This summary highlights selected information in the proxy statement. Please review the entire proxy statement and our Annual Report on

Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 before voting.

MSG Networks Inc., an industry leader in sports production, and content development and distribution, owns and operates two award-winning regional sports and entertainment networks, MSG Network and MSG+, and a live streaming and video on demand platform, MSG GO. For nearly 50 years, we have been a pioneer in regional sports programming, setting a standard of excellence, creativity and technological innovation. Today, our exclusive award-winning

programming continues to be a valuable differentiator for our viewers, advertisers and the cable, satellite, telephone and other platforms that distribute our networks. Our networks are widely distributed throughout all of New York State and significant portions of New Jersey and Connecticut, as well as parts of Pennsylvania. Our networks are also carried nationally by certain distributors on sports tiers or in similar packages.

Our Board of Directors (the “Board”) has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Governance Guidelines”) and practices to promote the functioning of the Board and its

committees to serve the best interests of all our stockholders. Several of our practices are highlighted below.

The Board has nominated 12 director candidates. Of the 12 nominees, three are Class A nominees and nine are Class B nominees. All director candidates have been nominated for a term to expire at the 2019 annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders and once their successors have been elected and qualified.

Our Class A nominees are elected by holders of Class A Common Stock:

Our Class B nominees are elected by holders of Class B Common Stock:

Our Board believes that the Company and its stockholders benefit from the combination of Class A and Class B Directors’ perspectives, institutional knowledge, and their collective deep business and investment experience.

Detailed information about each director’s background, skills and qualifications can be found under “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors.”

The Company is an industry leader in sports production, and content development and distribution, and competes for talent among a wide array of media and entertainment companies. Our named executive officers (“NEOs”) have substantial and meaningful professional experience in the industry in which

the Company operates. The Company places great importance on its ability to attract, retain, motivate and reward experienced NEOs who can continue to drive our business objectives and achieve strong financial, operational and stock price performance.

Elements of Compensation & Performance Objectives

The Company compensates its NEOs through base salary, annual incentive awards, long-term incentive awards, perquisites and benefit programs. Our annual and long-term incentive programs provide performance-based incentives for our NEOs tied to key financial and strategic measures that drive long-term stockholder value and reward sustained achievement of the Company’s key financial goals. The Company considers Company revenue and adjusted

operating income, or “AOI,” to be the key measures of the Company’s operating performance. As such, our Compensation Committee has incorporated these performance measures into our incentive plans, along with other specific strategic and operating measures.

The table below summarizes the current elements of our compensation program and how each element supports the Company’s compensation objectives. For more information on our executive compensation program and policies, please see “Compensation Discussion & Analysis.”

MSG Networks Inc., incorporated on July 29, 2009, is a Delaware corporation with principal executive offices at 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY, 10001. In this Proxy Statement, the words “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and “MSG Networks” collectively refer to MSG Networks Inc., a holding company, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries through which substantially all of our operations are conducted. Our Class A Common Stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”) under the symbol “MSGN.” As a result, we are subject to certain of the NYSE corporate governance listing standards.

MSG Networks was formerly known as “The Madison Square Garden Company.” We changed

our name to MSG Networks Inc. on September 30, 2015 (the “MSG Distribution Date”) in connection with the distribution of all of the outstanding common stock of MSG Spinco, Inc. (now known as The Madison Square Garden Company and referred to herein as “MSG”) to our stockholders (the “MSG Distribution”). Pursuant to the MSG Distribution, MSG acquired the entertainment and sports businesses previously owned and operated by the Company through its MSG Entertainment and MSG Sports business segments, including the arenas and other venues previously owned, leased or operated by the Company as well as the Company’s interests in various joint ventures.

These proxy materials are provided in connection with the solicitation of proxies by our Board for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Friday, December 14, 2018, at the J.P. Morgan Club at the Madison Square Garden Arena, which is located at located on Seventh Avenue between West 31st Street and West 33rd Street, New York, NY.

This Proxy Statement is being sent to stockholders on or about October 25, 2018. Unless otherwise indicated, references to “2018,” the “2018 fiscal year” and the “year ended June 30, 2018” refer to the Company’s fiscal year ended on June 30, 2018.

Who may vote at the annual meeting?

Holders of our Class A common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class A Common Stock”) and holders of our Class B common stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class B Common Stock,” together with Class A Common Stock, collectively, “Company Stock”) as recorded in our stock register at the close of business on October 16, 2018, may vote at the meeting. On

October 16, 2018, there were 61,234,541 shares of Class A Common Stock and 13,588,555 shares of Class B Common Stock outstanding. Each share of Class A Common Stock has one vote per share and holders will be voting for the election of three candidates to the Board. Each share of Class B Common Stock has ten votes per share and holders will be voting for the election of nine candidates to the Board. As a result of their ownership of all of the shares of our Class B

Common Stock, members of the Charles F. Dolan family and certain related family entities, have the power to elect all of the directors to be elected by the holders of our Class B Common Stock, and to approve Proposal 2 regardless of how other shares are voted.

Why did I receive a Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company has elected to provide access to its proxy materials by Internet. Accordingly, the Company has sent a Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to our stockholders. All stockholders have the ability to access the proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or request to receive a printed set of the proxy materials. Instructions on how to access the proxy materials by Internet or to request a printed copy may be found in the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. In addition, stockholders may request to receive proxy materials in printed form by mail or electronically. If you previously chose to receive proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive access to these materials via email unless you otherwise elect. The Company encourages stockholders who have not already done so to take advantage of the availability of the proxy materials on the Internet to help reduce the cost and the environmental impact of the annual meeting.

What is the difference between a stockholder of record and a beneficial owner of shares held in street name?

Stockholder of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Company’s transfer agent, EQ Shareowner Services, you are considered a stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials was sent directly to you by the Company. If you request printed copies of the

proxy materials by mail, you will also receive a proxy card.

Beneficial Owner of Shares Held in Street Name. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, then you are a beneficial owner of shares held in “street name,” and the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials was forwarded to you by that organization. The organization holding your account is considered the stockholder of record for purposes of voting at the annual meeting. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct that organization how to vote the shares held in your account. If you requested printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a voting instruction form from that organization.

What votes need to be present to hold the annual meeting?

In order to carry on the business of the annual meeting, we need a majority of the votes represented by the outstanding shares eligible to vote on October 16, 2018 to be present, in person or by proxy. This is known as a “quorum.” If voting on a particular action is by class, a majority of the votes represented by the outstanding shares of such class constitutes a quorum for such action. Abstentions and broker non-votes (described below) are considered present for purposes of determining a quorum.

How do I vote?

You may vote in advance of the annual meeting by telephone, Internet or mail by following the instructions provided on the Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials. If you choose to vote by mail, please sign, date and return the proxy card in the postage-paid envelope provided. You may also vote in person or by legal proxy at the meeting. Even if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, the Board strongly recommends that you submit a proxy to vote your shares in advance so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the annual meeting.

Can my broker vote my shares without instructions from me?

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, you must instruct them how to vote your shares. Please use the voting instruction form provided to you by your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization to direct them how to vote your shares. If you do not provide voting instructions, your shares will not be voted on the election of directors or any other proposal on which the brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization does not have discretionary authority to vote. This is called a “broker non-vote.” In these cases, the brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization can register your shares as being present at the annual meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum but will not be able to vote on those matters for which specific authorization is required under applicable rules.

If you are a beneficial owner whose shares are held of record by a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization has discretionary voting authority under applicable rules to vote your shares on the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as the Company’s independent auditors (Proposal 2), even if the brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization does not receive voting instructions from you. However, your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization does not have discretionary authority to vote on the election of directors (Proposal 1) without instructions from you, in which case a broker non-vote will occur and your shares will not be voted on these matters.

What is the voting requirement to approve each of the proposals?

Election of directors by the holders of our Class A Common Stock requires the affirmative vote of

the plurality of votes cast by holders of our Class A Common Stock. Election of directors by the holders of our Class B Common Stock requires the affirmative vote of the plurality of votes cast by holders of our Class B Common Stock. Approval of Proposal 2 requires the favorable vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of our Class A Common Stock and the holders of our Class B Common Stock, voting together as a single class. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not affect the outcome of the proposals because abstentions and broker non-votes are not considered votes cast. As a result of their ownership of all of the shares of our Class B Common Stock, members of the Charles F. Dolan family and certain related family entities have the power to elect all of the directors to be elected by the holders of our Class B Common Stock and to approve Proposal 2 regardless of how other shares are voted.

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

Yes. If you are a stockholder of record, you may revoke your proxy and change your vote at any time before the final vote at the annual meeting. You may change your vote prior to the annual meeting by:

If your shares are held of record by a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer or other similar organization, you should follow the instructions they provide in order to change your vote.

How will my shares be voted at the annual meeting if I submit a proxy card?

The proxy materials, including the proxy card, are being solicited on behalf of the Board. The Company representatives appointed by the Board (the persons named on the proxy card, or, if applicable, their substitutes) will vote your shares as you instruct. If you sign your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted as the Board recommends, which is:

Who participates in and pays for this solicitation?

The Company will bear the expense of preparing, printing and mailing this proxy statement and the accompanying materials. Solicitation of individual stockholders may be made by mail, personal interviews, telephone, facsimile, electronic delivery or other telecommunications by our executive officers and regular employees who will receive no additional compensation for such activities.

We have retained D.F. King & Co., Inc. to assist with the solicitation of proxies for a fee estimated not to exceed $20,000, plus reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, we will reimburse brokers and other nominees for their expenses in forwarding solicitation material to beneficial owners.

How do I attend the 2018 annual meeting in person and what identification must I show?

An admission ticket will be required if you plan to attend the annual meeting in person. Without an admission ticket, you will not be able to attend the annual meeting. To be admitted to the 2018 annual meeting, you must have been a stockholder at the close of business on the record date of October 16, 2018 or be the legal proxy holder or qualified representative of such stockholder. You must bring with you your admission ticket and a valid government-issued photo identification card (federal, state or local), such as a driver’s license or passport. Persons without an admission ticket and proper identification will be denied admission to the annual meeting. Registration will begin at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time on the annual meeting date.

Your proxy card is not an admission ticket. To obtain an admission ticket, go to www.proxyvote.com or call 1-844-318-0137 (toll-free) or 925-331-6070 (international). You will need to enter your 16-digit control number, which can be found on your Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, voting instruction form or proxy card. You may also request an admission ticket by calling the telephone number on your voting instruction form or proxy card. The deadline to obtain an admission ticket is 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 4, 2018. If you have questions about admission to the annual meeting, please call 1-844-318-0137 (toll-free) or 925-331-6070 (international).

Please note that you will need your admission ticket to be admitted to the meeting whether you vote before or at the meeting, and regardless of whether you are a registered or beneficial stockholder. If you are attending the meeting as a proxy or qualified representative for a stockholder, you will need to bring your legal proxy or authorization letter in addition to your admission ticket and government-issued photo identification card.

Stockholders must provide advance written notice to the Company if they intend to have a legal proxy (other than the persons appointed as proxies on the Company’s proxy card) or a qualified representative attend the annual meeting on their behalf. The notice must include the name and address of the legal proxy or qualified representative and must be received by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on December 4, 2018 in order to allow enough time for the issuance of an admission ticket to such person. For further details, see “Other — Advance Notice of Proxy Holders and Qualified Representatives.”

Please note that cameras, video and audio recording equipment and other similar electronic devices, as well as large bags (including backpacks, handbags and briefcases) and packages will need to be checked at the door. Additionally, the Company may impose additional restrictions on items that must be checked at the door as well as on the conduct of the meeting. To ensure the safety of all persons, attendees and bags may also be subject to security inspections.

Requests for admission tickets will be processed in the order received. Please note that seating is limited, and requests for tickets will be handled on a first-come, first-served basis.

What is “householding” and how does it affect me?

Stockholders of record who have the same address and last name and do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials may receive only one copy of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 (the “2018 Form 10-K”) unless we are notified that one or more of these stockholders wishes to receive individual copies. This “householding” procedure will reduce our printing costs and postage fees.

Stockholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards. If you are eligible for householding, but you and other

stockholders of record with whom you share an address currently receive multiple copies of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents, or if you hold MSG Networks stock in more than one account, and, in either case, you wish to receive only a single copy of each of these documents for your household, please contact Broadridge Householding Department, by calling their toll free number, 1-866-540-7095, or by writing to: Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

If you participate in householding and wish to receive a separate copy of this Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement and any accompanying documents, or if you do not wish to continue to participate in householding and prefer to receive separate copies of these documents in the future, please contact Broadridge Householding Department as indicated above. You will be removed from the householding program within 30 days of receipt of your instructions, at which time you will then be sent separate copies of the documents.

If you are a beneficial owner, you can request information about householding from your broker, bank or other holder of record.

How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?

This Notice of Annual Meeting and Proxy Statement, the proxy card and the Company’s 2018 Form 10-K, along with instructions on how to obtain an admission ticket, which is required to attend the annual meeting in person, are available at www.proxyvote.com.

In accordance with the SEC rules, we are using the Internet as our primary means of furnishing proxy materials to our stockholders. Consequently, most of our stockholders will not receive paper copies of our proxy materials. Instead we are sending these stockholders a Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials with instructions for accessing the proxy materials, including our

proxy statement and 2018 Form 10-K, and voting by Internet. The Notice of Annual Meeting and Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also provides information on how our stockholders may obtain paper copies of our proxy materials if they so choose. This makes the proxy distribution process more efficient and less costly, and helps conserve natural resources. If you previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, these materials will continue to be sent via email unless you change your election.

If you receive paper copies of our proxy materials and would like to sign up for electronic delivery via email or the Internet, please follow the instructions to vote by Internet at www.proxyvote.com and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access stockholder communications electronically in future years.

The following section provides an overview of our Board and corporate governance practices. We have taken several actions to be responsive to stockholder feedback, including expanding our

stockholder outreach efforts and enhancing our proxy disclosure to provide greater transparency to our stockholders.

Our Board has adopted the Governance Guidelines and other practices to promote the functioning of the Board and its committees to serve the best interests of all our stockholders. The Governance Guidelines provide a framework for our governance practices, including:

Our Governance Guidelines set forth our practices and policies with respect to Board composition and selection, Board meetings, executive sessions of the Board, Board committees, the expectations we have of our directors, selection of the Executive Chairman and the President and Chief Executive Officer, management succession, Board and executive compensation, and Board self-assessment requirements. The full text of our Governance Guidelines may be viewed at our corporate website at www.msgnetworks.com under Investors — Corporate Governance. A copy may be obtained by writing to MSG Networks Inc., 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001; Attention: Corporate Secretary.

Fostering long-term relationships with our stockholders is a priority for the Company. Engagement helps us gain insight into the issues most important to our stockholders, informing Board discussions and allowing us to consider investors’ views on a range of topics including corporate governance and executive compensation matters.

We regularly engage with stockholders, and during each of the 2017 and 2018 fiscal years, we have engaged with holders of over 75% of our Class A Common Stock concerning our Board, governance and executive compensation practices, with the specific goal of seeking stockholder feedback. We greatly value the views of our stockholders, and we look forward to continuing this dialogue.

Our Board has chosen to separate the roles of Executive Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that this is the optimal leadership structure as it recognizes both Mr. James L. Dolan’s senior executive role with the Company as well as his leadership

position on the Company’s Board while the Company is also able to benefit from the experience of its President and Chief Executive Officer, Ms. Andrea Greenberg, with responsibility for day-to-day management of the Company.

The Board conducts an annual self-assessment to determine whether the Board and its committees are functioning effectively. Among other things, the Board’s self-assessment seeks input from the directors on whether they have the tools and access necessary to perform their oversight function as well as suggestions for improvement

of the Board’s functioning. In addition, our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee each conducts its own annual self-assessment, which includes an assessment of the adequacy of their performance as compared to their respective charters.

Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, either our directors who are not also executive officers of our Company (the “non-management directors”) or our directors who are independent under the NYSE rules are required to meet regularly in executive sessions with no members

of management present. If non- management directors who are not independent participate in these executive sessions, the independent directors under the NYSE rules are required to meet separately in executive sessions at least once each year.

Our Board believes that risk oversight is an important Board responsibility. The Audit Committee takes the lead on behalf of the Board in this risk oversight role. The Audit Committee discusses guidelines and policies governing the process by which the Company’s management assesses and manages the Company’s exposure to risk, and discusses the Company’s major financial risk exposures and the steps management has taken to monitor and control such exposures. The Compensation Committee considers the Company’s exposure to risk in establishing and implementing our executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee, with the assistance of its independent compensation

consultant, reviewed the level of risk incentivized by the Company’s executive compensation program as well as incentive programs below the executive level. Based on this assessment and the executive compensation program’s emphasis on long-term performance, its close connection to Company-wide performance and its equity-based component designed to align the executive officers’ compensation with the Company’s long-term strategy and growth, the Compensation Committee determined that our executive compensation program does not create incentives for excessive risk-taking that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Our Board has adopted policies designed to allow our stockholders and other interested parties to communicate with our directors. Any interested party who wishes to communicate directly with the Board or any director or the non-management directors as a group should send communications in writing to the Chairman of the Audit Committee, MSG Networks Inc., 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001.

Any person, whether or not an employee, who has a concern with respect to our accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing issues or other matters, may, in a confidential or anonymous manner, communicate those concerns to our Audit Committee by contacting the MSG Networks Integrity Hotline, which is operated by a third-party service provider, at 1-844-761-0392.

Our Board has adopted a Code of Conduct and Ethics for our directors, officers and employees. A portion of this Code of Conduct and Ethics also serves as a code of conduct and ethics for our senior financial officers, including our principal accounting officer and controller. Among other things, our Code of Conduct and Ethics covers conflicts of interest, disclosure responsibilities, legal compliance, reporting and compliance with the Code of Conduct and Ethics, confidentiality,

corporate opportunities, fair dealing, protection and proper use of Company assets and equal employment opportunity and harassment. The full text of the Code of Conduct and Ethics is available on our website at www.msgnetworks.com. In addition, a copy may be obtained by writing to MSG Networks Inc., 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001; Attention: Corporate Secretary.

As a “controlled company” we have the right to elect not to comply with the corporate governance rules of the NYSE requiring: (i) a majority of independent directors on our Board, (ii) an independent corporate governance and nominating committee, and (iii) an independent compensation committee. Because of our status as a “controlled company” we have elected not to maintain a majority of independent directors on our Board or to have a corporate governance and nominating committee. We elect to maintain an independent compensation committee.

Our Board elected not to comply with the requirement for a majority of independent directors on our Board because of our voting structure. Under the terms of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (“Certificate of Incorporation”), the holders of the Company’s Class B Common Stock have the right to elect up to 75% of the members of our

Board and there is no requirement that any of those directors be independent or be chosen independently.

However, our Board has determined that each of the Class A director nominees is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE and the SEC: Joseph J. Lhota, Joel M. Litvin and John L. Sykes. In reaching its determination, the Board considered following:

As permitted under the NYSE rules, we do not have a nominating committee and believe it is appropriate not to have one because of our stockholder voting structure. The Board nonetheless has established a nomination mechanism in our Corporate Governance Guidelines for the selection of nominees for election as directors by the holders of our Class A Common Stock (“Class A Directors”) and by the holders of our Class B Common Stock (“Class B Directors”), as follows:

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides holders of the Company’s Class B Common Stock the right to elect up to 75% of the members of our Board and holders of our Class A Common Stock the right to elect 25% of the members of our Board.

Our Board believes that each director nominee should be evaluated based on the skills needed on the Board and his or her individual merits, taking into account, among other matters, the factors set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines under “Board Composition” and “Selection of Directors.” Those factors include:

The Class A Directors evaluate and recommend Class A Director candidates to the Board for nomination as Class A Directors and suggest individuals for the Board to explore in more

depth. The Board also considers Class A Director nominees recommended by our stockholders. Nominees recommended by our stockholders are given consideration in the same manner as other nominees. Stockholders who wish to submit nominees for consideration by the Board for election at our 2018 annual meeting of our stockholders may do so by submitting in writing such nominees’ names, in compliance with the procedures and along with other information required by the Company’s Amended By-laws. See “Other Matters — Stockholder Proposals for 2019 Annual Meeting.”

The Class B Directors will consult from time to time with one or more of the holders of our Class B Common Stock to ensure that all Class B Director nominees recommended to the Board are individuals who will make a meaningful contribution as Board members and will be individuals likely to receive the approving vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Class B Common Stock. The Class B Directors do not intend to consider unsolicited suggestions of nominees by holders of our Class A Common Stock. We believe that this is appropriate in light of the voting provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation which provides the holders of our Class B Common Stock the exclusive right to elect our Class B Directors.

The Board met four times during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 and all of the directors who were on the Board during such time attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and, as applicable, the committees of the Board on which he or she served.

We encourage our directors to attend annual meetings of our stockholders and believe that attendance at annual meetings is equally as important as attendance at Board and committee meetings. All of the incumbent directors, except one, attended the 2017 annual stockholders’ meeting.

Our board has two standing committees comprised solely of independent directors: the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee.

Audit Committee

The primary purposes and responsibilities of our Audit Committee are to:

Our Board has determined that each member of our Audit Committee is “independent” within the meaning of the rules of both the NYSE and the SEC, and that each has not participated in the preparation of the financial statements of the Company or any current subsidiary of the Company at any time during the past three years and is able to read and understand fundamental

financial statements, including balance sheets, income statements and cash flow statements. Our Board has also determined that Mr. Lhota is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the rules of the SEC.

Our Board has established a procedure whereby complaints or concerns with respect to accounting, internal controls, auditing and other matters may be submitted to the Audit Committee. This procedure is described under “Board and Governance Practices — Communicating with Our Directors.”

The text of our Audit Committee charter is available on our website at www.msgnetworks.com under Investors — Corporate Governance. A copy may be obtained by writing to MSG Networks Inc., Corporate Secretary, 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001.

Compensation Committee

The primary purposes and responsibilities of our Compensation Committee are to:

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance of the Senior Employees, evaluates their performance in light of those goals and objectives and, either as a committee or together with any other independent directors (as directed

by the Board) determines and approves the Senior Employees’ compensation level based on this evaluation. In determining the long-term incentive component of our Chief Executive Officer’s compensation, the Compensation Committee considers, among other factors, the Company’s performance and relative stockholder return, the value of similar incentive awards to Chief Executive Officers at comparable companies and the awards given to the Chief Executive Officer in past years. As discussed above, our Board has determined that each member of our Compensation Committee is “independent” under the rules of the NYSE.

The Compensation Committee may, in its discretion, delegate a portion of its duties and responsibilities to one or more subcommittees of the Compensation Committee. For example, the Compensation Committee may delegate the approval of certain transactions to a subcommittee consisting solely of members of the Compensation Committee who are (i) “non-employee directors” for the purposes of Rule 16b-3 of the Exchange Act, and (ii) “outside directors” for the purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code (“Section 162(m)”). The Compensation Committee has delegated the approval of certain Section 162(m)-related compensation decisions relating to granting, and determining the level of performance under, performance-based compensation to a subcommittee comprised of Messrs. Litvin and Sykes. The Compensation Committee may also engage outside compensation consultants to assist in the performance of its duties and responsibilities.

The text of our Compensation Committee charter is available on our website at www.msgnetworks.com. A copy may be obtained by writing to MSG Networks Inc., Corporate Secretary, 11 Pennsylvania Plaza, New York, NY 10001.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Messrs. Lhota, Litvin and Sykes serve as members of the Compensation Committee. Neither Mr. Litvin nor Mr. Sykes is a current or a former executive officer or employee of the Company. Mr. Lhota was an employee of the Company from June 2, 2010 to November 9, 2011.

Independent Committee

In addition to standing committees, the Company has adopted a policy whereby a committee of our Board consisting entirely of independent directors (an “Independent Committee”) will review and approve or take such other action as it may deem appropriate with respect to transactions involving the Company and its subsidiaries in which any director, executive officer, greater than 5% stockholder of the Company or any other “related person” (as defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K adopted by the SEC) has or will have a direct or indirect material interest. This approval requirement covers any transaction that meets the related party disclosure requirements of the SEC as set forth in Item 404, which currently apply to transactions (or any series of similar transactions) in which the amount involved exceeds $120,000.

Our Board has also adopted a special approval policy for transactions with MSG and AMC Networks Inc. (“AMC Networks”) and their respective subsidiaries whether or not such transactions qualify as “related party” transactions described above. Under this policy, the Independent Committee oversees approval of all transactions and arrangements between the Company and its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and each of MSG and its subsidiaries and AMC Networks and its subsidiaries, on the other hand, in which the amount exceeds $120,000. To simplify the administration of the approval process under this policy, the Independent Committee may, where appropriate, establish guidelines for certain of these transactions.

Currently, and throughout our fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, our Audit Committee (which consisted solely of Class A Directors) served as the Independent Committee under the above policies. For a further discussion of the scope of these policies, see “Related Party Transaction Approval Policy.”

Other Committee Matters

Our Amended By-Laws permit the Board to form an Executive Committee of the Board which

would have the power to exercise all of the powers and authority of the Board in the management of the business and affairs of the Company, except as limited by the Delaware General Corporation Law. Our Board has not formed an Executive Committee, although it could do so in the future.

The following table describes the components of our non-management directors’ compensation

program in effect during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018:

Director Compensation Table

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each person who served as a non-management director

during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. Directors who are employees of the Company receive no compensation for service as directors and are therefore not identified in the table below.

The Board has nominated 12 directors for election to the Board at this year’s annual meeting.

Of the 12 director nominees, three are to be elected by the holders of our Class A Common Stock and nine are to be elected by the holders of our Class B Common Stock. All 12 nominees have been nominated for a term to expire at the 2019 annual meeting of the Company’s stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.

The Company representatives appointed by the Board (the persons named on the proxy card, or, if applicable, their substitutes) will vote your shares as you instruct. If you sign your proxy card and return it without indicating how you would like to vote your shares, your shares will be voted to elect each of the director nominees below, as applicable, based on whether you are a holder of Class A Common Stock or Class B Common Stock. Information on each of our nominees is given below.

Each director nominee listed below has consented to being named in this proxy statement and has agreed to serve if elected. However, if a nominee for election as a director by the holders of our Class A Common Stock becomes unavailable before the election or for good cause will not serve, the persons named on the Class A proxy card would be authorized to vote for a replacement director nominee for election as a director by the holders of our Class A Common Stock if the Board names one. If a nominee for election as a director by the holders of our Class B Common Stock becomes unavailable before the election or for good cause will not serve, the persons named in the Class B proxy card would be authorized to vote for a replacement director nominee for election as a director by the holders of our Class B Common Stock if the Board names one.

WILLIAM J. BELL – Age 78

Class B Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Bell was a consultant to Cablevision from 2005 to 2014. He also held various positions at Cablevision and its predecessor beginning in 1979, including as Cablevision’s Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer until 2004. Mr. Bell is a director of AMC Networks since 2011. Mr. Bell also serves as the Treasurer and a director of the Lustgarten Foundation since 1998.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of Mr. Bell’s broad experience in the cable and programming industries for the past 40 years, as well as his experience in various positions with Cablevision and its predecessor, including as its former Vice Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, our Board has concluded that William J. Bell should serve as a director of the Company.

CHARLES F. DOLAN – Age 92

Class B Director since July 29, 2009

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan is a director and the Executive Chairman of AMC Networks since 2011. He served as the Chairman of Cablevision from 1985 until its sale in 2016. He was Chief Executive Officer of Cablevision from 1985 to 1995. Mr. Dolan founded and acted as the General Partner of Cablevision’s predecessor from 1973 to 1985 and established Manhattan Cable Television in 1961 and Home Box Office in 1971. In addition to AMC Networks, Mr. Dolan has served as a director of MSG since 2015, and previously served as a director of Cablevision from 1985 until its sale in 2016. Charles F. Dolan is the father of James L. Dolan and Thomas C. Dolan, father-in-law of Kristin A. Dolan and Brian G. Sweeney, the grandfather of Quentin F. Dolan and the uncle of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience in the cable television and cable programming industries, as well as his experience as founder of Cablevision, his previous service as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Cablevision and its predecessors, as well as the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company, AMC Networks, MSG, and Cablevision, our Board has concluded that Charles F. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

JAMES L. DOLAN – Age 63

Class B Director since July 29, 2009

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan is a director and the Executive Chairman of the Company since 2009. He also assumed the responsibilities of the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from March 2015 to July 2015. Mr. Dolan has also served as a director and the Executive Chairman of MSG since 2015, and the Chief Executive Officer of MSG since November 2017. Mr. Dolan was the Chief Executive Officer of Cablevision from 1995 until its sale in 2016. He was President of Cablevision from 1998 to 2014; Chief Executive Officer of Rainbow Media Holdings, Inc., a former subsidiary of Cablevision, from 1992 to 1995; and Vice President of Cablevision from 1987 to 1992. In addition to MSG, Mr. Dolan has served as a director of AMC Networks since 2011 and previously served as a director of Cablevision from 1991 until its sale in 2016. James L. Dolan is the spouse of Kristin A. Dolan, son of Charles F. Dolan, the father of Quentin F. Dolan, the brother of Thomas C. Dolan, the brother-in-law of Brian G. Sweeney and the cousin of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience in various positions with Cablevision, including as its Chief Executive Officer, his experience in various positions with the Company and its predecessors since 1999 and MSG since the MSG Distribution, including as Executive Chairman of the Company and MSG, as well as the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company, AMC Networks, MSG and Cablevision, our Board has concluded that James L. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

KRISTIN A. DOLAN – AGE 52

Class B Director since April 9, 2018

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks Inc., Revlon, Inc., The Wendy’s Company

Career Highlights

Ms. Dolan is the founder and has been the Chief Executive Officer of 605, LLC, an audience measurement and data analytics company in the media and entertainment industries, since its inception in 2016. Ms. Dolan previously served as the Chief Operating Officer of Cablevision from 2014 until its sale in 2016. Prior to becoming Chief Operating Officer, Ms. Dolan served in various other roles at Cablevision, including: President of Optimum Services from 2013 to 2014; Senior Executive Vice President of Product Management and Marketing from 2011 to 2013; and Senior Vice President from 2003 to 2011. Ms. Dolan has served as a director of Revlon, Inc. since May 2017, The Wendy’s Company since July 2017, MSG since 2015, and AMC Networks since 2011, and previously served as a director of the Company from 2010 to 2015, and Cablevision from 2010 until its sale in 2016. Kristin A. Dolan is the spouse of James L. Dolan, the step-mother of Quentin F. Dolan, the daughter-in-law of Charles F. Dolan, the sister-in-law of Thomas C. Dolan and Brian G. Sweeney, and the cousin by marriage of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills and Experience

In light of her experience as Chief Executive Officer of 605, LLC and in various positions at Cablevision, her service as a director of other public companies, as well as the knowledge and experience she has gained about the Company’s business and the contributions she has made during her tenure as a director of the Company, The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks and Cablevision, our Board has concluded that Kristin A. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

PAUL J. DOLAN – Age 60

Class B Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: J.M. Smucker Company

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan is the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Cleveland Indians Major League Baseball (“MLB”) team since 2010. Mr. Dolan was President of the Cleveland Indians from 2004 to 2010 and Vice President and General Counsel from 2000 to 2004. Mr. Dolan has served on multiple committees of the MLB and is currently on the MLB’s Long Range Planning Committee, Ownership Committee and Diversity and Inclusion Committee. Mr. Dolan has been a director and member of the Executive Compensation Committee of the J.M. Smucker Company since 2006, and as of August 2017, serves as the Chair of the Executive Compensation Committee. Additionally, Mr. Dolan has served as a director of Dix & Eaton, a privately-owned communications and public relations firm, since 2014, and previously served as a director of Cablevision from 2015 until its sale in 2016. Mr. Dolan was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fast Ball Sports Productions, a sports media company, from 2006 through 2012. Paul J. Dolan is the nephew of Charles F. Dolan, a cousin by marriage of Brian G. Sweeney and Kristin A. Dolan, and the cousin of James L. Dolan, Thomas C. Dolan and Quentin F. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his extensive business and management experience in the sports and media industries, his experience as a member of Cablevision’s founding family, the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and the contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company and of Cablevision, and his service on the board of another public company, our Board has concluded that Paul J. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

QUENTIN F. DOLAN – Age 24

Class B Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan is a recent graduate of New York University. Mr. Dolan has held internship positions at Grubman Shire & Meiselas, P.C. and Azoff MSG Entertainment, LLC. Quentin F. Dolan is the son of James L. Dolan, the step-son of Kristin A. Dolan, the grandson of Charles F. Dolan, the nephew of Thomas C. Dolan and Brian G. Sweeney, and the cousin of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and the contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company as well as being a member of the third generation of Cablevision’s founding family, our Board has concluded that Quentin F. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

THOMAS C. DOLAN – Age 66

Class B Director since February 9, 2010

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Dolan was the Executive Vice President, Strategy and Development, Office of the Chairman of Cablevision from 2008 until its sale in 2016. He was Chief Executive Officer of Rainbow Media Corp. from 2004 to 2005; Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Cablevision from 2001 until 2005; Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Cablevision from 1996 to 2001; Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Cablevision from 1994 to 1996; General Manager of Cablevision’s East End Long Island cable system from 1991 to 1994 and System Manager of Cablevision’s East End Long Island cable system from 1987 to 1991. Mr. Dolan has served as a director of AMC Networks since 2011 and MSG since 2015, and previously served as a director of Cablevision from 2007 until its sale in 2016. Thomas C. Dolan is the son of Charles F. Dolan, the brother of James L. Dolan, the brother-in-law of Brian G. Sweeney and Kristin A. Dolan, the uncle of Quentin F. Dolan, and the cousin of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience as a member of Cablevision’s founding family and in various positions with Cablevision, as well as the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company, AMC Networks, MSG and Cablevision, our Board has concluded that Thomas C. Dolan should serve as a director of the Company.

JOSEPH J. LHOTA – Age 64

Class A Director since December 15, 2016

Committee Membership: Audit (Chair), Compensation

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Lhota is the Senior Vice President, Vice Dean and Chief of Staff at NYU Langone Health since 2014 and Chairman of the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority (“MTA”) since June 2017. In 2013, Mr. Lhota was a candidate for Mayor of the City of New York. He previously served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the MTA from 2011 to 2012. Mr. Lhota was Executive Vice President of the Company from 2010 to 2011 and Executive Vice President of Cablevision from 2002 to 2010. Mr. Lhota was also the New York City Deputy Mayor for Operations from 1997 to 2001 and New York City Budget Director from 1995 to 1997. Mr. Lhota was an investment banker from 1980 to 1994. Prior to that, he was a Senior Accountant with Arthur Andersen & Co. Mr. Lhota has served as a director of MSG since 2017, and previously served as a director and the chairman of the audit committee of FirstAviation Services, Inc. from 2002 until it became a private company in 2015, and a director of Cablevision from 2014 until its sale in 2016.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of Mr. Lhota’s experience as a former executive of the Company, his experience as a senior executive and director of other public companies, his knowledge of the industry, his government service (including leading a major governmental organization) and his experience as an investment banker and accountant, our Board has concluded that Mr. Lhota should serve as a director of the Company.

JOEL M. LITVIN – Age 59

Class A Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: Audit, Compensation

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Litvin was the President, League Operations, of the NBA from 2006 until his retirement in 2015. As the NBA’s President, League Operations, he managed several core areas of the day-to-day operations of the NBA, including the league’s security, player development, social responsibility and legal functions. Mr. Litvin also managed, on behalf of the NBA Board of Governors, franchise matters such as revenue sharing, team sales and financings, relocations and the NBA’s ownership and debt policies. Mr. Litvin initially joined the NBA as a staff attorney in 1988 and also served as Senior Vice President and General Counsel from 1999 to 2000 and Executive Vice President, Legal and Business Affairs, from 2000 to 2006. Mr. Litvin began his professional career at the New York law firm of Willkie Farr & Gallagher, where he worked on several matters for Major League Baseball. Mr. Litvin has served as a member of the Board of Trustees of the Naismith Memorial Basketball Hall of Fame since 2008 and the Board of Directors of Hunger Free America since 2015. Additionally, he has served as a director of USA Climbing, the national governing body for the sport of competition climbing, since 2016, and is also a co-founder and Principal since 2016 of Animal Defense Partnership, a non-profit organization that provides legal and other professional services to organizations devoted to defending animals from cruelty in all forms.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of Mr. Litvin’s more than 27 years of business experience at the NBA (including as the chief NBA league office liaison to the NBA Board of Governors), his extensive knowledge about the sports and sports media businesses, his management and legal experience, and his service on the board of a charitable institution, our Board has concluded that Joel M. Litvin should serve as a director of the Company.

HANK J. RATNER – Age 59

Class B Director since September 30, 2015

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Ratner has served as a director of the Garden of Dreams Foundation since 2006, and Co-Chairman of the board of Winview, Inc., a Silicon Valley-based sports gaming app that enhances TV sports viewing by allowing fans to compete in in-game contests through its free mobile app that is synchronized with live sporting events, since 2016. Mr. Ratner also has been a director of GF Sports since 2015 and GF Events since 2016, live sport and entertainment companies that, among other things, own professional tennis and equestrian events. Mr. Ratner was the President and CEO and a member of the board of Independent Sports and Entertainment (“ISE”), an integrated sports, media, entertainment and management company that represents athletes in the NBA, NFL and MLB, from May 2016 until May 2018. Previously, Mr. Ratner was the Vice Chairman of Cablevision from 2002 until its sale in 2016. Mr. Ratner previously served as Vice Chairman of the Company from 2014 until 2015, and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company from 2009 to 2014. Mr. Ratner previously served in various roles at Rainbow Media (the name of AMC Networks while it was a subsidiary of Cablevision), including: Vice Chairman from 2002 to 2011; director from 1997 to 2003; Chief Operating Officer from 1999 to 2002; Chief Operating Officer and Secretary from 1998 to 1999; Executive Vice President and Secretary from 1997 to 1998; and Executive Vice President, Legal & Business Affairs and Secretary from 1993 to 1997.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience in various positions with the Company and its predecessors, including as the Company’s Vice Chairman and President and Chief Executive Officer, and the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company and Vice Chairman of Cablevision, our Board has concluded that Hank J. Ratner should serve as a director of the Company.

BRIAN G. SWEENEY – Age 54

Class B Director since February 9, 2010

Committee Membership: None

Other Public Company Directorships: The Madison Square Garden Company, AMC Networks

Career Highlights

Mr. Sweeney served as the President of Cablevision from 2014 and President and Chief Financial Officer of Cablevision from 2015 until its sale in 2016. Previously, Mr. Sweeney served in various other roles at Cablevision, including: Senior Executive Vice President, Strategy and Chief of Staff from 2013 to 2014; Senior Vice President — Strategic Software Solutions from 2012 to 2013; and Senior Vice President — eMedia from 2000 to 2012. Mr. Sweeney has served as a director of AMC Networks since 2011 and MSG since 2015, and previously served as a director of Cablevision from 2005 until its sale in 2016. Brian G. Sweeney is the son-in-law of Charles F. Dolan, the brother-in-law of James L. Dolan, Thomas C. Dolan and Kristin A. Dolan, the uncle of Quentin F. Dolan, and the cousin by marriage of Paul J. Dolan.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of his experience in various positions with Cablevision, as well as the knowledge and experience he has gained about the Company’s business and contributions he has made during his tenure as a director of the Company, AMC Networks, MSG and Cablevision, our Board has concluded that Brian G. Sweeney should serve as a director of the Company.

JOHN L. SYKEs – Age 63

Class A Director since August 5, 2015

Committee Membership: Audit, Compensation (Chair)

Other Public Company Directorships: None

Career Highlights

Mr. Sykes is the President of Entertainment Enterprises for iHeartMedia, Inc. (formerly CC Media Holdings, Inc.), a global media and entertainment company, since 2012. In his role at iHeartMedia, Mr. Sykes is responsible for developing new business partnerships and platforms across a range of media, including broadcast television, digital video platforms and live events, as well as creating value for iHeartMedia’s advertisers and key partners. Mr. Sykes is the co-executive producer of iHeartRadio branded annual live events, including six annual iHeartRadio live events that are broadcast on network television. He also worked with iHeartMedia in a consulting role during 2011. Prior to joining iHeartMedia, Mr. Sykes was affiliated with the Pilot Group, a private equity and venture firm, from 2008 to 2011. He was a core member of the team at Viacom, Inc. that launched MTV Networks in 1981. During his more than 20-year tenure at Viacom, Mr. Sykes served as President of New Network Development for MTV from 2005 to 2008, Chairman and CEO of Infinity Broadcasting Corporation (now CBS Radio) from 2002 to 2005 and President of the VH1 Cable Television Network from 1994 to 2002. Mr. Sykes is the founder and a director (since 1997) of VH1 Save the Music, and has also served on the boards of Shazam Mobile from 2011 to 2014, Critical Content since 2016, the Robin Hood Foundation since 1996, the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame since 1997, If Only since 2013, and Syracuse University’s Newhouse School of Communications since 1994.

Key Skills & Experience

In light of Mr. Sykes’s 36 years of business and management experience, his extensive experience in the media, television and entertainment industries and his service on the boards of other companies and charitable institutions, our Board has concluded that John L. Sykes should serve as a director of the Company.

The Audit Committee, comprised of independent members of the Board, has appointed KPMG as our independent registered public accounting firm (the independent auditors) with respect to our operations for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. KPMG will audit our financial statements for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2019. Representatives of KPMG will be present at the annual meeting. Those representatives will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and will answer appropriate questions. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines

that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

We are asking that you ratify the appointment of KPMG, although your ratification is not required. Approval of this proposal requires the favorable vote of the majority of the votes cast by the holders of our Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock, voting together as a single class. In accordance with our Certificate of Incorporation, holders of our Class A Common Stock will have one vote per share and holders of our Class B Common Stock will have ten votes per share.

The following table provides information about fees for services rendered by KPMG, our independent registered public accounting firm, for

our fiscal years ended June 30, 2018 and June 30, 2017, respectively:

The Audit Committee’s policy requires that the Audit Committee pre-approve audit and non-audit services performed by the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee may delegate its pre-approval authority to its Chairman provided that any such services are subsequently ratified by the entire Audit Committee. In addition, the Chief Financial Officer may pre-approve the engagement of the

independent registered public accounting firm for audit-related, tax and non-audit services not to exceed $50,000 per engagement provided that such engagement does not impair the external auditor’s independence and is ratified by the Audit Committee at the next Audit Committee meeting. All of the services for which fees were disclosed were pre-approved under the Audit Committee’s pre-approval policy.

This Compensation Discussion & Analysis provides a discussion of our compensation

philosophy and 2018 compensation for the following NEOs:

Business Overview

The Company, an industry leader in sports production, and content development and distribution, owns and operates two award-winning regional sports and entertainment networks, MSG Network and MSG+, and a live streaming and video on demand platform, MSG GO. For nearly 50 years, we have been a pioneer in regional sports programming, setting a standard of excellence, creativity and technological innovation. Today, our exclusive award-winning programming continues to be a valuable differentiator for our viewers, advertisers and the cable, satellite, telephone and other platforms that distribute our networks. Our networks are widely distributed throughout all of New York State and significant portions of New Jersey and Connecticut, as well as parts of Pennsylvania. Our networks are also carried nationally by certain distributors on sports tiers or in similar packages.

Strong 2018 Fiscal Year Performance Results

During the 2018 fiscal year, we again generated strong financial results for our stockholders. This strong performance reflects the strength of our highly-valued exclusive live content, as well as our dedication to delivering a compelling lineup of original programming to our distributors, advertisers and viewers. Financial highlights for the fiscal year included:

Stockholder Engagement & Responsiveness

During each of the 2017 and 2018 fiscal years, we have engaged with holders of over 75% of our Class A Common Stock concerning our Board, governance and executive compensation practices, with the specific goal of seeking stockholder feedback.

In direct response to our stockholder feedback and the Compensation Committee’s regular review of our programs, and in consultation with the compensation consultant, during the 2017 fiscal year we made several enhancements that we believe further align our compensation practices with our long-term strategy and the interests of our stockholders. Such enhancements include the improvement of disclosures regarding incentive program design, goal achievement against targets, and the alignment of incentive payouts with sustained Company performance, as well as the adoption of an anti-pledging policy.

We value the views of our stockholders, and we look forward to continuing this dialogue to inform the Compensation Committee’s ongoing review of the program.

Executive Compensation Program Objectives and Philosophy

The Company competes for talent among a wide array of media and entertainment companies. Our executive officers have substantial and meaningful professional experience in the industry in which the Company operates.

The Company places great importance on its ability to attract, retain, motivate and reward experienced executive officers who can drive our business objectives and achieve strong financial and operational performance as well as long-term value creation. The Compensation Committee has designed executive compensation policies and programs that are consistent with, explicitly linked to, and supportive of, the strategic objectives of growing the Company’s businesses and maximizing long-term stockholder value. Our Compensation Committee has designed a program that reflects four key overarching executive compensation principles:

In designing the executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee seeks to fulfill these objectives by maintaining appropriate balances between (1) short-term and long-term compensation, (2) cash and equity compensation, and (3) performance-based and time-based vesting of compensation.

Elements of Compensation

The Company compensates its NEOs through base salary, annual incentive awards, long-term incentive awards, perquisites and benefit programs. Our annual and long-term incentive programs provide performance-based incentives for our NEOs tied to key financial and strategic measures that drive long-term stockholder value and reward sustained achievement of the

Company’s key financial goals. The Company considers Company revenue and AOI to be the key measures of its operating performance. As such, our Compensation Committee has incorporated these performance measures into our annual incentive awards and long-term incentive performance equity awards, along with other specific strategic and operating measures. The Company’s long-term incentive program also includes restricted stock units and time-vesting stock options whose value is tied to the performance of the market value of the Company’s Class A Common Stock.

The table below summarizes the current elements of our compensation program and how each element supports the Company’s compensation objectives:

2018 Fiscal Year Annual Compensation Opportunities Mix

As described above, the Company’s compensation program is designed with

significant long-term performance-based and at-risk components. For the 2018 fiscal year, a majority of NEO compensation was at risk, with a majority of at risk compensation granted in the form of long-term equity-based awards.

Sound Compensation Governance Practices

The Company’s executive compensation program is overseen by the wholly independent

Compensation Committee, with the support of an independent compensation consultant. We maintain a compensation program with strong governance features, including:

The following discussion describes the practices and policies implemented by the Compensation Committee during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. For the 2018 fiscal year, compensation for the NEOs was subject to employment agreements approved by the Company’s Compensation Committee. Information concerning the Company’s current employment agreements with

each NEO is set forth below under “Executive Compensation Tables — Employment Agreements.”

In the Company’s most recent advisory “say-on-pay” proposal, which was held in 2017, a substantial majority of stockholders (including a majority of holders of our Class A Common

Stock) voted to approve on an advisory basis the Company’s executive compensation. The Compensation Committee considered the results of this vote, as well as the Company’s ongoing discussions with stockholders, in its assessment and development of the compensation program. These factors, among other considerations, contributed to our decision to adopt an anti-pledging policy and enhance our disclosure related to our compensation practices during the 2017 fiscal year.

Role of the Compensation Committee

Our Compensation Committee administers our executive compensation program. The responsibilities of the Compensation Committee are set forth in its charter. Among other responsibilities, the Compensation Committee (1) establishes our general compensation philosophy and, in consultation with management, oversees the development and implementation of compensation programs; (2) reviews and approves corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our executive officers who are required to file reports with the SEC under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, evaluates their performance in light of those goals and objectives, and determines and approves their respective compensation level based on this evaluation; (3) oversees the activities of the committee or committees administering our retirement and benefit plans; and (4) administers our stockholder-approved compensation plans. For more information about the Compensation Committee, please see “Board and Governance Practices — Committees — Compensation Committee.”

Role of the Independent Compensation Consultant

The Compensation Committee has authority under its charter to engage outside consultants to assist in the performance of its duties and responsibilities. Our Compensation Committee utilizes the services of ClearBridge Compensation

Group LLC (the “compensation consultant”), an independent compensation consultant, to assist in determining whether the elements of our executive compensation program are reasonable and consistent with our objectives.

The compensation consultant reports directly to the Compensation Committee and, at the request of the Compensation Committee, the compensation consultant meets with members of management from time to time for the purpose of gathering information on management proposals and recommendations to be presented to the Compensation Committee.

The services provided by the compensation consultant to the Compensation Committee during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 included:

During the 2018 fiscal year, the compensation consultant provided no services to the Company other than those provided to the Compensation Committee.

The Compensation Committee charter requires the Compensation Committee to consider the NYSE independence factors before receiving advice from an advisor, despite the fact that such independence rules are not applicable to controlled companies. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the Compensation Committee concluded that the compensation consultant satisfies the independence requirements of the NYSE rules. In addition, the Compensation Committee believes that the compensation consultant’s work did not raise any conflicts of interest during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. In reaching this conclusion, the Compensation Committee considered the same rules regarding advisor independence.

Role of Executive Officers in Determining Compensation

The Compensation Committee reviews the performance and compensation of the Executive Chairman and the President and Chief Executive Officer and, following discussions with the compensation consultant, establishes each of their compensation. Senior management of the Company assists the Compensation Committee and the compensation consultant as described in this Compensation Discussion & Analysis, and provides to the Compensation Committee, either directly or through the compensation consultant, management’s recommendations on the compensation for executive officers other than the Executive Chairman and the President and Chief Executive Officer. Other members of management provide support to the Compensation Committee as needed. Based upon a review of performance and historical compensation, recommendations and information from members of management, and discussions with the compensation consultant, the

Compensation Committee determines and approves compensation for the executive officers.

Performance Objectives

As described below under “— Elements of Our Compensation Program,” performance-based incentive compensation is an important element of the Company’s executive compensation program.

Generally, the Compensation Committee has historically based the performance objectives for the Company’s incentive compensation on Company revenues and AOI. The Company considers these performance objectives to be key measures of the Company’s operating performance.

The Company defines AOI, which is a non-U.S. GAAP financial measure, as operating income (loss) before (i) depreciation, amortization and impairments of property and equipment and intangible assets, (ii) share-based compensation expense or benefit, (iii) restructuring charges or credits and (iv) gains or losses on sales or dispositions of businesses. Because it is based on operating income (loss), AOI also excludes interest expense (including cash interest expense) and other non-operating income and expense items. At the time of grant of an award, the performance measures used may contemplate certain potential future adjustments and exclusions.

Tally Sheets

The Compensation Committee has reviewed tally sheets prepared by the compensation consultant, setting forth all components of compensation payable, and the benefits accruing, to the NEOs for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, including all cash compensation, benefits, perquisites and the current value of outstanding equity-based awards. The tally sheets also set forth potential payouts to the NEOs upon various termination scenarios.

Determining Compensation Levels; Benchmarking

As part of the Compensation Committee’s review of the total compensation for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the compensation consultant assisted the Compensation Committee in: (1) determining if a peer group should be used for comparative purposes, (2) assessing executive compensation in light of internal and external considerations and (3) reviewing the Company’s equity and cash-based executive incentive programs, taking into account evolving market trends. The Compensation Committee, in consultation with the compensation consultant considered broad market data (industry-related and general industry data) and multiple broad-based compensation surveys in order to appropriately assess compensation levels.

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the Compensation Committee, in consultation with the compensation consultant, determined not to utilize a peer group or target positioning in determining compensation given the limited number of comparable publicly-traded companies.

Besides the market data listed above, the Compensation Committee considered internal information (historical compensation, job responsibility, experience, parity among executive officers, contractual commitments and attraction and retention of talent) to determine compensation.

Our executive compensation philosophy is reflected in the principal elements of our executive compensation program, each of which is important to the Company’s goal of attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding highly-qualified executive officers. The compensation program included the following key elements for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018: base salary, annual cash incentives, long-term incentives, retirement, health and welfare and other benefits, which are generally provided to all other eligible employees, and additional executive officer benefits, including post-termination compensation under certain circumstances and certain perquisites, each as described below.

A significant percentage of total direct compensation is allocated to incentive compensation in accordance with the Compensation Committee’s philosophy. The Compensation Committee reviews historical Company compensation, other information provided by the compensation consultant and other factors, such as experience, performance, length of service and contractual commitments, to

determine the appropriate level and mix of compensation for executive officers. The allocation between cash and equity compensation and between short-term and long-term compensation is designed to provide a variety of fixed and at-risk compensation that is related to the achievement of the Company’s short-term and long-term objectives.

The compensation program and philosophies discussed in this proxy statement reflect only compensation that is paid by the Company for services rendered to the Company. Mr. Dolan is also employed by MSG as its Executive Chairman and Mr. Burian is also employed by MSG as its Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Messrs. Dolan and Burian receive separate compensation from MSG with respect to such employment. For more information regarding the respective compensation of Messrs. Dolan and Burian by MSG, see MSG’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed with the SEC on October 25, 2018.

Base Salaries

Our Compensation Committee is responsible for setting the base salaries of the executive officers, which are intended to compensate them for the day-to-day services that they perform for the Company. Base salaries for these executive officers have been set at levels that are intended to reflect the competitive marketplace in attracting and retaining quality executive officers. The employment agreements between the Company and the NEOs contain a base salary level. For information regarding these base salary levels, please see “Executive Compensation Tables — Employment Agreements” below. The Compensation Committee reviews the salaries of the executive officers at least annually. The Compensation Committee may adjust base salaries for executive officers over time, based on their performance and experience and in accordance with the terms of their employment agreements.

The base salaries paid by the Company to each of Mr. Dolan, Ms. Greenberg, Messrs. Richter and Burian, and Ms. Darino-Gorski in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 were as follows: $1,000,000, $974,615, $692,050, $309,000, and $369,036, respectively. See footnote 1 to “Executive Compensation Tables — Summary Compensation Table” for additional information regarding the base salaries paid during the Company’s fiscal year. Effective September 1, 2018, annual base salaries of Ms. Greenberg, Messrs. Richter and Burian, and Ms. Darino-Gorski were increased to $1,200,000, $750,000, $360,000 and $400,000, respectively. The base salary for Mr. Dolan is $1,000,000 and did not change from the prior year. The Compensation Committee determined salaries for NEOs after evaluation of Company and individual performance, market pay levels, the range of increases generally provided to the Company’s employees and, to the extent appropriate, management’s recommendations.

Annual Cash Incentives

Overview

Annual cash incentives in the 2018 fiscal year were determined by performance against goals: under the Management Performance Incentive Plan (“MPIP”) for the purpose of determining the final annual incentive payouts, and under the Cash Incentive Plan (“CIP”) for the purpose of achieving tax deductibility pursuant to the performance compensation exemption under Section 162(m) as in effect prior to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. See “Compensation Discussion & Analysis — Tax Deductibility of Compensation” for a discussion of the impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on the Company’s compensation program.

This annual incentive is designed to link executive compensation directly to the Company’s performance by providing incentives and rewards based upon business performance during the applicable fiscal year, while preserving

the tax deductibility of awards under Section 162(m) where possible.

Target Award Opportunities

Each employee eligible for an annual incentive award is assigned a target award equal to a percentage of that employee’s base salary earned during the applicable fiscal year. The target annual incentive awards are based upon the applicable employee’s position, grade level, responsibilities, and historical and expected future contributions to the Company. In addition, each employment agreement between the Company and each of the NEOs contains a minimum target annual incentive award level. See “Executive Compensation Tables — Employment Agreements” below. The Compensation

Committee, in its sole discretion and subject to the terms of employment agreements, may revise target annual incentive award levels for the executive officers.

Annual Incentive Payouts

The below table summarizes each NEO’s target annual incentive opportunity and the Compensation Committee’s determination of actual 2018 fiscal year annual incentive payouts. Consistent with prior years’ practice, payouts earned under the CIP were reduced so that the actual 2018 fiscal year annual incentive payouts were in line with calculated payouts under the MPIP. The annual incentive payouts are described in more detail below.

MPIP

Overview

MPIP awards to all eligible employees are conditioned upon the satisfaction of

predetermined financial and strategic objectives, weighted at 80% and 20%, respectively. Final MPIP results are calculated based on performance achievement against these predetermined goals.

Performance Targets & Achievement Levels

Financial Component (80%): For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the MPIP financial performance objectives included rigorous Company revenue and AOI targets, with potential

payouts under this component ranging from 0-200% of target. The level of payout is determined based on the extent to which the Company’s annual financial performance exceeded or missed the predetermined targets, as outlined below:

Strategic Component (20%): For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, the MPIP also included a performance component that measures achievement against strategic objectives set at the beginning of the year.

Management establishes three strategic goals with up to 13 discrete metrics under each individual goal, which are reviewed and approved by the Compensation Committee. Each strategic goal is assigned a weight at the beginning of the year and the level of achievement of each goal is evaluated on a four-point scale. The strategic component for NEO payouts is calculated based on the extent to which the objectives are achieved or missed in the fiscal year.

Based on the Company’s performance against the predetermined metrics, the payout result of the strategic component of the MPIP was achieved at 159.0% of target.

MPIP Payout: As a result of the level of achievement of the financial and strategic objectives, as discussed above, the MPIP paid out at 126.5% of the target level.

CIP

Overview

While the MPIP is used to determine annual incentive amounts, NEOs receive annual incentive awards under the CIP to preserve tax deductibility where possible.

Performance Targets & Achievements

For the 2018 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee used Company AOI as the financial measure for CIP funding, with no awards payable under the plan if an AOI threshold for the Company of $251.8 million was not achieved. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, our Company AOI was $336.5 million, and the CIP bonus pool was funded. The Compensation Committee used negative discretion to bring CIP payout levels down to the same level as payouts calculated under the MPIP (i.e., 126.5% of the target level).

Long-term Incentives

Long-term incentives represent a substantial portion of our executive officers’ annual total direct compensation. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, our long-term incentive programs were comprised of performance stock units and restricted stock units (for all NEOs excluding the Executive Chairman), and performance stock options and time-based stock options (for the Executive Chairman).

The Committee believes this equity mix:

The following table summarizes our 2018 fiscal year long-term incentive awards for all NEOs:

For the 2018 fiscal year, Mr. Dolan did not receive restricted stock units and performance stock units, and instead received time-based stock options and performance stock options as contemplated by his employment agreement. Half of the stock options are subject to performance-based vesting conditions, with the same performance conditions that are used for performance stock units; half of the stock options are subject to time-based vesting, with the same

vesting schedule that is used for restricted stock units. The Compensation Committee views stock options as inherently performance based because our stock price needs to increase for Mr. Dolan to recognize value, and therefore the Compensation Committee believes that Mr. Dolan’s long-term incentive award structure furthers our goal of establishing strong alignment with our stockholders.

Additional information regarding long-term incentive awards granted to NEOs during the 2018 fiscal year is set forth in the “Summary Compensation Table” and the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Effective September 1, 2018, the target annual long-term incentive opportunities of Ms. Greenberg and Messrs. Richter and Burian were increased to $3,400,000, $1,200,000 and $600,000, respectively. These increases reflect each of Ms. Greenberg and Messrs. Richter and Burian’s role and performance, as well as his or her competitive market positioning and internal considerations.

Performance Stock Units

Performance stock units are intended to align our executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders, with a focus on long-term financial

results. Under our executive compensation program for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, performance stock units were granted to executive officers and certain other members of management (other than Mr. Dolan) pursuant to the 2010 Employee Stock Plan, as amended (the “Employee Stock Plan”). With respect to NEOs, the performance stock units also were designed to achieve tax deductibility pursuant to the performance compensation exemption under Section 162(m) where possible.

2018 Fiscal Year Grants

In September 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the following awards of performance stock units to the NEOs (with the exception of Mr. Dolan, who was awarded performance-based stock options, as described below) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 (for the 2018-2020 fiscal year performance period):

Performance stock units are structured to be settled at the end of the three-year performance period, to the extent the applicable pre-determined financial performance goals are met.

Target Setting

For the 2018 fiscal year performance stock units granted in September 2017 for the 2018-2020 fiscal year performance period, the Compensation Committee selected total Company revenue and AOI as the two financial metrics. Goals were set at the beginning of the fiscal year based on the Company’s five-year strategic plan, which is subject to review by the Board in connection with

its approval of the annual budget. The Company’s five-year strategic plan is confidential and disclosure of those targets could provide information that could lead to competitive harm, and for this reason the three-year performance stock unit financial performance targets are not disclosed; however, the Compensation Committee seeks to make target goals ambitious, while threshold goals are expected to be achievable. The Company intends to disclose the Company revenue and AOI payout results as a percentage of target as well as the resulting payout for the 2018-2020 fiscal year performance stock units as a percentage of target after the end of the performance period.

The performance stock unit payout opportunity ranges from 0 to 110% of target, based on performance and subject to continued employment. At the threshold performance level, 90% of the target performance stock units would pay out, and at or above the maximum performance level, 110% of the target performance stock units would pay out. If the Company exceeds threshold levels but does not achieve the targeted rates, or if the Company achieves or exceeds one target but not both, the award provides for partial payments. No performance stock units pay out if the Company fails to achieve both threshold levels of performance.

Restricted Stock Units

Restricted stock units serve to align executive officers’ interests with those of our stockholders and promote the retention of employees, including the NEOs.

In September 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the following awards of restricted stock units to the NEOs (with the exception of Mr. Dolan) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 pursuant to the Company’s Employee Stock Plan:

Restricted stock units vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant subject to continued employment, and include a performance threshold designed to achieve tax deductibility pursuant to the performance compensation exemption under Section 162(m) for eligible NEOs.

For the 2018 fiscal year restricted stock units, the Section 162(m) performance objectives required the AOI of the Company in any of the fiscal years ending on June 30, 2018, June 30, 2019 or June 30, 2020 to exceed 75% of the 2017 fiscal year AOI of the Company.

On August 28, 2018, the Compensation Committee certified the achievement of the

performance objectives for the awards held by NEOs, based on AOI of the Company for the 2018 fiscal year ($336.5 million) exceeding 75% of the AOI of the Company for the 2017 fiscal year ($251.8 million).

Stock Options

Stock options establish a close alignment with stock price performance and with our stockholders’ interests. For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, Mr. Dolan received:

The performance conditions and vesting schedules for the performance stock options are identical to those for the performance stock units. The vesting schedule for the time-based stock options is identical to that of the restricted stock units; however, the time-based stock options do not have a separate Section 162(m) performance objective given that time-based stock options are not required to have performance objectives in order to achieve tax deductibility pursuant to the

performance compensation exemption under Section 162(m). See “— Performance Stock Units” and “— Restricted Stock Units” above for additional information.

In September 2017, the Compensation Committee approved the following stock option awards to Mr. Dolan for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 pursuant to the Company’s Employee Stock Plan:

2016 Fiscal Year Performance Stock Unit Awards

In August 2018, the Compensation Committee certified the Company’s achievement of the revenue and AOI performance objectives, weighted at 50% each, for the performance stock units that were granted in September 2015 and equitably adjusted in October 2015 following the MSG Distribution (except for Mr. Richter, whose awards were granted in October 2015 when he joined the Company). Based upon the Company’s level of achievement of revenue and AOI over the October 1, 2015 through June 30, 2018 performance period against the targets set for the fiscal year 2016 performance stock units, the

Company revenue and AOI performance results as a percentage of target performance were 101.0% and 107.5%, respectively, and the resulting payout for the fiscal year 2016 performance stock units was 101.0% of target, which was settled in September 2018.

Hedging and Pledging Policies

The Company’s Insider Trading Policy prohibits all directors and employees (including NEOs) from (i) engaging in short sales or other “hedging” transactions and (ii) placing securities in margin accounts or otherwise pledging Company securities.

Holding Requirements

Under our executive compensation program for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, annual restricted stock unit awards to NEOs vest ratably on each of the first three anniversaries of the date of grant and annual performance stock unit awards to NEOs cliff-vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant, in each case, so long as the recipient is continuously employed by the Company until the applicable vesting date (and subject to the performance conditions described above and any applicable terms of their employment agreement). With respect to our non-management directors, and as discussed above under “— Director Compensation,”

compensation includes annual awards of restricted stock units. Pursuant to the award agreements, directors’ restricted stock units are settled in shares of Company stock (or, in the Compensation Committee’s discretion, cash) on the first business day following 90 days after service on the Board ceases (other than in the event of a director’s death, where the restricted stock units are settled immediately). One effect of the cliff and three-year ratable vesting (with respect to our NEOs and eligible employees) and the holding requirements (with respect to our non-management directors) is to require each of our non-management directors, NEOs and eligible employees to maintain significant holdings of Company securities at all times.

Benefits offered to executive officers generally provide for retirement income and serve as a safety net against hardships that can arise from illness, disability or death. The executive officers are generally eligible to participate in the same health and welfare benefit plans made available to the other benefits-eligible employees of the Company, including, for example, medical, dental, vision, life insurance and disability coverage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Messrs. Dolan and Burian do not participate in certain Company benefit plans, including the Company’s medical, dental and vision plans, as they receive such benefits from MSG.

Defined Benefit Plans

Prior to the MSG Distribution, the Company sponsored the MSG Holdings, L.P. Cash Balance Pension Plan (the “Cash Balance Pension Plan”), a tax-qualified defined benefit plan, for participating employees, including certain executive officers. At the time of the MSG Distribution, the Cash Balance Pension Plan was transferred to MSG, but eligible employees of the Company received a full year of credit under the Cash Balance Pension Plan for the 2015 calendar year. Effective March 1, 2011, the Company merged the Madison Square Garden, L.P. Retirement Plan (the “Postretirement Plan”), a frozen defined benefit pension plan, into the Cash Balance Pension Plan. Under the MSGN Holdings, L.P. Excess Cash Balance Plan (the “Excess Plan”), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, the Company provided additional benefits to employees, including certain of the executive officers, who were restricted by the applicable IRS annual compensation limitation. Each of the Cash Balance Pension Plan and Excess Plan were frozen to new participants and future benefit accruals effective as of December 31, 2015.

More information regarding the Cash Balance Pension Plan, the Excess Plan, and the Postretirement Plan is provided in the Pension

Benefits table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Defined Contribution Plans

Prior to the MSG Distribution, the Company sponsored the MSG Holdings, L.P. 401(k) Savings Plan (the “MSG Savings Plan”), a tax-qualified retirement savings plan, for participating employees, including executive officers. As of the MSG Distribution, the MSG Savings Plan was transferred to MSG, renamed The Madison Square Garden 401(k) Savings Plan, and amended to be a multiple employer plan to which the Company contributes as a participating employer. Under the MSG Savings Plan, participants may contribute into their plan accounts a percentage of their eligible pay on a before-tax basis as well as a percentage of their eligible pay on an after-tax basis. The MSG Savings Plan provides (a) an immediately vested matching contribution equal to 100% of the first 4% of eligible pay contributed by participating employees and (b) a discretionary non-elective contribution by the Company. In March 2018, the Company provided a discretionary non-elective contribution with regards to the 2017 calendar year equal to 2% of eligible pay.

In addition, the Company offers the MSGN Holdings, L.P. Excess Savings Plan (the “Excess Savings Plan”), a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, to employees, including executive officers, who are restricted by the applicable IRS annual compensation limitation and/or the pre-tax income deferral limitation. More information regarding the Excess Savings Plan is provided in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Matching contributions made by the Company under the MSG Savings Plan and the Excess Savings Plan are set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

The Company provides certain perquisites to executive officers as described below. Additional information concerning perquisites received by each of the NEOs is set forth in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation Tables” below.

Car and Driver

Mr. Dolan has regular access to a car and driver which he is permitted to use for personal use in addition to business purposes. Mr. Dolan’s car and driver are provided by MSG and a portion of such costs are reimbursed by the Company. In addition, certain other executive officers and members of management have had access to cars and drivers on a limited basis for personal use. To the extent employees used a car and driver for personal use without reimbursement to the Company, those employees were imputed compensation for tax purposes.

Aircraft Arrangements

The Company has access to certain aircraft through time sharing arrangements with a subsidiary of MSG. Additionally, Mr. Dolan has access to helicopter travel pursuant to arrangements made by MSG for personal travel, which has primarily been for purposes of commutation. The Company and MSG have agreed on an allocation of the costs of such personal helicopter use. See “Transactions with Related Parties — Aircraft Arrangements.”

The Company is typically reimbursed for the incremental costs associated with the personal use of aircraft (other than for commutation). To the

extent any executive officer or other employee used any of the aircraft for personal travel without reimbursement to the Company, they were imputed compensation for tax purposes based on the Standard Industry Fare Level rates that are published biannually by the IRS. For compensation reporting purposes, we valued the incremental cost of the personal use of the aircraft based on the variable costs incurred by the Company net of any reimbursements received from executive officers. The incremental cost of the use of the aircraft does not include any costs that would have been incurred by the Company whether or not the personal trip was taken.

Executive Security

Mr. Dolan participates in MSG’s executive security program. The Company and MSG agreed on an allocation of the costs of such participation in their security program. See “Transactions with Related Parties — Relationship Between Us, MSG and AMC Networks.” Because certain of these costs can be viewed as conveying personal benefits to Mr. Dolan, they are reported as perquisites.

Other

From time to time certain employees, including the NEOs (and their guests), have access to tickets to events at MSG’s venues at no cost, and may also purchase tickets at face value. Attendance at such events is integrally and directly related to the performance of their duties, and, as such, we do not deem the receipt of such tickets to be perquisites.

We believe that post-termination benefits are integral to the Company’s ability to attract and retain qualified executive officers.

Under certain circumstances, payments or other benefits may be provided to employees upon the

termination of their employment with the Company. These may include payments or other benefits upon a termination by the Company without cause, termination by the employee for good reason, other voluntary termination by the employee, retirement, death, disability or

termination following a change in control of the Company or following a going private transaction. With respect to the NEOs, the amounts and terms of such payments and other benefits (including the definition of “cause” and “good reason”) are governed by each NEO’s

employment agreement and any applicable award agreements. Post-termination compensation is discussed in greater detail in “Executive Compensation Tables — Employment Agreements” and “— Termination and Severance” below.

For fiscal years beginning prior to December 31, 2017, Section 162(m) established a $1 million limit on the amount that a publicly held corporation may deduct for compensation paid to the chief executive officer and the next three most highly paid NEOs (other than the chief financial officer) in a taxable year. This limitation does not apply to any compensation that is “qualified performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m), which is defined as compensation paid in connection with certain stock options or that is paid only if the individual’s performance meets pre-established objective goals based on performance criteria established under a plan approved by our stockholders. Our short-term and long-term incentive compensation plans have generally been designed to qualify for this exemption from the deduction limitations of Section 162(m) and to be consistent with providing appropriate compensation to executive officers. The

Company’s stockholders approved an amended CIP at the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting on December 11, 2015, and an amended Employee Stock Plan on December 15, 2016.

The Compensation Committee has delegated the approval of certain Section 162(m)-related compensation decisions relating to granting, and determining the level of performance under, performance-based compensation to a subcommittee comprised of Messrs. Litvin and Sykes.

As a result of the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on December 22, 2017, Section 162(m) was modified to remove the “qualified performance-based compensation exemption” from Section 162(m), unless such compensation is “grandfathered” because it is paid pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and has not been modified in any material respect on or after such date.

Employee Restricted Stock Units

In connection with the MSG Distribution, each holder of an employee restricted stock unit that was granted prior to July 1, 2015 received one MSG restricted stock unit in respect of every three employee restricted stock units owned on the record date (each such MSG restricted stock unit, an “MSG Distribution Unit”) and continues to be entitled to a share of our Class A Common Stock (or cash or other property) for each employee restricted stock unit in accordance with the existing award agreement. In connection with the MSG Distribution, each employee restricted stock unit that was granted on or after July 1, 2015 (but prior to the MSG Distribution Date)

was adjusted in accordance with its terms, such that (1) each holder who remained employed by the Company following the MSG Distribution continued to hold the employee restricted stock units, with the number of employee restricted stock units adjusted to reflect the MSG Distribution to maintain the value of the employee restricted stock units, and (2) each holder employed by MSG following the MSG Distribution received MSG restricted stock units of the same value as such employee restricted stock units, and the original employee restricted stock units were cancelled. Any holder of employee restricted stock units granted on or after July 1, 2015 (but prior to the MSG Distribution Date), who was employed by both MSG and us

following the MSG Distribution continued to hold our employee restricted stock units, adjusted to reflect the MSG Distribution, and received MSG restricted stock units in connection with the MSG Distribution, so that 30% of the value of the

employee’s restricted stock units were our employee restricted stock units and 70% of the value of the employee’s restricted stock units were MSG restricted stock units.

The tables below reflect the compensation of the Company’s NEOs. See “Compensation Discussion

& Analysis” for an explanation of our compensation philosophy and program.

The table below summarizes the total compensation paid to or earned by each of our NEOs for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Following the MSG Distribution, our Executive Chairman and our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary are shared employees of the Company and MSG, therefore the information set forth below for periods following the MSG Distribution only reflects the compensation for

those shared NEOs paid by the Company for services rendered to the Company, including amounts paid by the Company to MSG in respect of pre-MSG Distribution compensation paid by MSG (for more information regarding the compensation of Messrs. Dolan and Burian by MSG, see MSG’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed with the SEC on October 25, 2018).

The table below presents information regarding awards granted during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 to each NEO under the Company’s plans, including estimated possible and future payouts

under non-equity incentive plan awards and equity incentive plan awards of restricted stock units, performance stock units, time-based stock options and performance stock options.

The table below shows (i) each grant of time-based stock options and performance-based stock options that are unexercised and outstanding and (ii) the aggregate number and value of unvested restricted stock units and performance stock units outstanding (assuming target performance) for each NEO, in each case, as of June 30, 2018.

References in the footnotes to awards granted in September 2015 mean the awards granted in September 2015, as equitably adjusted into new awards in October 2015 following the MSG Distribution (to the extent such awards were outstanding as of June 30, 2018).

The table below shows the present value of accumulated benefits payable to each of our NEOs, including the number of years of service

credited to each NEO, under our defined benefit pension plans as of June 30, 2018.

The Company maintains several benefit plans for our executive officers. The material terms and conditions are discussed below.

Cash Balance Pension Plan

Prior to the MSG Distribution, the Company sponsored the Cash Balance Pension Plan, a tax-qualified defined benefit plan that generally covered regular full-time and part-time non-union employees of the Company and certain of its affiliates who completed one year of service. Effective on March 1, 2011, the Postretirement Plan (as described below) was merged into the Cash Balance Pension Plan. The merged plan remains named the Cash Balance Pension Plan, but provides the same benefits that were

previously provided by the two separate plans. As of the MSG Distribution, the Cash Balance Pension Plan was transferred to MSG, and eligible employees of the Company received a full year of credit under the Cash Balance Pension Plan for calendar year 2015. The Cash Balance Pension Plan was frozen to future benefit accruals effective as of December 31, 2015 (though accrued benefits continue to earn interest credits).

A notional account is maintained for each participant under the Cash Balance Pension Plan.

While benefit accruals were frozen as of December 31, 2015, participants continue to earn monthly interest credits based on the average of the annual rate of interest on the 30-year U.S. Treasury Bonds for the months of September, October and November of the prior year.

A participant’s interest in the Cash Balance Pension Plan is subject to vesting limitations for the first three years of employment. A participant’s account also vests in full upon his or her termination due to death, disability or retirement after attaining age 65. Upon retirement or other termination of employment with the Company, the participant may elect a distribution of the vested portion of the cash balance account. Any amounts remaining in the Cash Balance Pension Plan will continue to be credited with interest until the account is paid. The normal form of benefit payment for an unmarried participant is a single life annuity and the normal form of benefit payment for a married participant is a 50% joint and survivor annuity. The participant, with spousal consent if applicable, can waive the normal form and elect a single life annuity or a lump sum.

Excess Plan

The Excess Plan is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that is intended to provide eligible participants, including each of the NEOs (other than Mr. Richter and Ms. Darino-Gorski), with a portion of their overall benefit that they would accrue under the Cash Balance Pension

Plan but for Code limits on the amount of “compensation” (as defined in the Cash Balance Pension Plan) that can be taken into account in determining benefits under tax-qualified plans. The Excess Cash Balance Pension Plan was frozen to future benefit accruals effective as of December 31, 2015 (though accrued benefits continue to earn interest credits).

The Company maintains a notional excess cash balance account for each eligible participant, and for each calendar year, credits these accounts with the portion of the allocation that could not be made on his or her behalf under the Cash Balance Pension Plan due to the compensation limitation. In addition, the Company credits each notional excess cash balance account monthly with interest at the same rate used under the Cash Balance Pension Plan. A participant vests in the excess cash balance account according to the same schedule in the Cash Balance Pension Plan. The excess cash balance account, to the extent vested, is paid in a lump sum to the participant as soon as practicable following his or her retirement or other termination of employment with the Company.

Postretirement Plan

The Postretirement Plan is a tax-qualified defined benefit plan covering substantially all of our non-union full-time and eligible part-time employees, including Ms. Darino-Gorski, who were hired prior to January 1, 2001. Effective as of January 1, 2001, membership in the plan was frozen and benefit accruals under the plan continued only for employees who were already active participants in the plan as of December 31, 2000. As of December 31, 2007, the plan was amended to freeze all benefit accruals effective January 1, 2008 and eliminate the ability of participants to earn benefits for future service under this plan. As discussed above, the Postretirement Plan was merged into the Cash Balance Pension Plan, effective March 1, 2011. This merger did not adversely impact any participant in either of the two plans.

The plan provides a benefit at retirement equal to (i) 2% of a participant’s final average pay (as defined in the plan) multiplied by years of benefit service up to 20 years; plus (ii) 1% of the participant’s final average pay multiplied by years of benefit service (as defined in the plan) in excess of 20 years; minus (iii) 1.25% of the participant’s Social Security benefit multiplied by total benefit service up to 40 years. Final average pay is based on the highest average compensation paid during 60 consecutive months out of the last 120 months of benefit service. Compensation means the basic cash remuneration paid to the participant, including annual incentive compensation, commissions and overtime pay, and before deductions for elective deferrals (up to applicable Code limits).

As a result of plan participants’ benefits under the plan being frozen on January 1, 2008, any pay earned and service completed after that date will not be taken into account when determining the amount of a participant’s benefit under the plan. Participants will continue to earn eligibility towards early retirement as long as they remain our employees. Normal retirement under the plan is age 65; however, participants who have attained age 55 and completed at least ten years of vesting service may retire prior to age 65 and receive a reduced benefit.

The normal form of benefit is a single life annuity for an unmarried participant and a 50% joint and survivor annuity for a married participant. The participant, with the spouse’s consent if married, may waive the normal form and elect an optional form of payment, including a single life annuity, a 50%, 75% or 100% joint and survivor annuity, a ten-year certain and life annuity, a level income option that integrates with Social Security benefits, and a lump sum payment if the actuarial present value of the benefit does not exceed $10,000.

The MSG Savings Plan

Under the MSG Savings Plan, a tax-qualified retirement savings plan, participating employees, including the NEOs (other than Messrs. Dolan

and Burian, each of whom participates through MSG), may contribute into their plan accounts a percentage of their eligible pay on a before-tax basis as well as a percentage of their eligible pay on an after-tax basis. Prior to January 1, 2016, the participants had been eligible to receive a matching contribution from the Company of up to 50% of the first 6% of eligible pay contributed by participating employees. Effective January 1, 2016, the MSG Savings Plan was amended to provide (a) a matching contribution equal to 100% of the first 4% of eligible pay contributed by participating employees and (b) a discretionary non-elective contribution by the Company. In March 2018, the Company made a discretionary non-elective contribution to each eligible employee’s account equal to 2% of eligible pay with respect to the 2017 calendar year. In connection with the MSG Distribution, the MSG Savings Plan became a multiple employer plan sponsored by MSG, to which we contribute.

Excess Savings Plan

The Excess Savings Plan is an unfunded, non-qualified deferred compensation plan that operates in conjunction with the Company’s tax-qualified MSG Savings Plan. An employee is eligible to participate in the Excess Plan for a calendar year if his or her compensation (as defined in the MSG Savings Plan) in the preceding year exceeded (or would have exceeded, if the employee had been employed for the entire year) the IRS limit on the amount of compensation that can be taken into account in determining contributions under tax-qualified retirement plans ($275,000 in calendar year 2018) and he or she makes an election to participate prior to the beginning of the year. An eligible employee whose contributions to the MSG Savings Plan are limited as a result of this compensation limit or as a result of reaching the maximum 401(k) deferral limit ($18,500, or $24,500 if 50 or over, for calendar year 2018) can continue to make pre-tax contributions under the Excess Savings Plan of up to 6% of his or her eligible pay. In addition, the Excess Savings Plan provides for (a) a fully-vested matching

contribution by the Company equal to 100% of the first 4% of eligible pay contributed by participating employees and (b) a discretionary non-elective fully-vested contribution by the Company. In March 2018, the Company made a discretionary non-elective contribution to each eligible employee’s account equal to 2% of eligible pay with respect to the 2017 calendar

year. Account balances under the Excess Savings Plan are credited monthly with the rate of return earned by the Stable Value Fund offered as an investment alternative under the MSG Savings Plan. Distributions of vested benefits are made in a lump sum as soon as practicable after the participant’s termination of employment with the Company.

The table below shows (i) the contributions made by each NEO and the Company during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018, (ii) aggregate earnings on each NEO’s account balance during the fiscal

year ended June 30, 2018 and (iii) the account balance of each of our NEOs under the Excess Savings Plan as of June 30, 2018.

Each of our NEOs had an employment agreement with the Company in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018. The employment agreements with Ms. Greenberg, Mr. Richter, and Ms. Darino-Gorski were due to expire on September 30, 2018. The Company entered into new employment agreements with each of Ms. Greenberg, Messrs. Richter and Burian, and Ms. Darino-Gorski, each effective September 1, 2018, which supersede and replace their prior agreements. Set forth below is a description of the employment agreements between the Company and each of Mr. Dolan, Ms. Greenberg, Messrs. Richter and Burian, and Ms. Darino-Gorski.

As noted above in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis, each of Messrs. Dolan and Burian also serves as an executive officer and employee of MSG. Such MSG employment arrangements are pursuant to employment arrangements between MSG and each of Messrs. Dolan and Burian, as applicable (which are not described herein). For a description of each of these employment agreements, see MSG’s Definitive Proxy Statement, filed with the SEC on October 25, 2018.

James L. Dolan

On September 16, 2016, the Company entered into a new employment agreement with James L. Dolan, effective as of July 1, 2016, which provides for Mr. Dolan’s continued employment as the Executive Chairman of the Company.

The employment agreement with the Company provides for an annual base salary of not less than $1,000,000. Mr. Dolan is eligible to participate in the Company’s discretionary annual bonus program with an annual target bonus opportunity equal to not less than 200% of his base salary. Mr. Dolan is eligible, subject to his continued employment by the Company, to participate in such long-term incentive programs that are made available in the future to similarly situated executives at the Company. It is expected that such awards will consist of annual grants of stock