium Holdings currently does not expect to be able to draw on the Lehman
Brothers Inc.’s $5.0 million commitment and, as a result, Iridium Holdings has
only $5 million available under the First Lien Revolving Credit
Facility.
5.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
The
Company entered into a manufacturing agreement with the Celestica Corporation to
manufacture subscriber equipment, which contains minimum monthly purchase
requirements of 2,000 L-Band transceivers, short burst data devices and/or
satellite phones per month. As a result of customer demand for subscriber
equipment, the Company’s purchases have exceeded the monthly minimum requirement
since inception. Pursuant to the contract with Celestica, Iridium Holdings may
be required to purchase excess materials from Celestica at cost plus a
contractual markup if the materials are not used in production within the
periods specified in the agreement. Celestica will then generally repurchase
such materials from Iridium Holdings at the same price paid by Iridium Holdings,
as required for the production of the devices.
From time
to time, the Company is involved in various litigation matters involving
ordinary and routine claims incidental to our business. Management currently
believes that the outcome of these proceedings, either individually or in the
aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business,
results of operations or financial condition. The Company is involved in certain
litigation matters as discussed below.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
5.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies (continued)
|
Contingencies
(continued)
The
Company, a director, and a former officer were named as defendants in a lawsuit
commenced in 2007 by a former member of the Company’s Board of Directors
(Plaintiff). The lawsuit alleges, among other things, defamation and tortuous
interference with the Plaintiff’s economic/business relationship with his
principal, an investor in the Company. These actions seek compensatory and other
damages, and costs and expenses associated with the litigation. Management
believes that the lawsuit is without merit, although no assurance can be given
in this regard, or as to what relief, if any, might be granted if the Plaintiff
were to be successful in this lawsuit. The Company has settled this claim and
has recorded the loss in the financial statements.
Satellite
was named as a defendant in a lawsuit commenced in December 2008 by a
vendor alleging copyright infringement by Satellite of certain software owned by
the vendor. The lawsuit sought (i) actual damages and any infringer’s
profits of Satellite attributable to the alleged infringement,
(ii) punitive damages, (iii) statutory damages, including certain enhanced
damages based on Satellite’s alleged willful conduct (as an alternative to the
damages specified in (i) and (ii) above), (iv) a permanent injunction, and
(v) costs and attorney’s fees under applicable law. The Company settled
this claim and recorded the loss in the financial statements.
6.
|
Members’
Equity in Parent
|
Issuance/Forfeitures
of Class B Units
Class B
units granted to directors are subject to forfeiture if the director voluntarily
resigns or is removed from the Iridium Holdings board of directors before the
expiration of his then current term. During the three months ended
March 31, 2009, an outside director voluntarily resigned from the Board of
Directors; accordingly, 3,958 Class B units were forfeited.
7.
|
Segments,
Significant Customers, Supplier, and Service Providers and Geographic
Information
|
SFAS
No. 131, Disclosures
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes
standards for reporting information regarding operating segments in annual
financial statements. SFAS No. 131 also establishes standards for related
disclosures about products and services and geographic areas. Operating segments
are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete
financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating
decision maker, or decision-
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
7.
|
Segments,
Significant Customers, Supplier, and Service Providers and Geographic
Information (continued)
|
making
group, in making decisions regarding the allocation of resources and asset
performance. Pursuant to SFAS No. 131, the Company operates in one segment
providing global satellite communication products and services.
The
Company derived approximately 24% and 19% of its total revenue during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 respectively, from agencies of the
U.S. government. Such agencies also accounted for approximately 30% and 29% of
the Company’s accounts receivable balances at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. The Company’s two largest commercial
customers accounted for 22% and 25% of total commercial service revenue for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
two largest commercial customers also accounted for approximately 22% of the
Company’s accounts receivable balances at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively.
The
Company acquires all of its subscriber equipment from one manufacturer. Should
events or circumstances prevent the manufacturer from producing the equipment,
the Company’s business could be adversely affected until the Company is able to
move production to other facilities of the manufacturer or secure a replacement
manufacturer.
All
satellite operations and maintenance services are provided by Boeing. Should
events or circumstances prevent Boeing from providing these services, the
Company’s business could be adversely affected until the Company is able to
assume operations and maintenance responsibilities or secure a replacement
service provider.
Net
property and equipment by geographic area, are as follows at:
|
|
March
31, 2009
|
|
|
December
31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
44,431 |
|
|
$ |
44,332 |
|
Satellites
in orbit
|
|
|
15,676 |
|
|
|
16,547 |
|
All
others (1)
|
|
|
2,124 |
|
|
|
2,211 |
|
|
|
$ |
62,231 |
|
|
$ |
63,090 |
|
(1)
|
All
others includes subscriber equipment in international
waters.
|
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
7.
Segments, Significant Customers, Supplier, and Service Providers and Geographic
information (continued)
Revenue
by geographic area for the three months ended March 31:
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
United
States
|
|
$ |
37,915 |
|
|
$ |
32,583 |
|
Canada
|
|
|
9,909 |
|
|
|
14,176 |
|
Other
countries (1)
|
|
|
27,965 |
|
|
|
27,541 |
|
|
|
$ |
75,789 |
|
|
$ |
74,300 |
|
(1)
|
No
one other country represents more than 10% of revenue for either of the
periods presented.
|
Revenue
is attributed to geographic area based on the billing location of the customer.
The Company does not bear foreign exchange risk on sales, as nearly all invoices
are denominated in United States dollars.
8.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Financial Assets and
Liabilities
The
Company provides for fair value measurement disclosures of its financial assets
and liabilities pursuant to the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (FASB)
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements.
SFAS 157 establishes a three-tier fair
value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value.
These tiers include:
·
|
Level
1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets;
|
·
|
Level
2, defined as observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted
prices for similar assets; quoted prices in markets that are not active;
or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable
market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities;
and
|
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
8.
|
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
|
·
|
Level
3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data
exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own
assumptions.
|
Pursuant
to SFAS 157, “fair value” is the price that would be received to sell an asset
or paid to transfer a liability that assumes an orderly transaction in the most
advantageous market at the measurement date. At March 31, 2009, the Company’s
financial and non-financial assets and liabilities were measured using either
Level 1 or Level 2 inputs. The following table summarizes information
about our financial assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a
recurring basis as of March 31, 2009:
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
|
|
|
|
March 31,
2009
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
42,305 |
|
|
$ |
42,305 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
Restricted
cash
|
|
|
15,520 |
|
|
|
15,520 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Interest
rate swaps
|
|
|
(3,017 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(3,017 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
(877 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
$ |
53,931 |
|
|
$ |
56,948 |
|
|
$ |
(3,017 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
Cash,
Cash Equivalents, and Restricted
Cash
|
All cash
and cash equivalents are recorded at fair market value at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008. The inputs used in measuring the fair value of these
instruments are considered to be Level 1 in accordance with the SFAS 157 fair
value hierarchy. The fair market values are based on period-end statements
supplied by the various banks and brokers that held the majority of the
Company’s funds deposited in institutional money market mutual funds (for
overnight sweep account funds) and the remainder held in regular interest
bearing and non-interest bearing depository accounts and certificates of
deposits with commercial banks.
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
8.
|
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
|
The
Company accounts for its interest rate swaps using the guidance contained in
SFAS No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, as amended (including
as amended by SFAS No. 161). SFAS 133, as amended, requires that all derivative
instruments be recorded on the balance sheet at their respective fair values. As
required by the Company’s credit facility, management executed four pay-fixed
receive-variable interest rate swaps in 2006, two of which were still open at
March 31, 2009 and mature within two years. The Company hedged
$86.0 million of variable interest rate debt as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008. The interest rate swaps are designated as cash flow hedges
under the provisions of SFAS No. 133. The objective for holding these
instruments is to manage variable interest rate risk related to the Company’s
$210.0 million credit facilities, by synthetically converting a portion of
the variable rate risk to fixed rate interest rate risk. The swaps are
structured so that the Company will pay a fixed rate of interest and receive a
variable interest payment, which, to the extent hedged, should offset the
variable interest that is being paid on its debt.
The
principal market in which the Company executes interest rate swap contracts is
the retail market. For recognizing the most appropriate value the highest and
best use of the Company’s derivatives are measured using an in-exchange
valuation premise that considers the assumptions that market participants would
use in pricing the derivatives. The Company has elected to use the income
approach to value the derivatives, using observable Level 2 market expectations
at the measurement date and standard valuation techniques to convert future
amounts to a single present amount (discounted) assuming that participants are
motivated, but not compelled to transact. Level 2 inputs for the swap valuations
are limited to quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets
(specifically futures contracts on LIBOR for the first two years) and inputs
other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability
(specifically LIBOR cash and swap rates, and credit default swap rates at
commonly quoted intervals). Mid-market pricing is used as a practical expedient
for fair value measurements. Key inputs, including the cash rates for very short
term, futures rates for up to two years and LIBOR swap rates beyond the
derivative maturity are compared to provide spot rates at resets specified by
each swap as well as to discount those future cash flows to present value at
measurement date. Inputs are collected on the last market day of the period. The
same rates used to compare the yield curve are used to discount the
future
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
8.
|
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
|
cash
flows. A credit default swap basis available at commonly quoted intervals are
collected and applied to all cash flows when the swap is in an asset position
pre-credit effect.
The
variable interest rates on the swaps reset every quarter concurrent with the
reset of the variable rate on the debt. The fixed rate will not change over the
life of the swap. Each quarter-end, the swaps are measured against current
interest rates to determine a fair market value. The fair market value is
recorded on the balance sheet and the offset to the value, to the extent
effective, is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The
effectiveness of the swaps in offsetting the gain or loss on the debt is
assessed on a contract by contract basis quarterly, by regressing historical
changes in the value of the swap against the historical change in value of the
underlying debt. To establish a value for the underlying debt a “hypothetical“
derivative is created with terms that match the debt (e.g., notional amount,
reset rates and terms, maturity) and had a zero fair value at
designation.
Foreign
Exchange Contracts
The
Company enters into foreign currency exchange contracts to mitigate foreign
currency exposure on a product consulting service contract denominated in
foreign currency. Given the variability of its purchase commitments
and payment terms under the purchase contracts, the Company has determined that
the foreign exchange contracts do not qualify for hedge accounting under the
requirements of SFAS 133. Accordingly, the foreign exchange contracts
are marked to market at each balance sheet date, with the changes in fair value
being recognized as a current period gain or loss in the accompanying
consolidated statement of operations. The inputs used in measuring
the fair value of these instruments are considered to be Level 1 in accordance
with the SFAS 157 fair value hierarchy. The fair market values are based on
quoted market values for similar contracts.
Non-Financial Assets and
Liabilities
In 2008,
the Company did not provide fair value disclosures for its non-financial assets
and liabilities pursuant to the exceptions and deferrals granted under FASB
Staff Position (FSP) 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement
No. 157 (FSP 157-2). FSP 157-2 amended SFAS 157 by
excluding lease transactions from its scope and deferring the effective date of
the adoption of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities
that are nonrecurring in nature. The Company adopted the guidance in
SFAS No. 157 with respect to its non-financial assets and liabilities in the
first quarter of 2009. While the Company considers the potential
impairment of its long-lived assets and the potential recording of its
contractual retirement obligations to be non-financial assets and non-financial
liabilities within the scope of FSP 157-
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
8.
|
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
|
2, the
Company has determined that no additional fair value measurement disclosures are
required pursuant to the adoption of FSP 157-2.
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities
The
following table summarizes the gross fair market value of all derivative
instruments (including interest rate swaps and foreign exchange contracts) and
their location in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The Company did
not hold asset derivative instruments at March 31, 2009.
|
Balance
Sheet Location
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Derivatives
designated as hedging instruments under Statement 133
Interest
rate swaps
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
$ |
(3,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
derivatives designated as hedging instruments under Statement
133
|
|
|
$ |
(3,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives
not designated as hedging instruments under statement 133
Foreign
exchange contracts
|
Accrued
expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
$ |
(877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under Statement
133
|
|
|
$ |
(877 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
derivatives
|
|
|
$ |
(3,894 |
) |
Iridium
Holdings LLC
Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(continued)
8.
|
Fair
Value Measurements (continued)
|
Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)
The
following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments designated as
cash flow hedges (interest rate swaps) on our results of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2009:
The
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Financial
Performance
For
the Period Ended March 31, 2009
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Derivatives
in Statement 133 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships
|
|
Amount
of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivative (Effective
Portion)
|
|
Location
of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective
Portion)
|
|
Amount
of Gain or (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective
Portion)
|
|
Location
of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective
Portion)
|
|
Amount
of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective
Portion)
|
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
Interest
Expense
|
|
$ |
(798 |
) |
Interest
Expense
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
(77 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(798 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
The
following table summarizes the effect of derivative instruments not designated
as hedges (foreign exchange contracts) on our results of operations for the
three months ended March 31, 2009:
The
Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of
For
the Period Ended March 31, 2009
(In
Thousands)
|
|
Derivatives
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments under Statement 133
|
Location
of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
|
|
Amount
of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative
|
|
Forward
Contracts
|
Other
(expense) income
|
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
Total
|
|
|
$ |
(64 |
) |
TRANSACTION
AGREEMENT
dated as
of
September
22, 2008
among
IRIDIUM
HOLDINGS LLC,
GHL
ACQUISITION CORP.
and
SELLERS
listed
on the signature pages hereof
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
|
|
Page
|
ARTICLE 1
DEFINITIONS
|
1
|
|
|
Section 1.01.
|
Definitions
|
1
|
Section 1.02.
|
Other
Definitional and Interpretative Provisions
|
10
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 2 PURCHASE AND
SALE
|
11
|
|
|
Section 2.01.
|
Purchase
and Sale
|
11
|
Section 2.02.
|
Closing
|
11
|
Section 2.03.
|
Purchase
Price Allocation
|
11
|
Section 2.04.
|
Tax
Benefits Payment
|
12
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 3 REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
|
12
|
|
|
Section 3.01.
|
Existence
and Power
|
12
|
Section 3.02.
|
Authorization
|
12
|
Section 3.03.
|
Governmental
Authorization
|
13
|
Section 3.04.
|
Noncontravention
|
13
|
Section 3.05.
|
Capitalization
|
13
|
Section 3.06.
|
Ownership
of Interests
|
13
|
Section 3.07.
|
Subsidiaries
|
14
|
Section 3.08.
|
Financial
Statements
|
14
|
Section 3.09.
|
Absence
of Certain Changes
|
14
|
Section 3.10.
|
No
Undisclosed Material Liabilities
|
16
|
Section 3.11.
|
Intercompany
Accounts
|
16
|
Section 3.12.
|
Material
Contracts
|
17
|
Section 3.13.
|
Litigation
|
18
|
Section 3.14.
|
Compliance
with Laws and Court Orders
|
18
|
Section 3.15.
|
Properties
|
18
|
Section 3.16.
|
Intellectual
Property
|
19
|
Section 3.17.
|
Insurance
Coverage
|
20
|
Section 3.18.
|
Licenses
and Permits
|
21
|
Section 3.19.
|
Finders’
Fees
|
21
|
Section 3.20.
|
Employees
|
21
|
Section 3.21.
|
Labor
Matters
|
22
|
Section 3.22.
|
Taxes
|
22
|
Section 3.23.
|
Employee
Plans
|
23
|
Section 3.24.
|
Environmental
Matters
|
25
|
Section 3.25.
|
Disclosure
Documents
|
26
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 4 REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF SELLERS
|
26
|
|
|
Section 4.01.
|
Existence
and Power
|
27
|
Section 4.02.
|
Authorization
|
27
|
Section 4.03.
|
Noncontravention
|
27
|
Section 4.04.
|
Ownership
of Equity Interests
|
27
|
Section 4.05.
|
Litigation
|
27
|
Section 4.06.
|
Finders’
Fees
|
28
|
Section 4.07.
|
The
Blocker Entities
|
28
|
Section 4.08.
|
Purchase
for Investment
|
30
|
Section 4.09.
|
1933
Act Compliance
|
30
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 5 REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT
|
31
|
|
|
Section 5.01.
|
Corporate
Existence and Power
|
31
|
Section 5.02.
|
Authorization
|
31
|
Section 5.03.
|
Governmental
Authorization
|
32
|
Section 5.04.
|
Non-contravention
|
32
|
Section 5.05.
|
Capitalization
|
33
|
Section 5.06.
|
No
Subsidiaries
|
34
|
Section 5.07.
|
SEC
Filings and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
|
34
|
Section 5.08.
|
Financial
Statements
|
34
|
Section 5.09.
|
Disclosure
Documents
|
35
|
Section 5.10.
|
Absence
of Certain Changes
|
35
|
Section 5.11.
|
No
Undisclosed Material Liabilities
|
35
|
Section 5.12.
|
Compliance
with Laws and Court Orders
|
35
|
Section 5.13.
|
Litigation
|
36
|
Section 5.14.
|
Finders’
Fees
|
36
|
Section 5.15.
|
Trust
Account
|
36
|
Section 5.16.
|
Transactions
with Affiliates
|
36
|
Section 5.17.
|
Taxes
|
36
|
Section 5.18.
|
Contracts
|
37
|
Section 5.19.
|
Employees
|
38
|
Section
5.20.
|
Employee
Matters.
|
38
|
Section 5.21.
|
Qualification
|
38
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 6 COVENANTS OF THE
COMPANY AND SELLERS
|
39
|
|
|
Section 6.01.
|
Conduct
of the Company and Each Blocker Entity
|
39
|
Section 6.02.
|
Access
to Information; Confidentiality
|
41
|
Section 6.03.
|
Notices
of Certain Events
|
42
|
Section 6.04.
|
No
Solicitation
|
43
|
Section 6.05.
|
Contribution
Of Carrier Holdings And Carrier Services
|
43
|
Section 6.06.
|
Limited
Powers Of Attorney; Certificates for Equity Interests
|
43
|
Section 6.07.
|
Costs
And Expenses
|
44
|
Section 6.08.
|
Convertible
Note
|
44
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 7 COVENANTS OF
PARENT
|
44
|
|
|
Section 7.01.
|
Conduct
of Parent
|
44
|
Section 7.02.
|
Stockholder
Meeting
|
45
|
Section 7.03.
|
Parent
Plan
|
46
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 8 COVENANTS OF
PARENT, SELLERS AND THE COMPANY
|
46
|
|
|
Section 8.01.
|
Reasonable
Best Efforts
|
46
|
Section 8.02.
|
Certain
Filings
|
47
|
Section 8.03.
|
Public
Announcements
|
47
|
Section 8.04.
|
Further
Assurances
|
47
|
Section 8.05.
|
Sales
and Transfer Tax
|
47
|
Section 8.06.
|
Directors
and Officers of Parent
|
48
|
Section 8.07.
|
Registration
Rights Agreement
|
48
|
Section 8.08.
|
Pledge
Agreement
|
48
|
Section 8.09.
|
Certificate
of Incorporation Protections; Directors’ and Officers’ Liability
Insurance
|
48
|
Section 8.10.
|
Sellers’
Committee
|
49
|
Section 8.11.
|
Parent
Committee
|
49
|
Section 8.12.
|
Legends
|
50
|
Section 8.13.
|
Tax
Matters
|
50
|
Section
8.14.
|
Regulatory
Matters.
|
52
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 9 CONDITIONS TO
CLOSING
|
53
|
|
|
Section 9.01.
|
Conditions
to Obligations of Parent, Sellers and the Company
|
53
|
Section 9.02.
|
Conditions
to the Obligations of Parent
|
54
|
Section 9.03.
|
Conditions
to the Obligations of the Company and Sellers.
|
55
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 10 SURVIVAL;
INDEMNIFICATION
|
55
|
|
|
Section 10.01.
|
Survival
|
55
|
Section 10.02.
|
Indemnification
|
56
|
Section 10.03.
|
Indemnification
Procedures
|
57
|
Section 10.04.
|
Indemnification
Payments
|
57
|
Section 10.05.
|
Waiver
of Claims and Rights
|
57
|
Section 10.06.
|
Exclusive
Remedy
|
58
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 11
TERMINATION
|
58
|
|
|
Section 11.01.
|
Grounds
for Termination
|
58
|
Section 11.02.
|
Effect
of Termination
|
59
|
Section 11.03.
|
Termination
Fee
|
59
|
Section 11.04.
|
Limitation
On Remedy
|
60
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE 12
MISCELLANEOUS
|
60
|
|
|
Section 12.01.
|
Notices
|
60
|
Section 12.02.
|
Amendments
and Waivers
|
61
|
Section 12.03.
|
Addition
of Sellers
|
62
|
Section 12.04.
|
Expenses
|
62
|
Section 12.05.
|
Successors
and Assigns
|
62
|
Section 12.06.
|
Governing
Law
|
62
|
Section 12.07.
|
Jurisdiction
|
62
|
Section 12.08.
|
WAIVER
OF JURY TRIAL
|
62
|
Section 12.09.
|
Counterparts;
No Third Party Beneficiaries
|
62
|
Section 12.10.
|
Entire
Agreement
|
63
|
Section 12.11.
|
Specific
Performance
|
63
|
|
|
|
Exhibits
and Schedules:
|
Exhibit
A – Each Seller’s Cash Pro Rata Share and Stock Pro Rata
Share
|
Exhibit
B – Form of Amended and Restated Parent Certificate of
Incorporation
|
Exhibit
C – Form of Limited Power of Attorney
|
Exhibit
D – Form of Registration Rights Agreement
|
Exhibit
E – Form of Pledge Agreement
|
TRANSACTION
AGREEMENT
TRANSACTION
AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) dated as of
September 22, 2008 among Iridium Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company (the “Company”),
GHL Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and each of the
sellers whose name appears on the signature page hereto (each of the foregoing,
a “Seller”, and
collectively, the “Sellers”).
W
I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS,
Sellers own, directly or indirectly, all of the issued and outstanding Units (as
defined in the Company LLC Agreement) of the Company; and
WHEREAS,
Parent desires to purchase, directly or indirectly, the Units.
NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE
1
DEFINITIONS
Section
1.01. Definitions. (a) The
following terms, as used herein, have the following meanings:
“Accounting Referee” means a
nationally recognized accounting firm, mutually acceptable to the Parent
Committee and to Sellers’ Committee, chosen to decide any disagreement of the
parties to this Agreement with respect to any Tax or accounting matters. The
fees and expenses of the Accounting Referee shall be allocated by the Accounting
Referee between the parties to any disagreement based on the principle that such
amounts shall be borne by the party whose determination differs from the
Accounting Referee’s ultimate determination by the greater amount.
“Additional Share” means, for
each Seller, the percentage set forth next to its name on Exhibit
A.
“Affiliate” means, with respect
to any Person, any other Person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled
by, or under common control with such Person.
“Aggregate Cash Consideration”
means $77.1 million, plus the Special Tax Distribution Shortfall, if
any.
“Aggregate Consideration” means
the Aggregate Cash Consideration and the Aggregate Stock
Consideration.
“Aggregate Stock
Consideration" means (i)
with respect to the Sellers (other than the Greenhill Noteholder), 36,000,000
shares of Parent Stock and (ii) with respect to the Greenhill Noteholder,
assuming the Convertible Note has been issued prior to the Closing and is
being
converted
in connection therewith, 2,290,000 shares of Parent Stock in accordance with
Section 6.08.
“Average Stock Price” means, as
of the date of any determination, the volume-weighted average per share trading
price of the Parent Stock over the 10 consecutive trading days immediately
preceding the date of such determination.
“Balance Sheet” means the
audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company and its Subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2007.
“Balance Sheet Date” means
December 31, 2007.
“Baralonco Blocker Seller”
means the Seller of the shares of Baralonco Blocker.
“Blocker Entities” means
Syncom-Iridium Holdings Corporation (“Syncom Blocker”) and Baralonco
N.V. (“Baralonco
Blocker”), and each of them, a “Blocker Entity”.
“Blocker Seller” means a Syncom
Blocker Seller and/or the Baralonco Blocker Seller.
“Blocker Shares” means all
shares of capital stock or other equity interests in any Blocker
Entity.
“Business Day” means a day,
other than Saturday, Sunday or other day on which commercial banks in New York,
New York are authorized or required by Law to close.
“Cash Available for
Distribution” means, in the case of a Blocker Entity at any time, the
excess of any cash or cash equivalents held by such Blocker Entity over all
liabilities that would be properly reflected on a balance sheet of such Blocker
Entity at such time prepared in accordance with GAAP.
“Cash Pro-Rata Share” means,
with respect to each Seller, the percentage set forth next to such Seller’s name
on Exhibit A, as the same may be amended upon the agreement of the Sellers who
are affected by such amendment (without consent of Parent) prior to the
occurrence of Special Tax Distribution that results in a Special Tax
Distribution Shortfall.
“Closing Date” means the date
on which the Closing actually occurs.
“Code” means the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986.
“Communication Laws” means the
Communications Act of 1934 and the orders, decisions, notices and policies
promulgated by the FCC pursuant thereto, all as may be amended from time to
time.
“Company Intellectual Property
Rights” means the Owned Intellectual Property Rights and the Licensed
Intellectual Property Rights.
“Company LLC Agreement” means
the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Iridium Holdings
LLC as in effect on the date hereof.
“Company Material Adverse
Effect” means a material adverse effect on (i) the financial condition,
business, assets or results of operations of the Company and its Subsidiaries,
taken as a whole, or (ii) the ability of the Company to perform its obligations
under or to consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement; except
any such effect resulting from or arising in connection with: (A) the
negotiation, execution, announcement or performance of this Agreement or the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby, including the impact
thereof on relationships, contractual or otherwise, with customers, suppliers,
distributors, partners, financing sources, employees, revenue and profitability
(other than any effect resulting from breach of representations and warranties
set forth in Sections 3.04, 3.16(b), 3.18 and 4.03), (B) changes in the economy
or the credit, debt, financial or capital markets, in each case, in the United
States or elsewhere in the world, including changes in interest or exchange
rates, (C) changes in Law, GAAP or accounting standards or the interpretation
thereof, or changes in general legal, regulatory or political conditions, (D)
acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, or any escalation or worsening of any such
acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, (E) earthquakes, hurricanes, tornados or
other natural disasters, (F) any failure, in and of itself, to meet any internal
or public projections, forecasts or estimates of revenue, capital expenditures
or earnings or the issuance of revised projections that are not as optimistic as
those in existence as of the date hereof; provided that the underlying
causes of any such failure or issuance may be taken into consideration in
determining whether such material adverse effect has occurred, or (G) changes
affecting the industries generally in which the Company or its Subsidiaries
conduct business, except to the extent, in the case of clauses (B), (C), (D),
(E) and (G), the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, are
disproportionately affected compared to other companies in the same
industry.
“Company Technology” means any
computer software (whether in object code or source code form), firmware,
middleware, development tools, and all associated documentation owned by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries or licensed to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries.
“Convertible Note” means the
Convertible Subordinated Promissory Note of the Company attached as Exhibit A to
the Note Purchase Agreement.
“Damages” means any and all
damage, loss, liability and expense (including reasonable expenses of
investigation and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses in connection with any
action, suit or proceeding whether involving a third party claim or a claim
solely between the parties hereto).
“Environmental Laws” means any
Law or any legally binding agreement with any Governmental Authority or other
third party, relating to the protection of the environment, or to the discharge,
release, use, recycling, labeling, treatment, storage, disposal or handling of
any toxic, radioactive, ignitable, corrosive, reactive or otherwise hazardous
substances, chemicals, wastes or materials or, to the extent relating to
exposure to any such substances, chemicals, wastes or materials, to human health
and safety.
“Environmental Permits” means
all permits, licenses, franchises, certificates, approvals, registrations and
other similar authorizations of Governmental Authorities required by
Environmental
Laws for the current conduct of the business of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries.
“Equity Interests” means the
Interests and the Blocker Shares, and each of them, an “Equity
Interest”.
“ERISA” means the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974.
“ERISA Affiliate” of any Person
means any other Person that, together with such Person, would be treated as a
single employer under Section 414(b), (c), (m) or (o) of the Code.
“FCC” means the Federal
Communications Commission of the United States of America, including its
bureaus, offices and divisions, or any Governmental Authority succeeding to the
functions of such commission in whole or in part.
“FCC Consent” means any order
of the FCC granting in all material respects any application filed with the FCC
(including the FCC Consent Application) without the imposition of any conditions
that would reasonably be expected to result in a Company Material Adverse Effect
or a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
“FCC Consent Application” means
any application, petition, motion, request or other filing with the FCC for its
consent to the transactions contemplated hereby with respect to any FCC License
or pending application therefor (including any petition, request or other
application to the FCC to approve, if necessary, aggregate foreign ownership in
the Company in excess of 25%).
“FCC Licenses” means the FCC
licenses for the satellite space stations and earth stations, and any other
licenses, permits or other authorizations (including those for special temporary
authority under the Communications Laws) issued to the Company or any Subsidiary
of the Company by, or pending before, the FCC in connection with the operation
or planned operation of the Company’s and its Subsidiaries’ business, including
any operational requirements contained in such licenses or other
authorizations.
“Foreign Permits” means all
licenses, permits, construction permits, approvals, concessions, franchises,
certificates, consents, qualifications, registrations, privileges and other
authorizations and other rights issued by any non-United States Governmental
Authority to the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company currently in effect
and used or useful in connection with the operation or planned operation of the
Company’s and its Subsidiaries’ business, including any operational requirements
contained in such licenses or other authorizations.
“GAAP” means United States
generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis; provided, however, that with
respect to any references to the financial statements of Baralonco Blocker for
periods commencing on or after January 1, 1990, GAAP shall mean International
Auditing Standards issued by the International Federation of
Accountants.
“Governmental Authority” means
any court, administrative agency or commission or other federal, state, local or
foreign governmental or regulatory authority, agency, body, instrumentality or
official.
“Greenhill Noteholder” means
Greenhill & Co. Europe Holdings Limited.
“Hazardous Substances” means
any pollutant, contaminant or waste or any toxic, radioactive, ignitable,
corrosive or reactive substance, waste, chemical or material, including
petroleum, its derivatives, by-products and other hydrocarbons, asbestos or
asbestos-containing materials and any substance, waste or material regulated as
hazardous, toxic or any other term of similar import under any Environmental
Law.
“HSR Act” means the
Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976.
“Initial Business Combination”
has the meaning set forth in the Parent Certificate of
Incorporation.
“Intellectual Property Rights”
means all worldwide (i) inventions, whether or not patentable; (ii) patents and
patent applications; (iii) trademarks, service marks, trade dress, logos,
Internet domain names and trade names, whether or not registered, and all
goodwill associated therewith; (iv) rights of publicity and other rights to use
the names and likeness of individuals; (v) copyrights and related rights,
whether or not registered; (vi) mask works; (vii) computer software, data,
databases, files, and documentation and other materials related thereto; (viii)
trade secrets and confidential, technical and business information; (ix) all
rights therein provided by bilateral or international treaties or conventions;
and (x) all rights to sue or recover and retain damages and costs and attorneys’
fees for past, present and future infringement or misappropriation of any of the
foregoing.
“Interests” means the Class A
Units and the Class B Units (as defined in the Company LLC
Agreement).
“IPO” means the initial public
offering of Parent, effected on February 21, 2008.
“IPO Shares” means the shares
of Parent Stock issued in the IPO.
“ITAR” means the International
Traffic in Arms Regulation, 22 CFR Parts 120-130.
“knowledge” of any Person that
is not an individual means the knowledge of such Person’s senior officers after
reasonable inquiry of the senior officer with primary responsibility for the
matter in question.
“Law” means, with respect to
any Person, any federal, state or local law (statutory, common or otherwise),
constitution, treaty, convention, ordinance, code, rule, regulation, order,
injunction, judgment, decree, ruling or other similar requirement enacted,
adopted, promulgated or applied by a Governmental Authority that is binding upon
or applicable to such Person, as amended, unless expressly specified
otherwise.
“Licensed Intellectual Property
Rights” means any Intellectual Property Rights owned by a third party
that either the Company or one of its Subsidiaries has a right to use, exploit
or practice by virtue of a license grant, immunity from suit or
otherwise.
“Lien” means, with respect to
any property or asset, any mortgage, lien, pledge, charge, security interest,
encumbrance or other adverse claim of any kind in respect of such property or
asset. For the purposes of this Agreement, a Person shall be deemed to own
subject to a Lien any property or asset which it has acquired or holds subject
to the interest of a vendor or lessor under any conditional sale agreement,
capital lease or other title retention agreement relating to such property or
asset.
“Majority Interest” means, in
the case of a group of Sellers, Sellers holding (directly or indirectly)
Interests having a majority of the voting power of the Interests that may be
voted on matters before the members of the Company under the Company LLC
Agreement immediately prior to the closing of the transactions to be consummated
on the Closing Date.
“Member” means any Person
owning Interests.
“1933 Act” means the Securities
Act of 1933.
“1934 Act” means the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
“Note Purchase Agreement” means
the Purchase Agreement dated as of the date hereof between the Company and the
Greenhill Noteholder.
“Owned Intellectual Property
Rights” means all Intellectual Property Rights owned by the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company.
“Parent Balance Sheet” means
the audited consolidated balance sheet of Parent as of February 21,
2008.
“Parent Balance Sheet Date”
means February 21, 2008.
“Parent Certificate of
Incorporation” means the Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Parent.
“Parent Material Adverse Effect” means a
material adverse effect on (i) the financial condition, business, assets or
results of operations of Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, or (ii)
the ability of Parent to perform its obligations under or to consummate the
transactions contemplated by this Agreement; except any such effect resulting
from or arising in connection with: (A) the negotiation, execution, announcement
or performance of this Agreement or the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby, including the impact thereof on relationships, contractual
or otherwise, with customers, suppliers, distributors, partners, financing
sources, employees, revenue and profitability (other than any effect resulting
from the breach of representations and warranties set forth in Section 5.04),
(B) changes in the economy or the credit, debt, financial or capital markets, in
each case, in the United States or elsewhere in the world, including changes in
interest or exchange rates, (C) changes in Law, GAAP or accounting standards or
the interpretation thereof, or changes in general legal,
regulatory
or political conditions, (D) acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, or any
escalation or worsening of any such acts of war, sabotage or terrorism, (E)
earthquakes, hurricanes, tornados or other natural disasters, (F) any failure,
in and of itself, to meet any internal or public projections, forecasts or
estimates of revenue, capital expenditures or earnings or the issuance of
revised projections that are not as optimistic as those in existence as of the
date hereof; provided that the underlying causes of any such failure or issuance
may be taken into consideration in determining whether such material adverse
effect has occurred, or (G) changes affecting the industries generally in which
Parent and its Subsidiaries conduct their business, except to the extent, in the
case of clauses (B), (C), (D), (E) and (G), Parent and its Subsidiaries, taken
as a whole, are disproportionately affected compared to other companies in the
same industry.
“Parent Ownership Tax Period”
means any 2008-10 Pre-Closing Tax Period for which the corresponding Tax Return
has not been filed prior to the Closing Date.
“Parent Plan” means the
long-term equity incentive plan for Company’s officers, directors, employees and
consultants to be agreed upon by the Company and Parent prior to the Closing
Date, and as approved and adopted by the stockholders of Parent.
“Parent SEC Documents” means
all of Parent’s reports, statements, schedules and registration statements filed
with the SEC.
“Parent Stock” means the common
stock, $0.001 par value, of Parent.
“Person” means an individual,
corporation, partnership, limited liability company, association, trust or other
entity or organization, including a government or political subdivision or an
agency or instrumentality thereof.
“Pre-Closing Blocker Tax
Return” means any Tax Return of any Blocker Entity with respect to any
Pre-Closing Tax Period that has not been filed prior to the Closing
Date.
“Pre-Closing Tax Period” means
any Tax period ending on or before the Closing Date; and, with respect to a Tax
period that begins on or before the Closing Date and ends thereafter, the
portion of such Tax period ending on the Closing Date.
“Pre-Closing Tax Liability”
means a liability for any Tax imposed upon a Blocker Entity for any Pre-Closing
Tax Period. In the case of a Tax period that begins on or before the Closing
Date and ends thereafter, the portion of such Tax related to the portion of such
Tax period ending on and including the Closing Date shall (y) in the case of any
Taxes based upon or related to gross income, net income, gross receipts, sales
receipts, or use receipts (“Revenue Taxes”), be deemed equal to the amount which
would be payable if the relevant Tax period ended on and included the Closing
Date, and (z) in the case of any Tax other than a Revenue Tax, be deemed to be
the amount of such Tax for the entire Tax period multiplied by a fraction the
numerator of which is the number of days in the Tax period ending on and
including the Closing Date and the denominator of which is the number of days in
the entire Tax period. Pre- Closing Tax Liability shall not include any
liability for any federal, state or local income Tax (other than any branch
profits tax) imposed upon a Blocker Entity by reason of (i) the treatment of a
distribution by the Company of such Blocker Entity’s share of the proceeds of
the Convertible Note as a sale of a portion of such Blocker Entity’s Interests
or (ii) any excess on or
after the
Closing Date of (A) such Blocker Entity’s share (as determined under Section 752
and applicable regulations thereunder) of the liabilities of the Company over
(B) such Blocker Entity’s adjusted tax basis in its Interests.
“2008-10 Pre-Closing Tax
Periods” means all Pre-Closing Tax Periods ending after December 31, 2007
that are not Parent Ownership Tax Periods.
“Public Stockholder” means each
holder of IPO Shares.
“Purchased Shares” means the
shares of Parent Stock to be acquired by the Sellers hereunder.
“Sarbanes-Oxley Act” means the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. “SEC” means the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
“Sellers’ Committee” means a
committee consisting of a designee appointed by the Baralonco Blocker, whose
designee shall initially be Steven B. Pfeiffer, and a designee appointed by the
Syncom Blocker and Syndicated Communications Inc., whose designee shall
initially be Terry L. Jones.
“Senior Loan Facilities” mean
(i) the First Lien Credit Agreement between the Company, Iridium Satellite LLC
and the other parties named therein dated as of July 27, 2007 and (ii) the
Second Lien Credit Agreement between the Company, Iridium Satellite LLC and the
other parties named therein dated as of July 27, 2006.
“Special Tax Distribution
Shortfall” means that amount equal to the difference between $37,900,000
and the sum of (x) Special Tax Distributions, to the extent such distributions
have been paid or declared on or prior to the Closing and (y) any payments and
expenses incurred in connection with such Special Tax Distributions (including
consent fees and other fees payable to the lenders under the Senior Loan
Facilities in connection with any consents or waivers under such Senior Loan
Facilities obtained on or after the date hereof).
“Stock Buyer” means any Seller
acquiring any of the Purchased Shares.
“Stock Pro-Rata Share” Stock
Pro-Rata Share" means (i) with respect to each Seller (other than the Greenhill
Noteholder), the percentage set forth next to such Seller's name on Exhibit A
and (ii) with respect to the Greenhill Noteholder, assuming the Convertible Note
has been issued prior to the Closing and is being converted in connection
therewith, the number of shares of Parent Stock set forth opposite the Greenhill
Noteholder's name on Exhibit A.
“Subsidiary” means, with
respect to any Person, any entity of which securities or other ownership
interests having ordinary voting power to elect a majority of the board of
directors or other persons performing similar functions are at any time directly
or indirectly owned by such Person. For purposes of this Agreement, each of
Iridium Carrier Holdings LLC (“Carrier Holdings”), Iridium Carrier
Services LLC (“Carrier
Services”), Iridium Satellite, LLC (“Iridium Satellite”) and
Iridium Constellation, LLC (“Iridium Constellation”) shall
be considered a Subsidiary of the Company.
“Syncom Blocker Seller” means
the Seller of the shares of Syncom Blocker.
“Tax” means (i) any and all
federal, state, provincial, local, foreign and other tax, levy, fee, impost,
duty or other like assessment or charge of any kind whatsoever (including
withholding on amounts paid to or by any Person), together with any interest,
penalty, addition to tax or additional amount imposed by any Governmental
Authority responsible for the imposition of any such tax (a “Tax Authority”), and any
liability for any of the foregoing as transferee and (ii) in the case of Parent,
the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, or any Blocker Entity, any liability
for the payment of any amount of the type described in clause (i) as a result of
being or having been before the Closing Date a member of an affiliated,
consolidated, combined or unitary group.
“Transaction Documents” means
this Agreement, the Registration Rights Agreement, the Pledge Agreement and any
and all other agreements and documents required to be delivered by any party
hereto prior to or at the Closing pursuant to the terms of this
Agreement.
“Trust Account” means the trust
account established by Parent in connection with the consummation of the IPO and
into which Parent deposited a designated portion of the net proceeds from the
IPO.
“Trust Agreement” means the
agreement pursuant to which Parent has established the Trust
Account.
(b) Each
of the following terms is defined in the Section set forth opposite such
term:
Term
|
|
Section
|
Agreement
|
|
Preamble
|
Allocation
|
|
2.03
|
Baralonco
Release Date
|
|
10.02
|
Blocker
Entity Securities
|
|
4.07(b)(ii)
|
Blocker
Settlement Date
|
|
10.02
|
Capex/R&D
Budget
|
|
6.01
|
Closing
|
|
2.02
|
Company
|
|
Preamble
|
Company
Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Article
3
|
Company
Securities
|
|
3.05(b)
|
Confidentiality
Agreement
|
|
6.02(a)
|
Contribution
|
|
6.05
|
Costs
|
|
8.09(c)
|
Employee
Plans
|
|
3.23(a)
|
End
Date
|
|
11.01(b)(i)
|
Exon-Florio
Amendment
|
|
8.14(a)
|
Foreign
Applications
|
|
8.14(c)
|
Indemnified
Party
|
|
10.03
|
Indemnifying
Party
|
|
10.03
|
Initial
Business Combination
|
|
5.01
|
International
Plan
|
|
3.23(l)
|
Organizational
Documents
|
|
5.01
|
Parent
|
|
Preamble
|
Parent
Board Recommendation
|
|
5.02(c)
|
Parent
Committee
|
|
8.11
|
Parent
Contracts
|
|
5.18(a)
|
Parent
Disclosure Schedule
|
|
Article
5
|
Parent
Indemnified Parties
|
|
10.02
|
Parent
Plan Grant
|
|
7.03
|
Parent
Proxy Statement
|
|
5.09
|
Parent
Stockholder Approval
|
|
5.02(b)
|
Parent
Stockholder Meeting
|
|
5.02(b)
|
Parent
Warrant
|
|
5.05(a)
|
Permits
|
|
3.18
|
Permitted
Liens
|
|
3.15(a)(iii)
|
Pledge
Agreement
|
|
9.02(c)
|
Pro
Rata Share of Tax Benefit Payments
|
|
2.04(a)
|
Registration
Rights Agreement
|
|
9.02(b)
|
Section
754 Election
|
|
2.04(b)
|
Seller
|
|
Preamble
|
Sellers
|
|
Preamble
|
Special
Tax Distribution
|
|
6.01(b)
|
Subsidiary
Securities
|
|
2.04(b)
|
Tax
Payment Date
|
|
2.04(a)
|
Tax
Returns
|
|
2.04(b)
|
Transfer
Taxes
|
|
2.04(b)
|
Units
|
|
Preamble
|
WARN
|
|
2.04(b)
|
Section
1.02. Other
Definitional and Interpretative Provisions. The words “hereof”, “herein”
and “hereunder” and words of like import used in this Agreement shall refer to
this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this Agreement.
The captions herein are included for convenience of reference only and shall be
ignored in the construction or interpretation hereof. References to Articles,
Sections, Exhibits and Schedules are to Articles, Sections, Exhibits and
Schedules of this Agreement unless otherwise specified. All Exhibits and
Schedules annexed hereto or referred to herein are hereby incorporated in and
made a part of this Agreement as if set forth in full herein. Any capitalized
terms used in any Exhibit or Schedule but not otherwise defined therein, shall
have the meaning as defined in this Agreement. Any singular term in this
Agreement shall be deemed to include the plural, and any plural term the
singular. Whenever the words “include”, “includes” or “including” are used in
this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words “without
limitation”, whether or not they are in fact followed by those words or words of
like import. “Writing”, “written” and comparable terms refer to printing, typing
and other means of reproducing words (including electronic media) in a visible
form. References to any agreement or contract are to that agreement or contract
as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in accordance with the
terms hereof and thereof. References to a statute shall be to such statute, as
amended
from time
to time, and to the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. References to
any Person include the successors and permitted assigns of that Person.
References from or through any date mean, unless otherwise specified, from and
including or through and including, respectively.
ARTICLE
2
PURCHASE
AND SALE
Section
2.01. Purchase and
Sale. Upon the terms and subject to the conditions of this
Agreement, each Seller agrees to sell to Parent, and Parent agrees to purchase
from such Seller, at the Closing, all Equity Interests held by such Seller as
set forth opposite such Seller’s name on Schedule 2.01. The aggregate purchase
price for the Equity Interests is the Aggregate Consideration, which shall be
paid as provided in Section 2.02.
Section
2.02. Closing.
The closing (the “Closing”) of the purchase and
sale of the Equity Interests hereunder shall take place at the offices of
Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP, 425 Lexington Avenue, New York, New York, as
soon as possible, but in no event later than 5 Business Days, after satisfaction
of the conditions set forth in Article 9, or at such other time or place as
Parent and the Company may agree. At the Closing:
(a) Except
as provided in Section 2.02(b), Parent shall deliver to each Seller (i) its
Stock Pro-Rata Share of the Aggregate Stock Consideration, which, at Parent’s
option, shall be in stock certificates or uncertificated book-entry form, and
(ii) its Cash Pro-Rata Share of the Aggregate Cash Consideration in immediately
available funds by wire transfer to an account of such Seller with a bank
designated by such Seller, by notice to Parent, which notice shall be delivered
not later than two Business Days prior to the Closing Date (or if not so
designated, then by certified or official bank check payable in immediately
available funds to the order of such Seller in such amount).
(b) Parent
shall retain, as contemplated by the Pledge Agreement, the certificates
representing shares of Parent Stock otherwise deliverable to the Sellers of the
Blocker Shares, all as set forth on Schedule 2.02.
(c) Each
Seller shall deliver to Parent certificates (if any) for its Equity Interests
duly endorsed or accompanied by stock powers duly endorsed in blank (or other
similar instruments as appropriate), with any required transfer stamps affixed
thereto or shall otherwise execute such documents and instruments as may be
necessary or useful to transfer such Seller’s Equity Interests to
Parent.
Section
2.03. Purchase Price
Allocation. Parent shall allocate for federal income tax purposes the
Aggregate Consideration paid for the Interests in accordance with Section 755 of
the Code and applicable Treasury Regulations thereunder. The Sellers’ Committee
shall review such Allocation and provide any objections to Parent within 30 days
after the receipt thereof. If the Sellers’ Committee raises any objection to the
Allocation, the parties will negotiate in good faith to resolve such
objection(s). If the Sellers’ Committee and Parent are unable to agree on the
Allocation within 15 days after the Sellers’ Committee raises
such
objections, they shall request the Accounting Referee, to decide any disputed
items. Parent and the Sellers’ Committee shall cooperate in the filing of any
forms (including, e.g., Form 8308 and compliance with Treas. Reg. 1.743-1(k), as
applicable) with respect to the Allocation.
Section
2.04. Tax Benefits
Payment. (a) In addition to the Aggregate Consideration but subject to
Section 2.04(b), Parent agrees to pay to each Seller (other than the Sellers of
Blocker Shares) an amount in cash equal to such Seller’s allocable portion as
set forth in Schedule 2.04 of an aggregate of $30 million (the “Pro-Rata Share of Tax
BenefitPayments”)
on the date which is 90 days after the Closing Date (the “Tax Payment
Date”).
(b) Parent’s
obligation to make the payments pursuant to Section 2.04(a) shall be subject to
the Company having in effect a valid election under Section 754 of the Code with
respect to the Company’s taxable year in which the Closing occurs (the “Section 754
Election”).
(c) Under
this Section 2.04, any cash payments by Parent shall be made in immediately
available funds by wire transfer to an account of a Seller with a bank
designated by such Seller, by notice to Parent, which notice shall be delivered
not later than two Business Days prior to the Tax Payment Date (or if not so
designated, then by certified or official bank check payable in immediately
available funds to the order of such Seller in an amount equal to such Seller’s
Pro-Rata Share of Tax Benefit Payments).
ARTICLE
3
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF THE COMPANY
Except as
set forth in the disclosure schedule (with reference to the section or
subsection of this Agreement to which the information stated in such disclosure
schedule relates; provided that any fact,
matter or condition disclosed in any section or subsection of such disclosure
schedule in such a way as to make its relevance to another section or subsection
of such disclosure schedule that relates to a representation or representations
made elsewhere in Article 3 of this Agreement reasonably apparent shall be
deemed to be an exception to such representation or representations
notwithstanding the omission of a reference or cross reference thereto)
delivered by the Company to Parent prior to the execution of this Agreement (the
“Company Disclosure Schedule”), the
Company represents and warrants to Parent as of the date hereof and as of the Closing Date
that:
Section
3.01. Existence and
Power. The Company is a limited liability company duly organized, validly
existing and in good standing under the laws of Delaware. The Company is duly
qualified to do business as a foreign limited liability company and is in good
standing in each jurisdiction where such qualification is necessary, except for
those jurisdictions where failure to be so qualified would not, individually or
in the aggregate, have a Company Material Adverse Effect. The Company has
heretofore delivered to Parent true and complete copies of the organizational
documents of the Company as currently in effect.
Section
3.02. Authorization. The
execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Agreement and the
other Transactions Documents to which it is party and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby are within the Company’s
powers
and have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the part of the Company
and the Members. This Agreement and the other Transactions Documents to which it
is party constitutes, and will constitute when executed, and assuming the due
authorization, execution and delivery hereof and thereof by Parent, valid and
binding agreements of the Company.
Section
3.03. Governmental
Authorization. The execution, delivery and performance by the Company of
this Agreement and the other Transactions Documents to which it is party and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby require no
action by or in respect of, or filing with, any Governmental Authority other
than (i) compliance with any applicable requirements of the HSR Act, (ii) FCC
Consent with respect to the FCC Consent Application, (iii) any notices required
to be given to U.S. security agencies under network security understandings,
(iv) the consents and approvals set forth on Schedule 3.03 and (v) such actions
or filings, if not made, would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably
be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section
3.04. Noncontravention. The
execution, delivery and performance by the Company of this Agreement and the
other Transactions Documents to which it is party and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby do not and will not (i) violate the
organizational documents of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, (ii)
assuming compliance with the matters referred to in Section 3.03, violate any
Law, (iii) require any consent or other action by any Person under, constitute a
default under, or give rise to any right of termination, cancellation or
acceleration of any right or obligation of the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company or to a loss of any benefit to which the Company or any Subsidiary of
the Company is entitled under any provision of any agreement or other instrument
binding upon the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or (iv) result in the
creation or imposition of any Lien on any material asset of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, except for such violations, consents, actions,
defaults, rights, breaches, conflicts, terminations, cancellations, impositions,
modifications or accelerations referred to in clauses (ii), (iii) and (iv) that
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Company Material Adverse Effect.
Section
3.05. Capitalization. (a) The
capitalization of the Company consists of the Interests set forth on Schedule
3.05(a).
(b) All
Interests have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully paid and
non assessable. Except as set forth in Schedule 3.05, there are no outstanding
(i) units of capital stock or voting securities of the Company, (ii) securities
of the Company convertible into or exchangeable for units of capital stock or
voting securities of the Company or (iii) options or other rights to acquire
from the Company, or other obligation of the Company to issue, any capital
stock, voting securities or securities convertible into or exchangeable for
capital stock or voting securities of the Company (the items in Sections
3.05(b)(i), 3.05(b)(ii) and 3.05(b)(iii) being referred to collectively as the
“Company Securities”).
There are no outstanding obligations of the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any Company
Securities.
Section
3.06. Ownership of
Interests. All of the Interests are owned by the Members in the
respective amounts set forth in Schedule 3.06.
Section
3.07. Subsidiaries. (a) Each
Subsidiary of the Company is duly organized,
validly existing and in good standing under the laws of its jurisdiction of
organization, is duly qualified to do business as a foreign limited liability
company or corporation and is in good standing in each jurisdiction where such
qualification is necessary, except, in each case, as would not, individually or
in the aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse
Effect. All Subsidiaries of the Company and their respective jurisdictions of
organization are identified on Schedule 3.07.
(b) All
of the outstanding capital stock or other voting securities of each Subsidiary
of the Company is owned by the Company, directly or indirectly, free and clear
of any Lien and free of any other limitation or restriction (including any
restriction on the right to vote, sell or otherwise dispose of such capital
stock or other voting securities). There are no outstanding (i) securities of
the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company convertible into or exchangeable
for shares of capital stock or voting securities of any Subsidiary of the
Company or (ii) options or other rights to acquire from the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, or other obligation of the Company or any Subsidiary
of the Company to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for capital stock or voting securities of any
Subsidiary of the Company (the items in Sections 3.07(b)(i) and 3.07(b)(ii)
being referred to collectively as the “Subsidiary Securities”). There
are no outstanding obligations of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company
to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any outstanding Subsidiary
Securities.
Section
3.08. Financial
Statements. (a) The audited consolidated balance sheets as of December
31, 2005, 2006 and 2007 and the related audited consolidated statements of
income and cash flows for each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2006 and
2007 of the Company and its Subsidiaries fairly present, in conformity with GAAP
applied on a consistent basis (except as may be indicated in the notes thereto),
the consolidated financial position of the Company and its Subsidiaries as of
the dates thereof and their consolidated results of operations and cash flows
for the periods then ended.
(b) The
unaudited consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2008 and the related
unaudited consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the period ending
thereon of the Company and its Subsidiaries fairly present, in conformity with
GAAP applied on a consistent basis (except as may be indicated in the notes
thereto (if any) and subject to normal year-end adjustments in amounts
consistent with past experience and the absence of footnotes), the consolidated
financial position of the Company and its Subsidiaries as of the dates thereof
and their consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the period then
ended.
Section
3.09. Absence of
Certain Changes. Since the Balance Sheet Date, the business of the
Company and its Subsidiaries has been conducted in the ordinary course
consistent with past practices and there has not been:
(a) any
event, occurrence, development or state of circumstances or facts that has had
or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Company Material Adverse Effect;
(b) any
amendment of the Company LLC Agreement, the articles of incorporation, bylaws or
other similar organizational documents (whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise) of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company;
(c) any
splitting, combination or reclassification of any Interests or shares of capital
stock of any Subsidiary of the Company or declaration, setting aside or payment
of any dividend or other distribution (whether in cash, stock or property or any
combination thereof) in respect of the capital stock of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, or redemption, repurchase or other acquisition or
offer to redeem, repurchase, or otherwise acquire any Company Securities or any
Subsidiary Securities;
(d) (i)
any issuance, delivery or sale, or authorization of the issuance, delivery or
sale of, any units of any Company Securities or Subsidiary Securities, other
than the issuance of Subsidiary Securities to the Company or any other
Subsidiary of the Company or (ii) amendment of any term of any Company Security
or any Subsidiary Security (in each case, whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise);
(e) any
acquisition (by merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock or assets or
otherwise), directly or indirectly, by the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company of any material assets, securities, material properties or businesses,
other than in the ordinary course of business of the Company and its
Subsidiaries in a manner consistent with past practice;
(f) any
sale, lease or other transfer, or creation or incurrence of any Lien (other than
Permitted Liens) on, any material assets, securities, material properties or
businesses of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(g) the
making by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company of any loans, advances or
capital contributions to, or investments in, any other Person, other than in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice;
(h) the
creation, incurrence, assumption or sufferance to exist by the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company of any indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantees
thereof other than under the Senior Loan Facilities and the Convertible
Note;
(i) any
damage, destruction or other casualty loss (whether or not covered by insurance)
affecting the business or assets of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company
that has had or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the
aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect;
(j) the
entering into of any agreement or arrangement that limits or otherwise restricts
in any material respect the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or any of
their respective Affiliates or any successor thereto or that would reasonably be
expected to, after the Closing Date, limit or restrict in any material respect
the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, Parent or any of their respective
Affiliates, from engaging or competing in any line of business, in any location
or with any Person or, except in the ordinary course of business consistent with
past practice, waiver, release or assignment of any material rights, claims or
benefits of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company;
(k) except
as required by Law or any Employee Plan, (i) the grant or increase of any
severance or termination pay to (or amend any existing arrangement with) any
director or officer of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, (ii) any
increase in benefits payable under any existing severance or termination pay
policies or employment agreements in respect of any director or officer of the
Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, (iii) the entering into of any
employment, deferred compensation or other similar agreement (or amendment of
any such existing agreement) with any director or officer of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, (iv) the establishment, adoption or amendment of any
collective bargaining, bonus, profit-sharing, thrift, pension, retirement,
deferred compensation, compensation, stock option, restricted stock or other
benefit plan or arrangement covering any director or officer of the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company or (v) any increase in compensation, bonus or
other benefits payable to any director or officer of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company, in each case, other than in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice;
(l) any
labor dispute, other than routine individual grievances, or any activity or
proceeding by a labor union or representative thereof to organize any employees
of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, or any lockouts, strikes,
slowdowns, work stoppages or threats thereof by or with respect to such
employees;
(m) any
change in the Company’s methods of accounting, except as required by concurrent
changes in GAAP as agreed to by its independent public accountants;
or
(n) any
settlement, or offer or proposal to settle, of (i) any material litigation,
investigation, arbitration, proceeding or other claim involving or against the
Company or any Subsidiary of the Company before any arbitrator or Governmental
Authority or (ii) any litigation, arbitration or proceeding that relates to the
transactions contemplated hereby before any arbitrator or Governmental
Authority.
(o) any
material restrictions or limitations imposed on the FCC Licenses or Foreign
Permits, or any revocation, non-renewal, suspension or adverse modification of a
material FCC License or a material Foreign Permit.
Section
3.10. No Undisclosed
Material Liabilities. There are no liabilities of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent,
absolute, determined, determinable or otherwise, other than:
(a) liabilities
provided for in the Balance Sheet or disclosed in the notes
thereto;
(b) liabilities
set forth in Schedule 3.10; and
(c) other
undisclosed liabilities which, individually or in the aggregate, are not
material to the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Section
3.11. Intercompany
Accounts. Schedule 3.11 contains a complete list of all intercompany
balances as of the Balance Sheet Date between each Member and its Affiliates, on
the one hand, and the Company and its Subsidiaries, on the other hand. Since the
Balance Sheet Date there has not been any accrual of liability by the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company to any Member or any of its Affiliates or other
transaction between the
Company
or any Subsidiary of the Company and any Member and any of its Affiliates,
except with respect to the period prior to the date of this Agreement, in the
ordinary course of business of the Company and its Subsidiaries consistent with
past practice, and thereafter, as provided in Schedule 3.11.
Section
3.12. Material
Contracts. (a) As of the date hereof, neither the Company nor any
Subsidiary of the Company is a party to or bound by:
(i) any
lease (whether of real or personal property) providing for annual rentals of
$500,000 or more;
(ii) any
agreement for the purchase of materials, supplies, goods, services, equipment or
other assets providing for either (A) annual payments by the Company and its
Subsidiaries of $1,000,000 or more or (B) aggregate remaining payments by the
Company and its Subsidiaries of $5,000,000 or more;
(iii) any
sales, distribution, dealer, sales representative, marketing, license or other
similar agreement providing for the sale by the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company of materials, supplies, goods, services, equipment or other assets that
provides for either (A) annual payments to the Company and its Subsidiaries of
1,000,000 or more or (B) aggregate remaining payments to the Company and its
Subsidiaries of $5,000,000 or more;
(iv) any
partnership, joint venture or other similar agreement or
arrangement;
(v) any
agreement relating to the acquisition or disposition of any business (whether by
merger, sale of stock, sale of assets or otherwise);
(vi) any
agreement relating to indebtedness for borrowed money or the deferred purchase
price of property (in either case, whether incurred, assumed, guaranteed or
secured by any asset), except any such agreement (A) with an aggregate
outstanding principal amount not exceeding $5,000,000 and which may be prepaid
on not more than 30 days’ notice without the payment of any penalty and (B)
entered into
subsequent
to the date of this Agreement as permitted by Section 6.01;
(vii) any
option, franchise or similar agreement;
(viii) any
agreement that limits the freedom of the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company to compete in any line of business or with any Person or in any area or
which would so limit the freedom of the Company, Parent or any of their
respective Subsidiaries and Affiliates after the Closing Date (excluding an
Employee Plan); or
(ix) any
agreement with (A) any Member or any of its Affiliates, (B) any Person directly
or indirectly owning, controlling or holding with power to vote, 5% or more of
the outstanding voting securities of any Member (if not an individual) or any of
its Affiliates, (C) any Person 5% or more of whose outstanding voting securities
are directly or indirectly owned, controlled or held with power to vote by any
Member or any of its Affiliates or (D) any director or officer of the Company,
any Subsidiary of the
Company,
any Member (if not an individual) or any of their respective Affiliates or any
“associates” or members of the “immediate family” (as such terms are
respectively defined in Rule 12b-2 and Rule 16a-1 of the 1934 Act) of any such
director or officer.
(b) Each
agreement, contract, plan, lease, arrangement or commitment disclosed in any
Schedule to this Agreement or required to be disclosed pursuant to this Section
is a valid and binding agreement of the Company or a Subsidiary of the Company,
as the case may be, and is in full force and effect, and none of the Company,
any Subsidiary of the Company or, to the knowledge of the Company, any other
party thereto is in default or breach in any material respect under the terms of
any such agreement, contract, plan, lease, arrangement or commitment, and, to
the knowledge of the Company, no event or circumstance has occurred that, with
notice or lapse of time or both, would constitute any event of default
thereunder, in each case, except as would not reasonably be expected to have a
Company Material Adverse Effect. True and complete copies of each such
agreement, contract, plan, lease, arrangement or commitment have been delivered
to Parent.
Section
3.13. Litigation. There is
no material action, suit, investigation or proceeding pending against, or to the
knowledge of the Company, threatened against, the Company or any Subsidiary of
the Company or any of their respective properties before any arbitrator or any
Governmental Authority.
Section
3.14. Compliance with
Laws and Court Orders. Except for such failures to comply, and notices,
actions and assertions concerning such failures to comply, that have not had and
would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Company Material Adverse Effect or have a material adverse impact on the ability
of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries to consummate the transaction
contemplated by this Agreement since December 31, 2004: (i) the Company and each
of its Subsidiaries has conducted its business in material compliance with all
Laws and (ii) no notice, action, or assertion has been received by the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries or , to the knowledge of the Company, has been filed,
commenced or threatened against the Company or any of its Subsidiaries alleging
any violation of any Law applicable to them or by which their respective
properties are bound or affected.
Section
3.15. Properties. (a) The
Company and its Subsidiaries have good and marketable title to, or in the case
of leased property and assets have valid leasehold interests in, all material
property and material assets (whether real, personal, tangible or intangible)
reflected on the Balance Sheet or acquired after the Balance Sheet Date, except
for properties and assets sold or disposed of since the Balance Sheet Date in
the ordinary course of business consistent with past practices. None of such
material property or material assets is subject to any Lien,
except:
(i) Liens
disclosed on the Balance Sheet;
(ii) Liens
for taxes not yet due or being contested in good faith (and for which adequate
accruals or reserves have been established on the Balance Sheet);
or
(iii)
Liens which do not materially detract from the value or materially interfere
with any present or intended use of such property or assets (clauses (i) - (iii)
of this
Section 3.15(a) are, collectively, the “Permitted
Liens”).
(b) There
are no developments affecting any such property or assets pending or, to the
knowledge of the Company threatened, which would, individually or in the
aggregate, reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse
Effect.
(c) Except
as would not reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Company Material Adverse Effect, all leases of such real property and personal
property are in good standing and are valid, binding and enforceable in
accordance with their respective terms and there does not exist under any such
lease any default or any event which with notice or lapse of time or both would
constitute a default.
(d) Except
as would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect,
the plants, buildings, structures and equipment owned by the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company have no defects, are in good operating condition and
repair and have been reasonably maintained consistent with standards generally
followed in the industry, are adequate and suitable for their present uses (in
each case giving due account to the age and length of use of same, ordinary wear
and tear excepted).
(e) The
material tangible property and material tangible assets owned or leased by the
Company or any Subsidiary of the Company, or which they otherwise have the right
to use, constitute all of the material tangible property and material tangible
assets used or held for use in connection with the businesses of the Company or
any Subsidiary of the Company and are adequate to conduct such businesses as
currently conducted.
Section
3.16. Intellectual
Property. (a) Schedule 3.16(a) contains a true and complete list of all
registrations or applications for registration included in the Owned
Intellectual Property Rights.
(b) The
Company Intellectual Property Rights constitute all of the Intellectual Property
Rights necessary to the conduct of the business of the Company and its
Subsidiaries as currently conducted. There exist no material restrictions on the
disclosure, use, license or transfer of any Owned Intellectual Property Rights
or Company Technology owned by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries. The
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will not, in and
of itself, alter, encumber, impair or extinguish the rights of the Company or
its Subsidiaries in any material Company Intellectual Property Rights or
material Company Technology.
(c) Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has infringed, misappropriated or
otherwise violated any Intellectual Property Right of any Person in any material
respect. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material
Adverse Effect, there is no claim, action, suit, investigation or proceeding
pending against, or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened in writing
(including invitations to take a patent license to avoid a claim of
infringement) against, the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (i) based upon, or
challenging or seeking to deny or restrict, the rights of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries in any of the
Company
Intellectual Property Rights or the Company Technology, (ii) alleging that the
use of the Company Intellectual Property Rights or the Company Technology or any
services provided, processes used or products manufactured, used, imported,
offered for sale or sold by the Company or any of its Subsidiaries do or may
conflict with, misappropriate, infringe or otherwise violate any Intellectual
Property Right of any third party or (iii) alleging that the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries have infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated any
Intellectual Property Right of any Person.
(d) No
material Owned Intellectual Property Rights have been adjudged invalid or
unenforceable in whole or part, and, to the knowledge of the Company, all
material Owned Intellectual Property Rights are valid and enforceable. The
Company and its Subsidiaries hold
(i) all
right, title and interest in and to all material Owned Intellectual Property
Rights and the material Company Technology owned by the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, and (ii) the right to use all material Licensed Intellectual
Property Rights and the material Company Technology licensed or leased by the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, in each case free and clear of any Lien
(other than Permitted Liens). The Company and its Subsidiaries have taken all
reasonable actions necessary to maintain and protect their rights in all
material Company Intellectual Property Rights and material Company
Technology.
(e) To
the knowledge of the Company, no Person has infringed, misappropriated or
otherwise violated any of the material Owned Intellectual Property Rights. To
the knowledge of the Company, the Company and its Subsidiaries have taken
reasonable steps to maintain the confidentiality of all material Company
Intellectual Property Rights and material Company Technology the value of which
to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries is contingent upon maintaining the
confidentiality thereof and no such Company Intellectual Property Rights or
Company Technology has been disclosed other than to employees, representatives
and agents of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or others who, in all
cases, are bound by written confidentiality agreements or other obligations of
confidentiality.
(f) The
Company Technology operates and performs in all material respects in a manner
that permits the Company and its Subsidiaries to conduct their respective
businesses as currently conducted. To the knowledge of the Company, (i) neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has experienced any material defects in
any material Company Technology that have not been satisfactorily resolved and
(ii) no Person has gained unauthorized access to any material Company
Technology.
Section
3.17. Insurance
Coverage. The Company has furnished to Parent a list of, and true and
complete copies of, all insurance policies and fidelity bonds relating to the
assets, business, operations, employees, officers or directors of the Company
and its Subsidiaries. Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect, there is no
claim by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company pending under any of such
policies or bonds as to which coverage has been questioned, denied or disputed
by the underwriters of such policies or bonds or in respect of which such
underwriters have reserved their rights. The Company and its Subsidiaries have
complied fully with the terms and conditions of all such policies and bonds.
Such policies of insurance and bonds (or other policies and bonds providing
substantially similar insurance coverage) have been in effect since December 31,
2004 and remain in full force and effect. The
Company
does not know of any threatened termination of, material premium increase with
respect to, or material alteration of coverage under, any of such policies or
bonds.
Section
3.18. Licenses and
Permits. (a) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have a Company
Material Adverse Effect, (i) the Company and its Subsidiaries have all material
licenses, franchises, permits, certificates, approvals or other similar
authorizations affecting, or relating in any way to, the assets or business of
the Company and its Subsidiaries necessary to conduct their business in the
manner in which it is currently conducted (collectively, including all FCC
Licenses and Foreign Permits, the “Permits”), (ii) the Permits
are valid and in full force and effect and have not been revoked, suspended,
canceled, rescinded or terminated and have not expired, (iii) neither the
Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company is in default under, and no condition
exists that with notice or lapse of time or both would constitute a default
under, the Permits and (iv) none of the Permits will be terminated or impaired
or become terminable, in whole or in part, as a result of the transactions
contemplated hereby. Schedule 3.18(a) lists all of the FCC Licenses held by the
Company and its Subsidiaries and describes all material pending applications
filed by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company with the FCC in connection
with the operation or planned operation of the business of the Company and its
Subsidiaries. Schedule 3.18(a) lists all FCC Consent Applications.
(b)
Except for restrictions or conditions that appear on the face of the FCC
Licenses or Foreign Permits, and except for restrictions or conditions that
pertain to the FCC Licenses under generally applicable rules of the FCC,
including those pertaining to satellite and common carrier radio licenses, and
except as set forth in Schedule 3.18(b), to the Company’s knowledge no FCC
License or Foreign Permit held by the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company
is subject to any restriction or condition which would limit the operation of
the Company’s and its Subsidiaries’ business as it is currently conducted.
Except as set forth in Schedule 3.18(b), no proceeding, inquiry, investigation
or other administrative action is pending or, to the Company’s knowledge,
threatened by or before the FCC or any applicable non-United States Governmental
Authority to revoke, suspend, cancel, rescind or modify any material FCC License
or Foreign Permit or otherwise impair in any material respect the operation of
the Company’s and its Subsidiaries’ business as it is currently conducted (other
than proceedings to amend the Communications Laws or proceedings of general
applicability to the satellite industry). No application, action or proceeding
is pending for the renewal of any FCC License or Foreign Permit as to which any
petition to deny or objection has been filed.
Section
3.19. Finders’
Fees. Except for Evercore Group LLC and Fieldstone Partners, Inc., whose
fees and expenses shall be paid only pursuant to the arrangements set forth on
Schedule 3.19 and will be paid by the Company, there is no investment banker,
broker, finder or other intermediary which has been retained by or is authorized
to act on behalf of any Seller, Member, Blocker Entity or the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company who might be entitled to any fee or commission in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction
Documents.
Section
3.20. Employees. Schedule
3.20 sets forth a true and complete list of the names, titles, annual salaries
and other compensation of all officers of the Company and its Subsidiaries and
all other employees of the Company and its Subsidiaries whose annual base salary
exceeds $300,000.
Section
3.21. Labor
Matters. (a) Except as would not reasonably be
expected to result in a material liability to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries, the Company and its Subsidiaries are in compliance with all Laws
respecting employment and employment practices, terms and conditions of
employment and wages and hours, and are not engaged in any unfair labor
practice. Except as would not reasonably be expected to result in a material
liability to the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, there is no unfair labor
practice complaint pending or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened
against the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company before the National Labor
Relations Board.
(b) (A)
neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has effectuated either (i) a
“plant closing” (as defined in the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification
Act (“WARN”)) affecting
any site of employment or one or more facilities or operating units within any
site of employment or facility of the Company or any Subsidiary thereof or (ii)
a “mass layoff” (as defined in WARN) affecting any site of employment or
facility of the Company or any Subsidiary thereof and (B) neither the Company
nor any of its Subsidiaries has been affected by any transaction or engaged in
layoffs or employment terminations sufficient in number to trigger application
of any similar law, rule or regulation, and none of the employees of the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries has suffered an “employment loss” (as defined in
WARN) during the six months prior to the date hereof.
(c) Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to or subject to, or is
currently negotiating in connection with entering into, any collective
bargaining agreement or other labor agreement with any union or labor
organization.
Section
3.22. Taxes.
Except as
would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse
Effect:
(a) The
Company and its Subsidiaries have each timely filed (or will timely file) all
returns, reports, statements and forms required to be filed under the Code or
applicable state, local or foreign Tax Laws (the “Tax Returns”) for taxable
years or periods ending on or before the Closing Date, and all Tax Returns when
filed were true, correct and complete in all respects;
(b) The
Company and its Subsidiaries have each timely paid (or will pay) all Taxes due
for such periods and has made adequate provision in accordance with GAAP for any
Taxes not yet due and payable;
(c) The
US federal and state income and franchise Tax Returns of the Company and its
Subsidiaries through the Tax year ended December 31, 2003 have each been
examined and closed or are Tax Returns with respect to which the applicable
period for assessment under Law, after giving effect to extensions or waivers,
has expired;
(d) No
Liens for Taxes other than Permitted Liens have been filed, and no claims or
adjustments are being asserted or threatened by a Governmental Authority in
writing with respect to any Taxes of the Company or its
Subsidiaries;
(e) Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is subject to any outstanding Tax audit,
inquiry or assessment (and no written notice of any such event has been
received);
(f) The
Company and its Subsidiaries have each complied with all Laws relating to the
payment and withholding of Taxes;
(g) There
has not been any Tax election or any change in any Tax election, change in
annual tax accounting period, adoption of, or change in, any method of tax
accounting, amendment of any Tax Return, filing of a claim for any Tax refund,
entering into of any closing agreement, settlement of any Tax claim, audit or
assessment, or surrender of any right to claim a Tax refund, offset or other
reduction in Tax liability with respect to the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries since the Balance Sheet Date;
(h) There
are no outstanding waivers or comparable consents regarding the application of
the statute of limitations with respect to any Taxes or Tax Returns of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, nor any agreement to any extension of time
with respect to a Tax assessment or deficiency, and no such waivers, consents or
agreements have been requested;
(i) Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a party to any agreement or
arrangement with any Tax Authority or any other Person with regard to Taxes,
including any contract providing for the allocation or sharing of
Taxes;
(j) Neither
the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries has entered into, engaged in or
participated in any “reportable transaction” as described in Section 1.6011-4(b)
of the Treasury Regulations (or any similar provision of applicable state or
local law);
(k) No
claim has been received from a Tax Authority in a jurisdiction where the Company
or any of its Subsidiaries, as the case may be, does not file Tax Returns with
respect to a particular type of Tax that the Company or any of its Subsidiaries,
as the case may be, may be subject to, or liable for, that particular type of
Tax in that jurisdiction. Schedule 3.22(k) contains a list of all jurisdictions
(whether foreign or domestic) to which any Tax is properly payable or any Tax
Return is filed, by or on behalf of the Company or any of its
Subsidiaries;
(l) The
Company and its Subsidiaries (other than the Subsidiaries listed on Schedule
3.22(l)) are (and have been since the date of its formation) properly classified
as a partnership or a disregarded entity for U.S. federal, state and local
income Tax purposes; and
(m) Neither the Company nor any
related person within the meaning of Section 197(f)(9) of the Code has
held or used, at any time on or prior to August 10, 1993, any Section
197 intangible
described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of Section 197(d)(1) of the
Code.
Section 3.23. Employee
Plans. (a) Schedule
3.23(a) contains a correct and complete list identifying each material “employee
benefit plan”, as defined in Section 3(3) of ERISA, each material employment,
severance or similar contract, plan, arrangement or policy and each other plan
or arrangement (written or oral) providing for compensation, bonuses, profit-
sharing, stock option or other stock related rights or other forms of incentive
or deferred compensation, vacation benefits, insurance (including any
self-insured arrangements), health or medical benefits, employee assistance
program, disability or sick leave benefits, workers’ compensation, supplemental
unemployment benefits, severance benefits and post-employment or retirement
benefits (including compensation, pension, health, medical or life insurance
benefits) which is maintained, administered or contributed to by the Company or
any ERISA Affiliate
thereof
and covers any employee or former employee of the Company or any Subsidiary of
the Company, or with respect to which the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company has any liability (excluding International Plans). Copies of such plans
(and, if applicable, related trust or funding agreements or insurance policies)
and all amendments thereto have been furnished to Parent together, to the extent
applicable, with the most recent annual report (Form 5500 including, if
applicable, Schedule B thereto) and tax return (Form 990) prepared in connection
with any such plan or trust. Such plans (excluding International Plans) are
referred to collectively herein as the “Employee Plans”.
(b) None
of the Company or any ERISA Affiliate thereof sponsors, maintains or contributes
to, or has in the past six years sponsored, maintained or contributed to, any
Employee Plan subject to Title IV of ERISA.
(c) None
of the Company or any ERISA Affiliate thereof contributes to, or has in the past
six years contributed to, any multiemployer plan, as defined in Section 3(37) of
ERISA.
(d) (i)
Each Employee Plan that is intended to be qualified under Section 401(a) of the
Code has received a favorable determination letter, or has pending or has time
remaining in which to file, an application for such determination from the
Internal Revenue Service, and to the Company’s knowledge, there is no reason why
any such determination letter should be revoked or not be reissued, (ii) each
Employee Plan has been maintained in material compliance with its terms and with
the requirements prescribed by any and all statutes, orders, rules and
regulations, including ERISA and the Code, which are applicable to such Employee
Plan, and (iii) no material events have occurred with respect to any Employee
Plan that would reasonably be expected to result in payment or assessment by or
against the Company of any material excise taxes under the Code.
(e) Except
as set forth in Schedule 3.23(e) or pursuant to an Employee Plan, neither the
Company nor any Subsidiary of the Company has any current or projected material
liability in respect of post-employment or post-retirement health or medical or
life insurance benefits for retired, former or current employees of the Company
or any Subsidiary of the Company, except as required to avoid excise tax under
Section 4980B of the Code.
(f) No
prohibited transaction as defined by Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the
Code, has occurred with respect to any Employee Plan, which transaction has or
will cause the Company or any of its Subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to incur
material liability under ERISA, the Code or otherwise, excluding transactions
effected pursuant to and in compliance with any statutory or administrative
exemption.
(g) No
Employee Plan that is an “employee welfare benefit plan” within the meaning of
Section 3(1) of ERISA, is funded by a trust or subject to Section 419 or 419A of
the Code.
(h) Each
Employee Plan that is subject to Section 409A of the Code has been operated in
good faith compliance with the requirements of Section 409A and the guidance
issued thereunder. Schedule 3.23(h) lists each Employee Plan that is an excess
benefit plan, as defined in Section 3(36) of ERISA.
(i) With
respect to each Employee Plan, there are no material restrictions on the ability
of the plan sponsor to amend or terminate such Employee Plan, and the sponsor
has expressly reserved in itself the right to amend, modify or terminate any
such Employee Plan.
(j) Except
as disclosed on Schedule 3.23(j), no payment made as a result of, or in
connection with, the transactions contemplated by this Agreement will fail to
qualify for a deduction as a result of Section 280G of the Code, or be subject
to tax under Section 4999 of the Code.
(k) Schedule
3.23(l) identifies each International Plan. The Company has furnished to Parent
copies of each International Plan. Each International Plan has been maintained
in substantial compliance with its terms and with the requirements prescribed by
any and all applicable statutes, orders, rules and regulations (including any
special provisions relating to qualified plans where such Plan was intended to
so qualify) and has been maintained in good standing with applicable
Governmental Authorities.
(l) For
purposes of this Agreement, “International Plan” means any
material employee benefit plan, program or arrangement presently maintained, or
contributed to, by the Company or any ERISA Affiliate thereof, for the benefit
of any current or former employee thereof, including any such plan required to
be maintained or contributed to by any applicable law, rule or regulation of the
relevant jurisdiction, which would be an Employee Plan but for the fact that
such plan is maintained outside the jurisdiction of the United States. For the
avoidance of doubt, no plan maintained or administered by a Governmental
Authority shall constitute an International Plan.
(m) Except
as set forth on Schedule 3.23(m), no employee or former employee of the Company
or any Subsidiary of the Company will become entitled to any material bonus,
retirement, severance or job security or similar benefit, or the enhancement of
any such benefit (including acceleration of vesting or exercise of an incentive
award), as a result of the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
(n) There
are no outstanding loans or other extensions of credit made by the Company or
any of its Subsidiaries to any executive officer (as defined in Rule 3b-7 under
the 1934 Act) or director of the Company that would be prohibited under the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
(o) There
is no action, suit, investigation, audit or proceeding pending against or
involving or, to the knowledge of the Company, threatened against or involving
any Employee Plan before any arbitrator or any Governmental Authority that would
reasonably be expected to result in a material liability to the Company or any
of its Subsidiaries.
Section
3.24. Environmental
Matters. (a) Except as would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse
Effect:
(i) no
written notice, notification, demand, complaint, request for information,
citation, summons or order has been received, no penalty has been assessed and
no action, claim, suit, proceeding or review is pending, or to the Company’s
knowledge, threatened by any Governmental Authority or other Person with respect
to any matters relating to the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company and
relating to or
arising out of any Environmental Law or relating to the actual or alleged
exposure to a Hazardous Substance.
(ii) The
Company and its Subsidiaries are and have been in compliance with all
Environmental Laws and have obtained and are in compliance with all
Environmental Permits; such Environmental Permits are valid and in full force
and effect and will not be terminated or impaired or become terminable, in whole
or in part, as a result of the transactions contemplated hereby.
(iii) No
Hazardous Substance has been discharged, disposed of, dumped, injected, pumped,
deposited, spilled, leaked, emitted or released at, on, to, from or under any
property now or previously owned, leased or operated by the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company or any predecessor of the Company or any Subsidiary of
the Company (including Iridium LLC) in a manner that would result in liability
under any Environmental Law.
(b) There
has been no material written environmental investigation, study, audit, test,
review or other written environmental analysis conducted of which the Company
has possession or control in relation to any material portion of the current or
prior business of the Company or any Subsidiary of the Company or any material
property or facility now or previously owned, leased or operated by the Company
or any Subsidiary of the Company which has not been delivered or otherwise made
available to Parent prior to the date hereof.
Section
3.25. Disclosure
Documents. The information provided by the Company for inclusion in the
Parent Proxy Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto will not, at the
time the Parent Proxy Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto is first
mailed to stockholders of Parent and at the time the stockholders vote on
adoption of this Agreement, contain any statement which, at the time and in
light of the circumstances under which it is made, is false or misleading with
respect to any material fact, or omit to state any material fact necessary in
order to make the statements therein not false or misleading.
ARTICLE
4
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF SELLERS
Except as
set forth in the disclosure schedule (with reference to the section or
subsection of this Agreement to which the information stated in such disclosure
schedule relates; provided that any fact,
matter or condition disclosed in any section or subsection of such disclosure
schedule in such a way as to make its relevance to another section or subsection
of such disclosure schedule that relates to a representation or representations
made elsewhere in Article 4 of this Agreement reasonably apparent shall be
deemed to be an exception to such representation or representations
notwithstanding the omission of a reference or cross reference thereto)
delivered by the applicable Seller to Parent prior to the execution of this
Agreement (as applicable, the “Seller Disclosure Schedule”),
each Seller, severally and not jointly, represents and warrants to Parent as of
the date hereof and as of the Closing Date solely with respect to such Seller to
Parent that:
Section
4.01. Existence and
Power. If such Seller is not an individual, such Seller is
duly organized and validly existing under the Laws of its jurisdiction of
organization.
Section
4.02. Authorization. The
execution, delivery and performance by such Seller (if not an individual) of
this Agreement, the other Transaction Documents to which it is party and the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby are within such
Seller’s powers and have been duly authorized by all necessary action on the
part of such Seller. If such Seller is an individual, the execution, delivery
and performance by such Seller of this Agreement, the other Transaction
Documents to which it is party and the consummation of the transactions
contemplated hereby and thereby requires no spousal consent. This Agreement and
the other Transaction Documents to which such Seller is a party constitutes, and
will constitute when executed by such Seller, assuming the due authorization,
execution and delivery hereof and thereof by the other parties hereto and
thereto, valid and binding agreements of such Seller.
Section
4.03. Noncontravention. The
execution, delivery and performance by such Seller of this Agreement, the other
Transaction Documents to which it is party and the consummation of the
transactions contemplated hereby and thereby do not and will not (i) violate the
organizational documents of such Seller (if not an individual) or any Blocker
Entity in which such Seller owns any Blocker Shares, (ii) subject to the Company
obtaining any required consents or approvals from Governmental Authorities as
set forth in Section 3.03, violate any Law, (iii) with or without notice, lapse
of time, or both, require any consent or other action by any Person under or
constitute a breach of or default under any provision of any agreement or other
instrument binding on such Seller or any Blocker Entity in which such Seller
owns any Blocker Shares or (iv) result in the creation or imposition of any Lien
on the Units of such Seller.
Section
4.04. Ownership of
Equity Interests. Such Seller is the record and beneficial owner of the
Equity Interests set forth opposite its name on Schedule 4.04, free and clear of
any Lien (including any restriction on the right to vote, sell or otherwise
dispose of such Equity Interests) other than restrictions under applicable
securities Laws and those restrictions contained in the Company LLC Agreement.
By execution of this Agreement, such Seller (i) hereby consents in all respects
to all of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, the Note Purchase
Agreement (including the amendment to the Company LLC Agreement contemplated
thereby) and the Convertible Note and hereby waives all restrictions contained
in the Company LLC Agreement or any other agreement to which such Seller is a
party pertaining thereto, (ii) hereby waives any preemptive rights under the
Company LLC Agreement with respect to the transactions contemplated by the Note
Purchase Agreement and the Convertible Note, and (iii) hereby agrees that such
Seller will cease to have any antidilution rights with respect to its Interests;
provided that clause
(iii) shall not apply to the Greenhill Noteholder. Except as set forth on
Schedule 4.04, none of such Equity Interests is subject to any voting trust or
other agreement or arrangement with respect to the voting thereof. Except for
Equity Interests listed on Schedule 4.04, such Seller does not own any other
Equity Interests.
Section
4.05. Litigation. There is
no action, suit, investigation or proceeding pending against, or to the
knowledge of such Seller threatened in writing against or affecting, such Seller
or any Blocker Entity in which such Seller owns any Blocker Shares, before any
court or arbitrator or any Governmental Authority or official which in any
manner challenges or
seeks to
prevent, enjoin, alter or materially delay the transactions contemplated by the
Transaction Documents.
Section
4.06. Finders’
Fees. Except as provided by Section 3.19 hereof, there is no investment
banker, broker, finder or other intermediary which has been retained by or is
authorized to act on behalf of such Seller or any Blocker Entity in which such
Seller owns any Blocker Shares who might be entitled to any fee or commission in
connection with the transactions contemplated by the Transaction
Documents.
Section
4.07. The Blocker
Entities.
(a) With
respect to each Blocker Entity in which such Seller owns any Blocker Shares,
such Blocker Entity is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing
under the laws of its jurisdiction of organization and has all powers and all
governmental licenses, authorizations, permits, consents and approvals required
to carry on its business as now conducted. Such Blocker Entity is duly qualified
to do business as a foreign corporation and is in good standing in each
jurisdiction where such qualification is necessary. Such Seller or such Blocker
Entity has heretofore delivered to Parent true and complete copies of the
organizational documents of such Blocker Entity as currently in
effect.
(b) With
respect to each Blocker Entity in which such Seller owns any Blocker
Shares:
(i) The
capitalization of such Blocker Entity consists of the Blocker Shares set forth
on Schedule 4.07(b)(i).
(ii) All
Blocker Shares have been duly authorized and validly issued and are fully
paid and non assessable. Except as set forth in this Section 4.07, there are no
outstanding (A) units of capital stock or voting securities of such Blocker
Entity, (B) securities of such Blocker Entity convertible into or exchangeable
for units of capital stock or voting securities of such Blocker Entity or (C)
options or other rights to acquire from such Blocker Entity, or other obligation
of such Blocker Entity to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for capital stock or voting
securities of such Blocker Entity (the items in Sections 4.07(b)(ii)(A),
4.07(b)(ii)(B)
and 4.07(b)(ii)(C) being referred to collectively as the “Blocker Entity Securities”). There are no
outstanding obligations of such Blocker Entity or any Subsidiary of such
Blocker Entity to repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any Blocker Entity
Securities.
(iii) Since
the date of its organization, such Blocker Entity has not engaged in any
activity other than the ownership of the Interests held by such Blocker
Entity.
(iv) Other
than the liabilities set forth on Schedule 4.07(b)(iv) and liabilities for Taxes
(representations and warranties with respect to Taxes being provided
exclusively
in Section 4.07(c)), there are no liabilities of such Blocker Entity of any kind
whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent, absolute, determined, determinable or
otherwise,
and there is no existing condition, situation or set of circumstances which
could result in such a liability.
(v) Such Blocker Entity has not violated,
and to the knowledge of such Seller, is not under investigation with
respect to and has not been threatened to be charged with or given notice of any
violation of, any Law.
(c) With
respect to Taxes of each Blocker Entity in which such Seller owns any Blocker
Shares, except as set forth in Section 4.07(c) of such Blocker Entity Disclosure
Schedule:
(i) Such
Blocker Entity has timely filed (or will timely file) all material Tax Returns
for taxable years or periods ending on or before the Closing Date, and all Tax
Returns when filed were true, correct and complete in all material
respects;
(ii) Syncom
Blocker has timely paid (or will timely pay) all of its Taxes (including
estimated Tax payments) for all Pre-Closing Tax Periods;
(iii) Baralonco
Blocker has timely paid (or will timely pay) all of its Taxes (including
estimated Tax payments) for all Pre-Closing Tax Periods (taking into account Tax
withholding amounts withheld by the Company);
(iv) The
income and franchise Tax Returns of such Blocker Entity through the Tax year
ended December 31, 2003 have each been examined and closed or are Tax Returns
with respect to which the applicable period for assessment under Law of
underpayments of Tax for such years, after giving effect to extensions or
waivers, has expired;
(v) No
Liens for Taxes other than Permitted Liens have been filed, and no material
claims or adjustments are being asserted or threatened by a Governmental
Authority in writing with respect to any Taxes of such Blocker
Entity;
(vi) Such
Blocker Entity is not subject to any material outstanding Tax audit, inquiry or
assessment (and no written notice of any such event has been
received);
(vii) Such
Blocker Entity has materially complied with all Laws relating to the payment and
withholding of Taxes;
(viii) There
has not been any material Tax election or any change in any material Tax
election, change in annual tax accounting period, adoption of, or change in, any
method of tax accounting, amendment of any Tax Return, filing of a claim for any
material Tax refund, entering into of any material closing agreement, settlement
of any material Tax claim, audit or assessment, or surrender of any right to
claim a material Tax refund, offset or other reduction in Tax liability since
the Balance Sheet Date;
(ix) There
are no outstanding waivers or comparable consents regarding the application of
the statute of limitations with respect to any Taxes or Tax Returns of such
Blocker Entity, nor any agreement to any extension of time with respect to a
Tax
assessment
or deficiency, and no such waivers, consents or agreements have been
requested;
(x) Such
Blocker Entity is not a party to any agreement or arrangement with any Tax
Authority or any other Person with regard to Taxes, including, any contract
providing for the allocation or sharing of Taxes;
(xi) Such
Blocker Entity has not entered into, engaged in or participated in any
“reportable transaction” as described in Section 1.6011-4(b) of the Treasury
Regulations (or any similar provision of applicable state or local
law);
(xii) No
material claim has been received from a Tax Authority in a jurisdiction where
such Blocker Entity does not file Tax Returns with respect to a particular type
of Tax that such Blocker Entity may be subject to, or liable for, that
particular type of Tax in that jurisdiction. Schedule 4.07(c) contains a list of
all jurisdictions (whether foreign or domestic) to which any Tax is properly
payable or any Tax Return is filed, by or on behalf of such Blocker Entity;
and
(xiii) Such
Blocker Entity is (and has been since the date of its formation) properly
classified for U.S. federal, state and local income Tax purposes (x) in the case
of Syncom Blocker, as a domestic corporation and (y) in the case of Baralonco
Blocker, as a foreign corporation.
Section
4.08. Purchase for
Investment. Such Seller (as a Stock Buyer) is purchasing the Purchased
Shares for investment for its own account and not with a view to, or for sale in
connection with, any distribution thereof. Such Stock Buyer (either alone or
together with its advisors) has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial
and business matters so as to be capable of evaluating the merits and risks of
its investment in the Purchased Shares and is capable of bearing the economic
risks of such investment. Such Stock Buyer acknowledges that it has not relied
upon any express or implied representations or warranties of any nature made by
or on behalf of or imputed to Parent, except as expressly set forth in this
Agreement.
Section
4.09. 1933 Act
Compliance.
(a) Such
Seller (as a Stock Buyer) is an “accredited investor” within the meaning of
Regulation D under the 1933 Act.
(b) Such
Stock Buyer acknowledges that the Purchased Shares have not been registered
under the 1933 Act and may not be offered or sold except in accordance with the
registration requirements of the 1933 Act or pursuant to an exemption from the
registration requirements of the 1933 Act. Accordingly, such Stock Buyer
represents and agrees that (i) it will sell the Purchased Shares only in
accordance with the registration requirements under the 1933 Act, pursuant to
Rule 144 under the 1933 Act (if available) or in offshore transactions pursuant
to Regulation S under the 1933 Act and (ii) it has not and will not engage in
any hedging transactions with regard to any Purchased Shares except in
compliance with the 1933 Act. Such Stock Buyer acknowledges that the Purchased
Shares will bear a legend to the effect set forth in Section 8.12 and that
Parent will be required by the terms of this Agreement to refuse
to
register any transfers of such Purchased Shares not made in accordance with this
provision. Such Stock Buyer further acknowledges that, except as
required under the Registration Rights Agreement, Parent is not required to file
a registration statement to permit sales of the Purchased Shares on a registered
basis.
ARTICLE
5
REPRESENTATIONS
AND WARRANTIES OF PARENT
Except as
disclosed in the Parent SEC Documents filed before the date of this Agreement,
and except as set forth in the disclosure schedule (with reference to the
section or subsection of this Agreement to which the information stated in such
disclosure schedule relates; provided that any fact, matter or condition
disclosed in any section or subsection of such disclosure schedule in such a way
as to make its relevance to another section or subsection of such disclosure
schedule that relates to a representation or representations made elsewhere in
Article 5 of this Agreement reasonably apparent shall be deemed to be an
exception to such representation or representations notwithstanding the omission
of a reference or cross reference thereto) delivered by Parent to the Company
prior to the execution of this Agreement (the “Parent Disclosure Schedule”),
Parent represents and warrants to the Company and the Sellers as of the date
hereof and as of the Closing Date that:
Section
5.01. Corporate
Existence and Power. Parent is duly incorporated, validly existing and in
good standing under the laws of Delaware and has all powers and all governmental
licenses, authorizations, permits, consents and approvals required to carry on
its business as now conducted, except for those licenses, authorizations,
permits, consents and approvals the absence of which would not have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect. Parent has
heretofore delivered to the Company true and complete copies of its certificate
of incorporation and bylaws as currently in effect (the “Organizational Documents”). Parent is not,
and has not been, in violation of any of the provisions of its Organizational
Documents. The transaction contemplated by this Agreement, when and if
consummated, will constitute an “Initial Business Combination”
within the meaning of Parent’s Organizational Documents and the Parent’s
Organizational Documents do not obligate Parent to liquidate or dissolve prior
to February 14, 2010 as a result of Parent’s execution and delivery of this
Agreement.
Section
5.02. Authorization. (a)
The execution, delivery and performance by Parent of this Agreement and the
other Transaction Documents to which it is a party and the consummation by
Parent of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby are within the
corporate powers of Parent and, except for the Parent Stockholder Approval, have
been duly authorized by all necessary corporate action. This Agreement and the
other Transaction Documents to which Parent is a party constitutes, and will
constitute when executed by Parent, assuming the due authorization, execution
and delivery hereof and thereof by the other parties hereto and thereto, valid
and binding agreements of Parent.
(b) (i)
The affirmative vote of a majority of the IPO Shares voted at a duly held
stockholders meeting (the “Parent Stockholder Meeting”) to approve the Initial
Business Combination contemplated by this Agreement and (ii) the affirmative
vote of the holders of a
majority
of the outstanding shares of Parent Stock (x) to amend the Parent Certificate of
Incorporation in the form attached hereto as Exhibit B, (y) to adopt the Parent
Plan, and (z) to 32 approve the issuance of Parent Stock contemplated by this
Agreement are the only votes of any of Parent’s capital stock necessary in
connection with the consummation of the Closing; provided that holders of less
than 30% of the IPO Shares vote against the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and exercise their rights to convert their IPO
Shares into cash from the Trust Account in accordance with the provisions of
paragraph C of Article Sixth of Parent Certificate of Incorporation (the “Parent Stockholder Approval”).
This Agreement constitutes a valid and binding agreement of Parent.
(c) At
a meeting duly called and held, Parent’s Board of Directors (including any
required committee or subgroup of the Parent’s Board of Directors) has (i)
determined that this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby are fair
to and in the best interests of Parent’s stockholders, (ii) approved and adopted
this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby, (iii) determined that
the fair market value of the Company is equal to at least 80% of the balance in
the Trust Account excluding Deferred Underwriting Compensation (as defined in
the Parent Certificate of Incorporation) and (iv) resolved to recommend to
stockholders adoption of this Agreement, the approval of the issuance of shares
of Parent Stock hereunder, the transactions contemplated hereby, and the
amendment to the Parent Certificate of Incorporation in the form attached hereto
as Exhibit B (such recommendation, the “Parent Board
Recommendation”).
Section
5.03. Governmental
Authorization. The execution, delivery and performance by Parent of this
Agreement and the other Transaction Documents to which it is a party and the
consummation by Parent of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby
require no action by or in respect of, or filing with, any Governmental
Authority, other than (i) compliance with any applicable requirements of the HSR
Act, (ii) FCC Consent with respect to the FCC Consent Application, (iii)
compliance with any applicable requirements of the 1933 Act, the 1934 Act and
any other U.S. state or federal securities laws, (iv) any notices required to be
given to U.S. security agencies under network security understandings, (v) the
consents and approvals set forth on Schedule 5.03 and (vi) such actions or
filings, if not made, would not, individually or in the aggregate, reasonably be
expected to have a Parent Material Effect.
Section
5.04. Non-contravention.
The execution, delivery and performance by Parent of this Agreement and the
other Transaction Documents to which it is a party and the consummation by
Parent of the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby do not and will not
(i) contravene, conflict with, or result in any violation or breach of any
provision of the certificate of incorporation or bylaws of Parent, (ii) assuming
compliance with the matters referred to in Section 5.03, contravene, conflict
with or result in a violation or breach of any provision of any Law, (iii)
assuming compliance with the matters referred to in Section 5.03, require any
consent or other action by any Person under, constitute a default, or an event
that, with or without notice or lapse of time or both, could become a default,
under, or cause or permit the termination, cancellation, acceleration or other
change of any right or obligation or the loss of any benefit to which Parent is
entitled under any provision of any agreement or other instrument binding upon
Parent or any license, franchise, permit, certificate, approval or other similar
authorization affecting, or relating in any way to, the assets or business of
the Parent or (iv) result in the creation or imposition of any Lien on any asset
of the Parent, except for such
contraventions,
conflicts and violations referred to in clause (ii) and for such failures to
obtain any such consent or other action, defaults, terminations, cancellations,
accelerations, changes, losses or Liens referred to in clauses (iii) and (iv)
that would not be reasonably expected to have, individually or in the aggregate,
a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section
5.05. Capitalization. (a)
The authorized capital stock of Parent consists of (i) 200,000,000 shares of
Parent Stock and (ii) 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per
share. As of the date of this Agreement, there were outstanding 48,500,000
shares of Parent Stock, no shares of preferred stock, 56,500,000 warrants
entitling the holder to purchase one share of Parent Stock per warrant (each, a
“Parent Warrant”), and
no employee stock options to purchase Parent Stock. All outstanding shares of
capital stock of Parent have been duly authorized, validly issued, are fully
paid and nonassessable, and were not issued in violation of any preemptive or
other similar right.
(b) Except
as set forth in this Section 5.05, there are no outstanding (i) shares of
capital stock or voting securities of Parent, (ii) securities of Parent
convertible into or exchangeable for shares of capital stock or voting
securities of Parent or (iii) options or other rights to acquire from Parent or
other obligation of Parent to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for capital stock or voting
securities of Parent. There are no outstanding obligations of Parent to
repurchase, redeem or otherwise acquire any of the securities referred to in
clause (i), (ii) or (iii) above, other than obligations that may arise if Parent
is required to pay cash from the Trust Account to stockholders who elect to have
their shares so converted in accordance with the provisions of paragraph C of
Article Sixth of Parent Certificate of Incorporation.
(c) Parent
Stock is quoted on the American Stock Exchange. There is no action or proceeding
pending or, to Parent’s knowledge, threatened against Parent by the American
Stock Exchange with respect to any intention by such entity to prohibit or
terminate the quotation of such securities thereon.
(d) The
shares of Parent Stock to be issued as part of the Aggregate Consideration have
been duly authorized and, when issued and delivered in accordance with the terms
of this Agreement, will have been validly issued and will be fully paid and
nonassessable and the issuance thereof is not subject to any preemptive or other
similar right.
(e) All
of the outstanding Parent Stock and Parent Warrants have been issued in
compliance in all material respects with all requirements of Laws applicable to
the Parent, Parent Stock and Parent Warrants.
(f) Except
as contemplated by the Transaction Documents, there are no registration rights,
and there is no voting trust, proxy, rights plan, anti-takeover plan or other
understandings to which the Parent is a party or by which the Parent is bound
with respect to the Parent Stock and Parent Warrants.
(g) Except
as disclosed in Parent SEC Reports filed prior to the date of this Agreement or
as expressly contemplated by this Agreement, as a result of the consummation of
this transaction, no shares of capital stock, warrants, options or other
securities of Parent are
issuable
and no rights in connection with any shares, warrants, rights, options or other
securities or Parent accelerate or otherwise become triggered (whether as to
vesting, exercisability, convertibility or otherwise).
Section 5.06. No
Subsidiaries. Parent has no Subsidiaries.
Section 5.07. SEC Filings and the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act. (a) As of its filing date, each Parent SEC
Document complied, and each such Parent SEC Document filed subsequent to
the date hereof will comply, as to form in all material respects with the
applicable requirements of the 1933 Act and 1934 Act, as the case may
be.
(b) As
of its filing date, each Parent SEC Document filed pursuant to the 1934 Act did
not, and each such Parent SEC Document filed subsequent to the date hereof will
not, contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any
material fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the
light of the circumstances under which they were made, not
misleading.
(c) Each
Parent SEC Document that is a registration statement, as amended or
supplemented, if applicable, filed pursuant to the 1933 Act, as of the date such
registration statement or amendment became effective, did not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not
misleading.
(d) Parent
has established and maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15 under the 1934 Act). Such disclosure controls and procedures are
designed to ensure that material information relating to Parent is made known to
Parent’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer,
particularly during the periods in which the periodic reports required under the
1934 Act are being prepared. Such disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in timely alerting Parent’s principal executive officer and principal
financial officer to material information required to be included in Parent’s
periodic reports required under the 1934 Act.
(e) Parent
has established and maintained a system of internal controls. Such internal
controls are sufficient to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of Parent’s financial reporting and the preparation of Parent
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
(f) There are no outstanding loans or
other extensions of credit made by Parent to any executive officer (as
defined in Rule 3b-7 under the 1934 Act) or director of Parent. Parent has not
taken any action prohibited by Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act.
Section
5.08. Financial
Statements. The audited consolidated statements and unaudited condensed
interim financial statements of Parent included in the Parent SEC Filings fairly
present, in conformity with GAAP applied on a consistent basis (except as may be
indicated in the notes thereto), the financial position of Parent as of the
dates thereof and their results of operations and cash flows for the periods
then ended (subject to normal year-end adjustments in the case of any unaudited
interim financial statements).
Section
5.09. Disclosure
Documents. The proxy of Parent to be filed with the SEC in
connection with the transactions contemplated hereby (the “Parent Proxy Statement”) and any amendments
or supplements thereto will, when filed, comply as to form in all material respects
with the applicable requirements of the 1934 Act. At the time the Parent Proxy
Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto is first mailed to stockholders
of Parent, and at the time such stockholders vote on adoption of this Agreement,
the Parent Proxy Statement, as supplemented or amended, if applicable, will not
contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material
fact necessary in order to make the statements made therein, in the light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading. The representations
and warranties contained in this Section 5.09 will not apply to statements or
omissions in the Parent Proxy Statement or any amendment or supplement thereto
based upon information furnished to Parent by the Sellers or the Company
specifically for use therein.
Section
5.10. Absence of
Certain Changes. Since Parent Balance Sheet Date, the business of Parent
has been conducted in the ordinary course consistent with past practice, and
there has not been:
(a) any
event, occurrence, development or state of circumstances or facts that has had
or would reasonably be expected to have, individually or in the aggregate, a
Parent Material Adverse Effect;
(b) any
declaration, setting aside or payment of any dividend or other distribution with
respect to any shares of capital stock of Parent, or any repurchase, redemption
or other acquisition by Parent of any outstanding shares of capital stock or
other securities of, or other ownership interests in, Parent; and
(c) any
change in any method of accounting or accounting practice by Parent, except for
any such change required by reason of a concurrent change in GAAP or Regulation
S-X under the 1934 Act.
Section
5.11. No Undisclosed
Material Liabilities. There are no liabilities or obligations of Parent
of any kind whatsoever, whether accrued, contingent, absolute, determined,
determinable or otherwise, and there is no existing condition, situation or set
of circumstances that would reasonably be expected to result in such a
liability, other than:
(a) liabilities
or obligations disclosed and provided for in the Parent Balance Sheet or in the
notes thereto or in the Parent SEC Documents filed prior to the date hereof;
and
(b) other
undisclosed liabilities which are, individually or in the aggregate not material
to Parent.
Section
5.12. Compliance with
Laws and Court Orders. Parent has not violated, and to the knowledge of
Parent is not under investigation with respect to and has not been threatened to
be charged with or given notice of any violation of, any Law, except for
violations that have not had and would not reasonably be expected to have,
individually or in the aggregate, a Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section
5.13. Litigation. There
is no material action, suit, investigation or proceeding pending against, or to
the knowledge of Parent, threatened against or affecting, Parent or any of its
properties before any arbitrator or any Governmental Authority.
Section
5.14. Finders’
Fees. There is no investment banker, broker, finder or other intermediary
that has been retained by or is authorized to act on behalf of Parent who might
be entitled to any fee or commission from Parent, Sellers or any of their
respective Affiliates upon consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement.
Section
5.15. Trust
Account. (a) As of the date hereof and at the Closing Date (without
giving effect to the transactions contemplated hereby), Parent has and will have
no less than $400,000,000 invested in United States Government securities or in
money market funds meeting certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 promulgated under
the Investment Company Act of 1940 in the Trust Account, less such amounts, if
any, as Parent is required to pay to stockholders who elect to have their shares
converted to cash in accordance with the provisions of paragraph C of Article
Sixth of Parent Certificate of Incorporation.
(b)
Effective as of the Closing Date, the obligations of Parent to dissolve or
liquidate within the specified time period contained in the Parent Certificate
of Incorporation will terminate, and effective as of the Closing Date Parent
shall have no obligation whatsoever to dissolve and liquidate the assets of
Parent by reason of the consummation of the Closing, and following the Closing
Date no Public Stockholder shall be entitled to receive any amount from the
Trust Account except to the extent such Public Stockholder voted against the
consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby and exercised its
conversion rights in accordance with the terms of paragraph C of Article Sixth
of Parent Certificate of Incorporation.
Section
5.16. Transactions
with Affiliates. There are no contracts, agreements or transactions
between Parent and any other Person of a type that would be required to be
disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the 1933 Act and the 1934 Act
and no loans by Parent to any of its employees, officers or directors, or any of
its Affiliates.
Section
5.17. Taxes.
Except as set forth in Schedule 5.17:
(a) Parent
has timely filed all material Tax Returns for taxable years or periods ending on
or before the Closing Date, and all Tax Returns when filed were true, correct
and complete in all material respects;
(b) Parent
has timely paid (or will pay) all material Taxes due for such periods and has
made adequate provision in accordance with GAAP for any Taxes not yet due and
payable;
(c) None
of the income and franchise Tax Returns of Parent have been examined and closed
or are Tax Returns with respect to which the applicable period for assessment
under Law, after giving effect to extensions or waivers, has
expired;
(d) No
Liens for Taxes other than Permitted Liens have been filed, and no material
claims or adjustments are being asserted or threatened by a Governmental
Authority in writing with respect to any Taxes of Parent;
(e) Parent
is not subject to any material outstanding Tax audit, inquiry or assessment (and
no written notice of any such event has been received);
(f) Parent
has materially complied with all Laws relating to the payment and withholding of
Taxes;
(g) There
has not been any material Tax election or any change in any material Tax
election, change in annual tax accounting period, adoption of, or change in, any
method of tax accounting, amendment of any Tax Return, filing of a claim for any
material Tax refund, entering into of any material closing agreement, settlement
of any material Tax claim, audit or assessment, or surrender of any right to
claim a material Tax refund, offset or other reduction in Tax liability with
respect to the Parent since the Balance Sheet Date;
(h) There
are no outstanding waivers or comparable consents regarding the application of
the statute of limitations with respect to any Taxes or Tax Returns of Parent,
nor any agreement to any extension of time with respect to a Tax assessment or
deficiency, and no such waivers, consents or agreements have been
requested;
(i) Parent
is not a party to any agreement or arrangement with any Tax Authority or any
other Person with regard to Taxes, including any contract providing for the
allocation or sharing of Taxes;
(j) Parent
has not entered into, engaged in or participated in any “reportable transaction”
as described in Section 1.6011 4(b) of the Treasury Regulations;
and
(k) No
material claim has been received from a Tax Authority in a jurisdiction where
Parent does not file Tax Returns with respect to a particular type of Tax that
Parent may be subject to, or liable for, that particular type of Tax in that
jurisdiction. Schedule 5.17(k) contains a list of all jurisdictions (whether
foreign or domestic) to which any Tax is properly payable or any Tax Return is
filed by or on behalf of Parent.
Section
5.18. Contracts.
(a) There
are no contracts, agreements or obligations of any kind, whether written or
oral, to which Parent is a party or by or to which any of the properties or
assets of Parent may be bound, subject or affected without penalty or cost,
which either (i) creates or imposes a liability greater than $50,000 or (ii) may
not be cancelled without liability by Parent on thirty (30) days’ or less prior
notice (the “Parent
Contracts”). All Parent Contracts are listed in Schedule 5.18(a) other
than the Transaction Documents and those that are exhibits to the Parent SEC
Documents filed prior to the date of this Agreement. True, correct and complete
copies of all Parent Contracts have been heretofore made available to the
Company.
(b) Neither
Parent, nor any other party thereto is in breach in any respect of or in default
under, and, to the knowledge of Parent, no event has occurred which with notice
or lapse of time or both would become a breach of or default under, any Parent
Contract, in each case, except as would not reasonably be expected to have a
Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section
5.19. Employees. There
are no employees of Parent. Schedule 5.19 sets forth a true and
complete list of the names, titles, annual salaries and other compensation of
all officers of Parent.
Section
5.20. Employee
Matters.
(a) There
are no current activities to organize any employees of Parent into a collective
bargaining unit.
(b) Parent
does not and is not required to, and has not and has never been required to,
maintain, sponsor, contribute to, or administer any pension, retirement,
savings, money purchase, profit sharing, deferred compensation, medical, vision,
dental, hospitalization, prescription drug and other health plan, cafeteria,
flexible benefits, short-term and long-term disability, accident and life
insurance plan, bonus, stock option, stock purchase, stock appreciation, phantom
stock, incentive and special compensation plan or any other employee or fringe
benefit plan, program or contract and does not have any liability of any kind
with respect to any of the foregoing (under ERISA or otherwise). Parent does not
have any contract, plan or commitment, whether or not legally binding, to create
any of the foregoing other than as contemplated by this Agreement. Neither
Parent nor any of its ERISA Affiliates has, during any time in the six-year
period preceding the Closing Date, contributed to, sponsored, maintained or
administered any "employee pension benefit plan" within the meaning of Section
3(2) of ERISA that is or was subject to Title IV of ERISA or Section 412 of the
Code.
(c) The
execution and delivery of this Agreement and the other Transaction Documents and
the consummation of the transaction will not (i) result in any payment
(including severance, unemployment compensation, golden parachute, bonus or
otherwise) becoming due to any stockholder, director or employee of Parent; or
(ii) result in the acceleration of the time of payment or vesting of any such
benefits.
Section
5.21. Qualification. Parent
is legally, financially and otherwise qualified under the Communications Laws to
own the Company and its Subsidiaries and to perform its obligations hereunder.
To Parent’s knowledge, there are no facts or circumstances relating to Parent
that would, under the Communications Laws, disqualify Parent as the transferee
of the FCC Licenses or the owner of the Company and its Subsidiaries. Except as
set forth in Schedule 5.21, no waiver of or exemption from any provision of the
Communications Laws is necessary for FCC Consent to be obtained. To Parent’s
knowledge, there are no facts or circumstances relating to Parent that might
reasonably be expected to result in the FCC’s refusal to grant FCC Consent.
Parent is legally, financially and otherwise qualified under all applicable Laws
to own all Subsidiaries of the Company that are party to contracts with a
Governmental Authority. To Parent’s knowledge, there are no facts or
circumstances relating to Parent that would, under applicable Law, disqualify
Parent from owning any Subsidiary of the Company that is party to any contract
with a Governmental Authority, that operates under U.S. government security
clearances or that is registered under ITAR.
ARTICLE
6
COVENANTS
OF THE COMPANY AND SELLERS
Section
6.01. Conduct of the
Company and Each Blocker Entity. From the date hereof until
the Closing Date, (x) the Company shall and shall cause each of its Subsidiaries
to, conduct its business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice
and use its reasonable best efforts to (i) preserve intact its present business
organization; (ii) maintain in effect all of its Permits, including the FCC
Licenses and the Foreign Permits; (iii) keep available the services of its
directors, officers and key employees; (iv) maintain satisfactory relationships
with its customers, lenders, suppliers and others having material business
relationships with it; (v) manage its working capital (including the timing of
collection of accounts receivable and of the payment of accounts payable) in the
ordinary course of business consistent with past practice; (vi) promptly execute
any necessary applications for renewal of FCC Licenses and Foreign Permits
necessary for the operation of the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries
as presently conducted and use reasonable efforts to cooperate with Parent in
any other respect as Parent may reasonably request in order to enhance, protect,
preserve or maintain the FCC Licenses, Foreign Permits or the business of the
Company and its Subsidiaries; (vii) timely file with the FCC and any applicable
non-United States Governmental Authority all required reports, and pay any
required annual or other regulatory fees, for the maintenance of the FCC
Licenses and the Foreign Permits and the ongoing operation of the Company’s and
its Subsidiaries’ business as presently conducted; (viii) deliver to Parent,
within ten (10) Business Days after filing, copies of any reports, applications
or responses to the FCC or any non-United States Governmental Authority related
to the satellite assets owned by the Company and its Subsidiaries which are
filed during the period between the date hereof and the Closing Date; (ix)
operate and control the satellite assets owned by the Company and its
Subsidiaries in all material respects in the ordinary course of business and in
a manner consistent with past practices and otherwise in compliance in all
material respects with all applicable Laws, including the Communications Laws,
the FCC Licenses, the Foreign Permits and all other applicable Permits; and (x)
continue to make capital expenditures materially consistent with the 2008
Capex/R&D Budget attached as Schedule 6.01(i) (the “Capex/R&D Budget”) and (y)
each Blocker Entity will continue to conduct its business in the ordinary course
consistent with past practice and will not engage in any activity other than the
ownership of the Interests held by such Blocker Entity. Without limiting the
generality of the foregoing, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement
or in Schedule 6.01(ii), or with the prior written consent of Parent (which
shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed), the Company shall not and shall
not permit any of its Subsidiaries to, and, with respect to each Blocker Entity
in which a Seller owns any Blocker Shares, such Seller shall cause such Blocker
Entity not to:
(a) amend
its articles of incorporation, bylaws or other similar organizational documents
(whether by merger, consolidation or otherwise);
(b) split,
combine or reclassify any shares of capital stock of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company or of such Blocker Entity or declare, set aside or pay
any dividend or other distribution (whether in cash, stock or property or any
combination thereof) in respect of the capital stock of the Company or any
Subsidiary of the Company or of such Blocker Entity, or redeem, repurchase or
otherwise acquire or offer to redeem, repurchase, or otherwise acquire
any
Company
Securities or any Subsidiary Securities or securities of such Blocker Entity,
provided that the
Company may declare and pay distributions on the Interests of up to an aggregate
of $37,900,000 (each, a “Special Tax Distribution,” and collectively, the
“Special Tax Distributions”) (and each Blocker Entity may distribute such
Blocker Entity’s allocable portion of any Special Tax Distribution to the
Sellers that own such Blocker Entity), provided further that no
Special Tax Distribution shall be paid unless any required amendment of Exhibit
A hereto has been executed by the Sellers who are affected by such amendment
(without consent of Parent) prior to the declaration or payment of such Special
Tax Distribution, provided
further that each Blocker Entity may distribute any Cash Available for
Distribution at any time prior to the Closing;
(c) (i)
issue, deliver or sell, or authorize the issuance, delivery or sale of, any
shares of any Company Securities or Subsidiary Securities or securities of such
Blocker Entity, other than the issuance of any Subsidiary Securities to the
Company or any other Subsidiary of the Company or (ii) amend any term of any
Company Security or any Subsidiary Security or any security of such Blocker
Entity (in each case, whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise);
(d) acquire
(by merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock or assets or otherwise),
directly or indirectly, any material assets, securities, material properties or
businesses, other than in the ordinary course of business of the Company and its
Subsidiaries or of such Blocker Entity, as applicable, in each case in a manner
that is consistent with past practice;
(e) sell,
lease or otherwise transfer, or create or incur any Lien on, any material
assets, securities, material properties or businesses of the Company or any of
its Subsidiaries or of such Blocker Entity, as applicable, in each case other
than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice;
(f) make
any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other
Person, other than in the ordinary course of business consistent with past
practice;
(g) with
respect to the Company and its Subsidiaries, create, incur, assume, suffer to
exist or otherwise be liable with respect to any indebtedness for borrowed money
or guarantees thereof having an aggregate principal amount (together with all
other indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantees thereof of the Company and
its Subsidiaries) outstanding at any time greater than the sum of the Senior
Loan Facilities and the Convertible Note; and, with respect to such Blocker
Entity, create, incur, assume, suffer to exist or otherwise be liable with
respect to any indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantees
thereof;
(h) enter
into any hedging arrangements;
(i) enter
into any agreement or arrangement that limits or otherwise restricts in any
material respect the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, such Blocker Entity
or any of their respective Affiliates or any successor thereto or that would
reasonably be expected to, after the Closing Date, limit or restrict in any
material respect the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company, such Blocker
Entity, Parent or any of their respective Affiliates, from engaging or competing
in any line of business, in any location or with any Person or, except in the
ordinary
course of
business consistent with past practice, otherwise waive, release or assign any
material rights, claims or benefits of the Company, any of its Subsidiaries or
such Blocker Entity;
(j) except
as required by any pre-existing contractual obligation expressly disclosed in
the Company Disclosure Schedules, Law or any Employee Plan, (i) grant or
increase any severance or termination pay to (or amend any existing arrangement
with) any director or officer of the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or
such Blocker Entity, (ii) increase benefits payable under any existing severance
or termination pay policies or employment agreements in respect of any director
or officer of the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or such Blocker Entity,
(iii) enter into any employment, deferred compensation or other similar
agreement (or amend any such existing agreement) with any director or officer of
the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or such Blocker Entity, (iv)
establish, adopt or amend any collective bargaining, bonus, profit-sharing,
thrift, pension, retirement, deferred compensation, compensation, stock option,
restricted stock or other benefit plan or arrangement covering any director or
officer of the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or such Blocker Entity or
(v) increase material compensation, bonus or other benefits payable to any
director or officer of the Company, any Subsidiary of the Company or such
Blocker Entity, in each case other than in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice;
(k) change
the Company’s or such Blocker Entity’s methods of accounting, except as required
by concurrent changes in Law or GAAP;
(l) settle,
or offer or propose to settle, (i) any material litigation, investigation,
arbitration, proceeding or other claim involving or against the Company, any
Subsidiary of the Company or such Blocker Entity before any arbitrator or
Governmental Authority, (ii) any equityholder litigation against the Company,
such Blocker Entity or any of their current or former officers or directors
before any arbitrator or Governmental Authority or (iii) any litigation,
arbitration or proceeding that relates to the transactions contemplated hereby
before any arbitrator or Governmental Authority;
(m) make
or change any material Tax election, change any annual Tax accounting period,
adopt or change any method of Tax accounting, materially amend any Tax Returns
or file claims for material Tax refunds, enter any material closing agreement,
settle any material Tax claim, audit or assessment, or surrender any right to
claim a material Tax refund, offset or other reduction in Tax
liability;
(n) apply
to the FCC or any non-U.S. Governmental Authority for any license, construction
permit, authorization or any modification thereto that would materially restrict
the present operations of any satellite assets owned by the Company or its
Subsidiaries; or
(o) agree,
resolve or commit to do any of the foregoing.
Section
6.02. Access to
Information; Confidentiality. (a) From the date hereof until the earlier
of the Closing Date or the termination of this Agreement in accordance with
Article 11 and subject to applicable Law, (x) each Seller will (i) give, and
will cause each Blocker Entity in which it owns Blocker Shares, the Company and
each Subsidiary of the Company to give, Parent, its counsel, financial advisors,
auditors and other authorized
representatives
reasonable access during normal business hours, upon prior notice, to the
offices, properties, books and records of each Blocker Entity in which such
Seller owns Blocker Shares, the Company and the Company’s Subsidiaries, (ii)
furnish, and will cause each Subsidiary of the Company to furnish, to Parent,
its counsel, financial advisors, auditors and other authorized representatives
such financial and operating data and other information relating to each Blocker
Entity in which such Seller owns Blocker Shares, the Company or any Subsidiary
of the Company as such Persons may reasonably request and (iii) instruct the
employees, counsel and financial advisors of the Company or any Subsidiary of
the Company to cooperate with Parent in its investigation of each Blocker Entity
in which such Seller owns Blocker Shares, the Company or any Subsidiary of the
Company, and (y) Parent will (i) give the Company, its counsel, financial
advisors, auditors and other authorized representatives reasonable access during
normal business hours, upon prior notice, to the offices, properties, books and
records of Parent, (ii) furnish to the Company, its counsel, financial advisors,
auditors and other authorized representatives such financial and operating data
and other information relating to Parent as such Persons may reasonably request,
and (iii) instruct the employees, counsel and financial advisors of Parent to
cooperate with the Company in its investigation of Parent. Any investigation
pursuant to this Section shall be conducted in such manner as not to interfere
unreasonably with the conduct of the business of the Company and Parent, as
applicable. No investigation by any party hereto or other information received
by any party hereto shall operate as a waiver or otherwise affect any
representation, warranty or agreement given or made by any other party
hereunder. The confidentiality agreement between Parent and the Company dated as
of May 1, 2008 (the “Confidentiality Agreement”)
shall survive the termination of this Agreement in accordance with its terms. On
or prior to the Closing Date, each Seller of any Blocker Entity shall deliver to
Parent the minute books and all other books and records relating to such Blocker
Entity as reasonably requested by Parent.
(b) After
the Closing Date, each Seller and its Affiliates will hold, and will use its
reasonable best efforts to cause their respective officers, directors,
employees, accountants, counsel, consultants, advisors and agents to hold, in
confidence, unless compelled to disclose by judicial or administrative process
or by other requirements of Law, all confidential documents and information
concerning the Blocker Entities, the Company and the Company’s Subsidiaries,
except to the extent that such information can be shown to have been (i)
previously known on a non-confidential basis by such Seller, (ii) in the public
domain through no fault of such Seller or its Affiliates or (iii) later lawfully
acquired by such Seller from sources other than those related to its prior
ownership of Equity Interests. The obligation of each Seller and its Affiliates
to hold any such information in confidence shall be satisfied if they exercise
the same care with respect to such information as they would take to preserve
the confidentiality of their own similar information.
Section
6.03. Notices of
Certain Events. From the date hereof until the Closing Date each party
shall promptly notify the other parties in writing of any of the following with
respect to which such party obtains knowledge:
(a) any
written notice or other written communication from any Person alleging that the
consent of such Person is or may be required in connection with the transactions
contemplated by the Transaction Documents;
(b) any
notice or other communication from any Governmental Authority in connection with
the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Documents;
(c) any
event relating to the Company, Parent any of their respective Subsidiaries or
any of their respective Affiliates, officers or directors discovered by the
Company or Parent which should be set forth in a supplement to the Parent Proxy
Statement; and
(d) any
material actions, suits, claims, investigations or proceedings commenced or, to
its knowledge threatened against, relating to or involving or otherwise
affecting the Company or Parent or any Subsidiary of the Company before any
arbitrator or Governmental Authority.
No
information received by any party pursuant to this Section 6.03 or otherwise
shall operate as a waiver or otherwise affect any representation, warranty or
agreement given or made by any other party in this Agreement, and no such
information shall be deemed to change, supplement or amend the Schedules
hereto.
Section
6.04. No
Solicitation. (a) Each of the Company and the
Sellers will not, and will cause their respective Affiliates, employees, agents
and representatives not to directly or indirectly, solicit or enter into
discussions or transactions with, or encourage, or provide any information to,
any Person (other than Parent) concerning any merger, sale (directly or
indirectly) of their respective Interests or assets of the Company,
recapitalization or similar transaction. Each of the Company and the Sellers
will, and will cause their respective Affiliates, employees, agents and
representatives to, terminate any existing discussions with any Person (other
than Parent) concerning any such transaction.
(b) Parent
will not, and will cause its respective Affiliates, employees, agents and
representatives not to, directly or indirectly, solicit or enter into
discussions or transactions with, or encourage, or provide any information to,
any Person (other than the Company) concerning any Initial Business Combination
or similar transaction. The Parent will, and will cause its respective
Affiliates, employees, agents and representatives to, terminate any existing
discussions with any Person (other than the Company and the Sellers) concerning
any such transaction.
Section
6.05. Contribution Of
Carrier Holdings And Carrier Services. Sellers shall cause the
contribution of 100% of the issued and outstanding equity interests in Carrier
Holdings and Carrier Services to the Company to be effected at the Closing,
which contribution shall not result in any liability to the Company, any of
Subsidiaries or Parent or in the breach of any representations or warranties set
forth in Article 3 (the “Contribution”); provided that, to the extent
necessary, the Company has obtained any required consents or approvals from
Governmental Authorities as set forth in Section 3.03.
Section
6.06. Limited Powers
Of Attorney; Certificates for Equity Interests. Each Seller shall, no
later than 10 days following the date hereof, (x) execute and deliver to the
Sellers’ Committee a limited power of attorney substantially in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit C, which limited power of attorney shall not be
amended and shall remain in full force and effect until immediately after the
Closing Date and (y) deliver the certificates for the Equity Interests to the
Sellers’ Committee to be held by the Sellers’ Committee for the sole purpose
of
delivering
such certificates at Closing pursuant to the limited power of attorney delivered
by such Seller. The Sellers’ Committee shall promptly inform Parent of any
failure of any Seller to execute and deliver such limited power of attorney and
to deliver such certificates for Equity Interests within such 10-day
period.
Section
6.07. Costs And
Expenses. The Company shall, prior to or on the Closing Date, discharge
in full all costs and expenses incurred by it or any of its Subsidiaries in
connection with or relating to this Agreement, the other Transactions Documents
and the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, including fees and
expenses of investment bankers, counsel, accountants and other advisors and
consultants.
Section
6.08. Convertible
Note. If the Closing occurs after the first anniversary hereof, the
Greenhill Noteholder, as the holder of the Convertible Note, shall, upon
exercise of its conversion rights under the Convertible Note be considered a
Seller for all purposes hereunder and have the right at Closing to receive the
number of shares of Parent Stock set forth in Exhibit A hereto. If the Closing
occurs on or prior to the first anniversary hereof, then Parent shall enter into
an agreement with the Greenhill Noteholder, as the holder of the Convertible
Note, that shall entitle such holder to exchange the Units into which such
Convertible Note is convertible for a number of shares of Parent Stock upon the
first anniversary of the issuance of such Convertible Note at the ratio of
27.2866 of shares of Parent Stock per Unit. Parent agrees that all of the
provisions of Section 8 of the Convertible Note applicable to the Company shall
apply to Parent from the date hereof until the date of such
conversion.
ARTICLE
7
COVENANTS
OF PARENT
Parent
agrees that:
Section
7.01. Conduct of
Parent. From the date hereof until the Closing Date except as
expressly contemplated hereunder, Parent shall conduct its business in the
ordinary course consistent with past practice and shall use its reasonable best
efforts to (i) preserve intact its present business organization, (ii) maintain
in effect all of its foreign, federal, state and local licenses, permits,
consents, franchises, approvals and authorizations, (iii) keep available the
services of its directors, officers, and key employees, and (iv) maintain
relationships with third parties and to keep available the services of their
present officers and employees. Without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, except as expressly contemplated by this Agreement, Parent shall
not:
(a) amend
its certificate of incorporation or bylaws (whether by merger, consolidation or
otherwise);
(b) split,
combine or reclassify any shares of capital stock or other equity securities of
Parent or declare, set aside or pay any dividend or other distribution (whether
in cash, stock or property or any combination thereof) in respect of the capital
stock or other equity securities of Parent, or redeem, repurchase or otherwise
acquire or offer to redeem, repurchase, or otherwise acquire any capital stock
or other equity securities of Parent;
(c) (i)
issue, deliver or sell, or authorize the issuance, delivery or sale of, any
capital stock or other equity securities of Parent, or (ii) amend any term of
any capital stock or other equity securities of Parent (in each case, whether by
merger, consolidation or otherwise);
(d) acquire
(by merger, consolidation, acquisition of stock or assets or otherwise),
directly or indirectly, any assets, securities, properties, or businesses, other
than in the ordinary course of business of Parent in a manner that is consistent
with past practice;
(e) sell,
lease or otherwise transfer, or create or incur any Lien on, any assets,
securities, properties, or businesses of Parent, other than in the ordinary
course of business consistent with past practice;
(f) make
any loans, advances or capital contributions to, or investments in, any other
Person;
(g) create,
incur, assume, suffer to exist or otherwise be liable with respect to any
indebtedness for borrowed money or guarantees thereof;
(h) enter
into any hedging arrangements;
(i) enter
into any agreement or arrangement that limits or otherwise restricts in any
respect Parent, or any successor thereto or that could, after the Closing Date,
limit or restrict in any respect Parent, the Company or any of the Company’s
Subsidiaries, from engaging or competing in any line of business, in any
location or with any Person or, except in the ordinary course of business
consistent with past practice, otherwise waive, release or assign any material
rights, claims or benefits of Parent;
(j) increase
compensation, bonus or other benefits payable to any director or
officer
of
Parent;
(k) change
Parent’s methods of accounting, except as required by concurrent changes in Law
or GAAP;
(l) settle,
or offer or propose to settle, (i) any material litigation, investigation,
arbitration, proceeding or other claim involving or against Parent, (ii) any
equityholder litigation against Parent or (iii) any litigation, arbitration,
proceeding or dispute that relates to the transactions contemplated
hereby;
(m) make
or change any material Tax election, change any annual Tax accounting period,
adopt or change any method of Tax accounting, materially amend any Tax Returns
or file claims for material Tax refunds, enter any material closing agreement,
settle any material Tax claim, audit or assessment, or surrender any right to
claim a material Tax refund, offset or other reduction in Tax liability;
or
(n) agree,
resolve or commit to do any of the foregoing.
Section
7.02. Stockholder
Meeting. Parent shall cause the Parent Stockholder Meeting to be duly
called and held as soon as reasonably practicable for the purpose
of voting
on the adoption of this Agreement, the approval of the issuance of shares of
Parent Stock and the other transactions contemplated hereunder, the adoption of
the Parent Plan, and the amendment to the Parent Certificate of Incorporation in
the form attached hereto as Exhibit B. The Board of Directors of Parent shall
recommend to Parent’s stockholders their adoption of this Agreement, and their
approval of such issuance of shares of Parent Stock and the other transactions
contemplated hereunder, their approval of the Parent Plan and their approval of
such amendment to the Parent Certificate of Incorporation and shall include such
recommendation in the Parent Proxy Statement. In connection with the Parent
Stockholder Meeting, Parent shall (i) promptly prepare and file with the SEC,
use its reasonable best efforts to have cleared by the SEC and thereafter mail
to its stockholders as promptly as practicable the Parent Proxy Statement and
all other proxy materials for such meeting, (ii) use its reasonable best efforts
to obtain the necessary approvals by its stockholders of this Agreement and the
transactions contemplated hereby and (iii) otherwise comply with all legal
requirements applicable to such meeting.
Section
7.03. Parent
Plan. Prior to or on the Closing Date, Parent shall adopt the Parent
Plan, pursuant to which options to purchase Parent common stock and/or awards of
restricted shares of Parent common stock will be granted to individuals to be
agreed upon by the Company and Parent (the “Parent Plan Grants”). The
Parent Plan Grants will be issued by Parent on the Closing Date to such
individuals, subject to such individual's continued employment or service with
the Company on such date and having the vesting schedule, if any, and such other
terms and conditions as may be agreed upon. Parent shall (i) reserve 8,000,000
shares of Parent common stock on the Closing Date for issuance under the Parent
Plan, (ii) cause the shares of Parent common stock so reserved to be registered
on Form S-8, or another registration statement of similar effect, promptly
following the adoption of the Parent Plan and (iii) use reasonable best efforts
to keep such registration statement effective for so long as any shares reserved
under the Parent Plan may be granted thereunder or are subject to outstanding
awards.
ARTICLE
8
COVENANTS
OF PARENT, SELLERS AND THE COMPANY
The
parties hereto agree that:
Section
8.01. Reasonable Best
Efforts. (a) Subject to the terms and conditions of this Agreement,
including Section 8.14 hereof, Sellers, the Company and Parent shall use their
reasonable best efforts to take, or cause to be taken, all actions and to do, or
cause to be done, all things necessary, proper or advisable under Law to
consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, including (i)
preparing and filing as promptly as practicable with any Governmental Authority
or other third party all documentation to effect all necessary filings, notices,
petitions, statements, registrations, submissions of information, applications
and other documents and (ii) obtaining and maintaining all approvals, consents,
registrations, permits, authorizations and other confirmations required to be
obtained from any Governmental Authority or other third party that are
necessary, proper or advisable to consummate the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
(b) In
furtherance and not in limitation of the foregoing, each of Parent, the Blocker
Entities, and the Company shall make an appropriate filing of a Notification and
Report Form pursuant to the HSR Act with respect to the transactions
contemplated hereby as promptly as practicable and in any event within ten
Business Days of the date hereof and to supply as promptly as practicable any
additional information and documentary material that may be requested pursuant
to the HSR Act and to take all other actions necessary to cause the expiration
or termination of the applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act as soon as
practicable.
Section
8.02. Certain
Filings. (a) The Company, Sellers, and Parent shall cooperate with one
another (i) in connection with the preparation of the Parent Proxy Statement,
(ii) in determining whether any action by or in respect of, or filing with, any
Governmental Authority is required, or any actions, consents, approvals or
waivers are required to be obtained from parties to any material contracts, in
connection with the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this
Agreement and (iii) in taking such actions or making any such filings,
furnishing information required in connection therewith or with the Parent Proxy
Statement and seeking timely to obtain any such actions, consents, approvals or
waivers.
(b) Prior
to the filing or mailing of the Parent Proxy Statement (or any amendment or
supplement thereto) or making any required filing with the SEC or responding to
any comments of the SEC with respect thereto, the Parent shall give the Company
and its counsel a reasonable opportunity to review and comment on such documents
or responses, and shall include in such documents or responses all additions,
deletions or changes suggested by the Company and its counsel as are reasonably
acceptable to Parent and its counsel.
(c) The
Company shall use its reasonable best efforts to obtain the consent of its
independent public accountants to the incorporation by reference into the Parent
Proxy Statement of the financial statements described in Section
3.08.
Section
8.03. Public
Announcements. Parent, Sellers and the Company shall consult with each
other before issuing any press release, making any other public statement or
scheduling any press conference or conference call with investors or analysts
with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby and,
except as may be required by Law or any listing agreement with or rule of any
national securities exchange or association, shall not issue any such press
release, make any such other public statement or schedule any such press
conference or conference call before such consultation.
Section
8.04. Further
Assurances. At and after the Closing Date, Sellers shall, upon the
request of Parent, execute and deliver any deeds, bills of sale, assignments or
assurances, and take and do any other actions and things reasonably necessary
and appropriate to vest, perfect or confirm of record or otherwise in Parent any
and all right, title and interest in and to the Equity Interests.
Section
8.05. Sales and
Transfer Tax. All transfer, documentary, sales, use, stamp, registration
and other such Taxes and fees (including any penalties and interest) incurred in
connection with transactions contemplated by this Agreement (including any real
property transfer Tax and any similar Tax) (“Transfer Taxes”) shall be
borne, equally, by Sellers on the one hand, and Parent, on the other hand. The
party or parties having responsibility therefor
under
applicable Law shall prepare and file all necessary Transfer Tax Returns and
other documentation, with the costs of such preparation and filing to be borne
by the Company.
Section
8.06. Directors and
Officers of Parent. Parent and the Company shall take all necessary
action so that (a) the persons listed on Schedule 8.06(a) are appointed or
elected, as applicable, to the position of directors, officers and employees of
Parent, as set forth therein, to serve in such positions effective immediately
after the Closing and (b) the persons listed on Schedule 8.06(b) have resigned
from their positions as directors, officers and employees of
Parent.
Section
8.07. Registration
Rights Agreement. Parent and each Seller which is a Stock Buyer shall
execute and deliver to each other the Registration Rights Agreement on or prior
to the Closing Date.
Section
8.08. Pledge
Agreement. Parent and each Seller of the Blocker Shares shall
execute and deliver the Pledge Agreement on or prior to the Closing
Date.
Section
8.09. Certificate of
Incorporation Protections; Directors’ and Officers’ Liability
Insurance. (a) All rights to indemnification for
acts or omissions occurring through the Closing Date now existing in favor of
the current directors and officers of the Company and Parent as provided in such
entity’s organizational documents or in any indemnification agreements shall
survive the Closing and shall continue in full force and effect in accordance
with their terms.
(b) For
a period of six years after the Closing Date, Parent shall cause to be
maintained in effect the current policies of directors’ and officers’ liability
insurance maintained by the Company and Parent (or policies of at least the same
coverage and amounts containing terms and conditions which are no less
advantageous) with respect to claims arising from facts and events that occurred
prior to the Closing Date; provided, that in satisfying
its obligation under this Section 8.09(b), Parent shall not be obligated to pay
an aggregate premium in excess of 300% of the amount per annum the Company paid
in its last full fiscal year, which amount the Company has disclosed to Parent
prior to the date hereof.
(c) From
the Closing Date through the sixth anniversary of the Closing Date, Parent shall
and shall cause the Company and its Subsidiaries and any successor to Parent,
the Company and its Subsidiaries to, and the Company shall, indemnify and hold
harmless each former or present (as of the Closing Date) officer or director of
Parent, the Company and its Subsidiaries, against all claims, losses,
liabilities, damages, judgments, inquiries, fines and reasonable fees, costs and
expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and disbursements (collectively,
“Costs”), incurred in
connection with any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation, whether
civil, criminal, administrative or investigative, arising out of actions taken
by them in their capacity as officers or directors at or prior to the Closing
Date (including this Agreement and the transactions and actions contemplated
hereby), whether asserted or claimed prior to, at or after the Closing Date, to
the fullest extent permitted under applicable Law. Each such officer or director
will be entitled to advancement of reasonable expenses incurred in the defense
of any claim, action, suit, proceeding or investigation from Parent, the Company
and its Subsidiaries.
(d) If
Parent or any of its successors or assigns (i) consolidates with or merges into
any other Person and shall not be the continuing or surviving entity of such
consolidation or merger, or (ii) transfers or conveys all or substantially all
of its properties and assets to any Person, then, in each such case, to the
extent necessary, proper provision shall be made so that the successors and
assigns of Parent assume the obligations set forth in this Section
8.09.
(e) The
provisions of this Section 8.09 are intended to be for the benefit of, and shall
be enforceable by, each Person who will have been a director or officer of
Parent or the Company or its Subsidiaries (as applicable) for all periods stated
herein and may not be changed, in the case of any provision regarding the
officers and directors of Parent, without the consent of the Parent Committee,
and in the case of any provision regarding the officers and directors of the
Company or any of its Subsidiaries, without the consent of the Sellers’
Committee.
Section
8.10. Sellers’
Committee. (a) From and after the Closing Date, Parent shall be entitled
to deal exclusively with the Sellers’ Committee in respect of all notices,
disputes and other matters delegated to the Sellers’ Committee pursuant to this
Agreement. Parent shall be entitled to rely upon any statements or actions taken
by the Sellers’ Committee (whether or not such statements or actions were in
fact authorized).
(b) The
Sellers’ Committee shall have the authority to take any and all actions required
or permitted to be taken by the Sellers’ Committee under this Agreement (and any
and all actions incidental or related to such authority), including with respect
to any matters in respect of Taxes as described in Section 8.05 (but not with
respect to Blocker Taxes), and all other matters described herein. The Sellers’
Committee shall notify Parent of any material action taken by the Sellers’
Committee. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Sellers’
Committee is not authorized to, and shall not, accept on behalf of any Seller
any portion of the Aggregate Consideration to which such Seller is entitled
under this Agreement.
(c) In
the event that a member of the Sellers’ Committee dies or becomes unable to
perform his or her responsibilities as a member of the Sellers’ Committee or
resigns from such position, the party who designated such individual to serve as
a member of the Sellers’ Committee shall have the right to appoint a
replacement. If such party fails to designate an individual to serve on the
Sellers’ Committee in substitution thereof, the remaining members of the
Sellers’ Committee shall have the authority to take actions as permitted herein
until a replacement is appointed.
(d) Any
matter approved by the Sellers’ Committee shall be set forth on a certificate
delivered to Parent by the Sellers’ Committee. Actions of the Sellers’ Committee
may be approved pursuant to a meeting or a written consent. Parent shall be
entitled to rely on a certificate from both of the members of the Sellers’
Committee with respect to any action taken by the Sellers’
Committee.
Section
8.11. Parent
Committee. Prior to the Closing, the Board of Directors of Parent shall
appoint a committee (the “Parent Committee”) consisting
of one or more of its then members to act on behalf of Parent after the Closing
to take all necessary actions and make all decisions pursuant to this Agreement
and the other Transaction Documents. In the event of a vacancy in such
committee, the Board of Directors of Parent shall appoint as a successor
a
Person
who was a director of Parent prior to the Closing Date or some other Person who
would qualify as an “independent” director of Parent and who has not had any
relationship with the Sellers. The Parent Committee shall have the sole
authority to take any and all actions on behalf of Parent under any Transaction
Document (excluding the Registration Rights Agreement).
Section
8.12. Legends.
(a) Each
Stock Buyer acknowledges and agrees that each certificate (if any) for the
Purchased Shares shall bear a legend substantially as set forth in Section
8.12(b) and that any Purchased Shares in uncertificated book-entry form will be
subject to equivalent restrictions.
(b) Certificates
for the Purchased Shares shall bear legends in substantially the following
form:
The
securities represented by this Certificate have not been registered under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”), and may not be transferred,
sold or otherwise disposed of except while such a registration is in effect
under such act and applicable state securities laws or pursuant to an exemption
from registration under such act or such laws. Hedging transactions in the
securities are also prohibited except in compliance with the 1933
Act.
When
issued pursuant hereto, the certificates evidencing Purchased Shares shall also
bear any legend required by any applicable state blue sky law. Any holder of the
Purchased Shares may request Parent to remove any or all of the legends
described in this section from the certificates evidencing such Purchased Shares
by submitting to Parent such certificates, together with an opinion of counsel
reasonably satisfactory to Parent to the effect that such legend or legends are
no longer required under the 1933 Act or applicable state laws, as the case may
be.
Section
8.13. Tax
Matters. (a) Parent and Sellers shall reasonably cooperate, and shall
cause their respective affiliates, officers, employees, agents, auditors and
other representatives reasonably to cooperate, in preparing and filing all Tax
Returns, including maintaining and making available to each other all records
necessary in connection with Taxes and in resolving all disputes and audits with
respect to all taxable periods relating to Taxes.
(b) The
Company shall have in effect an election under Section 754 of the Code for the
taxable year in which the Closing will occur.
(c) Blocker Tax
Procedures. As soon as reasonably practicable, the Company will provide to the
Blocker Entities schedules K-1 for 2008, estimated schedules K-1 for post-2008
Pre-Closing Tax Periods and other relevant information to be used in preparing
the Tax Returns of Syncom Blocker and Baralonco Blocker for the 2008-10
Pre-Closing Tax Periods. With respect to all Pre-Closing Tax periods other than
Parent Ownership Tax Periods, each Blocker Entity shall file Tax Returns and
make estimated and final Tax payments in accordance with applicable Law. Any Tax
credits or refunds received for a Pre-Closing Tax period other than a Parent
Ownership Tax Period shall be promptly paid over to the Blocker’s Seller. The
following
procedures
shall be followed with respect to the Tax liability of Syncom Blocker and
Baralonco Blocker for the Parent Ownership Tax Periods:
(i) With
respect to each Parent Ownership Tax Period, the Syncom Blocker Seller and the
Baralonco Blocker Seller shall pay to Parent at least two business days before
the applicable due date any amount of estimated Tax (including Tax amounts
required to be withheld by the Company and not theretofore withheld) required to
be paid by the Syncom Blocker and by Baralonco Blocker, respectively, for such
Parent Ownership Tax Period.
(ii) As
soon as is reasonably practicable, and in any event no later than 30 days prior
to the earlier of (x) the Blocker Settlement Date, and (y) the required date for
filing the applicable Tax Return (including any extensions permitted by law),
the Blocker Sellers will deliver to Parent drafts of all Tax Returns required to
be filed by their respective Blocker Entities for the Parent Ownership Tax
Periods, which drafts will be consistent with the information provided by the
Company pursuant to this Section 8.13(c).
(iii) Parent
shall cause the Blocker Entities to file their Tax Returns for the Parent
Ownership Tax Periods in a manner substantially consistent with the draft Tax
Returns delivered pursuant to Section 8.13(c)(ii), provided, however, that if
Parent disagrees with the treatment of any item on such draft Tax Returns, the
parties will negotiate in good faith to resolve any such disagreement. Failing
such resolution, the matter shall be referred to the Accounting Referee, the
determination of which shall be final and binding upon the parties.
(iv) At
least two business days prior to the required date (including any extensions
permitted by law) for filing the Tax Return for any Parent Ownership Tax Period,
the Syncom Blocker Seller or the Baralonco Blocker Seller, as the case may be,
shall pay to Parent the amount of the Pre-Closing Tax Liability shown as due on
the corresponding Tax Return.
(v) No
later than five business days before the Blocker Settlement Date, Parent shall
deliver to each Blocker Seller a reconciliation statement showing:
(x) the
aggregate Pre-Closing Tax Liability of the corresponding Blocker Entity for the
Parent Ownership Tax Periods (as reflected on the Tax Returns to be filed
pursuant to clause Section 8.13(c)(iii)) with
(y) the
amounts paid by the corresponding Blocker Entity and by the Blocker Sellers
pursuant to Sections 8.13(c)(i) and (iv) in respect of such returns prior to the
Closing, including a statement of the amount (if any) required to be paid by
each such Seller to Parent or by Parent to such Seller in order to effect such
reconciliation.
The
reconciliation payments reflected on the statements shall be made on the Blocker
Settlement Date.
(vi) Upon
receipt by Parent of all payments (if any) required of the Syncom Blocker Seller
on the Blocker Settlement Date, Parent shall release to the Syncom Blocker
Seller the shares of Parent stock pledged by the Syncom Blocker Seller (to the
extent such shares are not otherwise required to be retained pursuant to the
Pledge Agreement).
(vii) On
the Baralonco Release Date, Parent shall release to the Baralonco Blocker Seller
shares of Parent stock pledged by the Baralonco Blocker Seller (to the extent
such shares are not otherwise required to be retained pursuant to the Pledge
Agreement).
(d) Pre-Closing Tax Audits of
the Company. Notwithstanding Section 10.03, in the event of any US
federal, state or local income Tax audits of the Company with respect to any
Pre-Closing Tax Period or portion thereof, if (x) Parent and the Sellers’
Committee reasonably conclude that such audit could have a material adverse
effect on any of the Sellers and (y) a Majority of Interests of the Sellers that
could be so affected acknowledge in writing any indemnification obligations that
they may have under Section 10.02 (taking into account all limitations set forth
in Article X) with respect to all Taxes assessed or that may be assessed in
connection with such audit and provide reasonable assurance to Parent of their
financial capacity to provide any such applicable indemnification with respect
to such Taxes, then solely with respect to those portions of the audit relating
to the Pre-Closing Tax Period
(i) the
Sellers’ Committee shall be entitled to participate in such audit, including
having the right to participate in any contest or settlement discussions with
respect to any claims or assessments pursuant thereto, and
(ii) no
settlement of such audit shall be settled or compromised without the consent of
the Sellers’ Committee, which such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld,
provided, however, that if Parent
reasonably concludes that any positions or settlements proposed by the Sellers’
Committee in the conduct of such audit has or could have a material adverse
effect on Parent and/or any Blocker Entity, no consent of the Sellers’ Committee
shall be required, and Parent shall have ultimate control of any settlement or
compromise of such audit.
Section
8.14. Regulatory
Matters.
(a) The
parties shall cooperate with one another and use their reasonable best efforts
to make the following filings as soon as possible, to the extent legally
required or deemed appropriate by mutual agreement of the parties: (i) any
required notifications to the Department of Defense and U.S. security agencies;
(ii) a submission of a joint notification to the Committee on Foreign Investment
in the United States pursuant to Section 721 of the Defense Production Act of
1950, (the “Exon-Florio
Amendment”); (iii) any filings or notifications required to be made prior
to the Closing under the Arms Export Control Act of 1976 and the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations, 22 C.F.R. Parts 120-130; and (iv) any filings or
notifications required to be made prior to the Closing to the Office of Foreign
Assets Control, Department of the Treasury.
(b) The
consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement is subject to
the prior consent and approval of the FCC. The Company and its Subsidiaries and
Parent shall prepare and, within 20 Business Days after the date hereof, file
with the FCC the FCC Consent Application. In addition, each party hereto
covenants and agrees to (i) furnish to the other parties such information and
assistance as such parties reasonably may request in connection with the
preparation or prosecution of the FCC Consent Application; (ii) file any
amendment or modification to the FCC Consent Application; (iii) otherwise take
any other action with respect to the FCC as may be reasonably necessary in
connection with the transactions contemplated hereby; and (iv) cooperate in good
faith with the other parties hereto with respect to the foregoing, all as may be
determined by Parent, the Company and its Subsidiaries to be necessary,
appropriate or advisable in order to consummate the transactions contemplated by
this Agreement.
(c) The
Company and its Subsidiaries and Parent shall (i) use reasonable best efforts to
prepare, file and diligently prosecute all applications required to be filed
with non-U.S. Governmental Authorities for consent to the transactions
contemplated hereby, and to provide all appropriate filings and notifications to
such non-U.S. Governmental Authorities (such applications, filings and
notifications, collectively, the “Foreign Applications”); (ii)
furnish to the other parties such information and assistance as such parties
reasonably may request in connection with the preparation or prosecution of any
such applications; and (iii) keep the other parties promptly apprised of any
communications with, and inquiries or requests for information from, such
non-U.S. Governmental Authorities with respect to the transactions contemplated
hereby.
(d) Each
party agrees to comply with any condition imposed on it by any FCC Consent and
with any condition imposed on it by any similar order of similar and non-U.S.
Governmental Authority, except that no party shall be required to comply with a
condition if (i) the condition was imposed on it as the result of a circumstance
the existence of which does not constitute a breach by that party of any of its
representations, warranties, covenants, obligations or agreements hereunder or
(ii) compliance with the condition would reasonably be expected to result in or
cause a Company Material Adverse Effect or a Parent Material Adverse
Effect.
ARTICLE
9
CONDITIONS
TO CLOSING
Section
9.01. Conditions to
Obligations of Parent, Sellers and the Company. The obligations of
Parent, Sellers and the Company to consummate the Closing are subject to the
satisfaction of the following conditions:
(a) the
Parent Stockholder Approval shall have been obtained;
(b) no
Law shall prohibit the consummation of the Closing;
(c) any
applicable waiting period under the HSR Act relating to the transactions
contemplated hereby shall have expired or been terminated; and
(d) FCC
Consent with respect to the FCC Consent Application;
(e) FCC
Consent with respect to any other FCC applications required in connection with
the consummation of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement;
and
(f) all
actions by or in respect of, or filings with, any other Governmental Authority,
required to permit the consummation of the transactions contemplated hereby
shall have been taken, made or obtained, other than such actions or filings the
failure of which to take, make or obtain would not reasonably be expected to
have, individually or in the aggregate, a Company Material Adverse Effect or a
Parent Material Adverse Effect.
Section
9.02. Conditions to
the Obligations of Parent. The obligations of Parent to consummate the
Closing are subject to the satisfaction of the following further
conditions:
(a) (i)
the Company and Sellers shall have performed in all material respects all of
their respective obligations hereunder required to be performed by them at or
prior to the Closing Date, (ii) the representations and warranties of the
Company and Sellers contained in this Agreement and in any certificate or other
writing delivered by the Company or Sellers pursuant hereto shall be true and
correct in all respects (without giving effect to any limitation as to
“materiality” or “Company Material Adverse Effect” contained therein) at and as
of the Closing Date as if made at and as of the Closing Date (or, to the extent
any such representation and warranty specifically states that it refers to an
earlier date, on and as of such earlier date), except where the failures of such
representations and warranties to be so true and correct, in the aggregate,
would not reasonably be expected to have a Company Material Adverse Effect, and
(iii) Parent shall have received a certificate signed by the Chief Executive
Officer of the Company to the foregoing effect;
(b) Each
Seller which is a Stock Buyer shall have executed and delivered the registration
rights agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit D hereto (the “Registration Rights
Agreement”);
(c) Each
Seller of the Blocker Shares shall have executed and delivered the pledge
agreement substantially in the form of Exhibit E hereto (the “Pledge
Agreement”);
(d) Sellers
shall have effected the Contribution;
(e) Parent
shall have received (x) a certification dated not more than 30 days prior to the
Closing Date, issued by the Company and signed by an officer of the Company
under penalties of perjury, certifying that (i) fifty percent or more of the
value of the gross assets of the Company does not consist of U.S. real property
interests or (ii) ninety percent or more of the value of the gross assets of the
Company does not consist of U.S. real property interests plus cash or cash
equivalents and (y) a certification for each Blocker Entity dated not more than
30 days prior to the Closing Date and signed by an officer of such Blocker
Entity to the effect that such Blocker Entity is not, nor has it been within the
time period specified in Section 897(c)(1)(A)(ii) of the Code, a “United States
real property holding corporation” as defined in Section 897 of the Code. The
foregoing certification in clause (x) is intended to comply, and should be
interpreted in accordance, with the exemption from withholding provided in
Section 1.1445-11T(d)(2) of the Treasury Regulations;
(f) Parent
shall have received an affidavit, duly executed and signed under penalties of
perjury, by the custodian of Blocker Shares in Baralonco Blocker substantially
to the effect that, in its capacity as custodian of such Blocker Shares, it has
actual knowledge of the identity of the ultimate beneficial owner of such
Blocker Shares, who has been the ultimate beneficial owner of such Blocker
Shares from the date of formation of Baralonco Blocker to the Closing Date;
and
(g) Baralonco
Blocker shall have delivered to Parent a letter or letters providing evidence
that it has repaid and settled all of its outstanding debt and all other
liabilities.
Section
9.03. Conditions to
the Obligations of the Company and Sellers. The obligations of the
Company and Sellers to consummate the Closing are subject to the satisfaction of
the following further conditions:
(a) (i)
Parent shall have performed in all material respects all of their respective
obligations hereunder required to be performed by it at or prior to the Closing
Date, (ii) the representations and warranties of Parent contained in this
Agreement and in any certificate or other writing delivered by Parent pursuant
hereto shall be true and correct in all respects (without giving effect to any
limitation as to “materiality” or “Parent Material Adverse Effect” contained
therein) at and as of the Closing Date as if made at and as of the Closing Date
(or, to the extent any such representation and warranty specifically states that
it refers to an earlier date, on and as of such earlier date), except where the
failures of such representations and warranties to be so true and correct, in
the aggregate, would not reasonably be expected to have a Parent Material
Adverse Effect, and (iii) the Company shall have received a certificate signed
by the Chief Executive Officer of Parent to the foregoing effect;
(b) The
persons referred to on Schedule 8.06(b) shall have resigned as officers or
directors of Parent and the persons referred to on Schedule 8.06(a) shall have
been duly appointed as officers or directors of Parent;
(c) Parent
shall have made appropriate arrangements to have the Trust Account disbursed to
Parent immediately upon the Closing (and the amount of such disbursement shall
be no less than $400,000,000 (plus any accrued interest and
less (i) the payment of
deferred underwriting discounts and commissions and (ii) any payments to the
holders of IPO Shares who vote against the consummation of the transactions
contemplated by this Agreement and exercise their rights to convert their IPO
Shares into cash);
(d) Parent
and its Affiliates party thereto shall have executed and delivered the
Registration Rights Agreement; and
(e) Parent
shall have executed and delivered the Pledge Agreement.
ARTICLE
10
SURVIVAL;
INDEMNIFICATION
Section
10.01. Survival. The
representations and warranties of the parties hereto contained in this Agreement
or in any certificate or other writing delivered pursuant
hereto or
in connection herewith and each covenant requiring performance prior to the
Closing shall terminate effective as of immediately prior to the Closing such
that no claim for breach of any such representation or warranty or
covenant may be brought after the Closing; provided, however, that the
representations and warranties of Sellers contained in Article 4 and any covenants or agreements
of Sellers set forth herein shall survive indefinitely or until the latest date
permitted by Law, provided, however, that (w) the
representations and warranties of the Syncom Blocker Seller and the Baralonco
Blocker Seller contained in Section 4.07(b)(iv) and (v) and the indemnification
obligations under Section 10.02(a) of any such Sellers with respect thereto
shall survive until eighteen months after the Closing Date, (x) the
representations and warranties of the Sellers contained in Section 4.05 and the
indemnification obligations under Section 10.02(a) of any such Sellers with
respect thereto shall survive until eighteen months after the Closing Date,(y)
the representations and warranties of the Syncom Blocker Seller contained in
Section 4.07(c), the indemnification obligations under Section 10.02(a) of any
such Sellers with respect thereto and the indemnification obligations under
Section 10.02(b) of any such Sellers shall survive until nine months after the
Closing Date and (z) the representations and warranties of Baralonco Blocker
Seller contained in Section 4.07(c), the indemnification obligations under
Section 10.02(a) of any such Sellers with respect thereto and the
indemnification obligations under Section 10.02(b) of any such Sellers shall
survive until the second anniversary of the Closing Date. Notwithstanding the
preceding sentence, any breach of representation, warranty, covenant or
agreement in respect of which indemnity may be sought under this Agreement shall
survive the time at which it would otherwise terminate pursuant to the preceding
sentence, if notice of the inaccuracy or breach thereof giving rise to such
right of indemnity shall have been given to the party against whom such
indemnity may be sought prior to such time. Any covenant of any party in this
Agreement that requires performance at or after the Closing shall survive the
Closing.
Section
10.02. Indemnification.
Effective at and after the Closing, each Seller severally and not jointly,
hereby indemnifies Parent, the Company and their respective directors, officers
and Affiliates and their respective successors and assignees (the “Parent Indemnified Parties”) against and agrees
to hold each of them harmless from any and all Damages incurred or suffered by such
Parent Indemnified Parties arising out of (a) any breach of representation or
warranty contained in Article 4 made by such Seller (determined without regard
to any qualification or exception contained therein relating to materiality or
any similar qualification or standard) or breach of covenant or agreement made
or to be performed by such Seller pursuant to this Agreement regardless of
whether such Damages arise as a result of the negligence, strict liability or
any other theory of law or, violation of law by any Seller or (b) any
Pre-Closing Tax Liability of any Blocker Entity in which such Seller owns any
Blocker Shares. Parent Indemnified Parties shall not be entitled to any
duplicative recovery with respect to the same Damages arising under multiple
provisions of this Agreement under any circumstances whatsoever. Each Seller’s
maximum liability for all claims for indemnification pursuant to this Agreement
shall not exceed the sum of (i) the cash consideration received by such Seller
pursuant to Article II and (ii) the product of the number of shares of Parent
Stock received by such Seller pursuant to Article II and $10, provided, however, in respect of claims
for indemnification pursuant to (y) Section 10.02(a) in connection with any
breach of representation or warranty contained in Section 4.07(c) or (z) Section
10.02(b), the maximum liability shall not exceed $3 million for the Syncom
Blocker Seller and $15 million for the Baralonco Blocker Seller. For the
avoidance of doubt, no Seller shall have any liability under this Agreement
for
the
breaches of any representation, warranty, covenant or agreement by any other
Seller or for any Taxes of any other Seller or any Blocker Entity in which such
Seller has never owned any equity interests. In support of their indemnification
obligations, (i) the Syncom Blocker Seller agree to pledge 300,000 shares of
Parent stock until the first business day that is at least nine months after the
Closing Date (the “Blocker
Settlement Date”), and (ii) the Baralonco Blocker Seller agrees to pledge
1,500,000 shares of Parent stock until the second anniversary of the Closing
Date (the “Baralonco Release
Date”). Such pledges shall be effected pursuant to the Pledge
Agreement.
Section
10.03. Indemnification
Procedures. The party seeking indemnification under Section 10.02 (the
“Indemnified Party”)
agrees to give prompt notice to the party against whom indemnity is sought (the
“Indemnifying Party”) of
the assertion of any claim, or the commencement of any suit, action or
proceeding in respect of which indemnity may be sought under such Section. The
Indemnified Party will be entitled, at the sole expense and liability of the
Indemnifying Party, to exercise full control of the defense, compromise, or
settlement of any such third party claim unless the Indemnifying Party, within
twenty (20) days after the giving of such notice by the Indemnified Party, and
in any event within such shorter period as may be reasonably necessary for the
Indemnified Party to otherwise take appropriate action to resist such third
party claim, (i) acknowledges in writing without any reservation of its rights
its indemnification obligations and provides reasonable assurance to the
Indemnified Party of its financial capacity to defend such third party claim and
provide full indemnification with respect to such third party claim, (ii)
notifies the Indemnified Party in writing of the Indemnifying Party’s intention
to assume such defense and (iii) retains legal counsel reasonably satisfactory
to the Indemnified Party to conduct the defense of such third party claim. If
the Indemnifying Party does not elect to exercise control of the defense,
compromise or settlement of such third party claim, it may at its own expense
participate in (but not control) such defense, compromise or settlement. The
Indemnifying Party shall not be liable under Section 10.02 for any settlement
effected without its consent (not to be unreasonably withheld) of any claim,
litigation or proceeding in respect of which indemnity may be sought
hereunder.
Section
10.04. Indemnification
Payments. Any payment under Section 10.02 to an Indemnified Party
entitled to indemnification pursuant to Section 10.02 shall be paid to such
Indemnified Party by (1) wire transfer of immediately available funds to an
account of such Indemnified Party as may be designated by such Indemnified Party
or (2) delivery to such Indemnified Party of a certified or official bank check
payable in immediately available funds to such Indemnified Party. Any such
payments and any payments pursuant to Sections 8.13(c)(i), (iv) or (v) hereof
shall constitute adjustments to the purchase price of the corresponding Units or
Blocker Shares and shall be so treated by the parties for all Tax
purposes.
Section
10.05. Waiver of
Claims and Rights. Except for (i) rights arising pursuant to the terms of
any Transaction Document (or any document identified on Schedule 10.05), (ii)
rights arising pursuant to any employment agreement with Parent or its
Affiliates, or under any Employee Plan described in this Agreement and (iii)
rights to indemnification for actions taken in their capacity as an director or
officer, each Seller, as of the Closing Date, irrevocably waives any rights and
claims such Seller, or, to the extent permitted by Law and otherwise, any person
designated to serve as an officer or director of the Company by such Seller, may
have against Parent, any of its Affiliates or their respective officers,
directors,
employees
or agents, whether in law or in equity, relating to the Blocker Entities, the
Units, the Company, the Company’s Subsidiaries, the Interests or any options to
purchase Interests, or arising out of such Person’s ownership of Units or any
options to purchase Units, such Person’s position (including as a director or
officer) with the Blocker Entities, the Company or the Company’s Subsidiaries
prior to the Closing (subject to the exclusions described above), the operation
of the business of the Blocker Entities, the Company and the Company’s
Subsidiaries prior to the Closing or the transactions contemplated hereby or by
any other Transaction Document.
Section
10.06. Exclusive
Remedy. Except as specifically set forth in the Transaction Documents,
effective as of the Closing the parties waive any rights and claims they may
have against the other parties, whether in law or in equity, relating to this
Agreement, the other Transaction Documents or the transactions contemplated
hereby and thereby. After the Closing, the Indemnified Parties’ sole and
exclusive remedy with respect to any and all claims relating to this Agreement,
the other Transaction Documents and the transactions contemplated hereby and
thereby shall be pursuant to the indemnification provisions set forth in this
Article 10. For the avoidance of doubt, this Section 10.06 does not apply to any
of the documents identified on Schedule 10.05.
ARTICLE
11
TERMINATION
Section
11.01. Grounds for
Termination. This Agreement may be terminated at any time
prior to the Closing Date (notwithstanding any approval of this Agreement by the
stockholders of Parent):
(a) by
mutual written agreement of the Company and Parent;
(b) by
either the Company or Parent, if:
(i) the
Closing has not been consummated on or before June 29, 2009 (if all regulatory
approvals required to consummate the Closing have been obtained prior to such
date) or February 14, 2010 (if the only condition to Closing unfulfilled as of
June 29, 2009 is the obtaining of all regulatory approvals required to
consummate the Closing), (the “End Date”); provided that the right to
terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 11.01(b)(i) shall not be
available to any party whose breach of any provision of this Agreement results
in the failure of the Closing to be consummated by such time;
(ii) there
shall be any material Law that (A) makes consummation of the Closing illegal or
otherwise prohibited or (B) enjoins the parties hereto from consummating the
Closing and such injunction shall have become final and nonappealable;
or
(iii) the
Parent Stockholder Approval shall not have been obtained at the Parent
Shareholder Meeting (including any adjournment thereof);
(c) by
Parent, if a breach of any representation or warranty or failure to perform any
covenant or agreement on the part of the Company or a Seller set forth in this
Agreement shall have occurred that would cause the condition set forth in
Section 9.02(a) not to be satisfied, and such condition is incapable of being
satisfied by the End Date; or
(d) by
the Company, if:
(i) a
breach of any representation or warranty or failure to perform any covenant or
agreement on the part of the Parent set forth in this Agreement shall have
occurred that would cause the condition set forth in Section 9.03(a) not to be
satisfied, and such condition is incapable of being satisfied by the End Date;
or
(ii) the
Parent Stockholder Meeting has not been held within 90 days of the Parent Proxy
Statement being cleared by the SEC.
The party
desiring to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 11.01 (other than
pursuant to Section 11.01(a)) shall give notice of such termination to the other
party.
Section
11.02. Effect of
Termination. If this Agreement is terminated pursuant to Section 11.01,
this Agreement shall become void and of no effect without liability of any party
(or any stockholder, member, director, officer, employee, agent, consultant or
representative of such party) to the other party hereto; provided that, if such
termination shall result from the willful (i) failure of any party to fulfill a
condition to the performance of the obligations of the other party or (ii)
failure of any party to perform a covenant hereof, such party shall be fully
liable for any and all liabilities and damages incurred or suffered by the other
parties as a result of such failure. The provisions of this Section 11.02,
Section 11.03 and Article 12 shall survive any termination hereof pursuant to
Section 11.01.
Section
11.03. Termination
Fee. If (x) this Agreement is terminated by Parent or the
Company pursuant to Section 11.01(b)(iii), (y) Parent breaches its obligations
under Section 7.02 or Section 8.01 of this Agreement and (z) Parent consummates
an Initial Business Combination (other than with the Company), Parent shall pay
to the Company, within two Business Days of such consummation, $5,000,0000 in
cash, shares of Parent Stock or combination thereof, at Parent’s election. The
number of shares of Parent Stock deliverable in respect of the amount elected by
the Parent to be delivered in shares of Parent Stock shall equal (x) such amount
divided by (y) the Average Stock Price as of the date of such consummation,
provided that no
fractional shares shall be delivered and that cash shall be paid in lieu of
any fractional
shares. The receipt of such cash or shares of Parent Stock, as the case may be,
shall be the exclusive remedy of the Company, Sellers and their respective
Affiliates with respect to such breach and they shall have waived any other
rights and claims they may have against Parent and its Affiliates, whether in
law or in equity, relating to this Agreement, the other Transaction Documents or
the transactions contemplated hereby and thereby, following receipt of such cash
or shares of Parent Stock. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if prior to ten (10)
Business Days immediately following the termination of this Agreement, the
Company notifies Parent in writing that it believes in good faith that Parent
has committed a willful breach of this Agreement, then the obligation of Parent
set forth in the first sentence of this Section 11.03 shall
not come
into effect and the Company shall have the right to pursue its remedies for
willful breach of this Agreement against Parent, subject to other limitations
set forth in this Agreement.
Section
11.04. Limitation On
Remedy. Sellers and the Company hereby acknowledge that (a) they have
read the prospectus dated February 14, 2008, filed by Parent with the SEC
pursuant to Rule 424 promulgated under the 1933 Act and understand that Parent
has established the Trust Account for the benefit of certain Persons (as
described in the prospectus) and that Parent may disburse monies from the Trust
Account only to certain Persons (as described in the prospectus) and (b) for and
in consideration of Parent agreeing to evaluate the Blocker Entities and the
Company for purposes of consummating a transaction with respect to their capital
stock, Sellers and the Company agree that, prior to Closing, they do not have,
directly or indirectly, any right, title, interest or claim of any kind in or to
any monies in the Trust Account and waive any such claim they may have in the
future as a result of, or arising out of, this Agreement, any other Transaction
Document or any negotiations, contracts or agreements with Parent or any of its
Affiliates or representatives and will not seek recourse, directly or
indirectly, against the Trust Account for any reason whatsoever.
ARTICLE
12
MISCELLANEOUS
Section
12.01. Notices. All
notices, requests and other communications to any party hereunder shall be in
writing (including facsimile transmission) and shall be given,
if to
Parent, to:
GHL
Acquisition Corp.
300 Park
Avenue
New York,
NY 10022
Attention:
Jodi Ganz
Facsimile
No.: (212) 389-1761
with a
copy to:
Davis
Polk & Wardwell
450
Lexington Avenue
New York,
NY 10017
Attention:
Leonard Kreynin
Facsimile
No.: (212) 450-3800
if to any
Seller, to the address set forth below such Seller’s signature on the signature
pages hereof
if to the
Company, prior to Closing, to:
Iridium
Holdings LLC
6707
Democracy Boulevard, Suite 300
Bethesda,
MD 20817
Attention:
John Brunette
Facsimile
No.: (301) 571-6250
with a
copy to:
Simpson
Thacher & Bartlett LLP
425
Lexington Avenue
New York,
NY 10017
Attention:
Edward J. Chung
Facsimile
No.: (212) 455-2502
if to the
Sellers’ Committee, after Closing, to:
Iridium
Holdings LLC Sellers’ Committee
c/o
Fulbright & Jaworski LLP
801
Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington,
DC 20004
Attention:
Steven B. Pfeiffer
Facsimile
No.: (202) 662-4643
Iridium
Holdings LLC Sellers’ Committee
c/o
Syncom Funds
8515
Georgia Avenue
Suite
725
Silver
Spring, MD 20910
Attention:
Terry L. Jones
Facsimile
No.: (301) 608-3307
or to
such other address or facsimile number as such party may hereafter specify for
the purpose by notice to the other parties hereto. All such notices, requests
and other communications shall be deemed received on the date of receipt by the
recipient thereof if received prior to 5:00 p.m. on a Business Day in the place
of receipt. Otherwise, any such notice, request or communication shall be deemed
to have been received on the next succeeding Business Day in the place of
receipt.
Section
12.02. Amendments and
Waivers. (a) Any provision of this Agreement (including any Schedule or
Exhibit hereto) may be amended or waived if, but only if, such amendment or
waiver is in writing and is signed, in the case of an amendment, by Parent, the
Company, the Sellers’ Committee and each other party to this Agreement who is
adversely affected by such amendment in a manner that is material and
disproportionate to any other party, or in the case of a waiver, by the party
against whom the waiver is to be effective. Notwithstanding the foregoing, after
the Closing, amendments or waivers must be approved in writing by the Sellers’
Committee.
(b) No
failure or delay by any party in exercising any right, power or privilege
hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof nor shall any single or partial
exercise thereof preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise
of any other right, power or
privilege.
The rights and remedies herein provided shall be cumulative and not exclusive of
any rights or remedies provided by Law.
Section
12.03. Addition of
Sellers. In the event that one or more of the Persons listed on Schedule
2.01 has not executed a counterpart to this Agreement as of the date hereof,
Parent, in its sole discretion, may allow such person after the date hereof to
execute (x) a counterpart to this Agreement, accepting and agreeing to be bound
by all of the terms and conditions hereof, and (y) such other documents or
instruments as are necessary or appropriate to effect such Person’s addition as
a Seller hereunder.
Section 12.04. Expenses. Except as otherwise
provided herein, all costs and expenses incurred in connection with the
Transaction Documents shall be paid by the party incurring such cost or
expense.
Section 12.05. Successors and
Assigns. No party may assign, delegate or otherwise transfer
any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement without the consent of
each other party hereto.
Section
12.06. Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the law of the State of Delaware, without regard to the conflicts of law rules
of such state.
Section
12.07. Jurisdiction. The
parties hereto agree that any suit, action or proceeding seeking to enforce any
provision of, or based on any matter arising out of or in connection with, this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby shall be brought in any
federal court located in the State of Delaware or any Delaware state court, and
each of the parties hereby irrevocably consents to the jurisdiction of such
courts (and of the appropriate appellate courts therefrom) in any such suit,
action or proceeding and irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, any objection that it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the venue
of any such suit, action or proceeding in any such court or that any such suit,
action or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an
inconvenient forum. Process in any such suit, action or proceeding may be served
on any party anywhere in the world, whether within or without the jurisdiction
of any such court. Without limiting the foregoing, each party agrees that
service of process on such party as provided in Section 12.01 shall be deemed
effective service of process on such party.
Section
12.08. WAIVER OF JURY
TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES
ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
Section
12.09. Counterparts;
No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement may be signed in
any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same
effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.
This Agreement shall become effective when each party hereto shall have received
a counterpart hereof signed by the other party hereto. The provisions of this
Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties
hereto and their respective successors and assigns. Except with
respect
to
persons specified in Sections 8.09, 8.11 and 10.02, no provision of this
Agreement is intended to confer any rights, benefits, remedies, obligations or
liabilities hereunder upon any Person other than the parties hereto and their
respective successors and assigns.
Section
12.10. Entire
Agreement. This Agreement and the other Transaction Documents constitute
the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of
this Agreement and supersedes all prior agreements and understandings, both oral
and written, between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this
Agreement and the other Transaction Documents.
Section
12.11. Specific
Performance. The parties hereto agree that irreparable damage would occur
if any provision of this Agreement were not performed in accordance with the
terms hereof and that the parties shall be entitled to an injunction or
injunctions to prevent breaches of this Agreement or to enforce specifically the
performance of the terms and provisions hereof (subject, in the case of
enforcement against Parent, to the limitations set forth in Section 11.04) in
any federal court located in the State of Delaware or any Delaware state court,
in addition to any other remedy to which they are entitled at law or in
equity.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and year first
above written.
|
IRIDIUM
HOLDINGS LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Matthew
J. Desch
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Matthew
J. Desch
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GHL
ACQUISITION CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Robert Niehaus
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Robert
Niehaus
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Senior
Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SYNDICATED
COMMUNICATIONS VENTURE PARTNERS IV, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
WJM PARTNERS IV, LLC,
ITS
GENERAL PARTNER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Terry L. Jones
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Terry
L. Jones
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Managing
Member
|
|
|
SYNDICATED
COMMUNICATIONS INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/
Herbert P. Wilkins, Sr.
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Herbert
P. Wilkins, Sr.
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chairman
|
|
|
BARALONCO
LIMITED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Steven B. Pfeiffer |
|
|
|
Name:
|
Steven
B. Pfeiffer
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Attorney
in Fact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BAREENA
SATELLITE, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Michael Boyd |
|
|
|
Name:
|
Michael
Boyd
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COLUSSY
GRANTOR RETAINED ANNUITY TRUST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Dan A. Colussy |
|
|
|
Name:
|
Dan
A. Colussy
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Trustee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAN
A. COLUSSY REVOCABLE TRUST WITH DAN A. COLUSSY AS THE
TRUSTEE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Dan A. Colussy |
|
|
|
Name:
|
Dan
A. Colussy
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Trustee
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TYRONE
BROWN
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Tyrone Brown |
|
|
|
Name:
|
Tyrone
Brown
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Director
(nonvoting)
|
|
|
MOTOROLA,
INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Loren S. Minkus
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Loren
S. Minkus
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Director
Portfolio Management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GINO
PICASSO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Gino Picasso
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Gino
Picasso
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
CEO,
GLOBOKASNET
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AB
KRONGARD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ A.B. Krongard
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
A.B.
Krongard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THOMAS
J. RIDGE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas J. Ridge
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Thomas
J. Ridge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRIDIUM
EMPLOYEE HOLDINGS LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
IRIDIUM SATELLITE, LLC, AS MANAGER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John Brunette
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
John
Brunette
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Legal & Administrative Officer
|
|
|
EMPLOYEE
HOLDINGS LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
IRIDIUM SATELLITE, LLC, AS MANAGER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John Brunette
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
John
Brunette
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Legal & Administrative Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRIDIUM
OPERATIONS SERVICES LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
IRIDIUM SATELLITE, LLC, AS MANAGER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John Brunette
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
John
Brunette
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Chief
Legal & Administrative Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHASE
LINCOLN FIRST COMMERCIAL CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Samantha Hamerman
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Samantha
Hamerman
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BNP
PARIBAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Fletcher Duke
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Fletcher
Duke
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Managing
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Francois Schwall
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Francois
Schwall
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Managing
Director
|
|
|
CPR
(USA) INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert Olsen
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Robert
Olsen
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Authorized
Signatory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEUTSCHE
BANK TRUST COMPANY AMERICAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Scott G. Martin
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Scott
G. Martin
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Managing
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEUTSCHE
BANK AG, LONDON BRANCH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Andrea Leons
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Andrea
Leons
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
AIF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Sunil Hariani
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Sunil
Hariani
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
AIF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D.K.
ACQUISITION PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
M.H. DAVIDSON & CO.,
AS
GENERAL PARTNER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Anthony Yoseloff
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Anthony
Yoseloff
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
General
Partner
|
|
|
JPMORGAN
CHASE BANK NA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Ann Kurinskas
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Ann
Kurinskas
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Managing
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KENSINGTON
INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, AS NOMINEE FOR MANCHESTER SECURITIES
CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Elliot Greenberg
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Elliot
Greenberg
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
POST
STRATEGIC MASTER FUND, LP, AS
SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO POST BALANCED FUND, L.P., AS GENERAL
PARTNER
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
POST ADVISORY GROUP, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Carl H. Goldsmith
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Carl
H. Goldsmith
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Managing
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SILVER
OAK CAPITAL, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas M. Fuller
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Thomas
M. Fuller
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Authorized
Signatory
|
|
|
SPRINGFIELD
ASSOCIATES LLC AS NOMINEE FOR MANCHESTER SECURITIES CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Elliot Greenberg
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
Elliot
Greenberg
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
Vice
President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STONEHILL
INSTITUTIONAL PARTNERS, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BY:
STONEHILL CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ John Motulsky
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
John
Motulsky
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
MM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMENDMENT
TO TRANSACTION AGREEMENT
This
AMENDMENT (the “Amendment”),
dated as of April 28, 2009, to the Transaction Agreement, dated as of September
22, 2008 (the “Agreement”),
among Iridium Holdings LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Company”),
GHL Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”),
and the Sellers’ Committee (as defined in the Agreement).
W
I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS,
Section 12.02 of the Agreement permits the parties to amend the Agreement by an
instrument in writing and signed by Parent, the Company and the Sellers’
Committee; and
WHEREAS,
the parties desire to amend the Agreement as provided herein.
NOW,
THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE
1
DEFINITIONS
Section
1.01. Definitions. Unless
otherwise specifically defined herein, each capitalized term used but not
defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such term in the
Agreement.
ARTICLE
2
AMENDMENT
TO AGREEMENT
Section
2.01. Amendment
to Section 1.01 of the Agreement. The definition of “Aggregate Stock
Consideration” shall be amended and restated as follows:
“Aggregate
Stock Consideration” means (i) with respect to the Sellers (other than
the Greenhill Noteholder), 29,443,500 shares of Parent Stock and (ii) with
respect to the Greenhill Noteholder, assuming the Convertible Note has been
issued prior to the Closing and is being converted in connection therewith,
1,946,500 shares of Parent Stock in accordance with Section 6.08.
Section
2.02. Amendment
to Section 2.04(a) of the Agreement. Section 2.04(a) of the
Agreement is hereby amended by deleting “$30 million” and replacing it with
“$25.5 million”.
Section
2.03. Amendment
to Section 6.08. Section 6.08 of the Agreement is hereby amended by
deleting “27.2866” and replacing it with “23.1936”.
Section
2.04. Amendment
to Section 11.01(b). Section 11.01(b) of the Agreement is hereby
amended by deleting “June 29, 2009” and replacing it with “75 days from April
28, 2009”, in both instances.
Section
2.05. Amendment
to Exhibit A. Exhibit A to the Agreement is hereby deleted in its
entirety and shall be replaced by Exhibit A attached
hereto. Notwithstanding the forgoing, Parent shall not unreasonably
object to any amended Exhibit A delivered by the Sellers’ Committee at least 20
Business Days prior to the Closing Date, if such amended Exhibit A is not
adverse to Parent, does not contemplate any change to the Aggregate Cash
Consideration or the Aggregate Stock Consideration and does not create any risk
of delay to the transactions contemplated under the
Agreement.
Section
2.06. Amendment
to Schedule 7.01 of the Parent Disclosure Schedules. Schedule 7.01
of the Parent Disclosure Schedules is hereby amended by deleting Item 1 in its
entirety and replacing it with “None”.
Section
2.07. Amendment
to Schedule 8.06(a) of the Company Disclosure Schedules. Schedule
8.06(a) is hereby amended by deleting “Admiral Dennis Blair” and replacing it
with “An individual to be named by Baralonco N.V. prior to Closing (who shall be
reasonably satisfactory to Parent).”
Section
2.08. Continuing
Effect; No Other Waivers or Amendments. Except as modified by this
Amendment, the Agreement and all the covenants, agreements, terms, provisions
and conditions thereof shall remain unchanged and in full force and
effect.
Section
2.09. Counterparts. This
Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an
original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon
the same instrument. This Agreement shall become effective when each
party hereto shall have received a counterpart hereof signed by the other party
hereto.
Section
2.10. Governing
Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance
with the law of the State of Delaware, without regard to the conflicts of law
rules of such state.
[The
remainder of this page has been intentionally left blank]
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly
executed by their respective authorized officers as of the day and year first
above written.
IRIDIUM
HOLDINGS LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
Daniel A. Colussy |
|
|
Name: |
Daniel
A. Colussy |
|
|
Title: |
Chairman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
Scott L. Bok |
|
|
Name: |
Scott
L. Bok |
|
|
Title: |
Chairman
& Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/
Steven B. Pfeiffer |
|
|
Name: |
Steven B.
Pfeiffer
|
|
|
Title: |
Baralonco
Representative
|
|
By: |
/s/ Terry L.
Jones
|
|
|
Name: |
Terry L.
Jones
|
|
|
Title: |
Syncom
Representative
|
|
[Signature
Page to Amendment]
AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF
INCORPORATION
OF
Iridium
Communications Inc.
GHL
Acquisition Corp., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
State of Delaware (hereinafter the “Corporation”), hereby certifies as
follows:
1.
The name of the Corporation is GHL Acquisition Corp.
2. This
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation has been duly adopted by the
board of directors of the Corporation (the “Board of Directors”)
and by the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with Sections 228, 242
and 245 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, as amended (“DGCL”), and amends
and restates the provisions of the existing Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of the Corporation.
3.
The text of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the
Corporation is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as
follows:
ARTICLE
ONE
The name
of the corporation is Iridium
Communications Inc. The Corporation was duly incorporated under the
laws of the State of Delaware on November 2, 2007. A Certificate of
Incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on
November 2, 2007 under the name “GHL Acquisition Corp.”.
ARTICLE
TWO
The
registered office and registered agent of the Corporation is The Corporation
Service Company, 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington, New Castle
County, Delaware 19808.
ARTICLE
THREE
The
purpose of the Corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which
corporations may be organized under the DGCL.
ARTICLE
FOUR
A. AUTHORIZED
SHARES
The total
number of shares of capital stock which the Corporation has authority to issue
is [ ] shares, consisting of:
(A) [ ] shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share (“Preferred Stock”);
and
(B) [ ] shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common
Stock”).
B. PREFERRED
STOCK
The board
of directors of the Corporation (the “Board of Directors”)
is expressly authorized to provide for the classification and reclassification
of any unissued shares of Preferred Stock and the issuance thereof in one or
more classes or series without the approval of the stockholders of the
Corporation. The stockholders of the Corporation may increase or
decrease (but not below the number of shares of any class or classes then
outstanding) the number of authorized shares of any such class or classes of
stock by the affirmative approval of a majority of the stockholders entitled to
vote thereon irrespective of the provisions of Section 242(b)(2) of the DGCL (or
any successor provision thereto), including by a resolution of such
stockholders, and no vote of the holders of Common Stock or Preferred Stock
voting separately as a class shall be required therefore.
The
Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series, with such
distinctive serial designations as may be stated or expressed in the resolution
or resolutions providing for the issue of such stock adopted from time to time
by the Board of Directors; and in such resolution or resolutions providing for
the issuance of shares of each particular series, the Board of Directors is also
expressly authorized to fix the right to vote, if any; the consideration for
which the shares of such series are to be issued; the number of shares
constituting such series, which number may be increased (except as otherwise
fixed by the Board of Directors) or decreased (but not below the number of
shares thereof then outstanding) from time to time by action of the
Board of
Directors; the rate of dividends upon which and the times at which dividends on
shares of such series shall be payable, including a rate payable in shares of
Preferred Stock, and the preference, if any, which such dividends shall have
relative to dividends on shares of any other class or classes or any other
series of capital stock of the Corporation; whether such dividends shall be
cumulative or noncumulative, and if cumulative; the date or dates from which
dividends on shares of such series shall be cumulative, the rights, if any,
which the holders of shares of such series shall have in the event of any
voluntary or involuntary liquidation, merger, consolidation, distribution or
sale of assets, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Corporation; the
rights, if any, which the holders of shares of such series shall have to convert
such shares into or exchange such shares for shares of any other class or
classes or any other series of capital stock of the Corporation or for any debt
securities of the Corporation and the terms and conditions, including price and
rate of exchange, of such conversion or exchange; whether shares of such series
shall be subject to redemption, and the redemption price or prices and other
terms of redemption, if any, for shares of such series including, without
limitation, a redemption price or prices payable in shares of Common Stock; the
terms and amounts of any sinking fund for the purchase or redemption of shares
of such series; and any and all other powers, preferences and relative,
participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications, limitations
or restrictions thereof pertaining to shares of such series permitted by
law.
C. COMMON
STOCK
Except as
otherwise required by applicable law, all shares of Common Stock shall be
identical in all respects and shall entitle the holders thereof to the same
rights and privileges, subject to the same qualifications, limitations and
restrictions.
Section 1. Voting Rights.
Except as otherwise required by applicable law, holders of Common Stock, voting
together as if a single class, shall be entitled to one vote per share on all
matters to be voted on by the Corporation’s stockholders. Except as
otherwise provided by law, the Common Stock, together as if a single class,
shall possess full and complete voting power for the election of members of the
Board of Directors.
Section 2. Dividends.
Subject to applicable law and the rights, if any, of the holders of any
outstanding series of Preferred Stock or any class or series of stock having a
preference over or the right to participate with the Common Stock with respect
to the payment of dividends, dividends may be declared and paid on the Common
Stock at such times and in such amounts as the
Board of
Directors in its discretion shall determine. Dividends shall be
payable only as and when declared by the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE
FIVE
The
Corporation is to have perpetual existence.
ARTICLE
SIX
In
furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by statute, the Board
of Directors, acting by majority vote, is expressly authorized to make, adopt,
alter, amend or repeal the by-laws of the Corporation, except as may be
otherwise provided in the by-laws of the Corporation.
ARTICLE
SEVEN
Meetings
of stockholders may be held within or without the State of Delaware, as the
by-laws of the Corporation may provide. The books of the Corporation
may be kept outside the State of Delaware at such place or places as may be
designated from time to time by the Board of Directors or in the by-laws of the
Corporation. Election of directors of the Corporation need not be by
written ballot unless the by-laws of the Corporation so provide.
ARTICLE
EIGHT
Any
action required or permitted to be taken at any annual or special meeting of
stockholders may be taken only upon the vote of stockholders at an annual or
special meeting duly noticed and called in accordance with the DGCL, and may not
be taken by written consent of stockholders without a meeting.
ARTICLE
NINE
Special
meetings of the stockholders may be called by the Board of Directors and the
Chairman of the Board of Directors in accordance with the by-laws of the
Corporation and may not be called by any other person.
ARTICLE
TEN
The business and affairs of the
Corporation shall be managed by or under the direction of a Board of Directors
consisting of not less than 3 and not more than [___] directors. The
exact number of directors within such minimum and maximum shall be fixed solely
by the Board of Directors.
ARTICLE
ELEVEN
Section
1. Limitation on Liability of
Directors. The directors of the Corporation shall be entitled
to the benefits of all limitations on the liability of directors generally that
are now or hereafter become available under the DGCL. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, no director of the Corporation shall
be liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach
of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the
director’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts
or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a
knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL or (iv) for any
transaction from which the director derived an improper personal
benefit.
Section
2. Right of Directors and
Officers To Indemnity From the Corporation. The Corporation
shall indemnify, in a manner and to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL,
each person who is or was a party to or subject to, or is threatened to be made
a party to or to be the subject of, any threatened, pending or completed action,
suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative in
nature (including any legislative or self-regulatory proceeding), by reason of
the fact that he or she is or was, or had agreed to become or is alleged to have
been, a director or officer of the Corporation or is or was serving, or had
agreed to serve or is alleged to have served, at the request of or to further
the interests of the Corporation as a director, officer, manager, partner or
trustee of, or in a similar capacity for, another corporation or any limited
liability company, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise,
including any employee benefit plan of the Corporation or of any of its
affiliates (any such person being sometimes referred to hereafter as an “Indemnitee”), or by
reason of any action taken or omitted or alleged to have been taken or omitted
by an Indemnitee in any such capacity, against, in the case of any action, suit
or proceeding other than an action or suit by or in the right of the
Corporation, all expenses (including court costs and attorneys’ fees) and
amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her or on
his or her behalf and all judgments, damages, fines, penalties and other
liabilities actually sustained by him or her in connection with such action,
suit or proceeding and any appeal therefrom and, in the case of an action or
suit by or in the right of the Corporation, against all expenses and amounts
paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by him or her in connection
with such action or suit, if he or she acted in good faith and in a manner he or
she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best interests of the
Corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, without
reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful; provided, however, that in an
action by or in the right of the Corporation no indemnification shall be made in
respect of any claim, issue or matter as to which such person shall have been
adjudged to be liable to the Corporation unless, and then only to the extent
that, the Court of Chancery of Delaware or the court in which such action or
suit was brought shall determine
upon
application that, despite the adjudication of such liability but in view of all
the circumstances of the case, such person is fairly and reasonably entitled to
indemnity against such expenses or amounts paid in settlement as the Court of
Chancery of Delaware or such other court shall deem proper. The
termination of any action, suit or proceeding by judgment, order, settlement,
conviction or upon a plea of nolo contendere or its equivalent shall not, of
itself, create a presumption that the person did not act in good faith and in a
manner which he or she reasonably believed to be in, or not opposed to, the best
interests of the Corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or
proceeding, without reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was
unlawful. With respect to service by an Indemnitee on behalf of any
employee benefit plan of the Corporation or any of its affiliates, action in
good faith in what the Indemnitee reasonably believed to be the best interest of
the beneficiaries of the plan shall be considered to be in or not opposed to the
best interests of the Corporation. The Corporation shall indemnify an
Indemnitee for expenses (including attorneys’ fees) reasonably incurred by the
Indemnitee in connection with a proceeding successfully establishing his or her
right to indemnification, in whole or in part, pursuant to this
Article. However, notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this
Article, the Corporation shall not be required to indemnify an Indemnitee
against expenses incurred in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof)
initiated by the Indemnitee against the Corporation or any other person who is
an Indemnitee unless the initiation of the proceeding was approved by the Board
of Directors of the Corporation, which approval shall not be unreasonably
withheld.
Section
3. Advancement of
Expenses. Subject to the provisions of the last sentence of
Section 2 of this Article, any advancement by the Corporation against expenses
in advance of the final disposition of the proceeding shall be provided in
accordance with the by-laws of the Corporation then in effect.
Section
4. Procedural
Matters. The right to indemnification and advancement of
expenses provided by this Article shall continue as to any person who formerly
was an officer or director of the Corporation in respect of acts or omissions
occurring or alleged to have occurred while he or she was an officer or director
of the Corporation and shall inure to the benefit of the estate, heirs,
executors and administrators of the Indemnitees. Unless otherwise
required by law, the burden of proving that the Indemnitee is not entitled to
indemnification or advancement of expenses under this Article shall be on the
Corporation. The Corporation may, by provisions in its by-laws or by
agreement with one or more Indemnitees, establish procedures for the application
of the foregoing provisions of this Article, including a provision defining
terms used in this Article. The right of an Indemnitee to
indemnification or advances as granted by this Article shall be a contractual
obligation of the Corporation and, as such, shall be enforceable by the
Indemnitee in any court of competent jurisdiction.
Section
5. Amendment. No
amendment, termination or repeal of this Article or of the relevant provisions
of the DGCL or any other applicable laws shall affect or diminish in any way the
rights of any Indemnitee to indemnification under the provisions hereof with
respect to any action, suit, proceeding or investigation arising out of or
relating to any actions, transactions or facts occurring prior to the final
adoption of such amendment, termination or repeal.
Section
6. Other Rights to
Indemnity. The indemnification and advancement of expenses
provided by this Article shall not be exclusive of any other rights to which an
Indemnitee seeking indemnification or advancement of expenses may be entitled
under any law (common or statutory), agreement, vote of stockholders or action
of the Board of Directors or otherwise, both as to action in his or her official
capacity and as to action in any other capacity while holding office for the
Corporation, and nothing contained in this Article shall be deemed to prohibit
the Corporation from entering into agreements with officers and directors
providing indemnification rights and procedures different from those set forth
in this Article.
Section
7. Other Indemnification and
Advancement of Expenses. In addition to indemnification by the
Corporation of current and former officers and directors and advancement of
expenses by the Corporation to current and former officers and directors as
permitted by the foregoing provisions of this Article, the Corporation may, by
action of the Board of Directors, provide indemnification to such of the
employees and agents of the Corporation to such extent and to such effect as the
Board of Directors shall determine to be appropriate and authorized by the
DGCL.
Section
8. Insurance. The
Corporation may purchase and maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect
itself and any current or former director, officer, employee or agent of the
Corporation or of another corporation or a limited liability company,
partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise (including any employee
benefit plan) in which the Corporation has an interest against any expense,
liability or loss incurred by the Corporation or such person in his or her
capacity as such, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not
the Corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such
liability under the DGCL.
ARTICLE
TWELVE
Section 1. Restrictions on Stock
Ownership and Transfer. As contemplated by this Article, the
Corporation may restrict the ownership, or proposed ownership, of Common Stock
or Preferred Stock of the Corporation by any person if such ownership or
proposed ownership (i) is or could be inconsistent with, or in violation of, any
provision of the Federal Communications
Laws (as
hereinafter defined); (ii) limits or impairs or could limit or impair any
business activities or proposed business activities of the Corporation under the
Federal Communications Laws; or (iii) subjects or could subject the Corporation
to any law, regulation or policy under the Federal Communications Laws to which
the Corporation would not be subject but for such ownership or proposed
ownership (clauses (i), (ii) and (iii) collectively, “FCC Regulatory
Limitations”). For purposes of this Article, the term “Federal Communications
Laws” shall mean the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, and the
rules, regulations or policies promulgated thereunder.
Section 2. Requests for
Information. If the Corporation believes that the ownership or
proposed ownership of Common Stock or Preferred Stock of the Corporation by any
person may result in an FCC Regulatory Limitation, such person shall furnish
promptly to the Corporation such information (including, without limitation,
information with respect to citizenship, other ownership interests and
affiliations) as the Corporation shall request.
Section 3. Denial of Rights, Refusal to
Transfer. If (i) any person from whom information is requested
pursuant to Section 2 of this Article does not provide all the information
requested by the Corporation, or (ii) the Corporation shall conclude in its sole
discretion that a person’s ownership or proposed ownership of, or that a
person’s exercise of any rights of ownership with respect to the Common Stock or
Preferred Stock of the Corporation, results or could result in an FCC Regulatory
Limitation, then, in the case of either clause (i) or clause (ii), the
Corporation may (a) refuse to permit the transfer of Common Stock or Preferred
Stock of the Corporation to such person, (b) suspend those rights of stock or
equity ownership the exercise of which causes or could cause such FCC Regulatory
Limitation, (c) redeem the Common Stock or Preferred Stock of the Corporation
held by such person in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth
herein, and/or exercise any and all appropriate remedies, at law or in equity,
in any court of competent jurisdiction, against any such person, with a view
towards obtaining such information or preventing or curing any situation which
causes or could cause an FCC Regulatory Limitation. Any refusal of
transfer or suspension of rights pursuant to clauses (a) and (b), respectively,
of the immediately preceding sentence shall remain in effect until the requested
information has been received and the Corporation has determined in its sole
discretion that such transfer, or the exercise of such suspended rights, as the
case may be, will not result in an FCC Regulatory Limitation.
ARTICLE
THIRTEEN
The
Corporation expressly elects not to be governed by Section 203 of the
DGCL.
ARTICLE
FOURTEEN
The
Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision
contained in this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation in the
manner now or hereafter prescribed herein and by the laws of the State of
Delaware, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject
to this reservation.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has caused this Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation to be executed by ____________, its
__________________, this __ day of ______, 200__.
[_________________]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
PLEDGE
AGREEMENT
PLEDGE
AGREEMENT dated as of _________, ___ (the “Effective Date”) between [NAME
OF PLEDGOR] (the “Pledgor”) and GHL Acquisition
Corporation (the “Pledgee”).
WHEREAS,
the Pledgor and the Pledgee are parties to the Transaction Agreement dated as of
September 22, 2008 (as amended from time to time, the “Transaction Agreement”);
and
WHEREAS,
the Pledgor is willing to secure its indemnification obligations under the
Transaction Agreement and certain other obligations set forth herein, by
granting Liens on certain assets to the Pledgee as provided herein.
NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Definitions.
(a) Terms Defined in Transaction
Agreement. Except for capitalized terms specifically defined
in this Agreement, the terms defined in the Transaction Agreement shall have, as
used herein, the respective meanings provided for such terms in the Transaction
Agreement.
(b) Terms Defined in
UCC. As used herein, each of the following terms has the
meaning specified in the UCC:
Term
|
UCC
Section
|
Authenticate
|
9-102
|
Control
|
8-106
|
Instrument
|
9-102
|
Proceeds
|
9-102
|
Registered
Organization
|
9-102
|
(c) Additional
Definitions. The following additional terms, as used herein,
have the following meanings:
“Collateral” has the meaning
set forth in Section 2; provided that if at any time the Pledgor proposes to
substitute other collateral for the Collateral described in Section 2 and the
Pledgee agrees in its sole discretion to such substitution, “Collateral” shall
mean such substitute collateral as defined in the amendment or other documents
agreed and executed by the parties to document such
substitution. References
to the Collateral include the Pledged Securities, except as the context
otherwise requires.
“Indemnification Event” means
the failure by the Pledgor to make payment in full for any claim for
indemnification made by an Indemnified Party pursuant to Article 10 of the
Transaction Agreement after (i) the Pledgor’s liability has been determined by a
final non-appealable judgment of a court of compentent jurisdiction in respect
of such claim or (ii) conclusion of a written settlement agreement between
Pledgor and Pledgee in respect of such claim.
“Permitted Liens” means (i) the
Security Interest, and (ii) inchoate Tax and ERISA Liens.
“Pledged Securities” means
[ ]
shares of Pledgee’s common stock, represented by stock certificate number
[ ], which are pledged by the Pledgor hereunder. “Release Date” means the first
Business Day that is on or after nine months after the Closing Date]1 [the first Business Day
that is on or after the second anniversary of the Closing Date]2; provided that, if there is
any outstanding dispute under Article 10 of the Transaction Agreement, the
Collateral shall be partially released to the Pledgor, but only to extent that a
sufficient amount of Collateral remains so as to satisfy all outstanding claims
related to all Indemnification Events.
“Secured Obligations” means all
Damages and costs arising from or in connection with an Indemnification
Event.
“Security Document” means this
Agreement and the Transaction Agreement.
“Security Interest” means the
security interest in the Collateral granted hereunder.
“Transfer Restriction” means,
with respect to any item of Collateral pledged hereunder, any condition to or
restriction on the ability of the owner thereof to sell, assign or otherwise
transfer such item of Collateral or enforce the provisions thereof or of any
document related thereto whether set forth in such item of Collateral itself or
in any document related thereto, including (i) any requirement that any sale,
assignment or other transfer or enforcement for such item of Collateral be
consented to or approved by any Person, including the issuer
1 In the
case of the Syncom Blocker Seller.
2 In the case of the
Baralonco Seller.
thereof
or any other obligor thereon, (ii) any limitations on the type or status,
financial or otherwise, of any purchaser, pledgee, assignee or transferee of
such item of Collateral, and (iii) any requirement for the delivery of any
certificate, consent, agreement, opinion of counsel, notice or any other
document of any Person to the issuer of, any other obligor on or any registrar
or transfer agent for, such item of collateral, prior to the sale, pledge,
assignment or other transfer or enforcement of such item of
collateral.
“UCC”
means the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect from time to time in the State of
New York; provided
that, if perfection or the effect of perfection or non-perfection or the
priority of the Security Interest on any Collateral is governed by the Uniform
Commercial Code as in effect in a jurisdiction other than New York, “UCC”
means the Uniform Commercial Code as in effect from time to time in such other
jurisdiction for purposes of the provisions hereof relating to such perfection,
effect of perfection or non-perfection or priority.
(d) Terms
Generally. The definitions of terms herein (including those incorporated
by reference to the UCC or to another document) apply equally to the singular
and plural forms of the terms defined. Whenever the context may
require, any pronoun includes the corresponding masculine, feminine and neuter
forms. The words “include”,
“includes”
and “including”
shall be deemed to be followed by the phrase “without
limitation”. The word “will”
shall be construed to have the same meaning and effect as the word “shall”. Unless
the context requires otherwise, (i) any definition of or reference to any
agreement, instrument or other document herein shall be construed as referring
to such agreement, instrument or other document as from time to time amended,
supplemented or otherwise modified (subject to any restrictions on such
amendments, supplements or modifications set forth herein), (ii) any reference
herein to any Person shall be construed to include such Person’s successors and
permitted assigns, (iii) the words “herein”,
“hereof”
and “hereunder”,
and words of similar import, shall be construed to refer to this Agreement in
its entirety and not to any particular provision hereof, (iv) all references
herein to Sections, Exhibits and Schedules shall be construed to refer to
Sections of, and Exhibits and Schedules to, this Agreement and (v) the word
“property”
shall be construed to refer to any and all tangible and intangible assets and
properties, including cash, securities, accounts and contract
rights.
2. Security
Interest. In order to secure the Secured Obligations, the
Pledgor hereby grants to the Pledgee a security interest in the following (the
“Collateral”):
(a) all
right, title and interest of the Pledgor in the Pledged Securities and all
rights of the Pledgor in respect of the Pledged Securities, whether now owned or
existing or hereafter acquired or arising and wherever located; and
(b) all
Proceeds of any of the foregoing.
The
Security Interest is granted as security only and shall not subject the Pledgee
to, or transfer or in any way affect or modify, any obligation or liability of
the Pledgor with respect to any of the Collateral or any transaction in
connection therewith.
3. Representations,
Warranties and Covenants of the Pledgor. The Pledgor
represents and warrants to the Pledgee as of the date hereof, and covenants with
the Pledgee, as follows:
(a) [For
the Syncom Blocker Seller: The Pledgor is a Registered Organization validly
existing and in good standing under the Laws of the State of Delaware.] [For the
Baralonco Seller: [The Pledgor is a business company duly incorporated and in
good legal standing under the laws of the British Virgin
Islands.] The Pledgor’s exact legal name is correctly set forth on
the signature page hereof. The Pledgor will provide the Pledgee with
at least 30 days’ prior written notice of any change in the Pledgor’s name or
form or jurisdiction of organization.
(b) The
Pledgor has good and marketable title to all of the Collateral, free and clear
of any Lien, other than Permitted Liens. With respect to the Pledged
Securities, the Pledgor is relying on the representations of the Pledgee in
Section 5.05 of the Transaction Agreement. The Pledgor has not
performed any acts that might prevent the Pledgee from enforcing any of the
provisions of this Agreement. No financing statement, security
agreement, mortgage or similar or equivalent document or instrument covering all
or part of the Collateral is on file or of record in any jurisdiction in which
such filing or recording would be effective to perfect or record a Lien on such
Collateral except for the Security Interest. After the date of this
Agreement, no Collateral will be in the possession or under the Control of any
other Person having a claim thereto or security interest therein, other than
Permitted Liens.
(c) None
of the Collateral is subject to any Transfer Restriction except those created
under the Transaction Documents and under federal and state securities
laws. The Pledgor will not cause or suffer to exist any Transfer
Restriction with respect to any of the Collateral except those created under the
Transaction Documents and under federal and state securities laws.
(d) To
the extent that (i) perfection of a security interest in the Collateral may be
perfected by control pursuant to the UCC and (ii) the Pledgee obtains and
maintains control of the Collateral, no registration, recordation or filing with
any governmental body, agency or official is required in connection with the
execution or delivery of this Agreement or is necessary for the validity or
enforceability thereof or for the perfection or due recordation of the Security
Interest or for the enforcement of the Security Interest.
(e) The
Pledgor will, from time to time, at its expense, execute, deliver, file and
record any statement, assignment, instrument, document, agreement or other paper
and take any other action that from time to time may be necessary in order to
(i) create, preserve or perfect the Security Interest, (ii) cause the Pledgee to
have Control of the Collateral or (iii) enable the Pledgee to exercise and
enforce any of its rights, powers and remedies with respect to the
Collateral.
(f) The
Pledgor will, promptly upon request, provide to the Pledgee all information and
evidence concerning the Collateral that the Pledgee may request from time to
time to enable it to enforce the provisions of this Agreement.
4.
Dispositions; Proceeds; Voting Rights, Etc.
(a) The
Pledgor will not sell or otherwise dispose of the Collateral.
(b) Unless
an Indemnification Event shall have occurred and be continuing, the Pledgor will
have the right, from time to time, to vote and to give consents, ratifications
and waivers with respect to the Collateral. If any Indemnification
Event shall have occurred and be continuing, the Pledgee will have the exclusive
right to the extent permitted by Law to give consents, ratifications and waivers
and to take any other action with respect to the Collateral, with the same force
and effect as if the Pledgee were the absolute and sole owner thereof, and the
Pledgor will take all such action as the Pledgee may reasonably request from
time to time to give effect to such right.
5. Remedies. (a)
If an Indemnification Event has occurred, the Pledgee may exercise all the
rights of a secured party under the UCC (whether or not in effect in the
jurisdiction where such rights are exercised) with respect to the Collateral
and, in addition, the Pledgee may, without being required to give any notice,
except as herein provided in Section 8 or as may be required by mandatory
provisions of Law, sell, lease, license or otherwise dispose of the Collateral
or any part thereof, in one or more parcels at public or private sale, at any
exchange, broker’s board or at any of Pledgee’s offices or elsewhere, for cash,
on credit or for future delivery, at such time or times and at such price or
prices and upon such other terms as the Pledgee may deem commercially
reasonable, irrespective of the impact of any such sales on the market price of
the Collateral. To the maximum extent permitted by applicable Law,
the Pledgee may be the purchaser of any or all of the Collateral at any such
sale and shall be entitled, for the purpose of bidding and making settlement or
payment of the purchase price for all or any portion of the Collateral sold at
any such public sale, to use and apply all of any part of the Secured
Obligations as a credit on account of the purchase price of any Collateral
payable at such sale. Upon any sale of Collateral by the Pledgee
(including pursuant to a power of sale granted by statute or under a judicial
proceeding), the receipt of the Pledgee or of the officer making the sale shall
be a sufficient discharge to the purchaser or purchasers of the Collateral so
sold and such purchaser or purchasers shall not be
obligated
to see to the application of any part of the purchase money paid over the
Pledgor or such officer or be answerable in any way for the misapplication
thereof. Each purchaser at any such sale shall hold the property sold
absolutely free from any claim or right on the part of the Pledgor, and the
Pledgor hereby waives (to the extent permitted by Law) all rights of redemption,
stay or appraisal that it now has or may at any time in the future have under
any rule of Law or statute now existing or hereafter enacted. The
Pledgee shall not be obliged to make any sale of Collateral regardless of notice
of sale having been given. The Pledgee may adjourn any public or
private sale from time to time by announcement at the time and place fixed
therefor, and such sale may, without further notice, be made at the time and
place to which it was so adjourned. To the maximum extent permitted
by Law, the Pledgor hereby waives any claim against the Pledgee arising because
the price at which any Collateral may have been sold at such a private sale was
less than the price that might have been obtained at a public sale, even if the
Pledgee accepts the first offer received and does not offer such Collateral to
more than one offeree. The Pledgee may disclaim any warranty, as to
title or as to any other matter, in connection with such sale or other
disposition, and its doing so shall not be considered adversely to affect the
commercial reasonableness of such sale or other disposition.
(b) If
the Pledgee sells any of the Collateral upon credit, the Pledgor will be
credited only with payment actually made by the purchaser, received by the
Pledgee and applied in accordance with Section 6 hereof. In the event
the purchaser fails to pay for the Collateral, the Pledgee may resell the same,
subject to the same rights and duties set forth herein. Notice of any
such sale or other disposition shall be given to the Pledgor as required by
Section 8.
6. Application
of Proceeds.
(a) If
an Indemnification Event has occurred, the Pledgee may apply the proceeds of any
sale or other disposition of all or any part of the Collateral, in the following
order of priorities:
first, to
pay the expenses of such sale or other disposition, including reasonable
compensation to agents of and counsel for the Pledgee, and all expenses,
liabilities and advances incurred or made by the Pledgee in connection herewith,
and any other amounts then due and payable to the Pledgee in respect of any
expenses in connection with or any indemnity under the Transaction
Agreement;
second, to
pay the Secured Obligations, until payment in full of the Secured Obligations
shall have been made; and
third, to
pay all interest and fees payable pursuant to Section 7 of this Agreement, until
payment in full of all such interest and fees shall have been
made.
7. Fees
and Expenses. (a) The Pledgor will forthwith upon demand pay
to the Pledgee:
(i) the
amount of any Taxes that the Pledgee may have been required to pay in connection
with maintaining the validity, perfection and rank of the Security Interest or
to free any Collateral from any other Lien thereon; and
(ii) the
amount of any and all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses, including transfer
Taxes and reasonable fees and expenses of counsel and other experts, that the
Pledgee may incur in connection with (x) the administration or enforcement
of this Agreement, including such reasonable expenses as are incurred to
preserve the value of the Collateral or the validity, perfection, rank or value
of the Security Interest, (y) the collection, sale or other disposition of any
Collateral or (z) the exercise by the Pledgee of any of its rights or powers
under the Transaction Agreement; and
(iii) the
amount of any fees that the Pledgor shall have agreed in writing to pay to the
Pledgee and that shall have become due and payable in accordance with such
written agreement.
Any such
amount not paid to the Pledgee on demand will bear interest for each day
thereafter until paid at a rate per annum equal to 10%.
(a) If
any transfer Tax, documentary stamp Tax or other Tax is payable in connection
with any transfer or other transaction provided for in the Security Documents,
the Pledgor will pay such Tax and provide any required Tax stamps to the Pledgee
or as otherwise required by Law.
8. Authority
to Administer Collateral. As further security for the Secured
Obligations, the Pledgor irrevocably appoints the Pledgee its true and lawful
attorney, with full power of substitution, in the name of the Pledgor, the
Pledgee or otherwise, for the sole use and benefit of the Pledgee, but at the
expense of the Pledgor, to the extent permitted by Law to exercise, at any time
and from time to time while an Indemnification Event shall have occurred or be
continuing, all or any of the following powers with respect to all or any of the
Collateral:
(a) to
demand, sue for, collect, receive and give acquittance for any and all monies
due or to become due upon or by virtue thereof;
(b) to
settle, compromise, compound, prosecute or defend any action or proceeding with
respect thereto;
(c) to
sell, lease, license or otherwise dispose of the same or the proceeds or avails
thereof, as fully and effectually as if the Pledgee were the absolute owner
thereof; and
(d) to
extend the time of payment of any or all thereof and to make any allowance or
other adjustment with reference thereto;
provided
that, except in the case of Collateral that threatens to decline speedily in
value or is of a type customarily sold on (and such sale is being made through)
a recognized market, the Pledgee will give the Pledgor at least ten days prior
written notice of the time and place of any public sale thereof or the time
after which any private sale or other intended disposition thereof will be made.
Any such notice shall (x) contain the information specified in UCC Section
9-613, (y) be Authenticated and (z) be sent to the parties required to be
notified pursuant to UCC Section 9-611(c); provided
that, if the Pledgee fails to comply with this sentence in any respect, its
liability for such failure shall be limited to the liability (if any) imposed on
it as a matter of law under the UCC.
9. Limitation
on Duty in Respect of Collateral. Beyond the exercise of
reasonable care in the custody and preservation thereof, the Pledgee will have
no duty as to any Collateral in its possession or control or in the possession
or control of any agent or bailee or any income therefrom or as to the
preservation of rights against prior parties or any other rights pertaining
thereto. The Pledgee will be deemed to have exercised reasonable care
in the custody and preservation of the Collateral in its possession or control
if such Collateral is accorded treatment substantially equal to that which it
accords its own property, and will not be liable or responsible for any loss or
damage to any Collateral, or for any diminution in the value thereof, by reason
of any act or omission of any agent or bailee selected by the Pledgee in good
faith, except to the extent that such liability arises from the Pledgee’s gross
negligence or willful misconduct.
10. Termination,
Release. (a) The Security Interest shall terminate and all
rights to the Collateral shall revert to the Pledgor on the Release Date;
provided, however, that if a partial release of Collateral is made as specified
in the final provision in the definition of “Release Date,” then the portion of
such remaining Collateral retained on account of outstanding claims shall be
released upon (i) the payment by the Pledgor to satisfy such outstanding claims
following a final non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction
in respect of such claims; (ii) a final non-appealable judgment by such court
that the Pledgor has no liability with respect of such outstanding claims; or
(iii) the payment by the Pledgor after conclusion of a written settlement
agreement between Pledgor and Pledgee in respect of such outstanding
claims.
(a) Upon
any termination of the Security Interest and release of Collateral, the Pledgee
will, at the expense of the Pledgor, execute and deliver to the Pledgor such
documents as the Pledgor shall reasonably request to evidence the termination of
the Security Interest and the release of the Collateral.
11. Notices. Each
notice, request or other communication given to any party hereunder shall be
given in accordance with Section 12.01 of the Transaction
Agreement.
12. No
Implied Waivers; Remedies Not Exclusive. No failure by the
Pledgee to exercise, and no delay in exercising and no course of dealing with
respect to, any right or remedy under any Security Document shall operate as a
waiver thereof; nor shall any single or partial exercise by the Pledgee of any
right or remedy under any Security Document preclude any other or further
exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right or remedy. The
rights and remedies specified in the Security Documents are cumulative and are
not exclusive of any other rights or remedies provided by Law.
13. Successors
and Assigns. This Agreement is for the benefit of the Pledgee
and its successors and assigns. If all or any part of the Pledgee’s
interest in any Secured Obligation is assigned or otherwise transferred, the
transferor’s rights hereunder, to the extent applicable to the obligation so
transferred, shall be automatically transferred with such
obligation. This Agreement shall be binding on the Pledgor and its
successors and assigns.
14. Amendments
and Waivers. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof
may be waived, amended, modified or terminated except pursuant to an agreement
or agreements in writing entered into by the parties hereto.
15. Choice
of Law; Submission
to Jurisdiction. This Agreement shall be construed in
accordance with and governed by the Laws of the State of New York except as
otherwise required by mandatory provisions of Law and except to the extent that
remedies provided by the Laws of any jurisdiction other than the State of New
York are governed by the Laws of such jurisdiction. The Pledgor
hereby submits to the nonexclusive jurisdiction of the United States District
Court for the Southern District of New York and of any New York State Court
sitting in New York City for purposes of all legal proceedings arising out of or
relating to this Agreement. The Pledgor irrevocably waives, to the
fullest extent permitted by Law, any objection which the Pledgor may now or
hereafter have to the laying of the venue of any such proceeding brought in such
court and any claim that any such proceeding brought in such a court has been
brought in an inconvenient forum.
16. Waiver
of Jury Trial. EACH PARTY HERETO WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT
PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, ANY RIGHT IT MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY
LEGAL PROCEEDING DIRECTLY OR
INDIRECTLY
ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO ANY SECURITY DOCUMENT OR ANY TRANSACTION
CONTEMPLATED THEREBY (WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT OR ANY OTHER
THEORY). EACH PARTY HERETO (A) CERTIFIES THAT NO REPRESENTATIVE,
AGENT OR ATTORNEY OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE,
THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT, IN THE EVENT OF LITIGATION, SEEK TO ENFORCE THE
FOREGOING WAIVER AND (B) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT IT AND THE OTHER PARTIES HERETO
HAVE BEEN INDUCED TO ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE
MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN THIS SECTION.
17. Severability. If
any provision of this Agreement is invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction,
then, to the fullest extent permitted by Law, (i) the other provisions of the
this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in such jurisdiction and
shall be liberally construed in favor of the Pledgee in order to carry out the
intentions of the parties thereto as nearly as may be possible and (ii) the
invalidity or unenforceability of such provision in such jurisdiction shall not
affect the validity or enforceability thereof in any other
jurisdiction.
18. Counterparts. This
Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be
an original but all of which together shall constitute one
instrument.
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly
executed as of the date set forth above.
|
[NAME
OF PLEDGOR]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
|
[NAME
OF PLEDGEE]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
REGISTRATION
RIGHTS AGREEMENT
dated as
of
[ ],
among
GHL
ACQUISITION CORP.
and
THE
SHAREHOLDERS PARTY HERETO
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
|
|
ARTICLE
1
|
DEFINITIONS
|
|
Section
1.01. Definitions
|
1
|
Section
1.02. Other Definitional and
Interpretative Provisions
|
4
|
|
ARTICLE
2
|
REGISTRATION
RIGHTS
|
|
Section
2.01. Registration.
|
5
|
Section
2.02. Participation In
Underwritten Takedown
|
9
|
Section
2.03. Rule 144 Sales;
Cooperation By Parent
|
9
|
|
ARTICLE
3
|
INDEMNIFICATION
AND CONTRIBUTION
|
|
Section
3.01. Indemnification by
Parent
|
12
|
Section
3.02. Indemnification by
Participating Shareholders
|
12
|
Section
3.03. Conduct of
Indemnification Proceedings
|
13
|
Section
3.04. Contribution
|
14
|
Section
3.05. Other
Indemnification
|
15
|
|
|
ARTICLE
4
|
LOCK
UP
|
|
Section
4.01. Restriction on
Shareholders.
|
15
|
|
ARTICLE
5
|
MISCELLANEOUS
|
|
Section
5.01. Binding Effect;
Assignability; Benefit
|
15
|
Section
5.02. Notices
|
16
|
Section
5.03. Waiver; Amendment;
Termination
|
16
|
Section
5.04. Governing
Law
|
17
|
Section
5.05. Jurisdiction
|
17
|
Section
5.06. WAIVER OF JURY
TRIAL
|
17
|
Section
5.07. Specific
Enforcement
|
17
|
Section
5.08. Counterparts;
Effectiveness
|
18
|
Section
5.09. Entire
Agreement
|
18
|
Section
5.10. Severability
|
18
|
Annex
D
REGISTRATION
RIGHTS AGREEMENT
AGREEMENT
dated as of
[ ]
(this “Agreement”) among
GHL Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation (the “Parent”), and the Shareholders
party hereto as listed on the signature pages (each a “Shareholder” and collectively
the “Shareholders”).
WHEREAS
Parent, certain of the Shareholders and Iridium Holdings LLC are parties to the
Transaction Agreement dated September 22, 2008 (the “Transaction Agreement”) with
respect to the purchase by Parent of the equity interests in Iridium Holdings
LLC on the terms and subject to the conditions set out in the Transaction
Agreement; and
WHEREAS
Parent has agreed to grant certain registration rights to the Shareholders upon
the closing of the transactions contemplated by the Transaction Agreement as
provided herein.
NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration for the mutual promises made herein and other good
and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows:
ARTICLE
1
Definitions
Section
1.01. Definitions. (a) The following terms, as used
herein, have the following meanings:
“Affiliate” means, with respect
to any Person, any other Person directly or indirectly controlling, controlled
by or under common control with such Person, provided that no
securityholder of Parent shall be deemed an Affiliate of any other
securityholder solely by reason of any investment in Parent. For the
purpose of this definition, the term “control” (including, with
correlative meanings, the terms “controlling”, “controlled by” and “under common control with”),
as used with respect to any Person, shall mean the possession, directly or
indirectly, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and
policies of such Person, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by
contract or otherwise.
“Board” means the board of
directors of Parent.
“Business Day” means any day
except a Saturday, Sunday or other day on which commercial banks in New York
City are authorized by law to close.
“Exchange Act” means the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
“FINRA” means the Financial
Industry Regulatory Authority and any successor thereto.
“Initial Shareholders” means
Greenhill & Co., Inc., _______, ________ and ________.
“Parent Securities” means (i)
shares of capital stock or voting securities of Parent, (ii) securities of
Parent convertible into or exchangeable for shares of capital stock or voting
securities of Parent or (iii) options or other rights to acquire from Parent, or
other obligation of Parent to issue, any capital stock, voting securities or
securities convertible into or exchangeable for capital stock or voting
securities of Parent.
“Person” means an individual,
corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association, trust or other
entity or organization, including a government or political subdivision or an
agency or instrumentality thereof.
“Public Offering” means an
underwritten public offering of Registrable Securities of Parent pursuant to the
Shelf Registration Statement as amended or supplemented.
“Registrable Securities” means,
the Parent Securities held as of the date hereof by the Shareholders and any
other securities issued or issuable by Parent or any of its successors or
assigns in respect of such Parent Securities by way of conversion, exchange,
exercise, dividend, split, reverse split, combination, recapitalization,
reclassification, merger, amalgamation, consolidation, sale of assets, other
reorganization or otherwise until (i) a registration statement covering such
Parent Securities or such other securities has been declared effective by the
SEC and such Parent Securities or such other securities have been disposed of
pursuant to such effective registration statement, or (ii) such Parent
Securities or such other securities are sold under circumstances in which all of
the applicable conditions of Rule 144 (or any similar provisions then in force)
under the Securities Act are met.
“Registration Expenses” means
any and all expenses incident to the performance of, or compliance with, any
registration or marketing of securities, including all (i) registration and
filing fees, and all other fees and expenses payable in connection with the
listing of securities on any securities exchange or automated interdealer
quotation system, (ii) fees and expenses of compliance with any securities or
“blue sky” laws (including reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel in
connection with “blue sky” qualifications of the securities registered), (iii)
expenses in connection with the preparation, printing, mailing and delivery of
the Shelf Registration Statement, prospectuses and other documents in connection
therewith and any amendments or supplements thereto, (iv) security engraving and
printing expenses, (v) internal expenses of Parent (including all salaries and
expenses
of its officers and employees performing legal or accounting duties), (vi)
reasonable fees and disbursements of counsel for Parent and customary fees and
expenses for independent certified public accountants retained by Parent
(including the expenses relating to any comfort letters or costs associated with
the delivery by independent certified public accountants of any comfort letters
requested pursuant to Section 2.01(j), (vii) reasonable fees and expenses of any
special experts retained by Parent in connection with such registration, (viii)
reasonable fees, out-of-pocket costs and expenses of the Shareholders, including
one counsel for all of the Shareholders selected by the Shareholders holding a
majority of the Registrable Securities to be sold for the account of all
Shareholders in the offering or included in the Shelf Registration Statement,
(ix) fees and disbursements of underwriters customarily paid by issuers or
sellers of securities, but excluding any underwriting fees, discounts and
commissions attributable to the sale of Registrable Securities, (x) costs of
printing and producing any agreements among underwriters, underwriting
agreements, any “blue sky” or legal investment memoranda and any selling
agreements and other documents in connection with the offering, sale or delivery
of the Registrable Securities, (xi) transfer agents’ and registrars’ fees and
expenses and the fees and expenses of any other agent or trustee appointed in
connection with such offering, (xii) expenses relating to any analyst or
investor presentations or any “road shows” undertaken in connection with the
registration, marketing or selling of Registrable Securities, (xiii) all out-of
pocket costs and expenses incurred by Parent or its appropriate officers in
connection with their compliance with Section 2.01(o), and (xiv) fees and
expenses in connection with any review by FINRA of the underwriting arrangements
or other terms of the offering. Except as set forth in clause (viii)
above, Registration Expenses shall not include any out-of-pocket expenses of the
Shareholders (or the agents who manage their accounts).
“Rule 144” means Rule 144 (or
any successor provisions) under the Securities Act.
“SEC” means the Securities and
Exchange Commission.
“Securities Act” means the
Securities Act of 1933.
“Transfer” means, with respect
to any Parent Securities, (i) when used as a verb, to sell, assign, dispose of,
exchange, pledge, encumber, hypothecate or otherwise transfer such Parent
Securities or any participation or interest therein, whether directly or
indirectly, or agree or commit to do any of the foregoing and (ii) when used as
a noun, a direct or indirect sale, assignment, disposition, exchange, pledge,
encumbrance, hypothecation, or other transfer of such Parent Securities or any
participation or interest therein or any agreement or commitment to do any of
the foregoing.
(b) Each
of the following terms is defined in the Section set forth opposite such
term:
Term
|
Section
|
Agreement
|
Preamble
|
Parent
|
Preamble
|
Damages
|
3.01
|
Demand
Takedown
|
2.01(b)
|
Effectiveness
Period
|
2.01(a)
|
Indemnified
Party
|
3.03
|
Indemnifying
Party
|
3.03
|
Inspectors
|
2.01(h)
|
Maximum
Offering Size
|
2.01(b)
|
Notice
|
5.02
|
Records
|
2.01(h)
|
Requesting
Shareholder
|
2.01(b)
|
Selling
Shareholders
|
2.01(b)
|
Shareholder
|
Preamble
|
Shelf
Registration
|
2.01
|
Shelf
Registration Statement
|
2.01
|
Transaction
Agreement
|
Preamble
|
Underwritten
Takedown
|
2.01(b)
|
(c) Capitalized
terms used in this Agreement and not otherwise defined in this Agreement have
the meanings specified in the Transaction Agreement.
Section
1.02. Other
Definitional and Interpretative Provisions. The words
“hereof”, “herein” and “hereunder” and words of like import used in this
Agreement shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular
provision of this Agreement. The captions herein are included for
convenience of reference only and shall be ignored in the construction or
interpretation hereof. Any singular term in this Agreement shall be
deemed to include the plural, and any plural term the
singular. Whenever the words “include”, “includes” or “including” are
used in this Agreement, they shall be deemed to be followed by the words
“without limitation”, whether or not they are in fact followed by those words or
words of like import. “Writing”, “written” and comparable terms refer
to printing, typing and other means of reproducing words (including electronic
media) in a visible form. References to a statute shall be to such
statute, as amended from time to time, and to the rules and regulations
promulgated thereunder. References to any agreement or contract are
to that agreement or contract as amended, modified or supplemented from time to
time in accordance with the terms hereof and thereof. References to
any Person include the successors and permitted assigns of that
Person. References from or through any
date
mean, unless otherwise specified, from and including or through and including,
respectively.
ARTICLE
2
Registration
Rights
Section
2.01. Registration.
(a) As
soon as reasonably practicable and with a view to such registration to become
effective six months from the date hereof, Parent shall effect the registration
of the Registrable Securities under a registration statement (the “Shelf Registration Statement”)
pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act (or any successor rule) (the
“Shelf
Registration”). Parent shall use all reasonable best efforts
to cause the Shelf Registration Statement to become and remain effective for so
long as Shareholders hold Registrable Securities (the “Effectiveness Period”)
commencing on the first anniversary of the date hereof (or such shorter period
in which all of the Registrable Securities shall have actually been
sold).
(b) Parent
shall not be required to effectuate any Public Offering prior to, or following
the expiration of, the Effectiveness Period. During the Effectiveness
Period, Parent shall only be required to effectuate one Public Offering from
such Shelf Registration (an “Underwritten Takedown”) within
any six-month period, which offering may be requested by Shareholders then
holding at least three million Registrable Securities. In connection
with any such Underwritten Takedown:
(i) If
Parent shall receive a request from Shareholders then holding at least three
million Registrable Securities (the requesting Shareholder(s) shall be referred
to herein as the “Requesting
Shareholder”) that Parent effect the Underwritten Takedown of all or any
portion of the Requesting Shareholder’s Registrable Securities, and specifying
the intended method of disposition thereof, then Parent shall promptly give
notice of such requested Underwritten Takedown (each such request shall be
referred to herein as a “Demand
Takedown”) at least 10 Business Days prior to the anticipated filing date
of the prospectus or supplement relating to such Demand Takedown to the other
Shareholders and thereupon shall use its reasonable best efforts to effect, as
expeditiously as possible, the offering in such Underwritten Takedown
of:
(A) subject
to the restrictions set forth in Section 2.01(b)(iii), all Registrable
Securities for which the Requesting Shareholder has requested such offering
under Section 2.01(b)(i), and
(B) subject
to the restrictions set forth in Section 2.01(b)(iii), all other Registrable
Securities that any Shareholders (all such Shareholders, together with the
Requesting Shareholder, the “Selling Shareholders”) have
requested Parent to offer by request received by Parent within 7 Business Days
after such Shareholders receive Parent’s notice of the Demand
Takedown,
all to
the extent necessary to permit the disposition (in accordance with the intended
methods thereof as aforesaid) of the Registrable Securities so to be
offered.
(ii) Promptly
after the expiration of the 7-Business Day-period referred to in Section
2.01(b)(i)(B), Parent will notify all Selling Shareholders of the identities of
the other Selling Shareholders and the number of shares of Registrable
Securities requested to be included therein.
(iii) If
the managing underwriter in an Underwritten Takedown advises Parent and the
Requesting Shareholder that, in its view, the number of shares of Registrable
Securities requested to be included in such Underwritten Offering exceeds the
largest number of shares that can be sold without having an adverse effect on
such offering, including the price at which such shares can be sold (the “Maximum Offering Size”),
Parent shall include in such Underwritten Offering, up to the Maximum Offering
Size, Registrable Securities requested to be included in such Underwritten
Takedown by all Selling Shareholders and allocated pro rata among such Selling
Shareholders on the basis of the relative number of Registrable Securities held
by each such Selling Shareholders at such time.
(c) Parent
shall be liable for and pay all Registration Expenses in connection with the
Shelf Registration and any Underwritten Takedown.
(d)
Prior to filing the Shelf Registration Statement or a prospectus or any
amendment or supplement thereto (other than any report filed pursuant to the
Exchange Act that is incorporated by reference therein), Parent shall, if
requested, furnish to each Shareholder and each underwriter, if any, of the
Registrable Securities covered by the Shelf Registration Statement, prospectus,
amendment or supplement (as applicable) copies of the Shelf Registration
Statement, prospectus, amendment or supplement as proposed to be filed, and
thereafter Parent shall furnish to each Shareholder and underwriter, if any,
such number of copies of such documents and other documents as such Shareholder
or underwriter may reasonably request in order to facilitate the disposition of
the Registrable Securities.
(e)
After the
filing of the Shelf Registration Statement, Parent shall (i) cause any related
prospectus to be supplemented by any required prospectus
supplement,
and, as so supplemented, to be filed pursuant to Rule 424 under the Securities
Act, (ii) comply with the provisions of the Securities Act with respect to the
disposition of the Registrable Securities covered by the Shelf Registration
Statement during the applicable period in accordance with the intended methods
of disposition by the Shareholders thereof set forth in the Shelf Registration
Statement or supplement to such prospectus and (iii) promptly notify each
Shareholder holding Registrable Securities covered by the Shelf Registration
Statement of the effectiveness of the Shelf Registration Statement and any stop
order issued or threatened by the SEC or any state securities commission and
take all reasonable actions required to prevent the entry of such stop order or
to remove it if entered.
(f)
The
Parent shall use all reasonable best efforts to (i) register or qualify the
Registrable Securities under such other securities or “blue sky” laws of such
jurisdictions in the United States as any Shareholder holding such Registrable
Securities reasonably (in light of such Shareholder’s intended plan of
distribution) requests and (ii) cause such Registrable Securities to be
registered with or approved by such other governmental agencies or authorities
as may be necessary by virtue of the business and operations of Parent and do
any and all other acts and things that may be reasonably necessary or advisable
to enable such Shareholder to consummate the disposition of the Registrable
Securities owned by such Shareholder, provided that Parent shall
not be required to (A) qualify generally to do business in any jurisdiction
where it would not otherwise be required to qualify but for this Section
2.01(f), (B) subject itself to taxation in any such jurisdiction or (C) consent
to general service of process in any such jurisdiction.
(g)
Parent
shall immediately notify each Shareholder, at any time when a prospectus
relating the Registrable Securities is required to be delivered under the
Securities Act, of the occurrence of an event requiring the preparation of a
supplement or amendment to such prospectus so that, as thereafter delivered to
the purchasers of such Registrable Securities, such prospectus will not contain
an untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state any material fact
required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not
misleading and promptly prepare and make available to each such Shareholder and
file with the SEC any such supplement or amendment.
(h)
Selling
Shareholders holding a majority of the Registrable Securities requested to be
sold in an Underwritten Takedown shall have the right to select an underwriter
or underwriters in connection with such Underwritten Takedown, which underwriter
or underwriters shall be reasonably acceptable to Parent. In
connection with an Underwritten Takedown, Parent shall enter into customary
agreements (including an underwriting agreement in customary form) and take such
other actions as are reasonably required in order to expedite or facilitate the
disposition of the Registrable Securities in such Underwritten Takedown,
including
the engagement of a “qualified independent underwriter” in connection with the
qualification of the underwriting arrangements with FINRA.
(i)
Upon
execution of confidentiality agreements in form and substance reasonably
satisfactory to Parent, Parent shall make available for inspection by any
Shareholder and any underwriter participating in any disposition pursuant to the
Shelf Registration Statement and any prospectus being filed by Parent pursuant
to this Section 2.01 and any attorney, accountant or other professional retained
by any such Shareholder or underwriter (collectively, the “Inspectors”), all financial
and other records, pertinent corporate documents and properties of Parent
(collectively, the “Records”) as shall be
reasonably necessary or desirable to enable them to exercise their due diligence
responsibility, and cause Parent’s officers, directors and employees to supply
all information reasonably requested by any Inspectors in connection with the
Shelf Registration Statement and any such prospectus. Records that
Parent determines, in good faith, to be confidential and that it notifies the
Inspectors are confidential shall not be disclosed by the Inspectors unless (i)
the disclosure of such Records is necessary to avoid or correct a misstatement
or omission in the Shelf Registration Statement or prospectus (as applicable) or
(ii) the release of such Records is ordered pursuant to a subpoena or other
order from a court of competent jurisdiction. Each Shareholder agrees
that any non-public information obtained by it as a result of such inspections
shall be deemed confidential and shall not be used by it or its Affiliates as
the basis for any market transactions in the Parent Securities unless and until
such information is made generally available to the public. Each
Shareholder further agrees that, upon learning that disclosure of such Records
is sought in a court of competent jurisdiction, it shall give notice to Parent
and allow Parent, at its expense, to undertake appropriate action to prevent
disclosure of the Records deemed confidential.
(j)
The
Parent shall use reasonable best efforts to furnish to each Shareholder
participating in an Underwritten Offering and to each such underwriter, if any,
a signed counterpart, addressed to such Shareholder or underwriter, of (i) an
opinion or opinions of counsel to Parent and (ii) a comfort letter or comfort
letters from Parent’s independent public accountants, each in customary form and
covering such matters of the kind customarily covered by opinions or comfort
letters, as the case may be, as a majority of such Shareholders or the managing
underwriter therefor reasonably requests.
(k)
The
Parent shall otherwise use all reasonable best efforts to comply with all
applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, and make available to its security
holders, as soon as reasonably practicable, an earnings statement or such other
document covering a period of 12 months, beginning within three months after the
effective date of the Shelf Registration Statement, which earnings statement
satisfies the requirements of Rule 158 under the Securities Act.
(l)
The
Parent may require each Shareholder promptly to furnish in writing to Parent
such information regarding the distribution of the Registrable Securities as
Parent may from time to time reasonably request and such other information as
may be legally required in connection with the Shelf Registration.
(m)
Each
Shareholder agrees that, upon receipt of any notice from Parent of the happening
of any event of the kind described in Section 2.01(g), such Shareholder shall
forthwith discontinue disposition of Registrable Securities pursuant to the
Shelf Registration Statement covering such Registrable Securities until such
Shareholder’s receipt of the copies of the supplemented or amended prospectus
contemplated by Section 2.01(g), and, if so directed by Parent, such Shareholder
shall deliver to Parent all copies, other than any permanent file copies then in
such Shareholder’s possession, of the most recent prospectus covering such
Registrable Securities at the time of receipt of such notice. If
Parent shall give such notice, Parent shall extend the period during which the
Shelf Registration Statement shall be maintained effective (including the period
referred to in Section 2.01(a)) by the number of days during the period from and
including the date of the giving of notice pursuant to Section 2.01(g) to the
date when Parent shall make available to such Shareholder a prospectus
supplemented or amended to conform with the requirements of Section
2.01(g).
(n)
The
Parent shall use all reasonable best efforts to list all Registrable Securities
on any securities exchange or quotation system on which any Parent Securities
are then listed or traded.
(o)
The
Parent shall have appropriate officers of Parent (i) prepare and make
presentations at any “road shows” and before analysts and (ii) otherwise use
their reasonable efforts to cooperate as reasonably requested by the
underwriters or the Shareholders in the offering, marketing or selling of the
Registrable Securities.
Section
2.02 . Participation In Underwritten
Takedown. No Shareholder may participate in an Underwritten
Takedown hereunder unless such Shareholder (a) agrees to sell such Shareholder’s
Registrable Securities on the basis provided in any underwriting arrangements
approved by the Persons entitled hereunder to approve such arrangements and (b)
completes and executes all questionnaires, powers of attorney, indemnities,
underwriting agreements and other documents reasonably required under the terms
of such underwriting arrangements and the provisions of this Agreement in
respect of registration rights.
Section
2.03 . Rule 144 Sales;
Cooperation By Parent. (a) If any Shareholder
shall transfer any Registrable Securities pursuant to Rule 144, Parent shall
cooperate, to the extent commercially reasonable, with such Shareholder and
shall provide to such Shareholder such information as such Shareholder shall
reasonably request. Without limiting the foregoing:
(b)
Parent
shall, at any time shares of Parent’s capital stock are registered under the
Securities Act or the Exchange Act, (i) make and keep available public
information, as those terms are contemplated by Rule 144 under the Securities
Act (or any successor or similar rule then in force); (ii) timely file with the
SEC all reports and other documents required to be filed under the Securities
Act and the Exchange Act; and (iii) furnish to each Shareholder forthwith upon
request a written statement by Parent as to its compliance with the reporting
requirements of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, a copy of the most
recent annual or quarterly report of Parent, and such other information as such
Shareholder may reasonably request in order to avail itself of any rule or
regulation of the SEC allowing such Shareholder to sell any Registrable
Securities without registration.
Section
2.04. Piggyback
Registrations.
(a) Whenever
Parent proposes to register any of its equity securities (including any proposed
registration of the Parent’s securities by any third party) under the
Securities Act (other than pursuant to a registration on Form S−4 or S−8 or any
successor or similar forms), whether or not for sale for its own account,
and the registration form to be used may be used for the registration
of Registrable Securities (a “Piggyback Registration”),
Parent shall give prompt written notice to all holders of Registrable Securities
of its intention to effect such a registration (which notice shall be given at
least 20 days prior to the date the applicable registration statement
is to be filed) and, subject to Sections 2.04(c) and 2.04(d), shall include in
such registration (and in all related registrations and
qualifications under state blue sky laws or in compliance with other
registration requirements and in any related underwriting) all
Registrable Securities with respect to which Parent has received written
requests for inclusion therein within 15 days after the receipt of
Parent’s notice. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 2.04(a) to the
contrary, as long as Parent determines that such delay would not
impair the ability of holders of Registrable Securities to participate in such
registration (e.g., because the registration statement therefor is likely to be
reviewed by the Securities and Exchange Commission and/or such offering will not
be completed until at least 20 days after the registration statement therefor is
filed), Parent may delay the notice of a Piggyback Registration until the day
after the registration statement with respect to such Piggyback
Registration is filed, in which case, subject to the remainder of this Section
2.04, Parent shall include in such registration (and in all related
registrations and qualifications under state blue sky laws or in compliance with
other registration requirements and in any related underwriting) all
Registrable Securities with respect to which Parent has received written
requests for inclusion therein within 15 days after the receipt of Parent’s
notice.
(b) The
Registration Expenses of the holders of Registrable Securities shall be paid by
Parent in all Piggyback Registrations.
(c) If
a Piggyback Registration is an underwritten primary registration on behalf of
Parent, and the managing underwriter advises Parent that, in its view, the
number of Registrable Securities requested to be included in such underwritten
primary registration exceeds the largest number of shares that can be sold
without having an adverse effect on such offering, including the price at which
such shares can be sold, Parent shall include in such registration (i) first,
the securities Parent proposes to sell, (ii) second, the Registrable Securities
requested to be included in such registration, pro rata among the holders of
such Registrable Securities on the basis of the amount of such securities owned
by each such holder, and (iii) third, the other securities requested to be
included in such registration pro rata among the holders of such securities on
the basis of the amount of such securities shares owned by each such
holder.
(d) If
a Piggyback Registration is an underwritten secondary registration on behalf of
holders of Parent’s securities (a “Secondary Registration”), and
the managing underwriter advises Parent that, the number of shares of
Registrable Securities requested to be included in such Secondary Registration
exceeds the largest number of shares that can be sold without having an adverse
effect on such offering, including the price at which such shares can be sold,
Parent shall include in such registration (i) first, except to the extent
otherwise previously agreed to by holders of a majority of the Registrable
Securities, the securities requested to be included therein by the holders
requesting such registration, together with the Registrable Securities requested
to be included in such registration, pro rata among the holders of such
securities and Registrable Securities on the basis of the amount of such
securities owned by each such holder, and (ii) second, other securities
requested to be included in such registration pro rata among the holders of such
securities on the basis of the amount of such securities owned by each such
holder.
(e) If
any Piggyback Registration is an underwritten offering, Parent will have the
right to select the investment banker(s) and manager(s) for the
offering.
(f) During
such time as any holder of Registrable Securities may be engaged in a
distribution of securities pursuant to an underwritten Piggyback Registration,
such holder shall distribute such securities only under the registration
statement and solely in the manner described in the registration
statement.
(g) Parent
shall have the right to terminate or withdraw any registration initiated by it
under this Section 2.04, whether or not any holder of
Registrable
Securities has elected to include securities in such registration, without any
liability to Parent, except that the Registration Expenses of such withdrawn
registration shall be borne by Parent.
ARTICLE
3
Indemnification
and Contribution
Section
3.01 . Indemnification by
Parent. Parent agrees to indemnify and hold harmless each
Shareholder beneficially owning any Registrable Securities covered by the Shelf
Registration Statement, or any prospectus filed in connection with an
Underwritten Takedown pursuant to the terms hereof, or any amendment or
supplement thereto, its officers, directors, employees, partners and agents, and
each Person, if any, who controls such Shareholder within the meaning of Section
15 of the Securities Act or Section 20 of the Exchange Act from and against any
and all losses, claims, damages, liabilities and expenses (including reasonable
expenses of investigation and reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses)
(collectively, “Damages”) caused by or
relating to any untrue statement or alleged untrue statement of a material fact
contained in the Shelf Registration Statement or any such prospectus relating to
the Registrable Securities (as amended or supplemented if Parent shall have
furnished any amendments or supplements thereto), or caused by or relating to
any omission or alleged omission to state therein a material fact required to be
stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading,
except insofar as such Damages are caused by or related to any such untrue
statement or omission or alleged untrue statement or omission so made based upon
information furnished in writing to Parent by such Shareholder or on such
Shareholder’s behalf expressly for use therein. Parent also agrees to
indemnify any underwriters of the Registrable Securities, their officers and
directors and each Person who controls such underwriters within the meaning of
Section 15 of the Securities Act or Section 20 of the Exchange Act on
substantially the same basis as that of the indemnification of the Shareholders
provided in this Section 3.01.
Section
3.02 . Indemnification by Participating
Shareholders. Each Shareholder holding Registrable Securities
included in the Shelf Registration Statement, any prospectus filed in connection
with an Underwritten Takedown pursuant to the terms hereof, or any supplement or
amendment thereto agrees, severally but not jointly, to indemnify and hold
harmless Parent, its officers, directors and agents and each Person, if any, who
controls Parent within the meaning of either Section 15 of the Securities Act or
Section 20 of the Exchange Act to the same extent as the foregoing indemnity
from Parent to such Shareholder, but only with respect to information furnished
in writing by such Shareholder or on such Shareholder’s behalf expressly for use
in the Shelf Registration Statement or any such prospectus, or any amendment or
supplement thereto. Each such Shareholder also agrees to indemnify
and hold harmless
underwriters
of the Registrable Securities, their officers and directors and each Person who
controls such underwriters within the meaning of either Section 15 of the
Securities Act or Section 20 of the Exchange Act on substantially the same basis
as that of the indemnification of Parent provided in this Section
3.02. As a condition to including Registrable Securities in the Shelf
Registration Statement or any prospectus filed in connection with an
Underwritten Takedown pursuant to the terms hereof, Parent may require that it
shall have received an undertaking reasonably satisfactory to it from any
underwriter to indemnify and hold it harmless to the extent customarily provided
by underwriters with respect to similar securities. No Shareholder
shall be liable under this Section 3.02 for any Damages in excess of the net
proceeds realized by such Shareholder in the sale of Registrable Securities of
such Shareholder to which such Damages relate.
Section
3.03 . Conduct of Indemnification
Proceedings. If any proceeding (including any governmental
investigation) shall be instituted involving any Person in respect of which
indemnity may be sought pursuant to this Article 3, such Person (an “Indemnified Party”) shall
promptly notify the Person against whom such indemnity may be sought (the “Indemnifying Party”) in
writing and the Indemnifying Party shall assume the defense thereof, including
the employment of counsel reasonably satisfactory to such Indemnified Party, and
shall assume the payment of all fees and expenses, provided that the failure of
any Indemnified Party so to notify the Indemnifying Party shall not relieve the
Indemnifying Party of its obligations hereunder except to the extent that the
Indemnifying Party is materially prejudiced by such failure to
notify. In any such proceeding, any Indemnified Party shall have the
right to retain its own counsel, but the fees and expenses of such counsel shall
be at the expense of such Indemnified Party unless (i) the Indemnifying Party
and the Indemnified Party shall have mutually agreed to the retention of such
counsel, (ii) in the reasonable judgment of such Indemnified Party
representation of both parties by the same counsel would be inappropriate due to
actual or potential differing interests between them, including one or more
defenses or counterclaims that are different from or in addition to those
available to the Indemnifying Party, or (iii) the Indemnifying Party shall have
failed to assume the defense within 30 days of notice pursuant to this Section
3.03. It is understood that, in connection with any proceeding or
related proceedings in the same jurisdiction, the Indemnifying Party shall not
be liable for the reasonable fees and expenses of more than one separate firm of
attorneys (in addition to any local counsel) at any time for all such
Indemnified Parties, and that all such fees and expenses shall be reimbursed as
they are incurred. In the case of any such separate firm for the
Indemnified Parties, such firm shall be designated in writing by the Indemnified
Parties. The Indemnifying Party shall not be liable for any
settlement of any proceeding effected without its written consent, but if
settled with such consent, or if there be a final judgment for the plaintiff,
the Indemnifying Party shall indemnify and hold harmless such Indemnified
Parties from and against any loss or liability (to the
extent
stated above) by reason of such settlement or judgment. Without the
prior written consent of the Indemnified Party, no Indemnifying Party shall
effect any settlement of any pending or threatened proceeding in respect of
which any Indemnified Party is or could have been a party and indemnity could
have been sought hereunder by such Indemnified Party, unless such settlement (A)
includes an unconditional release of such Indemnified Party from all liability
arising out of such proceeding, and (B) does not include any injunctive or other
equitable or non-monetary relief applicable to or affecting such Indemnified
Person.
Section
3.04 . Contribution. If
the indemnification provided for in this Article 3 is unavailable to the
Indemnified Parties in respect of any Damages, then each Indemnifying Party, in
lieu of indemnifying the Indemnified Parties, shall contribute to the amount
paid or payable by such Indemnified Party, in such proportion as is appropriate
to reflect the relative fault of the Indemnifying Party and Indemnified Party in
connection with the actions, statements or omissions that resulted in such
Damages as well as any other relevant equitable considerations. The
relative fault of such Indemnifying Party and Indemnified Party shall be
determined by reference to, among other things, whether any action in question,
including any untrue or alleged untrue statement of a material fact or omission
or alleged omission of a material fact, has been taken or made by, or relates to
information supplied by, such Indemnifying Party or Indemnified Party, and the
parties’ relative intent, knowledge, access to information and opportunity to
correct or prevent such action, statement or omission. The amount
paid or payable by a party as a result of any Damages shall be deemed to
include, subject to the limitations set forth in this Agreement, any reasonable
attorneys’ or other reasonable fees or expenses incurred by such party in
connection with any proceeding to the extent such party would have been
indemnified for such fees or expenses if the indemnification provided for in
this Article 3 was available to such party in accordance with its
terms.
The
parties hereto agree that it would not be just and equitable if contribution
pursuant to this Section 3.04 were determined by pro rata allocation or by any
other method of allocation that does not take into account the equitable
considerations referred to in the immediately preceding
paragraph. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 3.04, no
Shareholder shall be required to contribute, in the aggregate, any amount in
excess of the net proceeds actually received by such Shareholder from the sale
of the Registrable Securities subject to the proceeding. Each
Shareholder’s obligation to contribute pursuant to this Section 3.03 is several
in the proportion that the proceeds of the offering received by such Shareholder
bears to the total proceeds of the offering received by all such Shareholders
and not joint.
No Person
guilty of fraudulent misrepresentation (within the meaning of Section 11(f) of
the Securities Act) shall be entitled to contribution from any Person who was
not guilty of such fraudulent misrepresentation. The indemnity
and
contribution agreements contained in this Article 3 are in addition to any
liability that the Indemnifying Parties may have to the Indemnified
Parties.
Section
3.05 . Other
Indemnification. Indemnification similar to that specified
herein (with appropriate modifications) shall be given by Parent and each
Shareholder participating therein with respect to any required registration or
other qualification of securities under any foreign, federal or state law or
regulation or governmental authority other than the Securities Act.
ARTICLE
4
Lock
Up
Section
4.01 . Restriction on Shareholders.
Except as provided in the next sentence, no Shareholder will, without the prior
written consent of Parent (which consent may be withheld in its sole
discretion), directly or indirectly, Transfer, offer, contract or grant any
option to Transfer (including any short sale), pledge, transfer, establish an
open “put equivalent position” or liquidate or decrease a “call equivalent
position” within the meaning of Rule 16a-1(h) under the Exchange Act, or
otherwise dispose of or Transfer (or enter into any transaction which is
designed to, or might reasonably be expected to, result in the disposition or
Transfer of) any Parent Securities, currently or hereafter owned either of
record or beneficially (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act) by the
undersigned, or publicly announce the undersigned’s intention to do any of the
foregoing, for a period commencing on the date hereof and continuing through to
the first anniversary of the date hereof, provided that the Board may,
in its sole discretion, at the request of any Requesting Shareholder, authorize
an Underwritten Takedown at any time beginning six months following the date
hereof. Each Shareholder may pledge up to 25% of its Parent
Securities as collateral to secure cash borrowing from a third party financial
institution, provided
that such financial institution agrees in writing with Parent to be bound
by the provisions of this Article 4 with respect to such Parent
Securities.
ARTICLE
5
Miscellaneous
Section
5.01 . Binding Effect;
Assignability; Benefit. (a) This
Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto
and their respective heirs, successors, legal representatives and permitted
assigns. Any Shareholder that ceases to own beneficially any Parent
Securities shall cease to be bound by the terms hereof (other than (i) the
provisions of Article 3 applicable to such Shareholder with respect to any
offering of Registrable Securities completed before the date such Shareholder
ceased to own any Parent Securities and (ii) this Article 5).
(b) Neither
this Agreement nor any right, remedy, obligation or liability arising hereunder
or by reason hereof shall be assignable by any party hereto, except pursuant to
any permitted Transfer of Parent Securities.
(c) Nothing
in this Agreement, expressed or implied, is intended to confer on any Person
other than the parties hereto, and their respective heirs, successors, legal
representatives and permitted assigns, any rights, remedies, obligations or
liabilities under or by reason of this Agreement.
Section
5.02 . Notices. All
notices, requests and other communications (each, a “Notice”) to any party shall be
in writing and shall be delivered in person, mailed by certified or registered
mail, return receipt requested, or sent by facsimile transmission,
if to
Parent to:
[ ]
with a
copy to:
[ ]
if to any
Shareholder, at the address for such Shareholder listed on the signature pages
below or otherwise provided to Parent as set forth below.
Any
Notice shall be deemed received on the date of receipt by the recipient thereof
if received prior to 5:00 p.m. in the place of receipt and such day is a
Business Day in the place of receipt. Otherwise, such Notice shall be
deemed not to have been received until the next succeeding Business Day in the
place of receipt. Any Notice sent by facsimile transmission also
shall be confirmed by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested,
posted within one Business Day, or by personal delivery, whether courier or
otherwise, made within two Business Days after the date of such facsimile
transmission.
Any
Person that becomes a Shareholder after the date hereof shall provide its
address and fax number to Parent.
Section
5.03 . Waiver; Amendment;
Termination. No provision of this Agreement may be waived
except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against whom the waiver
is to be effective. No provision of this Agreement may be amended or
otherwise modified except by an instrument in writing executed by Parent, the
Initial Holders (so long as they, collectively, hold at least 10% of their
initial Registrable Securities), Syndicated Communications, Inc. (so long as it
holds at least 10% of its initial Registrable Securities), Syndicated
Communications Venture Partners IV, L.P. (so long as it holds at least 10% of
its
initial
Registrable Securities), Baralonco N.V. (so long as it holds at least 10% of its
initial Registrable Securities) and the holders of at least 51% of the
Registrable Securities held by the parties hereto at the time of such proposed
amendment or modification. This Agreement may be terminated by an
instrument in writing executed by Parent, the Initial Holders (so long as they,
collectively, hold at least 10% of their initial Registrable Securities),
Syndicated Communications, Inc. (so long as it holds at least 10% of its initial
Registrable Securities), Syndicated Communications Venture Partners IV, L.P. (so
long as it holds at least 10% of its initial Registrable Securities), Baralonco
N.V. (so long as it holds at least 10% of its initial Registrable Securities)
and the holders of at least 51% of the Registrable Securities held by the
parties hereto at the time of such proposed termination. Except for
the indemnification provisions set forth in Article 3, this Agreement shall
terminate as to any Shareholder at such time as such Shareholder ceases to own
any Registrable Securities.
Section
5.04 . Governing
Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the law of the State of Delaware, without regard to the
conflicts of law rules of such state.
Section
5.05 . Jurisdiction. The
parties hereto agree that any suit, action or proceeding seeking to enforce any
provision of, or based on any matter arising out of or in connection with, this
Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby shall be brought in any
federal court located in the State of Delaware or any Delaware state court, and
each of the parties hereby irrevocably consents to the jurisdiction of such
courts (and of the appropriate appellate courts therefrom) in any such suit,
action or proceeding and irrevocably waives, to the fullest extent permitted by
law, any objection that it may now or hereafter have to the laying of the venue
of any such suit, action or proceeding in any such court or that any such suit,
action or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an
inconvenient forum. Process in any such suit, action or proceeding
may be served on any party anywhere in the world, whether within or without the
jurisdiction of any such court. Without limiting the foregoing, each
party agrees that service of process on such party as provided in Section 5.02 shall
be deemed effective service of process on such party.
Section
5.06 . WAIVER OF JURY
TRIAL. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES
ANY AND ALL RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY LEGAL PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR
RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.
Section
5.07 . Specific
Enforcement. Each party hereto acknowledges that the remedies
at law of the other parties for a breach or threatened breach of this Agreement
would be inadequate and, in recognition of this fact, any party to this
Agreement, without posting any bond or furnishing other security, and in
addition
to all
other remedies that may be available, shall be entitled to obtain equitable
relief in the form of specific performance, a temporary restraining order, a
temporary or permanent injunction or any other equitable remedy that may then be
available.
Section
5.08 . Counterparts;
Effectiveness. This Agreement may be executed (including by
facsimile transmission) with counterpart signature pages or in any number of
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, with the same
effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same
instrument. This Agreement shall become effective when each party
hereto shall have executed and delivered this Agreement. Until and
unless each party has executed and delivered this Agreement, this Agreement
shall have no effect and no party shall have any right or obligation hereunder
(whether by virtue of any other oral or written agreement or other
communication).
Section
5.09 . Entire
Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and
understanding among the parties hereto and supersedes all prior and
contemporaneous agreements and understandings, both oral and written, among the
parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof (including that certain
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of ____, 2008, by and among Parent,
Greenhill & Co., Inc. and the other Initial Shareholders, which is hereby
terminated in its entirety).
Section
5.10 . Severability. If
any term, provision, covenant or restriction of this Agreement is held by a
court of competent jurisdiction or other authority to be invalid, void or
unenforceable, the remainder of the terms, provisions, covenants and
restrictions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall
in no way be affected, impaired or invalidated so long as the economic or legal
substance of the transactions contemplated hereby is not affected in any manner
materially adverse to any party. Upon such a determination, the
parties shall negotiate in good faith to modify this Agreement so as to effect
the original intent of the parties as closely as possible in an acceptable
manner so that the transactions contemplated hereby be consummated as originally
contemplated to the fullest extent possible.
[Signature
page follows.]
IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement or have
caused this Agreement to be duly executed by their respective authorized
officers as of the day and year first above written.
|
GHL
ACQUISITION CORP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GREENHILL
& CO, INC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Insert
each Shareholder Name]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
IRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC.
STOCK
INCENTIVE PLAN
The
purpose of this 2009 Iridium Communications Inc. Stock Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”) is to
aid Iridium Communications Inc. (the “Company”) and its
Affiliates in recruiting and retaining key employees, directors and other
service providers and to motivate such persons to exert their best efforts on
behalf of the Company and its Affiliates by providing incentives through the
granting of Awards. The Company expects that it will benefit from the
added interest which such key employees, directors or consultants will have in
the welfare of the Company as a result of their proprietary interest in the
Company’s success.
The
following capitalized terms used in the Plan have the respective meanings set
forth in this Section:
(a) Act: The
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or any successor
thereto.
(b) Affiliate: With
respect to the Company, any entity directly or indirectly controlling,
controlled by, or under common control with, the Company or any other entity
designated by the Board in which the Company or an Affiliate has an
interest.
(c) Award: An
Option, Stock Appreciation Right or Other Stock-Based Award granted pursuant to
the Plan.
(d) Beneficial
Owner: A “beneficial owner”, as such term is defined in Rule
13d-3 under the Act (or any successor rule thereto).
(e) Board: The
Board of Directors of the Company.
(f) Change in
Control: The occurrence, in a single transaction or in a
series of related transactions, of any one or more of the following
events:
(i) the
sale or disposition, in one or a series of related transactions, of all or
substantially all, of the assets of the Company and its Subsidiaries, taken as a
whole, to any “person” or “group” (as such terms are used for purposes of
Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Act) other than the Permitted
Holders;
(ii) any
person or group, other than the Permitted Holders, is or becomes the Beneficial
Owner (except that a person shall be deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of
all shares that any such person has the right to acquire, whether such right is
exercisable immediately or only after the passage of time), directly or
indirectly, of more than 50% of the total voting power of the voting stock of
the Company (or any entity which controls the Company), including by way of
merger, consolidation, tender or exchange offer or otherwise;
2
(iii) a
reorganization, recapitalization, merger or consolidation (a “Corporate
Transaction”) involving the Company, unless securities representing 50%
or more of the combined voting power of the then outstanding voting securities
entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the Company or the
corporation resulting from such Corporate Transaction (or the parent of such
corporation) are held subsequent to such transaction by the person or persons
who were the Beneficial Owners of the outstanding voting securities entitled to
vote generally in the election of directors of the Company immediately prior to
such Corporate Transaction, in substantially the same proportions as their
ownership immediately prior to such Corporate Transaction; or
(iv) during
any period of 12 months, individuals who at the beginning of such period
constituted the Board (together with any new directors whose election by such
Board or whose nomination for election by the stockholders of the Company was
approved by a vote of a majority of the directors of the Company, then still in
office, who were either directors at the beginning of such period or whose
election or nomination for election was previously so approved) cease for any
reason to constitute a majority of the Board, then in office.
(g) Code: The
Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or any successor
thereto.
(h) Committee: The
Compensation Committee of the Board (or a subcommittee thereof), or such other
committee of the Board (including, without limitation, the full Board) to which
the Board has delegated power to act under or pursuant to the provisions of the
Plan.
(i) Company: Iridium
Communications Inc., a Delaware corporation.
(j) Effective
Date: The date the Board approves the Plan, or such later date
as is designated by the Board.
(k) Employment: The
term “Employment” as used herein shall be deemed to refer to (i) a Participant’s
employment if the Participant is an employee of the Company or any of its
Affiliates, (ii) a Participant’s services as a consultant, if the Participant is
consultant to the Company or its Affiliates or (iii) a Participant’s services as
an non-employee director, if the Participant is a non-employee member of the
Board or the board of directors (or equivalent governing body) of any
Affiliate.
(l) Employment Agreement:
The employment agreement, if any, specifying the terms of a Participant’s
employment by the Company or one of its Affiliates.
(m) Fair Market
Value: As of any date, the value of a Share determined as
follows: (i) if there should be a public market for the Shares on such
date, the closing price of the Shares as reported on such date on the Composite
Tape of the principal national securities exchange on which such Shares are
listed or admitted to trading, or, if the Shares are not listed or admitted on
any national securities exchange, the arithmetic mean of the per Share closing
bid price and per Share closing asked price on such date as quoted on the
National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation System (or such
market in which such prices are regularly quoted)(the “NASDAQ”), or, if no
sale of Shares shall have been reported on the Composite Tape of any national
securities exchange or quoted on the NASDAQ on such date, then the immediately
preceding date on which sales of the Shares have been so reported or quoted
shall be used, and (ii) if there should not be a public market for the
Shares on such date, the Fair Market Value shall be the value established by the
Committee in good faith.
3
(n) ISO: An
Option that is intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the
meaning of Section 422 of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder,
as amended from time to time.
(o) Option: A
stock option granted pursuant to Section 6 of the Plan.
(p) Option
Price: The purchase price per Share of an Option, as
determined pursuant to Section 6(a) of this Plan.
(q) Other Stock-Based
Awards: Awards granted pursuant to Section 8 of the
Plan.
(r) Participant: An
employee, director or other service provider who is selected by the Committee to
participate in the Plan and receives an Award hereunder.
(s) Permitted Holder
means, as of the date of determination, any and all of an employee benefit plan
(or trust forming a part thereof) maintained by (A) the Company or any
Subsidiary or (B) any corporation or other Person of which a majority of its
voting power of its voting equity securities or equity interest is owned,
directly or indirectly, by the Company.
(t) Performance-Based
Awards: Certain Other Stock-Based Awards granted pursuant to
Section 8(b) of the Plan.
(u) Person: A
“person”, as such term is used for purposes of Section 13(d) or 14(d) of the Act
(or any successor section thereto).
(v) Plan: This
2009 Iridium Communications Inc. Stock Incentive Plan, as amended from time to
time.
(w) Shares: The
shares of the common stock, $0.001 par value, of the Company.
(x) Stock Appreciation
Right: A stock appreciation right granted pursuant to Section
7 of the Plan.
(y) Subsidiary: With
respect to the Company, any entity that is a subsidiary corporation thereof, as
defined in Section 424(f) of the Code (or any successor section
thereto).
3.
|
Shares
Subject to the Plan and
Participation
|
Subject
to Section 9, the total number of Shares which may be issued under the Plan is
8,000,000 (which is also the maximum number of Shares for which ISOs may be
granted). Additionally, subject to Section 9, the maximum number of
Shares for which Options and Stock Appreciation Rights (or other Awards under
Section 8(b)) may be granted during a calendar year to any Participant shall be
2,000,000. The Shares may consist, in whole or in part, of unissued
Shares or treasury Shares. The issuance of Shares or the payment of
cash upon the exercise of an Award or in consideration of the cancellation or
termination of an Award shall reduce the total number of Shares available under
the Plan, as applicable. Shares which are subject to Awards which
terminate or lapse without the payment of consideration may be granted again
under the Plan.
Employees,
directors and other service providers of the Company and its Affiliates shall be
eligible to be selected to receive Awards under this Plan; provided, that ISOs
may only be granted to employees of the Company and its
Subsidiaries.
4
This Plan
shall be administered by the Committee, which may delegate its duties and powers
in whole or in part to any subcommittee thereof consisting solely of at least
two individuals who are intended to qualify as “non-employee directors” within
the meaning of Rule 16b-3 under the Act or any successor rule thereto,
“independent directors” within the meaning of the listed company rules of the
principal national securities exchange on which the Shares are listed or
admitted to trading and “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m)
of the Code or any successor section thereto (“Eligible
Directors”). Additionally, the Committee may delegate the
authority to grant Awards under the Plan to any employee or group of employees
of the Company or an Affiliate; provided that Awards
to Participants who are subject to Section 16 of the Act and/or Section 162(m)
of the Code shall only be made by the Committee (if the Committee consists
solely of at least two Eligible Directors) or by a subcommittee consisting
solely of at least two Eligible Directors; provided, further, that such
delegation and grants are consistent with applicable law and guidelines
established by the Board from time to time. Awards may, in the
discretion of the Committee, be made under the Plan in assumption of, or in
substitution for, outstanding awards previously granted by the Company or its
Affiliates or any entity acquired by the Company or with which the Company
combines. The number of Shares underlying such substitute awards
shall be counted against the aggregate number of Shares available for Awards
under the Plan. Subject to Section 13, the Committee is authorized to
interpret the Plan, to establish, amend and rescind any rules and regulations
relating to the Plan, and to make any other determinations that it deems
necessary or desirable for the administration of the Plan. The
Committee may correct any defect or supply any omission or reconcile any
inconsistency in the Plan in the manner and to the extent the Committee deems
necessary or desirable. Any decision of the Committee in the
interpretation and administration of the Plan, as described herein, shall lie
within its sole and absolute discretion and shall be final, conclusive and
binding on all parties concerned (including, but not limited to, Participants
and their beneficiaries or successors). The Committee shall have the
full power and authority to establish the terms and conditions of any Award
consistent with the provisions of the Plan and to waive any such terms and
conditions at any time (including, without limitation, accelerating or waiving
any vesting conditions). The Committee shall require payment of any
amount it may determine to be necessary to withhold for federal, state, local or
other taxes as a result of the exercise, grant or vesting of an Award
(including, without limitation, any applicable income, employment and social
security taxes or contributions). To the extent permitted by the
Committee in the applicable Award agreement or otherwise and, in each case, as
permitted by applicable local law, a Participant may elect to pay a portion or
all of such withholding taxes by (a) the delivery of Shares (which are not
subject to any pledge or other security interest owned by the Participant having
a Fair Market Value equal to such withholding liability; provided, that such
Shares have been held by the Participant for no less than six months (or such
other period as established from time to time by the Committee in order to avoid
adverse accounting treatment applying generally accepted accounting principles)
or (b) by having the Company withhold from the number of Shares otherwise
issuable or deliverable pursuant to the exercise or settlement of the Award a
number of shares with a Fair Market Value equal to such withholding liability
(but no more than the minimum required statutory withholding
liability).
No Award
may be granted under this Plan after the tenth anniversary of the Effective
Date, but Awards theretofore granted may extend beyond such date.
5
6.
|
Terms
and Conditions of Options
|
Options
granted under this Plan shall be, as determined by the Committee, non-qualified
or incentive stock options for federal income tax purposes, as evidenced by the
applicable Award agreement, and shall be subject to the foregoing and the
following terms and conditions and to such other terms and conditions, not
inconsistent therewith, as the Committee shall determine:
(a) Option
Price. The Option Price per Share shall be determined by the
Committee, but shall not be less than 100% of the Fair Market Value of a Share
on the date an Option is granted (other than in the case of Options granted in
substitution of previously granted awards, as described in Section 4
hereof).
(b) Exercisability. Options
granted under this Plan shall be exercisable at such time and upon such terms
and conditions as may be determined by the Committee, but in no event shall an
Option be exercisable more than ten years after the date it is
granted.
(c) Exercise of
Options. Except as otherwise provided in this Plan or in the
applicable Award agreement, an Option may be exercised for all, or from time to
time any part, of the Shares for which it is then exercisable. For
purposes of this Section 6, the exercise date of an Option shall be the later of
the date a notice of exercise is received by the Company and, if applicable, the
date payment is received by the Company pursuant to clauses (i) or (ii) of the
following sentence. The purchase price for the Shares as to which an
Option is exercised shall be paid to the Company as designated by the Committee,
pursuant to one or more of the following methods: (i) in cash or its equivalent
(e.g., by check or wire transfer) or (ii) by such other method as the
Committee in its sole discretion may permit either in the applicable Award
agreement or otherwise, including without limitation, (A) in Shares having a
Fair Market Value equal to the aggregate Option Price for the Shares being
purchased that are not subject to any pledge or other security interest and
satisfy such other requirements as may be imposed by the Committee; provided, that such
Shares have been held by the Participant for no less than six months (or such
other period as established from time to time by the Committee in order to avoid
adverse accounting treatment applying generally accepted accounting principles),
(B) partly in cash and partly in such Shares, (C) if there is a public
market for the Shares at such time, through the delivery of irrevocable
instructions to a broker to sell Shares obtained upon the exercise of the Option
and to deliver promptly to the Company an amount out of the proceeds of such
Sale equal to the aggregate Option Price for the Shares being purchased and
applicable withholdings or (D) through net settlement in Shares. No
Participant shall have any rights to dividends or other rights of a stockholder
with respect to Shares subject to an Option until the Participant has given
written notice of exercise of the Option, paid in full for such Shares and, if
applicable, has satisfied any other conditions imposed by the Committee pursuant
to this Plan.
(d) ISOs. The
Committee may grant Options under the Plan that are intended to be
ISOs. Such ISOs shall comply with the requirements of Section 422 of
the Code (or any successor section thereto). No ISO may be granted to
any Participant who at the time of such grant, owns more than ten percent of the
total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company or of any
Subsidiary, unless (i) the Option Price for such ISO is at least 110% of
the Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the ISO is granted and
(ii) the date on which such ISO terminates is a date not later than the day
preceding the fifth anniversary of the date on which the ISO is
granted. The documentation evidencing an ISO shall provide that any
Participant who disposes of Shares acquired upon the exercise of an ISO either
(i) within two years after the date of grant of such ISO or
(ii) within one year after the transfer of such Shares to
6
the
Participant, shall promptly notify the Company of such disposition and of the
amount realized upon such disposition. All Options granted under the
Plan are intended to be nonqualified stock options, unless the applicable Award
agreement expressly states that the Option is intended to be an
ISO. If an Option is intended to be an ISO, and if for any reason
such Option (or portion thereof) shall not qualify as an ISO, then, to the
extent of such nonqualification, such Option (or portion thereof) shall be
regarded as a nonqualified stock option granted under this Plan; provided, that such
Option (or portion thereof) otherwise complies with this Plan’s requirements
relating to nonqualified stock options. In no event shall any member
of the Committee, the Company or any of its Affiliates (or their respective
employees, officers or directors) have any liability to any Participant (or any
other Person) due to the failure of an Option to qualify for any reason as an
ISO.
(e) Attestation. Wherever
in this Plan or any Award agreement a Participant is permitted to pay the
exercise price of an Option or taxes relating to the exercise of an Option by
delivering Shares, the Participant may, subject to procedures satisfactory to
the Committee, satisfy such delivery requirement by presenting proof of
beneficial ownership of such Shares, in which case the Company shall treat the
Option as exercised without further payment and/or shall withhold such number of
Shares from the Shares acquired by the exercise of the Option, as
appropriate.
7.
|
Terms
and Conditions of Stock Appreciation
Rights
|
(a) Grants. The
Committee may grant (i) a Stock Appreciation Right independent of an Option
or (ii) a Stock Appreciation Right in connection with an Option, or a
portion thereof. A Stock Appreciation Right granted pursuant to
clause (ii) of the preceding sentence (A) may be granted at the time
the related Option is granted or at any time prior to the exercise or
cancellation of the related Option, (B) shall cover the same number of
Shares covered by an Option (or such lesser number of Shares as the Committee
may determine) and (C) shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as
such Option except for such additional limitations as are contemplated by this
Section 7 (or such additional limitations as may be included in
the applicable Award agreement).
(b) Terms. The
exercise price per Share of a Stock Appreciation Right shall be an amount
determined by the Committee but in no event shall such amount be less than the
Fair Market Value of a Share on the date the Stock Appreciation Right is granted
(other than in the case of Stock Appreciation Rights granted in substitution of
previously granted awards, as described in Section 4); provided, however, that in the
case of a Stock Appreciation Right granted in conjunction with an Option, or a
portion thereof, the exercise price may not be less than the Option Price of the
related Option. Each Stock Appreciation Right granted independent of
an Option shall entitle a Participant upon exercise to an amount equal to
(i) the excess of (A) the Fair Market Value on the exercise date of
one Share over (B) the exercise price per Share, times (ii) the number
of Shares covered by the Stock Appreciation Right. Each Stock
Appreciation Right granted in conjunction with an Option, or a portion thereof,
shall entitle a Participant to surrender to the Company the unexercised Option,
or any portion thereof, and to receive from the Company in exchange therefore an
amount equal to (i) the excess of (A) the Fair Market Value on the
exercise date of one Share over (B) the Option Price per Share, times
(ii) the number of Shares covered by the Option, or portion thereof, which
is surrendered. Payment shall be made in Shares or in cash, or partly
in Shares and partly in cash (any such Shares valued at such Fair Market Value),
all as shall be determined by the Committee. Stock Appreciation
Rights may be exercised from time to time upon actual receipt by the Company of
7
written
notice of exercise stating the number of Shares with respect to which the Stock
Appreciation Right is being exercised. The date a notice of exercise
is received by the Company shall be the exercise date. No fractional
Shares will be issued in payment for Stock Appreciation Rights, but instead cash
will be paid for a fraction or, if the Committee should so determine, the number
of Shares will be rounded downward to the next whole Share.
(c) Limitations. The
Committee may impose, in its discretion, such conditions upon the exercisability
of Stock Appreciation Rights as it may deem fit, but in no event shall a Stock
Appreciation Right be exercisable more than ten years after the date it is
granted.
8.
|
Other
Stock-Based Awards
|
(a) Generally. The
Committee, in its sole discretion, may grant or sell Awards of Shares, Awards of
restricted Shares and Awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference
to, or are otherwise based on the Fair Market Value of, Shares (“Other Stock-Based
Awards”). Such Other Stock-Based Awards shall be in such form,
and dependent on such conditions, as the Committee shall determine, including,
without limitation, the right to receive, or vest with respect to, one or more
Shares (or the equivalent cash value of such shares) upon the completion of a
specified period of service, the occurrence of an event and/or the attainment of
performance objectives. Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted alone
or in addition to any other Stock Awards granted under the
Plan. Subject to the provisions of the Plan, the Committee shall
determine to whom and when Other Stock-Based Awards will be made; the number of
Shares to be awarded under (or otherwise related to) such Other Stock-Based
Awards; whether such Other Stock-Based Awards shall be settled in cash, Shares
or a combination of cash and Shares; and all other terms and conditions of such
Awards (including, without limitation, the vesting provisions thereof and
provisions ensuring that all Shares so awarded and issued shall be fully paid
and non-assessable).
(b) Performance-Based
Awards. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein,
certain Other Stock-Based Awards granted under this Section 8 may be
granted in a manner which is intended to be deductible by the Company under
Section 162(m) of the Code (or any successor section thereto) (“Performance-Based
Awards”). A Participant’s Performance-Based Award shall be
determined based on the attainment of written performance goals approved by the
Committee for a performance period established by the Committee (i) while
the outcome for that performance period is substantially uncertain and
(ii) no more than 90 days after the commencement of the performance
period to which the performance goal relates or, if less, the number of days
which is equal to twenty-five percent (25%) of the relevant performance
period. The performance goals, which must be objective, shall be
based upon one or more of the following criteria: (i) consolidated earnings
before or after taxes (including earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation
and amortization); (ii) net income; (iii) operating income; (iv) earnings per
Share; (v) book value per Share; (vi) return on stockholders’ equity; (vii)
expense management; (viii) return on investment; (ix) improvements in capital
structure; (x) profitability of an identifiable business unit or product; (xi)
maintenance or improvement of profit margins; (xii) stock price; (xiii) market
share; (xiv) revenues or sales; (xv) costs; (xvi) cash flow; (xvii) working
capital (xviii) return on assets, (xix) total stockholder return, (xx) capital
expenditures and (xxi) progress toward or attaining milestones on key
projects. The foregoing criteria may relate to the Company, one or
more of its Affiliates or one or more of its or their divisions or units, or any
combination of the foregoing, and may be applied on an absolute basis and/or be
relative to one or more peer group companies or indices, or any combination
thereof, all as the Committee shall determine. In addition, to the
degree consistent with Section 162(m) of the
8
Code (or
any successor section thereto), the performance goals may be calculated without
regard to extraordinary items. The maximum amount of a
Performance-Based Award during a calendar year to any Participant shall be: (x)
with respect to Performance-Based Awards that are denominated in Shares,
2,000,000 Shares and (y) with respect to Performance-Based Awards that are not
denominated in Shares, $2,000,000. The Committee shall determine
whether, with respect to a performance period, the applicable performance goals
have been met with respect to a given Participant and, if they have, shall so
certify and ascertain the amount of the applicable Performance-Based
Award. No Performance-Based Awards will be paid for such performance
period until such certification is made by the Committee. The amount
of the Performance-Based Award actually paid to a given Participant may be less
than the amount determined by the applicable performance goal formula, at the
discretion of the Committee. The amount of the Performance-Based
Award determined by the Committee for a performance period shall be paid to the
Participant at such time as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion
after the end of such performance period; provided, however, that a
Participant may, if and to the extent permitted by the Committee and consistent
with the provisions of Sections 162(m) and 409A of the Code, elect to defer
payment of a Performance-Based Award.
9.
|
Adjustments
Upon Certain Events
|
Notwithstanding
any other provision in this Plan to the contrary, the following provisions shall
apply to all Awards granted hereunder:
(a) Generally. In
the event of any change in the outstanding Shares after the Effective Date by
reason of any Share dividend or split, reorganization, recapitalization, merger,
consolidation, spin-off, combination, transaction or exchange of Shares or other
corporate exchange, or any distribution to stockholders of Shares other than
regular cash dividends or any transaction similar to the foregoing, the
Committee in its sole discretion and without liability to any person shall make
such substitution or adjustment, if any, as it deems to be equitable (subject to
Section 17), as to (i) the number or kind of Shares or other securities issued
or reserved for issuance pursuant to the Plan or pursuant to outstanding Awards,
(ii) the maximum number of Shares for which Options or Stock Appreciation Rights
may be granted during a calendar year to any Participant (iii) the
maximum amount of a Performance-Based Award that may be granted during a
calendar year to any Participant, (iv) the Option Price or exercise price of any
stock appreciation right and/or (v) any other affected terms of such
Awards. For the avoidance of doubt, in the case of any "equity
restructuring" (within the meaning of the Financial Accounting Standards Board
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004)), the
Committee shall make an adjustment to outstanding Awards to reflect such equity
restructuring, which adjustment shall be made in such manner as the Committee,
acting in good faith, in its sole discretion determines to be
equitable.
(b) Change in Control. In
the event of a Change in Control after the Effective Date, the Committee may
(subject to Section 17), but shall not be obligated to, (i) accelerate, vest or
cause the restrictions to lapse with respect to all or any portion of an Award,
(ii) cancel such Awards for fair value (as determined by the Committee in its
sole discretion) which, in the case of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights,
may equal the excess, if any, of value of the consideration to be paid in the
Change in Control transaction to holders of the same number of Shares subject to
such Options or Stock Appreciation Rights (or, if no consideration is paid in
any such transaction, the Fair Market Value of the Shares subject to such
Options or Stock Appreciation Rights) over the aggregate Option Price of such
Options or exercise price of such Stock Appreciation Rights, (iii) provide for
the issuance of substitute Awards that will
9
substantially
preserve the otherwise applicable terms of any affected Awards previously
granted hereunder as determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, and/or
(iv) provide that for a period of at least 15 days prior to the Change in
Control, such Options shall be exercisable as to all Shares subject thereto and
that upon the occurrence of the Change in Control, such Options shall terminate
and be of no further force and effect.
10.
|
No
Right to Employment or Awards
|
The
granting of an Award under the Plan shall impose no obligation on the Company or
any Affiliate to continue the Employment of a Participant and shall not lessen
or affect the Company’s or any Affiliate’s right to terminate the Employment of
such Participant. No Participant or other Person shall have any claim
to be granted any Award, and there is no obligation for uniformity of treatment
of Participants, or holders or beneficiaries of Awards. The terms and
conditions of Awards and the Committee’s determinations and interpretations with
respect thereto need not be the same with respect to each Participant (whether
or not such Participants are similarly situated). In addition, except
as otherwise provided in a Participant’s Employment Agreement, under no
circumstances will any Participant ceasing to be an employee or other service
provider to the Company or any of its Affiliates, as applicable, be entitled to
any compensation for any loss of any right or benefit or prospective right or
benefit under the Plan which such Participant might otherwise have enjoyed
whether such compensation is claimed by way of damages for wrongful dismissal or
other breach of contract or by way of compensation for loss of office or
otherwise. By accepting an Award under the Plan, each Participant
acknowledges and agrees that any Award such Participant has been awarded under
the Plan and any other Awards the Participant may be granted in the future, even
if such Awards are made repeatedly or regularly, and regardless of their amount,
(i) are wholly discretionary, are not a term or condition of Employment and do
not form part of a contract of Employment, or any other working arrangement,
between the Participant and the Company or any of its Affiliates, (ii) do no
create any contractual entitlement to receive future Awards or to continued
Employment, and (iii) do not form part of salary or remuneration for purposes of
determining pension payments or any other purposes, including, without
limitation, termination indemnities, severance, resignation, redundancy,
bonuses, long-term service awards, pension or retirement benefits, or similar
payments, except as otherwise required by applicable law or as otherwise
provided in a Participant’s Employment Agreement.
11.
|
Successors
and Assigns
|
This Plan
shall be binding on all successors and assigns of the Company and each
Participant, including without limitation, the estate of each such Participant
and the executor, administrator or trustee of any such estate, and, if
applicable, any receiver or trustee in bankruptcy or representative of the
creditors of any such Participant.
12.
|
Nontransferability
of Awards
|
Unless
expressly permitted by the Committee in an Award agreement or otherwise in
writing and, in each case to the extent permitted by applicable local law, an
Award shall not be transferable or assignable by the applicable Participant
other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. An
Award exercisable after the death of a Participant may be exercised by the
legatees, personal representatives or distributees of the
Participant.
10
13.
|
Amendments
or Termination
|
The Board
may amend, alter or discontinue the Plan, but no amendment, alteration or
discontinuation shall be made, (a) without the approval of the stockholders
of the Company, if (i) such approval is required to comply with the rules of any
stock exchange on which the Shares are then listed or applicable law, or (ii)
such action would (except as is provided in Section 9 of the Plan),
increase the total number of Shares reserved for the purposes of the Plan or
change the maximum number of Shares for which Awards may be granted to any
Participant or (b) without the consent of a Participant, if such action
would materially adversely affect any of the rights of the Participant under any
Award theretofore granted to such Participant under the Plan; provided, however, that the
Committee may amend the Plan in such manner as it deems necessary to permit the
granting of Awards meeting the requirements of the Code or other applicable laws
(including, without limitation, to avoid adverse tax consequences to the Company
or to Participants).
Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, to the extent applicable,
notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, this Plan and Awards issued
hereunder shall be interpreted in accordance with Section 409A of the Code and
Department of Treasury regulations and other interpretative guidance issued
thereunder, including without limitation any such regulations or other guidance
that may be issued after the Effective Date. Notwithstanding any
provision of the Plan to the contrary, in the event that the Committee
determines that any amounts payable hereunder will be taxable to a Participant
under Section 409A of the Code and related Department of Treasury guidance prior
to payment to such Participant of such amount, the Company may (a)
adopt such amendments to the Plan and Awards and appropriate policies and
procedures, including amendments and policies with retroactive effect, that the
Committee determines necessary or appropriate to preserve the intended tax
treatment of the benefits provided by the Plan and Awards hereunder and/or (b)
take such other actions as the Committee determines necessary or appropriate to
avoid the imposition of an additional tax under Section 409A of the
Code.
14.
|
International
Participants
|
With
respect to Participants who reside or work outside the United States of America
and who are not (and who are not expected to be) “covered employees” within the
meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may, in its sole
discretion, amend the terms of the Plan and/or Awards with respect to such
Participants in order to conform such terms with the requirements of local law
and/or to make such changes as are necessary or beneficial to the Company, its
Affiliates and/or the Participants.
This Plan
and the Awards granted hereunder shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the internal laws of the State of Delaware applicable to
contracts made and performed wholly within the State of Delaware, without giving
effect to the conflict of laws provisions thereof.
16.
|
Effectiveness
of the Plan
|
This Plan
shall be effective as of the Effective Date, subject to the approval of the
stockholders of the Company.
11
Notwithstanding
other provisions of this Plan or any Award agreements hereunder, no Award shall
be granted, deferred, accelerated, extended, paid out or modified under this
Plan in a manner that would result in the imposition of an additional tax under
Section 409A of the Code upon a Participant. In the event that it is
reasonably determined by the Committee that, as a result of Section 409A of the
Code, payments in respect of any Award under the Plan may not be made at the
time contemplated by the terms of the Plan or the relevant Award agreement, as
the case may be, without causing the Participant holding such Award to be
subject to taxation under Section 409A of the Code, the Company will make such
payment on the first day that would not result in the Participant incurring any
tax liability under Section 409A of the Code. The Company shall use
commercially reasonable
efforts to implement the provisions of this Section 17 in good faith;
provided, that neither the Company, the
Committee nor any of the Company’s employees, directors or
representatives shall have any liability to any Participant with
respect to this Section
17.
GHL
ACQUISITION CORP.
300
Park Avenue, 23rd
Floor
New
York, NY 10022
SPECIAL
MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
THIS
PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS
OF GHL ACQUISITION CORP.
The
undersigned appoints
and
as proxies, and each of them with full power to act without the other, each with
the power to appoint a substitute, and hereby authorizes either of them to
represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side, all shares of common
stock of GHL Acquisition Corp. (“GHQ”) held of record by the undersigned on
,
2009, at the Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held on ,
2009, or any postponement or adjournment thereof.
THIS
PROXY REVOKES ALL PRIOR PROXIES GIVEN BY THE UNDERSIGNED. THIS PROXY
WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IF NO DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN, THIS PROXY
WILL BE VOTED “FOR” EACH OF THE PROPOSALS LISTED HEREIN. THE GHQ
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE PROPOSALS LISTED
HEREIN.
(Continued,
and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)
PROXY
CARD – GHQ
THIS
PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS DIRECTED. IF NO DIRECTIONS ARE GIVEN, THIS
PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” PROPOSAL NUMBERS 1, 2, 3, 4 AND 5. THE GHQ
BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE FOLLOWING PROPOSALS.
1.
|
To
approve our acquisition of Iridium Holdings, LLC (“Iridium Holdings”)
pursuant to the Transaction Agreement dated as of September 22,
2008 among GHQ, Iridium Holdings and the sellers listed therein, as
amended on April 28, 2009 (“Transaction Agreement”) and the transactions
contemplated by the Transaction Agreement (the “Acquisition
Proposal”).
|
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
ð
ð
ð
|
3.
To approve the issuance of shares of our common stock in the acquisition
and related transactions that would result in an increase in our
outstanding common stock by more than 20%.
|
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
ð
ð
ð
|
4. To
adopt the proposed stock incentive plan, to be effective upon completion
of the acquisition.
|
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
ð
ð
ð
|
|
If
you voted “AGAINST” the Acquisition Proposal and you hold shares of GHQ
common stock issued in the GHQ initial public offering, you may exercise
your conversion rights and demand that GHQ convert your shares of common
stock into a pro rata portion of the trust account by marking the “I
Hereby Exercise My Conversion Rights” box below. If you
exercise your conversion rights, then you will be exchanging your shares
of GHQ common stock for cash and will no longer own these
shares. You will only be entitled to receive cash for these
shares if the acquisition is completed and you affirmatively vote against
the Acquisition Proposal, continue to hold these shares through the
effective time of the acquisition and deliver your stock certificate to
GHQ’s transfer agent. Failure to (a) vote against the approval
of the Acquisition Proposal, (b) check the “I Hereby Exercise My
Conversion Rights” box below, (c) deliver your stock certificate to GHQ’s
transfer agent before the special meeting by following the procedures set
forth on pages 111 and 112 of GHQ’s proxy
statement under “The Special Meeting—Conversion Rights”, or (d) submit
this proxy in a timely manner, will result in the loss of your conversion
rights.
|
5. To consider the vote upon a
proposal to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates, if
necessary, to permit further solicitation and vote of
proxies.
|
FOR AGAINST ABSTAIN
ð
ð
ð
|
|
|
|
|
1a.
|
I
HEREBY EXERCISE MY CONVERSION RIGHTS
|
ð
|
|
|
2.
|
To
approve an amendment to GHQ’s Amended and Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to, among other things, (i) change the name of GHQ from GHL
Acquisition Corp. to “Iridium Communications Inc.”; (ii) permit GHQ’s
continued existence after February 14, 2010; (iii) increase the number of
GHQ’s authorized shares of common stock; and (iv) eliminate the different
classes of GHQ’s board of directors.
|
FOR
AGAINST ABSTAIN
ð
ð
ð
|
|
|
Sign
exactly as your name appears on this proxy card. If shares are held
jointly, each holder should sign. Executors, administrators,
trustees, guardians, attorneys and agents should give their full
titles. If stockholder is a corporation, sign in full name by an
authorized officer.
PLEASE
MARK, DATE AND RETURN THIS PROXY PROMPTLY. ANY VOTES RECEIVED AFTER A
MATTER HAS BEEN VOTED UPON WILL NOT BE COUNTED.
MARK
HERE FOR ADDRESS CHANGE AND NOTE AT
RIGHT ð
|
|
|
|
|
COMPANY
ID:
PROXY
NUMBER:
ACCOUNT
NUMBER:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Signature
|
|
Date
|
|
, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|