Notice of Annual Meeting

of Stockholders and

2018 Proxy Statement

The Annual Meeting of Stockholders

of U.S. Concrete, Inc. will be held:

Thursday, May 17, 2018 at 8:00 a.m. local time

Renaissance Newark Airport Hotel

1000 Spring Street

Elizabeth, New Jersey 07201

March 29, 2018

Dear Stockholders,

On behalf of the Board of Directors of U.S. Concrete, Inc., which we refer to as our Company, we invite you to attend the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of our Company, which we refer to as our Annual Meeting. We will hold our Annual Meeting at the Renaissance Newark Airport Hotel, 1000 Spring Street, Elizabeth, New Jersey 07201 at 8:00 a.m. local time, on Thursday, May 17, 2018.

We again are taking advantage of the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that allow issuers to provide electronic access to proxy materials over the Internet instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each stockholder. We believe that furnishing these materials electronically allows us to more efficiently provide our stockholders with our proxy materials while reducing costs and reducing the impact of the Annual Meeting on the environment. However, if you would prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials referenced below. If you have previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials electronically, unless you elect otherwise.

On or about March 29, 2018, we will commence the mailing to our stockholders (other than those who previously requested electronic or paper delivery) of a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, the proxy statement providing information concerning the matters to be acted on at the Annual Meeting, and our Annual Report to Stockholders describing our operations during the year ended December 31, 2017. If you requested printed versions of these materials, a proxy card for the Annual Meeting is also included.

We hope you will be able to attend our Annual Meeting in person. Whether or not you plan to attend, please take the time to vote. You may vote your shares via the Internet or by telephone, by following the instructions included in this proxy statement or, if you elected to receive printed versions of the materials, by signing, dating and returning the enclosed paper proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid envelope. If you attend the Annual Meeting and wish to vote your shares in person, you may revoke your proxy.

Thank you for your interest in our Company.

Sincerely,

William J. Sandbrook

President, Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chairman

331 N. Main Street, Euless, Texas 76039

		2018 PROXY STATEMENT

NOTICE OF 2018 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

MEETING INFORMATION

 

DATE:		Thursday, May 17, 2018
TIME:		8:00 a.m., Local Time
PLACE:		Renaissance Newark Airport Hotel 1000 Spring Street Elizabeth, New Jersey 07201

HOW TO VOTE

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to read this proxy statement and submit your proxy so that your shares can be voted at the Annual Meeting and to help us ensure a quorum at the Annual Meeting. You may nonetheless vote in person if you attend the Annual Meeting.

 

		IN PERSON You may come to the Annual Meeting and cast your vote in person
		BY PHONE 1-877-680-5400
		BY INTERNET www.proxypush.com/USCR
		BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope

 

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of

Proxy Materials for the Stockholders

Meeting to be held on May 17, 2018:

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders,

Proxy Statement and the Annual Report to

Stockholders are available at:

www.proxydocs.com/USCR

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    i

Table of Contents

ii    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Proxy Summary

PROXY SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in the proxy statement. This summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement before voting. For more complete information regarding the Company’s 2017 performance, please review the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS

2017 PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

We are committed to good corporate governance, which promotes the long-term interests of stockholders, strengthens Board and management accountability and helps build public trust in the Company. The section entitled “Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Committees” beginning on page 9 describes our corporate governance framework, which includes the following highlights:

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    1

Proxy Summary

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

Information about each director nominee’s experience, qualifications, attributes and skills can be found beginning on page 5.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

Set forth below is the 2017 compensation for each Named Executive Officer as determined under Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) rules. See the 2017, 2016 and 2015 Summary Compensation Table and the accompanying notes to the table beginning on page 39 for more information.

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS AND OTHER INFORMATION

Please see Questions and Answers about the Meeting and Voting beginning on page 59 and “Other Information” beginning on page 57 for important information about the proxy materials, voting, the annual meeting, Company documents, communications and the deadlines to submit stockholder proposals and director nominees for the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Additional questions may be directed by phone by calling (817) 835-4105.

2    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Proxy Summary

LEARN MORE ABOUT OUR COMPANY

You can learn more about our Company, view our governance materials and much more by visiting our website at www.us-concrete.com under Investor Relations.

Please also visit www.proxydocs.com/USCR to access the Company’s Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders, Proxy Statement and 2017 Annual Report.

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    3

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

PROPOSAL NO. 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Our Board of Directors, which we refer to as our Board, currently consists of seven members. Mr. Eugene Davis previously announced his intention to not stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting. To be elected as a director, each director nominee must receive a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting. A “majority of the votes cast” means that the number of shares voted “for” a director must exceed the number of votes cast “against” that director. Votes cast shall exclude abstentions with respect to that director’s election. A description of our policy regarding nominees who receive a majority against vote in an uncontested election is set forth in response to the question “What vote is required to approve of each of the proposals being considered at the Annual Meeting?” If you properly complete the voting instructions via mail, the Internet or telephone, the persons named as proxies will vote your shares “FOR” the election of the nominees listed below unless you vote against one or more nominees.

Should any director nominee become unable or unwilling to accept nomination or election, the proxy holders may vote the proxies for the election, in his stead, of any other person the Board may nominate or designate. Each director nominee has expressed his/her intention to serve the entire term.

Set forth below is information regarding the age, business experience and Board committee memberships concerning each nominee for election as a director of the Company, including a discussion of such nominee’s particular experience, qualifications, attributes or skills that lead our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to conclude that the nominee should serve as a director of our Company. The ages and positions listed below are as of March 15, 2018.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

There is no family relationship among any of the nominees, directors and/or any of the executive officers of the Company.

4    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS OF THE NOMINEES FOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    5

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

6    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    7

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote “FOR” the election of each of the director nominees.

8    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Committees

INFORMATION CONCERNING THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND COMMITTEES

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Our Board currently consists of seven directors. Mr. Davis previously announced his intention to not stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting. A majority of our Board constitutes a quorum for meetings of the Board of Directors. The convening of a special meeting is subject to advance written notice to all directors.

Tenure		Independent

Director Independence

Our Board has determined that five of our current directors, Messrs. Cellar, Lundin, Rayner, Sutherland and Rossi are “independent directors” in accordance with the applicable rules of the SEC and applicable corporate governance standards of the Nasdaq stock market and that none has a material relationship with the Company that would impair his independence from management or otherwise compromise his ability to act as an independent director. There were no transactions, relationships or arrangements that were considered by our Board in determining the independence of such directors. Accordingly, the majority of the Board is currently and, if all the director nominees are elected, will be comprised of independent directors.

Board Committee and Meetings

Our Board met 29 times during 2017. Our Board currently has standing audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees. Committee designations are generally made by our Board following the election of directors at each annual meeting of stockholders, upon the formation of a new committee or upon the addition or resignation of directors between annual meetings, if needed.

During 2017, each of our directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and any committee of the Board on which such director served. Members of the Board of Directors are expected to use all reasonable efforts to attend each meeting of the Board and to attend the Company’s annual meeting of stockholders. A director who is unable to attend a meeting is expected to notify the Chairman of the Board or the chairperson of the appropriate Board committee in advance of such meeting. The Chairman of the Board or his designee may also request that members of management or other advisors attend all or any portion(s) of the meetings of the Board of Directors. Each of our directors attended our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2017 Annual Meeting”).

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    9

Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Committees

10    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Committees

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    11

Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Committees

12    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Committees

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    13

Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Committees

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During 2017, the Compensation Committee was comprised of Messrs. Cellar, Sutherland, Rayner (since March 2017), Rossi and Lundin (through March 2017). During 2017, no member of the Compensation Committee was an officer or employee of U.S. Concrete or any of its subsidiaries. During 2017, no member of the Compensation Committee had any material interest in a transaction involving the Company (except for the director compensation arrangements described below) or a material business relationship with, or any indebtedness to, the Company. None of the Company’s executive officers served as a director or a member of a compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, the executive officers of which served as a director of the Company or member of the Compensation Committee during 2017.

Communication with Board of Directors

Stockholders and other interested persons may communicate with our Board by sending their communication to U.S. Concrete, Inc. Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, 331 N. Main Street, Euless, Texas 76039. All such communications received by our Corporate Secretary will be delivered to the Chairman of the Board.

Company Leadership Structure

The Board of Directors is currently led by our Chairman, Eugene I. Davis. William J. Sandbrook, our President and Chief Executive Officer, serves as Vice Chairman and as a member of the Board of Directors. Michael D. Lundin is our Lead Independent Director. In the absence of the Chairman, a majority of the directors present may elect any director present as chairman of the meeting. Non-management directors meet frequently in executive session without management following Board meetings. All members of the Board are elected annually.

The Board of Directors has historically separated the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. However, as a result on Mr. Davis’ determination to not stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting and the entry into a Consulting Agreement, Mr. Davis ceased to be independent on September 14, 2017.

As a result of Mr. Davis’ determination to not stand for reelection, following the Annual Meeting we expect the Board to be led by an executive Chairman and Lead Independent Director. Under our Board’s current leadership

14    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Committees

structure, we have a Chairman, an executive Vice Chairman and a Lead Independent Director. Our Lead Independent Director is empowered with robust, well-defined duties. Our Board is composed of experienced and committed independent directors (with all non-management nominees being independent), and our Board committees have objective, experienced chairs and members. Our Board believes that these factors, taken together, provide for objective, independent Board leadership, and effective engagement with and oversight of management.

Our Board is committed to objective, independent leadership for our Board and each of its committees. Our Board views the objective, independent oversight of management as central to effective Board governance, to serving the best interests of our Company and our stockholders, and to executing our strategic objectives and creating long-term value. This commitment is reflected in our Company’s governing documents, our Bylaws, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and the governing documents of each of the Board’s committees.

Our Board believes that its optimal leadership structure may change over time to reflect our Company’s evolving needs, strategy and operating environment; changes in our Board’s composition and leadership needs; and other factors, including the perspectives of stockholders and other stakeholders. Our Board has the flexibility to determine the Board leadership structure best suited to the needs and circumstances of our Company and our Board.

At least annually, our Board, in coordination with our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, deliberates on and discusses the appropriate Board leadership structure, including the considerations described above. Based on that assessment and on input from stockholders, for 2017 our Board believed that our current structure, with Mr. Davis as Chairman, Mr. Sandbrook as executive Vice Chairman and Mr. Lundin as Lead Independent Director, was the optimal leadership framework. As a result of Mr. Davis’ determination to not stand for reelection, following the Annual Meeting we expect that Mr. Sandbrook will be promoted to executive Chairman, at which point our Board will be led by an executive Chairman and Lead Independent Director. We and our stockholders will benefit from an executive Chairman with deep experience in and knowledge of our industry, our Company, and its businesses, and a strong Lead Independent Director with robust, well-defined duties. Our Lead Independent Director, together with the other independent directors, instills objective independent Board leadership, and effectively engages and oversees management.

The Board believes in having a Lead Independent Director who is empowered with robust, well-defined duties. The Lead Independent Director is joined by experienced, independent Board members and a Chairman who, as CEO, serves as the primary voice to articulate our strategy of long-term responsible growth. The independent directors provide objective oversight of management, help to establish the long-term strategy and regularly assess its effectiveness, and serve the best interests of our Company and our stockholders by creating long-term value.

Risk Oversight

The Board of Directors provides oversight with respect to the Company’s risk assessment and risk management activities, which are designed to identify, prioritize, assess, monitor and mitigate material risks to the Company, including strategic, operational, compliance, data security, financial and compensatory risks. The Board administers this oversight function at the Board level, and through the Audit Committee and the Compensation Committee. The entire Board oversees the strategic, operational and compliance risks. The Audit Committee focuses on financial risks, including reviewing with management, the Company’s internal auditors and the Company’s independent auditors, the Company’s major financial risk exposures, the adequacy and effectiveness of accounting and financial controls, and the steps management has taken to monitor and control financial risk exposures. The Audit Committee also oversees the Company’s data privacy and network security risks and strategy. The Compensation Committee considers risks presented by the Company’s compensation policies and practices, as well as those related to succession and management development. The Audit Committee and Compensation Committee each report directly to our Board.

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    15

Information Concerning the Board of Directors and Committees

Code of Ethics

Pursuant to our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, all employees (including our Named Executive Officers) who have, or whose immediate family members have, any direct or indirect financial or other participation in any business that competes with, supplies goods or services to, or is a customer of the Company, are required to disclose such matters to our Chief Executive Officer or General Counsel prior to transacting such business. Our employees are expected to make reasoned and impartial decisions in the workplace. Our Board members are also responsible for complying with our Code of Ethics and Business Conduct, which is in writing and is available on our website at www.us-concrete.com under Investor Relations — Corporate Governance. You may also obtain a written copy by making a request to our Corporate Secretary by mail at U.S. Concrete, Inc., 331 N. Main Street, Euless, Texas 76039 or by phone by calling (817) 835-4105. In the event that we amend or waive any of the provisions of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct applicable to our principal executive, financial and accounting officers, we intend to disclose that action on our website, as required by applicable law.

16    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Report of the Audit Committee

REPORT OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE

The following report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed with the SEC” or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the Exchange Act, nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates it by reference in such filing.

Oversight Function

The role of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board of Directors in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities related to the integrity of the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, the qualifications and independence of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, audit of the Company’s financial statements, and performance of the Company’s internal audit function and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, when appropriate, replace the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Management of the Company has the responsibility for the presentation and integrity of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, for the appropriateness of the accounting principles and reporting policies that are used by the Company and for the establishment and maintenance of systems of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, is responsible for auditing the Company’s consolidated financial statements and expressing an opinion on the fair presentation of those financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, performing reviews of the unaudited quarterly financial statements and auditing and expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. In performing its functions, the Audit Committee acts only in an oversight capacity and necessarily relies on the work and assurances of the Company’s management, internal audit group and independent registered public accounting firm.

As discussed above, the Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring and reviewing the Company’s financial reporting process. It is not the duty or responsibility of the Audit Committee to conduct auditing or accounting reviews or procedures. Members of the Audit Committee are not employees of the Company. Therefore, the Audit Committee has relied, without independent verification, on management’s representation that the consolidated financial statements have been prepared with integrity and objectivity and in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and on the representations of the independent auditors included in their report on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The Audit Committee’s review does not provide its members with an independent basis to determine that management has maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles or policies, or appropriate internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations.

As of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, management of the Company had identified and disclosed a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting relating to the accuracy and presentation of the accounting for income taxes. With the oversight of the Audit Committee, the Company has taken steps to remediate the previously identified material weakness and to strengthen the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in the area of tax accounting. Management concluded that the previously identified material weakness was remediated as of December 31, 2017.

Approval of 2017 Financial Statements

During 2017, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management U.S. Concrete’s audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with Ernst & Young LLP the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standards No. 16, Communications with

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    17

Report of the Audit Committee

Audit Committees, as amended, adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. The Audit Committee received and reviewed the written disclosures and the letter from Ernst & Young LLP required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, and discussed with that firm its independence from U.S. Concrete. In addition, the Audit Committee concluded that Ernst & Young LLP’s provision of services that are not related to the audit of U.S. Concrete’s financial statements was compatible with that firm’s independence from U.S. Concrete.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors of U.S. Concrete that the audited financial statements referred to above be included in U.S. Concrete’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This report is furnished by the members of the Audit Committee as of February 28, 2018.

The Audit Committee:

Michael D. Lundin, Chairman

Colin M. Sutherland

18    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Director Compensation

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Director Retainers and Meeting Fees

During 2017, we paid our non-employee directors the following annual retainers quarterly in advance. Non-employee directors do not receive per meeting fees.

The Chairman of the Board, in connection with a consulting agreement with the Company entered into on September 14, 2017 (the “Consulting Agreement”), agreed to forfeit compensation as a member of the Board and its committees as of such date and receive the cash and equity-based compensation as provided in the Consulting Agreement. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Director Equity Compensation

We generally grant annual equity awards to non-employee directors in October as part of their remuneration for services to us. In 2017, each non-employee director (other than the Chairman of the Board) received a grant of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) with a grant date fair value of approximately $125,000. As a result, on October 1, 2017, we granted 1,638 RSUs to each of Messrs. Rayner, Cellar, Lundin, Sutherland, and Rossi. The number of shares granted was based on the closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq stock market on October 1, 2017. The awards vest in four installments of 25% each on January 1, 2018, April 1, 2018, July 1, 2018, and October 1, 2018, provided the award recipient remains a member of the Board through the applicable vesting dates.

Mr. Davis, in connection with entering into the Consulting Agreement, agreed to forfeit his annual equity award for his service as Chairman of the Board and to instead receive RSUs with a grant date fair value of $167,500 pursuant to the terms of the Consulting Agreement. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.”

Director Stock Ownership Guidelines

In 2016, our Board of Directors adopted stock ownership guidelines that apply to our non-employee directors. Subject to transition periods and other provisions, the guidelines generally require that each non-employee director beneficially hold shares of our stock with a value at least equal to three times the annual cash retainer paid to non-employee directors. All non-employee directors were in compliance with the guidelines as of March 22, 2018. We also have stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers under Section 16, including each of our NEOs, as further described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Stock Ownership Guidelines.”

Other Director Compensation

We do not pay any additional compensation to our employees for serving as directors. We reimburse all directors for out-of-pocket expenses they incur in connection with attending Board and committee meetings or otherwise in their capacity as directors.

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    19

Director Compensation

The table below summarizes the compensation we paid to our non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2017.

2017 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

20    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Executive Officers

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table provides information about our executive officers as of March 15, 2018. Mr. Sandbrook also serves as a member of our Board of Directors, and his biography is set forth above under the heading “Proposal No. 1 Election of Directors.”

David A. Behring has served as our Regional Vice President and General Manager for the South Central Region since October 2015. From April 2014 until October 2015, Mr. Behring served as Vice President of Operations for the South Central Region. From 2006 until April 2014, Mr. Behring held various positions within accounting and operations for the South Central Region most recently as Controller. From 1991 through 2005, Mr. Behring served as General Manager and CFO for Go-Crete, Inc. Mr. Behring currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the Texas Aggregate and Concrete Association. Mr. Behring holds a Bachelor of Business Administration Degree in Accounting and Finance from Texas A&M University.

Herb Burton, has served as the Vice President and General Manager for U.S. Concrete’s West Region, responsible for five business units: Central Concrete Supply Co., Inc., Right Away Redy Mix, Rock Transport, NorCal Materials and Westside Concrete Materials since March 2017. From 2015 — March 2017, Mr. Burton served as Vice President of Operations and Sustainability for Central Concrete and Right Away Redy Mix, responsible for the management of 16 ready-mix plants, fleet and plant maintenance, safety, environmental management, customer service, inside sales and purchasing. Prior to that, from 2011 — 2015, he served as Director of Project Management for Central Concrete. From 1999 — 2011, Mr. Burton held various positions for Central Concrete, including Project Manager, Sales Manager and Plant Manager. He started his career working as a mixer driver, batch man and dispatcher. Mr. Burton is Secretary and current Board Member of California Construction and Industrial Materials Association (CALCIMA), a member of the NRMCA Operations, Environment and Safety (OES) Committee and a member of the NRMCA Promotion Committee, Sustainability Task Group. In June 2011, Mr. Burton filed a petition for personal bankruptcy under Chapter 7 of the federal bankruptcy laws, which was subsequently discharged in September 2011.

Jeff L. Davis has served as Regional Vice President and General Manager U.S. Concrete West (Central Concrete Supply Co, Right Away Redy Mix, Westside Concrete Materials, and Rock Transport) since 2005. From 2001 to 2005, Mr. Davis served as Vice President of Operations of Central. Prior to joining the Company in 2001, Mr. Davis served as Vice President Concrete for Cadman Inc., a Lehigh Heidelberg Cement Company, operating in the Seattle, Washington market. Mr. Davis has 43 years of experience in the ready-mixed concrete, aggregate and cement industry, serving in various sales, operational, and executive management roles. Mr. Davis is a past President and Board member of the Washington Concrete and Aggregate Producers Association, past President and Board member of the Idaho Concrete and Aggregate Producers Association, member of the American Concrete Institute, Chairman of the 1997 American Concrete Institute Convention National, and former Chairman

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    21

Executive Officers

of the National Ready Mixed Concrete Association Environmental Task Group of the Operations, Environmental and Safety Committee. Mr. Davis currently serves as an Industry Advisory Group member of the MIT Concrete Sustainability HUB and is a Trustee of the RMC Research & Education Foundation.

Paul M. Jolas has served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of U.S. Concrete, Inc. since February 2016. From August 2013 until February 2016, Mr. Jolas served as our Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining U.S. Concrete, Inc., Mr. Jolas served as Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary for Regency Energy Partners LP (NYSE: RGP) commencing in September 2009. Mr. Jolas has more than 28 years of legal experience, including extensive experience with corporate, securities, corporate governance, mergers and acquisitions, finance and transactional matters. Prior to joining Regency, he served in various legal roles at Dallas-based Trinity Industries, Inc. (NYSE: TRN) from June 2006 through September 2009, most recently as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Prior to his work at Trinity, he served as Senior Regional Counsel for the Texas division of KB Home (NYSE: KBH) from 2004 to 2006; from 1996 to 2004, he served as General Counsel, Executive Vice President and Corporate Secretary for Radiologix, Inc. (AMEX: RGX); and from 1989 to 1996, as a member of the corporate securities group for Haynes and Boone, LLP. Mr. Jolas received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics from Northwestern University and a Juris Doctor degree from Duke University School of Law.

Kevin R. Kohutek has served as our Vice President, Finance and Treasurer since March 2018. He served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer from April 2017 to March 2018 and from April 2014 to April 2015. From April 2015 to April 2017, Mr. Kohutek served as our Regional Vice President and General Manager for the Atlantic Region. From June 2012 until April 2014, Mr. Kohutek served as our Vice President and Corporate Controller. From 1997 through 2012, Mr. Kohutek held various positions at ClubCorp Financial Management Corporation (“ClubCorp”), most recently as Vice President of Finance and previously as Director of Financial Reporting. Prior to joining ClubCorp in 1997, he served in the assurance practice for KPMG. Mr. Kohutek holds a Bachelor of Business Administration Degree in Accounting and Finance from Texas A&M University.

John E. Kunz has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since October of 2017. Prior to that Mr. Kunz was Vice President and Controller from March 2015 to September 2017 at Tenneco Inc. where he was the principal accounting officer with responsibility for Tenneco’s corporate accounting and financial reporting globally. Prior to assuming his role as Controller, Mr. Kunz served as Vice President, Treasurer and Tax, from July 2006 to February 2015. Mr. Kunz oversaw the global tax, treasury, insurance and investment activities. Mr. Kunz joined Tenneco in 2004 from Great Lakes Chemical Corporation, where he rose through positions of increasing responsibility to become vice president and treasurer. Prior to joining Great Lakes in 1999, Mr. Kunz was director of corporate development at Weirton Steel Corporation, where he also held prior positions in capital planning, business development and financial analysis. Prior to that, Mr. Kunz spent four years with the international public accounting firm of KPMG. Mr. Kunz is a member of the audit and compensation committees of the board of directors of Wabash National Corporation, a diversified industrial manufacturing company listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Mr. Kunz holds a Master of Management in finance from the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, along with an undergraduate degree in accounting from the University of Notre Dame.

Mark B. Peabody has served as our Vice President — Human Resources since May 2012. Prior to joining the Company, from 2008 to 2012, Mr. Peabody served as Vice President of Human Resources and Risk Management for Mario Sinacola Companies. From 2006 through 2008, Mr. Peabody served as Senior Vice President, Corporate Human Resources for Hanson Building Materials North America, and from 2001 through 2006, he served as Chief Counsel, Labor & Employment for Hanson. From 1994 through 2001, Mr. Peabody served as Associate General Counsel and Senior Labor Attorney for PECO Energy Company. From 1992 through 1994, he served as an attorney for Reed Smith LLP. From 1987 through 1991, Mr. Peabody served in the United States Air Force Judge Advocate General’s Corp. He retired from the Air Force Reserve as a Lt. Colonel in 2014

22    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Executive Officers

after serving for 25 years. Mr. Peabody received his Bachelor of Arts degree in Business from Rollins College and a Juris Doctor degree from The University of Pittsburgh School of Law. Mr. Peabody later earned his Master of Laws (LL.M.) degree in Labor Law from Georgetown University Law Center.

Niel L. Poulsen has served as our Executive Vice President of the Southeast Division since October 2015. From January 2012 until October 2015, Mr. Poulsen served as our Regional Vice President and General Manager of Redi-Mix, LLC. From 2004 to 2010, he was Vice President and General Manager for Aggregate Industries’ (Holcim) Aggregate and Ready-Mix divisions in Colorado. From 2003 to 2004, he served with Cemex, 1995 to 2002 with the Edw. C. Levy Co., and prior to 2002, served in various international assignments. Mr. Poulsen has over 25 years of domestic and international general management experience in ready-mixed concrete, aggregates and other construction materials.

Ronnie Pruitt has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since October 2015. Mr. Pruitt began his career in 1995 joining the Expanded Shale & Clay group of Texas Industries, Inc. (“TXI”) as a Sales Manager. In 2002, Mr. Pruitt was promoted to Vice President of Cement and Aggregates Sales and Marketing. In 2005, Mr. Pruitt also assumed the responsibilities for TXI’s Consumer Products group along with being named President of TXI’s Transportation Company. In 2011, Mr. Pruitt transitioned into operations as the Vice President of Cement Operations for TXI. Mr. Pruitt continued in that role until July 2014 when TXI was acquired by Martin Marietta. Under Martin Marietta, Mr. Pruitt served as Vice President of Cement Sales until joining U.S. Concrete. Mr. Pruitt has served on the Boards of The Portland Cement Association, National Stone, Sand, and Gravel Association as well as serving as President of the Cement Council of Texas. Mr. Pruitt is a 1993 Graduate of the University of Texas-Arlington.

Jeffrey W. Roberts has served as the Vice President and General Manager -Ingram Concrete, LLC, or Ingram, since 2006. Mr. Roberts is a 1989 graduate of Oklahoma State University receiving a Bachelor of Business Administration Degree in Management/ Marketing and minor field of study in Statistics. From 1994 through 2006, Mr. Roberts held various positions for Ingram, including Vice President of Sales and Operations from 2003 through 2006, Sales and Operations Manager from 1997 through 2003, and Quality Control Manager from 1994 through 1997. From 1993 to 1994, he served as the Quality Control Manager for Campbell Concrete. From 1990 to 1993, Mr. Roberts served as Technical Sales Representative for Cormix Construction Chemicals (formerly Gifford Hill Chemical), with sales responsibility in southeast Texas. From 1989 to 1990, he served as Sales Representative and Quality Control Assistant for Gifford-Hill Concrete in Ft. Worth, Texas. Mr. Roberts is a delegate and past member of the Board of Directors of the Texas Aggregate and Concrete Association.

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    23

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

The following Compensation Discussion and Analysis describes the material elements of compensation for our executive officers identified in the Summary Compensation Table (the “Named Executive Officers” or “NEOs”). For 2017, the following individuals constituted our “Named Executive Officers”. The titles shown below were their titles as of December 31, 2017:

KEY TAKE-AWAYS FOR 2017 COMPENSATION

Certain executive officers, including each of our NEOs, entered into executive severance agreements with the Company. Each executive severance agreement provides for severance payments and other benefits following termination of the applicable executive’s employment under various scenarios.

24    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation-Setting Process

Overview

Our executive compensation program is administered by our Compensation Committee (“Compensation Committee” or “Committee”). The role of the Committee is to provide oversight and direction to ensure the establishment of executive compensation programs that are competitive in nature, enable us to attract top talent, and align the interests of our executive officers and our stockholders. The Committee is supported by our Vice President — Human Resources in the design, review and administration of our executive compensation programs and receives the input of our Chief Executive Officer regarding the compensation of our executive officers, other than himself. The Committee has engaged a third party compensation consulting firm, Willis Towers Watson, a nationally recognized executive compensation consulting firm (“Willis Towers Watson”), to evaluate executive officer compensation, evaluate Company practices in relation to other companies, and provide associated recommendations.

The Compensation Committee meets as often as it determines is necessary to perform its duties and responsibilities related to (i) compensation of the Company’s executives and other key employees, (ii) the fees and retainers paid to non-management directors of the Company, and (iii) the Company’s employee benefit plans and practices. The Committee typically meets at least four times a year with our Chief Executive Officer, Vice President — Human Resources, and General Counsel, and when appropriate and as needed, outside compensation consultants. The Committee also meets as needed in executive sessions without management, including at least annually, to evaluate the performance of our Chief Executive Officer, to determine his bonus for the prior calendar year, to set his base salary for the then-current calendar year, and to consider and approve any grants to him of equity incentive compensation.

The Committee works with management to establish the agenda for each meeting and typically receives and reviews materials in advance of each meeting. These materials include information that our management believes will be helpful to the Committee, as well as materials that the Committee has specifically requested. Depending on the agenda for the particular meeting, this information may include:

Management’s Role in the Compensation-Setting Process

Our management, especially our Chief Executive Officer and Vice President — Human Resources, plays a key role in the compensation-setting process for the executive officers, except with respect to the compensation of the Chief Executive Officer. The most significant aspects of management’s role are:

At the Committee’s request, our Chief Executive Officer participates in Committee meetings to provide:

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    25

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Chief Executive Officer considers all relevant information and provides recommendations to the Committee regarding compensation for review, discussion and approval for all executive officers with the exception of himself. While the Committee considers the recommendation of our Chief Executive Officer, the Committee has the ultimate authority in making compensation decisions for the executive officers. The Committee reviews the performance and establishes appropriate compensation for the Chief Executive Officer in executive session without the Chief Executive Officer present.

The Compensation Committee has designated our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Vice President — Human Resources, collectively, as the “Administrator” of our short-term incentive plan, which is our annual cash bonus plan. The Compensation Committee chose those individuals because of their access to financial information and individual performance criteria necessary to administer the plan. The Administrator has the authority to interpret the plan, to exercise discretion in interpolating performance levels and award payouts outside of or between the designated benchmarks, as well as to take all steps and make all determinations in connection with the short-term incentive plan and bonus payouts as it deems necessary. All incentive award payouts must ultimately be approved by the Committee.

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Policies

We are focused on building and maintaining a sustainable business model that consistently delivers superior returns to our stockholders. To be successful, we must attract, motivate, retain and reward key talent to provide the needed leadership capabilities to develop and execute our business strategy. Our compensation philosophy and approach is designed to support these objectives.

Our compensation philosophy is to provide competitive market compensation opportunities with an emphasis on performance-based variable pay. This “pay-for-performance” approach is reflected in the compensation package of all executive officers.

Our primary external market reference point for our market analysis is the 50^th percentile. Our Compensation Committee uses the 50^th percentile because it believes that is the appropriate level to attract and retain executive talent. Coupled with the opportunity to earn higher amounts commensurate with performance, the Committee believes high performing executives are given appropriate incentives and rewards for performance that results in improved stockholder value.

It is important to note that the external competitive market data serves as just one point of reference for the Committee. The total compensation packages for executives may vary materially from the benchmark data based on several factors, including individual performance, Company and business unit performance, tenure at the Company, retention needs, experience, strategic impact, and internal pay equity. In addition, as the Company’s revenue has increased from $598.2 million in 2013 to $1.3 billion in 2017, the NEO’s target total cash compensation and total direct compensation levels (other than the CEO) have not grown as rapidly, resulting in 2017 levels generally between the 25th and 50th percentiles. However, the Company intends to target the 50th percentile over time.

All components of compensation for executive officers and key management are reviewed annually to ensure consistency with our compensation philosophy and to verify that the overall level of compensation is competitive. We use the following principles in the design and administration of our executive compensation program:

26    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

We believe that we offer a work environment in which executive employees are allowed to use their abilities to achieve personal and professional satisfaction. However, we also understand that our executive employees have a choice regarding where they pursue their careers, and the compensation we offer plays a significant role in their decisions to choose to remain with us. We believe that our compensation principles will reward and encourage our management to deliver increasing stockholder value over time and help us to attract and retain top executive talent.

Internal Pay Equity

In implementing our compensation philosophy, the Committee also compares our Chief Executive Officer’s total compensation to the total compensation of the other Named Executive Officers. However, the Committee has not established a targeted level of difference between the total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer and the median total compensation level for the next lower tier of management. The Committee also considers internal pay equity among the other Named Executive Officers, and in relation to the next lower tier of management, in order to maintain compensation levels that are consistent with the individual contributions and responsibilities of those officers.

Stockholder Say-on-Pay Votes

At our 2017 Annual Meeting, of those stockholders voting on the matter, 95.6% voted to approve our executive compensation on an advisory basis. The Compensation Committee believes this affirms stockholders’ support of our approach to executive compensation and, as a result, did not change its approach in fiscal 2017. The Compensation Committee will consider the outcome of the Company’s future say-on-pay votes when making future compensation decisions for the Named Executive Officers.

Compensation Consultants and Competitive Benchmarking

Compensation Consultants. As in prior years, the Compensation Committee engaged Willis Towers Watson to analyze our current compensation program to ensure that the Company’s executive, key employee and director compensation programs were:

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    27

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

In connection therewith, Willis Towers Watson:

The Compensation Committee assessed the independence of Willis Towers Watson pursuant to applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules and concluded that Willis Towers Watson’s work for the Compensation Committee does not raise any conflict of interest.

For 2017, we also subscribed to an on-line compensation service available through the Economic Research Institute (“ERI”). ERI compiles a robust database on job competencies, cost-of-living increases and executive compensation surveys. These three databases are used to help gauge the competitiveness of our 2017 salaries and executive compensation practices.

Competitive Benchmarking. Our compensation philosophy generally results in the establishment of total direct compensation (base annual salary, target bonus opportunity, long-term incentives) that are between the 25^th and 50^th percentile of market for executives in similar positions. The Committee does not employ a formulaic approach in setting any aspect of total compensation. The Committee has the flexibility to increase compensation when either hiring new executives who have significant industry experience, or for existing executives who demonstrate outstanding performance.

We compete against companies in many industries for executive talent. Because we believe that our benchmark peer group does not necessarily represent all of the companies that may be direct competitors for executive talent, we also rely upon general industry national survey data of companies which are of similar revenue size. This general industry data is collected and prepared for us by Willis Towers Watson.

In 2017, Willis Towers Watson was asked to benchmark the compensation of the Company’s executive officers. In seeking an appropriate peer group, management, the Committee and Willis Towers Watson recognized that there are few publicly-traded companies in the construction materials industry that are close to the Company’s size in terms of annual revenue and market capitalization. Most other publicly-traded construction materials companies are larger than the Company and are companies with which the Company rarely competes. Despite those challenges, management and the Committee agreed on the following peer group for 2017:

28    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Committee believes this group of companies is an appropriate peer group for compensation setting purposes because their revenues, industry and geographic markets are most similar to the Company and provide a reasonable point of reference for comparing like positions and scope of responsibility for purposes of executive compensation. It is the Committee’s view that (i) we compete for executive officers and employees from companies that are represented by this group, and (ii) investors consider the performance of these public companies when deciding to make an investment in the construction materials sector. Among this peer group, the Company ranked near the median in terms of EBITDA.

Given the changing nature of our industry and the construction industry, the Compensation Committee expects that the companies used in the benchmarking process and peer group may vary from year-to-year.

Components of Executive Compensation

The primary components of our executive compensation programs are as follows:

Departure of Mr. Tusa

Effective March 23, 2017, Mr. Tusa resigned as the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer effective as of July 1, 2017 (the “Separation Date”). In connection with the foregoing, on March 23, 2017, the Company and Mr. Tusa entered into a Separation and Transition Agreement (the “Transition Agreement”). Pursuant to the Transition Agreement, Mr. Tusa provided transition services requested by the Chief Executive Officer of the Company until the Separation Date. In addition, pursuant to Mr. Tusa’s existing agreements with the

Company, Mr. Tusa received the following payments and benefits: (i) continued payment of his current base salary through the Separation Date; (ii) $584,000 in severance payments; (iii) payment of all applicable medical

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    29

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

premiums for continuation coverage under the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act, for his benefit (and his covered dependents as of the date of his separation, if any) under his current plan election for 18 months following the Separation Date; and (iv) accelerated vesting of 50% of all outstanding and previously unvested restricted stock awards granted to him prior to the Separation Date that would otherwise have vested during the twelve-month period following the Separation Date. All other equity awards, including restricted stock awards, granted to Mr. Tusa that were unvested on the Separation Date were immediately forfeited and cancelled, including 8,550 of 9,500 restricted stock awards granted to him in March 2017. Further, Mr. Tusa executed a general release of claims in favor of the Company and agreed not to compete with the Company or solicit the Company’s customers or employees for a period of one year following the Separation Date. On July 1, 2017, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Tusa pursuant to which he was paid $98,254 in consulting fees through September 30, 2017.

Hiring of Mr. Kunz

Effective October 2, 2017, we hired Mr. Kunz as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Grade Level 20). To incentivize Mr. Kunz to accept this position, we agreed to (i) pay Mr. Kunz a base salary of $425,000 per year, (ii) grant Mr. Kunz a 2017 target cash bonus opportunity equal to 65% of his base pay, with a maximum cash bonus opportunity equal to 97.5% of his base pay, with a guaranteed non-prorated bonus award of not less than $150,000 for 2017 in light of his foregone bonus opportunity at his former employer, (iii) pay Mr. Kunz a bonus of $200,000 on March 31, 2018 and subject to repayment by Mr. Kunz if he voluntarily leaves the Company prior to October 2, 2018 and (iv) award Mr. Kunz a restricted stock award under the U.S. Concrete, Inc. Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) with a value of $200,000 on the effective date of Mr. Kunz’s employment and to make Mr. Kunz eligible at the next regularly scheduled annual award in 2018 for a grant with an estimated value of $550,000. Based on the Company’s 2017 performance and Mr. Kunz’s individual 2017 performance, Mr. Kunz’s actual cash bonus for 2017 exceeded the $150,000 guaranteed bonus amount.

Analysis of Our 2017 Executive Compensation Program

Base Salary

Our Compensation Committee’s general approach is to determine base salaries by evaluating (i) the levels of responsibility, prior experience and breadth of knowledge of the executive, (ii) internal pay equity issues, and (iii) external pay practices. The Committee reviews executive salaries annually based on a variety of factors, including individual scope of responsibility and accountability, individual performance, time with the Company and experience, strategic impact of the position, general levels of market salary increases, retention concerns, peer group data, and our overall financial results. The Committee generally grants salary increases within a pay-for-performance framework. The Committee assesses performance for base salary purposes based on goal accomplishments, with such goals being set by supervisors, or in the case of the Chief Executive Officer, by the Board.

Effective April 1, 2017, salaried employees within the Company received an average of a 3.0% increase in their base salary. Based upon a review of external benchmarking data and assessments of individual performance, Company performance and each NEO’s contribution to the Company’s performance, the NEOs received base salary increases ranging from 0% to 23.3% as shown in the following table. The 2017 base salaries for the NEOs, which became effective April 1, 2017, and the percentage increase from their 2016 base salaries were as follows:

30    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

As a result of the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting identified in Item 9A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (the “Material Weakness”), neither Mr. Sandbrook nor Mr. Tusa received an increase in base salary in 2017. The Material Weakness was remediated during 2017.

Annual Cash Bonus — 2017 Annual Incentive Plan

Our Compensation Committee typically awards cash bonuses to executive officers on an annual basis. For 2017, the Committee adopted the 2017 Annual Incentive Plan, a short-term cash incentive plan for all our salaried employees, including all our executive officers. The purpose of the 2017 Plan was to attract, retain, motivate and reward team members for successful Company, business unit and individual performance, with rewards that were commensurate with the level of performance attained. The cash bonus award is intended to be a significant part of an executive officer’s total compensation package subject to the performance of the executive officer.

Performance Metric Selected. Our Compensation Committee periodically reviews the appropriateness of the performance measures used in our incentive plans (including the 2017 Plan), the degree of difficulty in achieving the targets based on these measures, as well as certain strategic and nonfinancial objective criteria. In 2017, the Compensation Committee again selected Total Adjusted EBITDA as the performance measure used for determining whether bonuses would be paid under the 2017 Plan. The Compensation Committee also reviewed the target level of Total Adjusted EBITDA under the 2017 Plan and adjusted it as appropriate to account for strategic acquisitions throughout 2017.

We define Total Adjusted EBITDA as our income (loss) from continuing operations plus the provision (benefit) for income taxes, net interest expense, depreciation, depletion and amortization, derivative gain (loss), (gain) loss on revaluation of contingent consideration, and gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt. Additionally, Total Adjusted EBITDA is adjusted for certain non-recurring or non-cash items. The additional items that are adjusted to determine our 2017 Total Adjusted EBITDA were: non-cash stock compensation expense; corporate officer transition expenses; acquisition-related professional fees; impairment of goodwill and other assets; hurricane-related losses; quarry dredge costs for a specific event; purchase accounting adjustments for inventory; and certain foreign currency losses.

Total Adjusted EBITDA Thresholds. For 2017, the Compensation Committee set the Total Adjusted EBITDA target for the 2017 Plan based on the Company’s 2017 Adjusted EBITDA budget of $210.1 million, which represented a 20.6% increase as compared to the Company’s 2016 Adjusted EBITDA budget under the 2016 Annual Incentive Plan (the “2016 Plan”). The Committee determined that achieving 100% of the Total Adjusted EBITDA budget warranted a payout of 100% of an employee’s individual target bonus award, which was consistent with the 2016 Plan. In 2017, the Committee established Total Adjusted EBITDA target thresholds for an initial payout, target payout and maximum payout at $168.1 million, $210.1 million and $252.1 million, respectively.

Total Adjusted EBITDA below $168.1 million would result in no non-discretionary bonuses being paid under the 2017 Plan. Total Adjusted EBITDA performance between these thresholds would result in bonus payments being made on an interpolated basis.

U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement    31

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Bonus Target and Maximum Percentages. Each NEO and participant in the 2017 Plan had a target bonus percentage that was (i) based on their grade level, and (ii) expressed as a percentage of their annual base salary, and could potentially earn amounts under the 2017 Plan that range from $0 (if the threshold Total Adjusted EBITDA performance level was not met) to a designated maximum level, based on performance actually achieved. The grade level and target maximum percentage applicable to each of the NEOs for 2017 were as set forth in the chart below:

Bonus Award Weighting and Criteria. After the threshold Total Adjusted EBITDA performance is met, the percentage of a NEO’s target bonus available for payout is determined using a formula that includes the following criteria: (i) Total Adjusted EBITDA performance as compared to budget and (ii) the individual’s performance against established individual performance objectives. In addition, for employees with business unit responsibility, the formula also includes the business unit’s Adjusted EBITDA performance as compared to budget. The following describes the weighting of the various criteria in the bonus calculation by NEO:

The following table summarizes for each NEO their target bonus and weighting and target amount by criteria:

32    U.S. Concrete, Inc.  |  2018 Proxy Statement

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

2017 Bonus Awards to Named Executive Officers. The following summarizes the calculation of the 2017 bonus awards paid to the NEOs:

Total Adjusted EBITDA Criteria. Our actual 2017 Total Adjusted EBITDA performance was $202.4 million, which exceeded the initial payout threshold level, resulting in every participant in the 2017 Plan being eligible to receive a bonus award. Because our actual Total Adjusted EBITDA achievement did not exceed 100% of the Total Adjusted EBITDA budget for 2017, NEO bonus awards based on Total Adjusted EBITDA were paid out at 86.0% of their Total Adjusted EBITDA bonus target amount.

Operating Region and Business Unit Adjusted EBITDA Criteria. For Mr. Poulsen, the Southeast operating region and business unit Adjusted EBITDA performance exceeded the target threshold level, resulting in a payout of 89.5% of his target award.

Individual Performance Criteria. The amount of a participant’s available target bonus to be paid out under the individual component was determined by the accomplishment of certain objectives specified for the participant and other individual performance criteria. These performance metrics were established at the beginning of 2017 and included metrics such as goal accomplishment, quality of work, and where appropriate, managerial competence and safety. We do not disclose specific individual performance goals due to the potential for competitive harm.

At the end of the year, the Compensation Committee subjectively reviews the performance of Mr. Sandbrook in achieving his individual goals and awards him from 0% to 200% of his individual goal target bonus amount. Similarly, Mr. Sandbrook subjectively reviews the performance of each of the other NEOs in achieving their individual goals and recommends to the Compensation Committee a bonus award from 0% to 150% of each of their individual target goal amounts.

For 2017, based on these subjective reviews of individual goal performance achievement, the NEOs were awarded the following percentages of their individual goal factor target bonus amount:

The Compensation Committee met in the first quarter of 2018, and pursuant to the 2017 Plan, awarded an annual incentive bonus for each of the NEOs as set forth in the table below: