UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM S-4
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
Under
The Securities Act of 1933
Eagle Bancorp, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
6021 (Primary Standard Industrial Classification Code Number) |
52-2061461 (I.R.S. Identification Number) |
||
7815 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301.986.1800 (Address, including ZIP Code and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Registrant's Principal Executive Offices) |
||||
Ronald D. Paul President and Chief Executive Officer Eagle Bancorp, Inc. 7815 Woodmont Avenue Bethesda, Maryland 20814 301.986.1800 (Name, Address, including ZIP Code and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Agent for Service) |
Copies to: |
||
Noel M. Gruber, Esquire Kennedy & Baris, LLP 4701 Sangamore Road, Suite P-15 Bethesda, Maryland 20816 301.229.3400 |
Joseph G. Passaic, Jr., Esquire Philip G. Feigen, Esquire Patton Boggs LLP 2550 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20037 202.457.6142 |
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
If securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box. o
If this form is being filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number in the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number in the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer ý | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
Title of Each Class of Securities to be Registered |
Amount to be Registered(1) |
Proposed Maximum Offering Price Per Unit |
Proposed Maximum Aggregate Offering Price(2) |
Amount of Registration Fee(3) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value | 4,338,363 | N/A | $6.02 | $1,026.40 | ||||
THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(a) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(a), MAY DETERMINE.
Information contained herein is not complete and may be changed. A registration statement relating to these securities has been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These securities may not be sold nor may offers to buy be accepted prior to the time the registration statement becomes effective. This document shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy nor shall there be any sale of these securities in any jurisdiction in which such offer, solicitation or sale is not permitted or would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such jurisdiction.
PRELIMINARY JOINT PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS
DATED , 2008, SUBJECT TO COMPLETION
Eagle Bancorp LOGO | Fidelity Logo |
On December 2, 2007, Eagle Bancorp, Inc. and Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which Fidelity will be merged into Woodmont Holdings, Inc., a newly formed wholly owned subsidiary of Eagle, and shares of Fidelity common stock will be converted into shares of Eagle common stock. Shareholders of Fidelity are being asked to approve the merger and the merger agreement at a special meeting of Fidelity shareholders to be held on , 2008. Eagle shareholders are being asked to approve the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock in connection with the merger at a special meeting of Eagle shareholders to be held on , 2008.
As a result of the merger, each share of Fidelity common stock, other than those shares as to which an objecting shareholder's right to demand and receive the payment of fair value have been properly exercised, will be converted into 0.9202 shares of Eagle common stock, subject to reduction in accordance with the merger agreement. If the merger had been completed as of December 31, 2007, then based on a preliminary, partial and estimated application of the adjustment provisions of the merger agreement, the conversion ratio would have been 0.7055 shares of Eagle common stock for each share of Fidelity common stock. The actual conversion ratio may be higher or lower than the estimated adjusted conversion ratio as of December 31, 2007. Based on the number of shares of Fidelity common stock outstanding as of , 2008, and assuming no options to acquire Fidelity common stock are exercised, Eagle will issue approximately 3,871,296 shares of Eagle common stock, or approximately 28% of the outstanding shares of Eagle common stock in connection with the merger, based on the initial conversion ratio, and approximately 2,968,050 shares of Eagle common stock, or approximately 23% of the outstanding shares of Eagle common stock following the merger, based on the estimated adjusted conversion ratio as of December 31, 2007. Each outstanding and unexercised option to acquire Fidelity common stock will be assumed by Eagle and converted into an option to acquire Eagle common stock. No fractional shares of Eagle common stock will be issued in connection with the merger. Outstanding shares of Eagle common stock will not be changed as a result of the merger. Eagle and Fidelity are sending you this Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus to ask you to vote on these matters.
The board of directors of Fidelity has unanimously approved the merger and the merger agreement and recommends that Fidelity shareholders vote "FOR" the merger and the merger agreement. The board of directors of Eagle has unanimously approved the merger and the merger agreement and recommends that the shareholders of Eagle vote "FOR" the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock in connection with the merger. The merger is subject to the receipt of regulatory approvals and to the receipt of the shareholder approvals being sought at the special meetings of Eagle and Fidelity shareholders, as well as the satisfaction of other conditions set forth in the merger agreement.
Please carefully review this joint proxy statement/prospectus in its entirety, as it provides detailed information about the merger and the proposals being presented at the meetings, and contains important information about Fidelity and Eagle. In particular, you should review the information under "Risk Factors" at page .
Directors and executive officers of Fidelity owning or controlling approximately 31.4% of the outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock as of the record date for the Fidelity special meeting have entered into agreements in which they have agreed to vote all of such shares in favor of the proposal to approve the merger and the merger agreement. Directors of Eagle and its wholly owned subsidiary, EagleBank, owning or controlling approximately 26.1% of the outstanding shares of Eagle common stock as of the record date for the Eagle special meeting have indicated their intention to vote in favor of the proposal approving the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock in connection with the merger.
Eagle common stock is listed under the symbol "EGBN" on The NASDAQ Capital Market. On November 30, 2007, the last trading day before the public announcement of the merger agreement, Eagle's closing price was $12.51 per share, and on , 2008, the last trading day before the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, Eagle's closing price was $ per share. You should obtain current market quotations for Eagle common stock. There is no public market for Fidelity common stock.
YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. The merger cannot be completed unless Eagle's shareholders approve the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock in connection with the merger and Fidelity shareholders approve the merger and the merger agreement. Whether or not you plan to attend your special meeting, please complete, date, sign and return promptly your proxy card in the enclosed postage pre-paid envelope. Abstentions and failures to vote, including by failing to instruct your broker how to vote, will have the same effect as votes against the proposal to approve the merger and the merger agreement at the Fidelity meeting.
We are very enthusiastic about the merger and thank you for your continued support.
Sincerely,
Ronald D. Paul President and Chief Executive Officer Eagle Bancorp, Inc. |
Susan B. Hepner Board Chair Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation |
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved the securities to be issued under this joint proxy statement/prospectus, or determined if this joint proxy statement/prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.
Shares of Eagle common stock are not savings or deposit accounts or other obligations of any bank or savings association, and are not insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or any other governmental agency.
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is dated , 2008, and is first being mailed to shareholders of Fidelity on or about , 2008, and is first being mailed to shareholders of Eagle on or about , 2008.
EAGLE BANCORP, INC.
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD
ON
, 2008
To the Shareholders of Eagle Bancorp, Inc.:
Eagle Bancorp, Inc. will hold a special meeting of shareholders on , , 2008 at : .M. local time, at , for the following purposes:
We have fixed the close of business on , 2008 as the record date for determining those Eagle shareholders entitled to notice of the special meeting and to vote at the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. If your shares are not registered in your own name, you will need additional documentation from your recordholder in order to vote in person at the meeting.
Holders of Eagle common stock do not have the right under Maryland law to demand and receive the fair value of their shares, as a result of the merger or the issuance of shares in connection with the merger.
We cannot complete the merger unless the proposed issuance of shares of Eagle common stock to Fidelity shareholders on the terms and conditions set out in the merger agreement is approved by the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Eagle common stock voting on the issuance. The joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice explains the merger and the merger agreement, the proposals to be considered at the Eagle special meeting and specific information concerning the Eagle special meeting. Please review this joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully.
The Eagle board of directors believes that the proposal to issue shares of Eagle common stock to Fidelity shareholders on the terms and conditions set forth in the merger agreement is in the best interests of Eagle and its shareholders, has unanimously approved the proposal and recommends that Eagle shareholders vote "FOR" approval of the issuance of shares.
The joint proxy statement/prospectus follows this notice, and a proxy card is enclosed. To ensure that your vote is counted, please complete, sign, date and return the proxy card in the enclosed, postage-paid return envelope, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person. If you attend the meeting, you may revoke your proxy and vote your shares in person. However, attendance at the meeting will not of itself revoke a proxy.
By Order of the Board of Directors | ||
Zandra Nichols, Secretary |
||
, 2008 |
Please complete and sign the enclosed proxy and return it promptly in the
envelope provided, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
FIDELITY & TRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
TO BE HELD
ON
, 2008
To the Shareholders of Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation:
Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation will hold a special meeting of shareholders on , , 2008 at : .M. local time, at , for the following purposes:
We have fixed the close of business on , 2008 as the record date for determining those Fidelity shareholders entitled to notice of the special meeting and to vote at the special meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. If your shares are not registered in your own name, you will need additional documentation from your recordholder in order to vote in person at the meeting.
Fidelity shareholders have the right to assert rights as an objecting shareholder with respect to the merger and demand in writing that the surviving corporation in the merger pay the fair value of their shares of Fidelity common stock under applicable provisions of Maryland law. In order to exercise and perfect these rights, Fidelity shareholders must give written notice of their intent to demand payment for their shares to Fidelity before voting on the merger at the special meeting and must not vote in favor of or consent to the merger. A copy of the applicable Maryland statutory provisions is included as Appendix D of the attached joint proxy statement/prospectus, and a summary of these provisions can be found under the section entitled "The MergerDissenters' Rights" at page of the attached joint proxy statement/prospectus.
We cannot complete the merger unless the merger and the merger agreement are approved by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock entitled to vote at the Fidelity special meeting. The joint proxy statement/prospectus accompanying this notice explains the merger and the merger agreement, the proposals to be considered at the Fidelity special meeting and specific information concerning the Fidelity special meeting. Please review this joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully.
The Fidelity board of directors has unanimously determined that the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are in the best interests of Fidelity and its shareholders, has adopted the merger agreement and recommends that Fidelity shareholders vote "FOR" approval of the merger and the merger agreement.
The joint proxy statement/prospectus follows this notice, and a proxy card is enclosed. To ensure that your vote is counted, please complete, sign, date and return the proxy card in the enclosed, postage-paid return envelope, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting in person. If you attend the meeting, you
may revoke your proxy and vote your shares in person. However, attendance at the meeting will not of itself revoke a proxy.
By Order of the Board of Directors | ||
J. Mercedes Alvarez, Secretary |
||
, 2008 |
Please complete and sign the enclosed proxy and return it promptly in the
envelope provided, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting.
|
Page |
|
---|---|---|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION | 1 | |
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETINGS AND THE MERGER | 2 | |
SUMMARY | 6 | |
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA | 16 | |
FIDELITY & TRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION | 17 | |
COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA | 18 | |
COMPARATIVE STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS | 20 | |
RISK FACTORS | 21 | |
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS | 23 | |
THE MEETINGS | 24 | |
THE MERGER | 30 | |
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 67 | |
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET | 68 | |
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED INCOME STATEMENT | 69 | |
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 70 | |
INFORMATION ABOUT EAGLE | 73 | |
INFORMATION ABOUT FIDELITY | 77 | |
COMPARATIVE RIGHTS OF SHAREHOLDERS | 121 | |
LEGAL MATTERS | 124 | |
EXPERTS | 124 | |
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION | 124 | |
COMMISSION POSITION ON INDEMNIFICATION FOR SECURITIES ACT LIABILITIES | 125 | |
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2007 AND 2006, AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT | F-1 | |
APPENDIX AAGREEMENT AND PLAN OF MERGER | A-1 | |
APPENDIX BOPINION OF MILESTONE ADVISORS, LLC | B-1 | |
APPENDIX COPINION OF SANDLER O'NEILL & PARTNERS, L.P. | C-1 | |
APPENDIX DSECTIONS 3-201 to 3-213 OF THE MARYLAND GENERAL CORPORATION LAW | D-1 | |
PART II: INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS | II-1 | |
EXHIBITS |
This document is the joint proxy statement of Eagle Bancorp, Inc. and Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation for their respective special meetings of shareholders. This document is also the prospectus of Eagle Bancorp for the shares of Eagle common stock to be issued in connection with the merger. This joint proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about Eagle from documents that are not included in or delivered with this joint proxy statement/prospectus. This information is available to you without charge upon your written or oral request. You can obtain documents incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus by requesting them in writing or by telephone from Eagle at 7815 Woodmont Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, Attention: Zandra Nichols, Secretary, 301.986.1800.
If you would like additional copies of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, please contact Computershare Investor Services, toll-free at 877-282-1168.
If you would like to request documents, please do so by , 2008 in order to receive them before the special meeting.
See "Where You Can Find More Information" at page for further information.
1
QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE MEETINGS AND THE MERGER
Q: Why am I receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus?
A: You are receiving this joint proxy statement/prospectus because you are a shareholder of either Eagle or Fidelity as of the respective record dates for the Eagle and Fidelity special meetings of shareholders. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being used by the boards of directors of Eagle and Fidelity to solicit your proxy for use at the special meetings. This joint proxy statement/prospectus also serves as the prospectus for shares of Eagle common stock to be issued in exchange for shares of Fidelity common stock in connection with the merger.
The Merger and the Special Meetings of Shareholders
Q: What matters will be considered at the Fidelity special meeting of shareholders?
A: At the special meeting of shareholders of Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation, Fidelity shareholders will be asked to vote on: (1) the Agreement and Plan of Merger among Eagle Bancorp, Inc., Woodmont Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Eagle, Fidelity and Fidelity & Trust Bank, under which Fidelity will merge with and into Woodmont, with Woodmont surviving the merger, and (2) a proposal, if necessary, to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates to permit further solicitation of proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the agreement and plan of merger and the merger contemplated thereby. The Agreement and Plan of Merger and the merger contemplated thereby are referred to in this joint proxy statement/prospectus as the "merger agreement" and "merger," respectively. The merger agreement is included with this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix A.
Q: What matters will be considered at the Eagle special meeting of shareholders?
A: At the special meeting of shareholders of Eagle, Eagle shareholders will be asked to vote on: (1) the issuance of up to a maximum of 4,338,363 shares of Eagle common stock to Fidelity shareholders in connection with the merger; and (2) a proposal, if necessary, to adjourn the special meeting to a later date or dates to permit further solicitation of proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the issuance of shares. As Fidelity will be merged into Woodmont, and not into Eagle, Eagle shareholders are not required to vote on or approve the merger. However, because more than 20% of the outstanding shares of Eagle common stock are proposed to be issued in connection with the merger, Eagle shareholders are required to approve the issuance of shares to Fidelity shareholders under the listing requirements of The NASDAQ Capital Market.
Q: What shareholder vote is necessary?
A: At the Fidelity meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock is required to approve the merger agreement and the merger, and the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented at the special meeting is required to approve the proposal, if necessary, to adjourn the special meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. Directors and executive officers of Fidelity and F&T Bank owning or controlling approximately 31.4% of the outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock as of the record date for the Fidelity special meeting have entered into agreements with Eagle under which they have agreed to vote their shares for approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
At the Eagle special meeting, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal is necessary to approve the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock to Fidelity shareholders in connection with the merger, and the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares present or represented at the special meeting is required to approve the proposal, if necessary, to adjourn the special meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. Directors of Eagle and EagleBank owning or controlling approximately 26.1% of the outstanding shares of Eagle common stock as of the record date for the Eagle special meeting have
2
indicated their intention to vote such shares for approval of the proposed issuance of shares of Eagle common stock in connection with the merger.
Q: What vote does the Fidelity board of directors recommend?
A: Fidelity's board of directors unanimously recommends that Fidelity shareholders vote "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger and "FOR" the proposal to approve, if necessary, an adjournment of the special meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the merger agreement and the merger.
Q: What vote does the Eagle board of directors recommend?
A: Eagle's board of directors unanimously recommends that Eagle shareholders vote "FOR" approval of the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock to Fidelity shareholders in connection with the merger and "FOR" the proposal to approve, if necessary, an adjournment of the special meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve the issuance of shares.
Q: What do I need to do now?
A: After you have carefully read this joint proxy statement/prospectus, indicate on your proxy card how you want to vote with respect to the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the merger, if you are a Fidelity shareholder, or the issuance of shares in connection with the merger, if you are an Eagle shareholder, and the proposal, if necessary, to adjourn the special meeting to a later date to permit the further solicitation of proxies. Complete, sign, date and mail the proxy card in the enclosed postage-paid return envelope as soon as possible so that your shares will be represented and voted at the special meeting. The proxy card should be mailed in accordance with the instructions provided thereon. Do not send your Fidelity stock certificates with your proxy card.
Q. How do I change my vote after I have mailed my signed proxy card?
A: You may change your vote at any time before your proxy is voted by revoking your proxy in any of the following three ways:
Q: If my shares are held in "street name" by my broker, will my broker vote my shares for me?
A: No. If you do not provide your broker with instructions on how to vote your shares held in "street name," your broker will not be permitted to vote your shares on the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the merger at the Fidelity meeting, or the proposal to approve the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock at the Eagle special meeting, without your instructions. You should therefore instruct your broker how to vote your shares. Your failure to instruct your broker to vote your shares of Fidelity common stock will be the equivalent of voting against the approval of the merger agreement and the merger. Your failure to instruct your broker to vote your shares of Eagle common stock will have no effect on either proposal being presented at the Eagle special meeting, unless it prevents the presence of a quorum at the Eagle special meeting.
3
Q: What if I abstain from voting?
A: If a Fidelity shareholder abstains from voting it will have the same effect as a vote against the merger agreement and the merger but will have no effect on the proposal, if necessary, to adjourn the special meeting to permit further solicitation of proxies. An abstention by an Eagle shareholder will have no effect on either proposal being presented.
Q: Am I entitled to dissenters' rights or similar rights?
A: Yes, if you are a Fidelity shareholder. Under Maryland law, Fidelity shareholders may exercise their rights as objecting shareholders to demand the payment of the fair value of their shares of Fidelity common stock in connection with the merger. These rights are occasionally referred to as "dissenters' rights" in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The provisions of Maryland law governing dissenters' rights are complex, and you should study them carefully if you wish to exercise these rights. Multiple steps must be taken to properly exercise and perfect such rights. A copy of Sections 3-201 through 3-213 of the Maryland General Corporation Law (the "MGCL") is included with this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix D.
If you are an Eagle shareholder, you are not entitled to dissenters' rights in connection with the merger.
For a more complete description of dissenters' rights, please refer to the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "The MergerDissenters' Rights" at page .
Q: When do you expect to complete the merger?
A: We presently expect to complete the merger in the third quarter, or early in the fourth quarter, of 2008. However, we cannot assure you when or if the merger will occur. Shareholders of Fidelity holding at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock must first approve the merger agreement and the merger at the Fidelity special meeting, Eagle shareholders must approve the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock to holders of Fidelity common stock in connection with the merger, we must obtain the necessary regulatory approvals, and other conditions specified in the merger agreement must be satisfied.
Q: Is consummation of the merger subject to any conditions?
A: Yes. In addition to the shareholder approvals being sought at the special meetings, consummation of the merger requires the receipt of the necessary regulatory approvals, and the satisfaction of other conditions specified in the merger agreement. See "The MergerRegulatory Approvals Required for the Merger" and "The MergerConditions to the Completion of the Merger" at pages and of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, respectively.
Merger Consideration
Q: What will Fidelity shareholders receive in the merger?
A: As a result of the merger, each share of Fidelity common stock (other than shares with respect to which dissenters' rights have been properly exercised and perfected) will be converted into the right to receive 0.9202 of a share of Eagle common stock, subject to reduction as provided in the merger agreement. Please refer to The MergerMerger ConsiderationPotential Reduction of the Conversion Ratio" at page , for a discussion of factors which may result in a reduction in the number of shares of Eagle common stock into which each share of Fidelity common stock may be converted.
The merger will not result in any change to the outstanding shares of Eagle common stock.
Q: What are the tax consequences of the merger to me?
A: We expect that for United States federal income tax purposes, in general, the merger will not be a taxable event to those Fidelity shareholders who receive solely Eagle common stock in exchange for their
4
Fidelity common stock. However, Fidelity shareholders generally will recognize gain or loss with respect to cash received in lieu of fractional shares of Eagle common stock that they would otherwise be entitled to receive. See "Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences" at page .
Eagle and Fidelity will have no obligation to complete the merger until they have received an opinion of counsel to the effect that the merger will be a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code and that the merger will have certain United States federal income tax results. However, this opinion will not bind the Internal Revenue Service, which could take a different view of the transaction.
We urge you to consult your personal tax advisor to gain a full understanding of the tax consequences of the merger to you. Tax matters are very complicated, and in many cases, the tax consequences of the merger will depend on your particular facts and circumstances.
Q: When should I send in my stock certificates?
A: Do not send in your certificates representing shares of Fidelity common stock with your proxy card. After the merger is completed, holders of Fidelity common stock will be sent a letter of transmittal and instructions regarding on how to exchange Fidelity common stock certificates for shares of Eagle common stock.
Q: Is there other information about Eagle I should consider that is not included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus?
A: Yes. Much of the business and financial information about Eagle that may be important to you is not included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Instead, that information is "incorporated by reference" to documents separately filed by Eagle with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This means that Eagle may satisfy its disclosure obligations to you by referring you to one or more documents separately filed by it with the SEC. See "Where You Can Find More Information" at page for a list of documents that Eagle has incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus and for instructions on how to obtain copies of those documents. The documents are available to you without charge.
Q: What will happen to my Fidelity stock options?
A: Each option to acquire shares of Fidelity common stock under Fidelity's stock option plans that is outstanding at the effective time of the merger will be converted into an option to purchase shares of Eagle common stock. The number of shares of Eagle common stock that may be acquired pursuant to Fidelity options will be the number of shares of Fidelity common stock underlying such option multiplied by the conversion ratio. The exercise price of the option will be ratably adjusted in accordance with such conversion. See "The MergerTreatment of Fidelity Options" at page .
Q: Who can answer my questions about the merger?
A: If you need additional copies of this proxy statement or have questions about voting your shares, call:
If you are an Eagle shareholder | If you are a Fidelity shareholder | |
Computershare Investor Services 877-282-1168 |
[ ] |
If you have other questions about the merger, call:
If you are an Eagle shareholder Michael T. Flynn Executive Vice President 301-986-1800 |
If you are a Fidelity shareholder |
5
This summary highlights selected information from this joint proxy statement/prospectus. It does not contain all of the information that may be important to you. We urge you to read the entire joint proxy statement/prospectus carefully and the other documents to which we refer to understand fully the merger. See "Where You Can Find More Information" at page .
Information about Eagle and Fidelity (See page and page )
Eagle Bancorp, Inc.
7815 Woodmont Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814
301.986.1800
Eagle Bancorp, Inc., organized in 1997 under Maryland law, is the registered bank holding company for EagleBank, Bethesda, Maryland, a Maryland chartered commercial bank which is a member of the Federal Reserve System. Eagle is a growth oriented institution, providing general commercial and consumer banking services through EagleBank, and subordinated financing for real estate projects through a direct subsidiary, where the primary financing would be provided by EagleBank. EagleBank was organized as an independent, community oriented, and full-service alternative to the super regional financial institutions, which dominate its primary market area. EagleBank's philosophy is to provide superior, personalized service to our customers. EagleBank focuses on relationship banking, providing each customer with a number of services, becoming familiar with and addressing customer needs in a proactive, personalized fashion. EagleBank currently has six offices serving Montgomery County and three offices in the District of Columbia.
Eagle's common stock is listed for trading on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol "EGBN." As of there were [9,832,063] shares of Eagle common stock outstanding.
At December 31, 2007, Eagle had totals assets of approximately $846 million, total loans of approximately $717 million, total deposits of approximately $631 million, and total shareholders' equity of approximately $81 million. At December 31, 2007, its nonperforming assets (consisting of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 or more days and other real estate owned) were approximately $5.3 million, or 0.63% of total assets. For the year ended December 31, 2007, Eagle had earnings of $0.78 per diluted share. Eagle paid a dividend of $0.06 per share with respect to each quarter of 2007.
Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation
4831 Cordell Avenue
Bethesda, Maryland 20814
301.657.7800
Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation, organized in 2003 under Maryland law, is the registered bank holding company for Fidelity & Trust Bank, Bethesda, Maryland, a Maryland chartered commercial bank which is a member of the Federal Reserve System. F&T Bank was organized to provide general commercial and consumer banking services, and to acquire and provide a source of funding for residential mortgage loans originated for sale by Fidelity & Trust Mortgage, Inc., a mortgage brokerage company organized in 2000, and a wholly owned subsidiary of F&T Bank. Since September 11, 2007, F&T Mortgage has ceased all origination activities, and is in the process of liquidating its remaining assets and liabilities.
At December 31, 2007, Fidelity had total assets of approximately $447 million; total portfolio loans of approximately $319 million; total deposits of approximately $366 million; and total shareholders' equity of approximately $25 million. At December 31, 2007, its nonperforming assets (consisting of nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned) were approximately $617,000, or 0.14% of total assets. For the year ended December 31, 2007, Fidelity had a loss of $3.18 per share, primarily as a result of losses incurred by F&T Mortgage.
6
Fidelity Special Meeting of Shareholders (See page )
The special meeting of Fidelity shareholders will be held at : .m., local time, on , 2008, at . At the Fidelity meeting, Fidelity shareholders will be asked to vote to approve:
You can vote at the special meeting if you were a record holder of Fidelity common stock at the close of business on , 2008, the record date for the special meeting. As of that date, there were [4,207,016] shares of Fidelity common stock outstanding and entitled to be voted at the special meeting. Approval of the merger and the merger agreement requires the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the shares of Fidelity common stock outstanding at the record date. Approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting requires a majority vote of the shareholders present or represented at the special meeting. Directors and executive officers of Fidelity and F&T Bank owning or controlling approximately 31.4% of the outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock as of the record date have agreed to vote their shares to approve the merger and the merger agreement.
Eagle Special Meeting of Shareholders (See page )
The special meeting of Eagle shareholders will be held at : .m., local time, on , 2008, at . At the Eagle special meeting, Eagle shareholders will be asked to vote to approve:
You can vote at the special meeting if you were a record holder of Eagle common stock at the close of business on , 2008, the record date for the special meeting. As of that date, there were [9,832,063] shares of Eagle common stock outstanding and entitled to be voted at the special meeting. Approval of the issuance of shares requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal. Approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting requires a majority vote of the shareholders present or represented at the special meeting. Directors of Eagle and EagleBank owning or controlling approximately 26.1% of the outstanding shares of Eagle common stock as of the record date have indicated their intention to vote their shares to approve the issuance of shares.
The Merger (See page )
Eagle, its wholly owned subsidiary Woodmont Holdings, Inc., Fidelity and F&T Bank have entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger that provides for the merger of Fidelity with Woodmont, with Woodmont continuing as the surviving corporation. The Agreement and Plan of Merger is attached as Appendix A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. In addition, promptly following the merger of Fidelity with and into Woodmont, F&T Bank will merge with and into EagleBank, with EagleBank continuing as the surviving bank. Woodmont will then be merged with and into Eagle, with Eagle continuing as the surviving corporation.
Upon effectiveness of the merger, Robert P. Pincus and one other member of the Fidelity board of directors, to be selected by Fidelity, will be appointed to the Eagle board of directors. Upon the effectiveness of the merger of F&T Bank and EagleBank, Mr. Pincus and three other members of the F&T Bank board of directors designated by F&T Bank will be appointed to the EagleBank board of directors.
7
Mr. Pincus will serve as Vice Chairman of both boards of directors. In the event that the merger is effective prior to Eagle's 2008 annual meeting of shareholders at which directors are elected, but too late for inclusion of the F&T designated directors in Eagle's proxy materials for the meeting, Eagle will appoint the designated directors to the Eagle and EagleBank boards of directors following the annual meeting. You should read the Agreement and Plan of Merger because it is the legal document that governs the merger. In this joint proxy statement/prospectus, we sometimes refer to the Agreement and Plan of Merger as the merger agreement.
The merger of Fidelity with and into Woodmont will occur shortly after all of the conditions to its completion have been satisfied or waived. Currently, we anticipate that the merger will occur in the third quarter or early in the fourth quarter of 2008. However, we cannot assure you when or if the merger will occur.
What Fidelity Shareholders Will Receive in the Merger (See page )
The merger agreement provides that at the effective time of the merger each outstanding share of Fidelity common stock, other than shares with respect to which dissenters' rights have properly been exercised and perfected, will be converted into the right to receive 0.9202 of a share of Eagle common stock, subject to reduction in accordance with the merger agreement. If the merger had been completed as of December 31, 2007, then based on a preliminary, partial and estimated application of the adjustment provisions of the merger agreement, the conversion ratio would have been 0.7055 shares of Eagle common stock for each share of Fidelity common stock. The actual conversion ratio may be higher or lower than the estimated adjusted conversion ratio as of December 31, 2007. See "The MergerMerger ConsiderationPotential Reduction of the Conversion Ratio" at page .
Eagle will not issue any fractional shares of Eagle common stock in the merger. Fidelity shareholders will receive cash for any fractional shares of Eagle common stock owed to them in an amount, without interest, based on the average closing price of Eagle common stock during a five day period ending immediately before the date which is two business days prior to the effective time of the merger.
On , 2008, the most recent practicable trading date prior to the filing of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the closing price of Eagle common stock was $ per share. No assurance can be given that the current market price of Eagle common stock will be equal to the market price of Eagle common stock on the date that stock is received by a Fidelity shareholder or at any other time. The market price of Eagle common stock when received by a Fidelity shareholder may be higher or lower than the current market price of Eagle common stock.
Fidelity's Board of Directors Unanimously Recommends Shareholder Approval of the Merger (See page )
Fidelity's board of directors unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are fair to and in the best interests of Fidelity and its shareholders and unanimously adopted the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Fidelity's board of directors unanimously recommends that Fidelity shareholders vote "FOR" approval of the merger and the merger agreement.
The affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock is required to approve the merger and the merger agreement.
As of the record date, the directors and executive officers of Fidelity and F&T Bank owned and were entitled to vote 1,319,179 shares of Fidelity common stock, which represents approximately 31.4% of the outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock. These persons have entered into agreements with Eagle under which they have agreed to vote all of their shares in favor of the merger agreement.
8
As of the record date, directors of Eagle and EagleBank owned 9,000 shares of Fidelity common stock, all of which were acquired from Fidelity in its 2005 private offering. These directors have indicated that they intend to vote "FOR" approval of the merger and the merger agreement.
Fidelity's Reasons for the Merger (See page )
In reaching its determination to approve and adopt the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, Fidelity's board consulted with Fidelity's management and its financial and legal advisors, and considered a number of factors, including, but not limited to:
The Fidelity board of directors also considered certain potential adverse consequences of the proposed merger.
9
Opinion of Fidelity's Financial Advisor (See page )
Milestone Advisors, LLC has served as financial advisor to Fidelity in connection with the merger and has given its opinion to Fidelity's board of directors that the merger was fair to Fidelity shareholders from a financial point of view. A copy of the opinion delivered by Milestone is included with this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix B. Milestone's opinion is summarized under the caption "The MergerOpinion of Fidelity's Financial Advisor", at page of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Fidelity shareholders should read the opinion carefully and completely. The opinion outlines the assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of the review undertaken by Milestone in providing its opinion, and the relationships between Milestone, Fidelity and members of the board of directors of Fidelity. Milestone's opinion is directed to the Fidelity board of directors and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder as to any matters relating to the merger. Fidelity has agreed to pay Milestone a success fee of $350,000, contingent upon the completion of the merger.
Eagle's Reasons for the Merger (See page )
In reaching its decision to approve and adopt the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, the Eagle board of directors, in consultation with management and its financial and legal advisors, considered numerous factors. In determining that the merger was in the best interest of Eagle and its shareholders, the board considered that the merger will, in a cost effective manner, substantially increase EagleBank's assets and capital base, allowing it to provide customers with larger loans, and a wider variety of loan, deposit and other products, and expand its human and financial resources; the addition of Fidelity's six offices will provide EagleBank with greater presence in the District of Columbia and Montgomery County, and provide it with the opportunity to enter the northern Virginia market for the first time; provide the combined company with opportunities for cross selling of products and for substantial cost savings through reduction of administrative and overhead expenses, as well as possible branch consolidation in the future, resulting in a transaction which should produce increased income and benefits for Eagle shareholders. The board of directors also considered the risks related to the proposed merger, including those related to F&T Mortgage.
Opinion of Eagle's Financial Advisor (See page )
Sandler O'Neill and Partners, L.P. has served as financial advisor to Eagle in connection with the merger and has given its opinion to Eagle's board of directors that the merger was fair to Eagle shareholders from a financial point of view. A copy of the opinion delivered by Sandler O'Neill is included with this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix C. Sandler O'Neill's opinion is summarized under the caption "The MergerOpinion of Eagle's Financial Advisor", at page of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Eagle shareholders should read the opinion carefully and completely. The opinion outlines the assumptions made, matters considered and limitations of the review undertaken by Sandler O'Neill in providing its opinion. Sandler O'Neill's opinion is directed to the Eagle board of directors and does not constitute a recommendation to any shareholder as to any matters relating to the merger. Eagle has paid Sandler O'Neill a fee of $100,000 and has agreed to pay Sandler O'Neill a transaction fee of 0.50% of the aggregate purchase price (subject to a minimum fee of $250,000), which will be due and payable upon the closing of the merger and against which the amount already paid will be credited.
10
Fidelity Officers and Directors Have Some Interests in the Merger That Are Different than or in Addition to Their Interests as Shareholders (See page )
In addition to their interests as shareholders, certain directors, executive officers or employees of Fidelity may have interests in the merger that are different from or in addition to your interests. These interests relate to or arise from, among other things:
Fidelity's board of directors was aware of these interests and took them into account in its decision to approve and adopt the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. For information concerning these interests, please see the discussion under the caption "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger."
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences (See page )
The merger has been structured as a "reorganization" for United States federal income tax purposes. Accordingly, holders of shares of Fidelity common stock will generally not recognize any gain or loss for United States federal income tax purposes on the exchange of their shares of Fidelity common stock for Eagle common stock in the merger, except for any gain or (in certain cases) loss recognized in connection with any cash received as part of the merger consideration for fractional share interests. The companies themselves will not recognize gain or loss as a result of the merger. It is a condition to the obligations of Fidelity and Eagle to complete the merger that they receive a legal opinion from Eagle's counsel that the merger will be a reorganization for United States federal income tax purposes.
The United States federal income tax consequences described above may not apply to all holders of Fidelity common stock, including certain holders specifically referred to at page . Your tax consequences will depend on your own situation. You should consult your tax advisor to determine the particular tax consequences of the merger to you.
Dissenters' Rights (See page )
Fidelity shareholders are entitled to exercise dissenters' rights with respect to the merger and, if the merger is completed and they perfect their dissenters' rights, to receive payment in cash for the fair value
11
of their shares of Fidelity common stock. In general, to preserve their dissenters' rights, Fidelity shareholders who wish to exercise these rights must:
The text of Sections 3-201 through 3-213 of the MGCL governing dissenters' rights is included with this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix D. Failure to comply with the procedures described in Appendix D will result in the loss of dissenters' rights under the MGCL. We urge you to carefully read the text of Sections 3-201 through 3-213 of the MGCL governing dissenters' rights.
The Merger Will Be Accounted for under the Purchase Method of Accounting (See page )
The merger will be accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, as such term is used under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Completion of the Merger Is Subject to Certain Conditions (See page )
Completion of the merger is subject to a number of conditions, including the approval of the merger and the merger agreement by Fidelity shareholders, approval of the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock to Fidelity shareholders in connection with the merger by Eagle shareholders and the receipt of necessary regulatory approvals. Certain conditions to the merger may be waived by Eagle or Fidelity, as applicable.
We May Not Complete the Merger Without All Required Regulatory Approvals (See page )
The merger requires the receipt of certain regulatory approvals, including the approval of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, and the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation. We have made filings and notifications for these purposes. We expect to obtain all necessary regulatory approvals, although we cannot be certain if or when we will obtain them.
Termination of the Merger Agreement (See page ).
Eagle, Woodmont, Fidelity and F&T Bank can mutually agree to abandon the merger and terminate the merger agreement at any time prior to the time the merger is completed, even after shareholder approval. Also, either Fidelity and F&T Bank or Eagle and Woodmont can decide, without the consent of the other, to abandon the merger in a number of situations, including if:
12
The merger agreement will be deemed to be terminated if:
Additionally, if Fidelity's board makes a good faith determination that the fiduciary duty of the directors under Maryland law requires that the board of directors consider, negotiate, communicate, or provide information (collectively "communications") with respect to an unsolicited acquisition proposal, because such proposal is more favorable from a financial point of view to the shareholders of Fidelity than the merger, which determination is made after receiving the advice of counsel to Fidelity regarding the requirements of the fiduciary duty of the directors under Maryland law, and the advice of Fidelity's financial advisor as to whether the proposal is more favorable from a financial point of view to its shareholders than the merger, resulting in Fidelity engaging in communications with respect to an unsolicited acquisition proposal, and such communications extend for 60 days from the date on which
13
Fidelity provided notice of such proposal to Eagle, and Fidelity has not rejected such unsolicited acquisition proposal by the end of the 60 day period, then Eagle shall have the right to terminate the agreement immediately upon notice to Fidelity.
Fidelity Must Pay Eagle a Termination Fee under Certain Circumstances (See page )
Fidelity must pay Eagle a termination fee of $2 million within three days of termination of the merger agreement in the following circumstances:
14
Fidelity agreed to this termination fee arrangement in order to induce Eagle to enter into the merger agreement. This arrangement could have the effect of discouraging other companies from trying to acquire Fidelity.
Effect of Merger on Rights of Fidelity Shareholders (See page )
The rights of Fidelity shareholders are governed by Maryland law, as well as Fidelity's articles of incorporation and bylaws. After completion of the merger, the rights of the former Fidelity shareholders receiving Eagle common stock in the merger will continue to be governed by Maryland law, and will be governed by Eagle's articles of incorporation and bylaws. There are substantive and procedural differences between Fidelity's and Eagle's articles of incorporation and bylaws that will affect the rights of Fidelity shareholders.
Market Price Information
The following table sets forth the closing sale price per share of Eagle common stock, as reported on The Nasdaq Capital Market, and Fidelity common stock, based upon the last recorded trade, as of November 30, 2007 (the last full trading day before the public announcement of the merger agreement) and as of , 2008, the most recent practicable trading day prior to the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
Eagle Common Stock |
Fidelity Common Stock |
Pro Forma Equivalent for Fidelity Common Stock(1) |
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
November 30, 2007 | $ | 12.51 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 11.51 | |||
, 2008 | $ | $ | 11.50 | $ |
The market price of Eagle common stock will fluctuate prior to the merger. You should obtain current market quotations for Eagle common stock.
Recent Developments
At March 31, 2008, Eagle had totals assets of approximately $899 million, total loans of approximately $760 million, total deposits of approximately $686 million, and total shareholders' equity of approximately $84 million. At March 31, 2008, its nonperforming assets (consisting of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 or more days and other real estate owned) were approximately $11.7 million, or 1.30% of total assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, Eagle had earnings of $0.17 per diluted share. Eagle paid a dividend of $0.06 per share with respect to the first quarter of 2008.
At March 31, 2008, Fidelity had totals assets of approximately $459 million, total loans of approximately $337 million, total deposits of approximately $369 million, and total shareholders' equity of approximately $25 million. At March 31, 2008, its nonperforming assets (consisting of nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 or more days) were approximately $6.3 million, or 1.37% of total assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, Fidelity had losses of $0.19 per diluted share, including losses of $0.15 per share from discontinued operations of F&T Mortgage.
15
SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA
The following tables show summarized historical financial data for Eagle and Fidelity. The information presented is based on historical financial statements for each company. The financial and other data set forth below is not complete and should be read together with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the more detailed information, including the consolidated financial statements of Eagle and related notes, appearing in its 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, incorporated by reference herein, and the consolidated financial statements of Fidelity included elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus.
|
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands except per share data) |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
Selected BalancesPeriod End |
||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 846,400 | $ | 773,451 | $ | 672,252 | $ | 553,453 | $ | 442,997 | ||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 81,166 | 72,916 | 64,964 | 58,534 | 53,012 | |||||||||||
Total loans | 716,677 | 625,773 | 549,212 | 415,509 | 317,533 | |||||||||||
Total deposits | 630,936 | 628,515 | 568,893 | 462,287 | 335,514 | |||||||||||
Selected BalancesAverages |
||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 800,437 | $ | 712,297 | $ | 610,245 | $ | 487,853 | $ | 375,802 | ||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 76,760 | 68,973 | 61,563 | 55,507 | 34,028 | |||||||||||
Total loans | 659,204 | 575,854 | 479,311 | 353,537 | 266,811 | |||||||||||
Total deposits | 634,332 | 585,621 | 512,416 | 397,788 | 292,953 | |||||||||||
Results of Operations |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 57,077 | $ | 50,318 | $ | 36,726 | $ | 24,195 | $ | 18,403 | ||||||
Interest expense | 23,729 | 17,880 | 8,008 | 4,328 | 3,953 | |||||||||||
Net interest income | 33,348 | 32,438 | 28,718 | 19,867 | 14,450 | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 1,643 | 1,745 | 1,843 | 675 | 1,175 | |||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit losses | 31,705 | 30,693 | 26,875 | 19,192 | 13,275 | |||||||||||
Noninterest income | 5,186 | 3,846 | 3,998 | 3,753 | 2,850 | |||||||||||
Noninterest expense | 24,921 | 21,824 | 18,960 | 14,952 | 11,007 | |||||||||||
Income before taxes | 11,970 | 12,715 | 11,913 | 7,993 | 5,118 | |||||||||||
Income tax expense | 4,269 | 4,690 | 4,369 | 2,906 | 1,903 | |||||||||||
Net income | 7,701 | 8,025 | 7,544 | 5,087 | 3,215 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared | 2,302 | 2,147 | 1,994 | | | |||||||||||
Per Share Data(1) |
||||||||||||||||
Net income, basic | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.82 | $ | 0.56 | $ | 0.49 | ||||||
Net income, diluted | 0.78 | 0.81 | 0.77 | 0.53 | 0.46 | |||||||||||
Book value | 8.35 | 7.69 | 6.95 | 6.38 | 5.85 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared per share | 0.24 | 0.23 | 0.22 | | | |||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio(2) | 29.89 | % | 27.06 | % | 26.42 | % | | | ||||||||
Financial Ratios |
||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets | 0.96 | % | 1.13 | % | 1.24 | % | 1.04 | % | 0.86 | % | ||||||
Return on average equity | 10.03 | % | 11.63 | % | 12.25 | % | 9.16 | % | 9.45 | % | ||||||
Average equity to average assets | 9.59 | % | 9.68 | % | 10.09 | % | 11.38 | % | 9.05 | % | ||||||
Net interest margin | 4.37 | % | 4.81 | % | 4.99 | % | 4.35 | % | 4.14 | % | ||||||
Efficiency ratio(3) | 64.67 | % | 60.15 | % | 57.95 | % | 63.30 | % | 63.62 | % |
16
FIDELITY & TRUST FINANCIAL CORPORATION(1)
|
Year ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dollars in thousands except per share data) |
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
2004 |
2003 |
|||||||||||
Selected BalancesPeriod End | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 446,529 | $ | 481,564 | $ | 367,527 | $ | 205,365 | $ | 52,155 | ||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 25,306 | 37,888 | 37,697 | 16,014 | 8,360 | |||||||||||
Total portfolio loans | 319,402 | 195,103 | 125,584 | 59,046 | 316 | |||||||||||
Total mortgage loans held for sale(2) | 11,898 | 139,338 | 128,479 | 117,025 | 33,317 | |||||||||||
Total deposits | 365,698 | 334,481 | 255,942 | 109,776 | 9,816 | |||||||||||
Selected BalancesAverages(3) |
||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 455,896 | $ | 377,993 | $ | 290,183 | $ | 134,137 | N/A | |||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 34,616 | 38,221 | 31,332 | 14,456 | N/A | |||||||||||
Total portfolio loans | 259,072 | 158,171 | 91,278 | 20,675 | N/A | |||||||||||
Total mortgage loans held for sale(2) | 73,725 | 106,264 | 130,317 | 66,557 | N/A | |||||||||||
Total deposits | 335,392 | 268,394 | 165,638 | 52,526 | N/A | |||||||||||
Results of Operations |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income | $ | 30,623 | $ | 21,885 | $ | 11,143 | $ | 2,338 | $ | 13 | ||||||
Interest expense | 15,029 | 9,693 | 4,319 | 1,142 | 7 | |||||||||||
Net interest income | 15,594 | 12,192 | 6,824 | 1,196 | 6 | |||||||||||
Provision for credit losses | 1,861 | 671 | 828 | 677 | 3 | |||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for credit losses | 13,733 | 11,521 | 5,996 | 519 | 3 | |||||||||||
Noninterest income | 565 | 314 | 195 | 55 | | |||||||||||
Noninterest expense | 12,837 | 9,333 | 5,960 | 3,606 | 528 | |||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes | 1,461 | 2,502 | 231 | (3,032 | ) | (525 | ) | |||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) | 541 | 792 | 42 | (1,031 | ) | (198 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations | 920 | 1,710 | 189 | (2,001 | ) | (327 | ) | |||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax(1) | (14,298 | ) | (1,489 | ) | 1,574 | 289 | (177 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss) | (13,378 | ) | 221 | 1,763 | (1,712 | ) | (504 | ) | ||||||||
Dividends declared | | | | | | |||||||||||
Per Share Data From continuing operations |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss), basic | $ | 0.22 | $ | 0.40 | $ | 0.05 | $ | (0.94 | ) | $ | (1.69 | ) | ||||
Net income (loss), diluted | 0.22 | 0.40 | 0.05 | (0.94 | ) | (1.69 | ) | |||||||||
From discontinued operations |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss), basic | (3.40 | ) | (0.35 | ) | 0.44 | 0.14 | (1.23 | ) | ||||||||
Net income (loss), diluted | (3.38 | ) | (0.35 | ) | 0.44 | 0.14 | (1.23 | ) | ||||||||
Per Share Data |
||||||||||||||||
Net income, basic | (3.18 | ) | 0.05 | 0.49 | (0.80 | ) | (2.92 | ) | ||||||||
Net income, diluted | (3.16 | ) | 0.05 | 0.49 | (0.80 | ) | (2.92 | ) | ||||||||
Book value | 6.02 | 9.01 | 8.95 | 6.66 | 5.70 | |||||||||||
Dividends declared per share | | | | | | |||||||||||
Dividend payout ratio | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||
Financial Ratios |
||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets | (2.93 | )% | 0.06 | % | 0.61 | % | (1.28 | )% | N/A | |||||||
Return on average equity | (38.65 | )% | 0.58 | % | 5.63 | % | (11.84 | )% | N/A | |||||||
Average equity to average assets | 7.59 | % | 10.11 | % | 10.80 | % | 10.78 | % | N/A | |||||||
Net interest margin from continuing operations | 3.87 | % | 3.93 | % | 3.59 | % | 1.95 | % | N/A |
17
The following table shows certain historical per share data for Eagle and Fidelity for the periods indicated, and pro forma combined information for Eagle and pro forma equivalent per share data for Fidelity, assuming the effectiveness of the merger and the estimated adjusted conversion ratio if the merger had been completed at December 31, 2007 of 0.7055 ("comparative pro forma information"). In presenting the comparative pro forma information for the periods shown, we assumed that we had been combined throughout those periods. The merger will be accounted for under the "purchase" method of accounting. Under the purchase method of accounting, the assets and liabilities of the company not surviving a merger are, as of the completion date of the merger, recorded at their respective fair values and added to those of the surviving company. Financial statements of the surviving company issued after consummation of the merger reflect such values and are not restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of the company not surviving. The operating results of Fidelity will be reflected in Eagle's consolidated financial statements from and after the date the merger is consummated.
We expect that we will incur reorganization and restructuring expenses as a result of combining our companies. While we hope that the merger also will provide the combined company with financial benefits that include reduced operating expenses and the opportunity to earn more revenue, the pro forma combined information does not reflect these expenses or benefits and does not attempt to predict or suggest future results.
The final allocation of the purchase price will be determined after the merger is completed and after completion of thorough analyses to determine the fair values of Fidelity's tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities as of the date the merger is completed. In addition, estimates of merger-related charges are subject to final decisions related to combining the companies. Any change in the fair value of the net assets of Fidelity will change the amount of the purchase price allocable to goodwill. Additionally, changes to Fidelity's shareholders' equity, including net income, and changes in the market value of Eagle's common stock through the date the merger is completed, will also change the amount of goodwill recorded. As a result, the final adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments used in preparing the pro forma information presented herein. The pro forma information should not be relied upon as being indicative of the historical results of the companies that would have achieved had the merger been effective before the periods presented, or the results of operations which the combined company may expect to achieve after the merger.
The information in the following table is based on, and should be read together with, the historical financial information that we have included in this joint proxy statement/prospectus or presented in Eagle's prior filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), which are incorporated into this joint proxy statement/prospectus by reference. See "Where You Can Find More Information" at page . The pro forma combined income per share have been computed based on the number of shares of Eagle common stock adjusted for the additional shares to be issued in connection with the merger. The pro forma equivalent per share data for Fidelity was obtained by multiplying the pro forma combined amounts by the estimated adjusted exchange ratio of 0.7055 shares of Eagle common stock for each share of Fidelity common stock. The resulting products were rounded to the nearest cent. The actual exchange ratio could
18
be lower than the initial conversation ratio and higher or lower than the estimated adjusted conversion ratio, but not in excess of 0.9202.
|
Year ended December 31, 2007 |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share: | |||||
Basic | |||||
Eagle | $ | 0.80 | |||
Fidelity | $ | (3.18 | ) | ||
Pro forma combined | $ | (0.41 | ) | ||
Pro forma equivalent for one share of Fidelity at 0.7055 estimated adjusted conversion ratio | $ | (0.29 | ) | ||
Diluted |
|||||
Eagle | $ | 0.78 | |||
Fidelity | $ | (3.16 | ) | ||
Pro forma combined | $ | (0.40 | ) | ||
Pro forma equivalent for one share of Fidelity at 0.7055 estimated adjusted conversion ratio | $ | (0.28 | ) | ||
Cash Dividends Per Common Share |
|||||
Eagle | $ | 0.24 | |||
Fidelity | | ||||
Pro forma combined | $ | 0.18 | |||
Pro forma equivalent for one share of Fidelity at 0.7055 estimated adjusted conversion ratio | $ | 0.13 | |||
Book Value Per Common Share |
|||||
Eagle | $ | 8.35 | |||
Fidelity | $ | 6.02 | |||
Pro forma combined at 0.7055 conversion ratio | $ | 9.18 | |||
Pro forma equivalent for one share of Fidelity at 0.7055 estimated adjusted conversion ratio | $ | 6.48 |
19
COMPARATIVE STOCK PRICES AND DIVIDENDS
Eagle's common stock is listed on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol "EGBN." Fidelity's common stock is not listed on any exchange or traded in the over the counter market or on the pink sheets. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices per share for Eagle common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Capital Market, the cash dividends declared per share for Eagle, and the high and low sales prices of the Fidelity common stock known to Fidelity.
|
Eagle(1) |
Fidelity |
|||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
High |
Low |
Cash Dividend |
High |
Low |
Cash Dividend |
|||||||||||
Quarter Ended: | |||||||||||||||||
March 31, 2008 | $ | 14.49 | $ | 11.25 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 11.50 | | ||||||
December 31, 2007 |
$ |
13.95 |
$ |
11.26 |
$ |
0.06 |
$ |
11.50 |
$ |
11.50 |
|
||||||
September 30, 2007 | $ | 16.99 | $ | 12.75 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 11.50 | | ||||||
June 30, 2007 | $ | 17.00 | $ | 16.25 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 11.50 | | ||||||
March 31, 2007 | $ | 17.43 | $ | 15.75 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 11.50 | | ||||||
December 31, 2006 |
$ |
19.14 |
$ |
16.78 |
$ |
0.06 |
$ |
11.50 |
$ |
11.50 |
|
||||||
September 30, 2006 | $ | 21.19 | $ | 18.49 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 11.50 | | ||||||
June 30, 2006 | $ | 19.92 | $ | 16.95 | $ | 0.06 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 11.50 | | ||||||
March 31, 2006 | $ | 18.58 | $ | 16.46 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 11.50 | |
20
In addition to the other information contained or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the following factors should be considered carefully when evaluating this transaction and the proposal to approve the merger agreement at the Fidelity special meeting and the issuance of shares at the Eagle special meeting. You should read these risk factors together with the risk factors contained in Eagle's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, and any changes to those risk factors included in Eagle's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, or other documents filed with the SEC after the date of the Annual Report.
The conversion ratio is subject to change as a result of adverse changes affecting Fidelity through the effective date of the merger. Additionally, because the market price of Eagle common stock will fluctuate between now and the time Fidelity shareholders receive their shares of Eagle common stock, Fidelity shareholders cannot be sure of the number, or the value, of the shares of Eagle common stock they will receive in the merger.
Upon completion of the merger, each share of Fidelity common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.9202 shares of Eagle common stock per share of Fidelity common stock, subject to reduction pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement. The adjustment to the conversion ratio is automatic, and the circumstances under which Fidelity can terminate the merger agreement as a result of adverse changes to the conversion ratio are extremely limited. Please refer to "The MergerMerger ConsiderationPotential Reduction of the Conversion Ratio" at page for a discussion of the factors which may result in a reduction in the conversion ratio. If the adverse changes to Fidelity are of a sufficient magnitude, then either Fidelity or Eagle may have the right to terminate the merger. If the merger were effective as of December 31, 2007, we estimate the conversion ratio would be approximately 0.7055 shares of Eagle common stock for each share of Fidelity common stock. See "The MergerTermination, Termination Payments" at page .
Because Eagle is issuing its shares at a fixed exchange ratio, subject to reduction in accordance with the merger agreement, any change in the price of Eagle common stock prior to completion of the merger will affect the value of the shares of Eagle common stock that Fidelity shareholders will receive upon completion of the merger. Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors, including general market and economic conditions, changes in our respective businesses, operations and prospects, and regulatory considerations. Many of these factors are beyond our control.
Accordingly, at the time of the Fidelity special meeting, Fidelity shareholders will not be able to determine the exact number of, or the value of, shares of Eagle common stock, they may receive upon completion of the merger.
The market price of the shares of Eagle common stock may be affected by factors different from those affecting the shares of Fidelity common stock.
Upon completion of the merger, holders of Fidelity common stock will become holders of Eagle common stock. Some of Eagle's current businesses and markets differ from those of Fidelity and, accordingly, the results of operations of Eagle after the merger may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the results of operations of Fidelity. For further information on the businesses of Eagle and Fidelity and the factors to consider in connection with those businesses, see the documents incorporated by reference into this joint proxy statement/prospectus and referred to under "Where You Can Find More Information" at page and the information contained under "Information about Fidelity" at page .
We may fail to realize the cost savings we estimate for the merger.
The success of the merger will depend, in part, on our ability to realize the estimated cost savings and revenue enhancements from combining the businesses of Eagle and Fidelity. While we believe, as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, that these cost savings and revenue enhancement estimates
21
are achievable, it is possible that the potential cost savings and revenue enhancements could turn out to be more difficult to achieve than we anticipated. Our estimates also depend on our ability to combine the businesses of Eagle and Fidelity in a manner that permits those cost savings and revenue enhancements to be realized. Our ability to realize increases in revenue will depend, in part, on out ability to retain customers and employees, and to capitalize on existing relationships for the provision of additional products and services. If our estimates turn out to be incorrect or we are not able to successfully combine our two companies, the anticipated cost savings and increased revenues may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected.
The costs and effects related to the terminated mortgage operations of F&T Mortgage may be greater or more expensive than we anticipated, which could have an adverse impact on the results of operations, shareholder returns and financial condition of Eagle following the merger, and on the market price for Eagle common stock.
Until September 2007, F&T Mortgage, a wholly owned subsidiary of F&T Bank, originated mortgages for sale into the secondary market. While many of these mortgages were conforming mortgages sold to quasi-governmental mortgage agencies, or guaranteed under Federal programs, others were nonconforming or "exotic" loans, including no documentation and low documentation loans, negative amortization and subprime loans. Under the terms of the agreements under which substantially all of these loans were sold, F&T Mortgage, and in certain cases, F&T Bank, is required to repurchase loans which are paid off early, default early, or which breached the representations and warranties in the loan sale agreements. While we expect that any request to repurchase loans for early payment default or early payoff will have been presented prior to the effective time of the merger, or will be time-barred, there is no express limit on the time frame in which a representations and warranties claim can be made. Although F&T Mortgage has had extremely limited requests to repurchase loans for representations and warranties breaches, it is not possible to predict with accuracy the extent to which it may receive such requests in the future. Although Fidelity and Eagle believe that there are significant arguments that F&T Bank, and EagleBank following the merger, would not be legally obligated to effect most such repurchases on behalf of F&T Mortgage, there can be no assurance that such arguments would be successful, or that the expense and effort of defending against, or settling litigation relating to, such requests would not be much greater than anticipated.
Combining our two companies may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than we expect, or could result in the loss of customers.
Eagle and Fidelity have operated, and, until the completion of the merger, will continue to operate, independently. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of key employees, the disruption of each company's ongoing business or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect our ability to maintain relationships with clients and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger. As with any merger of banking institutions, there also may be disruptions that cause us to lose customers or cause customers to withdraw their deposits from our banks. Although we do not plan to close any branches immediately upon consummation of the merger, we may consolidate branches in the future, including as leases expire. Certain customers' branches may be consolidated with other branches in the market area resulting in new office locations and new banking associates serving such customers. There can be no assurance that customers will readily accept changes to their banking arrangements after the merger.
Certain officers and directors of Fidelity have potential conflicts of interest in the merger.
Fidelity shareholders should be aware of potential conflicts of interest and the benefits available to Fidelity officers and directors when considering Fidelity's board of directors' recommendation to approve the merger. Certain officers, directors and employees of Fidelity will become officers, directors or employees of Eagle and/or EagleBank and will be subject to employment or other service agreements with EagleBank after completion of the merger.
22
Eagle and Fidelity make forward-looking statements in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and their public documents within the meaning of and pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. A forward-looking statement encompasses any estimate, prediction, opinion or statement of belief in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the underlying management assumptions. These "forward-looking statements" can be identified by words such as "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends" and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements appear in the discussions of matters such as the benefits of the merger between Fidelity and Eagle, including future financial and operating results and cost saving enhancements to revenue that may be realized from the merger, and Eagle's and Fidelity's plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements contained in this joint proxy statement/prospectus that are not historical facts. These statements are based upon the current reasonable expectations and assessments of the respective managements of Eagle and Fidelity and are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our control. In addition, these forward-looking statements are subject to assumptions with respect to future business strategies and decisions that are subject to change.
In addition to factors that we have previously disclosed in Eagle's reports filed with the SEC and those that we discuss elsewhere in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, the following factors, among others, could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the forward-looking statements:
The forward-looking statements are made as of the date of the applicable document and, except as required by applicable law, Eagle and Fidelity assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those projected in the forward-looking statements. You should consider these risks and uncertainties in evaluating forward-looking statements and you should not place undue reliance on these statements.
23
The Fidelity Special Meeting of Shareholders
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided by Fidelity to holders of Fidelity common stock as Fidelity's proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by its board of directors to be voted at the special meeting of Fidelity shareholders to be held on , 2008, and at any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting. This joint proxy statement/prospectus is also being provided to you as Eagle's prospectus in connection with the offer and sale by Eagle of its shares of common stock as a result of the proposed merger.
Date, Time and Place of Meeting
The special meeting of Fidelity shareholders is scheduled to be held as follows:
Date: ,
2008
Time: : .m., local time
Place:
Purpose of the Special Meeting
At the Fidelity special meeting, Fidelity shareholders will be asked to:
Record Date and Outstanding Shares
Fidelity's board of directors has fixed the close of business on , 2008 as the record date for the Fidelity special meeting. Only shareholders of record of Fidelity common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Fidelity special meeting. Each holder of record of Fidelity common stock at the close of business on the Fidelity record date is entitled to one vote for each share of Fidelity common stock then held on each matter voted on by shareholders at the special meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were [4,207,016] shares of Fidelity common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.
Vote Required to Approve the Merger Agreement and the Merger
The approval of the merger agreement and the merger requires the affirmative vote of holders of at least two-thirds of the outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock as of the record date.
Vote Required to Approve the Proposal, If Necessary, to Adjourn the Special Meeting
The approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting if and to the extent necessary to permit the further solicitation of proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes at the Fidelity special meeting
24
to approve the merger agreement and the merger requires a majority vote of the shares present or represented at the special meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.
Quorum; Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting must be present in person or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Fidelity special meeting. If a share is represented for any purpose at the Fidelity special meeting, it is deemed to be present for the transaction of all business. Abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to Fidelity's bylaws, the special meeting may be adjourned by a majority of the shares present or represented at the special meeting.
If you hold your shares of Fidelity common stock in "street name" through a broker, bank or other nominee, generally the nominee may only vote your Fidelity common stock in accordance with your instructions. However, if your nominee has not timely received your instructions, such nominee may vote on matters for which it has discretionary voting authority. Brokers will not have discretionary voting authority to vote on the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the merger. If a nominee cannot vote on a matter because it does not have discretionary voting authority, this is a "broker non-vote" with respect to that matter. Broker shares that are not voted on any matter at the Fidelity special meeting will, however, be counted as shares present or represented at the special meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. In the event that a quorum is not present at the Fidelity special meeting, it is expected that the special meeting will be adjourned or postponed to permit further solicitation of proxies.
For purposes of the vote with respect to the merger agreement and the merger, a failure to vote, a vote to abstain and a broker non-vote will each have the same legal effect under Maryland law as a vote against approval of the merger agreement and the merger.
Voting by Directors and Executive Officers
As of the record date, Fidelity's and F&T Bank's directors and executive officers beneficially owned 1,319,179 outstanding shares of Fidelity common stock, or approximately 31.4% of the shares entitled to vote at the Fidelity special meeting. The directors and executive officers, in their capacity as shareholders, have entered into support agreements with Eagle under which they have agreed, among other things, to vote their respective shares for approval of the merger agreement and the merger at the meeting. The directors and executive officers were not paid any additional consideration in connection with the support agreements. The support agreements terminate upon any termination of the merger agreement. See "The MergerSupport Agreement" at page .
Voting and Revocation of Proxies
After carefully reading and considering the information presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, you should complete, date, sign and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope so that your shares are represented at the Fidelity special meeting. You can also vote at the special meeting, but we encourage you to submit your proxy now in any event.
All shares of Fidelity common stock represented by each properly executed and valid proxy received before the special meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions given on the proxy. If a Fidelity shareholder executes a proxy card without giving instructions, the shares of Fidelity common stock represented by that proxy card will be voted "FOR" approval of the merger agreement and the merger and "FOR" the approval of the proposal, if necessary, to adjourn the special meeting to permit the further solicitation of proxies. Fidelity's board of directors has not proposed any other matters to be voted on at the Fidelity special meeting, and only matters proposed specified in the notice of meeting may be conducted at the special meeting. If any other matter properly comes before the special meeting, which
25
would generally be limited to matters related to the conduct of the meeting, the persons named on the proxy card will vote the shares represented by all properly executed proxies on those matters in their discretion.
You may revoke your proxy at any time before the proxy is voted by one of the following means:
Solicitation of Proxies and Expenses
The accompanying proxy for the Fidelity special meeting is being solicited by Fidelity's board of directors, and Fidelity will pay for the entire cost of the solicitation, other than certain costs of preparing and filing this joint proxy statement/prospectus with the SEC, which are being borne by Eagle. Arrangements will also be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding the solicitation material to the beneficial owners of Fidelity common stock held of record by those persons, and Fidelity may reimburse the brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable transaction and clerical expenses. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone, facsimile or other means of communication by Fidelity's directors, officers and regular employees. These people will receive no additional compensation for these services, but will be reimbursed for any expenses incurred by them in connection with these services.
Fidelity may engage a proxy solicitation firm to assist it in obtaining proxies from shareholders on a timely basis. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, Fidelity has not engaged a firm for the purpose of soliciting proxies. The cost of any proxy solicitation firm engaged by Fidelity will be paid solely by Fidelity.
Board Recommendation
Fidelity's board of directors unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are in the best interests of Fidelity and its shareholders. Accordingly, Fidelity's board of directors unanimously approved and adopted the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, and unanimously recommends that Fidelity's shareholders vote "FOR" the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the merger and "FOR" the proposal, if necessary, to approve an adjournment of the special meeting to permit the further solicitation of proxies.
The proposed merger is of great importance to the shareholders of Fidelity. You are urged to read and carefully consider the information presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and to complete, date, sign and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope.
Dissenters' Rights
Under Maryland law, Fidelity shareholders may exercise dissenters' rights in connection with the merger. The provisions of Maryland law governing dissenters' rights are complex and you should review them carefully. Multiple steps must be taken to properly exercise and perfect these rights. A copy of Sections 3-201 through 3-213 of the MGCL (the provisions of the MGCL governing dissenters' rights) is included with this joint proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix D.
26
For a more complete description of dissenters' rights, please refer to the section of this joint proxy statement/prospectus entitled "The MergerDissenters' Rights" at page .
The Eagle Special Meeting of Shareholders
This joint proxy statement/prospectus is being provided by Eagle to holders of Eagle common stock as Eagle's proxy statement in connection with the solicitation of proxies by its board of directors to be voted at the special meeting of Eagle shareholders to be held on , 2008, and at any adjournments or postponements of the special meeting.
Date, Time and Place of Meeting
The special meeting of Eagle shareholders is scheduled to be held as follows:
Date: ,
2008
Time: : .m., local time
Place:
Purpose of the Special Meeting
At the Eagle special meeting, Eagle shareholders will be asked to:
Record Date and Outstanding Shares
Eagle's board of directors has fixed the close of business on , 2008 as the record date for the Eagle special meeting. Only shareholders of record of Eagle common stock at the close of business on the record date are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Eagle special meeting. Each holder of record of Eagle common stock at the close of business on the Eagle record date is entitled to one vote for each share of Eagle common stock then held on each matter voted on by shareholders at the special meeting. At the close of business on the record date, there were [9,832,063] shares of Eagle common stock issued and outstanding and entitled to vote.
Vote Required to Approve the Share Issuance
The approval of the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock to Fidelity shareholders in connection with the merger requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast on the proposal.
27
Vote Required to Approve the Proposal, If Necessary, to Adjourn the Special Meeting
The approval of the proposal to adjourn the special meeting if and to the extent necessary to permit the further solicitation of proxies in the event there are not sufficient votes at the Eagle special meeting to approve the share issuance requires a majority vote of the shares present or represented at the special meeting and entitled to vote on the matter.
Quorum; Abstentions and Broker Non-Votes
Holders of a majority of the issued and outstanding shares of Eagle common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting must be present in person or represented by proxy to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Eagle special meeting. If a share is represented for any purpose at the Eagle special meeting, it is deemed to be present for the transaction of all business. Abstentions are counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. Notwithstanding the foregoing, pursuant to Eagle's bylaws, the special meeting may be adjourned by a majority of the shares present or represented at the special meeting.
If you hold your shares of Eagle common stock in "street name" through a broker, bank or other nominee, generally the nominee may only vote your Eagle common stock in accordance with your instructions. However, if your nominee has not timely received your instructions, such nominee may vote on matters for which it has discretionary voting authority. Brokers will not have discretionary voting authority to vote on the proposal to approve the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock in connection with the merger agreement. If a nominee cannot vote on a matter because it does not have discretionary voting authority, this is a "broker non-vote" with respect to that matter. Broker shares that are not voted on any matter at the Eagle special meeting will, however, be counted as shares present or represented at the special meeting for purposes of determining whether a quorum exists. In the event that a quorum is not present at the Eagle special meeting, it is expected that the special meeting will be adjourned or postponed to permit further solicitation of proxies.
Voting by Directors and Executive Officers
As of the record date, Eagle's and EagleBank's directors beneficially owned approximately 2,562,743 outstanding shares of Eagle common stock, or approximately 26.1% of the shares entitled to vote at the Eagle special meeting. The directors of Eagle and EagleBank have indicated their intention to vote in favor of the share issuance.
Voting and Revocation of Proxies
After carefully reading and considering the information presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus, you should complete, date, sign and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope so that your shares are represented at the Eagle special meeting. You can also vote at the special meeting, but we encourage you to submit your proxy now in any event.
All shares of Eagle common stock represented by each properly executed and valid proxy received before the special meeting will be voted in accordance with the instructions given on the proxy. If an Eagle shareholder executes a proxy card without giving instructions, the shares of Eagle common stock represented by that proxy card will be voted "FOR" approval of the issuance of shares in connection with the merger and "FOR" the approval of the proposal, if necessary, to adjourn the special meeting to permit the further solicitation of proxies. Eagle's board of directors is not aware of any other matters to be voted on at the Eagle special meeting. If any other matter properly comes before the special meeting, the persons named on the proxy card will vote the shares represented by all properly executed proxies on those matters in their discretion.
28
You may revoke your proxy at any time before the proxy is voted by one of the following means:
Solicitation of Proxies and Expenses
The accompanying proxy for the Eagle special meeting is being solicited by Eagle board of directors, and Eagle will pay for the entire cost of the solicitation. Arrangements will also be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for forwarding the solicitation material to the beneficial owners of Eagle common stock held of record by those persons, and Eagle may reimburse the brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable transaction and clerical expenses. In addition to the use of the mail, proxies may be solicited personally or by telephone, facsimile or other means of communication by Eagle's directors, officers and regular employees. These people will receive no additional compensation for these services, but will be reimbursed for any expenses incurred by them in connection with these services.
Eagle may engage a proxy solicitation firm to assist it in obtaining proxies from shareholders on a timely basis. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, Eagle has not engaged a firm for the purpose of soliciting proxies. The cost of any proxy solicitation firm engaged by Eagle will be paid solely by Eagle.
Board Recommendation
Eagle's board of directors unanimously determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are in the best interests of Eagle and its shareholders. Accordingly, Eagle's board of directors unanimously approved and adopted the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, and unanimously recommends that Eagle's shareholders vote "FOR" the issuance of shares of Eagle common stock in connection with the merger and "FOR" the proposal, if necessary, to approve an adjournment of the special meeting to permit the further solicitation of proxies.
The proposed merger is of great importance to the shareholders of Eagle. You are urged to read and carefully consider the information presented in this joint proxy statement/prospectus and to complete, date, sign and promptly return the enclosed proxy card in the enclosed postage-prepaid envelope.
Dissenters' Rights
Under Maryland law, Eagle's shareholders do not have the right to object to the merger or exercise dissenters' rights in connection with the merger.
29
Set forth on the following pages is a summary of the material terms and conditions of the merger agreement. This summary may not contain all the information about the merger agreement that is important to you. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the merger agreement included as Appendix A to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. We encourage you to read the merger agreement in its entirety.
Structure of the Merger
The merger agreement provides for Eagle's acquisition of Fidelity through a merger of Fidelity with and into Woodmont, a wholly owned subsidiary of Eagle formed for the purpose of effecting the merger, with Woodmont being the surviving corporation in the merger. As a result of the merger, each share of Fidelity common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.9202 shares of Eagle common stock, subject to reduction as described below under "Merger Consideration." Promptly following the effectiveness of the merger of Fidelity with and into Woodmont, F&T Bank will be merged with and into EagleBank, with EagleBank being the surviving bank, and Woodmont will then be merged with and into Eagle, with Eagle being the surviving corporation. After completion of the mergers, Eagle will be the direct holder of all of the outstanding shares of EagleBank, which will have the assets and liabilities of the combined banks.
The articles of incorporation of Eagle will be the articles of incorporation of the surviving corporation after completion of the mergers, and the Eagle bylaws will be the bylaws of the surviving corporation.
Upon completion of merger of Fidelity with and into Woodmont, Robert P. Pincus and one other member of Fidelity's current board of directors selected by Fidelity will be appointed to the board of directors of Eagle. Upon completion of the merger, Ronald D. Paul, President and Chief Executive Officer of Eagle, and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of EagleBank, will also become Chairman of Eagle, and Mr. Pincus will become Vice Chairman of Eagle. In the event that the merger is effective prior to Eagle's 2008 annual meeting of shareholders, but not in time for the inclusion of the Fidelity designated directors as nominees for election as directors in Eagle's proxy materials, Eagle will appoint the Fidelity designated directors to newly created vacancies on the Eagle board of directors following the annual meeting. Upon completion of the merger of F&T Bank with and into EagleBank, Mr. Pincus and three other members of F&T Bank's current board of directors designated by F&T Bank will be appointed to the board of directors of EagleBank. Mr. Paul will continue to serve as Chairman of EagleBank, and Mr. Pincus will become Vice Chairman of EagleBank. See "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" at page .
The executive officers of Eagle and EagleBank following the mergers will be the those persons who are currently the executive officers of Eagle and EagleBank, except that Barry C. Watkins, President of F&T Bank, will become President of EagleBank's District of Columbia and Virginia regions, and Michael T. Flynn, Chief Operating Officer of Eagle and President of the District of Columbia region of EagleBank, will serve only as Chief Operating Officer of Eagle. Certain of the other executive officers of Fidelity and F&T Bank are expected to join EagleBank, as discussed under "Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger" at page .
Merger Consideration
At the effective time of the merger, each issued and outstanding share of Fidelity common stock will be converted into the right to receive 0.9202 of a share of Eagle common stock, subject to reduction as described below, together with cash in lieu of any fractional share of Eagle common stock to which a shareholder would be entitled.
Potential Reduction of the Conversion Ratio. If, at the effective time of the merger, the pro forma consolidated book value of Fidelity as of September 30, 2007, adjusted for the items set forth below, would
30
be below $7.50 per share, then the conversion ratio will be reduced to the number of shares determined by dividing Fidelity's September 30, 2007 pro forma book value per share, as agreed upon for purposes of the merger agreement by $8.15, calculated to four decimal places.
Fidelity's September 30, 2007 pro forma book value per share shall be determined by adjusting Fidelity's adjusted September 30, 2007 book value of $31,552,620 by the net amount of following items only:
An adjustment relating to items (ii) through (viii) will be made, however, only to the extent such the aggregate of such amounts exceeds the amount reserved or provided for such items at September 30, 2007, and any adjustment shall be made only by the amount by which the net amount of the adjustments in (i) through (viii) above exceeds $400,000. In no event will the adjustments result in an increase in the conversion ratio. The procedures for adjustment of the conversion ratio do not increase Fidelity's book value above the September 30, 2007 agreed upon levels for earnings, option exercises or other accretions.
There can be no assurance that the conversion ratio will not adjust downward. If the conversion ratio is adjusted, the number of shares of Eagle common stock which holders of Fidelity common stock will receive will be lower than 0.9202. If the merger were completed as of December 31, 2007, we preliminarily estimate that the conversion ratio would be 0.7055 shares of Eagle common stock for each share of Fidelity common stock. In making this estimate, we considered changes in items (i) though (v) above which are reflected in or derivable from Fidelity's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31 2007. We did not include any adjustment pursuant to any other items as such amounts would either adjust for the same item more than once, or are not readily determinable at this time. The actual conversion ratio may be higher or lower than the estimated adjusted conversion ratio as of December 31, 2007.
The Conversion Ratio will be proportionately adjusted for dividends on Eagle common stock payable in shares of Eagle common stock or any combination or subdivision of the Eagle common stock the record date for which is after the date of the merger agreement but prior to the completion of the merger.
No Cash Option; Fluctuating Value of Transaction. Holders of Fidelity common stock do not have the option to elect to receive cash in the merger. Other than those holders of Fidelity common stock who elect to exercise, perfect and fully implement their dissenter's rights, all holders of Fidelity common stock will
31
receive shares of Eagle common stock as a result of the merger. Eagle will not issue any fractional shares of Eagle common stock in the merger. Fidelity shareholders will receive cash for any fractional shares of Eagle common stock owed to them in an amount, without interest, based on the average closing price of Eagle common stock during a five day period ending immediately before the date which is two business days prior to the effective time of the merger.
The value of shares of Eagle common stock will fluctuate based on factors relating to Eagle's performance, market conditions and perceptions and other factors, many of which are beyond the control of Eagle and Fidelity. There can be no assurance as to the value of the shares of Eagle common stock which will be issued to holders of Fidelity common stock upon completion of the merger. The value of the Eagle shares into which Fidelity common stock is converted may be higher or lower than the $11.51 value of 0.9202 shares of Eagle common stock as of the date of the merger agreement, may be higher or lower than the $ value of 0.9202 shares of Eagle common stock as of , 2008 and may be higher or lower than the $ value of 0.7055 shares of Eagle common stock as of , 2008.
Surrender of Certificates Representing Fidelity Common Stock
Upon effectiveness of the merger, certificates which formerly represented shares of Fidelity common stock will represent the number of shares of Eagle common stock into which such shares have been converted, except that until exchanged for Eagle common stock, the holders of Fidelity common stock certificates will not be entitled to receive payment of dividends or other distributions or payments on Eagle common stock.
Eagle has appointed its transfer agent, Computershare Investor Services, as the exchange agent with respect to the merger. Within 10 days following effectiveness of the merger, the exchange agent will mail to each holder of Fidelity common stock a letter of transmittal and instructions for use in the exchange of shares of Fidelity common stock for shares of Eagle common stock and cash in lieu of fractional shares, including procedures, including the posting of a bond, to be followed in the event that certificates representing Fidelity common stock have been lost or destroyed. Holders of Fidelity common stock should not deliver their certificates until they have received transmittal forms, and should not return certificates with the enclosed form of proxy.
Upon surrender of certificates representing shares of Fidelity common stock, the exchange agent will issue uncertificated, or book entry, shares, registered in the name of the former Fidelity shareholder, representing the number of whole shares of Eagle common stock into which such holder's shares have been converted. Each former Fidelity shareholder will receive a statement evidencing the issuance of uncertificated shares of Eagle common stock for the benefit of such shareholder, together with a check representing payment, without interest, of cash in lieu of any fractional share of Eagle common stock to which such holder may be entitled, and, if appropriate, a check representing payment, without interest, of any dividend or other cash payment or distribution on such holder's shares of Eagle common stock which may have been withheld as a result of such holder's failure to earlier surrender his or her Fidelity certificates for exchange. Each shareholder will have the ability to request a physical share certificate representing his/her shares of Eagle common stock at any time after he/she completes the exchange of his/her Fidelity certificates. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any shares of Eagle common stock which are required to carry a legend, such as shares of Eagle common stock to be issued to affiliates of Fidelity, will be represented by physical share certificates.
If any holder of Fidelity common stock has not surrendered his or her certificates for exchange within twelve months of the effectiveness of the merger, the shares to which he or she would be entitled may, at Eagle's option, be sold and the proceeds of sale, together with any cash in lieu of fractional shares and previously accrued dividends, held in a non-interest bearing account for the former shareholder's benefit. In such event, the shareholder will only have the right to receive any shares of Eagle common stock which have not been sold, if any, and to collect, without interest, and subject to applicable laws of escheat, the
32
cash in the account representing the net proceeds of the sale, cash in lieu and accumulated dividends, upon proper surrender of his or her Fidelity certificates.
Treatment of Fidelity Options
As of the effective time of the merger, each outstanding option to acquire a share of Fidelity common stock under Fidelity's stock option plans will be converted into an option to purchase shares of Eagle common stock. Eagle will assume each Fidelity option in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Fidelity stock option plan pursuant to which such option was issued, the agreement evidencing the grant of such option, and any other agreement between Fidelity and the holder of the option, except that
Eagle has agreed to file one or more registration statements on Form S-8 registering shares of Eagle common stock issuable upon exercise of the Fidelity options that are assumed by Eagle under the merger agreement.
Support Agreement
As a condition to the obligation of Eagle to consummate the merger, each of the directors and executive officers of Fidelity and F&T Bank has entered into an agreement with respect to the voting of shares of Fidelity common stock which they own or control (the "Support Agreement"). Pursuant to the Support Agreement, the directors and executive officers of Fidelity and F&T Bank have agreed, in their capacities as shareholders, that they will vote an aggregate of 1,319,179 shares of Fidelity common stock which they possess the power to vote or direct the voting of, or approximately 31.4% of the total number of shares of Fidelity common stock outstanding, in favor of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Under the Support Agreement, the directors and executive officers also agreed not to tender into any tender or exchange offer, or sell, transfer, hypothecate, grant a security interest in, or otherwise dispose of or encumber any of his or her shares of Fidelity common stock, or any options to acquire Fidelity common stock, not to exercise any option to purchase Fidelity common stock prior to the effective time, unless it would otherwise expire, and, except with the prior written consent of Eagle, not to purchase or submit a bid to purchase or an offer to sell any shares of Eagle common stock during the period during which the value of Eagle common stock for purposes of establishing the cash in lieu rate is determined. The officers and directors also agreed, in their capacity as such, that they will not authorize, direct, encourage or induce any person to solicit any alternative acquisition proposal in violation of Fidelity's covenant not to solicit such proposals.
Non-Competition Agreements
As a condition of the obligation of Eagle to consummate the merger, each director of Fidelity and F&T Bank, other than Mr. Pincus and Mr. Watkins, has entered into an agreement restricting such director's ability to engage in activities in competition with Eagle and EagleBank following the effective time of the merger. The directors did not receive any separate or additional compensation for entering into the non-compete agreements.
Under the non-compete agreements, each director has agreed that for a period of one year following the effectiveness of the merger, he or she shall not, directly or indirectly, engage or (i) participate in the
33
ownership, management, operation, control or financing of; or (ii) provide any service, advice or assistance regarding the management, operation, formation or acquisition of; (iii) have any financial interest in, whether as organizer, director, advisory director, officer, employee, consultant, partner, contractor, shareholder (other than as a holder of less than 5% of the capital stock of a financial institution); of any federal or state commercial bank, credit union, industrial loan bank, savings institution, thrift or non-bank commercial or commercial real estate lending business, or any person or entity seeking to acquire or form such a institution or company (a "financial institution"), competitive with Eagle or EagleBank's business as it exists on the date of the non-compete agreements, which has a branch or loan production office located in the Maryland counties of Montgomery, Prince Georges, Frederick, Howard, and the District of Columbia, and the Virginia counties of Arlington, Fairfax, Fauquier, Loudoun and Prince William and the cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, Falls Church, Manassas and Manassas Park, including but not limited to a financial institution engaged in, or which controls any entity engaged in, retail banking services, commercial banking services, consumer savings accounts, deposit production, commercial loan production or commercial or commercial real estate lending services in the designated area. Such restrictions do not apply to any relationship preexisting the non-compete agreements, and do not apply to advisory relationships with a financial institution which the director may have solely in the capacity as legal counsel, investment banker or independent public accountant or to activities that are not in the designated area.
The non-compete agreements also contain specified exclusions for Robert Tyson, Robert Fiallo and Christopher Miller, directors of Fidelity and/or F&T Bank who are currently engaged in certain mortgage brokerage business activities set forth in the agreements, and provide that such activities may continue to the extent that they are not with customers of Eagle, EagleBank, Fidelity or F&T Bank, and that brokered commercial and commercial real estate loans originated by Messrs. Tyson and Fiallo must be first offered to Eagle and EagleBank. The non-compete agreements provide that Mr. Miller may change his employment during the term of the agreement to work for a financial institution which has an office within the area covered by the agreement. The non-compete agreements also provide that Jay Weinstein, a director of F&T Bank, will not in any way be restricted from the sale of his financial advisor business to another financial institution or affiliation of his business with another financial institution in the area covered by the non-compete agreement.
Additionally, for a period of two years following the effectiveness of the merger, the Fidelity and F&T Bank directors may not directly or indirectly, for or on behalf of such director or any other person or entity, accept banking business from, solicit the banking business of, or induce to discontinue, terminate or reduce the extent of their relationship with Eagle or EagleBank, any person or entity who was a customer of Fidelity, F&T Bank, Eagle or EagleBank; or initiate any offer of employment to or hiring process with respect to, or in any manner solicit the services, or hire any person who was an employee of Fidelity or F&T Bank. Further, the Fidelity and F&T Bank directors have agreed that for a period of two years following the effectiveness of the merger, they shall not disclose or use, or authorize any person or entity to disclose or use, any confidential or nonpublic information relating to Eagle, EagleBank, Fidelity or F&T Bank of which such director is aware or to which such director has access, as a result of service on the board of directors or as an officer of Eagle, EagleBank, Fidelity or F&T Bank.
Effectiveness of the Merger
The closing of the merger will take place within 30 days of the receipt of all required approvals and authorizations of government and regulatory authorities, the expiration of all applicable waiting periods, and the satisfaction or waiver of all conditions to the merger. The merger will become effective upon the later of the filing of Articles of Merger with the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation or the date indicated in the Articles of Merger. It is expected that the merger will become effective on the same day of the closing, unless otherwise agreed in writing by the parties to the merger agreement.
34
Material United States Federal Income Tax Consequences
General. The following discusses the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the merger. This discussion is based on the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the "Code"), as amended, applicable Treasury regulations, administrative interpretations and court decisions as in effect as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, all of which may change, possibly with retroactive effect. This discussion assumes that Fidelity shareholders hold their Fidelity common stock, and will hold their Eagle common stock, as capital assets. This discussion does not address all aspects of federal income taxation that may be important to a Fidelity shareholder in light of that shareholder's particular circumstances or to a Fidelity shareholder subject to special rules, such as:
This discussion is not a complete analysis or description of all potential federal income tax consequences to the merger. It does not address tax consequences that may vary with, or are contingent on, individual circumstances. In addition, it does not address any non-income tax or any foreign, state or local tax consequences of the merger. Accordingly, shareholders are strongly encouraged to consult their own tax advisors to determine their particular tax consequences.
Tax Opinion. Eagle and Fidelity have received an opinion of Kennedy & Baris, LLP dated as of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, to the effect that the merger will be a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368 of the Code, and will have the tax consequences described below. The opinion of Kennedy & Baris, LLP relies on (1) representations made by Eagle and Fidelity, including those contained in certificates of officers of Eagle and Fidelity, and (2) certain assumptions, including an assumption regarding the completion of the merger in the manner contemplated by the merger agreement. In addition, the opinion assumes the absence of changes in existing facts or in law between the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus and the closing date of the merger. If any of those representations, covenants or assumptions is inaccurate the tax consequences of the merger could differ from those described herein.
The following is a description of the expected federal income tax consequences of the merger to Eagle, Fidelity and the shareholders of Fidelity:
35
The opinion of Kennedy & Baris, LLP is not binding on the Internal Revenue Service (the "IRS") and does not preclude the IRS or the courts from disagreeing with the opinion of Kennedy & Baris, LLP or otherwise adopting a contrary position. In the event of such disagreement, there is no assurance that the IRS would not prevail in a judicial or administrative proceeding. Eagle and Fidelity do not intend to obtain a ruling from the IRS on the tax consequences of the merger.
As a result of the complexity of the tax laws and the impact of each shareholder's particular circumstances upon the tax consequences of the merger, the information set forth above regarding the federal income tax consequences of the merger is not intended to be individualized tax or legal advice to the shareholders of Fidelity. Each shareholder should consult his or her own tax or financial counsel as to the specific federal, state, and local tax consequences of the merger, if any, to such shareholder.
For federal income tax purposes, holders of Eagle common stock will not recognize gain or loss as a result of the merger.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting. Information returns will be filed with the IRS in connection with cash payments for shares of Fidelity common stock pursuant to the merger. Backup withholding at a rate of 28% may apply to cash paid to a Fidelity shareholder, unless such shareholder furnishes a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies that he or she is not subject to backup withholding on the substitute Form W-9 included in the letter of transmittal to be delivered to the shareholder following the completion of the merger. Any amount withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowable as a refund or credit against a holder's U.S. federal income tax liability, provided required information is furnished to the IRS. The IRS may impose a penalty upon any taxpayer that fails to provide the correct taxpayer identification number.
Reporting Requirements. Holders of Fidelity common stock receiving Eagle common stock as a result of the merger will be required to retain records pertaining to the merger and will be required to file with their United States federal income tax return for the year in which the merger takes place a statement setting forth facts relating to the merger. The facts to be disclosed by such holder include the holder's basis in the shares of Fidelity common stock transferred in the merger, and the fair market value of the Eagle common stock and the amount of cash received in the merger.
36
Interests of Certain Persons in the Merger
In considering the recommendation of Fidelity board of directors that Fidelity shareholders vote in favor of the proposal to approve the merger agreement and the merger, Fidelity shareholders should be aware that Fidelity's directors and officers may have interests in the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, that may be different from, or in addition to, their interests as shareholders of Fidelity. Fidelity's board of directors was aware of these interests and took them into account in its decision to approve and adopt the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger.
Options to Acquire Fidelity Common Stock. As of the record date for the Fidelity special meeting, Fidelity's and F&T Bank's directors and executive officers owned, in the aggregate, options to purchase 507,070 shares of Fidelity common stock under Fidelity's equity compensation plans. Each issued and outstanding option to purchase shares of Fidelity common stock as of the effective time which has not previously vested, will become vested in full and exercisable at the effective time of the merger, in accordance with the terms of the Fidelity option plans, and will be converted into an option to purchase shares of Eagle common stock, as set forth under "The MergerTreatment of Fidelity Options" at page . Under the terms of its option plans, Fidelity may also accelerate the vesting of any option prior to the effective time, provided, however that under the merger agreement, the consent of Eagle would be required to effect such an acceleration.
Compensation and Termination Agreements. EagleBank has entered into an agreement with each of Messrs. Pincus and Watkins regarding the termination of their existing agreements with Fidelity and/or F&T Bank. Under the termination agreements, Mr. Pincus and Mr. Watkins agree that they will not receive any severance or change in control payments in connection with the merger. EagleBank has also entered into new agreements, effective as of the effective time, pursuant to which Mr. Pincus will serve as Vice Chairman of the board of directors of EagleBank, and Mr. Watkins will serve as President of the District of Columbia and Virginia regions of EagleBank.
Under his agreement, Mr. Pincus will be retained to serve as Vice Chairman of the board of directors of EagleBank, and receive an annual payment of $220,000, subject to annual increase to reflect, at a minimum, the increase in the consumer price index, in lieu of all other fees for service on the board of directors. Mr. Pincus will also be eligible to receive incentive bonuses pursuant to board approved plans, and to a car allowance of $1,250 per month. The agreement has a term of three years. In the event of early termination of the agreement by EagleBank without cause, or as a result of Mr. Pincus' death or disability, Mr. Pincus would be entitled to receive continued payment of retainer compensation and car allowance for the remainder of the term, subject to his continued compliance with the confidentiality, noncompete and nonsolicitation provisions of the agreement. The agreement provides that during the term and for a period of eighteen months after termination, Mr. Pincus will not in any capacity (i) render any services to a bank or financial services business, including but not limited to any consumer savings, commercial banking, insurance or trust business, or a savings and loan or mortgage business, or other business in which EagleBank has invested significant resources in anticipation of commencing, or to any person or entity that is attempting to form such a business if it operates any office, branch or other facility that is (or is proposed to be) located within a thirty-five mile radius of the location of any branch of Eagle, EagleBank, Fidelity or F&T Bank or their affiliates, or (ii) induce or attempt to induce any customers, suppliers, officers, employees, contractors, consultants, agents or representatives of, or any other person that has a business relationship with, Eagle, EagleBank, Fidelity or F&T Bank or their affiliates, to discontinue, terminate or reduce the extent of their relationship with such entity or to solicit any such customer for any competitive product or service, or otherwise solicit any customer or employee of Eagle, EagleBank, Fidelity or F&T Bank or their affiliates.
37
Under the agreement, in the event that (i) Mr. Pincus is terminated without cause after a change in control, (ii) his title, duties or position are materially reduced within twelve months after a change in control, without his consent, such that he would not have materially comparable compensation benefits and responsibilities, and not have his primary worksite moved more than twenty five miles, and such change is not cured within thirty days of notice of termination, or (iii) he voluntary terminates the agreement within the thirty day period following twelve months after a change in control, Mr. Pincus would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to 2.99 times his highest rate of base compensation in effect within the twelve months prior to termination, subject to adjustment to avoid adverse tax consequences resulting from characterization of such payment for tax purposes as a "parachute payment."
Under his agreement, Mr. Watkins will serve as President of the District of Columbia and Virginia regions of EagleBank. Pursuant to this agreement, which has a term of three years from the effective date of the merger, Mr. Watkins will be entitled to base compensation at an initial rate of $250,000 per year, a car allowance of $1,500 per month, bank paid life insurance, up to an annual premium of $5,000, paid parking and participation in all other health, welfare, benefit, retirement, stock, option and bonus plans, if any, generally available to officers of EagleBank. If Mr. Watkins is terminated without cause, then subject to his continued compliance with the confidentiality, noncompetition and nonsolicit provision of the agreement, he will be entitled to receive continued base salary and COBRA payments for a period of one year following termination. The confidentiality, noncompete and nonsolicit provisions of Mr. Watkins' agreement are identical to those in Mr. Pincus' agreement, except that they extend for a period of twelve months following termination.
Under the agreement, in the event that (i) Mr. Watkins is terminated without cause after a change in control, (ii) his title, duties or position are materially reduced within twelve months after a change in control, without his consent, such that he would not have materially comparable compensation benefits and responsibilities, and not have his primary worksite moved more than twenty five miles, and such change is not cured within thirty days of notice of termination or (iii) he voluntary terminates the agreement within the thirty day period following twelve months after a change in control, Mr. Watkins would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to 2.99 times his highest rate of base compensation in effect within the twelve months prior to termination, subject to adjustment to avoid adverse tax consequences resulting from characterization of such payment for tax purposes as a "parachute payment."
Bonus Payments. Under his current compensation agreement, Mr. Pincus would be entitled to receive a bonus of $100,000, payable at June 30, 2008 if F&T Bank's portfolio loans and its deposits were at or exceeded specified levels at that date. Also, under an agreement with a limited liability company through which Albert A. D'Alessandro, the Chairman of F&T Bank's advisory board serves, bonuses of up to $50,000 is payable by F&T Bank if the loans and deposits generated by members of the advisory board, exceed designated levels. As the levels of loans and deposits necessary to pay bonuses to each of Mr. Pincus and Mr. D'Alessandro have already been reached, it is a condition to closing that Mr. Pincus and Mr. D'Alessandro's company shall have been paid these bonuses prior to closing.
Change in Control and Severance Payments F&T Bank currently has employment agreements with each of the officers set forth in the table below, which expire on October 1, 2008, subject to automatic renewal unless either party gives notice of an intent not to renew. Eagle will assume these contracts at the effective time. Under these employment agreements, if there is a change in control of Fidelity (the merger will result in a change in control), and if within one year of the change in control, without the consent of the employee, the officer's responsibilities are reduced in a manner inconsistent with his/her position; the officer's base compensation is reduced; or his/her office is relocated more than fifty miles, then the officer has thirty days to resign. If the officer elects to resign (a "Change in Control Resignation"), he/she will be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to two times the amount of the officer's current base salary and the cost of two years of continued health insurance benefits under COBRA (a "Change in Control Resignation Payment"). If any officer does not become entitled to receive a Change in Control Resignation
38
Payment, but Eagle, as the successor to F&T Bank, elects not to extend such officer's employment agreement or terminates the officer's employment without cause, then such officer will be entitled to receive continued payments of base salary and COBRA payments for a period of twelve months (a "Severance Payment").
Name |
Title |
Change in Control Resignation Payment(1) |
Severance Payment(1) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Diane M. Begg | Chief Financial Officer | $ | 351,233 | $ | 175,616 | |||
Gloria M. Reyes | Chief Credit Officer | $ | 278,250 | $ | 139,125 | |||
J. Mercedes Alvarez | Chief Corporate Officer | $ | 306,198 | $ | 153,099 | |||
Cynthia A. Pehl | Chief Risk Officer | $ | 274,096 | $ | 137,048 | |||
Kim Ray | Chief Operating Officer | $ | 306,454 | $ | 153,227 | |||
Susan J. Schumacher | Commercial Deposit Services Manager | $ | 267,120 | $ | 133,560 |
It is currently anticipated that all executive officers of Fidelity will be offered continued employment with EagleBank. It is expected that each of these officers will be eligible to receive a Change in Control Resignation payment or a Severance Payment.
Mr. Pincus' relationship with Milestone Advisors, LLC. Robert P. Pincus is the Chairman of Milestone Merchant Partners, LLC, the parent company of Milestone Advisors, LLC ("Milestone Advisors"). While he is not receiving any compensation related to this transaction, he does receive compensation for other transactions from Milestone Merchant Partners, LLC. Mr. Pincus's relationship with Milestone Merchant Partners, LLC was fully disclosed to the Fidelity board of directors prior to receiving the opinion of Milestone Advisors.
Line of Credit. Independent of the obligations of Eagle and Fidelity under the merger agreement, EagleBank has provided Fidelity with a revolving line of credit, secured by a first lien security interest in all of the stock of F&T Bank, pursuant to which EagleBank may lend up to $9 million dollars to Fidelity for the purpose of contributing additional capital to F&T Bank, in the form of subordinated debt. The line of credit will be repaid upon effectiveness of the merger and bank merger. The obligation of Fidelity under the line of credit will exist regardless of whether the merger and bank merger are completed.
Accounting Treatment
Eagle will account for the merger as a purchase, as that term is used under United States generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"), for accounting and financial reporting purposes. Under purchase accounting, the assets and liabilities of Fidelity as of the effective time will be recorded at their respective fair values and combined with those of Eagle. The amount by which the purchase price paid by Eagle exceeds the fair value of the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired by Eagle through the merger will be recorded as goodwill. Financial statements of Eagle issued after the effective time will reflect these values and will not be restated retroactively to reflect the historical financial position or results of operations of Fidelity.
Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger
Eagle and Fidelity have agreed to use their reasonable efforts to obtain all regulatory approvals required to consummate the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, which include the approvals of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System and the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation. We have filed applications in order to obtain these approvals. The merger cannot
39
proceed without these regulatory approvals. It is presently contemplated that if any additional governmental approvals or actions are required (including any approvals necessary to acquire the inactive business of F&T Mortgage), such approvals or actions will be sought. Although Eagle and Fidelity expect to obtain all necessary regulatory approvals, there can be no assurance as to if and when these regulatory approvals will be obtained. There can also be no assurance that the United States Department of Justice or any state attorney general will not attempt to challenge the merger on antitrust grounds, or, if such a challenge is made, there can be no assurance as to its result.
A regulatory body's approval may contain terms or impose conditions or restrictions relating or applying to, or requiring changes in or limitations on, the operation or ownership of any asset or business of Eagle, Fidelity or any of their respective subsidiaries, or Eagle's ownership of Fidelity, or requiring asset divestitures. The merger agreement permits Eagle to decline to consummate the merger if any approval imposes any condition that, in the reasonable judgment of Eagle, would have a material adverse effect on the value of the merger to Eagle (excluding conditions that are ordinarily imposed in connection with transactions like the merger). There can be no assurance that the required regulatory approvals will be obtained on terms that satisfy the conditions to closing of the merger or within the time frame contemplated by Eagle and Fidelity. See "The MergerConditions to the Merger" at page .
Background of the Merger
On October 10, 2007, Fidelity board member and F&T Bank Chair, Robert P. Pincus and Eagle's President and Chief Executive Officer, Ronald D. Paul, met over breakfast and discussed the overall banking environment. The discussion led to talks of a possible business combination of the two financial institutions, Fidelity and Eagle, and all its positive opportunities. Mr. Pincus and Mr. Paul agreed to explore the merger option and to each seek input from an investment banking firm.
On October 18, 2007, Diane M. Begg, CFO of Fidelity met with William L. Boyan, III of Sandler O'Neill, Eagle's financial advisor, to discuss Fidelity's historical financial and operating results and discuss certain preliminary due diligence questions.
On October 23, 2007, Mr. Pincus met with Norman R. Pozez, Director of Fidelity, and John J. Nelligan and Eugene S. Weil of Milestone Advisors and discussed the rendering of financial advisory services to Fidelity in connection with a possible merger with Eagle.
On October 24, 2007, Susan B. Hepner, Chair of Fidelity's board of directors, executed an engagement letter between Fidelity and Milestone Advisors to retain its services for the purpose of assisting Fidelity in structuring, negotiating, and ultimately issuing a fairness opinion with respect to the merger with Eagle.
On October 31, 2007, Mr. Pincus met with Mr. Paul, Leland M. Weinstein, a director of Eagle, Messrs. Nelligan and Weil of Milestone Advisors, and Mr. Boyan, of Sandler O'Neill, to discuss all the business opportunities associated with a potential merger between Eagle and Fidelity, the compatibilities between the two institutions and benefits for the current clients and shareholders. The group agreed to pursue a letter of intent and definitive merger agreement.
On November 7, 2007, Fidelity's board of directors met and affirmed the retention of Milestone Advisors. The board requested that Milestone Advisors also render a fairness opinion on the sale transaction. The board of directors discussed and considered the terms and conditions of the preliminary merger agreement.
40
Between November 7 and November 29, 2007, the parties and the financial and legal advisors conducted due diligence and negotiated the material terms of the merger agreement and the related agreement.
On November 30, 2007, Fidelity's board of directors met with its financial advisor, Mr. Nelligan of Milestone Advisors, and legal advisors, Philip Feigen and Jonathan Pavony of Patton Boggs LLP, to discuss and consider the financial, business, strategic and legal aspects relating to the merger agreement, the merger, and related transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. Fidelity's board determined that it was in the best interest of Fidelity and its shareholders and approved entering into the agreement and plan of merger with Eagle.
Eagle and Fidelity executed the definitive merger agreement and issued a press release publicly announcing the transaction on December 2, 2007.
Fidelity's Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of Fidelity's Board of Directors
The terms of the merger agreement, including the consideration to be paid to Fidelity's shareholders, were the result of arms-length negotiations. In evaluating the merger proposal and concluding that the merger presents a more favorable opportunity for maximizing shareholder value than Fidelity's other alternatives, including continuing to operate on a stand-alone basis, the Fidelity board of directors considered a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the following:
41
The Fidelity board of directors also considered the potential adverse consequences of the proposed merger, including:
The above discussion of the information and factors considered by the Fidelity board of directors is not intended to be exhaustive, but includes the material factors the Fidelity board of directors considered. In reaching its determination to approve and recommend the merger, the Fidelity board of directors did not assign any relative or specific weights to the foregoing factors, and individual directors may have given differing weights to different factors.
The Fidelity board of directors believes that the merger is in the best interests of Fidelity and its shareholders. Accordingly the Fidelity board of directors has approved the merger agreement unanimously and recommends unanimously that you vote "FOR" approval of the merger and the merger agreement.
Eagle's Background and Reasons for the Merger
In reaching its decision to approve and adopt the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, Eagle's board of directors, in consultation with management and its financial and legal advisors, considered numerous factors. In determining that the merger was in the best interests of Eagle and its shareholders, the board considered that the merger will, in a cost effective manner, substantially increase EagleBank's assets and capital base, allowing it to provide customers with larger loans, and a wider variety of loan, deposit and other products, and expand its human and financial resources; the addition of Fidelity's six offices will provide EagleBank with greater presence in the District of Columbia and Montgomery County, and provide it with the opportunity to enter the Northern Virginia market for the first time; provide the combined company with opportunities for cross selling of products and for substantial cost savings through reduction of administrative and overhead expenses, as well as possible branch consolidation in the future, resulting in a transaction which should produce increased income, increased income per share and other financial benefits for Eagle shareholders. The board of directors also considered the risks related to the proposed merger, including those related to F&T Mortgage.
After the initial meeting between Mr. Paul and Mr. Pincus discussed in "Background of the Merger" above, Eagle consulted with its legal counsel and financial advisor, to assist it in conducting due diligence on Fidelity, and to commence preparing a draft definitive agreement. During the period of November 8 through November 17, 2007, Eagle's senior management, legal counsel, financial advisor and independent loan review consultants retained for the purpose, conducted an in depth review of Fidelity's business,
42
financial condition, assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities, including those related to F&T Mortgage. This review, and discussion of the findings, continued after the main portion of the due diligence investigation was completed.
On November 22, 2007, the Eagle board of directors met with representatives of legal counsel and Sandler O'Neill to discuss the proposed terms of the merger and the findings of the due diligence examination. Following an extensive discussion of the prospects for Eagle and its shareholders as a result of the merger, the condition and prospects of Fidelity and its subsidiaries, and the risks relating to an acquisition of Fidelity, the board approved continued discussions relating to the proposed merger. On November 28, 2007, the board of directors again met with Eagle's legal and financial advisors to discuss the merger. In anticipation of the meeting, the latest iteration of the merger agreement had been distributed to the directors. Following a presentation by management and counsel of the status of the discussions regarding the proposed merger, changes to the merger agreement since the draft distributed, a presentation by Sandler O'Neill of the financial impact of the proposed merger, a discussion of due diligence issues, and a presentation by counsel on issues relating to F&T Mortgage, the board approved continued discussions toward a definitive agreement.
On November 30, 2007, a joint meeting of the boards of directors of Eagle and EagleBank was held. The directors had previously been provided with the latest version of the proposed merger agreement. At this meeting, the boards reviewed the structure of the transaction, heard presentations from management and counsel on the status of the negotiations, changes to the agreement since the November 28, 2007 meeting and unresolved issues, and discussed the potential risks of the transaction and the potential impact of the merger on Eagle and its shareholders. The boards received and discussed a presentation by legal counsel regarding their fiduciary obligations under Maryland law. The boards received and discussed a presentation from Sandler O'Neill as to the financial impact of the transaction, pricing issues, and as to the fairness of the transaction from a financial point of view to the shareholders of Eagle. After extensive discussion, the boards of directors of Eagle and EagleBank unanimously approved the merger (with one member of the EagleBank board absent), subject to satisfactory resolution of open items, and authorized Mr. Paul to execute the merger agreement and related documents in the form presented, with such changes as he deemed appropriate, provided that such changes did not result in an increase in the substantive risk to Eagle and EagleBank of the proposed transaction.
The above discussion of the information and factors considered by Eagle's board of directors is not meant to be exhaustive, but indicates the material matters considered by the board. In reaching its determination to approve the merger agreement and the transactions which it contemplates, the board did not quantify, rank or assign any relative or specific weight to any of the foregoing factors, and individual directors may have considered various factors differently. The Eagle board did not undertake to make any specific determination as to whether any factor, or any particular aspect of any factor, supported or did not support its ultimate determination. There can be no assurance that the merger will be effected and the integration of the two companies consummated in the manner expected by the Eagle board, or that the expected benefits to Eagle and its shareholders will be realized.
The Eagle board of directors has unanimously approved the merger and unanimously recommends that holders of Eagle common stock vote "FOR" the approval of the issuance of up to a maximum of 4,338,363 shares of Eagle common stock in connection with the merger.
Opinion of Fidelity's Financial Advisor
At the request of Fidelity, Milestone Advisors has provided to the Fidelity board of directors a written opinion to the effect that, subject to the qualifications, limitations and assumptions set forth in the opinion, as of the date Fidelity entered into the merger agreement the consideration to be paid by Eagle as provided in the merger agreement was fair to the holders of Fidelity common stock from a financial point of view.
43
Milestone Advisors was retained by Fidelity as its financial advisor and to provide a fairness opinion to Fidelity. Milestone Advisors is an investment banking firm that provides a broad range of financial services, and, as part of its investment banking activities, is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and securities in connection with merger transactions and other types of acquisitions, private placements, secondary distributions and valuations for corporate, estate and other purposes. No limitations were imposed by the board of directors of Fidelity upon Milestone Advisors with respect to the investigation made or procedures followed by it in rendering its opinion.
The full text of Milestone Advisors' written opinion to Fidelity & Trust's board of directors, which sets forth the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered, and qualifications and limitations of the review undertaken by Milestone Advisors, is attached as Appendix B to this joint proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. The following summary of Milestone Advisors' opinion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the opinion, and shareholders of Fidelity are urged to read the opinion in its entirety in connection with their consideration of the proposed merger.
For purposes of Milestone Advisors' opinion and in connection with its review of the merger and the merger agreement, Milestone Advisors, among other things:
In addition, Milestone Advisors held discussions with the managements of Fidelity and Eagle concerning their views as to the financial and other information described above and the potential cost savings, operating synergies, revenue enhancements and strategic benefits expected to result from the merger. Milestone Advisors also conducted such other analyses and examinations and considered such other financial, economic and market criteria as it deemed appropriate to arrive at its opinion. It did not, however, make or review any independent evaluations or appraisals of any of the assets, properties, liabilities or securities, or make any physical inspection of the properties or assets of Fidelity. Milestone Advisors assumed the adequacy of allowances for losses in loan portfolios, and did not undertake to review any individual credit files, for Fidelity or Eagle.
In delivering its opinion to the board of directors of Fidelity, Milestone Advisors prepared and delivered to the board written materials containing various analyses and other information. Subject to the provisions of the merger agreement, each share of Fidelity common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger shall be converted into the right to receive consideration equal to 0.9202 shares of Eagle common stock. The aggregate number of Eagle shares to be issued in exchange for all of Fidelity's currently outstanding common stock is approximately 3.9 million. All
44
issued and outstanding options to purchase Fidelity's common stock at the time of transaction close will be converted into options to purchase Eagle shares per customary conversion methodology as described in the merger agreement. The fully diluted per share purchase price as of the date of the fairness opinion was $11.50 and as of the date of the merger agreement was $11.51. For purposes of the fairness opinion, Milestone Advisors assumed 4,207,016 shares of Fidelity common stock outstanding and 507,070 options to purchase Fidelity common stock outstanding at a weighted average exercise price of $10.75 per share.
The following are summaries of the analyses contained in the materials delivered to Fidelity board of directors:
Market Trading Analysis of Eagle Bancorp(1). Milestone Advisors reviewed the stock trading history of Eagle. As of November 29th, 2007, the market value of Eagle was $12.50 per share and ranged from $11.55 to $18.01 over the preceding 52-week period. The 30-, 60-, 90- day trading average stock prices were $12.57, $12.84, and $13.12, and the average daily trading volume was approximately 5,500 shares.
Public Comparable Company Analysis. This method applies the comparative public market information of comparable companies to Fidelity and Eagle. The methodology assumes companies in the same industry share similar markets, and the potential for revenue and earnings growth is usually dependent upon the characteristics of the growth rates of these markets, and companies that operate within the same industry or line of business experience similar operating characteristics and business opportunities and risks. The underlying component in the comparable company analysis assumes the companies are going concerns.
Using publicly available information, Milestone Advisors compared selected financial data of Fidelity with similar data of selected publicly-traded companies engaged in commercial banking considered by Milestone Advisors to be comparable to those of Fidelity. In this regard, Milestone Advisors noted that although such companies were considered similar, none of the companies has the same management, makeup, size or combination of businesses as Fidelity, as the case may be. Milestone Advisors reviewed and analyzed the following publicly-traded companies, which Milestone Advisors deemed to be comparable companies (collectively, the "Fidelity & Trust Comparison Companies"): This group was selected from companies that are (i) 16 commercial banks or bank holding companies which were established after 2002 and have assets between $250 million and $750 million (the "De Novo Comparison Companies"), (ii) 61 commercial banks or bank holding companies located in the Mid-Atlantic region and have assets between $250 million and $750 million (the "Mid-Atlantic Comparison Companies"), and (iii) 32 commercial banks or bank holding companies which have a return on average assets of less than 0.8% and have assets between $250 million and $750 million (the "Nationwide Comparison Companies").
Milestone Advisors analyzed the following financial data for each of the Fidelity & Trust Comparison Companies and then applied the mean and median trading metrics of the Fidelity & Trust Comparison Companies to Fidelity as a multiple or percent, as the case may be, of (i) total assets (ii) tangible book value, and (iii) earnings(2) for the latest twelve months.
45
Applied Median Comparables, De Novo Comparison Companies
|
Median Comparable Multiple |
F&T Multiplier |
Implied Price |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price to Assets (%) | 11.5 | 452,046 | 51,985 | ||||
Price to Tangible Book Value (%) | 143.5 | 32,321 | 46,390 | ||||
Price to LTM Earnings (x) | 15.6 | 1,765 | (1) | 27,571 | |||
Implied Average Total Market Capitalization ($000) | 41,982 | ||||||
Implied Fully Diluted Market Value per Share ($) | $ | 9.98 | |||||
Applied Median Comparables, Mid-Atlantic Comparison Companies
|
Median Comparable Multiple |
F&T Multiplier |
Implied Price |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price to Assets (%) | 12.1 | 452,046 | 54,472 | ||||
Price to Tangible Book Value (%) | 141.2 | 32,321 | 45,647 | ||||
Price to LTM Earnings (x) | 14.7 | 1,765 | (1) | 25,975 | |||
Implied Average Total Market Capitalization ($000) | 42,031 | ||||||
Implied Fully Diluted Market Value per Share ($) | $ | 9.99 | |||||
Applied Median Comparables, Nationwide Comparison Companies
|
Median Comparable Multiple |
Cordell Multiplier |
Implied Price |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Price to Assets (%) | 10.0 | 452,046 | 45,024 | ||||
Price to Tangible Book Value (%) | 122.5 | 32,321 | 39,577 | ||||
Price to LTM Earnings (x) | 19.0 | 1,765 | (1) | 33,545 | |||
Implied Average Total Market Capitalization ($000) | 39,382 | ||||||
Implied Fully Diluted Market Value per Share ($) | $ | 9.36 | |||||
The median range of values for this analysis was from $9.36 to $9.99 per share compared to the value of Eagle's stock offer equal to an exchange ratio of 0.9202, or $11.51 per share as of the date of the merger agreement.
Merger and Acquisition Transaction Analysis. Milestone Advisors reviewed certain publicly available information regarding 55 selected merger and acquisition transactions (the "Comparable Transactions") from January 1, 2005 to October 31, 2007 involving commercial banks and bank holding companies, in which the sellers (i) were commercial banks or bank holding companies formed after January 1, 2001 and had total assets at the time of transaction announcement less than $500 million (the 18 "De Novo Transactions"), (ii) were commercial banks or bank holding companies located in the Mid-Atlantic region and had total assets at the time of transaction announcement between $250 million and $750 million (the 12 "Mid-Atlantic Transactions"), and (iii) were commercial banks or bank holding companies which had a return on average assets less than 0.8% and had total assets at the time of transaction announcement between $250 million and $750 million (the 25 "Nationwide Transactions").
For each transaction, Milestone Advisors analyzed data illustrating, among other things, the multiple of purchase price to last twelve month ("LTM") earnings per share ("EPS"), the multiple of purchase price to tangible book value ("TBV"), and the ratio of the premium (i.e., purchase price in excess of tangible book value) to core deposits.
46
A summary of the mean and median multiples and ratios for the Comparable Transactions Group in the analysis follows:
M&A Metrics, De Novo Transactions
|
|
|
Price / |
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Assets ($000) |
Deal Value ($M) |
TBV (%) |
LTM EPS (x) |
Premium/ Core Deposits (%) |
|||||
High | 354,486 | 69.5 | 409.1 | 47.9 | 35.5 | |||||
Low | 37,935 | 6.4 | 99.1 | 20.4 | 8.1 | |||||
Mean | 110,850 | 23.1 | 223.5 | 32.8 | 22.6 | |||||
Median | 73,788 | 16.4 | 206.5 | 29.3 | 22.4 | |||||
F&T / Eagle | 452,046 | 48.8 | 143.8 | 27.6 | (1) | 5.8 | ||||
M&A Metrics, Mid-Atlantic Transactions
|
|
|
Current Price / |
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Assets ($000) |
Deal Value ($M) |
TBV (%) |
LTM EPS (x) |
Premium/ Core Deposits (%) |
|||||
High | 644,693 | 166.1 | 359.8 | 52.3 | 44.1 | |||||
Low | 320,510 | 69.8 | 195.9 | 19.5 | 10.2 | |||||
Mean | 484,158 | 109.7 | 280.3 | 32.6 | 22.3 | |||||
Median | 474,902 | 100.9 | 288.3 | 29.1 | 19.3 | |||||
F&T / Eagle | 452,046 | 48.8 | 143.8 | 27.6 | (1) | 5.8 |
M&A Metrics, Nationwide Transactions
|
|
|
Current Price / |
|
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Assets ($000) |
Deal Value ($M) |
TBV (%) |
LTM EPS (x) |
Premium / Core Deposits (%) |
||||||
High | 749,055 | 135.2 | 332.7 | 56.1 | 39.7 | ||||||
Low | 252,956 | 26.6 | 74.3 | 11.5 | (42.1 | ) | |||||
Mean | 477,661 | 76.1 | 236.1 | 29.7 | 13.7 | ||||||
Median | 477,391 | 75.3 | 231.5 | 27.6 | 15.4 | ||||||
F&T / Eagle | 452,046 | 48.8 | 143.8 | 27.6 | (1) | 5.8 |
An analysis of the results of the foregoing necessarily involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in the financial and operating characteristics of Fidelity & Trust and the companies included in the selected merger transactions and other factors that could affect the acquisition value of the companies to which it is being compared. Mathematical analyses such as determining the median or average is not in itself a meaningful method of using comparable transaction data.
Present Value Analysis. In performing the Present Value analysis, Milestone Advisors estimated the future cash earnings of Fidelity & Trust on both a stand-alone and pro forma basis (including the operational benefits that are expected to result from the transaction), and then discounted those values back to the present using discount rates ranging from 11.0% to 15.0%. Free cash flow in this analysis is equal to the cash earnings of Fidelity & Trust less the amount of retained earnings necessary to maintain an equity-to-assets ratio of 7.0%. The two valuation methodologies used were (i) a 12.0x to 20.0x
47
price-to-earnings multiple range to Fidelity & Trust's projected future earnings per share and book value per share and (ii) a price-to-book value ratio ranging from 150% to 250% to Fidelity & Trust's projected future earnings per share and book value per share.
12.0x20.0x Price / Earnings Multiple
Stand-alone |
Pro-forma |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Low |
High |
Low |
High |
|||||||
$ | 7.57 | $ | 14.58 | $ | 8.87 | $ | 17.09 | |||
Average | $ | 10.86 | Average | $ | 12.73 | |||||
F&T / Eagle | $ | 11.51 |
150%250% Price / Book Value Ratio
|
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Stand-alone |
Pro-forma |
|||||||||
Low |
High |
Low |
High |
|||||||
$ | 9.35 | $ | 18.01 | $ | 9.79 | $ | 18.85 | |||
Average | $ | 13.41 | Average | $ | 14.04 | |||||
F&T / Eagle | $ | 11.51 |
Accretion Analysis. Milestone Advisors analyzed the projected 2007 through 2011 earnings per share for one original share of Fidelity common stock, adjusted for the exchange ratio assuming 100% stock conversion. Milestone Advisors compared the projected earnings per share for the holders of Fidelity common stock on a stand-alone basis and on a combined pro forma basis for Fidelity and Eagle. This analysis assumes, among other things, that the transaction is completed in the second quarter of 2008, and expense savings are partially realized in 2008 and fully realized in 2009 and all periods thereafter. This analysis results in positive earnings accretion to Fidelity shareholders ranging from 20% to 30% in 2009 through 2011.
This analysis suggests that there are higher potential earnings per share and therefore higher potential value per share for the holders of Fidelity common stock if the merger is completed.
This analysis relies on financial projections for Fidelity and Eagle, which projections may be significantly different from actual results. Therefore, the accretion experienced by Fidelity and/or Eagle may be significantly different than projected.
While the foregoing summaries describe several analyses and examinations that Milestone Advisors deemed material in its opinion, it is not a comprehensive description of all analyses and examinations actually conducted by Milestone Advisors. The preparation of a fairness opinion necessarily involves various determinations of the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances, and, therefore, is not susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. Each of the analyses conducted by Milestone Advisors was carried out in order to provide a different perspective on the transaction and to add to the total mix of information available. Milestone Advisors did not form a conclusion as to whether any individual analysis, considered alone, supported or failed to support an opinion as to fairness from a financial point of view. Rather, in reaching its conclusion, Milestone Advisors considered the results of the analyses as a whole and did not place particular reliance or weight on any individual factor. Therefore, selecting portions of the analyses and factors considered, without considering all such analyses and factors, would create an incomplete or misleading view of the process underlying the analysis. The range of valuations resulting from any particular analysis should not be taken to be Milestone Advisors' view of the actual value or predicted future value of Fidelity's common stock.
48
In performing its analyses, Milestone Advisors made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance and general business and economic conditions such as industry growth, inflation, interest rates and many other matters, many of which are beyond the control of Fidelity, Eagle and Milestone Advisors. Any estimates contained in Milestone Advisors' analyses are not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by the analyses. Additionally, estimates of the values of the business and securities do not purport to be appraisals of the assets or market value of Fidelity and Eagle or their securities, nor do they necessarily reflect the prices at which transactions may actually be consummated.
In arriving at its opinion, Milestone Advisors assumed and relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all financial and other information provided to or reviewed by Milestone Advisors, including publicly available information, and Milestone Advisors did not assume any responsibility for independent verification of any such information. With respect to financial projections and other information provided to or reviewed by Milestone Advisors, Milestone Advisors was advised by the managements of Fidelity and Eagle that such projections and other information were reasonably prepared on bases reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the respective managements of Fidelity and Eagle as to the expected future financial performance of Fidelity and Eagle, and Milestone Advisors assumed that, after the merger, Fidelity and Eagle and its subsidiaries will perform substantially in accordance with such projections. Milestone Advisors' opinion does not address the underlying business decision of Fidelity to enter into the Agreement or complete the merger.
Pursuant to the terms of an engagement letter with Fidelity, Milestone Advisors will receive a fee from Fidelity. In the ordinary course of Milestone Advisors' business, the principals of Milestone Advisors and its affiliates own common shares and options to acquire common shares of Fidelity and may actively trade the common stock of Eagle for their own account and for the accounts of Milestone Advisors' customers and, accordingly, Milestone Advisors may at any time hold a long or short position in the common stock of Eagle. In addition: (1) Milestone Advisors and its affiliates have provided investment banking services to Fidelity over the last two years and have received fees for such services, (2) a board member of Fidelity provides advisory services to Milestone Advisors and its affiliates and receives compensation for such services, and (3) Milestone Advisors maintains banking relationships with Fidelity, all of which are on commercial terms. Fidelity has also agreed to reimburse Milestone Advisors for its expenses incurred in connection with its engagement and to indemnify Milestone Advisors against certain liabilities.
Milestone Advisors' opinion is for the benefit and use of the members of the board of directors of Fidelity in connection with their evaluation of the merger and does not constitute a recommendation to any holder of Fidelity common stock as to how such holder should vote with respect to the merger.
Opinion of Eagle's Financial Advisor
Opinion of Sandler O'Neill & Partners, L.P. By letter dated November 21, 2007, Eagle Bancorp Inc. ("Eagle") retained Sandler O'Neill to act as its financial advisor in connection with a possible business combination with Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation ("Fidelity"). Sandler O'Neill is a nationally recognized investment banking firm whose principal business specialty is financial institutions. In the ordinary course of its investment banking business, Sandler O'Neill is regularly engaged in the valuation of financial institutions and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions and other corporate transactions.
Sandler O'Neill acted as financial advisor to Eagle in connection with the proposed transaction and participated in certain of the negotiations leading to the execution of a definitive merger agreement on December 2, 2007. At the November 30, 2007 meeting at which Eagle's board considered and approved the merger agreement, Sandler O'Neill delivered to the board its oral opinion, which was later confirmed in
49
writing that, as of such date, the merger consideration was fair to Eagle from a financial point of view. The full text of Sandler O'Neill's written opinion is attached as Appendix C to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The opinion outlines the procedures followed, assumptions made, matters considered and qualifications and limitations on the review undertaken by Sandler O'Neill in rendering its opinion. The description of the opinion set forth below is qualified in its entirety by reference to the opinion. Eagle's shareholders are urged to read the entire opinion carefully in connection with their consideration of the proposed merger.
Sandler O'Neill's opinion speaks only as of the date of the opinion. The opinion was directed to the Eagle board and is directed only to the fairness of the merger consideration to Eagle from a financial point of view. It does not address the underlying business decision of Eagle to engage in the merger or any other aspect of the merger and is not a recommendation to any Eagle shareholder as to how such shareholder should vote at the special meeting with respect to the merger or any other matter.
In connection with rendering its November 30, 2007 opinion, Sandler O'Neill reviewed and considered, among other things:
Sandler O'Neill also discussed with certain members of senior management of Eagle, the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Eagle and held similar discussions with certain members of senior management of Fidelity regarding the business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects of Fidelity.
50
In performing its reviews and analyses and in rendering its opinion, Sandler O'Neill relied upon the accuracy and completeness of all the financial and other information that was available to it from public sources, that was provided to Sandler O'Neill by Eagle or Fidelity or their respective representatives, or that was otherwise reviewed by Sandler O'Neill and have assumed such accuracy and completeness for purposes of rendering its opinion. Sandler O'Neill further relied on the assurances of the management of each of Eagle and Fidelity that they were not aware of any facts or circumstances that would make any of such information inaccurate or misleading. Sandler O'Neill has not been asked to undertake, and has not undertaken, an independent verification of any of such information and Sandler O'Neill does not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness thereof. Sandler O'Neill did not make an independent evaluation or appraisal of the specific assets, the collateral securing the assets or the liabilities (contingent or otherwise) of Eagle or Fidelity or any of their subsidiaries, or the collectibility of any such assets, nor has Sandler O'Neill been furnished with any such evaluations or appraisals. Sandler O'Neill did not make an independent evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses of Eagle or Fidelity nor has Sandler O'Neill reviewed any individual credit files relating to Eagle or Fidelity. Sandler O'Neill assumed, with Eagle's consent, that the respective allowances for loan losses for both Eagle and Fidelity were adequate to cover such losses.
With respect to the internal budget and management guidance for Eagle as provided by the senior management of Eagle and the internal budget and management guidance for Fidelity as discussed with the managements of Fidelity and Eagle and the projections of transaction costs, purchase accounting adjustments and expected cost savings prepared by and/or reviewed with the managements of Eagle and Fidelity and used by Sandler O'Neill in its analyses, Eagle's and Fidelity's management confirmed to Sandler O'Neill that they reflected the best currently available estimates and judgments of management of the future financial performance of Eagle and Fidelity and Sandler O'Neill assumed that such performance would be achieved. Sandler O'Neill expressed no opinion as to the budget it received or the guidance provided by management and estimates or the assumptions on which they are based. Sandler O'Neill has also assumed that there has been no material change in Eagle's and Fidelity's assets, financial condition, results of operations, business or prospects since the date of the most recent financial statements made available to it. Sandler O'Neill assumed in all respects material to its analysis that Eagle and Fidelity will remain as going concerns for all periods relevant to its analyses, that all of the representations and warranties contained in the merger agreement and all related agreements are true and correct, that each party to the agreements will perform all of the covenants required to be performed by such party under the agreements, that the conditions precedent in the agreements are not waived and that the merger will qualify as a tax-free reorganization for federal income tax purposes. Finally, with Eagle's consent, we have relied upon the advice Eagle has received from its legal, accounting and tax advisors as to all legal, accounting and tax matters relating to the merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Agreement.
Sandler O'Neill's opinion was necessarily based upon market, economic and other conditions as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, the date of its opinion. Events occurring after the date of the opinion could materially affect the opinion. Sandler O'Neill has not undertaken to update, revise, reaffirm or withdraw its opinion or otherwise comment upon events occurring after the date hereof. Sandler O'Neill expressed no opinion as to what the value of Eagle's common stock will be when issued to Fidelity's shareholders pursuant to the merger agreement or the prices at which the common stock of Eagle may trade at any time.
In rendering its November 30, 2007 opinion, Sandler O'Neill performed a variety of financial analyses. The following is a summary of the material analyses performed by Sandler O'Neill, but is not a complete description of all the analyses underlying Sandler O'Neill's opinion. The summary includes information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand the financial analyses, these tables must be read together with the accompanying text. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. The preparation of a fairness opinion is a complex process involving subjective judgments
51
as to the most appropriate and relevant methods of financial analysis and the application of those methods to the particular circumstances. The process, therefore, is not necessarily susceptible to a partial analysis or summary description. Sandler O'Neill believes that its analyses must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the factors and analyses to be considered without considering all factors and analyses, or attempting to ascribe relative weights to some or all such factors and analyses, could create an incomplete view of the evaluation process underlying its opinion. Also, no company included in Sandler O'Neill's comparative analyses described below is identical to Eagle or Fidelity and no transaction is identical to the merger. Accordingly, an analysis of comparable companies or transactions involves complex considerations and judgments concerning differences in financial and operating characteristics of the companies and other factors that could affect the public trading values or merger transaction values, as the case may be, of Eagle and Fidelity and the companies to which they are being compared.
In performing its analyses, Sandler O'Neill also made numerous assumptions with respect to industry performance, business and economic conditions and various other matters, many of which cannot be predicted and are beyond the control of Eagle, Fidelity and Sandler O'Neill. The analysis performed by Sandler O'Neill is not necessarily indicative of actual values or future results, both of which may be significantly more or less favorable than suggested by such analyses. Sandler O'Neill prepared its analyses solely for purposes of rendering its opinion and provided such analyses to Eagle board at the board's November 30, 2007 meeting. Estimates on the values of companies do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which companies or their securities may actually be sold. Such estimates are inherently subject to uncertainty and actual values may be materially different. Accordingly, Sandler O'Neill's analyses do not necessarily reflect the value of Eagle's common stock or the prices at which Eagle's common stock may be sold at any time. The combined analysis of Sandler O'Neill and the opinions provided by each were among a number of factors taken into consideration by Eagle's board in making its determination to adopt the plan of merger contained in the merger agreement and the analyses described below should not be viewed as determinative of the decision of Eagle's board or management with respect to the fairness of the merger.
At the November 30, 2007 meeting of Eagle's board of directors, Sandler O'Neill presented certain financial analyses of the merger. The summary below is not a complete description of the analyses underlying the opinions of Sandler O'Neill or the presentation made by Sandler O'Neill to Eagle's board, but is instead a summary of the material analyses performed and presented in connection with the opinion.
In arriving at our opinion Sandler O'Neill did not attribute any particular weight to any analysis or factor that we considered. Rather we made qualitative judgments as to the significance and relevance of each analysis and factor. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. Sandler O'Neill did not form an opinion as to whether any individual analysis or factor (positive or negative) considered in isolation supported or failed to support their respective opinions; rather Sandler O'Neill made our determination as to the fairness of the per share consideration on the basis of their experience and professional judgment after considering the results of all their analyses taken as a whole. Accordingly, we believe that the analysis and the summary of the analysis must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of the analysis and factors or focusing on the information presented below in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the process underlying their analyses and opinions. The tables alone do not constitute complete descriptions of the financial analyses presented in such tables.
Summary of Proposal. Sandler O'Neill reviewed the financial terms of the proposed transaction. Using the fixed exchange ratio of 0.9202 shares of Eagle common stock for each share of Fidelity common stock, based upon Eagle's closing stock price as of November 29, 2007 of $12.50, Sandler O'Neill calculated a transaction value of $11.50 per share, or an aggregate transaction value of approximately $48.8 million.
52
Based upon financial information for Fidelity as of or for the twelve month period ended September 30, 2007, Sandler O'Neill calculated the following transaction ratios:
Transaction Ratios |
|
||
---|---|---|---|
Transaction value/2007 Budgeted earnings per share | 44.2x | ||
Transaction value/2008 Budgeted earnings per share | 18.9x | ||
Transaction value/Book value per share | 150 | % | |
Transaction value/Tangible book value per share | 150 | % | |
Tangible book premium/ Core deposits(1) | 7.17 | % |
The aggregate transaction value was approximately $48.8 million, based upon the offer price per share of $11.50 and 4,207,016 Fidelity common shares outstanding.
Comparable Company Analysis. Sandler O'Neill used publicly available information to perform a comparison of selected financial and market trading information for Eagle and selected financial information for Fidelity.
Sandler O'Neill also used publicly available information to compare selected financial and market trading information for Fidelity and a group of financial institutions selected by Sandler O'Neill. The Fidelity peer group consisted of the following publicly traded commercial banks headquartered in D.C., Maryland, or Virginia with total assets between $350 million and $550 million:
Hampton Roads Bankshares Inc. | Monarch Financial Holdings | |
First National Corp. | Abigail Adams National Bancorp | |
Eagle Financial Services Inc. | Calvin B. Taylor Bankshares | |
Fauquier Bankshares Inc. | F & M Bank Corp. | |
Bank of Southside Virginia Corp. | Cecil Bancorp Inc. | |
Chesapeake Financial Shares | Village Bank & Trust Financial Corp | |
Central Virginia Bankshares | Annapolis Bancorp Inc. |
The analysis compared publicly available financial and market trading information for Fidelity and the high, low, mean, and median data for Fidelity peer group as of and for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007. The table below sets forth the data for Fidelity and the median data for Fidelity peer group as of and for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007, with pricing data as of November 28, 2007.
53
Comparable Group Analysis
|
Fidelity |
Comparable Group Median Result |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Assets (in millions) | $ | 452 | $ | 464 | |||
Tangible Equity / Tangible Assets | 6.61 | % | 7.69 | % | |||
Return on Average Assets | (1.51 | )% | 1.04 | % | |||
Return on Average Equity | (19.73 | )% | 11.43 | % | |||
Price / Tangible Book Value | | 152 | % | ||||
Price / LTM Earnings per Share | | 12.8x | |||||
Price / 2007 Estimated Earnings per Share | | 16.3x | |||||
Price / 2008 Estimated Earnings per Share | | 13.3x | |||||
Core Deposit Premium | | 6.3 | % | ||||
Market Capitalization (in millions) | | $ | 56.9 |
Eagle's peer group consisted of the following publicly traded commercial banks headquartered in D.C., Maryland, or Virginia with total assets between $500 million and $1.0 billion:
Shore Bancshares Inc. | Eastern Virginia Bankshares | First Bancorp Inc. | ||
National Bankshares Inc. | Middleburg Financial Corp. | Old Point Financial Corp. | ||
Commonwealth Bankshares Inc. | C&F Financial Corp. | American National Bankshares | ||
Highland Bankshares Inc. | Access National Corp. | Valley Financial Corp. | ||
Tri-County Financial Corp. | Alliance Bankshares Corp. | Hampton Roads Bankshares Inc. | ||
First National Corp. | Eagle Financial Services Inc. |
The analysis compared publicly available financial and market trading information for Eagle and the high, low, mean, and median data for Eagle peer group as of and for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007. The table below sets forth the data for Eagle and the median data for Eagle peer group as of and for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007, with pricing data as of November 28, 2007.
Comparable Group Analysis
|
Eagle |
Comparable Group Median Result |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Total Assets (in millions) | $ | 802 | $ | 768 | |||
Tangible Equity / Tangible Assets | 9.73 | % | 9.01 | % | |||
Return on Average Assets | 0.97 | % | 1.07 | % | |||
Return on Average Equity | 10.13 | % | 11.08 | % | |||
Price / Tangible Book Value | 152 | % | 154 | % | |||
Price / Last Twelve Months' Earnings per Share | 16.1x | 13.2x | |||||
Price / 2007 Estimated Earnings per Share(1) | 14.8x | 13.7x | |||||
Price / 2008 Estimated Earnings per Share(1) | 13.2x | 12.6x | |||||
Core Deposit Premium | 8.0 | % | 7.2 | % | |||
Market Capitalization (in millions) | $ | 118.8 | $ | 101.2 |
Stock Trading History. Sandler O'Neill also reviewed the history of the publicly reported trading prices of Eagle's common stock for the one-year period ended November 28, 2007 and the three-year
54
period ended November 28, 2007. Sandler O'Neill then compared the relationship between the movements in the price of Eagle's common stock against the movements in the prices of the Standard & Poor's 500 Index, the NASDAQ Bank Index, the Standard & Poor's Bank Index and the median performance of a composite peer group of publicly traded commercial banks selected by Sandler O'Neill for Eagle. The composition of that respective peer group for Eagle is discussed under the relevant section under "Comparable Group Analysis" above.
During the one-year period ended November 28, 2007, Eagle's common stock underperformed the indices to which it was compared.
Eagle's One-Year Stock Performance
|
Beginning Index Value November 28, 2006 |
Ending Index Value November 28, 2007 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eagle | 100.00 | % | 69.5 | % | |
Selected Peer Group(1) | 100.00 | % | 92.7 | ||
NASDAQ Bank Index | 100.00 | % | 84.4 | ||
S&P Bank Index | 100.00 | % | 83.0 | ||
S&P 500 Index | 100.00 | % | 105.9 |
During the three-year period ended November 28, 2007, Eagle's common stock outperformed the peer group to which it was compared and the various indices, less the Standard & Poor's 500 Index.
Eagle's Three-Year Stock Performance
|
Beginning Index Value November 28, 2004 |
Ending Index Value November 28, 2007 |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Eagle | 100.00 | % | 102.9 | % | |
Selected Peer Group(1) | 100.00 | % | 95.1 | ||
NASDAQ Bank Index | 100.00 | % | 84.0 | ||
S&P Bank Index | 100.00 | % | 83.6 | ||
S&P 500 Index | 100.00 | % | 120.8 |
Analysis of Selected Merger Transactions. Sandler O'Neill reviewed eight (8) merger transactions announced from January 1, 2005 through November 28, 2007 involving Washington, D.C., Maryland, or Virginia-based commercial banks as the acquired institution with a transaction value greater than $15 million and less than $100 million. Sandler O'Neill reviewed the following multiples: transaction price at announcement to last twelve months' net income, transaction value to book value, transaction value to tangible book value, tangible book premium to core deposits, and transaction value to seller stock price one (1) month prior to announcement, and then computed high, low, mean, median multiples and premiums for the transactions. The median multiples were applied to Fidelity financial information as of and for the twelve months ended September 30, 2007. As illustrated in the following tables, Sandler O'Neill derived an imputed range of aggregate values for Fidelity stock of $33.1 million to $79.5 million based upon the median multiples for the Washington D.C., Maryland and Virginia commercial bank transactions and an imputed range of values for the aggregate of Fidelity stock of $57.7 million to $64.4 million based upon the median multiples for the selected nationwide transactions, for which the seller reported negative Last Twelve Months net income. Sandler O'Neill calculated a transaction value of $11.50 per share.
55
Transaction Multiples
|
D.C., MD, VA Nationwide |
|||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Median Multiple |
Implied Value |
Median Multiple |
Implied Value |
||||||
Price Per Share / Last twelve months Net Income | 30.1x | $ | 33,053 | NM | NM | |||||
Price Per Share / Book Value | 232 | % | $ | 75,027 | 183 | % | $ | 59,004 | ||
Price Per Share / Tangible Book Value | 246 | % | $ | 79,547 | 179 | % | $ | 57,725 | ||
Core Deposit Premium(1) | 20.2 | % | $ | 79,270 | 13.8 | % | $ | 64,382 |
Net Present Value Analysis. Sandler O'Neill performed an analysis that estimated the net present value per share of Fidelity common stock under various circumstances. In the analysis we used an internal budget for Fidelity for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2008 as provided by senior management of Fidelity and management guidance, based on discussions with the senior management of Eagle and Fidelity on an assumed asset growth rate for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010 for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010. To approximate the terminal value of Fidelity common stock at December 31, 2010, Sandler O'Neill applied price to last twelve months earnings multiples of 10.0x to 18.0x and multiples of tangible book value ranging from 100% to 200%. The terminal values were then discounted to present values using different discount rates ranging from 11.0% to 17.0% chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of Fidelity stock. In addition, the net present value of Fidelity common stock at December 31, 2010 was calculated using the same range of price to last twelve months earnings multiples (10.0x to 18.0x) applied to a range of discounts and premiums to budget projections. The range applied to the budgeted net income was 25% under budget to 25% over budget, using a discount rate of 13.0% for the analysis.
As illustrated in the following tables, the analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share for Fidelity's common stock of $7.05 to $15.06 when applying the price/earnings multiples to the matched budget, $6.13 to $14.55 when applying multiples of tangible book value to the matched budget, and $5.92 to $17.76 when applying the price/earnings multiples to the -25% to +25% budget range.
Earnings Per Share Multiples
Discount Rate |
10.0x |
12.0x |
14.0x |
16.0x |
18.0x |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.00% | $ | 8.37 | $ | 10.04 | $ | 11.71 | $ | 13.39 | $ | 15.06 | |||||
12.00% | 8.13 | 9.75 | 11.38 | 13.00 | 14.63 | ||||||||||
13.00% | 7.89 | 9.47 | 11.05 | 12.63 | 14.21 | ||||||||||
14.00% | 7.67 | 9.21 | 10.74 | 12.28 | 13.81 | ||||||||||
15.00% | 7.46 | 8.95 | 10.44 | 11.93 | 13.42 | ||||||||||
16.00% | 7.25 | 8.70 | 10.15 | 11.60 | 13.05 | ||||||||||
17.00% | 7.05 | 8.46 | 9.87 | 11.28 | 12.69 |
56
Earnings Per Share Multiples
Budget Variance |
10.0x |
12.0x |
14.0x |
16.0x |
18.0x |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-25.0% | $ | 5.92 | $ | 7.10 | $ | 8.29 | $ | 9.47 | $ | 10.66 | |||||
-20.0% | 6.31 | 7.58 | 8.84 | 10.10 | 11.37 | ||||||||||
-15.0% | 6.71 | 8.05 | 9.39 | 10.73 | 12.08 | ||||||||||
-10.0% | 7.10 | 8.52 | 9.94 | 11.37 | 12.79 | ||||||||||
-5.0% | 7.50 | 9.00 | 10.50 | 12.00 | 13.50 | ||||||||||
0.0% | 7.89 | 9.47 | 11.05 | 12.63 | 14.21 | ||||||||||
5.0% | 8.29 | 9.94 | 11.60 | 13.26 | 14.92 | ||||||||||
10.0% | 8.68 | 10.42 | 12.15 | 13.89 | 15.63 | ||||||||||
15.0% | 9.08 | 10.89 | 12.71 | 14.52 | 16.34 | ||||||||||
20.0% | 9.47 | 11.37 | 13.26 | 15.15 | 17.05 | ||||||||||
25.0% | 9.87 | 11.84 | 13.81 | 15.79 | 17.76 |
Tangible Book Value Per Share Multiples
Discount Rate |
100% |
125% |
150% |
175% |
200% |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.0% | $ | 7.28 | $ | 9.10 | $ | 10.91 | $ | 12.73 | $ | 14.55 | |||||
12.0% | 7.07 | 8.83 | 10.60 | 12.37 | 14.13 | ||||||||||
13.0% | 6.87 | 8.58 | 10.30 | 12.02 | 13.73 | ||||||||||
14.0% | 6.67 | 8.34 | 10.01 | 11.68 | 13.34 | ||||||||||
15.0% | 6.49 | 8.11 | 9.73 | 11.35 | 12.97 | ||||||||||
16.0% | 6.31 | 7.88 | 9.46 | 11.03 | 12.61 | ||||||||||
17.0% | 6.13 | 7.67 | 9.20 | 10.73 | 12.26 |
Sandler O'Neill performed an analysis that estimated the net present value per share of Eagle's common stock under various circumstances, using an internal budget for Eagle for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2008 prepared by and reviewed with management of Eagle and management guidance on an assumed asset growth rate for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010. To approximate the net present value of Eagle's common stock at December 31, 2010, Sandler O'Neill applied price to last twelve months earnings multiples of 10.0x to 18.0x and multiples of tangible book value ranging from 100% to 200%. The dividend income streams and terminal values were then discounted to present values using different discount rates ranging from 11% to 17% chosen to reflect different assumptions regarding required rates of return of holders or prospective buyers of Eagle common stock. In addition, the net present value of Eagle's common stock at December 31, 2010 was calculated using the same range of price to last twelve months earnings multiples (10.0x18.0x) applied to a range of discounts and premiums to management's budget projections. The range applied to the budgeted net income was 25.0% under budget to 25.0% over budget, using a discount rate of 13.0% for the tabular analysis. As illustrated in the following tables, this analysis indicated an imputed range of values per share for Eagle's common stock of $7.62 to $15.72 when applying the price to earnings multiples to the matched budget, $6.85 to $15.57 when applying multiples of tangible book value to the matched budget, and $6.53 to $22.37 when applying the price/earnings multiples to the -25.0% / +25.0% budget range.
57
Earnings Per Share Multiples
Discount Rate |
10.0x |
12.0x |
14.0x |
16.0x |
18.0x |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.0% | $ | 9.00 | $ | 10.68 | $ | 12.36 | $ | 14.04 | $ | 15.72 | |||||
12.0% | 8.75 | 10.38 | 12.02 | 13.65 | 15.28 | ||||||||||
13.0% | 8.51 | 10.09 | 11.68 | 13.26 | 14.85 | ||||||||||
14.0% | 8.28 | 9.82 | 11.36 | 12.90 | 14.44 | ||||||||||
15.0% | 8.05 | 9.55 | 11.04 | 12.54 | 14.04 | ||||||||||
16.0% | 7.83 | 9.29 | 10.74 | 12.20 | 13.66 | ||||||||||
17.0% | 7.62 | 9.04 | 10.45 | 11.87 | 13.29 |
Earnings Per Share Multiples
Budget Variance |
10.0x |
13.0x |
16.0x |
19.0x |
22.0x |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
-25.0% | $ | 6.53 | $ | 8.31 | $ | 10.09 | $ | 11.87 | $ | 13.66 | |||||
-20.0% | 6.92 | 8.82 | 10.73 | 12.63 | 14.53 | ||||||||||
-15.0% | 7.32 | 9.34 | 11.36 | 13.38 | 15.40 | ||||||||||
-10.0% | 7.72 | 9.85 | 11.99 | 14.13 | 16.27 | ||||||||||
-5.0% | 8.11 | 10.37 | 12.63 | 14.88 | 17.14 | ||||||||||
0.0% | 8.51 | 10.88 | 13.26 | 15.64 | 18.01 | ||||||||||
5.0% | 8.90 | 11.40 | 13.89 | 16.39 | 18.88 | ||||||||||
10.0% | 9.30 | 11.91 | 14.53 | 17.14 | 19.76 | ||||||||||
15.0% | 9.70 | 12.43 | 15.16 | 17.89 | 20.63 | ||||||||||
20.0% | 10.09 | 12.94 | 15.80 | 18.65 | 21.50 | ||||||||||
25.0% | 10.49 | 13.46 | 16.43 | 19.40 | 22.37 |
Tangible Book Value Per Share Multiples
Discount Rate |
100% |
125% |
150% |
175% |
200% |
||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
11.0% | $ | 8.09 | $ | 9.96 | $ | 11.83 | $ | 13.70 | $ | 15.57 | |||||
12.0% | 7.86 | 9.68 | 11.50 | 13.31 | 15.13 | ||||||||||
13.0% | 7.65 | 9.41 | 11.18 | 12.94 | 14.71 | ||||||||||
14.0% | 7.44 | 9.15 | 10.87 | 12.58 | 14.30 | ||||||||||
15.0% | 7.24 | 8.90 | 10.57 | 12.24 | 13.90 | ||||||||||
16.0% | 7.04 | 8.66 | 10.28 | 11.90 | 13.52 | ||||||||||
17.0% | 6.85 | 8.43 | 10.01 | 11.58 | 13.16 |
Pro Forma Merger Analysis. Sandler O'Neill analyzed certain potential pro forma effects of the merger, assuming the following: (1) the merger closes on June 30, 2008; (2) 100.0% of Fidelity shares are exchanged for Eagle common stock at a fixed exchange ratio of 0.9202x; (3) options of Fidelity's stock will be converted into options for Eagle's stock; (4) an internal budget for Fidelity for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2008 as provided by senior management of Fidelity and management guidance, based on discussions with the senior management of Eagle and Fidelity on an assumed asset growth rate for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010 for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010; (5) an internal budget for Eagle for the years ending December 31, 2007 and 2008 prepared by and reviewed with management of Eagle and management guidance on an assumed asset growth rate for the years ending December 31, 2009 and 2010; (6) purchase accounting adjustments, charges and transaction costs associated with the merger and cost savings determined by the senior management of Eagle and; (7) issuance of $10 million of Trust Preferred Securities to finance a portion of the transaction.
For each of the years 2008 and 2009, Sandler O'Neill compared the EPS of Eagle common stock to the EPS, on a GAAP basis, of the combined company common stock using the foregoing assumptions.
58
The analyses indicated that the merger would be dilutive to Eagle's projected 2008 EPS, and accretive to Eagle's projected 2009 EPS. The actual results achieved by the combined company may vary from projected results and the variations may be material.
Miscellaneous. Eagle has agreed to pay Sandler O'Neill a fairness opinion fee of $100,000, all of which has been paid. Eagle has also agreed to pay Sandler O'Neill a transaction fee of 0.50% of the aggregate purchase price (subject to a minimum fee of $250,000), which will be due and payable upon the closing of the merger and against which the fairness opinion fee will be credited. Eagle has also agreed to reimburse certain of Sandler O'Neill reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with its engagement and to indemnify Sandler O'Neill and its affiliates and their respective partners, directors, officers, employees, agents, and controlling persons against certain expenses and liabilities, including liabilities under the securities laws. Sandler O'Neill has provided certain other investment banking services to Eagle in the past and has received compensation for such services.
In the ordinary course of their respective broker and dealer businesses, Sandler O'Neill may purchase securities from and sell securities to Eagle and Fidelity and their affiliates. Sandler O'Neill may also actively trade the debt and/or equity securities of Eagle or their affiliates for their own accounts and for the accounts of their customers and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities.
Conditions to the Merger
Mutual Conditions. The obligations of each of Eagle and Fidelity to consummate the merger are subject to the fulfillment or waiver at or prior to the effective time of various conditions, including:
Additional Conditions to the Obligation of Fidelity to Close. The obligation of Fidelity and F&T Bank to consummate the merger is subject to the fulfillment or waiver at or prior to the effective time of the merger of additional conditions, including:
59
Additional Conditions to the Obligation of Eagle to Close. The obligations of Eagle and Woodmont to consummate the merger are subject to the fulfillment or waiver at or prior to the effective time of the merger of additional conditions, including:
60
Representations and Warranties
The representations and warranties of the parties contained in the merger agreement have been made solely for the benefit of the other party to the merger agreement, and are not intended to, and do not, modify the statements and information about Eagle contained in its periodic reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, or the information contained in other documents filed by Eagle with the SEC or by Eagle, Fidelity and their subsidiaries with the banking regulators, or otherwise. Representations and warranties in agreements such as the merger agreement are not intended as statements of fact, but rather are negotiated provisions which allocate risks related to the subject matter of the statements between the parties to the agreement. Additionally, the representations and warranties are modified in the merger agreement by materiality standards and conditions, and clarifications, exclusions and exceptions set forth on schedules and exhibits which are not included as part of this joint proxy statement/prospectus. Such representations and warranties have not been modified to reflect any changes which may have occurred since the date of the merger agreement. As such, readers should not place reliance on the representations and warranties as accurate statements of the current condition of any party to the agreement, their respective subsidiaries, operations, assets or liabilities.
The merger agreement contains a number of representations and warranties made by the parties as to, among other things: corporate existence, good standing and qualification to conduct business; due and valid authorization, execution and delivery of the merger agreement; capitalization; governmental authorization; the absence of any conflict of the merger agreement and the merger with organizational documents and the absence of any violation of material agreements, laws or regulations as a result of the consummation of the merger; the absence of undisclosed material liabilities; financial statements; the absence of material misstatements or omissions from information provided for inclusion in this joint proxy
61
statement/prospectus; the absence of material adverse changes since October 31, 2007; compliance with laws and court orders; loan portfolio, reserves and other loan matters and litigation and tax matters.
Certain of the representations and warranties are qualified as to "materiality," "material adverse effect" or "material adverse change." For purposes of the merger agreement, the following factors will not be considered in determining whether a material adverse effect or change has occurred:
The assertion of any claim or claims against Fidelity or any Fidelity subsidiary related to any issue arising out of the operations of F&T Mortgage, that individually or in the aggregate is material in nature or material in amount, but for which a reserve cannot be agreed upon by the parties or cannot be determined by a third party law firm within 45 days, will be deemed to have had a material adverse effect on, and caused a material adverse change to, Fidelity, resulting in Eagle's right to terminate the agreement.
The representations and warranties in the merger agreement do not survive after the effective time of the merger or the termination of the merger agreement.
Conduct of Business Pending the Effective Time
Negative Covenants of Fidelity. Pending effectiveness of the merger, and except as consented to by Eagle, Fidelity is required to conduct its business in the ordinary course, consistent with past practice and applicable legal and regulatory requirements. Additionally, Fidelity has agreed not to take certain actions without the prior consent of Eagle, including, but not limited to:
62
63
assets or acquiring any assets, other than in the ordinary course of its business consistent with past practice or as expressly required by the merger agreement; or agreeing to do any of the foregoing;
Nonsolicitation of Acquisition Proposals. Fidelity has also agreed that it will not solicit, encourage, or authorize any person, including but not limited to directors, officers, shareholders, or employees, to solicit from, or communicate with, any third party, or facilitate inquiries or the making of proposals relating to any Acquisition Proposal (as defined below), or except as specifically permitted, provide any third party with information or assistance or negotiate or conduct any discussions with any third party to facilitate inquiries or to obtain an Acquisition Proposal, or continue any such activities in progress as of the date of the merger agreement.
Notwithstanding the above restrictions on solicitation, if Fidelity receives, prior to the effective time of the merger, an Unsolicited Acquisition Proposal (as defined below) which, in the good faith determination of the Fidelity board of directors, the fiduciary duty of the directors under Maryland law requires that the board of directors consider, negotiate, communicate, or provide information with respect to (collectively "communications"), because the Unsolicited Acquisition Proposal is more favorable from a financial point of view to the shareholders of Fidelity than the merger, which determination is made after receiving the advice of counsel regarding the requirements of the fiduciary duty of the directors under Maryland law, and the advice of Fidelity's financial advisor as to whether the Unsolicited Acquisition Proposal is more favorable from a financial point of view to its shareholders than the merger, then Fidelity will be entitled to engage in such communications.
An "Acquisition Proposal" is any offer or proposal, other than the merger of Fidelity into Woodmont or the merger of F&T Bank into EagleBank, received by Fidelity or any Fidelity subsidiary from any person or entity other than Eagle, Woodmont or an affiliate of Eagle (including deemed receipt as a result of the public announcement of such proposal by the proponent) regarding: (1) any merger, consolidation, reorganization, business combination, share purchase or exchange, purchase and assumption or similar transaction involving Fidelity or F&T Bank; or (2) any sale, lease, transfer, pledge, encumbrance or other disposition, directly or indirectly, of all, or any substantial portion of, the assets of Fidelity or F&T Bank. An "Unsolicited Acquisition Proposal" is an Acquisition Proposal received by Fidelity or F&T Bank without a violation of the nonsolicitation covenant described above, including where it is received from a party contacted prior to the date of the merger agreement, but without any contact subsequent to the date of the merger agreement.
64
Other Covenants by Fidelity. In addition to the covenants set forth above, Fidelity and F&T Bank have agreed that, except as otherwise consented to by Eagle in writing, they will, and will cause other Fidelity subsidiaries to among other things:
Fidelity has also agreed to use its best efforts in good faith: (i) to settle, or have dismissed by final nonappealable order ("resolve"), certain identified material litigations, and to sell identified loans held for sale. In the event that Fidelity is unable to resolve any litigation, Eagle and Fidelity will jointly review the status of such litigation and the reserves maintained with respect for potential liability and litigation and settlement costs, and agree upon the amount, if any, of any increase to such reserves within fifteen business days. If Eagle and Fidelity cannot jointly determine such amount within fifteen business days, then the amount of such reserves shall be determined by an independent law firm which is experienced in the conduct of litigation of the type, scope and complexity of the applicable litigation. The determination of the third party law firm will be binding on the parties. In the event that any loan has not been sold prior to closing, Eagle and Fidelity will jointly review the related allowance for loan losses, market adjustment or other reserves maintained by Fidelity for such loans and agree upon the amount, of any increase within fifteen business days. If Eagle and Fidelity cannot jointly determine such amount within fifteen business days, then the amount of such reserves will be determined by an independent investment banking, loan valuation, banking or financial advisory firm experienced in the valuation of such loans. The determination of the third party investment firm will be binding on the parties. Any increase in reserves for unresolved litigation or with respect to unsold loans may result in a reduction to the conversion ratio. See "The
65
MergerMerger ConsiderationPotential Reduction of the Conversion Ratio" at page . Increases in the litigation reserve by $7.5 million or more, or the inability of the third party law firm to determine the reserve, could result in termination of the merger and the merger agreement. See "Termination and Termination Payments" at page .
Eagle Covenants. Pending effectiveness of the merger, Eagle and Woodmont are each required to use its best efforts to:
Eagle and Woodmont have agreed that they will not, without the prior written consent of Fidelity, knowingly take any action which would:
Eagle and Woodmont have agreed that pending the effective time:
Eagle has agreed that it will not, without the prior written consent of Fidelity:
Eagle has also agreed that except for the purchase of loans and/or securities in the ordinary course of business consistent with its past practice, it will not acquire (other than by foreclosures or acquisitions in a fiduciary capacity or in satisfaction of debts previously contracted in good faith and, in each case, in the ordinary and usual course of business consistent with past practice) all or any portion of the assets, business or properties of any other entity.
The merger agreement provides that as promptly as practicable after the date of the merger agreement and Fidelity furnishing any information regarding Fidelity required to be included, Eagle will file the registration statement with the SEC and applications or notices with the Federal Reserve Board, the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation, and any other appropriate state or federal regulatory agency for approval of the merger of Fidelity with and into Woodmont, the merger of F&T Bank with and into EagleBank, and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. As of the date of this joint proxy statement/prospectus, applications have been filed with the Federal Reserve and the Maryland
66
Commissioner of Financial Regulation, and appropriate notices have been filed with the Virginia State Corporation Commission and the District of Columbia Department of Banking, but approvals have not yet been received.
Termination and Termination Payments
Termination Events. The merger agreement may be terminated, and the merger abandoned, at any time prior to the effectiveness of the merger, even after shareholder approvals have been obtained at the Fidelity and Eagle special meetings, in the following circumstances:
67
parties to the merger agreement, provided that the terminating party(ies) is not in breach of a material representation, warranty or covenant of the merger agreement at the time of termination;
Effect of Termination; Termination Payments. In the event of termination of the merger agreement by either Eagle, Woodmont, Fidelity or F&T Bank, then the merger agreement becomes void and there will be no liability on the part of either Eagle, Woodmont, Fidelity or F&T Bank or their respective officers or directors, except that:
68
Fidelity's covenant not to solicit or communicate with respect to other Acquisition Proposals; then Fidelity shall pay $2,000,000 to Eagle within three days of termination;
Fidelity and F&T Bank have agreed that they will cause the acquiror in respect of any Acquisition Proposal to expressly assume the obligation of Fidelity and F&T Bank to make such termination payment to Eagle, to the extent such payment has not been previously been made. The obligations of Fidelity and F&T Bank to make the termination payments and to cause the assumption of such obligation will survive the termination of the merger agreement and is binding upon Fidelity and F&T Bank and any successor or assign of Fidelity or F&T Bank.
Eagle and Fidelity have agreed that if the merger is not consummated as a result of the refusal, without cause of the other party to consummate the merger, the other party is entitled, in addition to the rights provided by under the merger agreement and its other remedies at law, to specific performance of the merger agreement, except where Eagle receives the termination payments described above. Eagle and Woodmont are entitled to receive only one termination payment.
Amendment and Waiver
Any of the terms and conditions of the merger agreement may be amended by the parties in writing, at any time before or after approval of the merger agreement by the Fidelity shareholders, except that no amendment after approval by the shareholders of Fidelity may reduce the value or change the form of consideration to be received by shareholders of Fidelity as contemplated by the merger agreement, unless such amendment is subject to the approval of Fidelity's shareholders and such approval is obtained. The parties, by action in writing, taken or authorized by their respective boards of directors, may, to the extent legally allowed, (a) extend the time for the performance of any of the obligations or other acts of the other parties hereto, (b) waive any inaccuracies in the representations and warranties contained herein or in any
69
document delivered pursuant hereto and (c) waive compliance with any of the agreements or conditions contained in the merger agreement, at any time.
Restrictions on Resale of Eagle Common Stock by Controlling Persons of Fidelity
Shares of Eagle common stock to be issued to Fidelity shareholders in the merger have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act") and may be traded freely and without restriction by those holders not deemed to be affiliates of Fidelity. Any subsequent transfer of shares, however, by any person who is an affiliate of Fidelity at the time the merger is submitted for a vote of Fidelity shareholders will, under existing law, require either:
An "affiliate" of Fidelity is a person who directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with, Fidelity. These restrictions generally are expected to apply to the directors and executive officers of Fidelity and the holders of 10% or more of Fidelity common stock, if any. The same restrictions apply to certain relatives or the spouse of those persons and any trusts, estates, corporations or other entities in which those persons have a 10% or greater beneficial or equity interest. Eagle will issue stop transfer instructions to its transfer agent with respect to the shares of Eagle common stock to be received by persons subject to these restrictions, and the certificates for their shares will be appropriately legended.
If any person who is an affiliate of Fidelity becomes an affiliate of Eagle, such person may only transfer shares in a manner permitted by Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act.
The directors and executive officers of Fidelity and F&T Bank have executed written agreements under which they have agreed to the forgoing restrictions; and Fidelity has agreed to cause any person who becomes an affiliate of Fidelity after the date of the merger agreement to provide a similar letter to Eagle.
Dissenters' Rights
Under Sections 3-201 through 3-213 of the MGCL, Fidelity shareholders have the right to object to the merger and to demand and receive "fair value" of their Fidelity common stock, determined as of the date of the meeting at which the merger is approved, without reference to any appreciation or depreciation in value resulting from the merger or its proposal. These rights are also known as dissenters' rights.
Holders of Eagle common stock do not have the right to exercise dissenters' rights in connection with the merger or the issuance of shares in connection with the merger.
Sections 3-201 through 3-213 of the MGCL, which set forth the procedures a shareholder requesting payment for his or her shares must follow, is reprinted in its entirety as Appendix D to this joint proxy statement/prospectus. The following discussion is not a complete statement of the law relating to dissenters' rights under Sections 3-201 through 3-213 of the MGCL, and is qualified in its entirety by reference to Appendix D. This discussion and Appendix D should be reviewed carefully by any Fidelity shareholder who wishes to exercise dissenters' rights or who wishes to preserve the right to do so, as failure to strictly comply with the procedures set forth in Sections 3-201 through 3-213 of the MGCL will result in the loss of dissenters' rights.
General requirements. Sections 3-201 through 3-213 of the MGCL generally require the following:
70
meeting, a written objection to the proposed transaction. A vote against the merger agreement or the merger will not satisfy such objection requirement. The written objection should be delivered or addressed to Fidelity & Trust Financial Corporation, 4831 Cordell Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, Attention: J. Mercedes Alvarez.
Eagle Written Notice. Under Section 3-207 of the MGCL, Eagle, as the successor to Fidelity, will promptly notify each objecting shareholder in writing of the date the articles of merger were accepted for record by the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation. Eagle may also send a written offer to pay the objecting holders of Fidelity common stock what it considers to be the fair value of the stock. If Eagle chooses to do this, it will provide each objecting shareholder of Fidelity with: (i) a balance sheet as of a date not more than 6 months before the date of the offer; (ii) a profit and loss statement for the 12 months ending on the date of that balance sheet; and (iii) any other information Eagle considers important.
Written Demand for Payment. Within 20 days after acceptance of the articles of merger by the Maryland Department of Assessments and Taxation, you must make a written demand on Eagle for payment of your stock that states the number and class of shares for which payment is demanded. A demand for payment of the fair value must be executed by or on behalf of the holder of record, fully and correctly, as the holder's name appears on the holder's stock certificates. Therefore, if your Fidelity common stock is owned of record in a fiduciary capacity, such as by a broker, trustee, guardian or custodian, execution of the demand should be made in that capacity. All written demands for payment of the fair value of Fidelity common stock should be delivered or addressed to Eagle Bancorp, Inc., 7815 Woodmont Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, Attention: Ronald D. Paul.
Petition for Appraisal. Within 50 days after the date the articles of merger are accepted by the Maryland State Department of Assessments and Taxation, Eagle or any holder of Fidelity common stock who has complied with the statutory requirements summarized above may file a petition with a court of equity in Montgomery County, Maryland demanding a determination of the fair value of Fidelity common stock (an "appraisal"). Eagle is not obligated to, and has no present intention to, file a petition with respect to an appraisal of the fair value of Fidelity common stock. Accordingly, it is the obligation of objecting holders of Fidelity common stock to initiate all necessary action to perfect their dissenters' rights within the time period prescribed by Section 3-208 of the MGCL.
If a petition for an appraisal is timely filed, after a hearing on the petition, the court will determine the holders of Fidelity common stock that are entitled to dissenters' rights and will appoint three disinterested appraisers to determine the fair value of the Fidelity common stock on terms and conditions the court considers proper. Within 60 days after appointment (or such longer period as the court may direct), the
71
appraisers will file with the court and mail to each party to the proceeding their report stating their conclusion as to the fair value of the stock. Within 15 days after the filing of this report, any party may object to such report and request a hearing. The court shall, upon motion of any party, enter an order either confirming, modifying, or rejecting such report and, if confirmed or modified, enter judgment directing the time within which payment shall be made. If the appraisers' report is rejected, the court may determine the fair value of the stock of the objecting shareholders or may remit the proceeding to the same or other appraisers. Any judgment entered pursuant to a court proceeding shall include interest from the date of the Fidelity shareholders' vote on the merger. Costs of the proceeding shall be determined by the court and may be assessed against Eagle or, under certain circumstances, the objecting shareholder(s), or both. The court's judgment is final and conclusive on all parties and has the same force and effect as other decrees in equity.
Fair Value. You should be aware that the fair value of your Fidelity common stock as determined under Section 3-202 of the MGCL could be more than, the same as or less than the value of the Eagle stock you would receive in the merger if you did not seek appraisal of your Fidelity common stock. You should further be aware that, if you have duly demanded the payment of the fair value of your Fidelity common stock in compliance with Section 3-203 of the MGCL, you will not, after making such demand, be entitled to vote the Fidelity common stock subject to the demand for any purpose or be entitled to, with respect to such shares of stock, the payment of dividends or other distributions payable to holders of record on a record date occurring after the close of business on the date the shareholders approved the merger and the merger agreement. Fair value may not include any appreciation or depreciation which directly or indirectly results from the transaction objected to or from its proposal.
If you fail to comply strictly with these procedures you will lose your dissenters' rights. Consequently, if you wish to exercise your dissenters' rights, we strongly urge you to consult a legal advisor before attempting to exercise your dissenters' rights.
72
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The following unaudited pro forma combined financial information and explanatory notes present how the combined financial statements of Eagle and Fidelity may have appeared had the businesses actually been combined as of the dates indicated. The unaudited pro forma combined balance sheet at December 31, 2007 assumes the merger was completed on that date, based upon the preliminary, partial, estimated adjusted conversion ratio of 0.7055. The actual conversion ratio may be higher or lower than 0.7055, but not in excess of 0.9202 shares of Eagle common stock for each share of Fidelity common stock. The unaudited pro forma combined income statement for the year ended December 31, 2007 gives effect to the merger as if the merger had been completed on January 1, 2007.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information shows the impact of the merger on the combined financial position and results of operations of Eagle and Fidelity under the purchase method of accounting with Eagle treated as the acquiror. Under this method of accounting, Eagle will record the assets and liabilities of Fidelity at their estimated fair values as of the date the merger is completed.
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information has been derived from and should be read in conjunction with the historical consolidated financial statements and the related notes of both Eagle and Fidelity that are included or incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See "Where You Can Find More Information" at page .
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is presented for illustrative purposes only and does not indicate the financial results of the combined company had the companies actually been combined at the beginning of the periods presented and had the impact of possible revenue enhancements and expense efficiencies, among other factors, been considered. In addition, as explained in more detail in the accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma combined financial information, the allocation of the purchase price reflected in the unaudited pro forma combined financial information is subject to adjustment and will vary from the actual purchase price allocation that will be recorded upon completion of the merger based upon changes in the balance sheet including fair value estimates.
73
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED BALANCE SHEET
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
|
Eagle |
Fidelity |
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Pro Forma Combined |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ASSETS | |||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks | $ | 15,408 | $ | 7,691 | (2,436 | )Note 3 | $ | 20,651 | |||||||
Federal funds sold | 244 | 7,461 | 7,705 | ||||||||||||
Interest bearing deposits with banks and other short-term investments | 4,490 | | 4,490 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value | 87,117 | 90,746 | 177,863 | ||||||||||||
Loans held for sale | 2,177 | 11,898 | 14,075 | ||||||||||||
Loans |
716,677 |
319,402 |
(3,692 |
)Notes 3, 4 |
1,032,387 |
||||||||||
Less allowance for credit losses |
(8,037 |
) |
(3,195 |
) |
(11,232 |
) |
|||||||||
Loans, net | 708,640 | 316,207 | (3,692 | ) | 1,021,155 | ||||||||||
Premises and equipment, net | 6,701 | 3,929 | 10,630 | ||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
3,597 |
1,185 |
440 |
Note 3 |
5,222 |
||||||||||
Core deposit intangibles, net (Note 3) | | | 788 | Notes 1, 3 | 788 | ||||||||||
Goodwill (Note 3) | 12,311 | Notes 1, 3 | 12,311 | ||||||||||||
Other assets | 18,026 | 7,412 | 25,438 | ||||||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS | $ | 846,400 | $ | 446,529 | $ | 7,411 | $ | 1,300,328 | |||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES |
|||||||||||||||
Deposits: | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest bearing demand | $ | 142,477 | $ | 56,680 | $ | 199,157 | |||||||||
Interest bearing transaction | 54,090 | 5,834 | 59,924 | ||||||||||||
Savings and money market | 177,081 | 95,273 | 272,354 | ||||||||||||
Time, $100,000 or more | 173,586 | 132,683 | 306 | Note 3 | 306,575 | ||||||||||
Other time | 83,702 | 75,228 | 92 | Note 3 | 159,022 | ||||||||||
Total deposits | 630,936 | 365,698 | 398 | 997,032 | |||||||||||
Customer repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased | 76,408 | 49,165 | 125,573 | ||||||||||||
Other short-term borrowings | 22,000 | 3,000 | (3,000 | )Note 4 | 22,000 | ||||||||||
Long-term borrowings | 30,000 | 30,000 | |||||||||||||
Other liabilities | 5,890 | 3,360 | | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 765,234 | 421,223 | (2,602 | )Note 3 | 9,250 | ||||||||||
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|||||||||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; shares authorized 20,000,000, shares issued and outstanding 9,721,315, 12,689,365 issued and outstanding pro forma combined (Note 2) | 97 | 29 | Note 2 | 126 | |||||||||||
Common stock, $.01 par value; shares authorized 20,000,000, shares issued and outstanding 4,207,016 (Note 2) | 42 | (42 | )Note 2 | | |||||||||||
Additional paid in capital | 52,290 | 37,726 | (2,437 | )Note 2 | 87,579 | ||||||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) | 28,195 | (12,807 | ) | 12,807 | Note 2 | 28,195 | |||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss | 584 | 345 | (345 | )Note 2 | 584 | ||||||||||
Total shareholders' equity | 81,166 | 25,306 | 10,013 | 116,485 | |||||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY | $ | 846,400 | $ | 446,529 | $ | 7,411 | $ | 1,300,340 | |||||||
74
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED INCOME STATEMENT
For the Year Ended December 31, 2007
(dollars in thousands)
|
Eagle |
Fidelity |
Pro Forma Adjustments |
Pro Forma Combined |
|||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Interest Income | |||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans | $ | 51,931 | $ | 25,248 | $ | 692 | Note 3 | $ | 77,871 | ||||||
Taxable interest and dividends on investment securities | 4,177 | 4,622 | 8,799 | ||||||||||||
Interest on balances with other banks and short term investments | 293 | | 293 | ||||||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold | 676 | 753 | 1,429 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income | 57,077 | 30,623 | 692 | 88,392 | |||||||||||
Interest Expense | |||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits | 19,810 | 13,299 | (398 | )Note 3 | 32,711 | ||||||||||
Interest on customer repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased | 1,887 | 1,710 | 3,597 | ||||||||||||
Interest on other short-term borrowings | 611 | 20 | 631 | ||||||||||||
Interest on long-term borrowings | 1,421 | | 1,421 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | 23,729 | 15,029 | (398 | ) | 38,360 | ||||||||||
Net Interest Income | 33,348 | 15,594 | 1,090 | 50,032 | |||||||||||
Provision for Credit Losses | 1,643 | 1,861 | 3,504 | ||||||||||||
Net Interest Income After Provision For Credit Losses | 31,705 | 13,733 | 1,090 | 46,528 | |||||||||||
Noninterest Income | |||||||||||||||
Service charges on deposits | 1,491 | 231 | 1,722 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of loans | 1,036 | 1,036 | |||||||||||||
Gain (loss) on sale of investment securities | 6 | 6 | |||||||||||||
Gain on increase in surrender value of bank owned life insurance | 455 | 455 | |||||||||||||
Income from subordinated financing | 1,252 | 1,252 | |||||||||||||
Other income | 946 | 334 | 1,280 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest income | 5,186 | 565 | 5,751 | ||||||||||||
Noninterest Expense | |||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits | 14,167 | 6,851 | 21,018 | ||||||||||||
Premises and equipment expenses | 4,829 | 2,666 | 7,495 | ||||||||||||
Advertising | 465 | 175 | 640 | ||||||||||||
Outside data processing | 793 | 504 | 1,297 | ||||||||||||
Legal, accounting and professional fees | 611 | 1,440 | 2,051 | ||||||||||||
Other expenses | 4,056 | 1,201 | 5,257 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of intangible | 113 | Note 3 | 113 | ||||||||||||
Total noninterest expense | 24,921 | 12,837 | 113 | 37,871 | |||||||||||
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Tax Expense | 11,970 | 1,461 | 977 | 14,408 | |||||||||||
Income Tax Expense | 4,269 | 541 | 440 | 5,250 | |||||||||||
Income From Continuing Operations | 7,701 | 920 | 537 | 9,158 | |||||||||||
Loss From Discontinued Operations | (15,855 | ) | (15,855 | ) | |||||||||||
Income Tax Benefit | (1,557 | ) | (1,557 | ) | |||||||||||
Net Income (Loss) | $ | 7,701 | $ | (13,378 | ) | $ | 537 | $ | (5,140 | ) | |||||
Earnings Per Share | |||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.80 | $ | (3.18 | ) | $ | (0.41 | ) | |||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.78 | $ | (3.16 | ) | $ | (0.40 | ) | |||||||
Dividends Declared Per Share | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.24 | |||||||||
Weighted Average Shares OutstandingBasic | 9,574,000 | 4,206,000 | (1,237,950 | ) | 12,542,050 | ||||||||||
Weighted Average Shares OutstandingDiluted | 9,864,000 | 4,231,000 | (1,237,950 | ) | 12,857,050 |
75
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Note 1Basis of Pro Forma Presentation
The merger will be accounted for as an acquisition by Eagle of Fidelity using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the assets and liabilities of Fidelity will be recorded at their respective fair values on the date the merger is completed.
The merger will be effected by the issuance of shares of Eagle stock ($.01 par value) to Fidelity shareholders. Each share of Fidelity common stock will be exchanged for an amount of Eagle common stock which is subject to adjustment based on various events detailed in the definitive agreement under section 2.1. At the date of announcement (December 2, 2007), the conversion ratio was 0.9202 shares of Eagle for each Fidelity share subject to reduction in accordance with the definitive agreement. This pro-forma analysis uses an exchange ratio of 0.7055 shares. See Note 5 below for a description of this adjustment. The final exchange ratio could be higher or lower than 0.7055, but not in excess of 0.9202 shares of Eagle for each outstanding share of Fidelity. The shares of Eagle common stock issued to effect the merger are assumed in this pro-forma analysis to be equal to $11.90 per share. This is the average closing sale price of Eagle common stock for the thirty trading day period ending April 30, 2008, and is deemed representative of the Eagle stock price. The final purchase price will be based on the Eagle average closing price for the five business days immediately preceding the date which is two business days before the closing date.
The pro forma financial statements include estimated adjustments to record assets and liabilities of Fidelity at their respective fair values. The pro forma adjustments included herein are subject to change as additional information becomes available and as additional analyses are performed. The final allocation of the purchase price will be determined after the merger is completed and additional analyses are performed to determine the fair values of Fidelity's tangible and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities as of the date the merger is completed. Changes in the fair value of the net assets of Fidelity as of the date of the merger will likely change the amount of purchase price allocable to goodwill. The further refinement of transaction costs, changes in Fidelity's shareholders' equity, including net income, asset valuations and other items identified in the definitive agreement, between December 31, 2007 and the date of the merger will further impact the amount of the purchase price and any excess purchase price recorded, as compared to this pro-forma analysis. Also impacting the final amounts will be changes to the stock price of Eagle, as noted above. The final adjustments may be materially different from the unaudited pro forma adjustments presented herein.
The pro forma financial statements for the merger are included for balance sheet purposes at December 31, 2007 and assume the transaction occurred on that date. The pro forma financial statements for the merger are included for income statement purposes for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007 and assume the transaction occurred at the beginning of the period.
The unaudited pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations or the combined financial position that would have resulted had the merger been completed at the beginning of the applicable periods presented, nor is it necessarily indicative of the results of operations in future periods or the future financial position of the combined company.
Note 2Adjustments to Equity
The pro forma financial information reflects the issuance of 2,968,050 shares of Eagle common stock. The table below provides the calculation of the number of shares issued:
Fidelity common stock outstanding | 4,207,016 | |
Conversion ratio (as preliminarily adjusted) | 0.7055 | |
Eagle Bancorp stock issued | 2,968,050 | |
76
The pro forma financial statements include adjustments to shareholders' equity for the elimination of Fidelity's accumulated other comprehensive gain of $345 thousand and the elimination of Fidelity's undivided deficit of $12.8 million. All of these amounts have been reclassified into additional paid in capital. No value has been attributed to the outstanding Fidelity stock options to be assumed upon the merger as they are all out of the money at the assumed conversion ratio of 0.7055.
The following table summarizes the pro forma adjustments to shareholders' equity.
Pro Forma Adjustments to Shareholders' Equity | ||||||||||
Purchase Price: | ||||||||||
Shares of Eagle Bancorp common stock issued | 2,968,050 | |||||||||
Eagle Bancorp par value | $ | 0.01 | $ | 29,680 | ||||||
Less Fidelity's common stock | (42,000 | ) | ||||||||
Common stock adjustment | (12,320 | ) | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital adjustment |
||||||||||
Purchase priceFidelity's common stock (Note 3) | 35,319,792 | |||||||||
Purchase priceestimated fair value of | ||||||||||
Fidelity's stock options | | |||||||||
Fidelity's retained earnings (deficit) | (12,807,000 | ) | ||||||||
Fidelity's accumulated other comprehensive gain | 345,000 | |||||||||
Fidelity's shareholder's equity | (25,306,000 | ) | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital adjustment | (2,436,888 | ) | ||||||||
Retained earnings (deficit) adjustmentFidelity | 12,807,000 | |||||||||
Elimination of Fidelity's accumulated other comprehensive gain | (345,000 | ) | ||||||||
Total shareholders' equity adjustment | $ | 10,001,472 | ||||||||
Note 3Purchase Accounting Adjustments]
The purchase accounting adjustments included in the pro forma balance sheet include the following adjustments:
Loan discounts | $692,000 | (average life of 5 mos.) | ||
Deferred income taxes | $440,000 | |||
Core deposit intangible | $788,000 | (life of 7 years) | ||
Time deposits discounts | $398,000 | (average life of 10 mos.) | ||
Cash (estimated transactions cost) | $2,436,000 |
The adjustments recorded for these assets and liabilities on the merger date could vary significantly from the pro forma adjustments included herein depending on changes in interest rates and the components of the assets and liabilities. Fidelity had no previous unamortized purchase adjustments.
An analysis to determine the purchase accounting adjustment (if any) to Fidelity's property and equipment has not yet been completed. Upon completion of this analysis, adjustments may be recorded, but they are not expected to be material.
77
The table below identifies all pro-forma purchase accounting adjustments as well as the unidentified intangible recorded as Goodwill.
Purchase Price: | |||||||||
Fidelity common shares outstanding | 4,207,016 | ||||||||
Exchange ratio (as preliminarily adjusted) | 0.7055 | 2,968,050 | |||||||
Eagle closing price average 4/30/08 | $ | 11.90 | |||||||
Purchase price of Fidelity common shares | 35,319,792 | ||||||||
Estimated fair value of Fidelity stock options | | ||||||||
Purchase price (excluding direct transaction costs) | 35,319,792 | ||||||||
Direct transaction costs | 2,436,000 | ||||||||
Purchase price (including direct transaction costs) | 37,755,792 | ||||||||
Net Assets Acquired: |
|||||||||
Fidelity shareholders equity | 25,306,000 | ||||||||
Excess of purchase price over carrying value of net assets acquired | (12,449,792 | ) | |||||||
Estimated adjustments to reflect fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed: |
|||||||||
Estimated core deposit intangible | |||||||||
Fidelity's core deposits | 157,787,137 | ||||||||
Premium rate | 0.50 | % | |||||||
788,936 | |||||||||
Fair Value Adjustment on Loans | (692,000 | ) | |||||||
Fair Value Adjustment on Time Deposits | (398,000 | ) | |||||||
Deferred Taxes on Fair Value Adjustments (Loans and Deposits) | 439,924 | ||||||||
Goodwill | $ | 12,310,933 | |||||||
Note 4.Intercompany Transactions:
Elimination of intercompany loan which was settled in December 2007 of $3,000,000.
Note 5.Conversion Ratio Update:
The following table reflects certain adjustments to the originally announced conversion ratio through December 31, 2007. These adjustments are required, as of the closing date under Section 2.1(b)(i) of the Agreement and Plan of Merger. The following table does not reflect any adjustments under any clause of Section 2.1(b)(i) other than clauses (i), (ii) and (iii), although adjustments under other clauses may be required, as such other adjustments are not readily determinable at this time. Final adjustments will reflect items through the closing date. The final adjusted conversion price may be higher or lower than 0.7055
Eagle Shareholders' Equity (9/30/2007) | $ | 78,065,932 | $ | 8.15 | ||||||
Fidelity Adjusted Shareholders' Equity (9/30/2007) |
$ |
31,552,620 |
$ |
7.50 |
0.9202 |
|||||
Pro Forma Adjustments under Section 2.1 |
||||||||||
1. Losses of Mortgage Subsidiary | ||||||||||
a. for full year 2007 (audited statements) minus nine month internals | $ | 7,519,000 | $ | 1.79 | ||||||
2. Net Credit Lossesthree months ended 12/31/2007 | $ | 256,000 | $ | 0.06 | ||||||
3. Section 2.1 General Credit | $ | (400,000 | ) | $ | (0.10 | ) | ||||
Fidelity Adjusted Shareholders Equity (12/31/2007) | $ | 24,177,620 | $ | 5.75 | 0.7055 | |||||
78
Eagle Bancorp, Inc. ("Eagle"), organized in 1997 under Maryland law, is the registered bank holding company for EagleBank, Bethesda, Maryland ("EagleBank"), a Maryland chartered commercial bank which is a member of the Federal Reserve System. Eagle is a growth oriented institution, providing general commercial and consumer banking services through EagleBank, and subordinated financing for real estate projects through a direct subsidiary, where the primary financing would be provided by EagleBank. EagleBank was organized as an independent, community oriented, and full-service alternative to the super regional financial institutions, which dominate its primary market area. EagleBank's philosophy is to provide superior, personalized service to our customers. EagleBank relies on relationship banking, providing each customer with a number of services, becoming familiar with and addressing customer needs in a proactive, personalized fashion. EagleBank currently has six offices serving Montgomery County and three offices in the District of Columbia.
Eagle offers a broad range of commercial banking services to our business and professional clients as well as full service consumer banking services to individuals living or working in the service area. Eagle emphasizes providing commercial banking services to sole proprietors, small- and medium-sized businesses, partnerships, corporations, non-profit organizations and associations, and investors living and working in and near EagleBank's primary service area. A full range of retail banking services are offered to accommodate the individual needs of both business customers as well as the community Eagle serves. EagleBank has developed significant expertise and commitment as an SBA lender, has been designated a Preferred Lender by the Small Business Administration ("SBA"), and is the largest community bank SBA lender in the Washington metropolitan area.
Eagle's common stock is listed for trading on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol "EGBN." As of , there were [9,832,063] shares of Eagle common stock outstanding.
At March 31, 2008, Eagle had totals assets of approximately $899 million, total loans of approximately $760 million, total deposits of approximately $686 million, and total shareholders' equity of approximately $84 million. At March 31, 2008, its nonperforming assets (consisting of nonaccrual loans, loans past due 90 or more days and other real estate owned) were approximately $11.7 million, or 1.30% of total assets. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, Eagle had earnings of $0.17 per diluted share. Eagle paid a dividend of $0.06 per share with respect to the first quarter of 2008.
Description of Eagle's Capital Stock
Eagle's authorized capital consists of 20,000,000 shares of common stock, $.01 par value, and 1,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock, $.01 par value. As of , 2008, there were [9,832,063] shares of Eagle common stock outstanding and no shares of preferred stock outstanding. There were also options, SAR's and performance based restricted stock relating to an aggregate of approximately 861,585 shares of common stock outstanding under Eagle's 1998 Stock Option Plan and 2006 Stock Plan.
Common Stock. Holders of Eagle common stock are entitled to cast one vote for each share held of record, to receive such dividends as may be declared by the board of directors out of legally available funds, and, subject to the rights of any class of stock having preference to the common stock, to share ratably in any distribution of Eagle's assets after payment of all debts and other liabilities, upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up. Shareholders do not have cumulative voting rights or preemptive rights or other rights to subscribe for additional shares, and the common stock is not subject to conversion or redemption. The shares of common stock to be issued in connection with the merger will be, when issued, fully paid and non-assessable.
Preferred Stock. Eagle's board of directors may, from time to time, by action of a majority, issue shares of the authorized, undesignated preferred stock, in one or more classes or series. In connection with any such issuance, the board may by resolution determine the designation, voting rights, preferences as to
79
dividends, in liquidation or otherwise, participation, redemption, sinking fund, conversion, dividend or other special rights or powers, and the limitations, qualifications and restrictions of such shares of preferred stock. As of the date hereof, no shares of preferred stock are outstanding.
The existence of shares of authorized undesignated preferred stock enables us to meet possible contingencies or opportunities in which the issuance of shares of preferred stock may be advisable, such as in the case of acquisition or financing transactions. Having shares of preferred stock available for issuance gives Eagle flexibility in that it would allow us to avoid the expense and delay of calling a meeting of shareholders at the time the contingency or opportunity arises. Any issuance of preferred stock with voting rights or which is convertible into voting shares could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of common stock.
The existence of authorized shares of preferred stock could have the effect of rendering more difficult or discouraging hostile takeover attempts or of facilitating a negotiated acquisition. Such shares, which may be convertible into shares of common stock, could be issued to shareholders or to a third party in an attempt to frustrate or render a hostile acquisition more expensive.
Limitations on Payment of Dividends. The payment of dividends by Eagle will depend largely upon the ability of EagleBank to declare and pay dividends to Eagle, as the principal source of Eagle's revenue is from dividends or interest payments on capital debt securities paid by EagleBank. Dividends will depend primarily upon the bank's earnings, financial condition, and need for funds, as well as applicable governmental policies and regulations. Even where we have earnings in an amount sufficient to pay dividends, the board of directors may determine to retain earnings for the purpose of funding growth.
Regulations of the Federal Reserve and Maryland law place limits on the amount of dividends EagleBank may pay without prior approval. Prior regulatory approval is required to pay dividends which exceed the bank's net profits for the current year plus its retained net profits for the preceding two calendar years, less required transfers to surplus. Federal bank regulatory agencies also have authority to prohibit a bank from paying dividends if such payment is deemed to be an unsafe or unsound practice, and the Federal Reserve Board has the same authority over bank holding companies.
The Federal Reserve Board has established guidelines with respect to the maintenance of appropriate levels of capital by registered bank holding companies. Compliance with such standards, as currently in effect, or as they may be amended from time to time, could possibly limit the amount of dividends that we may pay in the future. In 1985, the Federal Reserve Board issued a policy statement on the payment of cash dividends by bank holding companies. In the statement, the Federal Reserve Board expressed its view that a holding company experiencing earnings weaknesses should not pay cash dividends exceeding its net income, or which could only be funded in ways that weaken the holding company's financial health, such as by borrowing. As a depository institution, the deposits of which are insured by the FDIC, EagleBank may not pay dividends or distribute any of its capital assets while it remains in default on any assessment due the FDIC.
Security Ownership of Directors, Executive Officers and Certain Beneficial Owners of Eagle
The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number and percentage of whole shares of Eagle common stock beneficially owned by Eagle's directors, executive officers whose compensation is required to be disclosed in its proxy statement for the 2008 annual meeting of shareholders, and by its directors and all executive officers as a group, as of , 2008, as well as information regarding each other person known by Eagle to own in excess of five percent of the outstanding Eagle common stock. Except as otherwise indicated, all shares are owned directly, the named person possesses sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all such shares, and none of such shares are pledged as security. Except as set forth below, Eagle knows of no other person or persons who
80
beneficially own in excess of five percent of the Eagle common stock. Further, Eagle is not aware of any arrangement which at a subsequent date may result in a change of control of the Company.
Name |
Position |
Number of Shares |
Percentage(1) |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Leonard L. Abel | Chairman of Board of Company, Director of Bank |
299,719 | (2) | 3.05 | % | ||
Leslie M. Alperstein, Ph.D. | Director of Company | 64,674 | (3) | 0.66 | % | ||
Dudley C. Dworken | Director of Company and Bank | 185,591 | (4) | 1.89 | % | ||
Michael T. Flynn | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Director of Company; PresidentDistrict of Columbia Division of Bank | 26,664 | (5) | 0.27 | % | ||
Harvey M. Goodman | Director of Company and Bank | 97,882 | (6) | 1.00 | % | ||
Philip N. Margolius | Director of Company and Bank | 208,773 | (7) | 2.12 | % | ||
Ronald D. Paul | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director of Company; Chairman of Board and Chief Executive Officer of Bank | 709,084 | (8) | 7.16 | % | ||
Donald R. Rogers | Director of Company and Bank | 44,052 | (9) | 0.45 | % | ||
Leland M. Weinstein | Director of Company and Bank | 107,641 | (10) | 1.09 | % | ||
James H. Langmead | Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Company and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer of Bank | 11,385 | (11) | 0.12 | % | ||
Thomas D. Murphy | Executive Vice President, PresidentMontgomery County Division of Bank | 63,100 | (12) | 0.64 | % | ||
Susan G. Riel | Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer of Bank | 62,435 | (13) | 0.63 | % | ||
Martha Foulon-Tonat | Executive Vice President, Chief Lending Officer of Bank | 84,732 | (14) | 0.86 | % | ||
All directors and executive officers of Company as a group (13 persons) | 1,965,732 | (15) | 19.39 | % | |||
Other 5% Shareholders | |||||||
Neal R. Gross | 607,988 | (16) | 6.18 | % |
81
Additional Information
Information relating to the background and experience of the directors and executive officers of Eagle, executive compensation, transactions and relationships with related persons, director independence and compensation committee interlocks is incorporated by reference or set forth in Eagle's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, which is incorporated by reference in this joint proxy statement/prospectus. See "Where you Can Find More Information" at page . Comparable information for directors and executive officers of Fidelity who will become directors or executive officers of Eagle is provided in this joint proxy statement/prospectus under the caption "Information About FidelityManagement."
82
General
Fidelity is a Maryland corporation and registered bank holding company that was formed on July 29, 2003 for the purpose of becoming the bank holding company for F&T Bank. F&T Bank is a Maryland-chartered commercial bank, a member of the Federal Reserve System, and commenced operations on November 17, 2003. F&T Bank is the parent company of F&T Mortgage, a residential mortgage banking company, which has been operating since August 1, 2001. F&T Mortgage was acquired and became the wholly owned subsidiary of F&T Bank following a reorganization transaction, which was completed on November 13, 2003. In the reorganization transaction, the shareholders of F&T Mortgage received shares of common stock in Fidelity in exchange for their ownership interest in F&T Mortgage.
Fidelity conducts commercial banking business through F&T Bank and conducted residential mortgage loan origination business through F&T Mortgage until August 20, 2007. On that date, F&T Mortgage discontinued origination activities, sold certain assets and transferred the F&T Mortgage sales force and lending offices to a third-party purchaser. F&T Mortgage retains certain residential mortgage loans and continues to wind down its activities.
F&T Bank is a full service, community oriented-financial institution, providing general commercial and consumer banking services to small- and medium-sized businesses, professionals and consumers in our market area. F&T Bank currently has three offices in Montgomery County, Maryland, two offices in the District of Columbia and one office in Tysons Corner, Virginia. Management emphasizes local decision-making and personal relationship service to our customers. By combining the technological support and products and services that F&T Bank's customers demand with direct access to senior management and responsive customer service, we seek to foster a business and consumer banking environment that allows us to effectively compete in our particular market with other financial institutions of all sizes. We seek to provide our customers with the technological support that banking in today's market requires, including 24 hours a day, seven days a week Internet banking services. These services allow individuals and businesses to view accounts, make transfers, submit wire transfer requests, pay bills and place stop payments on checks at any time of the day.
F&T Bank offers a broad range of commercial banking services to our business and professional clients as well as full-service consumer banking services to individuals living or working in our service area. F&T Bank focuses on providing commercial banking services to sole proprietors, small and mid-sized businesses, partnerships, corporations and investors living and working in and near F&T Bank's primary service area. Our principal business consists of the acceptance of retail and business deposits from the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area and investing primarily in commercial loans, commercial real estate loans and secured and unsecured consumer loans. F&T Bank also invests in certain government and government sponsored securities. F&T Bank is funded primarily by a combination of deposits, principal payments and repayments on loans and Federal funds purchase lines.
Banking Services
F&T Bank provides a wide variety of commercial banking services to its customers. In the commercial lending area, F&T Bank offers short and medium term loans, including lines of credit, inventory and accounts receivable financing and real estate loans. In the commercial depository area, F&T Bank offers business checking accounts, money market accounts and certificates of deposit. Cash management services are offered, which include sweep accounts, balance reporting, account reconciliation, wire transfers, credit cards and Automated Clearing House transfers.
F&T Bank also offers a range of consumer banking services to its customers, including checking accounts, savings and certificates of deposit programs, Individual Retirement Accounts, lending services including auto and other installment and term loans, overdraft lines of credit, sales of travelers' checks,
83
safe deposit box rentals, night depository and ATM services. Deposits with F&T Bank are insured by the FDIC up to prescribed limits.
Lending Activities
General. Our lending activities occur primarily in the areas of commercial, commercial real estate and consumer loans. F&T Bank's lending activities are primarily commercial loans, which are held to maturity with varying maturities and structures.
F&T Bank Lending Activities. F&T Bank's lending activities include commercial real estate loans, commercial non-real estate loans, construction loans, one-to-four family mortgage loans, and to a lesser extent, consumer loans. All of the loans originated by F&T Bank are held to maturity.
Commercial Real Estate Lending. Commercial real estate loans are generally secured by retail business locations, retail shopping centers, multi-family properties and industrial facilities. This category also includes commercial purpose loans secured by real estate, including one-to-four family real estate (e.g., a loan to a retail business secured by deed of trust against the business owner's residence). Commercial real estate loans have a maximum amortization of 25 years; however, they generally mature in five years. Rates on these loans can be either fixed or adjustable. The rates on adjustable-rate commercial real estate loans reset on a regular basis to a stated margin over an independent index. Loans in this category are generally written in amounts up to 80% of the lesser of the appraised value or purchase price of the underlying collateral. Commercial real estate loans (including commercial purpose loans secured by real estate) totaled $133.4 million, or 41.7% of total loans at December 31, 2007.
Loans secured by commercial real estate generally present a higher level of risk than loans secured by one-to-four family residences. The increased risk is due to several factors, including: the concentration of principal over a limited number of loans and borrowers; the effects of general economic conditions on income producing properties; and, the increased complexity of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. Furthermore, the repayment of loans secured by commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful management of the property or the underlying business (for owner-occupied real estate). If the cash flow from the property is reduced, the borrower's ability to repay the loan may be impaired. In most instances, the risk level is mitigated by individual guarantees of the loan and/or additional collateral pledged to secure the loan. These loans generally offer a higher interest rate, which management believes justifies the increased credit risk.
Commercial Non-Real Estate Lending. Commercial loans are of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower's ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower's business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial loans may be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself. Further, the collateral that generally secures commercial loans has the potential to depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business. Generally, commercial loans are made to closely held businesses and additional security is provided through personal guarantees from the business owner(s). Commercial loans normally have adjustable interest rates and may be interest-only lines of credit, time notes or amortizing term loans. F&T Bank's management believes that the credit and underwriting policies currently in place provide a reasonable basis upon which to evaluate these risks and to continue to extend credit of this type. Commercial loans totaled $95.9 million, or 30.0% of total loans at December 31, 2007.
Construction Lending. F&T Bank makes loans to builders and developers for the construction of one-to-four and multi- family residences and the development of one-to-four and multi- family lots, as well as making loans to individuals for the construction of their residences. At December 31, 2007, construction loans totaled $68.8 million or 21.5% of total loans.
Construction loans to builders of one-to-four family residences and multi-family residences require the payment of interest only, generally for up to 12 months, and normally have terms of up to 12 months.
84
These loans may provide for the payment of loan fees from loan proceeds and have an adjustable rate of interest. F&T Bank also makes loans to builders for the purpose of developing one-to-four family home sites. These loans typically have terms of one to two years and also have an adjustable rate of interest. These loans may provide for the payment of interest and loan fees from loan proceeds. The principal on these loans is typically paid down as home sites are sold.
Construction loans on commercial real estate projects may be secured by strip shopping centers, office buildings, industrial or other property and may be converted to permanent loans at the end of the construction phase, which generally lasts up to 12 months. These construction loans have rates and terms matching other permanent commercial real estate loans then offered by F&T Bank, except that during the construction phase, the borrower pays interest only. These loans may provide for the payment of interest and loan fees from loan proceeds.
Construction and development loans are made principally through continued business with developers and builders who have established relationships, as well as new referrals from existing customers and walk-in customers. F&T Bank's application process includes a submission of accurate plans, specifications and costs of the project to be constructed or developed. Loan amounts are based on the lesser of current appraised value and/or the cost of construction (land plus building).
Construction loans to individuals for their residences are normally structured to be paid off by permanent loans at the end of the construction phase, which typically lasts 12 months. These construction loans have rates and terms that match other one-to-four family mortgage loans then offered by F&T Bank, except that for loans that extend beyond the construction phase, the borrower pays interest only during the construction period.
Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating development and construction costs and the market for the project upon completion, it is relatively difficult to ascertain accurately the total loan funds required to complete a project, the related loan-to-value ratios and the likelihood of ultimate success of the project. To help mitigate these risks, F&T Bank requires pro-forma rental cash flow and debt service coverage ratio analyses, and verification of construction progress prior to authorizing a construction draw and generally requires mechanics' lien waivers and other documents to protect and verify its lien position. Construction and development loans to borrowers other than owner-occupants also involve many of the same risks discussed above regarding multi-family and commercial real estate loans and tend to be more sensitive to general economic conditions than many other types of loans. Also, the funding of loan fees and interest during the construction phase makes monitoring a project's progress particularly important, as early warning signals of project difficulties may not be present.
One-to-Four Family Residential Lending. F&T Bank also offers loans secured by one-to-four family residential properties. These residential mortgage loans are primarily originated in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area.
F&T Bank originates one-to-four family revolving open-ended loans secured by the residence with up to 90% loan-to-value of the appraised value. In addition, F&T Bank originates one-to-four family mortgage loans for second homes and investment properties with up to 80% loan-to-value of the appraised value. F&T Bank evaluates both the borrower's ability to make principal and interest payments and the value of the property that will secure the loan. F&T Bank requires title opinions, title insurance, fire, casualty, and in certain cases flood insurance on all properties securing real estate loans originated.
F&T Bank holds to maturity both the fixed and adjustable rate mortgage ("ARM") loans it originates. However, ARM loans we hold to maturity generally can pose credit risks not inherent in fixed-rate loans, primarily because if interest rates rise, the underlying payments required of the borrower rise, thereby increasing the risk of default. At December 31, 2007, one-to-four family revolving open-ended and other mortgage loans held to maturity totaled $20.0 million, or 6.3% of total loans.
85
Consumer Lending. F&T Bank offers various secured and unsecured consumer loans, including unsecured personal loans and lines of credit, automobile loans, deposit account loans, installment and demand loans, letters of credit, and home equity lines. Such loans are generally made to customers with existing relationships with F&T Bank. At December 31, 2007, consumer loans totaled $1.6 million or 0.5% of total loans.
Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of unsecured consumer loans, such as lines of credit, or loans secured by rapidly depreciable assets such as automobiles. In such cases, any collateral that is repossessed for a defaulted loan may not provide adequate funds to repay the outstanding loan balance due to the greater likelihood of damage, loss or depreciation of the collateral. The underwriting standards employed by F&T Bank for consumer loans include a review of the applicant's payment history on other debts and an assessment of the applicant's ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan. The stability of the applicant's monthly income may be determined by verification of gross monthly income from primary employment, combined with funds available from verifiable secondary income sources. Although creditworthiness of the applicant is of primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes an analysis of the value of the collateral in relation to the proposed loan amount.
Unfunded Commitments. In the normal course of business, F&T Bank makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities, which are disclosed in the footnotes of its annual financial statements, including commitments to extend credit. At December 31, 2007, unfunded commitments to extend credit totaled $104.0 million.
Loan Approval Procedures
F&T Bank. The board of directors establishes the lending policies and loan approval limits of F&T Bank. In accordance with those policies, the board of directors has designated certain officers to consider and approve loans within their designated authority.
Loan authorities are determined by the loan policy adopted by the board of directors. Currently, lending authorities for one-to-four family loans are assigned to individuals with varying amounts based on the level of responsibility of the individual within the organization. The maximum loan that may be approved by any one individual is $500,000. For loans in excess of $500,000 but less than $800,000, approval is required from the Officer Loan Committee, comprised of management representatives. Loans in excess of $800,000 must be approved by the Director's Loan Committee, which includes board and management representatives. F&T Bank's loan policy considers the potential borrower's aggregate credit exposure in determining the authorization required for loan approvals. In addition, F&T Bank has established a general guideline for a maximum credit exposure equal to 80% of the legal lending limit.
Asset Quality
Delinquent Loans. Reports listing all delinquent accounts are generated and reviewed by management daily and the Directors Loan Committee bi-weekly, and overall delinquencies are reviewed by the board of directors monthly. The procedures applied by us with respect to delinquencies vary depending on the nature of the loan, period and cause of delinquency and whether the borrower is habitually delinquent. When a borrower fails to make a required payment on a loan, a written notice of non-payment is generally sent to the borrower. Telephone, written correspondence and/or face-to-face contact is attempted to ascertain the reasons for delinquency and the prospects of repayment upon a loan becoming 30 days past due. When contact is made with the borrower at any time prior to foreclosure, attempts are made to obtain full payment, to offer to structure a repayment schedule with the borrower to avoid foreclosure, or in some instances, to accept a deed in lieu of foreclosure or other legal action. Management will ascertain the borrower's capacity to pay the loan, any secondary source of repayment and
86
determine whether the loan should be placed in nonaccrual status. In the event a loan becomes 90 days past due, the loan will be placed in nonaccrual status unless it is well secured and in the process of collection.
Classified Assets. Federal regulations and our internal policies require that an internal asset classification system be used as a means of reporting problem and potential problem assets. In accordance with regulations we currently classify problem and potential problem assets as "Substandard," "Doubtful" or "Loss" assets. An asset is considered Substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as Doubtful have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, make the collection or liquidation in full highly questionable. Assets classified as Loss are those considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance as assets, without the establishment of a specific loss allowance, is not warranted. Assets that do not currently possess a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are designated "Special Mention."
When we classify one or more assets, or portions thereof, as Substandard or Doubtful, it is required that we establish an allowance for probable loan losses in an amount deemed prudent by management as long as the loss of principal is probable and estimable. When one or more assets, or portions thereof, are classified as Loss we are required to charge off such amount. A specific allowance may be established prior to the loan being charged off where circumstances exist that make determining the amount of the loss difficult.
Our determination as to the classification of assets and the amount of valuation allowances is subject to review by the State of Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation (the "Commissioner") and the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, who can order the establishment of additional general or specific loss allowances. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Federal Reserve") has adopted an interagency policy statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses ("ALLL"). The policy statement provides guidance for financial institutions on both the responsibilities of management for the assessment and establishment of prudent, conservative, but not excessive ALLL in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and guidance for banking agency examiners to use in determining the adequacy of general valuation allowances. Generally, the policy statement recommends that institutions have effective systems and controls in place to identify, monitor and address the ALLL; that management has analyzed and documented all significant factors that affect the collectibility of the portfolio in a reasonable manner; and that management has established acceptable ALLL evaluation and disclosure processes that meet the objectives set forth in the policy statement. While management believes that it has established an adequate allowance for probable loan losses, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not request a material increase in the allowance for probable loan losses, thereby negatively affecting our financial condition and earnings at that time. Although management believes that adequate specific and general loan loss allowances have been established, future provisions are dependent upon future events such as loan growth, portfolio diversification, and general economic trends, and as such, further additions to the level of specific and general loan loss allowances may become necessary.
Management reviews and classifies assets, in accordance with the guidelines described above, on a monthly basis and the Credit Quality Committee, comprised of board and management representatives, reviews the results of the reports on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 2007, we had $10.3 million in assets designated as Special Mention, consisting primarily of commercial and commercial real estate loans. At December 31, 2007, we had $5.6 million in assets designated as Substandard, consisting primarily of
87
commercial real estate loans. Assets classified as Doubtful at December 31, 2007, totaled $222,000. At December 31, 2007, we did not have loans classified as Loss that had not been charged off.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses represents the charge to income necessary to adjust the allowance for loan losses to an amount that represents management's assessment of the estimated probable credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio that have been incurred at each balance sheet date. All lending activity contains associated risks of loan losses. At December 31, 2007, the allowance for loan losses totaled 1.00% of gross loans outstanding as compared to 1.10% at December 31, 2006. The decrease in the percentage was primarily related to the recognition during 2007 of losses that were identified and allocated for during 2006. Total net charge-offs for fiscal 2007 were $816,000 as compared to net charge-offs of $29,000 for the fiscal 2006 year. The provision for loan losses for fiscal 2007 was $1.9 million as compared to $671,000 for the fiscal 2006 year.
Management analyzes the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses regularly through reviews of the performance of the loan portfolio considering economic conditions, changes in interest rates and the effect of such changes on real estate values and changes in the amount and composition of the loan portfolio. The allowance for loan losses is a material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant changes in the near term and is established through a provision for loan losses based on management's evaluation of the risk inherent in our loan portfolio and the general economy. Such evaluation, which includes a review of all loans for which full collectibility may not be reasonably assured, considers among other matters, the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, economic conditions, historical loan loss experience and other factors that management believes warrants recognition in providing for an appropriate allowance for loan losses. Additionally, we utilize an outside party to conduct an independent review of non-real estate commercial and commercial real estate loans. Future additions to the allowance for loan losses will depend on these factors among others. Management believes that the allowance for loan losses was adequate at December 31, 2007. Based on the variables involved and the fact that management must make judgments about outcomes that are uncertain, the determination of the allowance for loan losses is considered to be a critical accounting policy.
Other Real Estate Owned. At December 31, 2007, we owned one OREO property with a net book value of $395,000. When property is acquired through foreclosure or deed in lieu of foreclosure, it is initially recorded at the lower of the fair value of the related assets at the date of foreclosure or the carrying value of the loan, less estimated costs to sell the property. Any initial loss is recorded as a charge to the allowance for loan losses before being transferred to OREO. Thereafter, if there is a further deterioration in value, a specific valuation allowance is established and charged to operations. We reflect actual costs to carry OREO as period costs in operations when incurred.
Loans Held for Sale. Fidelity operated a mortgage company and originated residential loans until August 20, 2007 when its mortgage company ceased operations. Loans originated and intended for sale into the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value, determined on an aggregate loan basis. Estimated fair value is determined by outstanding commitments from investors and/or bids obtained on the secondary market. Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to operations. The carrying amount of loans held for sale includes principal balances, valuation allowances, origination premiums or discounts and fees and direct costs that are deferred at the time of origination.
At December 31, 2007, Fidelity reported total loans held for sale of $11.9 million, net of lower of cost or market adjustment of $4.5 million, as compared to total loans held for sale of $139.3 million, net of lower cost or market adjustment of $161,000 as of December 31, 2006. Fidelity accounts for the costs and fees of mortgage loans held for sale pursuant to SFAS No. 91, Accounting for Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans and Initial Direct Costs of Leases, which requires the deferral of loan origination fees and direct loan costs over the estimated life of the loans for loans originated and
88
not sold as of the end of the year. Fidelity has deferred the fees and costs attributed to these loans and will recognize them at the time of the sale of the loans.
On August 20, 2007, Fidelity ceased operating its mortgage company with the sale of certain assets and leases related to its branch origination system. Subsequent to that transaction, Fidelity has been in the process of selling the remaining loans held for sale portfolio. Loans held for sale at August 20, 2007 were $75 million, net of adjustments, compared to $11.9 million, net, as of December 31, 2007.
Investment Activities
The board of directors and its Asset Liability Committee ("ALCO") approve the investment policies and procedures and monitor all securities-related activity. The policies generally provide that investment decisions will be made based on the safety of the investment and its ability to provide liquidity, collateral for pledging purposes and reasonable after-tax income. In pursuing these policy objectives, management considers the ability of an investment to provide earnings consistent with factors of quality, maturity, marketability and risk diversification. Management evaluates all investment activities for safety and soundness and adherence to policies. In accordance with these investment policies, we do not purchase mortgage-related securities that are deemed to be "high risk," and we do not purchase bonds that are not rated investment grade.
Mortgage-backed securities are created by the pooling of mortgages and issuance of a security. Mortgage-backed securities typically represent a participation interest in a pool of single-family or multifamily mortgages. Investments in mortgage-backed securities involve a risk that actual principal prepayments will be greater or less than estimated prepayments over the life of the security. Prepayment estimates for mortgage-backed securities are prepared at purchase to ensure that prepayment assumptions are reasonable considering the underlying collateral for the mortgage-backed securities at issue and current mortgage interest rates and to determine the yield and estimated maturity of the mortgage-backed security portfolio. Prepayments that are faster than anticipated may shorten the life of the security and may result in faster amortization of any premiums paid and thereby reduce the net yield on such securities. During periods of declining mortgage interest rates, refinancing generally increases and accelerates the prepayment of the underlying mortgages and the related security.
As F&T Bank's assets increased through the collection of customer deposits, its investment securities portfolio was established with excess funds beyond those invested in loans and overnight funds. The investment portfolio is comprised primarily of U.S. government agency securities and mortgage-backed securities, including government agency and government sponsored enterprises (FHLMC, FLHB, FNMA or GNMA) issues. F&T Bank's investment strategy has been to purchase short term investments or investments with amortizing principal payments with excess customer deposits as deposit growth exceeded loan growth in 2005 and 2006. This strategy allowed F&T Bank to increase earnings beyond the overnight funds rate and provide liquidity for loan growth as it occurred in 2006 and 2007. F&T Bank also invests in callable agency securities, which in the current declining interest rate environment, provides liquidity as securities are called to reinvest in portfolio loan growth. The growth in the investment portfolio slowed as loan growth exceeded deposit growth in 2007.
In 2007, the investment portfolio increased $7.1 million or 9%, from $83.6 million at December 31, 2006 to $90.7 million at December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily in mortgage-backed securities as some agency securities were called and reinvested in mortgage-backed securities to bring the asset mix closer to an even mix between agency and mortgage-backed securities. The investment portfolio increased $27.2 million or 48%, from $56.4 million at December 31, 2005 to $83.6 million at December 31, 2006 as deposit growth exceeded loan growth. The investment growth was in both agency and mortgage-backed securities to mitigate some of the call risk in the portfolio.
89
The current investment portfolio is comprised of U.S. government agency securities (46%) and agency mortgage-backed securities (52%) with a combined average life of 3.5 years. The remaining securities are equity investments, some of which are required by regulatory mandates (Federal Reserve and Federal Home Loan Bank stocks), and the remaining represent equities of a few community based bankers banks.
The following table sets forth information concerning the investment portfolio at the dates indicated. The information in the table is derived from the financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere herein. All of F&T Bank's investment securities are designated as available for sale and therefore are carried at their fair values. Additional information concerning the investment portfolio is contained in Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
At December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(dollars in thousands) |
2007 Amount |
Percent of Total |
2006 Amount |
Percent of Total |
2005 Amount |
Percent of Total |
|||||||||||
Securities available for sale | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies | $ | 41,663 | 45.9 | % | $ | 54,677 | 65.4 | % | $ | 43,976 | 78.0 | % | |||||
Federal Reserve and Federal | |||||||||||||||||
Home Loan Bank stock | 1,763 | 1.9 | % | 1,867 | 2.2 | % | 1,454 | 2.6 | % | ||||||||
Other equity investments | 118 | 0.1 | % | 65 | 0.1 | % | 65 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||
Total debt and equity securities | 43,544 | 48.0 | % | 56,609 | 67.7 | % | 45,495 | 80.7 | % | ||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | 47,202 | 52.0 | % | 27,001 | 32.3 | % | 10,869 | 19.3 | % | ||||||||
Total securities available for sale | $ | 90,746 | 100.0 | % | $ | 83,610 | 100.0 | % | $ | 56,364 | 100.0 | % | |||||
The table below sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost, weighted average yields and contractual maturities of the debt securities in the available for sale portfolio.
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
One Year or Less |
More than One Year to Five Years |
More than Five Years to Ten Years |
More than 10 Years |
Total |
|||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
Amortized Cost |
Weighted Average Yield |
Amortized Cost |
Weighted Average Yield |
Amortized Cost |
Weighted Average Yield |
Amortized Cost |
Weighted Average Yield |
Amortized Cost |
Weighted Average Yield |
||||||||||||||||
Debt securities available for sale | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. government agencies | $ | 9,999 | 4.49 | % | $ | 17,383 | 4.97 | % | $ | 14,002 | 5.63 | % | $ | | | $ | 41,384 | 5.08 | % | |||||||
Mortgage-backed securities | | | 4,298 | 4.38 | % | 1,201 | 4.01 | % | 41,418 | 5.55 | % | 46,917 | 5.40 | % | ||||||||||||
Total debt securities available for sale | $ | 9,999 | 4.49 | % | $ | 21,681 | 4.86 | % | $ | 15,203 | 5.50 | % | $ | 41,418 | 5.55 | % | $ | 88,301 | 5.25 | % | ||||||
Sources of Funds
General. The primary sources of funds are customer deposits and repurchase agreements, principal and interest payments on loans and securities, borrowings, and funds generated from operations of F&T Bank. F&T Bank also has access to advances from federal fund purchase lines. Contractual loan payments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows, loan prepayments and security calls and principal payments on mortgage-backed securities are significantly influenced by general market
90
interest rates and economic conditions. Borrowings may be used on a short-term basis for liquidity purposes or on a long-term basis to fund asset growth.
Deposits. F&T Bank offers a variety of deposit accounts with a range of interest rates and terms consisting of non-interest and interest checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts and certificate of deposit accounts.
F&T Bank has a significant portion of its deposits in core deposits. Management monitors activity on its core deposits, and based on historical experience and the current pricing strategy, believes it will continue to retain a large portion of such accounts. F&T Bank is not limited with respect to the rates it may offer on deposit products. Management believes F&T Bank is competitive in the types of accounts and interest rates it offers on its deposit products. Management regularly evaluates the internal cost of funds, surveys rates offered by competitors, reviews cash flow requirements for lending and liquidity and executes rate changes when necessary as part of its asset/liability management, profitability and growth objectives.
As an enhancement to the basic non-interest-bearing demand deposit account, F&T Bank offers a sweep account, or "customer repurchase agreement", allowing qualifying businesses to earn interest on short-term excess funds which are not suited for either a certificate of deposit or a money market account. Customer repurchase agreements are not deposits and are not insured but are collateralized by U.S. government agency securities. These accounts are particularly suitable to businesses with significant fluctuation in the levels of cash flows. Attorney and title company escrow accounts are an example of accounts which can benefit from this product, as are customers who may require collateral for deposits in excess of $100,000 but do not qualify for other pledging arrangements. This program requires F&T Bank to maintain a sufficient investment securities level to accommodate the fluctuations in balances which may occur in these accounts.
The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in money market rates, prevailing interest rates and competition. F&T Bank's deposits are obtained predominantly from the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. F&T Bank relies primarily on customer service, its relationships and other banking services, including loans, to attract and retain these deposits. However, market interest rates and rates offered by competing financial institutions affect F&T Bank's ability to attract and retain deposits. F&T Bank uses traditional means of advertising its deposit products, including print media.
The table below sets forth the average balance of deposit accounts and the average rate paid by type.
|
Year ended December 31, |
||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2007 |
2006 |
2005 |
||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) |
Average Balance |
Average Rate Paid |
Average Balance |
Average Rate Paid |
Average Balance |
Average Rate Paid |
|||||||||||
Deposits | |||||||||||||||||
Non-interest-bearing deposits | $ | 51,172 | 0.00 | % | $ | 37,131 | 0.00 | % | $ | 18,639 | 0.00 | % | |||||
NOW accounts | 4,657 | 0.62 | % | 5,919 | 0.30 | % | 3,775 | 0.21 | % | ||||||||
Money market accounts | 95,711 | 4.24 | % | 84,076 | 3.40 | % | 65,144 | 2.23 | % | ||||||||
Savings accounts | 169 | 0.59 | % | 78 | 0.70 | % | 49 | 0.35 | % | ||||||||
Certificates of deposit | 183,683 | 5.02 | % | 141,190 | 4.46 | % | 78,031 | 3.67 | % | ||||||||
Total deposits | $ | 335,392 | 3.97 | % | $ | 268,394 | 3.42 | % | $ | 165,638 | 2.61 | % | |||||
91
The following table sets forth the amount outstanding of certificates of deposit that are $100,000 or greater by time remaining until maturity as of December 31, 2007.
(dollars in thousands) Maturity Period |
Amount Outstanding of Certificates of $100,000 or more |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Three months or less | $ | 28,205 | ||
Over three through six months | 49,420 | |||
Over six through 12 months | 24,466 | |||
Over 12 months | 30,092 | |||
Total | $ | 132,183 | ||
Borrowings. F&T Bank has access to additional funds by borrowing federal funds from its correspondent banks. These borrowings are short-term in nature. Average federal fund borrowings for 2007 totaled $386,000 with no borrowings outstanding as of December 31, 2007. F&T Bank may use borrowings in the future to fund asset growth, and as a result, may experience an increase in funding costs.
At December 31, 2007, Fidelity maintained a $7 million revolving line of credit with EagleBank which is secured by Fidelity's stock in F&T Bank. Fidelity had $3 million outstanding under this line at December 31, 2007. The interest rate on the line is prime minus 0.25% and the line expires on September 29, 2008. At December 31, 2007, the interest rate on the line was 7%. The line is expected to be paid in full at the time of the merger with Eagle Bancorp, Inc.
F&T Mortgage maintained a warehouse facility with RFC, at various commitment levels, to fund mortgage loan originations. The warehouse facility agreement was a committed facility with a term of one year (expiring October 31, 2007), and was renewable annually. The warehouse facility was secured by the mortgage loans owned by F&T Mortgage, mortgage loans in the custody, possession or control of the lender for purposes of a pledge for advances made to F&T Mortgage by the lender including all related rights thereto, the amounts advanced to F&T Mortgage to fund mortgage loans, and certain of F&T Mortgage's other assets. Our company and F&T Bank were guarantors of the obligations of F&T Mortgage under the RFC warehouse facility. Advances drawn under these warehouse facilities bear interest at a rate that varied depending on the type of mortgage loans securing the advances.
The warehouse facility was subject to, among other requirements, sub-limits, advance rates and certain terms that varied depending on the type of mortgage loans securing the financing and the ratio of F&T Mortgage's liabilities to total tangible net worth. There were several covenants under the warehouse facilities, including requiring F&T Mortgage to meet amounts of modified tangible net worth and liquid assets and leverage ratios.
On August 20, 2007, at the time of the sale of certain assets of F&T Mortgage and the transfer of the F&T Mortgage sales force and branch locations to the buyer, there was a balance of $47 million on the RFC warehouse line. As mortgage loans were sold to investors, the line was paid down until October 4, 2007, when F&T Bank purchased the line of credit from RFC, including the security interest in the remaining underlying loans held for sale.
Competition
F&T Bank's main office and the headquarters of Fidelity and F&T Bank is located at 4831 Cordell Avenue, Bethesda, Maryland 20814. F&T Bank has two additional Maryland offices, located at 130 Rollins Avenue, Rockville and 8301 Fenton Street, Silver Spring. There are two offices in Washington D.C., located at 1725 Eye Street, NW and 1044 Wisconsin Avenue, NW. There is one office in Virginia, located at 8601 Westwood Center Drive, Vienna.
92
The primary service area of F&T Bank is the Washington D.C. metropolitan statistical area. The Washington, D.C. metropolitan statistical area attracts a substantial federal workforce, as well as supporting a variety of support industries such as attorneys, lobbyists, government contractors, real estate developers and investors, non-profit organizations, tourism and consultants.
Montgomery County, Maryland with a total population of approximately 962,000 and occupying an area of about 500 square miles is located roughly 30 miles southwest of Baltimore and is a diverse and healthy segment of Maryland's economy. Montgomery County is a thriving business center and is Maryland's most populous jurisdiction. While the State of Maryland boasts a demographic profile superior to the U.S. economy at large, the economy in and around Montgomery County is among the very best in Maryland. According to data from the Maryland National Capital Parks and Planning Commission, the number of jobs in the County have increased about 1-2% per year in the recent past to approximately 509,000 (2006), with the public sector contributing about 25% of this total (2005 census update). According to the 2007 Economic Forces Report for Montgomery County, job growth slowed due mainly to declines in consumer related industries such as hotels and merchandise stores. The unemployment rate in Montgomery County is among the lowest in the state at 2.5% (December 2007). A very educated population has contributed to favorable median household income of $91,641 (2006) and average single family new and used home sales prices of $485,000 (2006). According to the 2005 census update, approximately 64% of the County's residents hold college or advanced degrees, placing Montgomery County among the most educated in the nation. The area boosts a diverse business climate with a strong federal government presence, a substantial technology sector, a housing construction and renovation sector, and a legal, financial services and professional services sector. According to the 2007 Economic Forces Report for Montgomery County, the market for commercial office space improved from March 2006 to March 2007, increasing to 26.9 million square feet from 26.6 million, and the overall Class A office vacancy rate was about 6.62%. There was about 1.6 million square feet of office space under construction in mid 2006 for delivery in 2007. Developers and leasing agents have proposed 890,000 square feet of space for completion in 2008. Class A office rents in Montgomery County have been much less volatile than in some other markets in the region. The county is also an incubator for firms engaged in bio-technology and the area is attracting significant venture capital. Transportation congestion remains the biggest threat to future economic development and the quality of life in the area.
Washington D.C. in addition to being the seat of the Federal government is a vibrant city with a well educated, diverse population. Over the last eight years the total population has grown to approximately 580,000. Median household income, at $49,549, is above the national median level. The growth of residents in the city is due partially to improvements in the city' services and also to the many housing options available, ranging from grand old apartment buildings to Federal era town homes to the most modern condominiums. Over the last few years the housing market has grown to over 275,000 units. While the Federal government and its employees are a major factor in the economy, over 100 million square feet of commercial office space supports a dynamic business community of more than 20,000 companies. These include law and accounting firms, trade and professional associations, information technology companies, international financial institutions, health and education organizations and research and management companies. Employment in the city has been growing at an annual rate of 5.4% and currently stands at 775,000. This is a well educated and highly paid work force. Over 51% of the jobs in the city are in managerial or professional positions. The Federal Government provides just about 25% of the employment and there is another 18% in professional services firms. Other large employers include the many local universities and hospitals. Another significant factor in the economy is the leisure and hospitality industry.
Montgomery County is home to many major federal and private sector research and development and regulatory agencies, including the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Institutes of Health, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Naval Research and Development Center,
93
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the Food and Drug Administration and the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda.
Deregulation of financial institutions and holding company acquisitions of banks across state lines has resulted in widespread, fundamental changes in the financial services industry. This transformation, although occurring nationwide, is particularly intense in the greater Washington, D.C. metropolitan area because of the changes in the area's economic base in recent years and changing state laws authorizing interstate mergers and acquisitions of banks, and the interstate establishment or acquisition of branches.
Throughout the Washington D.C. metropolitan area, competition is exceptionally keen from large banking institutions headquartered outside of Maryland. In addition, F&T Bank competes with other community banks, savings and loan associations, credit unions, mortgage companies, finance companies and others providing financial services. Among the advantages that many of these large institutions have over F&T Bank are their abilities to finance extensive advertising campaigns, maintain extensive branch networks and technology investments, and to directly offer certain services, such as international banking and trust services, which are not offered directly by F&T Bank. Further, the greater capitalization of the larger institutions allows for substantially higher lending limits than F&T Bank. Certain of these competitors have other advantages, such as tax exemption in the case of credit unions, and lesser regulation in the case of mortgage companies and finance companies.
Personnel
At December 31, 2007, Fidelity and its subsidiaries had 92 full-time equivalent employees, seven of whom are executive officers of F&T Bank. There were no employees who worked on a part-time basis. The employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit and management considers the relationship with the employees to be good. F&T Bank provides a comprehensive employee benefits program that includes medical and dental insurance, life insurance, and short- and long-term disability insurance.
Fidelity maintains a defined contribution 401(k) plan. Under the Plan, employees may contribute a percentage or dollar amount of their annual salary, subject to statutory limitations. Fidelity may make discretionary contributions to the Plan.
Subsidiary
Fidelity has one wholly owned subsidiary, F&T Bank. F&T Bank has one wholly owned subsidiary, F&T Mortgage. On August 20, 2007, some of the assets of F&T Mortgage were sold to a third party and the operations of the subsidiary were shortly thereafter discontinued. On September 11, 2007, the last residential mortgage loan was originated and funded. Through the remainder of the third quarter and during the fourth quarter of 2007, loans held for sale were systematically sold and as of December 31, 2007, the principal balance of loans held for sale totaled $16,340,822. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Fidelity, F&T Bank and F&T Mortgage. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Depository Institution Regulation.
General. The Bank is a Maryland commercial bank and its deposit accounts are insured by the Deposit Insurance Fund ("DIF") administered by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). The Bank also is a member of the Federal Reserve System. The Bank is subject to supervision, examination and regulation by the Commissioner, the Federal Reserve Board, Maryland and federal statutory and regulatory provisions governing such matters as capital standards, mergers and establishment of branch offices, and it is subject to the FDIC's authority to conduct special examinations. The Bank is required to file reports with the Commissioner and the Federal Reserve Board concerning its activities and financial condition and is required to obtain regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions, including mergers with, or acquisitions of, other depository institutions.
94
The system of regulation and supervision applicable to the Bank establishes a comprehensive framework for the operations of the Bank and is intended primarily for the protection of the FDIC and the depositors of the Bank. Changes in the regulatory framework could have a material effect on the Bank and their respective operations that in turn, could have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Business Activities. The Commissioner regulates the Bank's internal organization as well as its deposit, lending and investment activities. The basic authority for the Bank's activities is specified by Maryland law. Additionally, Maryland law contains a parity statute by which Maryland commercial banks may, with the approval of the Commissioner, engage in any additional activity, service or practice permitted for national banks.
The Federal Reserve and FDIC also regulate many of the areas regulated by the Commissioner and federal law may limit some of the authority provided to the Bank by Maryland law. Approval of the Commissioner and the Federal Reserve is required for, among other things, business combinations and the establishment of branch offices.
Holding Company. The Company, as the sole shareholder of the Bank, is a bank holding company and is registered as such with the Federal Reserve Board. Bank holding companies are subject to comprehensive regulation and examination by the Federal Reserve Board under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended (the "BHCA"), and the regulations of the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board also has extensive enforcement authority over bank holding companies, including, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, to issue cease and desist or removal orders and to require that a holding company divest subsidiaries (including its bank subsidiaries). In general, enforcement actions may be initiated for violations of law and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.
Under the BHCA, a bank holding company must obtain Federal Reserve Board approval before: (i) acquiring, directly or indirectly, ownership or control of any voting shares of another bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, it would own or control more than 5% of such shares (unless it already owns or controls the majority of such shares); (ii) acquiring all or substantially all of the assets of another bank or bank holding company; or (iii) merging or consolidating with another bank holding company. In evaluating such applications, the Federal Reserve Board considers a variety of financial, managerial and competitive factors.
The BHCA also prohibits a bank holding company, with certain exceptions, from acquiring direct or indirect ownership or control of more than 5% of the voting shares of any company which is not a bank or bank holding company, or from engaging directly or indirectly in activities other than those of banking, managing or controlling banks, or providing services for its subsidiaries. The principal exceptions to these prohibitions involve certain non-bank activities which, by statute or by Federal Reserve Board regulation or order, have been identified as activities closely related to the business of banking or managing or controlling banks. The list of activities includes, among other things, operating a savings institution, mortgage company, finance company, credit card company or factoring company; performing certain data processing operations; providing certain investment and financial advice; real estate and personal property appraising; providing tax planning and preparation services; and, subject to certain limitations, providing securities brokerage services for customers.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 authorized bank holding companies that meet certain management, capital and other criteria to choose to become a "financial holding company" and thereby engage in a broader array of financial activities including insurance underwriting and investment banking. The Company has not, up to now, opted to become a financial holding company.
Capital Requirements. The Bank is subject to Federal Reserve Board capital requirements, as well as statutory capital requirements imposed under Maryland law. Federal Reserve Board regulations establish two capital standards for state-chartered banks that are members of the Federal Reserve System ("state member banks"): a leverage requirement and a risk-based capital requirement. In addition, the Federal
95
Reserve may, on a case-by-case basis, establish individual minimum capital requirements for a bank that vary from the requirements that would otherwise apply under Federal Reserve Board regulations. A bank that fails to satisfy the capital requirements established under the Federal Reserve Board's regulations will be subject to such administrative action or sanctions as the Federal Reserve Board deems appropriate.
The Leverage Ratio adopted by the Federal Reserve Board requires a minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital to adjusted total assets of 3% for the most highly rated banks. Banks receiving ratings other than the highest rating are required to maintain a minimum ratio of Tier 1 Capital to adjusted total assets of at least 4%. Additional capital may be necessary for institutions with supervisory, financial, operational or managerial weaknesses, as well as institutions experiencing significant growth. For purposes of the Federal Reserve Board's leverage requirement, Tier 1 capital consists primarily of common stockholders' equity, certain perpetual preferred stock (which must be noncumulative with respect to banks), and minority interests in the equity accounts of consolidated subsidiaries; less most intangible assets, except for specified servicing assets and purchased credit card receivables and other specified deductions.
The risk-based capital requirements established by the Federal Reserve Board's regulations require state member banks to maintain total capital equal to at least 8% of total risk-weighted assets. For purposes of the risk-based capital requirement, total capital means Tier 1 Capital (as described above) plus Tier 2 Capital (as described below), provided that the amount of Tier 2 Capital may not exceed the amount of Tier 1 Capital, less certain assets. Tier 2 Capital elements include, subject to certain limitations, the allowance for losses on loans and leases, perpetual preferred stock that does not qualify for Tier 1 and long-term preferred stock with an original maturity of at least 20 years from issuance, hybrid capital instruments, including perpetual debt and mandatory convertible securities, and subordinated debt and intermediate-term preferred stock and up to 45% of unrealized gains on equity securities. Total risk-weighted assets generally are determined under the Federal Reserve Board's regulations, which establish four risk categories, with general risk weights of 0%, 20%, 50% and 100%, based on the risk believed inherent to the type of loan involved.
In addition, the Bank is subject to the statutory capital requirements imposed by the State of Maryland. Under Maryland statutory law, if the surplus of a Maryland commercial bank at any time is less than 100% of its capital stock, then, until the surplus is 100% of the capital stock, the commercial bank: (i) must transfer to its surplus annually at least 10% of its net earnings; and (ii) may not declare or pay any cash dividends that exceed 90% of its net earnings.
The table below provides information with respect to the Bank's compliance with its regulatory capital requir