SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE
14A
Proxy
Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
|
Filed
by the Registrant x
|
|
Filed
by a Party other than the Registrant o
|
|
Check
the appropriate box:
|
|
o
|
Preliminary
Proxy Statement
|
|
o
|
Confidential,
for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by
Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|
|
o
|
Definitive
Proxy Statement
|
|
o
|
Definitive
Additional Materials
|
|
x
|
Soliciting
Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12
|
|
Merck
& Co., Inc.
|
|
(Name
of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
(Name
of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the
Registrant)
|
|
|
|
Payment
of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
|
|
x
|
No
fee required.
|
|
o
|
Fee
computed on table below per Exchange Act
Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Title
of each class of securities to which transaction
applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Aggregate
number of securities to which transaction applies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Per
unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to
Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee
is calculated and state how it was determined):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Proposed
maximum aggregate value of transaction:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
Total
fee paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
o
|
Fee
paid previously with preliminary materials.
|
|
o
|
Check
box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act
Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting
fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration
statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its
filing.
|
|
|
(1)
|
Amount
Previously Paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Form,
Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Filing
Party:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
Date
Filed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This
filing consists of “Behind the Merger with Chris Scalet” and a related video
transcript, first available to employees on March 24, 2009 and posted on the
Merck & Co., Inc. (“Merck”) internal
website on March 25, 2009, in connection with the proposed transaction between
Merck and Schering-Plough Corporation.
Behind
the Merger With Chris Scalet
Dick
Clark and other members of the Executive Committee have filmed a series of short
videos to provide you with more details on the recent Merck and Schering-Plough
merger. This video is the eighth in the series, each highlighting different
aspects of the merger agreement. Each video segment will only be available for
one week from its distribution date.
Transcripts
are available in English, Spanish, Portuguese, French, Chinese, Korean, Russian,
Japanese, Italian and German.
Click here to
view the video or transcripts of "Behind the Merger With Chris
Scalet."
Behind
the Merger with Chris Scalet
A merger
for Global Services of this magnitude means a number of things. First and
foremost, because of the global reach of Schering-Plough and the fact that a
huge part of their business is outside of the United States primarily in Europe
it’s going to give our organization an opportunity to truly be global; to reach
into different parts of the world where we traditionally haven’t had that
significant a reach so it’s a tremendous opportunity. The second thing is that
it is going to be great for our employee base. It’s going to give our employees
access to some new challenges that they haven’t had before. It’s going to give
them a chance to learn new things and to grow into areas that probably wouldn’t
have been in our area, in Merck in the immediate future. All in all, while there
is a tremendous amount of work ahead of us and a number of challenges and
certainly decisions, this is a tremendous opportunity for the organization and
I’m really excited about it.
As a
result of the merger with Schering-Plough, Executive Committee has made a number
of decisions as it relates to the COMET program. We’ve made the decision to go
forward with the U.S. implementation of COMET. In correlation with that, we also
made the decision to go forward with the global Hire-to-Retire program. Which
means we’re also going to be launching the global portal that will enable a
number of the HR processes.
The
decision we’ve made in relation to COMET in other parts of the world outside of
the United States is we’ve made the decision to take a delay and the purpose of
the delay, in essence, is to go back and see what the environment will look like
given the fact that Schering-Plough is now going to be a part of that. As we all
know, Schering-Plough has got a huge presence in Europe. With the European
implementation coming up in the next year, we thought it might make sense to go
back and see; would we change the implementation plan given that fact that we
obviously want to integrate Schering-Plough into Merck.
I have
every confidence in our ability to pull this off and I look forward to working
with the team as we take this thing through the next year or
so.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This communication
includes “forward-looking
statements”
within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such
statements may include, but are not limited to, statements about the
benefits of the proposed merger between Merck and Schering-Plough, including
future financial and operating results, the combined company’s plans,
objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not
historical facts. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs and
expectations of Merck’s and Schering-Plough’s management and are subject to
significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ from those set
forth in the forward-looking statements.
The
following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ from those
set forth in the forward-looking statements: the possibility that the expected
synergies from the proposed merger of Merck and Schering-Plough will not be
realized, or will not be realized within the expected time period, due to, among
other things, the impact of pharmaceutical industry regulation and pending
legislation that could affect the pharmaceutical industry; the ability to obtain
governmental and self-regulatory organization approvals of the merger on the
proposed terms and schedule; the actual terms of the financing required for the
merger and/or the failure to obtain such financing; the failure of
Schering-Plough or Merck stockholders to approve the merger; the risk that the
businesses will not be integrated successfully; disruption from the merger
making it more difficult to maintain business and operational relationships; the
possibility that the merger does not close, including, but not limited to, due
to the failure to satisfy the closing conditions; Merck’s and Schering-Plough’s
ability to accurately predict future market conditions; dependence on the
effectiveness of Merck’s and Schering-Plough’s patents and other protections for
innovative products; the risk of new and changing regulation and health policies
in the U.S. and internationally and the exposure to litigation and/or regulatory
actions. Merck and
Schering-Plough undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. Additional factors that could cause results to
differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements can be
found in Merck’s 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Schering-Plough’s 2008 Annual
Report on Form 10-K and each company’s other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) available at the SEC’s Internet site
(www.sec.gov).
Additional
Information
In connection with the proposed
transaction, Schering-Plough will file a registration statement, including a
joint proxy statement of Merck and Schering-Plough, with the SEC. Investors are urged to
read the registration statement and joint proxy statement (including all amendments and
supplements to it) because they will contain important information. Investors may obtain
free copies of the registration statement and joint proxy statement when they
become available, as well as other filings containing information about Merck
and Schering-Plough, without charge, at the SEC’s Internet web site
(www.sec.gov). These documents may also be obtained for free from
Schering-Plough’s Investor Relations web site (www.schering-plough.com) or by
directing a request to Schering-Plough’s Investor Relations at (908) 298-7436.
Copies of Merck’s filings may be obtained for free from Merck’s Investor
Relations Web Site (www.merck.com) or by directing a request to Merck at Merck’s
Office of the Secretary, (908) 423-1000.
Merck and
Schering-Plough and their respective directors and executive officers and other
members of management and employees are potential participants in the
solicitation of proxies from Merck and Schering-Plough shareholders in respect
of the proposed transaction.
Information
regarding Schering-Plough’s directors and executive officers is available in
Schering-Plough’s proxy statement for its 2008 annual meeting of shareholders,
filed with the SEC on April 23, 2008, and information regarding Merck’s
directors and executive officers is available in Merck’s proxy statement for its
2009 annual meeting of stockholders, filed with the SEC on March 13,
2009. Additional information regarding the interests of such
potential participants in the proposed transaction will be included in the
registration statement and joint proxy statement filed with the SEC in
connection with the proposed transaction.