SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For
the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
Commission
File Number 000-26025
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or
other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
IRS
Employer Identification No. 76-0586680
2925
Briarpark, Suite 1050
Houston,
Texas 77042
(Address
of principal executive offices, including zip code)
(713)
499-6200
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Large
accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated
filer þ Non-accelerated
filer ¨ Smaller
reporting company ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No þ
As of the
close of business on May 7, 2010, U.S. Concrete, Inc. had 37,432,645 shares of
its common stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding (excluding 673,022 of treasury
shares).
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC.
INDEX
|
|
|
Page
No.
|
Part
I – Financial Information
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements (Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
3
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
4
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
|
5
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
6
|
|
|
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
|
7
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
24
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
35
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
Part
II – Other Information
|
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
36
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
36
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
39
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
39
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
SIGNATURE
|
41
|
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
|
42
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands)
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
3,997 |
|
|
$ |
4,229 |
|
Trade
accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
65,056 |
|
|
|
74,851 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
32,656 |
|
|
|
30,960 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
8,417 |
|
|
|
7,847 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
6,478 |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
7,596 |
|
|
|
6,973 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
124,200 |
|
|
|
128,589 |
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
236,110 |
|
|
|
239,917 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
14,063 |
|
|
|
14,063 |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
7,310 |
|
|
|
6,591 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
381,683 |
|
|
$ |
389,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
8,898 |
|
|
$ |
7,873 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
41,349 |
|
|
|
37,678 |
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
49,490 |
|
|
|
48,557 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
99,737 |
|
|
|
94,108 |
|
Long-term
debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
298,757 |
|
|
|
288,669 |
|
Other
long-term obligations and deferred credits
|
|
|
7,071 |
|
|
|
6,916 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
10,161 |
|
|
|
9,658 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
415,726 |
|
|
|
399,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies (Note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
(Deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
268,785 |
|
|
|
268,306 |
|
Retained
deficit
|
|
|
(306,049 |
) |
|
|
(280,802 |
) |
Treasury
stock, at cost
|
|
|
(3,353 |
) |
|
|
(3,284 |
) |
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(40,579 |
) |
|
|
(15,742 |
) |
Non-controlling
interest (Note 1)
|
|
|
6,536 |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
Total
equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(34,043 |
) |
|
|
(10,191 |
) |
Total
liabilities and equity (deficit)
|
|
$ |
381,683 |
|
|
$ |
389,160 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
90,266 |
|
|
$ |
117,300 |
|
Cost
of goods sold before depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
86,855 |
|
|
|
103,522 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
16,495 |
|
|
|
16,541 |
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
(Gain)
loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(19,877 |
) |
|
|
(9,756 |
) |
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
6,768 |
|
Gain
on purchases of senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,493 |
|
Other
income, net
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
|
|
(26,335 |
) |
|
|
(11,682 |
) |
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
(637 |
) |
Net
loss
|
|
|
(26,743 |
) |
|
|
(11,045 |
) |
Net
loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
Net
loss attributable to stockholders
|
|
$ |
(25,247 |
) |
|
$ |
(9,454 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
per share attributable to stockholders – basic and diluted
|
|
$ |
(0.69 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
|
36,630 |
|
|
|
36,844 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
(DEFICIT)
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands)
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Controlling
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
BALANCE,
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
37,558 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
268,306 |
|
|
$ |
(280,802 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,284 |
) |
|
$ |
5,551 |
|
|
$ |
(10,191 |
) |
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
479 |
|
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
Cancellation
of shares
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Capital
contribution to Superior Materials Holdings, LLC
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(25,247 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1,496 |
) |
|
|
(26,743 |
) |
BALANCE,
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
37,433 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
268,785 |
|
|
$ |
(306,049 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,353 |
) |
|
$ |
6,536 |
|
|
$ |
(34,043 |
) |
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in
thousands)
|
|
Three Months
Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss
|
|
$ |
(26,743 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,045 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
Debt
issuance cost amortization
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
Gain
on purchases of senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(4,493 |
) |
Net
(gain) loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(781 |
) |
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
268 |
|
Stock-based
compensation
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities, excluding effects of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
9,556 |
|
|
|
23,356 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(1,696 |
) |
|
|
1,499 |
|
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
|
|
(1,782 |
) |
|
|
995 |
|
Other
assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
4,604 |
|
|
|
(7,678 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
(9,173 |
) |
|
|
10,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(2,447 |
) |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
Proceeds
from disposals of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
Payments
for acquisitions
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(750 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
|
|
(5,177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from borrowings
|
|
|
37,682 |
|
|
|
29,432 |
|
Repayments
of borrowings
|
|
|
(28,885 |
) |
|
|
(26,460 |
) |
Purchases
of senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(2,785 |
) |
Purchase
of treasury shares
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(122 |
) |
Non
controlling interest capital contributions
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
— |
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
11,209 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
|
|
5,019 |
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
|
|
4,229 |
|
|
|
5,323 |
|
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD
|
|
$ |
3,997 |
|
|
$ |
10,342 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
U.S. Concrete, Inc. and its subsidiaries and have been prepared by us, without
audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”). We include in our condensed consolidated
financial statements the results of operations, balance sheets and cash flows of
our 60%-owned Michigan subsidiary, Superior Materials Holdings, LLC
(“Superior”). We reflect the minority owner’s 40% interest in income,
net assets and cash flows of Superior as a non-controlling interest in our
condensed consolidated financial statements. Some information and
footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or
omitted pursuant to the SEC’s rules and regulations. These unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the consolidated financial statements and related notes in our annual report on
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “2009 Form
10-K”). In the opinion of our management, all adjustments necessary
to state fairly the information in our unaudited condensed consolidated
financial statements have been included. All such adjustments are of
a normal or recurring nature. Operating results for the three-month
period ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of our results
expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
For a
discussion of the accounting impact of the Chapter 11 proceedings described
below, see Note 2 to these financial statements.
The
preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.GAAP”)
requires management to make estimates and assumptions in determining the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions that
we consider significant in the preparation of our financial statements include
those related to our allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill, accruals for
self-insurance, income taxes, reserves for inventory obsolescence and the
valuation and useful lives of property, plant and equipment.
2. CHAPTER
11 BANKRUPTCY
Developments
Leading to the Chapter 11 Proceedings
Since the
middle of 2006, the United States building materials construction market has
become increasingly challenging. Currently, the construction
industry, particularly the ready-mixed concrete industry, is characterized by
significant overcapacity, fierce competitive activity and rapidly declining
sales volumes. From 2007 through 2009, we have implemented a variety
of cost reduction initiatives, including workforce reductions, plant idling,
rolling stock dispositions and divestitures of nonperforming business units to
reduce structural costs.
Despite
these initiatives in 2007, 2008 and 2009, our business was severely affected by
the steep decline in single-family home starts in the U.S. residential
construction markets, the turmoil in the global credit markets and the U.S.
economic downturn. These conditions have had a significant impact on
demand for our products since the middle of 2006 and into the first quarter of
2010. During 2007, 2008 and 2009, single family home starts declined
significantly, and commercial construction activity, which has been negatively
affected by the credit crisis and U.S. economic downturn, is expected to be
weaker in our markets in 2010. Sales volumes in our precast
operations have also been significantly affected due to the dramatic
downturn in residential construction. We also experienced product
pricing pressure and expect ready-mixed concrete pricing to decline in 2010
compared to 2009 in most of our markets, which will have a negative effect on
our gross margins.
In
response to our protracted, declining sales volumes, we expanded our cost
reduction efforts for 2010, including wage freezes, elimination of our 401(k)
company match program and reductions in other employee benefits. We
also continued to significantly scale back capital investment
expenditures.
Nonetheless,
the continued weakening economic conditions, including ongoing softness in
residential construction, further reduction in demand in the commercial sector
and delays in anticipated public works projects in many of our markets, placed
significant stress on our liquidity position. Our liquidity position
deteriorated further in the first quarter of 2010 due to severe inclement
weather limiting our ability to manufacture and distribute our
products. In response, we entered into two separate amendments to our
Senior Secured Credit Agreement (“Credit Agreement”), one during February 2010
and the other during March 2010, to provide additional short-term liquidity. The
February 2010 amendment provided for, among other things, a temporary waiver by
the lenders through April 30, 2010, of any default or event of default arising
under the Credit Agreement as a result of our failure to make our regularly
scheduled interest payments under the 8⅜% Senior
Subordinated Notes due 2014 (the “8⅜% Notes”). These
amendments are described in more detail in Note 6.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
We were
obligated to make semi-annual interest payments on the 8⅜% Notes aggregating
approximately $11.4 million on April1, 2010, which we did not
make. Under the indenture relating to the 8⅜% Notes, an event of
default would have occurred if we had failed to make any payment of interest on
the 8⅜% Notes when due and that failure continued for a period of 30 days, or
April 30, 2010. If such an event of default occurred, the trustee or
the holders of 25% or more in aggregate principal amount of the 8⅜% Notes then
outstanding could have accelerated our obligation to repay the 8⅜% Notes,
together with accrued and unpaid interest. Under the terms of the
Credit Agreement, an event of default under the 8⅜% Notes indenture would have
also constituted an event of default under the Credit Agreement, and would have
given rise to the right of our lenders under the Credit Agreement to immediately
accelerate the maturity of the debt outstanding under the Credit
Agreement.
We
retained legal and financial advisors to assist us in reviewing the strategic
and financing alternatives available to us. We also engaged in discussions with
the lenders under our 8⅜% Notes (“the Noteholders”) regarding a permanent
restructuring of our capital structure.
Chapter
11 Bankruptcy Filings and Plan of Reorganization
We
reached an agreement with a substantial majority of the Noteholders on the terms
of a comprehensive debt restructuring plan prior to April 30, 2010, the date an
event of default would have occurred under the indenture relating to the 8⅜%
Notes for non-payment of interest. The proposed plan will reduce our
subordinated debt by approximately $272 million. To implement the restructuring,
on April 29, 2010, (the “Petition Date”), we and certain of our subsidiaries
(collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) seeking
relief under the provisions of Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code
(the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Chapter 11 cases are being jointly
administered under the caption In re U.S. Concrete, Inc., et al., Case
No. 10-11407 (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). The restructuring does not
involve Superior’s operations. The Debtors will continue to operate
their businesses as debtors in possession under the jurisdiction of the
Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the
Bankruptcy Code.
Subject
to certain exceptions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (“Chapter 11”),
the Debtors’ Chapter 11 filings automatically enjoined, or stayed, the
continuation of any judicial or administrative proceedings or other actions
against the Debtors or their property to recover on, collect or secure a claim
arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example, most creditor actions to
obtain possession of property from the Debtors, or to create, perfect or enforce
any lien against the property of the Debtors, or to collect on monies owed or
otherwise exercise rights or remedies with respect to a pre-petition claim are
enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay. The
filing of the Chapter 11 Cases triggered the acceleration of financial
obligations under the terms of the Credit Agreement and the 8⅜%
Notes. The Debtors believe that any efforts to enforce the financial
obligations under the Debt Documents are stayed as a result of the filing of the
Chapter 11 Cases in the Bankruptcy Court.
We also
filed a Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) with the Bankruptcy Court on April
29, 2010, and are seeking expedited confirmation. The Plan provides that the
holders of the 8⅜% Notes would exchange all their 8⅜% Notes for equity in our
reorganized company. Existing shareholders would, upon emergence from Chapter
11, receive two tranches of warrants to acquire up to an aggregate total of 15%
of the equity of our reorganized company. Exercise prices with respect to
these warrants, will be set and based on the value of the equity in the
reorganized company reaching approximately $285.0 million and $335.0 million
with respect to each tranche. The Plan also proposes all trade
creditors will not be impaired and will be paid in full in the ordinary
course. A hearing is set for June 3, 2010 to approve the disclosure
statement related to the Plan. The disclosure statement contains certain
information about the Debtors’ prepetition operating and financial history and
the events leading up to the commencement of the Bankruptcy Cases. The
Disclosure Statement also describes the terms and provisions of the Plan,
including certain effects of confirmation of the Plan, certain risk factors
associated with securities to be issued under the Plan, the manner in which
distributions will be made under the Plan, and the confirmation process and the
voting procedures that holders of claims and interests entitled to vote under
the Plan must follow for their votes to be counted. The holders of
the 8⅜% Notes and other security holders (including our stockholders) are the
only constituents deemed impaired and eligible to vote under the Plan. If
approval is obtained, we then expect to move forward soliciting votes for our
proposed Plan in an expedited manner with an anticipated timeline to complete
the Chapter 11 process within 75 to 90 days from the Petition Date. However,
there can be no assurance that the Plan will be confirmed in this time frame or
in the manner proposed.
On
April 29, 2010 the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) notified us that, in
accordance with NASDAQ’s Listing Rules 5101, 5110(b) and 1M-5101-1, our common
stock will be delisted by NASDAQ and that trading of our common stock will be
suspended at the opening of business on May 10, 2010. NASDAQ’s notice and
determination followed our announcement that we and our subsidiaries had filed
petitions under Chapter 11. We do not plan to appeal NASDAQ’s
determination to delist our common stock. It is expected that our
common stock will continue to be traded on an over-the-counter
market. Trading in our common stock will be highly speculative as the
trading may not be representative of the ultimate return to stockholders based
on the Plan.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Debtors
in Possession
The
Debtors are currently operating as debtors in possession (“DIP”) under the
jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Chapter 11 and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. In general, as
debtors in possession, we are authorized under Chapter 11 to continue to
operate as an ongoing business, but may not engage in transactions outside the
ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy
Court. On April 30, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court signed a variety
of “first day” orders. These orders included an interim order that will allow us
to continue to pay general unsecured creditors in the ordinary course of
business and an order to continue existing customer programs. Other orders that
provide us the ability to continue to operate our business in the ordinary
course without interruption, covered, among other things, employee wages and
benefits, tax matters, insurance matters, and cash management. We also received
authority, on an interim basis, to enter into an $80.0 million
debtor-in-possession credit facility (the “Interim Order”) to fund operations as
we move forward with our comprehensive debt restructuring and repay amounts due
under the Credit Agreement in full. There is a hearing
scheduled on May 21, 2010 to consider final approval of these
orders.
We
reported net losses in the last four years and currently anticipate losses for
2010. This cumulative loss, in addition to our Chapter 11 Case,
raises substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern for a
period longer than the current fiscal year. Our ability to continue
as a going concern depends on the achievement of profitable operations and the
success of our Plan of Reorganization, which includes restructuring of the
8⅜%
Notes. Until the completion of the Chapter 11 Case, our future
remains uncertain, and there can be no assurance that our efforts in this regard
will be successful.
Our
consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will
continue as a going concern, which implies that we will continue to meet our
obligations and continue our operations for at least the next 12 months.
Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown,
and our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability or classification of recorded asset amounts or
the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary as a result
of this uncertainty.
As a
result of the Chapter 11 filing, we are now required to periodically file
various documents with, and provide certain information to, the Bankruptcy
Court, including monthly operating reports in forms prescribed by Chapter 11.
Such materials will be prepared according to requirements of Chapter 11. While
we believe that these documents and reports will provide then-current
information required under Chapter 11, they will be prepared only for the
Debtors and, hence, certain operational entities will be excluded. In addition,
they will be prepared in a format different from that used in our consolidated
financial statements filed under the securities laws and they will be unaudited.
Accordingly, we believe that the substance and format of those materials will
not allow meaningful comparison with our regular publicly disclosed consolidated
financial statements. Moreover, the materials filed with the Bankruptcy Court
will not be prepared for the purpose of providing a basis for an investment
decision relating to our securities, or for comparison with other financial
information filed with the SEC.
DIP
Credit Agreement
We
entered into a Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guaranty Agreement (the “DIP
Credit Agreement”) on May 3, 2010 that provides for aggregate borrowings of up
to $80.0 million, under facilities consisting of: (i) a $45.0 million Term Loan
Facility, the entire amount which was drawn on May 3, 2010, and (ii) a $35.0
million asset based Revolving Credit Facility, of which up to $30.0 million was
available on May 3, 2010, after entry by the Bankruptcy Court of the Interim
Order. The remaining $5.0 million of borrowing availability under the
Revolving Credit Facility is expected to become available upon entry by the
Bankruptcy Court of the Final Order approving the DIP Credit
Agreement.
3. SIGNIFICANT
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
For a
description of our accounting policies, see Note 2 of the consolidated financial
statements in the 2009 Form 10-K, as well as Note 12 below.
4. ACQUISITIONS
AND DISPOSITIONS
In
September 2009, we sold our ready-mixed concrete plants in Sacramento,
California for approximately $6.0 million, plus a payment for inventory on hand
at closing. This sale resulted in a pre-tax loss of approximately $3.0 million
after the allocation of approximately $3.0 million of goodwill related to these
assets.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
In May
2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of a concrete recycling business
in Queens, New York. We used borrowings under our revolving credit facility to
fund the cash purchase price of approximately $4.5 million.
5. INVENTORIES
Inventories consist of the following
(in thousands):
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw
materials
|
|
$ |
18,354 |
|
|
$ |
18,128 |
|
Precast
products
|
|
|
8,654 |
|
|
|
7,342 |
|
Building
materials for resale
|
|
|
2,639 |
|
|
|
2,555 |
|
Repair
parts
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
2,935 |
|
|
|
$ |
32,656 |
|
|
$ |
30,960 |
|
6. DEBT
A summary of debt is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Senior
secured credit facility due 2011
|
|
$ |
26,337 |
|
|
$ |
16,700 |
|
8⅜%
senior subordinated notes due 2014
|
|
|
271,804 |
|
|
|
271,756 |
|
Notes
payable and other financing
|
|
|
3,473 |
|
|
|
2,319 |
|
Superior
Materials Holdings, LLC secured credit facility due 2010
|
|
|
5,227 |
|
|
|
5,604 |
|
Capital
leases
|
|
|
814 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
|
307,655 |
|
|
|
296,542 |
|
Less: current
maturities
|
|
|
8,898 |
|
|
|
7,873 |
|
|
|
$ |
298,757 |
|
|
$ |
288,669 |
|
The
estimated fair value of our debt at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was
$196.7 million and $188.7 million, respectively.
DIP
Credit Agreement
Effective
as of May 3, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), we and certain of our domestic
subsidiaries (each individually a “Guarantor” and collectively, the
“Guarantors”) entered into the DIP Credit Agreement which provides us with a
debtor-in-possession term loan and revolving credit facility.
The DIP
Credit Agreement provides for aggregate borrowings of up to $80.0 million, under
facilities consisting of: (i) a $45.0 million term loan facility (the “Term Loan
Facility”), the entire amount which was drawn on May 3, 2010, and (ii) a $35.0
million asset based revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”),
of which up to $30.0 million was available on the Effective Date, after entry by
the Bankruptcy Court of the Interim Order. The remaining $5.0 million
of availability under the revolving credit facility is expected to become
available upon entry by the Bankruptcy Court of a final order, provided that
certain other conditions are satisfied or waived. Up to $30.0 million
of capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility is available for the issuance of
letters of credit, and any such issuance of letters of credit will reduce the
amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility. Advances under
the Revolving Credit Facility are limited by a borrowing base of (a) 85% of
eligible accounts receivable plus (b) 85% of the appraised orderly liquidation
value of eligible inventory plus (c) the lesser of (i) $20.0 million and (ii)
85% of the appraised orderly liquidation value of eligible trucks minus (d) such
customary reserves as the Administrative Agent may establish from time to time
in accordance with the terms of the DIP Credit Agreement. We had
$17.9 million of outstanding standby letters of credit at May 3,
2010. There were no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit
Facility.
Proceeds
from the DIP Credit Agreement may be used (i) for operating expenses, working
capital and other general corporate purposes (including for the payment of the
fees and expenses incurred in connection with the DIP Credit Agreement and the
transactions contemplated therein and the cases pending under Chapter 11), and
(ii) to repay in full the obligations outstanding under the prepetition Credit
Agreement. On the Effective date, $45.0 million under the Term Loan Facility was
funded and used to repay in full the obligations outstanding under the
prepetition Credit Agreement of approximately $40.3 million, and that Credit
Agreement was terminated. After that repayment and after deducting
certain fees and expenses in connection with entering into the DIP Credit
Facility, we received net cash proceeds of approximately $3.7
million.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
At our
option, borrowings under the DIP Credit Facility may be obtained from time
to time at LIBOR or the applicable domestic rate (“CB Floating Rate”) which
shall be the greater of (x) the interest rate per annum publicly announced from
time to time by the Administrative Agent as its prime rate and (y) the interest
rate per annum equal to the sum of 1.0% per annum plus the adjusted LIBOR rate
for a one-month interest period. The applicable margin on (i) the Revolving
Credit Facility is 2.50% for borrowings bearing interest at the CB Floating Rate
and 3.50% for borrowings bearing interest at the LIBOR rate and (ii) the Term
Loan Facility is 4.25% for borrowings bearing interest at the CB Floating Rate
and 5.25% for borrwings bearing interest at the LIBOR rate (subject to a LIBOR
floor of 2.0% per annum under the Term Loan Facility only). Issued
and outstanding letters of credit are subject to a fee equal to the applicable
margin then in effect for LIBOR borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility
(other than an issued and outstanding letter of credit in the face amount of
$3.5 million which bears interest at a rate per annum equal to 7.25%), a
fronting fee equal to 0.20% per annum on the stated amount of such letter of
credit, and customary charges associated with the issuance and administration of
letters of credit. We also will pay a commitment fee on undrawn
amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility in an amount equal to 0.75% per
annum. Effective immediately upon any event of default, all
outstanding borrowings and the amount of all other obligations owing under the
DIP Credit Agreement will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to 2.0% plus
the rate otherwise applicable to such borrowings or other
obligations.
The DIP
Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature on May 3, 2011, which date may be
extended by three months to July 3, 2011 so long as certain conditions are
satisfied or waived (the “Termination Date”). Borrowings are due and
payable in full on the Termination Date. Outstanding borrowings under
the DIP Credit Agreement are prepayable without penalty. There are mandatory
prepayments of principal in connection with (i) the incurrence of certain
indebtedness and certain equity issuances and (ii) certain non-ordinary course
asset sales or other dispositions (including as a result of casualty or
condemnation), with customary reinvestment provisions for asset
sales. Mandatory prepayments are to be applied first to repay
outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility with a corresponding
permanent reduction in commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility, and then
to repay borrowings under the Term Loan Facility.
The DIP
Credit Agreement requires us to maintain certain financial covenants. These
covenants include the maintenance of a minimum cumulative earnings before income
taxes, depreciation, amortization and restructuring costs (“EBITDAR”), excluding
Superior, tested on a monthly basis beginning May 31, 2010. The cumulative
EBITDAR threshold as of May 31, 2010 is approximately $0.2 million and as of
June 30, 2010 is approximately $2.0 million. We also must not exceed established
cumulative capital expenditure thresholds tested on a quarterly basis, excluding
Superior. For the period from May 1, 2010 to June 30, 2010 our cumulative
capital expenditures must be less than approximately $1.5 million. We
must maintain minimum availability under the Revolving Credit Facility of $3.0
million at all times.
The DIP
Credit Agreement requires us and our subsidiaries to comply with customary
affirmative and negative covenants. Such affirmative covenants require us and
our subsidiaries, among other things, to preserve corporate existence, comply
with laws, conduct business in the ordinary course and consistent with past
practices, pay tax obligations, maintain insurance, provide access to the
Administrative Agent and lenders to property and information, conduct update
calls with the Administrative Agent and lenders to discuss the business
performance and other issues the Administrative Agent may reasonably request,
maintain properties in good working order and maintain all rights, permits,
licenses and approvals and intellectual property with respect to their
businesses, provide additional collateral and guaranties for property and
subsidiaries formed or acquired after the Effective Date, maintain cash in
approved deposit accounts subject to account control agreements, comply with
their respective obligations under leases and notify the Administrative Agent
upon taking possession of any new leased premises, pay or discharge their
respective post-petition tax and contractual obligations, and comply with
certain post-closing obligations with respect to deposit accounts and real
property, in each case, subject to thresholds and exceptions as set forth in the
DIP Credit Agreement.
Restrictions
imposed through the negative covenants impact our ability and the abilities of
our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur debt, create liens or permit
liens to exist, engage in mergers and acquisitions,
conduct asset sales or dispositions of property, make dividends and
other payments in respect of capital stock, prepay or cancel certain
indebtedness, change lines of business, make investments, loans and other
advances, enter into speculative hedging arrangements, engage in transactions
with affiliates, enter into restrictive agreements and amend organizational
documents or the terms of any subordinated debt, enter into non-ordinary course
operating leases or engage in sale/leaseback transactions and create or permit
to exist any superpriority claim or any lien on any collateral which is pari
passu or senior to claims of the Administrative Agent or the lenders in each
case, subject to thresholds and exceptions as set forth in the DIP Credit
Agreement.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
The DIP
Credit Agreement contains customary events of default,
including: nonpayment of principal, interest and other fees or other
amounts after stated grace periods; material inaccuracy of representations and
warranties; violations of covenants; certain bankruptcy and liquidation events
of affiliates of ours which are not Debtors (the “Non-Filers”) or the exercise
by any creditor of any remedies against any Non-Filer unless such Non-Filer
seeks protection under applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization law
after a stated grace period; cross-default to material indebtedness; certain
material judgments; certain events related to the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended, or “ERISA”; actual or asserted invalidity of
any guarantee, security document or non-perfection of security interest; a
change in control (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement); and customary
bankruptcy-related events of default, including appointment of a trustee,
failure to comply with the Interim Order or Final Order, as applicable, or
failure of the Interim Order or Final Order to remain in full force and effect,
prepayment of certain pre-petition indebtedness, and the failure of the Debtors
to meet certain milestones with respect to a plan of reorganization as set forth
in the DIP Credit Agreement.
All
obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement are (a) unconditionally guaranteed by
all of our existing and future U.S. subsidiaries (other than Superior and its
direct and indirect subsidiaries), (b) subject to the Interim Order, constitute
an allowed administrative expense claim entitled to the benefits of Bankruptcy
Code Section 364(c)(1) having superpriority over any and all administrative
expenses of the kind specified in Bankruptcy Code Sections 503(b) or 507(b), and
(c) subject to the Interim Order, are secured by (i) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code
Section 346(c)(2) in the case of the debtors, a first priority perfected lien
(subject to certain exceptions) in our and the Guarantors’ present and
after-acquired property, not subject to a valid, perfected and non-avoidable
lien on the date of filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, excluding (x) 34% of the
issued and outstanding stock of new or existing foreign subsidiaries, (y) the
equity and assets of Superior and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, and (z)
certain other excluded collateral as set forth in the related pledge and
security agreement (collectively, the “Excluded Collateral”) and
(ii) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 364(c)(3) in the case of the
debtors, a perfected junior lien on all present and after-acquired property that
is otherwise subject to a valid, perfected and non-avoidable lien on the date of
filing of the Chapter 11 Cases or a valid lien perfected after the date of
filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, excluding, in all cases, the Excluded
Collateral.
Senior
Secured Credit Facility
Prior to the payoff of our senior
secured credit facility on May 3, 2010, we entered into two separate amendments
to the Credit Agreement, one in February 2010 and the other in March 2010, that
provided additional short term liquidity. The February 2010 amendment provided
for (i) a permanent waiver by the lenders of any default or event of default
arising under the Credit Agreement as a result of our delivery of our 2009
fiscal year financials with a report from our independent registered public
accounting firm containing an explanatory paragraph with their conclusion
regarding substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and
(ii) a temporary waiver by the lenders through April 30, 2010, of any default or
event of default arising under the Credit Agreement as a result of our failure
to make our regularly scheduled interest payments under the 8⅜% Notes.
Additionally the February 2010 amendment:
|
·
|
temporarily
reduced the minimum availability trigger at which we were required to
maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 from $25.0
million to (1) $22.5 million from the effective date of the amendment
through March 10, 2010 and (2) $20.0 million thereafter through April 30,
2010, but in each case that trigger would have reverted to $25.0 million
upon the earlier of (a) our delivery of notice to the lenders of our
intent to make payment on the 8⅜% Notes or
any other subordinated debt and (b) May 1,
2010;
|
|
·
|
reduced
the size of our revolving credit facility from $150.0 million to $90.0
million;
|
|
·
|
implemented
cash dominion by the lenders over the deposit accounts of us and the
guarantors under the Credit Agreement, subject to exceptions for specific
accounts and threshold dollar
amounts;
|
|
·
|
modified
the borrowing base formula to include a $20.0 million cap on the value of
concrete trucks and mixing drums that could have been included in the
borrowing base;
|
|
·
|
increased
the pricing on drawn revolver;
|
|
·
|
required
us to report our borrowing base on a weekly, rather than monthly,
basis;
|
|
·
|
waived
our solvency representation and warranty through April 30,
2010;
|
|
·
|
permitted
us to prepay or redeem the 8⅜% Notes with
the proceeds of permitted subordinated debt and/or an equity issuance, but
not cash;
|
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
|
·
|
modified
certain restrictions on the operation of our business by, among other
things, (i) eliminating the general restricted payments, lien and
investment baskets; (ii) adding new restrictions on our ability to sell or
incur liens on certain assets, including owned real property of our
company and our subsidiaries; (iii) adding restrictions on our ability to
form, acquire or enter into any new joint venture or partnership or create
any new foreign subsidiary; (iv) reducing the basket for permitted debt of
Superior from $20.0 million to $17.5 million; (v) limiting investments by
our company and our subsidiaries in Superior to $2.25 million in any
fiscal quarter and $5.0 million for the remaining term of the Credit
Agreement; and (vi) limiting our ability to consummate permitted
acquisitions and incur or assume debt at the time the acquisition is
consummated; and
|
|
·
|
added
a new event of default under the Credit Agreement if we or any of our
subsidiaries contested the enforceability of the subordination provisions
relating to the 8⅜% Notes or
any other subordinated debt, or if such debt failed to remain subordinated
to the Credit Agreement.
|
The
principal terms amended in the March 2010 amendment were:
|
·
|
further
reduced the facility size from $90.0 million to $60.0
million;
|
|
·
|
increased
the pricing on drawn revolver;
|
|
·
|
provided
that the 2.00% default rate was to increase by an additional 1.00% at the
end of each successive 30-day period for which the default rate was in
effect;
|
|
·
|
temporarily
reduced the minimum availability trigger at which we were required to
maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 from $20.0
million to $1.5 million until the earliest to occur of (i) April 30, 2010
and (ii) our making of (or delivery of notice to the lenders of its intent
to make) any interest payment on the 8⅜%
Notes;
|
|
·
|
modified
the negative debt covenant to prevent us and our subsidiaries from
incurring certain indebtedness, subject to certain carve outs and
thresholds; and
|
|
·
|
granted
to the administrative agent, on behalf of the lenders, a first priority
security interest in certain previously excluded collateral, including any
of our and our subsidiaries owned real estate assets (other than Superior
and its direct and indirect subsidiaries) with a net book value of greater
than $100,000.
|
At March
31, 2010, we had borrowings of $26.3 million and outstanding letters of credit
of approximately $18.0 million under the Credit Agreement. The
balances outstanding on May 3, 2010 were paid in full with funds obtained under
our DIP Credit Agreement.
Senior
Subordinated Notes
On March
31, 2004, we issued $200 million of 8⅜% Notes. In July 2006, we
issued $85 million of additional 8⅜% Notes. Interest on these notes
is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year.
On April
1, 2010, we were obligated to make semi-annual interest payments on the 8⅜%
Notes aggregating approximately $11.4 million which we did not
make. Under the indenture relating to the 8⅜% Notes, an event of
default would have occurred if we failed to make the payment of interest on the
8⅜% Notes when due and that failure continued for a period of 30
days. If such an event of default occurred and continued, the trustee
or the holders of 25% or more in aggregate principal amount of the 8⅜% Notes
then outstanding could have accelerated our obligation to repay the 8⅜% Notes,
together with accrued and unpaid interest. Under the terms of the
Credit Agreement, an event of default under the indenture would have also
constituted an event of default under the Credit Agreement, and would have given
rise to the right of the lenders under the Credit Agreement to immediately
accelerate the maturity of the debt outstanding under the Credit
Facility. As discussed in Note 2, we reached an agreement with a
substantial majority of the holders of the 8⅜% Notes on the terms of a
comprehensive debt restructuring plan prior to April 30, 2010, the date an event
of default would have occurred for non-payment of interest. The Plan,
under protection of Chapter 11, provides that the holders of the 8⅜% Notes would
exchange their 8⅜% Notes for equity in our reorganized company.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
During
the first quarter of 2009, we purchased $7.4 million aggregate principal amount
of the 8⅜% Notes in open market transactions for approximately $2.8 million plus
accrued interest of approximately $0.3 million through the dates of
purchase. We recorded a gain of approximately $4.5 million as a
result of these open market transactions after writing off $0.1 million of
previously deferred financing costs associated with the pro-rata amount of the
8⅜% Notes purchased. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we
purchased an additional $5.0 million principal amount of the 8⅜% Notes for
approximately $2.0 million. This resulted in a gain of approximately $2.9
million in April 2009, after writing off $0.1 million of previously deferred
financing costs associated with the pro-rata amount of the 8⅜% Notes purchased.
We used cash on hand and borrowings under our Credit Agreement to fund these
transactions. These purchases reduced the amount outstanding under the 8⅜% Notes
by $12.4 million, reduced our interest expense by approximately $0.7 million in
2009 and were expected to reduce our interest expense by approximately $0.9
million on an annual basis thereafter.
All of
our subsidiaries, excluding Superior and minor subsidiaries, jointly and
severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed the repayment of the 8⅜%
Notes.
Superior
Credit Facility and Subordinated Debt
Superior
has a separate credit agreement that provides for a revolving credit facility
(the “Superior Credit Agreement”). Effective April 1, 2010, the
Superior Credit Agreement was amended and restated under which borrowings
of up to $15.0 million may become available, which amount includes a $5.0
million letter of credit subfacility. The Superior Credit Agreement is secured
by substantially all the assets of Superior. The Superior Credit
Agreement is scheduled to mature on September 30, 2010. Based on this
maturity date, the amounts outstanding under the credit agreement are classified
as current at March 31, 2010. Availability of borrowings is subject to a
borrowing base of net receivables, inventory and machinery and equipment, and in
certain circumstances letters of credit, in each case, subject to the
eligibility criteria set forth in the Superior Credit Agreement.
Borrowings
under the Superior Credit Agreement are subject to interest at our election of
LIBOR plus 5.00% (subject to a 1.00% floor) or a domestic prime rate plus 3.00%
(subject to a floor of 2.5%). Commitment fees at an annual rate of
0.25% are payable on the unused portion of the revolving credit
facility.
Superior
and each of Superior’s existing and future subsidiaries, if any, have guaranteed
the repayment of all amounts owing under the Superior Credit Agreement.
The Superior Credit Agreement contains covenants substantially the same as under
the previous credit agreement restricting, among other things, Superior’s and
its subsidiaries’ distributions, dividends and repurchases of capital stock and
other equity interests, acquisitions and investments, mergers, asset sales other
than in the ordinary course of business, indebtedness, liens, changes in
business, changes to charter documents and affiliate transactions. It also
generally limits Superior’s capital expenditures and will require them to
maintain compliance with a minimum EBITDA level as of the end of each fiscal
quarter. During the trailing 12 months ended March 31, 2010, Superior was
in compliance with these covenants. The Superior Credit Agreement provides that
specified change-of-control events, as well as, among
others, customary payment and covenant defaults, breach of material
representations and warranties, impairment of collateral or guarantees,
cross-default to certain material indebtedness, judgments in excess of a
threshold amount, certain ERISA events, and certain bankruptcy events, would
constitute events of default.
As a
condition precedent to the initial advance under the Superior Credit Agreement,
U.S. Concrete Inc. and the Edw. C. Levy Co. were required to fund $3.6 million
to Superior in the form of cash equity contributions, representing a prefunding
of the respective obligations under certain support letters entered into in
connection with the previous Superior Credit Agreement for the period from
January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010. Our portion of this cash obligation
was $1.1 million. Additionally, we made capital contributions in the amount of
$2.6 million in lieu of payment of related party payables during the first
quarter of 2010. In the first quarter of 2009, U.S. Concrete provided
subordinated debt capital in the amount of $2.4 million in lieu of payment of
related party payables. Additionally, the minority partner, Edw. C. Levy Co.,
provided $1.6 million of subordinated debt capital to fund operations during the
first quarter of 2009. The subordinated debt with U.S. Concrete was
eliminated in consolidation. There was no interest due on each note,
and each note was scheduled to mature on May 1, 2011. During the third quarter
of 2009, U.S. Concrete and, Edw. C. Levy Co., converted the subordinated debt
capital into capital contributions to Superior. There can be no
assurance that U.S. Concrete and Edw. C. Levy Co. will not have to make
additional cash equity contributions to Superior to finance its working capital
requirements and fund its cash operating losses if they are greater than
anticipated.
As of
March 31, 2010, there was $5.2 million in outstanding revolving credit
borrowings under the Superior Credit Agreement, and the remaining amount of the
available credit was approximately $1.4 million. Letters of credit outstanding
at March 31, 2010 were $3.0 million, which reduced the amount available under
the revolving credit facility.
7. INCOME
TAXES
There
were no income tax payments made during the first three months of 2009 and
approximately $20,000 paid during the first quarter of 2010.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
In
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), we estimate
the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full
year. We use this estimate in providing for income taxes on a
year-to-date basis, which may vary in subsequent interim periods if our
estimates change. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we
applied a valuation allowance against certain of our deferred tax assets,
including net operating loss carryforwards, which reduced our effective benefit
rate from the statutory rate. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, a valuation
allowance is required unless it is more likely than not that future taxable
income or the reversal of deferred tax liabilities will be sufficient to recover
deferred tax assets. In addition, certain state taxes are calculated on bases
different than pre-tax loss. This results in recording income
tax expense for these states, which also lowered the effective rate for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the statutory rate.
8. STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY
Common
Stock and Preferred Stock
The
following table presents information regarding U.S. Concrete’s common stock (in
thousands):
|
|
March
31, 2010
|
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
Shares
authorized
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
Shares
outstanding at end of period
|
|
|
37,433 |
|
|
|
37,558 |
|
Shares
held in treasury
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
Under our
restated certificate of incorporation, we are authorized to issue 10,000,000
shares of preferred stock, $0.001 par value, none of which were issued or
outstanding as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Treasury
Stock
Employees
may elect to satisfy their tax obligations on the vesting of their restricted
stock by having the required tax payments withheld based on a number of
vested shares having an aggregate value on the date of vesting equal to the tax
obligation. As a result of such employee elections, we withheld
approximately 121,000 shares during the three months ended March 31,
2010, at a total value of approximately $0.1 million and we accounted for
the withholding of these shares as treasury stock.
9. SHARES
USED IN COMPUTING NET LOSS PER SHARE
The
following table summarizes the number of shares (in thousands) of common stock
we have used, on a weighted-average basis, in calculating basic and diluted net
loss per share attributable to stockholders:
|
|
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Basic
weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
36,630 |
|
|
|
36,844 |
|
Effect
of dilutive stock options and awards
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
Diluted
weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
36,630 |
|
|
|
36,844 |
|
For the
three month periods ended March 31, we excluded stock options and awards
covering 2.3 million shares in 2010 and 3.5 million shares in 2009 from the
computation of net loss per share because their effect would have been
antidilutive.
10. COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
From time
to time, and currently, we are subject to various claims and litigation brought
by employees, customers and other third parties for, among other matters,
personal injuries, property damages, product defects and delay damages that
have, or allegedly have, resulted from the conduct of our
operations. As a result of these types of claims and litigation, we
must periodically evaluate the probability of damages being assessed against us
and the range of possible outcomes. In each reporting period, if we
determine that the likelihood of damages being assessed against us is probable,
and, if we believe we can estimate a range of possible outcomes, then we record
a liability reflecting either the low end of our range or a specific estimate,
if we believe a specific estimate to be likely based on current
information.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
In May
2010, we entered into a settlement agreement for approximately $1.6 million
related to four consolidated class actions pending in Alameda Superior Court
(California), which is subject to approval by the Bankruptcy
Court. The original class actions were filed between April 6, 2007
and September 27, 2007 on behalf of various Central Concrete Supply Co., Inc.
(“Central”) ready-mixed concrete and transport drivers, alleging primarily that
Central, which is one of our subsidiaries, failed to provide meal and rest
breaks as required under California law. We previously entered into settlements
with one of the classes and a number of individual drivers. The approximate $1.6
million settlement is included in accrued liabilities on our condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010.
In May
2008, we received a letter from a multi-employer pension plan to which one of
our subsidiaries is a contributing employer, providing notice that the Internal
Revenue Service had denied applications by the plan for waivers of the minimum
funding deficiency from prior years, and requesting payment of our allocable
share of the minimum funding deficiency. We have been evaluating
several options to minimize our exposure, including transferring our assets and
liabilities into another plan. In April 2010, the multi-employer
pension plan filed a civil complaint to collect approximately $1.8 million for
this minimum funding deficiency. We may receive future funding deficiency
demands from this particular multi-employer pension plan, or other
multi-employer plans to which we contribute. We are unable to
estimate the amount of any potential future funding deficiency demands, because
the actions of each of the other contributing employers in the plans has an
effect on each of the other contributing employers, the development of a
rehabilitation plan by the trustees and subsequent submittal to and approval by
the Internal Revenue Service is not predictable, and the allocation of fund
assets and return assumptions by trustees are variable, as are actual investment
returns relative to the plan assumptions.
Currently,
there are no material product defect claims pending against
us. Accordingly, our existing accruals for claims against us do not
reflect any material amounts relating to product defect claims. While
our management is not aware of any facts that would reasonably be expected to
lead to material product defect claims against us that would have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations, it
is possible that claims could be asserted against us in the
future. We do not maintain insurance that would cover all damages
resulting from product defect claims. In particular, we generally do
not maintain insurance coverage for the cost of removing and rebuilding
structures, or so-called “rip and tear” coverage. In addition, our
indemnification arrangements with contractors or others, when obtained,
generally provide only limited protection against product defect
claims. Due to inherent uncertainties associated with estimating
unasserted claims in our business, we cannot estimate the amount of any future
loss that may be attributable to unasserted product defect claims related to
ready-mixed concrete we have delivered prior to March 31, 2010.
We
believe that the resolution of all litigation currently pending or threatened
against us or any of our subsidiaries will not materially exceed our existing
accruals for those matters. However, because of the inherent
uncertainty of litigation, there is a risk that we may have to increase our
accruals for one or more claims or proceedings to which we or any of our
subsidiaries is a party as more information becomes available or proceedings
progress, and any such increase in accruals could have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations. We
expect in the future that we and our operating subsidiaries will from time to
time be a party to litigation or administrative proceedings that arise in the
normal course of our business.
We are
subject to federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations
concerning, among other matters, air emissions and wastewater discharge. Our
management believes we are in substantial compliance with applicable
environmental laws and regulations. From time to time, we receive claims from
federal and state environmental regulatory agencies and entities asserting that
we may be in violation of environmental laws and regulations. Based on
experience and the information currently available, our management believes the
possibility that these claims could materially exceed our related accrual is
remote. Despite compliance and experience, it is possible that we
could be held liable for future charges, which might be material, but are not
currently known to us or cannot be estimated by us. In addition,
changes in federal or state laws, regulations or requirements, or discovery of
currently unknown conditions, could require additional
expenditures.
As
permitted under Delaware law, we have agreements that provide indemnification of
officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or
director is or was serving at our request in such capacity. The maximum
potential amount of future payments that we could be required to make under
these indemnification agreements is not limited; however, we have a director and
officer insurance policy that potentially limits our exposure and enables us to
recover a portion of future amounts that may be paid. As a result of
the insurance policy coverage, we believe the estimated fair value of these
indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, we have not recorded any
liabilities for these agreements as of March 31, 2010.
We and
our subsidiaries are parties to agreements that require us to provide
indemnification in certain instances when we acquire businesses and real estate
and in the ordinary course of business with our customers, suppliers, lessors
and service providers.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
Insurance Programs
We
maintain third-party insurance coverage against certain risks. Under
certain components of our insurance program, we share the risk of loss with our
insurance underwriters by maintaining high deductibles subject to aggregate
annual loss limitations. Generally, our deductible
retentions per occurrence for auto, workers’ compensation and general liability
insurance programs are $1.0 million, although certain of our operations are
self-insured for workers’ compensation. We fund these deductibles and
record an expense for expected losses under the programs. The
expected losses are determined using a combination of our historical loss
experience and subjective assessments of our future loss exposure. The estimated
losses are subject to uncertainty from various sources, including changes in
claims reporting patterns, claims settlement patterns, judicial decisions,
legislation and economic conditions. Although we believe that the
estimated losses we have recorded are reasonable, significant differences
related to the items noted above could materially affect our insurance
obligations and future expense.
Performance
Bonds
In the
normal course of business, we and our subsidiaries are contingently liable for
performance under $53.3 million in performance bonds that various
contractors, states and municipalities have required. The bonds principally
relate to construction contracts, reclamation obligations and mining
permits. We and our subsidiaries have indemnified the underwriting
insurance company against any exposure under the performance bonds. No material
claims have been made against these bonds.
11. SEGMENT
INFORMATION
We have
two segments that serve our principal markets in the United
States. Our ready-mixed concrete and concrete-related products
segment produces and sells ready-mixed concrete, aggregates (crushed stone, sand
and gravel), concrete masonry and building materials. This segment serves
the following principal markets: north and west Texas, northern California, New
Jersey, New York, Washington, D.C., Michigan and Oklahoma. Our precast
concrete products segment produces and sells precast concrete products in select
markets in the western United States and the mid-Atlantic region.
We
account for inter-segment revenue at market prices. Segment operating
income (loss) consists of net revenue less operating expense, including certain
operating overhead directly related to the operation of the specific
segment. Corporate includes executive, administrative, financial, legal,
human resources, business development and risk management activities which are
not allocated to operations and are excluded from segment operating income
(loss).
The
following table sets forth certain financial information relating to our
continuing operations by reportable segment (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
concrete and concrete-related products
|
|
$ |
80,371 |
|
|
$ |
106,997 |
|
Precast
concrete products
|
|
|
12,426 |
|
|
|
13,508 |
|
Inter-segment
revenue
|
|
|
(2,531 |
) |
|
|
(3,205 |
) |
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
90,266 |
|
|
$ |
117,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income
(Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
concrete and concrete-related products
|
|
$ |
(11,948 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,245 |
) |
Precast
concrete products
|
|
|
(881 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
Gain
on purchases of senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,493 |
|
Unallocated
overhead and other income
|
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
807 |
|
Corporate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
(7,222 |
) |
|
|
(4,959 |
) |
Gain
(loss) on sale of assets
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
(6,790 |
) |
|
|
(6,768 |
) |
Profit
(loss) from continuing operations before income taxes and non-controlling
interest
|
|
$ |
(26,335 |
) |
|
$ |
(11,682 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
Depletion and Amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
concrete and concrete-related products
|
|
$ |
5,470 |
|
|
$ |
6,223 |
|
Precast
concrete products
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
506 |
|
Total
depreciation, depletion and amortization
|
|
$ |
6,742 |
|
|
$ |
7,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Expenditures:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
concrete and concrete-related products
|
|
$ |
2,248 |
|
|
$ |
6,627 |
|
Precast
concrete products
|
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Total
capital expenditures
|
|
$ |
2,447 |
|
|
$ |
6,666 |
|
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
|
|
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Revenue by
Product:
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
concrete
|
|
$ |
69,536 |
|
|
$ |
95,504 |
|
Precast
concrete products
|
|
|
12,494 |
|
|
|
13,559 |
|
Building
materials
|
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
1,814 |
|
Aggregates
|
|
|
2,412 |
|
|
|
3,427 |
|
Other
|
|
|
4,201 |
|
|
|
2,996 |
|
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
90,266 |
|
|
$ |
117,300 |
|
|
|
As of
March 31,
2010
|
|
|
As of
December 31,
2009
|
|
Identifiable
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
concrete and concrete-related products
|
|
$ |
200,296 |
|
|
$ |
203,681 |
|
Precast
concrete products
|
|
|
23,666 |
|
|
|
23,496 |
|
Corporate
|
|
|
12,148 |
|
|
|
12,740 |
|
Total
identifiable assets
|
|
$ |
236,110 |
|
|
$ |
239,917 |
|
12. RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In
February 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an
update that removes the requirement for a SEC filer to disclose a date through
which subsequent events have been evaluated. This change removes
potential conflicts with SEC requirements. The adoption did not have
an impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In August
2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance, which provides additional guidance
on measuring the fair value of liabilities. This guidance reaffirms that the
fair value measurement of a liability assumes the transfer of a liability to a
market participant as of the measurement date. This guidance became effective
October 1, 2009. This guidance did not have a material impact on our
condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
June 2009, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standard
Codification™ (the “Codification”). The Codification becomes
the single source of authoritative nongovernmental U.S. GAAP, superseding
existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging
Issues Task Force and related literature. The codification establishes one level
of authoritative U.S. GAAP. All other literature is considered
non-authoritative. This Statement was effective for our financial statements
issued during the quarter ended September 30, 2009. As a result, references
to authoritative accounting literature in our financial statement disclosures
are referenced in accordance with the Codification.
In June
2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on consolidation of variable
interest entities (“VIE”) that changes how a reporting entity
determines a primary beneficiary that would consolidate the VIE from a
quantitative risk and rewards approach to a qualitative approach based on which
variable interest holder has the power to direct the economic performance
related activities of the VIE as well as the obligation to absorb losses or
right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. This
guidance requires the primary beneficiary assessment to be performed on an
ongoing basis and also requires enhanced disclosures that will provide more
transparency about a company’s involvement in a VIE. This guidance is effective
for a reporting entity’s first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material
impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance related to interim
disclosures about fair value of financial instruments. The guidance requires an
entity to provide disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in
interim financial information. This guidance is to be applied prospectively and
is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. We
adopted this guidance in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. There was no
impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements, as the guidance
relates only to additional disclosures. The required disclosure is included in
Note 6 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
13. STOCKHOLDER
RIGHTS PLAN
In
November 2009, our Board of Directors adopted a Stockholder Rights Plan designed
to protect stockholder value by preserving the value of certain of our deferred
tax assets primarily associated with net operating loss carryforwards under
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code. Our ability to use net
operating losses carryforwards and other tax benefits could be substantially
reduced if an "ownership change" under Section 382 were to occur. The
Stockholder Rights Plan was adopted to reduce the likelihood of an unintended
"ownership change" occurring as a result of ordinary buying and selling of
shares of our common stock. The Stockholder Rights Plan entails a dividend
of one right for each outstanding share of our common stock. Each right
will entitle the holder to buy one one-hundredth of a share of a new Series A
Junior Participating Preferred Stock, for an exercise price of $10.00. Each one
one-hundredth of a share of such preferred stock would be essentially the
economic equivalent of one share of our common stock.
The
rights will trade with our common stock until exercisable. The rights
will not be exercisable until ten days following a public announcement that a
person or group has acquired 4.9% of our common stock or until ten business
days after a person or group begins a tender offer that would result in
ownership of 4.9% of our common stock, subject to certain extensions by the
Board of Directors. In the event that an acquiror becomes a 4.9% beneficial
owner of our common stock, the rights "flip in" and become rights to
buy our common stock at a 50% discount, and rights owned by that acquiror
become void.
In the
event that our company is merged and our common stock is exchanged or
converted, or if 50% or more of our assets or earning power is sold or
transferred, the rights "flip over" and entitle the holders to buy shares of the
acquiror's common stock at a 50% discount. A tender or exchange offer for all
outstanding shares of our common stock at a price and on terms
determined to be fair and otherwise in the best interests of our company and our
stockholders by a majority of our independent directors will not trigger either
the flip-in or flip-over provisions.
We may
redeem the rights for $0.001 per right at any time until ten days following the
first public announcement that an acquiror has acquired the level of ownership
that "triggers" the Stockholder Rights Plan. The rights extend for ten years and
will expire on October 31, 2019. The distribution of the rights will be made to
stockholders of record on November 16, 2009.
14. FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS OF SUBSIDIARY GUARANTORS
All of
our subsidiaries, excluding Superior and minor subsidiaries, have jointly and
severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed the repayment of our
long-term debt. We directly or indirectly own 100% of each subsidiary
guarantor. The following supplemental financial information sets
forth, on a condensed consolidating basis, the financial statements for U.S.
Concrete, Inc., the parent company and its subsidiary guarantors (including
minor subsidiaries), Superior and our consolidated company, as of March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009 and for the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and
2009.
The
condensed consolidating balance sheet as of December 31, 2009 has been revised
to reduce investment in subsidiaries by $5.6 million and eliminate
non-controlling interest in the same amount that was previously recorded in the
accounts of the Subsidiary Guarantors. Corresponding revisions of $5.6
million were also made to the eliminations column. These revisions had no
impact on the Parent, Superior, or consolidated columns in the condensed
consolidating balance sheet as of December 31, 2009. The condensed consolidating
statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 has also been
revised to reduce equity loss in subsidiary by $1.6 million and eliminate net
loss attributable to non-controlling interest in the same amount that was
previously recorded in the accounts of the Subsidiary Guarantors.
Corresponding revisions of $1.6 million were also made to the eliminations
column. These revisions had no impact on the Parent, Superior, or consolidated
columns in the condensed consolidating statements of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2009.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - Continued
(Unaudited)
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
of March 31, 2010:
|
|
U.S.
Concrete
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiary
Guarantors1
|
|
|
Superior
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,978 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,997 |
|
Trade
accounts receivable, net.
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
60,750 |
|
|
|
4,306 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
65,056 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
29,325 |
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
32,656 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,417 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
8,417 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,144 |
|
|
|
1,334 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,478 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
5,568 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,596 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
113,182 |
|
|
|
9,049 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
124,200 |
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
216,782 |
|
|
|
19,328 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
236,110 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,063 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,063 |
|
Investment
in subsidiaries
|
|
|
271,565 |
|
|
|
9,750 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(281,315 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
5,614 |
|
|
|
1,653 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,310 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
279,148 |
|
|
$ |
355,430 |
|
|
$ |
28,420 |
|
|
$ |
(281,315 |
) |
|
$ |
381,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
1,863 |
|
|
$ |
1,224 |
|
|
$ |
5,811 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
8,898 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
39,532 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
41,349 |
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
13,262 |
|
|
|
31,722 |
|
|
|
4,506 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
49,490 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
15,125 |
|
|
|
72,478 |
|
|
|
12,134 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
99,737 |
|
Long-term
debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
298,141 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
298,757 |
|
Other
long-term obligations and deferred credits
|
|
|
6,461 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,071 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,161 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
10,161 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
319,727 |
|
|
|
83,865 |
|
|
|
12,134 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
415,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
(Deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
268,785 |
|
|
|
541,101 |
|
|
|
48,958 |
|
|
|
(590,059 |
) |
|
|
268,785 |
|
Retained
deficit
|
|
|
(306,049 |
) |
|
|
(269,536 |
) |
|
|
(32,672 |
) |
|
|
302,208 |
|
|
|
(306,049 |
) |
Treasury
stock, at cost
|
|
|
(3,353 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,353 |
) |
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(40,579 |
) |
|
|
271,565 |
|
|
|
16,286 |
|
|
|
(287,851 |
) |
|
|
(40,579 |
) |
Non-controlling
interest
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,536 |
|
|
|
6,536 |
|
Total
equity
|
|
|
(40,579 |
) |
|
|
271,565 |
|
|
|
16,286 |
|
|
|
(281,315 |
) |
|
|
(34,043 |
) |
Total
liabilities and equity (deficit)
|
|
$ |
279,148 |
|
|
$ |
355,430 |
|
|
$ |
28,420 |
|
|
$ |
(281,315 |
) |
|
$ |
381,683 |
|
1
Including minor subsidiaries without operations or material
assets.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31 2010:
|
|
U.S.
Concrete
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Superior
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
86,128 |
|
|
$ |
4,138 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
90,266 |
|
Cost
of goods sold before depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
80,773 |
|
|
|
6,082 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
86,855 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
15,384 |
|
|
|
1,111 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
16,495 |
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
6,156 |
|
|
|
586 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
6,742 |
|
(Gain)
loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(16,236 |
) |
|
|
(3,641 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(19,877 |
) |
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
6,663 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
Other
income, net
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
|
|
(6,663 |
) |
|
|
(15,972 |
) |
|
|
(3,700 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(26,335 |
) |
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(2,332 |
) |
|
|
2,701 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
408 |
|
Equity
losses in subsidiary
|
|
|
(20,916 |
) |
|
|
(2,243 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
(25,247 |
) |
|
|
(20,916 |
) |
|
|
(3,739 |
) |
|
|
23,159 |
|
|
|
(26,743 |
) |
Net
loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
Net
loss attributable to stockholders
|
|
$ |
(25,247 |
) |
|
$ |
(20,916 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,739 |
) |
|
$ |
24,655 |
|
|
$ |
(25,247 |
) |
1Including
minor subsidiaries without operations or material assets.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three months ended March 31, 2010:
|
|
U.S.
Concrete
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Superior
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
(10,546 |
) |
|
$ |
7,778 |
|
|
$ |
(6,405 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
(9,173 |
) |
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(2,189 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(2,268 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
10,546 |
|
|
|
(5,581 |
) |
|
|
6,244 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
11,209 |
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(232 |
) |
Cash
and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
3,970 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,229 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
|
$ |
–
|
|
|
$ |
3,978 |
|
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
3,997 |
|
1
Including minor subsidiaries without operations or material
assets.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet
As
of December 31, 2009:
|
|
U.S.
Concrete
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Superior
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Current
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,970 |
|
|
$ |
259 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
4,229 |
|
Trade
accounts receivable, net.
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
67,021 |
|
|
|
7,830 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
74,851 |
|
Inventories
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
27,459 |
|
|
|
3,501 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,960 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,847 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
7,847 |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,361 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
3,729 |
|
Other
current assets
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,876 |
|
|
|
1,097 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,973 |
|
Total
current assets
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
115,534 |
|
|
|
13,055 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
128,589 |
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
220,082 |
|
|
|
19,835 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
239,917 |
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,063 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
14,063 |
|
Investment
in Subsidiaries
|
|
|
281,664 |
|
|
|
8,273 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(289,937 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
4,867 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,591 |
|
Total
assets
|
|
$ |
286,531 |
|
|
$ |
359,624 |
|
|
$ |
32,942 |
|
|
$ |
(289,937 |
) |
|
$ |
389,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
|
$ |
860 |
|
|
$ |
1,245 |
|
|
$ |
5,768 |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
7,873 |
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
30,768 |
|
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
37,678 |
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
6,584 |
|
|
|
35,533 |
|
|
|
6,440 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
48,557 |
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
|
7,444 |
|
|
|
67,546 |
|
|
|
19,118 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
94,108 |
|
Long-term
debt, net of current maturities
|
|
|
288,529 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
288,669 |
|
Other
long-term obligations and deferred credits
|
|
|
6,300 |
|
|
|
616 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
6,916 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,658 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
9,658 |
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
302,273 |
|
|
|
77,960 |
|
|
|
19,118 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
399,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
(Deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
268,306 |
|
|
|
530,284 |
|
|
|
42,757 |
|
|
|
(573,041 |
) |
|
|
268,306 |
|
Retained deficit
|
|
|
(280,802 |
) |
|
|
(248,620 |
) |
|
|
(28,933 |
) |
|
|
277,553 |
|
|
|
(280,802 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost
|
|
|
(3,284 |
) |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
(3,284 |
) |
Total
stockholders’ equity (deficit)
|
|
|
(15,742 |
) |
|
|
281,664 |
|
|
|
13,824 |
|
|
|
(295,488 |
) |
|
|
(15,742 |
) |
Non-controlling interest
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
|
|
5,551 |
|
Total
equity
|
|
|
(15,742 |
) |
|
|
281,664 |
|
|
|
13,824 |
|
|
|
(289,937 |
) |
|
|
(10,191 |
) |
Total
liabilities and equity (deficit)
|
|
$ |
286,531 |
|
|
$ |
359,624 |
|
|
$ |
32,942 |
|
|
$ |
(289,937 |
) |
|
$ |
389,160 |
|
1
Including minor subsidiaries without operations or material
assets.
U.S.
CONCRETE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS – Continued
(Unaudited)
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Operations
Three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
U.S.
Concrete
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiary
|
|
|
Superior
Materials
Holdings,
LLC
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
111,977 |
|
|
$ |
5,323 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
117,300 |
|
Cost
of goods sold before depreciation, depletion and
amortization
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
96,516 |
|
|
|
7,006 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
103,522 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
14,908 |
|
|
|
1,170 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
16,078 |
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
6,500 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(5,947 |
) |
|
|
(3,809 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(9,756 |
) |
Interest
income
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
6,594 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
6,774 |
|
Gain
on purchase of senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
4,493 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,493 |
|
Other
income, net
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
|
|
(2,098 |
) |
|
|
(5,682 |
) |
|
|
(3,902 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(11,682 |
) |
Income
tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(734 |
) |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(637 |
) |
Equity
losses in subsidiary
|
|
|
(8,090 |
) |
|
|
(2,386 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
10,476 |
|
|
|
– |
|
Net
loss
|
|
|
(9,454 |
) |
|
|
(8,090 |
) |
|
|
(3,977 |
) |
|
|
10,476 |
|
|
|
(11,045 |
) |
Net
loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
Net
loss attributable to stockholders
|
|
$ |
(9,454 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,090 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,977 |
) |
|
$ |
12,067 |
|
|
$ |
(9,454 |
) |
1Including
minor subsidiaries without operations or material assets.
Condensed Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
Three months ended March 31, 2009:
|
|
U.S.
Concrete
Parent
|
|
|
Subsidiary
Guarantors1
|
|
|
Superior
Materials
Holdings,
LLC
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands)
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$ |
5,682 |
|
|
$ |
10,530 |
|
|
$ |
(6,081 |
) |
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
10,131 |
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(5,487 |
) |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
(5,177 |
) |
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(5,682 |
) |
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
5,137 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
5,653 |
|
|
|
(634 |
) |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
5,019 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
4,685 |
|
|
|
638 |
|
|
|
– |
|
|
|
5,323 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
10,338 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
– |
|
|
$ |
10,342 |
|
1
Including minor subsidiaries without operations or material
assets.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Statements
we make in the following discussion which express a belief, expectation or
intention, as well as those that are not historical fact, are forward-looking
statements that are subject to various risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our
actual results, performance or achievements, or market conditions or industry
results, could differ materially from the forward-looking statements in the
following discussion as a result of a variety of factors, including the risks
and uncertainties we have referred to under the headings “Risk Factors” in Item
1A of Part I in the 2009 Form 10-K and in Item 1A of Part II of this report, and
“—Risks and Uncertainties” below. For a discussion of our commitments not
discussed below, related-party transactions, and our critical accounting
policies, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” in Item 7 of Part I in the 2009 Form 10-K. We assume no
obligation to update these forward-looking statements, except as required by
applicable law.
Our
Business
We
operate our business in two business segments: ready-mixed concrete and
concrete-related products; and precast concrete products.
Ready-Mixed
Concrete and Concrete-Related Products. Our ready-mixed concrete
and concrete-related products segment is engaged primarily in the production,
sale and delivery of ready-mixed concrete to our customers’ job
sites. To a lesser extent, this segment is engaged in the mining and
sale of aggregates, and the resale of building materials, primarily to our
ready-mixed concrete customers. We provide these products and
services from our operations in north and west Texas, northern California, New
Jersey, New York, Washington, D.C., Michigan and Oklahoma.
Precast Concrete
Products. Our precast concrete
products segment engages principally in the production, distribution and sale of
precast concrete products from our seven plants located in California, Arizona
and Pennsylvania. From these facilities, we produce precast concrete
structures such as utility vaults, manholes and other wastewater management
products, specialty engineered structures, pre-stressed bridge girders, concrete
piles, curb-inlets, catch basins, retaining and other wall systems,
custom-designed architectural products and other precast concrete
products.
Overview
The
markets for our products are generally local, and our operating results are
subject to fluctuations in the level and mix of construction activity that occur
in our markets. The level of activity affects the demand for our
products, while the product mix of activity among the various segments of the
construction industry affects both our relative competitive strengths and our
operating margins. Commercial and industrial projects generally
provide more opportunities to sell value-added products that are designed to
meet the high-performance requirements of these types of projects.
Our
customers are generally involved in the construction industry, which is a
cyclical business and is subject to general and more localized economic
conditions, including the recessionary conditions impacting all our
markets. In addition, our business is impacted by seasonal variations
in weather conditions, which vary by regional market. Accordingly,
demand for our products and services during the winter months is typically lower
than in other months of the year because of inclement weather. Also,
sustained periods of inclement weather could cause the delay of construction
projects during other times of the year.
Since the
middle of 2006, the United States building materials construction market has
become increasingly challenging. Currently, the construction
industry, particularly the ready-mixed concrete industry, is characterized by
significant overcapacity, fierce competitive activity and rapidly declining
sales volumes. From 2007 through 2009, we have implemented a variety
of cost reduction initiatives, including workforce reductions, plant idling,
rolling stock dispositions and divestitures of nonperforming business units to
reduce structural costs.
Despite
these initiatives in 2007, 2008 and 2009, our business was severely affected by
the steep decline in single-family home starts in the U.S. residential
construction markets, the turmoil in the global credit markets and the U.S.
economic downturn. These conditions have had a dramatic impact on
demand for our products in each of the last three years and into the first
quarter of 2010. During 2007, 2008 and 2009, single family home
starts declined significantly, and commercial construction activity, which has
been negatively affected by the credit crisis and U.S. economic downturn, is
expected to be weaker in our markets in 2010. Sales volumes in our
precast operations have also been significantly affected due to
the dramatic downturn in residential construction. We have
experienced product pricing pressure and expect ready-mixed concrete pricing to
decline in 2010 compared to 2009 in most of our markets, which will have a
negative effect on our gross margins.
In
response to our protracted, declining sales volumes, we expanded our cost
reduction efforts for 2010, including wage freezes, elimination of our 401(k)
company match program and reductions in other employee benefits. We
also continued to significantly scale back capital investment
expenditures.
Nonetheless, the continued weakening
economic conditions, including ongoing softness in residential construction,
further reduction in demand in the commercial sector and delays in anticipated
public works projects in many of our markets, placed significant stress on our
liquidity position. Our liquidity position deteriorated further in
the first quarter of 2010 due to severe inclement weather limiting our ability
to manufacture and distribute our products. In response, we entered
into two separate amendments to our Senior Secured Credit Agreement (“Credit
Agreement”), one during February 2010 and the other during March 2010, to
provide additional short-term liquidity. The February 2010 amendment provided
for, among other things, a temporary waiver by the lenders through April 30,
2010, of any default or event of default arising under the Credit Agreement as a
result of our failure to make our regularly scheduled interest payments under
the 8⅜%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014 (the “8⅜% Notes”). These
amendments are described in more detail under “Liquidity and Capital Resources –
Senior Secured Credit Facility” and in Note 6.
We were
obligated to make semi-annual interest payments on the 8⅜% Notes aggregating
approximately $11.4 million on April 1, 2010, which we did not
make. Under the indenture relating to the 8⅜% Notes, an event of
default would have occurred if we failed to make any payment of interest on the
8⅜% Notes when due and that failure continued for a period of 30 days, or April
30, 2010. If such an event of default occurred, the trustee or the
holders of 25% or more in aggregate principal amount of the 8⅜% Notes then
outstanding could have accelerated our obligation to repay the 8⅜% Notes,
together with accrued and unpaid interest. Under the terms of the
Credit Agreement, an event of default under the 8⅜% Notes indenture would have
also constituted an event of default under the Credit Agreement, and would have
given rise to the right of our lenders under the Credit Agreement to immediately
accelerate the maturity of the debt outstanding under the Credit
Agreement.
As
previously announced, we retained legal and financial advisors to assist us in
reviewing the strategic and financing alternatives available to us. We also
engaged in discussions with the holders of our 8⅜% Notes (“the Noteholders”)
regarding a permanent restructuring of our capital structure.
Chapter
11 Bankruptcy Filings and Plan of Reorganization
We
reached an agreement with a substantial majority of the Noteholders on the terms
of a comprehensive debt restructuring plan prior to April 30, 2010, the date an
event of default would have occurred under the indenture relating to the 8⅜%
Notes for non-payment of interest. The proposed plan will reduce our
subordinated debt by approximately $272 million. To implement the restructuring,
on April 29, 2010, (the “Petition Date”), we and certain of our subsidiaries
(collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the “Bankruptcy Court”) seeking
relief under the provisions of Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code
(the “Bankruptcy Code”). The Chapter 11 cases are being jointly
administered under the caption In re U.S. Concrete, Inc., et al., Case
No. 10-11407 (the “Chapter 11 Cases”). The restructuring does not
involve Superior’s operations. The Debtors will continue to operate their
businesses as debtors in possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy
Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy
Code.
Subject
to certain exceptions under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code (“Chapter 11”),
the Debtors’ Chapter 11 filings automatically enjoined, or stayed, the
continuation of any judicial or administrative proceedings or other actions
against the Debtors or their property to recover on, collect or secure a claim
arising prior to the Petition Date. Thus, for example, most creditor actions to
obtain possession of property from the Debtors, or to create, perfect or enforce
any lien against the property of the Debtors, or to collect on monies owed or
otherwise exercise rights or remedies with respect to a pre-petition claim are
enjoined unless and until the Bankruptcy Court lifts the automatic stay. The
filing of the Chapter 11 Cases triggered the acceleration of financial
obligations under the terms of the Credit Agreement and the 8⅜%
Notes. The Debtors believe that any efforts to enforce the financial
obligations under the Debt Documents are stayed as a result of the filing of the
Chapter 11 Cases in the Bankruptcy Court.
We also
filed a Plan of Reorganization (the “Plan”) with the Bankruptcy Court on April
29, 2010, and are seeking expedited confirmation. The Plan provides that the
holders of the 8⅜% Notes would exchange all their 8⅜% Notes for equity in our
reorganized company. Existing shareholders would, upon emergence from Chapter
11, receive two tranches of warrants to acquire up to an aggregate total of 15%
of the equity of our reorganized company. Exercise prices with respect to
these warrants will be set and based on the value of the equity in the
reorganized company reaching approximately $285.0 million and $335.0 million
with respect to each tranche. The Plan also proposes all trade creditors will
not be impaired and will be paid in full in the ordinary course. A
hearing is set for June 3, 2010 to approve the disclosure statement related to
the Plan. The disclosure statement contains certain information about the
Debtors’ prepetition operating and financial history and the events leading up
to the commencement of the Bankruptcy Cases. The Disclosure Statement also
describes the terms and provisions of the Plan, including certain effects of
confirmation of the Plan, certain risk factors associated with securities to be
issued under the Plan, the manner in which distributions will be made under the
Plan, and the confirmation process and the voting procedures that holders of
claims and interests entitled to vote under the Plan must follow for their votes
to be counted. The holders of the 8⅜% Notes and other security
holders (including our stockholders) are the only constituents deemed impaired
and eligible to vote under the Plan. If approval is obtained, we then expect to
move forward soliciting votes for our proposed Plan in an expedited manner with
an anticipated timeline to complete the Chapter 11 process within 75 to 90 days
from the Petition Date. However, there can be no assurance that the Plan will be
confirmed in this time frame or in the manner proposed.
On April
29, 2010, the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) notified us that, in accordance
with NASDAQ’s Listing Rules 5101, 5110(b) and 1M-5101-1, our common stock will
be delisted by NASDAQ and that trading of our common stock will be suspended at
the opening of business on May 10, 2010. NASDAQ’s notice and determination
followed our announcement that we and our subsidiaries had filed petitions under
Chapter 11. We do not plan to appeal NASDAQ’s determination to delist
our common stock. It is expected that our common stock will continue
to be traded on an over-the-counter market. Trading in our common stock will be
highly speculative as the trading may not be representative of the ultimate
return to stockholders based on the Plan.
Debtors
in Possession
The
Debtors are currently operating as debtors in possession (“DIP”) under the
jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable
provisions of Chapter 11 and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. In general, as
debtors in possession, we are authorized under Chapter 11 to continue to
operate as an ongoing business, but may not engage in transactions outside the
ordinary course of business without the prior approval of the Bankruptcy
Court. On April 30, 2010, the Bankruptcy Court signed a variety
of “first day” orders. These orders included an interim order that will allow us
to continue to pay general unsecured creditors in the ordinary course of
business and an order to continue existing customer programs. Other orders that
provide us the ability to continue to operate our business in the ordinary
course without interruption, covered, among other things, employee wages and
benefits, tax matters, insurance matters, and cash management. We also received
authority, on an interim basis, to enter into an $80.0 million
debtor-in-possession credit facility (the “Interim Order”) to fund operations as
we move forward with our comprehensive debt restructuring and repay amounts due
under the Credit Agreement in full. There is a hearing
scheduled on May 21, 2010 to consider final approval of these
orders.
We
reported net losses in the last four years and currently anticipate losses for
2010. This cumulative loss, in addition to our Chapter 11 Case,
raises substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern for a
period longer than the current fiscal year. Our ability to continue
as a going concern depends on the achievement of profitable operations and the
success of our Plan of Reorganization, which includes restructuring of the
8⅜%
Notes. Until the completion of the Chapter 11 Case, our future
remains uncertain, and there can be no assurance that our efforts in this regard
will be successful.
Our
consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will
continue as a going concern, which implies that we will continue to meet our
obligations and continue our operations for at least the next 12 months.
Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown,
and our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability or classification of recorded asset amounts or
the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary as a result
of this uncertainty.
As a
result of the Chapter 11 filing, we are now required to periodically file
various documents with, and provide certain information to, the Bankruptcy
Court, including monthly operating reports in forms prescribed by Chapter 11.
Such materials will be prepared according to requirements of Chapter 11. While
we believe that these documents and reports will provide then-current
information required under Chapter 11, they will be prepared only for the
Debtors and, hence, certain operational entities will be excluded. In addition,
they will be prepared in a format different from that used in our consolidated
financial statements filed under the securities laws and they will be unaudited.
Accordingly, we believe that the substance and format of those materials will
not allow meaningful comparison with our regular publicly disclosed consolidated
financial statements. Moreover, the materials filed with the Bankruptcy Court
will not be prepared for the purpose of providing a basis for an investment
decision relating to our securities, or for comparison with other financial
information filed with the SEC.
DIP
Credit Agreement
Effective
as of May 3, 2010 (the “Effective Date”), we and certain of our domestic
subsidiaries (each individually a “Guarantor” and collectively, the
“Guarantors”) entered into a Revolving Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement
(the “DIP Credit Agreement”) which provides us with a debtor-in-possession term
loan and revolving credit facility.
The DIP
Credit Agreement provides for aggregate borrowings of up to $80.0 million, under
facilities consisting of: (i) a $45.0 million term loan facility (the “Term Loan
Facility”), the entire amount which was drawn on May 3, 2010, and (ii) a $35.0
million asset based revolving credit facility (the “Revolving Credit Facility”),
of which up to $30.0 million was available on the Effective Date, after entry by
the Bankruptcy Court of the Interim Order. The remaining $5.0 million
of availability under the Revolving Credit Facility is expected to become
available upon entry by the Bankruptcy Court of a final order, provided that
certain other conditions are satisfied or waived. Up to $30.0 million
of capacity under the Revolving Credit Facility is available for the issuance of
letters of credit, and any such issuance of letters of credit will reduce the
amount available under the Revolving Credit Facility. Advances under
the Revolving Credit Facility are limited by a borrowing base of (a) 85% of
eligible accounts receivable plus (b) 85% of the appraised orderly liquidation
value of eligible inventory plus (c) the lesser of (i) $20.0 million and (ii)
85% of the appraised orderly liquidation value of eligible trucks minus (d) such
customary reserves as the Administrative Agent may establish from time to time
in accordance with the terms of the DIP Credit Agreement.
Proceeds
from the DIP Credit Agreement may be used (i) for operating expenses, working
capital and other general corporate purposes (including for the payment of the
fees and expenses incurred in connection with the DIP Credit Agreement and the
transactions contemplated therein and the cases pending under Chapter 11, and
(ii) to repay in full the obligations outstanding under the prepetition Credit
Agreement. On the Effective date, $45.0 million under the Term Loan Facility was
funded and used to repay in full the obligations outstanding under the
prepetition Credit Agreement of approximately $40.3 million, and that Credit
Agreement was terminated. After that repayment and after deducting
certain fees and expenses in connection with entering into the DIP Credit
Facility, we received net cash proceeds of approximately $3.7
million.
At our
option, borrowings under the DIP Credit Facility may be obtained from time
to time at LIBOR or the applicable domestic rate (“CB Floating Rate”) which
shall be the greater of (x) the interest rate per annum publicly announced from
time to time by the Administrative Agent as its prime rate and (y) the interest
rate per annum equal to the sum of 1.0% per annum plus the adjusted LIBOR rate
for a one-month interest period. The applicable margin on (i) the Revolving
Credit Facility is 2.50% for borrowings bearing interest at the CB Floating Rate
and 3.50% for borrowings bearing interest at the LIBOR rate and (ii) the Term
Loan Facility is 4.25% for borrowings bearing interest at the CB Floating Rate
and 5.25% for borrwings bearing interest at the LIBOR rate (subject to a LIBOR
floor of 2.0% per annum under the Term Loan Facility only). Issued
and outstanding letters of credit are subject to a fee equal to the applicable
margin then in effect for LIBOR borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility
(other than an issued and outstanding letter of credit in the face amount of
$3.5 million which bears interest at a rate per annum equal to 7.25%), a
fronting fee equal to 0.20% per annum on the stated amount of such letter of
credit, and customary charges associated with the issuance and administration of
letters of credit. We also will pay a commitment fee on undrawn
amounts under the Revolving Credit Facility in an amount equal to 0.75% per
annum. Effective immediately upon any event of default, all
outstanding borrowings and the amount of all other obligations owing under the
DIP Credit Agreement will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to 2.0% plus
the rate otherwise applicable to such borrowings or other
obligations.
The DIP
Credit Agreement is scheduled to mature on May 3, 2011, which date may be
extended by three months to July 3, 2011 so long as certain conditions are
satisfied or waived (the “Termination Date”). Borrowings are due and
payable in full on the Termination Date. Outstanding borrowings under
the DIP Credit Agreement are prepayable without penalty. There are mandatory
prepayments of principal in connection with (i) the incurrence of certain
indebtedness and certain equity issuances and (ii) certain non-ordinary course
asset sales or other dispositions (including as a result of casualty or
condemnation), with customary reinvestment provisions for asset
sales. Mandatory prepayments are to be applied first to repay
outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility with a corresponding
permanent reduction in commitments under the Revolving Credit Facility, and then
to repay borrowings under the Term Loan Facility.
The DIP
Credit Agreement requires us to maintain certain financial covenants. These
covenants include the maintenance of a minimum cumulative earnings before income
taxes, depreciation, amortization and restructuring costs tested on a monthly
basis beginning May 31, 2010. We also must not exceed established cumulative
capital expenditure thresholds tested on a quarterly basis. We must maintain
minimum availability under the Revolving Credit Facility of $3.0 million at all
times.
The DIP
Credit Agreement requires us and our subsidiaries to comply with customary
affirmative and negative covenants. Such affirmative covenants require us and
our subsidiaries, among other things, to preserve corporate existence, comply
with laws, conduct business in the ordinary course and consistent with past
practices, pay tax obligations, maintain insurance, provide access to the
Administrative Agent and lenders to property and information, conduct update
calls with the Administrative Agent and lenders to discuss the business
performance and other issues the Administrative Agent may reasonably request,
maintain properties in good working order and maintain all rights, permits,
licenses and approvals and intellectual property with respect to their
businesses, provide additional collateral and guaranties for property and
subsidiaries formed or acquired after the Effective Date, maintain cash in
approved deposit accounts subject to account control agreements, comply with
their respective obligations under leases and notify the Administrative Agent
upon taking possession of any new leased premises, pay or discharge their
respective post-petition tax and contractual obligations, and comply with
certain post-closing obligations with respect to deposit accounts and real
property, in each case, subject to thresholds and exceptions as set forth in the
DIP Credit Agreement.
Restrictions
imposed through the negative covenants impact our ability and the abilities of
our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur debt, create liens or permit
liens to exist, engage in mergers and acquisitions,
conduct asset sales or dispositions of property, make dividends and
other payments in respect of capital stock, prepay or cancel certain
indebtedness, change lines of business, make investments, loans and other
advances, enter into speculative hedging arrangements, engage in transactions
with affiliates, enter into restrictive agreements and amend organizational
documents or the terms of any subordinated debt, enter into non-ordinary course
operating leases or engage in sale/leaseback transactions and create or permit
to exist any superpriority claim or any lien on any collateral which is pari
passu or senior to claims of the Administrative Agent or the lenders, in each
case, subject to thresholds and exceptions as set forth in the DIP Credit
Agreement.
The DIP
Credit Agreement contains customary events of default,
including: nonpayment of principal, interest and other fees or other
amounts after stated grace periods; material inaccuracy of representations and
warranties; violations of covenants; certain bankruptcy and liquidation events
of affiliates of ours which are not Debtors (the “Non-Filers”) or the exercise
by any creditor of any remedies against any Non-Filer unless such Non-Filer
seeks protection under applicable bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization law
after a stated grace period; cross-default to material indebtedness; certain
material judgments; certain events related to the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974, as amended, or “ERISA”; actual or asserted invalidity of
any guarantee, security document or non-perfection of security interest; a
change in control (as defined in the DIP Credit Agreement); and customary
bankruptcy-related events of default, including appointment of a trustee,
failure to comply with the Interim Order or Final Order, as applicable, or
failure of the Interim Order or Final Order to remain in full force and effect,
prepayment of certain pre-petition indebtedness, and the failure of the Debtors
to meet certain milestones with respect to a plan of reorganization as set forth
in the DIP Credit Agreement.
All
obligations under the DIP Credit Agreement are (a) unconditionally guaranteed by
the all of our existing and future U.S. subsidiaries (other than Superior and
its direct and indirect subsidiaries), (b) subject to the Interim Order,
constitute an allowed administrative expense claim entitled to the benefits of
Bankruptcy Code Section 364(c)(1) having superpriority over any and all
administrative expenses of the kind specified in Bankruptcy Code Sections 503(b)
or 507(b), and (c) subject to the Interim Order, are secured by (i) pursuant to
Bankruptcy Code Section 346(c)(2) in the case of the debtors, a first priority
perfected lien (subject to certain exceptions) in our and the Guarantors’
present and after-acquired property, not subject to a valid, perfected and
non-avoidable lien on the date of filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, excluding (x)
34% of the issued and outstanding stock of new or existing foreign subsidiaries,
(y) the equity and assets of Superior and its direct and indirect subsidiaries,
and (z) certain other excluded collateral as set forth in the related pledge and
security agreement (collectively, the “Excluded Collateral”) and
(ii) pursuant to Bankruptcy Code Section 364(c)(3) in the case of the
debtors, a perfected junior lien on all present and after-acquired property that
is otherwise subject to a valid, perfected and non-avoidable lien on the date of
filing of the Chapter 11 Cases or a valid lien perfected after the date of
filing of the Chapter 11 Cases, excluding, in all cases, the Excluded
Collateral.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Our primary short-term liquidity needs
consist of financing seasonal working capital requirements, servicing
indebtedness, and purchasing property and equipment. Our working capital needs
are typically at their lowest level in the first quarter and increase in the
second and third quarters to fund the increases in accounts receivable and
inventories during those periods. Generally, in the fourth quarter of
each year, our working capital borrowings decline and are at their lowest annual
levels in the first quarter of the following year. As a result of the
challenging and prolonged economic and industry conditions, we anticipate using
net cash in our operating activities for all of 2010. In response to the
protracted, declining sales volumes, we have expanded our cost reduction efforts
for 2010, including wage freezes, elimination of our 401(k) company match
program and reductions in other employee benefits. We have also
continued to scale back capital investment expenditures in order to maintain
liquidity.
The
principal factors that could adversely affect the amount of and availability of
our internally generated funds include:
|
·
|
further
deterioration of revenue because of weakness in the markets in which we
operate;
|
|
·
|
further
decline in gross margins due to shifts in our project mix or increases in
the cost of our raw materials;
|
|
·
|
any
deterioration in our ability to collect our accounts receivable from
customers as a result of further weakening in residential and other
construction demand or as a result of payment difficulties experienced by
our customers; and
|
|
·
|
impacts
on our business operations resulting from the commencement of the Chapter
11 cases.
|
The
following key financial measurements reflect our financial position and capital
resources as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
|
$ |
3,997 |
|
|
$ |
4,229 |
|
Working
capital
|
|
$ |
24,463 |
|
|
$ |
34,481 |
|
Total
debt
|
|
$ |
307,655 |
|
|
$ |
296,542 |
|
Our cash
and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments in deposits we hold at
major financial institutions.
DIP
Credit Agreement
As
discussed above and Note 6 to these financial statements, we entered into the
DIP Credit Agreement on May 3, 2010 that provides for aggregate borrowings of up
to $80.0 million, under facilities consisting of: (i) a $45.0 million Term Loan
Facility, the entire amount which was drawn on May 3, 2010, and (ii) a $35.0
million asset based Revolving Credit Facility, of which up to $30.0 million was
available on May 3, 2010, after entry by the Bankruptcy Court of the Interim
Order. The remaining $5.0 million of borrowing availability under the
Revolving Credit Facility is expected to become available upon entry by the
Bankruptcy Court of the Final Order approving the DIP Credit
Agreement. We believe that this facility will provide us with
sufficient liquidity to finance our operations in the ordinary course as we seek
confirmation of the Plan.
Senior
Secured Credit Facility
Prior to the payoff of our senior
secured credit facility on May 3, 2010, we entered into two separate amendments
to the Credit Agreement, one in February 2010 and the other in March 2010, that
provided additional short term liquidity. The February 2010 amendment provided
for (i) a permanent waiver by the lenders of any default or event of default
arising under the Credit Agreement as a result of our delivery of our 2009
fiscal year financials with a report from our independent registered public
accounting firm containing an explanatory paragraph with their conclusion
regarding substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern and
(ii) a temporary waiver by the lenders through April 30, 2010, of any default or
event of default arising under the Credit Agreement as a result of our failure
to make our regularly scheduled interest payments under the 8⅜% Notes.
Additionally the February 2010 amendment:
|
·
|
temporarily
reduced the minimum availability trigger at which we were required to
maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 from $25.0
million to (1) $22.5 million from the effective date of the amendment
through March 10, 2010 and (2) $20.0 million thereafter through April 30,
2010, but in each case that trigger was to revert to $25.0 million upon
the earlier of (a) our delivery of notice to the lenders of our intent to
make payment on the 8⅜% Notes or
any other subordinated debt and (b) May 1,
2010;
|
|
·
|
reduced
the size of our revolving credit facility from $150.0 million to $90.0
million;
|
|
·
|
implemented
cash dominion by the lenders over the deposit accounts of us and the
guarantors under the Credit Agreement, subject to exceptions for specific
accounts and threshold dollar
amounts;
|
|
·
|
modified
the borrowing base formula to include a $20.0 million cap on the value of
concrete trucks and mixing drums that could have been included in the
borrowing base;
|
|
·
|
increased
the pricing on drawn revolver;
|
|
·
|
required
us to report our borrowing base on a weekly, rather than monthly,
basis;
|
|
·
|
waived
our solvency representation and warranty through April 30,
2010;
|
|
·
|
permitted
us to prepay or redeem the 8⅜% Notes with
the proceeds of permitted subordinated debt and/or an equity issuance, but
not cash;
|
|
·
|
modified
certain restrictions on the operation of our business by, among other
things, (i) eliminating the general restricted payments, lien and
investment baskets; (ii) adding new restrictions on our ability to sell or
incur liens on certain assets, including owned real property of our
company and our subsidiaries; (iii) adding restrictions on our ability to
form, acquire or enter into any new joint venture or partnership or create
any new foreign subsidiary; (iv) reducing the basket for permitted debt of
our Michigan joint venture from $20.0 million to $17.5
million; (v) limiting investments by our company and our
subsidiaries in the Michigan joint venture to $2.25 million in any fiscal
quarter and $5.0 million for the remaining term of the Credit Agreement;
and (vi) limiting our ability to consummate permitted acquisitions and
incur or assume debt at the time the acquisition is consummated;
and
|
|
·
|
added
a new event of default under the Credit Agreement if we or any of our
subsidiaries contested the enforceability of the subordination provisions
relating to the 8⅜% Notes or
any other subordinated debt, or if such debt failed to remain subordinated
to the Credit Agreement.
|
The
principal terms amended in the March 2010 amendment were:
|
·
|
further
reduced the facility size from $90.0 million to $60.0
million;
|
|
·
|
increased
the pricing on drawn revolver;
|
|
·
|
provided
that the 2.00% default rate would increase by an additional 1.00% at the
end of each successive 30-day period for which the default rate was in
effect;
|
|
·
|
temporarily
reduced the minimum availability trigger at which we were required to
maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 from $20.0
million to $1.5 million until the earliest to occur of (i) April 30, 2010
and (ii) our making of (or delivery of notice to the lenders of its intent
to make) any interest payment on the 8⅜%
Notes;
|
|
·
|
modified
the negative debt covenant to prevent us and our subsidiaries from
incurring certain indebtedness, subject to certain carve outs and
thresholds; and
|
|
·
|
granted
to the administrative agent, on behalf of the lenders, a first priority
security interest in certain previously excluded collateral, including any
of our and our subsidiaries owned real estate assets (other than Superior
and its direct and indirect subsidiaries) with a net book value of greater
than $100,000.
|
At March
31, 2010, we had outstanding borrowings of $26.3 million and outstanding letters
of credit of approximately $18.0 million under the Credit
Agreement. The balances outstanding on May 3, 2010 were paid in full
with funds obtained under our DIP Credit Agreement.
Senior
Subordinated Notes
On March
31, 2004, we issued $200 million of 8⅜% Notes. In July 2006, we
issued $85 million of additional 8⅜% Notes. Interest on these notes
is payable semi-annually on April 1 and October 1 of each year.
On April 1, 2010, we were obligated to
make semi-annual interest payments on the 8⅜% Notes aggregating approximately
$11.4 million which we did not make. Under the indenture relating to
the 8⅜% Notes, an event of default will occur if we fail to make any payment of
interest on the 8⅜% Notes when due and that failure continues for a period of 30
days. If such an event of default occurs and is continuing, the
trustee or the holders of 25% or more in aggregate principal amount of the 8⅜%
Notes then outstanding may accelerate our obligation to repay the 8⅜% Notes,
together with accrued and unpaid interest. Under the terms of the
Credit Agreement, an event of default under the indenture would also constitute
an event of default under the Credit Agreement, and would give rise to the right
of the lenders under the Credit Agreement to immediately accelerate the maturity
of the debt outstanding under the Credit Agreement. As discussed in
Note 2, we reached an agreement with a substantial majority of the holders of
the 8⅜% Notes on the terms of a comprehensive debt restructuring prior to April
30, 2010, the date an event of default would have occurred for non-payment of
interest. The Plan provides that the holders of the 8⅜% Notes would
exchange their 8⅜% Notes for equity in our reorganized company.
During
the first quarter of 2009, we purchased $7.4 million aggregate principal amount
of the 8⅜% Notes in open market transactions for approximately $2.8 million plus
accrued interest of approximately $0.3 million through the dates of
purchase. We recorded a gain of approximately $4.5 million as a
result of these open market transactions after writing off $0.1 million of
previously deferred financing costs associated with the pro-rata amount of the
8⅜% Notes purchased. During the quarter ended June 30, 2009, we
purchased an additional $5.0 million principal amount of the 8⅜% Notes for
approximately $2.0 million. This resulted in a gain of approximately $2.9
million in April 2009, after writing off $0.1 million of previously deferred
financing costs associated with the pro-rata amount of the 8⅜% Notes purchased.
We used cash on hand and borrowings under our Credit Agreement to fund these
transactions. These purchases reduced the amount outstanding under the 8⅜% Notes
by $12.4 million, reduced our interest expense by approximately $0.7 million in
2009 and were expected to reduce our interest expense by approximately $0.9
million on an annual basis thereafter.
All of
our subsidiaries, excluding Superior and minor subsidiaries, jointly and
severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed the repayment of the 8⅜%
Notes.
Superior
Credit Facility and Subordinated Debt
Superior
has a separate credit agreement that provides for a revolving credit facility
(“the Superior Credit Agreement”). Effective April 1, 2010, the
Superior Credit Agreement was amended and restated under which borrowings
of up to $15.0 million may become available, which amount includes a $5.0
million letter of credit subfacility. The Superior Credit Agreement is secured
by substantially all the assets of the Borrowers. The Superior Credit
Agreement is scheduled to mature on September 30, 2010. Based on this
maturity date, the amounts outstanding under the credit agreement are classified
as current at March 31, 2010. Availability of borrowings is subject to a
borrowing base of net receivables, inventory and machinery and equipment, and in
certain circumstances letters of credit, in each case, subject to the
eligibility criteria set forth in the Superior Credit Agreement.
Borrowings
under the Superior Credit Agreement are subject to interest at our election of
LIBOR plus 5.00% (subject to a 1.00% floor) or a domestic prime rate plus 3.00%
(subject to a floor of 2.5%). Commitment fees at an annual rate of 0.
25% are payable on the unused portion of the revolving credit
facility.
Superior
and each of Superior’s existing and future subsidiaries, if any, have guaranteed
the repayment of all amounts owing under the Superior Credit Agreement.
The Superior Credit Agreement contains covenants substantially the same as under
the previous credit agreement restricting, among other things, Superior’s and
its subsidiaries’ distributions, dividends and repurchases of capital stock and
other equity interests, acquisitions and investments, mergers, asset sales other
than in the ordinary course of business, indebtedness, liens, changes in
business, changes to charter documents and affiliate transactions. It also
generally limits Superior’s capital expenditures and will require them to
maintain compliance with a minimum EBITDA level as of the end of each fiscal
quarter. During the trailing 12 months ended March 31, 2010, Superior was
in compliance with these covenants. The Superior Credit Agreement provides that
specified change-of-control events, as well as, among
others, customary payment and covenant defaults, breach of material
representations and warranties, impairment of collateral or guarantees,
cross-default to certain material indebtedness, judgments in excess of a
threshold amount, certain ERISA events, and certain bankruptcy events, would
constitute events of default.
As a
condition precedent to the initial advance under the Superior Credit Agreement,
U.S. Concrete Inc. and the Edw. C. Levy Co. were required to fund $3.6 million
to Superior in the form of cash equity contributions, representing a prefunding
of the respective obligations under certain support letters entered into in
connection with the previous Superior Credit Agreement for the period from
January 1, 2010 through September 30, 2010. Our portion of this cash obligation
was $1.1 million. Additionally, we made capital contributions in the amount of
$2.6 million in lieu of payment of related party payables during the first
quarter of 2010. In the first quarter of 2009, U.S. Concrete provided
subordinated debt capital in the amount of $2.4 million in lieu of payment of
related party payables. Additionally, the minority partner, Edw. C. Levy Co.,
provided $1.6 million of subordinated debt capital to fund operations during the
first quarter of 2009. The subordinated debt with U.S. Concrete was
eliminated in consolidation. There was no interest due on each note,
and each note was scheduled to mature on May 1, 2011. During the third quarter
of 2009, U.S. Concrete and the minority partner, Edw. C. Levy Co., converted the
subordinated debt capital into capital contributions to
Superior. There can be no assurance that U.S. Concrete and Edw. C.
Levy Co. will not have to make additional cash equity contributions to Superior
to finance its working capital requirements and fund its cash operating losses
if they are greater than anticipated.
As of
March 31, 2010, there was $5.2 million in outstanding revolving credit
borrowings under the Superior Credit Agreement, and the remaining amount of the
available credit was approximately $1.4 million. Letters of credit outstanding
at March 31, 2010 were $3.0 million, which reduced the amount available under
the revolving credit facility.
Cash
Flows
Our net
cash provided by (used in) operating activities generally reflects the cash
effects of transactions and other events used in the determination of net income
or loss. Net cash used in operating activities was $9.2 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to net cash provided by
operating activities of $10.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009. The change in the 2010 period was principally a
result of lower profitability, restructuring costs and lower working capital
improvement.
We used
$2.3 million of cash in investing activities for the three months ended March
31, 2010 and $5.2 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009. The change during the 2010 period was primarily attributable to
lower net capital expenditures and lower payments related to acquisitions when
compared to the first three months of 2009. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2009, we made a $750,000 payment, reduced for certain uncollected
pre-acquisition accounts receivable, to the sellers of a precast operation
related to a contingent payment obligation.
Our net
cash provided by financing activities was $11.2 million and $0.1 million for the
three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The
increase in the 2010 period was primarily the result of higher net borrowings
under the Credit Agreement and a $2.5 million contribution to Superior by the
minority owner. Additionally, in 2009, we purchased $7.4 million principal
amount of our 8⅜% Notes for $2.8 million. At March 31, 2010, we had
$26.3 million outstanding under the Credit Agreement compared to $13.0 million
at March 31, 2009. The increase in the 2010 period was primarily due
to borrowings necessary to finance our operations during the continued economic
downturn, including restructuring costs.
We define
free cash flow as net cash provided by operating activities less purchases of
property, plant and equipment (net of disposals). Free cash flow is a
liquidity measure not prepared in accordance with GAAP. Our
management uses free cash flow in managing our business because we consider it
to be an important indicator of our ability to service our debt and generate
cash for acquisitions and other strategic investments. We believe
free cash flow may provide users of our financial information additional
meaningful comparisons between current results and results in prior operating
periods. Our working capital needs are typically greater in the
second and third quarters of each year. This is due to the cyclical nature of
our business which requires more working capital to fund increases in accounts
receivable and inventories. To the extent that we are unable to generate
positive free cash flow, we would be required to draw on other capital sources,
including our credit arrangements and possibly delay acquisitions or other
strategic investments. As a non-GAAP financial measure, free cash flow should be
viewed in addition to, and not as an alternative for, our reported operating
results or cash flow from operations or any other measure of performance
prepared in accordance with GAAP.
A
reconciliation of our net cash provided by operations and free cash flow is
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) operations
|
|
$ |
(9,173 |
) |
|
$ |
10,131 |
|
Less: purchases
of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(2,447 |
) |
|
|
(6,666 |
) |
Plus: proceeds
from disposals of property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
Free
cash flow (as defined)
|
|
$ |
(11,441 |
) |
|
$ |
5,704 |
|
Cement
and Other Raw Materials
We obtain
most of the materials necessary to manufacture ready-mixed concrete and precast
concrete products on a daily basis. These materials include cement, other
cementitious materials (fly ash, blast furnace slag) and aggregates (stone,
gravel and sand), in addition to certain chemical admixtures. With
the exception of chemical admixtures, each plant typically maintains an
inventory level of these materials sufficient to satisfy its operating needs for
a few days. Typically, cement, other cementitious materials and
aggregates represent the highest-cost materials used in manufacturing a cubic
yard of ready-mixed concrete. Historically, we have purchased cement
from several suppliers in each of our major markets. Due to certain
industry consolidations and our decision to have a primary and secondary
supplier, in certain of our markets, we are now purchasing cement from fewer
suppliers than in past years. Based on current economic conditions,
this decision has not affected our ability to obtain an adequate supply of
cement for our operations. Chemical admixtures are generally
purchased from suppliers under national purchasing agreements.
Generally, cement and aggregates prices
remained relatively flat to down in most of our markets during the first quarter
of 2010, as compared to the 2009. Generally, we negotiate with
suppliers on a company-wide basis and at the local market level to obtain the
most competitive pricing available for cement, aggregates and chemical
admixtures. The demand for construction sector products was weak
throughout 2007, 2008 and 2009 and into 2010, with sales volumes significantly
below 2006 peak levels. The slowdown in our end-use markets has
caused an oversupply of cement in most of our markets, with cement producers
slowing down or shutting down domestic production and reducing imported cement
to respond to the weak demand. We do not expect to experience cement
shortages. Today, in most of our markets, we believe there is an
adequate supply of aggregates.
Acquisitions
In May
2009, we acquired substantially all the assets of a concrete crushing and
recycling business in Queens, New York for approximately $4.5
million. We do not anticipate completing any new acquisitions in the
foreseeable future due to our restructuring process.
Divestitures
During the third quarter of 2009, we
sold our ready-mixed concrete plants in Sacramento, California for approximately
$6.0 million, plus a payment for certain inventory on hand at
closing.
Risks
and Uncertainties
Numerous
factors could affect our future operating results. These factors are discussed
under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of the 2009 Form 10-K and
in Item 1A of Part II of this report. Based on our Chapter 11 filing,
we have also included additional disclosures regarding the Chapter 11 process
and our liquidity under “Chapter 11 Filings and Plan of Reorganization,” “Debtor
in Possession,” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in this
report.
Critical
Accounting Policies
We have
outlined our critical accounting policies in Item 7 of Part II of the 2009 Form
10-K. Our critical accounting policies involve the use of estimates
in the recording of the allowance for doubtful accounts, realization of
goodwill, accruals for self-insurance, accruals for income taxes, inventory
obsolescence reserves and the valuation and useful lives of property, plant and
equipment. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included in
Item 8 of Part II of the 2009 Form 10-K for a discussion of these accounting
policies. See Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial
statements in Part I of this report for a discussion of recent accounting
pronouncements.
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth selected historical statement of operations
information (in thousands, except for selling prices) and that information as a
percentage of sales for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
Revenue:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
concrete and concrete-related products
|
|
$ |
80,371 |
|
|
|
89.0 |
% |
|
$ |
106,997 |
|
|
|
91.2 |
% |
Precast
concrete products
|
|
|
12,426 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
|
13,508 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
Inter-segment
revenue
|
|
|
(2,531 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
(3,205 |
) |
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Total
revenue
|
|
$ |
90,266 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
$ |
117,300 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
of goods sold before depreciation, depletion and
amortization:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
concrete and concrete-related products
|
|
$ |
76,007 |
|
|
|
84.2 |
% |
|
$ |
92,852 |
|
|
|
79.2 |
% |
Precast
concrete products
|
|
|
10,848 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
10,670 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Selling,
general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
16,495 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
16,541 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
6,742 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
7,456 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
(Gain)
loss on sale of assets
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
(463 |
) |
|
|
(0.4 |
) |
Loss
from operations
|
|
|
(19,877 |
) |
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
|
|
(9,756 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
Interest
expense, net
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
6,768 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
Gain
on purchase of senior subordinated notes
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
4,493 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
Other
income, net
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
Loss
before income taxes
|
|
|
(26,335 |
) |
|
|
(29.1 |
) |
|
|
(11,682 |
) |
|
|
(10.0 |
) |
Income
taxes
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(637 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Net
loss
|
|
|
(26,743 |
) |
|
|
(29.6 |
) |
|
|
(11,045 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
Net
loss attributable to non-controlling interest
|
|
|
(1,496 |
) |
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
|
|
(1,591 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
Net
loss attributable to stockholders
|
|
$ |
(25,247 |
) |
|
|
(27.9 |
)% |
|
$ |
(9,454 |
) |
|
|
(8.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
Concrete Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
selling price per cubic yard
|
|
$ |
93.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
97.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
volume in cubic yards
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Precast
Concrete Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
selling price per cubic yard of concrete used in
production
|
|
$ |
780.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
865.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
Ready-mixed
concrete used in production in cubic yards
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
Ready-mixed concrete and concrete-related products.
Revenue from our ready-mixed concrete and concrete-related products
segment decreased $26.6 million, or 24.9%, to $80.4 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2010, from $107.0 million in the corresponding period of
2009. Our ready-mixed sales volumes for the first quarter of 2010
were approximately 742,000 cubic yards, down 23.8% from the 975,000 cubic yards
of ready-mixed concrete we sold in the first quarter of 2009. Additionally, the
average selling price per cubic yard of concrete sold declined 4.4% to $93.65
for the first quarter of 2010 when compared to the first quarter of 2009 due to
competitive pressures in most of our markets.
Our
revenue and sales volume declines reflected the continuing downturn in
residential home construction activity that began in the second half of 2006 in
all our markets, and the downturn in commercial construction and public works
spending due to the ongoing economic downturn in the United
States. Less favorable weather conditions in most of our major
markets during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 also contributed to these
decreases.
Precast concrete products.
Revenue from our precast concrete products segment was down $1.1 million,
or 8.0%, to $12.4 million for the first quarter of 2010 from $13.5 million
during the corresponding period of 2009. This decrease reflects the
downturn primarily in residential construction in our northern California and
Phoenix, Arizona markets and lower commercial construction in our mid-Atlantic
market.
Cost
of goods sold before depreciation, depletion and amortization
Ready-mixed concrete and
concrete-related products. Cost of goods sold before depreciation,
depletion and amortization for our ready-mixed concrete and concrete-related
products segment decreased $16.8 million, or 18.1%, to $76.0 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010 from $92.9 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009. This decrease was primarily associated with lower
sales volumes in 2010. As a percentage of ready-mixed concrete and
concrete-related product revenue, cost of goods sold before depreciation,
depletion and amortization was 94.6% for the three months ended March 31, 2010,
as compared to 86.8% for the corresponding period of 2009. The increase in cost
of goods sold as a percentage of ready-mixed concrete and concrete-related
products revenue was primarily attributable to slightly higher per unit delivery
costs and the effect of our fixed costs being spread over lower volumes, as
compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Precast concrete
products. Cost
of goods sold before depreciation, depletion and amortization for our precast
concrete products segment increased $0.1 million, or 1.7%, to $10.8 million for
the quarter ended March 31, 2010 from $10.7 million for the corresponding period
of 2009. As a percentage of precast concrete products revenue, cost
of goods sold before depreciation, depletion and amortization for precast
concrete products rose to 87.3% for three months ended March 31, 2010 from 79.0%
during the three months ended March 31, 2009. This percentage increased
primarily because of the decreased efficiency in our plant operations for all of
our precast operations. Our northern California and Phoenix, Arizona operations
were impacted by lower demand for our primarily residential product offerings in
these markets.
Selling, general and administrative
expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses were approximately
$16.5 million for each of the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
We experienced lower costs during the first quarter of 2010 related primarily to
reduced compensation as a result of workforce reductions in 2008 and 2009,
reduced incentive-based compensation accruals, and other administrative
reductions such as in travel and entertainment costs and office
expenses. We experienced higher professional fees during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 as a result of our restructuring discussed under
“Chapter 11 Filings and Plan of Reorganization” above. These higher fees were
partially offset by the settlement of a class action lawsuit in California for
an amount that was below our previous estimate.
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization. Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense decreased
$0.7 million, or 9.6%, to $6.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010
from $7.5 million in the corresponding period of 2009. The decrease
was due to lower capital expenditures compared to assets becoming fully
depreciated.
Interest expense,
net. Net interest expense was approximately $6.8 million in
each of the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. While this amount was
consistent, we experienced lower interest expense during the first quarter of
2010 compared to the same period of 2009 due to interest savings from the first
and second quarter 2009 repurchases of some of the 8⅜% Notes. This was
substantially offset by increased interest associated with higher amounts
outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
Income taxes. We
recorded income tax expense from continuing operations of $0.4 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2010, as compared to an income tax benefit of $0.6
million for the corresponding period in 2009. For 2010, we applied a
valuation allowance against certain of our deferred tax assets, including net
operating loss carryforwards, which reduced the effective rate from the expected
statutory rate. In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance, a
valuation allowance is required unless it is more likely than not that future
taxable income or the reversal of deferred tax liabilities will be sufficient to
recover deferred tax assets. In addition, certain state taxes are calculated on
bases different than pre-tax loss. This results in us recording income tax
expense for these states, which also lowered the effective rate in 2010 compared
to the statutory rate. At the end of each interim reporting period, we estimate
the effective income tax rate expected to be applicable for the full
year. We use this estimate in providing for income taxes on a
year-to-date basis, and it may vary in subsequent interim periods if our
estimate of the full year income or loss changes.
Non-controlling
interest. The net loss attributable to non-controlling
interest reflected in the three month periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
relate to the allocable share of net loss from our Michigan joint venture,
Superior, to the minority interest owner.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not
currently have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are
reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial
condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital
expenditures or capital resources. From time to time, we may enter into
noncancelable operating leases that would not be reflected on our balance sheet.
At March 31, 2010, we and Superior had $21.0 million of undrawn letters of
credit outstanding. We are also contingently liable for performance
under $53.3 million in performance bonds relating primarily to our ready-mixed
concrete operations.
Inflation
We
experienced minimal increases in operating costs during the first quarter of
2010 related to inflation. However, in non-recessionary conditions
cement prices and certain other raw material prices, including aggregates and
diesel fuel prices, have generally risen faster than regional inflationary
rates. When these price increases have occurred, we have been able to
partially mitigate our cost increases with price increases we obtained for our
products. In 2007 and 2008, prices for our products increased at a rate similar
to, or greater than, the rate of increase in our raw materials
costs.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
We do not
enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative
purposes, but we may utilize them to manage our fixed-to-variable-rate debt
ratio. All derivatives, whether designated as hedging relationships
or not, are required to be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair
values. Because of the short duration of our investments, changes in
market interest rates would not have a significant impact on their fair
values. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we were not a
party to any derivative financial instruments.
The
indebtedness evidenced by the 8⅜% Notes is fixed-rate debt, so we are not
exposed to cash-flow risk from market interest rate changes on these
notes. The fair value of that debt will vary as interest rates
change.
Borrowings
under our Credit Agreement and our Superior separate credit agreement expose us
to certain market risks. Interest on amounts drawn under the credit
facilities varies based on the floating rates under each agreement. Based on the
$31.6 million outstanding under these facilities as of March 31, 2010, a one
percent change in the applicable rate would change our annual interest expense
by $0.3 million.
We
purchase commodities, such as cement, aggregates and diesel fuel, at market
prices and do not currently use financial instruments to hedge commodity
prices.
Our
operations are subject to factors affecting the overall strength of the U.S.
economy and economic conditions impacting financial institutions, including the
level of interest rates, availability of funds for construction, and the level
of general construction activity. A significant decrease in the level
of general construction activity in any of our market areas has and may continue
to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated revenues and
earnings.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
In
accordance with Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of management, including our chief
executive officer and chief financial officer, of the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Exchange Act) as of March 31, 2010. Based on that
evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2010
to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our
reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and
forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls
and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by
an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal
executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar
functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, there were
no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors
that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal
Proceedings
For
information about the Chapter 11 Cases involving us, see Note 2 to the condensed
consolidated financial statements in Part I of this report which we incorporate
by reference into this Item 1. For information about other litigation
involving us, see Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in
Part I of this report, which we incorporate by reference into this Item
1.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
In
addition to the risk factors described under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item
1A of Part I in the 2009 Form 10-K, any of the following factors could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows, as well as the market values of our
securities. These risks are not the only risks that we may
face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or
that we currently view as immaterial may also materially and adversely affect
our business, financial condition, results of operation or, cash flows or the
market values of our securities.
We
filed for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on April 29,
2010, and we are subject to various risks and uncertainties associated with the
Chapter 11 Cases.
For the
duration of the Chapter 11 Cases, our operations and our ability to execute our
business strategies will be subject to the risks and uncertainties associated
with bankruptcy. These include risks relating to:
|
•
|
our
ability to continue as a going
concern;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to operate within the restrictions and the liquidity limitations
of the DIP Credit Agreement and any related orders entered by the
Bankruptcy Court in connection with the Chapter 11
Cases;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to obtain Bankruptcy Court approval with respect to motions filed
in the Chapter 11 Cases from time to
time;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to consummate the proposed Plan, or any other plan of
reorganization, with respect to the Chapter 11
Cases;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to obtain and maintain normal payment and other terms with
customers, suppliers and service
providers;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our
operations;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to attract, motivate and retain
employees;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to attract and retain
customers;
|
|
•
|
our
ability to retain our existing suppliers or secure alternative supply
sources; and
|
|
•
|
our
ability to obtain acceptable and appropriate exit
financing.
|
We also
may be subject to risks and uncertainties with respect to the actions and
decisions of our creditors and other third parties who have interests in the
Chapter 11 Cases that may be inconsistent with our plans.
These
risks and uncertainties could affect our business and operations in various
ways. For example, negative events or publicity associated with the Chapter 11
Cases could adversely affect our relationships with our customers, suppliers and
employees, which could adversely affect our operations, financial condition and
cash flows. Also, pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, we need Bankruptcy
Court approval for transactions outside the ordinary course of business, which
may limit our ability to respond timely to events or take advantage of
opportunities. Because of the risks and uncertainties associated with
the Chapter 11 Cases, we cannot predict or quantify the ultimate impact that
events occurring during the Chapter 11 proceedings will have on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and there is no
certainty as to our ability to continue as a going concern.
As a
result of the Chapter 11 Cases, realization of assets and liquidation of
liabilities are subject to uncertainty. While operating under the
protection of the Bankruptcy Code, and subject to Bankruptcy Court approval or
otherwise as permitted in the normal course of business, we may sell or
otherwise dispose of assets and liquidate or settle liabilities for amounts
other than those reflected in our consolidated financial
statements. Further, a plan of reorganization could materially change
the amounts and classifications reported in our historical consolidated
financial statements, which do not give effect to any adjustments to the
carrying value of assets or amounts of liabilities that might be necessary as a
consequence of confirmation of a plan of reorganization.
Risks
in connection with implementation of the Plan.
If
implemented in accordance with its terms, the Plan will substantially change our
capital structure. The Plan, for example, provides for all existing
common stock, upon emergence from Chapter 11, to be replaced with warrants to
acquire up to an aggregate total of 15 percent of the equity of our reorganized
company. Exercise prices with respect to these warrants will be set
and based on the value of the equity in the reorganized company reaching
approximately $285.0 million and $335.0 million with respect to each tranche. As
a result, our existing stockholders should not expect that there will be
significant value associated with our existing common stock.
We can
provide no assurance that the Plan (or any other plan of reorganization) will be
consummated, so we urge caution with respect to existing and future investments
in our outstanding securities.
Our
business could suffer from the commencement of the Chapter 11 cases, including a
loss of customers and suppliers.
The
general impact, if any, that the Chapter 11 Cases may have on our operations
cannot be accurately predicted or quantified. Adverse publicity
related to the Chapter 11 Cases might negatively our ability to maintain our
existing customer and supplier bases. The loss of a significant
number of customers during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases or otherwise
could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows. In addition, any failure to timely obtain suitable
supplies at competitive prices could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our
business could suffer from a long and protracted restructuring.
Our
future success will depend on the successful confirmation and implementation of
a plan of reorganization. Failure to obtain this approval in a timely
manner could adversely affect our operating results, as our ability to obtain
financing to fund our operations and our relations with customers and suppliers
may be harmed by protracted bankruptcy proceedings. If a liquidation
or protracted reorganization were to occur, there is a significant risk that the
value of our business would be substantially eroded to the detriment of all
stakeholders.
Furthermore,
we cannot predict the ultimate amount of all settlement terms for the
liabilities that will be subject to a plan of reorganization. Even
once a plan of reorganization is implemented, our operating results may be
adversely affected by the possible reluctance of prospective lenders, customers
and suppliers to do business with a company that recently emerged from
bankruptcy proceedings.
We
may have insufficient liquidity.
We expect
to incur significant costs as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases and the
transactions contemplated by the Plan. Assuming confirmation and
implementation of the Plan in accordance with its terms, we expect to incur
significant costs in the forms of bank, legal, accounting and other
fees. Some of these costs may be paid through borrowings under the
DIP Credit Agreement or a replacement credit facility which may be in place at
the time such costs and fees become due and payable.
We are
dependent on access to the DIP Credit Agreement to fund our working capital
requirements and various expenses we expect to incur throughout the pendency of
the Chapter 11 Cases. We can provide no assurance that the lenders
will fund their entire commitments under the DIP Credit Agreement for the
pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases. In order for us to borrow under the
DIP Credit Agreement, no default or event of default may exist at the time of
such borrowing. In the event of an event of default under the DIP Credit
Agreement, we would not be able to borrow additional amounts under the DIP
Credit Agreement and, absent a waiver, the lenders under the DIP Credit
Agreement could terminate their commitments and declare all amounts owing under
the DIP Credit Agreement due and payable.
Furthermore,
the DIP Credit Agreement may prevent us from obtaining additional capital we may
need to expand our business during the pendency of the Chapter 11
Cases. Failure to obtain additional capital may preclude us from
developing or enhancing our business, taking advantage of future opportunities
or responding to competitive pressures.
Our
ability to emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases will depend on obtaining sufficient
exit financing to settle administrative expenses of the reorganization and any
other related obligations, and to provide adequate future
liquidity.
For the
Plan to be effective, we will need to obtain and demonstrate the sufficiency of
exit financing. Failure to obtain exit financing as contemplated by
the Plan may further delay our emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases, leaving us
vulnerable to any further deterioration in economic conditions.
Emergence
from the Chapter 11 Cases is not assured.
If the
Plan is not confirmed and consummated, it is unclear whether we would be able to
reorganize our business and what, if any, distributions holders of claims
against us would ultimately receive with respect to their claims. The
Debtors would likely incur significant costs in connection with developing and
seeking approval of an alternative plan of reorganization, which might not be
supported by the holders of the 8⅜% Notes or other stakeholders. If
an alternative reorganization could not be agreed upon, it is possible that we
would have to liquidate our assets, in which case it is likely that holders of
claims would receive substantially less favorable treatment than they would
receive if we were to emerge as a viable, reorganized entity. While
we expect to emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases in the future, we can provide no
assurance as to whether we will successfully reorganize and emerge from the
Chapter 11 Cases or, if we do successfully reorganize, as to when we will emerge
from the Chapter 11 Cases.
We
depend on key personnel and may not be able to retain those employees or recruit
additional qualified personnel.
We are
highly dependent on the continuing efforts of our senior management team and
other key personnel. During the Chapter 11 Cases, the Bankruptcy Code
limits our ability to enter into retention, severance or similar types of
arrangements with our key personnel and other persons who may be considered
“insiders.” Our business, financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows could be materially adversely affected if we lose any key
personnel and are unable to attract and retain qualified
replacements.
Risks
of trading in an over the counter market.
Securities
traded in the over-the-counter market generally have significantly less
liquidity than securities traded on a national securities exchange, due to
factors such as a reduction in the number of investors that will consider
investing in the securities, the number of market makers in the securities,
reduction in securities analyst and news media coverage and lower market prices
than might otherwise be obtained. As a result, holders of shares of
our common stock may find it difficult to resell their shares at prices quoted
in the market or at all. Furthermore, because of the limited market
and generally low volume of trading in our common stock that could occur, the
share price of our common stock could be more likely to be affected by broad
market fluctuations, general market conditions, fluctuations in our operating
results, changes in the markets perception of our business, and announcements
made by us, our competitors or parties with whom we have business
relationships. The lack of liquidity in our common stock may also
make it difficult for us to issue additional securities for financing or other
purposes, or to otherwise arrange for any financing we may need in the future,
and we may be subject to additional compliance requirements under applicable
state laws in connection with any such issuance. In addition, we may
experience other adverse effects, including, without limitation, the loss of
confidence in us by current and prospective suppliers, customers, employees and
others with whom we have or may seek to initiate business
relationships. We expect that the stock issued in connection with the
implementation of the Plan will be traded in the over-the-counter
market.
We
may not be able to fully utilize our U.S. net operating loss
carryforwards.
As of
March 31, 2010, we have U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards
of approximately $56 million. These net operating loss carryforwards
will expire in the years 2026 through 2029. As of March 31, 2010, our
management determined that it is more likely than not that the net U.S. deferred
tax asset, excluding certain indefinite lived intangibles, would not be realized
in the future and, as a result, we recorded a full valuation allowance to offset
the net U.S. deferred tax assets, including our net operating loss
carryforwards.
Our
ability to deduct net operating loss carryforwards could be subject to further
limitations if we were to undergo an additional “ownership change,” as defined
in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, during or as a result of the
Chapter 11 Cases. During the pendency of the bankruptcy proceedings,
the Bankruptcy Court has entered an order that places limitations on trading in
our common stock, including options to acquire common stock, as further
specified in the order. However, we can provide no assurance that
these limitations will prevent an “ownership change” or that our ability to
utilize our net operating loss carryforwards may not be significantly limited as
a result of our reorganization.
Item 2.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides
information with respect to our acquisition of shares of our common stock during
the first quarter of 2010:
Calendar Month
|
|
Total Number of
Shares
Acquired(1)
|
|
|
Average Price Paid
Per Share
|
|
January
2010
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
February
2010
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
March
2010
|
|
|
117,823 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
(1)
|
Represents shares
of our common stock acquired from
employees who
elected for us to make their required
tax payments upon vesting of certain restricted shares by withholding a
number of those vested shares having a value on the date of vesting equal
to their tax
obligations.
|
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
1.
|
At
our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 3, 2010, our stockholders
elected John M. Piecuch, T. William Porter, III, Michael W. Harlan,
Vincent D. Foster, Mary P. Ricciardello, William T. Albanese, and Ray C.
Dillon as directors of U.S. Concrete with terms expiring in 2010.
Votes cast with respect to the election of each director were as
follows:
|
Votes Cast to Elect:
|
|
For:
|
|
Withheld:
|
|
|
|
|
|
John
M. Piecuch
|
|
6,230,197
|
|
3,876,862
|
William
Porter, III
|
|
6,088,362
|
|
4,018,697
|
Michael
W. Harlan
|
|
6,136,972
|
|
3,970,087
|
Vincent
D. Foster
|
|
5,764,574
|
|
4,342,485
|
Mary
P. Ricciardello
|
|
6,074,667
|
|
4,032,392
|
William
T. Albanese
|
|
6,228,759
|
|
3,878,300
|
Ray
C. Dillon
|
|
6,200,087
|
|
3,906,972
|
2.
|
At
our annual meeting of stockholders held on May 3, 2010, our stockholders
ratified the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent
registered public accounting firm of U.S. Concrete for the year ending
December 31, 2010. Votes cast with respect to such ratification were
26,746,826 for and 198,902 against, with 149,985 abstentions and no broker
non-votes.
|
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
3.1*
|
|
—
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Concrete, Inc. (Form 8-K filed on May
9, 2006 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit 3.1).
|
3.2*
|
|
—
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of U.S. Concrete, Inc., as amended (Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-42860), Exhibit
4.2).
|
3.3*
|
|
—
|
Restated
Certificate of Designation of Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit
3.3).
|
3.4*
|
|
—
|
Certificate
of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of U.S.
Concrete, Inc. (Form 8-K filed on November 6, 2009 (File No. 000-26025),
Exhibit 3.1).
|
3.5*
|
|
—
|
Rights
Agreement dated as of November 5, 2009 between U.S. Concrete, Inc. and
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (Form 8-K filed on
November 6, 2009 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit 4.1).
|
4.1*
|
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 4 and Waiver to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
February 19, 2010, among U.S. Concrete, Inc., Citicorp North America Inc.,
Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the Lenders and
Issuers named therein (Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2010 (File No.
000-26025), Exhibit 10.1).
|
4.2*
|
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 5 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 24,
2010, by and among U.S. Concrete, Inc. and the Lenders named therein (Form
8-K filed on March 26, 2010 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit
10.1).
|
4.3
|
|
—
|
Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2010, among
Superior Materials, LLC, BWB, LLC, Edw.C.Levy Co. and Comerica
Bank.
|
4.4*
|
|
—
|
Revolving
Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2010, by and
among U.S. Concrete, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders and
Issuers named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Form 8-K filed on May
6, 2010 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit 10.1).
|
4.5*
|
|
—
|
Pledge
and Security Agreement dated, as of May 3, 2010, by and among U.S.
Concrete, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
(Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2010 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit
10.2).
|
31.1
|
|
—
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Michael W. Harlan.
|
31.2
|
|
—
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert D. Hardy.
|
32.1
|
|
—
|
Section
1350 Certification of Michael W. Harlan.
|
32.2
|
|
—
|
Section
1350 Certification of Robert D.
Hardy.
|
*
Incorporated by reference to the filing indicated.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
|
U.S. CONCRETE, INC.
|
|
|
|
Date: May
10, 2010
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert D. Hardy
|
|
|
Robert
D. Hardy
|
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting
Officer)
|
INDEX
TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
3.1*
|
|
—
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation of U.S. Concrete, Inc. (Form 8-K filed on May
9, 2006 (File No. 000- 26025), Exhibit 3.1).
|
3.2*
|
|
—
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of U.S. Concrete, Inc., as amended (Post Effective
Amendment No. 1 to Form S-3 (Reg. No. 333-42860), Exhibit
4.2).
|
3.3*
|
|
—
|
Restated
Certificate of Designation of Junior Participating Preferred Stock (Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit
3.3).
|
3.4*
|
|
—
|
Certificate
of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock of U.S.
Concrete, Inc. (Form 8- K filed on November 6, 2009 (File No. 000-26025),
Exhibit 3.1).
|
3.5*
|
|
—
|
Rights
Agreement dated as of November 5, 2009 between U.S. Concrete, Inc. and
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC (Form 8-K filed on
November 6, 2009 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit 4.1).
|
4.1*
|
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 4 and Waiver to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of
February 19, 2010, among U.S. Concrete, Inc., Citicorp North America Inc.,
Bank of America, N.A., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and the Lenders and
Issuers named therein (Form 8-K filed on February 22, 2010 (File No. 000-
26025), Exhibit 10.1).
|
4.2*
|
|
—
|
Amendment
No. 5 to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of March 24,
2010, by and among U.S. Concrete, Inc. and the Lenders named therein (Form
8-K filed on March 26, 2010 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit
10.1).
|
4.3
|
|
—
|
Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement, effective as of April 1, 2010, among
Superior Materials, LLC, BWB, LLC, Edw.C.Levy Co. and Comerica
Bank.
|
4.4*
|
|
—
|
Revolving
Credit, Term Loan and Guarantee Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2010, by and
among U.S. Concrete, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto, the Lenders and
Issuers named therein and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Form 8-K filed on May
6, 2010 (File No. 000-26025), Exhibit 10.1).
|
4.5*
|
|
—
|
Pledge
and Security Agreement, dated as of May 3, 2010, by and among U.S.
Concrete, Inc., the Guarantors party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
(Form 8-K filed on May 6, 2010 (File No. 000- 26025), Exhibit
10.2).
|
31.1
|
|
—
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Michael W. Harlan.
|
31.2
|
|
—
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Robert D. Hardy.
|
32.1
|
|
—
|
Section
1350 Certification of Michael W. Harlan.
|
32.2
|
|
—
|
Section
1350 Certification of Robert D.
Hardy.
|
*Incorporated
by reference to the filing indicated.