Table of Contents

 

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549

 


 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

 

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

 

 

OR

 

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                    to                   

 

Commission file number 0-12138

 


 

New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Massachusetts

 

04-2619298

(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)

 

39 Brighton Avenue, Allston, Massachusetts

 

02134

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (617) 783-0039

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Depositary Receipts

 

NYSE AMEX

(Title of each Class)

 

(Name of each Exchange on which Registered)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

Class A

Limited Partnership Units

(Title of class)

 

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by checkmark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes o  No x

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.  Yes o  No x

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o  No o (the Registrant is not yet required to submit Interactive Data).

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer o

 

Smaller reporting company x

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o  No x

 

As of March 31, 2011, there were 105,188 of the registrant’s Class A units (1,051,876 Depositary Receipts) of limited partnership issued and outstanding and 24,982 Class B units issued and outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE:  None.

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

INDEX

 

 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements (Unaudited)

 

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

 

 

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010

 

 

Notes to Financial Statements

 

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

 

 

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

 

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

Item 4.

(Removed and Reserved)

 

Item 5.

Other Information

 

Item 6.

Exhibits

 

SIGNATURES

 

 

2



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES, L.P.

 

PART 1 — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheets, statements of income, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows and related notes thereto, have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).  Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements.  The financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting only of normal, recurring adjustments, which are in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim periods.

 

The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet at that date but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements.

 

The aforementioned financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the aforementioned financial statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the financial statements and notes thereto included in New England Realty Associates L.P.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.

 

The results of operations for the three month period ended March 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the entire fiscal year or any other period.

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

 

March 31,

 

December 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

(Unaudited)

 

(Audited)

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

$

91,589,523

 

$

92,151,239

 

Property Held for Sale

 

586,382

 

593,017

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

3,752,296

 

3,245,361

 

Rents Receivable

 

707,730

 

622,944

 

Real Estate Tax Escrows

 

371,981

 

301,853

 

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

 

3,291,830

 

3,337,886

 

Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

 

19,310,410

 

20,076,957

 

Financing and Leasing Fees

 

917,264

 

947,477

 

Total Assets

 

$

120,527,416

 

$

121,276,735

 

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

Note Payable

 

$

4,668,600

 

$

4,668,600

 

Mortgage Notes Payable

 

137,445,891

 

137,680,660

 

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

 

2,584,349

 

2,440,141

 

Advance Rental Payments and Security Deposits

 

3,496,723

 

3,407,901

 

Total Liabilities

 

148,195,563

 

148,197,302

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commitments and Contingent Liabilities (Notes 3 and 9)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital 131,484 units outstanding in 2011 and 2010

 

(27,668,147

)

(26,920,567

)

Total Liabilities and Partners’ Capital

 

$

120,527,416

 

$

121,276,735

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

3



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

8,178,851

 

$

7,968,844

 

Laundry and sundry income

 

102,043

 

117,548

 

 

 

8,280,894

 

8,086,392

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

425,743

 

477,941

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,353,609

 

1,363,311

 

Management fees

 

333,350

 

329,312

 

Operating

 

1,458,686

 

1,230,744

 

Renting

 

87,886

 

65,450

 

Repairs and maintenance

 

1,062,141

 

977,557

 

Taxes and insurance

 

1,052,526

 

1,051,635

 

 

 

5,773,941

 

5,495,950

 

Income Before Other Income and Discontinued Operations

 

2,506,953

 

2,590,442

 

Other Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(1,946,709

)

(1,997,348

)

Interest income

 

1,226

 

759

 

(Loss) from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

(454,047

)

(999,497

)

 

 

(2,399,530

)

(2,996,086

)

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations

 

107,423

 

(405,644

)

Discontinued Operations

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

65,389

 

62,693

 

Gain (loss) on sale of real estate from discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

65,389

 

62,693

 

Net Income (Loss)

 

$

172,812

 

$

(342,951

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) per Unit

 

 

 

 

 

Income (loss) before discontinued operations

 

$

0.82

 

$

(3.06

)

Income from discontinued operations

 

0.49

 

0.47

 

Net Income (loss) per Unit

 

$

1.31

 

$

(2.59

)

Weighted Average Number of Units Outstanding

 

131,484

 

132,315

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

4



Table of Contents

 

 NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Units

 

Partner’s Capital

 

 

 

Limited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Limited

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class A

 

Class B

 

General
Partnership

 

Subtotal

 

Treasury
Units

 

Total

 

Class A

 

Class B

 

General
Partnership

 

Total

 

Balance, January 1, 2010

 

144,180

 

34,243

 

1,802

 

180,225

 

47,879

 

132,346

 

$

(17,069,520

)

$

(4,050,138

)

$

(213,165

)

$

(21,332,824

)

Distribution to Partners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(741,140

)

(176,021

)

(9,264

)

(926,426

)

Stock Buyback

 

 

 

 

 

565

 

(565

)

(275,850

)

(65,452

)

(3,444

)

(344,746

)

Net (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(274,361

)

(65,161

)

(3,430

)

(342,951

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, March 31, 2010

 

144,180

 

34,243

 

1,802

 

180,225

 

48,444

 

131,781

 

$

(18,360,871

)

$

(4,356,771

)

$

(229,303

)

$

(22,946,946

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance January 1, 2011

 

144,180

 

34,243

 

1,802

 

180,225

 

48,741

 

131,484

 

$

(21,539,906

)

$

(5,111,628

)

$

(269,033

)

$

(26,920,567

)

Distribution to Partners

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(736,314

)

(174,874

)

(9,204

)

(920,392

)

Net Income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

138,250

 

32,834

 

1,728

 

172,812

 

Balance, March 31, 2011

 

144,180

 

34,243

 

1,802

 

180,225

 

48,741

 

131,484

 

$

(22,137,970

)

$

(5,253,668

)

$

(276,509

)

$

(27,668,147

)

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

5



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

$

172,812

 

$

(342,951

)

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,353,609

 

1,363,311

 

Loss from investments in joint ventures

 

454,047

 

999,497

 

Depreciation and amortization, discontinued operations

 

11,360

 

15,600

 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

(Increase) Decrease in rents receivable

 

(84,786

)

152,710

 

Increase in accounts payable and accrued expense

 

144,208

 

147,061

 

(Increase) Decrease in real estate tax escrow

 

(70,128

)

10,858

 

Decrease (Increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets

 

46,056

 

(165,500

)

Increase (decrease)in advance rental payments and security deposits

 

88,822

 

(90,646

)

Total Adjustments

 

1,943,187

 

2,432,891

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

2,115,999

 

2,089,940

 

Cash Flows From Investing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Proceeds from unconsolidated joint ventures

 

312,500

 

320,000

 

Purchase and improvement of rental properties

 

(765,385

)

(335,745

)

Net proceeds from the sale of rental property

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) investing activities

 

(452,885

)

(15,745

)

Cash Flows From Financing Activities

 

 

 

 

 

Payment of financing costs

 

(1,018

)

(1,620

)

Proceeds of mortgage notes payable

 

 

912,440

 

Principal payments of mortgage notes payable

 

(234,769

)

(212,376

)

Stock buyback

 

 

(344,746

)

Distributions to partners

 

(920,392

)

(926,426

)

Net cash (used in) financing activities

 

(1,156,179

)

(572,728

)

Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

506,935

 

1,501,467

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, at beginning of year

 

3,245,361

 

2,879,663

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, at end of year

 

$

3,752,296

 

$

4,381,130

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

6



Table of Contents

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

MARCH 31, 2011

 

(Unaudited)

 

NOTE 1. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Line of Business:  New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership (“NERA” or the “Partnership”) was organized in Massachusetts in 1977. NERA and its subsidiaries own and operate various residential apartment buildings, condominium units and commercial properties located in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. NERA has also made investments in other real estate partnerships and has participated in other real estate-related activities, primarily located in Massachusetts.

 

Accounting Standards: On July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, also known as FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC 105-10”), General Accepted Accounting Principles (“ASC 105-10”).  ASC 105-10 established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities.  Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.  The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards.  All other non -grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative.  Following the Codification, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts.  Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.  GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB’s Codification project, but it will change the way the guidance is organized and presented.  As a result, these changes will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009.  The Partnership has implemented the Codification in this report by providing references to the Codification topics, as appropriate.

 

Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of NERA and its subsidiaries. NERA has a 99.67% to 100% ownership interest in each subsidiary except for the nine limited liability companies (the “Investment Properties” or “Joint Ventures”) in which the Partnership has between a 40 - 50% ownership interest. The consolidated group is referred to as the “Partnerships.” Minority interests are not recorded, since they are insignificant. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Partnership accounts for its investment in the above-mentioned Investment Properties using the equity method of consolidation. (See Note 14: Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures).

 

The Partnership accounts for its investments in joint ventures using the equity method of accounting. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures, and subsequently adjusted for equity in earnings and cash contributions and distributions. The authoritative guidance on consolidation provides guidance on the identification of entities for which control is achieved through means other than voting rights (“variable interest entities” or “VIEs”) and the determination of which business enterprise, if any, should consolidate the VIE (the “primary beneficiary”).  Generally, the consideration of whether an entity is a VIE applies when either (1) the equity investors (if any) lack one or more of the essential characteristics of a controlling financial interest, (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity’s activities without additional subordinated financial support or (3) the equity investors have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor with a disproportionately small voting interest.

 

On January 1, 2010, the Partnership adopted the updated provisions of ASC 810, pursuant to FASB No. 167, which amends FIN 46® to require ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity.  Additionally, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46® to eliminate the quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, which was based on determining which enterprise absorbs the majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of the entity’s expected residual returns, or both.  FASB No. 167 amends certain guidance in Interpretation 46® for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. Also, FASB No. 167 amends FIN 46® to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity.  The enhanced disclosures are required for any

 

7



Table of Contents

 

enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity.  The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact to these financial statements.

 

Impairment:  On an annual basis management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Partnership’s rental properties or investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries may be impaired.  A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property.  The Partnership’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved. The Partnership has not recognized an impairment loss since 1995.

 

Accounting Estimates: The preparation of the financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United State of America, requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Revenue Recognition:  Rental income from residential and commercial properties is recognized over the term of the related lease. For residential tenants, amounts 60 days in arrears are charged against income. The commercial tenants are evaluated on a case by case basis. Certain leases of the commercial properties provide for increasing stepped minimum rents, which are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Concessions made on residential leases are also accounted for on the straight-line basis.

 

Above-market and below-market lease values for acquired properties are initially recorded based on the present value (using a discount rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the differences between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to each in-place lease and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for each corresponding in-place lease, measured over a period equal to the remaining term of the lease for above-market leases and the initial term plus the term of any below-market fixed —rate renewal options for below-market leases.  The capitalized above-market lease values for acquired properties are amortized as a reduction of base rental revenue over the remaining term of the respective leases, and the capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to base rental revenue over the remaining initial terms plus the terms of any below-market fixed-rate renewal options of the respective leases.

 

Rental Properties:  Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; improvements and additions are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation is eliminated from the accounts, and any gain or loss on such disposition is included in income. Fully depreciated assets are removed from the accounts. Rental properties are depreciated by both straight-line and accelerated methods over their estimated useful lives. Upon acquisition of rental property, the Partnership estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships.  The Partnership allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values.  The Partnership records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction.  In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Partnership considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information.  The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

 

Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Partnership’s overall relationship with the respective tenant.  Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions.  In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.  Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Partnership’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals.  The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining

 

8



Table of Contents

 

initial terms of the respective leases.  The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.

 

In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a rental property may be impaired, an analysis of the value is prepared. The estimated future undiscounted cash flows are compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value is required.

 

Financing and Leasing Fees: Financing fees are capitalized and amortized, using the interest method, over the life of the related mortgages. Leasing fees are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the life of the related lease. Unamortized balances are expensed when the corresponding fee is no longer applicable.

 

Income Taxes: The financial statements have been prepared on the basis that NERA and its subsidiaries are entitled to tax treatment as partnerships. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded.

 

Cash Equivalents: The Partnership considers cash equivalents to be all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less.

 

Segment Reporting: Operating segments are revenue-producing components of the Partnership for which separate financial information is produced internally for management. Under the definition, NERA operated, for all periods presented, as one segment.

 

Comprehensive Income: Comprehensive income is defined as changes in partners’ equity, exclusive of transactions with owners (such as capital contributions and dividends). NERA did not have any comprehensive income items in 2011 and 2010 other than net income as reported.

 

Income Per Unit: Net income per unit has been calculated based upon the weighted average number of units outstanding during each period presented. The Partnership has no dilutive units and, therefore, basic net income is the same as diluted net income per unit (see Note 7).

 

Concentration of Credit Risks and Financial Instruments: The Partnership’s properties are located in New England, and the Partnership is subject to the general economic risks related thereto. No single tenant accounted for more than 5% of the Partnership’s revenues in 2011 or 2010. The Partnership makes its temporary cash investments with high-credit-quality financial institutions. At March 31, 2011and December 31, 2010, substantially all of the Partnership’s cash and cash equivalents were held in interest-bearing accounts at financial institutions, earning interest at rates from 0.05% to 1.0%.  At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively, approximately $4,663,000, and $4,349,000 of cash and cash equivalents, and security deposits included in prepaid expenses and other assets exceeded federally insured amounts.

 

Advertising Expense: Advertising is expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was $14,841 and $16,283 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

Discontinued Operations and Rental Property Held for Sale:  When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Partnership discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If, in management’s opinion, the net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established. Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

If circumstances arise that previously were considered unlikely and, as a result, the Partnership decides not to sell a property previously classified as held for sale, the property is reclassified as held and used. A property that is reclassified is measured and recorded individually at the lower of (a) its carrying amount before the property was classified as held for sale, adjusted for any depreciation (amortization) expense that would have been recognized had the property been continuously classified as held and used, or (b) the fair value at the date of the subsequent decision not to sell.

 

Interest Capitalized: The Partnership follows the policy of capitalizing interest as a component of the cost of rental property when the time of construction exceeds one year. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 there was no capitalized interest.

 

Extinguishment of Debt: When existing mortgages are refinanced with the same lender and it is determined that the refinancing is substantially different then they are recorded as an extinguishment of debt.  However if it is determined that the

 

9



Table of Contents

 

refinancing is substantially the same then they are recorded as an exchange of debt. All refinancings qualify as extinguishment of debt.

 

Reclassifications:  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts in order to conform to current period presentation.

 

NOTE 2. RENTAL PROPERTIES

 

As of March 31, 2011, the Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships owned 2,269 residential apartment units in 20 residential and mixed-use complexes (collectively, the “Apartment Complexes”). The Partnership also owns 19 condominium units in a residential condominium complex, all of which are leased to residential tenants (collectively referred to as the “Condominium Units”). The Apartment Complexes and Condominium Units are located primarily in the metropolitan Boston area of Massachusetts.

 

Additionally, as of March 31, 2011, the Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships owned a commercial shopping center in Framingham, commercial buildings in Newton and Brookline and mixed-use properties in Boston, Brockton and Newton, all in Massachusetts. These properties are referred to collectively as the “Commercial Properties”.

 

The Partnership also owned a 40% to 50% ownership interest in nine residential and mixed use complexes (the “Investment Properties”) at March 31, 2011 with a total of 799 units, accounted for using the equity method of consolidation.

 

See Note 14 for summary information on these investments.

 

Rental properties consist of the following:

 

 

 

March 31, 2011

 

December 31, 2010

 

Useful Life

 

Land, improvements and parking lots

 

$

26,191,560

 

$

26,110,238

 

15—40 years

 

Buildings and improvements

 

110,461,667

 

110,106,179

 

15—40 years

 

Kitchen cabinets

 

4,033,288

 

3,923,029

 

5—10 years

 

Carpets

 

3,496,063

 

3,404,951

 

5—10 years

 

Air conditioning

 

857,641

 

857,375

 

7—10 years

 

Laundry equipment

 

332,534

 

331,002

 

5—7 years

 

Elevators

 

1,139,296

 

1,086,140

 

20 years

 

Swimming pools

 

155,441

 

155,442

 

10 years

 

Equipment

 

2,055,763

 

1,989,645

 

5—7 years

 

Motor vehicles

 

107,792

 

107,792

 

5 years

 

Fences

 

36,270

 

33,970

 

5—10 years

 

Furniture and fixtures

 

924,633

 

924,633

 

5—7 years

 

Smoke alarms

 

97,840

 

97,840

 

5—7 years

 

Total fixed assets

 

149,889,788

 

149,128,236

 

 

 

Less: Accumulated depreciation

 

(58,300,265

)

(56,976,997

)

 

 

 

 

$

91,589,523

 

$

92,151,239

 

 

 

 

On March 1, 2011, the Partnership entered into a purchase and sales agreement to sell the Avon Street Apartments in Malden, Massachusetts.  The total sales price is $8,750,000.  The closing date is expected to occur in May 2011. The Partnerships net proceeds from the sale of Avon Street Apartments will be approximately $5,700,000 and the gain on the sale will be approximately $7,800,000.  The Partnership is actively searching for an appropriate acquisition that will allow for a tax free exchange and significantly reduce the taxable gain.

 

NOTE 3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Partnership’s properties are managed by an entity that is owned by the majority shareholder of the General Partner. The management fee is equal to 4% of rental revenue and laundry income on the majority of the Partnership’s properties and 3% on Linewt.  Total fees paid were approximately $343,000 and $339,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

The Partnership Agreement permits the General Partner or Management Company to charge the costs of professional services (such as counsel, accountants and contractors) to NERA. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 approximately $211,000 and $176,000 was charged to NERA for legal, accounting, construction, maintenance, rental and architectural services and supervision of capital improvements.  Of the 2011 expenses referred to above, approximately $60,000 was for repairs and maintenance and $85,000 was for administrative expense. Approximately $66,000 of expenses for construction, architectural services and supervision of capital projects were capitalized in rental properties. Additionally in 2011, the Hamilton Company received approximately $180,000 from the Investment Properties of which approximately $139,000 was the management fee, approximately $35,000 was for maintenance services and approximately $4,600 was for administrative services. The management fee is equal to 4% of rental income on the majority of investment properties and 2% on Dexter Park.

 

On January 1, 2004, all employees were transferred to the Management Company’s payroll. The Partnership reimburses the management company for the payroll and related expenses of the employees who work at the properties. Total reimbursement was approximately $662,000, and $591,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Management Company maintains a 401K plan for all eligible employees whereby the employees may contribute the maximum allowed by law. The plan also provides for discretionary contributions by the employer.  There were no employer contributions in 2011 and 2010.

 

Prior to 1991, the Partnership employed an outside, unaffiliated company to perform its bookkeeping and accounting functions. Since that time, such services have been provided by the Management Company’s accounting staff, which consists of approximately 14 people.  During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Management Company charged the Partnership $31,250 ($125,000 per year) for bookkeeping and accounting services included in administrative expenses of $211,000 previously discussed.

 

In 1996, prior to becoming an employee of the Management Company, the President of the Management Company performed asset management consulting services for the Partnership. This individual continues to perform this service and receives an asset management fee from the Partnership.  During the three months ended March 31, 2011, this individual received $ 18,750.

 

The Partnership has invested in nine limited partnerships, which have invested in mixed use residential apartment complexes. The Partnership has between a 40% and 50% ownership interest in each investment. The other investors are Harold Brown, the President of the Management Company and five other employees of the Management Company. Harold Brown’s ownership interest is between 43.2% and 57%. See Note 14 for a description of the properties and their operations.

 

See Note 8 for information regarding the repurchase of Class B and General Partnership Units.

 

On October 28, 2009, the Partnership borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (“HBC”).  The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice.  The partnership may also prepay the note without penalty.  On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000.  During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $2,500,000 as requested.  The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBC’s right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $70,000  and $108,000 respectively.  This loan is collateralized by the Partnership’s 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street.

 

NOTE 4. OTHER ASSETS

 

Approximately $1,787,000 and $1,729,000 of security deposits and prepaid rent deposits are included in prepaid expenses and other assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

 

Included in prepaid expenses and other assets at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 is approximately $934,000 and $896,000, respectively, held in escrow to fund future capital improvements. The security deposits and escrow accounts are restricted cash.

 

Financing and leasing fees of approximately $917,000 and $947,000 are net of accumulated amortization of approximately $572,000 and $541,000 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

 

11



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 5. MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

 

At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the mortgages payable consisted of various loans, all of which were secured by first mortgages on properties referred to in Note 2. At March 31, 2011, the fixed interest rates on these loans ranged from 4.84% to 7.07%, payable in monthly installments aggregating approximately $726,000, including principal, to various dates through 2023. The majority of the mortgages are subject to prepayment penalties.  At March 31, 2011, the weighted average interest rate on the above mortgages was 5.55%. The effective rate of 5.64% includes the amortization expense of deferred financing costs. See Note 12 for fair value information.

 

The Partnerships have pledged tenant leases as additional collateral for certain of these loans.

 

Approximate annual maturities at March 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

2012—current maturities

 

$

3,504,000

 

2013

 

1,061,000

 

2014

 

41,104,000

 

2015

 

16,428,000

 

2016

 

97,000

 

Thereafter

 

75,252,000

 

 

 

$

137,446,000

 

 

In December 2009, the Partnership refinanced Linhart, LLP, located in Newton, Massachusetts.  The new loan is $2,000,000, with a rate of 3.75% over the Libor rate or 4.25% whichever is greater and matures five years from the date of closing.  The interest rate as of March 31, 2011 was 4.25%.  The loan agreement calls for interest only payments for twenty four months and principal and interest payments for the remainder of the five year period based on a thirty year amortization.  The loan proceeds were used to pay off the prior loan of approximately $1,700,000, and closing costs of approximately $38,000.

 

On March 25, 2010, the Partnership refinanced the Brookside Apartments.  The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%.  The loan is a ten year note amortized over 30 years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000.  There were no prepayment penalties.

 

NOTE 6. ADVANCE RENTAL PAYMENTS AND SECURITY DEPOSITS

 

The Partnership’s residential lease agreements may require tenants to maintain a one-month advance rental payment and/or a security deposit. At March 31, 2011, amounts received for prepaid rents of approximately $1,338,000 are included in cash and cash equivalents, and security deposits of approximately $1,787,000 are included in other assets and are restricted cash.

 

NOTE 7. PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

The Partnership has two classes of Limited Partners (Class A and B) and one category of General Partner. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, distributions to holders of Class B Units and General Partnership Units must represent 19% and 1%, respectively, of the total units outstanding. All classes have equal profit sharing and distribution rights, in proportion to their ownership interests.

 

In February 2011, the Partnership approved a quarterly distribution of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) which was paid on March 31, 2011. In April 2011, the Partnership approved a quarterly distribution of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) payable on June 30, 2011.

 

In 2010, the Partnership paid quarterly distributions of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) in March, June, September and December for a total distribution of $28.00 per unit ($2.80 per receipt.)

 

12



Table of Contents

 

The Partnership has entered into a deposit agreement with an agent to facilitate public trading of limited partners’ interests in Class A Units. Under the terms of this agreement, the holders of Class A Units have the right to exchange each Class A Unit for 10 Depositary Receipts. The following is information per Depositary Receipt:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended
March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Income (loss) per Depositary Receipt before Discontinued Operations

 

$

0.08

 

$

(0.31

)

Income from Discontinued Operations

 

0.05

 

0.05

 

Net Income (loss) per Depositary Receipt after Discontinued Operations

 

$

0.13

 

$

(0.26

)

Distributions per Depositary Receipt

 

$

0.70

 

$

0.70

 

 

NOTE 8. TREASURY UNITS

 

Treasury Units at March 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

Class A

 

38,993

 

Class B

 

9,260

 

General Partnership

 

488

 

 

 

48,741

 

 

On August 20, 2007, NewReal, Inc., the General Partner authorized an equity repurchase program (“Repurchase Program”) under which the Partnership was permitted to purchase, over a period of twelve months, up to 100,000 Depositary Receipts (each of which is one-tenth of a Class A Unit).  On January 15, 2008, the General Partner authorized an increase in the Repurchase Program from 100,000 to 200,000 Depositary Receipts. On January 30, 2008 the General Partner authorized an increase the Repurchase Program from 200,000 to 300,000 Depositary Receipts.  On March 6, 2008, the General Partner authorized the increase in the total number of Depositary Receipts that could be repurchased pursuant to the Repurchase Program from 300,000 to 500,000.  On August 8, 2008, the General Partner re-authorized and renewed the Repurchase Program for an additional 12-month period ended August 19, 2009.  On March 22, 2010, the General Partner re-authorized and renewed the Repurchase Program that expired on August 19, 2009.  Under the terms of the renewed Repurchase Program, the Partnership may purchase up to 500,000 Depositary Receipts from the start of the program in 2007 through March 31, 2015.  The Repurchase Program requires the Partnership to repurchase a proportionate number of Class B Units and General Partner Units in connection with any repurchases of any Depositary Receipts by the Partnership based upon the 80%, 19% and 1% fixed distribution percentages of the holders of the Class A, Class B and General Partner Units under the Partnership’s Second Amended and Restate Contract of Limited Partnership.  Repurchases of Depositary Receipts or Partnership Units pursuant to the Repurchase Program may be made by the Partnership from time to time in its sole discretion in open market transactions or in privately negotiated transactions.  From August 20, 2007 through March 31, 2011, the Partnership has repurchased 398,320 Depositary Receipts at an average price of $73.86 per receipt (or $738.60 per underlying Class A Unit), 1,724 Class B Units and 91 General Partnership Units, both at an average price of $585.05 per Unit, totaling approximately $30,481,000 including brokerage fees paid by the Partnership.

 

On September 17, 2008, the Partnership completed the issuance of an aggregate of 6,642 Class A Units held in treasury to current holders of Class B and General Partner Units upon the simultaneous retirement to treasury of 6,309 Class B Units and 333 General Partner Units pursuant to an equity distribution plan authorized by the Board of Directors of the General Partner on August 8, 2008 and as further described under Item 3.02 of the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 18, 2008, which is incorporated herein by reference. Harold Brown, the treasurer of the General Partner, owns 75% of the issued and outstanding Class B Units of the Partnership and 75% of the issued and outstanding equity of the General Partner, Ronald Brown, the brother of Harold Brown and the president of the General Partner, owns 25% of the issued and outstanding Class B Units of the Partnership and 25% of the issued and outstanding equity of the General Partner.

 

On January 18, 2008, 113,518 Depositary Receipts included above became available to purchase at a price of $75.50 per receipt. In order for the Partnership to take advantage of this opportunity, the Partnership borrowed $5,285,000 from Harold Brown, the Treasurer of the General Partner. This loan was paid in full, with interest at 6% of $37,899, on February 29, 2008.

 

The Partnership did not purchase any Depositary Receipts during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 

13



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

From time to time, the Partnerships are involved in various ordinary routine litigation incidental to their business. The Partnership either has insurance coverage or provides for any uninsured claims when appropriate. The Partnerships are not involved in any material pending legal proceedings.

 

NOTE 10. RENTAL INCOME

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, approximately 90% of rental income was related to residential apartments and condominium units with leases of one year or less. Approximately 10% was related to commercial properties, which have minimum future annual rental income on non-cancellable operating leases at March 31, 2011 as follows:

 

 

 

Commercial
Property Leases

 

2012

 

$

2,877,000

 

2013

 

2,189,000

 

2014

 

1,925,000

 

2015

 

1,451,000

 

2016

 

1,091,000

 

Thereafter

 

720,000

 

 

 

$

10,253,000

 

 

The aggregate minimum future rental income does not include contingent rentals that may be received under various leases in connection with percentage rents, common area charges and real estate taxes. Aggregate contingent rentals from continuing operations were approximately $153,000 and $168,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 respectively.

 

Rents receivable are net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of approximately $537,000 at March 31, 2011 and $595,000 at December 31, 2010.  Included in rents receivable at March 31, 2011 is approximately $343,000 resulting from recognizing rental income from non-cancelable commercial leases with future rental increases on a straight-line basis.  The majority of this amount is for long-term leases with Staples and Trader Joe’s at Staples Plaza in Framingham, Massachusetts.

 

Rents receivable also includes approximately $148,000 representing the straight-line of rental concession primarily related to the residential properties in the latter half of 2010.

 

For the three months ended March 31, 2011 rent at the commercial properties includes approximately $2,800 of amortization of deferred rents arising from the fair values assigned to in-place leases upon the purchase of Cypress Street in Brookline, Massachusetts.

 

NOTE 11. CASH FLOW INFORMATION

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, cash paid for interest was approximately $1,980,000, and $2,029,000, respectively. Cash paid for income taxes was approximately $26,000 and $10,000 respectively.

 

NOTE 12. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

 

Fair Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis

 

At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we do not have any significant financial assets or financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements.

 

Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at Fair Value

 

At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010  the carrying amounts of certain of our financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, and note payable, accounts payable and accrued expenses were representative of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments or, the recent acquisition of these items.

 

At March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, we estimated the fair value of our mortgages payable and other notes

 

14



Table of Contents

 

based upon quoted market prices for the same (Level 1) or similar (Level 2) issues when current quoted market prices are available.  We estimated the fair value of our secured mortgage debt that does not have current quoted market prices available by discounting the future cash flows using rates currently available to us for debt with similar terms and maturities (Level 3).  The differences in the fair value of our debt from the carrying value are the result of differences in interest rates and/or borrowing spreads that were available to us at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, as compared with those in effect when the debt was issued or acquired.  The secured mortgage debt contain pre-payment penalties or yield maintenance provisions that could make the cost of refinancing the debt at lower rates exceed the benefit that would be derived from doing so.

 

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Partnership in estimating the fair value of its financial instruments:

 

·                  For cash and cash equivalents, other assets, investment in partnerships, accounts payable, advance rents and security deposits: fair value approximates the carrying value of such assets and liabilities.

 

·                  For mortgage notes payable: fair value is generally based on estimated future cash flows, which are discounted using the quoted market rate from an independent source for similar obligations. Refer to the table below for the carrying amount and estimated fair value of such instruments.

 

The following table reflects the carrying amounts and estimated fair value of our debt.

 

 

 

Carrying Amount

 

Estimated Fair Value

 

Mortgage Notes Payable

 

 

 

 

 

Partnership Properties

 

 

 

 

 

At March 31, 2011

 

$

137,445,891

 

$

143,446,494

 

At December 31, 2010

 

$

137,680,660

 

$

142,896,706

 

Investment Properties

 

 

 

 

 

At March 31, 2011

 

$

140,755,793

 

$

145,791,587

 

 

Disclosure about fair value of financial instruments is based on pertinent information available to management as of March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued for purposes of these financial statements since December 31, 2010 and current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented herein.

 

NOTE 13. TAXABLE INCOME AND TAX BASIS

 

Taxable income reportable by the Partnership and includable in its partners’ tax returns is different than financial statement income because of tax free exchanges, accelerated depreciation, different tax lives, and timing differences related to prepaid rents, allowances and intangible assets at significant acquisitions. Taxable loss was approximately $450,000 greater than statement loss for the year ended December 31, 2010. The cumulative tax basis of the Partnership’s real estate at December 31, 2010 is approximately $5,300,000 less than the statement basis. The primary reason for the lower tax basis is the acquisition of Linewt and Cypress Street utilizing tax free exchanges in 2008. The Partnership’s tax basis in its joint venture investments is approximately $1,500,000 greater than statement basis.  Mortgage prepayment penalties and accelerated tax deductions allowable in 2010 and 2011 will result in taxable income in future years greater than statement income.

 

Certain entities included in the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements are subject to certain state taxes.  These taxes are not significant and are recorded as operating expenses in the accompanying consolidates financial statements.

 

The Partnership adopted the amended provisions related to uncertain tax provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes.  As a result of the implementation of the guidance, the Partnership recognized no material adjustments regarding its tax accounting treatment.  The Partnership expects to recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, if any, as income tax expense, which would be included in general and administrative expense.

 

In the normal course of business the Partnership or one of its subsidiaries is subject to examination by federal, state and local jurisdictions in which it operates, where applicable.  As of March 31, 2011, the tax years that remain subject to examination by the major tax jurisdictions under the statute of limitations is from the year 2003 forward.

 

15



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 14. INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES

 

Since November 2001, the Partnership has invested in nine limited partnerships and limited liability companies, the majority of which have invested in residential apartment complexes, with three partnerships investing in commercial property. The Partnership has a 40%-50% ownership interests in each investment. The other investors are Harold Brown, the President of the Management Company and five other employees of the Management Company. Harold Brown’s ownership interest is between 43.2% and 57%, with the balance owned by the others. A description of each investment is as follows:

 

On October 28, 2009 the Partnership invested approximately $15,925,000 in a joint venture to acquire a 40% interest in a residential property located in Brookline, Massachusetts.  The property, referred to as Dexter Park, is a 409 unit residential complex. The purchase price was $129,500,000.  The total mortgage is $89,914,000 with an interest rate of 5.57% and it matures in 2019.  The mortgage calls for interest only payments for the first two years of the loan and amortized over 30 years thereafter.  In order to fund this investment, the Partnership used approximately $8,757,000 of its cash reserves and borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (“HBC”).  The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice.  On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000. During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $2,500,000 as requested. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBC’s right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $70,000 and $108,000 respectively. This loan is collateralized by the Partnership’s 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street.  A majority of the apartments were leased at the time of the acquisition.  As a result, the Partnership amortized the intangible assets associated with the “in place” leases over a 12 month period which began in November 2009.  The total monthly amortization was approximately $407,000 which at 40% reduced the Partnership’s income by approximately $163,000 per month. For the year ended December 31, 2010 the total amortization in connection with these leases was approximately $4,073,000, of which the Partnership’s share was approximately $1,629,000.  The intangible asset was fully amortized effective November 2010.  This investment, Hamilton Park Towers, LLC is referred to as Dexter Park.

 

On October 3, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,500,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 168-unit apartment complex in Quincy, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $30,875,000. The Partnership plans to sell the majority of units as condominium and retain 48 units for long-term investment. Gains from the sales of units will be taxed at ordinary income rates (approximately $47,000 per unit). In February 2007, the Partnership refinanced the 48 units which will be retained with a new mortgage in the amount of $4,750,000 with an interest rate of 5.57%, interest only for five years. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Bay Apartments, LLC. The loan will be amortized over 30 years thereafter and matures in March 2017. In April 2008, the Partnership refinanced an additional 20 units and obtained a new mortgage in the amount of $2,368,000 with interest at 5.75%, interest only, which matures in 2013.  As of May 3, 2011, 105 units have been sold, the proceeds of which went to pay down the mortgage on the property.  The balance on the new mortgage is approximately $1,668,000 at March 31, 2011. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Bay, LLC.

 

On March 7, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,000,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a building comprising 49 apartments, one commercial space and a 50-car surface parking lot located in Boston, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $14,300,000, with a $10,750,000 mortgage. The Partnership plans to operate the building and initiate development of the parking lot.  In June 2007, the Partnership separated the parcels, formed an additional limited liability company for the residential apartments and obtained a mortgage on the property. The new limited liability company formed for the residential apartments and commercial space is referred to as Hamilton Essex 81, LLC.  In August 2008, the Partnership restructured the mortgages on both parcels at Essex 81 and transferred the residential apartments to Hamilton Essex 81, LLC.  The mortgage on Hamilton Essex 81, LLC is $8,600,000 with interest only at 5.79% due in August 2015.  The mortgage on Essex Development, LLC, or the parking lot is $2,162,000 with a variable interest rate of 2.25% over the daily Libor rate (0.24% at March 31, 2011) and is due in August 2011.  Harold Brown has issued a personal guaranty up to $1,000,000 of this mortgage. In the event that he is obligated to make payments to the lender as a result of this guaranty, the Partnership and other investors have, in turn, agreed to indemnify him for their proportionate share of any such payments.  The investment in the parking lot is referred to as Hamilton Essex Development, LLC; the investment in the apartments is referred to as Hamilton Essex 81, LLC.

 

On March 2, 2005, the Partnership invested $2,352,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 176-unit apartment complex with an additional small commercial building located in Quincy, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $23,750,000. The Partnership sold 127 of the units as condominiums and retained 49 units for long-term investment. The Partnership obtained a new 10-year mortgage in the amount of $5,000,000 on the units to be retained by the Partnership. The interest on the new loan is 5.67% fixed for the 10 year term with interest only payments for five years and amortized over a 30 year period for the balance of the loan term.  This investment is referred to as Hamilton 1025, LLC.

 

16



Table of Contents

 

In September 2004, the Partnership invested approximately $5,075,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 42-unit apartment complex located in Lexington, Massachusetts. The purchase price was $10,100,000. In October 2004, the Partnership obtained a mortgage on the property in the amount of $8,025,000 and returned $3,775,000 to the Partnership. The Partnership obtained a new 10-year mortgage in the amount of $5,500,000 in January 2007. The interest on the new loan is 5.67% fixed for the ten year term with interest only payments for five years and amortized over a 30 year period for the balance of the loan. This loan required a cash contribution by the Partnership of $1,250,000 in December 2006. This investment is referred to as Hamilton Minuteman, LLC.

 

In August 2004, the Partnership invested $8,000,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 280-unit apartment complex located in Watertown, Massachusetts. The total purchase price was $56,000,000. As of May 2008, the Partnership sold 137 units as condominiums. Gains from these sales were taxed as ordinary income (approximately $50,000 per unit). The majority of the sales proceeds were applied to reduce the mortgage with the final payment made during the second quarter of 2007. With the sale of the units and the payments of the liabilities, the assets were combined with Hamilton on Main Apartments, LLC.  An entity partially owned by the majority shareholder of the General Partner and the President of the management company, 31% and 5%, respectively, was the sales agent and received a variable commission on each sale of 3% to 5%. Hamilton on Main, LLC is known as Hamilton Place.

 

In 2005, Hamilton on Main Apartments, LLC obtained a ten year mortgage on the three buildings to be retained. The mortgage is $16,825,000, with interest only of 5.18% for three years and amortizing on a 30 year schedule for the remaining seven years when the balance is due. The net proceeds after funding escrow accounts and closing costs on the mortgage were approximately $16,700,000, which were used to reduce the existing mortgage. Hamilton on Main LLC paid a fee of approximately $400,000 in connection with this early extinguishment of debt.  At March 31, 2011, the remaining balance on the mortgage is approximately $16,084,000.

 

In November 2001, the Partnership invested approximately $1,533,000 for a 50% ownership interest in a 40-unit apartment building in Cambridge, Massachusetts. This property has a 12-year mortgage, with a remaining balance at March 31, 2011 of approximately $7,138,000 at 6.9% which is amortized on a 30-year schedule, with a final payment of approximately $6,000,000 in 2014. This investment is referred to as 345 Franklin, LLC.

 

As required by the lender, the Treasurer of the General Partner has provided a limited repayment guaranty equal to fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding balance for the loan on the for sale units at Hamilton Bay and a limited guaranty of $1,000,000 for the loan on Hamilton Essex Development.  In the event that he is obligated to make payments to the lenders as a result of these guaranties, the Partnership and other investors have, in turn, agreed to indemnify him for their proportionate share of any such payments.

 

17



Table of Contents

 

Summary financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

Hamilton
Essex 81

 

Hamilton
Essex
Development

 

345
Franklin

 

Hamilton
1025

 

Hamilton
Bay Sales

 

Hamilton
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton
Minuteman
Apts

 

Hamilton
on Main
Apts

 

Dexter
Park

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

9,741,901

 

2,595,466

 

8,544,652

 

6,019,739

 

1,986,926

 

7,493,466

 

7,528,318

 

22,603,616

 

117,082,691

 

183,596,776

 

Cash & Cash Equivalents

 

16,253

 

39,101

 

34,218

 

9,714

 

46,053

 

36,686

 

33,291

 

24,336

 

971,275

 

1,210,928

 

Rent Receivable

 

18,652

 

 

 

5,268

 

9,451

 

1,046

 

6,622

 

3,719

 

4,789

 

71,815

 

121,361

 

Real Estate Tax Escrow

 

86,163

 

 

 

37,496

 

57,224

 

 

 

81,503

 

39,025

 

96,324

 

533,430

 

931,166

 

Prepaid Expenses & Other Assets

 

50,450

 

192

 

48,355

 

77,332

 

198,847

 

82,148

 

40,610

 

444,824

 

1,132,034

 

2,074,793

 

Financing & Leasing Fees

 

90,307

 

2,612

 

22,454

 

28,442

 

10,368

 

37,376

 

22,895

 

26,588

 

503,566

 

744,608

 

Total Assets

 

10,003,726

 

2,637,371

 

8,692,444

 

6,201,902

 

2,243,240

 

7,737,800

 

7,667,858

 

23,200,479

 

120,294,812

 

188,679,631

 

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage Notes Payable

 

8,539,527

 

2,162,000

 

7,138,412

 

5,000,000

 

1,668,000

 

4,750,000

 

5,500,000

 

16,083,855

 

89,914,000

 

140,755,793

 

Accounts Payable & Accrued Expense

 

46,235

 

7,769

 

36,118

 

53,786

 

6,547

 

7,792

 

60,308

 

208,125

 

807,720

 

1,234,400

 

Advance Rental Pmts & Security Dep

 

145,837

 

 

 

117,743

 

66,692

 

20,819

 

81,635

 

64,739

 

243,096

 

1,766,796

 

2,507,358

 

Total Liabilities

 

8,731,599

 

2,169,769

 

7,292,272

 

5,120,478

 

1,695,365

 

4,839,427

 

5,625,047

 

16,535,076

 

92,488,516

 

144,497,550

 

Partners’ Capital

 

1,272,127

 

467,602

 

1,400,171

 

1,081,424

 

547,875

 

2,898,373

 

2,042,811

 

6,665,403

 

27,806,296

 

44,182,081

 

Total Liabilities & Capital

 

10,003,726

 

2,637,371

 

8,692,444

 

6,201,902

 

2,243,240

 

7,737,800

 

7,667,858

 

23,200,479

 

120,294,812

 

188,679,631

 

Partners’ Capital — NERA 50%

 

636,064

 

233,801

 

700,086

 

540,712

 

273,937

 

1,449,186

 

1,021,405

 

3,332,701

 

 

 

8,187,893

 

NERA 40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11,122,518

 

11,122,518

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,310,411

 

Total units/ condominiums

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apartments

 

48

 

 

40

 

175

 

120

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

409

 

1,030

 

Commercial

 

1

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Total

 

49

 

1

 

40

 

176

 

120

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

409

 

1,033

 

Units to be retained

 

49

 

1

 

40

 

49

 

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

409

 

786

 

Units to be sold

 

 

 

 

127

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

247

 

Units sold through May  3 , 2011

 

 

 

 

127

 

105

 

 

 

 

0

 

232

 

Unsold units

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

Unsold units with deposits for future sale as of May 3 , 2011

 

 

 

 

 

0

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Three Months ended March 31, 2011

 

 

 

Hamilton
Essex 81

 

Hamilton Essex
Development

 

345
Franklin

 

Hamilton
1025

 

Hamilton
Bay Sales

 

Hamilton
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton
Minuteman
Apts

 

Hamilton
on Main
Apts

 

Dexter
Park

 

Total

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

288,852

 

69,000

 

281,770

 

198,291

 

57,290

 

214,939

 

193,006

 

613,563

 

2,892,080

 

4,808,790

 

Laundry and Sundry Income

 

3,938

 

 

 

628

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6,090

 

25,590

 

36,246

 

 

 

292,790

 

69,000

 

282,398

 

198,291

 

57,290

 

214,939

 

193,006

 

619,653

 

2,917,671

 

4,845,037

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

4,797

 

382

 

4,373

 

2,041

 

909

 

3,072

 

6,523

 

10,706

 

32,356

 

65,158

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

105,698

 

1,563

 

110,587

 

64,212

 

22,416

 

78,135

 

80,454

 

239,951

 

1,423,077

 

2,126,093

 

Management Fees

 

12,498

 

2,760

 

11,098

 

7,879

 

2,432

 

8,245

 

7,895

 

25,557

 

62,813

 

141,177

 

Operating

 

38,416

 

 

 

23,076

 

618

 

44

 

50

 

22,475

 

124,158

 

283,307

 

492,144

 

Renting

 

5,100

 

 

 

6,000

 

3,459

 

 

 

926

 

1,252

 

3,218

 

54,726

 

74,682

 

Repairs and Maintenance

 

26,662

 

 

 

13,788

 

77,252

 

14,830

 

63,521

 

21,000

 

71,827

 

164,211

 

453,091

 

Taxes and Insurance

 

47,185

 

11,908

 

23,659

 

36,597

 

11,366

 

39,102

 

21,834

 

80,881

 

286,440

 

558,973

 

 

 

240,356

 

16,613

 

192,581

 

192,057

 

51,997

 

193,051

 

161,435

 

556,299

 

2,306,931

 

3,911,319

 

Income Before Other Income

 

52,434

 

52,387

 

89,817

 

6,234

 

5,293

 

21,888

 

31,571

 

63,354

 

610,740

 

933,718

 

Other Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Expense

 

(124,604

)

(15,446

)

(124,576

)

(71,274

)

(24,150

)

(66,879

)

(78,289

)

(210,165

)

(1,261,882

)

(1,977,263

)

Interest Income

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

22

 

141

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,219

 

3,394

 

Interest Income from Note

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,471

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2,471

 

 

 

(124,604

)

(15,446

)

(124,563

)

(71,252

)

(21,538

)

(66,879

)

(78,289

)

(210,165

)

(1,258,663

)

(1,971,397

)

Net Income (loss)

 

(72,170

)

36,942

 

(34,746

)

(65,018

)

(16,245

)

(44,991

)

(46,718

)

(146,811

)

(647,923

)

(1,037,680

)

Net Income (loss) - NERA 50%

 

(36,085

)

18,471

 

(17,373

)

(32,509

)

(8,122

)

(22,495

)

(23,359

)

(73,406

)

 

 

(194,878

)

NERA 40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(259,169

)

(259,169

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(454,047

)

 

18



Table of Contents

 

Future annual mortgage maturities at March 31, 2011 are as follows:

 

 

 

Hamilton
Essex 81

 

Hamilton
Essex
Development

 

Franklin
Street

 

1025
Hamilton

 

Hamilton
Bay

 

Hamilton
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton
Minuteman

 

Hamilton
Place

 

Hamilton
Park
Towers

 

 

 

Period End

 

March
2005

 

March
2005

 

November
2001

 

March
2005

 

October
2005

 

October
2005

 

August
2004

 

August
2004

 

October
2009

 

Total

 

March  31, 2012

 

113,619

 

2,162,000

 

160,444

 

19,763

 

 

 

5,131

 

16,704

 

265,303

 

490,164

 

3,233,127

 

March  31, 2013

 

120,333

 

 

 

171,872

 

62,402

 

 

 

63,462

 

68,345

 

282,034

 

1,223,753

 

1,992,201

 

March  31, 2014

 

127,488

 

 

 

6,806,096

 

66,085

 

1,668,000

 

67,089

 

72,379

 

297,208

 

1,293,683

 

10,398,029

 

March  31, 2015

 

135,069

 

 

 

 

 

69,986

 

 

 

70,922

 

76,651

 

15,239,310

 

1,367,610

 

16,959,548

 

March  31, 2016

 

8,043,019

 

 

 

 

 

73,370

 

 

 

74,975

 

80,353

 

 

 

1,445,761

 

9,717,478

 

Thereafter

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,708,394

 

 

 

4,468,420

 

5,185,568

 

 

 

84,093,029

 

98,455,411

 

 

 

8,539,527

 

2,162,000

 

7,138,412

 

5,000,000

 

1,668,000

 

4,750,000

 

5,500,000

 

16,083,855

 

89,914,000

 

140,755,793

 

 

Summary financial information as of March 31, 2010

 

 

 

Hamilton
Essex 81

 

Hamilton
Essex
Parking

 

345
Franklin

 

Hamilton
1025

 

Hamilton
Bay Sales

 

Hamilton
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton
Minuteman

 

Hamilton on
Main

 

Dexter Park

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ASSETS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Properties

 

10,115,781

 

2,576,552

 

8,949,556

 

6,269,852

 

2,071,444

 

7,833,058

 

7,784,163

 

23,526,217

 

122,393,455

 

191,520,079

 

Cash & Cash Equivalents

 

20,876

 

17,146

 

1,363

 

11,140

 

2,304

 

1,047

 

39,059

 

93,762

 

911,937

 

1,098,634

 

Rent Receivable

 

29,873

 

 

1,396

 

5,681

 

1,699

 

219

 

2,319

 

12,674

 

77,070

 

130,932

 

Real Estate Tax Escrow

 

57,105

 

 

37,166

 

42,922

 

 

77,186

 

39,209

 

97,288

 

370,061

 

720,938

 

Due From Investment Properties

 

 

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

 

 

91

 

Prepaid Expenses & Other Assets

 

72,644

 

199

 

83,121

 

83,986

 

240,894

 

84,492

 

65,354

 

364,473

 

3,876,318

 

4,871,481

 

Financing & Leasing Fees

 

113,499

 

8,865

 

30,620

 

33,468

 

15,433

 

43,738

 

26,863

 

33,450

 

562,883

 

868,819

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Assets

 

10,409,779

 

2,602,762

 

9,103,222

 

6,447,049

 

2,331,866

 

8,039,740

 

7,956,968

 

24,127,864

 

128,191,724

 

199,210,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage Notes Payable

 

8,600,000

 

2,162,000

 

7,288,188

 

5,000,000

 

1,668,000

 

4,750,000

 

5,500,000

 

16,337,945

 

89,914,000

 

141,220,133

 

Due to Investment Properties

 

 

 

 

 

 

91

 

 

 

 

91

 

Accounts Payable & Accrued Expenses

 

59,060

 

5,440

 

82,175

 

41,949

 

12,081

 

7,841

 

79,817

 

211,578

 

732,428

 

1,232,371

 

Advance Rental Payments & Security Deposits

 

144,011

 

 

117,773

 

64,532

 

16,546

 

81,660

 

56,563

 

235,510

 

1,553,515

 

2,270,110

 

Total Liabilities

 

8,803,071

 

2,167,440

 

7,488,135

 

5,106,481

 

1,696,627

 

4,839,593

 

5,636,381

 

16,785,033

 

92,199,943

 

144,722,704

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital

 

1,606,708

 

435,322

 

1,615,086

 

1,340,568

 

635,239

 

3,200,148

 

2,320,587

 

7,342,830

 

35,991,781

 

54,488,270

 

Total Liabilities and Capital

 

10,409,779

 

2,602,762

 

9,103,222

 

6,447,049

 

2,331,866

 

8,039,740

 

7,956,968

 

24,127,864

 

128,191,724

 

199,210,974

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Partners’ Capital - NERA 50%

 

803,354

 

217,661

 

807,543

 

670,284

 

317,620

 

1,600,074

 

1,160,293

 

3,671,415

 

 

 

9,248,245

 

Partners’ Capital - NERA 40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14,396,712

 

14,396,712

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

23,644,957

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total units/condominiums

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Apartments

 

48

 

 

40

 

175

 

120

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

409

 

1,030

 

Commercial

 

1

 

1

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

 

Total

 

49

 

1

 

40

 

176

 

120

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

409

 

1,033

 

Units to be retained

 

49

 

1

 

40

 

49

 

 

48

 

42

 

148

 

409

 

786

 

Units to be sold

 

 

 

 

127

 

120

 

 

 

 

 

247

 

Units sold through April 26, 2010

 

 

 

 

127

 

105

 

 

 

 

 

232

 

Unsold units

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

 

 

 

 

 

15

 

Unsold units with deposits for future sale as of April 26, 2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19



Table of Contents

 

Summary financial information for the three months ended March 31, 2010

 

 

 

Hamilton
Essex 81

 

Hamilton
Essex
Parking

 

345
Franklin

 

Hamilton
1025

 

Hamilton
Bay Sales

 

Hamilton
Bay Apts

 

Hamilton
Minuteman

 

Hamilton
on Main

 

Dexter
Park

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental Income

 

280,848

 

69,000

 

269,385

 

197,261

 

50,767

 

207,266

 

187,227

 

618,013

 

2,863,176

 

4,742,943

 

Laundry and Sundry Income

 

4,049

 

 

463

 

 

 

 

265

 

5,360

 

23,645

 

33,782

 

 

 

284,897

 

69,000

 

269,848

 

197,261

 

50,767

 

207,266

 

187,492

 

623,373

 

2,886,820

 

4,776,725

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

2,437

 

(1,174

)

9,325

 

1,461

 

934

 

4,537

 

2,755

 

11,537

 

45,507

 

77,320

 

Depreciation and Amortization

 

106,179

 

1,563

 

109,825

 

67,277

 

24,032

 

89,594

 

80,045

 

244,822

 

2,540,358

 

3,263,695

 

Management Fees

 

11,678

 

2,760

 

11,119

 

7,962

 

2,234

 

8,287

 

8,081

 

24,434

 

61,518

 

138,073

 

Operating

 

40,673

 

(137

)

17,104

 

104

 

(173

)

283

 

21,771

 

108,501

 

298,100

 

486,226

 

Renting

 

 

 

6,000

 

135

 

 

604

 

1,099

 

3,404

 

48,708

 

59,949

 

Repairs and Maintenance

 

40,858

 

 

12,949

 

63,812

 

36,941

 

108,567

 

24,533

 

79,768

 

160,007

 

527,435

 

Taxes and Insurance

 

48,327

 

11,874

 

27,481

 

31,959

 

10,525

 

37,763

 

24,993

 

77,387

 

382,034

 

652,343

 

 

 

250,153

 

14,887

 

193,804

 

172,709

 

74,492

 

249,635

 

163,278

 

549,852

 

3,536,233

 

5,205,041

 

Income Before Other Income

 

34,744

 

54,113

 

76,044

 

24,552

 

(23,726

)

(42,368

)

24,214

 

73,522

 

(649,412

)

(428,316

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Income

 

2

 

1

 

11

 

23

 

3,230

 

0

 

1

 

3

 

5

 

3,274

 

Interest Income from Note

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest Expense

 

(125,244

)

(15,134

)

(127,094

)

(71,266

)

(24,134

)

(66,935

)

(78,247

)

(213,454

)

(1,252,117

)

(1,973,625

)

Gain on Sale of Real Estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9,478

 

 

 

 

9,478

 

Other Income

 

 

 

 

 

7,721

 

 

 

2,168

 

 

9,889

 

 

 

(125,243

)

(15,133

)

(127,083

)

(71,243

)

(13,184

)

(57,457

)

(78,246

)

(211,284

)

(1,252,112

)

(1,950,984

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Income (Loss)

 

(90,498

)

38,980

 

(51,039

)

(46,690

)

(36,909

)

(99,825

)

(54,032

)

(137,762

)

(1,901,524

)

(2,379,300

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Loss - NERA 50%

 

(45,249

)

19,490

 

(25,520

)

(23,345

)

(18,455

)

(49,913

)

(27,016

)

(68,881

)

 

 

(238,888

)

Net Loss - NERA 40%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(760,610

)

(760,610

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(999,497

)

 

20



Table of Contents

 

NOTE 15. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

 

The following tables summarize income from discontinued operations for the property held for sale for the three ended March 31, 2011, and 2010:

 

 

 

March 31,

 

March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Total Revenues

 

$

227,900

 

$

231,625

 

Operating and other expenses

 

151,151

 

153,332

 

Depreciation and amortization

 

11,360

 

15,600

 

 

 

162,511

 

168,932

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

$

65,389

 

$

62,693

 

 

ITEM 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Forward Looking Statements

 

Certain information contained herein includes forward looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Liquidation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). Forward looking statements in this report, or which management may make orally or in written form from time to time, reflect management’s good faith belief when those statements are made, and are based on information currently available to management. Caution should be exercised in interpreting and relying on such forward looking statements, the realization of which may be impacted by known and unknown risks and uncertainties, events that may occur subsequent to the forward looking statements, and other factors which may be beyond the Partnership’s control and which can materially affect the Partnership’s actual results, performance or achievements for 2011 and beyond. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties mentioned below materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

 

Since the Partnership’s long-term goals include the acquisition of additional properties, a portion of the proceeds from the refinancing and sale of properties is reserved for this purpose. If available acquisitions do not meet the Partnership’s criteria, the Partnership may purchase additional depositary receipts. The Partnership will consider refinancing existing properties if the Partnership’s cash reserves are insufficient to repay existing mortgages or if the Partnership needs additional funds for future acquisitions.

 

The general real estate market in the Greater Boston area has reached a supportable level. The commercial market vacancy peaked and positive employment will continue to support commercial property cash flows.  The multifamily sector is experiencing improved occupancy and modest revenue increases.  Management is experiencing higher occupancy earlier than expected and continues to believe that limited new multi-family housing and greater demand will result in low single digit

 

21



Table of Contents

 

vacancy rates and higher rents upon turnover during the next 18 to 36 months. Management believes that the Partnership will benefit from this supply constraint,  free rent and commissions will continue to decline resulting a positive impact on net operating income.  Management is confident that its present cash reserves as well as anticipated rental revenue will be sufficient to fund its current operations, finance current planned improvements to its properties, and continue distribution payments in the foreseeable future.  Management believes that the continued improvement in the local unemployment rate, general stabilization of housing prices and stability in Massachusetts’s major industries will support a stronger multifamily market for the foreseeable future.

 

For 2011, the Partnership’s revenues are trending toward higher revenue growth as compared to 2010.  Free rent concessions are less than 2010 and leasing commissions in the urban portfolio should also decline for the remainder of 2011.  Combined, these reductions will offset the unseasonably high snow plow and removal costs impacting this quarter’s results.  If not for these unanticipated costs, operating expenses were well in line with 2010.  As in previous quarters, occupancy continues to remain above the competition.     Management is satisfied with staff efforts to balance tenant retention, curb appeal and the profitability of the properties while mitigating growth in the other expense categories.  Management believes that bottom line growth, excluding depreciation, will surpass 2010 operating performance in its core holdings as well as the joint ventures.

 

Management anticipates that the purchasing power of the Management Company will continue to buffer large increases in operating expenses.  In 2008, the Partnership financed approximately $65,000,000 of mortgage debt for 15 years at rates less than 6%.  The Partnership has mitigated financing concerns and locked in interest rates to the benefit of the shareholders.  The next significant round of refinancing, approximately $45,000,000, will not occur until 2013 and 2014.  Management anticipates that stability in financial markets will return to the marketplace by 2013.

 

As Management reviews property performance, it takes into consideration opportunities for property dispositions.  On February 2, 2011, the Partnership was presented an unsolicited offer to sell the Avon Street apartments. The possible disposition of the Avon Street Apartments is one such opportunity where Management believes is an optimum time to dispose of an asset in light of demand for such product, the current interest rate environment and the property’s position in the marketplace.  On March 1, 2011, the Partnership entered into a purchase and sale agreement.  For additional information, see Note 2 to the financial statements.

 

The Stock Repurchase Program that was initiated in 2007 has purchased 398,320 Depositary Receipts through May 2011 or 29% of the outstanding class A Depositary Receipts.  The Partnership has retained The Hamilton Company (“Hamilton”) to manage and administer the Partnership’s and Joint Ventures’ Properties. Hamilton is a full-service real estate management company, which has legal, construction, maintenance, architectural, accounting and administrative departments. The Partnership’s properties represent approximately 40% of the total properties and 70% of the residential properties managed by Hamilton. Substantially all of the other properties managed by Hamilton are owned, wholly or partially, directly or indirectly, by Harold Brown. The Partnership’s Second Amended and Restated Contract of Limited Partnership (the “Partnership Agreement”) expressly provides that the general partner may employ a management company to manage the properties, and that such management company may be paid a fee of up to 4% of rental receipts for administrative and management services (the “Management Fee”). The Partnership pays Hamilton the full annual Management Fee, in monthly installments.

 

At March 1, 2011, Harold Brown, his brother Ronald Brown and the President of Hamilton, Carl Valeri, collectively own approximately 39.50% of the Depositary Receipts representing the Partnership Class A Units (including Depositary Receipts held by trusts for the benefit of such persons’ family members). Harold Brown also owns 75% of the Partnership’s Class B Units, 75% of the capital stock of NewReal, Inc. (“NewReal”), the Partnership’s sole general partner, and all of the outstanding stock of Hamilton. Ronald Brown also owns 25% of the Partnership’s Class B Units and 25% of NewReal’s capital stock. In addition, Ronald Brown is the President and director of NewReal and Harold Brown is NewReal’s Treasurer and a director. One of NewReal’s directors, Roberta Ornstein also owns immaterial amounts of the Partnership’s Class A receipts.

 

On March 31, 2011 the Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation (the “Foundation’) purchased 8,000 Depositary Receipts of the Partnership at a price of $66.75 for a total cost of $534,000.  The Foundation was formed under Sec. 501(c) (3) of the Internal Revenue Code.  There are five trustees of the Foundation, all of whom are family members or associates of Harold Brown.  Neither Harold Brown nor the Foundation’s Trustees have any economic interest in the Foundation.

 

In addition to the Management Fee, the Partnership Agreement further provides for the employment of outside professionals to provide services to the Partnership and allows NewReal to charge the Partnership for the cost of employing professionals to assist with the administration of the Partnership’s properties. Additionally, from time to time, the Partnership pays Hamilton for repairs and maintenance services, legal services, construction services and accounting services. The costs

 

22



Table of Contents

 

charged by Hamilton for these services are at the same hourly rate charged to all entities managed by Hamilton, and management believes such rates are competitive in the marketplace.

 

Hamilton accounted for approximately 3.6% of the repair and maintenance expense paid for by the Partnership in the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to approximately 7% for the three months ended March 31, 2010.  Of the funds paid to Hamilton for this purpose, the great majority was to cover the cost of services provided by the Hamilton maintenance department, including plumbing, electrical, carpentry services, and snow removal for those properties close to Hamilton’s headquarters. However, several of the larger Partnership properties have their own maintenance staff.  Further, those properties that do not have their own maintenance staff and are located more than a reasonable distance from Hamilton’s headquarters in Allston, Massachusetts are generally serviced by local, independent companies.

 

Hamilton’s legal department handles most of the Partnership’s eviction and collection matters. Additionally, it prepares most long-term commercial lease agreements and represents the Partnership in selected purchase and sale transactions.  Overall, Hamilton provided approximately 73% and 76% of the legal services paid for by the Partnership during the three  months ended March 31, 2011 and  2010.

 

Additionally, as described in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, The Hamilton Company receives similar fees from the Investment Properties.

 

R. Brown Partners, which is owned by Ronald Brown, managed the condominium association containing five condominium units which were sold in 2008 located in Brookline, Massachusetts. That entity received annual management fees from the five units of approximately $1,500, and Hamilton reduced its management fees to approximately 2%, so that the total management fee will not exceed the 4% allowed by the Partnership’s Partnership Agreement.

 

The Partnership requires that three bids be obtained for construction contracts in excess of $5,000. Hamilton may be one of the three bidders on a particular project and may be awarded the contract if its bid and its ability to successfully complete the project are deemed appropriate. For contracts that are not awarded to Hamilton, Hamilton charges the Partnership a construction supervision fee equal to 5% of the contract amount. Hamilton’s architectural department also provides services to the Partnership on an as-needed basis. During the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, Hamilton provided the Partnership approximately $66,000 and $4,000, respectively in construction and architectural services.

 

Prior to 1991, the Partnership employed an outside, unaffiliated company to perform its bookkeeping and accounting functions. Since that time, such services have been provided by Hamilton’s accounting staff, which consists of approximately 14 people.  In 2011, Hamilton charges the Partnership $31,250 per quarter for bookkeeping and accounting services ($125,000 per year).

 

For more information on related party transactions, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

 

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, requires the Partnership to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. The Partnership regularly and continually evaluates its estimates, including those related to acquiring, developing and assessing the carrying values of its real estate properties and its investments in and advances to joint ventures. The Partnership bases its estimates on historical experience, current market conditions, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. The Partnership’s critical accounting policies are those which require assumptions to be made about such matters that are highly uncertain. Different estimates could have a material effect on the Partnership’s financial results. Judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of these policies and estimates may result in materially different amounts being reported under different conditions and circumstances. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Principles of Consolidation.

 

Revenue Recognition:  Rental income from residential and commercial properties is recognized over the term of the related lease. For residential tenants, amounts 60 days in arrears are charged against income. The commercial tenants are evaluated on a case by case basis. Certain leases of the commercial properties provide for increasing stepped minimum rents, which are accounted for on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Concessions made on residential leases are also accounted for on the straight-line basis.

 

23



Table of Contents

 

Rental Properties:  Rental properties are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; improvements and additions are capitalized. When assets are retired or otherwise disposed of, the cost of the asset and related accumulated depreciation is eliminated from the accounts, and any gain or loss on such disposition is included in income. Fully depreciated assets are removed from the accounts. Rental properties are depreciated by both straight-line and accelerated methods over their estimated useful lives. Upon acquisition of rental property, the Partnership estimates the fair value of acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, building and improvements, and identified intangible assets and liabilities assumed, generally consisting of the fair value of (i) above and below market leases, (ii) in-place leases and (iii) tenant relationships.  The Partnership allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values.  The Partnership records goodwill or a gain on bargain purchase (if any) if the net assets acquired/liabilities assumed exceed the purchase consideration of a transaction.  In estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired, the Partnership considers information obtained about each property as a result of its due diligence and marketing and leasing activities, and utilizes various valuation methods, such as estimated cash flow projections utilizing appropriate discount and capitalization rates, estimates of replacement costs net of depreciation, and available market information.  The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property considers the value of the property as if it were vacant.

 

Other intangible assets acquired include amounts for in-place lease values and tenant relationship values, which are based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Partnership’s overall relationship with the respective tenant.  Factors to be considered by management in its analysis of in-place lease values include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases at market rates during the expected lease-up periods, depending on local market conditions.  In estimating costs to execute similar leases, management considers leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.  Characteristics considered by management in valuing tenant relationships include the nature and extent of the Partnership’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals.  The value of in-place leases are amortized to expense over the remaining initial terms of the respective leases.  The value of tenant relationship intangibles are amortized to expense over the anticipated life of the relationships.

 

In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying value of a rental property may be impaired, an analysis of the value is prepared. The estimated future undiscounted cash flows are compared to the asset’s carrying value to determine if a write-down to fair value is required.

 

Impairment:  On an annual basis management assesses whether there are any indicators that the value of the Partnership’s rental properties may be impaired.  A property’s value is impaired only if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.  To the extent impairment has occurred, the loss shall be measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the property over the fair value of the property.  The Partnership’s estimates of aggregate future cash flows expected to be generated by each property are based on a number of assumptions that are subject to economic and market uncertainties including, among others, demand for space, competition for tenants, changes in market rental rates, and costs to operate each property.  As these factors are difficult to predict and are subject to future events that may alter management’s assumptions, the future cash flows estimated by management in its impairment analyses may not be achieved. The Partnership has not recognized an impairment loss since 1995.

 

Rental Property Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations:  When assets are identified by management as held for sale, the Partnership discontinues depreciating the assets and estimates the sales price, net of selling costs, of such assets. If, in management’s opinion, the net sales price of the assets which have been identified as held for sale is less than the net book value of the assets, a valuation allowance is established. Properties identified as held for sale and/or sold are presented in discontinued operations for all periods presented.

 

Investments in Partnerships:  The Partnership accounts for its 40%-50% ownership in the Investment Properties under the equity method of accounting, as it exercises significant influence over, but does not control these entities. These investments are recorded initially at cost, as Investments in Partnerships, and subsequently adjusted for the Partnership’s share in earnings, cash contributions and distributions. Under the equity method of accounting, our net equity is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets, and our share of net income or loss from the Partnership is included on the consolidated statements of income.

 

With respect to investments in and advances to the Investment Properties, the Partnership looks to the underlying properties to assess performance and the recoverability of carrying amounts for those investments in a manner similar to direct investments in real estate properties. An impairment charge is recorded if management’s estimate of the aggregate future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) to be generated by the property is less than the carrying value of the property.

 

24



Table of Contents

 

Legal Proceedings:  The Partnership is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that arise, from time to time, in the ordinary course of business. These matters are frequently covered by insurance. If it is determined that a loss is likely to occur, the estimated amount of the loss is recorded in the financial statements. Both the amount of the loss and the point at which its occurrence is considered likely can be difficult to determine.

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Three Months Ended March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010

 

The Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships earned income before interest expense, loss from investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and other income and loss of approximately $2,507,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to approximately $2,590,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of approximately $83,000.

 

The rental activity is summarized as follows:

 

 

 

Occupancy Date

 

 

 

May 3, 2011

 

April 26, 2010

 

Residential

 

 

 

 

 

Units

 

2,269

 

2,269

 

Vacancies

 

63

 

66

 

Vacancy rate

 

2.8

%

2.9

%

Commercial

 

 

 

 

 

Total square feet

 

110,949

 

110,949

 

Vacancy

 

0

 

163

 

Vacancy rate

 

0

%

0.1

%

 

 

 

Rental Income (in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

 

 

Total
Operations

 

Continuing
Operations

 

Total
Operations

 

Continuing
Operations

 

Total rents

 

$

8,403

 

$

8,179

 

$

8,197

 

$

7,969

 

Residential percentage

 

90

%

90

%

90

%

90

%

Commercial percentage

 

10

%

10

%

10

%

10

%

Contingent rentals

 

$

153

 

$

153

 

$

168

 

$

168

 

 

Three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2010:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

Dollar

 

Percent

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Change

 

Change

 

Revenues:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rental income

 

$

8,178,851

 

$

7,968,844

 

$

210,007

 

2.6

%

Laundry and sundry income

 

102,043

 

117,548

 

(15,505

)

(13.1

)%

 

 

8,280,894

 

8,086,392

 

194,502

 

2.4

%

Expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Administrative

 

425,743

 

477,941

 

(52,198

)

(10.9

)%

Depreciation and amortization

 

1,353,609

 

1,363,311

 

(9,702

)

(0.1

)%

Management fees

 

333,350

 

329,312

 

4,038

 

1.2

%

Operating

 

1,458,686

 

1,230,744

 

227,942

 

18.5

%

Renting

 

87,886

 

65,450

 

22,436

 

34.3

%

Repairs and maintenance

 

1,062,141

 

977,557

 

84,584

 

8.7

%

Taxes and insurance

 

1,052,526

 

1,051,635

 

891

 

0.0

%

 

 

5,773,941

 

5,495,950

 

277,991

 

5.1

%

Income Before Other Income and Discontinued Operations

 

2,506,953

 

2,590,442

 

(83,489

)

(3.2

)%

Other Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest expense

 

(1,946,709

)

(1,997,348

)

50,639

 

2.5

%

Interest income

 

1,226

 

759

 

467

 

61.5

%

(Loss) from investment in unconsolidated joint ventures

 

(454,047

)

(999,497

)

545,450

 

(54.6

)%

 

 

(2,399,530

)

(2,996,086

)

596,556

 

(20.0

)%

Income (loss) from Continuing Operations

 

107,423

 

(405,644

)

513,067

 

126.4

%

Discontinued operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Income from discontinued operations

 

65,389

 

62,693

 

2,696

 

4.3

%

 

 

65,389

 

62,693

 

2,696

 

4.3

%

Net Income (loss)

 

$

172,812

 

$

(342,951

)

$

515,763

 

(150.3

)%

 

25



Table of Contents

 

Rental income from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $8,179,000, compared to approximately $7,969,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of approximately $210,000(2.6%).  The increase in rental income is due primarily to the decrease in the free rent incentives granted to tenants in 2011.  The amortization of free rent was approximately $63,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to approximately $184,000 for the same period in 2010.  In addition the Partnership has seen a decrease in bad debt expense of approximately $68,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011.  Both of these factors have resulted in an increase in rental income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010.

 

Operating expenses from continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2011 were approximately $5,774,000 compared to approximately $5,496,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of approximately $278,000 (5.1%). The most significant factors contributing to this increase is an increase in operating expenses of approximately $228,000 (18.5%) due to significant snow removal costs in 2011 compared to 2010, an increase in repairs and maintenance expenses of approximately $86,000 (8.7%) due to repairs at many properties to maintain occupancy, and an increase in renting expenses of approximately $22,000 (34.3%) due to an increase in rental commissions.

 

These increases are offset by a decrease in depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $9,700 (0.1%) due to 5-10 year property becoming fully depreciated, as well as the suspension of the depreciation of the Avon Street property held for sale; and a decrease in administrative expenses of approximately $52,000 (10.9%) due to professional fees incurred in 2010 in connection with the stock buyback program.

 

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $1,947,000 compared to approximately $1,997,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of approximately $51,000 (2.5%).  This decrease is due to a lower level of debt in 2011 compared to 2010.

 

At March 31, 2011, the Partnership has between a 40% and 50% ownership interests in nine different Investment Properties. See as Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a detail of the financial information of each Investment Property.

 

As described in Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Partnership’s share of the net loss from the Investment Properties was approximately $454,000.  Included in this loss is depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $921,000.  The allocable loss associated with the October 2009 investment in Dexter Park is approximately $259,000 of which approximately $569,000 is depreciation and amortization.

 

Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $1,200 compared to approximately $800 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase of approximately $400. This slight increase is due to an increase in cash available for investment.

 

In March 2011, the Partnership entered into a purchase and sales agreement to sell the Avon Street Apartments in Malden, Massachusetts. The sale price is $8,750,000 and the gain on the sale will be approximately $7,800,000.  The closing is scheduled for May 2011.  The Partnership is actively searching for an appropriate acquisition that will allow for a tax free

 

26



Table of Contents

 

exchange and significantly reduce the taxable gain.  The net income from the Avon Street Apartments is approximately $65,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2011 compared to approximately $63,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.  The income is included in income from discontinued operations.

 

On March 25, 2010, the Partnership refinanced the Brookside Apartments.  The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%.  The loan is a ten year note amortized over 30 years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000.  There were no prepayment penalties.

 

As a result of the changes discussed above, net income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was approximately $173,000 compared to a loss of approximately $343,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase in income of approximately $ 516,000.

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

The Partnership’s principal source of cash during 2011 and 2010 was the collection of rents and refinancing of Partnership properties. The majority of cash and cash equivalents of $3,752,296 at March 31, 2011 and $3,245,361 at December 31, 2010 were held in interest bearing accounts at creditworthy financial institutions.

 

This increase of $506,935 at March 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:

 

 

 

Three Months Ended March 31,

 

 

 

2011

 

2010

 

Cash provided by operating activities

 

$

2,115,999

 

$

2,089,940

 

Cash (used in) investing activities

 

(452,885

)

(15,745

)

Cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(235,787

)

698,444

 

Repurchase of Depositary Receipts, Class B and General Partner Units

 

 

(344,746

)

Distributions paid

 

(920,392

)

(926,426

)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents

 

$

506,935

 

$

1,501,467

 

 

The cash provided by operating activities is primarily due to the collection of rents less cash operating expenses. The increase in cash used in investing activities is due to improvements to rental properties in 2011. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities is due to the refinancing of a property in 2010 resulting in an increase in cash.  In 2010, the Partnership repurchased Depositary Receipts in the amount of approximately $345,000; no purchases were made in 2011.

 

During 2011, the Partnership and its Subsidiary Partnerships completed improvements to certain of the Properties at a total cost of approximately $765,000. These improvements were funded from cash reserves and, to some extent, escrow accounts established in connection with the financing or refinancing of the applicable Properties. These sources have been adequate to fully fund improvements. The most significant improvements were made at Westgate Woburn, Olde English Village, Redwood Hills, 62 Boylston Street, School Street, Nashoba, Clovelly and Hamilton Oaks at a cost of approximately $192,000, $171,000, $97,000, $74,000, $41,000, $34,000, $32,000, and $31,000, respectively. The Partnership plans to invest approximately $1,213,000 in capital improvements during the remainder of 2011.

 

During the three months ended March 31, 2010 the Partnership repurchased 4,521 Class A Depositary Receipts for $275,850, 107 Class B Units for $65,462 and 6 General Partnership Units for $3,444.  The purchase was funded from cash received from the refinancing of Partnership properties in 2010 and 2009.  The Partnership did not repurchase any Depositary Receipts or Units during the three months ended March 31, 2011.

 

On March 25, 2010, the Partnership refinanced the NERA Brookside Associates, LLC.  The new loan is $2,820,000, matures in 2020 and has an interest rate of 5.81%.  The loan is a ten year note amortized over 30 years. The proceeds of the loan were used to pay off the old mortgage of approximately $1,900,000.  There were no prepayment penalties.  The Partnership and Joint Ventures do not separately reserve funds for the potential costs of refinancing their maturing mortgages.

 

On October 28, 2009 the Partnership invested approximately $15,925,000 in a joint venture to acquire a 40% interest in a residential property located in Brookline, Massachusetts.  The property, referred to as Dexter Park, is a 409 unit residential

 

27



Table of Contents

 

complex. The purchase price was $129,500,000.  The total mortgage is $89,914,000 with an interest rate of 5.57% and it matures in 2019.  The mortgage calls for interest only payments for the first two years of the loan and amortized over 30 years thereafter.  In order to fund this investment, the Partnership used approximately $8,757,000 of its cash reserves and borrowed approximately $7,168,000 with an interest rate of 6% from HBC Holdings, LLC, an entity owned by Harold Brown and his affiliates (“HBC”).  The term of the loan is four years with a provision requiring payment in whole or in part upon demand by HBC with six months notice.  On August 17, 2010, HBC gave six months written notice to the Partnership requesting a principal pay down of $2,500,000.  During the fourth quarter of 2010, the Partnership paid HBC $2,500,000 as requested. The balance of the loan, $4,668,600, will remain subject to the original terms of the Note, including HBC’s right to demand payment of the balance of the loan in whole or in part upon six months notice. The interest paid during the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 was approximately $70,000 and approximately $108,000, respectively. This loan is collateralized by the Partnership’s 99% ownership interest in 62 Boylston Street.  This investment, Hamilton Park Towers, LLC is referred to as Dexter Park. Dexter Park distributed $240,000 and $250,000 to the Partnership during the three months ended March 31, 1011 and 2010, respectively, and a total of $830,000 in 2010.  Principal payments on the Dexter Park mortgage begin in the fourth quarter of 2011 and will result in a substantial reduction of distributions from Dexter Park.  The Partnership’s share of the principal payments is approximately $440,000 per year.

 

In February 2011, the Partnership approved a distribution of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) payable on March 31, 2011.  In April 2011, the Partnership approved a quarterly distribution of $7.00 per unit ($0.70 per receipt) payable on June 30, 2011.

 

The Partnership anticipates that cash from operations and interest bearing accounts will be sufficient to fund its current operations pay distributions, make required debt payments and  to finance current improvements to its properties. The Partnership may also sell or refinance properties. The Partnership’s net income and cash flow may fluctuate dramatically from year to year as a result of the sale or refinancing of properties, increases or decreases in rental income or expenses, or the loss of significant tenants.

 

As more fully described in Note 2, the Partnership entered into a purchase and sales agreement to sell the Avon Street Apartments, which will result in cash proceeds to the Partnership of approximately $5,700,000.  These funds may be used to purchase additional properties, depositary receipts or pay down debt. The Partnership is actively searching for an appropriate acquisition that will allow for a tax free exchange and significantly reduce the taxable gain.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements-Joint Venture Indebtedness

 

As of March 31, 2011, the Partnership had between a 40%-50% ownership interest in nine Joint Ventures, all of which have mortgage indebtedness. We do not have control of these partnerships and therefore we account for them using the equity method of consolidation. At March 31, 2011, our proportionate share of the non-recourse debt related to these investments was equal to approximately $61,386,000. See Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

See Notes 5 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of mortgage notes payable. The Partnerships have no other material contractual obligations to be disclosed.

 

Factors That May Affect Future Results

 

Certain information contained herein includes forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Liquidation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”). While forward looking statements reflect management’s good faith beliefs when those statements are made, caution should be exercised in interpreting and relying on such forward looking statements, the realization of which may be impacted by known and unknown risks and uncertainties, events that may occur subsequent to the forward-looking statements, and other factors which may be beyond the Partnership’s control and which can materially affect the Partnership’s actual results, performance or achievements for 2011 and beyond. Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties mentioned below materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, estimated or projected. We expressly disclaim any responsibility to update our forward looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they are made, to anticipate future results or trends.

 

28



Table of Contents

 

Along with risks detailed from time to time in the Partnership’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, some factors that could cause the Partnership’s actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements include but are not limited to the following:

 

The Partnership depends on the real estate markets where its properties are located, primarily in Eastern Massachusetts and these markets may be adversely affected by local economic market conditions, which are beyond the Partnership’s control.

 

The Partnership is subject to the general economic risks affecting the real estate industry, such as dependence on tenant’s financial condition and the need to enter into new leases or renew leases on terms favorable to tenants in order to generate rental revenues and our ability to collect rents from our tenants.

 

The Partnership is also impacted by changing economic conditions making alternative housing arrangements more or less attractive to the Partnership’s tenants, such as the interest rates on single family home mortgages and the availability and purchase price of single-family homes in the Greater Boston metropolitan area.

 

The Partnership is subject to significant expenditures associated with each investment, such as debt service payments, real estate taxes, insurance and maintenance costs, which are generally not reduced when circumstances cause a reduction in revenues from a property.

 

The Partnership is subject to increases in heating and utility costs that may arise as a result of economic and market conditions and fluctuations in seasonal weather conditions including snow removal expenses.

 

Civil disturbances, earthquakes and other natural disasters may result in uninsured or underinsured losses.

 

Actual or threatened terrorist attacks may adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and the value of our properties.

 

Financing or refinancing of Partnership properties may not be available to the extent necessary or desirable, or may not be available on favorable terms.

 

The Partnership properties face competition from similar properties in the same market. This competition may affect the Partnership’s ability to attract and retain tenants and may reduce the rents that can be charged.

 

Given the nature of the real estate business, the Partnership is subject to potential environmental liabilities. These include environmental contamination in the soil at the Partnership’s or neighboring real estate, whether caused by the Partnership, previous owners of the subject property or neighbors of the subject property, and the presence of hazardous materials in the Partnership’s buildings, such as asbestos, mold and radon gas. Management is not aware of any material environmental liabilities at this time.

 

Insurance coverage for and relating to commercial properties is increasingly costly and difficult to obtain. In addition, insurance carriers have excluded certain specific items from standard insurance policies, which have resulted in increased risk exposure for the Partnership. These include insurance coverage for acts of terrorism and war, and coverage for mold and other environmental conditions. Coverage for these items is either unavailable, or prohibitively expensive.

 

Market interest rates could adversely affect the market prices for Class A Partnership Units and Depositary Receipts as well as performance and cash flow.

 

Changes in income tax laws and regulations may affect the income taxable to owners of the Partnership. These changes may affect the after-tax value of future distributions.

 

The Partnership may fail to identify, acquire, construct, or develop additional properties; may develop or acquire properties that do not produce a desired or expected yield on invested capital; may be unable to sell poorly- performing or otherwise undesirable properties quickly; or may fail to effectively integrate acquisitions of properties or portfolios of properties.

 

Risks associated with the use of debt to fund acquisitions and developments.

 

29



Table of Contents

 

Competition for acquisitions may result in increased prices for properties.

 

Any weakness identified in the Partnership’s internal controls as part of the evaluation being undertaken by the Partnership and its independent public accountants pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 could have an adverse effect on the Partnership’s business.

 

Ongoing compliance with Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may require additional personnel or system changes.

 

The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive or as an admission regarding the adequacy of disclosures made by the Partnership prior to the date hereof or the effectiveness of said Act. The Partnership expressly disclaims any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward- looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

 

The residential real estate market in the Greater Boston area has softened and the Partnership anticipates the climate will remain the same in the foreseeable future. This may result in increases in vacancy rates and/or a reduction in rents. The Partnership believes its present cash reserves as well as anticipated rental revenue will be sufficient to fund its current operations, and to finance current planned improvements to its properties and continue dividend payments in the foreseeable future.

 

Since the Partnership’s long-term goals include the acquisition of additional properties, a portion of the proceeds from the refinancing and sale of properties is reserved for this purpose. The Partnership will consider refinancing existing properties if the Partnership’s cash reserves are insufficient to repay existing mortgages or if the Partnership needs additional funds for future acquisitions.

 

ITEM 3.  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

As of March 31, 2011, the Partnership, its Subsidiary Partnerships and the Investment Properties collectively have approximately $282,870,000 in long-term debt, substantially all of which pays interest at fixed rates. Accordingly, the fair value of these debt instruments is affected by changes in market interest rates. These mortgages and note payable mature through 2023. For information regarding the fair value and maturity dates of these debt obligations, see Item 2. Properties and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements — “Mortgage Notes Payable,” Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements — “Fair Value Measurements” and Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements — “Investment in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures.”

 

For additional disclosure about market risk, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Factors That May Affect Future Results”.

 

ITEM 4.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Disclosure Controls and Procedures.  We have evaluated the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures to determine whether they are effective in ensuring that the disclosure of required information is timely made in accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) and the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. This evaluation was made under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) of our General Partner as of the end of the period covered by this annual report on Form 10-K. The CEO and CFO have concluded, based on their reviews, that our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2010 that materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

 

30



Table of Contents

 

PART II  —  OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1.  Legal Proceedings

 

The Partnership, the Subsidiary Partnerships and their properties are not presently subject to any material litigation, and, to management’s knowledge, there is not any material litigation presently threatened against them.  The Partnership and Subsidiary Partnerships are occasionally subject to ordinary routine legal and administrative proceedings incident to the ownership of residential and commercial real estate.  Some of the legal and other expenses related to these proceedings are covered by insurance and none of these costs and expenses are expected to have a material adverse effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Partnership.

 

Item 1A.  Risk Factors

 

There were no material changes to the Risk Factors disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

 

Item 2.  Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

(a)                                  None

 

(b)                                 None.

 

(c)                                  None

 

Item 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities

 

None.

 

Item 4.  (Removed and Reserved)

 

Item 5.  Other Information

 

None.

 

Item 6.  Exhibits

 

See the exhibit index below.

 

31



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

NEW ENGLAND REALTY ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

 

 

 

By:

/s/ NEWREAL, INC.

 

 

Its General Partner

 

 

 

 

By:

/s/ RONALD BROWN

 

 

Ronald Brown, President

 

Dated: May 12, 2011

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

 

Signature

 

Title

 

Date

/s/ RONALD BROWN

 

President and Director of the General Partner (Principal

 

May 12, 2011

Ronald Brown

 

Executive Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ HAROLD BROWN

 

Treasurer and Director of the General Partner (Principal

 

May 12, 2011

Harold Brown

 

Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ GUILLIAEM AERTSEN

 

Director of the General Partner

 

May 12, 2011

Guilliaem Aertsen

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ CONRAD DIGREGORIO

 

Director of the General Partner

 

May 12, 2011

Conrad DiGregorio

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ DAVID ALOISE

 

Director of the General Partner

 

May 12, 2011

David Aloise

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

/s/ ROBERTA ORNSTEIN

 

Director of the General Partner

 

May 12, 2011

Roberta Ornstein

 

 

 

 

 

32



Table of Contents

 

EXHIBIT INDEX

 

Exhibit No.

 

Description of Exhibit

(3)

 

Second Amended and Restated Contract of Limited Partnership.(1)

(4)

 

(a)

Specimen certificate representing Depositary Receipts.(2)

 

 

(b)

Description of rights of holders of Partnership securities.(2)

 

 

(c)

Deposit Agreement, dated August 12, 1987, between the General Partner and the First National Bank of Boston.(3)

(10.1)

 

Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Sally A. Starr and Lisa Brown, Trustees of Omnibus Realty Trust, a nominee trust.(5)

(10.2)

 

Commitment letter from Wachovia Multifamily Capital, Inc. to The Hamilton Company dated January 11, 2008.(6)

(10.3)

 

Amendment dated February 27, 2008 to Commitment letter from Wachovia Multifamily Capital, Inc. to The Hamilton Company dated January 11, 2008.(7)

(10.4)

 

Purchase and Sale and Escrow Agreement dated September 1, 2009 by and between 175 Free Street Investors LLC, as Seller, The Hamilton Company, as Purchaser, and First American Title Insurance Company, as Escrow Agent. (8)

(10.5)

 

Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of HBC Holdings, LLC. (9)

(10.6)

 

Limited Liability Company Agreement of Hamilton Park Towers, LLC. (10)

(10.7)

 

Pledge Agreement dated October 28, 2009 by and between New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership and HBC Holdings, LLC. (11)

(10.8)

 

Promissory Note dated October 28, 2009 of New England Realty Associates Limited Partnership in favor of HBC Holdings, LLC. (12)

(10.9)

 

MultiFamily Note - CME of Hamilton Park Towers, LLC, as Borrower, in favor of Wachovia Multifamily Capital, Inc., as Lender, in the principal amount of $89,914,000 dated October 28, 2009. (13)

(10.10)

 

Purchase and sale agreement by and between Avon Street Apartments and 503-509 Pleasant Street, LLC.

 

 

 

(21)

 

Subsidiaries of the Partnership.(4)

(31.1)

 

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Ronald Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Partnership (President and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership)

(31.2)

 

Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Harold Brown, Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership (Treasurer and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership)

(32.1)

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of Ronald Brown, Principal Executive Officer of the Partnership (President and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership) and Harold Brown, Principal Financial Officer of the Partnership (Treasurer and a Director of NewReal, Inc., sole General Partner of the Partnership).

(99.1)

 

Combined Financial Statements of Significant Subsidiaries

 


(1)                                  Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Partnership’s Statement Furnished in Connection with the Solicitation of Consents filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on October 14, 1986.

 

(2)                                  Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to Exhibit 2(b) to the Partnership’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on August 17, 1987.

 

(3)                                  Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2(b) to the Partnership’s Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on August 17, 1987.

 

(4)                                  Incorporated by reference to Notes 2 and 14 to Financial Statements included as part of this Form 10-K.

 

(5)                                  Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 30, 1995.

 

(6)                                  Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 11, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 6, 2008.

 

(7)                                  Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 27, 2008 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 4, 2008.

 

(8)                                 Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009.

 

(9)                                 Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009.

 

(10)                           Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009.

 

(11)                           Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 3, 2009.

 

(12)                           Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 3, 2009.

 

(13)                           Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Partnership’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 3, 2009.

 

33