arena_10q33110.htm
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
[X]
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT
OF 1934
For
the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
or
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT
OF 1934
For the transition period from
__________ to __________.
Commission
File Number 001-31657
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada |
|
73-1596109 |
(State or
other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
6555 S.
Lewis Ave.
Tulsa, Oklahoma
74136
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(918)
747-6060
(Registrant’s
telephone number)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the past 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X]
Yes [ ] No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files).
[
] Yes [ ] No [X] Not Applicable
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting
company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act:
Large accelerated
filer [X] |
Accelerated
filer [ ] |
Non-accelerated
filer [ ] |
Smaller reporting
company [
] |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act):
[ ] Yes
[X] No
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the latest practical date:
As of May
6, 2010, the Company had outstanding 39,459,963 shares of common stock ($0.001
par value).
INDEX
Arena
Resources, Inc.
For the
Quarter Ended March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Page |
Part
I. Financial Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
1. Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results
of Operations
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk |
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item
4. Controls and Procedures |
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
Part
II. Other Information |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1. Legal
Proceedings |
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 1A. Risk
Factors |
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3. Defaults
Upon Senior Securities |
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 4. Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 5. Other
Information |
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 6.
Exhibits |
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
Forward-Looking
Information
Certain
statements in this Section and elsewhere in this report are forward-looking in
nature and relate to trends and events that may affect the Company’s future
financial position and operating results. Such statements are made
pursuant to the safe harbor provision of the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The terms “expect,”
”anticipate,” ”intend,” and “project” and similar words or expressions are
intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements
speak only as of the date of this report. The statements are based on
current expectations, are inherently uncertain, are subject to risks, and should
be viewed with caution. Actual results and experience may differ
materially from the forward-looking statements as a result of many factors,
including changes in economic conditions in the markets served by the company,
increasing competition, fluctuations in raw materials and energy prices, and
other unanticipated events and conditions. It is not possible to
foresee or identify all such factors. The company makes no commitment
to update any forward-looking statement or to disclose any facts, events, or
circumstances after the date hereof that may affect the accuracy of any
forward-looking statement.
Part
I – Financial Information
Item
1. Financial Statements:
The
condensed consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial
statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such
rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading.
In the
opinion of the Company, all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring
adjustments, necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of
the Company and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows
have been made. The results of its operations and its cash flows for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.
ARENA
RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$ |
55,015,353 |
|
|
$ |
63,635,078 |
|
Accounts
receivable
|
|
|
19,109,114 |
|
|
|
13,103,483 |
|
Joint
interest billing receivable
|
|
|
2,834,249 |
|
|
|
2,392,814 |
|
Receivable
from derivatives
|
|
|
25,500 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Fair
value of derivatives
|
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
1,212,171 |
|
|
|
1,040,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
|
|
78,213,655 |
|
|
|
80,171,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property
and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas properties subject to amortization
|
|
|
708,649,133 |
|
|
|
661,453,134 |
|
Oil
and gas gathering systems
|
|
|
3,318,186 |
|
|
|
2,134,876 |
|
Inventory
for property development
|
|
|
991,861 |
|
|
|
1,052,538 |
|
Drilling
rigs
|
|
|
6,694,841 |
|
|
|
6,694,841 |
|
Land,
buildings, equipment and leasehold improvements
|
|
|
6,132,667 |
|
|
|
5,991,983 |
|
Total
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
725,786,688 |
|
|
|
677,327,372 |
|
Less: Accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(112,919,977 |
) |
|
|
(100,428,326 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Property and Equipment
|
|
|
612,866,711 |
|
|
|
576,899,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
|
$ |
691,080,366 |
|
|
$ |
657,070,934 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
|
$ |
18,002,641 |
|
|
$ |
17,155,260 |
|
Current
taxes payable
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
314,700 |
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
|
|
1,322,964 |
|
|
|
1,101,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
19,325,605 |
|
|
|
18,571,593 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-Term
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
retirement liability
|
|
|
8,158,997 |
|
|
|
7,209,812 |
|
Deferred
income taxes
|
|
|
119,267,035 |
|
|
|
108,622,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Long-Term Liabilities
|
|
|
127,426,032 |
|
|
|
115,832,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders'
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock - $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no
shares issued or outstanding
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock - $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,459,963
shares and 38,693,963 shares outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
39,460 |
|
|
|
38,694 |
|
Additional
paid-in capital
|
|
|
330,527,853 |
|
|
|
326,990,590 |
|
Retained
earnings
|
|
|
213,750,537 |
|
|
|
195,637,446 |
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
10,879 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders' Equity
|
|
|
544,328,729 |
|
|
|
522,666,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
|
|
$ |
691,080,366 |
|
|
$ |
657,070,934 |
|
See the
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
For
the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and Gas Revenues
|
|
$ |
51,797,626 |
|
|
$ |
20,193,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs
and Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil
and gas production costs
|
|
|
4,463,674 |
|
|
|
4,206,783 |
|
Oil
and gas production taxes
|
|
|
2,786,047 |
|
|
|
1,098,339 |
|
Realized
gain on derivatives
|
|
|
(25,500 |
) |
|
|
(5,111,210 |
) |
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
12,297,186 |
|
|
|
7,231,481 |
|
Accretion
expense
|
|
|
131,965 |
|
|
|
94,750 |
|
General
and administrative expense
|
|
|
3,503,810 |
|
|
|
2,674,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Costs and Operating Expenses
|
|
|
23,157,182 |
|
|
|
10,194,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Income (Expense)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
110,494 |
|
|
|
266,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Other Income (Expense)
|
|
|
110,494 |
|
|
|
266,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
Before Provision for Income Taxes
|
|
|
28,750,938 |
|
|
|
10,264,560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for Deferred Income Taxes
|
|
|
(10,637,847 |
) |
|
|
(3,799,111 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$ |
18,113,091 |
|
|
$ |
6,465,449 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
Net Income Per Common Share
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Diluted
Net Income Per Common Share
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized
gain on hedge derivative contract settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reclassified
from other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(2,916,308 |
) |
Change
in unrealized deferred hedging gains
|
|
|
10,879 |
|
|
|
9,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Other Comprehensive Income
|
|
$ |
18,123,970 |
|
|
$ |
3,559,086 |
|
See the
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
ARENA
RESOURCES, INC.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
For
the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
18,113,091 |
|
|
$ |
6,465,449 |
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation,
depletion and amortization
|
|
|
12,297,186 |
|
|
|
7,231,481 |
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
10,637,847 |
|
|
|
3,799,111 |
|
Stock
based compensation
|
|
|
1,608,779 |
|
|
|
1,329,317 |
|
Accretion
of asset retirement obligation
|
|
|
131,965 |
|
|
|
94,750 |
|
Changes
in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
and joint interest receivable
|
|
|
(6,472,566 |
) |
|
|
1,853,860 |
|
Income
taxes payable
|
|
|
(798,690 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Prepaid
expenses
|
|
|
312,332 |
|
|
|
148,390 |
|
Accounts
payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
1,068,712 |
|
|
|
(9,691,042 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
|
|
|
36,898,656 |
|
|
|
11,231,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
and development of oil and gas properties
|
|
|
(42,902,119 |
) |
|
|
(15,256,515 |
) |
Purchase
of inventory for property development
|
|
|
(3,221,518 |
) |
|
|
(1,818,526 |
) |
Construction
of oil and gas gathering systems
|
|
|
(1,183,310 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
Purchase
of buildings, drilling rigs & equipment
|
|
|
(140,684 |
) |
|
|
(242,575 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
|
|
|
(47,447,631 |
) |
|
|
(17,317,616 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
Flows From Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from exercise of options
|
|
|
1,929,250 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Cash Provided by Financing Activities
|
|
|
1,929,250 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Decrease in Cash
|
|
|
(8,619,725 |
) |
|
|
(6,086,300 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
at Beginning of Period
|
|
|
63,635,078 |
|
|
|
58,489,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
at End of Period
|
|
$ |
55,015,353 |
|
|
$ |
52,403,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for income taxes
|
|
$ |
314,700 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
Cash
paid for interest
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Cash
Investing and Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
retirement obligation incurred in property
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions
and development
|
|
|
817,220 |
|
|
|
134,232 |
|
Depreciation
on drilling rigs capitalized as oil and gas properties
|
|
|
194,465 |
|
|
|
110,675 |
|
Use
of inventory in property development
|
|
|
3,282,195 |
|
|
|
1,486,572 |
|
See the
accompanying notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
ARENA
RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
NOTE
1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements – The accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company and are
unaudited. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited
financial statements contain all adjustments necessary for fair presentation,
consisting of normal recurring adjustments, except as disclosed
herein.
The
accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been condensed pursuant
to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission;
therefore, certain information and disclosures generally included in financial
statements have been condensed or omitted. The condensed financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s annual financial
statements included in its annual report on Form 10-K as of December 31,
2009. The financial position and results of operations for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010.
Nature of
Operations – Arena Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) owns interests in oil
and gas properties located in Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas and New
Mexico. The Company is engaged primarily in the acquisition,
exploration and development of oil and gas properties and the production and
sale of oil and gas. The accompanying statements of operations and
cash flows include the operations of their wholly owned subsidiaries from the
date of acquisition/formation.
Use of
Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Fair Values of
Financial Instruments — The carrying amounts reported in the balance
sheets for joint interest billings receivable, prepaid expenses and accrued
liabilities approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term
maturity of these financial instruments. The carrying amounts reported for notes
payable and long-term debt approximate fair value because the underlying
instruments are at interest rates which approximate current market
rates. The fair value estimates for oil derivatives are derived from
published market prices for the underlying commodities to determine discounted
expected future cash flows as of the date of the estimate. See Note 8—Derivative
Instruments.
Consolidation
– The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Concentration of
Credit Risk and Major Customer – The Company has cash in excess of
federally insured limits at March 31, 2010. During the three months
ended March 31, 2010, sales to one customer represented 82% of oil and gas
revenues. At March 31, 2010, this customer made up 83% of accounts
receivable.
Oil and Gas
Properties – The Company uses the full cost method of accounting for oil
and gas properties. Under this method, all costs associated with
acquisition, exploration, and development of oil and gas reserves are
capitalized. Costs capitalized include acquisition costs, geological and
geophysical expenditures, lease rentals on undeveloped properties and costs of
drilling and equipping productive and non-productive wells. Drilling costs
include directly related overhead costs. Capitalized costs are
categorized either as being subject to amortization or not subject to
amortization.
ARENA
RESOURCES, INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
All capitalized costs of oil and gas
properties, including the estimated future costs to develop proved reserves and
estimated future costs of abandonment and site restoration, are amortized on the
unit-of-production method using estimates of proved reserves as determined by
independent engineers. Investments in unproved properties and major development
projects are not amortized until proved reserves associated with the projects
can be determined. The Company evaluates oil and gas properties for impairment
at least annually. Amortization expense for the three months ended March 31,
2010 was $12,297,186, based on depletion at the rate of $16.47 per barrel of oil
equivalent compared to $7,231,481 for the three months ended March 31, 2009,
based on depletion at the rate of $12.60 per barrel of oil equivalent. These
amounts include $117,160 and $73,274 of depreciation for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
In addition, capitalized costs are subject to a ceiling test which
limits such costs to the estimated present value of future net revenues from
proved reserves, discounted at a 10-percent interest rate, based on current
economic and operating conditions, plus the lower of cost or fair market value
of unproved properties. As of March 31, 2010, the Company’s net book
value of oil and gas properties did not exceed the ceiling
amount. Consideration received from sales or transfers of oil and gas
property is accounted for as a reduction of capitalized costs. Revenue is not
recognized in connection with contractual services performed on properties in
which the Company holds an ownership interest.
Drilling Rigs –
Drilling rigs are valued at historical cost adjusted for impairment loss
less accumulated depreciation. Historical costs include all direct
costs associated with the acquisition of drilling rigs and placing them in
service. Drilling rigs are depreciated over 10 years and the
depreciation is capitalized as part of oil and gas properties subject to
amortization. For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 the
Company had depreciation of $194,465 and $110,675, respectively, on the Company
owned drilling rigs. During the three months ended March 31, 2009,
the Company temporarily discontinued the use of one of the two Company owned
rigs and placed it in storage. Because the rig was not in use during
the quarter no depreciation was calculated on that rig.
Land, Buildings,
Equipment and Leasehold Improvements – Land, buildings, equipment and
leasehold improvements are valued at historical cost adjusted for impairment
loss less accumulated depreciation. Historical costs include all
direct costs associated with the acquisition of land, buildings, equipment and
leasehold improvements and placing them in service.
Depreciation
of buildings and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method based
upon the following estimated useful lives:
Buildings
and improvements
|
|
30
years |
|
Office
equipment and software |
|
5-7
years |
|
Machinery
and equipment
|
|
5-7
years |
|
Inventory for
Property Development – Inventories consist primarily of tubular goods
used in development and are stated at the lower of specific cost of each
inventory item or market value.
Basic and Diluted
Income Per Common Share – Basic income per common share is computed by
dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding
during the period. Diluted income per share reflects the potential
dilution that could occur if all contracts to issue common stock were converted
into common stock, except for those that are anti-dilutive. The
dilutive effect of stock options and other share based compensation is
calculated using the treasury method with an offset from expected proceeds upon
exercise of the stock options and unrecognized compensation
expense.
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
Restricted
shares outstanding are included in the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding. This treatment is based on FASB guidance that states
that unvested share-based payment
awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents
(whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in
the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method.
Recent Accounting
Pronouncements
– In
January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value
Measurements (ASU 2010-06). This update provides amendments to Subtopic
820-10 and requires new disclosures for 1) significant transfers in and out of
Level 1 and Level 2 and the reasons for such transfers and 2) activity in Level
3 fair value measurements to show separate information about purchases, sales,
issuances and settlements. In addition, this update amends Subtopic 820-10 to
clarify existing disclosures around the disaggregation level of fair value
measurements and disclosures for the valuation techniques and inputs utilized
(for Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements). The provisions in ASU 2010-06
are applicable to interim and annual reporting periods beginning subsequent to
December 15, 2009, with the exception of Level 3 disclosures of purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements, which will be required in reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not impact
the Company’s operating results, financial position or cash flows, but did
impact the Company’s disclosures on fair value measurements. See Note 9, “Fair Value
Measurements.”
In
February 2010, FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, Amendments to Certain Recognition
and Disclosure Requirements (ASU 2010-09). This update amends Subtopic
855-10 and gives a definition to SEC filer, and requires SEC filers to assess
for subsequent events through the issuance date of the financial statements.
This amendment states that an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated for a reporting period. ASU
2010-09 becomes effective upon issuance of the final update. The Company adopted
the provisions of ASU 2010-09 for the period ended March 31,
2010.
In April
2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-12, Accounting for Certain Tax Effects
of the 2010 Health Care Reform Acts (ASU 2010-12). This update clarifies
questions surrounding the accounting implications of the different signing dates
of the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (signed March 30, 2010)
and the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (signed March 23, 2010).
ASU 2010-12 states that the FASB and the Office of the Chief Accountant at the
SEC would not be opposed to view the two Acts together for accounting purposes.
The Company is currently assessing the impact, if any, the adoption of ASU
2010-12 will have on the Company’s disclosures, operating results, financial
position and cash flows.
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
NOTE
2 – EARNINGS PER SHARE INFORMATION
For
the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
$ |
18,113,091 |
|
|
$ |
6,465,449 |
|
Basic
Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
38,836,252 |
|
|
|
38,210,187 |
|
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
133,007 |
|
Stock
options
|
|
|
438,901 |
|
|
|
450,255 |
|
Diluted
Weighted-Average Common Shares Outstanding
|
|
|
39,275,153 |
|
|
|
38,793,449 |
|
Basic
Income Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
Diluted
Income Per Common Share
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Income
|
|
|
0.46 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
For the
three months ended March 31, 2010, 205,000 stock options were not included in
the computation of diluted income per share as their effects are
anti-dilutive. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, 780,000
stock options were not included in the computation of diluted income per share
as their effects are anti-dilutive.
NOTE
3 – NOTES PAYABLE
Credit facility
- Effective as of June 30, 2009, the Company entered into a new agreement
that provides for a credit facility of $150 million with a borrowing base of $75
million with the structure in place to increase that borrowing base an
additional $75 million. The new facility has an interest rate grid
with a range of LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.25%, depending upon our level of
utilization of the credit facility with the total interest rate to be charged
being no less than 4.00%. As of March 31, 2010, we were in compliance
with all covenants and did not have any amount outstanding under this credit
facility.
NOTE
4 – ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION
The
Company provides for the obligation to plug and abandon oil and gas wells at the
dates properties are either acquired or the wells are drilled. The
asset retirement obligation is adjusted each quarter for any liabilities
incurred or settled during the period, accretion expense and any revisions made
to the estimated cash flows. The reconciliation of the asset retirement
obligation for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is as follows:
Balance,
January 1, 2010
|
|
$ |
7,209,812 |
|
Liabilities
incurred
|
|
|
817,220 |
|
Accretion
expense
|
|
|
131,965 |
|
Balance,
September 30, 2009
|
|
$ |
8,158,997 |
|
NOTE
5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Options
exercised – During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company
issued 330,000 shares of common stock from the exercise of options for proceeds
of $1,929,250. Of these options, 305,000 had an exercise price of
$4.15 per share, 20,000 had an exercise price of $23.42 per share and 5,000 had
an exercise price of $39.02 per share.
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
Common Stock
Issued pursuant to Restricted Stock Award Plan – During the three months
ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued 436,000 shares of common stock to key
personnel. The shares were valued based on the closing price on the
date the shares were awarded. The expense associated with these
issuances will be allocated ratably over the vesting
period. Following is a table of the shares granted during the three
months ended March 31, 2010:
Shares
granted
|
Date
granted
|
Grant
date price
|
|
Vesting
|
75,000
|
|
01/06/10
|
|
$ 45.05
|
|
|
50%
each year for two years from issuance
|
300,000
|
|
03/30/10
|
|
32.62
|
|
|
1
year from issuance
|
60,000
|
|
03/30/10
|
|
32.62
|
(1)
|
|
After
transition period of merger, if closing occurs
|
1,000
|
|
03/30/10
|
|
32.62
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2010.
|
(1) The
referenced shares were issued in anticipation of entering into a definitive
merger agreement. Said agreement was entered into subsequent to March
31, 2010 (See Note 10: Subsequent Events). Subject shares
will vest only in the event that said merger closes and recipients of the
subject shares remain employed through an as yet undefined transition period
after closing.
NOTE
6 – EMPLOYEE STOCK OPTIONS AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARD PLAN
Compensation
expense charged against income for stock based awards during the three months
ended March 31, 2010 was $1,608,779, with $876,557 of this being associated with
the stock option plan and $732,222 associated with the restricted stock award
plan. This compares to $1,329,317 for the three months ended March
31, 2009, all of which is associated with the stock option plan. All
equity based compensation is included in general and administrative expense in
the accompanying financial statements.
Employee Stock Options – On
March 11, 2010, the Company granted 25,000 nonqualified stock options to an
employee. These options have an exercise price of $32.42 per share,
based on the market price on the date of grant. There were no
forfeitures during the three months ended March 31, 2010. During the
three months ended March 31, 2010, a total of 330,000 options were exercised to
purchase shares. Of these options, 305,000 had an exercise price of
$4.15 per share, 20,000 had an exercise price of $23.42 per share and 5,000 had
an exercise price of $39.02 per share. A summary of the status of the
stock options as of March 31, 2010 is as follows:
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding
at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1,920,000 |
|
|
$ |
23.94 |
|
Granted
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
32.42 |
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(330,000 |
) |
|
$ |
5.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding
at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
1,615,000 |
|
|
$ |
27.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable
at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
625,000 |
|
|
$ |
25.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average fair value of options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14.35 |
|
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
The
Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair-value
of each option grant. The assumptions used in calculating the fair
value of options granted are as follows: Risk free interest
rate: 2.43% Expected life: 4.25
years Dividend
yield: None Volatility: 53%.
As of
March 31, 2010, there was approximately $4,535,915 of unrecognized compensation
cost related to stock options that will be recognized over a weighted average
period of 2.03 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of options
exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
$9,289,650. The aggregate intrinsic value of options expected to vest
at March 31, 2010 was $12,083,504. The aggregate intrinsic value of
options exercisable at March 31, 2010 was $5,900,750. The intrinsic
value is based on a March 31, 2010 closing price of the Company’s common stock
of $33.40.
Restricted stock grants –
During 2009 and 2010, the Company granted restricted stock awards
pursuant to the Restricted Stock Award Plan. All shares awarded are
valued based on the market price on the date of grant. The fair value
of the awards is expensed over the vesting period associated with the
award. Following is a schedule of all outstanding restricted stock
awards and the terms associated with them:
Shares
granted
|
Date
granted
|
Grant
date price
|
Grant
date fair value
|
|
Vesting
|
5,226
|
|
12/17/09
|
|
$ 43.10
|
|
$ 225,241
|
|
|
6
month from issuance
|
75,000
|
|
01/06/10
|
|
45.05
|
|
3,378,750
|
|
|
50%
each year for two years from issuance
|
300,000
|
|
03/30/10
|
|
32.62
|
|
9,786,000
|
|
|
1
year from issuance
|
60,000
|
|
03/30/10
|
|
32.62
|
|
1,957,200
|
(1)
|
|
After
transition period of merger, if closing occurs
|
1,000
|
|
03/30/10
|
|
32.62
|
|
32,620
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2010.
|
(1) The
referenced shares were issued in anticipation of entering into a definitive
merger agreement. Said agreement was entered into subsequent to March
31, 2010 (See Note 10: Subsequent Events). Subject shares
will vest only in the event that said merger closes and recipients of the
subject shares remain employed through an as yet undefined transition period
after closing.
As of
March 31, 2010, there was approximately $14,631,534 of unrecognized compensation
cost related to restricted stock grants that will be recognized over a weighted
average period of 1 year.
NOTE
7 – CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS
Standby Letters
of Credit – A commercial bank has issued standby letters of credit on
behalf of the Company to the states of Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Kansas
totaling $686,969 to allow the Company to do business in those
states. The standby letters of credit are valid until cancelled or
matured and are collateralized by the revolving credit facility with the bank.
Letter of credit terms range from one to five years. The Company
intends to renew the standby letters of credit for as long as the Company does
business in those states. No amounts have been drawn under the standby letters
of credit.
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
NOTE
8 – DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
The
Company uses commodity–based derivative contracts to manage exposures to
commodity price fluctuations. The Company does not enter into these arrangements
for speculative or trading purposes. These contracts consist of costless
collars. The Company does not utilize complex derivatives such as swaptions,
knockouts or extendable swaps. At March 31, 2010, the Company
had three costless collar contracts. The fair value of all hedges,
represented by the estimated amount that would be realized upon termination,
based on a comparison of the contract prices and the reference price, on
March 31, 2010, was $17,268.
The
following table sets forth our derivative volumes as of March 31,
2010:
Commodity
|
|
Remaining
Period
|
|
Volume
(Bbls)
|
|
Floor
|
|
Ceiling
|
WTI
Crude Oil
|
|
April
2010 - December 2010
|
|
275,000
|
|
$ 70.00
|
|
$ 92.85
|
WTI
Crude Oil
|
|
April
2010 - December 2010
|
|
550,000
|
|
$ 65.00
|
|
$ 93.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
Remaining
Period
|
|
Volume
(MMBTU)
|
Floor
|
|
Ceiling
|
El
Paso Permian Gas
|
April
2010 - December 2010
|
|
1,375,000
|
|
$ 4.00
|
|
$ 7.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Every
derivative instrument is required to be recorded on the balance sheet as either
an asset or a liability measured at its fair value. Fair value is generally
determined based on the difference between the fixed contract price and the
underlying estimated market price at the determination date. Changes in the fair
value of effective cash flow hedges are recorded as a component of “Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss),” (“AOCI”) which is later transferred to
earnings when the underlying physical transaction occurs. As of
March 31, 2010, there was an unrealized gain on derivative, net of tax, of
$10,879 recorded in AOCI.
For those
derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting, settled transaction
gains and losses are determined monthly, and are included in the operating
section of our income statement as “Realized loss (gain) on derivatives” in the
period the hedged production is sold. Our realized gain on
derivatives includes $25,500 in the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared
to a gain of $5.1 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009.
Any ineffectiveness associated with these hedges would be reflected in the
income statement caption called “Derivative fair value income (loss).” Our
hedging contracts are all fully effective.
To
designate a derivative as a cash flow hedge, the Company documents at the
hedge’s inception our assessment that the derivative will be highly effective in
offsetting expected changes in cash flows from the item hedged. This assessment,
which is updated at least quarterly, is generally based on the most recent
relevant historical correlation between the derivative and the item hedged. The
ineffective portion of the hedge is calculated as the difference between the
change in fair value of the derivative and the estimated change in cash flows
from the item hedged. If, during the derivative’s term, the Company determines
the hedge is no longer highly effective, hedge accounting is prospectively
discontinued and any remaining unrealized gains or losses, based on the
effective portion of the derivative at that date, are reclassified to earnings
as realized gain or loss on derivatives when the underlying transaction occurs.
If it is determined that the designated hedge transaction is not probable to
occur, any unrealized gains or losses are recognized immediately in the
statement of operations as a “Derivative fair value income or loss.” Our hedges
are considered to be effective and therefore no amounts have been recorded for
ineffectiveness.
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
Derivative
Fair Value Income (Loss)
The
following table presents information about the components of derivative fair
value income in the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
2009:
|
|
For
the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Realized
gain on oil derivatives
|
|
$ |
25,500 |
|
|
$ |
5,111,210 |
|
The combined fair value of derivatives included
in our consolidated balance sheets as of March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009 is summarized below. The Company conducts derivative activities with two
corporations. The Company believes these corporations are an acceptable credit
risk. The credit worthiness of our counterparties is subject to
periodic review.
|
|
March
31, 2010
|
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
Derivative
assets, natural gas collars
|
|
$ |
17,268 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
The
Company does not have any derivatives that do not qualify for hedge
accounting. The table below provides data about the carrying values
of derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting:
|
|
March
31, 2010
|
|
|
December
31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
(Liabilities)
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
value |
|
|
Carrying
value |
|
|
Carrying
value |
|
|
Carrying
value |
|
|
Carrying
value |
|
|
Carrying
value |
|
Derivatives
that qualify for cash flow hedge accounting |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collars
|
|
$ |
17,268 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
17,268 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
The
tables below provides data about the amount of gains and losses related to cash
flow derivatives that qualify for hedge accounting included in the balance sheet
caption “Accumulated other comprehensive income” (AOCI) and in our
statement of operations:
|
|
Amount
of Gain/(Loss)
recognized
in AOCI
|
|
|
Amount
of Gain/(Loss)
reclassified
from AOCI in Income
|
|
|
|
As
of March 31,
|
|
|
As
of March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Collar
|
|
$ |
17,268 |
|
|
$ |
15,786 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
4,629,061 |
|
Income
taxes
|
|
|
(6,389 |
) |
|
|
(5,841 |
) |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(1,712,753 |
) |
Total
|
|
$ |
10,879 |
|
|
$ |
9,945 |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
2,916,308 |
|
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
NOTE
9 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The
FASB’s fair value measurement standards establish a single authoritative
definition of fair value based upon the assumptions market participants would
use when pricing and asset or liability and create a fair value hierarchy that
prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions. The
standards require additional disclosures, including disclosures of fair value
measurements by level within the fair value hierarchy.
Fair
value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants (an
exit price) at the measurement date. Fair value is a market based measurement
considered from the perspective of a market participant. The Company uses market
data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs
to the valuation. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated,
or unobservable. The Company primarily applies a market approach for recurring
fair value measurements using the best available information while utilizing
valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs.
Generally
accepted accounting principals establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes
the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority
to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1
measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3
measurement). The Company’s fair value balances are based on the observability
of those inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as
follows:
|
•
|
|
Level
1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
that the Company has the ability to access. Active markets are those in
which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient
frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing
basis. The Company does not have any fair value balances
classified as Level 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
|
Level
2 — Inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in
Level 1, that are either directly or indirectly observable. These inputs
are either directly observable in the marketplace or indirectly observable
through corroboration with market data for substantially the full
contractual term of the asset or liability being measured. The Company’s
Level 2 items consist of a costless collar.
|
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
|
Level
3 — Includes inputs that are not observable for which there is little, if
any, market activity for the asset or liability being measured. These
inputs reflect management’s best estimate of the assumptions market
participants would use in determining fair value. Level 3 would include
instruments valued using industry standard pricing models and other
valuation methods that utilize unobservable pricing inputs that are
significant to the overall fair value. The Company does not have any fair
value balances classified as Level
3.
|
In
valuing certain contracts, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into
different levels of the fair value hierarchy. For disclosure purposes, assets
and liabilities are classified in their entirety in the fair value hierarchy
level based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the overall fair
value measurement. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to
the fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect the placement within
the fair value hierarchy levels.
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
The
following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the
Company’s liability that is measured at fair value on a recurring
basis:
Fair
Value Measurements at March 31, 2010 Using:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities:
(Level
1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other Observable Inputs
(Level
2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
(Level
3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets/(Liabilities):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
- $70 - $92.85 oil hedge
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
- |
|
2010
- $65 - $93 oil hedge
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
- $4 - 7.87 gas hedge
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
17,268 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE
10 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On April
3, 2010, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger
Agreement”) with SandRidge Energy, Inc. (“SandRidge”) and a wholly owned
subsidiary of SandRidge, Steel Subsidiary Corporation (“Merger
Sub”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Merger Sub will merge
into the Company, and the Company will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of
SandRidge (or, in certain circumstances, the Company will merge with and into
Merger Sub, in which event the Merger Sub would be the surviving
entity). The merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement is subject
to the fulfillment of certain conditions, including the approval of the merger
by holders of at least a majority of shares of the Company’s common stock issued
and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting of
stockholders. A more complete description of the Merger Agreement and
the transactions related to the merger may be found in the Company’s definitive
proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5,
2010.
Since the
date of the Merger Agreement, nine shareholder lawsuits styled as class actions
have been filed against the Company and its board of directors. The
lawsuits are as follows:
Thomas Slater v. Arena Resources,
Inc., et al. – filed in the District Court in Tulsa County, Tulsa,
Oklahoma on April 6, 2010;
Raymond M. Eberhardt v. Arena
Resources, Inc., et al. - filed in District Court in Oklahoma County,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on April 8, 2010;
City of Pontiac General Employees’
Retirement System v. Arena Resources, Inc., et al. – filed in District
Court in Washoe County, Reno, Nevada on April 8, 2010;
West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund
v. Rochford, et al. – filed in District Court in Clark County, Las Vegas,
Nevada on April 12, 2010;
Henry Kolesnik v. Arena Resources,
Inc., et al. - filed in District Court in Washoe County, Reno, Nevada on
April 14, 2010;
ARENA RESOURCES,
INC.
NOTES
TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH
31, 2010
Roger and Kanya Tiemchan Phillips v.
Rochford, et al. - filed in District Court in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma on April 16, 2010;
Richard J. Erickson v. Arena
Resources, Inc., et al. – filed in the District Court in Tulsa County,
Tulsa, Oklahoma on April 16, 2010;
Reinfried v. Arena Resources, Inc.,
et al. - filed in District Court in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma on April 20, 2010;
Thomas R. Stevenson v. Rochford, et
al. - filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
on April 26, 2010;
All nine
lawsuits also name SandRidge as a defendant. Six of the lawsuits
(Eberhardt, Pontiac, West Palm
Beach, Tiemchan Phillips, Reinfried, and Stevenson) name both
SandRidge and Merger Sub as additional defendants. All nine
complaints generally allege that the Company’s board of directors breached their
fiduciary duties in negotiating and approving the merger and by administering a
sale process that failed to maximize shareholder value. The suits
(other than Pontiac)
also claim that Arena and SandRidge aided and abetted the Company directors in
breaching their fiduciary duties. In the Stevenson lawsuit, the
plaintiff also alleges that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the
Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder by issuing an incomplete and
misleading proxy statement. The plaintiffs seek among other relief,
to enjoin the merger, to rescind the Merger Agreement and/or collect
damages. In the Pontiac lawsuit, the
plaintiff also specifically seeks an order declaring the termination fee
contained in the Merger Agreement void and unenforceable, on the ground that it
allegedly impermissibly influences the vote of the Company stockholders on the
proposed merger.
The
Company believes the lawsuits are without merit and it has valid defenses to all
claims. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself and its
directors in the lawsuits.
Subsequent
to March 31, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement for a commodity swap on
a portion of oil production. The volumes hedged under these
agreements are 2,000 barrels per day at $87.35 for June through December 2010,
3,700 barrels per day at $90.30 for calendar year 2011 and 3,000 barrels per day
at $91.30 for calendar year 2012, all based on the WTI index
price.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations
Results
of Operations – For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Oil and natural gas
sales. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, oil and
natural gas sales revenue increased $31,604,466 to $51,797,626, compared to
$20,193,160 for the same period during 2009. Oil sales increased
$29,179,164 and natural gas sales increased $2,425,302. The increases
were the result of higher oil and gas prices between periods and higher oil and
gas production. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, oil sales
volume increased 141,803 barrels to 631,052 barrels, compared to 489,249 barrels
for the same period in 2009. The average realized per barrel oil
price increased 103% from $36.89 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to
$74.84 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. For the three
months ended March 31, 2010, gas sales volume increased 178,005 thousand cubic
feet (MCF) to 650,828 MCF, compared to 472,823 MCF for the same period in
2009. The average realized natural gas price per MCF increased 55%
from $4.54 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to $7.02 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010.
Oil and gas production costs.
Our lease operating expenses (LOE) increased from $4,206,783 or $7.41 per
barrel of oil equivalent (BOE) for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to
$4,463,674 or $6.04 per BOE for the three months ended March 31,
2010. The increase in total LOE is the result of rising costs while
the decrease on a per BOE basis was the result of higher
production.
Production
taxes. Production taxes as a percentage of oil and natural gas
sales were 5% during the three months ended March 31, 2009 and remained steady
at 5% for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Production taxes
vary from state to state. Therefore, these taxes may vary in the
future depending on the mix of production we generate from various states, as
well as the possibility that any state may raise its production tax
rate.
Depreciation, depletion and
amortization. Our depreciation, depletion and amortization expense
increased by $5,065,705 to $12,297,186 for the three months ended March 31,
2010, compared to the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily a result
of an increase in our depletion rate from $12.60 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 to $16.47 and an increase in produced volumes.
General and administrative
expenses. General and administrative expenses increased by
$829,041 to $3,503,810 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to
the same period in 2008. The increase was the result of an increase
in stock-based compensation expense from $1,329,317 for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 to $1,608,779 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and
higher overall compensation expense between periods.
Interest income. Interest
income was $110,494 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared to
$266,312 for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease was
due to lower interest rates between periods.
Income tax
expense. Our effective tax rate was 37% during the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and remained steady at 37% for the three months
ended March 31, 2010.
Net income. Net income
increased from $6,465,449 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 to
$18,113,091 for the same period in 2010. The primary reason for this increase is
higher commodity prices between periods partially offset by higher depreciation,
depletion and amortization and higher general and administrative
expense.
Revenues
Year to Date by Geographic section
Arena
reports its net oil and gas revenues for the year to date as applicable to the
following geographic sectors:
OIL
|
Net Production
Volume |
Net
Revenue |
Texas
Leases |
569,317
BBLS |
$ |
42,623,856 |
Oklahoma
Leases |
13,334
BBLS |
$ |
992,093 |
New Mexico
Leases |
48,401
BBLS |
$ |
3,611,140 |
GAS
|
Net Production
Volume |
Net
Revenue |
Texas
Leases |
552,154 MCF |
$ |
3,886,070 |
Oklahoma
Leases |
2,784 MCF |
$ |
14,976 |
New Mexico
Leases |
66,927 MCF |
$ |
529,497 |
Kansas
Leases |
28,963 MCF |
$ |
139,994 |
Significant
Subsequent Events occurring after March 31, 2010:
On April
3, 2010, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Merger
Agreement”) with SandRidge Energy, Inc. (“SandRidge”) and a wholly owned
subsidiary of SandRidge, Steel Subsidiary Corporation (“Merger
Sub”). Pursuant to the Merger Agreement, the Merger Sub will merge
into the Company, and the Company will become a wholly-owned subsidiary of
SandRidge (or, in certain circumstances, the Company will merge with and into
Merger Sub, in which event the Merger Sub would be the surviving
entity). The merger contemplated by the Merger Agreement is subject
to the fulfillment of certain conditions, including the approval of the merger
by holders of at least a majority of shares of the Company’s common stock issued
and outstanding and entitled to vote at the special meeting of
stockholders. A more complete description of the Merger Agreement and
the transactions related to the merger may be found in the Company’s definitive
proxy statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 5,
2010.
Since the
date of the Merger Agreement, nine shareholder lawsuits styled as class actions
have been filed against the Company and its board of directors. The
lawsuits are as follows:
Thomas Slater v. Arena Resources,
Inc., et al. – filed in the District Court in Tulsa County, Tulsa,
Oklahoma on April 6, 2010;
Raymond M. Eberhardt v. Arena
Resources, Inc., et al. - filed in District Court in Oklahoma County,
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma on April 8, 2010;
City of Pontiac General Employees’
Retirement System v. Arena Resources, Inc., et al. – filed in District
Court in Washoe County, Reno, Nevada on April 8, 2010;
West Palm Beach Police Pension Fund
v. Rochford, et al. – filed in District Court in Clark County, Las Vegas,
Nevada on April 12, 2010;
Henry Kolesnik v. Arena Resources,
Inc., et al. - filed in District Court in Washoe County, Reno, Nevada on
April 14, 2010;
Roger and Kanya Tiemchan Phillips v.
Rochford, et al. - filed in District Court in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
City, Oklahoma on April 16, 2010;
Richard J. Erickson v. Arena
Resources, Inc., et al. – filed in the District Court in Tulsa County,
Tulsa, Oklahoma on April 16, 2010;
Reinfried v. Arena Resources, Inc.,
et al. - filed in District Court in Oklahoma County, Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma on April 20, 2010;
Thomas R. Stevenson v. Rochford, et
al. - filed in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma
on April 26, 2010;
All nine
lawsuits also name SandRidge as a defendant. Six of the lawsuits
(Eberhardt, Pontiac, West Palm
Beach, Tiemchan Phillips, Reinfried, and Stevenson) name both
SandRidge and Merger Sub as additional defendants. All nine
complaints generally allege that the Company’s board of directors breached their
fiduciary duties in negotiating and approving the merger and by administering a
sale process that failed to maximize shareholder value. The suits
(other than Pontiac)
also claim that Arena and SandRidge aided and abetted the Company directors in
breaching their fiduciary duties. In the Stevenson lawsuit, the
plaintiff also alleges that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the
Exchange Act and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder by issuing an incomplete and
misleading proxy statement. The plaintiffs seek among other relief,
to enjoin the merger, to rescind the Merger Agreement and/or collect
damages. In the Pontiac lawsuit, the
plaintiff also specifically seeks an order declaring the termination fee
contained in the Merger Agreement void and unenforceable, on the ground that it
allegedly impermissibly influences the vote of the Company stockholders on the
proposed merger.
The
Company believes the lawsuits are without merit and it has valid defenses to all
claims. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself and its
directors in the lawsuits.
Subsequent
to March 31, 2010, the Company entered into an agreement for a commodity swap on
a portion of oil production. The volumes hedged under these
agreements are 2,000 barrels per day at $87.35 for June through December 2010,
3,700 barrels per day at $90.30 for calendar year 2011 and 3,000 barrels per day
at $91.30 for calendar year 2012, all based on the WTI index price.
Capital
Resources and Liquidity
As shown
in the financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2010, the
Company had cash on hand of $55,015,353, compared to $63,635,078 as of December
31, 2009. The Company had net cash provided by operating activities
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 of $36,898,656, compared to
$11,231,316 for the same period 2009. The only other significant
source of cash inflow was proceeds from option exercises of $1,929,250 during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 with no amounts from this source during
the same period in 2009. The most significant cash outflows during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were capital expenditures of
$47,447,631 and $17,317,616, respectively.
Effective
as of June 30, 2009, we entered into a new agreement that provides for a credit
facility of $150 million with a borrowing base of $75 million with the structure
in place to increase that borrowing base an additional $75
million. The new facility has an interest rate grid with a range of
LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.25%, depending upon our level of utilization of the credit
facility with the total interest rate to be charged being no less than
4.00%. As of March 31, 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants
and did not have any amount outstanding under this credit facility.
Disclosures
About Market Risks
Like
other natural resource producers, Arena faces certain unique market
risks. The two most salient risk factors are the volatile prices of
oil and gas and certain environmental concerns and obligations.
Current
competitive factors in the domestic oil and gas industry are
unique. The actual price range of crude oil is largely established by
major international producers. Pricing for natural gas is more
regional. Because domestic demand for oil and gas exceeds supply,
there is little risk that all current production will not be sold at relatively
fixed prices. To this extent Arena does not see itself as directly
competitive with other producers, nor is there any significant risk that the
Company could not sell all production at current prices with a reasonable profit
margin. The risk of domestic overproduction at current prices is not
deemed significant. The primary competitive risks would come from
falling international prices which could render current production
uneconomical.
Secondarily,
Arena is presently committed to use the services of the existing gatherers in
its present areas of production. This gives to such gatherers certain
short term relative monopolistic powers to set gathering and transportation
costs, because obtaining the services of an alternative gathering company would
require substantial additional costs since an alternative gatherer would be
required to lay new pipeline and/or obtain new rights-of-way in the
lease.
It is
also significant that more favorable prices can usually be negotiated for larger
quantities of oil and/or gas product, such that Arena views itself as having a
price disadvantage to larger producers. Large producers also have a
competitive advantage to the extent they can devote substantially more resources
to acquiring prime leases and resources to better find and develop
prospects.
Environmental
Oil and
gas production is a highly regulated activity which is subject to significant
environmental and conservation regulations both on a federal and state
level. Historically, most of the environmental regulation of oil and
gas production has been left to state regulatory boards or agencies in those
jurisdictions where there is significant gas and oil production, with limited
direct regulation by such federal agencies as the Environmental Protection
Agency. However, while the Company believes this generally to be the
case for its production activities in Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and New Mexico, it
should be noted that there are various Environmental Protection Agency
regulations which would govern significant spills, blow-outs, or uncontrolled
emissions.
In
Oklahoma, Texas, Kansas and New Mexico specific oil and gas regulations exist
related to the drilling, completion and operations of wells, as well as disposal
of waste oil. There are also procedures incident to the plugging and
abandonment of dry holes or other non-operational wells, all as governed by the
Oklahoma Corporation Commission, Oil and Gas Division, the Texas Railroad
Commission, Oil and Gas Division, the Kansas Corporation Commission, Oil and Gas
Division or the New Mexico Oil Conservation Division.
Compliance
with these regulations may constitute a significant cost and effort for
Arena. No specific accounting for environmental compliance has been
maintained or projected by Arena to date. Arena does not presently
know of any environmental demands, claims, or adverse actions, litigation or
administrative proceedings in which it or the acquired properties are involved
or subject to or arising out of its predecessor operations.
In the
event of a breach of environmental regulations, these environmental regulatory
agencies have a broad range of alternative or cumulative remedies to
include: ordering a cleanup of any spills or waste material and
restoration of the soil or water to conditions existing prior to the
environmental violation; fines; or enjoining further drilling, completion or
production activities. In certain egregious situations the agencies
may also pursue criminal remedies against the Company or its
principals.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
Interest
Rate Risk
The
Company is subject to interest rate risk on its revolving credit facility, which
bears variable interest based upon a LIBOR rate. Changes in interest
rates affect the interest earned on the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and
the interest rate paid on borrowings under its bank credit facility. Currently,
the Company does not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure
to interest rate changes.
Commodity
Price Risk
The
Company’s revenues, profitability and future growth depend substantially on
prevailing prices for oil and natural gas. Prices also affect the
amount of cash flow available for capital expenditures and Arena’s ability to
borrow and raise additional capital. The amount the Company can borrow under its
bank credit facility is subject to periodic redetermination based in part on
changing expectations of future prices. Lower prices may also reduce the amount
of oil and natural gas that the Company can economically produce. Arena
currently sells all of its oil and natural gas production under price sensitive
or market price contracts.
The
Company has entered into derivative contracts in order to manage the commodity
price risk for a portion of production through 2010. The Company’s
current derivative contracts are costless collars. A collar is a
contract which combines both a put option or “floor” and a call option or
“ceiling.” The Company receives the excess, if any, of the floor
price over the reference price, based on NYMEX quoted prices, and pays the
excess, if any, of the reference price over the ceiling price. The
following is information relating to the Company’s collar positions as of March
31, 2010.
Commodity
|
|
Remaining
Period
|
|
Volume
(Bbls)
|
|
Floor
|
|
Ceiling
|
WTI
Crude Oil
|
|
April
2010 - December 2010
|
|
275,000
|
|
$ 70.00
|
|
$ 92.85
|
WTI
Crude Oil
|
|
April
2010 - December 2010
|
|
550,000
|
|
$ 65.00
|
|
$ 93.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
Remaining
Period
|
|
Volume
(MMBTU)
|
Floor
|
|
Ceiling
|
El
Paso Permian Gas
|
April
2010 - December 2010
|
|
1,375,000
|
|
$ 4.00
|
|
$ 7.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
change in fair value of the oil hedging contracts in place at March 31, 2010,
resulted in the recording of an asset of $17,268. The after tax
impact of the change in the fair value of the hedge of $10,879 is reflected in
other comprehensive income. Changes in the fair value of derivative
instruments designated as cash flow hedges, to the extent they are effective in
offsetting cash flows attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in “Other
Comprehensive Income” until the hedged item is recognized in
earnings. Any change in fair value from ineffectiveness is recognized
currently in unrealized derivative gain or loss in the consolidated statements
of operations.
Cash
settlements of cash flow hedges are recorded as a gain on derivatives in the
operating section of the Company’s statement of operations. Our
statement of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 include gain
on derivative instrument of $25,500 as compared to a gain of $5,111,210 for the
three months ended March 31, 2009.
Additionally,
to the extent we hedge our commodity price exposure, we will forego the benefits
we would have otherwise experienced if commodity prices were to change in our
favor.
Currency
Exchange Rate Risk
Foreign
sales accounted for none of the Company’s sales; further, the Company accepts
payment for its commodity sales only in U.S. dollars; hence, Arena is not
exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk on these sales.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The
Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the
Securities and Exchange Commission. At the end of the period covered
by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company's management, under the
supervision and with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures. Based
on that evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that as of the end of such period the Company’s disclosure
control and procedures are effective in alerting them to material information
that is required to be included in the reports the Company files or submits
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Changes
in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There
have been no changes in the Company's internal control over financial reporting
during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Part
II - Other Information
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
None.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes from risk factors as previously disclosed in our
Form 10-K in response to Item 1A to Part I of Form 10-K.
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
During
the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company issued 436,000 shares of
restricted common stock pursuant to its Restricted Stock Award Plan which was
adopted at the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders in December
2009. The restricted shares were issued in transactions not involving
a public offering in reliance upon the exemption from registration provided by
Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. The persons to whom the
shares were issued had access to full information concerning the Company and
represented that they acquired the shares for their own account and not for the
purpose of distribution. The certificates for the shares contain a
restricted legend advising that the shares may not be offered for sale, sold or
otherwise transferred without having first been registered under the 1933 Act or
pursuant to an exemption from registration under the 1933 Act. There
was no underwriter involved in these transactions.
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item
4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
Item
5. Other Information
None.
Item
6. Exhibits
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
|
REGISTRANT: ARENA RESOURCES,
INC. |
|
|
|
Dated:
May 10, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Phillip W.
Terry |
|
|
Phillip
W. Terry |
|
|
President, Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated:
May 10, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ William R.
Broaddrick |
|
|
William R.
Broaddrick |
|
|
Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer |